09/13/1960
,:,.} ':;,"~~":'.' I",~;:,,::.I ,.,':1 .,,~"',,~ ,:',:~::,:,:: '~''',:'......::.' .::: '.):' ,/" .::'~"';:",', ',' :':\,~'..:.";: :::,:,~,,{,:;,: :'r':" 'I':"~':~ :.:,'.:,:..~'.' ':'f" .';' ~::, >"'~+" '~~';.: ,',:",':'.' .""'~":.,~: ;-.: t., ~.'. .:::. >,:.'.,::.: . ~:,:,::\': .'>,....;,.,'~...~.:.
~
ZONING AND PLANNING BOARD
Minutes of the ~1aeting, Tuesday) S~pt0rnber 13 I J.960.
The meeting was called to ordor at 3:00 P. Mo by the Chairman,
Mro Kruse. Present were Members Gntes\ Cassady, l~ylander, Reade,
Kennedy, S'\'lan and Galloway, Mr.. Rettig of l; he Engineering Depart-
ment and Mr. "loll a .
The minutes of the August 30, 1960 I meeting \~ere approved as
read.
poncerning review of zoning on ~INGSLAND TEl~AcE, ~r~posed
subdivision betw~~n Kings Highi~Y ~nd Highland Ave~. Mr. Philip
E. Di Paolo, the owners appeared bofore the Board to discuss rea-
sons for his requested use of thts property for two':'family homes
and to ask for reconsideration of the R-l (Single~Family) zoning
recommended on August 30J 1960. Mr~ Reade acted as chairman during
,"', r,
"...J
, ' 1
.~
this interview, as the Chairman, Mi~~ Kruse, was on vacation at the
time o~ previous Board action on this item. The applicant explained
that he purchased the land with the exp~ess intention of develop-
ing it in duplexes and living on part of it; and further that the
cost of improvements (such as streets, sewer, and ~ther utilities)
\'lill be just as much for 11 lots as it vTOuld for 22 lots" At time
of his purchase there ,~as no COill1ty zoning, but County zoning later
classified this property as County R-J (Residontial 1 Family- lot
area 6,000 sq~ ft.,,) u The Board was informed that a number of real
estate brokers and individuals had mad.;~ surveys f'or him and that
'" none of them are interested in the propor'ty as Cl single-family' de..
velopment 0 He quoted ~il3, 000 as the pr'ice pa j.d for the entire
strip including the tract on which his borne is locatNL 'l'he J~ct-
ing Chairman pointed ou.t that thG abutt.ing property t.o the nort.h
and south has al....zays beBn 7.oned R-l (SiHgle-l?ami:..y') by the City and
that the lots on Overlea Sto and Pineb:l'ook Drive are fully developed
~1opt 13 1960
" ,
Page ;/ ~
.'''''
~. .
(,r)
Tho npplicil.nt udvined t.hat ho did not have any questions
.1bol,It the Boa.rd' s recomrnondation~l concerning pl~t chan!?;ea and that
ho \unts to include his reuiddnce pro~orty in the annexation also~
~ilr.. D1 Paolo "Ii.lS excused from the me~tine at this time. und informed
that he would be advised of the Doard's decision.
In the follovdn~ disc~soion ~r. Gates expressed doubt that
the nppl:Lcun t could sell singloolM.family uwellint;u. dr. lieade ~C\ve
his opinion that as J./3 o.f the tract is taken up by the O\'mer 1 sown
home, thut his .11 i)latted lot.s \lould reilreoent an inve3t:nent of
only Gi~~ht or nine thousand llollars, or 50mcthine le~i3 than ';;1000.00
a. lot. '6,lr. Rat ti~ observed that tho mojoI' imprOVeh1ent costn \lould
. be for tho street and the seVier extensiol1o
l
.
(
J.lr. n~:J.tle ~ntoveu tllat~tl~cQ.of.irm j,t2, acti'ln.~,
196Q) in r9cO~nendin~ R-l (~i.n~~e-F~ily) zQning ~r the oroPQs~~
,KIl{G:1L.1WU j'3t,U~iLC3 antI denyin.~ requE:!st for ;t-2 (Juplex) zonlne;, as'
,
also confirming its ri3:comrnendatioJls concernin~1 plat and annexationo
His motion ''las seconded by ;lr. SVJan and \>,'a,S passed unanimously.
~:"'''.''''''''-~
a~view was made on the 's~atus or & portion of Forrest Hill
...._-_.....-~..
'~ .?-.... .d" . .' . >+. .... ~
Estates in regard to the devalop~ent us a shopping center and'sub-
_,,_1__"""""'-'
." ".a . '
mission as a revised plat allowing t~he YD.~qtiC?n q,f.: .forrest Hill
Estates , Unit if?.!.. i4r. ;'lo11e report.ed thut the developer, i.ir"
,
Bleakley, no\-/ plans parking use for the H-l.. area rathor t.han apart-
ment use.. The Board vatou to make t',}10 follo\1ing recoIotc:1endatlons:
.1.. - ,!'hat the vacation of [.'orr'czt Hi!.l 3!3t.a.tcs lIni;" Ir2 be
"'~'"
'.
. '.,
approved provided that the 40 ft,. rir;ht-of-\'Iny on High.-
land Avenue be retained t~nd t.he additional 17 ft. of
Lakoview Road be retained~
., ~':- ,:-," " :' '." , ~': .' .. ',~-, .', .' '~'.', r :, ,: . ': ; ,: .~, /,:~ :-,' ,:.., ~', :: ..,. : ' > ' ':.:. -:.,.'.,:' ~ ' ., . '. ,: '. ~ : ~:- " " ';, ' ' :' ,.: t : ~ ': .: ~' <',' ' '.""~',.' ~"", ' ',.,'~ :". I.;'. " ('" ,\,',:: .~ t~ / .' t,' '. , .,; ';". ::.::' '.': ~ \,.'..., , "', : .~. :'. ;, ,: :"~ \ \ ~: ,
. ,
.~
. }
..iupt 13, 1~00
Paso /13
2. -'rhat roplat of this ,lrea D.nd adLlitional platting \Tould
include the dodica'tion of Hid11and Avenue up tio Durry
Stree t) completing the So ft. riJhc-or...way as sho'ltm on tho
t-taster Plan j and that thero be indication on the plut of
a number or let~ar to .sepurate the U-4 zoned area from the
busineos zoned area.
.' .,
3 ~'rhat the plat sho\', dedi~atBd a.reus at the \'/e3t end of
. Illino:l.s Houd and 'l'uscolu Road, each to allow for the
necessar)' right-of-\':ny for 50 ft. radius cul-de-sac (It.
is to be ctssu.ned that, suet. cul....de-~ucu \:ould be a part of
the paved areas thnt the applicant intends to use for
parking purposes at tho pre aen1~ time)"
. 40 - That replat as requested 'would. be proceused in accordance
'-lith the subdivision rceulaticma, thus requiring bond in
tho amount specified by' the City ~ngineer to cover
utility extensions and drainage responsibility that the
: ", r"~"'"
\ .. ),
~ ___J ,
r" '
. )
.
~I ~
City ~ngincer may i-1pprOVe 0
The above recomme:nuutiuns ar~ to be tra.nsmitted to tho City
Attorney's office for consiJerution \81en vacation proc~ading5 are
f'iled.
,C.oncerning .~tatu5 of the out.ltryo (.If tha_. Pl'oposed planninii.
~m.l zoning bro~hure (,1t~J. :;:uestion~ ~_.Ml~@!5H), ..tra ~;olle re-
ported that ~.1r. l{eade had su'uraitl;~d 30::18 revisions in the text
I
\Jhich he thou.ght \'/St'O very ~ood nn...:i t.lm t {), .final dra.rt 01' the re-
vised outline '"ould be ?re pareJ .for the d;'>jJrovilJ. 01' tile C.ity ~.luna-
zer.
" ..,;,)
l.tr.. \:olle advised that ? CO:J1C3 of' the JIDA preliminary r ;port
on COhilnunity Facilitios had UGon sent co the Ci.ty ~.lanu.~:(-!rl s oi'r'ic~
.::i'~:.':,,'... " .'. :"" ;~,,\_ ''''.'", ,~: ..;.... :\:-,:~",::.,'~;:,.,,:':',' ~:~.oI"..,:": i.:.'~ ::'. :..;~..~:,-',:C7-:',::~:.::.d~',;.;':~",,: ' ,\..I,:~, '. ":, ,,::',=",::,. ':. ~ ,:';',:'.',:.:, .,.':'::',:-,:.),:'~,~',;- .,~.,.., ::. I,.:..::..,.r~
Jept ~3,. J.~60
P.:lZO //4
~
tha.t duy for raVie\'l by the Commi~sion fJnd ocbauulin~~ of II meoting
\/ith the Board if noco.3 HJ.l"Y. P1u ten from this .report were p:::l ssed
to tho dernbers for thoir 0 bservation. It. ,.ms oxpla1ned. Lhat nome
corrections were to be made in Plute ,/6, "Jlurbor Facilities"..
".
_ J
.lr. \/011e ,rei'e,I'l"'sd to the Board ~h~.!lli!..tt.er oL: ,a notice r~
- .c,eived. b~ him concarninl1 a. t!eal"in~ beforo yhe Countl. Co.tllninaion
3optoJllber 2,2) ~960, on nn_ uppl~cution tQr tfrailer Park use (H.-~
. zonj.J};~) of~pn area in~~thCl County J eti~t or u. ~3. 19, ~'Jhich is ne~
n 'frail ~r Park .31,pllc:oition loc<.ltion north of Gulf-to-i3D.Y \ihich the
City GOill:llisoion denied. He advised that he hnJ attended the ~xam-
iner' 5 henrin3 on this CD-SO (at the .rO(!uost of the County ilui.1Jing
unJ honin~ at.:tff) to :;ivo the history of the 0ityrd denial o:f the
previous request .:Iud at the ti.~le had informed the City 1.ianaecr
. i~
.: - '.~.rJiJ1
of this ap)!3D.rance. As the ~xruniner ..;a:J roo colitflenUin.; ilf.h,roval of
:~ ~
tho Cl.p~)lic.:ltion, tho Board agreed tha t cht3 notice should be ro-
f'errou to the <Jity J.lanazor for any action he .1Ii.sht think advisable.
Concarn:!!,!z studies by tho Orf13tree~ Parkin~ C,amnittec) ..lr.
'~:olle outlined some addition,'11 section:'3 that \iould nocessarily ba
included in nn Orr5tre:.>t pa14kin~ ordil1;:mce if proposed as l:. sepa-
rate ordinunce, such as an ndffiinistr~ti In saction~ nnu provloion
.for i'Jena.lties. He sU5..;e~1ted t,h."lt the Cix'dinJ.ncc should l~i.lve hi~her
stand.:lrds than tho!~? o.f the jH"evi0U5 draft. It vias dac idad that
..:.r.l.1;land0r, Uhair:l1nn of the Uffst.r::lct :':o.rkin.:; Co.:~nittlJe, \'JOuld
ar!'an~c to ta;i' ..:!t \:i th 6,~r. ..0:\lEl -1.:.0 Jiscu:;s for.~.:1t of' a su~.:;a;JtBd
orjinance..
~ .' '
II
ot.. .:;;
",
dr. '..'olla advised th.:l t data t.o be furnished llBA oj" the Plan-
nin~ Ufl'ice 1'01' the Hou:3inz an...i Public Litilitios .iCl)O:C1:. ..,ould be
:\ ..:,-,:!l':",;' ~-,,: '''~:.'' '"," " :':', ',' .,.',: ~:'\::.'" ::'."".': ,:''', :,~:':.,.,~:.: "'~': ';' ,'::-.~': ,,;;::,:;,:.::,4;:..:.:,~.:,>;. ,.:n",~',":".".,'.:I." -"":', "~~",,;,~: ~,,~;~,:",f'~:',~.~,"-:'.~"'~' :-::,
J() ot 13 s 1960
PaBc ,15
, ~ compl.ete u~on suumisoion of the 1,E)ishborhooll Jolino;~tion ,.lap 811d
a proposed HOuDing Codo) ,\,tnd th3t Hholl l~numeratlon O:l.etrict tabulEl-
bion of the 1960 census \as received this map co~1d bo comploted.
Ho requested that u mQ~ ting of tho Hou~.d.ng Committee be scheduled
~or consideration of a housing code.
l,jr. Swan announced thu t a Chamber of Com.lorce rei~ional moe t-
in~; \'Io.S to be holJ at the Ft. llarriuon Hotal on 3ept.Jmbar 27, 1960,
and invited Board membera to nt.tend .';l panel discussion on IIUrban
,tonownl in Floridall scheduled l'ro.or 10: 45 to noon on that dato.
", :;......",
..' J
,.~
. :.Ir ao ~;olle reported tha t port-ions of the Ijorkable Pro3ram
hull been completed by tho Planning Oi'i'icQ. Uther po~tions depended
'upon. in.t"or:l1ation .rro~a the City ,.;anu3or':3 office ilnd the County
. ]anit~:\rio.n. j.{equaata for this information have been, sub.nittod to
those oi'l'icos.
, .'
jI'our charts pro~arad by tho Pl;illning Uff'icrJ i:e.:;'c displayed.
" Thes~ illustrate Plattin.6J lIousin.e;, Zonin;:;, {..\uJ DuilJin3 JtanJClrds
and are to be photogro'.lphcli for usa us graphic slides.
Plannin.~ literature \t.'3S Jistributedo
(.
~c ,
:.~'
'.i'he iilC3etinz \1.:\3 adjourned at 5:0r' P. ..i.
"J.
,i.esp0 ct.fully sU,b:nitted,
f);"1. n ' ): IJI?
..(1(... .;,/ tot.. C"f:(1 C'_'
Gek I. i..'olle, joe' y
Oi ty Planner
d.. "; '~:'!~
".~
{'"T"
" '
" ,
,I.'.. .'