04/07/1964THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD /
flinutc:l of the riiat-- :ins, Tuasday, April 71 964.,
The meeting wan called to order at 3:30 P. M. by the Chairman,
Mr. Kruse. Present were Mem'`_4era Meade, Oaten, Harries and Mylander,
Mr. Rettig of the Enga.r3e ?rar. s1 Depar-tm _nt , and Mr, Wolle.
The minutes of the 1riet t%* np. of March 6.. 3.964-1. trere approved as
submitted in written s Umma ti ??n to each me )nber.
The Chairman reportw-d c z*,ncernirig I:;ie appt-)y ntmerIt Of Mr. John Henry
Logan, Jr., by the City Commi3nion on April 6/64 to fill the existing
vacancy on the Punning and loning Ward. It was learned that this
appointment was made subject to Mr. Uog nw l s acceptance.
ZONING FOR ANNEXATION INT'f.:3'T ORDI'MA11CE. AIU09 T MORNINGSJPX,.....
?Ww.?.M w'... •?-??V'•1.Mr .? Nry.+-• r raves. l 7'=?
ESQ. f Ms - ?E?..,On .??:,? xS?1Z.._f-T"f2..;- ?a??cv?.ecee`c?" a'eF ?i?.3.s con
corning the Board's originr; ! approval of R-M zoning for this area of an-
nexation as :shown can master zoning plan for Morni.ngside Estates. It was
recalled that its anticipated use for ?. Ce-i Aunity Club and recreational
facilities was discussed wit% the deve loper W his engineer at that time
(See Planning is Zoning Bda rn_-.nutes of 4-00--63). The Roar•d was 'further in-
formed of recent request to -the City Coimnission for liquor zoning be-
cause of the type o club tc? be constructed and of preliminary approval
of such raquest? Leatter of vequest for annexation dated 3113/64 from
B. B. C. C. Inc., signed by Wra. G.' B].ambburn, Pres., was read to the
Board containing zoning request as.follows : .. , ......
Olt is further requested that this land be zoned B--Business. The
described property is b_?ing annexed for the purpose of constructing
a private club and restaurant. My corporation feels that the grant-
ing of business and liquor Toning for .the above described property
would be necessary for •thia purpose, We therefore make this re-
quest contipgent upon the nequeste d s.king., to
The Board discussed some evicting R-M zoned properties where it was
thought that restaurant operations were conducted with liquor zoning,
Reference was made to B/A/A section of the Zoning Ordinance listing.a
restaurant (as a separate establishment) and certain commercial recrea-
tion facilities as exceptions in R--M with B/A/A approval.. Reference was
also made to limited business use permitted under R--M zoning in combinationil
with a hotel., motel, or apartment building containing 16 or more units.
o
P G Z $d. Minutes 4/7,164 t'age #2
The -following discussion •rFrvv alnd that the Board f??l t t•ba t• the " H"
'„on i rit.=, wan not justi t'I er" .;}no r, k F gr,-tr.ted, would cent ab'l i r.b i dang4trowi
precedent, condoning 'IS" uui patterns treat may destr. o?1 the Val up of the
immediate R--1 areas. The rec:cq,,nizetl the- usage as proposed and was
of the opinion that these ncti.vzti.e:: can 1.c accoinpl i.shed under the R-M
zoning. Motion was made....... by Mr,. 1,.rie that thi a club
r.rrrras•....?w+.+rrwy.r.....?.r.e.t?.r.•...u•.an..r...w.rer..•.....R...rrue.,ar....rw vr...r..u.a,....?n ur..wr. n 7
Morniligsi e s atew,RSr;i.???=?..r??,11. A??.?-Vx,..,A
be. o 9rLde,,?L.for.? ex r?i „z ,??h ?t-:M.w:??pJ?- ... ?•x. After an investigation
and report by Mr, tdolle t?x:i c hu cot, .(.1 not find -that a l.icena(.: for the
dispensing of liquor vioul.d be prohi l)ited by the R-•M Toning, Mr. Rea,_gp_! ,
motion was seconded bit Mr.. ;Sv1, dr?r??
_..1L,.?..,...........t.,. ,..?. _.
was
anrli;r as e,j..U..Djjjjj 1)!L1;.xy:.?.
a reed that
Y record of action of
?lus/OYR..J.v.Mr,R.Ma.•1r L, •Y•V,.?w the
I.YM?.a.il. v Board be
uy Y. a+ •??.n-?+.I..L transmitted to the _Lit
,..?
.s.wM....wMlw.r...r.rw.wY,?IMMti-wnM ?,lt
Manager b the Chairman with an eirp l ilpai ion of -the veasonR
mendation.
ZONING INFOR14ATTOM BROCHURE.-») Cha:irmart Kruse reported on his con-
versation of that' mornirq-, with ?it-, ffoupan of the Clearwater--Largo
Board of RealtOrs concerning tl ....rf?auUanls idea of com•?iLing
?.?
zoning manual for the u:%a of real-tors, One suggestion made to him by
Mr. Kruse was that this mi,zIrc he in loosel,eaf .form.
REPORT ON PARKING LOT 111,AIN 'REVIEW - Mr. Kruse reported that memo-
randum had gone forward to City M fna r.? concerning request for Board
review of plans for public and pri vtjte g .r} ink lots.
ZONING FOR ANNE'*ITTON
7.,wA?M_...?....?w+.?V-?r._?gv.N..a..'?... u•{wuh...
..x ear .Y .rY......i,n •.. k401k`X1 N'CSIUE
_Ira....?..r,.e...)._s..e.h.?rwt? ESTATES, UNIT TT --
',.rKt.'r.•.f-hY?M..?..?+?wwwww..VM.?r?.?.4?wsNr
The Board was i.nfoi-med that ;r???rcx??s ?_,:?f j?••1 t? zaiiing was in conformance with
the master zoning plarr as ?I)-,pvoved. Area Of ?innexatlon was pointed out
on map displayed by Mr, Rat.: _ u (ved Motion, was .'Qu424i,
and 12asaad tid JaDimp
Morni.np,s 1 Estates, Unit 1-'- .,?i...s
?1-_?,? in Irt r cs,?p?
. ... _ ;
»w ........_._...?..?... »»...,.....-,.. _,-,
as? 1?_r_u ..PaYv,,1 QR=7=.
P 9 Z Bd Minutes 4!7/64 Wage #3
CONTINUATION OF SIGN ORDINAUCE ",TUDItS - (continued from Mar.
w? w,n. rrw. •r..,.m..www.? w.n«+?wr •...• . r..«.rn..ww.ru..w ?rwr.w.
31/64) -- The Planner di strIbuted copien of outlines of coverage of
signs in existing city ardi.n nc:e as fo l.lows {Age nda 3 W:..
City Code Chapter 13 (Sign Ordinance)
City Building Code Section 2301.
City Code Chapter 26 (Zoning Ordinance)
rir? Wolle conducted ass i.n's o-1-n ational review of content of -these
three codes.
? eg nda 3(h)Alternatives -- Discussion
Model Ordinance ?• sr-?para.te
Zoning Ord.i.nanc-Et inclusion
Building (:cede •- Structural referral.
Mr. Wol.le offered for discussion a recommendation that the Building Dept.
should focus on, 'what is Ln t.hei..r Bu-' Idingr, Code and that Bldg, Code de-
finitions should not be takart from that code'. He proposed as an alterna-
tive to a separate ordinance to have everything in either the Building
Code or the Zoning Code '14 i.naluded in the Zoning Code his idea was that
this code should spelt outi 71rna s i gn5 are treated in, the separate zones
and that sections of the si gui ordinance may be added to -the Building
Code or put into a general :.action It,n the Zoning Code (structural re-
quirements to remain as par,t of -the 31-dg.-Code).. Among suggestions made
by individual members la+.re i t) that everything pertaining to signs
should be in one ordinance, 0) that sign regulations should be sim-,
plifi.ed. The Chairman coni-punted t:hsvt the inclusion of general sign re-
gulations as a par=: of -,he terdi.:)r,nce would further, complicate this
ordinance and make it rn+,)re r.t:.ffi:E?I t for the ordinary person to under--
stand. Mr. Mylander poin ted out os one drawback -to inclusion of sign
regulations in the Bl.dg tha r.:.'?t?. Bldg,. Code changes all the time.
He stated that from his revi.!vo cn'r tl-0,? ordinances that the Planner had
submitted to him the trend cis-! jns to to have signs under zoning dis-
tricts.
P Z Bd Minutes
X07/611 Wage #14
Mr. Reade questioned seeming, confli rti ng statements in a Suggested
revision of Ord. 645 previomaly ubmitted concerning Nonconforming Si.gna
It was agreed that this paragr.iph would reed further clarification.,
Secondly, Mr. Reade brought tip thE' question of the unattractive ap-
pearance of many projected signs on 44alls, on marques, etc., and over
right-of-way. It. was generally :,olreed that consideration should be
given to stricter control of such signs., The Planner advised that he had
not found any one ordinance to c:onplately allow as a model, but that he
had selected certain formats that niight serve as a model. He displayed
`. the 5t. Pete zoning ordi.nanco to their column listing of
sign-requirements, After spine further di.scussa.on.,:,i ? was estab P
?+..alW.wlYlw i..xw Mw.oA VpwM.VfA.NwYwq.WW pYNw?al?F..`? MIMII?M..thc?_Board favored ,'the a1terijjti,ve,,,nL_incjof s?,?,fi,?
trua r re uir merit; T : was ar hanged that Mv,, Mylander would work
with the Planner in preparation of concrete proposals for such zoning
amendments and submit them for Board approval. The Cha.i.xma?? delegated
Maio Reade and Mr. Gates to assist in this project and suggested they
might review drafts prior to Board careside::?ation.,
TOUR APRIL ;L? l t 1964 - Mra Ws>: 1. '_ announced that he would be on vaca-
tion fox three days bed i.nninF the following Tuesday. Tt was decided that
members would reet at the Planning Office at 2:00 P. M. for a conducted
tour of the new incinerator. ild of the shuffleboard and bowling
greens courts if time perini•t-ree,
Planning literature war:, d i x, is ri,6ul:: d,
The sleeting was ad j corn d 5 : 7 0 T' 11"
Respectfully submitted,
ty Planner
• s