06/28/1966
THE Pl.ANNIHG AND ZONING BOARD
/
........
~
Minutes of the Meeting, Tuesday, June 20, 1866.
The meeting was called to order at 3:30 P. M. by the Chairman.
Mr. Kruse. Present were M~mbers Reade, Mylandcr, Williams and
Galloway, M~. Rettig of the EngineerinR Department, and Mr. Wolle.
The minutes of the meeting of June 7, 1966, were approved as
submitted in written summation to each member.
ZONING FOR ANNEXATIONS:
The Planner informed the Board of request for zoning recommenda-
tion for the following two properties as made in memo from the City
Manager dated June 21-66.
(a) Ten Pin LanesJ Inc.
J..Ixh..l'lt:. tl~
NW corner Belcher Rd and
NE Coachman -
Reques+ liB" Zoning -
Right-of-Way Requirements -
Map-drawing of annexation parcel submitted by the ap-
;
i
I
t
I
1
\
,<
, ..-...
" )
, I
I...~........."
plicant was displayed. This showed dimensions and legal de-
scription. The Planner located the property on office maps and
pointed out the land use of adjoining tracts and the intended
use of subject propertYQ The Engineering representative reported
that the parcel would become contiguous by reason of the annex-
ation of a southwest segment of road right-of-way; further, that
the existing bowling alley is already served by City sewer
through arrangement made at the time it was built.
The Planner recommended "B" zoning as compatible with
the present County1s commercial zoning and stated that he would
further recommend that 17 ft~ additional right-of-way be re-
quested for NE Coachman and Belcher Roads to complete the major
street requirement of 50 foot half right-of-way for each of these
two major roads. He reported that explanation of the request
had been given Mr. Butler of the Zoning Committee. who had ex-
'It" "
" ...__J
pressed his agreement that "BII zoning was most appropriate fol"'
P&Z Bd. ~1inut'es
ii/fiR/56
P,'r,e /I ')
,..."
the parco.l. After' review C;:!!ld dinc',mpion! motion \4,lS rn'2d~..-!:!y ~lr.
Baade to rec,;ommend <;!!?}1vovnl of It (1" t B~itie5S 1 7.onine for pr'oEorty of
Jen P!.n La~cst Inc. (ao dC9Cti~cd in petition for anne~,'\tion) 8t~2jeC!
~ the.dedication,of 17 ft. ilddi!.iona1 r~eht~'of..wa{' on H~.Coachm~n
Roa~ and Belcher Road" Motion was sec9nded by Mr. Myland~rrand pasae1
hX malority vote. One dissentinR vote WAS based on the disparity of
county and city requirements and the feeling that it was desirable
to adhere to more similar standardso
(b) LIVE OAK COURT - Lake Ave, and Jeffords -
Request~ R-IC Zoning
The Planner located the property on office maps and
pointed out the land use of adjoining tracts and the intended
use of subject property for a single-family subdivision~ for
which the master plan had been previously approved by the BOd~d
(Jano 11/66). A copy of the proposed plat submitted by the a?-
plicant was studied~ The Planner recommended R-ID zoning to
conform to the lot frontage proposed in the platt in that one
half of the lots do not have the 75v minimum width requirement
for an R-1C zoning as requested.
After review and discussion, ~Qtion wasvmade b~ M~
,B,eade to. recommend approval of R-.ID~SinBlT~Famil:t ~ zon!IJg. for
~rea proposed to be platt~d
as Live Oak Court (as described in
........."._...-.........
Detition for annexation),
~ Ir
Hotion was seco~d bL !1r. Mylan~l~
and passed unanimous1Yo Some discussion followed display or the
proposed plat over whi~h there was conce~n about the double
frontage lots on Lake Avenue.
, r \ ~...
It was expressed that deslra-
plat res trictions shOt1ld prohibi 1: Ch"ll vev1ay access to Lake Ave"
,
L
, ,
~.~;:I
CHAIRMAN'S ITEMS~
.... ...-
AppoiI}troent~ :- Chairman, Kruse informed the Board of the acti.on
--
of the City Commission) June 20/66, reappointinp ~embcrG Hnrries~
.,.-.. .~........ ~~
PSZ Bd. Minutes
6/28/66
Page #3
f"^... .
tt~ll!!!!derJ,,-and ",Wi IJ.~~ms to 3 ;lea!' terms .9!:- the Planning_~~d Zoni.na
Board. Mr. Kruse commented on the uoual procedure each year after
T
the completion of appointments to hold an election of officers. He
suggested that such election be deferred until a subsequent meet-
ing when a larger representation of members would be present~
R~R~rt on Pinell~~ Plannin6 ~ouncil - Mr. Kruse reported that
the report on the Mid-County Area had been approved by 'the Sub-
Committee and would be presented for approval to the full Council
on July l3~ An invitation was extended to any interested members
to attend this meeting. It was announced that a copy of the re-
port in question was available to members in the Planning Office
and that any of the reports made by the Area Study Committee of the
Council would also be on file for office referenceu Mr~ Kruse stated
that one of the most important projects currently being initiated
(.- " was to try to get an extension of 1-75 into the northern part of the
CountYa It was also learned that the Area Study Committee was just
beginning a study of Upper Pinellas.
Report on Master Plan Mo~ningside Estates - Mr. Kruse read copy
of a letter to Max Battle from Blackburn B~others Land Development
Co. dated Jun 6/66, in regard to request and comment of master plan
approval on Morningside Estates. Such items of content were covered
in letter May 19/66 of the Planning and Zoning Board to the City En-
gineer (of record in the Planning & Zoning Board office). It was
voted that this letter be accepted and filed.
figenda ftem' 1i 3 ( a ~ ;'-i{e~or'S s>n I ~enEfus Tract Committee Q!:g~n~ zation t
was not covered due to a t~me I1m1tat1on.
"...
Planning literature was distributed.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:00 P. Mu
Respectfully submitted,
V Sl..t.Jt:r~
ec y