07/18/1961
.- .. , . . ~ .:. ,.:. , ~'. .::~,;' ~: !'.: ::, >.', , :, ~ ,: " ,:: .' ~ '.'!., ~. . . '; ~~" . \' I ~;'::;".~ ',: ..., :; I:, ,~,.' : J. :" 'l.,' . ~ ',+ .: " ' ' '. ~ ,",:, '....::..;'; ~:'l;: ~: , ,".;. '...~, ;. .',: :'.:: : : ":, " . .., ~ .~, I" ~ \ '\ 1'. ',~ j',"':" :' " ~:. '... 1 ,'. .... . ,: <r:,;: ~:"\. :. ' " :...... ' . ~ . :': t ; " '.' " ',., '.' :" ': '
~
ZON INll ,\ND PLANN ING 130AHD
l.finut.oa of tho ,HaatJ..ng) 'ruesday~ July 18, 1961..
_. '-...~....,.. ...
'j,~.~... fr~e m0e1~ing was called to orufl];' at :3 :30 Pol 11.. by the Chairraan~
4'1..1. Kruse.. }lresent ware 111ambers Gat~Js t Reade t Kcnn'l;~dY'l Galloway
and S\'lan., 1'1r... Rettig of. ~hl!! Sngineering Department lo and Mr. \'lolle~
,....-....
I .'
,_.J
The Minut.es of the July IIi 1961 p meeting 1,-/01''':: approved as read"
.\1~DSOR .E4KK~.$UBDIV:CS ION.JN~t.r-r._I:J.a.l!..l.~S~d~~1:!su.ill! Almexa-
Bfllll '.. G9I1;GLa;t, I;:l,o,cat,ioll ~~ S~!.lth~~~_ .qqrnoUrlion Street and Nor1ill,
~.J!..B..oad_ - lifr" \/011G raportedthat ho had talked with l~lr~ Albreoht ~
the 'engineer, about the Board' 5 request for a masteU~~,an but; tha1~
this had not been receivod as yet.. He stated f.urther that the en-
gineor had not objected to the I,ittle Neck Road extension into
Sunset Lake Estates) but did not state that the developer would
agree ~ 14rc Wolle estimated the distance bet\-reen ''''eene Road and
Nug~et Drive as approximat.ely 1600' .rt Co and stated that normal sub,-
division deSlgli would' break this _ l.lr. Rettig advised that. plans
for, the proposed sewer lj.ne do not rec()gni~~e the extension of'Lit-
tle Neck Road and that none of' the streets are laid out as thorou~h-
fares. After some further dj.scussion of the necessity for the Little
Neck lload extension, Fir.. iteade withdrew his objecti.on to a through
stroet link to Souvenir DriveQ The Board voted to reconsider ac-
~........_-----._~--_.",,-----
,
.f
t ion 9f_~1l1:i~ J~~ ' ~n.5L~.Q._i.1lQE::!.Y~~_.J!_hS_J~~~Lqf , \!~nd~_qr Pa_rJc. .~l!l?d;hy~Q!!.
~ "I
Hith 1~,9.!;:;.r.:em~~l:1'C_,f9}: ~jJ.t~rW!lfl OPL t!!L;9~ ;~~~~~s,t~ J!.~_Ji2.l"t,l~-K~.!W-~.
~ aJ1d t~...9~s~ th:?~.....Q.2.lleJ,c!e~:~:JorJ bf;:_..!!\:iYeE'_ tiL,!;j1e r~1S.~'(:U~J2!!
of orooodod l.ittle Hf:ck Road south '.tnto Sunset Lake r~states Subd:L-
__L 111 _ _1 "V...............__..__..______-._.___~___.__._..... '1"& v-... ..
'y:i:3ton~-p"g~ ~a.e.P.r9.\r&_\.@.S a~..29__!?I!t~"..t::E.~_5~yJ~~.9~iE:!_Qf an .~$'~~.ptahlQ
mfi~~ t e r P,J.@J1"
, "'\
,., J
,.~
Annexat'lon - 0ue to the fae~, t.hat i t, i~a~> learned, thi-lt. th is unit I
--..---.
\andsot' Park Subdtvi.sion ~roperty) Has pUl'chat5od fr'oiTl o\mer of the
.. '.
"
ant ire cract., "1110 at this time l'Gtains oi'mership of t,he remaindHr
Z foG P Hinut.eu
~ruJ.y 11J. l'YJl
P,., TO t;'
\;.~,..) Ir/~
unit, ..
9.Of'1 ~~! A NTIl~~ t' Afu~,~. COd.lE}J..9.b11:.J:.Mi 1\ {ns d 2...~ r ib ~_<l_ in m~p ~~..e ~ of:
J\11y,~.1).~..-1~6}.L -
,eg}!iJ!{ - l~l!'" Gallo~{ay reported tha t Zoning OOlThnit t.ee membel:'s
had all inspected the property separat.ely ~ He noted the proximity
of the 'drive-in tiheatre, filling station, bakery a.nd other co:ntler-
cial \lses and expressed doubt that any higher 'restricted zoning
than uBusinessrt \'JOuld gain acceptance ~ He pointed out. that Stal--
ere'at. 'Lake \'1ould serve as a buffer betl'~en any comnercial zone 'and
the single-family zone on the opponi te side.. lllr. \'Iolle advised that
, '~ present County zoning of trL8 tract ',.{as for busineE:l8. No action ''las
taken~
,'.~
, "
.9~ree~nd Anne~t.i<Ul - L'iJ.~. Holle reported that he had not
succeeded in contacting the develQi,er'; therefore ~ question 1"/a8 not
ans\/ered as to ".he ther s ta"ee t S HerD to be public or pri va te . In
discussing this \"li.th the City j.1anager it \-(as assumed that the 160
f't.. is dedicatf~d 1"'ight-of"'\'I'B.Yi and that j.t ,'/Ould bH desirable to
annex all the property a'C thts timE.l rather than. thu tJ portion pro-
posed (area in pencil outline on the plan present.ed: block 5 and
that par't of block 1 that lie:;) north of the existing city 1 imits
north of C'ulf...to.-Bay' Blvd~) Several memberD eXpr83BOd obJection to
entrance street dedications that \'iQuld involve parking 011 CitY" right,-
Of-\'IUY and City maintenance of the roads und park:\.ng areas, l~(l
\~olle reported that 1.t1"o Constantine hud ,;lgreed to 50 ft" right.-of-
vlay dedication on Belcher ltoad" !.tr.L~L.rurthel' dj~cus~io!l.L..2.1~_lliJi:.~9.2.
:...., . '.,...-::::.~. ',.',-: ,.', .:.'.' .~.," .>.,.~ ':,.', ,:".~,,:,,~,.:,' :'.. ',' ',~. n..~,:~... '. :,; ...':..,.:'.. ': "", ,; "" ; .:""1-~": . '. "/1/,;:.:...;' "', .~. ~l!:';;.:~:;'~~~~:'~ ..,...:'l~,~ .<,::.' ::~' :,"',':;::':':.::~":;'.: .,,+,,:/ '''''~~ :':~
.July ,U~) 1961
Pi:lf!,(l ,13
~ moved,J?11l:\.t.' t~~.. o,.,rn~r....~ <.?P his r8..p1:'El sgEtnt~.YS!...E~-!:.Q.~l~~.?tcc.l. ,.!is> appe_~
E.~~.J~hL~J!.~.s!!!l9..us~.. ,th~ --4q~vf.!!E.Qm~H~._~*'. ..!~11?-~ arei!...t....E1lr!. .tJ~....!~
Z &. P l<1inutea
the... ,Bo:ar,d ~C!.ke no actiop ur~p,;i.l hLt!P~eD.r~.
R.I)>1r... E\tLun p.~_ \'Ia~ ~assed ,wlani!!!9ld-.~.:X.o
!40AT:fQ,N _ O.F I'~~...Y_iiRUJ1! (Sl}Q}J.Z f\...Y.ft.l IN J.lAKE Bg,L~EYIEW AUpI::.
His mottion \'lao soconded
"<P..,.4 _.v .j.~ ,..... .w~~......__ ...._
W1L.... l,1r" , Kruse read letter dated July 13 $ 1961. from iJirl' HObet.t
J.. i~cDEJrmott t IJargo at tornay 7 making lnquir'Y relative to the possi..
bility of' yacating that portion oi' Lake Ave" (Shore Ave,,) lying be-
tween Lot One (l), Block Five (5)) and Lot Seventeen (17), Block
Six (6)) of" IJalta Bellavia\'! Additionll 1.11'.. \/olle furnished the Board
wi~h details concerning the Planning Board's expressed opposition
to a 1956 re quest' for vacation of tJle south 185 ft" of Shore Ave.,
bet\'l8en Dempsey and Lake. Ballevue.. Mre Hettig stated that' the City
'J Corruhission haa twice denied requ.ests in this a.rea.) The Cit.y Planner
s'tated he would not ~'er.:oU)mend apprj)val o:f vacating any \'lat.er front
property and that records showed the City Engineer supported this
policy" ~~ Rea,de m.9..Y~.g. tpat ~le ,C~~z_?la!Uler advise i.lr_:". 1'.lcDermot~,
~h.e.s._t.Jle Board is. not JJ1 i;a~.91" of 31.\bje_~,:~..1!!acwation for ,the :rea,s.o~ .th.~
it. fe~l:.s.. ~hat it, shoul..<iJl0t b,8 a pc).ic.'( nor is :tt].."gaE}.irable t.hah
the CitX vaE~anYup.Ol'tJ5m of w!.to}~ I'l'onta~ or_~'pc~.~:~~'?-,.Jiis~ion.
~s se,c,Q.ng~f!J~JI' l.u-~ gg~]...o~~JiU~_~g. :2,ra.~.2..e.~~Tf:!.e4 .y'nlY.!!~o"g~l~o.
r1.0BIL~_vH91'r~~ l!RJLJL~..:r' ltJ}::_.i~:rNf2..~L,ZONE'~_-:....~YND t~P.Bg~{6 -
Q.~:QJU.~1 LO,c.ali9.n: o1.l_~tr~...1:ti~de -S'.t' J1~,lf-t.o..Ba~ .B}..;.vd > L.-~1!Y._~~ !l~.
,119.. - J',1ro K1"\.\3e :'ead letter dat:.....' ";"\:1 18~ 1961~ from J,ir.. W. gn Lynd~
";.)
O,':ner and Operator of Lynd lH:res Mobile HQrne Park. 26l,.2 Gulf-t.o..Bay
Blvd., described as 0. 20 r;pace unit situateu :i.n thn County" He oui;- \
lined a proposal t.o develop 1~he pl'O po:r'vY \'/hich lies inside the city'
limits>> and is zoned trlJusinl'3ssH, into addittonal lots i"or ~'!obi.le
Home use Q v/ith his letter he subnli.tted two pro pmlals: Plan No.. 1
July ll~, 1961
Page /IA
~ to develop the East half of the property which involves roquest
Z &. P Bd l<1:1.nutc$
that the front setback roquirE)lllent' be changed to allOt'l full use
of this half; Plan l-Jo. 2 Hhich involves request that the front set-
bacl<; requirement be reduced t~o 170 feet.. In development under ei..
ther plan he agreed to confonn to the restrictions as reco~nended
in ,the roferendum P.\"oposal of the Zoni('..g ani Planning Board.. He
further stated that thl;) at~;ached d.l'&wing~l had been approved by the
State Board oE Health and that se~rer and water improvements had been
checked by the CitY' Engineor.. In vte\'l ot' the fact that the appli-
)
cant's apprdv'al of plans by the Board of Health contains a provisiolJ
l ' ,
that. the se\tt.3.ge .from this' trailer park shall be discharged into t,ha
t
. I
Clearwater s:mital"'Y sel':erage Syst.80l, the Board felt that some clari-
:Cication of his proposal would be needod..
Mr~ Reade moved that the
_ 1 . J& l>.. --...-_ ........ .....
,1'~
....,...) ,citY: P1El11!}e:t:', b,e ,re-9!!-efl_ted to o.Q.lli1..!E.2.nformatJo1!..1rom th~L p~n~r, ft~
to what his intent is and advise him that the Board feels all the
~_.d . 1 .L -.- ~aR ""'... --..._.......,.a... p- _ 1".1'17 . & J
j
property sllOuld be anll~ed... H~~ti~X!3las. seconded b:t J.\11"~ Ke~ll~ed~
anp. ,,~~~ ~a8sed uns?-imo,l!.s1J> Cl1J:aj...t~ Kr;..\se ,r~Slue~~tJJ1at_the Sub.::
~ivi~~o.n C<;H1},11it11ee look at _~~ P,1'?,~_r_~1uuan,d ma~ rep,prt,"
The Planner requested an expression from the Board on the poli-
cy of -rr1.thrJ.Ta.l>1a.l of approval on pl.:lte. which ha'fe not been recorded
nor have had any improvements mado '..lithin the perIod of the bond.. "
Example cited was' Madison Hei.ghts ,subdi'r1.8ion whi~h had never been
. _..._______.'1_...........__.....~~_...
recorded bu't had bond j.n accordanc(: \.,::i,th the Ordinance 632 ~onta"'al~t.~
requirement. .. action to be taken vlithin 3.8 Olonchs n.ft.er expiration
of bond.. :"..fter some d~.s CIJ.35 ion ~ it. vms agr'eed tha t; t.he approvHl of
\
subdi visioll plats in this status should lw \'rl. thdl'c';p"m upon l"ecollLllenda-
tion of the Zoning - and Planning Board and approval by t,he Commis::iion..
Developer, Ol'1nar) or agent should be '=10 notif'ied t,hat, such plat
Z & P ~11nutes
July 18, 1961
'Page 115
may receive justifiable extension of approval by application, 'or
~
'"
"
.,1'.
'I:
, ,
"
, '
, ,
i
(
i
, I
i
, !
't
j
I
l
j
I
" ' , .....-..
'" " .I
. . ......,....
: ,~ ~ , .
. '
!'
public 0
AGENDA I~~4 #6: HOUSING CODE, D!SCU~SION OF CONTENTS~ was de-'
farred due to lack of timeo
, ",1
Tho Chairman appointed ~~o Swan as a member of the Subdivi~
sian tJommittee~
The meeting \tolas adjolU'n€ld at 5:00 o'clock..
:1:.' ,
'iliRe s pe ctfully submit~ed I
!:) ~. J..t- '''> I uJ ~
J ck I~ "lolle, Sec' y
, ,ity Planner .
: j-
" 'J: ".~
:,,'i\..J
~.. .
,,'.
~~ :'J ~
:, :
.-'
. ~ '~'