10/17/1961
. ~:: '. ,::'" ~ \, : : ..: l :' '..1 ,",~'::, ~ : '. :',':': " ." ,,: ,t :: "I~, :'. c ':, .j.: I' ~..".: " I : ~ ..=." I:', .'.,,:,' I ': .:~.. .. :. ','.. > ,':,~,;: '::: P, ~ I:..: ~,,:', I; :/: '," ~: ;", '. ..' . ': t i ~. : . :',; ~ >~, ;. ,,' /~:.~ ~:l ': ~, ..~ : ':'., " :.'.': ~' .;: ,:;'.' '::" :.: ::'":,', ' ',~::, :. ". ,f.: ", ' ."~ , ",:): ': ~ ' .:, I' . ,.; : I.,' ;,
~:.ON ING JU: D PLAtJl~INQ BOJ\HD
, .("'..
, I
rJ1inutca of tho lV(CO ti.ng, Ifuosdny, October 1'7 t 1961"
'L'ha iUoeting was called to order (:l t 2: 30 P M !~!. by the Chairmun J
,1.11" _ Kr\uJO. Pre sent \'lare l-1ombers Kenrwdy t Har.ries t j~ylander J Shopard ~
Oates and Ga 110\'/l.lY t l.ir. l{ett ig of the J~ngineA ring JJapar t:nent J und
~.1r" t.'o110 It
'rho Cha lrman, welcomed ~..lro Harry \J" Shepard who ,'Vas appointed
to the Board by the Co,u\nission Oc tab a1' 16 to f1.11 the terlll of
i:'IrD Jam38 Novotny. It was annoullced tha t 1.ir" Novotny's reBignacion
uas accepted wi th regret 011 that Bame date. 'I'he eha irman commented
that, he considered it .particula.rly valuable to have ~/lr~ Shepard as
a ~ilembGr J in that the Board can effect S0a119 liaison throu~h him with
the Board of Adjustmenb and Appeal on Zoning. dr~ Shepara expressed
his pleasure in serving as a :nemb er of tha Zoning and Plann ing Board Q
'fhe millUtes of the' Oct. 10 j 1961 ~ me~ting 'VJere approved as read..
S,lGN J:BCO!,1.L!;NDATIO.~CONTINU3D Ffl.Oi-i~9CT 10L611~' 'fhe Planner
advised that Asst ~ Oity Jlttorney Kennedy was unable to meet with
the Board on this day for discussion of the possibllity of revision
of the Sign Ordinanceo 'rhe Planner fw~thar advised that a rt?,QuesJ:.
..-..
)
,for a temEOI:aI.t~i-gn for, CJ.ei:1I'.vie'~ TO\'/ers on. ~slaf!S. gS~M was con-
sidered by the City Co~nission on October 16 and that action was post-
"
'\
poned until the next regular .111eetii:ll~ as m.i~f) ir.!:orma',:,ton was ,needed
from .l,lr.. illbert Po .ltogers, represent:tng Clearview Towerso The Beard,
'das informed that this sign request had been rei'erred by the Planner
..
t~o the City At,torney as an. exception to the sign ordixlance (as appli-
cation was for a real estate sign over 6 sq. fta in area). ~:o
:~iQ,11e t:,9J?rorted t.r..a t ,~the l!.EEll.cat iOl},,!~r .CGi[~~..!:.,:.:lal._~?:gn 11Z. I:h:i:.lli~
~'~ot,el (!r!ZOv'., R.!?~:d._k@.~ bY)~lB )leld in char ~laII!l_Ang_S~f.f.!~.Q
De cision
...._-~....-....
~~~ by~the B.Q..ard J1.2...l!,grry~ oy'or Agenda ~~e.n_.lil_~.__~_ tV~,.2.9!!~~E..cJi!-
BE..g,~...~to the ,next J~~.bi~I1rL.ill. fur!;o..l}~eyie!!"
.~QNlllJL)3AYS*.Q~Ol~.~_j Cv'Nll]]!lI~1L.J1ill~L OCT:~~~l) -. .C:t~F~~:i=
1061 .. The Planner reported that hl:: had advised ;.~1r" Baskin by'
r-
..:-_J
,
letter of the Boardt:;! request .fOI' an oxpresston of approval 01" dis-
approval .from the Ot'l'TI131"a of Lot 16 and Lot 19, but had not, received
this 'ini'orma tion from him as ye to It; \'Jas pointed out that the
, .,
! .
z ~(. P j.linutoi:1
Uc t J.'/ / (, 1 1,' ago ,/ ').
ori~innl 't.on1.ng for \:;he Hauth FintI,ar uppro',od by tho Gommitmion -was
~ ft-i'~ zoning for the ext.f31.'ior) wHl Busine 8$ ze, nlng l'Qr the intorior"
'1\he Planner :3 tu tod. tho. t. he could not. re COffiillElnd a certain amount of
business zoning based on the population of che area and that' much
o~ this business ,."ould serve "p,:lssers throu;')1" u He pointed out that
business zonin$ ,~uld permit flexibility for each property o~mer
, to develop his property 0 It "tas hla opinion that if .L'lr u Baskill is
grant.ed \;his requested change to busine S8, and the Ih:~goon owner re-
quescs busil1es~ usage to the wast of his pre-party., that th~ whole
, south. finger would be involved in' l'Bu zoning" He gave a.a his inter-
pretation of the incant of the exist i.ng zoning ordi.nanca in relating
the, amount of business to the number of rooms or unit.s, that such
use (in an R-M zone) v~uld be limited to business tha~ largely
','c
served residents of the dual use buildingso
He stated 111' think
, .
, "....)
" I
. ....""~.
possibly there' will be certain areas \<dd.ch should be motel ara.'9.S
only and other, areas \-lith entirely busine 55', serviC0BlI" .Mr.. liettig
suggested that a requirement for a setback in a business zone on
I
property rezoned from R-N \/ould be desirable and a forward step"
Several members thought that most;. motels \'Iould pre.fer to establish
a\'lay .from the bridgehead. Mr~ Kruse raised the question of hot.." the
requested. rezoning might affoct. people who have bought buslness
zonlad property depending on the .R-!~ dt)vell.1pmerrc u It was pointed out
tha t 'State Road. Depart,m3 nt Plans for the bridge approach roads, not.
yat available to t.he Board, min;ht .affcet llS 0 of' the property. o:ehe
Bop..xd learned that present plans are i'o l' the b1'1.d.r.;B to be cleva ted ,>
..1rn Kennedy expresr;;ed the opinion th:-it the aZ'tHl 01.' ti'lf;: brldge ap-.
'". )
. ,........'
proach should be planned t,O be llt.tract:tve to a~;. many tourists as
possi.ble) siricG it ,\,,'.Juld be their .rirst sight. of Gl/~a:c\..,ater. !.Jr"
Kennedy further recommended tha t only r'ezoni!l{; eonsidered absolutely
necessar~r/g~oHb~roved at this time, \dth other areas of request left
I
:\'. ;",: "~':" '.' ,:.. 'A: M:~' .:::;'. ....::..~::.::.: ~,I.,:',.,.~.:..'.~~,':'~,:.." ...,..,r:':....: '.;.~ :..-::::,'1 ;,',:.:<.'. )'.:./....:::'.;~'>./,..i,,:.' '........~'.j.:.: ,:...:......,:. :.:'~ :'::;:"'~:-":.' :.:,;'.,:: l'~";.""::' I.:/..'::~~.', :....:..:...~>...:~\.:.:.". ..:::.:,'.\"~.:':
z (;~ I) Hd~ .l/!bll.lt,(>I.>
u,: t:. 1/ I ,Jl i',;1H;(:J if j
opon for. i'uture dc-)cis.ion. 11ir. ~iolle utatad the question \'{tlS uhe t.her
~ the lots apeciriod .In the request. should follow the l.onin,~ tho ap-
plicant indicated, or \Ihethsl" the ll-!\i and UflU zOl1ing should be aplit1 a
After (~:r.:~her disnu~j,Q.~~!:!ra Gates-.@oved, th.a~ ~~ case b~ r,e~.urned
I
, ,t,P, ,the, 7....qn.~ Oommittee for ~.t.8. c~efll1 study and r~somnlendation~
2t15 l~~,;i.on wan ~se_q9nded bX_.~U:. , Harries. and , was passed U1pl1,i,mo~!lJ....Y>
Chairman Kl'usa appointed io1ro Shepard as an additional member
o~ the Zoning Committeeo
, ,
~,~ ,')'
: .,.....
\ ",
, .,
~p st~ik~t9~ fol1ov~~:
~ect1on 1: Page #1
Page ll2
~A } 1 a
\
.. (B) 10
(B) 3.,
Section 4: Page #3
to. . ...- 1 ~
Section 5: Page #3
411.~_~
} {~ '
l~.. Shepard wan excused from 'th9 mcet.ing at. Jl-~4S to fill a prev:tom..~
engagement 0
~tw:!.~ n -1;;....,<..AL
.. 'change to .i3usiness 20nlng
,i.lass Brosu sJte to correct
zoning map '"
S,ec,tion~: Page if2
Definition of Home Oc cupatj.on
'I
" ',J'
Exclude from fi-l tind ft-2 areas"
Clnriiicati on of Sl~rv ices-\'lord i.ng.,
~cction ~: Page #3
Definition of Lot -
i',
Provide for contiguoua port~ionSn
. ~ ", ' \
.~, ,
"
I
.,"::.':,',:: :.' :" ,....: !\,'. ;.:.'~'.," .i ,<:~ ". ,', :\'.J' ':.' : "':'.' ,/: . \~<.:,;,.::..\\I..:..:'.<':., .: :.1: ',' ":::,":.'~I~.' ......,1':..:'..'" .:,.:. ':'~';.',:'::,: ,'j,:, ~...' " ':':", ':'.F,'.",',:~:',,: ;.';~'J~ ,:",.'. \. ..~ ,'''...... .::..'.:.':":, "':-:~': ::"':"~"-:.':.'.'.
( .. '/ '" 'b"
JC,~ .\ II . J.
A','Jl!,O kh
- il'tobilo HOtTlEI to replace
'llrailor Park \-/horevor used"
'ro exclude Homa Uccupatiom.'
undor U:,m liegulat:i.onn t l'llobile
Home Dist.rict
Detailod corrections' of the above are indlcated on the of'fi.ce
secretary's master copy of this proposed 1960 Ol~d.il1t:!nlJ(l u
In tYie discussion of Sect:i.on 9, tl1e Fla,n:l0r prc/posed aj1 fLd~,
dltioll t~o Item (1) a.ft.er "l.labile Homes arId accessory usesU nr
Ilcqttage tmits lUlder one ownershipu ft He stated this would .;1,.110w
an owner to develop ~ sl~j."ies of: small apartments; also that he '\1ould
like to add that, a.nythin,t; allowed in R-i.. and R-l.lzon~s be allm'lsd
in ,the !o1obile Home zone to keep it from being a selective type of'
thing~ After some discussiont the Board decided net to accept che
'"
Plan ner 1 s pro posal sat this time"
Section 10 and the remaining sections of pr oposed Ordi.nance 882
are to be r,evievred at the next meeting. 1'he Plqnner, was requested
',to submit to members pr~tor to the meeting his writ~ten' recownenuatio11S
for additions to or changes in the remaining sectioIls"
....--.,
, , i
.~_...
;-L
g1lY1Q.E STATION. S~!;?~bAN) lli21lTIl\~.:?.'11 _90HN!~lLg.UU!s)i'~:1~Q..:J}At
BLVD.. F.ND COACH1/lAN ROAD - The ?lanner indicated that the siz~ of the
___'--~_._.1 __.-u.-
."
,1~~', (1501 xl 50 ,) and 'the pump setback shown i-mra s at:l.sfactor,r. He
'I
rocommended approval of the sj,1;e plan subject to I.he approach
drives meeting tho raquir-ements of' the City' Enginc~/.H"ing DepartlIwnt <'
'fhe Board approved the site plan as recoIlJmended..
~. ~ .....1.JIIo. 1- ..._.......""" __ _____loJ_...._.___
( .
The ,me:etiruJ adjournod at 5: 20 p" !il'1
Respectfully submitt~d~
~O ....~. {J.)&e_
'8ck :r.. ''folIe ~ Sec'}Y
'ity Planner
I I , "~
, --..I
;'