01/02/1962 - Special
',~
, I
ZONING l\ltD p.l.J~t:r~ :tHU iJOP.IW
UinutE:t8 of the 3i)Gciul A/lt.:)oting h..jld ut. roqlJost of t~hu C1ty
, COlllmiss iOll) Janu.'lry 2, 1962,~
Hai'ere nc a is ok'1de to Gi t~r COhtmis!.Jion minut.e3 of ']tH1Unry 2,
1962 t Page lil'r. i''ll'. J tl trunk rlnncock J Sr.., reported to the COIILnis-
s:J.on that h~ had a contract 1'Jith tha ?inriLlas County Hoard of Public
J:nstruction in regard to the aale of a 20 acre tract in Section 12...
29-15 as a site for' a ,jur.ior high school.. '1'hl; contract W:-;.R t./o (;om..
tnit h:l.ln to provide j.raproved stredts ,rllld the r8cordj.ng of the deed
for Sher'~ood Stre ~ t l'ight-of-vlay in particular t an d provided that
the Pinellas Count.y .doard of Public' Instruct..ion \'loulu retain
~3'8JOOO.OO from the purchase money until such streets are .finished..
'l;Ir.. Hancock at t,his 'meeting ,.sas offering doed for the 3herl'tooa St..
riciht-of-way and showed upon a. drill-ling of' this area ,Saturn Ave ~ OJ
Flagler Dr.J Sherwood St.., and a p0~lible street right-of-way con-
necting Flagler with Sher\'lOod (this street to be to the west of
pre'sently improved' industrial property).. The Zoning and Planning
Board (~~mbers Kruse, Gates} R~ade. Mylander) Harries and 8hepard
being present) was requested b~r the {Ilayar to discuss this proposal
ill separate meeting \n.th ,Fir.. Hancock" '.rIle Ch3irrnan and the Board
'retired then to the co.n.ltittee. ~oom, at ''lhich time the City PlaI?,ner
\,',\
" \,/
was in attendance .. Here t.Jr" Hancock sga in explained his 311 er\.;o od
Street co:n:ni tme:n t , and other plans as they t,i~~d into a P1'6'/io118
"
mastor plan of the proposed subdivision i'or the ';1 rea) :; nd t.he agrea..
ment that had been temporarily approved .ioint. J.y by the develope;- s ~
the late City l~ng ineer) u nd t.h'3 Cit..y Planner ill l"egard to r':i.ght-o-f-
\~ay for the North !\eene itoad c,:xti8113ion through l~he prcpel"tjr ~
The Board discussed the follOl'ling point,a l1ith :cel'm:-ence to the
overall plan!ling and land \.we l'e qu.irsn:E:nt [; of th1s are a:
Ii
"
: ~ :.' .'..' . '~'_.. ';,": ',' .. , '. ", " '.......' " .': ":, . : . ". '~:',~ I \'.. ~: .':, ': .:' ". . ~: ,', ::. I"..:.' :,'" '. /'~ ';" : ":"'" ,. ~ . ,.' . .~, J" .~. :': . .... ' ., . ' '., ::' : ~ i '~'I': '; :.: ;::: :';. :~,: I ',',' :';. . .' _ .: \ ,f .::: ":' '; ":"" ..' .:.!: : . -: .:':,,' ,', '.. ",:. (~(.. ,,: ',~' .'1, :', ;": :"::~~' , : ~ .:: :~ ',~'
~: .
j' ,
1 '
:(.
jl'
,.
1:,'"
r:
" ,
r;,
"
;}
f..'..
<.' . .
, '
"
'j
::: '
(, '
~ ~,
~, I
IA; , .
=~. :'
\"
~;'. ,,~\
;"....1
"'. '
I',: ,
;l
<"<I
",
,
"
." c
-\'cl
"
,
, '
",',
~ :
,... . ..
.
~.' '"...,,;......
'~, ~ .'
\",.
r: "
Z It. P JJd dinut~as
Jf.1 n 2/62
Page ,12
2,\ y )j1lae;ler Driv9 extension .~\hd ull'.1nu;J.La connoction to
lJorcule l~ ~
Street
b.\ Sherwood :t;O:l;"~:: cxtanoi,ol1 and/.)r lonp to S0:r'VO si.n~le
family deve lopment '.
c" Canna ction bet.,.,re un Nort;h f1e~ltle !toad ~xin tirlft north of the
3A'L itnilroad. crosoj.ng l"'ailroadJ and Ultimately to
continue to Drew Stireat, .
C l) A junior high .site being; located somowher'e :In the
iliI'par.k vie init;:.y.' '.(1... lO ' .
atH-A::2-O-^<.~\ O..J<~
e" QOtiroate improveu~nt of E:.tt'LmKtto S-tro-e-t \'IOGt from ?tt~~
, Hel'cules co the Nor.th l\eene ltoad ex.tel:1s~ ~'J"?"'II.J!..("ff:!::J-flJ
1- ..z !J -It.;;! Au.u.eu",~'1
Plat.es and maps available in, the Planning O.t'.fica incorporate <J
theso points as record of eloments of planning necessary for this
are a 0
In that j.ir.. Hancock1 s proposal had inca rporated these elements
of planning ~or the area, the Board passed a motion unanimously' to
recornlnend thatl4ro Hancock's deed for right-of-r/ay of Sherwood
Str6lSt be accepted by the City Go,nalission~
The Board at this time adjourned 2.ncl reconvened at the City
Commi 55 ion mea ting , and upon i11qu iry of the !.Iayor, li1r" Kruse
r,l;ported t.he Board's action concerning this matter I;> He reminded
the 00;'.1.:1185 ion of' a pre ViOU3 s inglef'amily us e commitment that ,had
beer! made concerning the transf~r of this pro party originally to
i.fr.. Hancock. Because of th:ts he suggested ttk"\t a document be exe-
cuted rescinding the single family use agreement between l.!r..
Hancock and t~he City for that portion of the property' t-;hnt l'loi.tld be
j
,'I
I
, I
'1
'I
\
purchased by the School Board.., '.rhe above r,) cOJ!lffi8ndation and actions
of the Spacial J11eeting 01' the Zord.ng and PIa nnirlg Boa rd are incor-
porated in the minutes of the Cit,y Com.'l1ission for this date"
Respact.fully submitt.edll
~~J?WA~ecty
(J6itY Plawlor ,