01/11/1966
..: ~ -~' ~,: :.: '. ~,:,., I" ~:,:,:' I '. I;' '~.I"Y :', " ..., I'~'I\/ ....: ....~.": '. :'," ~::- /;.,: ,:{.: <,r .:;:' j: ~"l' .'~~, \:: :~.... ',:>..'.\ ::.::.' I,..:. :~:' :':'~",I;: ",\,::. :'.:<~ ;:"', J:: :', >.\:/"~~~.:' ::' "!. .~:..,:'/ ~'+: :~::',.:,:,:,:~:::~, '::.\" ."\ ,; '< ;':,: ':.. ", \; / .:. ,',;" ~':. ':,;: '<.'.! ...':>:: ~':""",: "-,.,~ ",:," :-:' ~ ," ~,'
~
I
l~
-.,,.,,,,!
\~
~~l"
THE PLAUNING AND ZONltfG nOAHD
.....
,/
\,/'
Minutes of the Meeting, Tuesday, January 11, 1966,
The Board met at 2:30 P.. H.in joint sessi-en Hith the City of
CJ.earwatel" Beautification Commit,tee, Chairman Kruse praniding. Present
were Board Membet'5 Bu.tle~, Mylandcr; Harries and Hilliama. Present
by invitation were the following members of the City Beautification
Committee: Mrs. H. Hervschaft, Mrs. Fred Culler, Hr. H. H. Carlisle,
Sr., Mr. Albert Rogers, Mr. Eddie C. Moore, Parks and Recreation Oi-
recto~, Mr. Virgil Dobson, Parks Superintendentu Alao pr.esent were
Mr. Victor E. Brodeur, Jr~, Chairman Chamber of Commerce Beautification
Committee, and Mr. Elmer Sh~fer, Chairman of the Community Development
and Civic Activity Committee of the Clearv1ater-Largo Board of Healtors.
Chairman Kruse introduced Mr. Shafer, Board of Realtors rgpresen-
tative, and Mr. Brodeur, Chamber of Conwerce repreaenta'tive, to the
group. In preamble remarks Mr. Kruse explained that the City Beauti-
fication Committee is more o~ less a clearing house through the City
Commission to coordinate efforts of various groups wishing to carry
on beautification projects. He set forth as the purpose of this meet-
ing a joint discussion of City beautification projects which have been
'unde~taken, or are proposed, in that on the part of the Board it was
fel t tha1: there wa,s a distinct overlap of inte!'est between the Com-
mittee and "the Board. He added that the groups should have had a
meeting lon'g before this, but due to busy involvement in different
Board activities such a meeting had not been called 5ooner~
Mrc Kruse informed the group that the interests of the Board are
the proposals ~lhich have been defined in the City Plan of the City.
The Chairman then outlined two Board proposals as depicted on
large dI"a\~ing displayed of the SUBgested Development Q,f the Central
Business District (plate as contc.tined in the Comprehensi va Plan RepoT't).
Smaller p~ints were passed out for reference.
first - Development of a ci vie CenteT' on -the ,.,est side of
Osceola, partially implemented to date by location of the Chamber
of Commerce and 'the re~ova tcd Libt'~1I"Y bu i:1 dinps near DreH Stl'ee t
on the no~th, the ne\o; County COUy,t House em tlll:':' south ~ and th0
..: ", ',j ;.' .:.' :.:'.. . ::',: ~':' . "i'.. ,:"".~ ..: ~ :;:':.: .: .:. \ ':' ,: :.:->: -: " ," :.": '.' :, \ ::.; .~::: ,'~.... ":,;;'" ':.:; .. .:; ..~:. ,'.. ~ " ,:'~' :.:,'; .:\' -\" .// ::.: "/T' : r .,:~. ... :,".' .:./..' }. . ~.:t. ::::, .:; : <.:~.:i', ,.. ':,:,~ .;', ':. .~':.:.: . ': ~',".;' ~ {'.:, ;':: , " '..':,::, ::.t: :~:: :'1 ,t~" . ':,,:,r\ : ,'~'~: ; : : :.:,' ~
P&Z Ed.. Hinutas
1/11/EI6
Pap,e, 112
,,J
~
now City Ht111 building at Piet~co Stroot. Nota \-JeW n1.:lde of one
illustt'ated Board proposal to link the County and City adminis-
1
triltive centers by a park strip (dependent uprm Ci.ty acquisition
of property on the west side of Osceoln).
Second - A shopping mall on Cleveland between Garden Ave. and Ft.
............-..-.. .}.....III .
Harrision to tie in with features of an inner and outer loop
plan. Prime reason for the mall proposal, as t.Ji. th examples cited
. in other sections of the country, was given as to try. to rejuve-
nate the downtown area. In this connection, Hr. Kruse furnished
some information as to thought being given at the present time
to revision of proposals to extend Chestnut-Court to connect with
Pierce as a l"oute to the Causeway Bridge.. He stated his under-
standing that some study was being made, but that the Board had
not as yet been submitted plans. The future possibility of the
abandonment of downtown railroad tracks in the event of the an-
ticipated merger of the two railroads was noted as a consideration
in the central business distl~ict development plan.
A resume ~~s gtven of,~he plann~jL2~v~19prnent of downtown Earks
with particular reference to the Coachman Park area west of city
owned property on the west side of Osceola between Cleveland and Drew,
the l1emorial Parkette nOH completed at the east end of the Memorial
"
Causeway on the south side, and a similar (but smallel") parkette un-
cle!' development' on the north side (for which plant' materials are be-
ing collected).
Hr. Kruse named ~~~~r~n~gj~cts in ~!lli~h.-!ll.!!_Si!.z.~Com;-_
mission had recentlY shown renewed interest --
... . ~ .~~.._t____~.......-ar..M.......-.._ ........""ar .t ~L ...tA-....__..--.-..--_.....1II ~ ~w...~
:,'~
Crest Lake Park - refer.ence was made to a. paat request made to
_-......-..~~-----
the Boa1"'d in 195 B for recommendation in r'cRard to p-r(~pCT' cleve lopm(,mt
;I......~:..:...:~..:., '.::',:::,";."< !I::,...~..:..:..::l:...'..,.', ,..,..'..i;,......, ::....'...'....:'.~~..'.\~.;... ...~i..;:..,.~':.'.:.,:.. .1':.': -:. ,.\,..\~..!..', ':"':"';"'::,:,.';.'~.",; ,';t,:'" .\': ~::,." .".I....~:I.,I::~..:~;':".I<.",..."..::...,
P&Z Bdw Hinutes
1/11/66
Page f/3
~
of this park. It was learned that a join"t t'ecommendutirm of the PInn-
ing and Zoning Board and the City Pa~kB and Recreation Advisory Board
had been for use of a south pOI,tion of the pf1rk for tennis courts (a
scheme prmpared for submittal at that time was displayed). It was re-
called that after objections from surrounding owners, d~cisiori was made
by the Commission not to ~elocate the tennis courts in the Park. Mr_
Kruse expressed the opinion that there seems to be new thought on the
part of the City Commission at the present ~ime to make more use of
"
the park.
" <)
~d~~wat~ Dr~~ - reference was made to instructions received
by the Board from the Co~nission for a survey and recommendation in-
volving a study design for a project of beautification and shore pre-
servation of this waterfront area, along with a determination' as to the
possible 'need for widening of this drive. Collaboration with Dunedin
,was to,be a ~art of the study planD The possible alignment of Alter-
nate 19 as such to another route was mentioned' as a matter that would
,affect F.:dgewater Drive adversely as a scenic approach to the City~ In
this regard, mention was made of surveys being made by the City in con-
nection with the planned Myr'tle Ave.. extension acr-ass Stevenson Creek
to tie in with Dciuglas Ave.. This extension; Mr~ Kruse thought, would
be' considered as a probable Business By-pass from Alte~nate 19. It
"
was reported Lhat a committee of the Board comprised of Members
Butler, Harries, and \-1illiarns had made preliminary study plans for
improvement of the EdgeNater Drive waterfront (copies Here passed out
for review and were discussed). Mr. Kruse suegested that after plans
were completed, the' Board probably would want to have another meeting
with the group to review this project.
~
\ ,
, "> .;~ "",: ' /l\~:' '/~~ ..; :+ .:~ " ~ >- ,". ,.:':'~:- .." :' ' . ,.', : .:', ;';',~,I: I~": ':,i :i, "~_~: if'.: 'i"':~ '.', :.'::' :' '.~"': ,r .:.: 1< '".,',,\.,': ':: L: : ':':<":', "'" ~'.:: ,l:'" ',' ;':-~; \ ~.~ ,:j .:::<1':': ''',: ';:; . ','~,': :;~': ;,'.~ ,": l.' ~"L "~;" ": '..: ,',: l':~'\ ~': ..':',' :~':/: <~.~ :",', ;',', '( '? ...~ ,.'\ ' ' , ::;,
'"
P&Z 8dn Hinutes
1/11/66
Puce fI If
I~
Upon llequest of 'the Ch;.lirman, MI'. Brodeur at this time outlined
the p1"oposala 'that the 'Chamber Committee have undertaken,as follows:
Gul~-to-~ BfJ~,.utifi~,~~ioll - Under past-:-h~irman; Don ~lil1iams,
cooperat~on or toe St~ lrcrcUJ Dapt~ was so11c1ted to help prepare
islands for plantings.
~e~i~na~2n_of ,~ffj.si~~;tr~es~-1J~we~~ etc. - This program com-
p"Iete~xcept tor rorIow up by a gtlrcYenC5'1tiE'""'member appointed to
inform, people through the press as to the proper care of these
, plilntings _ Attempts would be made 'to enCOU1:~il ge the use of' these
official plants in public places, etc~
~hili.~,!I1~~~.....~i g,h tina
Expected to continue this program.
,I
~;~~n,::,up.._p1"og!:~~.m-g.t}.!ldiv:idual l?l~oE~l::tJ.!i~ -=-: this would be oon-
t~nued unacr a Jo~nt comm~ttee whose purpose was to give as-
sistance whe~e they can.
In conclusion, Mra Brodeur advised that his committee would meet
the following night to discuss the subject of new projects. Mr.
Williams 'gave some further details in'regard to his contacts with the
State 'Road Dept~ about the possibility of the SRD improving the, soil
~~ conditions of the Gulf-to-Bay median strips.
'-'
,Upon inquiry of the Chairman, Mr. Shafer reported that ,his Com-
mittee had not had,any meetings on beautification.
Upon inquiry of the ChaiY'man as to any proposals under stUdy
by the Pa~ks and Recreation Dept. in regard to Crest Lake Park, Mr.
Moore r.epo1"'ted that the general agi'eement of the Park Board at this
time, was either to nctivate the park to make more effi.cient llse of it,
I,
or to turn it into un aes'thetic park and endeavor to develop it into
a thing of beauty (as, for instance given~ Eola Park in Orlando). He
stated thai: his department had other projects ahead of them ~lhit~h had
utilized all of their work forcesu
Vat"ious' queG,tions from those present \oJ'ere ans\-1Cl'erl as to are."l of
. f.....h ~ 1 t S ~s]ll" tlr'" B i'."l~t m."trl."h.t be
this park, SJ.Z~ 0 L e J.a:::e., e C J orne po~ ',) f~ -.,<~.. ! c. t'
~.....wJ considered apprOpl.'itlte wel:"e suggested.
.C,.:.:........:~..:-..:.::I:...., \":-.:' ~'~,::' "', ...... "','t',~., ',....L. I' ,:",;"" I""'~ "'."'~':'I:":;~l"~'::::-':'~':~"':.':"""~"""'::'.~,;:~'::~:-;l~~';"':':';"':;:"':':;~"':'~":"'I':;':.,:..:',..~',',:,,:."."'.,,:'.',,:,:,,'.,.: ~~:~,
P f. Z Bd. Hi nut: (! n
1/11/6G P(1pC fiS
"
I~
Suggust~d pl.~lns fop the DI'Hl\1tifico1ticll of C{),1chman PitY'k (pre...
pured for' ,1:he Ci. ty IhH1Uti fieati on ConlIn! 'ttee) ~;e.~'(~ pllGBed out rlnd re...
vieWlld.. J1r~ Kr'use dotc'Jiled fea....:urea ineludE;!d of ,~l t.'C.lte-t'fa,11, b):'ook,
f:;~esh Hater lake, and J;]ndr3caped meadO\.f and gav(:~ T'(~t)r,}T't on pr08l"'P..ss
made to <.:1ate,in development of thit'l pRrk area.
Some general discussion Iollm.Jed of the wn"'ious pi:n:'ks and heclU..
tification proiectn which l\ad been outlined1 Mr~ Carlisle in~uired
as to th~ s.tatus of the. plan fOl" the Chestnut StT'ee't extension und
. hi . .. -r-' h f h . b f .
pCSS3- e acq11ua't:u:m 0;- rl g .1:-0. -"my t roug11 th :U:.l ar'ea e 'ore 1. ta
"
development by pl'livate interests.
, '
Mp. Krusa ntated that some time apo
the Boa,t"d had submitted two studies to "the Ci ty Commj,8sion. A fUl"ther
,study is under- consideration by the Commission but 'I~he Planning
Boa~d had not be~n ddvised as to the details.
Jjis.n OI"9J..!F~!l-':.~~- H-r." Kruse repo'r.oted that a part of any beauTi-
fication 'program .was tlH~. control of signs. He related that the City
Attorney was now prl!!:pa1"'ing an ordinance consolidati.ng proposals of
"
the Planning and Zoning Board which had been discussed ~ith the Out-
door Advertising interests and had had join~ study,revisiona by the
Board and a conuni ttee representing the Clea1~vla'ter-J..argo, Boal"'d of
Realtors . Although focus had been 011 the ou'tdoor advel~tising (bi.l1-
boards)., he 'reported that furthp..'C' study i,ncluded non premise" point"
of pUt' chase :=d.gns~ 'l'he. Chnirman reported th~t' oth~r RY'CH.rpt'l; crrc:'li-
tecta and the 'the gal'dE'n 1,,;1 ubs, as well. <is :Lnd]., vi au,,;! 151 t...ere cc)Ocern"Jd
with the prob1em~ and he felt t11ey S1H)I~1,,'j <.::'>:r.rN~~;S th(::1.1" 1Jie~'JS on
the i.mpol"'tance of any ordinence in:i ti.clti nr t:hi,s c::ontr'oL In-.l\d.1"Y
had indicated that nei nhbCl.'Iing mun ici p<11.it.i r~:;r. 'were ({r~ ~d,o\1s ly r:W,l i. t-.
ing Clear\o/~te'r' l s pr.H3sa.p.c of ..'thn s :tEn t)T'~l:i.nan(!c.
, ' ~
: ~';.." '~'."~ .: . ".":.'. ,::".~..<.':':'. "~;:;":". :':.'.,~.: '-:~'.~''':'l..'. ..~I..,<:..: />... ,!M:.::':I/',: ::';:<:".'!'I';~; '..I..::~.~.;.:.,.'..',.~'::':"..I.:'::'.':',:,:,<:.:",.~~",<,,::'.'~"."'~":~.:" :.::....:..:-".~.:.~':.:..::..:.:.:.:....:.".::.I..:::'.~.
.\
Pf.Z Bd. Minutes
1/11/6-6
p,age #5-a
~
'At this point t-lr. Ct\!'liale stated th;i't h:i.~~ fi,rTtl had uGed biJ.l-
boa'1."d ad,vOl:'tioinn ~ h~~ didn' t f:r~el thclt they' had bc~n any preat
asset. He fUI'ther sti'(tod that he di,dn I 't think that business people,
would go out of business if there was a reduotion of boal~ds (bill-
'boards).
Chairman Kruse' ,offered congratulations 'to the Ch.:lmbct" Beautifi.-
cation Commi t.tee, fOl~ the HOI'k they l1ave been doing and ,expressed
,gratitude to the' Real Estate Board, for the.ir' coopeI"ation in connec-.,
,tion with th'e sign ot"dinance ,study~ The Chair~an made ,request that
copies of Planning Board minu.tes coveri.ng 'this, joint session be sent
;.
.'
"
,;
."
~~, ;. c,
to ,lirs.. 'Culler., See'y,of the City Beautification Comrnittee't and to
. \ .'
I.. .
Mr~ Shafer" and Mr. Drodeul~"
, ,
.
,The joint session was,adjouI'nedat 4:1.5 P.. M.
,<' ..'
".:
l'cl > '.
~'d: i: * 1d({~ ft tc '" it if
. ~ ". .......
;,
" ."
~. ~ c'" . , .
! .
:: 'i ~
,'. .
',"
. . :-. . ". ~
, '
'I'
_.. :"1
, '
'j
> . ",:
'ic"t
~.
':i;',:V'"
'\:>1 :'
" ". . .
; ,
......~ \
."
;,'!
':f" ,
, ,
, ,
P&Z Dd. Minutes
1/11/66 Page lIS
Suggestad plans for the beautification of Coachman Park (prepared
f""", fot' the City BeilUtificati,on Cornmi ttee) were passed out and rcviawe.d.
~1r. Kruse detai.led featuras included of a Haterfall, brook, fresh
~ ."
water lal.::e, and landscaped meadOv7 and gav(I, l:'CpO'r't on progress made, to
date in dave~lopment of this park area..
Some general discttssion followed of the vanious parks. and beau-
'J -'1 1., [
',' '" -( 1.'- ~f J '1 ~ ('., c/ 12:''',''',L '11 .::J
~ f ti . t h' h h d b 01-1. d . J( k .' "'-'1:. , v,-
L.i ica on proJec s \01 ~c a een Oll ~ . ~ne . ,; ,. , I '. :..:- ,) c:..,,,~ 1'.- ,.t.,...
{.<..(/~.r-!t..,' )"tJ~t::'i'?.(-~(.-t.c,,';"'If('''/~'''''''' 'CI ~-,.
,Si&lJ 9.~~ri~.~ - Mr.,. Kruse repOl:"ted that a pat'T of any, beauti-
fication program was the control of signs~ He related that the City
Attorney, was now preparing an o~diijance,consolidating proposals of
the Planning and Zoning Board which had be~n discussed with the Out-
door- Advertising interests and 'had had. joint, study revisions 'by the
Board and a. caromi ttee 'l"epflesanting the Clearwater-Largo Board of
. Realtors ..' Although' focus had been on the outdOl..,)"r advertising (bill-
. hoards), he reported that further study included "on premise" point:
of purchase signs. The chairman reported. that other gl"OUPS; <J:rchi-
tects and the garden'clubs, as \ole11 as individuals) 't-Jel"'e concerned
. :
XL
'I
, '
wi.t~ the problem., and he felt the.y' should e";tpress their views on the
importance of any ordinance initiating this control~ Inquiry had in-
dicated tha't neighboring, rnunicipali ties ~el"e a~y.~9t1S1y m..rai ti.ng CJ.ea3:'.
. . . ... 4>'.- ~.?...! ,-:;;,,:''''.>t./c-;.~~/)~ /rt t.."4(' .,~(C'-~..~"-'-'1...,'C{":-
~.;ater' s passage of the s).gn oIld~nance w /} .' ;,(1;. f' -z..,
/:('//( ..!:7 <~.;... #':-- ....;..;:1- (,
Chairman Kruse offered cOllgratul.at.iC'n~ ~i!o the 'Chr,HnbCl' Beau,ti fica-
"
i
tion Committee foY' ';;he \.,or}~ they have DEll.';m doing i1Yld f.n~pr'C'8ned grati.w
tude to the Real Esta te Bo:::n....d fo!' their' cooperation 5.n connection \-;i th
t~le sign' ordinance. study" The CtWil....man mado :r(';qncsi:' th;:ri: copies of
"
,Planni.ng Board minutes covel"ing this :ioin-i.+ sC',Gsion be :.1~:m'.': -to Jvh"D.
v
Culler, Seely of the City B(~c'1.ut:i.fic,::ti.on C'.'))!lc 21nc1 to l'h'. Sh<1:f;\'!y' and
MrQ Brodeur.
, ,
~ : .
The joint
z e:] ~3 i on
{'1 ~.... ') d "J ('11~"J" ., (} ;l'l'
. ~.j. ..;) ~. ~ ,J. J. ! t~. ....
l!. : l~:
J"; I r\f ..
"
"
.On' \ r'
P6Z Bd. HinutcB
1/11/66 PaBO #6
,.........
Mr. ~lilliams left the meeting at thi13 time. Chllil'n:an 1<l"'uoe
exoused himL~elf to J\:eep anotheY' appointmont nod Hl"'. l1ylander
took the chair. Hembcr GCl,lloway j oinod the !l1~ating.
~ UB QI~~ ~Lo.li..=... LIYE-9.!'}1Lfg-y]'!._~g~.NE]~!_~@1.91tLdErl-~ anns. 8r;1D,...,
1ms.~J. , - ~H~LER,,_ ~.lliEEill_-
Hr. liarries advised of, s1 te illGpection' made by hj.msel~ and Mr.
Reade and offe~od "the report of the Subdivision Committee to recommend
approval of the HasteI' Plan of Live Oak Court as submi.tted provided
that the diameter of the cul-de-silc be incL'eased to 100 feet. Hr.
....
ttl.!e.!1qer move d. .to accept !he S~\bd i.v:i. s i qn_J;_q~mi tte,e t S re QOFt. 11 is_
~~r~i 0.11.L ~ C CO.!l.ge d ~P-Y. )~r. ~~t~E.2-~~~~~.i!.l2!.1!!2~l.Y.:-_
ZONING pRDINffi~CE CHANG~~
~. ~ ....'
Request of Ci.ty Commission Represen"tati ve, ,1 ~ Ste\>1art:
SEC. 26-17 (11) A Drive-In Theatre in an HB or M Zone'
Delete the wor~cfs: "\<1i thin 500 ft'. of a residential district nor""
Preliminary discussion i.ndicated Members were of the opinionlthat
"the existing ordinance provi.sion should be retained.. In final action,
mgtiol!.}vas ..ea,s!!.?d t~t the Pt~ner1 ra~I}d i.f;"_l?oAs,ible jh..~" Chaj:r>man,
, !neet .wi th tl}~....Q.i.tv J':fanageX,_t...o_ ~~.n , mgpe !ntq,r.~~tion a!l to ~hy' th.i~_
c!!~n ~e is 'd~S.i...~
',--"
SIGNS ~ COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING SIGNS - SUNAD:
...... 't ........~~ ~ _........,...___............. i~-___r.~ ..~................._......... I ...-.....~
, ;
(a)
CAS it82
MEADOR (OWNER) -Sullivan E King (DISPLAY)'
Single-fi:1ce - '300 sq.. 'ft~' - 27 f't. high ,.
Wrn~ Brown'g Sub~ - SW ccr. Gulf-to-Bay & CR 61
(45' west of Bayvicw)
'It was voted to delax action on this aoplication fo~
cJ.arili~~i'pn' or 1os.~1:-rQn _.?,f"~.~c[sr:ffiI'as-~~~}:~~~=-----:-
(b)
CAS #83
IGNICO (OWNER) - DISPL^Y MOT COMMITTED
Dou~ta'cecr::--' 3 01'- s q:--:ft~ ? 2-rt:",nr gh
Lot 4& 5,. Block II,. Boulevard Hci p,lrts Subdi'\~ision
Gulf-to-BilY ano flun lTutm
. ,
After review and discussion,
the Boa~d vo~ed to ~ecommen1
......o--._______""_~__IL_...._. ---"'0.........
.liJ
9,i s a J2.!2 I' 0.., 2.Q~f:.- a b (.2.:.'!Ll2:~~)_. II ry]MH' .f~~:_,!!~S~_.:?~~~lJl~L..r~~f~~l0~_,tl fl....JZ.u.1?m itt.ft!L_
, '. . 1 '. he:),. ~ r' r:
for d i. sa P {H'O V <3.1 () f .99J11.; l_~.gY,D..r..t.~1~.;1TI.fL~{~.1.rJ:L..Js!..!L,,1 r'~LU.-,~! 11 f:.....l11.).~Q.~a~_;l...-,..e,\ L.:::"L,l,_.
--...~ ----....--
tln~ouP'h CAS it 81..
...__...... J I~ .---..-
, ,
"
I
l'
::;"+'l.":. ~.:\j..:..4' .".:'. ..:.\.'.:..:.... '.: 'f;........:.,..+... .."'..,." ..' '. "\ ".';~..~:.~.,::"~":':;":.' ;..:......':,~........[ ','~: I'.:. ":.:..r.",.:'.~..;:.. ....".,', ..'t., .;'.\.
':1.~'
(
,,'
P8Z BEl. Minutes
1/11/66
Page'i/7
, "
Planning,literature was distributed.
,"~
, \
. ~ "... '
TIle' meet ing was
. ' ,
adJourned at 4:~5
p-
H.
.'
,
',"
SP:Jlf':Y Gu~d,
~ ,
c I. " Wolle t, Sec y
ty.. Planner
I.,.,
i".
'" ,
" ,
',I
':
<,
" ,I.
.t,
':,;
.~,,',
:',; .
:: ~
','
"
" ~
.{,
, ,
1: l. ~ ~
, '
" '
?':,.r.'
1"'1"
~~ '
" ,
"
, "
, '
,.'
-~~I";' '
,I
\ ,
, l,>
\.'. '.
;\";.. .
" ,~
:~v;~:s'::'
t ".'
~', ,. '. .
}<}. '
{""'. '
~ ;.', . '
::~;~":.. ': ~:.
'I.
, \.,'.
I'
,{;
'/~ . ~
,. .~
:i I ~.
{, " ~ .
.. -"1
. :
"
, "
;.
"
'" .
", ,
,',
'j
....
.'
;'j
,,'
'\...
"" .
,., .
./'.,'
~, .'
...
"
. ,
'I
;.
,t
."
f .
~I .
/, ,. tit t.~~ ~ '
, .....",..
,'.
.
n l
\".
"
. ~ ,
d 'I"'
'J~. (. c
"
"