03/31/1964
,
,"
THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
/'
,~
Minutes of tht~ Hot!tinB~ l.'uooday, l1aT"ch 31, 1961t~
Tho moeting wus called to or-del' (1t 3: 30 P. M. by tho Chairman.,
Mr. Kruse. Present W(H'O Hembcr~J Reada, Gates'.l Harries, l1ylander 'f
Wi.lliams and GallmJay, fir'" Hettig of 'the Engineeri11g DepR!'tment., and
Hr. Wolle.
~,
':
\.
'f
i
'I
~,
The minutes of the mf~~!tingn of February 25, 1964, and March 3.,
, 1961.4, were approved a~l !3ubmltted in written summation to each memberv
~:
\
I
~
1
I
f
I
1
!
J
1 ;
,
ZONING FOR ANNEXATION .. LO'rS 4,5 6 7 0 11 F,. 12 of BLOCK 1
J '" ......,..._ Ii!IJI. 1 IIIT~T"____""-f.'''''t~_.........,....,_~~_.,;_J.......'"""",~:"~",,,,,~,,--,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,w- IIPI" ~l
illiEENW.Q..9.D..l~klli..,..[tll!llY..!&1.Ql! ~ General location was described as south
of Belleair Road, west of ~;ing Ave", adjoining Mr. Miller's trailer
pa1"]< (Belmon't). The Planne1"' infor.med th('~ BO.;lI-d of reques.t for HH zon-
ing as intended use was for an tlddi t5.on to Belmont Trailer Park (for
Which plan is to be submitted) ~ Otll(!!l information given was:
That expa,nded area would extend to Ewing Ave. and would be facing
'some single family homes (in the County) which are not of high
valuation. The southwest corner of Belleair Rdu and Greenwood
Ave.. 'is occupied by a fish market~
Some lots occupied by single fnmi.ly homes wi.ll remain in Block 1
and will adjoin lots to be annexed v
The o~mer has indicate6 in contact wi:th the Plannel' that he will
conform to the 25' sethack from pUblic right-of"way (Ewing Ave.).
The intent to annex cr6:i.na.nce has been passed~ (Upon inquiry of
Mr. Williams, the Boa!'d, le:aI'ned that I'p.commendation of the Sub-
division Committee will not be availnble until a plan of the pro-
posed addition is p~esented),
!:!r. G.aj=es moveq~l!..!:..ov~~}~,~lU~st..l?~.~.2~_..EJm~~E.SL1E~~..2.M..tJ.
~ils'J~~t;,,-..?.n9w~l!~8,tpn~...ttt.<Li.lJ. uJ:ir.9,.~Pj;.~!!:~s.t_PJ~~_tli~...QIL
~~Qn~J1y.~Jj;~~,..J:t!J.J~t{WE-..:- .
In discussion of the r.1':r'~:iun, t'h,', Ret';:ig e}tPl"essed doubt that the
Ololner CQuld meet all the r(~-(:l1i:r:'ern(!nts ('If the MH zone for the park addi-
..',
tion. The Planne1'" advised ':':hat !1ru r"iil1n'~" wo\\ld nqt be able -to adhet"e
to the 15 e setback fr'om the iJ,d:i oining vt'cperty on those lots that aI'e
1,,./'
abutting residential zoned pl'Opel"ty and that he llfld sugges ted to Mr.
Miller that he might apply to the Board of Adjustment 6 Appeal on Zoning.
" '
.~. VIr.
P & Z Bd Minutes
3/31/611
Pa~a N2'
Mr. Wolle furthel1 'J:~el(Jtad tb:\t the :'4nrv:i.co r.Jrf~n for' his o'Xi,atinr. IMT'k
is to serve the flI~\>' uddition t but thl11: tho o\omcl' dOl~13 not havo tho re-
~ quired 10% for reCI'eat.ion m~'e.a" Th(' Boar.d concuI're.d wi th th~ Chairmt':.tn
that it could act I.)n thl~ S\1j:pOg ition that Nl". M:t1.1al." 9 exi.sting mobile
home park would be chanr.ed 'Lo,MH zoning as approved at the Mal'ch 30
. public hearing tht'ough for""!:",l ndop't:i.on of the z.oni.ng .1mendment ol"'dinance,
and that such original parJt: i>1ould bl:''2 considered nonconfot.'ming as to
I'Iestt'ictions. The Planner r-ecommenclp.d approval of the MIl zoning and
suggested that the Board could let The Legal DcpartTr1ent and/or the
B/AIA determine how far'the owner could go with his' development. Upon
inquiry, Mr. Rettig stated that the right-oi-Hay for Ewi11g Ave ~ is l~O ft.
~!he_~..!~j,nL~,.tE-.1w1--1.J~E.~.~,!~~.~....mR.!!!?E.~illE.."p,il2E.$.g.:-.
.....,
!
SUBD!Y..!l>.'!~Q1!...1l!:E,1iQ.Y:1~_~U~I:::!.Q:.;,~6.!..f.~~~a.l.~JmJT !..J..ili~1&U.I.~'P-
Zoning on the nor-th side of Shelle')' Str'eet was described as R-4 and
on the south side as uBn ~ It was r.oepol"l.ted that this Unit 3 was appa!"ent-
Iy being platted for rcsidelrtial lots. ncrte \va~ made of paT'king and
busbieas use (Fla. St.. Emplo:'yment OffiCE!) of a portion of the business
zone adjoining the' proposetl plat.. The Planner pointed o'ut the realign-
,
,
ment of Landry Ave. (a change from th1..~ mat3'1:eJ,~ plnn). IiI". Harrdes T'e-
ported that Shelley Street 5 s pavr;!d, R(:~cm"i\mendation of the Subdivision
Comrni ttee, offered by 11:!'. Harries, Wt:S to ,Jpprove the plat. Qp..2l!...
El2!!:QLQfJlt.t...11x12.D,~.l...:?_~S?,r'.Q~9._,E;L)ir:~..~..t{i".:~lJ,f!!!l!b...,j:l~~tg....y_Q.~dJ--t.g_
~~31Li;.ll~~..mlli.~m.i!~.t.&?Du r,.J ,_ tb.9._..~,.!!t~Jl~ ;~~A~ j ~:ll,-'~g.!l1mL~:t~~_<!Dd. ,..!?~l2.P..r:.Q.'l...~nt.hL
.'
1>~a::Lgf ,0.\1 1, f.::.t_Q...';.J3.gY.~M!fl !!if>_ , ~. ,~!!.\;,t~~ ..J.': .
CHAIRMANtS I'rENS ~ NARCH 30/61,:. ZOl:ING PUBl,Ie HEARING - The
__""I"" ~_. ~ ,,__......._~....._.I.oo..... ,.t:_.......... ....____..-'~ -'- ,~'tI.a. ~..~~_...-..... iI.:Af *_'~""..t.A..AVo~""'-'--_________
t,......)
Chairman expressed hiD apppcciatic:n :r:01' the:" ;lttc.ndance. of seven of the
eight Board members at the. hearing and "thanked f1r. Wolle for a fine
presentation: of the zoning i tt.~ms" It \oms reported that the Board t s
recommendations were upheld with the excep"tion of one application (for
rezoning of the SaIl's property)" Thl;~ Board was informed of ,3n ex-
~ '.'~~:":\" .:/<,",~':I."!:,I...,:..,:.'~"" ,: I'~:~:' "':~""":;;";:,I::".'...:':'\~" I~:"'~" ';,., .:..,'..-,..' \ :':;" "1..:....~..;.r':.:tl,.,:::::.'."".,.:..,\> :";",":-,,\~~..:. :'.:d~::'~: ;,".";' ~'.:.'~:.'.~>::\': '(:':'~I"~'\':"J"'. ~ ':'," J'.f:.,',.",/,,:>".,\'.:~l:'.',.l,\'.::,:,
P & Z Bd Mi.nu1;os
3 / 31/611
PuRe Ii 3
prenaion by Comm:i.n~(.ion(-t~:" Sm:1.1:h indir.:A:ting that ho would f.1\10'P " :;oi.nt
meeting of the commi.as:1.t)n \01:), th the Hoard 1)1"'iol.... to zonin B pnb1 ic hear-
~ ings. Concerning Cornm,it~9i()~' d i oappl'ovml :fOl" vezoning to R _If of the
Shankman pl"Opet"ty, tne Hoarl--j discussed C0i11men1: by The Commisoion at the
hearing that the BC1llrd Ijhon~1 d try "to "mI'k out a Golution foT' th~ appl i-
cant.. It ""uS the Chai.vtn."ln ';.':; opini.on that It would be propel" for the
Board to await contact by .th~ nppli.(t~)nt :in this matter'~ By opaque
Pl"oj ection, Mr. Wolle d:Lspl.-\yed ,1 ~:;t1.1dy pr.v~pared by him of a suggested
'plan' for possible duple:l:, d(;'i~l opment of 1:h.1s Shankman trac1:. The
BoaI"d studied the plan i:md c:ffered ,rariou/':I comment.
Mr~ Kruse. related (;Onl1ilf:,nt~~ madB by Commissione:!:" Insco concerning
the pos9ible inclu~ion i.n, th(~ 1):f:Ydino!\nce. of gome pl"'ovision for beauti-
fication and p'["(!ser1vation of tr'e€sS in parking lots in R-l or R-2 zones ~
._~~
Mr.. 'Kt"uae raised the qlJ..~sti C II cf wlv:!;thel:" :i.t 1:jrouJ.d be ,within the Board t s
juriSdiction to have plans cf these lo'ts sent in fOl"' iota review. Mr..
Williams advised of req\.tirew,~mt of thC! Ci1:y Engineer that every parking
lot over 1500 sq. 'ft" b~~ sl.t~:.ir,i ~C'ted to 'the!'l by a 1~e8istered engineer
.-....
and stated that it hasn't b~en ch~11eng~d GO far. He suggested the
next step would be to r,~qu~:JG t "the Cf ty Eng:lneei.' to refe'r' plans to
the Planning and Zoning Bcaz'cL 'l'he Chair-Flc1n thought any request should
be made thI"ough the City Mil; ,~Jge1." ~ 'l'he Planner read for the Board f s in-
formation paragI"8ph in the I,' ffGt'('I;1e'i: pa't"'k:i.ng section 2 6-11A of the
present zoning ordinance as fellows:
(6) Design ar',d Cor~3t>,' (,t:l'. on
(b) No part of (:.:~? parkin$': r.~pa(:':~ shall be closer than (3)
feet to ;1ny ,,!~~tt'lblis!Jed st7',=et rlight of WilY or alley
lin€~,o Ii'! C;)::":~ "~h>3 p.:::'-'k:i.ng lot r:tdjoins any "Rn distI"ict~
it shall be :; 8t back a.t le':r"T'': (5) five feet 'from the
URn district bOl:l1dary and !::;11al1 be effectively screened
by planting :,'!' fencing.
,,,) Aftg,~~-Jtlf!.~~j..mJ.~_}j~~ .J\~e9 e _IEEX..tg9.,.. tb.?j:n,.!h~_.9_l1~,.~rm.'!1J,_ 'll.:cQ.9..:t...2_J..eu.e:c
~~gf}X._'C.~<1~nn.8...!hi!:t_p.l~!1~__tQr._.2.1.1...JEtrtW.f.....l0..tg~.Q~-...
P &tZ Dd Minutes
3/31/64 Pge g4
~ .~!w.!.~t~...9__ to th2.J~..1 ~!min.s_illl~~2:.E~J}.;us.,~~9~~:S~PE2.!...e;:. !:tl)l1.L...l! ~ R~:.oya l_..R.L
!l;l~- .c~ t~,...tn~.l:.t--tJi,r,;....,mStt;9!l.,_.!!.!!s..o_n_9.9} ~"J2~:..J!:lJJ1n,ds.r~. '~a.a t!~!!..f!~
,-...,
. . ~
. .'
\.)
" ,.
: ".
, ,
.'
I' '
, Ymm~1:l..
SIGN ORDINANCE PROPOSALS - DISCUSSION (CONTINUED FROM 2/20/64} -
-~~ ~..... A JII.l~~"'~~____~fIfL-""'._ ."'t....,._.............-__..._._ ....4.... R ."'r ~~...., r ~ ......
'H1'o Wolle discussed with Llcmbera a numhclr'of ideas and proposals for
sign ordinance revision and submitted illustrative material for studyw
Reference was made to prior' revim.J of :SvIM! of the proposals. He
pointed out as one deficiency of: the fs:x"Lsting or'dinance a lack of
limitation in size of cl poi.nt of PUl:'Cha.l;e B.tgn~ Various questions
were answered and suggestions offered" It \iaS :finally agre~d tl:1at
the Plannel' and Mr.. Mylander Hould sele'~t a sign ordinance from a
city compar"able to Clearwater. :i.n order' that the Board may review pro-
, I
!
1
, i
,
I
,
j
1
I
I
I
l
!
!
visions ,that might be applicable for a.cbption.
~~t~.t.!~ d . U~1.i.:i.1I:.s~_.n,~-'it,.!n~rt:!.J;12. '.
, P~anning lite~ature was distributed:
To Subdivision Cornmi."l':tee - "Planned Un.i. t Development"
Further conaidera!.i.2ll...
.-. u.._.............--..-'1. ... ~ R
-To Housing Committee
General
_ UUc.,using Nanifcsto"
- Florida Developm(,~l t Newsletter
,)
i
l
\
The meeting was adjourned at 5: 15 P ~ 1-10
Respectfully submi.tted,
"
~' _~~W~ .
ack r:~\VOj'J:.e~' S'ec'y-...-".'--
, ity Planner
v
".
I
"