10/30/1962
ZONING AN D PLANNING BOARD
/
Minutes of the 14aa ting ~ 'rlt{tsrj1lY ~ Octobo r :~O, 1962,>
('-. The meeting WflB called ti.l order :Olt '): 00 r" No.. br \,'.he (}huirman,
IJ1r'~ Kruse.. Pre13ent were i~1e.mbel's Read~,~ Gat€l3. Shopt.l),~d. MyJ.andel'~
Harries! and Galloway ~ L..fr" llot.tlg or 'the B\1g~.l\~a1"i.tl& Departrnent, and
!.tr 0 \'101 e.,
The Board \1/.\3 gl,l3.d to welcome back Vice-Chairman Reade a.ft.er a
a trip abroad..
The Minutes of t.ho meeting of October 16t 1962, ware approved
as submitted in writ.t.en summation l~O each 11l9mbex-o
'rho approval of the mlnut;fJ S 0 f the meeting of October 23, 1962J
was defarrcdp
PriQr to agen cia i tetUs 1 there M~a a d:tiacuss ion of a suggestion
made by 14r a Ueade to eJ.aand 'the approv~d definition of a Mobile Home
by changing the, 'tTorcling ~ ndGsj.gned to be u.sed without a permanen1;
foundation" to "erected Ot.. installed without a permanent foundation
,r-.
.
and/or '\'/ithl'nit other additions"" Aft.er soma consideration, the Board
felt it was not advisable to change the definition as approvedc The
Planner brought to the Boardt s attention a copy of a letter sent to
him by i~tember GaJ.10\iay \1lhich contained an oxpression of opinion on
the part of the Ue 8. Comptroller of the CurrenGY ~egarding the eli-
gibility of certain types of mobile homes for :real est.ate 108..115 (when
on a lot. owned by the mortgagor)u
,
,
C'_
Zm~ING REQUES1J!S , CASE 2-i-10-62 I.lOTS 1 L 8, &. 9 BJ~OGK~_._ PINE-
'f;RESTL SUBDIV~~j:~bN~~ROM R~2:;.:n.QE~Ei~r~' :TO. f~'::' BUS:r;.!i.r3~ . A-pPLICANir': &
.S.A[A}i,J~A~....- General ),ocatIon \lIaR aescr:t6cd as tho :!East, s e oj'
N. 11yrtle Ave c in bloclc south of Palmo teo Street n It "IUS poiIlted
out that the requested razonL'1D; \'iQuld extend the business zoning
fronting ort Palmetto sout:.h to Nicholson ~~tradtj eJ.s{) that the pre-
dominant land use to the ~ast nnd on '~pposit8. side of l..lyrtle Ave"
,,,as re sidential... The Planner recommended denla 1 of the appl:ication
f.or the reasons that there is surrj.ciont~ zoninp.: (It' ItB" in the area
(on G~rdGn A"Je.., li't.. Harrison A~leo, Palmetto 8t...~ "lid GreCl'l\'1ood Ave!);
th.is. addii~ionnl ttBH zoning woul.d l''9duc\? the \~.ffectivorlt:.sss of N" i'llyrtle
~'.::'" ',": ....~. "'.:.::.:\' ~"~.lJ:'.:~"',:.,:I.~'",. :,.:. ",::,: i,1 .,' ~''':'I!';' ;'::}.;':', 'f.. '.,:. ,; ;..... "Il . ."~". ;'.,:.:~:,: :::::...;::.:1~,::"; .:'.'::',:;.'.:"1:, ";'::'.".'~; ..','::,',::':':"",~::"':r.'~'. I'~: .',',~,~~.., :,'; .1\1~;;'./.,":.:' :.:\'.t:,'I:';':'~f~":-"'::""':"::': I,.'.~.. ",:'::'::i.,.:~:,~,..';.,.'~'..~'"
Minutes Z & P Ed.
lO/~O/62 Page #2
r-.
Ava D to move traffic; and it l'lQl.lld sot procQ.dent for at,rip zona, ex-
tonding south _, !1Jlon ,fl1p.t~on by...~~.,g,st<h-~s..q.nd.9...cJ....Q.r kIr ~_J!~!.t~e~ the
Board vo~U~ n 1"~co.m\n'lUd di Bg.Q~x:.O:YJ}!, 9.f~& ~g:.L~!},g",~pp ~ic!\ t ~.on I ,~a~.E!
Z-1l-lO-62.
""'q t ~ . ~- ~ ....-
ZONING J!~UESTS.s.., CASE Z-6-10-62 1. LO 10 BLOCK}i~ l LAICEY~~J.i
~J~GJ~~~ ,~tfBonrISI1.YN~~@.OM ii- liWilfTpj.:E; WELLING "fO -n']u, Jl'uJ3I~~:3 to.
j LIOANtr: INA Lo\i1'HORPE .. Genera ocation \'Jas described as tna
.....,c
, ,
East side or Oreanh'Ood Ave., appro::c. IOD it. North of Kipgsley fa Land
use of the area was described as single-family to the north and east.
business on South Greenwood from Kil1gs1ay to Woodlawn. It was pointed
out that the adjoining 4 lots 8.t the N/E corner of Grean\'/ood and
Kingsley, (o\.med by the applicant) were lwezoned to un", Business. in
1958 for requested photo-processing lab use. but to date had not been
utilized ~or businesso The Planner recommended denial o~ tho applica- '
tion in that extension of the business ZOlle to the north opposit.e
new park dedication (Ed C. Wright Park) was not advisable and this
J..ot 10 'With R-It. zoning was presently eligible for parking usa. UJ;!pn
rnot.ion of !.u-.i,tllander ~ s~e.qonded by ,l'tr 0 R~ade.. the......B.qard \t~ed una.ni..~,
~~usly ~o~~commend d~saRpr~xal or.zon~lication, C~B~. Z-6~~Q~62~
parking area East o~ Clear~ater Federal Savings and Loan Assn. build-
ing, northeast of Lincoln Ave. and Parl..: Street. Requested use \'las for
building expansion. It lias pointed out that the surrounding area is
developed commercial.. The Planner in.formed the DOc;U'd that Planning
,
, '-/
necorllmendations include (PR ill) re cOI1IDlendution for rezoning of Cleve-
land Plaza and the site of tho Cleart'1ater Ft~deral buildi.ng to Business
to conform to land use and recommended' that \rd th Commission approval of
tt}.e B~rd' s recommendation, and of this individual application, the
two be combined as one referendum item.. Y'p-Q!L~~i.Q.n.~&:r:" Gatelt,~
~ e c,Qng.e d Er. ~11r.. _~ h e pg~r.9:.l.._tb~...J29~~H:~_:!.9.~E_,.E!!.?-,nJmE};~9 ~,..tQ....:r.E.QPE1L~4
J
Z & P Dd 111inutea
2 paga 13
f'
!\2E!.01f4+ of, zon~n-L~ ap21~a.~;.e!L.9l16e Z"'2.::J.9~:-.Q~." It was agroed that
combining of the Planning RacoIJuuondation for Clovoland. Plaza and tho
banlt building lot \dth this requost muy bo /lrranged fJ.B one item for
the roferendum if' approved aB such by the C'ity Comr&1ission.1I
was. described as north of Businaas zone at Draw Street and Tulanen
The Planner distributed for Boal"d review 3 dra\'lillgs of prints sub-
mitted by the applioantso The Planner d03cribed zoning to the south
of the al~ea of request as Business extending 150 i't. from the Droli
Street right-or-way and zonulg o~ the area of request as R-lE for an
east portion ,and R~2 for a west portion, with R-1E and R-2 zoning to
the north) R-lE zoning to the east, and H-'2 zoning to the l'iest. Land
use of" the surrounding area was described" 'rIle Planner reviewed recent
zoning histo~y of this tract involving denial o~ request for an ex-
ception under the hardship provisions o~ the Zoning ordinance by the
Adjustment and
Board of/Appeal on Zoning and J.at~:l' br the City Commission. I}'he
following discussion revealed that the .8o~u'd felt that it Vfl;.1S unde-
sirable to extend. -the Business ~one nortll) thus exposing tihe usa to
,1
the residential development to the east anu to potential residential
de.velopment to the \'1ssto It \.laS also felt that the e:;~tan8ion of
plat-tad street.s reasonably would serve addj.tional residential use 0
)]pon mo~ioE:~bY.l~o~l1Gade~ secon~L9z, 14r~ Barr~.~r~Hr~!.le _BoaE.'!...Y.oted
unanimously to recommend disapproval ai' zoning applicab:Lon, Case
"""If' ~ ..41 .......... v- .... Y 1.... l ~ _.--011........... _ .__ -......lllll.....---_..__.______....~ "" b.
Z"'$-10-62o
~ .n..-.d\. ---.....
'[fZA j~~I1'lfL~-:...g.&&AR\1ATmll.l9..eJ. ..:-_ A~fl9nIZA~1-QN fOIL INV11[\'llIOlf
Al~D PUBLICrfY - l'he Board voted unanimously to approve the extending
-.;-r h. .......~ .....~. _"''1'.,,_
I
"-./
of an il1vit~tion to the FJ.ad Planning and Zoning Aosociat"ion to hold
its 1963 Annual Conif':rcnce j.ll CJ.0G:.:l'water v 'Ehe Board \'filS informed that
("\
.-......,
.....)
Z I~ P nd t-iinutes
J.0/30/62 Pago #4
such invit,at1ons wore to be conoJ.dernd at. t:lll~e of. the 1962 Annual
ConfererIce to be held in MiHmi9 Fln~, ~ bqsa:i~'ln'it1g DucGrahtn" 28th.
Chairman Kruso annou.nced that the ~te ,cl1~ of the Ul?Ber
~~no).le.a Cm!9~y.Y1.~n.n,ing_Cqfl111l..J:..8!i.~Pl}~,Jl1C9~' \-UtS presented to the organ-
ization at ita meeting on Friday evening) October 26th.,
ZONIUG RE.FBH.E}IDU~l ITEIJIS - D!SCUS3IO~ \iITH CITY CO~.t.uSSION -
~........'1 .-pq- ~ r U ~ I:. ~..,..........., V ...............L 'I ..........1. L .OII-",-l7"f' LT 1 ... .d-A
The Planner informed the Board tha~ this meeting with the Commission
was scheduled for Thursday, Novo 1, 1962, at 1:30 Po Mo in the Ciuy
Hall Auditorium.,
THE BOARD CONTINUED ITS REVIEW OF PROPOS~D RiliFEaeNDUM IT&4S
(Reference was made to packet distributed at Oct 23 meeting):
QRO,UP__,uB".... MQPElb.. HqM!tJ3U.fJ-~EC~Tlflli- - Upon inquiry. l~l' Reade was
informed that the provisions of this sub-section as approved ware the
same as proposed for the last year's refe~endum. l~. Reade suggested
reconsideration o~ wording in the original texc to the effect that
no model could be constructed aftar a epeci~ied percentage of lots
had bean built upono ..J\fj:.~r 60~ d1sCU!S8.~-,. i~_ wa.s, .f!ecip.eq ....tQ. ~af...,
:r,irm th~ PFoyis,~on8 !n Su.~,,:?~],"p.grap!l~,( b) of__ t,ha. E17oposa~4 L~s a p..9rov~
~t the....c!ct 9..1.",,-~962 t. m.1f~!?~.ng),o
GROl!f.."""E ll) OFF~TREE'lI, P1\.!llCt;.~.tG AND...-LOADING SECTION ,- The Board
voted unanimously to approve this section as revised at the October
23, 1962, meeting.
,Gl}OJ!P~ D ..l2LMARD~A F4.Q.IhIXJES J.1,g,?,~ ~{lfJ_~vi,~~ Oct.~ ,23/621. ,-
Type A (pleasure craft docking) - approved adding as an ex~
l~eption in an R-l,. zone alsO.,
approved Type A wi~h this
addit.ion t.
Typa 8 (launching ramp site-
cODUllGrcia,l) ~. approvedo
, \
Type C {private marina)
- tl'he BODrd discussed at length
the adv:i.aabil:i.tjt' of limit.in,:~ ttw UH8 for "boat 81 ~"pBtt to un-
Z & P Bd Minutes
10/30/62 Page r15
, f'*\
coverod slips. Members considered the fact that.. cO"t!rad slips
would no doubt m.eet with objections in c..artaj.n ar138Ci and. that
dry. storage of boats could conceivably :I.nvolve ~ facility for
as many as 500 boat.s.. The Board voted to add provj.sion con...
earning boat slips under both Types A ~nd C as follows:
nOovered boat slips or dry storage may be pGrmi'tited it
specifically requested and approved by both the Zoning
and Planll1ng Boal"d and the Board of Adjustment and
Appeal on Zoning.u
.--\
Q.ROUf E {;1 SHqPPING;,CENJ~R tsgt ,ZONE.. The Planner explained
the general character of the SO ~one (Typed "Au rOI.' areas orionted to
neighborhood convenience needs and uBu for areas oriented to meat
con~nunity an~ regional needs,,' He advised that as a "floating zone"
no spec~fic site is zon~d until a zoning application has been AP-
proved. based on developer p:rovi~ his need :for such zoningo He
noted ~ha~ ~hia would allow,a planned acrea~e type of development
and 'Would minimize the extension o:f strip business zoning. He called
attention to existin3 similar classification in the Sto Petersburg
and Pinallaa Coun~y ordinanceso The Board VO~~ to,apP2:ove ~p~
Shopping C~nter Zpne plaasific~t~gn w~th th~pllowin~,mipor.~e~
visions:
page #1. Par.. (5) - 9l!an~e to: HAdequate screening to be erected
or planted on all sides adjacent to
higher restricted zoning.."
Page #2, '1'ype "BH - Change: "greater than 10 acres" ~
U10 acres or mOr0H'l
GROg? E (2) PROFE3S,ION~.~hJH) )~EL.Ax..ED SE-RVJ;Cl~S 1-~S) ,ZO:NE ,";-
The Board indicated approval of thiR new. zone classification as
included in the packetu
Planning literature was distributad~
. )
'-._~
!
I
,
1
, ,
,
.
,
: ,:,.: :'. ~:' ': : ::. . ':, ~ , '. ,,;.: . '. >.; :':,..; ~ : ~ :.. . : ~ . ~ : . '. '. ':,,' i ... . ,..:'.': '. '.<.' ~ ";".;' ".: ','I ~. ,'.'~' : -: l .' . _ '. f . ,\:.~ ~ /:':: .: L': : ". .'.."" ,< ~:.,:: : ::. ~, ~:.', ";.,:" \,'. . :: ':..... . : ::'::' .; >" '>: ......: ': ~ ~ ': ' ,.;..., '. .' : : . " " :', . ~ ~. .\ i.' :: :'. .'
Z lk P Bd Minutas
10/30/62 Paga #6
" '
. .',
Asid"i~Jons t.o Q.fJica L~Q~~r~ Jis~ed:
. ' '>
, ,
"Standard Metropolitan StatisticalOiat.rict.u"
"Annual Health. Education, and ~ielfare Trendsu
,The meeting ~s adjourned at 5:10 P. Mo
" '
"&espact~Uy submitted,
..gyO
Planner '
;,
,,'
.~'
f ~,\ ~.1
,:' ",I
~". , . I.
. ~', J
, ,
"
,,'
i ',T..
. '<\',
. "
, "
" \
"
;
'.
'.
\
,
,
i
,'I
:,.. !
~
, j
'.j
:1
, 1
I
"
'l
,l
;
,'. .
:' ~.i:"..: .,
If' ::'
; .
.;, '~ :.'
, ,.
, '
:/. . .
"
-).." '
.. .
,
"
:r .
, "
, .. J
Fr",:".. < .,
l ,.'" c
':..: ;.,< J
";;'~~~>"J~'"'
~''''~;.:"....~~ ,
I.'~ J
:,ill," ' .
J\:~>c':-~
\, ~ ) , . ,
i~::<<."
.."j'
!.:.\;' I ~.' . I <
~~) :": ,.
r\.....,~.: > ,'. "
, . .'.
','
"
.' ,. ~ '
, ,
"., .
, '.' .'
'.~ ,
;',' ;.
!i~;;~:" . . '~, ~c' ~
;.
'\":: "'"
:;.'....
.',
,,'
"
, I
r.;.
."
'. i
"
"~ : . . ..
"
".
'.1' ..' ,,' '}
;,.~.'I.~,~
I,
.'
"
l'
,.'
:'~ :. .
'.
.' i ."
/.;' ,
F"/';".' .,.., ..,>
:,..