01/30/1962
, . ~ : ~ :. ':.... \', . . :; ~ ".',. " :":" ,:' :" /, .::,' ~ ;, . ':", :", '. ,~.: ,:' i : ~". " :' .' . ~ :. + . ~' .: ~ ',: ~ ': ,: : : : : :'. :"1':" I," ,,' ....:.: \ : ~ :.. ,.~" ,;'::' :~' I .'.: ,': :-~ " ~ t:, ' "... ". ': '..: I '.:",:, ~ :,':':", : ~~ :: " ': ,: ;:, t ,\ ?, C' ..~' , . :,:, :: :"N L, ,', ~ :' :. ~.;. ; ,;' I , '; j, .. ~.' : . "'. I. ;, ~ ::'
~~
. ,
THffi ZONING AND PT.lANNING BOAUD
Minutes of the .Meotin~, l'uooday 1 \1Ilnuu:,y 30 ~ 1962 n
The meeting was cf.ulod to o~dor at 3:00 P. Mo by tho Chairman,
i.w" KrW30.. Present. were ;.1embGl"s Raado, .Mylander, Uarries, Shepard,
Gates and Galloway, Mr" tiettig 01: t~he EnginecH":J.ng Dspartmont ~ and
l-1r. ~lolla II
t/{r. Max G.. llat'tle f who recHn1~J.y took oveI' as City E!lginuer, was
present at the beginning of the meoting and vms introduced to the
Board~ He stated his intention to sit in on some of the Doard'meet-
ings from time to, time and expressed regret that he vrould be unable
to stay for this meeting, as invi.tIJd, because of matters needing his
attentioDo
The Minutos of the meeting of January 23, 1962, were approved
, as l"ead and corrected 0
RZPORT ON SUNNY GROVE TRAIU1! PJ\RK EXTENSION (continued from
r n --, u ~""<I'""" ~....~ ~....-....... T~" ~._ ~
. ..~...'
~anual'"Y 2,-~ 12.~2L:u~UBDIVISION Cp..,~l'lIT l~E, ~;rC!.lpr. - Heference is made
~
to City L4anager's memorandum dated Jane 19/62 requesting the Board's
recommendation concerning the revi8ed plans for the layout (total
number of acres in ~railer park addition, to the existing park was
indicated in notes on the drawing submitted as 6,,55) 0 ...' f-fro Reade
advisod that the Subdivision Oommittee visited the property and
cheCked the layout, on the site and that 1~1r. Hai'ries had made a
second field su~vey~ Mra Harries noted that thrBe of the lots ~ere
1L~der ~he O~din~ce 912 minimum area requirewsnt and that the recrea-
tion and service area was approximately 300 sqa ita less than the
. .
--',
. ~
rG'quitement. He expressed the opinion that effort should be made to
get some of' the above t.hr-ae lots increased; however, he st.;ated he
thought the layout was good enough to approveo (.1re Heads stated that
if it ~sn J t. a highly undesirable situation that "vie ought to re commend
that it be approved'~ If 20 foot ri.ght-of-vrdY \'J.:.:I.3 il1et a~~ a !'Elquirement -
serves for 2-way or l-,\ray f,
\.
'.J
',,'., ~'.': ~::...\ :',' .\'~:-:{,".'{:>',",.:" :,; (:~.': . ~"'II~ ',:'.~.':: ~',"':,-"" ,,~"..;. .: ': I .",.~ :",' '.. (.~::;..I':~,I.'""..',I, ':', '. ~...~,..~:,;"./...~:.:.,:.,:,..,.{.J::,,:,,',~',~,\'/:,':,..~ .," \.1 ;,........: ..'"..~; ~~':':\'., :~":''':J''i...;.'',.' '\'.'
Z &. P Bd J.Unut eo
.
'!JO
\To.n '>../J../62 Pae;o i/2
~
Mr. noad~l rapoX'ted t.hat:. the Sllbd~,v:i.8:lon Co,11,nit toe 1~OCOlt1ln~nd0d that
the Board approve th.o layout for tho Sunny Grove 'I'railer P:::u"k Extel1-
pion and so reoOlr.mond to thaOit~' Commission" !.~....8hG)_e[f'~...!ill2Y.9.d th.~J~
J1h..~ .13i?B:r(L~rmme11.d f!P.J2~.l. of....:H!!l l~ay'pu.~ as recoi~lAl.~.dad t!:l~ chao. S~g,"
fii via:f.on C,o~mr1.:t tea .Y",-Jl~fL..m.Q!:..:ll>.!!.;l-,~g.s,2!1.2!!.~.hY-cl!'~apg..er, 1'fa!!_~~~E..:.
Da.fora the vote \'1as taken, the Chairman questioned 'dhether the
Commission might be :reluctant to a~-:cept the annexation area \'n,thout
a plat.. In the di.scussion that ioJ.lowed j.t was brought out that:
The Board has not considered H plat desirable, for if platted
the O\1ner might be able to soli separate lots, and streets
\dthin the park would n~~d ba public instead of privato6
That a safeguard existed in the City ordinance \'lhich provides
that trailers used for livin~ purposes must be ldthin a duly
licensed trailer park.
I'cha t the' layout 1;rill go on f:lle in the City r5uilding Departluent
as provided in the zoning ordinance regulations and \-[QuId be
enro~ceable through the Building Official~ '
!)
',~_..,,-
,
ZONING O}I rJlOBlLE HOlm itNNEXJtlrION .. AREA ADJAC~NT TO Ji.i.O ON 'mB
~ L - 1 ~ .-...-...-...- ... 'Jpt~ L J
!,
~A3'r OF GLE~ ELLEN TilA~L~~i PJill.K tf!Q.BEil:r s'rZTWLi P~tO'PER.'.rY) - Reference
1s made to Zoni,ng and Planning Board minutes or Jan.. 9, 1962, for
legal description of area of roqU3st and for tentative Q1scussion of
this anticipa.ted request.. The Planner advised that current informa-
tion from the City Attorney! B office 'taG that the intent .for annexa-
ti,on is ready to be submitted and he was asking for Board consideration
,
, ....1
in the event its reco.l1Jlondatioll on the annexat ion JGj.gh1~ be requested,
in tha.t the applicant Has requesting annexation \dth the t>rov~,sion
that the City \1Oulct zone it for 1.'iobilo Home Park. The Pl,anner re-
ported that:
The intent ord:l.nance am1 property doscript,ion hets been
checked by the Engineering Department-.
That the S1j~tler property abuts the l'lary Dro~l property
and is located about 9.30 ft. \'Jest 01' County Hoad 1;61 (oppoal te
Thornton Road)"
',( ,
;' . '....: : . ":,":. :.,' i.', j' .":',:' '::.: :.~ ~ ':: ,~.:.' '~': ....,:' ': ',' (,.;' .<:: :,' ,~,: ,:.,; :~,~ . ::;' :'\~"': :',. ",~ . ':., ': :', ,~',,: ! , ",: .i :' I :.":",'.,11 . : .~ ';':., :.., I. ", : : ".' . ,ll,:,~.,:,.: ',' '.:\~ :..',,:' ,.',:,::\ ;. :.: \ .~: , " '.. '. ~"' ~;~:: ::'f '. ':. "'; ~ '\: '1 ,: ,:. ':. ',' ", > ,': ,', , :' ",-, . '.: . '.~' , .' L "~ "/" :. t .~'
Z r.t. P Dd ,~inut ea Jan 30/62 Pt\go II)
'fhut the pr(lparty has bC(H1 ro~oned foX' mobile hams pUl'k
by th~ Oounty and tha.t. t.he Gounty prov1df!d 65 ioet for no
1"\
building aoross the norMl p~"operty line in conform~nce ho an
intent rOl" roserving a COl1t;Lnuoua right..oi'-way along thio 40
aore lIne, to be in alignment \\'"1 th that. ~.O ft~" a.trip res91'ved
in Glen Ellen i,Iobilo Home Par.it:..
The Planner referred to previous 196~ survey and field, study' of
collector streets in the uOl"thel;\:Yt, aect:ton made by 1.1r" Harries and
section
himself and indicated on the mop strip in thio northeast/that was
a roost potential a.nd doairable aJl l\lobile Home Dis tr~tct (front/a~e on
Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. to be retained predominantly busines3)~
, The Chairman read for the Boa:cdf 8 information copy of' a letter
dateq. Jan. 3/62 addressed to City' l'!iaJlager St.ewart by Attorney John
Bonner in which he advised that hi:3 clients would only apply .for aI:l~
nexa~ion in the event that the Clty' o~ Clearwater \~uld zone the
property 'for trailer park. UPOll 4ilr.. Kruse f 8 inquiry" 14r. \/olla ad-
vi.sed that t.here had been no direc'~ reque st to the Board, hut that he
had requested rI.om, the City Attorney's of~ice that he be sent a copy
of' the intent ordinance. Tho Boe,rd discussed the advi.sability or.
requesting a J"O ,it. right-of-way e.':lsement at the time of zoni.ng
recommendation. It waa consider€Jd that this might be made a re-
quirement before approv~.l of any pnrl<: layout. subrnit..ted"
t4.r.. H.ea~~ ...rq~4e l!--~!.c.uL.~,_~~he ~t.!tili..:r ~p'ro.~~.!:y_as ~ubm~~
to the. pi,t~ .f~r ,a~~,tion be ra c01Uillanded to b~~.~,ZOl)~~'t ~.!:1.tll , t'lo9il~e
l!.2me Park; ,!?is,lf.r;',~G. .. His ,.lJ!9.!:.!2.tL_.~.2.onq€!.d bV..tk.:__9BI1Q)'.1?:L...J.m.~,R!:l~sed
.un~i!!t.9.lls1~~
R~POa'r' ON ft(\DG~H.S PLA'r {N!v{ Cc.>1Ul~n B2LC HJlt ROAD JH~D, I.tAiillVIZVl
L ... _______________......~..."..,... .1...1>...--....
"~ ROAD J~XT~!:tSIONL pq}~TINUp:D Ij'HlJ~~rl/!f.::I ~62 4. A'lr" l.:olle informed the Board
that he had consulted with i-iI'.. Ward !lodgers s:ince the last meeting
",: ;".:~\,.:' ,,',: .,', ;':::'.:, ;"/:' .':,"":-::' .:....~.:~, .J..,..;,:...:...;:. ;:;':,.:;..,': I~': '....:... "':"'\.'::'~\::I' ,I. . .::';~)~',," ,.-i.:.:::'.,.:.,::.l,.'..".j'.~',~:...,.i:,~.".~,~.:.:,:. ~..::\.~~....' .~,; :". ~":.'" 'r,'.:',',:~. :"I\~' ....,.,:,:::".l:..: :~":,,'::'\ "':':::"':::~'::~:,.;:'
. ,
z ~ P Dd Minuteu
Jan J 0/62 Page ,jh
concorn1.ng plu.tt.;ill&~ of chiH trnct,' so us t~o meet requil'(;tinonta of'
mln:f.mum 10,000 aq.. 'ft~ lotn and 11110\'/ for dodicatlon of a 50 ft.
~ huLf right-or-'f1'ay for. Lakeview !toHd extension \1Ii1;hin the tract"
Nr... Rodgo1"s reportedly was not V91'Y receptive to the idoa and it
was tho Planner'So opinion' 1~ha. t thE:: mat. tar '-'rvuld be a dead i~aue for
e. while pand1.ng either acquisition 01' pi.'operty to 1;he south or do-
termination of' the feasibility of plattil1~ only a port.:l,on of the
tract" It was learned that exj.Ating strict County ragulations con...
cel"Iling approval of septic tanka (and availabilit y of.' city S6\'ler' on
Belcher Hoad) lrould ,probably prohj.bit its development in, metes and
bounds lots in the County~ p1r. GateD proposed that the Planner
~ight secure information as to County regulations about 3ubdividing
property for the Boar,d. The Chairman racornnended caution in con-
sideration of such small subdivisions and in approval of double
frontage lots. l{r. Galloway sug~e5ted the adVisability of having
....-......
-"., ' 'the County or some ot,her agency make aome pre liminary surveyor en-
ginearing study as to the problems of extending Lukavie\'1 Road. The
Chairman pointed out that it is for such projectathat the Board
haa always contended a regional board is naadcdn A!~or fprther dis-
cussion~ the~~oEF~l }-+~read to t~E:~e any oth2F a2~on 9P this ..agend~
i tam ",
OENTlL\L BUSllmss DISTR1CT CONTENT INCLUSION - COUNTER PRO-
I" 4'-' __~..._..,.__.--.. _.....,.........,._ "".......---. ....rW'"_~ ~
fQ[~~ - ,CBD PL,ATE1._ - i~l n \Jolle informod the Board of content of a
paragraph in a commwlication received from l\'Ir. Ij\red Hobinson of' Har-
land Bartholomr.:Hl and Assosciates :in which he advised against includ-
ing in the Comprehensive Plan Report the Contral Business District
text ond CDn plate submitted by the Boo.:cd) a~ he did not think it
. ,
,
- -....1
\lIas fi.nished and complete 'enough~
i,il'. Hobin5011 recommendod to l'ollow
t,he Comprehensive Plan \'lith a Central Businesn Diatri-ct Plan .as Boon
as possible.. Text of the aboY'e pEn:'ugraph \'13.8 read to the Board"
~: . :.:.... ':":":~'."'''.:, j ::.': 'I . II", '. -:'.:' ,.t. '.... ~ ',' . ..":. ~ ' ':' ::- '~. ~ .: .~! '. :., ~~ ..., ",.,: '.' , " ." I ",' . I p,', , :'. . ':':. :' ' ~...: ;" . ',' ~ . I ~ .:.... ~ ',: : ~ . '~':"I'. i: :(" ~. .' :,',', ,~. ~,.' >,.., ' ~. ~'. ': ~ .~:' .'. ,.'~' ',:.,,' .~ .: ~ ," ::- '.:: ',~:: ~'.'.. ' ::'" :'. t,~. :'.' L " ."
z ~ P Dd Minutos
Jan 30/62 Pogo #5
1~'. \/01113 invi.tod BOl:\rd consid el~r,t:\.on of n COu'l1t131.' proposal to BBA
for nome limited coverago <)n tho Oentral })tlsin08n' District Plan in
~. the Oomprehensive Plan Report.. ;'~r.. Galloway' n optn1011 ",as that tho
outline submitted was more Ii pre,;ontntion of Sit educated forecast
ins'tead o:f definite proposals an(] \'lould not accomplish mucho Mr..
Reade t $ opinion h'aS that the Cornprehenai va Plan WtiS to be a basis :for
future detailed planning and he thought inclusion of. a oan section
hOuldinspire a great deal of illt.erest8 The Board was advised that
a. CBD study \"laB not ;,ncluded in the consultant r s contract for the
Comprehensive Plan and that City Co.fhnission authorization \"ould be
necessary for any suppleUlentary l.'eports by HBA" ThQ Planner offored
as an alternative proposal Board presentation of the Central Busi-
ness District Plan in a brochur8 to contain reproduction of the CBD
p1ate~' ~he Cha~ma~ ~~v~~d, ~~t-E!Qgresa g!~~pt~atioll-]i~~ the
cpn5ult~t8 li'Ould,ba X~'port.~.d to,,~he B9,~~
.-""
t )
,~.
HARLAND BARTHOLO~,Ln; &. A390S. PLJ'tTZS - H~-':~NT SCHOOL CHANGES -
1 -4 L.....lI -.;fT....~ ~.........
The' Planner displayed Plate for General Plan for Future Schools and
explained recent revisions made :~11 th is plate to make it current"
LIBRARY COLLECTION - lrlR 0 HAf:LlIES - 11ft'. Harries offered to meat
~ -"", T .,. ._u 1-"'--'-'
',1
;,1.th tJIr" \-tolle concerni~ the aJ ::ierably of' planning mater:1.al for the
public library collectiono
ALTEliNA11E ME.&11INGS - .l-.1emlJer':". reconfirmed the policy of' ''lGekl~r
.......~ .......... ...............-
medtings :.mu that Ineetinga be called of'1: 'H'hene.ver it was deemed ad-
v1sable"
lBPORT ON ZONING EUFB1UliDULil ~ANEL - 'i1he Board \'las advised ,thac
~......--...-... ~e_a "'~JllI .L~___"+'+ __........._
........)
the Planning Uffice has availa blt: a recoi"'d ll'lr'lde from taped 1'03 cording
01' the Zoning H.aferandwn Panel Program presented over \lIIAN itadio
Station in Decambero
,I
.
of
I"~ '
~: ,
'i,'
~ '
~,
~"
~':
t~
t " .
~" '
~' ,
t' ,
;",
"
.'
"
f,' ,
r -' :
,~, ~ ' .
f:" "
I" "
t\
l "
~ '
l;,
~',. .
~';'..
;\~~.' .
'i."<
(,,: ':',
i., .'.'
~(:",",
, 0", "
. <.'
~ .', .:
J:; : ,::
~ 1" ..
r;: ":. '.,
l':'
r~i:".:',~'" "
~:{\~:';:"'" '
r,,~y::~
"q',' ,0 )" '
r.~:,: ~'\ ,~ . ~.. :'
.))}!':'~.~:' , : .
~:~:I~: :'..:: :.': .
~W':~
~. ~ ,~: .:: I ':
" ,
~" :,
;~'\;~':~ ,'.
1:1 el..
~ ~. ~, ,~. . \ .
~ ,. "
'. '
,,'
>~';: :
"
I':,
'. .'..
" '
, '
"'f ~ ' ~
/:..~: .'
\l{,.:. ,,~
.. .," ,
.,"
, '
~.'- e . .
;:;;'.',0.
~?:'.'\., ;
....: .'
..",+'! .
:,i:, ':..',' 0
.\";- ,
.? ~'. j " '
: ~ ~ :'
~ I .'
\
......-...-.
~: ~... .', Ud l/linutos
Jon 30/62 Page #6
R~p(lnT ON O~t~TRi\L Bm.1INES] 0ISfitIOT' CONFmn.JNCre L^KgI)~D
~ ..&1'47"L _____'\,. 1Ft WI , r 1 11-:-- 1I'"'q ~v ...,11I:I.............. ,.....-..._.....--.-....-................JI1oII , ""'fry _ """"'f_______J ----
lIlt"., \;Qllfl ga'le a briei" report on hiehllgh ta of tho cnD !lrogram' halks..
110 ' Ildvia od that 14r. Ed J~'lichels) Ohairman of. the COllullunity Planning
,Co:nmittee,of the Clearwater Ch.3Jl'be.l" of COffllRerca,'accompanied him
and found, the, con.t'erence very l.:nteresting"
,Planning literature was d:l ~\tributodo;.
The mee,til1g' "W.s adjourned, at 4: 55 P.. M"
Ues,pect'fully submitted, '
I,
,'~.W,~
, ack:I.. ~;olla j Sec,' y
'ity Planner '
,. :
I,
:,
'i" ,
,I
, ~ > > ~ J . . l
,1,1
. "I
J
, ,I
dO "
,~ ,'.' ~
" ,
..
,'I
, ,
,'I
, '
'I
., 4
I '
..;~ e
. ' ~ I
, ' ,)
"I' 1
,'I
I
'I
, "
, ' ,
" 'I' ,
')
. "
~ \, I,
. '
, .
I,
I,
.
I! '
i~1~1t.:..~.~,~.~.~.,~!.~: ~~~';"," . e
+....1 ,..', ,
,;., ," I
I '
S',~:~ ;:,'"
l'~ : , I' "
.." 'I' ,
;~,\/~ ., , ,~, .,' I,