02/05/1963
Ttn: ZONING ANn PLl\mHUG BOi\l~.l)
J
r".
.Mi.nut~o or the Hf.H.~tinfh febrl1.!l.);'y 5, 19li3..
The Ill'aeti.ng WlW called t(\ o'r'del" t.lt 3;00 P. H" M:J .t'h(~ Ch~il:'JrI{"}n.
t-1r~ l<t'usc.. Present wel'e Members ~cado ~ Sheparn ,ll.lr'!'ier, il Kannf!!dy,
NylandoI', Gates and Galloway to H:r...." Rf'J'ttig (..~f the El.IHin'fJc~r.tng Department"
and Mro.. \.,rolle..
The m:tnutet; of the meeting o.f ,1,:muaT.'Y 22. 196~~) \vm:te approvod
with cot'r.ection on Page, l1S 1 Line H7 ~ in f~pel1ing Ij1" nam,~ 1 Hr.. Payson,
to Pa'ysen~
\ .
ENABLING LEGISLATION
1- .... _ ...... _ .............."""-..._ .....~
l'he Board had far. t1i:1vj.(.u lJopies of the
Planner's draft, of, m{!ffior.o.J1duY:.1S containine Irropona.ls fO~1 legisl':l'tion
in regard to (a) Zoning~ (b) Housing Code (these havin~ bean mniled ~o
membel"S subsequent to Jan 22/63 mee1:ing CilJ T'!:!qucstf.id)., The Chaif'llllln ad-
\,j,~;t~d the Board of dcve.lopman,ts crJncet'ning en.;lhlin~~ la.t3islati,or-. since
... i~"}
~ .' "-""
thE;! rl~ir.'r meeti.ng:
That. it \<las ascet'tained tht pt'OpoGeQ legi31a'ci 'Je bills are
required to be submitted to the Pinellas Legiela-tivf~ Delega...
,tion by Feb.. J.5;
That becaus.e of the time ~lemant. it, We:1S mutually agreod in con-
ferring wi.th M:ro~ Wolle that the Pln.m,.e-r suhm:i.t advance copies of
ma'terii\l prepared on (a) and (b) above and on (e) Planning .
Le.gislation to Assistant City Atto~ney Kennedy {forttarded Jan..
30 with copy to City Manage~)~
That verbal report from the Ass'\: ~ City Attorney vias that he
. felt he should proceed only upon 5.nE.tr'uct:i.onf> f1'om the Ci t.y
Commission;
. That memol'andum to the. Ciaty Manager on Feb. i~ Jlt:~quesi:ed a WCl1:."k'.
session wi'th the City Commission concer-ning Zoning and: l:)lamling
legislation (if considex'ed advisable.) ~ At: this time :3\Jflzestion
was made that' the Commission might IllfJlJ t t-Ii th -the Boa.r'd today..
No directive had yet been'.z~ceive~~
T'ne Planne:l.'\ invi tea questi0:18 r~~lati va to pi."loposal ro~'" amendmen"t: to
Section 79 of "the City Ch m....te 1" " He ~'rpla:i.ned the intetlt of .tn:i.s h: gisJ.c.-
ti.on ~1Ct.tld be to p~~rmi t the pr."(~8ent ,t"efcrendum p..r.oeeHis of 1.on5.ng to be
. \
discontinued and replaced by .th(~ zoning pl'oc".~se ':-ie ;;~u'thori::;ed j.n
Chaptel' 176'11 General Statutes of }'lo.l'i,ja b T.he Chail':'man J:'j:..!po-:;-.tod that
, \ ~
. ,,,../
'the. I..uague of ~lomen Voter's 1n 'f."~oo'ffimendi.ng tlie adoption of Chapter 176 <-
MI". Wolle presented as the simplast pr,)cedu!'d 'the submission of a bill
generally contain:i.ng the provL1ions or thl~ (ll'b:n:'na"b~ zon:i.n;? bill that W,;lS
Z & P ;3d I IUl1\.l'tes
L l 61 6 ;jh.\g~~ #2
palJF.lec1 by th~ 1961 r"l(~ri.dl\ J.eg:i.n lntm."o and :r.nj ~')ctcfl hy tJl0 vnter~l.
The Plilnnc1.' .fUl"thtn:' i;\dvi.s13d thut trw Hai."Vmd nllrtholcmeH and.
('l
ASfJocia"t(.!s t oui:llnf~ of pl.anning lcg.h;latIon wi th suffi.ci.ent d(~tail
would involve a. apeci.al act. faY." planning rllone.., Thin '.,auld indi<Je;te
f",hat would be in vol ved in thf) ,rldoptior.\ of .:\ cOlIlpl'ehenui va plan and
its status.. It. Ytould also.outl:i.ne. otheX" paz.tic'Uli'l!' areas in \.lhich the
Planning BO;31"d ",ould have autncr.i t.y. liembt?l's t;1€!1'e. (Jdvi(~.~d .that such
planning law would have. to be: an .~nHbling .:H'.lt in t~1a"t there is no Sta-t:t1
overall planni,ng legislation ~ In that Chapt8!' 1.';6 is pt'inc5.pally ;i
zoning law fo it was pointed otrt that a choice ('Jf adoptiQn of Chapter
176 in totelJ. ~~c.'uld cn"tail the loss of the planning con8ideruti.ons
in See G '/9 of the City Chartol'. Hro. Wolle r'Ead to the Board correa..,
pondenc:!e .from Hal'land BarotholomsH and Associates:.; dated April 7.9, 1959 jo
....-.
, I
'. )
.....r'
. pertaining 1:0 the outline of planning le~islation submitted and
generally t"evicw-ledconten.t of the outlin~..
l:J.'eJ.:t of memorandums of Si::uuary 30, 1963 ~ to the ASt:>is'tant City
Attorney and of Fehruary 4,. 1963" to the City Hanager referred "to above
was read 1:0 the BeaI'd" ~!!e!::~~_!"!l~:t_.:~!~~!_.:t.h~..,.ll~.~E~r~P.r....o~lJ...9.t:Lg.QE
~Uh~~~f..ty......~!!r~l!~,~_~.~.~1_ :~J~!;.,-,9~~~~m~!!. ..~,~~_ ~"ttei! 7:'..9,. ~t~L,~~~.\1.1J~ ~,~ ~.9.!1_ o~ ~tJili.
1~K:LsJ..~!.h9..rl=__, !1.~}!.._B9,!~:,~.'lh_ _ ~:;.~9~).gz,~-p'Y . M~!..,._g.~ ~~f:).~..)~.. ~ ~F? .~E.~l:!,~.~P,..~"9.1)i;1}~J.!l~9,g,s ,1..Y., e
b'
g~Y.9.R.2~.1iDS .!!\l~..Sl~.BP.IY,I fi.I gNr- L~{.tJ. It~.G...~.._ S,~B.~.O"~t1?;.'r!.E:~. ~:.EgOg.T_.. ._
(continued fl"om 1/2 2/G 3),... Cc,mtn:L "ti:ee meJnbe:p.~ J.'0ported !lli"t{-!T.'ii:'.l sup-
_ _ ~-- -- -- ........ - - '-"'''-'' - -.. ...,.. --
plied on the Ventura County o1:'dinance ~.:a3 5 I;:i. 1 ), l1nde!' t3tl.ldy .:..nd 'the.y
wer-e no...,: ready to repoI't aT; ,this cil1lc '" Tl~e Plann~r ct5.3(mssed with tJw
Board val",ious pl'ovisi.ons us~d in $on:i) o'th""!f\ ct):rur;~:l\ i .ti,~s for' obt~d.ning
al'ea. for playgro\tnd deve lopmel1"'t u This iTl~l t.:cl~cl pepcen.t~q.;i:!G of sub-
di vision drea, a)lea 01" money Q!J!i'Jc1.1en'l; in r~lcc:o::.'dan(~e -to m.m.bel' of lots,.
or fees for plat procesEing, etcu Mr. Ga~cs felt ~hat the study
. :....~} .should be ezpand~d to gi.ve '~ol1side'!'i'rtion 1:0 othe,~" pr.ovisions in sub....
ill 41 . ~ , r:
d~v~s.J.on r-egulat:':'vns to mct.(~~ '1:"8
~I" . ----!+ ~ I"'n
_ ....c:t t) .. h...-L..:~
"t'GeuJ.a:t:i 0~\S more fl.?~~ible
z e P Bd
Clnd Guggea ted contiul.tt'rl;ion wi th !J(Jrne a t'€. i:'J de Y;:llopey"~1 J
Commi t 't{1 e
..............._.+I.........~. ...-~I--.'\_'.l"
Elli!!!:El.i!B_~.?~~,tA2.-l~~.qg!~!!!-:,~.!t_tJ.lli.!._~tb.2. ..f.l-'it~ll).~.:r._..EH~!~m.!.!=_~ t9 _-tr!!'L.Q.9..mmi..t:t~_(.t. ~
~
2.t...Q!l'!:..~~.Y~~.:f.l?'!'P.l.e.,. i'o-~~A..'(...Jn~~~~a!~. ,.. .J11i:..'!.. Jig. J;'.r. i~.~_QK\?~,~~}"~i 9w.f.~,~.~l ;.~ ~...!}J~t..
f'lannf:.l' in :!.t1EH:wrch on thi~ ma1;.te~"
.. "Co","..._ ~~ ..___...... ~...."...-..~_~h <11\ 'W.:Io. --.....'''Io'.l._ _.ojo..._.-".,,__.......... .............--... ........
DISTRIBU'l'ION COHPREHl:NSIV1:: PLAN rrBPOWf. 'l'h~ P lanner anno\lnc~d that'
....... __ .."". ...... _"'" _... i_ .......,. ._ :0..1... ..... ........ ....... _. ... AI.. ...... ~""" ........
he had obtained. 16 bour~d. copies freml the Ilrinte,tt that: mOr'ningo Copies
of the report \.lere dist:,ibuted to Boar.d mOjnbers and .....eY."e autograj;>ned
l'epcmt
la'tet' . in tn,e mae.ting" The! !le.Ct~iv(~d .n1l.lnh f(:n~t)rable comment and
rr.J(;tmhers expvessed 1'1easur!! in t-eceiving .theit" eopics" The completion
of. the report was chal."acte.rized as a vr~ry s\.ibs.t:.:ln1::ial accomplishment..
Upon formal 11Lotion t the Planneranrl Planning Office Secretary ~'ere
. ,
....~.., ;'-.
\>' .....~}
,commended as deserving of a gX'eat deal of m.'edit for the.ir contribu..
tiorts.to the fin~l completion of the. Comprehensive Plan R~port.
A suggested distribution lit-~'i: for complimenta'!'y copies was re-
viewed by the Board,. together :-;i th a sugg~sted memo to' the City Mana-
gera .concerning distl."ibution a.."\d sale of the !"eport~ Hr...Wollc. ('ld~'
. vised that aPP1~oximatelY 30n copies would be 2.vai.lable ror' ~alc
(ZOOcopie5 not-l at "Che .pl.,in.te1."!3 foy' b:i.rlding) ~ He recommendeCl ,1 pl'\ice
of, $4~OO .per copy (cost of j~1iltel.~iaJ. .:lnd '.s~Y.'vic~s -eot'imated at about
$4.25 each), but indicated h~ would be ag~Beable to a price of $5nOO
per copy as suggr~sted. by a H1cj ol"lity of nl)u1:\(] I.Hr~mbE':rii ~ A fe....l mir,or.
revision::;.' in the list w~rf.! mG\dn ;;;"$ I'*corded t1!l (S.ty Planner":::' copy.
.',
TIl.~,. .!3..2~r..~L .Y.9.!&':L.~~~.2!l;!!~.~.X,_!!~!~~~ :~~l~H '. ~~.~rJ.s;:.3;...J? !::_. ~.~~Lg~.L~~l.: SLQ.-..P~I:
S:_f1.l2l...E1l9... !9...-2.~ ~ E~.ll..xYKp...~:,~:(' ~".!=l~~t... ~.~ 2~:r~;!.J ~~v:: J}tsx~'t...:;lL~ t~~i1?_~!~~ 1,?,l]...J,it? .t..L..3J)1
!':~.Y..i~_~....t~}2P'.~??9.}E,~:t~J;(....t~ .,,~..i~.~.~ ~.sslil1JL,~~ 119~.~..t2~~.~t~.o~~gD .1:.A}J';, ..?.J.l.g ..~t:l ~-Qnj..ng
!l~;:9. )_...ill:v..'.j~2m~1i~ ~,:J:g,I}..~ ;::~_1'..-,~!}.2~~Q1~ ~ ~ .~~. _Q tot;y _' 9J.f. ~ ,c:~ ~1]~ ~~. _sr.~Q.(!~:r:....~~G~. Q S,:!-..~.~}, "
l'he Board was informed 'i:.h;'lt cOl-"it-J~~ tOl" th1~ C~_i:y Commissioner's \-muld
'"
,. ,
.,' \", '
. ..,.
be submi tte.d tha fol1ol;liog rlny.,.
0., "
" -..+~."'~~""", ",c " .,,~ T~'" '~,...;.
.. ' . t.. ~.
'.., . . ," .~."..... r... _k"''''',...........''i'
~ '1-. .
Z & P Bd Minutas
2/&/63
Pag~ '4
eno HODEL BASE WORK :E1fWGESSS .... ~lI'D Harries reported on hi" pro..
...... --- ..... ,..... ,..,. ."... ...... -- .... - -.... .,.. - ....,..,.-~
I..
Brese in p'i'eparat(}l'Y work for' this, type modal.
>'l"~
".: +' .,
., '
. The Planne.r- rep()rted that he Wt\G working on obtaisd.ng a ,~f!!..ol:l~1
! ~~~.si~~jJ1~:t.2r_f.2.!...!t~~~..D.,.J2..~~~tqi~1ng_..!!.~~....~WJl~~h~!ll=!:iY.!LJ?l1n."
He indicated, ,40 to, 60. elides ~1oulcl dornpos8 this program" He ,again
suggested consideration be gi.ven to the necessity of 1.\ .~P-i~!l.(J..n.ll~.Y,q
~ :
, '
,
} ,'/'
,.
; .
,. .
. ~' ,
;,> g,lan' .!lr9..~lJ~r~. Time fot.. disCl.1Gsion \.,ras 1im! t,~d and no decision was.
". .' .'
, .
made ttf.:igarding the proposed brochur.e ~
Plannili.g literature was diH'tIlibuted~
The meeting \o1aB adjouI1ned at I): 00 PaN.
". . Respectfully submi.tted II
. ,
f.,; .
I.
I" I '
:;:, '
I.' c>
., .
.'
,I.:, .:::! p
, .. ~_~vj~e.... _
. J ..., I" WCllle t S~c t Y
.C jy.Planne~ '
i' "
i ~ ,:'
.. ,
;{:,':.. .
f;'J:.! ~~. ....:
~or.." I; .
1 , . H \ . ,~
1,)-:::)
~, > ;..
I.,
,
: ..1
!
1
.j
"'
I
.,\
.', ' I
'1
.1
1
I
.' .J
I
I
'.' ,
''/ . c ~,.'
. ~ i " I'. ,
. ~ !. > .
1\\1::'. .
II '.: .
{<,
.:,;' . . :' ~
:.... l
I. . .
.:~~ " ':'. .
. :, ~; ,
: J ~ .' ,
, ,
, I
.1.'0"
.. "
t,',
, .
'.
) .
I. .
. \
.';....>
'::,-# "I
'l.~l
~:~ " : .
~i: ; ',. ' \
,>. .
, .
.'.
.J.", \
\~.' '" ,..'
:~,';~":.' ~ c '.' .
, "