1982-1993 ULTIMA III CORRESPONDENCE SAND KEY
1982 - 1993
UL TIMA III
CORRESPONDENCE
SAND KEY
....-
, lib ~. CARBON LESS CA~~ON
. V "'fJT FORM 3801 REQUIRED
~ - - - - - - -- - - - - ~ - -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - -
F~ ~ jw--
RAPID LETTER
NOTE Send White and Pink caples
Sender retains Canary copy
TRIPLICATE
)
DATE
RrPL Y
ItT,- \~
S"SN::D
TOPS~ FOAM 3801 LITHO IN USA
R~~IPIi=NT Ri=PI V nN PINK r.npv _ Ri=T4IN WI.IITi= r.npv
PLAZA-LEVEL
ELEV 17.0'
-C J-
, II II . -
I I
r m--- '- - - - - -L I -m- -+n In r-
rHi m 1m H-H1 11-+1 I~
I ~ 83 I MUL T1 -LEVEL I
I ITl 83 11 H a- lEE m ~ ~
I 1I1I 83 rHI I~ 1m I] I BLDG. ENVELOPE
F='-'
I 111 m Ill-I I~ 183 III I C140'x24 0/x21 OCH) ea.] I ....
I lTl 83 rH-l BItE II- 183 fl1 I I
I F== I I
I 1Tl 83 II -j , I~ 183 ITl I I
F==
I TI1 83 i 11- 1m rn I I
p=
I I I I
TI1 m -j I~ '83 I T I
I I II 83 r=r I I~ 183 rn I I
I ~ = I I
I m-l 83 ~H R=ll r+m HtH n+ I~ 183 [11 I I
p==
I ml EE ITfi Rilftm R=mIFf II- 'I EE ITl I I
~ It
I In] 83 II H r+11 f.m1 ffiR Iff I~ 183 n1 I
, p== I I'
III HI ~R=mIFf I~ 183 III
I ~ 83 I I
I III EE I Hi i=f11 R+R RfFlIFf ' II- lEE 11 i I I
I
= I~
I 111 83 I HI ~:l:mm~ R=mlm 11- 1m II] I
I 111 EB IIHI 11- 183 ITT I I~
-r H-' "111 H1
I III ~H rnm::l+l p::m 1::+ III I It
I 83 II- lEE I I
=
I 1T1l EE IIH IT II r:m:J ::rrtillt a. II 83 11 T I I
~
I :111 )E I ! l-I rnmm rm 1+ I~ 1m III I I
I nTl ffifTH .~ff ' I\- UEE III, I it
I ~ ' - - - - -- .. j I!!!!!t L'-_ L I
I En' I
I ;(I!lii'~mn=, I I
I
I
I
~
______~------------L------------------L--------------------~-
PHASE TWO
EASrl'
}~ lJ E \ 7 ~~ T ION
i/40"=1' J"
rl I
f- -~!-
r------------------------ -- - --g bJ-- ID -- -- -- -- -- JLu .~
I ltl I _ J ===J~ I ,,- I'
I I
I rn ID -- ,
I ] ltl I rr I
I I I
I rn J:1 -------~ I
I lti IT I
I I I
I rn IT ,.--------{ I
I lH (I I
I I I
I OJ U -------~ I
I ltl I I
I I I
I rn IT >--------, I
I I I
I I I
I IJ u I~-------~ I
). Ii IT if I
I I
~ ~-------~ I
~:ti [ T I
I I
-------~ I
II I If I
I I
I I~-------~ I
IT I I
I I I
I--------i I
il 0: IT I 209'-011
I I
:~ ---- ---" I
il IT I
I I I
-------~ I
lIT;l:J I rr I
I 1 I
~ ilI3 =- r-------~ I
:r I
I I
I l-------- I
I il II I
I I I
I ~ 1-------- I
I JI I I
, I I I
I r-------~ I
I rr~ IT IT I
I I I I
I IJ II: }--------. I
I ~ I I
I I I
I ~JI I -------. I
I itJ rT I
I ~ I I
I ).:-------, I
: _mum IS IT rT I
I I I
I 1 _______J I
\ 1'~nmn~n~1 I If T r-------, I
I I I
rr I I I
, I I
I ~ I
- - - - --'------ -- - - ----l~ -- - -------- -- --- f- :..- - ~~ -
-
PHASE TWO
SECTION
TOP ROOF
C FLOOD PLAIN
@ el. 11.00'
--------------
f 2628
-
l~
0 -~-
I
ill CEMENT PLASTER FINISH
----------
. RUUCTED LINE OF" C(
0
I SUPERSTRUCTURE SLOG TOWER
" REF" DRWGS A9-1, SUPERSlRUCTURE
A9-2 A~-.3, A9-4 UNENCLOSED SPACE
TP EL 2498 ,_J _1
---- -----
I
I
'co I
I I
io
I
I FINISHED ROOF SURF AdE
EL 24117' I
,~
'0
I
EL 229 ]]'
MACHINE ROC
"
".
I
ROOF STRUC
EL 220 00'
".
,
-0>
EL'210.S7: =.::~ .:.~__ -_~_-.::-...
_ _&.:_ --o:;J1 ,~.....~- ...... ':.-_~ -.. Ij
----~
------
---- ---
------- -------------
- --- - --- -- - -- ---------------
--------.:_-------=-- --
/
,
,
- - \------.
\
\
---
,
,
,
,
...- - - 1
(
\ \ (
\ ,-..J
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
---
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-------------------
----------------
-
--
IdJ~tJTn;- rrmmn ;l~n :I-~;m~~
-
---
---
---
\
\
\
\\
,
\ '
\ ,
\'
\ ,
\ '
"
I'
_ n_ _ _:__::: __ __: _:_= _=
:::::: ::::::-:::-:::-:::::-=--::=:: -
,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
,
wdC20:~ cPJ lZ. N02-
- - -
---
- - -
~-=- -:..:
---
---
-- --
- - - -
- - - -
-----
-----
u
.<j
-'
n..
><
IJJ
l-.
. j
LL:
.. w'
~I
.
ItlJ
r-
N
rjJ
0
.0
I ~-
(0
'.f)
v
"/
{L
Certwed as a true and correct copy Minor Amendment to Certwed SIll
Plan as approved by the City Manager on March 4, 1992
Witness my hand and the seal of the City of Clearwater, F10nda
- this 5th day of March, 1 2
, ..
RECEIVED
4' WIDe ':JOLlD
WWITt ':JTt2.IPc.
JAN 2 9 1992
PlANNINQ.
DEVELOPlfENT DEPT,
SITE DATA
REOUIRED
EXISTING PROPOSED (Mln ')r Max )
Ppr Sptllempnt
Jil!nul,lIlon Il A N/A
Between St'uctures
~-!l!L- ' SO .
150 '
~Q~ECE'V D
WATERFRONT
S,de
.2!f)~ ___50~
'/flcant
&!l.\ ( 66AC)
J L.!:.:i 246.5 SO
Resl(~~
N/A
Rear
_~')J!'L- _.::~ ~) {'
_-.!:.j!~ li!-~@'1' I ( ) FW
-2J'A& /1~/:"lo -P~~NN'NG & UR AN
2'u!!-'L- '-- "':'2Z.5.OL D~~Y~LOPMfNT 0 PI.
&,_"\ (II 6 "lol
~~~ _~e 21~U..i _..t!~
N/A
N/A
HEIGHT
for
W'th Bonus ProvIsions l~ appl1clblel
WA N/A
N/A
PAVED VEHICULAR AREAS IS'1 Fl and
% 01 sltel
N/A 510 :
N/A
N/A 395 -
N/A&& 44 5DU/AC
&,0.. (124%)'
NonQ @30632 sl
N/A
OPEN SPACE
T olal for the Lot (Sq Ft and "lo
01 s'tel
N/A
N/A
For the Front Yard ISq FI and
% at reQUlrPd front fiHdl
-2!"~"L_ _LS..Q:iQ_ll _.l!L~__
j '1'0 of
None
N/A
N/A
Clear Space (Waterlront Prol)NtYI
~l'!Q_ _ 2') fJ2Lu.:::
'j,A
lns
Extenor Ppnmeter 8UttNo;
__~i~'~_Q_ _N~_ ...........!!J_L_
None
50..
50 ..
P1rl<lnQ Lot Ir1fPrlor Llfl(j<;r10In'l
ISo Ft and "<, of P'/1'(J lotHr LJIl'
arp15 also dflDlcr on $Ite ;Jliln
,jnNIn'1 bv .,hadlnq, rrO'l';I11trhlnq,
__.t! A_
_2!JP- _
~.'_A _
None
140 .
20..
PAHKHJG IGIw'pn lnnhrar'in IqrmlJl.lJ
_1..'1)"11.._
___ m_
Ii
1#
1/,J ./
, /[ 11 I] I l-
-2..1 f..l fy '7
None
20 ..
_, ':'5iC'J_
'r(;'.'IE" SUL
UTe NGl \110 PARKING DfCK COVf!lAGE "'VIE d r:O'lnltjO.
ADD NOTE. / GULF BLVD
LDOtD DOME'::JTIC W M J TAP~" METe.Q~, t2E.'J
F1t7E LINE. LOCATeD E:.)( ~LE~TlZA'LEIZ.
PA\2~IIN6
.. ---~-_"""''''''''_~ .... ~.. ..--.......-., .......~~ .........-..---.....--
) t2t.\} LEG.6..L DESClZIP1ION I, '~il L Qt.-\6-
= ~tv,~w_~~!:i~~~I~~~_~~~~~i~_~=~~~' -
6,tJo COt-..1'::lT~UCT\ON. Wo\"e.,:> ..,
,")f:j tlO
1999 053
. l< I
~1r:
]-17-80
, l
r
""-..",......,.~~~ __ ...... .....J. .....::..~_ ~ ~
King Engineering Associates, Inc.
24945 us Highway 19 North. Clearwater; Flonda 34623 . (813) 791-1441 . Fax (813) 791-9228
Engineers
Planners
Scientists
Surveyors
January 29, 1991
i , 1,1 IJ.l'J1-I
Mr. Bob Maran, Civil Engineer
City of Clearwater
Public Works Department
10 S. Missouri Avenue
Clearwater, F_~ 34618 , .::: ~
R~ar Pha~ /
Dear Bob:
"At~ 3 i .
f
.
j ,
r
I
r1 l \ : I I :,1
(1 Vi t l.. I 1 ! I) l-~ r II;
rJ J\ '/ l r! II I' 'I 1 \..1 I:)
(J (i':. I' I (: I, I; 1
d'd 1I J v,: I': ~ I (I l.> J
k.w HI' ____ .------ -------
F1Lr _ _ - --- -- -- --- ----
...--- (:11'/ TO
L -..;0 c..
.7 t;::; _ vi C _/,.J .:6( I'.
- <.. t::J
T((/I Fr'
We appreciate Don Malone's follow-up on my question regarding showing the revised
improvements within Gulf Boulevard right-of-way on the Ultimar Phase 2 Final Site Plan. These
revised improvements were required by Pinellas County during the Right-of-Way UtilIzatIOn
License review process which was after the initial Final Site Plan submittal. Mr. Malone informed
me that, after discussing the matter with Sandy Glatthorn and yourself, the revised improvements
within Gulf Boulevard do not have to be shown on the Final Site Plan. For the record, the revised
improvements included an enclosed stormwater system along the entire length of the project and
the relocation of the southern most entrance eight (8') feet to the north. (Note: the entrance
relocation was not required by Plllellas County but was m ved to better coincide with the proposed
third tower). The improvements described above will e shown on the construction plans.
Should your understanding regarding this issue dif er from ours, please respond in writing on
February 8, 1991.
~~f~~
~~~~
(Ddh.. *- ~ ~
c~~)
2-/-9/
Very truly yours,
~~'7~-
P. Gregory Singleton, P.E.
Project Manager
:es
cc: Sandy Glatthorn
Ted Cobb
Ed Mazur
File 1999-053.355
Citrus
Hernando
HlIlsborough
Pasco
Pmel/as
~
. .:.:l'li~~~fll..>JI]!l:"'" ". ' .
6:.~.\ ~h~BI' ,,~ . ~L.I ^. .
~'l \ .~' ,'\"J'r.; ....' ~', .. ~." '. ',' "
'"~u.rl.. ".~~,...."Y~" M~i':"" f. , ,..' .4.",,\ .
X:'::' J':~' .. ....,1~....... ~.-.' ,:,:-., I ~.~ ,'. .' I': -.
, "~.._~,,....i r~il... 7"'2~~"''' .t. ,..
. '~'A '- r.,t::l ,., ,\".1 ..,.... ,-" ."'.
T1 ..... It. c ",,'~' .. .! .
~- .l - , t t.. ...
. ;;6' . \ } \::'.. lit!'
,. \'. 8~~~~t!Jy,: :):(
I dllJ ~ "'" '.-,
. ,I~ l:~~ :""':'\.oJ...MSl~f.~"", . "
. ~~l~!-o~ ~~;:/,(.(,.:.. . .,,~ 1 -.' "
~PIII '81y..~y\':!:"";:'''' , ..' . :' '
''N' .Q~ '1p..\'" \, I
MSIG1OCD"!' _de tbla .n.d day ot Jarrua'l1" ~, ~ 1981, by
m!4~' noclWl' %, LTD., . FLorid. 1iJ11tad
P.~/(!.b81gno,=-), aM axmuCAlf DUlaK NI1) DEVnOI'HZH'!
10!..:~r.tt~ ,DY, . P101:14& corpora~ion, (-AIIel91'''.).
. 1<,R;,'t J~.r;j~'~:l. . '
''-'. '1..-.:1........, . Y
..10:." '.~:;'.' .. .... . X ~ H S"]I 'J!I AI
, l~'!l" ~i!~' '.'
I I. 1.tiJt :?'~'\ ( '-,, .
. Ai.lgnor j",l 'in . con.iderat.1on of the .UlI of Ten Dollar-
'10~OO)~~,an4' .Qt.heJ: valuable conalc!.ra~ion, ~. receipt anlS
1Clqoy' of.' which i. hex-By acknovledg'-.4, doe. ~ereby 91:'u1:,
. r~ ..11 ~' convey, an4 a..1gn to Aaaignee a 'total r..i4en1:ial
,:tl1v '~Uftit: count ot forty (40) unIts. which unit. are alloeateet
~lI(to:th. property 4..cribed on Exhibit. "A" attached hereto and Jede
_~~~.~~~:hereOf ("Parcel AM) purauant to tbe City of Clearw.ter's
r ~~~~~~~ land u.. ordinances.
~ 1r'..:-'':-;a9:.,.-.t.' .~t"
.-.._.......';,r\::\;.~.f;~ HAW AND '1'0 HOLD the aforesaid units .et fo~ above in
. <..;'connactlon with, and only in connection with the real ..tate
'... ~~ de.cribe4 On Exhibit -8" attached heX'eto and by this reterence
~,!~~<~".~;:~~.r~t.cS herein (.Parcel aM).
~&?!!~.i':~." (,,' '111e utilization ot the unibl descrlbed above shall )).
'~~I : ::'7, 'lJ.a1ted to P.rcel a, and upon completion of AslIlqn....
;'~'l~~ " . develOpJIent of Parc.,l B, all unit. noc 80 utilized flhall b.
~:;, . . rec:onveyed to Aa819110r tor the benetit ot Parc:.l A withih fIve
, (5) day. ot X'equ..t ~y AS81qnor.
.,
l' :
. Thi. A8s1gnaen~ i. given in accordance with paragraph 11 ot
~. the S.t~l..en1: St.ipulation in United states steel corporAtion v..
. city of Clearwater, circuit civil No. 78-4165-7, Pin.11m. county,
I'lorida.
..'t '.
~ fa \,'. ""'" ::. .
.'. ';~"l' .i..1:';,~~1i'~
, ....:~;~..~ ~,.;ji':S.;. .'
,.. .. U G II;.i\
~':4r ""'~. .~.. ,I.;:, , {~~ '
~.
.
, ... I
... .
\.
"
. ,
I
I
IN WITNESS MHEREOP, A.siqnor haa .xecuted thl. Aaslgnment ..
ot the ~ay and y.ar ~ir.t written above.
WI'l'NESSESI
By:
...
...
IlI\
~
CO')
~tJ:!
lce-rrealdent
Its GanQral ~artner
.
"IS
~
...
o
....
:,..
M .
~..
.
tIC.,
tiE
. ..
o.
.~
....u
STAT!: or
COUNTY or
Florida
Pinell..
)
)
:4 247=6971 70
10
10'AL
1. 02..187
1300
13 .99 anc
The tox-egoing inatl"U1Il8nt was acknowledged beto1:'G me this
-IJI4day _O~_u_J~nuary '. _19_87_, __b'!._ R.oberta 11. ;'cnnb ..a Genera~
'ftot"'~,llI"'J,,'partn.J:"O:f~ SAUD BY ItrJESTKBN'l' PROGRAK If LTD., a FLor1da l1Ju.~ecs
partnership, on 1 alt or said partner.hip.
-A...:: I ~ ,~.::;;:':'_~
No~~e ,"l~"::';!
- .
JU;40.2-120JG
Ky com!nlsslon Oxpil'os:. I. i\ l
. ...~ v
Ial,'n tVtllC S U1( 01 neltD4
II' co..n"ol (I'. ICl'I ...n"
lO.,tO rtwlJ C.CIItlAt lIS.. ulir\ .
....... ".. 'II
.-
.'
~.. A.
...
..
. ) .
. 'j"'- ' j .
~ .
. . .
, - . . .
. . .- . ...
FRO" K.8. ARSENAULT P.A.
.. 7 1992
. ..., .
.
, .
-,. '.
'.
.... .
.
.
..... I
........ ..---.,... . ... -
..-.- . .._..... t
t ._ ~r'- _~
..",
.. .
..
FRON
t ...., . IIi! :~. , -I,y.-.,:F . ....~fi!ft\!Ji.\1.t"'..,i 'N..it'~\;t\i.~,A.~ f'.'~'~' ,~ .
':ll' .,.. . "!I. /I'-f:~,t..y ,~, .i~"-1'-.f'l'1 it) ,I.,. ~\ "
. ~~ l!Y",.~I"lT-'."~~' .....'\.. ,', l~ ...,;
.j,!If}j~:! ;'.~.,. ,.,~ to .~ .. ... . ",-.' ,'V.~'~~'\'f~:\~ C.. "
';:'.C(,;~~;."""~. :~.. ~ ~f"~'l":"'~~''''''' \.~Wi\p..r.:
'fi' ~ot~~ ;.l " . .. "l~" ~ :,. ,r, \!...~ ~ W:
'nl~ :;~v..f(;f~^' ~ !;".~~ ~ ,. '. ~ ,'rU." . f8-1 tu~ I
~ i:io~.' :t~...d!4.~-A~~~ l~~'!' :-.!r:' ,"".1.\ f'tli.~'~r."l"';" -n;r' ..,m. ~
, i:i't,~~CA.:.lII''! '~r-Y~'" ~{f,,"fJt~......~.. ..rt:,'.. to f:t:'l ~\"iJ..~l.:' .:~t.!)\,! ·
~~"'''1t............'I'.. "...:.''tl.,r~:,f'" ':.Jr..'l~' I ;'l.'~ ....(~;...~( '.' ....ttl.~ r:.a....... ~
"',.....,~aAA...... ,.~....~:ft)~~~'".JL-_r ... ~.~'\ ~,....~J.. .:,..4'Tf.'.':'~fi,Ct.: ~. ~"
'. !\. .', . Hi' _.. '.....i."'-~.~ ,'-.. "'.. '11' .,.~t.. ".., .... .,.. ,,;.. ~ ,....r "
'. '. / :'~~..csr":3 ~~~~fJI \",~~"';l"".Jl""':'\~l:.:,;":/I!''''; t'~'~~'(.f~:~J~{~;Ijfl,.t,/ ~~l
I~r.~ rI ~;.... 1- _. ' 'l'~'~ ~-_. · > -,.. f I" . ,.i' ~.!II. .",. ..
. I ". I~. ~~~,id~~l:!:i!f.~#:.!{l~'~~~~~;~',;~/;':' '~"~'. ~.,;,~ ~:~ :~~~:~4:'" \,\$~lt.i:~;~~~
~1t.'~.IJf'~"1JI!.W"'i.~'~~~"':"""''''''''~:';t'I'' .!.....::r.-: '. or' .:. . ,..-,~.,~Y:!;;(:"\
\ ~"'" ',.. .. .' . . . .. .. " .' ' .', I' .....
. , . ...__ .:; '... ,.: ....... ,".' " . I.' '."' ,,~ ,,~......,
. _ ... ''1'' YYT ;..._'&'0.".1..1"1;.-' I,.;'. ' ~::<..... .,.,' :.:..... .i \:....i'il-<tl.:;.f:,.
, ~........~. '.' ,,' '1;'-" Q . ':"'I OJ ..,..... ..." " ,. . ...oJ""",,-,
f~' .'.l{~':.;.:;",. _ .,~. .:..~.', ".:".., .,. ......... " .' .:.... " :. :~)o'..rr..;
. ~-m''-r'li~t,...t:., ,;". ~ .I~ ,:.~~""","'l'C"',....: . :'_' '.. ~,.~.:.. '.' .... .~~; ,;;":';
~u....."s...,...,,"... T_ahll' 29 540011"" ".e. n ra..; ...ella.' ;', ,"~"~
. ~ no. ~"',e it; 'iill' ...i.. . "" tt ,...1..1,' .....11004 '0'. 1.11....... , :,. .'.'. . . . '.,:',;~,:.:~~'i.tJi'
, . ~ ..~~,Ik..~. ,'''pi'.~' '. . . .:...1.-:.,. j ..':, ,.'r .. .' .' ,.' : 4' . :" . ~",', ".~..
. ..... ........-0( _"l" fA... .... ," ... .... ." .' ..' . .'" ..... ., '...,"
C lil~ 1M'; lIoot """" . ...... ..r ..I' Soctl.. ,,;'; &I......... . .,.~. Dr! V... ", ;':; :;1,: ;.,
U~'l"O:t,[.i';'son.. IM:lIoot" u.. .r '..14 s.ctl.. ,. . rol'" '0 ,IIo .... ",","..!';,;.:~~:
"..C.~17lfS,hC-or-wa1 UI'e or r..l' 110\11....1'. (tOO' U'J. 0... 1766. ".... : .. 'L'~.~~
n~")I:'-'. .10., ..14 _...Iy rlc",-.r-r Uo. .. ')l'sa'tr E.. . '''...
S3!)1: I.it t. c1\o tolnt .r lI.tAM Inl:: U,.nte II. "004 '07" .al.. 38).00
't..c~;~_r" or S... ,. . ,.Int on the .C3. hl;h veur u". of th. c.au
I~OJ~~atC~:"'I' pol~t hcr~ln."I~' rorc~rr' to~. rOlnL MA~ for (OQ-
..~.ftS"ftce' "cheM. 11'0. th.. rol~& or "..~lnDlnr. n.n aln"" thu .rore..' S~
~~t.tQrl, r1Iht-Or-~., l'ft~ at r~lr aoule~A" the 'oll~tnl r~t.t. .n'
;1~u"." II. "05'-20" t.. ~03.;1 h.ot to A pollat of CliNeS rhone. J&on....
L~.ve.l~r1' .10nl .d' c.~. ",leb . ,,,'IUI or le~9.'6 feet t'lr~u,b A cen"
~{'\!,: cral .nlh 01 O'o01t.l.\ . .n Aft .UaC.2nce of ~'6.'n rc'~ (C.,.
'1 : ~.'. 2'02"'')0'' L. 19)-.99 hrtH thence N.' 220$0.')9" E. t. ')o..~O htt;
~.,_ ell_C' hlVSnl ..14 \lu\,rly rSs;ht-Or-v:.1 Unl. tI. 6'D09'21.. \I., )9S
..~...' lut. _u or leu to the .,.~" hI~" VALur \ l~~ or r..sll of KedcD;
chtnee So~thwl.tcr11 alon, .~sa .03" hlR~ vatet 11n. and btftdlnl
lbef~Ub'~o the ~tor"'lln\ 1,......1 r..lnL MAllO.
~
!
'.
........ -
r
. ..,....
i
I
I
,
i
r,
\
.
r
'1
S
..~- 0' t
70ft SETBACK LINE
ENTRY
CONTROL
STATION
-
~
- A C NDOMINIUM 0
Y. H. LEE ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS
.
.. ~ - .:1 -;:#-- _n.;. ~- -- -- - -;;. -~ - - - ~ - -- _/l:nJiL- un_~ -- ---
W--~AN~~ ~--~~ --"= .kCJ_L~____---- -~ --
~- - -. --- - -- -:ad -- ell -~:d!o' -,- - --- - ---le- -- -- -- --- --- -- --
_ ___ ...f, ~ _~~J3~ en ~_tA!J__ g._ __n _ _
.. _ ""'~l~ It- ~'f 0 J+ )( 02 ,/ZJ ~~___
__~~_____ __ _ ___ _ .. 2- { 0 <F+. ; "-- ~;j L. _ _ _ n_______ ___ ___ _ _ _ __
-- - --- ----- ---- - --- _ ,: ~ ~_ <3~_~~__ ~~_r_;::-; _-(__ __.___ _ _~__ _
----~~-~~~-~n-=~
(z?_ - _ -~_-_it~ !:t-~::--~~- - ~f:Z:-~_j~~~-~
1L~!) ~ I -;i
"'----. - - :Jj----tL-r-r---- ---- - -----~--
~~_~~___~ _: _-_~ -__'~0JJLZ-_;:; -_-]-:t:-_~---~~u~
/ - t"~ .:... t;- ~ .:... lIt~
- ---- ------. - - ----.------- - . ------~~~ -- -z;-------- ------------ -- ----
-- --- --.-. ----.. ~ - --..-...-- '<.. ---~---- -----~--- . - - --------- ------
-.. -- ~.. -<?~J-~~7tf)~--____-----
__ __ _ . __ _ _JH:y:~k_- Wl4~_~
-- - .. -- - - ---..~~ ~ P>~_____ _
- __n - _~: ~- _- - ---~~fii:~i_~~~~(ii<
...J.....
__ s~ , ~lrf~-
~ '{ ~ZfJ
~/6r (> ~ - ~ I
- - ------,r - - - -- ---~ -
/~t' ? ~_ ~6(
'I.. -' III ltC' r
- ,
/
~
- ~ 1ITo~.t;- ~,~~
Gc1~ti~. .L/;-/-f~~w.~ 1;:~~,
d\ l.(o ~1f /V #
~
Cvk -riJ
":? /J - ~
~ ~o~f, t:ik. ~
4r--~ 6 k ~ o' ~ c
- f ~~: ~ ~ p;!- 6cM ~-~
_~el AA 1/' ~k &J ~ -
-
R;,j.
, L ~
f,,- ~)
(;,0'
-
o~
lOPS FORM
7525
Litho In US A.
~
1
l
l
"
I. Policy does not insure the nature and extent of riparian rights and subnerged
lands incident to caption prope,....".
.. This land appears to be filled-in land, and 1s subject to the rights of the
United States of America by reason of its control over navigation and canmerce,
especially in ttme of war, for use for navigable purposes, and also rights, if
any, reserved to the united States of America in the permit, if arrj, under
which the land was filled in.
~
I. Rights, if any, of the public to use as a public beach or recreation area any
part of the land lying between the body of water aootting the 8ubject prq>erty
and the natural line of vegetation, bluff, extreme high water line, or other
apparent boundary line separating the publicly used area fran the upland
pr ivate area.
--
r. Terms and conditions of Beach Erosion Control project recorded on January 28,
1981 in O. R. Book Sl4l, page 1590 am First Amendnent recorded in O. R. Book
SlU, page 1626 as approved by Resolution recorded in o. R. Book 5141, page
1646, Bulkhead and Erosioo control Plat Book 2, pages 64 and 65.
I. Reservations and/or easements contained in Deed fran the State of Florida,
through the Trustees of the Internal ImprovEltlent Fum of the State of Florida,
to Ed C. Wright, recorded on April 25, 1955, in Deed Book 1531, page 351.
I. Oil, Gas and Mineral Lease fran Trustees of Internal Improvement Fund to Arnold
Oil Explorations, Inc. (Now COastal petrolelmt ~y), recorded in Deed Book
1184, page 399, together with all of its modifications'and assignnents as
affected by the Consent Decree recorded in O. R. Book 4794, page 261.
lo.~covenants as contained in Final Judgment, circuit Civil ~. 78-4765-7, as
-recorded 00 February 4, 1987 in O. R. Book 6420, page 975, and in Amended Final
Judgment, Circuit Civil No. 83-14905-7, as recorded on February 4, 1987 in O.
R. Book 6420, page 1001.
11. Assigrment by and between Sand Key Investment ProgrC!'O I, Ltd., a Florida
limil:.ed partnership (-Assignor") ard Arner!can Design arx1 Developnent
COrporation of Sand Key, a Florida cor~ration (-Assignee-), as recorded on
February 2, 1987 In o. R. Book 6418, page 1098.
12. Terms, corxHtions and other provisions contained in Oevelopnent Covenant, by
and between American Design & Development Corp. of Sand Key, OOX Corp:>ration,
and Centerbanc savings Association, recorded on September 14, 1987 in O. R.
Book 6590, page 1212.
N:7l'E: Unless noted otherwiJe, all instrUl'llents referred to herein are recorded
in the Public Records of P Inellas County, Flor ida.
~
Director, Parks and Recreation
..
!!<!le: All fees payable to "City of Clearwater". QJ>_en Space and Re..cr~ti~
.!:.1!..<:..JJl!LLand fees should be submitted to the Parks and Recreation
IJepRrtment, 'City lIa11 Annex, 10 South Mi9souri Avenue.
ltecrenUon Fncility fees should be 8ubmitted to the Duilding
Department at the same address.
1-10-84 - FORM 102
"Amenity. In real property law, such circumstances, in
regard to situation, view, location, access to a water course, or
the like, as enhance the pleasantness or desirability of the
property for purposes of residence, or contribute to the pleasure
and enjoyment of the occupants, rather than to "their
indispensable needs. Extras or intangible items often associated
wi th property. They may be tangible. Often amenities in a
condominium include swimmin ools, landscaping, and tennis
courts." emphasis added Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth
Addition.
911/DHM/30874MEM1
d-1
TO'
FAX #
FROM'
MESSAGE
69
FAX MESSAGE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
P.O. BOX 4748
CLEARWATER, FL 34618-4748
OFFICE PHONE - (813) 462-6880
FAX PHONE - (813) 462-6476
Mr Steve Bauman
595-8928
Louis R. Hilton, Development Planner IT
Per your request, this is the form whIch accompames the fmal site plans
for certIfication by the City Clerk. The Parks & RecreatIOn fee must be
paid before I can move forward for certIfication
JOHNSON. BLAKELY, POPE. BOKOR. RUPPEL & BURNS. R A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E D ARMSTRONG 111
BARBARA A BACCARI
BRUCE W BARNES
JOHN T BLAKELY
BRUCE H BOKOR
GUY M BURNS
MICHAEL T CRONIN
EUZABETH J DANIELS
USA B DODGE
BRIAN BEVANS
MARION HALE
REBECCA HENSON HUDOBA
SCOTT C ILGENFRITZ
FRANK R JAKES
TIMOTHY A JOHNSON JR
SHARON E. KRICK
JOHN R LAWSON
JAMES G LEWIS
MICHAEL G UTTLE
MARIA MAISTREUJS
MICHAEL C. MARKHAM
DANIEL L MDODY
DAVID J OTTINGER
F W ALl.ACE POPE JR
DARRYL R RICHARDS
DENNIS G RUPPEL'
CHARLES A SAMARKOS
JOHN A SCHAEFER
BETHANN SCHARRER
PHIUP M SHASTEEN
CHARLES M T A TELBAUM
GLEE A TRIPLETT
JOAN M VECCHIOU
MICHAEL T W1LUAMS
ANTHONY P ZINGE
. OF COUNSEL.
PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER
FILE NO
October 1,
~~08~74. 83474
r"" -, r:--'J '
J.992 -__ r~~ . \\1 \1 \
\i)i~~ - V[ tt~, \\ \
I}\\r;e G
'I \ '\ ('\1'\0')
~\p\ \1\:\ ,,)2\~~'lt.
~LANN\NG
DEP~MEt-!l
Mr. Michael Wright
City Manager
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida
34618-4748
Re:
Ultimar III
"
Dear Mike:
Please
meeting is
caused any
note that the
October 15 and
inconvenience.
correct date for the Ci ty Commission
not October 16. Our apologies if this
Very truly yours,
~~
Leticia Meynet
Secretary to
Timothy A. Johnson, Jr.
T AJ /lm
911/TAJ/30874LELl
83474
cc: Mr. Ted Cobb
Mr. James Polatty
/'
CLEARWATER OFFICE
911 CHESTNUT STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 3461 7-1368
TELEPHONE (813) 461 1818
TELECOPIER (813) 441-861 7
TAMPA OFFlCE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 1100
TAMPA FLORIDA 33601-1100
TELEPHONE (813) 225-2500
TELECOPIER (813) 223 7118
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartment Correspondence
, ,
TO:
VIC Chodora, BUlldmg Official, Don Meerians, Assistant Director/Public Works/Traffic
Engineer, William C. Baker, Director/Public Works/Engineenng Group; Tom Miller,
Assistant Director/Public Works/Environmental Group; Ream Wilson, Director/Parks
and Recreation, James Go loe, Fire Marshall
FROM:
LoUIs R HIlton, Planner II '
SUBJECT:
Certified Site Plan for U1timar Three (pSP 89-12)
DATE:
January 20, 1993
Attached is a copy of the above descnbed site plan submitted on January 13, 1993 for certificatIon,
Please refer to attached copy of conditions of approval by D R C on July 23, 1992 for this site plan
If you find the site plan to be acceptable, please wnte your Initials and date next to the appltcable conditlon(s)
on the attachment If you do have an objection and/or recommendatIOn, your comments are required below (or
please attached your comments to this memo)
Comments: (by whom and with date, please)
~~
a.q,~~
PrIor to Tuesday, January 26,1993, please return thiS SITE PLAN and memorandum to LoUIS Hilton, Planner
II, for final processmg to the City Clerk for certification and distrIbution
LRH/lrh
01sp8912 cer
PUBLIC W ~EPArrrMENT
~B
INFRA UTIL EI':G TR,e.NS ENV
OGS ORMB C::CMH oPt Cl~
o 0 0 a 0 (';'"
CJ FN 0 JRL a MH 0 013 R. V fYl
COPIES TO.
FILE.
---....----
m r ~ ~ ~ I' r~. - ·
Wi ~ JAN 2 0 1993
l -- -
r,
Pu~~~~-- _,~~ _' ~ I
, ,
I " h~
~-03-1992 15:32 FRIJr'I 'CIlY OF a..w
. EKi I I-EER I I'[i TO
959S8928
,-
FAX MESSAGE
~
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTIENGlNEERING
SENDING LOCATION FAX NUMBER: (813) 462-6641
OffICE lELEPHONE NUMBER: (813) 462-6970
TO: ~R~ L-6l3I>
LOCATION:JJ.b-T'~ :rrc
FAX NUMBER: -S<1'=:>- S9Ze
FROM: Lo<.-\ 11"....,,0
DATE: Me..IL- ? 1112-
I
MESSAGE:
NUMBER OF PAGES THIS MESSAGE (INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE)
P.1i31
-z-
~
'i
fFR-m-1992 15:33 FROM CITY OF a..W. EH:i11'EER11'(i TO
959S8928
P.l2I2
C 1: T y 0 po
Interde
!rO:
Micbael wright, city Manage
I'Rcx:
James M. Polatty, Jr., oi
Development
VIA:
S'OB3EC't :
Kathy Rioe, Oeputy City
Ultimar Three - Request for approval of alternative
site plan tor the tower buildinq tootnrint onlY
pursuant to settlement stipulation dated October
17, 1986
Scott Shuford, Planning Manager; File
COPXES:
DATE'
March 25, 1992
The Ul timar proj ect is being developed in accordance wi th the
Exhibit "B", Parcel II Schematio, Site Plan 2 pursuant to the
settlemen~ stipulated dated October 17, 1986 (Circuit Civil No. 78-
4765-7). This sohematio presents the building envelope for Ultimar
III as a rectangle measuring 100 ft. x 250 ft. x 210 ft.
The applicant is requesting the City Manaqer' s approval of an
alternative site plan for the building footprint or ultimar three.
The proposed change incorporates a unique "U" Shaped buildinq
dQsign that increases the buildinq setback from Gulf Blvd. on the
north end of the structure and eliminates part of the building
envelope on the south end of the structure. The overall building
footprint is deoreased from the allowed 25,000 square feet to the
proposed 19,500 square feet.
After careful review of this proposed change to the Ultimar Three
building footprint, the Planning Department has determined the
proposed ohange to the buildinq footnrint only. to be acceptable.
However, it should he understood that this does not satisfy the
requirement of ~raph.-..1..1.. restrictinq the development to 360
residential units wi~e-eliqibility to transfer 40 residential
units from Parcel IV. The overa 11 development does, in fact,
propose to develop the maximum 400 residential units. Therefore,
the developer shall be required to record an appropriate notice of
transfer in the Publio Reoords of Pinellas County and filing a copy
thereof with the City Clerk's Office.
~
APPROVED
lOJ
DISAPPl'tOVED
DATH:
~/f902J
03mem3.tc
TOTfl.. P. 02
, ,
1. ... _
"
...--..
, ,
:
p
> 1IIiiiI-'
"
"
,
, ,
~ I ..,
"
"
;;.
" c
\.
"
':-
"
, '
"
".
, . Sea Towers
ConstructIon Company, Ine
\ ... ,!'<<
, .
.'
"
~,
, ~
r
'-
r ' .
" '
. t -
J
-'
" ,
... ~ (
September 3, 1992
_ {l .....
'.
"
"
~
, \'
""'
"
"
, .
Mr. Don Meerians
: CUy of Clearwater
Traffic-Engineer1ng Dept.
10 South Mi,ssouri" Aye'nue'
Clearwater" FL 34616~4748
, I,
I,
'.
"
.\
t ~
'r
. "" ~ ....
I "
,I'
RE :-
Ultimar Three,
-1560 Gu1f Boul~v,ard
Clearwater, F;I.orid,a ,
~~ '.
j
,,'
~
"
...( ;-
"
, I
, ,
r'
"
;c
~ I" ,
I'
,
"
, ,
~.
.
Dear Mr. Meeria~s:
" ,
, "
~ , "
~
_Response 'to Development Review' Committee Request Dat'ed ~uly 23, 1992
, ,
SUBJECT:
~ .... ~ I
"
~
, I
"
, ,
EnclosE?d are' sheets,AZ.OP and,A'3.0P for'your re~iew and'~ppro~al-iii ascordance w~th'
cond~tion,7 of.Item HI-of the ~evelopme~t Review Committee meeting-minutes d~ted
,J~ly 23,-19,92, ~~cppy'of which is enclosed. Please c~l1 me at ?,95-8915 tp clarify
any questions ,you may have during your review of these' plans.
- ~ j 1 I _ ~ ." ~_ - ~ ~'\
,
"
"
~
,
~~nce.r_~y;' <
, , ,
I ' ,
j \ - - .
Steve Baumann'
Architect
, . .
" ,
. .:
'.
"
"
"
J "
,~
"'
-'
SB/dk '
<Enclosure
,I,
(
. '
.~
l,
',-
J\. ~...
.
,
"
_fe....
"
, '
~
"
",
"
,
"
"
, ,
"
,~ \
"
. ,
"
. , '
"
. <
'-
, ,
",'
"
. I
" .;: If
" ,
- />,
,
\ .
\-
. '
, \
"
.1
"
, '
\
1560 Gulf Boulevard - Clearwater, Flonda 34630 -' 813:595-8915 - 595~8928 FAX
, ,
,
,
"
, ,
.,
, ,
- J
JUL 27 '92 12:11 KING ENGIN AND ASSOC
P.1/3
IJI:J'J~,:.t'"............__
", <'" Jil" -..
. ' .J-::'~'- !./.~
,,~./ . '/r'-
.: ,-' I "...'" ~~
:~I(' '1/~(YI,..t\..,...
) ~J _I --"'SJ .r"
..,-- ,-. .::::!;,~
~."fi \ ....... ,'/
,,-J \ ~....~
... -":~',- :-;....1
"':....rl,.""""'"'-- .,',vJ
~V..0Jrr rl '{ '1,1'
""'_.,..r ! sc... ,IJJ
~"'#'J'.,,/././)J
CITY
OF
CLEARWATER
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Telephone (913) 462-6990
POS 4748
C LEA RAT E RReoo'~D 4 e 1 e 4 74 8
!JUl 2 7 1992
ce' ".~~.~ -
ELJ([.--
7:io-jp~~
July 23, 1992
P. Gregory Singleton, P.E,
, King Engineering Associates Inc,
24945 U.S. 19 Nonh
Clearwater, Fl 34623 - - . -
--- ._- - .. - -.-'. ,
tfi9" JI/() ~pf)
r-ILf. .
-v_, .....
Dear Mr. Singleton:
Re: Amendment to the CertlflecJ SUe Plan for Ultlmar Phase III (A resldentfal condominium proJect)
located at 1520 Gulf Blvd. on Sand Key (PSP 89-12)
On July 23, 1992 the Development Review Commntee approved the above referenced amended site plan
subject to the conditions listed on the attaohed copy of the unoffioial DRC minutes.
Please submit tWQlve ('2) ooples of a (signed and sealed) final site plan, drawn In accordance With
Development Review Committee conditions of approval, to our office, 10 South Missouri Avenue, within
sixty (60) days from the date of approval. It Is recommended that the site plan submittal be limited to one
(1) sheet.
When all COnditions required prior to cen,flcaUon have been met, the final site plan will be forwarded to
the City Clerk for cenlflcalion. Please allow approximately one week for your plan to be certified. (Note:
If no plan revisions are required, B memo of revalidation shall be forwarded to the City Clerk for
Cerltlflcatlon. )
If you now wish to submit your Construction plans for building permit review, please contact the Building
Olvlslon, telephone 462-6567 for Instructions Please note that no permit will be Issued until the site plan
has been cenlfled and that any necessary changes required as part of site plan certlfioaflori may result
In changes to your building plan.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Louis Hilton, Planner II.
Slnte% 1/ /
/~~
Ted H. Clarke
Planner II
THO/tho
07am8912.1rh X
o
"Equal Employlt19n' und A'flrmAllve Aotlon Employe'"
,-
.J I
. 1: -
JUL 27 '92 12:12 KING ENGIN AND ASSOC
P.2/3
MEMBERS PRESENI;
Ream Wilson
Bob Maran
James E. Goodloe
Don Meerians
Ted Clarke
Walt McAleer
Mike Oultten
OlliERS PRESENT:
Doreen Feldhaus
Gregg Singleton
Ted Cobb
Roberta Kaplan
TIm Johnson
YNQFfICIAl
MINUTES
DEVELOPMENT ReVIEW COMMITTEE
City of Clearwater, florida
July 23, 1992
IDrn~~~
- Assist. Director, Parks and Recreation; Acting Chairman
. Representing Publlo Works Department/Engineering
- Representing Fire Department -
- Representing Trafflo Engineering Department
- Representing Planning and Development Department
- Representing Planning and Development Department
., Representing Public Works/Environmental
- Recording Secretary
~ KEA
M Key Investment Holdings
- I(ey Investment Holdings
- Johnson, Blakely
(Item 61 I
(Item 61)
(Item 111)
(Item 'U
The meeting was called to order at 9:06 a.m. by Aotlng Chairman Willon In ORe Conference Room
"A".
Minutes of ORe Meeting June 26, 1992 were approved (motion by James Goodloe, seconded by Bob
Maranl.
ITEM 11 ULTIMAR PHASE III, (8 residential condominium project), located at 1620 Gulf Blvd. on
Sand Key (PSP 89-12)
Pertinent comments from the Department representatives are Incorporated Into the motion listed below.
MOTION: Motion was made by Ted Clarke, and seconded by Bob Maran, to approve the amendment
to the certified site plan for Ultlmar Phase III subject to the following conditions:
1. Signs and fencing/walls are subject to separate review and permitting processes,
2. The requisite building permits must be procured within one (1) year from the date of
certJrleatlon of tl1e final site plan and all requisites certificates of occupancy must be obtained
within throe (3) years of the date of certification of the site plttn.
3. Prior to certification of the final sito plan, the tabulation tabiD shall be adjusted to show the
area of the town houses and multi-story building separately In order to compare with approved
modlflcatlons.
4. Prior to certification the applicant shall provide additional information according to the court
stipulation for the facilities proposed above the roofllne beyond tho 210ft. height limit.
6. Fire lane shall be designed to access the townhouses. The final design shall be subject to the
approval of the Fln~ Marshal.
e. Prior to certification the location of siamese connection and fire hydrants shall be show on the
site plan or II note that locations shall be subject to final approval by the fire Marshal.
1 '(IDrn&~1f
ORC 07/23/92
JUl 27 '92 l~:13 KING ENGIN AND ASSOC
P.3/3
-
. . y-;.
7. P,lor to certification II detailed parking plan shall be submlttet. ...l1d Is subject to the approval
of tho City Traffic Engineer.
8. All construction within 18' of the seawall must obtain a variance from flood boards per
Chapter 39 - Cost,1 Construction Code. (Forms available at Centtal Counter).
9. The applicant shall contact the Parks & Recreation Department for the required recreatlon/open
space assessment fee, which shall be paid In accordance with the court stipulation.
MotIon carried unanimously.
ITEM..lZ BA YSIDE TOWERS (a1<8 The Islander/Clipper Cove), located on the north side of Dory
Passage between Island Way and Larboard Way, south of Starboard Tower Clipper Cove
Condominium IPSP 87-32)
Tho applicant was not present at the meeting.
MOTIONi Motion was made by Bob Maran end seconded by Don Mesrlens, to continue until Planning
meets with the Developer to resolve whether Impact fees are to be paid prior to
recertification. Motion carried unanimously.
The meeting adjourned 81 10:05 a.m.
Ream Wilson, Acting Chairman
2'IDrn&~~
ORe 07/23/92
,.AI
o {
... '\.. ~"... ... {
"..l
~ -,.. ./'
" -
,,~
1:
,.'
, ,.
,-
"
-r-
, I
-' ,
,-
"
, "';~
'" -
"
I ..;p ~ ("
"
I.,J,; _
:-
,"
",
"
, .
"
I.
I "
,-
, >
.
,
,
,- ,
',! )
I , . ""
~
,- 1
, -
'\
..: .
-,
"
~
'I'q. J
~; '-
" " Sea Towers
-' . ConstructIOn Company,Jnc"
.. 'I, ' "..,
, . '
\:
" ,
,-'
'{ -
.,'
,".
, (
,
-;
"
~. ~..
, .
po \~ '
.'
.::
, \
"\ ,.
oj' -
"
..
~
,VIA"HAND DELIVERY
- I ,~
, ,<
> -
... .
<
, '
,.4
, ,
)-
-, .
"
, r
'.
,1,
'f
-.
-"
'.
- >
'! ~..
. "
.t'
. "
- "1 -
'",
, .
.,.
, t
, May 4, 1992
,
'''-I.,
r\ "
f
"
.' T
,"
,
, '
" ,
i
". ,
..
~c
, /
-'
/..;!
/
.... ~ ..>'":.
"
Mr. Louis R. Hil to~" Plariner l'J;
Planning Servi~e D;vision ".' "
.City.Ha)l AI}nex ' , ," ' "..,
10 South' MissourLAvenue, '. r , .-
, -'
;CleaFWater,.FJ;., 34618; ,^
.. \ ~ ....... "j \
'.
, r
"
"'-, -
, ..
.1
",
~ eJ ...
.
.,'
.;
<
I
\.
.'
f ..... ~ \ Co ..
, >'
':. r
. ,
,.i ~ ~ {
"\$....
'r
,
,
'7
'.
Ultimar Three , ,.
"
.1560 Gulf Boulevard '
" ,.c l \
," 'Sapd KEiy,' "Cl.earwater, Florid'a, __' '. "
:'--' "c'., r'_:/'" ;:\'"' '" ."
,SUBJ: :"4ssignm~I)-t. betwe:n-S~nd Key Invest'fent- Pro~ram,I, L~d~ and ,American Design
and Development' Corporation of Sand Key dated JailUary .23, 1987
J ~ I .. \.1- /' ~ ..\1 - ;,..' { ..... ,,,,..:\..
RE:
" ~
, '
--
,...
~
"'........ .
.~
"
\.. 1:.,1
~,
~,,,
"
, -
.....
, -,
,:,. "\...
,
J)ear Lou:
, "
. -,,-;
, I
".. -
1\ (
"
7
.. ,,1_.. . ..., r ,. ..." It .. .
Ip' keep~ng"wJ.th our di'scussJ..oI( of las,t ,week, we have:been ~ble' tc?' obta:i"n a better
qu~lity r~prodtict~~I}>.-of ,t.he',above captioned "Ass~gnriier:~",' a copy of ,V;hich 1S
, enclosed,. ,.This "Ass1gnment;:", wh1chwas the subject'of..my 'letter to the C1tY,Manager
, datea April 23,"1992, was~recorded ~n the Public Records"6f Pin~lras County on
February 2; 1987'.i,n Ofhcia]" Re~ords Book 6418, at page 1q98. =-, -" ..
... I ... "~ <{: - - f ",,"
1 .) _..' f ";, \ ..
We. a.te_~}iopeful ,tl;at; th~ encl~sed' d~cument will 1S~ ~dequate "for your needs.: Please.
fee'l free to call me if. you,require; f.urther information. .-
~ r
, .
.~
Sincer~ly,~ .'
\. \ ,
" F~ , _ '~
,'~~r -'
-,.
, ,
r
,>
"
::-....,:.{,
..-~'"'
,
- c,
, ,
-" ,
''\ :
"
'.
, ",
, '
~ ^ '\ ..',"
,"Ted'Cobb, President
'i "',... ), ~
,.. ... ~
...,. ...~).
"
",
. "
- -1 ~ ~\-
, TC/dk,
, \ '
. ;
'-,
"
.'
I~!
"
" ,
,,~ .
"
,-
, c
, <
, "
, '>.
,
" ,
- \
,
. -'
'.
'.'
"
.... -'-~: 1
"
"
"
, '
,
.'
.}
"
"
,... ";.
. "
,..';0 ..'--
, .
1-3....
'.
-,
,. .
. t r' \ '"'
.I ......".,. t'"
-:
.'
~,
" ~
. ,
-,
1..(.....
.,
, ,
,F
," (
, \
, ,
"
-''"''I
, ' ...
'. .
-'
. 'f ~
{~ ,.J,.. "- /.
,
, ^
"
.i, f;
.\
./;; /"
- ,
" '
\
, .
l~ ~.IlJ" -
~
...... ~, ~
~ ).
,.
,<l.
J,
, . >
"
. "
.'
'.
"
...... II ~
<,
\..' ... ~ "" .... JJ.- 1: ~ r ~ l' ...'- ~ I !,. I 1--~ - ~;' -:.' t
,1520 Gulf Boulevard - Clearwater, Flonda/34630 -'813':595-8915 - 595-8928'FAX
... f .,. -. ,; .;. ~
j
,.'
,
\. .l ~..
< ,
, ,\
" ,
.'
,c
"
,,' ,
'.
"
, .
,
.,'
,.,
".
,
- ,
- ,
, ,
-',
-.
"
"
"
"
'( .
. -
"\ to..
.'
."'
-':::.~
C_,
. ~
<
'"
-
~
~
'"
~
0<:
~
0<:
~
o
l:Q
....
~
U"l
- CO'!
~ CO'!
'"
o
p.,
co
'tl
:.: 1:
~ 0
~ ~;:
::'iCO'!-
l:Q~""
Ql
-lC4'
:z; 0 CO
gl:Qt
~O:
o .~
..., p.,c.J
o
ro
i5
::>
ro
~
~~~~} ";'4i:t;~?(./: >}
':.~:~. . t ,~Y~,:/C' -.
~,
"- -....... .. . ,
~~f\.., ,~ I. .. - ~..~ ..it~1'ft:.~
. ~~f'j"\ioi~~'.
rJ~.r .....-~..... ..'C. J, ... (~':.. ": ... L
~
. ,
1..- _
t(~i;"J ..
}. i, ,J\U ~ , .' . ,
S~ASSIGNJIEH'1' made this ~ day of January _ , ":1987, by
m~DvBsTHEH'1' PROGRAH I, LTD. , a FLorida' 11mi~ed
___ ~- '< p,:{~jj(!Ai.iqnor")" and AHERICAH DESIGN AND DEVELOPKENT
_~ _q~o~;'O:rASAHD DY, a Florida corpora~ion, ("Assignee.).
I~~~(~e~~r ~'~t;-1! :~~ ~-
,".tr-;1tl;^~ " -.,-. WIT N E SSE T H:
U J r.... ii:~~"~:~ ~:) l .
"" \!;;"~':~~~ASsignor, in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars
:,~ J: :_~_,($,1.9~.~~)());: ,and other valuable consideration, the receip~ and
. . ~~su~~!c~ency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant,
bargaini, sell, convey, and assign to Assignee a total residen~ial
living unit count of forty (40) units, which units are allocated
to the, property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made
a part hereof ("Parcel A") pursuant to the City of Clearwater's
zoning and land use ordinances.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid units set forth above in
connection with, and only in connection with the real estate
described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference
incorporated herein ("Parcel B").
The utilization of the units described above shall be
limited to Parcel B, and upon completion of Assignee's
development of Parcel B, all units not so utilized shall be
reconveyed to Assignor for the benefit of Parcel A within five
(5) days of request by Assignor.
This Assignment is given in accordance with paragraph 11 of
the Settlement Stipulation in United States Steel corporation vs.
City of Clearwater, Circuit Civil NO. 78-4765-7, Pinellas County,
Florida.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor has executed this Assignment as
of the day and year first written above.
WITNESSES:
I.
~. rP~
- Q".jJLY'
p~rtner
By:
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
:4 :47:69;4 70 1 92rB87
40 13 eo
'0T~L 13 99 CHk
Florida
Pinellas
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged
~d day of January, 1987, by Roberta H. Dennis
Partner of SAND KEY INVESTMENT PROGRAM I, LTD., a
partnership, on behalf of said partnersh~p.
before me this
, as General
FLor~da limited
~-%: o:~
No ar Publ~c . ~ ~ '
RE40.2-l2036
My commission expites:~~\\'
lOURY PUBliC SIAl( 01 flORID.(
.1 CO."IS~lOI UP 10Y 19,IlB7
80llOEO II RU GENERU liS u.n' .
\' ,
@JfJ3
40 Roc _
41 OS
43 Inl
TOIJ~
.t.
~7:f"-~:t~-'''':f..1!~_..,-~;;--~-L~~- - ---- -- -
f~r,;f';~7;).;:".-t-,...,,!l"I,t.(-, ' , " ' . - ~:. ':'..~~::;;':1f::'~'I~~
~1.. " ~~ ~.>,f";~V:..~< .~Q~ ( -E " ;, ' ' -','", ~ ~,' .; '."r~~s,}: r
'\ i '", . . ' C~"\f"~;f' {- _'..: - - ~ ,..;'<. ~"~...-.~~~~f"{ ~~..;\ . . ~,'
_~t-f.{tt1~:/!.t.k,~'~'::-:~' '.;" ,,~~+~~~~~~~{"'-:-i?i1~!~,~: .i,
" Yi"'.(;<:<:r~', !""'')-';:'~' ,_ , -;;. ,~~'~:'''<~M}.a;t~~l#1It+.~)l~,~ t
/ 1e:,l:~~~'~~ ,:$t.>~ "'~ ",:., , . . ~- .. - ~ Jo<"' "'~~.~ . ~
_ _.t. '. ' _ _. ' '" '-~,';,.. , "-"~":'j;i, ,,; e, ,~;; ,~~s: 1-
_:;"'1.~f.~; .. , ",.;'~ ; '"' --- _....c.". "<.' "
":,,"(1-";' ,,,,- ". JJ~' , ' EXHIBIT A " ,
,?-'ti;s'"';,.~ <f.-:;':, _ ":0> ~'^. ~
:f;~::?;;';,?" ::';.'.~<'''; , '", ~- .
;R.lilIlIl"':'",~;.;;~.. . ,:. ~
.4~~-, .t, ';:'::1 0<;"'"";::''':''.'" '" ~ - . ~' .
''';;:'''-r' :''; , _: :', J:
~'t!~;~S~~~-t?~~ ,,~ --:~:-}"_- - ~~ ~ -~ ~~ -~ - -, ~ ~ ~
.J;,t........ - -:,'rt. .. ..r,;. _~ .~....~ ~~~...~~~~....~- ~ ~ -~I"'<i- ...#~ ~ P - ~
"m:scR1P'1'IClf -' pJlJa:L N '-" ~ ~~~ .,-. - ~-:.:~~ -. - ,--~~F~- .:
_ _ ,__ .::11.' ":... ":"",'-" ...~;. ii'-~~-
-. '".~-- - . ~~- =",,_.{:<~.... ....,......, -' .. ~ -.
.~,~:":~.. ,_ \".~~" ~ i..""!';" -.-- ~ )~';~-.d~~" ~-~-=._-:... '"""-'l...:r...b_.
A;'aUrvey of PARCEL, also 1tn~wn'" aa - S1~.. V. Sand Key#, -: -".- -:: ~~:.:: ~-:-':~'';- ,
beino a portion of s.c~ion. 17 and 20.- Township 29 ~ _~':' -:...:. ~'-:,,'~ j ,~. r
, 15 P l' "'1 d - ~t~~r:t,. ...~<r'~"'H......,4 ~
Sou~h.. Ran;. Ea.~. 1ne 1.. Coun~y."'_'" ori a.-:,lDOr....,>e',."....,.'.......t-~.- "1' :rg.L':-.
010 -. ...~ ;.. "'I::"t" ~-1:"~ ~f1~
.ft.r~icul.rly d..cribed .. fOllow.~r~ '" .,;~~, "m......~~-;........, J. '''--~~-:;[: ~ J-
"'. .. . ' ..;:;;;;I........'~ . .. ~ - - -'~".....-:l:ot .~
_~.;;.( /. ~ . . of:: . ' ,l!' ~ ._"'~_T'r,"ti'_ ~_- ~.- --"P.""v-:....~-~:~'
~o~. a po1n~ o~ reference co_ence:at.;t.he Section corn-:r;-"';~o ;. ~7~~;4.:7
co..on ~o Sections 17.- 18; 19_ .nd..20: of~ said' Town.hip .-t{':':-- ~~;;.~y-l~~~:'
and,:Ranoe. .. now e.t.ab1i.hed~ as''; having - ~he coord1na~e."':"~ ~~;;'-...'r.}ii'=r
(ba.ed on ~he P1neUU County G~id Sy.t em)' of Jlor!-h~j=."~J:"'.'::i'. '. --;;;:~ ~i~
6500. 72.. E..~ 31<&52.98: thence rurf Ii' 89-10.31-, E.' alone;..}' ~'.- '''t',~ .~'t~~~
v~he Section.line d1vitUng..a1d,Sect.10na 17 anCl 20.,a .,.-..- " . .';." .:.'
di.~ance of 843.47 feet to -an-:1nteraect,1.on-with-t.he <:':~-:"'-', ~- .-:;-;.~';_...,
cent.erline of Gulf Boulev.rd (Sta~e Road No., 208) as' - ;;' ~ _J .~--:;:-''';,---:::-
-now estabUshed .. a 100-foot. right-of-way: t.hence run .,; -.., - '-, ~;.
~.. S 42-11'31- " along said cent~r1ine a distance of 263.93 - '.~1 ;;":::,3"
.t:t'1~.!feet. t.o a oolnt: thence'run N 4~.46'29. W,- a d1atance.of - ::',. f'~'
~J'~- .,. 50.00 feet to the po~nt of Beglnnin;: thence run ,,::. '" ,.;
; 'M 42-13'31- E. alon; the Northwesterly rlght-of-way line
~, of .foresaid Gulf Boulevard, A dlatanCe of 650.00 feet:
~hence run H <&7046'29- W, a distanCe of (776.5 feet. more
or lea. deed) (1169.69' more or less field) t.o t.he mean
hiqh water line (elevatlon 1.29 feet H.G.V.D. of the
Gulf of KexlCO: t.hence run southerly al~n9 said .ean
high water l1ne, a d~stance of (690 f.e~ .ore or leas
deed) (724.7. acre or leas field) to & point that liea
N 47-46'29. ". and (540 feet .ore or less deed) (849.21'
~ore or lea. field) dlstant from the POlnt of Beginning
t,hence run S 47046'29- E, a dlstanCe of (540 feet .ore
~~ . or less deed) (849.21' more or less field) to the POlnt
~<'~ ~,~ "f Beg1nning-
....
~
r
I
[
"
.)1 ,~ .. ~ ....-
"-~-">>'~,,-~~;:" <
....... /to:;', '.:'~_
-tl~i.afii8-, ><
:;0- "'..('~,i-_ ....5.~~"s -:::~""":~4::~
~ - .... ~ ..,. -...... .....
'/ ..___ r - :' )tr::;
_ ...-""\~ _...;f;J.i;: ,
~;:-. .':'..~l"'\.":ir~!\~~~,
;. ."'""1-'
"':"'1-' ....~'.g~.:t"9'r-~ w;,;..--t:
.. ;_ . .t\~i(_ ~1fli ..
~ .. "'~{,.l~~ :"~,.'O{..1 <:;,
.._ r _- _..~; rlh"~
:'~~~i~f'
- ;.. ~
~ -;. I~:r
I-\~}: .
,
f
,-
,. .. -........ ...
~f'':~ ,j ~'1; {" ...l' :.... '..0 -
'lj,\~~.. .,.~i.tt~'t;";'.J::- ~;.r~ ;: I ~ ' " r~
~ i1~1~~~ l:i \~~ ~"'\.,,~ ..
- ..."rot,.. ~ \ r.. r"
'~?"~iS,,~~ J~: ...14
,....,'.i.,~L~:..... ~ l.. J,'
f.;S.~ to.~; ~ ':. ::J': ,'--' ./ E::
l~ ....~.:'*.:"......t:'..,.\.J)"'lI.,.>l.. .;--' \
.- -, ,- EXIlDIT B
. tJU_i't~ -..
f~,Y co ;,,,H ~ ~ '
~'" Yj'{~~~~"': .. ..I '\ ~ .,r"
:-:r:::2~~~Cr~:-~r;,~'l~~~- t ~
~...~.'.f....i""ri: .:- ..,.{.... :...-,... "
~~_+~ff~~~~~."It;.; -- ~ tf., ~ \t~.. 0'2.
..fZ,,;'.U",,: .~'
"tt:;;.~~-.ol 'Jr..~)-:.~?....
,of ; Sect toft'~.\9', Towuhl r :!'1 ~..rh. Rans;e n E:lst. I'lnell..
it ol'l. <:/.:">:'-' ... ''l''.. r - I'"
~U"Cli;:FlorJd:a., bc:lnt IlInrll r:l" "'1I13rl, "csrrlhcd :\S 10110vs:
"..'%1r,~,!J"';\ ^'--' ~'-' , '.-
'~.J1w~o.." I' .
r.~ _ me", ~t tbe SoUlhr:aat cornl'r or s:lld Section 19. tbence N. 89004'07" v..
'~"2~S1';80.feet Alona the 50111.11 line oC 1:lld Section to a roSnt on tbe
~~,<::We.terlj- iiaht-of-\QY llne or r.lIlf 1\oulevard 000' 'RIll. O.R. 1766. PI. .
i~~':, ,>293.-295); thence alons; ~:lld Uc"terly rls;ht-oC-v:lY Hne N. :11058'20. E..
~~:',.:'~553.:n het to the Point nr Ih'r,innlns;; thanre N. 119004'07" J:.. 383.00
~ r'ill~ :: f..c. !Dore or less to . 1'"'lnt on the me:an bl;1\ water lin~ oT the CuI!
;' - ~of Hextco; said point hrr~ln~rl~r rcrerrrd to ~. Poinl. "A" Cor con-
::... ~. -'~venS~nc.; thcncl" fro. c:h.. rnlnt or nt';lnninh nl" alnns; the: arorem~tl~d
'Vesterly right-oC-way linr oC r.ulC 8oulev3rd thc following rourses and
curves; N. 31058'20" E.. 103.71 f~et to :I point oC curve; rhence ~rtb-
vesurly alon; Gld c'lnc vnh . r:\dll1$ oC 18~9.86 feet through :a cen-
tral anile of Ogo07'},1", an arc dht3nce oC 296.30 (cet CC.S.
N. 27024'30" E.. 29~.99 Cert); thcnce ~. 2:!0~O'39" E.. 308.50 Ceet;
_ thence leaving sdd VCAI.C,] 1 rll;ht-Or-\l':\y llnc, N. 67009'21" u.. 395
feet, IIlOre or lcss ro the 1Il,.~n hi~h v:llcr line or r.ulf of Mexico;
thence Southwestcrly alon~ s~id lIle3n hi~h water line and bindlng
thercwith to the :I!orc'lftt'nll'\lII'.1 r..llIl "A".
"'1'" ..
... ......,'"
..... -.. ~
'-- ~
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
!.
:;
Sea Towers
ConstructIon Company Ine
September 4, 1992
Mr. Don Meer~ans
City of Clearwater
Traffic Engineering Department
10 South M~ssour1 Avenue
Clearwater, FL 34616-4748
RE: Ultimar Three
1560 Gulf Boulevard
Clearwater, Florida
SUBJ: Amendment to Certified Site Plan
DRC Cond~tion of Approval No.7
Dear Mr. Meerians:
This letter 1S wr1tten conf1rmation of our meeting on September 3, 1992 ~n wh~ch you
stated that the supplemental parking plans that have been submitted to the Traffic
Engineering Department, specifically sheets A2 .OP and A3.0P dated August 1, 1992,
satisfy the requirements of Item 111, Condition 7 of the Development Rev1ew Committee
meeting minutes dated July 23, 1992 regarding the cert1f1cat1on of the s1te plan for
Ult~mar Three.
Thank you for your cooperation in th1s matter.
S~ncrrtly ,
~!:iz!I/.T'lIf:11
Steve Baumann
Arch~tect
SB/dk
cc: City of Clearwater, Department of Planning and Development
tttJ:~I1':~ -~~.q-H.-Cl-a:d<e ,-Plan~~ ~~ ~)
King Engineer1ng Assoc1ates, Inc.
Attn: P. Gregory Singleton, P.E.
Sea Towers Construction Company, Inc.
Attn: Ted Cobb
RECEIVED
SfP 8 1992
PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1560 Gulf Boulevard - Clearwater, Flonda 34630 - 813-595-8915 - 595-8928 FAX
'.
(CQ)[PY
C I T Y
OF
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE R, F LOR I D A 3 4 6 1 8 - 4 7 4 8
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
(813) 462-6880
May 5, 1992
Mr. Ted Cobb, President
Sea Towers Construction Company
1520 Gulf Boulevard
Clearwater, Florida 34630
RE: "Assignment" Between Sand Key Investment Program I, Ltd. and
American Design and Development corporation of Sand Key dated
January 23, 1987
Dear Mr. Cobb:
The city of Clearwater is in receipt of your letter dated April 23,
1992 to Michael Wright, City Manager, with regard to the Ultimar
Three transfer of forty (40) residential dwelling units pursuant to
the Settlement Stipulation dated October 17, 1986.
The City is also in receipt of your most recent letter dated May 4,
1992 with the clear copy of the "Assignment" which has been filed
with the Office of the Clearwater City Clerk and with the Public
Records of Pinellas County on February 2, 1987 in Official Records
Book 6418, page 1098.
In reference to your original request regarding the request of an
alternative site plan modification to the proposed Tower Building
footprint, the City is not opposed to the proposed alternative
building footprint as submitted on March 19, 1992 with the
understanding that the proposed site plan meet all applicable site
plan review and Development Review Committee criteria.
If I can be of further assistance to you, please contact me at 462-
6880~and thank you for your interest in the city of Clearwater.
reI}!.."
.,
Loui R. Hilton
plan er II
LRH/lrh
cc: Michael Wright, City Manager
"
o
"Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer"
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
COPIES:
DATE:
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartment Correspondence
Cyndle Goudeau, City Clerk
LoUIS R HIlton, Planner II
Certified Site Plan for U1timar Three (PSP 89-12)
See List Below
Apnl5, 1993
The Development Review Comnuttee at Its meetmg of July 23, 1992 approved the above descnbed site plan subject to the
followmg COndItions'
~
W
~
~
~
6)
/
SignS and fencmg/walls are subject to separate review and pernuttmg processes
The requIsite bUlldmg pernuts must be procured wlthm one (1) year from the date of certification of the final site
plan and all reqUisite certificates occupancy must be obtamed wlthm three (3) years of the date of certification
of the site plan
Pnor to certification of the final site plan, the tabulation table shall be adjusted to show the area of the
townhouses and multi-story bUlldmg separately m order to compare with approved modifications
Pnor to certification, the apphcant shall provide additional mformatlOn accordmg to the court stipulatIOn for the
facIlities proposed above the ,roof hne beyond the 210 foot height hnut
FIre lane shall be deSignated to access the townhouses The final deSign shall be subject to the approval of the
FIre Marshal.
Pnor to certification the location of a siamese connection and fire hydrants shall be shown on the site plan or a
note that locations shall be subject to final approval by the Fire Marshal
Pnor to certification, a detaIled parkmg plan shall be subnutted and IS subject to the approval of the City Traffic
Engmeer
All construction wltlun 18 feet of the seawall must obtam a vanance from the Flood Board per Chapter 39 -
Coastal Construction Code
The apphcant shall contact the Parks and RecreatIOn Department for the requIred recreahon/open space
assessment fee, which shall be paid m accordance with the court stipulatIOn
As conditions #3, 4, 5, 6, 7 an 9 ave been met, please certify the attached plans subject to conditions #1 and 2 and
conditions #1, 2, 8~and hsted a 0 e and dlstnbute
cc,
01sp8912 cer
~? \l> ~~
~lO(C- \b/c..,e;e:n~~~
James M Polatty, Jr" DIrector of Plannmg & Development
WIlham C Baker, Director of Pubhc Works/Engmeenng
Chuck Warnngton, Gas Department
Tom Miller, EnVironmental
Ream WIlson, Parks & Recreation Director
Don Meenans, Traffic Engmeer
Victor Chodora, BUlldmg Official
Cyndle Goudeau, City Clerk
Steve Doherty, Zomng Section Supervisor
Ted Clarke, Planner II (Memo Only)
Developer/Project Sponsor (3)
Mr Gregory Smgleton, P E
Kmg Engmeenng and ASSOCiates, Jnc ,
24945 U S Hwy 19 North
Clearwater, Flonda 34523
t::i\
\C/
j,"
LAW OFFICES
M~MULLEN, EVERETT, LOGAN, MARQUARDT & CLINE, P A
FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
400 CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER FLORIDA 34615
POBOX 1669
JOHN TWEED MOMULLEN
FRANK C LoGAN
EMIL C MAROUARDT JR
HARRY S CLINE
,j PAUL RAYMOND
,JAMES A MARTIN JR
STEPHEN 0 COLE
MARGOT PEOUIGNOT
R NATHAN HIGHTOWER
ROBERT C DICKINSON III
THOMAS C NASH"
NANCY S PAIKOFF
MARIE L D<MARCO
T SHEA GILLS
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 34617
(813) 441-8966
FAX (813) 442-8470
OF COUNSEL
JOE S EVERETT
WILLIAM E NODINE
PALM HARBOR OFFICE
(813) 7854402
33920 HWY 19 NORTH
SUITE 150
PALM HARBOR FL 34684
August 7, 1992
Mr. Louis R. Hilton
Planner II
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618-4748
Re: Proposed Ultimar Phase III
Dear Lou:
Following up on our meeting a few days ago, and consistent
with our correspondence to the City of Clearwater dated October
22, 1991, and February 12, 1992, we represent members of the con-
dominium association across the street from the proposed project.
We have requested that the City insure that the plans for this
final Ultimar project comply with the Settlement Agreement
pertaining to this property.
We do not feel that the initial plans submitted to the DRC on
July 23, 1992 comply with the requirements and limitations of the
referenced Settlement Agreement and Court proceedings. As Mr.
Polatty noted in his letter of July 31, 1992 to Tim Johnson, the
swimming pool/deck, and driveway, are structures within the view
corridor which are not permitted. Mr. Polatty raises the lim1ta-
tion as Note #4, which is correct; Note #3 also confirms where
amenities, driveways and the like should be, which is in the open
area as shown on the schematic. This is further confirmation
that these matters should not be authorized at all, in any man-
ner, within the view corridor.
Our clients also object to the height, and believe Mr.
Polatty's objections should be maintained. Note #1 on the refer-
enced exhibit specifically limits height to 210', subject to the
adjustments authorized in Note #8; under no circumstances would a
72-foot increase be envisioned within these contractual provi-
( ,"
~ .....
August 7, 1992
Page Two
visions. In addition to this proposed height being violative of
the agreement, which is a sufficient basis to deny this expanded
request, our clients also object on the grounds that it is
anticipated that the developer will seek to illuminate these
towers at night. They have done this on the two ( 2 ) prior
developments, and it represents a nuisance and invasion of the
privacy and sanctity of their homes to have this intense light,
at extreme heights, all through the night.
In summary, our clients, as residents, property owners in the
Ci ty of Clearwater, and immedial:e neighbors to this project,
insist upon strict compliance with the agreements on this site. I
would like to ask you to advise us when amended site plans are
filed, which I understand are being prepared, so we can come and
review them further before final City approval is granted. If
further City boards are meeting to review these plans, or new
plans, we would request notice and an opportunity to attend on
behalf of our clients.
As we discussed, I am sending a copy of this letter to Tim
Johnson, attorney for the developer so he knows of our concerns
and our clients' position that the agreements should be complied
wi th according to their terms. I will be happy to meet with
representatives from the City and Mr. Johnson, should you or Mr.
Johnson deem it beneficial.
Please have your files noted as to our involvement and
concerns and please keep us advised of subsequent plans and plan
review and approvals.
With best regards, I am
s~ncer~ yours,
~s, Cline
HSC:koh
cc: Mr. Norman Olson, Harbor Condo
Timothy A. Johnson, Esq.
REceiVED
AUG 1 1 1992
Pl-ANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
- ,
'-
. ,
, ,
. ,
"
~ '
~'
\ .
"
,
"J \ ~
; ,
'"
. "
""
~.
1 ~,
, '
{
"
. '
~ .. '- ~
-,
, '
"
P
IIIiI
, ,
\
",
';:,
"
. , '
~, -
~ ~... ... - l
Sea Towers
ConstructIon Company, me
\ -
\ "
"\
'.
, J
./
~
J '_
r '
'\ ' .. ~
>
"
" "
"
-
'. .
VIA HAND DELIVERY
, '
,
, \ ... - (\
= ~~ - '1'" ... -~
lONJt~G mON RB!~1 i '
CITY"OFQfAHWATER
; Jnci f)s;a..-....,
> - '
..-~...
.,.'
." -
" ~ ". 1;
October 7, ")..992 :
- l'
- ,
,
, ,
, ,
..... I,,' "l.
f I 11",M~~ tlti ' -. ,~ - ~
f)- \J~~~ ~..~.. .' ~o :::.'.:.' n-';'"
... t( ~ ~ y ...~-:. -: :""7 _~.n( - ~- :;.,:;I... ~ .J
,
} " 1
. , -
Mr. Louis R.- Hil tel)' '."' .
Planner II ',':: .
clty of cle~rwater
P. 0: Box 4748 '. ,~ .
\ " .. 1
Clearwater, Florida" '34618-4 748-
~ t,":, ~ ..
" ,
,'. Re: Ultimar'Tllree:' ,
ce~tific~tion:of site Plan
.... ~ -1..
"
, ,
.
( J. _..
~
, '
""t......
"'
~
, '
Dear Lou:
, ,
.
(
"
, . '
In accordance 'with the :requlrements set forth 'in the'citY's,letter
,'t-o King'Engineering Associates;' Inc. .dated July 23, 1992, we are
submitting, for final,certification twelve (12) 'signed ana sealed,
copies of'the site plan for ,Ultimar Three. Please note'that.the
.site pla.'n,' for Ulti,mar Three 'has been reyised. to' satIsfy the
conditions ,set forth by' the. Design, Review Committee ("DRC!') a:t its
mee~ing :on J~ne- 25, 1992.,'" _, ~ ' ',.' .-'
\ .. ~', \ 1 '" J
In addition' to satisfying ,the 'conditions of approval set forth by
the DRC,.th~ slte' plan also has been modified by: (i) ,deleting the'
swimming pool; and- (ii) deleting, the porti'on of the roof top
elem~nts thato'exteryded above the 248 foot_'height. Th~se'
modifications were made 'to satisfy the requirements set forth in
tl].e City's letter dated' September 23, 1992, a copy of ,~hich is
attached. ' Please be :advised that we disagree with the city's'
decisions regaFding th'f appropriat'eness of th~ location 'of the
swimming pool in ,the view 'corridor and the ,height .of the "necessary'
design eJements" 'of. the building. We have delet~d the., swim:qling-
pool and,th~t por~i9n o~ the build~ng above.the-248 foot height in
'order to allow the. 'site plan to be pertified at this t.ime and we
dp 'not ~a1ve:an~'9f. the right~,we may, have:to appeal, or have'
'revie\;led, the 'ci~y"s"',decisions with respect to ~he ~w~mming pool
and height ,that ,exists under ,the Settlement' Stipulation dated
October'17'; 1986. ' , '.. " '\
.. ! -' - ... "') ..
, ~
'-
> ,
"
,
- I'" ....
"
-- .
or.....<:" I.' t r I 1 ,.
, .r560 Gulf Boulevard ~ Clearwater, Flonda 3f1630 - 813-595-891~ - 595-8928 FAX
f I ' "..
J -~ ~~ '
, "
'.
..
"
'.
~ "I'
'-
'"
"
, "Ok.)
'-
~.
\
I
"
'.
.
, ,
;"
'i-
:-
, ..
"" \,,~
':,
"
"
,-
r/
Mr'.' Lou'rs'R. R.il ton
cl ty' of::Clearwater'..,
- ... 1 I
OctorHir -:"J ., ~ 992'
P~~e 2 ,::
..
)'
,,,:, "".:
." .
,.
..., l....
'.'
, ),
~ "
A
.. "" 'l
"Sh~U~d you, have'
"Please,'"adyi~~,~
~
" S'incerely,
I, f '- 1,":::
} "
"
_.,\,~
' ~ - -...-'~ '
~..r: ~,~ _
",
,
, .
,
,"
, "
cc:
"
"
...-:0-
"
" .
" !~
, 1
" ,. 't ~
>
, "
, ,
,',
, -,
" .
"
~.,
'"
.'
"
,
~,
I,
~
.:
, , ,
,r
"
~ J
-~ .:
~~4 ,"'_ -
il ~ \
"
. ,
/.
1
,
, -
'r
? --' ......-"
j,,,..- ~
,',
"
~~ ~
, ,
':;
. - ,
, I
..,
,
r,
'.
. ....... ~
.... t -....'
\ -
"
,.
, ~......,.
'I
,
\. l
;:
"-I
,
-'
)- '"V
, '
.0
,
. J
..:...' f
;
\,
'-:: '
, -
^-
~-
7- ~. ,.
-...i' .r
I:' '
,I'
'-.
~
, .
-',
"
'... .
/ -}
I'
I
.' ,
- '"
'.
"
~-
, ,
",'
. ."
,
-'
"
,,"
1'1.... ...
pny
~ I?!. ... ..
ques_~-iotis'
...'>- r,'"
, "
-;
. ,
",
;~
~
I r
... ~.. ,
',1
., ,
" ~)..~...
_ I
\. t"'-<
/........
, "
,," , ~ r
J ,"
'.1
" .
"
~ \
\ '
"
"
r/
, ,
.'
, r .
,~ ~ J
"
" ^
,
)- "
- ,
, ,
, ~
"
>,..',
" \............
,..
~... 1.........
"
,
,
, '
"
J ,
"
':r:eg~r9~~g
"
.r;
"
, '
-,
,>
~s~quire ~.
"
r-
, ,
"
, , _"'!..
f.
"
,J
"
, ,
, ,
"
"
,t'
" '
"
) ,
~
." '
-'
"
~
. ,
"
'.
"
.'
, "
-r.~ \ ;~
"
/'
"
,
, ,>
-.
Ted Cobb-:C"
. ,President'
... ... .. ..
.$ {- ," ......... ,-.Ii ~.... )
~r ~, ' T i~o!-h;{ ..A. ; ~ohnsOI;,
,0'
"''1 '~~c::..,:;'
i 'lO~I~~G SECilON- R~~[~~,
~~ ~ .CiTY'OF,~RWATER
'OCT'08.."
~ '" r .... -, ....
;
\ ~~lewed ax,
...:__'- ---=- ---.!iPf",,-~ 110___
~")\
~j,
, ::;
~ =->:"~"JIi"
J-
'-
~
the 'enclosed site
, ,
pI_ails,
"
- ,
;
c,
",
I,
'. )
"I', :..
"
;!
,~
'"
,(
.(
, .
, -,
,
,
> .
r
, '
~ ~ -
, "
< '
'-?
, -
.,
t- r _
~ ~ \ ,1
r
I!:"S_
~ "-
,....,.....
\. '
"
,
",
!..
~,
I~'" :
)< ,
;
"
,\
, '
,
. ,
"
" ,
, I _
,< ,
"1
,-
,0
l' :
-,
"I
".... ... ;0
y'
..~I
r
>
. ,,-
" ,>
>>'
.-'
.....:
..
,
T
"
~
"
"'
,,-
-,'
,'-
> .
~ ~
,/
~,.,- ~~
--
...L w"
~
, '
~
"
,
,
.-,
~
J
<.
..
, ,
::
'-
\.
"
-r
'~
",
, ,
.'
~ ,
y <: l'
, -
~ ' ;'
"'.,.;$ ..... \.
~, ,
;,
"
, '
"
, '
.. ~(\
"
" -
"
,
".
"
~, -
-,
,',
,
,'-
, ,-
. '>
-'
, ,
" ..
..,
. ,
,
" " "
C I T Y 0 F l,'L EAR W ATE ~
Interdepartment Correspondence
FROM:
Michael Wright, City Manager
James M. Polatty, Jr., Director of Planning and Development :;- {Y\ p
TO:
VIA:
Kathy Rice, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT:
Ultlmar Three Site Plan Certification Request
COPIES:
Scott Shuford, Planning Manager
Lou Hilton, Planner II
DATE:
January 7, '993
Ed Mazur, of King Engineering has requested that the Ultimar III site plan be certified with
the in-ground swimming pool removed from the clear-view area, and the height to be 210
I feet. These changes will bring the plan into full compliance with City Code and the
,Settlement Stipulation.
, I
Prior to this request, you had denied the request for certification due to the fact that the
site plan was in the formal appeal process. The last request for certification consideration
~as requested by Steve Bauman of Sea Towers Construction Co., Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning and Development staff recommends that the Ultimar Three final site plan be
certified in accordance with the Settlement Stipulation.
o Approved
\-.
o Disapproved
J
\(
Michael J. Wright, City Manager
JMP/LRH/df
"
UL TMAR LRH
,-
I
, >
I
I
I
I
I . \ ~
-
,
~ J
:;
r \
Sea Towers
Constructlon Company. Ine
September 10, 1992
Mr. James Goodloe, Fire Marshall
City of Clearwater Fire Department
610 Franklin street
Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748
RE: Ultimar Three
1560 Gulf Boulevard
Sand Key, Clearwater, Florida
SUBJECT: Amendment to certified site Plan
DRC Conditions 5 and 6
Dear Mr. Goodloe:
This letter is written confirmation of our meeting on september 9,
1992 regarding the amended site certification plans, specifically
King Engineering Associates, Inc. sheet no. 1 "Final site Plan"
dated September 8, 1992 and Y.H. Associates, Inc. "site Plan
Review" dated August 28, 1992. In this meeting you indicated that
the plans satisfied the requirements of Item #1, conditions 5 and
6 of the Development Review Committee meeting minutes dated
July 23, 1992 regarding the certification of the site plan for
Ultimar Three. We also agreed that the details of the fire lane
surface and hose cabinet locations will be addressed at the time
of processing the building permit for the project.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
sincerelY
~~/P~
steve Baumann, Architect
cc: City of Clearwater, Department of Planning and Development
Attn: Ted H. Clarke, Planner II
King Engineering Associates, Inc.
Attn: P. Gregory Singleton, P.E.
RECEIVED
Sea Towers Construction Company, Inc.
Attn: Ted Cobb
SEP 1 It 1992
PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1560 Gulf Boulevard - Clearwater. Flonda 34630 - 813-595-8915 - 595-8928 FAX
,
x
-' \\'
\
,
\
lok--
{L(L
\ From:
~o:
Date:
Subject:
Shuford (SCOTT)
JAMES
Thursday, February 11, 1993 9:37 am
ULTlMAR III
PER YOUR REQUEST, I HAVE REVIEWED THE CORRESPONDENCE YOU
PRESENTED ME CONCERNING THE ULTlMAR III PROJECT. MY REVIEW OF
THIS CORRESPONDENCE INDICATES THAT THE DEVELOPER HAS NEVER
PRESENTED THE CITY WITH ANY SITE PLAN OR OTHER INFORMATION THAT
IS DIRECTLY INTENDED TO "MODIFY" THE FIVE PROVISIONS OF PARAGRAPH
14 OF THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION. IN A LETTER DATED 3/19/92,
I
DEVELOPER TED COBB SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES THESE FIVE PROVISIONS
IN SUBMITTING A "TOWER BUILDING" FOOTPRINT PLAN. THE SUBMITTAL
ADDRESSES A "MODIFIED 'MULTI-LEVEL BUILDING ENVELOPE'" WHICH WAS
DETERMINED TO BE IN KEEPING WITH THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION BY
THE CITY STAFF PRECISELY BECAUSE IT DID NOT APPEAR TO MODIFY ANY
OF THE FIVE PROVISIONS.
,
IN A LETTER TO THE CITY MANAGER DATED JULY 14, 1992, MR COBB
FORMALLY REQUESTED SITE PLAN APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH
PARAGRAPH 17 OF THE SETTLEMENT STIPULATION, WITH THE INDICATION
THAT THIS SITE PLAN WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE STIPULATION AND
THAT IT REFLECTED THE FOOTPRINT CHANGES PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.
MY REVIEW OF THE CORRESPONDENCE DOES NOT SHOW ANY ATTEMPT BY THE
DEVELOPER TO "MODIFY" THE TERMS OF THE STIPULATION. THE QUESTION
IS WHETHER THE SITE PLAN IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THOSE TERMS AND
THIS APPEARS TO BE A DIFFERENCE IN STAFF AND DEVELOPER
INTERPRETATION OF THE HEIGHT AND VIEW CORRIDOR ISSUES.
A SUMMARY OF KEY CORRESPONDENCE ISSUES FOLLOWS. THIS IS NOT A
COMPLETE SUMMARY OF ALL CORRESPONDENCE (IT EXCLUDES OUTSIDE PARTY
CORRESPONDENCE AND "ROUTINE" CORRESPONDENCE), BUT INCLUDES ALL
"MILESTONE" CORRESPONDENCE.
- MARCH 19, 1992 - SUBMITTAL OF "TOWER BUILDING" FOOTPRINT-PLAN.
- APRIL 23, 1992 - CLARIFICATION OF TRANSFER OF 40 UNITS
- JULY 14, 1992 - SUBMITTAL OF SITE PLAN
- AUGUST 13, 1992/SEPTEMBER 17, 1992 - LETTERS DISCUSSING THE
DESIGN NECESSITY OF ROOFTOP ELEMENTS
- SEPTEMBER 30, 1992 - LETTER APPEALING SWIMMING POOL AND HEIGHT
ISSUES
- OCTOBER 7, 1992 - SUBMITTAL OF REVISED PLANS FOR CERTIFICATION
ELIMINATING POOL AND REDUCING HEIGHT, BUT RESERVING RIGHT TO
LAW OFFICES
M~MULLEN, EVERETT, LOGAN, MARQUARDT & CLINE, P A
FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
400 CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER FLORIDA 34615
POBOX 1669
JOHN TWEED MCMULLEN
FRAN K C LOGAN
EMIL C MAROUARDT JR
HARRY S CLINE
J PAUL RAYMOND
JAMES A MARTIN JR
STEPHEN 0 COLE
MARGOT PEOUIGNOT
R NATHAN HIGHTOWER
ROBERT C DICKINSON III
THOMAS C NASH II
NANCY S PAIKOFF
MARIE L OtMARCO
T SHEA GILLS
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34617
(813) 441-8966
FAX (813) 442-8470
O~ COUNSEL
JOE S EVERETT
WILLIAM E NODINE
PALM HARBOR OFFICE
(BI3) 7B5 4402
33920 HWY 19 NORTH
SUITE 150
PALM HARBOR FL 34684
February 12, 1992
Mr. Theodore Clark, Planner II
Planning Department
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618
Re: Harbor Condo
Dear Ted:
Following up on our most recent conversations, I understand
that no site plan has been filed for the third U1timar building.
As you will recall, we represent condominium owners across
the street. They are most concerned that the Development
Agreement for this site be honored, which in particular provides
that there will be no structures, walls, fences, parking and the
like in the view corridor. The view corridor is to provide for
passive amenities such as landscaping, pedestrian walkways,
driveways and emergency vehicle access.
We would appreciate being advised if and when a site plan is
filed, so we can review the same to insure compliance.
With best regards, I am
:;zrelY 7r~
Har:::t Cline 1 ~
HSC:koh
cc: Harbor Condo
RECEIVED
FEB 1 4 1992
PlANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
\
'"
\
Y. H. \LEE ASSOCIATES, Architects
330 Fifteenth Street, Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 836-6688 f,)( (510) 836.6689
August 12, 1992
Mr, Ted Clarke
Planner II
City of Clearwater Planmng & Development Dept.
10 South Missoun Ave.
Clearwater, Flonda 34616-4748
Re: Ultimar Three
ConditIon Of Approval No.4,
Site Plan CertificatIon
Dear Mr. Clarke'
ThiS letter and the enclosed matenals are mtended to prOVide addltlonal mformatIon and
response to the question raIsed regardmg roof top elements of UltImar Three dunng the
Development Review Committee meeting of July 23, 1992.
The exact language of the Settlement Stipulation states that "Elevator machme rooms,
mechanical rooms, stairs, parapet walls and other necessary deSign elements wIll be permitted
above the maximum heights established herem" The proposed deSign has a flat roof deck at
210 feet above flood plaIn. The only proposed bUIldmg components exceedmg thiS height are
the elevator penthouses, mechanical eqUIpment and shelters, staIrways, parapet walls and
necessary architectural deSign elements (unoccupied space) that are reqUIred to maIntam the
mtegnty of the bUIlding deSign. To elaborate on thiS concept, we have prepared a deSign
statement regardmg these roof top elements, as well as some prelimmary deSign sketches for
your reference, The statement and sketches Will demonstrate the deSign necessity of the roof top
elements of UltImar Three.
The roof top deSign compositIOn m conjunction With other components of the bUIldmg establ1sh
a positive aesthetic statement. In thiS respect these elements enhance thiS project m particular as
well as the Visual deSign enVironment of the commumty as a whole, ThiS is achieved at
additional expense to the project sponsor With no direct economiC return.
Statement of Necessity for Design Elements Above 210 Feet
When determmmg the "neceSSIty" of any feature of a given desIgn, the architect IS usually trymg
to achieve a balance between the speCial reqUIrements of a WIde range of obJectIves. These
Mr. Ted Clarke
UltImar Three, Clearwater, FL
August 12, 1992
Page 2 of 3
objectIves wIll vary from the concrete (code compliance, structural support, mcorporatlOn of
mechanIcal systems, etc) to the abstract (pleasmg aesthetIcs, perceIved qUalIty of construction,
"fittIng m" to the commumty, etc). Our design successfully synthesIzes the following outlined
objectIves WhICh demonstrate the necessIty for the roof top elements of the UltImar Three
buIldmg.
1. Functional Requirements:
Items such as elevator penthouses, exit st3.1r termmatIons and mechamcal eqmpment
must, of necessIty project above the roof of the last habItable floor. In "flat" roofed
bmldmgs these objects can appear Jamng and unSIghtly. To mItIgate theIr presence, we
have composed theIr mass mto the overall deSIgn compositIOn.
2. Orientation of the User:
Part of an archItect's task IS to prOVIde VISUal 3.lds to help users understand how a
buIldmg 15 orgamzed. One tIme-honored deVIce IS to gIve special prommence to
entrances and pnmary CIrculatIon spaces. In our buIlding thIS translates to emphasIzmg
the elevator lobbIes and vertIcal CIrculatIOn. The roof top projeCtIons of these vertIcal
shafts accentuate theIr Importance and onents the user on the SIte.
3. Imparting a Sense of Quality:
In order for a buIldmg to be well accepted and mamtamed by ItS users and to be
welcomed by the commumty at large, It must Impart a sense of quality. To achIeve thIS,
It IS necessary to go well beyond satIsfymg the functIonal reqmrements of the design
program. A well deSIgned and promment top to the buIldmg allows us to "go beyond"
the functIOnal mImmum, to Impart a sense of qualIty and to contnbute somethmg speCIal
to the commumty.
4. Aesthetic Composition:
AesthetIc Judgement IS always somewhat subjective, but cert3.1n pnncIples concemmg
bmldmg massmg are faIrly umversal. In a bmlding such as ours (where the overall
heIght IS nearly that of the overall WIdth) It IS necessary to VIsually "diVIde" the bmldmg
mto smaller parts m order to aVOId a "boxy" appearance. Two deVIces were reqmred to
accomphsh thIS.
A The first IS to break the bmldmg mto dIstmct vertIcal elements (so as to make the
composltlon look hke an assemblage of well-proportIoned smaller structures). In order
for the vertIcal elements to be dIstmgmshed from one another, It IS necessary that one (m
Mr. Ted Clarke
Ulttmar Three, Clearwater, FL
August 12, 1992
Page 3 of 3
our case the central element) be taller than the adjacent ones. This also works well with
our deSIre to hIde roof top eqUIpment and accentuate "entrance" and cIrculatton.
B. The second deVIce IS to diVIde the budding mto a base, a mid-sectton and a top. This
IS a ClasSIcal approach to budding composlUon and one whIch IS hIghly successful m
reducmg the scale of tall bUildings and malang them appear" approachable" at the human
level. In order to achieve this diVIsIOn, the top of the bUilding must have a umque
character to dIsttngUIsh It from the mId-section. Also, the buIlding top must be
proporUoned SUitably WIth respect to the overall bUilding heIght and bulle Clearly, If the
top IS too short, It wIll present a VIsually weak appearance WIth respect to the rest of the
buIlding.
To sum up, we are mIttgattng the potenttal "bulkmess"and "boxmess" that a more
SImplIstic deSIgn would Impose by provIdmg numerous recesses and proJections, and by
proVIding a vanety of roof heIghts. When VIewed overall, the aesthetic composItton of
the bUIldmg IS greatly enhanced by the mclusIOn of the roof top deSIgn elements and
would mdeed suffer WIthOUt them.
S. Historical Precedent:
ArchItects nowadays often look to hIstoncal precedent not only for mspIration, but to
find ways to achIeve continUity WIth theIr present work. The truly delIghtful hIgh nse
bUIldmgs of the past are those that celebrate theIr heIght WIth a creative and memorable
top; bUIldmgs whIch go beyond mere function to m WhICh they were created. A
promment and well-deSIgned top WIll help connect our buIlding to a nch architectural
tradItIOn and secure Its speCIal place m the commumty
It IS for all these reasons the roof top deSIgn for UltImar Three IS a "necessary deSIgn element".
We would be pleased to address any further questions you may have regardmg the deSIgn of
Ulttmar Three.
cc. Ted Cobb
~
ELGJATCf<. Fe-rrH(Ms6
A~S 87Pc1ttS /9<<) J
M~r.()cL, ~1f.: fi
~'-~~w
~-;/l:r-AU;, ~\!f~~ . ~ ___.
~.., : ",-- , ~ I' /~
~~ - ,'" l.~ ~
~ ! ' . a l~ u 1 ,. _' ~
"LA- -' 'd! ,I=t== - ,1JfJ' ... _ --- J::
~ '~,,~ -L..J..-~ "-,, _~ BIEr-_::...... ""
-~ ~ ~ [ -L .' _ . ~ ~
I ,; - , fIIIi--'
I- J::::' t:::;::k=: .. .1-Il.~!It r -
· " ~~. '~'::S i'
:::::j t=:tMl::!:k: .:!L t- 01:::::
=rbkd: ~
- ,~i~~
J -~:t9 ~~ '
J I-- =~ -, ,:~ IL =:t:";:E
""- ........ I U i b'j , '. I rL. -!... ,
" l::::= ;t::=l '. -=-'-:::,l'R I ,~ d .
"",,", I ~ '""""I ~ _ It ,- f __.
.... ~ ': r-J I --', P .-t-- ,,- -r--i==-'
~ 'A. --- +- I~" _-:'i'h ,tL~, I; ,r- L._ 1'- ; ~,
- --~ '! I I fl' --1 j, L -:-1- ~l____ t _ _ ,
, ~~- II I .. -, U - _ I Ii I' --=-4~:!J 1
.. - I L 11._--. __..L- ,~- .--. __:::_.-J ':'I-~L__ . --I' i' II -t-- l ~'f1
: 11 I , , - I - ' .-..----. I I I' I' - -. ~ J-'- r1
" ',,- -"'---.:..- I "i il ~ ,I, --I "1tl ---;- -lil---+1.'
'JI,~, I I;; ~' _ - '--_~' ,________ --':'-+---11 .~:t 1 ,__' ~ __~~_.
II~;':,I: ." :.----".-..,.;---j'1 I! I; I I I: i .-;- fi=l I _ h
'Ii!il/ ~-,.- , 'I, I: I'l ~ I . ~.,: I ",---.i.
,:nrj - _:::11. '--,''1---- --- --- - ~II' --"-',1-- -. -. --i- _ '1." ~ 1_ _~_ ~
,t k" l' ----- --'~--I' : I ':. ': It [, I nl' , ,.-____ _~'
'I-"Jd- - '. , ' ~ ,U I J ' - q 11 ' K . -...' 1_ ' . "
111"" " iitl___ ~-.I+__---- ---;r-,'--- ,-- .-- ,--,-~1 _ ~ ~ ,.'-_ ,I r J
"III ___-I , I :l' , I I D ---,.,.....-.- r--
.;rl~" ~----~-, - ,:- II j, t :' ~- .~ '- I , II - II ~~, ,I----!- II" _'_ ~.:
',I ffl~ ~'1[- l rl --, - --~ --~ ---"'-'-- - -+--~j -___.iJU 1, , L _ ij~ r
ttt' (\ _f-- -~I-'----' -~I I,' , 'I' II! I " "ljIT: i I i - l-f 'I
1;1 t I i 'I . tl/'" ~~ )- 1 - 11l1lL1-L -H 1- t-i
ii'~~ _~'_-U-~~-r t--- _-----.J~I' --,-- r-;---~.- - --:- iI--~-iTl'TiII--~-'------:"-
-ta ,,-- " I I" Ii ",II , 'I ~f1W.' I I I -Hf'"
,;11,..'1 I" '''' 1III Il, I" 1L::W . I' ,I - - ,--, i I I ~ ,
JH* ~--,--~---~.lt-lt--;i-L~- r:------ .:-:11 ,!\!i -:-~_. U'
I I~,'I'I 'II I 2 /I" " I Ill. I ..L.- __ -ll _._~_._ "
'il~r _.L~_~~_ -. ill: ;~-"rl t~-:I'" ~ ,------, i ~ ;;!': I' Hili
iI),'11 ::, I I .,;if I 1111 ---f--I'I----JJII-- ~--~------.---- I ~ II'1 I I
J!i,g- Ii : ~ ':111 1'1 !!I -, ' =i' tI -,HI!!!!: ~l,
1~J.jJiJ _, I .al llii .'j 1:, ,il. I U: ~
", ,'-,;,--~ ~'.'I--. .;-~ - - _, '1"":'7 ,I I: I
:I: ,,': (I ',: ~ ' ' , I 'I' I ':::
'i;' ,:' 'II I :: III II I : ,I
I ,I I' ,III 1\, J _ _ _____
- " "I ,I I' i 'I ~I 1__' ~-_.
-__..J "
I f'Rl \A,AR'( I
I ~,~GE."
MAlt\1IA~~ ~ _
~ A"WlQ.. lA1b9/It::'Zl
//
~
M~ YBKfL~
~eJ~ ott\QJT
~~.~TO
MIt1.J ~es,
A l ()? IN C6r'A'f~~~€t.H31~
~'~.OV<C1AN\Zkt{ON
r.JR
"'"
I
M(~~TIGAt,
~EN1S 8R~
~tJ M~$S lN1:o
~...> 'A,aJ - f'Q.Of'~
:~ --. / S _
-~ ~. ~
~ .;J~
Z- rI~t--
~=H
~!
~
~ .~
~
..... 1 - , 1
. , I
, - - .
I
..,.
- I
~
View from Gulf Blvd.
1t 4 ..,~:
~i~~'~~~ ~~~__
~
J,I
fr- .
~
tIIIIIIIIT
..-
.~ '=-~~--=-=-ll"----~ 'I .:
." I..-j j 1 - 1-'11 _ ....
::::..~,-'" I ' --L H .
'J ::llJ, - I
- _1___~ ,. -.. 1 J -
......;:; rl, _ .~'
,r,--ml ,- I~
~~~_ 1 -=:... _ ___ r---- - i _~_~.. ~~
'::- I __ J -lJ l.. 1
!l. .i,gJJI II 'II
'r--ff'ftfll- __ I I,
~ ---------- --1-'-1- I ~
'" - I ' -<l i 1 ~
~J~ - - : Ijll
,J '_ _ :;'"'-_" ,'-
Il~_ 1 -- ~ II'-
't ---:i1'_
ti - -~ , , I' I
-"~~-- ----~,~.- .--IJ~
~ ""
.; L
[~
1---
f
~ ~
~
!
:
-
-
--- I
-I
I 'l-
I 1
I
--
I
: .I
~~
$/
I-i = I
'I
-----+tJ
.-
1
I I
L-
:1 :
i I [I
I
I
.::::f
~
,
II
i
:L, ~Yiew from Gu~f of Mexico
t~ I; ~~}.,.. ..
:,;;,;;;< i. '
iiiIi:....... _.>>z..,. _ _..--.___
I
M^~ Vf34t1.ICAt,
~GNT ~\)e; ~o
QIV)lOE ~~.IN10?J p~5
-K!~~ V~\t(At,. ~~S
&J A{..
I";-
fiii
~~~
-'t
,-I
I
i
1 I
,
I
I
i
I
,
;
_~'
--
I !
I II
. I
II
I
'I ,I-f--
I I '
111---1--, ,
II !-i
I i
11___ ;
I
I I
I
r
-,
....; J-
II
+- -~ T
() I i
I
I
I
:s:r
FRIM~~ ~Ul.,f-
~H'Je tb(..,~. Aca;~
~\l5 TO ~C\JI~ '11
~~ gp TO ?L'ANE 01=
fACA06
~l
-1_~_
~I-
--1-
-- -I
1 I I
;_L :_
II
I
I
---
-+
-~"I
-
_ LI -c:=""l
.I....L..L I I(
-Itl l3if[~ ~~
-, ~1', --., tJ
:Ill r.:-t:" rtr:: '
, .... i----l-+"~~ ~
.. ,\.,j.'-...J..~-~
-- -~-
!ill =: i~t", ~~-
, t--I~;"~~
1-::- I,', ~-J
- 'l~""-~~ ]I.,
I -~t-'~~.2~
I ~ "A-Fe ....
I'W- r:=-"-1L4- ,:;2 r'!!['
,1~ I ,I l~
~;IM~f1~r'3 [tJ
i,lli I L i"",li;-~ C ~
. ' I ,------" I ,f'
.... ~------;. -...... _;:::;;; I
'""-l 'u :1-- i:'"',! -
Iii -;- --"r ,-~
~"J___ ---, "__ I;:::;
I~I~ ' - l:... ~~!
~'__r_L::"-=:" ;; _~~ IiJJ
It~-l 11 J ~~J...;;:'!
, E=i 1--1 -'b.,
,-h I=<P'"
-, -'I ;a-
~ ~ 1...
- ~
....,
-:.
- ..::
- t
-
I I,
--
Ld::: '
h
, I--- -
'~
-:::::: -
,.-
I.
- .-J
--
;hl
~
~~. '.~ dJ.~ -
r- i-- ~ r~'~ I v.
~ -~.:::" /: :. I'it;'" I i mt'>-, ! '--:0-.
.... J::c -- ~ - ~ ~~ I cttjIJ
~ ,t:t: -m. Ifj- :H~~~~:- -;-~ I u.. · ~..---
r-r rt ie3 it;: ~ I _. m.,+-; jflill ~;.::.. 1
~ l:::l::: II' s:::::~ L!r H ' It..... __ ~ ' ,
----rl ~ ~ i~' ct:?: iFl=t~ !.I'.. .~ II
~ ~iI:I ~Eioo 9-El: .L' ~- l! '.-f
~i:::: .- ~" - -
r l:"L fIoi .... ..... I~ L:""T J!I IT
i 11'1 i '1 ~ E:::l:Z --, 1-
-l'_~ .,; r~ I ~~ ~._ "
: J lJ i ~ _ _ r-- l-;i-=-~J--
--'J j Ii i ,
. I :-U- T'-.-=-"- ~ ' --.-"-----'-.:. ," -
, . I ' ;-'----r' ~- ., --- -
_-;-...~, L ! _ 1, I I'
, . , f-.', I -!- - I -.J__, ,
I-'~'I" r-<:':~~-I,' -"-I~--
--J_~ll -L_---+-J l_ _ J I. ; : :' _
1 , I ,-t:l./-1--"-1-~- ~""'----'-"t-~.L",-,_ _
'1'oL; " ~, 1'-'
-""'1.,_ : I ~_ I -!::r-- --~l _ I I I t__1
'f'-:! i: ~_-+=-~l- =_:~~-~-~~'i---~~' ,-
,.d ~1-'--=-""-,,",=_~_ ...---l--_",~-,--
_ III ! i_II, I
, ,J ~____o"_ _ 1 ""
r- J i :-!1i-;--=1 -~-;, ! .,,~--""-
-I - 't:H---i..... - - 1 I -l-~
i 1- _ I I I I-
!-
1
I
I I
I
,I :s:
Y. H. LEE ASSOCIATES, Architects
330 FIfteenth Street, Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 836-6688 Fax (510) 836-6689
September 17, 1992
Mr. Ted Clarke, Planner II
Planmng & Development Department
City of Clearwater
10 South Missoun A venue
Clearwater, Flonda 34616-4748
RECEIVED
SEP 1 8 1~~,
Re: Ultimar Three
Clearwater, Florida
PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
Dear Mr. Clarke:
As a follow-up of my letter to you of August 12, 1992, we have enclosed WIth this letter
the relevant graphic to illustrate the design intent of roof top design element of Phase III
and Its relatIOnship to Phase I and II.
The design and the height of Phase III roof top element is different from that of the Phase I
and 11 for two essential reasons
1. The Phase I and II buildings reflect the same prototype building plan WIth slIght
differences in therr lobby and penthouse floors With the exception of 4 additional
floors, the appearance of Phase II is in most respects similar to Phase I (with identIcal
exterior terraces, window patterns and vertical roof top elements) However, Phase III
is an entIrely different building. With completely new floor plans and circulation
conditions, this building requires significant changes to its exterior appearance. As a
consequence It also requires a new and different deSIgn response to the roof top
element, reflecting the different plan and circulatIon conditIOns of Phase III.
2 As illustrated in the site plan, the Phase I and II buildings are basically oriented at the
right angles to the Beach projectIng their relatively narrow ends toward Gulf
Boulevard. However, the Phase III building in consequence of both site and program
considerations must be oriented parallel to the Beach thereby projecting a WIder
frontage toward Gulf Boulevard. As a result of this contrasting WIdth between
bUIldmg elevations of the adjacent phases, the roof top element of Phase III has been
increased to maintain similar proportion with the establIshed sequence of the earlier
Ultimar Phases. As can be seen from accompanying exhibit 'A', this relationship has
been achIeved with only two of the smaller elements of the Phase III rooftop
exceeding the dimensional height of adjacent Phase II building.
. .
Mr. Ted Clarke, Planner
Ultlffiar Three, Clearwater
September 17, 1992
Page 2 of 2
We are very pleased with the design outcome of Phase III, and we are very confident that
it will contribute positively to the built environment and the skyline of the City. If you
have any question regarding the design concepts of this building, please don't hesitate to
call me to clarify.
Sincerely,
1M
~
CC: Mr. Ted Cobb
King Engineering Associates, Inc.
24945 us Highway 19 North. Clearwater. Ronda 34623 . (813) 791-1441 . Fax (813) 791-9228
s; C-CSft ~
Qb--:I:" 3'
Cu -J -
F { Lfi-,
~
"'~I'';.
. c...
-
_ . ;";;tt~...-.. ..
Engineers
January 12, 1993
· Planners
SCientists
Surveyors
Mayor Rita Garvey
,/ Comml~~loner Sue BerfIeld
CommlS~lOner Art Deegan
CommIssioner Mayme Hodge~
Commbsioner Richard Fitzgerald
P O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618-4748
RECEIVED
JAN 1 3 1993
City Manager
RE. Ull1mdf/Pha~c Three
Dear Mayor and CommIssioners
DUring the December 17, 1992 commiSSIOn meetIng, the fmal site plan for UItImar - Phase Three
wa~ dl~cussed. As you may remember, the two maIn issues regardIng this project had to do with
the height of the buIldmg and the construction of a pool in the VIew corndor. Unfortunately, I was
not able to be at that meetIng to proVIde Information that may have been of some benefit during
the consideration of the request to construct a pool In the view corridor. The purpose of thIS letter
IS to provide thIS Informatlon to you, and to request that the comnussIOn formally reconsider the
decI~Ion made at the December 17th meetmg. I sIncerely belIeve that due to the subjective nature
of the "passive recreation" Issue It would be m the long term best mterest of the City of Clearwater
and It\ re~ldents to con~lder the followmg'
ButldIn~ Height - The developer understand~ the po~lt1on of the City CommissIOn
with re~pect to the height of the budding and agree~ to comply with that positIOn a~
outlined at the December 17 meeting.
2 View Corndor - The majority of the dIscussion of the concept of constructIng a pool
in the view COrridor seemed to center on whether or not the proposed constructIon
would be conSidered "passive" recreation or "active" recreation. Unfortunately, I do
not believe that the commISSIOn was proVided With a formal definItion of either
"pa~~lve" or "active" recreation, or gUldelme~ commonly used by Planner~/Engineer~
that could help distinguish between the two types of recreatIonal faclllt1es. As a
result, I belIeve each comnussIOner relIed on her/hiS personal experIences to make
a dlstmctlon between the two.
Enclosed with thiS letter IS a memorandum from Rich Dutter of our staff who IS a
certified planner and I~ responSible for all plannIng actlvlt1es with our fIrm. The
point to be made is the fact that it is the design intent of a facility that is more
commonly used to distinguish between "passive" and "active" recreation, rather than
the facility Itself For Instance, a "lap" pool IS de~lgned to allow sWimming to be a
Citrus
HII/sborough
Pasco Pinel/as
"'~F .... ~~--- .. ..,...................,.,-~~-~ _~
-----~.. -------
,/
,{ Ulum.H jPha"e !hree
J ..U1uary 12, llJ93
P ..1gc:: Twu
.
r!
\ I
\
~
form of exerCIse, and other pools such as the one at Norton Park is designed for both
exercise and competItion. Both of these are examples of pools that are designed for
actIve recreation.. The pool proposed at Ultirnar, however, is a linear "kidney" shaped
mground pool of relatively shallow depth and does not have diving boards or
platforms. It could not be used, and is not Intended to be used, for diving and is not
designed to be used as a facihty that could prOVIde any degree of exercise by
sWlITurung. In fact, the shape is Intended to discourage anything other than walking
mto it on a hot day to cool off.
Pools are traditlonally found at almost every condominium facilIty in the State of
Florida. Occupants expect a pool because it provides a place to sit and relax. Most
often the only type of "recreation" commonly found at a pool such as the one
designed for UltImar - Ph~e Three IS "sunbathing". Certainly thIS is not anythIng
other than "passive" recreation.
The developer of UltImar wa~ abo the developer of Cre~cent Beach Club Two. DUrIng the past
five (5) year~ the developer and the City of Clearwater have worked together In a po~lt1ve manner
which ha~ resulted In a "ubstantlal Increa~e In the tax ba~e of The City of Clearwater. Since a pool
I~ a mandatory amemty for a condomInIUm such a~ UltImar Three, relocating the pool outSide the
view corrIdor may nece~sitate the elimInation of four townhouses and a POrtiOD of the parkmg
garage, WhICh most hkely wIll cause a reductIOn of the number of condomInIUm units in the tower
building as well. Should such a design change be required, the project value will be reduced by
$3,000,000 If only the townhomes are lost, and an addItional $2,500,000 if a typical floor of tower
umts IS lost. This, in turn, corresponds to a loss to the City of Clearwater of approXImately $30,000
In yearly tax revenue. In my opmIOn it would be unfortunate, and unnecessary for the City and the
developer to become adversanes over a subjective Issue that has both short and long term benefits
to the citizens of Clearwater.
As a result of the above, we respectfully request that the CommISSIon reconSider thiS Issue m order
to receive, at a pubhc heanng, information that specifically addresses the dlstmctIon between
"passive" and "active" recreational faCIlIties. Your earliest conSIderatIon of thIS request would be
much dppreCldted.
Sincerely,
CC. Mike Wnght
Al Galbraith
Ted Cobb
File: 1999-140-000
(g:ultlmar.3 )
. . .
t KjNQ.,ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC.
~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ed Mazur
FROM: Rich K. Dutter
DATE: January 7, 1993
SUBJECT: UltImar Pool- ProfessIonal Planning OpIruon Re: "ActIve" VS. "PassIve" RecreatIonal
Use
The purpose of thIS memo IS to offer my profeSSIOnal planrung opInion concerrung whether the
proposed pool facility at the UltImar CondoIrunium project on Sand Key In the City of Clearwater
conStltutes an "active" or "pasSIve" recreational use as typically interpreted In planrung, zoning and
land use deCISions. Ba~ed upon the nature of the propo~ed pool and ~urroundmg deckmg, and m
pnncIpal u~e a~ an area for condominium re~ldent~ to take a dip and ~unbathe, It is my professional
opinion that thiS faCIlity ~hould be properly c1a~~lfled as a "pas~lve use"
As you are aware, pnor to being a planrung consultant in the pnvate sector, I held positions as a
municipal planning dIrector and a CIty zoning administrator. In those capacIties, I was charge WIth
making Interpretations concerrung the defirutIOns of planrung and zorung terminology and
Judgment~ concerrung tne appropnateness of vanous land uses based upon those defIrutIons. In
attemptmg to clasSIfy a potential use, It IS critical that one looks at the phYSIcal composltlon of the
u~e, a!:l well as ItS Intended use and illtensIty of use Typically an "active" recreational use IS
Interpreted from a planrung and zoning perspective to be a use reqUIring a recreatlonal apparatus
and able to accommodate some form of organized sporting endeavor. The presence of physical
~tructures such as a walkway, boardwalk, pavilion or deck WIth benches is not sufficient to cause
a claSSIfICatiOn of an area as "active" recreation.
In my profeSSIOnal opimon, the pool and sundeck area proposed for the Ultlmar Condominium
project in no way fulfIlls the reqUIrements to be clasSIfIed as an "actlve" recreational use. The pool
IS a small kIdney-shaped facility SUItable for "dIpping" to get cool between sunbathing and relaxation
on lounges which will surround the pool on ItS deck The pool IS not SUItable for "actIve"
recreatIonal events, ~uch a~ accommodatmg lap work or platform. or mId or high dIVing actiVIties
No organIzed recreatIOnal ~portJng or athletic event~ can be readIly accommodated WIthin the
propo~ed facIlity.
From a plannIng and zonmg perspective, "active" recreational uses typically Include ballflelds, rac~et
~ports facilities and other SimIlar faCIlities which are designed for organIzed and competitive
recreational aCtlvItIes A pool Intended solely for the residents of a hOUSing project which ha<; been
designed prlmarilv as a SOCial gathering area is not an "active" recreational use. but a normal and
even reqUired accessorY use to a reSIdentIal condominIum proiect
)
In summary. I strongly feel that the proposed pool faCIlity is not'an "active" recreatIonal use under
any traditional planmng and zomng defmltlonallnterpretatlOn If I can be of any further aSSI<;tance,
plea~e do not hesitate tv contact me.
:ge
(l'\l1fW RO)
",
-~
~ .. ' r
"
. ,
.., ~ _ J
'. ,
':, "r
, "
,
"
1 ,_
,r , :;...
... )9- ~ ,
~ .. ~ - ( -'
1,.
I. .
"
\ -
~
\
'" '"\.
P
iii
. J.
"
~
..
, \
'-
\.
, I
. <
-
,
"
Sea Towers .
. ConstructIOn Company..Inc
~
. ,
'I.
'"'
"
-<'
, .
VLA FAX AND U;8. MAIL. ' .
.. ~ ") \
"
J ';),....
I ,
'.
-,
r
August 13-',' 1992
"
, ,\
. "
" .
... '.
'" ,
'-..., I "\ ., ,,~
'Mi-.' Louis R.- iIi'l ton
Planner I~ :
,Ci ty _ ot Clearwater ,. ~ ,
j P. O. 'Box 4.748 ' ' "
~l~~rwater" FL 34618"7.4748.
"- I . ~
,,, ~ - I \ \ t
RE:' Ultimar-Condominium-project
Sand Key, 'Clearwater '
. ~ ~ { [ ~... -. A' , t _~.. '\ <#"
pear Lou: '- .\ ~~ I~' , .,
; ,t .. __ ,
IJ ,) "
We 'are in receipt '~f;a copy'of a letter to the City 'of Clearwate~
from Mr. Harry ';S ~ Cline dated August 7, ,1992, regarding 'Ul timar
Three~: We are' currently finalizing 6ur_plans-for Ultimar Three to
,comply -with ~he 'condit~6ns of ,approval of the site plan as :setforth
'in the Ci~y's lett~r to-King Engineering As~ociates, 'Inc; dated.
J,uly.23,' 1'99-2. I At' this time, however, -it- 1:s necessary that w~ ,
, ," advise' you 'of our obje,ctions to Mr,. Cline's:allegations regarding'
~- the rOOf-top lighfi'ng of Ultimar'One and Ultimar ,!:wo.' In the first
.> . place, we find these_allegations to be irrelevant with respect to
the d~s'ign of, / Ul tiinar ,Three. Secondfy and mQre ':importantly, ,these
allegations 'are 'inaccurate and misleading. :
... ~': ' ''I \J :...) ~~ , ~ : ' \'" (' 'r- j ; , f r
We would like' to' -clarify the circumstances regarding the. roof-top.
~i9,hting,~or Ultimar-One and Ultimar Two as follo~s:
\ . '- \.. ,
A' ) ~ ..
,... ,1
.'
'. ,
1 .
, ,
I' ,
,
I
"
'"
'.
"
, , ,
,
, ."
I'
i,
,
b( , ,
'.-
"
( .
The original design of the rOOf-top lighting for Ulti~ar One,
'consisted of: ,( i-) seven' (7) litjhts mounted on each side 'of
the f~at roof deck shining up on the vertical. elements above,
the roof, (ii).' four (4)' lights', lnount~d" on, each side, of ,the
'elevator machine room roofs -Shining. uP. on the vertical
:"elements' above, -and. (iii) six ,'(6) light~' mounted above the
" .'flat roof deck shining horizontally through', the' - various
.,.ope_nings in the'vertical elements. : ~ " '.,
\."'..,. I" - l; ..... ..", ,~ .. r- I .
."In JanuaiY/F~bruary of 1991' 'shortly after ,completion of'
. construc~ibn of Ul timar One, complaints we,rE( rece'i ved from the .
,neighboring condominiums regarding the lighting'. . In',response,
.:,the lights'shining horizontally through the op~nings of the
.:-"vertical elements were eliminated' leaving (only the up
,7 ; lighting .~ .- No - ~urther compla~nts w,ere received after this
, ,modification was accomplished...
;.. ~ 1._ J~..... I ... '/ .. .I, f I
.-- \ '" '
.. ....t.
1.
,
,
.' .
, '
2 .
, .,
. --
(~ ~"
, ' -
. ,
/.
, ,
J
~,>. .. ....
.. '- . ,/, ~
'I' 1 -. -, i560 Gulf Boulevard - Clearwater, Flonda 3463'0 - 813-595-8915 - 595-8928 FAx
... , ....1;" y.... , ~
."
'-
.. .... - .
"
1 <
"
"
'..
"
.:
1 .... ~
.
;....r ...
".. ::::
..
':-
I- ~ \ \
. ~ -....
r .
" ,
\ '
, ,
" ,
, ~ , -
, ,
,
~ ,
f
- \
.I' ~ ,,"
: J/
'"
, . J
;"
, '
'.
-,
.c ,
I .. ~;::.
, ~
-, ,J..........._
<
<
, }
< .
l' ..... ~ ~
, ..
\~ ): I ~ 1
"
.',
, -
:'
"
, ,'" -
"
-Mr. 'Hilton "
... .. 't ~
Page'-2' . -:;'- _ '- ,,~,
August 13':- 1992, - _.' ~,,"
.. r f
~ 1..-'
"
'.
~ ,- .J
. ~ ~
, \ "
J I ~ 1->, :; l .., ,,~
"< J"'-
" '
.. j I. ~ I.. -
\_ "'L
"
"
,- .\ S
, ,
~ ,
,"
...
"
, ,
-'
"
, '
, , ,
, ,
.I... ~ '-
t .......
"
"
,-
"
" ~' "" 't.
( .... '- ..- ...... -; \- ....
.... -..... :: ' I r ....
In 'November',' -'1'99:1 'while .on "s'ite, :Mr. y'ui Hay.- Lee (proJect'
architect 'from' ;,oakland, california') propose'd' -an additional,.,
, change:, to 'the r06r-top, lighting for 'U1 tima,r One '~nd' Ul timar
( ,~ . I J.. "\ . r ~ . r'" \
Two, whJ.ch -was .'stJ.J.l, under constructJ.on at; thae tJ.me,: _ Even
<, I-. .t:llough' "w~ ,had' received. no'- further" complaints:, a:Qout o~r
,lighting, 'M)::,. 'Dee proposed to replace the previously spec~fied
metal h~lid,e r-ight fixtures (whicp cast a' bright" white Eight) 1 \
, w~,th' sodlu~, lig:qt, ,fixture,s (which' cast a .wapner; .softer
.' ,:l~ght) -. ,Thi,s' qhange was completed ,in qrtimar, -One"!n O-:anuary"
<'1992 -and -the same improvement;was later -implemented in'Ultimar
~) ... "" ....T 0 ' - - .......- l . l ~ ..... ~ ..( i' ~ _ .. .
w . - I." '.... ~ oF, .. . -....... t 1 I'
... _ .., '>.' )"': ( .. "-_ ~..- 1- ....' , , ...... .};... I
" ,lti conclu'sion -and":'c~ritrary to 'Mr;_ Cl,ine"s ,opiriion, 'we believe, that: :-,
;the - rOQf.....tqp i1g!i:ti~g' of. Ul tim'ar qne an'd, Ul tiinar ,'" Two .<is an~, '
"aesth~tically, pleasing' additio!11'to the' 'Sand ~Key^ _skyli'n~-; We would
-'be pleased to ,answer 'any further questions you,ma~ have 'regarding
. the light~ng,'a.nd ~,we look 'forward to the ,final certificatio~. of' the
" , site plan, >~.orJ ,u~ t~mar, "Three' in t~e near ,futu:t'e., ,. ; _ , c ~ '.' < -., _' ,
~ ..~\ , j ..J.. .. / ~ '<' 1,....
"
"
3,._, ' I
~ ....... (I -
. '.
.,
" ~
........ ~ >
,
. ,
-,
- '
, ,
, .
r
, ,
. "
~ "... ..
, ::.
, "-<
. , ,
.,' Sincerely,: ',,_ <
'~~J~:,,',,-
, t
,'-
.. "v~ ~
....,~',,"I.~~- ...
I 1>' ~ \
I'
(.... _I ....
, "
"
, '
c '
~..
.
,
~ " , \... ::
~," ','Ted Cob~_, ,P:r;esident _'
'''., - ~
- ,
J. ;,
"
, .
, '
'.,
.'
J'
.r * .....
"
.' -
,
"."J ...' l'
, TC/~K., -,: ",..' J"=. "
'- '\ -::-. './ ...
{' "'(..) '-. 'l
cc:' . 'Mr.' Yul -Hay,: Lee', "AlA
'~. - "Mr~" Tim 'Johnson ',- .'
" - - .j ~ .. - ~") ~'-'
~ ,
>'
...~ ~
"
, -
J ,:.....
" I
,
-" "
'-
, '
:> ."
.\
'-
"
-,
y
"-
"
, ,
, ,
-' .
, ,~ 1
"
, ;
.'
'- ,
"
,
.,
" .
, "
('
. 0
'.
, '
" <.-
"
, ~
t
,
"I I "-. ,....,...
'1.~ ..... )~
....' "',..... - .
.' .
, '
. ' ,
-'
.:
':"
.'
1>.
, ,
.
-- ,
, "
_.. l_
t "
, ,
- ').
"
J:
~,
,
)
, -,
, - ~
r ~ .,.-,
" r
;' ,-'
, ~
, ,
" ,
, ,
r
, .
,
. ,
., t
,-
~....'\. ~
"
, '
, "
'.
f -"'</
, "
/ "~1 ~
, ~.., ""..-
: ,.-
( , ,
"
,
....,...
~ A _". ..
"
, -
, t
-
..., ')-
, ,
"
. ' .
j ...., ...
l t {.
A' ,
."
,-
"
, "
, "
c
< .
, -
- -
"
. .
, ,
-
;~
--< v.....
~ ,
'. '
. ,
-- ..
t
"
, "
).
'-
I \-....... -"'..
~\
, ,
., ..~
..... ... ..
-' - -' ...
, -
~ '.,'
" .
,,-
l~r-
\..; - "l.
, .
.:
.." :
_f _
,. -
t-'
~,
'"
, _~,.-- I..
')-
, .
...... .. ~
'-
":: . ~ ....
, ,
, b
, <'
r A,
., .,. -./
~ _\ ~ r
.
, , ,
"
.. t... "-
, "
A.
... \~: ..{
, ~:
, )
If....-......=....
:;
, '
',-
1 '
-' ,.-
... I r_l -
, ,
"
J
, '
.J , ~ f ..
, ,
~'
.f
,^ '
, '
'. -
. .
\
/ -
'.
-~
.L
... . .,!
t ...... .....
'> -......'.-' fA .. \'
, , .
1 1 .... '" - ~
, ,
, '
"
'- -<
, -
. '
, "
'-
,.
"
"
f
~ -~ ~....- I
--
-,
,~
<, .
"
JOHNSON. BLAKELY. POPE, BOKOR. RUPPEL & BURNS, R A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E D ARMSTRONG III
BARBARA A BACCARI
BRUCE W BARNES
JOHN T BLAKELY
BRUCE H BOKOR
GUY M BURNS
MICHAEL T CRONIN
ELIZABETH J DANIELS
LISA B DODGE
BRIAN BEVANS
MARION HALE
REBECCA HENSON HUOOBA
SCOTT C ILGENFRITZ
FRANK R JAKES
TIMOTHY A JOHNSON JR
SHARON E KRICK
JOHN R LAWSON
JAMES G LEWIS
MICHAEL G LITTLE
MARIA MAISTRELLIS
MICHAEL C MARKHAM
DANIEL L MOODY
DAVID J OTTINGER
F WALLACE POPE, JR
DARRYL R RICHARDS
DENNIS G RUPPEL'
CHARLES A SAMARKOS
JOHN A SCHAEFER
BETHANN SCHARRER
PHILIP M SHASTEEN
CHARLES M T A TELBAUM
GLEE A TRIPLETT
JOAN M VECCHIOLl
MICHAEL T WILLIAMS
ANTHONY P ZINGE
. OF COUNSEL
,
PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER
FILE NO
30874.83474
November 13, 1992
. tOrt)
W)\/ \ h \~.J
v\ M\N\NG
Dt.P J\\\1N\E.H r
Mr. James M. Polatty, Jr.
Director of Planning and Development
City of Clearwater
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748
Re: Ultimar III
'" .
Dear Jim:
This letter confirms our telephone conversation on November
13 wherein I requested that the appeal regarding the pool
location and height of Ultimar III be continued from the
Commission's December 3 meeting to its December 17 meeting. If
there is a problem with ~his continuance, please let me know.
v~yours.
Timothy A. Johnson, Jr.
TAJ/lm
911/TAJ/30874LELl
83474
cc: Mr. Ted Cobb
CLEARWATER OFFICE
911 CHESTNUT STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34617-1368
TELEPHONE (813) 461 1818
TELECOPIER (813) 441-8617
TAMPA OFFICE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 1100
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601 -1 100
TELEPHONE (813) 225 2500
TELECOPIER (813) 223 7118
JOHNSON. BLAKELY. POPE. BOKOR. RUPPEL
~~~~
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E D ARMSTRONG III
BARBARA A BACCARI
BRUCE W BARNES
JOHN T BLAKELY
BRUCE H BOKOR
GUY M BURNS
MICHAEL T CRONIN
ELIZABETH J DANIELS
LISA B DODGE
BRIAN BEVANS
MARION HALE
REBECCA HENSON HUDOBA
SCOTT C ILGENFRITZ
FRANK R JAKES
TIMOTHY A JOHNSON JR
SHARON E KRICK
JOHN R LAWSON
JAMES G LEWIS
MICHAEL G LITTLE
MARIA MAISTRELLIS
MICHAEL C MARKHAM
DANIEL L MOODY
DAVID J OTTINGER
F WALLACE POPE, JR
DARRYL R RICHARDS
DENNIS G RUPPEL'
CHARLES A SAMARKOS
JOHN A SCHAEFER
BETHANN SCHARRER
PHILIP M SHASTEEN
CHARLES M T A TELBAUM
GLEE A TRIPLETT
JOAN M VECCHIOLl
MICHAEL T WILLIAMS
ANTHONY P ZINGE
. OF COUNSEL
PLEASE REPL V TO CLEARWATER
FILE NO
30874.83'474
November 13, 1992
~~~ll~ --:-~
- '~ -\ . If! \; ~\;;
~,' ",,>~rt m- t\, \',j( ,;; '11
\~},~\. ..1 ~.v""'J;~\1 U'\x.YlI \""'......\, ~
v l~ ....... ."....11 ........",~ I ... , ~
L'~l~~~ ..I'
\~~K~lW "" ,;I
~~t~~ ~O~ \ t1 '9~2.
rU\NN\NG
or.PA~1N\an:-
Mr. James M. Polatty, Jr.
Director of Planning and Development
City of Clearwater
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748
Re: Ultimar III
..... ..
Dear Jim:
This letter confirms our telephone conversation on November
13 wherein I requested that the appeal regarding the pool
location and height of Ultimar III be continued from the
Commission's December 3 meeting to its December 17 meeting. If
there is a problem with this continuance, please let me know.
v~ours,
Timothy A. Johnson, Jr.
TAJ/lm
91l/TAJ/30874LELl
83474
cc: Mr. Ted Cobb
CLEARWATER OFFICE
911 CHESTNUT STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34617-1368
TELEPHONE (813) 461-1818
TELECOPIER (813) 441-8617
TAMPA OFACE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 1100
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601-1100
TELEPHONE (813) 2252500
TELECOPIER (813) 2237118
kEl', I NlE'3THENT
\ \.
4 ..... -- "
\ ,'-
\
~ '
TEL' R 13-595-2 92,3
Rug 1< g2
15.39 No.006 P 01
./\
TBLECOfY TRAKSK%TTAL
Da.ta:
August 13 > )992
Number of pages (including cover sheet): 3
PLEASE DELIVER TO:
~3.me:
Mr. k2yis R. Hl1'Q~
Firm: _<_.s::Hx of Cleat'i:llil!;~r
..
Telecopy No.: ( 813
l 462-6641
"
FRDlvI:
N, "L
,,,- -red CMt<
Fit1,.l
,_ J~~ .Towers ConliltltL!~t;ton CODl,panv.
Inc.
Talecopy No. :(llJ.L ~95-892B
r.;:t YOll do not reoeive all the paqes, please call (813) 59!:. ;"'~l~
Comments:
"'-
-"---
Attachrnent(s) :.
Copias:
KE1' ( I I~~ESTMENT
t
4 ~
TEL 813-595-8928
Rug 13 92
15.40 No 006 P.02
\
::;
Sea 'Ibwers
ConstructIon CompanYl Inc.
VIA FAX AND u.s. MAIL
August 13, 1992
Mr. Louis R. Hilton
Planner II
City of Clearwater
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618-4748
RE: Ultimar Condornini~m Project
Sand Key, Clearwater
Dear Lou:
We are in receipt of a copy of a letter to the city of Clearwater
from Mr. Harry S. Cline dated August 7, 1992 regarding Ultimar
Three. We are currently finalizing our plans for Ultimar Three to
comply with the conditions of approval of the site plan as setforth
in the City's letter to King Engineering Associates, Inc. dated
July 23, 1992. At this time, however, it is necessary that we
advise you of our objections to Mr. Cline's allegations regarding
the roof-top lighting of Ultimar One and Ultimar Two. In the first
place, we find these allegations to be irrelevant with respect to
the design of Ultimar Three. Secondly and more importantly, these
allega~ions are inaccurate and mlsl~ading.
We would like to clarify the circumstances regarding the roof-top
lighting for ultimar One and Ultimar Two as follo~s:
1. The original design of the roof-top lighting for Ultimar One
consisted of: (i) seven (7) lights mounted on each side of
the flat roof deck shining up on the vertical elements above
the roof, (il) four (4) lights mounted on each side of ,the
elevator machine room roofs Shining up on the vertical
elements above, and (iii), six (6) lights mounted above the
flat roof deck shining horizontally through the various
openings in the vertical elements.
2., In January/February of 1991 'shortly after completion of
construction of Ultimar One, complaints wer~ received from the
neigh~oring co.ndominiums regarding the l.ighting. In response,
the l~ghts sh~nin9 horizontally through the openings of the
vertical elements were eliminated leaving only the up
lighting. No further complaints were received after this
modification was accomplished.
1560 Gulf Boulevard - Clearwater. FlOrIda 34630 - 813.595.8915 _ 595-8928 FAX
~ ,of' w..... \ .... .. ~ ~ '
KEY I N(')ESTt1E~n
TEL'813-595-8928
8ug 13 92
15:41 No,006 P 03
.. ...
\
Mr. Hilton
Page 2
August 13, 1992
3. In November, 1991 while on site, Mr. Yui Hay Lee (project
architeot from Oakland, California) proposed an additional
change to the roof-top li9hting for Ultimar One and Ultimar
Two, which was still under construction at that time. Even
though we had received no further complaints about our
lighting, Mr. Lee proposed to replace the previously specified
metal halide light fixtures (whioh cast a bright, white light)
with sodium light fixtures (which cast a warmer, softer
light). Th~s change was completed in Ultimar One in January,
1992 and the same improvement was later implemented in Ultimar
Two.
In conclusion and contrary to Mr. Cline's opinion, we believe that
the rOOf-top lighting of ultimar One and Ultimar Two is an
aesthetically pleasing addition to the Sand Key skyline. We would
be pleased to answer any further questions you may have regarding
the lighting and we look forward to the final certification of the
site plan for Ultimar Three in the near fut~re.
Sincerely,
~~
Ted Cobb, President
TC/dk
cc: Mr. Yui Hay Lee, AlA
Mr. Tim Johnson
-,
.. .
'",
, ,
,p
iii
" ,
~,
\
-I \
\"
> .
/ - I
/
,/-:{{J-92-
. I'
;'
. Sea Towers ~
ConstructIOn Company. Ine
. /;{)#:
~~ ~"~-.
~. ;LUc ~
:.' ~ ~i~Iv,.,
~~. . .
'... --' J ~
'- \
, >.
-
,;.. \ .
"
"
, ,
, '
"
, '.
~
, ,
VIii.. HAND DELIVERY ,
. '
"
:July 14,. 1'992
'-
< '
_ r.Jr/ f
"
... ';
, "
, ~
Mi: Mi~hael Wnght, City~Ma~qger.
City of Clearwater
112. Osceola Avenu'e S,.
C-learwater, FL .34615 -, ~ "
,- l \).... ~
--
, f
,
~
. J
.7
'-
,.;
"
:
,
,
":..1 '- 1
RE:
- ,-
Ultimar, Three: ,~he Third Phase of ' a Residential Condominiu~ Project
To be ,loc~1;:ed 'op property previously kno~ "South Beachll
1560 Gulf BQulevard _. \ -, , ' , -~
Sand Key, ~:tearwater, 'Flon.da '"
>.
).
SUBJECT.: '
.. "\.. r _ .
Applicat{op for Site Plan pursuant to Settl~m~nt St1pulation dated
Qctober ~17.,' 19~6,
^.
, ,
'. . \
Dear Mr~ Wright:~
~
1 ~ _ ~ :\- '
'r' - ) ,. .... . - . ..... .. ~ ...
, Sea Towers Consfruction Company, Inc., ,general 'contractor for USX :Corporation,
-'hereby makes formal application to the City of Clearwat"er for ~:(te plan ~pprovar for
_ - _the third phase of a residential condominium project 'planned for the p!operty <
- referenc~d ab'ove. You -w1-ll recall ):'hat we had previously requested and'received
, apP,ioval froq1 the City of'an lIalternative ~site'plan for the 'tower bU1lding onlyll of
Ultimar Three. '
- , '
;.
",
r '
"
'" <
; t - .. - ... /" l
'This application ~or site' plan approval .is 'be,ing 's~bm1tted pursuant - to the
requirements of Paragraph 17 of, the Settlement Stipulat10n dated October 17, 1986,
and more specifically, 1n: accorda!lce' with the portion ~ of Exhibit "B", to," the
Settlement Stipuiation en'titled "Parcel II S'chematic'S1te Plan 21~:' It' 1S our,
1nt'ention, and we are hopeful that you wi'll de.term1ne this;to be 'the case, that the'
design pf qltima~ Thre~-complies fully with the requ1remen~s ~~,the Settlement~'
Stipulation arid' the previously referenced schematic s1te plan.
1J -..r .... ' '\ ... ~, I ~ "'," ': \.- ,,-' , -,. ,
For your,review and" consideration, we are enclos1ng'two copies of each bf the
f~l1owi~g; (:iJ, a s'igned an~ sealed site, pl~n 'prepare4 by ,Y.' fl. Lee ,Assoc1ates".
Ar'chite~ts dated July;8, 1992 and,(H) a s1gned and sealed ~iv1l drawing prepared
by King,Engineering Assoc~~tes, Inc. dated July 14, 1992. -
, .. I -
I ... , '
/ t
,\ ,
'~
l~ .. ,
- ,........~ I
.
"
"
, '
\,.. \' ,
" -
"
~ .. t'
<
, I
, - ,
, '}
" .
< - '
"
, ,
-'
/ "
,-
.
-.... ..,. - -: ...
1560 Gulf Boulevard - Cle~ater. FlOl1.qa 34630., 813-595~8915 - 595-8928 FAX
.r ) .. '- .jI J ... M J ,.. .."
"
~ " }r of! ':. l'~
;-f r~ r J .., ~"'J~r~/~ '~
,. _ , (: If'"... t.>:'- ,.;l
, ' , "Mr. 'Michael, Wr:f.g[1(, "City M~n~ger
, '(. . t.. P \.. ~ ... ' J.It "o-<.~, _'"" '" ,...... .. 'l..
$;,~;-...( _~ age-2....,,'-">:..r ~~~ ,1,,,,,,_.-
, ....r"...... ~ J
Jul~,,14', 1992~> ~ I' ~'~,
:< :~;, ';,l ":!,,~,,.,'~".':.', < ,. ,", ~( ,~-~" " ~"',,"::.".,':,':,",
./' , , We trus't that vhth: submi'ssl.on' of the' araw1.ngs as ~descrl.bed 'above, ~ we have provided
,. ,~~ "~-, the City ~f ,Ciea~ater.'w}tli"th~ I)ece,s"s~ry clra';'ings as' de'~cri'b'ed, i~~Yaragraph 11 ~f -
'- ", 't,' the '~ettl~m~nt'.Sd.~uia~'l.o~n s'c; as to" allow for. the appr'6va,~ ;ot,\~e"':.s~t.e plan .;o~
, ;_:U~tiI?ar ThJ;'e,e'., ,We~ ~qula .be-pleased 'to answer any qU,est;1ons you' may ,have r~ga:d~I}g, <
" 'the' drawings .:,= Please' 'feel"fr;e'~' 't,/ccmtac't ,me 'l.n 'this 'regard -: .<'..
~, ' , '. .' /' ",~.." ~ . '. _~~~" ~,'" - ",:' - ;', ",' . 4', ~, ~ _ , ' ,$ ,~ ~:_!
"<,',' ;;. . Sincerely~;"" .':;., . ,,, ," - ' ~, " ~ , .,', ., ~"' ;, ,"
',~ ", ~ "< /'; .'. 'r ~,~ /. ", '. _, ,,,,', _ I '~, ~: , , : ~ ".
':'r-- :~, ~c;..- " ,,",~ " '.' J' ',,,,~ ~ ,',
,7; }~'~~ ....'1 ,.. ~~ ~ "-.r"- ...._" -; ,""- ,,-,<, ,- .' -1 "":,.~
....... ~ - ... ~i' .. ~ -..... - r" I' ~ \.. ~~ ., .. -f"" ...~_ r '1 ~ ,... ... 1_' ) Y
"TedCd'bb,'Pr~sl.'deAt ,..,.':" " " ",',-' ',-' '.';: ~
) :.. - ~./': 1 .;: ~ - ..... - -... ~ 1\ ( .... - , t'"' '"1'- ' . -, ~;. 1 ~:..,. ~
.' Tc/ak. \,' ';' ",,-/. -"", ", ; ,,' ,.' >,:""-~,".- ',~':. ' " :;.~.-
,',:, .-~' _ " ,,' ", c - , , ~ ; . ":y"~" ' , ' c" , " ~~ .,'
cc: Ciiyof,"~leaiWater '.. ,. . "" -;:"",", "'- '"' "J',""-' ,',,'
.' '{ / , At.tn: oM~,:. J~,mJs ~:',Poiatty, 'Jr.':-,- Planning '?-n( Deve+opmen,t' ihF~_ctor"" .',
>,..1 ',: o~ _ (with 'enclosure;:' . sev~nteen ,( l'7) se'ts .~vf ;plans r '"", " ',> ..,: . . ,
.,"" t"''''\ ...:"'-,"~ 1 r;l~ ~ \'",,- ~ I t~" -' '" ,("....~....
. r.. ( ,-" }ro:-~-":\_1-7 ~ ~,r"'~..~{(> ..~.... ,'-1\- "':;-:1-"~ T",,-J... 'f- Ij -....: -"J ~~
"'( ""J. .... _ 1-1:"') , ~'- 1 _ '- t ~ , r I'; ... ..
'< ~ ~.. ...~..... r i...r''-'';:--'f ~..,l...> ... _}.. J.; 1'::--\"'.
..
..\ l' i'
;. f
.'
,., .;:" ,~.-
"
~
'T,,_, ...
, "
,-
,
::;f \
"
"
; ::11
} ,
,-
~
,
\ :'
ot'" j ;
j
J
IN
,,'
,"
~" ~I>
,,.
, '
-...~
',.
"
<..
,
"
~ ~ ~f
';
"'"
"
'.
, .
~"
"
,
\
, .
, ,
'.
.. ~ "i...). ...
. -
,
.- ...::~I" ~ .:"
"
~ 1,-\
/1 r::
-'
~
! ~ .;-,
11 I .,,"1
,
'~ ........
" '
{ ,
;-
'J
, ,
.. ',,':: "'r
(', l!Jt..... '-,""''-
-, ...!.-
t\:- J
,
J'A ~...
,.
" ..;....
"
.,. ,\
~ '\ -~
,.t 1." ~
, "
J ",_" ~
1.... ~
r ,
, '
~ ~
, .
~- -.(.
>
^
-~....)
,
"
"
'"
..... r ~
\ -::. ~
,~
"..
'\
".
-1/
"
, ~-;
"
f
"J ...1>1
" '
-:
"
, '
, ,
"
- ~ .,?
'J
'.
: :~ ~~~; ~ t
..-- ,'" -; i
~ r - .;, 'It' J ''o_
J _..... r
,
" .
...
\.. .s k',,;......
, <,
"
,"" I'
'r
"
,.,
...'
\. "-~'
, ,
"
(,
,
"
- ,
'... rI
.." \",,"" ~
~
,.
,J
,,'
;; I
'<
"
V; '- ~
'.{"--I
, ,
" .
,,'
,
~, .,..; "t'::'
:...., /..~
'J Z .. i
,,"'...,... -,,;-'"
.
.. _ J ~
......... .. I ~
,~
.. J
~
,
- "
"
" .'
" '
... " .
, ,
"
"t- ),"
" ,
<... .","
. ,
~,
"
,v~.> 1
>'
~,
,
/
"'.... fJle:....!.", ~; ..
, ^
, "
"
>'
, '
,
,~ -( r
~ ... f" -
, ^
, ;'
)
'.
~ ~\
\:"~ :
.'
- '" - E _
... .:
.'
" -
-:
~ ..-, ;:
l '
"
"I
..... "-'1
) r v
'1\'"
t', "
, "
, "
"
~ rgt ~
'.
r'
"j-
~,
_'J
- I
,
,
J
...~ ~
'.,
-:
'~ '
~ (~ .....
~ '}-"t
"
~.. 1 "t.
../:-
,.f;:
1- I- .."
,>
." _" \ I..,
i"/l
.>
,
;
A,
-v
...\ ....~ '
~. " +'
'<,I!' '
-.; ~.;. - ..~
J '
, j
'-::,. -- > ~
- ,
L
"
~.
..o(} ".i-( r
, ,
~ ~ ~
~_ ~-r ~
'. ,
, r
,
. '
'ir-:,' 1
1>-..-....
"
'>
\-,/
:..... \\ .; ~ /" : '
..~} {.~ ... ~~~ "
.1 _...",
.. ..
',.r!C"?
"
w.
=- ~~ j
.
, "
, '
...\ 1"'-
'.
... ~"J
" ,
.:; .. ....
... '1 f' ^ ....
, "
t-... - ...
- "
-r,-' ...
"
...,--r-,
"-( ..,,,.
'-
1 - \,..-......
~..~ " \.
X ~l
'.
.-'
/'c"'" r
."
; tI ~
-,..." - .I'-,,"~~
\ ....-,.r- ...
"-... .. ~
___,' ,:/'';' ""1,,
.... "1 ~
'J
~.
'( ,
'i
-:
.,..~
, . '
,.'
, I
"c -<I I
.., .t
.-
..
"
,'.
, "
"
., ,
,
;.
j-
,<- }
"
, " ~
...-.. ~ ,..
,(' ~
-- J ,,#. ~
-\ ... \'-,
/' --. (~
;: "-"f'" J<!
,J'
,,1. -I~ -11
, "
, . ,
...." J.,..
" "
.
" '
"J.. l
" ,
!
~ ... ~ "J
1,,\
;..... (
'<
,.
J.
.'
- ,;.:.
j"\."' ",
"'
~ -- ;
"'
, .
I
"
"
"":.J- ""....
"
j, '....4t
o ~
1 "
. "
~ ) ~ A
" ,
,r '
... .....1(..,
, ~
"'I, t'
0'
. -
I ~~ ~~ ~ \
so ""-~
"
'- "
.'
~- ..
'-~ .....
>-
, "
, .
t ~ ~~' ~
1'" ".,_:!
J ,::....
_~ r"""_ .,J fJ';. =--
,-
""",'" J )
~ r <: I'"
A
~--
, ,
'"
"
'"
........,.....
)~ !>-..
. '
-;.
, '
- , {
.'
.. ;~ ..;..........
"
0'
,I
.- -'.....~
,-
, ,
,~
\- "
"
1 .'
, ~ ~..
, ~
-; ." \. ~ \
, ,
.'
(
-::: l.t.
1 ,~
,
-lot .s-' .~ _ _ ..
..,. ,~-. r
't
.)
"
or
- ,
,. t ..,;/ ,:>:" ~ /..
"',s. _4.'t \.........
,,};. --j.,
-'~
...-.... -y.........
..
" '
,-
_ J~
,
;:,'"-' /... ~
"
, '
I " .
i ~ ) I
, ~
" ,
r<
"
, ~
'-
=) ,
"
, '
............
~~': ;;
.1
, ,
'.c',
, ,
~ ,
'J,
>-
~..1 I
,-'
,/
.. '\ - .... (
""
, -'
;> ,
- - :...-
"
;:-
.." (~
, ~
-...
I '
, '
"
"
r
"
\. "'
, , ,
" .
11"... t ./
.
I "
-i..... -
. ;
..
-,
,
,
~;-./ ...
.!
I
, ,
, '
:;
.... ~ A- ~
, ,
}'
"
"
"
~"
, ~ '
.' J,.
..- :\"/
~
.. ~ J
"
':'
J>,
. ,
.., ",',
,
,
;'
~~...t
, ~'
, -
C
.),'
<
;;,
" ,
I
J "fr
, '
-\,
> :
...,.... .
__,:;'" t
, ,
/"' .
I ~....- _ ~
~(
>.... :.
~ -'-
, ,
..,f\ >"
,.' "J - ;
~').
, . '
1"'" ''"\
, ,
~
'"
"
-'
",
...
"l<'t- (S
.~'
.... ),1\
<I:~]
,"
, ~
-I; '\...
" .
../.... "-
.,'
-: L r -<; ,
( ,
...., ~,,) ~
f~
h.
.. " } ~ ....!
"
..."..... , '\
-;r" \ .........
~..- / y
'l ,S
,<
. .
... ..I~
- I
_:.._\ I
-\.
"
.' ,
"
"1\,..
.'
J "
.' "
,;.... ~
.',
II "''''...
"
.;,
j
"
,
"
"
,-
;' ,.),
, "
,-
, , ,
.f
, ~
"
'-
f J ,-"(r:..
,
. ,
-:..
~,
..~(
. ~; .....$
. /- .. \ \,. ...
+
"
'-k
""'... ~ ,~..
.
"
r--r ~
-' J _
~ ..~.J\
, r
. :.."....'
..... ' ~,
" ~,
,,\ ........1
. '
I. y" ;."
, '.
/. ,
. /,
"'..oJ :/..,.._
r r ..
"
. "
,"' .) t..
,,^
'"
" -;....... ~_...
"
.... _:;.!:, ,... ,J-....-' 1'1
, ,
~
"
'.\
f "
'r ,r
...
,,,, '"..-
,,1 ~J- /
" '
,
I. '..
.'
'J
" ~.... ...
.,
"':- -"
;:
:c
...
, '
,',
f
>""\
';'
"
"
"
"
, --
F"
'K
.,; . ....,' .
-'" ... ':..
s
.J
LETTEF{QF TRANSMITTAL
-
om: Julv 14, 1992 I JOll NQ I
~ Mr. Michael Wright
AI. Ult1mar Three
:
cc: CJ W/ENC1.OSEl CJ ~SMITrAL ONLY I
!
I
I
I
I
Sea'Ibwers
ConSUUctlon Company, me.
1520 Gulf Boulevard
Clearwater. Flonda 34630
TO: City of Clearwater
112 Osceola Avenue S.
Clearwater. FT, 146]8
GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 ATTACHED
The Following:
o Onglnal (tracings) 0 Speaficatlons
o SepIa Trans. 0 Test ReportS
o UNDER SE?ARATE COVER. VIA
o BJue Pnnts
o Letter
CJ Shop orawtngs
CJ Photcgraphs
CJ Samples
CJ Other
DRAWING NO. I COPIES I OESCRlPTlON I REv. / ewe
EACH NO.
, 2 I Arch1tectural Site Plans I 7/8/92
1 of 1 I 2 I C1v1l F1nal Site Plans 17 / 14/92 17 / 13 /92
I 1 I Site Plan Certification Letter I /
I T
I I
I I I
I I I I
- , I
I I
, I 1
I I I I
THESE ARE 1"rWJSMITTED as checked below:
o For approvaJ 0 Approved as submitted
o For your use 0 Approved as noted
o As requested 0 Returned fer COlTedlons
o For review and comment 0
o FOR SloS DUE;: 19_
o Resubmit COpies fer approvaJ
o Submlt_ COpIeS fer oJStnbutJon
o Return _ correaed pnntS
o PRINTS RETURNED AF'TEM LOAN 10 US
REMARJG
Tra.nSllU. ~~ed By:
R.ece:.ved By:
'reel Cnhh
JOHNSON. BLAKELY. POPE. BOKOR. RUPPEL & BURNS. R A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E. D ARMSTRONG III
BARBARA A BACCARI
BRUCE W BARNES
JOHN T BLAKEL. Y
BRUCE H BOKOR
GUY M BURNS
MICHAEL T CRONIN
EUZABETH J DANIELS
USA B OODGE
BRIAN BEVANS
MARION HALE
REBECCA HENSON HUOOBA
SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ
FRANK R JAKES
TIMOTHY A JOHNSON JR
SHARON E. KRIa<
JOHN R LAWSON
JAMES G LEWIS
MICHAEL. G. UTTLE
MARIA MAISTREl.l.JS
MICHAEL. C MARKHAM
DANIEL L MOODY
DAVID J OTTINGER
F WALLACE POPE. JR
DARRYL R. RICHARDS
DENNIS G. RUPPEL'
CHARLES A SAMARKOS
JOHN A SCHAEFER
BETHANN SCHARRER
PHfUP M SHASTEEN
CHARLES M TATELBAUM
GLEE A TRIPLETT
JOAN M VECCHIOU
MICHAEL. T WIWAMS
ANTHONY P ZINGE
. OF COUNSEL
PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER
FILE NO
October 14,
30874.83474
1992m' tll> @,\;:W~~f~~~~
<<I) ~ .J!"'-l I' : \ "".1 P'
u.. ..~ \.... J' \
11\\\ I fj..~ ("....', 'J". \; J. i '
~U.,prp " i J.!
. Gel. <1 \.." ~O0,? ~~'
, \) tt....' 1l--.
Mr. Michael Wright
City Manager
\ity of Clearwater
P. O. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida
3 46 18- 4 748
PLAN\\!!NG
OEPARTI'11J;NT
0;"
Dear Mike:
I learned today that the Ultimar swimming pool and height
issues were not scheduled for hearing by the City Commission at
its meeting on October 15. I have spoken with Jim Polatty and he
understands that we do continue to request that this issue be
reviewed by the Commission. Accordingly, please schedule this
matter for review by the Commission at its meeting on November
19, 1992. I would appreciate confirmation that the matter will
be on the Commission's agenda.
Very truly yours,
0--
Timothy A. Johnson, Jr.
TAJ/lm
911/TAJ/30874LELl
83474
cc: Mr. Ted Cobb
Mr. James Polatty
/
CLEARWATER OFACE
911 CHESTNUT STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34617-1368
TELEPHONE (813) 461 1818
TELECOPIER (813) 441-8617
TAMPA QFFlCE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 1100
TAMPA FLORIDA 33601-1 100
TELEPHONE(813)2~25oo
TELECOPIER (813) 223 7118
" ^ ' .
-' " ~
, \ -
,,-. p
( -
, ,
e'
.'. '- iii
-
,
, r \v
.., 0
,
. . Sea Towers
, ConstructlOn Company, Ine < ~
i -
, ' , .
., ,
VIA HAND D~~IVE;RY' ,:.' - . >
, .
- ,
" ' , , '..
i' "
, , '
~February '16, .,1993 , . i'
, ,
.J ~ _ .., , ~
-
. , ^' - , -
, - ,
, ' , Mr. Louis,R. Hilton, Planner II'
_,Planni~g ~nd zoning, Qepartment .
- , , , C-ity of ClearvTater -
, ,1'0 S: Missouri' Avenue '
, Clean.iater, 'FL 34616-
~.
"
~ ,,\ ::: \ ~ ..
-, RE:- Ultimar"Two. ':',Amepded site Plan
Dear Mr. Hil 'ton_:. ~,
, "
I'
1 "
-"
, ,
,<
'-
"
.. ...
~
" .
,1
-,
.1
"
Enclosed ,are -twelve, (12) signed and sealed copies of the amended
~,Ultimar TW9 site plan indicating the beach dune walkov~r and-access
structures as yo~ requested prior to approving t~e-permits for the
dune walkover structures. ' . , ~
1.... .. \
)
"
".~ ....
, Should you have any questions,' please contact me.
.... / ' .... ... ~, - '"1" \ ... ...
, '
. - ,
~~; .',\,.
. \ ~ ... ..,
Steve Baumann-; Architect:
, .
.: ,
"( -'
_ 1-....
, ~
\ ,
J'
-;
SBjdk
" ,
,\
, ~ .
Enclosure's
-f
'-
,cc: Se~ Tower?,C6nstr~ction' Company, Inc.
.', Attn: ,red e'o~b', ~r"esident
i ... -,)1
, '
J. .,-J..
, ' ,
, '
,
, 0
'J'
"
, ~
, , .
d
,,'
~
,"
. '
;
. <
) ,
. , .
,-
~ 'I
"J /.,
<'
, I
. ."
1'" I ~f
\ ,
.. f I J
" ,
, J
,
"
"
" '
. ,
r '~. -
"
~ -
,'" )
.'
t,
"
. , '
< ..
J. ~ "--
- \ "....
>
"
,I \__\
. ~ ....... ~ ~,,\ 0- - I l~\ .: 1-:" "f" r .. : f _ .. ~" - ,,:t' \
1560 Gulf Boulevard - Clearwater, Flonda 34630 -.813-595-8915 - 595-8928 FAX
I'" ....... I -
" .
-.
, "
-<
~~....... ...
" ,
'.
~
?
" ,
-' ,
<,
;
r'
"
"
,
J
, I
L '- " ~---
<- ~. - ,
Otile. OJ
City MO(tley
(8i3) 46208100
"
\
,.'
! '
.'
" .
.;
f." . ... /
1\ , I
J _, _.1 I I UI i
C.t T Y
OF
11_1
1ll1llL
LOl,,\.
fiw,
CLEARWATER
POST OFfIce BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE A, F LOR t 0 A 3 4 6 1 S . 4 7 4 S
FACSIMItE (813) 462-6426
I I
FACSIMILE T~SMITTAL LETTER
TO:
~~
At ~4L
I~ - ( b- 4~
~~ ~ lVU.f~
FAX *
/
FROM:
DATm: ~
COMMEN'l'S:
~u
,
.
(
~.
~-' ~... \
,
,
NUMBER or PAGES, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: 3
, ,..
I ".. /1 ,.., < t ) ,",1. \"'1. r", I...., n
C n1 '"' ,'", I, ~ t ' I
_ j 1 ~
"
,
I '-.\. ~ ~V .
QVQO 'I;I\, J..Wl'~4 '(;::>'1.1
~'''''' .ft4
,
~ ~.. I '. ....,I~) ,
, j
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
Florida
Office (If t.he ())untl Adlllll\btl'll.lOt
'F~erlek B. Kad
I'.V.I.
). . " I'~I t'{!J
--"'# :r,: :\'I~
...... '.. '*L
~
t.,
. )'
,li/cI'llI:ir ~.0:Iun11 ~lI'I_
,< ,,~.llulI
'," :tMrtPM'
,~; ,}(_M.~
\,~ ,,/ '
, :,. J'la,i,1a1U CG..1't ~,\<v ,14t.
", ' !ll.& Kuftlll.t
'. "J-leLtl
kWb ~ er.'(lNT'/' o:>>ofMl.c;.o;lONFM
n.!4IIt ~u~
}de Q\1IIn
w~ ItWllollt
1,.,4. ).1l!let
, ,'" NtotNn
, ""It."
IW. t..\.."ll;~
. '
"
~ '
Dece~~~ ,16, 1992
. ,
~~; \
1.
r.AD. ArRatronq, III
Johnson, &,lakely, pope, aakar,
Ruppel , lu~~s, P.A,,"
. ~,.o. BoX 11{)O
~ampa, fL 33~Ol-1100
.. ~ r: I
'),..~ ( : ~
:~:; .: ',~ .
.... ;'.,
.. )\.~ }~
,\
RE:
1\$'
SAND lCEY .SlS'l'TLtMEN'l' S'l'tPU~TION
I'
. "
, .
Dear Mr. Armst~onq:
"
,
\
, '
kespol\cUnq to you.r lettet Of Decomber 10, 199~, :tegArdii1g
interpret~tion of the "vieW' c:::ot"t'idor" language inoorpbratod into
tho Sand ~cy Sottle~ont stipulation, ~y ~Qmory i~ faIrlY el~ar in
thl$ regard4 It was my intent in provld1nq such langu~g9 to
assure there would be an,opp~~tun1ty to view the water by
passeraby from cult Boulevard. It wa~ not th~ intQnt of tho
n~9otiatlng t~am to ~~plic~t~ wha~ otherwisa ~ay haVe be9n
requirements in the eOde ~pp+~o~hle to other ~evelop~~nt in
clecu."'Water. , , '
. '
The opportunities tor davelopment ot Sand Key basQd 6i~ply
on the tindings of vestod ri~ht. by the Court, 9~ve
allowabiliticc to tho developor that vara not allowable under the
oodQg ~t tha time or thQ CitY's nS9otlatlon. The pos1tion ot the
City was to strive toward a develop~ent pattern that recoqnizad
vest.d ri9hts, bu~ adQOrnpliBhod a 8enoitivity to th. City'_
updatQd a~si9n standards.
The construction of ~n in~round,Gwimmin9 pool th~t bad no
protruding oloments abovo the ground ~o blook th~ v1e~ tro~ Gulf
Boulevard to the Gulf waters ~ould respect auul\ a view oorridor,
in my op1n1on. Cle~~ly, a ree~oatioriol f~cl1i~y suoh as tennis
oourts roquiring t.ncoa and n~t~ ~ould block such a ~iew &nd
should not ne allowed. '
fon Office 80r t 110 · 'l'ampa.l'1orida ))601
A~~'" ,,!,bnJF4WIl ~ri" ~
~ '*'lud ()\ Altc~l'q>oJ
\1 ~
l'
" .
.'
. ,
.'
'--
.'
B.D. A~ctron9~ IJl
O.d~~bQr 16. 1"3
p&q. two
, ,
~ 'I? : .
" '
I J I ,
In summary, my intent innegotiatlnq the view cQt~l~o~
~8pect of the aottlQ~ent atipulat10n ~a8 to keap pro~~Gions
abovo ground that would blocK vio~s thro~9h the vie~ ~6rrldor.
An 1nqroun4 5wl~ln9 pool would bo conaidergd ~,pas81ve
recreation~l ~~enity au d~ser1bQd 1~ the Settlement .Ag~.ement.
I
If you hav& any othe~ quoDtiondl plQase let me know.
Slnc.:rely,
. fJ~ N.. 11.. ..;.: ~
PaulA M. Marva: I-Y
zoning Admlnlatra~or '
po.
~lrlAl.
'.J :'~ , : ..
.. .. ' ~
,1\ ,
~ \. ('
" .
,
, I
.'
,
... ~.... ~ }
i' ,"'..
~ ~\..,
I
I
I
,
:'
I
'.
,
"
.,
I
, :... ~
:"; I j\'"'
,.~ ~ "\ ~
" t \,
, '
, "
~ \~ ~
L ..) (" ~ \- ,..
....J',..' $.
I ,
J
, "
, .\
,
, ,
, ,
'_ I\., \
/ ',' f,
....~ '~\/l \. I" I
\ -
\ '
. '
~ \. '.. I.
" ,
" " I ~ },
.~.... : "
. .J
'. . "
. ,.
''.1 )
, ~ I
"
;J "
,
\} "
:- ~ .t ,~
..~~l: ;,~ _ :
, ,
,
~;' .
-" : \.~ ..
, .,
\ t '(I I
. ~
,e l: /~ ~
~ '"
: '
.-
... ,
,
.. -.. ," '\,
.'
.....'~...,~.: , )
to' _'\ ~ '
~ f.'\ I
( ,'" ~A., I
l ' ,....1 __' I ~
,
,
,.
,.
;
..--........ Mrl/~. . ~
.. III '
. Ja...
~j:~~:f\ -t~,,~~ ~ ----------------- --
--- -, ~ -~-.--t2.-- \- . \.'b. -- -- - - -- - ~--- - - - , . - - - -
---~ ----f, --\1--\:::t -:- - --- --- _~___s....~-'< - \~-1. .,," (jI) --
- - --- ---- --- --f 00- -\-\-~ " --- _=_h - -- -~- -- - - ---- -- . --- - --- J_~ f:..~h~~(~l("- -- --
-------- - --- -~-- ------------- --- - --~- ---------- - -~-------~- ~ ---- -- --- - - -~ ~...--
(lu~lLil1€: ~ Co~ 0'\ (L
-------------------~ -------- n ---------.
_ c:rt~__~~-=--A~~)..:~~: '-'n - _
(~l\:--- --------- -~---------- --- -~ ----.- -------- ------.-
\lY_nQJL\\I,IL~--=-~- _ .l.~_ n~~_ n uu _n____ __
Qt_~:J~~~~ ~lt n~ -- 'S:~ ~?!.~~X*-~-f"-i:~_
l J-~ ~ ~-oT
- -------- -- - - --- - -- --- ------ --. - - - - - -- - -~ - - - ~- -- - - - - -
Cc A"~_ - + N OJ'
- -- - --------n-bf~ - - fL~- -- - ----
- , - --~----._- -- - - -- ------- ----.--~-- -n- --:C-' .--- - -,-.--.-
(&;,--11- ~~--7 - -- ~- ~~dJy--n
-~~--l{6W~-~~6ik ~7? {-e_ __
I[--~-} -0-- -- - ~-~tl~-- c~ - -~~- ----;k.
Ji/ - (L?- - - d _nu_ - -- nn -
_ ___:_ ________c~~~- _ - ------. - ---------
-p ----- - -- -------- --,------- - -~
_ _ _~ _,~ cO--f\}__cPrsr___wfl-{~ ~ _.s
(jJl-CAV'~ -_ · - __ ~-!J(Y1lw/~cJJ<t I~i+ -
-, ~:~~~ 0
! f-
TiME - -ji:rv- '~r\r j
'F !
>'!;;; ;- I
l~- I
~ I'
~K;~~""
PH~N: ~/-Jn/l
,
6E!J:PhOOE~ ~ llj; [ro~O$EE-!~~-:--~I~lrw~NT;TO~E~Y-OU -~f~) I
~C~ASE-;~URNt!;1,;;,~tl_ ILl. V\f;LLCALlAG;~--:~Tl;-;Rs~i-~~~-'r-J i
... --r- II ;tv r .);(7~J !
MESSAGe - - ~- - ,k~~ I
j ~-
t S~GNEO ~
TOPS ~ FOQM 3335
I
~~---------- I
I
../
LItho 1'1 U SA
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Louis R. Hilton (LOU)
Pat
Monday, August 17, 1992
Ultimar Three
1:06 pm
Jim had requested he see all recent correspondence concerning the
Ultimar Three Development on Sand Key. Please let him know I
have all the correspondence ready and available for his review, I
just need an appointment.
It would be best if he could review this material today, as we
have a meeting tomorrow with MAG at 1:00 p.m.
Please advise at your earliest convenience.
cc:
Scott
:JiJ--
:Jr-
~~,
.:J-
I
B~ 51
A~6J
, I
\
, I
I
\
\~
-~--
' A~...
"'-::::+ -~
- ..--
I'-'~~
c:;~! . .
~ ( ,
-"~ -~/ "
~-
?=?>.~ '-~ -
: 1" -" ________________
!l". ''\,
~ \ ,
" -- //
, ..-:::/
<C--_,
---
\\
~
--
~... ~q~
-- -- -
~
. . -
t...
\
it'-
,
!
LAW OFFICES
M!;;MULLEN. EVERETT, LOGAN. MARQUARDT & CLINE. P A
FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
400 CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER FLORIDA 34615
POBOX 1669
JOHN TWEED MCMULLEN
FRANK C LOGAN
EMIL C MAROUARDT JR
HARRY S CLINE
.J PAUL RAYMOND
JAMES A MARTIN JR
STEPHEN 0 COLE
MARGOT PEOUIGNOT
R NATHAN HIGHTOWER
ROBERT C DICKINSON III
THOMAS C NASH II
NANCY S PAIKOFF
MARIE L DeMARCO
T SHEA GILLS
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 34617
(813) 441-8966
FAX (813) 442-8470
OF COUNSEL
JOE S EVERETT
WILLIAM E NODINE
PALM HARBOR OFFICE
(813) 785 4402
33920 HWY 19 NORTH
SUITE 150
PALM HARBOR FL 34684
August 7, 1992
Mr. Louis R. Hilton
Planner II
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618-4748
Re: Proposed Ultimar Phase III
Dear Lou:
Following up on our meeting a few days ago, and consistent
with our correspondence to the City of Clearwater dated October
22, 1991, and February 12, 1992, we represent members of the con-
dominium association across the street from the proposed project.
We, have requested that the City insure that the plans for this
final Ultimar project comply with the Settlement Agreement
pertaining to this property.
We do not feel that the initial plans submitted to the DRC on
July 23, 1992 comply with the requirements and limitations of the
referenced Settlement Agreement and Court proceedings. As Mr.
Polatty noted in his letter of July 31, 1992 to Tim Johnson, the
swimming pool/deck, and driveway, are structures within the view
corridor which are not permitted. Mr. Polatty raises the limita-
tion as Note #4, which is correct; Note #3 also confirms where
amenities, driveways and the like should be, which is in the open
area as shown on the schematic. This is further confirmation
that these matters should not be authorized at all, in any man-
ner, within the view corridor.
Our clients also object to the height, and believe Mr.
Polatty's objections should be maintained. Note #1 on the refer-
enced exhibit specifically limits height to 210', subject to the
adjustments authorized in Note #8; under no circumstances would a
72-foot increase be envisioned within these contractual provi-
f " '.
-
. ,
,
August 7, 1992
Page Two
visions. In addition to this proposed height being violative of
the agreement, which is a sufficient basis to deny this expanded
request, our clients also object on the grounds that it is
anticipated that the developer will seek to illuminate these
towers at night. They have done this on the two ( 2 ) prior
developments, and it represents a nuisance and invasion of the
privacy and sanctity of their homes to have this intense light,
at extreme heights, all through the night.
In summary, our clients, as residents, property owners in the
Ci ty of Clearwater, and immediate neighbors to this proj ect,
insist upon strict compliance with the agreements on this site. I
would like to ask you to advise us when amended site plans are
filed, which I understand are being prepared, so we can come and
review them further before final City approval is granted. If
further City boards are meeting to review these plans, or new
plans, we would request notice and an opportunity to attend on
behalf of our clients.
As we discussed, I am sending a copy of this letter to Tim
Johnson, attorney for the developer so he knows of our concerns
and our clients' position that the agreements should be complied
wi th according to their terms. I will be happy to meet with
representatives from the City and Mr. Johnson, should you or Mr.
Johnson deem it beneficial.
Please have your files noted as to our involvement and
concerns and please keep us advised of subsequent plans and plan
review and approvals.
with best regards, I am
. ~in~~ yours,
~~ S, CHne
HSC:koh
cc: Mr. Norman Olson, Harbor Condo
Timothy A. Johnson, Esq.
REOEIVED
AUG 1 1 1992
Pl.ANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
i '
,"",
_ }l" -
, ' '
, ,
,- .
~. '
"'
> ,-
,
..... - -;..,
>, ..
- )
> -
, ~'m:iJlii~ D\':f'7{!i;~'('fm '
.. Ji ~ -,-..-r-.L.~~ L:-5 ~ ~
"=.' , ':MiH/t9~";c',>~,lJ-
-' ~ . ' ":. ',~92 'I'Ll ,
. ,. ',' . \ I ' I,
_ >. ~ -0, ~~~~W WJA&Ug~~'~ ",,~L:: <'!.' -.'
Se To . . Bl!'k ~"L'I'''I\:'') J .
a wers' , .;\~' I.; I .' ."~, ..",,,._::."11 "
, ConstructIOn Company, Ine '. '. _,' :.' ~ . ", ,,'. ", ' ~ -7__
- .... ".,j.
, ,
',.p
,iii
"
,
.'
l'
......J-.
.r 't:""" \
I ~. r- r ~ 0-
f", ___" ....
.. ,~ - ~ ." -
...... '...
, ,
.. I - ~ ,-'
, "
"
T \ : r. ;
~ ~ ~ I -.. J
io.;....... '" \~ ...;::~ - '~"" ""\, '" :...: ....,.....1.
\ ......1' :
"
..~.:: '
.' v.........'" .. ., f.
r : ~ ~.. )
.: ..< -t':'..,. ,'"
"/ ,......'> 1 C.
" .
v. .
" 'I
" '
~ I _~ ~ ..
, '
~, .
,- , ?
. ,
p -
"
..- .,." ~
, ,
I
"', t,
., ,
t- _...V"
. ,
" ,
,. \l I... .. :... "':::: ""..t ,: .._
'. ~ 7V,IA ~ND"D,ELiVERY:_ ~ .~
r "") t~... - r- -.: .
! ~ ,.10" _ I . ~ I ~.... ~ r...',
. . C
_.r.--);' ,
~... ?->'"
" '
.)1' I~:" (.,. \ p ;
, ~ ~
, '" _ ,ti' J
l ~.. "\ ~ ,.
,
"
"'".... ..,.t. ,..J
. "
, -1....
""-'" ...,
'd
~,
, '
"..- ) "
~ ~
..." >. ~
I I ~ ..
"'" ~.J ~
i I (
, ,
March \'1.9, 1992, ~,"
.. '..., ..... or ' \ ,../'.. ~ l t
f ,-" I.. >
,
. ''f ,," ~
"
"
"
" - ,~..
. ..:
t
., .
, .
,.
~~
< '~
\'_ ..: ~_ l.
^' .
~ .~ ...
#-./
.; ..._ ~1-'.J- :....) "! ~
, .
1 -v' - .
"
'"
"
, '
'-
I (.. ...
"
'"
, I
'.
'0
, ,
, "
, , '
r.... _ t
"
... I" ~
,~
. .
!'
\'
; ,
., '
'..1...
--
. ~
"
.J
"
"
,
. - ,
f
h
, / ,
.... ..... !..(
Mr. 'Michael ,Wright- ".'" C \: _: ,~
,p'age 2,'"" '" " , '," c ",' _,"
I-\:. ~ ;- r -, ~ 4 I ..~ - I
March ~9,'19~~ "",.' , " ' ",\" 5J "
-: - ...) "'....~, 1" ~ ..." - ...~ I' J ..'-_ ".. ,--,' - ...
. _,~!l c~mparing our:al1;erna't'ive site plan with Parcel II Sc~ematic Site'Plan: 2, ~e ask'J
- that you consider.the'foIlow;ng: \' ' "- ,"', , "
... .,. .. '"','" ~ ~,..,...... \. ~ - . \
'.': , CI. "The '-propose~r' t6ie-r: building ,does not exc~ed '~he: ;l1~wabl~ :-"~ult'{-level
'b~ilding en\relope" d1mensioi1 of 250 feet in thetnorth/ south direction:" Thus,
, the ~,istas 'from Gulf Boulevard will not be r-edliced. In fact'- by "lopping-'
. off" the southwest, C:orner of the "mult'i-level buildingJ envelope", the vistas
'~\ \ '~from 'Gulf Bq;uie~ard' are '~mproved.' You 'will, r also n?>te' that J,there is, no
'reduc~i~n i~ ~he 'v~stas.from,the Cabana ,Club' c~ndominium" our neighbor~,
'lmmed;iately to the" so~ut'h'. . " . ,\ - .' " . _ .
~ '" I, I'" ~ '- _ I ... ; ....-'
r, I... 1"_ ... \." "..' .,f
2.:. The propo;ed~towe~ building wilL have~a footprfnt of 'approximately 19,500
< .,. l--
, square',. feet ,which .is' consloerably less than the maximum allowable "inulti-
<lev~fbuilding'envelope" ~rea of 25,090 square ~eet.: " 'j - [
_I :- :... rl.l, ..~..;"[ "...~ ~~ - ) -," ~
F~rthermore, in~keep~~g with the prov~sions,of Paragraph ~4 'of the.,Settlement
. 'Stipulation,' we call, tq your attenti:on the following 'additional consfdera.tions: .',
_ .. j ~- ' ': + t.. ~.t ~.- -: .. J t:~. .J" ~ . ,'(
. "'r.l ~ -: 'The~e' is no increas~, iri height being proposed by the'alternative site plan.
\""- '>-\ ( ~ : .., '- "'-};I ~ _.. .......... _ ' ;, _ .. .. .. _""" ' ~ \ , .. ~ ~;;t ....... ': j .r .,. ~.. -
. '2: '\~he setba~ks ~~ proposed by~the alternative si~~.pr~n ar~ greateF than or
e'qual to the setbacks :shown on IIParcel II Schematic' Si'te Plan 2". " ,
....~_ ~.. -..2 ..~ \)'" ~.. _ __,~ r /,
\ -{ I ~
~ ! I - ... -' r......
'3.' , There is nQ red'uction of the open area proposed by the alter-native's-ite plan.
, ;:.', .'-' ,", - ,,~;.- ' ,,' :,' .':', -':,' ',I, ~ I,',., ~
. ,.4.. ' 'Tltere is no, incre~se' i..n denSitY proEose~ by the'.al~~rI).ativ~ site pla~.,
,. \.-(" f I"\.... ... '" ... J ,. 1 ~ I..... '- _ -.. ,} ",
'~'Tli~re 'i~"n~ ~educti.on of the' ~idth oJ the vi~~ 'C~r~id?,r, ,pr~p,?sed (~y the
_ altern,ative site'plan: " .' ",' ", '
\ r l' -.. I ..' ~.Jo \ ... , r'
~ ~, ~ ~ ,j ~,."'> \. l,.- :;:l... ~ \ \ ,. .... t'
;:. ~ - - .r~........ "I ~ - = ... C' \ " ... ~ . _ I" .. v.... ... .... ~ ~
I 'We trus.t' that thi's letter' an? enclosed drawings wil1.'p'rovide t~e 'City of Clearwater
'.' with ~he nec~ssary 'in~ormation as described in ,Paragraph, 14' of th~ Se'ttlement.-
, Stipulation sq as 't9 J"allow, the City' to approve ,the altern,ative siJ;e plan 'for the
tower building of tIle, third' phase of Ultimar. We would De ple'ased to meet with Y9u
at your' conveniencl;! to answe'r any questions ,you may have :regarding the sit~ plan or
, ... I ... , ~ ,.
,this 'letter,. , We' look forward,'to hearip.g from, y,ou in this matte,r'. ",', : ",' "
; "-......, _ ~ ...l .... , .... .. >' , S" .~ ~ : .,,A
.. ,..... . _ 1.. ...
, ' Sil}ce,:ely," '.- . ^, ,'J ,. ..,-
" '/!J'
"~(', ':- , . ,
'-'1'.. ... ... ,f
,Ted Cob.b, President' '!c'
, "
" " 'c.~:. . city o'f Clea;~/~ter J ( , '",', ." c', '
, ~' . .' Attn:, ~r. James M>Po];:ad:y, Jr.: Plarining'Jand'De";'e'l~pmE!11i D~re'ct'o:i:-, "
., , ('wi th enclosures) ~ " ' ", 'J " " '~ '-_
:, ,'", . ~~.,:Milton A. G~llb~ait}l, qity,Attot~e~ (witn e~c~os~1S~S')
...\. ,'.,.. I J I (I
l
..
"
, c
~ , '
, ,
,..
~.
, '
, ,
" ,
- 1
I... .....1
" '
J,
,'':
"
"
. f
,"
'.
, '
. '
",'5.
"
'.
'.
'..o'\.
" .
1 '
,,"
.r ,
'.
1 '
"
" ,
-.'.
)
, <
, ,
'--
<,
j J..,i r
"
, '\
." )
'f
, ' J
, .
, ' ,
... :r
. "
, ,
-,
T,
... "'....'\.
"
.... ",..'-\
,}
,
. T .
"
C::t.. -
,.j );".,0:
, .
,
, "'
, <
,
, -'
"
.-
'-,
"
"
'.
t: ^'
- I
.,. ~~
~ ~
:. .
"'.., >\ .
, ,
"
...1't' -
. \
, ,
..
"
1,
"
~,'
'.
"
'" '. ~ r!'"
" '
" ..,
, "
. "
~ -l r ," ....
J
-' \_ r '"l
'f6/dk
1 '
,- ,
"
, y'
,
, ,
...;-
, ,
.'--
" J
~ -.
, ,
/J
Enclosure~
"
....
J,
...-! -'. t
, l -..: f_,."'
-
<. '
~,
.' ,
\ ~ t
. ,
, r
, ^
-"
I '
- ,
, ,
, ,
:::
,.( ,
- r\ ...
'.
"-4
.'.
"
4-1'"...v ..
"
, ,
,.,. <
~'
,,\ - }
I.,....'
'1--,
}...- \ '-
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Sandra E. Glatthorn (SANDY)
Walt
Monday, July 20, 1992 8:53 am
URGENT:CityManager response forUltimar
The Sand Key settlement requires the city Manager to respond
within 15 days from submittal of a site plan to state if it is
substantially in accordance with the stipulation. Please
research the Ultimar file for the last letter for Phase II and
prepare one for Phase III (if they submitted the plan last Monday
that means we need to get Mike Wright to sign the letter this
week). I have a few questions on the plan: What documentation
did we receive verifying the transfer of the 40 units from Parcel
IV? If none, please call Greg Singleton at King Eng. for such
proof and then run it by the City Attorney for his review; there
is a pool and other uses shown in the requisite 70 ft. view
corridor which allows "passive recreation", please check on the
Radisson site Plan to see what was allowed in their view
corridor(s) and also check the court settlement for more
clarification on this.
Thank you.
cc:
Scott
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Sandra E. Glatthorn (SANDY)
WALT
Monday, July 20, 1992 4:43 pm
URGENT:UltimarPhase3 site PlanUPDATE
UPDATE as noted.
I have a few comments after reviewing the site plan:
1. Make sure the site data calculations are for the entire site
including first two phases.
2. Check on uses (pool, etc.) proposed in 70' view corridor
(passive recreation requirement of the settlement). Also, see
what we allowed in the view corridor for the Radisson so that we
can be consistent.
3. UPDATE: We have the documentation--do not call King
Engineering. Get documentation (i.e., from Greg S. at King
Engineering) to be approved by the City Attorney for the 40 units
being transferred from Parcel IV.
4. UPDATE: Check to see if this letter was previously sent by
Ted or Lou. Letter due to developer from CM within 15 days from
7-13-92 site plan submittal as per the court settlement to
indicate substantial compliance (look at previous letters for
Ultimar for format).
5. Check on parking requirement and other requirements of the
court settlement stipulations (in Lou's office).
6. This plan is apparently a modification of Parcel II Schematic
site Plan 2: Do we have a problem with the building envelope
change? Something to be addressed in the CM letter perhaps and
definitely at the DRC meeting.
7. What are they proposing in the 20' required buffer from west
p/l (make sure it is consistent with Phases 1 and 2).
Let me know within the next 2 days (before DRC meeting on
Thursday July 23) what you find out.
Thanks.
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
SCOTT SHUFORD (SCOTT)
WALT, TED
Monday, July 20, 1992 4:48 pm
DRC
JMP ASKS WHO IS HANDLING DRC THURSDAY AND DO WE HAVE THE STD.
COMMENTS READY. PLS. ADVISE HIM.
THANKS. SS
CC: SANDY
li.f, :.
~ /0 -r-
l fr~
-
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Sandra E. Glatthorn (SANDY)
WALT
Monday, July 20, 1992 4:43 pm
URGENT:UltimarPhase3 site PlanUPDATE
UPDATE as noted.
I have a few comments after reviewing the site plan:
1. Make sure the site data calcu~ations are for the entire site
including first two phases. h..A4eer - ~"":;""J ~ {n- ~
~ 1J/II1cv
2. Check on uses (pool, etc.) proposed in 70' view corridor
(passive recreation requirement of the settlement). Also, see
what we allowed in the view corridor for the Radisson so that we
can be consistent. See.-- ;<Idtc:=.. #- t/
3. UPDATE: We have the documentation--do not call King
Engineering. Get documentation (i.e., from Greg S. at King
Engineering) to be approved by the City Ateorney for the 40 units
being 'transferred from Parcel IV.
4. UPDATE: Check to see if this letter was previously sent by
Ted or Lou. Letter due to peveloper from CM within 15 days from
7-13-92 site plan submittal as per the court settlement to
indicate substantial compliance (look at previous letters for
ultiman~or format). See- Ur ~''''''' ~/Jr4f~ ~ t6 F~
~~ ~ -" >
5. Check on parking requirement and other requirements of the
court set~lement stipulations (in Lou's office). O~
I
6. This plan is apparently a modification of Parcel II Schematic
site Plan 2: Do we have a problem with the building envelope
change? Something to be addressed in the CM letter perhaps and
definitely at the DRC meeting. e r1 ~('~ Lf~2/~"2.---
17" ~ /3- /;1,~ ~~~
7. What are they proposing in the 2 ' required buffer from west
pll (make sure it is consistent with Phases 1 and 2).
Let me know within the next 2 days (before DRC meeting on
Thursday July 23) what you find out.
Thanks.
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Sandra E. Glatthorn (SANDY)
Walt
Monday, July 20, 1992 12:59 pm
URGENT:UltimarPhase3 site Plan
I have a few comments after reviewing the site plan:
1. Make sure the site data calculations are for the entire site
including first two phases.
2. Check on uses (pool, etc.) proposed in 70' view corridor
(passive recreation requirement of the settlement). Also, see
what we allowed in the view corridor for the Radisson so that we
can be consistent.
3. Get documentation (i.e., from Greg S. at King Engineering) to
be approved by the City Attorney for the 40 units being
transferred from Parcel IV.
4. Letter due to developer from CM within 15 days from 7-13-92
site plan submittal as per the court settlement to indicate
substantial compliance (look at previous letters for Ultimar for
format).
5. Check on parking requirement and other requirements of the
court settlement stipulations (in Lou's office).
6. This plan is apparently a modification of Parcel II Schematic
site Plan 2: Do we have a problem with the building envelope
change? Something to be addressed in the CM letter perhaps and
definitely at the DRC meeting.
7. What are they proposing in the 20' required buffer from west
pll (make sure it is consistent with Phases 1 and 2).
Let me know within the next 2 days (before DRC meeting on
Thursday July 23) what you find out.
Thanks.
CC: James, Scott
C I T Y 0 FeE A R W ATE R
Interdepartment correspondence
SUBJECT:
James M. Polatty, Jr., Dir~tor
Development I
\ ~..-?
Louis R. Hilton, Planner ~
Ultimar Three - Height Appeal
of Planning and
TO:
FROM:
COPIES:
Scott Shuford, Planning Manager
victor C. Chodora, Building Official
DATE:
October 21, 1992
You directed me on Monday, October 19, 1992, to get with vic
concerning the height issue of the proposed Ultimar Three
condominium development in comparison with the existing height of
the Ultimar Two (248 ft. high) and Ultimar One towers (210 ft.
high) .
vic and I reviewed the building plans for the existing towers in
light of the settlement stipulation. vic' s conclusion on the issue
is similar to yours; the height of Ultimar Two is excessive due to
the developer's desire to construct unnecessarily lofty mechanical
facility rooms atop tower two and proposed tower three.
How did tower Two get a 248 ft. height approved and built when
tower One was approved and built at 210 ft. when the settlement
stipulation restricts the height to 210 ft.? Vic, has determined
that the answer to this question is aesthetic preference.
The Sand Key skyline could be embellished with a more symmetrical
character line if the City held the developer to the stipulated
height of 210 ft.; which would mean, the center tower would be the
highest of the three towers with a height of 248 ft. and the two
other structures located on either side would be approximately 212
ft. in height.
a,r f'P~r ~
.2 20 r r'~~ /1 / ftlln' F/Op--
(j~-IO-9~)
'J.-zo
---II
---
PO'T(~ hp ';5 k~~~)
+6(~~~~
/ ~ fu fup 1 ~-f ~ 11 ~
fwJ-14 If! (
--------- - ~?
?-s 0 I Iu fop 1J ~t- ~~j
J-~J 7s( iD ~p
-- {{
-
--"
2 5 J . r s 50
(3~
~rcJl~'I-~
~ ~
1,1/"1',."
lilt. il ....-
I" c.~1'\ UlTlIlft-_
/'B~C.~~
II ~ ",L.~
~r':; \1, 1"1 c>..
~~ ,,; ... ';.
~iM _L:::\.. .. -~
~r-: 'c:P
\(1"\ - ~ ~
':.~ ~~~
~'''I '"" I~
~-:.j~ f[\\ <("j,11
.........~.;,.....,....~JI/JltJ
C I T Y
OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE R, F LOR I D A 3 4 6 1 8 - 4 7 4 8
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Telephone: (813) 462-6880
July 22, 1992
Mr Ted Cobb, President
Sea Towers ConstructIon Co , Inc.
1310 Gulf Blvd.
Clearwater, FL 34630
Dear Mr. Cobb.
Concerning the question regarding the forty units to be transferred to the Ultlmar III Site,
our records Indicate that this transfer has already occurred
Should you have questions or comments, please contact me
Sincerely.
. 9~
James Polatty. Jr
Director of Planning and Development
JMP/SS/dJs
cc. Lou Hilton, Planner II
Tim Johnson
Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Rupple, & Burns
POBox 1368
Clearwater, FL 34617-1368
TJnhsn1 ss
o
I I 'II II I I II Ii f\ If 1 I III ," V I' ^ ( tin n Fin pin y p r ' ,
.0
(C~~v
./,
C I T Y
o F
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE R. F LOR IDA 3 4 6 1 B - 4 7 4 B
Office 01
City Attorney
(813) 4626760
June 29, 1992
Richard J. Salem, Esquire
Salem, Saxon and Nielsen, P.A.
One Barnett Plaza, suite 3200
101 East Kennedy Boulevard
Post Office Box 3399
Tampa, Florida 33601
Re: Sand Key "Parcel IV;"
Consolidated Bank, Sand Key Property Matters
(Your File No. 012638.01)
Dear Richard:
After our meeting last Wednesday, I found two documents that shed
some light on the mystery of how to allocate the densities between
the northern 10 acres (the bank's subparcel) and the southern 5
acres of Parcel IV.
The first is a copy of a letter from Joe McFate to Ed Armstrong of
Johnson, Blakely, dated January 30, 1987, in which he states that
an assignment of 195 units to the southern subparcel is
permissible, leaving 285 units assigned to the remainder of Parcel
IV (after the transfer of 40 units to Parcel II). He also said
that development of any portion of Parcel IV shall be in
substantial compliance with the settlement stipulation, and the
site plans may be modified without the consent of the city as long
as the developer complies with the limitations for height, density,
setbacks, open area and view corridors.
The other document is entitled, "Calculations supporting Density
Transfer," which I believe to have been prepared by Steve Seibert
in November or December of 1987. This seems to indicate that an
assignment of 40 units to Parcel II took place on January 23, 1987,
and an assignment of 195 units to the southern subparcel took place
on January 31, 1987, leaving 285 units for the northern subparcel
plus units to be transferred from the accreted beach, including the
Sheraton's accreted beach. The handwritten notes in the margins
are mine, but some of them make little sense to me now.
o
"Equal Employment and Affirmative Acllon Employer
;,'
~ ,
Copies of both documents are enclosed. If I had found these during
our meeting, it would have saved us some head-scratching.
Sincerely,
~
M. A. Galbraith, Jr.
city Attorney
MAG: a
Enclosures
copy (w/encl):
~Lou"o/Hi'lton, - Planner II
RECEIVED
JUN 3 0 1992
PLA.NNING & URBAN
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
.
/~.
. .
/ ~ /
'\1W'
jJv
PLANNING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
January 30, 1987
E. D. Armstrong, III, Esquire
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, FL 33516
HE: Sand Key Settlement
Dear Ed:
I understand that your client proposes to subdivide Parcel IV of the Sand Key
property and sell the south five (5) acres thereof with an assigned density of
195 units. I further understand that your client is in the process of
transferring 40 residential dwelling units from Parcel IV to Parcel II and
that you will be recording a Notice of Transfer in the public records and will
be filing a copy with the City Clerk pursuant to the Settlement Stipulation.
Please furnish this office with a copy of that Notice of Transfer for our
files.
Upon the effective transfer of those 40 residential dwelling units, a density
of 480 residential dwelling units will remain allocated to Parcel IV. The
assignment of 195 units to the south five (5) acres of that Parcel is
permissible, leaving 285 units assigned to the remaining of Parcel IV.
Please remind your client that the development of any portion of Parcel IV
shall be in substantial accordance with either the Parcel IV Settlement
Stipulation or Exhibits "0-1" through "0-3" attached to the final Stipulation
Settlement. Your client or its Assignee shall have the right to modify any of
the site plans without the consent of the City provided there is no increase
in height or density, the setbacks are at least equal to those shown, and
there is no reduction in open area or view corridors from the plan being
modified. Any modification of the schematic site plans will require City
approval as provided in Paragraph 14 of the Settlement Stipulation.
Sincerely,
Joseph R. McFate, II
Director
813--462-6880
1M Tlf.,'y ll: 11 '\ 7 r~ 1:,1'
~ Pi}... 1>04 t~ tl li_
JRM/jmm
cc: City Manager Anthony L. Shoemaker!
City Attorney M. A. Galbraith, Jr
FfB
.-..
'"
\ J I
lr'"~f .' ,
~}!. u L ~ ~ t.
.~'
~
./ .
.
1.
2.
3 .
4.
CALCULATIONS SUPPORTING DENSITY TRANSFER
/41-'; (81
~1~
_ p~lt.l \ ~
Settlement Stipulation (10/17/86) - gives entire Parcel
IV (15 acres) right to develop 520 residential dwelling
units (" rdu") . ~ 3'/, ''1 rJ..y~c-
Assignment (1/23/87) - we assiqn~ Parcel II, 40 of
our 520 rdu. ~nave 480 rdu lef~--> I S Sth- 196
. . N, It) A-c.. ZSS-
Ass1gnment (1/31/87) - we ass1gn to southern 5 acres of -
our 15 acres, 195 rdu, leaving us 285 rdu. (480 rdu-195 980
rdu= 285 rdu). ' ~"C",J. -"i! '* P~~( \\1 -
Settlement Stipulation (para raph 13) states "...1.5
hotel units may be constructe in lieu of 1 residential
dwelling unit"... Therefore, 285 rdu x 1.5 = 427.5
hotel units.
:P~e-( ~
5. On July 9, 1987, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed
lower court ruling that upland owners own abutting
accreted beach.
6. Section 135.164 (5) , Ci ty Land Development Code,
permits transfer of development rights from Open
Space/Recreation District property "provided that the
density or intensity of uses, available for transfer
shall not exceed the maximum allowed on the adjoining
property. " The accreted property is designated Open
space/Recreation District.
7.
acres plus the
is zoned "Resort
28 dwelling units
8 .
The "adjoining property" (our 10
existing Sheraton Sand Key property)
Commercial-28 District" which allows
or 42 hotel/motel units per acre.
The acc~eted beach totals approximately 9.6 acres.1
Therefore, 9.6 x 42 hotel units = 403.2 hotel units. )
.k
, \]'1 ~
lA(,"
\ v' Ico\.-
S-~ "-V'\
S~~
r
9.
Our existing development rights of 427.5 hotel units
plus the development rights due to the ggnS.f~
accreted beach (403.2 hotel units) tot~830.7 units.
The developer is planning to build a total of 750 hotel
units with 428 hotel units in the first tower and 322
planned for the second tower. The 750 total hotel
units is less than the 830.7 hotel units that would be-
authorized.
- ~'"'=
10.
tI _ f\ -'L ~~ t(t;- ~'{ ~~.
.:Me" ~f" ~ ~ ~'= ~k. (:y ~~'l
Mso) -tL ~ {;" 1" .,Jut of l'e~.
~ ,JeJ. S"k~ t4.(i{>(l)~{,
~ -/;. JJ:tt~ .sJ..f1J.ct....
Ut' -l;. 'DNR - ~<- ~ ~ /'4.- p-nQ.(( 'We
"lkt ..f 4 ..p t.t&. . ,-' p J.. J..A.c.-.
Nul ~ J; JL...- P6J.....{ ~ t;. ~ f .
SMS:mme
SMS5'121187
\),~~
u · I'f ?
/.- ~c.... ~
~ S'"o - ftO 'f.u....,
oJ: J;. i~" ~D.~
~ ~ ~ ir ~t-
~~.~
,
~,.
'f"
King Engineering Associates, Inc.
24945 us HlglTway 19 North' Clearwater Flonda 34623 . (813) 191-1441 . Fax (813) 191-9228
Engineers
Planners
SCientists
Surveyors
January 22, 1993
Mr JIm Goodloe, FIre Marshall
Clearwater Fire Department
City of Clearwater
610 Franklm Street
Clearwater, FL 34616
Re: Ultlmar Phase 3
Dear Jim:
ThIS letter confIrms that both the engineer and owner for the Ulumar project understand that the
southern fIre lane shown on the Ultimar Phase 3 final site plan IS required to be a minimum of 20
feet wide and be located no closer than 10 feet to the buildmg. The fire lane shown on the fmal
site plan does not meet this criteria in all cases. The final deSIgn of the fire lane will be shown on
the construction plans and will reflect the minimum cntena discussed above.
It IS our understandmg that you wIll approve the fmal site plan for certification upon receIpt of thIS
letter.
Smcerely,
~~
P Gregory Smgleton, P E
Project Manager
e:,
(G:\59\GOODLOE)
ee Lou HIlton, Planmng Dept., Hand DelIvered
Ted Cobb, Key Investment Holdmgs Corp.
Ed Mazur, Kmg Engmeering Associate:" Ine
File 1999-140-000 N347
Citrus
HII/sborough
Pasco
Pinel/as
~
C I T Y
o F
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE R, F LOR I D A 3 4 6 1 8 . 4 7 4 8
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Telephone: (813) 462-6880
September 23, 1992
FOr
~ . {} Ur "
l'II~\f c @ O~ .~ flL~~.J,~;~~lr\t/nv
1 ~o, In
I ; S[P 29i992 .
U L I II
,J; I:
Timothy A. Johnson, Esquire
Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns
PO. Box 1368
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater. FL 34617-1368
-J.......
RE: Proposed U1t1mar Three Condominium Site Plan - View Corridor
Dear Tim.
With regard to the most recent Ultlmar Three site plan proposal dated September 18, 1992, the City
Manager has decided to deny the modificatIOn of the plan with regard to two of the three issues
discussed at our meeting of Fnday, September 18, 1992.
The City Manager IS committed to the limitations of the Court Settlement Stipulation with regard to the
height and the restnctlOn of passive recreational amenities placed on the view corndor which Will restnct
the proposed bUilding to 248 feet In height, and the removal of the In-ground swimming pool from within
the stipulated 70 foot view corndor. ThiS decIsion IS In accordance With the City's Land Development
Code and the Final Judgement of the Circuit Court, October 17, 1986.
As you know, you have the nght to appeal the City Manager's deCISion to the Clearwater City
Commission.
If you should have any questions concerning thiS matter, please contact me at 462-6880.
f\:eIY, '" ..... .
~aQ::p:~
Director of Planning and Development
cc: Michael Wnght, City Manager
M. A. Galbraith, City Attorney
Scott Shuford, Planning Manager
LOUIS R. Hilton, Planner II
Harry Cline, EsqUire
Ted Cobb, PreSident
-
llONI~~G SrenON RBJijE",1 rl
\ CITY OFCLfARWATER
~ OCTOa.,
~,~~'! d'~~~ ~ -
Johnson3.lrh
o
.
~ 'Clearwater City Commission
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Item #
Meeting Date:
~
,
or '
12-17-92
SUBJECT:
Ultimar Three Condominium Appeal, located at 1560 Gulf Boulevard, Sand Key; Sea Towers
Construction Company (owner); Timothy A. Johnson (representative).
(PSP 89-12)
RECOMMENDA TION/MOTION:
Deny the developer's appeal to: (1) increase structure height to 280 ft.; and (2) locate an In-ground pool
swimming pool within the clear view cOrridor.
[] and that the appropriate officIals be authorized to execute same.
First, the developer is proposing to increase the height of the proposed structure to 280 ft., which is 70
ft. above the maximum height allowed by the Settlement Stipulation. The Settlement Stipulation allows
a height of 210ft. However, Exhibit "B" Parcell! Schematic Site Plan, note number 8, states:
- --
"The height of the building structures IS defined as the distance above the flood plain to the
rOOt dec~ or, in the case where sloped roofs are used, to the mid-pOint of the roof slope.
Elevator machine rooms, mechanical rooms, stairs, parapet walls and other necessary
eSlgn elements will be permitted above the maximum heights established herein."
The Ultimar residential development includes three bUildings, of which two have already been
constructed. Ultimar One has a hei h nd Ultimar Two has a height of 252 ft. The Ultlmar
Two tower was bUl t to 252 ft. to accommodate mechanical room rr.AIVAd to be "necessary
/eslgn e ements" when the tower was approved. Staff approved the 252--tl. height for UltlmarTwo
VL.TI~ S'iCft{ pL/.)r/'J -4*-")... ~ 2-lol H~~k-r- It\~jlLUA~
~ortt f?-o.4 W~I-J. ~ L-.D-i:> ~~ ~" r- rr
~).' P'OO\ l--r-
originatil1:J Dept: ~rt\
PlannIng & Develo~' a ~
Costs: S IIA
Total
Reviewed by:
Legal
Budget
Purchasing
Risk Mgmt.
CIS
ACM
Other
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
~
NIA
User Dept:
S 0.00
Current FIscal Yr.
isaion Action:'"") (
Approved ~ ---
[] Approved w/conditions
[] Deni ed
[] Continued to:
Advertised:
Date:
Paper:
III Not Requl red
Affected Parties
[] Notified
IilI Not Requi red
FW1dil1:J Source:
o Capital Iq:!.
[] Operating
[] Other
ApprGpriation Code:
Attact.!nts:
- Denial Letter - Polatty for
City Manager
. Appeal Letter - Johnson
- Cline Letter
- ElevatIon DraWIngs -
Ultlmar Two
[] None
.
o pr nted on recycled paper
,
-.
+
C.C. 12/17/92 t
PSP 89-12
Page 2 f
since the usable floor space was below the 210ft. limit as shown on the attached drawings, and only
machinery, parapet walls and similar features extended above 210ft., in accordance with note 8 above.
Note that the attached letter from James M. Polatty, Jr., Director of Planning and Development, to the
applicant's representative contains a statement that the allowable height for the Ultlmar Three project
is 248 ft. This height limit was based on a staff estimate of the Ultimar Two building height that further
research has determined to be in error; the (building is actually 252 ft. tall. Staff feels that if the Ultlmar
Three building is constructed to the same height as the Ultimar Two building, it will be sufficiently tall
to accommodate any likely mechanical equipment and other necessary design elements.
The Sand Key skyline is an important characteristic of Clearwater, and should reflect the best planning
and architectural practices possible for the long term benefit of the citizens and visitors of Clearwater.
The applicant has presented no "hardship" as to why the building should be 280 ft. high rather than 252
ft. like the Ultimar Two structure. The design elements associated with this extra height appear to be
simply aesthetic in nature and are not related to mechanical requirements.
Second, the developer of Ultimar Three residential condominium development IS proposing to Include an
in-ground swimming pool within the clear view cOrridor. The Settlement Stipulation does not allow
active recreation uses in the clear view corridor. Exhibit "8" Parcell! of the Schematic Site Plan, note
number 4. states:
"The view corridors through the site will exclude all structures, walls, fences and parking,
but will allow passive recreational amenities, landscaping, pedestrian walkways, drtveways
and emergency vehicle access ways."
The applicant has presented no "hardship" as to why the swimming pool must be located in the clear
. view corridor.
6 I
letter of opposition has been submitted by the representative of the Harbor Condominium located
.!;l' cross from the proposed tower. The letter states that It is also an appeal of any decision by staff to
'J Jauthprize a bUilding height in excess,of 210ft. ·
1 J' .
. . ...
"
,
'I
C I T Y
/
o F
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE R, F LOR IDA 3 4 6 1 B . 4 7 4 8
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Telephone: (813) 462-6880
September 23, 1992
Timothy A. Johnson, Esquire
Johnson, Blakely. Pope. Bokor. Ruppel & Burns
P.O. Box 1368
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, FL 34617-136-B
---' ......
RE: Proposed U1t1mar Three Condominium Site Plan - View Corridor
Dear TIm:
With regard to the most recent Ultlmar Three site plan proposal dated September 18, 1992, the City
Manager has decIded to deny the modification of the plan with regard to two of the three issues
discussed at our meeting of Fnday, September 18, 1992.
The City Manager is committed to the limitations of the Court Settlement Stipulation with regard to the
height and the restnctlon of passIVe recreational amenities placed on the vIew cOrridor which will restrict
the proposed buildIng to 248 feet In height. and the removal of the In-ground swimming pool from within
the stipulated 70 foot view COrridor. This deCISion IS In accordance With the City's Land Development
Code and the Final Judgement of the Circuit Court, October 17, 1986.
As you know, you have the right to appeal the City Manager's deCISion to the Clearwater City
Commission.
If you should have any questions concerning thiS matter, please contact me at 462-6880.
f\:eIY, r-. ^
~aQ:; p:$
Director of Planning and Development
cc: Michael Wright, City Manager
M. A. Galbraith, City Attorney
Scott Shuford, Planning Manager
LoUIS R. Hilton, Planner II
Harry Cline, EsqUire
Ted Cobb, PreSident
JOhnson3.1rh
-
ZONlr!G SECnON REVIH'J
ellY OF ClEARWATER
OCT 08_
t Reviewed By
;-
~ .... ...
.b.
o
~
r
.'
.
JOHNSON. BLAKELY. POPE. BOKOR. RUPPEL & BURNS. R A.
I
~
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
/
E D ARMSTRONG IU
BARBARA A BACCARI
BRUCE W BARNES
JOHN T ElLAKEL Y
BRUCE H BOKOR
GUY M BURNS
MICHAEL T CRONIN
EUZABETH J DANIELS
USA B DODGE
BRIAN BEVANS
""AHION HALE
REBECCA HENSON HUDOBA
SCOTT C ILGENFRITZ
FRANK R JAKES
TIMOTHV A JOHNSON, JR
SHARON E KRICK
JOHN R LAWSON
JAMES G LEWIS
MICHAEL G UTTLE
MARIA MAISTREWS
MICHAEL C MARKHAM
DANIEL L MOODY
DAVID J OTTINGER
F WALLACE POPE JR
DARRYL R RICHARDS
DENNIS G RUPPEL.
CHARLES A SAMARKOS
JOHN A SCHAEFER
BETHANN SCHARRER
PHIUP M SHASTEEN
CHARLES M T A TELBAUM
GlEE A TRIPlETT
JOAN M VECCHIOU
MICHAEL T WIWAMS
ANTHONY P ZINGE
. OF COUNSEL
PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER
I
FILE NO
September 30, 1992
30874.83474
D rr~. (f"'),-," r-.-.
}1 J'. t. I I) \ (), -'r-..
;~ \j '""\'.~~' ~Ii
~ P,
\l .:;o.~
.".
Mr. Michael Wright
City Manager
City of Clearwater
P.o. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida
or: r ~~
34618-4748
Pili ",,/
r, I r.1('
I a. 'J t '-J J
DEPART!.'lENT
Re: U1timar III
Dear Mike:
I I hereby request that the issues of the swimming pool
construction and height of U1timar III be submitted to the City
Commission for its review at its meeting on" October 16, 1992.
This reque~t is without prejudice to any rights enjoyed by this
project under the Settlement Stipulation but, rather, is made in
an effort to resolve this matter without returning to court.
ruly yours,
~
Imothy A. Johnson, Jr.
TAJ /lm
9l1/TAJ/30874LELl
?3474
cc: Mr. Ted Cobb
Mr. James Po1atty
"
CLl!ARWA TP CW~1CIl
811 CHESTNUT STRUT
POST OFFICE BOX IHI
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 34617.1368
TELEPHONE ClI'3I461 111'11
TELECOPIER 11I131441-8011
TAMPA OFACE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 1100
TAMPA FLORIDA 33601-1100
TELEPHONE 18131 225-2500
TELECOPIER (8131 2237118
J
;t
LAW OFFICES
MCMULLEN. EVERETT, LOGAN, MARQUARDT & CLINE, P A.
F'IRST NATIONAL BANK BUILOING
~OO CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER, F'LORIDA 34615
POBOX 1669
.JOHN TWIID MSMULLEN
F'RANK C LOGAN
EMIL C MAAOUAADT, JA
HA~AY S CLINE
.J PAUL AAYMOND
.JAMES A MAATIN. JA
STEPHEN 0 COLE
MAAGOT PEOUIGNOT
R NATHAN HIGHTOWEA
THOMAS C HAIH. II
NANCY S. PAlKO"
MAAII L. DIMAACO
T SHIA GILLS
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 34617
(813) 441-8966
FAX (813) 442-8470
OF COUNSEL
.JOE S EVERETT
WILLIAM E NOOINE
I
I'
PALM HARBOR OFFICE
(BI31785-4402
33920 HWY 19 NORTH
SUITE 150
PALM HARBOR, FL 34684
November 25, 1992
Mr. Michael Wright, City Manager
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618
I
I,
I
I
ReI Ultimar, Phase III/pending site plan approvals
~ear Mr. Wright:
As the City files will reflect, we represent owners in the
Harbor Condominium located essentially across the street from the
proposed development. Our client's position is that the Settle-
ment Agreement reached by the City and the land owners, after
protracted litigation, should not be modified to allow increased
height or construction within the view corridor.
i -
I
Mr. Polatty has indicated by letter dated September 23~ 1992,
that the City is inclined to approve a building at a proposed
height of 248'. The Settlement Agreement specifically provides
for buildings with "a maximum of ... 210 feet in height." The
agr~ement further provides that the:
"height of the building structures is defined as the
distance above the flood plain to the roof deck or, in
the case where sloped roofs are used, to the mid-point
of the roof slope. Elevator machine rooms, mechanical
rooms, stairs, parapet walls and other necessary design
elements will be permitted above the maximum heiqhts
established herein." [Emphasis added]
j
I,
I'
I
I
Our clients do not believe that any height should be approved
in excess of 210', plus the necessary design elements.
In the first instance, the land owner has under the Settle-
ment Agreement the right to propose to modify any of the
, "schematic site plans" subj ect to your approval. We do not
believe that this envisions increasing the specific limitation as
to maximum height. The height limitation is contained within the
text of the site plan, and is not part of the "schematic site
plan".' As in the case of a proposal to put a swimming pool or
I
"
I'
I'
,
I
I
.
November 25, 1992
Page Two
i
I-
I
,
I
other active recreational facilities in the view corridor, we
submit that this is not a matter that can be varied or altered
since these are limitations imposed by the text and not by the
"schematic site plan".
In the 'second instance, it is our understanding that the
basis for this request is architectural in nature, re1Y.tng on
aesthetics. We view this request in the nature of a variance
request, and aesthetics are not proper to vary a Code limitation,
and should not be authorized to vary this Settlement Agreement
and its limitations. If aesthetics are an overriding concern for
the property owner, then the building can be redesigned wi thin
the mandated building envelope of 210' in height.
Accordingly, on behalf of our clients, and consistent with
prior correspondence to the Planning Department, our clients
object to any expansion regarding height over and above the
agreement, and object to the inclusion within the view corridor
of anything other than passive items as defined in the agreement.
It is our understanding that this matter is now calendared for I
hearing on December 17th before the City Commission as a result!,
of an appeal by the land owner to apparently seek to place the
pool within the view corridor and to seek even more height.
Please accept this letter on behalf of our clients as an
appeal as well, since we seek review of any approval granted in
excess of 210' on the building itself, which apparently has been
internally approved. In the event the matter is to be heard on a
different date, please advise since we wish to appear on behalf
of our client.
I
HSC:koh
cc: Mayor Rita Garvey
Commissioner Art Deegan
Commissioner Susan Berfield
Commissioner Richard Fitzgerald
M.A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney
Commissioner Charles E. Raney
Commissioner Bruce Tyndall
Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd
Commissioner Steve Seibert
Commissioner Sally Parks
Timothy A. Johnson, Esq.
Harbor Condo (Attn: Mr.jNorman Olson)
Sincerely yours"
H~7:!me~~
i I
I
,I
, ,
.-
, ,
I .
"
"1,
J,
... '~'" '". I
----
"
"l,-
rt I
r
_od! ____.lL __
~----------------------- ~---~ ]-- ~ -- -- ------- - "'--- -- .~
I lH I ==--=j~ I , l"-
I I
I JJ IJd - I
I II lH I
I I I
JJ IJd '='-------1 I
lH ] I
I I
bId 8 I!i;- -------~ I
I
I I
~ -------~ I
1I I
I
____a_a' I
a I
I I
), ~ 1--------, I
aD rT I
I I
-------~ I
a I
I I
u0ll1l'l -------~ I
I
I I
] -------1 I
a I
I I
~ r------.. I
a I 209'-0"
I I
[f~- ~------- I
I
I
~-------, I
1I I
I I I I
I ] r------.- I
I 1I I
I I I
I ] ~------_. I
I II I
I I I
] ,aD r-------- I
I
I I
bId Ii"'. I--------~ I
I
I I I
] 1I "'- r------.- I
I
I ~ I
~~ ------.- I
tI I
.A -------~ I
I
Y .em lE I
I I I
I _______J I
I II ~ r-------, I
0[ 111\ \~I I I I
[] I I I
I I I
'\ I
------'------------- II~ -- .- -------- -- ---I _L-_~~ -
~
PHASE TWO
SECTION
. ';1 ,",!11::-1'_n"
TOP ROOF
L FLOOD PLAIN
@ el, 11.00'
--------------
I 1
I rTf-ffi ~-- f-- -~t83--h-,
I Tl 83 r:lllt: T 83 I I I
I
I I I I 83 r:ll EBllHBImllm I ~ 1 83 I 1 I
I II I 83 i=r lEt I'" '83 rTl
: I I I 83 H ,... I 83 nl
I n 83 :l:1I ' W I 83 nl
I IT EEm ~ I~II 83 nl
I rn 83 tr 1+l1H+H HfHIf+ I ~ i 1 83 nl
: I I I EE cr -l 1+l11+l+l1-H-H1f+ I I'" I 83 nl
I I I I 831 -l p:mu+:n~..HII!+ I'" 1 83 rTT
I I I I EE [I SmfrnJ:tHlIFR I'" 1 83 I I I
I 11 1 EE:r mlltttH+mlR1 a.. I EE rTT
: I I EE I -l ~11+I+l1+HHH1 I'" I EE rTT
I I I EE -l i p::.m.j.++-l R1+l1Ff: I'" I EB IIi
I I I I EE II f-ll 1...11 EB rn
I I I I EB Fi ,... I EB m
I
I I I I EE Ff I'" 183m
I I I I EB H I'" I 83 I I I
I ,ill mil-! \1..183 III '
I I~..H :'
I 1fT _~ ~_"J. _ '-'-_ ' I,k-U EE nl~ I I ~
I : I I I : ~
I II'! Ill~ wTIliil ro I I
1_______ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ L_ _________ _____ ___ ---1-
-CD-
I. II
PLAZA-LEVEL
ELEV 17.0'
I
I
______~--- _____'-V ___
PHASE TWO
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MUL T1 -LEVEL
BLDG. ENVELOPE
[140'x240'x210(H) eo.]
r
I
~
I
I
I
,
,
I
I'
I
I
I
It
I~
I,
I ~;
I ,
1 I
I :
I
I
EASrl'
ElJE\7 _~ TI 0 N
i/40H=1' 2/1
"",
...
TV\; 2628 ,
_~L
) -
0 -\"--
I
iD CEItAENT PLASTER FlNISH
,
------- ---
0 RU"LECTED LINE OF C(
I SUPERSTRUCTURE BLDG TOWER
"
REF DRWGS A9-1, SUPERSTRUCTURE I
A9-2, A9-J. A9-4 UNENCLOSED SPACE
TP EL 2498 . ,-1 ---__1__
---
I I
I
I
. I
10
I I
in
I
I FINISHED ROOF" SURF AdE
EL 24117' I
'~
~
I
~
EL 229 33'
MACHINE ROC
.
~
I
'"
I
ROOF STRUC
EL 220 00'
.
~
I
'"
?. 01
~
:.
'.
"':1-- ~ ...\1l- _....~_
.c
./>
,-
\~
"
,- ") ~( 1_' l.-
I "",'"
~ '
C J ~ . t
". _' ,_ ,..'1':
r ~
"IiI,c ':
. :.. ~
.......... ~ .f
- 'I '
1 ",I- (\. ...... ,,-"1
"
" ';..rJ
.;-
" - <
,
, ,
~-
'1- - t ~ ....
~
,
'.
I ~ ,\
, ~
"
, -!
, '
'-
"
',,"'- J
>,
1 'r. ~ ,
~;' ( 0:.
"
_ t
. '
~ . I
~... t:- '" , ""./' "..
" -
,r,_
I.
~
,-'
- ), . .' ,"
" ,
,_ ; ..1 )'~ Sea.Towers';-
, -;': ;-; COI).structlOn Co~p~ny, ~~
_ ~~ (i \- w"-
of t .,J ~ - .. \ _ _. -I~ d i ]'
- - " ,.4-. r ~ '-, .r{' ""
.. (' ... _....... .... "'r I
~ \'''.- \..;.. i'"
'-
~,
" '
~'
"
.>
_ ~ , , ~ r~ ~ '~~
'/.~' ~\-flf~O';:, r;' (/~=;s r; VJ~F~~-
, {, ,-:-< "-'" I . \~j
_ i t Ilr.:-'----~';;:"2;M.;-t~I~j
~ j, ri~~;j* ~-_ ~ . f
': .c,.ll~[APR2' ~ :992 \. ~ ,."
.~; .' ' L};~ '~~~~l"~ ':'
I' .... -" ....... \.J_",--:_~~ ,J ~~;!.. :_:.J.:
, ,
, "
>,.;"
, .
" -
\ w\ .... ~
--;. "" .... _')!j, -~.... " - ... 'I ~ .. ... oy-.... _" !
(_ \ "__ ........... ~"\~ \ r~. :.i: 'I~ _^'.; .. ) =}...
VIA HAND DELIV~RY~, .-:. :" ~ .
.....,. " r. -' 1 ....,! ""-,t .: I ~ ......
~ -~ / "......)
"' 1 ?t:~ i, 1_,'" \~""~ ~~ 1'_\~I'~ /~~~ ~ ~ >1;; ~L
J , r t~ _ t }: >, J - .. j ":. '~ ~
,. "J :, f, - '.' , , 'l-'~' ~'-~:- ,~:...,:;,:" \~
, .... I "1 \ ~ .... ~
f__ ~ l' "', -{ .. ~
/' f) ..... L.""" \ -,,"
, ' -
~ < .:t ....t.,. <;.
"- ~ .. .. '.. ('
-~',\c; .:.: ^' -,;" o'RlCE"V ED .
c
-
, .. J ... _ ....,
~ -
~J-:; ;/
- \
, -
... 'J -....:r,-
...... r-:"
~.... ~
.. \ '..
> '
, "
"
It "'\
-^
- -'
" .
"
I'
~.. I:" ~..\
\ '.
'- '
'"
i
, .
, .
p .
~ ~;
"
o _'
."
"
:
- ,.
" '
_......~
, '
,-
, \
.t 1o.."l
; '{c... (
'-,
,
. I,
:. .. ,~
J
I,'
1:.,.... '\
,," .....,.<; c. )>
.. :... I ~ - ~ 1 "'-j ~",:: " i
" '
/ J<l..
. J '
"
[ ,
/
"
r '
-
.....1\.
~
, ,
F-_
q'
,I ..}... I'.,.
'.r ~.. -. ; 1
1
,
"
-:.....,
'" ,
"
"
, '
-,
"
, ,
, ^'
I ~-
, \
;
,
"
"'-,
,)
Ci
"
~
-', ~
;- ..(,
~
. r
1; ) ,
.:
. .... l~ ...
'_Mr. Michael Wright
City of Clea~ate;
April 23" 1992' "
Page 2 '~
" -
, ,
-.,
, -,
"
. ,
'-
"
;'
< ,
"
r ,
L
, ,
':<'
"
, '
"'\ _ v-' ~.. ~ -" ,,'" __
Aga~n, ;w~ th-~~k)::hE!' ~ity - for ,its '~-ooperatio1} imd 'a~,sist'ance' fn prqcess:l,n(our p,~ans ~
f6rUlt'imar'Three,." " "--' ',,'~','
! /, .:-
"
::'
, '
, .
~ "
f
?incer~ln
':i/~
-"
.;.....-
.'
r
f
I r..).
,r-
"
Ted Cobb" Presidenf~,
r
TC I dk.
''\
.4~") ~ J
{-
Enclosures
.r(.. "
. cc :. r
, '
"
"
, ,
_J.~
, !
, -
"
-:
"
City olf Cleirwater~ \
I 'f ~
Attn: MF: James M. Polatty, Jr.,
(with 'enc13sures )" " ,
Mr.. Milton A. Galb~aith,
- ,M~., CY1}diei GO,udeau, ~City
, ,
;-, "
~
-;:t ...-"
,.'
J
., ,
, -
.'
"-Jl,.;
...-~ ")
-,
"
>
"
,;
t' .....
'-
T.... ~ ).~ ~
-' ,
?
( ) ;-
'- -
, ,
,
,
, .
v
_ ~(- r
/ ,
''--
"
;...... ...
~;..,/ "I,...
<'
, ; .
'" (
J ,
.
. '
,:
"
"".~..
"
;.
'.
- ,
,
,J
" "
"
-
';
.' ,
'J
'"
"
I .
-,
fl (....
I'
."
"-
"
-'
,:
I,
I'
_ 't
..J ....r
",
.,
, \ ,
"
{
"
'.
"
. ,
~r"
"
-'
. , ,
,.-
.',
'{ ;,..
"
\
"-
"
'"
, ,-
,
_J
.. ~-;;.
>-
n'
.:
-, ,
A,
.
, ~
"
, '
" ,
Planning' 'and Development
'" t... \
"
}
"
l'
- ,\
Director-
"
~ity Attorn~y -(witl(enclosures)
clerkl (with encl"osu~e'~), r, '
-;
. )
"
, -'
.7'-,,-
"
, .
-:"
l:
~',
, I
"
" -
,
,(.,\. ,
:
,~
"
-
,\
:-
~
I.
JI
~
" -
-,
, ,
";..'
':;,....,...
.(..... ~ ~ "J. "-
\' ,
" f
':.
;:-
r .
< .
, ,~
_, t," ,,-,'''l.,':; 1
, "
"
'.
......\t
"
,~
,/
-.
,.,
"
,'-
, :,..
- ,
....l' ...
:~_ Ie 1,
c,
,
" ,
"
/1. ;7-:
,'- -\,';
~.
, ,
, '
",
, ,
" '
'-
..~
,.... ~ '"
~ . .... '- ~
"
71..
-r
, "
,-.
... -~-" 1\:')"'-
, "
..... t ~" ,
-"
"
- " '
; ,
l
~ '
--
"' ,
"
, ~
-.
'..'"
"
~
, --
"
Co
"
," '"--
J.,.,.....-
1 '
~>
: ,",..
"-
-'
'''-..
" '
"
-_, I
- '
^
'.
, -
'7
:
"
, ,
,
,
, '
.;
.'
-;:
\. "'lr
/"
) ,
~ ...J
, '
/
. J
"
, "
-'
-'
"
r
, \
'("") ~
,-
".
~ '
','
, ,-
,-
, '
'-
,-'~. ~...,
l=F'R-03-1992 15:32 FROM
-lTY OF a...w. EN:i ll'EER 1 N:i 10
95958928
..- -... .
FAX MESSAGE
,
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGlNEERING
SENDING LOCATIOn FAX NUMBER: (813) q62-6641
OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: (813) 462-6970
TO:' W'\R~~
LOCATION:nT\~ :TII:
FAX NUMBER: -s,<1t?- S92,e
FROM: Lo<.-\ Utt-""TlI,J
DATE: APe.IL- ? 1112-
I
MESSAGE:
NUMBER OF PAGES THIS MESSAGE (INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE)
P.01
~
,...~"
FflR-eJ3-1992 lS:33 FROM CITY OF a.W. EN":i1!'EERIN:i TO
9S9S8928
P.02
C I '1' y 0 p
Interde
TO:
Michael wright, city Manage
RCK:
James M. Po latty, Jr., Di
Development
VJ:A:
stJD3ECT:
Kathy Rioe, oeputy city
Ultimar Three - Request for approval of alternativQ
site plan for the tower builClina tootDrint onlY
pursuant to settlement stl.pulation dated October
17, 1986
Scott Shuford, Planning Manager; File
COPXES:
DATE I
March 25, 1992
The Ultimar project is being developed in accordance with the
Exhibit "B", Parcel II Schematic, Site Plan 2 pursuant to the
settlement stipulated dated Ootober 17, 1986 (Circuit Civil No. 78-
4765-7). This schematic presents the building envelope for Ultimar
XII as a rectangle measuring 100 ft. x 250 ft. x 210 ft.
The applicant is requesting the city Manaqer' s approval of an
alternative site plan for the building footprint or u1timar three.
The proposed change incorporates a unique "u" shaped buildinq
design that increases the building setback from Gulf Blvd. on the
north end of the structure and eliml.nates part of the building
envelope on the south end of the structure. The overall building
footprint is deoreased from the allowed 25,000 square feet to the
proposed 1~,500 square feet.
After careful review of this proposed change to the Ultimar Three
building footprint, the Planninq Departntent has determined the
proposed change to the building fOQtnrint only. to be acceptable.
However, it should be understood that this does not satisfy the
requirement of Paragraph 11 restricting the development to 360
residential units with the eligibility to transfer 40 residential
units from Parcel IV. The overall development does, in fact,
propose to develop the maximum 400 residential units. Therefore,
~e developer shall be required to record an appropriate notice of
transfer in the Publio Reoords of Pine lIas County and filing a copy
thereof with the City Clerk's Office.
~
APPROVED
~/1902)
[I
DISAPPROVED
DATB:
03mem3.tc
TOTFL P. 02
.,
, .
.
(
~.
.
...
...
~
..,
~
III
"'l:J
...
..
o
rI
:,..
M .
.....
.
M..
"2
..,
o.
....
..u
, . .,
.. ,.. ",. \,', '-......::- '.
_' I , ." :.';..,""t,- -_
. .~...~\: .~,}'fi." LtJ:.. :.
~.., io~~.
~~4r,.",,~. _~...f.:';' , {,,~,
, ..' '\ ' t"".
. .
'.
. ,
by
I
I
above shall ))e
Thi. A8.1gnm.n~ i. given in accordance vi~ para~apb 11 ot
the S.t~l..en~ S~lpulation in uni~ed states st..l corpor~tion v..
City of Clearwater, circuit c1vil NO. 78-41155-1, Pin.lla. county,
Florida.
'IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Asslqnor haa .xeouted th1. Assignment ..
of the day and y..~ tlrat written above.
lfI'l'NESSES I
SAND KEY INVESTMENT PROGRAM I,
LTD., a Florida limited
partnership
BYI S II: UND CORP.
By:
~~
lca-ttrea1den t
Its Ganeral Rartner
STAT!: or
co(J!f"fi OF
)
)
:4 2H:6V71 70
40
lOTt\L
1. 02..187
13 09
13.99 OfK
Florida
f1nellu
'1'he toregoing inst:t'UD1ent WDS Dcknowledged bet01:"e me this
-.llI4day _O~_u_J~n~ry , _ _19_8'_, __b~_ R~be_r_t_a H. ;)C!_~nh ,.a Gener~~
't,t~t\: Ill" '''-Partner-or. SAND
p~rtn.rllhip, on
r'( XrJESTHBNT PROGRAK I, LTD., a FLorida 111u~ecl
alt of said partnership.
~ ,-.-..... .-.
. ~.~ : cj: ..
110 ar Publ c ,.' .~
- .
JU;40.2-1203G
My commission OXpir4UJ:... i\ i
, .,...~ lit
llOt&n "m.c surf DI HeAlD(
II' CO.-U'101 U,. tOW ..~n"
10"111 l"'" ,t 'Ull lIS.. u.~ .
........,.. \
.-
..
~..A.
.... .
.
.
. ~., I
.
. .
., . .
'l
~". ..._--.,.... .. -
~___ . 4_...... I
rr ._--.-."'-'-__- .,.
. .
..
t . .' ,..tl ." l!". ,'. . .., -
. . ~~., ~' ~...j.~$!jr',l1~'~.t~..; '~'il.i,,\,t\i..'J\..H'l'-'~'~' :~
~ .,..' ~-~~~/.':J.i~::.f..:.~l1ft'3'/.'.\ ~
.~,~ ,;~.: ~J . . .,~ to ,~I\':~..&T-1t ~~'~A~'(~~,f;~''(; - ,.
''1~~''~{'~' _~..~. "f'ijl..:s.~~''''I' \.~w.!~'1~
:,.~}'&J.~ l."~~" .', t& :di. a '.t8t.li{iiji' ,
~~~.:":~~1Jl4,d.!s..~-t~~~.I~~" :\~...Jo'>-\ "tli'~'~~f'~l_"'~~~~' ~
~":f.li"CIt;'1IJ''! '~rY..s-'" ~'r_,.fN....w,.'~, S:'- ..f i::--~ '"lJ(;:>'J. 0<:.'\."(./..--:1... .~/,~,\,! ' ,
~~. "\o"if~'I'." ,'l,;,'1.&-tir~:_~': ~i,."Jr..II~' I .'j"'.. '~t"i,{!f'""" ".' ....tl~.~ I...:.a...... + ~~
......... ." .~ ..,.....,.... ..,~"'~-. ~'Iw "'1-1.; -,' ..:,.... ~ I . ....Jo.f .:1' ~:l~ · ...,::,~ ~I~':
J ,'.. N~../,:~.:. '.~,,~ 7ti3; 'M,~~;,,";.:'~~""""i:~,t:,:'\t.~::::,t:~{".I.M,,~.~t.:" j',
_' . ~r.:.:"'t. A'~ ,.J~JI ~i"ta~'f.''r'.1l' . 't',I" .,.... t '.\iJ\",ItIo'~\''''l.._~{f,''lf-' ~;" '" I
. ';i i~~\J.{:{':i!l~1J;:~;I~,~j:~;~',;:l':~'~':~:, ~I:;~\>; :t~'~:\1:'" ~l'l\$~~'~~~r~.
~.~ ~ ~!i " oJ..... ._, "'. f.' ..' ." , O. " . . J 'l-T.."!j.: {f,'l"
~~~\oJl\':I"''' !:t ~ :..... .......,. :.;r.I., '. ..... ..r., '. . ~ ;.. . . " .f .'... ;.,.'1
,. :;W-l.'4 .... .... " ,'. .' ." "'1 -." . '.' '. .'; ,.~'.. ':.'
, ~_' Alr'!f. 't~.:' ... t~'''~' .(.' . '., .,. ,.....:.. ,. ::1... \:'~:f..:
" _ T :,..:""." I.,......~....t.... . ~:.(.~ .,\, ':..... .' ,'.l!'/~O((IWlI.;
. I' P. "'~.. . .' ." . ~ .. - ,. .' '. . ' .. " .' . ". .J,... .
~ .'!tl. :I'.'.:";:~:~' . ';.."" .'r "". \ .. . ,..' . '. .' " .... .. :,,....rr..:
,,'"li .._~~,' ~..., '-, .' ....' " ....' (.... . .~ . . ..'
:,~:~''-r~.1:''.':'. :. ~ ... ,:.,,';',':0''0: .... ,". :.. .' ..' ~.,~ ' '.. .'. .'~ ';1:....:..-
~ ....:;.'" SiCs ...." ",.. T_'''' I' " _. ".... ...~. 1\ Eo..; -1'...1 h. . ,.. . :.', ~I .}\.~~~
. . ~ rlo, !~;~ ""~II' ...., a . ...', I,,,'.a,~:,. ~..., 11001 'aa. I. n.....:. ,:" .'.'. . ':: \~'1..: 1~'1-!'"
f ;t.,..~.:L~I~L'f" ,,:(0. ,. . . .' .. .., '.; . \ .1. ~":' .,'r 'I' .' " .:~, . .' .,. ~ , ". ,..l,,:
, . -...V."""l" A.' .... . - ., .... .... . ", ......,.:.~...
, C' ii c ,~""':...., _.. . eo"" ., ~.. s.., I... ,,:,' "...... II. . .,.OG' ~ v., " ;~;~::';i"
*)~\II!D:Y~i,'al""'. s _: l'ea'" u.. .r 00" s.. .... .0 a ro.as ...IIo ':" . . ". .t', ,;', ','. .
1I.....1:r! ..C.....,-..., 11.. . r r..l' \IOU Iowa.' U 00' UII, O. a. 1"'. 1&.... "1 ' '~~
U)Oat)) I: s...... .1..... .... _to, I, , Ic'" -. r -, lSoa II. ')l 05l'2~ E.. · - ," ,,'
S)!)l: ,.ft to c1\. toSftt ftr Ik.tl"" Ins:: t't.nt. "- .9004 '0'" .II. - 38).00
If..ci;:.'. or 1... ,. . ,..Int on the _caft hi,.. Vlur Un. of 'b. c..U
~QJ'fti,s.':'a'I' ,.,~. "..~I..II~' ,.r..,.. '0 aa ,.lac MAM r.. ...-
",4tft'Sllac., "lheM~ fro- th.. t..lnl. or "r&lnoltlr. ,,,,, al"n~ I.hu .rouaoat S.-cd
~~titorl, r1Ihl.-or-~., l'~~ at f~lr aoul...'. the fo)l~lnl r~r'.. an'
;/~u"." II. ".S"20" E.. ')0).;) r.,et to D polltt or cun.: thonee ICon....
~~~.~~r1, .1anl adel eta"O ",leh a ,,,'luI of 18~9.'6 'eu tl,r~u&b a cen"
~~,!.~ cral 1"118 of O'oOlt.I.l,". .ft art dlaunce .1 :196.'0 fctJ (C.I.
~\ :~.. 2102"'30" L. 29",.99 hrtl& ~henc. N..2:D~O')9" E., ')08.80 teet;
;:.,... tb.ncI teaySnl ..14 \luU1'11 rh;hC-ot-v:.1 1 inl. M. 6'0'0'-21.' \I.. )U
":~..,, lut. _U OT leu to the ...:tft bl~h woLul' \ be or f.ul( of "cuelCD;
cbtnce South~..tcrl1 alon, .~S4 .03" b'R~ vatet lln. aft' btndln&
tMfevJl.h.to the ~ror..."n\ lna,,",' r.,ln\ "I.".
'.
........ -J
{ .
i
I
I
,
I
,.
\
.
~
'I
i
~-- .. t
I
.~
\-
~. ...
4"
,~
',--
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Ream Wilson
Bob Maran
James E. Goodloe
Don Meerians
Ted Clarke
Walt McAleer
Mike Quillen
OTHERS PRESENT:
Doreen Feldhaus
Gregg Singleton
Ted Cobb
Roberta Kaplan
Tim Johnson
UNOFFICIAL
MINUTES
DEVElOPMENT REVIEW COMMITIEE
City of Clearwater, Florida
July 23, 1992
_ Assist Director, Parks and Recreation; Acting ChaIrman
- Representing Public Works Department/Engineering
- Representing Fire Department
- Representing TraffiC Engineering Department
- Representing Planning and Development Department
_ Representing Planning and Development Department
- Representing Public Works/Environmental
- Recording Secretary
- KEA
- Key Investment Holdings
- Key Investment Holdings
- Johnson, Blakely
(Item #1)
(Item #1)
(Item #1)
(Item #1)
The meeting was called to order at 9 05 a m. by Acting Chairman Wilson in DRC Conference Room
. "A".
Minutes of DRC Meeting June 25, 1992 were approved (motion by James Goodloe, seconded by Bob
Maran) .
ITEM #1 UL TIMAR PHASE III, (a residential condominium project), located at 1520 Gulf Blvd. on
Sand Key (PSP 89-12)
Pertinent comments from the Department representatives are incorporated into the motion listed below.
MOTION' Motion was made by Ted Clarke, and seconded by Bob Maran, to approve the amendment
to the certified site plan for Ultlmar Phase III subject to the following condItions.
1. Signs and fenCing/wails are subject to separate review and permitting processes.
2 The requisite bUilding permits must be procured Within one (1) year from the date of
certificatIOn of the final site plan and all requiSites certificates of occupancy must be obtained
wlthm three (3) years of the date of certification of the site plan.
3. Prior to certification of the final site plan, the tabulatIon table shall be adjusted to show the
area of the town houses and multi-story bUilding separately in order to compare with approved
modifications.
I'
4.
Prior to certification the applicant shall prOVide additional information according to the court
stipulation for the facilities proposed above the roofllne beyond the 210ft. height limit.
5. Fire lane shall be designed to access the townhouses The final design shall be subject to the
approval of the Fire Marshal.
6. Prior to certification the location of siamese connection and fire hydrants shall be show on the
site plan or a note that locations shall be subject to final approval by the Fire Marshal.
DRC 07/23/92
Prior to certification, a detailed parking plan shall be submitted and is subject to the approval
of the City Traffic Engineer.
All construction within 18' of the seawall must obtain a variance from flood boards per
Chapter 39 - Costal Construction Code (Forms available at Central Counter)
The applicant shall contact the Parks & Recreation Department for the required recreation/open
space assessment fee, which shall be paid in accordance with the court stipulation.
Motion carried unanimously.
ITEM #2 BA YSIDE TOWERS (aka The Islander/Clipper Cove), located on the north side of Dory
Passage between Island Way and larboard Way, south of Starboard Tower Clipper Cove
Condominium (pSP 87-32)
The applicant was not present at the meeting
MOTION: Motion was made by Bob Maran and seconded by Don Meerians, to continue until Planning,
meets With the Developer to resolve whether impact fees are to be paid prior to
recertification Motion carried unanimously
The meeting adjourned at 10 05 a m
~j~
Ream Wilson, Acting Chairman
I
\
2
DRC 07/23/92
itt-
JOHNSON. BLAKELY, POPE. BOKOR. RUPPEL & BURNS. P. A
,/ -'
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E D ARMSTRONG III
BARBARA A BACCARI
BRUCE W BARNES
JOHN T BLAKELY
BRUCE H BOKOR
GUY M BURNS
MICHAEL T CRONIN
ELIZABETH J DANIELS
LISA B DODGE
BRIAN BEVANS
MARION HALE
REBECCA HENSON HUOOBA
SCOTT C ILGENFRITZ
FRANK R JAKES
TIMOTHY A JOHNSON JR
SHARON E KRICK
JOHN R LAWSON
JAMES G LEWIS
MICHAEL G LITTLE
MARIA MAISTRELLlS
MICHAEL C MARKHAM
DANIEL L MOODY
DAVID J OTTINGER
F WALLACE POPE JR
DARRYL R RICHARDS
DENNIS G RUPPEL'
CHARLES A SAMARKOS
JOHN A SCHAEFER
BETH ANN SCHARRER
PHILIP M SHASTEEN
CHARLES M T A TELBAUM
GLEE A TRIPLETT
JOAN M VECCHIOLl
MICHAEL T WILLIAMS
ANTHONY P ZINGE
. OF COUNSEL
PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER
FILE NO
30874.83474
Hand Delivered
February 23, 1993
o
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., Esq.
City of Clearwater
P.o. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618
FE B 2 3 1993
J
: I' ,
11. .1
_-' I
Re: U.S. Steel Corp. v. City of Clearwater
Dear AI:
Attached to this letter are sixteen (16) original site plans
for Ultimar Phase III, prepared by Y. H. Lee Associates, dated
July 8, 1992, and revised February 4, 1993, and Civil Engineering
Site Plan prepared by King Engineering Associates, Inc., dated
July 13, 1992, and revised February 22, 1993 for review by City
of Clearwater staff.
know, the site plan is governed by the Set tlemen t
signed late 1986 between the predecessors in title to
and the City of Clearwater.
We respectfully request that the City consider these attached
si te plans under provisions of paragraph 14 of the Settlement
Stipulation, which sets forth certain criteria for review of site
plans which are submitted as alternatives to the schematics
atttached as exhibits to the Settlement Stipulation. It is our
impression that the City staff has not previously reviewed any
site plans from our client under the provisions of paragraph 14
of the Settlement Stipulation.
As you
Stipulation
our client,
It is my understanding that you will endeavor to have this
matter presented to the City Commission for its consideration at
the March 4, 1993 meeting. We would ask that you confirm this
timing at your earliest convenience.
CLEARWATER OFACE
911 CHESTNUT STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 34617-1368
TELEPHONE (813) 461 1818
TELECOPIER (813) 441-8617
TAMPA OFACE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 1100
TAMPA FLORIDA 33601-1100
TELEPHONE (813) 225-2500
TELECOPIER (813) 223-7118
-.
.-
JoHNSON. BLAKELY. POPE. BOKOR. RUPPEL & BURNS. P. A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
M.A. Galbraith, Esq.
February 23, 1993
Page 2
As always, please feel free to call me if you have any
questions regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR,
RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
~~~
EDA/jr
Enc.
cc: Mr. Mike Wright
Mr. Ted Cobb
Ms. Roberta Kaplan
Mr. Scott Shuford
E. D. Armstrong III
9lS/MHH/30874JRL17
83474 (6278)
lot
.
CITY
o F
CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE R, F LOR IDA 3 4 6 1 8 4 7 4 8
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Telephone: (813) 462-6880
August 24, 1992
Tim Johnson
Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns
POBox 1368
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, FL 34617-1368
RE: Proposed Ultimar Three Condominium Site Plan - View Corridor
Dear Tim
After further staff review and diScussion of the Ultlmar Three preliminary site plan, I must Inform you that
the City of Clearwater Intends to uphold the terms specified In the Parcel II Court Settlement Stipulation
The City Will use the Land Development Code as a means to ensure consistent Implementation of the
Settlement Stipulation The Land Development Code IS Identical to the process followed for all new
development on Sand Key
We maintain that the proposed pool/deck area and appurtenances are structures and shall not be placed
In the 70 ft Wide view corndor. The three code sections you cited support this contention. To rule that
a sWimming pool IS passive recreation IS contrary to all definitions of that term The proposed Inclined
dnveway accessing the covered parking facIlity located withIn the view corndor that measures three and
one half feet In elevation plus the curb/guard/median divider would negate the view corndor The height
of the structure shall be limited to 210 feet In height with the exception of necessary deSIgn elements to
accommodate mechanical facIlities as stated In the Settlement Stipulation
If you have any questions or comments, please contact me
M Polatty, Jr., AICP
r of Planning and Develop nt
JMP/lRH
cc: /M A Galbraith, City Attorney
Michael Wnght, City Manager
Scott Shuford, Planning Manager
./iOUIS R Hilton, Development Planner II
Harry Cline, EsqUire
Ted Cobb, President
johnson2 Irh
o
, Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer
~ oct I@
M E M 0 RAN DUM
FROM:
The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City commission
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney ~
Deposition Scheduling--Ultimar Phase III
TO:
RE:
DATE:
February 24, 1993
This is to confirm that the depositions that were scheduled for
Thursday of this week and Thursday of next week have been canceled.
The court did not rule on my motion for protective order, although
it was brought up for hearing Monday afternoon. The motion has
been rescheduled for the morning of March 10.
The question of the swimming pool in the view corridor will be
before you again next week. When the swimming pool was proposed,
we understood the issue to be whether a swimming pool would be
consistent with a site plan limitation. The limitation is that the
view corridor "will exclude all structures, walls, fences and
parking, but will allow passive recreational amenities,'
landscaping, pedestrian walkways, driveways and emergency vehicle
access ways." The City Manager disapproved the swimming pool on
the grounds that a swimming pool is a structure and would be an
active recreational amenity. That decision was appealed to you,
and you upheld the decision on December 17, 1992.
The developer has now requested approval of a modification of the
site plan for the property in order to allow an in-ground swimming
pool to be constructed in the clear view corridor. Modifications
are allowed if they do not violate five basic elements of the
settlement stipulation relating to height, density, setbacks, and
whether there is a "reduction" in open space and the view corridor.
The question will be whether it is reasonable to deny an in-ground
pool at the proposed location; under the settlement stipulation, we
are not to withhold approval of site plan modifications
unreasonably. This is a substantially different question than the
last question that was presented to you.
Whether your depositions are rescheduled after March 4 will depend
upon whether this matter is resolved on March 4, and whether my
motion for a protective order is granted on March 10.
Please give me a call if you have any questions regarding this
matter.
MAG: a
Copies:
Michael Wright, city Manager
Jim Polatty, Planning and Development Director
o
..
.h _
LAW OFFICES
M!;;MULLEN, EVERETT, LOGAN, MARQUARDT & CLINE, P A
FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
400 CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER FLORIDA 34615
POBOX 1669
JOHN TWEED M,MULLEN
FRANK C LoGAN
EMIL C MARQUARDT JR
HARRY S CLINE
J PAUL RAYMOND
JAMES A MARTIN JR
STEPHEN 0 COLE
MARGOT PEQUIGNOT
R NATHAN HIGHTOWER
THOMAS C NASH II
NANCY S PAIKOFF
MARIE L D~MARCO
T SHEA GILLS
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34617
(813) 441-8966
FAX (813) 442-8470
OF COUNSEL
JOE S EVERETT
WILLIAM E NODINE
PALM HARBOR OFFICE
1813) 785-4402
33920 HWY I 9 NORTH
SUITE 150
PALM HARBOR FL 34684
November 25, 1992
Mr. Michael Wright, City Manager
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618
Re: Ultimar, Phase III/pending site plan approvals
Dear Mr. Wright:
As the City files will reflect, we represent owners in the
Harbor Condominium located essentially across the street from the
proposed development. Our client's position is that the Settle-
ment Agreement reached by the Ci ty and the land owners, after
protracted litigation, should not be modified to allow increased
height or construction within the view corridor.
Mr. Polatty has indicated by letter dated September 23, 1992,
that the City is inclined to approve a building at a proposed
height of 248'. The Settlement Agreement specifically provides
for buildings with "a maximum of 210 feet in height." The
agreement further provides that the:
"height of the building structures is defined as the
distance above the flood plain to the roof deck or, in
the case where sloped roofs are used, to the mid-point
of the roof slope. Elevator machine rooms, mechanical
rooms, stairs, parapet walls and other necessary design
elements will be permi tted ab~ve the maximum h~hts
established herein." [Emphasis added]
Our clients do not believe that any height should be approved
in excess of 210', plus the necessary design elements.
In the first instance, the land owner has under the Settle-
ment Agreement the right to propose to modify any of the
"schematic site plans" subj ect to your approval. We do not
believe that this envisions increasing the specific limitation as
to maximum height. The height limitation is contained within the
text of the site plan, and is not part of the "schematic site
plan".' As in the case of a proposal to put a swimming pool or
....
1
#
November 25, 1992
Page Two
other active recreational facilities in the view corridor, we
submit that this is not a matter that can be varied or altered
since these are limitations imposed by the text and not by the
"schematic site plan".
In the second instance, it is our understanding that the
basis for this request is architectural in nature, relying on
aesthetics. We view this request in the nature of a variance
request, and aesthetics are not proper to vary a Code limitation,
and should not be authorized to vary this Settlement Agreement
and its limitations. If aesthetics are an overriding concern for
the property owner, then the building can be redesigned wi thin
the mandated building envelope of 210' in height.
Accordingly, on behalf of our clients, and consistent with
prior correspondence to the Planning Department, our clients
object to any expansion regarding height over and above the
agreement, and object to the inclusion within the view corridor
of anything other than passive items as defined in the agreement.
It is our understanding that this matter is now calendared for
hearing on December 17th before the City Commission as a result
of an appeal by the land owner to apparently seek to place the
pool within the view corridor and to seek even more height.
Please accept this letter on behalf of our clients as an
appeal as well, since we seek review of any approval granted in
excess of 210' on the building itself, which apparently has been
internally approved. In the event the matter is to be heard on a
different date, please advise since we wish to appear on behalf
of our client.
Sincerely yours,
~/~
Harry S. Cline ~~
HSC:koh
cc: Mayor Rita Garvey
Commissioner Art Deegan
Commissioner Susan Berfield
Commissioner Richard Fitzgerald
M.A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney
Commissioner Charles E. Raney
Commissioner Bruce Tyndall
Commissioner Barbara Sheen Todd
Commissioner Steve Seibert
Commissioner Sally Parks
Timothy A. Johnson, Esq.
Harbor Condo (Attn: Mr. Norman Olson)
C
TO:
Michael Wright, City
FROM:
James M. Polatty, Jr., Di
Development
SUBJECT:
Kathy Rice, Deputy City
Ultimar Three - Request for approval of alternative
site plan for the tower buildinq footprint only
pursuant to settlement stipulation dated October
17, 1986
VIA:
COPIES:
Scott Shuford, Planning Manager; File
DATE:
March 25, 1992
The Ultimar project is being developed in accordance with the
Exhibit "B", Parcel II Schematic , site Plan 2 pursuant to the
settlement stipulated dated October 17, 1986 (Circuit civil No. 78-
4765-7). This schematic presents the building envelope for Ultimar
III as a rectangle measuring 100 ft. x 250 ft. x 210 ft.
The applicant is requesting the City Manager's approval of an
alternative site plan for the building footprint of Ultimar three.
The proposed change incorporates a unique "U" shaped building
design that increases the building setback from Gulf Blvd. on the
north end of the structure and eliminates part of the building
envelope on the south end of the structure. The overall building
footprint is decreased from the allowed 25,000 square feet to the
proposed 19,500 square feet.
After careful review of this proposed change to the Ultimar Three
building footprint, the Planning Department has determined the
proposed change to the buildinq footprint only, to be acceptable.
However, it should be understood that this does not satisfy the
requirement of Paragraph 11 restricting the development to 360
residential units with the eligibility to transfer 40 residential
units from Parcel IV. The overall development does, in fact,
propose to develop the maximum 400 residential units. Therefore,
the developer shall be required to record an appropriate notice of
transfer in the Public Records of Pinellas County and filing a copy
thereof with the City Clerk's Office.
~
APPROVED
~
DISAPPROVED
DATE:
wright, Cit~ anaqer
L//f902}
03mem3.tc
" '
f ../\
\(~)
ONE BARNETT PLAZA. 101 E KENN- BOULEVARD · SUITE 3200 · PO BOX 3399 . TAMP! )RIDA 33601 . (813) 224-9000 . FAX (813) 221-8811
SALEM, SAXON & NIELSEN
ATTORNEYS AT LAW ProfessIOnal AssocIatIOn
STEVEN M BERMAN
GERALD R BOYD, JR
BETH M COLEMAN
LYNDI GORDON
SHARI L LEFfON
CONSTANCE J McCAUGHEY
RICHARD A NIELSEN
CATHERINE M NORlUN
JUANA M ROJAS
RICHARD J SALEM
BERNICE S SAXON
JACQUELINE M SPOIO
DAVID J IDNG
MARK HUNTER
OF COUNSEL
June 25, 1992
Mr. Louis R. Hilton
Planner II
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618-4748
RE: Consolidated Bank, Sand Key Property Matters
Our File Number 012638.01
Dear Lou:
This is just a brief note to thank you for your time, consideration
and assistance during the course of our meetings in connection with
the above-referenced property. We will be in touch with you soon
in order to schedule a time to outline the terms of a "development
agreement" that can be acted upon by the City Commission.
If you have obtained any additional information, or if you should
have any suggestions concerning this project, please feel free to
call. We look forward to talking with you soon and working with
you in the future. With kindest personal regards, I am
Very truly yours,
& NIELSEN, P.A.
J. Salem
RECEIVED
JUN 2 6 19~t
RJS/tj
cl\misc_a-m\letr\hilt2638.8la
PLANNING &
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
I
OC.- ;4
@
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney ~
Ultimar Phase III Swimming Pool
TO:
RE:
DATE:
February 25, 1993
The question of a swimming pool in the view corridor of Ultimar
Phase III will again be on your agenda when you meet next week,
because the developer has filed a request to amend the site plan
to allow construction of the pool at that location.
Backqround: The development of this property is subject to a
site plan and other limitations contained in a settlement
stipulation entered into in 1986, in a lawsuit brought by U.S.
Steel in 1978.
The developer is permitted, pursuant to Paragraph 14 of the
settlement stipulation, to propose modifications to the site
plan. Site plan modifications (a) may not violate any of five
requirements which are discussed below; (b) are to be reviewed by
the city manager, and his approval may not be unreasonably
withheld; and (c) ordinarily do not require .approval by the City
Commission. Typically, you would see them only if the city
manager disapproves them. (We are scheduling this for your
action because the question of a pool came before you in
December. )
The December issue: When this swimming pool was proposed several
months ago, we understood the issue to be whether a swimming pool
would be consistent with Note 4 on the site plan. Note 4 states
that the view corridors "will exclude all structures, walls,
fences and parking , but will allow passive recreation~l
amenities, landscaplng, pedestrian walkways, driveways and
emergency vehicle access ways."
The City Manager disapproved the swimming pool on the grounds
that a swimming pool is a structure and would be an active
recreational amenity, contrary to Note 4. That decision was
taken to you on an appeal by the developer, and you upheld the
declsion on December 17, 1992.
The current issue: The developer has now requested approval of a
modification of the site plan to allow an in-ground swimming pool
in the clear view corridor. This presents a substantially
different question than was presented to you in December.
According to Paragraph 14 of ,the settlement stipulation,
modlfication of a site plan is a right of the developer, subject
to five site plan requirements which are "protected" in the sense
that a site plan modificat1on may not be 1nconsistent with them.
The "protected" requirements are:
~ There is no increase 1n height.
~ Setbacks are equal to or greater than those shown on
the site plan.
~ There is no reduction in open area. ("Open area" means
an area defined on the site plan; the open area is not
the same as the view corridor. "No reduction" appears
intended to mean no decrease in the width or the area
of the open area.)
~ There is no increase in density.
~ There is no reduction in view corridor. ("No
reduction" appears intended to mean no decrease in the
width or the area of the view corridor.)
If a site plan modification observes the "protected" requirements
but is disapproved, the standard to be applied is whether
approval has been unreasonably withheld. The agreement permits
the court to make that determination if the city commission
affirms a disapproval.
Recommendation: Approval of the in-ground, grade-level pool as a
mod1fication to the 'site plan is recommended, because an in-
ground swimming pool will cause no increase in height, will
reduce no setbacks shown on the site plan, will not reduce the
open area, will not increase the density, and will not reduce the
view corridor.
The planning and development director and the city manager concur
in th1s recommendation.
MAG: a
Copies:
Michael Wright, City Manager
Jim Polatty, Planning and Development Director
"
.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY. POPE, BOKOR. RUPPEL & BURNS. P A
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E D ARMSTRONG III
BARBARA A BACCARI
BRUCE W BARNES
JOHN T BLAKELY
BRUCE H BOKOR
GUY M BURNS
MICHAEL T CRONIN
ELIZABETH J DANIELS
LISA B OODGE
BRIAN BEVANS
MARION HALE
REBECCA HENSON HUOOBA
SCOTT C ILGENFRITZ
FRANK R JAKES
TIMOTHY A JOHNSON JR
SHARON E KRICK
JOHN R LAWSON
JAMES G LEWIS
MICHAEL G LITTLE
MARIA MAISTRELLIS
MICHAEL C MARKHAM
DANIEL L MOODY
DAVID J OTTINGER
F WALLACE POPE JR
DARRYL R RICHARDS
DENNIS G RUPPEL'
CHARLES A SAMARKOS
JOHN A SCHAEFER
BETHANN SCHARRER
PHIUP M SHASTEEN
CHARLES M T A TELBAUM
GLEE A TRIPLETT
JOAN M VECCHIOLl
MICHAEL T WILLIAMS
ANTHONY P ZINGE
. OF COUNSEL
PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER
FILE NO
30874.83474
Hand Delivered
February 23, 1993
RECFIVED
~j. "l 2 3 1~~3
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., Esq.
City of Clearwater
P.o. Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618
c.-, t./.or.Qger
i
Re: u.s. Steel Corp. v. City of Clearwater
Dear AI:
Attached to this letter are sixteen (16) original site plans
for Ul timar Phase III, prepared by Y. H. Lee Associates, dated
July 8, 1992, and revised February 4, 1993, and Civil Engineering
Site Plan prepared by King Engineering Associates, Inc., dated
July 13, 1992, and revised February 22, 1993 for review by City
of Clearwater staff.
As you
Stipulation
our client,
know, the site plan is governed by the Settlement
signed late 1986 between the predecessors in title to
and the City of Clearwater.
We respectfully request that the City consider these attached
site plans under provisions of paragraph 14 of the Settlement
Stipulation, which sets forth certain criteria for review of site
plans which are submitted as alternatives to the schematics
atttached as exhibits to the Settlement Stipulation. It is our
impression that the City staff has not previously reviewed any
site plans from our client under the provisions of paragraph 14
of the Settlement Stipulation.
It is my understanding that you will endeavor to have this
matter presented to the City Commission for its consideration at
the March 4, 1993 meeting. We would ask that you confirm this
timing at your earliest convenience.
CLEARWATER OFFICE
911 CHESTNUT STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
CLEARWATER FLORIDA 3461 7-1368
TELEPHONE (813) 461 1818
TELECOPlER (813) 441-8617
TAMPA 0FF1CE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 1100
TAMPA FLORIDA 33601-1100
TELEPHONE (813) 22S-2SOO
TELECOPlER (813) 223-7118
..
,
JOHNSON. BLAKELY. POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS. P A
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
M.A. Galbraith, Esq.
February 23, 1993
Page 2
As always, please feel free to call me if you have any
questions regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR,
RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
~~~
EDA/jr
Enc.
cc: Mr. Mike Wright
Mr. Ted Cobb
Ms. Roberta Kaplan
Mr. Scott Shuford
E. D. Armstrong III
9l5/MHH/30874JRL17
83474 (6278)
..
~,
1,1)./ JI//~"''''''''''''''
,.1 (,'5\ ~ dll},/i""
.', lC~~ - ',-e~~;-~
" ~' \ I , t1..+..:;\ ~ \
\ ~~"""'rl ,
~ ~ -' \.., ~~
.... \ 1\'1 E:-::a\~
'-\'" --.....,
.' ~)\
If; _' '~II
IJ'I}"r\\ \V,l'
..~~:'1 .\.. pI'
:J../'. ~_-".f,j,j"..
C I T Y
o F C J.. EAR W ATE R
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE R, F LOR I D A 3 4 6 1 8 - 4 7 4 8
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Telephone (813) 462-6880
October 26, 1992
Mr Ted Cobb, President
Sea Tower Construction Company, Inc.
1560 Gulf Boulevard
Clearwater, Flonda 34630
Dear Mr. Cobb'
Re: Ultimar Three Appeal
The Issue of the proposed swimming pool within the view cOrridor and the proposed
height of the Ultlmar Three Condominium development will be submitted to the City
Commission November 5, 1992, as an appeal of the City Manager's decision to remove
the swimming pool from the view cOrridor and to reduce the height of the building to 210
feet In height In accordance with the Final Judgement of the Circuit Court, October 17,
1986
If you should have any questions concerning thiS matter, please contact Louis Hilton at
462-6880
Sincerely. \?t
~atty. Jr. Ale
Director of Planning and Development
cc:
Mr. Timothy A Johnson, Esq
~\
o
( ",\.
.) .J
----
~.
D~ (~ )6-
. ...
\.
I
.
-, .
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Interdepartmental Correspondenoe Sheet
FROM:
James M. Polatty, Jr., Planning and Development Director
M. A. Galbraith, Jr., city Attorney~
u.s. steel Corp. v. city [Ultimar Phase III]
'TO:~
RE:
DATE:
January 26, 1993
Enclosed is a copy of a Request for Production in this case, not
including 5 pages of definitions. They have filed a motion to
"enforce" the final judgment (i. e. , interpret the site plan .
conditions), and they are asking for our files regarding the
settlement stipulation and the site plan approval process.
Our deadline is March 1, contrary to the deadline in this request,
but I would like to see your files before then. Please round them
up, including those in storage and on microfilm (make copies) if
any were microfilmed and then destroyed, and deliver them to me
during the week beginning February 15.
By copy to the city manager, I am asking him to do the same thing.
MAG: a
Copy:
Michael Wright, city Manager
, I
(
. ,,\'.
, I
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
UNITED STATES STEEL
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
)
) RECEIVED
)
~ JAN 2 6 1993
) CASE NO. 78-4765-7 CITY ATTORNEY
)
)
)
)
)
)
vs.
CITY OF CLEARWATER, a
Municipal corporation,
Defendant.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
USX Corporation, successor in interest to the plaintiff,
United States Steel Corporation, by and through its undersigned
attorneys, and pursuant to Rule 1.350 Florida Rules of Civil
Procedure, hereby request the defendants, City of Clearwater, to
produce for inspection and/or copying by counsel for the
plaintiff the following documents, which are to be produced at
the offices of the plaintiff's attorneys at 911 Chestnut Street,
Clearwater, Florida 34616, on or before February 25, 1993, or at
such times and places as may be agreed upon between the
respective parties.
Definitions
Unless otherwise indicated, the following definitions shall
be applicable.
A. The term "settlemen_t" as used herein means the
, >
settlement stipulation approved by the court in the final
judgment entered on February 4, 1987.
B. The term "Ultimar" as used herein means the real
property owned by USX Corporation located on Sand Key in the City
:
.'
,(
.
"
, ,
")
stated.
3. These requests are continuing in nature and effect to
the extent provided in the applicable rules and require
supplementary production concerning any aocuments falling within
the scope of the request that may come into the knowledge,
custody, control or possession of Defendant subsequent to its
response hereto.
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS TO BE PRODUCED
1. All documents relating to the settlement stipulation'
including, but not limited to, all internal memoranda
regarding Ultimar Phase Three, the site plan approval process
for Ultimar Phases One through Three and all notes and
memorandum written by or to employees of the City of
Clearwater regarding Ultimar Phase Three.
2. All documents relating to the issue of locating an in-ground
swimming pool in the view corridor as defined by the
settlement stipulation.
3. All documents in any file kept by Paula Harvey or the City of
Clearwater Planning Department regarding the settlement
stipulation.
4. All documents in any file kept by Frank Kowalski, M.A.
Galbraith, Jr., or the City Attorney's office of the City of
Clearwater regarding the settlement stipulation.
3. All documents you may introduce into evidence at the March
12, 1993, hearing on the motion to enforce the settlement
stipulation.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy hereof has been served uponl
7
"
( ).
M.A. Galbraith, Ji-., Esquire, P. O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL
34618 by regular U.S. Mail, this ;2...S1!::::::-day of January, 1993.
JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE,
BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P.A.
BY~/~~
RO ~
Post Office Box 1368
Clearwater, Florida 34617
(813) 461-1818
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SPN it68l924
FBN #441351
I I
9l5/JME/30874JEPl
83474
LI T __~ J, ~ir ~-'l' I
Jf r r IR r I ,.U
---,--..- ..-....-_..._-~--- ~.. - ~~...._~- ~ -- ---
LAW OFFICES
MC;;MULLEN, EVERETT, LOGAN, MARQUARDT & CLINE, P A
FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
400 CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER FLORIDA 34615
POBOX 1669
JOHN TWEED M!:;MULLEN
FRANK C LoGAN
EMIL C MARQUARDT JR
HARRY S CLINE
.) PAUL RAYMOND
JAMES A MARTIN JR
STEPHEN 0 COLE
MARGOT PEOUIGNOT
R NATHAN HIGHTOWER
ROBERT C DICKINSON 111
THOMAS C NASH 11
NANCY S PAIKOFF
MARIE L D<MARCO
T SHEA GILLS
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 34617
(813) 441-8966
FAX (813) 442-8470
OF COUNSEL
JOE 5 EVERETT
WILLIAM E NODINE
PALM HARBOR OFFICE
(813) 78S 4402
33920 HWY 19 NORTH
SUITE ISO
PALM HARBOR FL 34684
.,
August 27, 1992
lli\i ~jI'"",~~r,;c\'\lr-~1ffi
Ri}l.... _~;..... "" l:i ~ I}t .:..
, /'J' :*~ ~ ,.k~ ., ~ ~ l- t ....
It\>' L.-") '~..."''''-'J'J '\- I ~. ~.
~\.~ ~ ,.....,'fit :<. ,,'1 " ~
~,,-- , ; 'p, ,~
I< U 't:J
SEP ~ 1992
Mr. James M. Po1atty, Jr., AICP
Director of Planning and Development
City of Clearwater
Post Office Box 4748
Clearwater, FL 34618-4748
PLl\Ni'~;NG
DEPARTMENT
..
Re: Proposed U1timar III Condominium site plan
View Corridor / Your letter dated 8/24/92
to developer's attorney
Dear Jim:
Thank you very much for copying me with the referenced
letter. I appreciate being advised, and trust that you will
continue to do so. Specifically, if at any time the City should
consider modifying its position as outlined in your letter, we
certainly want to have an opportunity to be invol ved in that
decision and process, on behalf of our clients residing in the
condominiums across the street.
As always, thank you for your assistance.
With best regards, I am
b2'~/~
HSC:koh
cc: The Harbor Condominium
. , -
., "'1~.",,- ,I,.
(
<:. v.. :
;
; ,
"
I ( -"\ ,
, "
. ,
,
\ ~.. -
,
'~-.-'
.:i
( - Lc,v. ..
, '
",
,
"
...::' "
, .'
"
,.. '" t_
'"
,
, "
. ,
... ;*
" ,
"
, ' -
l ,~
"
4", ;
1 <"'p ~
...
..
~EtElV~D
"
" .-< J ci t~ ',2' 8 " 199~:. '
','
,I" ~~-{
,I
'... ..... ~
,:
, ' ,
, -
," "'-
,
., ,
( ,
.J .. S
I ...\. f
-. ' Sea Towers,.
, "~CoristructlOn CompalW; Inc'
, l ~ ..
'" r.;. ( ...
_, '- }",r \ >
~.
, .
..,..., .
~.......... ,G;
. , '
.'-
'i
, ,Y
, -..r; !
:."
1.
, 'C'ty Manager, ,- , -
, ,I _,
"
.'
.... f- ~ 1..
~
.. r,~ .
. '
, y
" '
/
, ,
, ,
? ) I.' "I
, ,
. I ' , \.. '" ~ \J.. ..
HAND DELIV_~RED
t
" .
" ,
.; j .
, ,
,-
,--
\: \
"
- '
, '
, ,
,
"
..'- ~
/
~,
, '
J t 'y f
~ 1"":__
~ +; "/ -- ,
,
;. (
:-
~ , .
, ,
.'" ~
or
, .'
:.~ ~ ~
, "'\'
"
) :
{'
1; r-' ~ Q...
.' ,
, .
- ,\
~.
i........ ;.
':
, "
,..-.. ~
", June 27,~ '199'4
: .1\ ~
. ..
,/.,1>1'.... ..
, I
-,t _ 1,' ,.-- .,. -:0.
~~ \ . I ... ~ \' "\ " -
, ~....\ ' -/
.. ... ~? _ '.. -'" \ ~..'" "'. ~ I ~ .. 1 I ..~ '" ~ I\- .../" ' r
Mrs. 'Elizabeth Deptula.,' 'City Manager ' ~ i . ~'" . _ _
,/City of- Clearwater ,/ '. ..' ,', \ ^' <
_)",-.- 1 ,J
112\ South Osceola Avenue", , '" L' ,. "
Clearwater',- FL . 34618 - ( , 'J' , ..
" .J./' (.. \ '...... J r~ - v.!
... -< ,.. - . ~.... .." ,~..- ' ':.. \. ~ ,?- _~ ... ., .. I
RE: " . Ul ti-mar Thr~e:' : ii' Residential Co~domiilium' '. . ,:' f
- 1,560 Gulf Boulevard ' ! ;-
Sand -Key,' Clearwater, Florida - j ~ '
..\ ' 1. f_ .,~ ) t 7 j _} .. f.. .. ('" .. <J" ' - ! . '\.
SUBJECT!: ,Applicat-ion,~for:.Building Permit, pur"suant to -:
,) r. seft~ement Stlpulation da;ted October 17, 1986
~ '\ r ~ -... _ ", - --r..... I " )
l.. I \ .( f j ( I "7-"",.... - \'"
,Dear Mrs. Deptul~:, ',' " "
.- .. ~ ....... "" ~ j r ,,_.r ;""( - t I I' ...' ,..
" ~, Se~ Towers conitruc'f~~n~c:ompany, Inc,., ge_n~ral contrac'tor"for ultimar Three' '
, 'DeYe~opment Corpofat~op, a ,supsidiary of ~SX Corporation, 'hereby formally
)' mak~s application to the City of-Cl~arwater ,for a full~and,unrest~icted
building permit for.the third and final phase of ' a' residential condominium
,pr"oject planned for -the~pr9perty referenced ,ab6ve~ This thir,d,.phase of the,
prdje~t: ,known 'a~ "Ultimar Three", "will consis_t' of 'an 18 st'OFY tower
b~ildiIig con~9-iriing 109 condominium' d,welling'uni 1:;s and a surrounding parki,ng
g?Fage and plaza- deck ,which abut, the parking garage', an.d p.laza declc of
ul,timar, Two.. - ,"~' , , (: ,';. ~ ,'''. " 1,
This ~p~lic'atio~~ f'~~. \l?u~'~ding' p:r~:t i~ beJ'~g su~mi ~t~~ pu;su~nt to t~e""
;.> require}tlents of Paragraph 17,,-of the SettlemenJt S~ipulation dat,ed October 17,
,1,986, and more specifically" in accprdance with the portions, of 'Exhibi t "B"
to the' Settlerl).e,nt., Stipulation,>enti tIed "Parcel II Schematic ~i te plan 2,".
We call to your attention that our site plan was'certified initially by the
City on April 16, 19~3 -an,d1 was 'later, modified and :r:ecertifl=ec;i on~-Januar'y 5, ,
1994. ,I-n addition; t;he' foundation permit for Ul~imar Tnr.ee was issued Qn
May 14,1993 E!nd sub~'egueiltly.amended,bn April ,20"1994., '.I ~'" I
, ~.l 1 ". .. ,
.,," 'in ord~r to"fac{lita~e the Ci~;'S review ~f this applicat~on; by copy of
~ ' this letter" we ,are, submi tting three (3) sets ?f signed.and' s~aled building,
, 'plans,~nd Gityof Clearwater perm~t application form dtrec~ly to the~City
of Clearwgter Building 'Department ,to, che attention of, Mr~- victor.Cpodora,
, ,Assista,nt. pf:r;,ector bf, ~eIitral , Permi,tting. .j' " " ':,' :: - . , ,
, I ,I' , r If \. ~ '\.' J ; '" ","
, "
, ;
,
.! ~;:
,
/ j
, l
,-
.:
,J '
," , )
"'..,< '~
",
(... ~ 5" I
, ,/
\
"
'{
... ... '>. ~
,
,
/
1.... ...
"
\, ~ ~
, ,
,
,
-'
,-
~
, '
~}... J
f I" ,,'" f':" (
\ ~ , l
- ,
~ -' .....
r,
-, ,
, '
"' ,
" \
''S- I..,
"
~ ~\
"
, .
- ",r :.. - <~ ,..; r
~ _ ..... , l ~ ...
I' "'......
) ,
r ,
~.. ," y y'-
, ">
......... }. -"".J ,..
"
.. 11 ~~ I ---i.
-. r ..:'
"
"
, -.,;-
"'- --, I'
"t <
, -
r' ,
,r'oO 1
.... r ~ ., Y}....."' :.. t""
( . ... -,,' 1 t;: \-: r ~...I -; l< I ,.. I ...1 \ ~.J...' l .- - I I \ ..~
..,. :-~ ". I \ \ ~ \ t. ~ .t :; 1: ", '" " _.. _1 '_ "V ( ~ f\
~ ;>.1' ">:J .. i! I.. I .... .0 , I - \
I ",' .1.:' 'A...-': "',~ ( . ',"" ......:. ',:: ~r'~,. ,.' ':" .,' " "".~ ,-
1560,Gulf,B01Hevard. Clearwater, Flonda 34630 - 813-595-8915 - 595-8928 FAX":
~ A <0,..
i-:, _ '..
~ r '
..~ "".. 1
< .r r
.
- ~, ~
') ,
, "
..., _"1.
, ,
> .'
.,..
,
'r.
~,
r
"
..~ "'f
. , ,
; .
'-
~
'J... p \..\ ~ "\
,"
,
/ -.....
"
".
, -
..L,__
, .
, "
"
......... --..
, ,
'-
,. ,
"
, -
r ,
, "
. ,
Mrs. Elizabeth, Deptula,
June' 27, .1994 ' -
Pi;lge'2
City'Manc;lger
...~....
I-
~
,
I
, J
y
;
",
, {.
",^
f
.!
<"
I ~ ;. " ... ~, ~ .. f
... jF .".,.. .. \ ,.. "',
~ , ) \. ...._ .... t , _ '_ ~
',,~- we~tiust'that.w~th~submls~ion of the building pla~s as'describea abo~e, we~
.. ',hav:e\' provided ,the City of Cl'earwater' with the,'r necies~:tary" drawings as
described in Paragraph' 17'of the Settlement Stipulation ~o as to allow the
;issuance of-~he building'permit for.Ultimar"Three., We wou~d be ple;ased to
answer any ques~ions you may>ha~e regarding-the plans or this application;
<I' Please -feel <'free ' 'tr~_, ?ontact ,me' in 'this r.!3gard. '> .~<' "" ,'- -" , '
,-
;~
"
, '
:
~ -.I..
Sincerely ~ ,,',
"'-- ' , ' ~'''''',-~J) # -r ..,1/
-, ., ,4 '
,""1 ~ /...~ /V' ~ '...
-' - -;....... ~1t. - ..t -l
, ,
, ,
",
,
...
'.
.' ,
"
1 J-oJ.
- ,
. \
~'
',-
;
~ - .....' ..
0; ",'-
,
"
"
"
'~ ,
'.
,I
"
Ted" Cobb,
; ... ~ ...
presid~nt' :
. ... , ..... ~ - 1..
~
'.
:0
"'p... --'
,
,"-
"
-
TC/dk'
,r
, ~~
- ,-
, ,
, "
, ,I
...;~
.;
". -
.,
Enc~osur:-es ;
....._ - f
'" :.
:
- "
r~{'
;..,
. \
, "
/ {,
'-'
, ;
'..-
':
~ -.1 \
"
'City ,o'i. ,Clear;""ater "',' .'
Attn:' 'Mr-... Scott "Shuford, Director of' Central' t>ermitting.' '.
twfthout. building plans f . " ' - ,:
." -' - ::... ,,;> '" ~ \ .. "'; ,..\"}. ~ - .4, -.. ,..
C'ity of Ci~arwater' '. '- '. , " " .,"
Attn: :~Mr. victor Chodora,' Assistant Director ,of. Centi~l'perm~tting
- .J.. -. -. - - j ...l...
. , (wi th ,buipiing plans - three. (3 r sets)
t \ ~~
,tfsx'Realty ,oe'velopment, "usx c'orporat.f.on' 0.' ".'~
Attn:' .Mr'. Tom Howard, General- Manager - Southeast,
, I'" ('"...... I I ,J , \... - -
(w~thout ,b~~ld~ng plans)
',-
"
.,"
"
.cc:
>
. >
r
I
'"
I
\.i) ..
-1' ~ .,.,/
,
~
'.
",
, '
:.
i
J.).t;
I'
,-
....
,
/
, c'
.. '\; ~ ~
-',
"
-' -^
"
,<
, \,
~ r
')
, L
(,....
.'
"
.'
, ~r
f'
.,
, ~
;:
" ,
. )
- '-
~ ;:...
< >
, ,
"
- "
,
"-
-'
'.
, "
, .
, '
~t .
^ ".
, '
" "
, '
> "
,:;;-......
.' ,,'
~.. ..
l I
;
"
"
~ <'" \
t, \ '
A -
~
\
, ,
"
".- >-
" ,
/
"
. > -
- ..::
"
^
"
"
" ,
, I
." .
"
~
~ .....'
- "
, ,
.' ,
<
t.,- - - \
-
..~ _J 4... I...
'.
,
, (
" -
"
"
~
"
) ,
"
"
"
, ,-
"
J ~
"
. )
,. "
"
"
.'
..,-'"
, 1
'- '
'- (-i
. , - ~
, ~-
.... --.."'I:
:
, ^
.!), ~
,
. ~
,~
.'
, .
. .,
,<.
:
.,
, r'
..:
J,
-; ,
.,;
"'; f
..,
-1'............ .....
.(
"
, ,
. '
"\
;1"'. ~~~,_
.r
~
"
, ,
,"" ,-
( <
, ~
"
\ ,
'.
,
" ,
-',
.,-
( "
I'
I
-'
.,.- -,,'"
"
'c.
r'
,
,
',.
:
'" --1(-
. 'l,
. I
'; ~ ....
~l
',~
r', .;'
-.... \ ;
.. - .. /
. ,
r,
, .
1 ~ ""..
,
~ '0.
.
.1. _ : ..~
"
, "
, "
J ,
. - ,
"
/
.:
<'- ~ -;
,',
<. .
,
" -
/ 1\
:'
"
,,'
.'
"
JOHNSON. BLAKELY. POPE. BOKOR. RUPPEL & BURNS. P. A.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW
E D ARMSTRONG III
BARBARA A BACCARI
BRUCE W BARNES
JOHN T BLAKELY
BRUCE H BOKOR
GUY M BURNS
MICHAEL T CRONIN
ELIZABETH J DANIELS
LISA B DODGE
BRIAN BEVANS
MARION HALE
REBECCA HENSON HUDOBA
SCOTT C ILGENFRITZ
FRANK R JAKES
TIMOTHY A JOHNSON, JR
SHARON E KRICK
JOHN R LAWSON
JAMES G LEWIS
MICHAEL G LITTLE
MARIA MAISTRELLlS
MICHAEL C MARKHAM
DANIEL L MOODY
DAVID J OTTINGER
F WALLACE POPE JR
DARRYL R RICHARDS
DENNIS G RUPPEL'
CHARLES A SAMARKOS
JOHN A SCHAEFER
BETH ANN SCHARRER
PHILIP M SHASTEEN
CHARLES M T A TELBAUM
GLEE A TRIPLETT
JOAN M VECCHIOLI
MICHAEL T WILLIAMS
ANTHONY P ZINGE
* OF COUNSEL
PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER
FILE NO
....:
September 30, 1992
Mr. Michael Wright
City Manager
City of Clearwater
P.o. Box 4748
Clearwater, Florida
34618-4748
PLAN~I1r.\lr\
"I !Jr{ IJll
DEPARTMENT
Re: Ultimar III
Dear Mike:
I hereby request that the issues of the swimming pool
construction and height of Ultimar III be submitted to the City
Commission for its review at its meeting on October 16,1992.
This request is without prejudice to any rights enjoyed by this
project under the Settlement Stipulation but, rather, is made in
an effort to resolve this matter without returning to court.
Jr.
TAJ /lm
9ll/TAJ/30874LELl
83474
cc: Mr. Ted Cobb
Mr. James Polatty
CLEARWATER OFFICE
911 CHESTNUT STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 1368
CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 34617-1368
TELEPHONE (813) 461 1818
TELECOPIER (813) 441-8617
TAMPA OFRCE
100 NORTH TAMPA STREET
SUITE 1800
POST OFFICE BOX 1100
TAMPA FLORIDA 33601-1100
TELEPHONE (813) 225 2500
TELECOPIER (813) 223 7118
J ~ ,:1'
~ \
/ i" r
\'~
fr
PLANNING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
January 30, 1987
E. D. Armstrong, III, Esquire
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, FL 33516
HE: Sand Key Settlement
Dear Ed:
I understand that your client proposes to subdivide Parcel IV of the Sand Key
property and sell the south five (5) acres thereof with an assigned density of
195 units. I further understand that your client is in the process of
transferring 40 residential dwelling units from Parcel IV to Parcel II and
that you will be recording a Notice of Transfer in the public records and will
be filing a copy with the City Clerk pursuant to the Settlement Stipulation.
Please furnish this office with a copy of that Notice of Transfer for our
files.
Upon the effective transfer of those 40 residential dwelling units, a density
of 480 residential dwelling units will remain allocated to Parcel IV. The
assignment of 195 units to the south five (5) acres of that Parcel is
permissible, leaving 285 units assigned to the remaining of Parcel IV.
Please remind your client that the development of any portion of Parcel IV
shall be in substantial accordance with either the Parcel IV Settlement
?tipulation or Exhibits "D-I" through ID-3" attached to the final Stipulation
Settlement. Your client or its Assignee shall have the right to modify any of
the site plans without the consent of the City provided there is no increase
in height or density, the setbacks are at least equal to those shown, and
there is no reduction in open area or view corridors from the plan being
modified. Any modification of the schematic site plans will require City
approval as provided in Paragraph 14 of the Settlement Stipulation.
Sincerely,
Joseph R. McFate, II
Director
813--462-6880
it1"l'lf~v -r.l1 '\ ~~ f::O !,"f
~~. .J:l.t l~" to4t ~ t~ .. t...
JRM!jmm
cc: City Manager Anthony L. Shoemaker!
City Attorney M. A. Galbraith, Jr
FEB
."
I"
'\ } I
\'FIll..r. 7 "
Ji;rJOfil, 1] ~. ~ "
'~ '
.
.'-1
Copies of both documents are enclosed. If I had found these during
our meeting, it would have saved us some head-scratching.
Sincerely,
k-
M. A. Galbraith, Jr.
city Attorney
MAG: a
Enclosures
Copy (w/encl):
Lou Hilton, Planner II
RECEIVED
JUN 30 1992
PLANNING & URBAN
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
r'
/'
I
'\
C I T Y
o F
CI..EARWATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE R, F LOR IDA 3 4 6 1 8 - 4 7 4 8
Office of
City Attorney
(813) 4626760
June 29, 1992
Richard J. Salem, Esquire
Salem, Saxon and Nielsen, P.A.
One Barnett Plaza, suite 3200
101 East Kennedy Boulevard
Post Office Box 3399
Tampa, Florida 33601
Re: Sand Key "Parcel IV;"
Consolidated Bank, Sand Key Property Matters
(Your File No. 012638.01)
Dear Richard:
After our meeting last Wednesday, I found two documents that shed
some light on the mystery of how to allocate the densities between
the northern 10 acres (the bank's subparcel) and the southern 5
acres of Parcel IV.
The first is a copy of a letter from Joe McFate to Ed Armstrong of
Johnson, Blakely, dated January 30, 1987, in which he states that
an assignment of 195 units to the southern subparcel is
permissible, leaving 285 units assigned to the remainder of Parcel
IV (after the transfer of 40 units to Parcel II). He also said
that development of any portion of Parcel IV shall be in
substantial compliance with the settlement stipulation, and the
site plans may be modified without the consent of the City as long
as the developer complies with the limitations for height, density,
setbacks, open area and view corridors.
The other document is entitled, "Calculations Supporting Density
Transfer," which I believe to have been prepared by Steve Seibert
in November or December of 1987. This seems to indicate that an
assignment of 40 units to Parcel II took place on January 23, 1987,
and an assignment of 195 units to the southern subparcel took place
on January 31, 1987, leaving 285 units for the northern subparcel
plus units to be transferred from the accreted beach, including the
Sheraton's accreted beach. The handwritten notes in the margins
are mine, but some of them make little sense to me now.
o
"Equal Employment and Affirmative Action Employer
/ .
J .y-'.
.
2.
3 .
4.
7.
CALCULATIONS SUPPORTING DENSITY TRANSFER
/41>'; (~1
~~~
_ ~"'(Ll \ ~
1.
Settlement Stipulation (10/17/86) - gives entire Parcel
IV (15 acres) rlght to develop 520 residential dwelllng
units ("rdu").
Assignment (1/23/87) - we assign to Parcel II, 40 of
our 520 rdu. We have 480 rdu left.
Assignment (1/31/87) - we assign to southern 5 acres of
our 15 acres, 195 rdu, leaving us 285 rdu. (480 rdu-195
rdu= 285 rdu). '1. ~~ N. '3.1! ck PO,h~( \V
Settlement Stipulation (paragraph 13) states ". ..1.5
hotel units may be constructed in lieu of 1 residential
dwelling unit..... Therefore, 285 rdu x 1.5 = 427.5
hotel units.
5.
On July 9, 1987, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed
lower court ruling that upland owners own abutting
accreted beach.
6.
Section 135.164(5), City Land Development Code,
permits transfer of development rights from Open
Space/Recreation District property "provided that the
density or intensity of uses, available for transfer
shall not exceed the maximum allowed on the adjoining
property. .. The accreted property is designated Open
space/Recreation District.
8.
The "adjoining property" (our 10 acres plus the
existing Sheraton Sand Key property) is zoned "Resort ~
Commercial-28 District" which allows 28 dwelling units \!'l.
or 42 hotel/motel units per acre. \'^(... Sco\.-"
The accreted beach totals approximately 9 . 6 acres.1 s,~ ~QJ'\"
Therefore, 9.6 x 42 hotel units = 403.2 hotel units. ) S~ uA
r
9 .
Our existing development rights of 427.5 hotel units
plus the development rights due to the transfer from
accreted beach (403.2 hotel units) totals 830.7 units.
10. The developer is planning to build a total of 750 hotel
units with 428 hotel units in the first tower and 322
plaI)ned for the second tower. The 750 total hotel
units is less than the 830.7 hotel unibs that would be-
authorized.
- ~~
.:JW.. ~f' ~ ~ ,.n;~ t>~ (:.,.. ..........~~ ~-fM.- t(t;..- cMJ( ..~.
SMS:mme
SMS5121187
,L ^ · ~ ?
~ ~ \I\J.Ul I- U ~c..... II
~ S""C - rn 'f.u- ~
'CC ;t i ~ .' ~!t."
~ ~ 1: ir ~t-
~~.k
Mso) L ur.J {;,. ~(J ."d or CC~L.
:-. ,JeuJs. .rk~ ~{l(>f"QJa.{.
~ -t.. Jl-(;(tw.-J:. dpJ,d.iJL...
Lit- -l:;. DNR - 0.<- ~ tL-, l'A.<- p.n"-(( CfPC
"lk, . J: 4 .,p.(.t!.-. 0 . n . p J.. J.A.o.-. .
rJuJ ~ ()~~ rM~ ~t;, ~ f
~
I
,'\
) 'l
\\
):;.tf ~ 'I n.. .. .....~
" \ ., ~i Ir'I-/1:..
II \ '\-. - ,,/,,:
\1,/ ~" .. ". " I~
\1.: ~ \ I, ....-'.'~,' "" \
~ - ,'.-', k. 1 ') \ "s
~r-:'r -,--.\ 'm'~' rrf"'~
~\~~'t 1:~~":~
~::.rr~" ~,.~,~
~! It:"4-}; n ~,',,')i
..:.. (! t' ~\'l ~f!"
k _ r? ,t
C I T Y
OF CLEAH.WATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748
C LEA R W ATE R, F LOR I D A 3 4 6 1 8 - 4 7 4 8
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Telephone: (813) 462-6880
July 31, 1992
Mr Timothy A Johnson, Esquire
911 Chestnut Street
Clearwater, Florida 34616
RE: Proposed Ultimar III Condominium Site Plan - View Corridor and Maximum
Building Height Limitation
Dear Tim'
At the Development Review Committee meeting held Thursday, July 23, 1992, there was
some discussion as to what is permitted Within the proposed 70 ft wide view corndor,
and concern about the proposed bUilding height
The proposed site plan shows a swimming pool/deck which is considered a structure by
city code definition, and an Inclined driveway
In accordance With the Settlement Stipulation, Exhibit 11811 Parcel II Schematic Site Plan,
note number 4. states'
liThe view corridors through the site Will exclude all structures, walls, fences
and parking, but Will allow passive recreational amenities, landscaping,
pedestrian walkways, driveways and emergency vehicle access waysll.
The proposed site plan also shows a proposed building height which unnecessarily
exceeds the 210ft height as stipulated In the court settlement by approximately 72 ft
In accordance with the Settlement Stipulation, Exhibit 11811 Parcel II SchematiC Site Plan,
note number 8. states:
o
, . E qua I E m p-I 0 Y men tan d A f fir mat I V (> A c I Ion E m p I 0 Y e r .
. '.
)..~
Mr Timothy A. Johnson,' 1
July 31, 1992
Page two
"The height of the building structures is defined as the distance above the
flood plain to the roof deck or, In the case where sloped roofs are used, to
the mid-point of the roof slope Elevator machIne rooms, mechanical
rooms, stairs, parapet walls and other necessary design elements will be
permitted above the maximum heights established herein"
I would like to discuss these items with you at your earliest convenience. Please contact
me at 462-6880
Sincerely,
(\ \\
, {w- ))4~
, 1
James M Polatty, Jr , AICP
Director of Planning and Development
JMP/LRH/lrh
cc' Scott Shuford, Planning Manager
Louis R Hilton, Planner II ~
( >,
v~)
\,-,:)'1'0
I , . ,
'-
'--
~<-<-~
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
I
~
~~ T
N24- .3r?' 22" e
4100'
0.<:-
~c$
:c......C
o
SCAL./f:: /". ad
LEOBND
roo
RfW
P,O.
C.P.D.
Point or ",nnlnl
DellClles R......oI.W.y
P...
CoIMIoInIe1u1ll P1aI Book
~ ....... ..,,-- e,eo1,loN aOAlrlCOL
'< L/NlE
'-.....
'-.....
"-
/.... MlEA1...J I-lltiJH 41:
/ WA r~f<! LINe
t/t. TIMAIZ TWO
/ A CONDOMINiuM
all! 77t11, ~ /555 / c,pe 110, ~. u!5-7u,
NZ4" 39' 22"e
Its. 37 ' -.........
#&6- 20'3S"W ,,/
~.oo' I
(Wlf.srEIZl.Y.EVW
I?O.B.
~
"
rurU~
t.ILrtM~
rf{1ZEe
.5our#t:A8r COIZN/:lZ
.sec. 19- 29-/5
LEGAL DESCRIP110N: ULTIMAR 6.0 foot PUBUC ACCESS (South)
A tract of land lying within Sec:don 19, Towusbip 29 South, Raqe 15 East, PineUas County, Florida and beiDa more particularly
described as foUows:
Commence at the Southeast corner of said Section 19; thence N89'04'orw, for 2351.80 feet; along the South line of said
Section 19 to the westerly right-of.way One of 0uJf Boulnvd, as h now aIsts; thence along said westerly right-of-way One,
N310S8'20"B, for 553.31 feet; thence leaYfng said right-of.way Une, N89"04'orw, for 384.26 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING, said point being located on the , mean bfgh water One, as shown on City of Oe81W8ter Survey 7960-F.D,
and being recorded In the BuDchead and Erosion Control Une Plat Book 2, Pages 64 and 6S of the public records of PineUu
County, Florida: thence N65W38"W, for 6.00 feet; thence N24~9'22"B. for 15.37 feet; thence N64"06'39"W, for 78.97 feet to
the ,erosion control One, as shown on said City of Ceuwater Survey 7960-F-D: thence along said erosion control
line, N24"39'22"E, for 6.00 feet; thence leaving said line S64"06'39"B, for 84.97 feet to the aforesaid mean bfgh water One:
thence along said mean bfah water One, S24"39'22"W, for 21.24 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING: and containing
601.66 square feet, more or 1esL
NOTES: -
1. The Iketda IbowD bereoa II fot lDformatlODal putpOIet oalyud II aollateaded to depict a lurvey performed
Ie the field.
1. The aketda ahOWD hereoll wu prepared wlthoul the beDefit or I title Ibslrlet od II aubjecl 10 oy od aU
cuemeDLI, ratrlctloDl or oy other matlen at record.
3. The beariDp ahO'Ml hercoa are bued oa the South 1lae or Sectloa 19.29-1.5 u beIDa N89.04'01"W.
... The Iketchud legal deac:rfptloa IhO'Ml hereoa meetl the minimum lechDlcaJ atudarda u set forth by the
Florid. Board 01 ProfessloDal Laod SuneJOII III Oaapter 2unJ-6, Florida Aclmln1ltralive Code, pursuant to
SeeliOD ..72.02 Florida St.tuca.
.. 5. The emMa meaD hisb water lioe aiad the propoaed eroalOD coatrol Une derived from City of CJ~arw.ter
lurvey 7960-P.D. The wae beIDa recorded Ia Bulkhead od I!roIIoD CcmlrollJDe Plat Book 2, Pagel 64 aDd
65 flf the Public Recorda of PmeUu County, Florida.
PREP ARED FOR'
UL TIMAR DEVELOPMENT CORP.
PROJECT'
UL TIMAR
SCALE
1-" 30'
DATE:
1/13/93
DRAWN BY:
RMC
SEC TWP RGE.
19-29-15
~
~~
~~
i
oln
u~
.~ ~
~~
::Jl()
(J
\\(,~
~2
"'(
(1)
~!fl
C\l~
,,~
C\l~
QC
1U\ij
I{)IJ)
S3;
~~
,.,. .IJWIIIU__ A'ItJCIA,. AM::
24945 U.S. Hwy. 19 North
Clearwater, Florida 34623
Phone (813) 791-1441
PLAN
SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CKD BYla
PG
N/A
JOB NO.:
999-1141-00
SHEET NO
1 OF 2
III
'-
.....-
THIS IS NOT A SURVEY
..-- NCIZTH
o ~ !lO
~ I
~~..<:-
Ok
~c$:
'-....... ~""<:'o
""
............
...........
~t.e: /"-SO'
NM3'1'2Z~
~()()'
LiioBND
.'
POB ,aIM 01........
R/W o.ae.. RIiIlI".W.,
'.0. '. I
c.P.8. ~...... Plat Book
!
E,l dJ I
11, ;,\j h~j' 11
,.t
:\ '
,1Ij J>
~~O' 0 ~ /
I:.. If "~~~i ~
~ ^.; ~. /~
'l~~ I
,,~ 8 Q~ f
'N J ~ /
~ V () ~r /-J'
tu ~ <:<$' ~~' (
~ ~ ~ h ~ l:<r~o >
.9 ~ ~ ~\l ~
~ ~ ~~~
~ ~~~
/ WESTe12t..y -Etw
'" ~ Nf:J8.0/'-fdW
~;". /3722'
~,
~..
/
NZ4' .39' 2Z' e
/ Z~Z7'
U5- 20'.38- e
fA 00'
oS Z4' aq' 2Z" W
zt:/. tn'
t./l..TlM~~
ONe if I
A CONlX>MlNtl.lM /'-- 5' ACCESS eA:SeMeNl
eRa 107, P'tiS,4d-53. 012 7217, ~ ~
LSOAL DBSCRIP110N: ULmf:'\R 6.0 foot PUBUC Acx:ess (North)
A tract of land Iyfna withiD Secdon 19, TOWIIIbfp 29 Soutb, RuIp 15 But, PineUu County, Florida and befns more partfcuIarly
dac:ribed u Collowr.
Commence at the Southeast comer of saJd Section 19; thence N89'04'07"W, for 2351.80 feet along the South Une of saJd Section
1910 the westerly ript-ot.way Une of Gulf Boulevard, u it DOW exists; thence alan, saJd rfsht-of.way Une, N31"S8'2O"E, for
826.75 feet 10 the Southeast corner of Uldmar Two, A CoDdomfnfum, as recorded In Condominium Plat Book 110, 'lies 65.76
of the pubUc recordI of PineDu County, Florida; thence along the South Une of said Ultimar Two, A Condominium,
N58"01'4O"W, tor U7.22 feet; tbeDce N67'09'21"W, for 250.63 feet to a point being located on the melD hfah water
IDe, as IbowD OIl QtJ of Oeuwater Sarver 7960-F.O, ad beIDa recordecIln Bulkhead and BrosIon Control Une Plat Book
2. ..... 64 ad 65 of the public recorda of PIneDu Coaaty, JlIodda; tbeaoe alquid Une N24-:J9'22"B, for 5&2.91 feet to the
POINT OF BBOINNINO; tbeDce leaviDa uid Une N64W4rW, tor 84.97 feet to the erosion control Une, u shown
- the IIid 01:J of Oearntet SumJ 7960-F.O; tbeGce aIoIIt IIid erosion control line, N24-:J9'22"B, for 6.00 feet; thence
...... IIid Une S64W48"B, for 78.97 feet; thence N24-:J9'22"B, for 23.27 feet; thence SW2C138"E, for 6.00 feet to the
Nortbwat corner of tJJdmar One, A Condominium, u recorded III Condominium Plat Book 107, Pqes 43-S3 of the pubUc
records of PInelIu COunty, Florida; thence along the westerly line of saJd UltImar One, A Condominium, also being the
Iforesafd mean bIJb water Une, S24"39'22"W, for 29J9 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; IJld containing 649.80
IqIIUe feet, more or lesa.
NOTES:
1.
The skelch aIaoWD hereGO is for Worm.tiODll purpoICI oaJy aDd is DOC mteDded to depid a .unc)' performed
ill the field.
The sketch abowa hereoa ..... prepared witIaout lhe beadit 01 a title abstract uclll aubjeca 10 aD)' aDd aU
eueaaeDta. rea&rtcdoaa Or aD)' ocher matten of reoonI.
The bcarIDp aIIowD bereoa an baed OD the SoutIlIIae 01 SecdOD 19-29-15 u beIDa HWoe'O'rW.
The aelda aud legal description .14owD Iaereoa mceta the minimum tedualcalltaudarcla u let fort" by the
F10rida Board 01 'roCesaional Laud SUfY870IIIa Qaapter 211Df-6, Florida AclmlDlatrliM Code. puraUIDIlo
SectJoa 472.02 Florida SI.tues.
The nialiDa meaD hip waler liDo aild the propollCl erClIIoD coatrolliDe derMd from OIJ of Cearwaler
.uney ~F.D. The lIIDe being recordedlD BuIkbeIcI ud I!raIIoa Coatrol Uae Pial Book 2, Papa 64 aDd
60S .,r lhe Public Records or PineUu CoUDIy, florida.
1-
3.
4.
'* ,.
PREPARED fOR:
UL TIMAR DEVELOPMENT CORP.
PROJECT'
UL TIMAR
PLAN'
SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CKO BYIO C.
SCALE'
1- a 30'
...
~
~
IU
'(!. II)
~~
~V)
~~
.~ ~
~ '
I1J II)
::JQ
~\ij
~ g
Q.'(
~~
""
l\I~
"
Nf\J-
CQ
lUlU
!l~
">~
~~
,,,,. --- J'"'' AIItJCIA,. M:
24945 U.S. Hwy 19 North
Clearwater, F1orldo 3462J
Phone (81J) 791-1441
DATE'
1/13/93 :
DRAYttoI BY:
RMC
PG,
N/A
SEC ~ RGE
19-29-15
SHEET NO
2 OF 2