08/30/1960
of August, 25 concerning appllcatioll of Vled~al ~, Inc.., for use
- ~ ~ ....., .._-~
~~ zoned property ill ~"or]'..:st ,~~~..~~~~,?-,~~. fer a ~.:~:~l cl.~~tic..
The Board was advised that this application was approved \nth an
agreement on the par.t of the developers to provide Barry Street
... r~""'. ... ...ll~........ ........T.,..oj;~""....~Lti~. '" ~ ,d' ~.'" . . ," ~ " ,....'"
right-of'-way and road improvement and to deed .33 :f't. right...of-\iay
.-~___..._~...----. ,.....,.,.1 ~ ...._...,..,.___ ~"""""""""""I"-~"'.~""'''''-
.~~
ZONING AND PLANNING BOAHD
Minutes of the Mal:lting, 'fu0sday, August. 30, 1960. .
The meeting 1"as called to order at 3: 4.5 by the' Vice-Chairman,
Mr.. Reade. Present \'-lera Members Gates, Hylander I Galloway a.rid
Swan, l~. Rettig of the Engi.neeril1g Dopartm~l1t, and loir. \lolle"
The minutes of the .August 16, 1960, meeting were approved as reado
Mr.. \~lolle reported on the~~:h9n of. the BAA at their meeting
.............--..-
, ,
\
.._j.
to the City for Jeffords Streeto
Concernil~ zoning~n the. proposed su~division'to ~~ ,kno'ffi a~
KINGSLANDJERRAg~ (located bet'~en Overlea Street and Pinebrook Dr~.
east of Kings Hi.ghway and west 01' Highland Avenue), Mr.. Galloway relQ
ported that the ~bdivis~~:m. q,QilJJl1tttee :t~~cop)ffiend.Qd R;:3:. ~ si1.1g1e-f~lYt
zon:!J1g for this proposed subdivision and .geni~.1 o~ rHquest for R-2
t~wo-familx} zoning.. Mr. Mylander moved that the comnittee1s recom-
mendation for R-I zoning be approved. His motion was seconded by
~~~ Gates and 'fflS passed unanimously. The reasons discussed Ear
this recommendation were:
"
The adjoining subdivisiolls are or .ririe singla-fmnily homes
and single -fe.mily z ened..
, . '..)' ,
: l '~
~,
. ,'\
'I'he maintenance of duple~: homes as. .L"'ental pl"'operty is belm>;
that of single-family homes and has an effect upon the use
and enjoyment of the adjoining single-family proporties"
\'1hile duplex building in the aroa might be cons:i.dered as
a more profitable i.nvest,ment by the developer. zoning i", not
primarily directed at economic raturn~
.. ': ~>,: .~ :: :: :'; : ,I '. '. ",' .... '..1 ~ : / .':':"': l..::;; . \' .,.:: ~.' ..' ,.':,: .:.': ,'. L'.. '.:. '~...~ ,'. '.::. '.':, ':; ".':'",,:, ',' ~ :'.:.:.' :;' .':: '< .,: .... ~ . ,'..: "'. :" . .,.. . I.: ""- .' '; : ~, . ..', .~, ':-" '. '. . : '. .'1 ~..:'.' ~ l ;... '.'j ~ '.:. . '. ' . ~',;..... {"'" ... ,'::.,'.... ~ : l.~ . f' . : " '-.'~ .:~:'.;' . '. ~:. .' ','\. ': ':, ':
"
August 30, 1960
Pago 1,~2
.~Qoncernin~~~relimina.ry plat of 1=!r~posod subdiv1,Bion to bo
kno\'m ~s KINGSLAND ~+EnH.ACE: tho ,~ubdiv;isi,on Comr/11ttao l"'ucommendf;3.fl
M~hat the J?lat be di~~eprovec! and requested tho i'olloh"ing:
, ,
1 n a 60 ft 01'" H/liT i.'~r Kingsland Court according to the sl1bdi.....
"~
: .~;'
I,
vision ~~gUlations.
A50 f't / radius in the R/V1 for cul..de-sac turn around at
'j
"
the we8t~ end of Kingsland Court.,
2. Highland Avenue dedication may be reduced to 30 ft. R/W.
3. Kings Highway dedication may be reduced to 30 ft. R/W~
4. Plat to show '\'lost pal'cal of J.and as a tract and dedication
of 30 ft. to Kings Highwqy (to be included in the subdivi-
sion platol.
,
.>, ....'
" ~
't, 1
Adjoining streets and names of adjoining sUbdivisiona, with
lots and easemen~8 of record) ~o be shown on plat, this to
lnnJ:ude the south side of Overlea and the north s3.de' of'
Pine brook Drive and ~hus show the double frontage lots
created by the platting of Kingsland Court (l~1ch may require
special building variances for the owners adjoining Kingsland
Court to the south).
Mro S~mn moved that the Board approve the Subdivision CommittaeJs
5..
. c
" ........'"
. "
recommendation for disapproval of the plat of Kingsland 'rerrace and
the re quested changes., His motion was seconded by 1-11"., Galloway and
was carried unanimbusly.,
The Board voted to recommend that the parcelt.o th0 wast be
included ill tho plat, al1cl also be :Lnclt..tcled in the anne::w.tionD
"
'-'
.i<+",
: """;, . ,:::... t : ~ " ; '-. .~:. :'. ~ . ,:. 4':',:': '1' ~ ~ " ": :::. ~ :' ~ .' ;..:". 1'" ~: . ~'.:, .::....: -.. .:.::' ~ '.: '; .'. J )~".. /~: . ':" :'~ . /'. i. ~ ::. '".:-! I . ';"':: ':,~",,: l~. .'. _ ~':., ': I ';'; ':. ... :':: :." ,'.: '. :.' ,:" '; . :'':' '.-' ~ I . ~ '. \ . , ' . .' - ,:::. '.:'":~::I \ /. ~', ~ . :' :, . ~ ~: ..:'.,~; ;::: ,:.: ~ ~.: .':.' .,\, ..:' . . :
~
"
"
'.' ,',.-).
". '-'"
" ,;
" ~
~I ~
~c .
<:
AuguSG JO, 1960
Page i13 '
'fhere ,.ras a'di.scusaion of the outline oJ: tho proposod zonin,g
.,.. ,.4' c.........
brochure (n13 Questiono and AllinlOrsll) previously submitted for
~""""._'___il.-....t~.. c......~
. IP""'"
revie\'l. !o1r.. ~/olle explained the charts and druvtil1gs wh ich will
be includerl.l4r. Reade exprossed the opinion tha~ t,he content
might be condonsed somewhat and that l1aragraph 1112 might need some
clarification. It was agreed that the inside pages should be in
Hhita with color for the COVl~r and t)ha t l1r.. Reade \\ould submit
some revisions in the text atl the next liGoting..
r.tr. Mylander, Chatrman of the Offstreet Parking Committee,
, ,
reported that he had inquired of the City .l-1anager on August 18
as to \mether city of~icia18 would be receptive to the idea of con-
sidering an of'fstreet pal"king ordi.nance at this time. Mr. Stelt/art
later advised ilir. \lolle that after the airparI~ situatioll was settled
the comnlissioners would be receptiv~ to talking ~th the Board on,
o~f-street parking ~nd further join~ meetings on the proposed zon-
ing ordinance. 'llhe Vice-Cha:i.rman stated he thought it would be ad-
visable for members of this com:aittee to famlliarize themselves with
the text of the previous offstreeb parking ordinance prepared by
Mi".. Holle ~ l~r. l>1ylander is to call a meeting of his committee
for revie\'l and diDcuseion of offstreet parking requirements, this
\lleak if members are 'available..
The City Planllel" reported that he had transmitted J:-ecord of
the Board 1 s recommendation for denial of' B (Business) ~!..o.1~Jpg,.,.ror
~hf'~~p_~~~q ~~ighl~,I!-.d .1:I~~}: Subdivi[;ion t.o t~e City A ttorn8y1 s of-
fice for consideration \\'1. th the Intent l'or Annexation of this prop-
erty.. He' also read th~ text of his memorandum of August 191 19601
directed to the City t.lanager~ on t.he subject) URequir'ements of
Subdivisions and/or Properties to be Annexedll, in \'1hieh it ..vas
,,'
~' ,
':~;,~,,:,"'" ":'.::.-,}.".' ..:....t:.~~..:,~.::',. I,.:'.~...,:L"'.":""':':"'.' ;..~.:(....:......:..:..':....:.' .....:...\...,'1.......,-:...;,....'.-:.,'....:.'.....:. ;...:.'.!~...I:.\~.." :.'; ::'~Li~.:". ..,:..... :,~'l.". ~'.t' _:~ ..,'~'''~,::''.::
l\U~ust 30, 1960
Pags 114
~
", !
requ0stod that authority be given tho ~oning and Pla.nning Doard
for submitting rocommendatiol1s on all annexations to the OJ.ty of
Clearwater. rrhe Board \'l'as advised that no reply has yet been re-
ceived from the City vbnager's office.
Mr. Reade emphasized the fact that' in any future considera-
tion of ..~.~~q,~nQ,...H:U.l...Subdivi8iqn, t.he Board v1ants all of the docu-
mentation that is called for included on the plat that is presented
for approval.
Gopies of the Oity Ene;ineerfs directive on "Standards ~ol'
""'...~~t....~.:t..'t'''''"~''''~;;..lr1'.......~~~.''':'..~.. "('. "1 "''''(.- I'~~'~ t
Street Name Signs" (as proposed bjr the Zoning and Planning Board) ,
~---.............'.....I\.'''-1r.I~~ft~........."\:-oMII~-I;,,,......~).
were distributed to members. The Board was informed that the Sub-
division Committee Will include street, name signs as a part of its
recommendation on plats and t.he City Erlgi.neer's personnel will in-
:~) spect before bond on a subdivision is released to see if signs
are properly installed~
, New notebook entries relative to H~~~!!K_~2g..g,@.~~\1ere called
--
!,
to the attention of' l'~embers Q AX'.. \/olla explained the necessary
content of such codes and stReed he \'ms turning over some material
for 'study to the Hous:i.ng Committee, including the provJ..sions of
housing code:.~ in seven other American cities comparable in size
to Clear\'/atero
, :J""
'.
, .
A map \Vas displa~red showing proposed ne ighborhood delinea-
tions (ror HBA Housing Report) 0
The Board I'las given SOllie data from building reports (Clear,,:",
water) :tor the last; 3Q mont~~B~.". These reports ShOi'l "tha t~ in 1958 two-
.------...._--~.....I..~.,."~.~~.. ,........
, "I thirds of the d\'lelling unittJ \'let't? single-family and 1$/~ (1.38 untt.s)
were tl':o-family. In 1959 I lO~~ (90 units) J and for the '7 months
of 1960 J.7~~ (66 units) lilere tt'lO-fumily. l'lr D \lo11e stated this
generally indicates that zoning; should b(~ in the proportion of
I .
c,".' .
... :'.',~\... ~':'" ~":":"'" '" ::..L,~:" '.'. I "L~ ",.~:~~,,~'.I"", .. .:.,.l~".:':.::' ,...:~~:I'''.,..'.t.:. .:.r":. .'~_..II:.'I':....: .,.,' ~.1" ".':~':":':"';"::;'.">":_
,
, i
.l
\~"~~~
~'" "
\-, .
'.;' I
....
',~ .:: .'
,..... .
I', ' .'
~. - . .
~:> '
.. > ',~'_,n'
~.. ,r
, '~ c
'<:'; '.
,e "
. t", . ~
.~:.' '. .:
~ !,~:::" .
/'.",' ",
-1-, .......
" .
:;:.\,'.'d :
(I; .:":: :.
.. :,). :
.;~; ,:< ..: .
j:r:.; : J1 ' '.; .
". .
f,{':".,{)',
~}'~/:t," ,..,
t"~....,~ . .: i. . '.'. '.
Iii::.';:""..",
~~:~oj t.:;. ~'/,: : .
[{t':,::, :""
n, ,'~
~~ <' .
':Y.,' .-'d""
,:.' :"',
" r'
;.~: :'.
~ ,;',: .', "
.~ . . ( .
~':; ~
~.:~ .1', ' ~.' . I
,., ,
".~,':~. J':' .
: ~, .
~. I: '. '
::1'1.' ~ . I .
(,< . -;,)'" " :
;.; : i
. to . '~. .
.1 ",
:0-11. .
.;.;.. .
\~.>>:.:. :.
~ ';'.:' '.
U<~-)::, ' '
~i;~\':,':;:' ,,'\:
August )0,1960
P 'l~'
ago rr'
10 to 20~ qf' units in ffiulti...f.amily and 2..family zon:i.ng and over
AQ%'in single-family zoning fo~ residential areas. Other informa-
, "
, '
, "
t10n \~~5 'given on structural valuations for this period~
It ,was announced that there, "lOuld be no mae, ting of' the Board
'on 'September 6 unless ,required by some, urgent item"
,'Planni'ng literature wa~ distributed..
"
The meeting was adjourned at 5:00 P.'M..
, . ltsspect.fully submitted,
- ~idL&uJ~ '
,:" J ck, I~ llorie, Sec'Y
, , ity,Planner '
,,'
J
'," ,
,
'j
'1
'1,\
\i:,;~'/;',<:/:' ;'..: <~' , . .
:'{ -, '
.......~ ;
~ I I . _ .
:i:\'" ': .
:','. .