07/19/1966
:,~~:," l~"'~~':":'~:::''':''j';'::' :':..:-:/':, ,~. :'~' 4....4,:,,~:...:.: :::,:/::~ ,~~I ':l':~':: ":,: :~;.::'.;'.:;'~'.'\ \:;;: ,~,.;,<~ :..:.:."~:,,,,',:: ',~,:.::..:, :,:,:,:':,~...::',~~.:~ ',;", ,~'.':I ::",.:.":. ::',:' ,,::..:::-:'~. ,:>,_:,+,', ".+::", :,,,I-~,: ~:,t.;,..~I: '.:' ,':~: ':'.:,:',',':".,:.":'~.:;-:I,l.:'::
.....-.
1........
THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
f"*'
Minutes of the Meeting) Tuesday, July 19, 1966.
The meeting was called to order at 3:30 P. M. by the Chairman,
Mr. Kruse. Present were Members Butler, Mylander, Reade and Galloway,
Mr. Rettig of the Engineering Department, and Mr. Wolle.
The minutes of the meeting of June 28,' 1966 t were approved as
submitted in written summation to each member.
PUD - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - FINAL APPROVAL (CONTINUED FROM
~A? 31766) - ~opies were distributed or this zoning ordinance
l'I Jl"'""'l'
amendm~nt proposal, as revised 4/16/65, and further revised in ac-
cordance with the Zoning committee's recommendations offered at the
May 31st meeting.
The Planner presen~ed the proposal with explanation of the ap-
proval given by Mr. My1ander to change in proposed Sec. 26-SAA and
26-8 (on page #1) of parcelspf reco~~ to parcels of land. The Plan-
ner's recommendation was for formal approval at this time. Reference
,-,
...........
was made to the Board's careful review of the content at prior meet-
ings and to the general agreement with the content (as revised) ex-
pressed by those members present at the May 31st meeting, although any
action was tabled to the next meeting in order that more than a quorum
might represent the Board's recommendation. It was determined that of
those present at today's meeting, Mr. Reade and Mr. Mylander were not
present on May 31st.
Upon request of Mr. Wolle, Chairman Kruse commented on a pending
Planned Unit Development proposal under study by pinellas County for
possible adoption as an amendment to its zoning ordinance. ,During a
discussion of this, and in reply to a question by Mr. Butler as to
whether in view of annexation possibilities that the Board's proposed
amendment should more nearly conform to the County's, Mr. Wolle said
,
i..."...~ that, in hi S opini on, he di dn 't think there would be any problem in
tying in to county type development. Mr. Wolle also read for the
. '
..' ",'., ",.,.... ..'. '...\1.., I."II~ ...,.',.\..,. ," ..~,., ...', ~ .....,'.,..,'-1 ..t.. .. ..,,,~ "
. .~.:. ?/, ';.j:' .,'~:: ';,,>::; :,:,,:;.~,,' .~," c.":',:.;;, {,' ':~', ;',;.,:,:<,:;, ;"'~:<\ ~': <: ;::;-::':.:;. .';.:'".{::';;':,.','.' '\-.;:,~: :,:,':, ',\ ,\'>.,,~ :,.: :'t ,'.\'~;:::,,> ;: :'::::'.~"':
:: I, ,. : <,:.; ,~,", .. ::.. .....: ~ .~"I .'.1.,' ,,;~. ;.':, ' , '., ,':, ,; ~ .' ,~~, :' I f I~" ..~ :' ',~ '.. , .) : :,1, : '...' I, " ,:, ' ' ,~. : '. ~; ': : ~ ',' : ' +, ~:'~,. .: ~', l '. r . . .';: ,4;, :.;;" :.:::.: ' ~ :', '.' .1)..,.: ': :',~ .:' \ ,~ .'" . .:. ':, ':.' 1 : " . ~, '- '~: ,:~',:,,' ~ ,~ . '; " ;." .' ~.' I~ '..: ".' .,' ,.; ~..: ;' t,:" r -\. ".,;.;
P&Z Bd. Minutes
7/19/66
Page #2
~~
Board's information a memo which the Board forwarded 2/10/65 to the City
Attorney, City Clerk and City Manager on the subject of a Planned Unit
Development proposal. He related the history of the withdrawal of such
proposal from the agenda of the next subsequent zoning public hearing
for further discussion with the Commission. The Chairman entertained
a motion, if the pleasure of the Board, stating his recommendation for
approval of submittal of the subject amendment as acceptable to pre-
sent in the next zoning hearing. Upon ~ot~on duly, made and seconde~,
it was voted unanimously that the proposed Pyq ordinance ~rovisionl
as revised date of ll(16/65 and,as amended to date~ be submitted an~
approEriate ste~s tak~n to have it added to the Zoning Ordinance.
SERVICE STATION ORDINANCE - DISC~SSION OF SUBMITTAL STATUS -
~~
,-)
Copies were reviewed of draft of the proposed Service Station Ordinance
containing revisions through May 23/66~
Chairman Kruse reported that he had inquired of Mr. Clifton
Stephens if he wanted to attend this meeting, but was told that he
had other commitments which would prevent his attendance. Mr. Kruse
further stated that upon inquiry made it was his opinion that an ordi-
nance that was not too restrictive as to the number of stations would
be more acceptable for passage by the City Commission.
Among points further discussed by the Board was the matter of dis-
tance requirements as contained in Item Hl~. It was revealed that there
was a diversity of Board opinion with expressions bein~ offered in
favor of:
,
~~
Elimination in total of any distance requirement.
Elimination of the requirement of 7501 distance apart for sta-
tions, but retention of a 7501 distance from church, school,
hospital>> or any ~ype of governmental-owned or operated public
assembly building, etc,.~.
Change of distance of 7501 to 5001.
. c
: -,; < ',: ;',:,:',:~ ,: .:.:. :.,';-: ", ~:1 :"', ,~'. ,.,.. ;,;': 'f;,':, 't,':; <~ Y\,. ~, ',:....:.: ":'.,'.; " :.".1 ~. 'I'i:: ';", I..' '~' :':, ,:-.":' 'or., '.~ I:,:" :':~'." ~'''''',:" :~,' '.'~ >:': (", .::: ~ \ '>,,:,:- ~"j ',t' { ;'.:'" .~:,l,: ;":' .: .', .: }:, : '. ~~~ ",' .\... \ ~: ; ~';: ,:':~.'. : \ ,'-.~':.',~'~:: r.I,'~ ~I:' ~...': : ~ 'l,,:: ~ .,':, ~ ,~ .1'/ I ': ,; ,:;.~ /.....: ;.~""
P&Z Bd. Minutes
7/19/66
Pa ge n 3
,.-....
(Recommendation of the Planner was for consideration of a change
of 750t to 250t as a distance from church, school, hospital, or
.....etc.)
There was general agreement to amend Item #3(b) to strike the words,
"minimum" and "emergency major".
Upon inquiry made by the Chairman, Mr. Mylander rendered the
opinion that if all of Item #ll were removed , it would leave no sub-
stance to Justify a separate ordinance, as some of the other provisions
are already considerations in review of service stations~ Mr. Galloway
..
suggested that instead of a separate ordinance that the zoning ordi-
nance section covering service stations in the "B" zone might be
amended by the addition of some generalized provisions regarding traf-
fic safety, a 'reasonable minimum lot size, and enclosure of areas used
for repair.
,-I~
',,~I
After, some further discussion, MI". Mylander stated that he was in
I.,
favor of the original ordinance; however, that in view of the diversi-
ty of opinion on the Board, he didn't think they would ever get it
passed by the Commission. He summarized the following alternate pro-
posa1:
Under the present circumstances, he would fall hack on Mr.
Galloway's suggestion to incorporate service station restrictions
in the Zoning Ordinance.
To leave out Item 84 (which seemed to be controversial)
To definitely include the minimum lot size of 100' x 100'.
To substitute for #3(b): "area of any automobile service station
used for repairs shall be structurally
enclosed."
To strike: I-terns /14,' #5, & #6 (#5 and #6 no longer appl.icable as
a zoning ordinance amendment)
The Planner suggested an expansion of Item #2(b) [in lieu of
t~~ location requirements removed] by adding after the first sentance end-
ing...."building permitll:
.t :t.~
P6Z Bd. Minutes
7/19/66
Page i/l~
. r-"
"and may consider the proximity of service station to parking
area for public assembly buildings."
or in second se~tence revise to:
"pedestrian safety near public buildines and vehicular traffic
circulation"~
There were some objections to these suggested Item #2(b) revisions, al-
though approval was given to the suggested insertion of the word,
"safety" after pedestrian.
Formal motion,made by Mr. Mylander was to incorporate as items
from the pro~osed ordinance in the Eresent zoning ordinance reg?rding
service stations:
L
Item #2(b)
Items fl3(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)
Add to #2(b) at end of first sentence, !lafter permit review
and subject to recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Board, the City Engineer, and the Traffi.c Planner".
~~1 Mr. My1ander withdrew his ~tion,~fter it was agreed that a. zoning
.....-}
ordiuance amendment proposal would be written up in ~ccordance 'with
the content of his motion and resubmitted to the Board at the next
n -
meeting.
..
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS - Deleting Sign Restrictions :
The Planner presented PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
TO DELETE REfEREHCE TO SIGN RESTRICTIONS NOW PROVIDED IN SIGN ORDI-
NANCE, with information that these had been reviewed with Mr, Mylander.
It was explained that. some few sign references in the Zoning Ordinance
were being retained a5 for signs in connection with home occupations
and for public dining room or restaurant in the R-I~ zone. Recommen-
dation of the P1anne~, concurred in by Mr. MY1~nder, was for approval
of above ordinance changes qr additions as detailed on list dated 7/19/
.' '\-~
66 submitted as an agenda attachment.
The Board voted unanimously to
.:I ..
accept these ~roposa1~ a5 presentedor
:.~:,. \, ':T"~':.j"::.tI,.~:,,,,.:.~:.,:.,.:......~...'.I',:;,,.. .\l:\'\:,.::':r..: /, " '.,......, ~'.::'.~..:,> ~ ,:~I'....'.'... ":':"."':,,":.;.~.,..~ ~.'.>", ...:::-.:..'.;.\':;.;\1,:....:..:/, ':..::1.:.1. ',.' _. ';...:.,.....':'.I'>..:~,
P&Z Bd. Minutes
.7/l9/66
Page #5
'",
'",
" f4 "'"" .
, 1 ',"
PLANNER'S" ITEMS:
-v-- 1
AGENDA ITEMS NOT COVERED DUE TO A 'rIME LIMITATION:
#5(a)
#S(b)
#5(0)
" ill 5 ( d)
Repo~t on Census Tract Committee Organization
Morningside Estates Unit #4
Live Oak Court
FPZAConference Program -, Committee Appointments
\, .
.
,"
Agenda Item #S (e), - Mr.', Wolle refert'~d a Zqnin~.L Ordinance Amend-
ment' proposal to the Z~!ling 9ommi'ttee for.. ~tudy--,,-
Planning literature was distributed.
\,
, .
....
.....
The meeting'was adjourned at 5:05 P. M.
Respectfully submitted,
,
, '
S.w~
. ole, See y
Planner.
"... .
:r";' .'
)c,.
, ~ < ~
"~
. ;:;.::' ~;~~.~:
~l.;1 .
:'}' .
" "
'I,
. ;)
q
, .
, ~. "
'I "
'J';! .
. I
" ,
, \--" .
.c,
, ,
I.
...' ,
:' ..
: t\
~. "
".
",' :',c