01/23/1962
;.~'::'::':. ;'.l ,'~I:.,., \"~' .'r,.~,~.j./.,../ . '... .....; l:: !:'?'~'~:""'; :'.~, :':""'.,'.',::;> I:',:..~ " .:'.,,;.,.... ,":'. :-::" '~".' ':' .....'':.tk:: ,:,,:,";':'" '.:: .:. '..:I',,'~',"'~':':."'.'~:.:"":.:~.:~',.:,r:+ ::,.\',';'::: 'l.'.'~",:~.';..,:-.\~. ':.:'r.:.:.l'l:..l;;~ \ ~:"'\'.'
/"'..
,.',I,~
. J
, '.........
.' "
'~ '
..-t
ZONING ANDPLANl~ING BOAdD
!llinutas of the tJIeoting, TuesdaY:1 JEinur'lry 2), 19620
The Meeting ....ms called to order at ). ~ 00 Po i<L by the'" 'Chairman,
1'11"00 KrU3o.. Present were l.lembers Read~) Shepard, Harries. io1.ylandar
and Gallovlay, i~lr.. Rettig or. the BngineIH'ine; DopartLUent, and l~ro' vlol1e..
The Board voted to appr'ove corl"ections ,to page.a ,12 of th~,
1.linut.es of, January 2 ani Januar.y "s 1962: HallIe, Palmotto Street)
corrected to Ai~p.on~ Driv~~ ~~ ~." . ..--
The I4inutas of, the meeting of. Jan" 9, 1962\1 ware .:tpprovod as read.
RODGERS TRACT (t~PROX. 10 ACi~S) 335 F~. FRONTING ON BELCH~R
RO AD ::pftjfi; j]4 IN Aft i''DlThliiNCr. ~'.IJ\k2 v'l"E1TifiYAD .. ~-S1TIfIITV1TIYmrco::h:yy;fmr
1{~5RTr.: Tne l:JIanner pOinteaolit' I'ocatlon01r--tne "t'ract on.photomap
and land use map and generally described it as at the nortlu/est cOX'-
ner of Belcher Road and Lakevi,ew Rood. extensJ.on (as indicated on the
I~Iaj or Stree t Plan)" 1tef'erence '~,3.3 m~\dFJ to writt en report of the
Subdivision COlJl.nittee mee ting held January 16, 1962, concerni.ng this
propert.y and filed as a supplement to these minutes" 'The Boardre...
vie\~dpreliminary drawing of a subdivision layout submitted by
Hodgers) Hod~~ers and CUInmings~ It was noted t,hat the proposod lay-
,out included area anticipated in the i.la,jor Strce t Plan to be dedica-
ted for the' half rir;ht-of-'\'iuy of Lakev:tew Road extens:i,on, and that
dedication by the developeI's of this hall' ri&1t-of-wu)r along the
quarter ,section line across the south botmdary of t~his parcel ''Jould
neco3sitate a reduction in size of the 22 lots sho\'m on dra1'ling as
\
apP~'oxirnat.ely 14~OOO sq. ft.. each", ,The Planner advisod chat Lake-
'liel'l Road at the pre sent time terll1inn1:.ed a sh ort dis tau ee ~)ast. of
.'
!(eens Road (dead ends past r.\'1O aubdivis ions); Lak;.~view extGnded is
i.ndicat~3d on County ma.ps '.'methe:c (1,'::?d:LcB.l:.ed or not; Count,y mnp has
it extended through to Belcher Hoad but no'l~ t,o' us 1~119; bO\\'evcr~
,',
County mCJp shoHS Iha-S6l'Y Hond t.o U~; 19, P::rt of t.he tract under
discus si.an is in a low"area t.hat, dy'ai n~i j.llL 0 J\llcn;:; 8r;c f?k area and
,u drainage problom is involved,. The Che.irrm.l.11 c;:tllod to the t3oard's
attention that the l,m~.l adopted by the City i.n 1957 ShOWB an extension
:.: '., I',:::,,', '~,..." .... ' ~..,' ',.. . / .,;'" ~'. , ~ "., .....:::! L; ,': ',. j' :, , ,. ~. ' '! . ; : ~,': " : < " .. . " i, .' . ,: ' ." :.', . . \ l ~ ',: ; ~ ~ \ ,', .".: ,;? +:. ' .: :...; : , ".. I: ~:' ~:. ,': ',',: " ':' II . ~ ' ~ ,': :' :':-, ~ ;,:~; '~"~ ';,' ~': ':; .':. . :;' "~:' .'.: :~,~; ',~ .. ",: I: ~ I' " ,',' : . .:' "I "
Z &, p ad ,JIinutes Jc:~n 23/62 pa.go ,/2
of Hoooevelt Blvd" as a southt~aot diae<.H1Ul t.o an lntcroectton of
Hercules and Lakevie\.( H.oad~ and that Lukoylow Road in t.hH 1.m~.1 Plan
:' ~ \'li:U1 shown as tarfl\innting at this interf3l:~ct.:\.on... He oXpX"o ssod tho
..
opinion that th,e Board would either ha v'.:) to consl.1.lo r' re quest.ina; the
Commission to resciIld tho .J.'Jm-l Plun b(d'oro recomnending changes in
alignment, of Il!:\kevie\'/ Hoad f3xtonsion Or' m3ke denision t.o, stand by
its original :cncommendation. The Plannor.ls int8rpratHtic.m "illS ,that
1.n ~cceptil1g the i']aj or Stre et. Plan tho Hosrd accepted the proposal
fol:' the ext.ension of Lakevie\'l Road t.o US 19~
Upon invitati.on ot' the Chairman, Go..lJni:~s1oner IJosaph IL J.rurner~
Sr.. joined the mset:tng at this time and \'Jas welcomed by tho Chairu
man. In a fe\'! "'rord3~ Commissioner 'J,lurnol' charactori~ed the work ,
',of the Board. as being very important and very vita.l"
In continued discussion oJ: the i-ltl-l diagona.l} t.he Planner
pointed out that such a diagonal \>lOuld create more Iff:Lve points""
t
(
of which this area has enough.. The Planner r.eported that although the
County does not shO\'l the extension of .Lakeview Road to US 19 on the
map; in his discussion of this \'Jlth members of the County Planning
~nd Engineering stafr he found them sympathetic to the idea of the
Lakeview extension; and he, himself'~. .felt Lakeview had more merit
, I
I
..
than Nursery lload a.s a connoctor bo t;'ree n Al teI'na t e 19 and US 19,
particularly giv i,ng southeast Cleur\1at(~r reaident.s direct access to
"new shopping center developlaout,s (1-1ont _'5.0 Iner~1-\'iard, !,1::i.d \-ray , and the
proposed Sears cent/er), A pO::isi'olc; future connection from lndj.an
Rocks Beach to LukeviC::!vT Hoad. awl its tie-in to a B<lyshOl~(~ Blvd '. along
Tampa Bay \yas alt30 discu.JsecL drQ H.aade reported t.hat t,he proposed
subdivision \-las platted to fall lrJ tile i~-,:U3 cla::;:.;ifj,c~1tion(fIlln:i,lrtum
lot area 10,000 t.o 20,000 [i q" f't. alld Hlin~,rllwn .fl OOT' ~ire(:.. l?Cn :1 g" ft.)
and is going to be a higl}-cLOl;i~ Dubdb':l.s:Lon of cxpens:l.Vl:1 home:::!.
''r .,
, "
". '-/
He furthor re'ported that~ rear lot lin'3s vi" t.he :iOuth tIer of lets
\'lould abut the e:;.:tension of LalmvicH ltorHl ~ if l.akr.:vieu :5.[; 1>11 t !~hl'out;h ~
': '.' .' ,:"': .'. . ' " ',' . . .l \~ " . ", ". . ..' ...". .+', " :,' :' ~. \' ;,' \., '. '.:' .'.:. -, :'. ':: ." .:: . "':' ,.:.:... I'I'~( ..:: ..' ,:..; '.". ~ '; " : ~ .'. ~ :-: : "':, '.: " .: ; '.~ ': \':~: .': .'; -'.~' :', _ ",.';': ", .... '. ; :'.,:. . "". \ .r..:; '~' ' .' " -: ~, :', : : ' ."':, :, ......;,.:;.. f ,; ( " ,
z u:. P Ed L.1inutoo
Jun 2) /62.
Pago #3
so that. there \'lould be double frontago lota on l.nkevi,ew, \'.:hich under
the c1.rcumstances tho Subdivision Commit. J,~oe dtd not. .foul ''1ottld be
f".,
objoctionablo.. Tht1 Board wos 1.nformod that the developer ~1af~ at-
tempting to acquire property south of tihis plat, rAnd that. the Com-
mittee i'el,t. that if t,his is so tha,t I:.ha applicant i'IOUld be requasted
to dedicate a J.OO ft.. right-of-'wuy for Lakev:tf:)w Hoad through that
area; also to provido a pedestrian, e~scmont t.hrough the south tier
of lots in vie", of the approximate quarter mtls l~ngth of the cul-
de~sac. ~-1r.. Heade concluded \/i th "t.he statement that: lIF'rom our
standpoint, I do not see any ob,jection to the layout...!?
,1\ t J: JJ;~ P. 11.. J.1r D \;ard Hodgers an d .l,lr ~ ~/lilne r CUlflillings, the
ap.>1icants, appeared before the 13oat'd to disGuas details of' their
proposed development of the tract~ !..!r.. liodgers stated his purpose
in submitting, 'the dravli.ng \/as to get ,an idea 6.1" its acceptability if'
they platted the tract in s l.milar manner" In die cU.'Jsion vd,th the
realtors the Board was told. that they were informed by J-W" Harn, ovm':'
er of the property to the south, that the estate was not in a state
to set a price on the pro pe rty' ; and tha t if the estate did set a
price on it, they thouaht they \'lould bl..=! interested in it" 'llhe Planner
explained tha I; upon conferring \'!ith 1;he COtUlty y that the County do~s
desire Lakeviel'l,to go tllrough, and ",ould normnlly expect. to follow
the quarter see tion line.. He stated tho .i.loa~l"'d t,3. 00 jo c ti ye 'rIHS to
get a conll11itrnent that right~oi'-way for thE:;! ext~cnsion ~)f L~,kt~view
Head \lould be pro"ided~ l,1r" Hodgers rf:1plj.ed that their group can't
,give thl.LJ cO:llmitment. ,~nd if they are r(;;quir'sd to give half of' Lake-
vie\'! right-of-'VI.?Y, they '.li11 not plE\t... He. lat(~r eXpl'eS52d doubt
"
'.'
/~
. ,~_/
: '
'I
."
that they'. could carry ont, the:Lr p1::.l..n 'iy?eause 01' muck depo:;,j. ts on
:,'J
partoi' the, proper'ty. In j,'e~lF'on~1f;;! 1~o l..h~" iLeadc ~ S i.nquiry a::.)" to
i
vrhether if' they acquire the property t~o ch\:: SOlLth th(~y hould give
.:',: .~'...., ,.... ::..... .:;.....~:.....:......::{:;. ...'...:....!:~.,....:.,:::;...::..::" .'~.,:.;::..::I..:.'~:...~...::.~:...:.:...~.'.:,: ..<':"<'''::',<~:'~.I/'E''~'....':':'''''''I~'':''::'~~'':- :.~;':.'i .''''''~~::'':'>'I''''''::''' ";";'::"':: .':.' ..,'1 ,"j;. ~.' ...I"I.'.~~'I.:'<'::':;:';'.~"~ ~\"J I ,~.". .'~' ','~', '1
'z &~ P Hd l.tiI\lJ.l:.ao
Jan 23/62 Page J4
~
100 ft.,. ri[;ht.-O!.>-"Iay} 1'/11'0 HodgtH'fl stfat~ed if tho)r acquiru it, ho
nSfJ1.Uned thoy '>JOuld4 'fhe Heultol's Hel'C~ informed' t.hat a lOr) ft"
right...o.r'.'t/ay htld been 'obtainod in recent pln~t.1ng3 and t#lwt. the
C01.U1ty 8ho\'13 100 .ft... j:'i,gh t~-~of-Hay' hOl'e., 'the Cha irlllan i3xpre sned a
porsonal disllko for doubl(~ frontage l?ts and nt~acQd hiB, opinion of
t~he mat t.er \wuld depend entirely on ~f.l,k~vlc;\... be.ing extonded( which he
t:.hought it VlOllld)" "llhe Board d:i.ocussed at length the possibility, of
det.'l.acl~il1g IJak~viewt;outh of' the qu.arl;er section line if extended in
t,his' area and its ef'fect on continu'3d ali,'7~!lll1ent~1 (much of this t.o be
, detel'lll:i.ned by the Go Ullty ) c
'rhe Chairman t.hanked l,lr. aod~ers and t.1r" Cummings fOl~ their
attendance uud,thuy loft the meeting at 4:10 p~ Mo'
After a further dis CU3 s1,on of the Subdivision Comr:.i t tee' s
..~.....'
recommendations and of the facts disclosed' in discussion "lith the
realtors. ~ S)lep,arc;...Jnovefl..._tJl!1t. t.h.~:1Ll\geI!.d~.._f1;~'!1rjL~"J.)!J 9-€lf'e,r:r.~..c!
}E!.~h~J.nstructi,~ns tSL the C,:hty"_Py1an!l..P::.!:.L9r further' Jnv';E.tigatiQ..n~E.
_con~ultation It.:!:. th the~fli).?J~can t.~-S:.Q.u~_;.:p...ing, .~~!li-S~'H~.iQ!U2.~'ill rt,"
h~J.f .rig!1j;",o~~,wC!.t for_b.alt~~.JfPJ.id .e1S!"~ns~on .1'ri~11in~jlis.. t!.~~
jlIld p.k~tinf1;~.t.Q..Jneet ll-lB ~~SlH.irem~ntl s .J10 100Q Jj.(J" ft.. :l;.~.J.,lus) G,
B.a..!Lm.9t.i on, ~e conde,g,..BY 1,tr :'..-ljg.ti~e_~':..l:!M~.;'is.ed trr!fl!L~!!!2..l;lsJ.'y.~
"
I
!
\ '
,,- .
, \
i
"
SUNNY GnOV1~ THAIIJJ~H. PA RK - Pi~.()PO:]gD Lll.YOUT J~N D ZONING FOR
I>I___......~_...L______....-.!.. .. '.......fo._..,.....;.I'-.."i"....~"'.. ....I.,..~~ ..... ~i.."""""""':.a,"".,.",.., ~., .~.,..,.....,.....;.~....J~.lo
, , ,
ANNJ;XA'~ION All.~A (LOG ATIOH SO" ,SIDg' 01,1 GULF-l'O-BAY' .t3IND.. B31'\:,l;ZN
.;o............~..>>-I'......~~....:,~I" .... ...q >~"')~""~"'.... "'l".~ .
I~ "
B3LCHza ROAD r\HD US 19, Dlit:~crfLY J;rU'f VIii :i:t)~HvrLL;~ 3U13tiIV:i:3ION) -
Lte ouest for Board re comrnendG.t.'lon v:a S Inad'3 in memorandum from the
,
City l..fu.nager ~ 'JllH~ Plal.1ner di,a(;U3!.H~~i \li 1~h tho go::J. I'd \rU:r'iuus fea tU!'& n
..
of' the plot plan, t.he existing pnrk \ anl~ pro posed derJicat ions for
l)ruici Road and ;.4agnoliu DriVE \'v:i.1~hin t.h'3 ;)ortions adt\Hd,. ile also
, '\ ma.de referent e to a Pl'8Vivus ;,t.u tly n.:..J:~ by htl~l ()f ;:1 1'8 cCP'};~18ndBd pl&n
\.../
') .for this total aroa Ud a logicul Dr~a ,i'or continuou:,~ mobile home
pal-'ks 0 He rt'1Gom:n(3nded t.his pn)por;'f::d :i,:.1Y out., n~; ell':: th u t g~~nm'r.:.ll y
Z & P Dd Minutes
Jon 23/62 Page #5
"',
.f )
..' ,
..
mot the I.fQbilo Home Park District requirementu and sta.t.ad he found
no ob.ject..ion to i.t.. l1J?on4~[t1.oti~w. bl. !:1r-I>._J:~b..~l',g!,d t._ sec.9!l.~QLl1!:"
!1Y.J..andar.t...!:be ~oar(t..Y9.ted ~ d~Lex: !!Eionda~te,n~ IlL~U:are1:~~
nmllf!!'. ~o,_!he..~J&1divisio!l.. Cpmmitt,~e.-.!.or reegn"
HAULAND BAR1'HOLOMEW AND A 3.30CIATES CON'fRACT ~ Plat.e ltevisioll: ...
__~_ ..-- ....u....__.. ..1 "'1:. r _.....Mr ~III..._ __~__... T . -,#.& Tr ...d._.~
'.'
".. "
A report \'lUB made by 1J1.r. Kruse B:1d' ~,i..r. \1011e concerning recent 're-
que sts of HBA in arranging to accept c os t of J'evision of plates over
and above expected costs.. 'l'his item \'las diocu[Jsed \dth the City
!,lanager ...lith a collective opinion (1'Ianager~ Chait'man) B.11d Planner)
that any aJditional costs incurred because of dela.y could be ne-
gotiatedo ' Board members \Jere informed of the effect of their plate
inclusions on th~ cost of the Comprehonsive Plan i(Sport 1 as \'iell as
printing costs of additional copies 0 J<lembers made. inquiry as to
extent the final report might be delayed by use of the, present bud-
get funds for the plate revision" 'rhe PlalU1er advised that some
prior, Commission ac'tion in 'regaru to the Housing l{eport and Capit.al
Improvement Program would also be re quired before completion of the
final re port 0
.4t~.J...J..O() P D ~4." COllLuissioner 'furner thanked th~ Board for the
opportunity of 'boing'ipresent and, left the meetingo
~.her Board agre!Jd ~he Cha,irl.@n' s SU~ '~e5tion .to negoti.?~
y.ri~th t..he consE.ltants and [JJ1~..illLll....!4lat~ ~lI:.t'?-!}K~ent:i,~ ,~an be mat!!'~ \f..ith
them concerning .J:;h.t,.~. ;;1100000 .f~~t!re q~ted,.1'.Q.r rS':i.Jdi12..Q.LClnq .E.9.n.:.
cerninr;~1J.sible ecgnolnies in )1:umqer 01' ,e.l'it~s to b9-. UH<Jc:!.~.
LAK,SLAND CONlrl~.l.uNCE - The !3oard ""US reminded of .JHl1UW'Y 25 and
""'IlIiL. 'I'........-~ ~.................... .v__
January ,26 dates for this, conference on the Cell t.!'ul JJuDi.ness' vis t.rict 0
I
rlegistration fea was quoted as ~5~OO~
I
\
'\,) \
\
'.
..:::.\1: '> '.' ","~:,:'::;':d:" :.-:.:~.'...::,':'.:,:.:l~.. '~I:,~-:"":;:{~'<':"L.''''~~'':':'l':' :.'\...,'....:."..'..,~~.~.,:. :" C '>.:"'. .:J.:....;..:........:.:..~'\ ".'.:',:).i..: ':.:'. ...,,'I,...:"I'.~.~....II,.......,,..:'..
Z &P Bd' iUnutes '
Jan 2;/62, Page #6
,:c'
The Planner advisod that m$mbora should be .familiar Wlth
the' Capital Improvernenl~ Outline distributed to t.ho Board. lIo stated
that, thal~ has been a delay 'in tho' discuDsion betwnen Gerald \/lJimer
"
and the City TreastU~or concerning priority of projects and policy,
on finance program due to the re Cellt il1ne 8S and ret..ireme,l'lt 0 f th.e
I
City'l'reasUl"er u
.. !
,
c,
, ,
.The Ohairman reported 'that l'1rn \lolle spoke before, the Suncoast
.r>.
,
. . . .
League of' 1.Junicipalit ies at Zephyr Hill s, Flu. I on Jamiary 13, and'
''las very highlycomplimeritGd on' hiD 'participation in the progr&nlo
, A,GE1VDA .!.'r~.L:!.~ ,~J,a H b )( c)_an~ {~..t were not covered du (; to ,lack
of timed
The meeting was adjourn~d at 5~15 PaMn
;.';'-, .. ' lle sp e,ctifully s uhnli t tad II
(" ,'; .,~. ". ~.t.0CtI.et~_,
/',;,','" Jack I.. \~olle. Sec'y
'::::: ':'~\ ' " City, Planner , '
.~~';' :. ,.I . . ' I '. , c.
, (
, i
,p.: .
,'" .
.!.. " .
,I
I
r:~~'. .
~ ,.. .' .
~:> ..' .
'\
,
, J
:1
. '!
',I
;. ~ I
I
(' ,
'j' '
....
, .
.,'; !
;
j
:1
,
I
)'. '
,;
'\
"
, ;
)
..,
" .
'.(,' """\
. ''"'-'
"
, ,
.'
~ . . . 1 >
.'.' ..
,,'
~ '.", .
.,~. ..
I ~
j
"
~I' i' '"