02/25/1964
':"', ,:'.1 :,' ~" .'::~' '~:'It::-\,',/,~,':,::~:,~\,.".,'L '+;:'.:::: .::'::.:::: :'.:',J ". :\.l.,:,:;'..',",":..,:',':.':,...+!':':.~,.,\;:1-;, :.\< .:' .""""~~'~'/~',~, 11".',', : .'1- ',':"~,.......~~," .,,~ .'.~.~', .,,:{,.,:.:,",..~.~:, '::'\/',~:~~':;'.', :.',~ ~ ',::.'~, ,,':"::':,~,l';:':' "~:':"'.\:~~'.,~
THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
/1
t~
Minutes of the l1eeting, 'l'ueoday, rebx'\.1cn~y 25, 1964
The meeting was called to order at 3:00 P., r'L by tho Chairman,
Mr.. Kruse.. P1"t'!sent were Hembsl"'s Reade, Hylandel.'\, \+lilliama, Hilvriea
and Galloway, Mr~ Rettig of,the Engineet"illg Department:, and HI'~ WollfJ~
~-....\ .
, ZONING CHANG~S'l" Z-5-264 .. CLEARi'1ATER MEDICAL .aB.::r.S I~~~
if..FEJt~::1m.~;L~rl13K1[t-.!.WLBQffiTI1<[~M:~...BTr]8S..T--
gm;.J)F lU!lli.I&liD....a~t...k~m!.W;.....tt_P.A~RrUJ;l..r...HAW.1Uin;.~.s.Qli-CJ.ll~~.-
l1AIfll,..l....e..au.I_~_:tli....'Q.~l;..TJL~- 111'. ~ol e expla1ned that the eX,~l:1ting med1cnl
canteY' was established ~s an exception '-'ri th BI AI A approval and that ap-
parently applicants iritend to have more flexibility in usa of the land.
Zoning 'to the north was described as R_l~., and OIl the Hest side of High-
land Ave.. opposi.te as PRS. A site sketcl'L :3,ubmii:ted by the applj,cant
was passed to the BoaI'd.. M)~~ Rettig explai.ned that thf:Jrc is no north-
sQu~h street extension on the east side of the property and pointed out
the location of a per'petual drainage, easement for t]le creek at the
eastel"ly boundary vlhich he felt \'lOuld serve to act as a buffer for' the
adjoining Gates Knoll single-family areau The Board discussed the
effect of the proposed zoning on these homes~ Reference was made to
uses pe~rnitted in the PRS ~oneQ Mr. Mylander. reported that the Planner
recommended the c.hange a.nd that he concuI'l?ed \'1:i:th his recommendation.
Mr. Wolle stated that he could not find any strong point of objection;
"
"
further> tha1: he had discussed the application with all Zoning Committee
membez,s and none had registered objection, Mr" Reade inquired as to
the intended use of the property" Hr.. Holle read reaGons for request
as atatl~d in application as f0110'V18 ~ llRezoning to conform to existing
land use, which is compatible with adjacent zoning".
j"
~~9tl-.2U.h~JQU.!o.,tt..9.21.l}!l\~_t!~~_r~2.~~~l.~_~.~_!~.t._t.h.~~!:~q}~~~.t....D.s:_JUt:._-
R.~~_...11:r-s-.B~!J~...1!I.:?~v.~~.9_t.h~\.t_SJ:1&LS~m?~!:t!it~~'i.~ r~~.9J1lJ!l~D.ft~!iQn_.t.Q_iJ.g~rn..'t~
~~_~.:t....f,QJZ..J'...h9J1Zft....tQ..~~~E~Lz~Q.Di.UE.J~y_~G.l.Q.\3J~iBt~~ ~~1'~l;,1tpJ1 J._ ,A 1;.'~t~~_.lrl.~'h~'
,
.~.,)
'If'~s..~..~ --'5 - 2.fi.!.tL.Q.~__qv.p.x.Qj:..t"; Q,~~_J1 jJ?. ~.l!!D:tL9.f).,.L. .,g. ~q.9..n!L~~g .J2:1.JiC~~,_H.D.r,ci~~, ot--.td~R.
J?.~g.lO.. Upon inquiry by Mz'. Ratti g 1 the PI anl1er infol''1mcr] the B()ard
t~
.'....-........
"
-'
\~
. c" '
r,',
P E Z Dd Minut~c
PaRe N'l
? /? S I (i 11
of PRS 7.one requirement c,lf 10 ~OOO sq. ft. mll1,hnlln "'U"~i.\ and for plan
1:0 be nubmittod to the Plett',) ing nnd Zoning Hoard :i f t!lY'ea fa more them
2 acres.' Mr. Rettig HUgg.eZ1 tad thn t i f th~, i.ntent io to sall off som~
of the sUbject property tiH:Y el10uld file plat. The Chail"'llwn requested
the Planne~ to ~eek informHtion 89 ~o th~ applicant's intended U8e.
, Th ~..ll o.~._LCl.t~ 1.)~~!!lt;lrl9....:!1 t~...!.~P"y'~,,~!l9j;.i.'?1! J~~~ ".?d(lQ~Jlg~~1>.r..Q~d9..~..Q.,..tll9..t._.Lf
!..~_.in.:t;.mt.....Q!......th~_pqo/.n..Y;J.~~._i" ft'M:kQ ..~U! luJiy.~.4..g" ".,:,tlJ ~1:....Rl~tJ~t~_%JlbmL1;.1i.~;;.s1 u .
, ZON:r~lG CHANGE REQUES'!' Z-S...26'l} - MARIO Dr MEO - FR0r1 11'.-2 '1'0 R-.I~
(N OR TBl21r"'t'1;m-or'-Cn'F"Y""1~ti5ci<'-23-''AN:;r~l)r;1A~1'AifK-S'trBjjrJIsf.6F1:~--
~Jg\J~Qg~rClli""I.':'~~!JJ.g~~:t~3~.Q[mrE:::9L.fQiHt;E~:'?if'.::&!IP=fi\~c;f~~iJ;.Vx.:::;
'Reason for> request as stt1tnd :tn ap!,llicaotion N'ilS n.to remodel garages
. i.nto apaY'tmentu. Hr.. \'I'011'3! dism:'ibed surrounding land usa, generally
as single-family 'h~i th Oo.Ci.l;~ tonyl noneon forming "third unit on' a lot.
Mr~ Mylander reported that the Plannev r.eco~~ends disapp~ovaland that
he personally concurred wi. ';-:h his l",;comm(:1ncla'ti.on" Mr~ \'lolle reported
as r~asons for disapproval that rezoning would establish policy and
a legal incl"eas~ in (hmsi t)~ \>1hich would promote and pernd t extensive
add! tions to oldel"' structu'Y.'es Hi thout rehabi Ii tatioTl :for existing oc-
cupancy; f1.1t'\ther tfla.t in d:Lncuss2on \~i tl1 Zoning Committee Chairman
Galloway., both agreed thu:t apprqvill of thi.s request would lead to a
rapid conversion of the al"'i:':t1 which they f.(~l t was unde,sit'Ztble. A
~e-1?prt _giJ~_~smiD.fl.,.~.Q.I1_u.!l.-i:t::t~~ __r..~.9,ql.!!W..~i2~-9.2...j;2~t,j:b~".!~9.!!~ E.!."p_e~.Jl~ :'_..
, ,
~'ad.....~Ur.......Jl~~~tuJll.9.~f$1.~~, ' .tJE~t. .!h.~.~.uE.~g, qn'JilElD.llt\. t 5,,9!1.._qL_tJ:ill.....:k9J0.nft-.J:~Qm~....~
mi.:t.t.fta...a.e.....$lqr~.9j:~,<L_illJJi....tl).i!:i, ~.:thtL.D..~~.J!.:..rL;~~ C}.'") iJ!.l~qr.I;..~\ti.,~~1P. p'cQ~~al_Q.f_,app,li"";-~
, Aat..t.t..QIL..f~QbJv.lS'J.t _iL;.9.D.~. n r' .~ R_r!::.~,l.~. Eo ,\;._ 1; D.~. Ji !lJ':th. .l?.,~L....~g,t~QJ~...L.Q:h... .1.~_.
, Jll.o.r,JL.2.a.h-JjiJ..gn.Qli.a_.Eg.ci;.~..S.I,F!0:;i.sl8..t~;:I....i.c;.....1.~~ ...~~ ;:,.!~::?.6.,1J l, .J.1' i,?_ ,wl!2!igD.~
~~~!:.t.9.Y_l-k:.:~Jji.:~.1:'lq..!I!f~~'t.....\,'~:~I":LiJtl.~~g,.::.._
1',
.',.':.1;.:....,',.,' 1.:'.",< ,!,::',..:.,I'; ,:l~':,~'::'f:':I"""" "1<' ';" :. ',,:,,' ::: ",' ::',"'~,' ":',~'''..~,: ',~,.,~,\,.'.,:.,,'" I,~: t'."":",~,',~~:'::',~..~~."". :';'~':~'<''',:. {~,.: ;',",~t"~~:\>: ~,\"'.">:";',,:':'{, ;,. ~~:,..",."f,~ ~ "f:,::I'~::.'~", :,~:+,:.":.:,~::, ""'~\".
P & Z Rd. Minutes
7/?5N'jQ
Pa~fJ #3
im UEST ZONIUG ORTrrNAHCl~ CHANGE .. ZOR-l. ^~1E:ND SECTION 20-11 (} l_
SCHED J' r-r:~lf A'fJlr1311Y1D1Tnj'-ITE1~TJLA'.t;f'O"[s:.'_._"'--'--'-'h'''v_-",...--...~ ,'~
~ ..-- .............~..... . .-..-~~~.._-..~.. ~.--.-..._.-..--..~...--.....~ '
~
R.1C Roar Setback
R~lD Rear Setback
to 15 feet
to 10 fue.'t
OnCOl"ncr lots, ehang(! side otr.~et
lot line setbac.k from ?G fect .to, 20 ff:et
in both R-1C and R-1D
~Jm.:1J...9.!l..!!..t..:.-....Y1iill,p..m._@~... ~~~S!;\e.\lE.1}. ·
Chairman Kruse read the following l."aason for l"CqUHI1,+t as stated in ap-
plication:
"Applicant is dev~loper' of ;.!t:,rningside ESt~1h1G and upon expet":ience and
contact wi th many' bufJ.ders ~,nd developers.. he f~'e19 that R-1C and R-l D
setback restrictions are ton restrictive according to market demands
t1nd change should be appli(;!\~ to total city R-1C and R-1D. U
It was confirmed by 'the P1 aflfHn" thi\t at pre!Jent R-1C and R-1D rear set-
backs are 20 ft. and that B ::.hce such setback.s were established seveT'al
years ago, new plats h.:!,ve 1~'(:~cognized t-rlese 1:"equi x'Cfllents r.:lnd in most
cases have plat.ted above thl~ mi.niDlum~ Hc-: g,llva additional infonnation
tha't all the lots in Horninwdde Estates run from 70 to 0.5' wide and
100' in depth, permittil1g cttJout 55 ft. depth in a house on a 100' deep
lot.. t.fr. {~olle pointed out that the dec:t,siol1 to be made NaB what the
Board wo\\ld consider- as th.;~ lninimurn requi.rement in the F.-l'O classifica-
tion
lOr1est resio0nti.aJ classi ficat:l.on not-l applicable for new
,\,
pIc L:ting ana annexations ~ 'r'he Board ~las reminded that R-IE zoning is
only given to anne~at'ions involving exiatin,g pl.;!,tt'ed lots that conform
to R-IE requirements (usually a,djoining exisi:ing R~lE zoned ~ubdiv:i.-
sions) . 'l'he Planne1." 8.tat~d that he woul(! no\: obj act to change to a
15 ft. rear' setback in R..ID
Fo~ the Boa~dY~ info~matjon, he reviewed
the County I s zoning regulatj ons conCe'flfli:1!? lot and b~dlding r>equire-
menta for' J:'f:sidential diat'j,"'icts. I-1embeT's >:'ICl"e in fOl'>rned tha t Mr. AI.ack-
burn had request~d to appeal" befo7.'s the Boat"'d H1. t11 some other buildel"'s
\ '
\......,..; and/or 'developers. He recommend(::d .tha t i:he Board Hithhold action until
,after discussion Hi th these partie8. b.f1!:..~__~.2!!.l.~.""prltl!J!!J:.rEH:~y__g1E~9.1:!,~.t<2.!l.t.
!h;.~...ivi~.Qs2..t~.m..Jg,.g~~,.g,~~,r.!"~}2_,P!'~].1A.l)fJ...~~~!S:J+, .E.~.~t~~!.~rtc:,~~, .
r
P & Z Bd Minut~ef)
2/25/64
Page fl4
Z-P...2 (PLAHNING RECOHll!,~t!nNL'IOlO 'l'RIAtlGl.lE NORTH or J\CJ, nR EAST
or M tfLrAVJ~':-S1){f.f"{r~"~)rf {A'f,: ':: 11i\t:J~-:-zON'1'N('f.CH^trGEttj:[oA~.1fipr'~"M1-~G-" ~,_._.
pJ:.~~~_ ...._:..J,.......tr:=..-1't-l.1~.......I.'" 'I;..t ~.._I,..._~'_~ t,..... __....... .."'_.........__~~"......_~~~._..,.,_..-.......-...........t...'Ii___J::Q..~.
~~..J.ttJ.S.1.1:lli.~~...- nt'. 't'H~ .e 1~>;'p..1i11nat"1 ~a l"(NmCn~, rOt" toe pr.oposod zoning
~ of thiB property 'back to bUG~I,n(-HH):
1. Thi\t although t,he T~.}tl-\l trianglE! hi1S b~H;:J1 in Hfg~ zoni.ng for
a considerl.1ble ti,Hl"~ I its development has been largely resi...
dential"
'2.. That an existing tE;.(..'! by an en8i,II(H~t'il\g 4~once:r.n fol" storage of
construction equipnH;!;r..t would not be prohibited i.n a Business
zone (attentic!'\ H.;l:~ l::al1ed "to a p:ropol1al for screening of
a~o~a8e yards in B ~onco incl~ded in Item 13 of today's
agendao)
3.. ,That mfg" convorsi 01'1 Wi18 not rH~(,",dr~d for' this ;)rea; Business
zoning and \\l'ti'M..t(,:~ land ,,~:!~ is morn appropriate 1 considering
traffic l.l.nd h:i.ghlol,:1:~' dlJvelt1prnent trl?nd. '
In Board discussion of th~ R~,"'~C1 '1 com~'itent t.>1as mado by one m-smber 'that
manufacturing sites need to J.(h~a:i;e on ?.1 l~a,\lroad and that one obj ection
"
..
would be that the chanf::E:: in ~t1n5.ng to1ould male.:? -the rail't."oad of no value
'to the property u In r>eply, !-h;".. Holle expressed the opinion that the
Ci ty had a surplus of ~fB. 4~~}P :i.ng~ !!P..2!:..E:..?~~is:.D...E.~_t:!!::..1!.q~i-.1i~..:tJ?e..ttQD..d..e.d.-
~1~~tt~!l-!!S':..e.,;:.cL..~,9.!~<;L..t....q,.SJl.Qg.1~!I!~.n.cJ.~.9,h~J1~~t2...~ij~1_.llu~.s.-_
. '71"\1'\; 'nCJ ~""nm t.(~~ '~('\y\ c..;;p+-t ~'n~,::d 't:,..; i"lna' ~ r C;':;;.e 2-'0...>) \
1~~~~~~.....,..-,.~,.....{~i:........:x:..7...:~/~. ...~.. l.a..:s.t'at.t...~N..A...c.,~__~_t.......'tJ.""';".~"''''''''''''';'~f...(Ji",",,-W''''
Z-p- 3 (PLANtrING RECOHrn:;HDATION) REZONING Ot' HH PARKS IN CI'!'Y
NOT : No\TZ6~En.'frn-Bt1TT.ffi1I'"CH--'~rC\lJCD""~A1!CJ.:P"'f'~ffirlJRoVYYS'ET5Aiffi'iiTroN OF '-b-~...
..-..-...- ..... ..-.J 1 1 -.____.......~...tL,.__._....."... r... I......l...--..-...........,._....~_. f ...."*Ir-........,...~....~....--....... ............,. ..................---.,...___~~
qONX9R1IDI2._~19J:L..f.Q.1jIg:rIRlr .J..Bgf..~,Bf~t{Cf,~ T.Q...'l!:.:.Q.;:,JJLV.1.
'(
(1) Belmont Trailer Park
(2) Glen Ellen NH Pit!'}:
(3) Clean'later Tr'ail er Pc'lrk
(4) Lakeside Trai:!.el' Pm"k
(5) Plaza Pines DR P~l~
B to MH
R-1E to Nfl
R-1E to tiff
'R-M & R-1E to MH
R-IE to MH
The Planner reported "thi't'i::
The Board had pr-~~viou~] y app'!:"Cl'v'ed ...~~~ c~Jmm':md,rtioli fOT' a zoning
ordina'nce aJnendm~n'.: PJ: ;;:,l.rdi ng nonc0I: f,:':r.~m5.n g l:'est1~ictions (See
p g ZBd. Minutes of la/l0/63)"
"'''-"' ;
The Planning Offic2 h,.ld made sut'vcy 't":D:'':HJgh the Mobile Home Park
Association of those C I, '.:y parks h'hos<2 Ol,;ner!'J t.Jould not object
to the rezoning." Fout, nf the abe,'l/o five pa r'k Qwnera had pos i ti ve ly
indicated their Hillir.!,.!1ESS to acc(~pt .the !-it! Disi7r:ici; classifi-
cation based on passaf;'.8 of 'the nonCI')nfoT'ming restriction ?t'opoBal,_
He . had' no direct word fr'om the r...~~ke~dde Park ownel", Hho was out
of town, and if,she objects he will strike that park from the list.
2/2S/6l~
P & 'l. nd Minutes
Page 115
For those pa],'\ka with B t:om~d f:i:""n't.:lr.~t~, tlH~ change \015,11
invc)l VEl on ly tht! iit'~a b,..hind tbe tl an :f,one..
() Upon inqu:i.ry of Mr. Kruse, I'h', Hnlle co:mfir'mlfd thwt the: condi -ti.on of
nonconfo'('lmlng restrictions \;lOuld not CO\l~r\ dny ~~~!p,'1ndad a:rea.. H.t'",
Rettig questionad Whclt i:h~! ),~::. tUixt'ton !tumId bf? ld t:h HH zon5.of; if thes.e
t~ailer paI"ks wel"e disc(,)l1tiw\;;:,d I Re\,J..y. fY't"Yi" ~1t'. Wolle was that they
would ~henhave to ~eZOJle according to use. Mr. Rettig called ntten~ion
to the fact that soma of .thl:% .:;: p.::lt'ks ~lfH""~ :I'~Clned R.-1E wi 1:71 the UndeI'B'tand-
ins 'that if the trililer par'/~ lmf: ~.mrd di:sr.:oi"l'titnwd~ "the pl"OpeI1ty would
l\(lVcrt to R-1E zone use. rh~ noi:e':l tha"c '.vi th die continua.nce. of a use
under MH zoning the way t.,JI:>uId be open for' r'e~on:ing ~ poss~bJ.y to Busi..
nessQ AfteI' furth~r considri!:ri=lt.1.0n of tho!-: 'Pr'op"t.~al, !!!2J.L~Q...!'!.S!fLA.!U9,S.Ul-
, ~...J1r.. _Ha~i:~_~l-raf~9DQ!tg J2.Y~ l'1r'.,t...J~[YJJ1m.s!~.r.:..)',~,'!bi1.t_t~}l..11.Q.~~,.J~QJll}MM...1tl,a.:t:.._
.:tll!:-.~.uiJlp-9...f....tJ.llLil1?.mm..",fj"y~", LI.(.U:lt-9.......( ~X!Ll.l.l15j~~~~....Jt.e,~.':.T,\.~-'fxm1.tg.a....x:.e..tilitl.ad-l
, ,
~~~J..QK.1l:1ro~.Q12i..l.!.~.Jlon.\:._.'e..~'Ck'l-.. _tT.;i.,9._m.Q:t'j..\)1JMY.HUi....r.a~d.
CHAIRMAN'S ITEMS - Ch~~:i.l"nti~n Kruse anntiUnct-1d a seminar to be held '
---,-,~"~N,"__
at the University of SOllth Florid;'l 0:1 i1ur.c:h 5th under 'the =.ponsorship of
the Community De'lelopnlent: COl';,nd:ttee of .th(~ Clf1.arwu.ter e~hambeIJ, of Com-
, ,
"
merce and conducted by .the Flc)"l.ida Insti:tut!; of Continuing University
Studies" Bus transportation <:lnd lunGh ,.;C'uld bC1 supplied through the
, courtesy of the Seax's Roebuok roundatio:'1. .t)et;dls of program topics
'l
and speakers ~-lere given and iri:t<:mdanc:e by any interested members was
I"l!icornrnended..
~.ffi[!?!i~.J~?-fi9.~~.9.B,'~.~J... '., .:.:. ;:J~~,!.~g N ~"~I.L~.!~)~~" : ...~~ ?_:~~_~~~.~~~_:?l.~!R l.QI.~~
Reason given fOI" Jchis p:r.('IPC,!:'\;~' ~'lc~F.. t:'ldt 'i:h,'ce ;11\11 now no nUZIf zoned
a re as on' the z on i n g ma p v .Y.E ~?X~".fEg !~,~~ .J:!X ... ~~1:r.,.~,. "!i'~L~D_9.'?1,:,,.,.!L~9.QIlQQ.Q...P..)~_Jl't..
. ReC}.d~J..i.h~.~y'Qr&~<t..:t(L~' ~: ';' :-'j)~i)jgJ.1. d.~.I.l~ :! :;..tJ9.!~. ,.~{. ~~ E;!S.~._Z&.:::,?.
ZO AMENDMENT PROPOSAL '", :3CHEENING 0[' 8'rORAGE YAPDS nr II E" J.91U:.s__-
r.....b.. ~ _______....,~_...."".~ I.-~.... "- _~_I... ............~ ._._....*,_.....Ii-..__.____.po,.~ _.~-~--..-,.._-- ...-
, ,
y
ThE: Planner read to the Board a :Jaragt'apn Hhich he pl~oposed 'to be
added. Upon advice of r-1:ro, Nylande~ tha"t the content Has too g,~neral
"
P & Z Bd Minutes
? / 2 S / 6 I.
Page fl6
and too indefinite to be conBti-::l\tio1!f11l and that it ohould bi!) dropped,
and concUi"rence in this opinl on b~ ml~~mbt!1:"8, Sl.~!L,.ll.911!SL~~...e..Q......~D-~linLL::.
P'"", !l..C!- te lili~,..J2.~.n.Q:~~,d...JH!r.iJ.\.tti!.P.h....Jf2!?JD~),j 9. .:t,.Jt:f ~..!~~.:,;\;LlJ!)Jlg.s_f.1m~!I.dm~!I.:ts _...t2....D..L
J:f',..~.mm~.:tb.(}~p~qOLt,~li~r...r.
~.9..!~1!DMEN!..~!9.!:.<2.~~..,::.._~~.1~!.tlM~_~9!..~Sgl,~.~'~~,..Y.E..!1121f.g.-!.~~~~!.illl~T.!b.L
~2N~~~_- _ Chairman K~se e'fp'lid nl?O th.~!'i: this ;.1:mn was just put on the
agenda foX' diacussit.,n becal.]~1f!~ r;..f compla.ints th(.'l,t ha~/I~ been received. He
reported that i.n dhlcussion with City Ai:tor~nHY Brown, Mrv Brown, told him
that you' can tt prevent a man fron; (H1I'ning 1ds li1..'elihood and 'can 't stop
him from parking in hi.s 0\010 ci;"Ii ve\olay . Hr>. i-':ett.ig' informec] the Bca.rd of
existing Ci.ty l"legulation of cur!::s.tde parking" Discussion showed the
cOt:1sensus to be that cont,:-ol of par.~~ing of comml~t1oial vehicles in resi-
dential zones through a z.<.m:.!!f,!. regul,tJ.ticn o;,1ould not be w~rkable, ~nd_
the~.~oat'(t .C!E~!llL..!.<L~.~~~j,~~~1~?R2~L~!:~}~k~_?.f. ElT!4!!~ q?:g;.np.tlg~
amendment's to be l"lecommended,
-- ,,~ "~-"............... ~ ....-..........-.-....-~"""...._~-.....-'_--..""~-,......
~ . ~....I'
PLANNER'S ITEMS:,
'~ff:"~1~~~E..E.~~.ct!)l:~! ... Th"J Pianl'wr' in formed the Board of, an
inquil;\Y by Mt'~ Baskin) Sr'. ~ toA?st _ City At't<n'ney Kennedy concerning' a
site on South Ft. Ha1."'l..:i.son !\v~" f1!;!i'!r tjv..~ ltO~lsis1f CUBlI zoned property)
for possible relocation of the Gulf Packaging Company'g paper box op~I'a-
tion. 'Hr.. Wolle f'Ut.,tlleI' reJ.i.>:';e(' tha'~ upon rcql.11;~st)> he had advised Hr.
Kennedy that the proposed use according to the Standard Industrial
Classification l1anual ohould he in ~l manuf~(."1.:uring zone and that he ~Quld
classify it as manufa ctn::".ing_
r:t-! 1'1:' ,[, "'!" (.,,' ',-,oz,('l"1 p.t
f; . I" '\.. IL.... ~ J~ ,"_I .. ... ~
of a copy of HI' ~
Kenn.edy's letter to t1r~ BaHf.in :i)\ I{,!"'.ich ~\':'. Kt:nnedy rendered the opinion
that the proposed ,use vlould ...equire th~ t tIl'; p:('.::,:>perty be in an "M" Dis-
might
t:rict r'athel' than a "Bu Di~ t:':'ic:.: . ~'~-:'. ~~,~~ 1,: I: ti:'lteo -tnat this inquiry I
t,
, "!":..1t,.fWI.1
",
'; :,,' :"..., ~,':,\.,~..:.,.~l....'::.:,..,... ',>" ':;"",:,':.':.~:'.,,:': ;.,,'.::..,......,:,.\.'::'.: .....'.;,'.',J.~<.:,',...,'.'~,.:.,:.:(:::":.:,:..,',':~,:,:",~: ~<,...,...'~-'"'....".::.".,,.:'::,',.,:, ,'. '.,'.: '..'...'..:::.:'.:..::.'..:
,;
p (; Z Bd Minutes
2125/64
Fane 17
possibly lead to a rezoning applioationA
Chll,i1"milll )(tllJ~O expressed hi.s
" "
..
~
", '
approval of the stand tliken lly Ml'~ Nolle in'this matter~
'The' meeting was ;.\d:io~1::'ned i\t 5:0liP. 11~
'Respectful~y submitt9d~
, ,
"
, ,
~"'-:':"~"W"~ ,"
. c -.:f~.,Vorro~ Sec"Y-w~
, itY PlanheX', "
, ..
., ~ J
\.>"
, 'I
,
"f ,.
','
~:' .
'I' '
.</ '
'>;, "
~. ", I :
, ,~.
l. " ~
);.',,:,.;';",\
, ,t: '
"',
f. '-." L"
.1', ,
" .' ~.
',.,c ,'t".. .
",/,
~"L ~
'" ..,'~ -- :.,
'. .'. I '
~,;.~ ',.1. \ , :<
~~ir<j' , "
:.~.~~,> ;: ,-
',' \....
, '
" ."1
,,,
.J
'::',
" .
." "
I . ~ ,
, 1
" ,
~ ' b
,. :
", , ..
" ,
',i
, ~ .
<.. " ,
::c ': .
'i;"'. .
,t.. .
.\';.,'.
~ ,:.". ~
ir~'.~ ,
~::,?
" ,
, '
!, :
"."j.
, "
,~ .'
" '
"" 'j ',..
, I
':1
\ ,.'
.. ,\
i";':
'. to ". ~ ,
, . ^
, , ,
~
,~j ,
"
, ,',
; ,)
I. ',.
.: ,
:'
;". .'
.\
.,\l
,I:'t
, '
-\
"....
. ..
, ,
{, t
I'!
:>'tl,' :'
~~K
[~V":<. ~ ;1. I,' <' ~.. > I .
t'; :::', I /. ,
'.. '.:..." ,'I
~:(,,;<~,:l " ;,'
~1~~::~~ '~.;' ,:: ~ ;',
.',
I'
!