11/23/1965
I, ~: ,,' ";, :-: .' < .':::> ",:. 'r'~:: . .; , ,;~: ,'. '" ,,: .: ~ :.1:: ':. :,~,:', ~ : . t .: >.~:. :,' ~,",.' ,', :' ~" ~ '.....' ; . '.:;: , ::} '," :: ~', ' ,,' '.' ~', :- ":'J':" ~ ~.., ' : ,: .' ~. ,~ \>:" ': ",,' .,' :; I '.) :. ~ '..~' .:::,~' \: :'.. , : \ "" ,: .',;' 1 ':, ~ . ,'.. ~ ',',' .:~ ';'~ ,'~.f" '. '. ~ >: ':':4,",1__ I:
THE PLAlUIING AND ZONING DOARD
. I
t;/
~
Minutco of the MeetinB, Tuesday, NovDmbe~ 23, 1965~
The meeting was cnll cd to order' at 3: 00 P ~ N. by theChai rman,
Hr. KI'USC. Present were Members Harries, Hylandcr, Butlct", Rende,
Williams and Swan, Mr.' Rettig of the Engineering Department~ and
Hr. Holle.
'..-....
The minutes of the meetings of October 26, 1965, and November 2,
1965.J were approved as submitted in written summation to each mernbe,r.
ZONING FOR ANNEXATION - TRACT SO. Of BELLl-~AIR BLVD., WEST OF
MJ?SOURI AVE. -' REPORT 6r COMMITTE~ -' , ,
The Pl~nner presented petition for annexation da~ed Nov. 12/65
(copy) containing request for HB, Heavy Business, zoning. Property
was generally described as located south of 'the County R-4 subdivi-
sion strip on the south side of Belleair Blvd. and to the west of
the City National Bank site (City PRS zone). Land use and zoning in
the area was analyzed. Mr. Wolle offered his recommendation for
acceptance of the annexation with HE zoning for the reasons that:'
Tract of.request is already zoned C-2, Commercial, in the
County.
Tract is an interior one and the only access shown is 60 ft.
access road to Missouri Avew A vacant a1.'lea divides the tract
and the residential zoned strip along Greenwood Ave.
Property to the south of the 60 ft. access road is zoned the
old County B-8, is undeveloped, and neither the annexation tract
nor property adjoining on the south would in all prObability be
devoted to any type of subdivision development.
The city was presentlv,overzoned for retail business and needed
an at'ea for expansion of heavy busi.ness type uses.
It was learned that an annexation ordinance was scheduled to be read
~_.'\
at the Nov. 29 zoning public hearing meeting of the City Commission.
Mr. Butler reported ~lat he had inspected the site and felt that the
tract would lend itself to a warehouse type use, but did f~el conc~rn
as to how Heavy Business zoning 'Would affect the house~ on 'the Bt~lleaiT'
frontage, a third oJ which he estimated to be ubove the average fop
. the area. Hr. Butler flJl"thcr !'cported thiJt a Zoninp Conuni ttce T'epm....t
...../
':::', ' '.. "~ :' :~':, ;. I I ''-, ~: " ',; ~~ :- :1 :;:, " : ',:', ,I, ',: " ' ~ ',:. . '~'.,..',::': ',,', /;: .. '~:" :.: ;..'~ ': ;,' : '/ ' " :> .',:', ~ '>: ':" : ': '~- :'': ,. ',', ~~;..).: t 't',' ; J f; :.<' , ..' -: ': '/" :>:':, ~:.. :: :;' : :", '.' ::- ~ ,,;,.... ,.' : ' ~ ,: ':' ': ~ ' , ~ ': ':',' ,"::. ~ ,:, '; ~, : ':;:. ..:': ( .~: '~.;. : :. :.: ;" . .. n , : :f:" '~, ~. ~ + ~. :: ~' ::: ,; : \ ,~,;~, I ::,: }',
P&7. nd. Minutes
11/23/65'
Page (/2
~
\.....1.1:1 not awtill1bla. Upon inquit"y made t H!'. Wolle made refe.t'encc. to
tho zoning ordinance 1.isting of permitted uses in the liB zone., noting
that the special excepti.ons of the "BU zone are included. He pointed
out some protective restrictions as to noise-and nuisance factors.
f.fter ~-;.-"if.;.~. ~nd discus..tion.; upon motion b'l. ~ H~!:l"i.~!!.z...l!ep(~n.p~2...qy._
~liY.1~~,nd~~l'~it w~P-~.yqtEt-d.. t~ pecomrnend aEprqvctl ~of !jl!.2. 1i~av~ Bus",~'1es~,
1.0xl1..ns fo~..annexqtion ~~Lde9cr~b,~d In sul:?iect .pe1:ition (Hickey).
SIGNS - COMtL ADVERTISING SIGNS (SUNAD) -
... r J.-"'~
CAS ff.74
Location: N. 1/2 17/29-16, no. side Gulf-to-Bay,
approx. 1100 f1:. east of US 19.
Location: Ne 1/2 17-29-16, No. side Gulf-to-Bay,
approx. 630 ft. east of US 19
Location: Lots 6 and So. 1/2 of Loi: 7,
Block A, 2nd. Addtn to SaIl Sub.
Location: Lots 9, 10, NH1/2 of 11,
Block J, Boulevard Heights,
approx. 150 ft. San Juan and Gulf-to-Bay,
south side Gulf-1:o-Day.
After review and discussion, ~he Board voted to recommend dis-
CAS #75
CAS il76
CAS #77
~xoval ~f the~ahove 4 sign applications fqr the s~~e reaso~~*~~
sJIbmtt.ted.lo't? ..cU~appro'{a.!. of com' 1 adverti,sin~ s"ig.n aImlicati,oJlL.
nu~~ers CAS-55 throug~~S 73,_
"
Mr. Kruse reported that he did not have information as yet
as to whether the sign ordinance would be on the Ci ty C07TImil3~1ion
agenda for Dec. 6th or not~ Hr. Wolle advised that the City Engineer
had gone over his copy of the ordinance and subrni t"ted Som(~ technical
comments 'to him.
A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPt1ENT - PRELIHINARY PLAN FOR APARTMENT
DEVELOPMEUT' '(TIIROUcJH ALBRECHT-VUNCANNON) - GENF.gAI. LOCA'~I,O'N:
WEST' END TURNEJ{ S"TR"tE:! - .
Chairman Kruse read to the Board u. lettel" of submitta1 accom-
,..J panylng the plans (signed by Ft'ances G. l1i.ll~r) ~ SUBJl:~CT: "THE
':~'I""'" .1::- :,.;."." ,,:.'; 'I' ".'; /I~\\..;.."... :.' .:~.;:: \>.! .,': '..\.;:.:',. '. :,..:..,'.";:.'.jJ ..;'"...1...:...'....(...':.':...:..... .::.~l~".I.'i-'~...:~.::./.,:..',.,.t:.>......'.~,..(.,'::..".;~:.:\...:::.....:........:.;q:'..:.'.;~:).:...::.:..~::.:\:..,:...'
PSZ Dd. Meeting
.11/23/65 P~gc 63
HILLER GARDEN PROJECT (TURNER AND ORANGE STRF:ETS) - SITE PLAN APPROVAl,lf.
The Planner presented and explaine.d the ,lans. He c(.mfir'rnnd that the
~ . PRS zoning of the proposed s:i.te pel"mi.ts the npnrtment use and thut
. Planning Board approval of the plans ,..ras not a zoning requirement;
however, that Board opinion was requested. FU\"Ithf:!l"l, that planning de-
cisions as to the question of the vacation of Rogers Street right-of-
way would be involved, as also the determination as to a possible
encroachment of. the site on right-of-way that might be needed for the
Chestnut Street extension. Mr. "1011e pointed out that the plan could
be accomplished with Roge~s Street as a private drive or as public
right-of-way (bisecting the development), but that if Rogers Street
were extended, an 8 ft. building setback shotoln would be in variance
to regulations. In the discussion that followed, it was brought out
that:
.............'\
. I
The City had usually followed a policy of not vacating
waterfront .stub";'end streets.
Rogers Street also serves as access xx to the Blnnt'on waterfront:
property to' the west of the proposed..site.
Present plans under consideration for the extension of Chestnut
Street would not entail acquisition of right-of-way bordering
this proposed site.
After review of the plans and consideration of the information pre-
sented., !!!,2!io,n, ,was p,assed unanimously to~i,B~ the owner~ tJ:1at ~
~l~~~~s.considered v~ry~desirable, ~nd i~ confor~~q~,~o~zoning
"'
standards for the area. Also that the owners be further advised (in
.--- w-- 1:1' 1 ____ ___~ r I 1..
re~ar~ t9...!J~i-r J~ropos.e.l. t.2._vacata~ ROGer:.s..~t.) ~~.E.!.,r-he_~...t9-1!lL
th~.tJo&e.E2~ St:~~_et~~_t be~ .r~1:ained bx...,:t:l1e Ci ~~
. t'
.'
I...~)
. ... ,~.''''l':':::,~' ,~,:,:",:,':"',':"".'. :,:".:'/ :,:.: .".,':.1. "+.' "..~:.~::., "/, "'~'I '.! '.' :'/, :,....... ':', '..:~,/ ..........'.'...::..:./:;.: .:';,', ,.,,::,,:....',: :;,'. ~..;':: 1"'I'\;"~"t', ::'...:;',:.;:'~',:::,' :.....;.... :'. ':'.~ ':':, ::/.,:j;,:,.',:'.:., :,':.: :,~:,:'..'.': I:: ":'~ ,:.:::'
P&Z Bd. Minutes
11/23/65
Page f/'.
PROGRESS REPOR'l' - l~DGE\~A1'ER DRIVE COMM11'rEE - Ml"'. Dutlcv,
1 L,I. '~T'-r -. - ____"""',.. _
.~
~
Committee Chairman, reported on mcetinc of the committee with City
Attorney Brown held the pant week to Dcok' ;my llwlilable informatIon as
to plans the City might have for t-tcquisi tion of addi tionnl wc1tevfl"'ont
I
properties alon~ the Drive. Mr. Butler advised that the Committee
had drafted an outline report, in worksheet form, in which two plans
were presented for suggested discussion: Plan ^ based on use of land
within the present bUlkhe,:ld line averaging no fi:. from the Drive and
Plan B, vlhich was only possible if the City i.s to acquire all upland
as recommended. He stated .that sketches by Hr. HaT'!"ies illustrative
of these two plans were hei.ng submitted also. Hr. . 'Butler then submitted
~his written report of .the Subco'!l!l'itte~,dated 11/~/65 'titled~ npLAUS'
FOR IM~ROVEMENT OF EDGE\tJATER DRIVE \tlATERFRONT". Conles ,_~s m..Qqe a
part of these minutes".were reyiewed and discussed~by member~. One
.--.. suggestion made was that planned parking for the Dicus hotel site
".---'
.1.
,might be. shown. Some members voiced objection to any seawall balus-
trade or t:'Pr;! of park development that would detract from the natural
beauty of. the waterfront view~ The Engineering representative suggested
that the Boa~d should recommend as an approach to erosion control
.either for a seawall or shore protection by heavy riprap,.rather than
offel'" a choice between the two. ~n final a9tion, moi:i_on wa~ J!1ade and
seconded.!hat the Board endors~ presenting.Plan B ~without ,seawall) to
.!=h~.C~ty Commission. In line t-li.th M. suggestion made by Chairman Kruse~
the motion \'las amended to direct also that the Dunedin authm"'i-ties b~~
_ ~ ~ 1 10.. 1 ..._ ..v-."""....., III 17rllll U~ "LL ... __
contacte.Q_to l"'~view an..Y_J1:.[\al P17QILosa.1. w'3tl' the l3o~~~~..~~1"'d~.nP':-
. . .. h a \Ie
In discussion of the motion) 11T'. HaT'1."'ies acv:i.ned that he would I
Plan B prints mad(~ up for t1T'. H:tlliams to work on, as Mr. Wi1liiJrns hEld
. .
.-/1 not as yet had 3.n oppo1"tnni ty 1:0 meet w:t th 1:he C0mmi t.tee and thot he
. ,
, " : \ ,.' ',' :','". ' .'.' ;',' , ~ ' '.. " : ':.' " ',." ',': r :;: 01: :.:- ,; " .~', ':. '.. ':. ~. ..~,',~ '. I,.', ", ',' I" .' ';"" ,:,"~ ': 1 : ..:.,: ..,. '. I ::' , ", : , : ' ", I'... " I ! ... ~ ' , ' . : ;.:' " ' , ~,', ,',; .;: L,: ',' . ~,' ',I", ~', . . .':. , :.: 'j t ,:, .' " .:' .o'. : , "~', :' " '.,;' I', <
. 'Iff'
paz Bd. Minutes
11/23/65
Pago fl5
wo':!ld wa.nt to develop Plan n sketch fut'thol" bcf()re pl'csentation to
r' the, Ci ty Commission. Up'on_..Y.~1~ ,!~e.!l", rnot~t9n, an ill11ended ~ wa~ paaned
unanirnous~:l..~~, It was agr'eed that docicdon as to timing of a meoting
.wi th the Dunedin authoY.'i ties wrJuld be .dcfeI't"ed until. the next meeting.
HA1'ERIAT~ FOR ZONING PUBLIC HEARING nov.. 29/65- Chairman Kruse
~- _1 h.l 1 1_
.1
reminded,the Board of the Nov. 29th hearing. It. was announced that
packets of mate~ial pertaining to these agenda cases would be made
available to those members able to attend.
OFF1~E, MOVE . '- It was announced that the Planning Office would be
moved to the new City Hall over the Thanksgiving week-end.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:15 Pw M.
. Respectfully submitted,
,.,.-a"
.~~'~. uJ~ .
.ck I. Wolle, See'y
, 1ty rlanne~ .
. j
;. '
:.J,:.. .
:i '
..:.. ,'.
."
1\"
,.
:' !
'I
: ,
, .
- )
.....
(,
','
.,
r '
'(.>
~ " .
II, '