04/30/1963
~:,...;. ~:. I ":'..', : .', - ~,"" .. '" ,~ .,,': ,", ; ~.' : : :.::". ,::.', .., .~: : '. ',',": " ~ ; ....: : ~:' :: ~ :. >.: :: ':, ':. .'...,..',~.; ",: .:' :. :";' : :..,1 '. /:;', ';,: '; ::' .,,'; ". :..' . / : ~:' l,:r :: t,,~ ".: ,',:: :" ."~ ..' I ;.'..1.' : :-: ',: ~ : -:': . i .i ,~ ~ ,.' .:', ". ~: :' .,:,' \ :": : ..~, :: :':',; ; ,'::: " ,;: I ".', ':',,' " ,,'." ~ ~: :. .... 'I :,~:::" ~ ":' ~ ". ' : '. ' ".:'. ';"~ " , '.:. . '..
'rHl:: ZON1JH:l AND PLNlNING BO,.'\nD
V'~
Ninutcs of tho Hooting t 'flHHH]i.lY ~ t\pril 30. 1 n G 3. .J
, f~ l"'ltu meoting \Ii"!? ctlll(~d -to I.n~dep at ~J: on }J. ~t. by tlHO! ChLdl%iln,
Mt". Kl~use ~ PrrJsent we1....e Hcmbero HCf:trJe,. Ga-:=ca, HDr.'J.\i.~o. }(cHll1fJdy:>
th\J.loway and SHan ~ tll'.. Rott~i~~ of: the F.nr.inec.r.ing De p:J1:"t\ltfJnt,. \lnd It'!'.
Wolle.' The City Engineor joined the meeting at 3:20 P. M.
The appr'oval of thu minutes of J;pl"il 23,,1963,. ,Has defarI'nd be-
cause of a long agenda.
, . MASTER Pl~AN LA'lOUT - MORNINGS IDE ESTJ\'n~S ~ Pl.AN LA1<EVIEN EX...
.tBl!ll~:IB~q~'BWUl ;_Q[ilmTJ:TR-__ :...., ~~E'[@~~::Qf..Q.:rt!K!TfI"':-(Re1erenc;~: 1 u
made. to Zoning and Planning Board roinuteB of Apr23/63 concel".ni.ng Sub-
di vislon Cmnmi tte.c t s Repo't't) II Ci 1:y Engineer, Ha" Bat'tle ~ras present
by his request and explained his thr(!e reasons foX' h.is opposition to
the extension of LakevieH Road to US Hwy.. 19.
1.. Construotion cost - fhhich he named as the. less significant.
Problem of construction in the muck area v1hich was bvought
up at the last Board meeting he did not consider ~he real
iasu64
,-..,.
2 Co The main reason - that he is firmly con-vinced that you
shouldn't have another access off US 19 'chat close to
Gulf-to-Bay Blvdo
r'..
,(
34 Ifhe type of developmenT proposed - Thiu subdivision is in-
tended to attract as prospective buyers people such as
engineers and executives whose employment will most likely
be at Hone~'Well and other area indust!'ial plants.. Such
people will not be making frequent ,trips to downtown
Clearwater.
at 1~:25 P.. 11.. 111". ~lilliam Dlackbul:'n,. develope:r:-, and Mt'..
William Albrecht ~ engineer ror 'the developel"l,
were present to discuss t.Jii:h the Boa'l"d its
recommendation foI' revision, in master plan
submitted..
The Planner pointed out that the dis'tancr~ bettqeen Barre'tt Road and
Northeast Coachman Read (on US 19) Has idt:,mtical 1:0 the distance. between
, ;
Gulf-to-Bay Blvd.. and the plannr;;d La!<Gvieli Road aCCGS3 point.. NI' 1
Kruse ear'lier commented that although Dr1uid Road eJ~tension to US 19
"J
.i
0.
'I
..
, .....J
zap Bd'Minutea
11/30/U3 Plige 112
Chait'man Kl"'usa ndvi.ocd thllt th~ Bc:mt"cl lt81"'C(~d to il fuX'ther 7:'0-
vie\~ of this masto:c" pl.nl'l ill ol'ckJI' that addi.tional fncta llliEht IJ8
presented foX' cons:I.der.:\tion. and in order to affot"d 'tho developer an
oppo~tunity to discuss with Boa~d members detnils of his propoDed plan.
Mr. Kruse gave! a brief historoy of thp. BOcl\"d r (3 Pl"oposals concerni,ng a
connector tCl tie-in with a pl"opf.:n=-~d IJ,~lul(~va'L"d along Tampa Bay. Refer-
ence was made to studies as X'€fJ.eH~to.d in the MR-l Plan and Major Street
Plan. He emphasized that the prime intent waD to get a bouleva~d to
US 19 and along 'fampa Bay and that t.,akeview "mG f!electod as the only
possible connector in that (1) NU:J:Iset'y Road ter'minatad 1:0 the west at
Highland Ave., and (2) the extension of Belleair Road would be diffi-
cult because of industrial development in the path of easte~ly align-
'ment. He stated tha~ presently there is no throughst~eet between
Gulf-to~Bay Blvd. and Belleair Road.
IW. Blackburn referred to the obstacle created by the muck aY'ea
to the west of Belcher Road~ Otherwise, he felt the street ndght be
ex1:ended (Mr. Reade informed him that the BoaI'd kneH about the muck).
He 'then stated there m~re two concessions he t.val3 goine to inal:e and
inquil"ed, uwhere else in the Citj.' of Clea!'l\'Iater can you bring in 160
acrGS and develop it into fi1:'st-class area?"
. .. Mr. Harries inquired a.s to what the obj ection hTould be to changing
the boulevard entrance off Belcher to one. block south~
Mr. Blackburn replied that mainly fOl" his sales pt'omotion he
wanted to hold i i: as in the original plan for' 1:11(: l"'sasons that:
1.. It, segt.egates areas designed for upper' claBs, middle class,
and l""etirees homes"
2. He doesn't want di~ect traffic f~om Lakeview e~~ension ~
into this subdivision s~~a~tv
30 He doesn't YBnt to have a division of his subdivision.
. .'
.-
Z 6 P Bd MirJUtt~a 'Jdtfi It/30/SJ Page g'll
'1'ho Chail'mtm in(lUil"ll9d if he would think it pl:"Opl'.n~ for iJ duvelOlH,n'
in aJ~ pa~t of the city to dHv~lcp hi~ property rcgnrdlass of 'any con-
,~" ll(~ction with any Rtreetg in thp.. gene'!'.11 pJ.nn of th~ c:L ty ~ SOmfJ of these
stl"'!;lets, he pointed out ~ have: t'J ~~(J thl'()ugh some of thc~~ pr~)perties"
. '.-....
'-..........
He stated that the BotlI'a had the ,lntf,~x'f:r.:t of the city a:t hl~.'1J:lt, as Wt~ll
as the interest, of the d(";v(~lopm_'" and \~aB trying to evolve some GC~leme
of roads that lrdll best seI'VG the pu.hlic~ He infoI.'med the. applicants
that it Has the Board's intent regavding this lal'gc tract to try to
tie it in with the remainder of the c:i, ty ~
MI'. Battle informed the Board that in 'the rush of business before
the City ManageI" t-Ient out of town that, he did not knov] specifically ~.,hat
theHanager' 5 reasons' at"e, but that the City Manager and, the maj ori ty of
"the' Commission was convinced that they did not \1nni: Lakeview tied through.
Concerning arte:t'ial l"oads, Nt"" Albrecht felt they had a significant
impaot on the areas they t~ave~sed. He spoke in favor of a change to
the concept of arterial roads being every 1/2 mile or 1/4- mile. Nrs.
Reade pointed out that with fewe~ arteries, traffic would be heavier
on those remaining, since one a~~eriul road would neceDsarily have more
traffic, than if you. hava two or three roads to divide. the tl"'affic D As
"
a speoific exati!ple" he stated 'tha-:: ~ri '\:hout Lakeview as an a!"terial road,
troaffic would increase on Belleair and Uu'!'se1"'Y Roads, l-lhich also h,we
residential ereas~
111"'" Blaakburrn made rt:fin~ence "to UIl:""~f~(JI1ded plat aI'ea (\-lard Radgel"s)
on opposi. te sid,! of Belcher '; no~-:'th e..i' th.u Lr'Jk::!vir,fio' eXi;ensionA (County
.
recorda checked by the Planne:c' reveals additioBsl depth of lot on south
and building setbac), 75 feet from the: pt"loposed c~nte~"'J.ine of a
possible LakevielY' extension.) C(mct~rninG the :t'(~dE:sign as Pl"'oposad by
'the, Bo'aI'd, Mr~ Blackburn 5tatf~,d tha't it uould "aestroy his conee. pt of
',.J a community a!'sa fOLl r~3iden.tial }?ul"'j)o3es 0 He appeared agT.'eeable to a
change in 'cuJ:v,a on Harn Blvd.. as su!Se~~G,'ted in a pl:'iol:' conva1."'sa:tion '..d th
~I:" .... ,-'.. . ;"". . .,", / ",,;.;.,:; '.' ,\':, i., " ': ,,' ..~: .: .. .. .... ..: L ~ j." ;, :':: :,: ,: .: " ,,' ;'j , ':;.. \\, I,: " "::.': ,.:-',: : / ;, :.: '; ::'~ I :'. i: \'.'" ~.,: "i '.~;' . ~ :>, , '. '.",,:'.'..,:~ :,;.' > :-. i :....; t....., " ,'1.. ",' " .; :': '-: ~',' '\' .... ":: ;, :" . ,,' .' : . ".... ~, ' p': " " :.': ~\ I..., '~ ,I: :::.: ..;'::: :""
Z & IJ Bd Hinnt<:\t\
11/30lG:~
Pdg<\ I;I~
Hr. \l/olle. Th<n'o i'ollO\'ll~O S~rJ':!. (1] DCUfHdon of cJn 1.d(.~I:\ 5uegc8't(l,r) by
.r'\
Hv.. Albl"ocht that oonsidcI'r:.\tioll m:i.p,tl'i.: .be gi,v.:~n to the t'(:.aliemnan1: of
the cas'l.:el"'ly G"tension of La kft vim..' (f't'om its pI'csent t~'.1:,miJllJ.o) to Belcher
T(oad to be further north t.J'1111\"I:. th~ muck deposit repo)~tedly .to aht111owar.
Hl". Reade again e~<prassed tlw, opinion that the only thing the BOlll:\d 1 S
redesign proposal v,ould affect to/()uld' be the di.~Jposition of the lots
by price. levels.
.At: this time, 1:he Chai,:=man restated the main issue of discussion ~
"lhe.thaI' the boulevard should Gliter the StJbdivision as ot.iginally planned
Qr be located to the. south opposi,te Lukeviev7 Extended. 'r'he developer'
indicated a willingness,to efiec~ a compromise whereby he would change
CUI've of the boulevavd imd tel'Iilinutl? it to the east further south .than
in the Board's sugges~ed redesign~ Upon inquiry~ he 5ta~ed the ~ight-
of-way width "'auld be 30 ft. \l1i th a parkl.vay in cent S 1'" .
4 ~ 25 P.. M. The Subdivision Committee ,d; this time went .:i.nto
executive session and then vetu~nad ~o the meeting.
-~,
!
,
........./
I.
4: 30 P.. 11.. 'fhe applicants were eJc(lused from the meeting.. Mr"
Reade announced "that Hr~ Har~ies would give the
Committee's raport, as it was necessary that he
leave at this ,time.
~x;..i.- e~ .~~:r:!=,!;E....tl)..c3;:t... ~ Sq!.?~~!i ~!..2!'L..~~~tS.e~.r~commen_qed ~'t...
s.~~~~~~1.~~!.J1<?!'...ll~~...i..2.~~~~_~_!!P..P.J;.'9~9~~~~ill!.L.:t~
~m.6S~~.<2...J?..E!rmi .:L.L~.Y.!!.~~~_c.l-ID!L12.J~.]2!!1~:,{~.r.sL.l?t..9Y idilllJ .traLf._~_c ,,-t Q
. ea,sterly
~t!...~~ L wi.1:1ti..n. a._'Lgrrtin.l!.~~~_!.fL..fj;.~~;:~'It-...2!.-:l"'2;.Y..~t~.~!:gp.lY.m.g.,tt-
E.~:lU Il~r...v_.2.LJl1,e_..JE29Eo~~.cLR:-L~:t __~ll~:..mr1!:~.n1i_!d~..!'~.sQr.illt9...il!L...D..rgJJ-JD.2llil,"~Y..r;
!?.lan ~. -: E,.~~vI;1.n ,j.P.B. ..2:tU2!LS.Qp.Yl. 11:c..,.... ,ii~:Ji!.1.~...l!I~r~!..t .,j"..':l-~~...eJtt.....:tl't:~~e.p.Q..t.t..6:-
+1-.... ~nl-.r'f.;u.;c;,.n r"''''mm;t-1-~':l f..l.j~ n.....4.".. .....c.,.'''r'lr'n'~)-)v MY' K",,,,,'c. Iv' f.l"':co
_~~~\O.:W~",-....,~~Q1.. J~.n.\lHW~~~~.I6.Q............_1.-" ~rn....... ....t...~. ~~.. ~~ .i....r~.....,...,,;.- ~.i...). ...,.tl~T'l;.......-.irt.-....~w........t~'.J.~.....-__....t.l".4..~iltorU':J~-Ut4<&:..r~....
~~~e~.E!!~}~.9.2el:(d
The a,pplicants I"etuJ:ln~d to the l'l.tt:.H.l'ting and ,.(ere infDl'\W;:)d of the
Board's 1:'12commendation... Hr... BlaektHil:'ll lldvised that 60' acres of the
'..-...'
total of 160 acr'Ge ~Jould be:: in'.Y(;)lv~-;(l in 'i:.tl':i fit'r.t inte.n-:': for ~nnexation
to be fi le.d ~
,--
4', f; P Bd Hinutt.!G
IU30/03
P,':tgc jJ 5
t-'"
~'hQ question of a r-wcond tie-i n to tht;) nn:t'l:h "1i th .th~ plwt of
N€~adOt-ls SUbdivision, Unit f}'1 s \UUl hrol1~:ht up hy tho appl:i.cantD ~ T.ho
t'1l<:dl"\Jnnn advised that upon' final re,vim.l of tl\in plat: ~ this matter
would be consideredu
ZONING FOR AUNEXATION ... HORNINGSl'DE ESTATES... Zoning request \flaS
-~<r..vr~""" Jl....III-...-....._____....,.,..~___i:.........,.,.........~~.._v~...~___.~
a"plained as sho't'1n on plll.n as R-1D and R'-2 fot' platted sinBle family
and duplex areas. R-H for Jl\ul t.i..family and community club and J:'ccY."ea-
tion area, and "all. Business" for commot'cial area, f!'lontage on Nursery
Road.. N~.. Albrecht advised that the requested annemJ.tion al."ea was
p~edominantlY zoned A-2) Small FarInG~ in the County (exception is a
portion of County C-2, Commercial, f~ontagl:: 011 Nurser.).' Road). H1:'..
Blackburn indicated they had no pro!!scnt plans for the al~ea that is to be
zoned fo'!' business; but t~ould' like it "'co be 'as versatile as possible ~
,Applicants informed the Board of anticipated development of the R-N
zone to, include a community club (m~eting ~oom, ~ecreational facilities
such as swimming pool and shuffleboa~d courts, concession operations,
etc.). It was lea!~ed that consideration was also being given to
a rela:ted apartntent coznple.x" Applico.nts felt that R...M' zoning classifi-
cation would be more appropriate than R-1t zoning classification (proposed
by -the Planner) fo!' .these ani:icipa:ted \lues. ThF. Pl<lnn~r dnsCl"ibed the
zoning and land uses in the. County ClY.'(~a on the north and south side of
Nurse:r.y Road in .th(~ vicinity of the l"'C'=!qucsted US" zoning.
After BOrne
-~"'~~--.
di,~...cIJ.S ~i2~2L.,.t!E,~I~~l~X...!'flll_~ ~!.~,.!.!;g..!-..:t:D~. ~kll~:~Ji..,g2.mm:'h:t~JUL.!f'~.f?!J)ln~~9..~.9.
il~~~....'!'~l).!.!llLE~~.l2P.FQY.~cL...t:.~_~.~~~~E_LI}.....:!:. ~B~...:1.Sm.t~Ji..1?1&..I}~l!R.l!t~sl..
!l&Ol1 .lnQ..tign....P..:iL::b;\~~ifla~~lg.P.n.d~~.q"J1Y..tf.t:,':"....&.~t~r'-i._,th.f~....~ar-1..J!.Q.t~.d
~~t ttt..~...~e..2..~.1L'S!.sm.._9~,t..:tQS_~9!.t}1l~.-,9.~i,t.1:~~"
It t-las arr-anged that I>lr. Albrecht, would pl~epcl!'e a revised mastel'
....J plan incoX"poX'ating the changes ~ ot'J. approved" for the record..
'I.. ~t P Bel MinutoB
4/90/63 puge #6
ZONING fOR GURTIS PfWP1:R'I',( (^tlNf~XATION) - GE~n-:H^I.. LOCNl'ION:
l!llilt~illmIT:g1m1t.~"~.1!Y.:.r;zR[:zm)l:1-7ili1~lW:li12Bf~11!!i1f~~DJ~:DL.trJ._ -
f~
RequeatQd'~oninRt
!:xinting :.:ouing:
nnll, l3usincflD.
County C-2.. CommGl"'cial.
. r...-.......,
In dlsousait'>n ! t wan b1"CI~lght out 'that:
Property ir;J in' a COt~er of Plaza pinee Trailer" ParJr, site, '
which WM annexed ,to the city with a R-l zoni.ng (non-conforming
use). ' .
The ownership is aepat'ate II'orn that of the TraileJ:' Park.
Berty Lane immediatelY north of pX'ope!'ty to be annexed
haa 30 f1:. cast rigllt~'of-wa.y adj oining Ardmore Subdivision
(County Subdivision) and 20 ft.. tflcst right-of..",ay adjoining
, tra.iler park 61 te - Planner Pl'Joposed that applicant should
dedicate 20 ft. strip on eaet gidc of this property for Betty
'ltane right-of-way.
Intended use was report~d to be for a 7-11 food Btore~
It was questioned \-lhetller the property lass a 20ft ~ right-of-way
dedication would be' adequate for the intended use. Hr. Wolle ~ecom-
mended disapproval in that there is sufficient business zoning in the
area and this would be spot zoning.' !1!_~~~ J:,'.~.2.orj:~d_ ~hat_!~
" /
~oning..~C?.J!Ulli!.!ee' ~e..C;~~.!tg~9.. ~e~i~.!.-9f "t~,h~~g!l..eE!...!.2r....!tusiness -~.9Jl-
!.n.u · __ U,2Ol!....}lloBon b:l)1E.-~~)j~e.s ~~2!.t9nS~..~L)1Y_~9@ i:e s \ -...1;~....R2.~
y...ot,ed tea, ~p!{reY~ tDe.&.Z9!l:i!!~.....9..Q!!!!!ti.t.~~~&ti 1.:.l.~.9~eI d;;lti :.ll.!.
, ZONING ANNEXATIONS '- INTENT ORDINANCE ig~ ~ The Planner located
............."""""v w"- p-" Lpq- 1. ......._ t . T"~ ~ .~~_____~~ ~ ~
. ~".
'the fol1.o\.Jing properties as described in IIltent Ordinance and. fUl'ther
pointed out the land use of adjoining areaeQ
Ag~~da Item 2(a) , THE HEADO\.lS UNIT #7..~ General Location:
E"a-sl:,-a""Ide o{,"-S6:rcnerlt'oacr;-a"'a"'joiiililg"'l'he He ad Cl\flS , Unit ill ...
Requested zoning: H-1C
. ,/; \ d R Ie s' 1
B~~"lJ!!.~-~1~.J: 1.:he......E~arS_~l.t.f-d .'\.:t:~2. r~E2.!!'~~,!1___J' ~~r.. E;l
~.;.ty_t.-AQm:!1R a,;:LcL-:]f~~D.~;~2~J,....!?LJ2.!'D12~.J:]:.Qj;J2..
~I~~N .~{E~~..!.9~1iL,;~...~~.EE:.l:....19s.:~!~-- ~nor.!h.~1l9~
o . e ea:lt' each'" .'
........................-.,prNM~....." ..............,.....
!
....-1
f1n"~ Busineos..
Requested zoning:
The Board voted to defm:.' c.lction until. the next ~ati.!l.3..s.nd"....x~::.
nuGEJte;raBtii"cfvm:iQof-t1\(~aI~:a';----'-'~'-~--
~~....................-...............~___.."It~"'''''* ....._.................._......_...__
I.
71 R F Bd H1.nutt~n lI/30/53 Page iJ?
AEenda Item 2 (c) nOUTHvlE8'1' COaiH:R NDRHEP:i l~IJ f. l.n:a.CHER (arml'CX.
2Un~~p.....=~...".........,........"...............~...........----t.............,..-..~......................-....~..............._..--.~..................--_.. ......~..t:;............ .
AMiWrII-............,. V""lJ'....."""<t_lL .....
~
Requested zoning:
Existing zoning:
ttB". Buui.nesG
County A-2 t Small Fat'lma
~!3 !l!2!..t".2..4 Y9!.~~..."if!.f:e~J::~2:.'!..lH2!!1. j:jllL..!l.9E-!'t~ ~iD.a. ,
APPROVAL OF FAR HORIZONS HOBILE HOliE PARK PttAN - l.lAYOUT -
(GBllElTAC r;~:1mt{1nw:esre6'IT'NBR:usH\lIY ~-9ANDNlTRSERYR-OAD)
~~ClnOOTfE~~y-:.-'ffi.-:-cm:es-~e """o"'ffio"tliat tne-""'- <vn'
..-..V- t. -q....., .h...l A~d4~ _ ..,..'*'--"~ ~~.---.- P 17 ~ ~~. r
, '
~l!l?.<!!!.:!..!~i2tL.CollJIDi tte~ .pe~$?nun..el'!~~.E!...~J. .;..oL...!he...l"Sl.Y~2.l!t...$'-s~ _~E.m!j:ted ~
,',
, .
Mr.. Kruse inquil....ed if there \o1aS any stipulation as' 'to access to US 19"
The Planner pointed out tha:t plan shows a 20ft g roadway abutting
Nursery'Road which would afford entrance from Nursery and that i:hey'can
, have an entrance on US 196 Requested Mobile Home zoning was described
'as extending all the way out to I-!\<lY 19 ft'ontage -co include an
existing owner' a home and I"ecreation area.. Ql?on ~.~aJ,)L!1~:....E'wan,
~e.g_onda~..2Y_Mr.._ Kenned,Y t ,.!1:~ B~_ Y.2.t(!9..:~.2.~~.l2t. ..!.,he,.-rec9.I!.1J!l.envd_atio-!l'
2.t.:t;)le, S~P9ivi.!3J..o}.l COJ!llIl~~t~~...tor' @2;c9.\''!L..2!_~..m9kile home JP~' '
" ~
~q.ut.. > Fuller discussion of ~ anne.xation zoning was defel:1red,'
until the next meeting.
The u~e~ing was adjourned at 5:30 P. M.
Respectfully submitted;
!
i
'1
, ,
.~." .t,
.....,4...
" '
)"JL~~ uj~tJ!
aCk-I: Wol1e.~~y
ity Plannel"g
l ,
. ,I..
C~'. . t
" . .....j
"
"