06/13/1967
~
'.J
THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
/
Minutes of the Meeting, Tuesday, June 13, 1967.
.' 1'he meeting was called to or~der at 3: 00 P. M. by the Chairman,
Mr. Kruse. Present were Members Butler, Mylandcr, Morris, Reade and
Iley, Mr. Rettig of the Engineering Department, and Mr. Wolle.
The minutes of the meetine of June 6 , 1967, were aporovcd as
submitted in written summation to each member. .
I
ZOtlING - CASE Z-16 DISCUSSION - G. P. DAVIS (tabled from 5/2/67)
ZONING
CASE Z-17 DISCUSSION
DAVID & GWEN S. WADDELL (tabled
from 5 /9/6 ~/)
. .
Map-drawing depicting property ownerships and surrounding prop-
erties in area of above agenda requests was displayed. History was
related as to Commission action at the last Zoning Hearing in request
made for Board restudy of the arca involving requests for properties
along North Osceola Ave. in the vicinity of Palm Bluff and Cedar
Streets. New information was given of report from the City Clerk that
the anticipated date of the next Public Hearing was August 14, with
possible ,deadline of July 21 for filing of applications. It was
learned that the Davis and Waddell applications were the only two that
had to date been refiled.' The Planner advised of a requirement under
the zoning law which calls for receipt of a recommendation by the
Planning and Zoning Board within 60 days of filing of an application.
It was determined that filing date of the Davis resubmittal was May
1/67 and of the Vladdell r'esubmi ttal May 2/67.
After some discussion, motion made bV Mr. Iley, as amended, was
to recommend aoproval of reauest (Case Z-16 DAVIS) for change to R-4
...... - ...
zoning, it being the Board's overall jUdgment that the entire east
side'of Osceola from Palm Bluff Street to Cedar Street should in the
future be aoproved for R-4 upon request made by owners. His motion~
seconded bY..11r. Mvlander,
Recommendation was based on the
was
~
oassed.
r
.~:<.::,I,.:..:, ",:..:,~:,,:.,,:",,"'.',\.:.:::-,..::...:..,i'. ",~,~.','f:':',:,':~'.::>\ "\.,"':. ,~.:..I.,:,"~ ',:.,.."': ',:,', '.' :';'.'..':.".,' ,.~),"'I'I::,.".") ..4.:~~.::.r'.._..<:.".::.J j.,~ ',,'.':':.:'~"....:'.:':,:......::,::~I~ ~~.L~.~:.,;:...;:,..,:.I.,./ ,:::;,: ';';,,;,':,:,', :."', /~',:',:. ..:,.,:, :;,...:;...,
P&Z Bd. Minutes
6/13/67 Par-e #2
considerations that:
,-...
The existing use of the Davis property is for a noncon-
forming apartment structure.
Lots to the north facinB on Palm Bluff are occupied by
nonconforming multiple units and the strip to the south
on the east side of Osceola has mixed residential land uses.
It would be good zoning practice to encourage the conversion
of this R-IE east frontage to R-4 zoning to provide a buffer
to the business on North Ft. Harrison and the single family
residences on the west side of Osceola.
The opinion of the Planner that while a rezoning of the one
property mieht be called spot zoning, such spot zoning
was based on unrelated usage as to zone.
~'.
':
Mr. Wolle offered as his interpretation that the Waddell property
was similar in its situation because of an existing nonconforming apart-
ment, use and its juxtaposition to both business use (marina) and a
single family subdivision; further that its access by Osceola from the
south and Cedar Street from the east set it apart from other proper-
ties on the west side of Osceola. The Chairman expressed concern that
theI"'e was not sufficient control of height and density in the existing
R-4 classification to ensure a desirable development of properties on
the bay side. There was some discussion of the R-3 (LD) classifica-
tion under study as it might apply to control density and height of
i .
any multifamily development. However, it was re~ognized that this pro-
posed classification would not be available until such time as it was
adopted by the Commission in ordinance form. The question was raised
as to the legality of Mr. Waddell's signing the application of re-
submittal as owner, whereas it was of application record that the prop-
erty was under contract of sale. Mr. Hylander rendered the opinion
that it Has perfectly legal for a contract-owner to sign the applica-
, '
'-'-~
tion.
.:
: ." . , , :: ' ..... < ,:- ;. ~.,' ~ ': .:?<' ,-: , .y, ~,'. ' .. : :",,:' " ,:;., ..'. :.. I .' :~' ::: ~ ,. I ;~.: '.,: : ,'; : ';.. . ..~..~: " '::'.: :.~ '.'., : ~': :.',... ~'.'.' :'~' , ~ .: : ~. :~. ,: :. , ::. ~. i ,>'. . .~I ~': It' /" ."~ .:: t , ~ '.1' < :.,..:.; : ., ::.~ :.~ ,~~. I ~ '..,.. ': '; ~ '::1: ,>:~.... I , : ~ .... : ~~:., :.; :)\ . :~~:,.~ ." : .': ,.\'.~; : :' '-:,.: .::'.:: .. ~:. ':: /
..
PE? Bd t1inutcs
6/13/67
P':lr,e 113
.r-'
Bo~rd expression showed n divcrrcnce of opinion as to appro-
priate action to be taken. ^ first motion was made by Mr. Butler
to approve Case Z-17 Ovaddell) with recommendation for the future
rezoninR of R-1E frontilpe on the south side of Cedar St:reet to R-11
upon request of owners. Mr. Butler withdrew his motion after his
inquiry directed to members showed a consensus in favor of tabling
the Waddell request at this time. It was felt that without more
knowledge of the type of development planned for the' other large
waterfront parcels along Osceola, the granting of R-I~ for one
west side property might set a pattern for similar area rezoning.
Upon motion by Hr. Iley, seconded by Hr., Mylander, it was voted
pnanimously to table Case 2-17 until the next meeting.
",--.,
DISCUSSION (CONTINUATIOn R-3 (LD) DISTRICT PROPOSAL -
Copies were distributed of Sheet #5 of study proposal (copy of
agenda record) containing definitions of the following to be added
or revised (under Sec. 26-2): Boardinghouse, Dormitory, Lodgine
House or Rooming House, and Hotel. The Planner presented the listing
with information that these were considered necessary for R-3 (LD)
District explanation in connection with special exception uses. After
a brief discussion, upon motion by Mr. Iley the Board approved items
on above Sheet #5 as recommended by the Planner, Chairman,and legal
counsel.
.1; ,
4:35 P. M. Mr. Iley was excused from the meeting at this time.
Mr. r~ylander recommended Board revie.,,1 of Sheets #1 throu2'h #4
in detail in order for members to be acquainted with the material
..
i~) incorporated. After consideration and discussion of each section,
it was agreed to make the followinR additions and chanpes:
~ .
Page 112 - Under Permitted List (II) - to add, "public schools".
.', ~ ,,',,.,',';,.' .", ,;', "I ,,' :, ' I, .: ':' ," ',' :.! :' .'.:; ... ;': .;-':':".:, . \ " ,~:, ..', '\: I , " :",~: ,: ~ :::. ',''':. ~ '.,.': :..: ",!.' : '., '~ <:' ' :. '... ',., , : ~'~ ,,', .' ~: J: ~,." 't<,' : : '.1, ' :::~' , .'.: '. '<'...'; :. ~, '\>.. ,.: ~'\ '. <.: : ' :',~, ~:I:,: ,1 :,', .:...; ;: ': ': / ,..:- :"' :,::,...:..' ,,' ',~. :~. ; ~....... ' :::; ',: '.. ,l .:~ 'l',\ .':'
PE Z Bd 11inutcs
6/13/67
Pace {III
Page H2 - Under. B/A/A Section 26-17 -
"}...-..,
(l.4')(a) Ere Dormitory] - to stril<e: "and it is under
such instituti.onal management und/or super-
vision." '
(14)(b) (re Lodging (rooming) house, boardinBhous~] -
to strike: "and it is under such institutional
managemmit and/or supervision."
Page #3 - Under Prohibited List - to strike: "(8) Non comrnc!l"lcial
parkin,g lot."
- Under Exceptions list (1) Dormi.tory - to strike: "when
supervised by recognized educational institution (may
be under private management)"
No objections were expressed to items on Page #1 - Definitions
of Court, Outer Court, and Inne~ Court, and to items on Page #4
Special Building Requirements - Cou~ts, and Off-st~eet Parkine.
The above additions and changes Here recorded on the Planner's
" ,
master copy of the district pr~posal.
DISCUSSION AGRICULTURAL ZONE CLASSIFICATION '(continued from 6/6/67)
i
j
,j
Excerpt from the County Zoning Ordinance outlining its "A-l
AgriculturalU District had been mailed to members for study prior to
this meeting. The Planner indicated that he would recommend the in-
COl"poration of some supplementary requirements as to single and two-
, ,
family dwellings. pue to a time limitation, further discussion of
this agenda item was postponed until the next meetinp,.
VACATION SCHEDULE - Members were reauested to furnish the Plannine
Office with anticipated vacation dates to facilitate scheduling of
meetings durine the summer period.
Agenda Items #5, Review Housine Code (SSBC) - Ed Blanton, and
#7(a), field Trip Program, were not covered.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:10 P. M.
,I :
.
'..~"
1. 'dolle, See y
Planner
;