03/01/1956
/" ,'_.'---:---
I 1 ,'J
( .. 1\, '),1'
. q",' ~~
~ '. iF
... ~ , '
~1intttcs p~ mootin~ 'rh~t1'Sc1uy Harch 1.J 1D50 in 1'1unnl.tlg.~l1"Cl orf'j.co
',~
l>roHcnt ''''01'0 mombers l~ruse, Levisoll, Harrios) Nopt.OIl l\l1tl Heude" ox-
,/
o1'1"1oio member Liclcton) Nick HOUlpon of tho City l!:nginocrt 8 orrice n.nd Joe
Devlin of the Clen.rlo1t\ tor SUll.
The minutes of the l~ebl'uury 23rd meeting 'olOro approved for tpunsmission
to t.ho City Conmdssiol1 and the corrcctc(l minutes or the FCU1"UlWy 16th meet-
irig '.;ere rend awl approved 1"01' tro.usnd.ssion. It 'olas decidetl u copy of' the
minutes of each meoting should uo g1 ven Hr. Lickton in 01"(1el' to avoid a
recurrence of such errol'S as occuPl"etl ill the February 16th m:lnut.os.
,
l
Hr. Levison opened a discussion 01' assignDlent of projects 'vithin the
Board and urged that the practice of" muldng assiE:,rnmcnts to cOlJ1l11i ttees of the
Board be adhered to. He also felt thu tit t~ould be preferable if assignments
of" projects to the Board by the City COlIDuission ~yere delivered in written
',)
, ,._,f form. It ,{US his feeling that if' all assignments wepe (Ie 11 vOl~eu tn ~olri ting
, "
there ~vould be no possibility of 0. misundel'stL1.l1tling among the Conunlssiouel's
,as to projects being Hqrl<:cd on by the Board.
The discussion of 'vi-dths of' l':lr;hts-of-\'l(:~,Y of perimeter stl"cets of
.
ne\ol subdivisions l<laS resumed and again 110 solution to the problem 'o1US found.
",
It was concluded hO\Y'evol" ~ thut it, \voulfl 1)0 'olorth \\'hi10 to \{1"1 te to other
c1 ties and to the ll'eucl'u1 Housing Ailministr'u tioll to gathcl" 1ni'ol"llla ti on us
to 11m.. this problera has been handled in othe r' COIll!lltUli ties. The 'secrctar;r
agr"eeu to do this.
Chairmen Kruse next intl'oduced a discussioll of' Naster Developmont
PIn,n Thl~ee 01' tho Hoger!; Jackson 'fl"act and tile pr-e lil1li.nary plan of Uni t I
of thi s tra ct. Chairman Krus c said that the i"l unning 130 ard ha s be on 1"0-
quested bJ' the City COllJmission to stud.y this plan ami make rccolJu,lewlations
~; .to the Conunissioll rcgal"ui.ng its annexation to the City u1' Clcar,,'tltcr. It
.
Hnrch 11 lOfHJ
l:'n.ge 2
, '".Ab..
. P ~
was quiclcly brought out thu t the tdclth 01' right..o1'..tmy 01' Highland Avo. anti
Sunset Point Roadl as sl1m.,n on the plnn nrc only 100 foutl t~tho1"QUS the
Planning lloartl l1ltl.ster roadtolay plnn "H n P' has tlUSigllll. tod thoso t\W streots
as ma.in arterials for which 120 foot right-of-\my Hidth is roquired. Plan-
ning Board II}! n I" also calls 1'01' a diar;onn.l ruuthvu,y running nOl'theast
f'roUl a point 11enr Betty Lane ami F'airmont. 'rho dovoloporsl 01' COUl~!.W, had
no know'ledge 01' the need for deuicuting this roa<1tvuy and have made no
provision for it in their plan.
Hr. Levison moved that the. mattal" be rni'erred to the lJlanlling Boaru' 5
COlwuittce on street planning \'lith the l"equest that it have a report ready
for the next meeting of the ~lanning Board end suggesting thut the City
COll1missj.on conuld ttee lJe invited to a tteu(l the meeting aml be invited to
'to/ark \-lith the l!lo.nning Boaru cOliunitteo on this matter. Hr. Norton seconded
the motion which \'las unanimously Ul)l1l"oved.
Hr. Harries then moved annexation 01' the above be recommended by the
Planning Board to the City COnUnission subti act to the uevelopeps cOlUpl~ring
"
'tvi th all of the requirements 01' Planning Board uH n 1". Hr . Heade seconded
the motion tvlli.ch \.ms appr'oved unanimously.
The meeting thon acljoul"netl a.t 4:50 P.H.
Respectfully sub1:u tted
--Q ~\~\\i~~'\~~
\~~~ ~ "ll.,. hoadc, Secretary
,I' '
, .
'J