10/25/1960
. ,": ~ " ." // . l, : .'. ......- '. " : " . :. . ' .' ~ ;':, .~' ~'.' '. J '. - ' . ~ '. :: . ~ ~I, " ,- :'. -:;. . j- .'.; /:' ,", :; , '::~... I', -:. ': :".:.0;" r; :" ;'1 ,~ ~..~ ~ ..' ... ;'......:' ~"l . :.: l ':.. -:."".,' ~ \':' t..' ,." '. ' ,'; I "I, . : . '.. ~..', ".. ,:'; '. '~~ ',:j~..'" ,\'.. : ."..' .; ~ ~", ~, '. : :. ~: .'.: : , ' ... :
~
"
,'., ~.
.'. . (~l~
'/.,,;N 1M1 !\''In'.) LJ'\i'. \{ j.f h, LlIldd.l
MinutG:f} of tho to\ootiOl!; ~ 'l'uosday" Octobor 25, 19f.l).
lrhe lOeo ttng \'laB CHllnd to ordor by l~ho Chai,l'man, !wlr ~ tcru80,
at. 2: 45 P. M. Present wero 11'omb(;,ll"'s Cassady, l\1ylnnder, Gates and
Hea.ds, Alice Bush of the Enginearlng Department, and l'Jlr. \'Jollo.
Member. Swan joined the meeting later..
'rhe minutes of "the Oct. 18~ 1960) . meeting l-;ero IlpprO'lred as road..
l'JIr.. Kruse announced that a card of sympathy hue been sent to
Mr.. Paul Rettig, \'lhose father passed away in Ohio on Octobor 18..
l.w.. \tol1e reported that he had not yet received a.nS~ler f'rom the
City Attorney to hi.s memo regal'ding requirements for submittal of re~
quest to the State Legislature for repeal of the Special Act' or 1931.
&oncerni~,zo~in~ change requ~st Z-6-1060 (appliq~nts: Fordman
,'~> andJ-i~lal1 ,1".. B~ach) East 90 f~,_of~ L~t, 1 't.., Block. No ~, ~. ST Arm AND
~~.YERY .SllBPI,VISIUN ~rkg~.t?{{~est cornel' of B~4" &:., Pine,) . fro.m R~2 to .R-4
The Board discussed ~le fact that all of Block No. 5 with the ex-
ception of applicants' 90 fta parcel \~S church property, that Block
.3 of this same subdi vif:11.ol1 to the north of Pine Street is zoned R-Ir,
and 'that the Board j.8 recom.,u::mding approv'al of zoning change reque lits
for areas in Blocks 2 and 1,. for inclusion ill 1960 refe renduIll items ~
tlir.. iieade moved. that the Bo(-)rd recoll'linend appr~v.el of requtlst
Z-6-1060.. His motion "'1~S seconded by i.1r.. Mylander and was pas5ed
unanimously~
9?nc~.r~i~g 'frailer Park ar~nexation$ zoni~g. ~~~yout (general
locati.on north Qf Gulf.,to-Bay, appro:{Lnately 1000 ft,. east of County
________._____.. b r _____.._,........l ~ ____
Road lh.1.~1 request for 8.rmexution by At.tornoy i"lohn H..> Bonner \ repre..
1_ ______ w .<1>4 _______..___-_10__....___.~____
.
~if.mt,ing iJir. an.d 1.1rs ~ Joseph Thuot. ,'3.nd )i1' ~ and lll'S. nUf~h \'1 ~ Bat.chel1er
..~ this r-eql.lest \~a.s considered by the Cit.y e/);r"I1is~:don at its October l']t,h
me et.iug and upon its j.ns truction) \'lHS X'e.fe:l'Ted to trw Zoninl~ cUld
Planning Board by the ctty iiJ.anag~:t" s rnerhC of Or.:toher :.~O \.rith request
that the Board m;?ke a ::~tudy of the gltuatiol1 Hnd fH'E:sl;)nt. its rind:Lngs
NOTms OF ME~TINa
~
\ '''gt.~ ,,1
A Joint mooting of tho Zon:tng a.~ld Planning BOArd und tho City
Oommission was h'eld on October 25 ~ 1960, at the City Hull Audit,orium
lh'lginn::1.ng at B:15 P. M. Purpose oJ: the moeting n discussion of
zoning referendum items proposed by the Board for the December refer-
endum and requGsts for changes in zoning distr.icts received by the
Board to date..,
Present \-lare Mayor Alex D. Finch, Commissio11ers Amos Smith and
Cleveland Insco, City Attorney H. H. Baskin, trr~, City Manager James
. R. Stewart, Planning Board I~embers A. M... }{ruse, Ra.lph W. 13. rleade,
and Orville Cassady. and illr. ~lolle, qity Pla,l1ner..
Individual requests for zoning clmnges were d~scussed firstd
Case Z-1-760
Case Z-J+-I060
Case 2-2..1060
"'\".
'J
Case Z-3-1060
changB from.R-2 to R-4, Lots 1,2,3 and 4 except
the W 60' of Lot 2, Elk. 4, STARR AND SAVERY
SUBDIVISION (Between Bay and Oak, south of Pine
St.) . . .
Applicant: Oald~rel1 at al
P&Z Board recommendation - Approval
Commissi.on OK
change f'rom R-2 to R-4) Lot 4, SOn half Lot 3,
So.. half Lot 2, Block 2, STARH AND SAV3RY SUB-
DIVISIUN (N.. side of" Pine St.o between Bay and
Oalc Avenue)
ApplicHnt: Stewart at a1
P&Z Board recommendation Approva.l
GOlU.luission
OK
1~Ir~ tiolle advised tha t there \'JOuld be an ad\.ti..
t,ional case by the t.:oning and Plilnn:t.nG Board to
eo"er change from R-2 to R../.. 1'0:4' all of Blocks
1, 2~ and L.. of t.his r;ubdivisiol1, .
- Change J'rom fi-2 to \ B, 1.ots 5} 6,7 &:. $, Block 10 I
PINECRES'l' SUBDIVISION (east side of North ,
t>1yrtle Avenue .between HapJ.c St.. &; ~ldridge St,)
Applicant.: through A-Gty" Alfred 1'to j.larshall
P&.Z BOHl'd reCOlfi.llEmdati.on ,- Approval
Corrunission:
OK
change from fi-l:. t.o B I Lot 11.8 DrmW fllANOR (NW
corner Drew St. and Duncan)
. '<~ j
I:.
I
Nol:,n:'~ ,!:,':)/i, IH.";l~:\ "H'; 7':I~P .lJd JI}'!d
Uity Uo@niuoion 10-25-60
Pa~(J ,/2
~
OaBO 2-)-1060 .. Applicant: DouglnD \~i8S
( con t inued) P&Z Board ro C ornrnendn t ion - d(w:l.a.l
Oommission:
Insco: Not in favor of this raquast.
Smith: ~'ould go along "lith Clove on thin.
. (Hemarked on amount of in and out
traf.fic in businesfl zones on Gulf..to-'
Bay and Di"e,'1 nmof. Said he thought
we "lil1 get to the point in the citjt
whero will have 'to have aome
through thoroughfares)
Finch: LO,t's pass that one.
change from R..J. to R-M Lot 6, Block 7, Jv1ANDALAY .
SUBDIVISION (SH l:lnd of Eldorado Circle)
Applicants: vi. E. ::md J.~:ry D. Cro'..m.
P&Z Board re cO!i1,~lend[l, t ion - de nial
Case z- 5~.106o
; ,
/
;,
'oil'. .
Com..niBS ion:
Finch: Think we rezoned lot on the Beach
in last year's referendum.
Smith: I am going to. have. to listen to
the public hearing on ~his one.
I~. \/011e explained that the Board 'was con-
sidering in its recommendation the fact that
to grant this change l'muld mean the be-
ginning of ,the breakdown of R-I. zoning from
Kipling Plaza to the south.
i4r. Kruse stated that when l.frS.. Cro\'ffi spoke
.to him about putting in this request she
said she intended to continue living in her
house on this lot, but since an apartment
project is planned for the adjoining R-M
zone J she l'/ished t,o have her zoning changed
to cover some future use. He spoke in
support of the Board's reco:rl.Mmdation.
IJIayor Finch appeared to favol:' granting of
this request, saying that such zonin~
changes.might be stopped at th~.end of the
block~
Hr. Kruse: "If you start 1.t'l don f t }eno\'{
\lhere to stop it 11 .
~/...~
.. c '; . ~",..J
."j
'rhe . fnct tha l; the city Oh7lS 2 lots to the
north of tho R-M zone (north of the Pink
house) was disCUSS8d, .
This completed r6vie"f of. the "indiv:l.dual requests. 1J11'. \/011e s'tat.ed
that another one in the saillc arGS &0'3 cases Z-l and Z-/~ had been
received. by the plannj.ng offico, but~ l'/cW not in time for preaenting
at this meet,ing"
. ".j.
... , ....
. ~.,
-;r,'fi.' .
f .., ~~
. .'1.
..,
Hol:,{llJ joint m'Jel~:l.nG Z"2P Uti. and
City Comminaion lO-25~60
Pagl:? If3
~ Review was than ow..oo of zoning district mup chanB(H) .~ reference
Page #5 (planning recommendation district map - PIlDM) CITY PROPER'!'! -
PRDM 1 - All.of Airpark
(which is 'in the city)
PRDM 2 - Marymont Park
- R-l to P
- R-l to P
PRDM 3
City P:roperty
Fire Station #4 north to
Airpark
R-2 'to R-4
, .
'"
~ "
'Mr. ~/olle explained that all three above recommendations \,/era based
on the fact that the established uses novr are non-conforming in such
zones. Attorney Baskin expressed the opinion that the zoning of up"
(Public) has a feature of public trust and that property so zoned
can only be used for governmental purposes, ~dth limited types of
use. such as public parks, recreational centeus, public buildings,
etc.) and that under proprietary powers of the city, the city had
the. right to control use of city property not dedicated to a speci-
fic use. In the discussion it was brought out that the Airpark and
. -......
;, . ) .
. . ~ ~".."
; ,
'r
.,
.<~~
Marymont Park property vias obtained by the city in a tax deal at
very' little cost 'CO the taxpayers and was not dedicated to a speci-
fic use. ~tr~Baskin further stated that to take a,my these pro-
prietary po\'rers not other"lise limited and put the property in a up"
zone might tie the hands of future city officialse
1-iayor Finch: HI \IIould say leave it (R-l zoning) the
\'lay it is. II
(regarding Pil.DI\l-Fire Sta. 114 north to
Airpark)
"He have deed+3d one area t,Q the Junio],."
Chamber' of Commerce for e. club houae and
think should be R-4 to allo\'l construction
of that."
Commission de cisfon: 'ro strike 'PRDfir.!fl and #2
'fa approve PftDr.i lr3
, '. ' -, -:;. " ,'. ...'. .',:: ,:: ::. ' '. :" '<':,' i, '.' '+"',':. .::'" , .: "'~ . :. '..'. '. : I:' I ": ': ~.~ :.: " ~ :. ..... '~..~; ; I' :-- ',', .1.....,.::. .~: : '.:} >:~,. . ':. ,. ~'. : '.,' '" ': ,'.': /., :,' ,~,. : ~ ,: ...<.; .'.... . . . .,' .'. ,: :'~/ .' ..;:. ~,< '~': . ~,,::I .:: ',i/:: " ...~ ~ ,..,' ;'-;i:, :;:. \, ."~ '.
t
\
,
1< l ~) l- ....\ ;". ; -~.. . ~, 1'.' i ... t ! L "./1.. 1 ~ .' I. ., 1 1
Cit;;'J c~~~i~S~~)~ "lg/25)60)^ " ~ 1...1
]3,',> r,') }-l
"0'" i/ f-
FRDM Ill.. - All that property So. of Drew Sbreet
(Wast) ex.tension and south to the .
existing Public zone. - K-M to P
(this is the Rogers tract being pur-
chased by the. city) .
Commission decision: To approve
.PRDM #5. -Marianne St. to Clearwater
Harbor. Gulf Beach to
Memorial Causeway
"I like the UZ just as it is"b
He further stated that if in the future
the city \'lant.s to rework that side, .fill
in, expand or put something in there
that the up" zoning would limit, such
zoning would restrict i.ts use.
U\ihy not ;leave. it UZ?lI
Itl think the Bay ought to be zoned R-lu~
. 1fI would suggest that everything in Clear-
water Bay beyond the seawall (duly es-
tablished bulkhead) line established by
the city commission and approved by the
county commission be ,zoned R-l."
Mayor Finch: f'That would be the greatest thing I know of
for the protection of the city" It" . . . . .". '
If I agree vlith that. I had been. under the
impression until a couple of years ago
that that had bgen done 10 years ago..
Commission decision: To strike PRm,l i/5
~
I
Mayor Finch:,
Mr. Stewart.: .
Mayor Finch:
" l~.Baskin:
",!
,
.......j}; --
:.1.
~ .
Mr.. Insco:
.'"
- UZ to P
To j.nclud~ R-l zoning, for Clear-
\1-later Bay in r,jf(:!rel.1o.Um items"
Reference - Page #6! Planning Recommendat:i.ons Di3tric;t l"ap - PRIVATE
PHOPERTY
PRDi4 il7 - Cleveland Plaza 32 and )3 R H ~ Padgett ?:st. 0
Lots 1-8 Blk. E Hibiscus Gardens
Lots 21-27 Blk. B Hibiscus Gnrdens
R-l!. to B
.\.
COlqnission d€:cision ~ To npp:C'ove
PRDIJl 118 YV!CA Blk. Y Hibiscus Gal'(lens
.~
UZ to H-4
Commission decision: To approve
~' .
,..
~..' I '.i"1It,I ~. :. >
!:",l\ .-.;:: .j~ .;;:. r.;!'--....t;:_r,~.~ :~::~.~l ~~\~ " >~:'~:r
Cit.y COm\Htf.~ion lO':~;~5~.60
P;Jg/~ I.;~
~
; .f
PRDl"i 119 - 10 Acres east of Li.ncoln, nQX't.h of
Druid Head H~.l \;.0 <<-4
( 81. te of' ltindru Apl:l~...t.GIents devolopm\:1nt.)
.'
"
Commission decision:
l\f.roc.~d \/itil Board t E; recommendation
t.,' omit from zoning referendum, items.\
PRD~1 1110 -Carlouel Yacht Club Site
,
UZ to R-l
,'.
I.
c
Commi.ssion decision: 1\~ strike
Attorney Baskin raised the question of whether procedure ought to
be changed whereby applicant,or his representative, comes before
the Board of Adju8tm~nt and Appeal and wants to get parmisslve use
for doctor's office in R-4 arGa1 then applicant buys single family
property next door, tears down house and uses lot for parking~
\ ,
, .
j
I..
,
Mayor Finch: HThink lrJB should leave this alone 4"
.. I~~... Kruse 1 . "Think \-/e l~hottld leava :itt ito "t')!m JMAJA
as they' are '1.sol.a t;ed case~ un
Ordinance changes 'fere reviewed next. i'4r.. Holle explained that;
. Ordinance Changes ill through #6 '~ere based on. those originally pro-
posed for the 1959 referendum~ '
Ord. Change 1
Public Hearing, etc~
Oommission approved
Ord. Change 2 - Side and Hea.r Setbacks R-4 &. R-lu1 areas ... Commission
approved
Urda Change 3 - (~ee flysheet Sec. III Use Districts (Ord.. 627)
addition) - substituted i'or Ord.n Change 3
Commission approved \'lith suggest.ion that R-IE
zone be included in minimum \'lidth 01" lots
schedule.
Attorney Basldn suggested that the city reenact the zoning ordinance,
substituting sections .for those changed. 'fhe COfiLtlission concurred
".d.thl.iayor Fincll' s statement: "Think He ought to amend t.he old
ordinance at this time..1I i~.. KrU:3e and l'lr. \voll e explained that
the revised zoning ordinance \'lhich the Board \-:a8 proposing in con-
n~ ction \dth the Comprehensive Plan would be in. more modorn .form
r.-lith use regulat.ions and aroa and height regulations in one schedule.
Ord. Change 4 - R-2.,lot. area 6tOOO 8q~ ft.~ .- Co.rcnission approved
Corner Lot $O~ .
Ord G Chan~ 5 .- Sec.. IIA adJed - j.'iodel Home d\?fined ~.
Ord.. Change ? - BAA See. XVII 5/d 7) a.dder! - I.lodel HC!1)8
Jtpproyal by viui - 'llime Limit.
. . \
, ~~
, .\
Commis siol! ap proved Urdina \1Ct~ Change0 5&7 \.sith
addition (per l'Ir. Baskin':J SUB:gQst.ion)
of re3id~.!1c~ after the word Itoccupj.edlf.
~t .