09/20/1960
,/ : i~, : ': : :. ~',',' ,.:' ,... ~ ',,: ; ,:" ' ,~ :'" , ': ;:."1 ,.', :.'.J :" r, :', "..,," :<1 ; ~ ~ : :....:, .. '~" ;'.. ,: .. ::,: ~+,; , :' :.',' _, ~ ',,:. ':,: ., ", \' '.,' /:, ~ ',~ ,~'" ,,'.: -" ' :; '+ ~: " ,: '~" / ", '~", '; :" / " ',~" " '; <::; ~~ :' :' .~ ',~.' ~ '; '... ,': ,::' ': ~' "~~, '; ~,', ,', I, ..', .' "': '. ::', '" .. ~' ,\::, ~
t'
"~(;{-:]T!C~ 1~\l~;J ~lJ.~\l~'~ll~'~ ::~'t,<~.I.1
Minutoo ot' ~ho Meoting, 'fuosday, Septemb~r 20t 1960..
rr'he meet~.Tlg h'as called to ordor at 3~OO P. M. by the Chairman,..
Mr. Kruse. .Present W(!l'e 14embers Mylander, Heado. Cannady, Kennedy t
Gates and Galloway, Mr~ RottiG of the Engineering Department, and
r,ir. Wolle.
The minutes of tho Sept. 1J, 1960, moeting were approved as reado
Nr.. Reade corrunented on the fact that his neighborhood ~las shO\'ffi
on the snap of proposed neighborhood delineations (for HBA Housing Re-
port) as "Hillcrest" rather than "Glen\'lOod". l"ir 0 Wolle explained that
he had present,ly designated the area of Mr. Reade f s residence- as the
"Hillcrest Sect ion" o.f' the ftOlenl'lood Neighborhood" and that bounda-
ries ~ld designations might be subject to reviaiono
Mr" Kruse reported that at the last C1.ty Commission meeting Com-
missioner Insco had inquired as to the zoning in the airport area and
location of the Drew Street Fire Station~ There ,~s a discussion of
areas that have non-conforming uses on public owned land. The Chair-
man requested the City Planner to take under advisement the matter of
publiq used areas that are not zoned publico
There ",as a discussion of chang~a in offs,treet l?arkinliLproposals Cl
Mr.. Mylander, Committee Chairm,~J reported that he had mot with I~..
~volle and reache'd agreement on sections relative to administration,
penalties for violations, and provision fo!.~ a.ppeals to t.he building
code administrator, a.s changeG in Q(;cupanc:r would require 1;1 permit
and such changos might require moX"c offst!"Get parking. Mr. f<1ylander
proposed that the ordinance should spell out requirement.s for specific
uses 0 1.lr. Cassady observed that the pe.l'C0!J_case of smaller cars in use
might need to be considered in determinin.!~ requit'ements" Deck parking'
OV'3r stores J as pl;:umed for' a proposed un:!.r. on. Gulf-to-Bay, \'{as one
,~ . suggestion for p:coviding parl.:ing in cOIlge~) t\3d a:ceas"
.'~
. '.,->l
.0'
<<.
'fa familiar.ize "the Board \-lith public J"'oac1;:ton to tho pr'sviolls1y
proposed ordinance, portions of a record.hlt:; of the Forn!.l on Offstreet
Parking of Nov" 12, 1957. ,';ere played. III tha follovJing ulscussion ~
:Jopt.. 20, 1960
Page I}?
IJIr. Reado proposod tha t ~Itl" 0 \/o11e 8wn.narize in "lI'1tten form all the
ob,jectiono that \'lore made to the ordinance at that. t,imQ l1nd the con-
structive ,!.=u.tggost,ions that 'ifera offered, ao thG Board could conoidcl"
them. It \1186 pointed out that; the City controlled. offstreet parking
to some extent by the process of gradually eliminating curb parking
near corners, alleys,' etc 0, and t.hat "no parking" on Myrtle Avenue at
th,e dire ct,ion of the snn hud met with public acceptance. I~. Rettig
informed the Board that revocable permits for drive~my paving of R/W
for parking can be issued with approval of the Cit.y Commission and that
if the SRD.,ddens a road (like Coronado on the Beach) it would do
a'way "lith pa.rking on sl1ch street.. Mr.. Kruse coromont.ed that since t.his
first ordinance was proposed 5~~e progres3 has been made in the accep-
tance of off-street parking regulation by the inclusion in the Zoning
.':) Ordinance of requirements for restaurants, churche s, doctor' 5 cffice)
convalescent homest and day nurseriGs or private schools vmen per-
~
'J
mitted in certain zoning dist.ricts t> ~4rt> Gates suggested that the pro~.
posed ordinance be discussed with the Clearwater Board of' Realtors,
but that:the ordinance should be in as nearly perfect form'as possi-
ble before presentation to the ComOll.ssion or subsequent groupo It 'WaS
decided tha t ilw. },.lylander and !'.1ro Holle Bhould compose a preliminary
revised ordinance for study by the Board t> i.tr.. lJiylander "Volunteered
to talk with the City IJIanager again relat.ive to a discu5sion ,nth the
Commissiono
He cOl)sip.erat~on .9( rez~>ning of: fron~(1(~e. on t,hBr,East side at:
Nor'th Myrtle Avenue!' north of .'!?he SAL RR J_...eres.9ntly ZO!!~clJJ.-2 (Duple~l
- i/Ir.. Holle reported receipt of a lette.r from AttOl'ney Alfred p"
Marshall in which inquiry ''/W3 mado concerning rc:n~oning of Cl. section
of, N u Myrtle Ave ~ to conform ~'rlth ot,her propel"tiY :tn that part.icular
area. ''chs Board \'ias informed that zoning .s.pplication fot'me had beGn
consideration
..';.", .,~p :', .,.....'.,.,. ,: ,', :,.:~ ~:.','. : ":'~"::'~':' '.,.. ,', ''''';':.' ".,d~,_~~:'I~...,:.~:'".' ~..',.:. ,+ ':1-'::, ~', _:' "':'::,":, .":~'::~ .:'.' ,:,,<;<,.:;,~.~:~',:,:.', :,': .' :1 ::'~.:~'''':':~ :-.:'..:':,::,...:~. :,::....:{r.:J~;:: ".: ::- ~(\',.'.~, '::. ',':...' " ~,",,:":,' .', ~
~
, 1
J.yGu
f ~ . '...0
,JO!JV 4 .:; I
Pf.lg~~ 113
bA given to the pooslblo rc .wning of ull of 1310c1< 10 J so uth of li.;ldr:1.dgo
in VitH'l of the ndjoinlng J.lnnufuctu1"ing Zone to trw east ~ This case
\'1as referred to the Zoning Committeo for :;t;.udy Clnd report at the r~oxt
meeting..
Con9~nin.~ z2n.~AA of tt1,0 ~r{)p_osed Hi~h.l.:lnd Jl:i.ll Subdivisi6n -
I
'fhe Board 1;,laS advised that a letter had been rece5.ved .from the engi-
neers .for this subdivision ~ Leo. !3utler t J.~equesting residential zoning
(confirmed by telephone as being 'H-l, Single Fami.ly) ~ As 1\-1 zontng
was. approved by the Board on April 12, '19601 no action was necessary
at this t.ime.. ,The City Planner reported that Intent for Annexat:i.on
Ordinance No c 873 l,dth R-l zoning) \-/aB passed by the City Commission
. on its first reading on August 151 1960) ~t which time. the City Engi-
neer pointed out that a 11 ft" strip betv!e en this pro posed subdivision
, and parkwood Subdivision l'Iould be left in the County.. 'fhe City Planner
...,..." .
, ;
. ~:' c .
~., " ,
, ,
j '.
'"
:',:":.'
, ,
, ,
<p,: '
:;",:...C
i "
, ,
J. '
, .
.' ~
;' .
,.
,.'
d'
q
reported that he had transmitted to the C:tty Attorney's of.fice the
Zoning and Planning Board's recomnendation that armexation be continued
only if this 11 feet is a.rranged to be annexed also.. He furtper 'ad.M
vised that he had talke d i/it~h the engineers about sidewalks for
.. Highland Hill but had re ceivad no conll.1itl1len t on this 0
There was some discussion of uide\'lalk requirements in general, and
the need for them in certain school and business areas~ It was pointed
out that Contract 632 ha.s a sidewalk rt:H.l'..\.irement but that this is usu-
ally wnivedo Chairman Kru.5t! suggeuted that it 'would be in order for
the Board to give more ,thought to this matt.er~
Planning literature was distributeocl"
The meeting was adjourned at 5:00 p~ J.l"
ifespeC~~~itted'
ack I.' Wolle, ~a~ty
ity Planner