The URL can be used to link to this page

09/17/1992... ems. f.,t,.. . F „ E ?f kkkL' is ji. r i Order of Agenda Packs for 1992 Action Agenda - listing the Thursday, Commission Meeting Date Preliminary Agenda (This is the agenda for the worksession that is held on the Monday prior to the Thursday meeting) Any items that were "Work Session Only" and any items that did not continue onto Thursday's agenda as in they were "Pulled" off to possibly return at a later date. Some "WSO" items may not have any paperwork, i.e.. Discussion - re:...... unless something is handed out. Any information that was received at Worksession Final,Agenda - the start of the Thursday meeting "pack" the beginning 7 items are standard: Pledge of Allegiance Invocation Service Pin Awards Introductions and Awards Presentations Minutes of meetings to be approved Citizens to be heard re items not on agenda There may or may not be any paperwork for the above 7 items. The action agenda lists the results of each. Also, items at the end of the agenda (Other pending matters - Other City Attorney Items - City Manager Verbal Reports and Other Commission Action) often have no paperwork. Starting with #8 are the Items for the meeting. After each item there may be memos/information that correlate to that item which will be noted as "RE: # ". This information was not actually part of the item, it is not part of the attachments for the item but is information that will stay in the agenda pack to be microfilmed. i i After some of the items there. may be information marked as City Manager Back Up, abbreviated as CM b.u.. Again this is information that is not actually part of the agenda item but it is placed in the agenda pack. After each item there maybe information regarding that item that was handed out at the meeting. This information should have the notation "Rec'v (date)". E r When looking at an agenda cover memorandum for an item, look at the listing of attachments at the bottom of the page. If something is listed as a "plan" or "manual" this means the agenda item could be many pages in length as that type attachment was probably in notebook form for the meeting with the binder being removed from the original for microfilming. ACTION AGENDA - CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING - September 17, 1992 (6:00 P.M.) Welcome. We are glad to have you join us. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state your name and address. Persons speaking before the City Commission on other than Public Hearing items shall be limited to 3 minutes. No person shall speak more than once on the same subject unless granted permission by the City Commission. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Invocation 3. Service Awards 4. Introductions and Awards 5. Presentations 6. Minutes of Regular Meeting September 3, 1992 7. Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda 1. Mayor. 2. None. 3. 4 awards presented. 4. Proclamation: Safety Awareness Week - 9119-24192. 5. Ed Mazur - National Forget-Me-Not Assoc. - Update on POW/MIA issue; requested media cover the issue. Proclamation: POW/MIA Recognition Day 9118192. ' 6. Approved as submitted. 7. Clark Weaver requested new curbs along Glenwood Avenue South. Mr. Clark complained regarding not being compensated by Coast Guard for work he performed for them. Ken Hamilton, representing Chamber of ' Commerce, requested reconsideration of purchase of the Sun Bank Building. Mike Fields spoke in favor of leaving the Sun Bank Building option on the table. Bob Wright spoke in opposition to purchase of the Sun Bank Building, suggested Bilgore site be considered. Fred Thomas stated the Chamber put out misinformation regarding the Commission voting to spend money on a new City Hall and owed the Commission an apology. Not Before 6:00 P.M. - Sc e u e Public Hearings (1) Presentation of issues by City staff. (2) Statement of case by applicant or representative (5 minutes). (3) Statement of case by opposition.15 minutes). (4) Commission questions. (5) Comments in support and in opposition: (a) individual (3 minutes); (b) spokesperson for groups (10 minutes). (6) Commission' questions. (7) Rebuttal by opposition (5 minutes). (8) Final rebuttal by applicant or representative (5 minutes). 9/17/92 1 PUBLIC EARI 8. #9 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. a. Second Reading Ord. #5257-92 - Relating to LDC, amending Ch. 134, regarding signs and sign regulations; amending Sec. 137.005 b. Res. #92-59 - amending Res. #92-38 which established a schedule of fees Not a Public Hearing but action needed prior to Budget being adopted First Reading Ord. #5284-92 - Relating to utilities; amending Secs. 50.05(e)(1) and (3), 50.05(f)(1) and 50.05(g)(1) to decrease domestic water and wastewater rates (AS) 1992193 Budget (AS) a. Second Reading Ord. #5280-92 - millage rate for FY92/93 b. Second Reading Ord. #5281-92 - operating budget for FY92193 c. Second Reading Ord. #5282.92 - capital improvement program budget for FY92193 Florida Gulf Coast Art Center a. Declare part of Maas Brothers property surplus b. Second Reading Ord. #5283-92 - Providing portion of Maas Brothers property be sold for $750,000 to Florida Gulf Coast Art Center, Inc. Public Hearing - Declare property located at 401 S. Prospect Ave., Coachman's Heights Revised, Blk C, westerly 110' of Lots 4-6, as surplus to City needs for the purpose of leasing to the IAFF (AS) (Cont. from 712192) Public Hearing - Vacating Spruce St., between Blk 2, E of Lots 14-18 & Blk 3, W of Lot 19-21; J.H. Rouse Sub., subject to the r-o-w being retained full width as a drainage & utility easement, elimination of existing business on the W side of Spruce St. & filing a replat or Unity of Title covering the property on both sides of Spruce (Jimmie V92-07)(PW) (Cont. from 913192) Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5263-92 - IPD Zoning for property located at 22067 US19N, Clearwater 19 Commerce Park, Lot 1 (Kunnen Z92-07)(PLD) 9/17/92 'N 2 8. a. Ord. #5257-92 adopted as amended. b. Res. 92-59 adopted. 9. Ord. #5284-92 passed 1st reading. 10. a. Ord. #5280-92 adopted. b. Ord.,#5281-92 adopted as amended. r.. Ord. 115282-92 adopted as amended. 1 1. a. Approved. b. Ord. #5283-92 adopted as amended. 12. Continued to 1011192. 13. Approved without retaining as a drainage and utility easement. 14. Withdrawn. w 0 15. Variances to Sign Regulations for property located at 1500 Belleair Rd., Sec. 23-29- 15, M&B 34.04 (Fortune Fed'I S&L Assn/Fortune Bank SV92-14)(PLD) 16. (Cont. from 913192) Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5264-92 - relating to height limitations, amending Sec. 136.004 & 137.005 (LOCA92-12)(PLD) 17. Declare property located at 1002 N. Garden Ave., Joseph J. Eldridge Sub., Blk C, Lot 31, as surplus to City needs for purpose.of selling or exchanging (PLD) 16. Approved. Ord. #5264-92 passed 1st reading as amended. 17. Approved. Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances 18. Ord. #5219-92 - Roll-Off Container ordinance revision, amending Secs. 54.20 thru 54.22 and 54.24 thru 54.26, repealing Sec. 54.23 19. Ord. #5265-92 - amending Ch. 146 regarding flood protection, redefining time limit of cumulative total for definition of substantial improvement to Clearwater Beach and Sand Key 20. Ord. #5266-92 - Vacating Fifth Avenue South and portions of Main Street and Fourth Avenue South, lying within Sec. 32- 28-16 (City/Dimmitt V92-13) 21. Ord. #5267-92 - Relating to finance and taxation, amending Sec. 44.21 regarding exemptions from public service tax 22. Ord. #5268-92 - Vacating S 1' of the 10' drainage and utility easement lying along the N side of Lot 78, Clubhouse Estates of Countryside Unit 2, less the E 5' and the W 5', located at 2670 St. Andrews Dr. (Burr V92-16) 18. Ord. #5219-92 adopted. 19. Ord. #5265-92 adopted. 20. Ord. #5266-92 adopted. 21. Ord. #5267-92 adopted. 22. Ord. #5268-92 adopted. CITY MANAGER REPORTS CONSENT AGENDA (Items #23-43) - Approve as submitted less Item #39. The following items require no forma) public hearing and are subject to being approved in a single motion. However, any City Commissioner or the City Manager may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to allow discussion and voting on the item individually. 9/17/92 15. Continued to 1011192. 3 i , fE fi i i' 1 f i 0 Agreements q = •y 23. Amendments to the City's Firm Transportation Service Agreement dated 1011191 and commensurate amendments to the General Service Agreement dated 11/16/89 (GAS) 24. Supplemental Agreement No. 5 to contractual agreement with David Volkert and Associates, Inc., to provide additional studies required by permitting agencies and to design utility accommodations regarding Clearwater Pass Bridge Replacement Project, increasing the amount by $111,086 for a new total of $1,153,294.34 (PW) Bids & Contracts 25. Cash Purchase of an Uninterruptable Power System from DataComm, Tampa, FL, for $7,416.86 (AS) 26. Purchase of a combination engine and aerial ladder truck for the s=ire Dept from Saulsbury Fire Equipment Corp., Tully, NY, for $459,601 and authorize lease/purchase from the City lease/purchase vendor (FD) 27. Contract for digitizing of 21.0 gas atlas pages to Digital Engineering Consultants, Clearwater, FL, at an est. $10,500 (GAS) 28. Purchase of Black 3408 Polyethylene pipe and fittings from Phillips Engineering Co., Clearwater, FL, and to Perfection Corp., Madison, OH, for the period 'Z;'I18/92- 911'7193, for total est. $268,745.80 (GAS) 29. Contract for construction of 9,000' of 4" and 3,500' of 2" gas main in West Tarpon Springs (Mares Blvd. Phase 11) to Visk Construction, Inc., Riverview, FL, at a total est. $80,450 (GAS) 30. Purchase of 2 Modular Secretarial Work Stations from Pride of Florida, Polk City, FL, for $7,500 (GAS) 31. Extension of security guard service contract with Janus Securtiy Services for the period 8115192-8115193, for approx. 2,314 hours, at an est. $15,272 (LIB) 9117192 4- a i•> ?u f i 32. Purchase of 6 EDACS FMD Scanning 12 watt radios and 1 EDACS MPA system portable radio with DES voice guard for the l Police Dept. to General Electric Co., Lynchburg, VA, for $15,296 (PD) 33. 1 year extension to contract for purchase of miscellaneous cast iron meterlvalve boxes, lids, covers, etc., with Sunshine Foundry and Machine Co., St. Petersburg, FL, for the period 10/l/92-9/30193, at an est. $46,837.50 (PW) 34. Purchase of computer hardware for the PW Dept, from National Data Products, at an est. $6,103.65 (PW) 35. Extension of contract for mowing i Clearwater Airpark with Greenturf Services, t for the period 1011192-9130193, for a total cost not to exceed $17,000 (PW) 36. Purchase of a Microwave Digestion System for the Water Pollution Control Division from Questron Corp., Princeton, NJ, for $19,800(m) i 37. Purchase of 3 acid storage cabinets for the ' Water Pollution Control Division from Descon International inc., Lindenhurst, NY, at an est. $4,100 (PW) Plans & Plats 38. Receive Modified site plan for the Sayview Baptist Church located on Meadow Lark Lane and Kentucky Avenue and authorize the DRC to approve the final site plan subject to signs and fencing/walls being subject to separate review and permitting processes (PLO) Receipt & Referral 39. (Cont. from 8113192) - Land Use Plan Amendment to CommerciallTourist Facilities, CPD Zoning and Preliminary Site Plan for property located in the NW 1/4 of the SW 114 of Sec. 0-29-15, M&B 32.01 (Sun Bank of Tampa Bay LUP92-14, Z92-08)(PLD) I; 9/17/92 i 39. Received and Referred. ; ! 5 ', 'r '1 . I 40. Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment to Medium Density Residential and RMH Zoning for property located at 2975 Gulf to Bay Blvd., William Brown's Sub. of Bayview, Lot 17 and the S 88.44' of the W 153.92' of Lot 2, 2.4 acres (Kirkpatrick A92-11,LUP92-18)(PLD) 41. Proposed Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code Amendments (PLD) CITY ATTORNEY Agreements, Deeds & Easements 42. Quitclaim deed - South 30' of right-of-way of Allen Avenue (Northwood Estates) 43. Sanitary sewer lien,agreement - Carlton Terrace 1 st Addition; Blk F, Lot 4 (2717 & 2719 South Drive - Black) 9 OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT 44. .1991/92 Third Quarter Budget Review (AS) a. First Reading Ord, #5278-92 - operating budget b. First Reading Ord. #5279-92 - capital improvement program budget 45. Staff update on the Annexation Committee and Annexation Incentive Program and receive direction regarding recommendations (PLD) 46. Res, #92-57 - authorizing issuance of a guarantee for loans made under the CNHS economic development loan program (PLD) 47. Development Code Adjustment Board - 1 appointment (CLK) 48. Other Pending Matters 44. Approved. a. Ord. #5278-92 passed 1st reading. b. Ord. #5279-92 passed 1st reading. 45. Continued to 10/1/92. 46. Approved. Res. #92-57 adopted. 47. Appointed John B. Johnson, Jr. 48. None. 49. Other City Attorney Items 49. None. 50. City Manager Verbal Reports a. Bordner Survey 9/17192 6 50. a. authorized to proceed. 51 • Other Commission Action a• Appointment of replacement for Commissioner Regulski 52• Adjournment •4 51. a, No Action. Dorgan questioned how staff was responding td request by Sand Key Civic Association regarid ng placing utilities underground as part of Gulf Boulevard widening. Betty Deptula responded that a meeting has been scheduled with the Association to discuss their prioriti es, will have a report at the 9128192 workse i ss on. Berld expressed displeasure regarding the Chamber's Busine ss alert. Stated the Commission has only voted to select a site and go out for RFQs for a new City Hall. Requested Chamber members be notified that what they responded to E were not the facts. Ga? rv-ey verified the City Attorney and City Manager evaluati ons will be on 9/28/92 worksession. ' 52. 12:27 a.m. i ' . I1 ' s . i i ? I } s 7. } . t k f' t F t PRELIMINARY AGENDA Work Session - immediately after CRA & Pension which begin at 1:00 P.M. Monday, September 14, 1992 Clearwater City Commission Meeting - 6:00 P.M. - Thursday, September 17, 1992 Service Awards WORK SESSION ONLY 1. Hillsborough County Land 2. Status of Clearwater Pass Bridge - Volkert 3. Sidewalks on Mandalay Avenue AS ADMINISTRATIVE- SERVICES 1. Public Hearing - Declare property located at 401 S. Prospect Ave., Coachman's Heights Revised, Blk C,' westerly 110' of Lots 4-6, as surplus to City needs for the purpose of leasing to the IAFF (PH) 2. First Reading Ord. #5284-92 - Relating to utilities; amending Secs. 50.05(e)(1) and (3), 50.05(f)(1) and 50.05(g)(1) to decrease domestic water and wastewater rates (CM) 3. Cash Purchase of an Uninterruptable Power System from DataComm, Tampa, FL, for $7,416.86 (Consent B&C) ' 4. 1991192 Third Quarter Budget Review a. First Reading Ord. #5278-92 - operating budget b. First Reading Ord. #5279-92 - capital improvement program budget 5. 1992193 Budget a. Second Reading Ord. #5280-92 - millage rate for FY92/93 b. Second Reading Ord. #5281-92 - operating budget for FY92/93 c. Second Reading Ord. #5282-92 - capital improvement program budget for FY92/93 FD FIRE - 1. Purchase of a combination engine and aerial ladder truck for the Fire Dept from Saulsbury Fire Equipment Corp., Tully, NY, for $459,601 and authorize lease/purchase from the City lease/purchase vendor (Consent B&C) AS GA SYSTEM 1. Contract for digitizing of 210 gas atlas pages to Digital Engineering Consultants, Clearwater, FL, at an est. $10,500 (Consent B&C) 2. Purchase of Black 3408 Polyethylene pipe and fittings from Phillips Engineering Co., Clearwater, FL, and to Perfection Corp., Madison, OH, for the period 9118192-9117/93, for a total est. $268,745.80 (Consent B&C) 3. Contract for construction of 9,000' of 4" and 3,500' of 2" gas main in West Tarpon Springs (Meres Blvd. Phase 11) to Visk Construction, Inc., Riverview, FL, at a total est. $80,450, (Consent B&C) 4. Amendments to the City's Firm Transportation Service Agreement dated 1011191 and commensurate amendments to the General Service Agreement dated 1 1116189 (Consent Agrmt) 5. Modular Furniture (Consent B&C) B LIBRARY 1. Extension of security guard service contract with Janus Securtiy Services for the period 8/15192-8115193, for approx. 2,314 hours, at an est. $15,272 (Consent B&C) 9/14/92 „r 1 1 I PD POLICE 1. Purchase of 6 EDACS FMD Scanning 12 watt radios and 1 EDACS MPA system portable radio with DES voice guard for the Police Dept. to General Electric Co., Lynchburg, VA, for $15,296 (Consent B&C) PW PUBLIC WORKS 1, (Cont. from 7/2192) Public Hearing - Vacating Spruce St., between Blk 2, E of Lots 14-18 & Blk 3, W of Lot 19-21, J.H. Rouse Sub„ subject to the r-o-w being retained full width as a drainage & utility easement, elimination of the existing business on the W side of Spruce St. and filing a replat or Unity of Title covering the property on both sides of Spruce (Jimmie V92-07)(PH) 2. 1 year extension to contract for purchase of miscellaneous cast iron meter/valve boxes, lids, covers, etc., with Sunshine Foundry and Machine Co., St. Petersburg, FL, for the period 1011192-9/30/93, at an est. $46,837.50 (Consent S&C) 3. Purchase of computer hardware for the PW Dept. from National Data Products, at an est. $6,103.65 (Consent B&C) 4.. Extension of contract for mowing Clearwater Airpark with Greenturf Services, for the period 1011192-9/30/93, for a total cost not to exceed $17,000 (Consent B&C) 5. Purchase of a Microwave Digestion System for the Water Pollution Control Division from Questron Corp., Princeton, NJ, for 519,800 (Consent B&C) 6. Purchase of 3 acid storage cabinets for the Water Pollution Control Division from Laboratory Safety Supply, Janesville, WI, at an est. $4,500 (Consent B&C) 7, Supplemental Agreement No. 5 to contractual agreement with David Volkert and Associates, Inc., to provide additional studies required by permitting agencies and to design utility accommodations regarding Clearwater Pass Bridge Replacement Project, increasing the amount by $111,086 for a new total of $1,1153,294.34 (Consent Agrmt) PL&D PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 1 . (Cont. from 913/92) Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5263-92 - IPD Zoning for property located at 22067 US19N, Clearwater 19 Commerce Park, Lot 1 (Kunnen Z92-07)(PH) 2. (Cont. from 9/3192) Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5264-92 - relating to height limitations, amending Sec. 136.004 & 137.005 (LDCA92-12)(PH) 3. Declare property located at 1002 N. Garden Ave., Joseph J. Eldridge Sub., Blk C, Lot 31, as surplus to City needs for purpose of.selling or exchanging (PH) 4. Variances to Sign Regulations for property located at 1500 Belleair Rd., Sec. 23-29-15, M&B 34.04 (Fortune Fed'I S&L Assn/Fortune Bank SV92-14)(PH) 5. Res. #92-57 - authorizing issuance of a guarantee for loans made under the CNHS economic development loan program (CM) 6. (Cont. from 8/13192) - Land Use Plan Amendment to Commercial/Tourist Facilities, CPD Zoning and Preliminary Site Plan for property located in the NW 1 /4 of the SW 114 of Sec. G'-29-1 5, M&B 32.01 (Sun Bank of Tampa Ray LUP92-14, Z92-08)(Consent R&R) 7. Staff update on the Annexation Committee and Annexation Incentive Program and receive direction regarding recommendations (Consent C&S) 8. Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment to Medium Density Residential and RMH Zoning for property located at 2975 Gulf to Bay Blvd., William Brown's Sub. of Bayview, Lot 17 and the S 88.44' of the W 153.92' of Lot 2, 2.4 acres (Kirkpatrick A92-1 1,LUP92-18)(Consent R&R) 9. Proposed Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code Amendments (Consent R&R) 10. Receive Modified site plan for the Bayview Baptist Church located on Meadow Lark Lane and Kentucky Avenue and authorize the DRC to approve the final site plan subject to signs and fencing/walls being subject to separate review and permitting processes (CM P&P) 11. 'Direction regarding appointment of a City representative to the CNHS Board (WSO) 9114/92 2 L CITY CLERK 1. Development Code Adjustment Board - 1 appointment (CM) A LEGAL DEPARTMENT Second Reading Ordinances 1. Ord. #5219-92 - Roll-Off Container ordinance revision, amending Secs. 54.20 thru 54.22 and 54.24 thru 54.26, repeating Sec. 54.23 2. Ord. #5257-92 - Relating to LDC, amending Ch. 134, regarding signs and sign regulations; amending Sec. 137.005 3. Ord. #5265-92 - amending Ch. 146 regarding flood protection, redefining time limit of cumulative total for definition of substantial improvement to Clearwater Beach and Sand Key 4. Ord. #5266-92 - Vacating Fifth Avenue South and portions of Main Street and Fourth Avenue South, lying within Sec. 32-28-16 (City/Dimmitt V92-13) 5. Ord. #5267-92 - Relating to finance and taxation, amending Sec. 44.21 regarding exemptions from public service tax 6. Orel. #5268-92 - Vacating S 1' of the 10' drainage and utility easement lying along the N side of Lot 78, Clubhouse Estates of Countryside Unit 2, less the E 5' and the W 5', located at 2670 St. Andrews Dr. (Burr V92-16) Agreements, Deeds and Easements 1. Quitclaim deed - South 30' of right-of-way of Allen Avenue (Northwood Estates) 2. Sanitary sewer lien agreement - Carlton Terrace 1 st Addition, Blk F, Lot 4 (2717 & 2719 South Drive - Black) OTHER CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS'. 1. Florida Gulf Coast Art Center a. Declare part of Maas Brothers property surplus 1 b. Second Reading Ord. #5283-92 - Providing portion of Maas Brothers property be sold for $750,000 to the Florida Gulf Coast Art,Center, Inc. c. Discussion regarding straw ballot question Uty Manager Verbal Reports Other Commission Action 1. Appointment of replacement for Commissioner Regulski 2. City Attorney Evaluation 3. City Manager Evaluation ourn 5 9/14192 3 l r"' MAIM CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Agenda Cover Memorandum Item 0 ittlEa? Meeting Date: 9/14/92 Subject: SERVICE AWARDS Recommendation/Motion: The following employees be presented with service awards for their length of service in the employment of the City of Clearwater. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same, BACKGROUND: ? Years: Trent D. Whitler Parks & Recreation Robert S. Teilone F'i re Elaine A. Muldowney Planning & Development Gina L. Morrow Parks & Recreation Corine Woodard Parks & Recreation Richard D. Debord Public Works/]nfrastructure/Water 10 Years: Doreen B. Feldhaus Margaret L. Simmons Years: Emmanuel Hutchinson Planning & Development City Manager's Office Public Works/Utilities/Solid Waste t 'S ¦ Reviewed by: Legal Originating Dept.: uman Resources Budget Purchasing _ User Dept.: Risk Mgmt. DIS ACM Advertised: Other Date: Submitted by: Paper' ? Not required Affected parties ? Notified City Manager ? Not required Costs: Commission Action: Total ? Approved ? Approved w/conditions Current FY Denied ? Continued to: Funding Source: L] Capt. Imp. ? Operating EJ Other Appropriation Code: Attachments: ? None ?r 2 TO: Mayor Rita Garvey' " F FROM: Betty J. Blunt, Confidential Clerk Receptionist ' t COPIES: City Commissioners, Michael Wright, Cystdie Goudeau SUBJECT: Presentations at the September 14, 1992 Work Session DATE: September 14, 1992 The following presentations will be made at the September 14, 1992 Work Session. SERVICE PINS i 5 ears Elaine Muldowney, Planning and Development, 10-years Doreen Feldhaus, Planning and Development (desk clock) Margaret Simmons, City Manager's Office (desk clock) ; s . i ,?gEAI?? f WORK SESSION ONLY Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Item # Meeting Date: _ 09L/92 W SO I SUBJECT: SALE OF CITY PROPERTY TO HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: To discuss status of nomination of City owned property in Hillsborough County for purchase by the Hillsborough Environmental Lands Acquisition and Protection i. Program (ELAPP); and discuss options for encouraging the county to purchase the 3 property. ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: Attached is information prepared by Hillsborough County Staff and Frank Blandford, of Tourtelot Brothers, Inc., the City's agent in dealing with Hillsborough County in the nomination of our property for purchase by the ELAPP program. The County's program is interested in acquiring the portion of property west of Patterson Road, which is approximately 50% of the City owned property. Although our property was ranked as a category "B" there are certain actions we can pursue to encourage Hillsborough county to purchase our property. Frank Blandford will attend the Work Session on September 14, 1992 to discuss the project status. Reviewed by: originating dept: Costs: S Coamission Action: Legal ZA City Manager Total ? Approved Budget NIA Purchasing NIA S ? roved w/conditions APP Risk Mgmt. NZA User Dept; Current Fiscal Yr. 13 Denied ACM N-_ L - cis ACM ? City Manager funding source: ? Continued to: other ? Capital Imp. Advertised: © operating Attachments: Date: ? other }) Report from Frank Paper: Blandford l e Hot Required Affected Parties 2) Letter from Hillsborough 0 Notified Appropriation Code: County submit ed ? Not Required 3) Letter from Ethel Hammer 4) Hillsborough County Report City Man g None y REALTORS REVIEW OF BROOKER CREEK R I VER I NE SYS'T'EM E LAPP NOM I NA7I ON 6/24/92 i .i :t f ri This review will cover the period July 16 - August 21, 1992 Hillsborough County has ranked all 16 qualifying sites, including the City of Clearwater's property in Northwest Hillsborough County, for possible future purchases under the ELAPP Program. On August L2, 1992, the County's ELAPP Site Selection Team rated the sites and assigned a numerical score of 56 points to the "Clearwater Property" (Refer to Exhibit 1 accompanying this report). In addition, according to Hillsborough County's policy, this score placed the Clearwater property in a "B" category. This is explained in Exhibit 1 as well is in a Memorandum from Ethel Hammer marked Exhibit 2, A "B" site is considered for acquisition by Hillsborough County if one of the following questions is satisfied: 1. Discount from appraised value. Would the owner consider selling the property at a .discount from whatever the appraised value is determined to be? This might be as low as a 5% discount or whatever the owner might be motivated to propose to the County. Or, it might be a variable discount subject to-what a future appraised value per acre, falling in a certain range, might be, 3 2. Availability of outside funding. Is there a possibility of financing the purchase from another source? If SWFWMD were to join Hillsborough County in acquiring the Clearwater Property, then this could be another point to motivate the County to proceed with the purchase. Howevcr, unless the SWFWMD staff changes its direction on this, the District plans to assist in only the acquisitioh of the "Brooker Creek- Headwaters" site in another part of the County. 3. Imminent threat of development. How close to actual developme6t is the property; i.e., has it been zoned, subdivided and/or permitted for residential construction? "Offers to purchase" the raw acreage unfortunately do not count as highly in this category, according to the ELAPP staff. ' Nevertheless, the City again can stress the private offers to purchase the property received in recent months since the City never intended to rezone or subdivide the property anyway. „ 414 •41h AVENUE NORTH, 5Y. PETERSBURG, FLOR1DR 33701 (813) 821.7828 Reeldendel • (813) 823.8383 COmmeTcl\l t i ,13 1 w 1 REVIEW OF BROOKER CREEK RIVEkINE SYSTEM ELAPP NOMINATION 6/24/92 Page 2 4.' AApproved_ or funded . restoration or resource-based lurk Is there an approved and -funded restoration plan available for the Clearwater property? There are at least three possibilities for the City to consider in this regard: .t (a) SWIM funds, restoration obtained for could involv Hillsborough and SWFWMD. allocated by SWFWMD for site purposes, possibly could be the Brooker Creek property. This e an "Interlocal Agreement" with County, the City of Clearwater, (b) The City of Clearwater might prepare a restoration plan for the site (i.e., using the services of Dr. Craig Huegel of Pinellas County Environmental; Biological Resources Associates of Tampa; or, its own environmental staff), subject to approval by the County., Funding for the restoration of the site with native material might be included as a contingency in the sale agreement with a certain amount of proceeds of the sale "set aside in escrow" for that purpose. (c) A third possibility, mentioned by the Hillsborough County ELAPP staff, would be to extend Pinellas County's management of Pinellas Preserve into the Clearwater property. This could be set up as an extension of the larger Preserve area and as a "testing ground" For restoration of other sections in Pinellas County, Whether or not Pinellas would have authority to do this could be a question. The next step for Hillsborough County is to present the report on "Recommendations Concerning Hillsborough County's ELAP Program -- 5th Year" to the Board of County Commissioners on September 2, 1992. Refer to Exhibit 3, the draft of this report,' approved by the County Parks and Recreation Board on August 20, 1992. '. Following approval on September 2nd, the next step is up to the City, of Clearwater to determine how negotiations should proceed with the "B" site designation. Preliminary discussions between the City and Hillsborough County officials might open a direction to pursue. This should be accomplished in early September so the momentum for purchasing the site can be maintained, I r t 1r a HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY Florida OO.Utp OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I Phyllis Husansky Joe Chillura Pam lario Sylvia Ipmbell i Jan Platt James D. Selvey Ed Tumnchik Office of the County Administrator Frederick B. Karl All August 11, 1992 Frank Blandford C/O Tourlelot Brothers, Inc. 414 4th Avenue North St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Dear Mr. Blandford: ScniorMsistsnt County Administrators Patricia tlrarl t-krry ttlick James M. Butlrey Assistant County Administrators Edwin Itunzeker Jimmic !feel The Site Selection Team of the Environmental Lands Acquisition and Protection Program (ELAPP), has proposed a ranking of class "B" for the "Clearwater Property" Site, which you nominated for consideration this year. A class ttBtt Site is defined as: C .S. "B" Any site with a point total from forty--five (45 to fifty-nine (59) or ' due to capacity in class "A") will be in this classification. No more than fifteen sites (including class "A" sites) will'be in this { classification level at any one time. If more than fifteen (15) sites qualify, the most recent nomination(s) will be temporarily placed in "Class C". sites in this classification may be considered for acquisition by satisfying at least one of the following: 3 1) Owner is willing to sell at a discount from appraised value. 2) Funding assistance is available from another agency. 3) An eminent threat of development exists. 4) An approved and funded restoration or resource based park plan exists. i This recommendation will be presented to the Parks & Recreation Board prior to final approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The Parks & Recreation Board will meet Thursday, August 20, 1992, at 9:30 a.m., in the Northlakes Community Center Building, 2650 North Lakeview Drive; off Dale Mabry (entrance to Northlakes development, on east side of Dale Mabry Highway, north of ! Gaither High School). There will be an opportunity for Public comment ifl\you care to attend. Thank you for your interest in our program. Should you have any questions or care to discuss this project in more detail, please contact me at 272-5840. Sinc ely, Peter Fowler, Manager PARKS AND RECREATION HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY Post Office Box 1110 .'Pampa, Horitla 33601 An AJTrmrrtiveAclio"Ih' veil Olymirl unity Nmployer "" printed on nocvded paper .iiiiii IM LSBOROUGH COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL LANDS ACQUISITION AND PROTECTION PROGRAM QUALIFYING CRITERIA Environmental lands are those lands which shall have as their purpose the conservation and protection of environmentally unique, irreplaceable and valued ecological resources. The primary purpose of acquiring such lands shall be for resource protection, but all lands shall be open for public use and enjoyment to the extent that the County finds such use compatible with the conservation and protection of these lands. Each environmental lands project shall be qualified by satisfying one or more of the following criteria: L Land containing native, relatively unaltered flora and fauna representing a natural habitat unique to, or scarce within the State or County. II. Land that provides or could provide a significant habitat important to the support or protection of endangered or threatened plants or animals. III. Land containing an unusual, outstanding, or unique geologic feature. IV. Land which plays a vital role in the enhancement and protection of water quality and quantity or which provides protection for fish and wildlife habitat but which cannot be adequately protected through local, state, and federal regulatory programs. V. Land that provides valuable .access, land links, buffer zones, or additions to existing environmentally endangered lands and which is essential for protection and management of those endangered lands. VI. Land containing sign.incant archaeological sites. . 4? RANKING CLASSIFICATION CLASS "A" Any site with a point total of sixty (60) or more will be in this classification. All sites in this category will be considered for purchase at any time. No more than ten (10) sites will be- in this classification at any one time. If more than ten (10) sites qualify, the most recent nomination(s) will be temporarily placed in "Class B" until a vacancy is available. CLASS °s° Any site with a point total from foray-five (45 to fifty-nine (59) or due to capacity in class "A") will be in this classification. If more than twenty (20) sites qualify, the most recent nomination(s) will be temporarily placed in "Class 'C"until a vacancy is available. Sites in this classification may be considered for acquisition by satisfying at least one of the following: 1) Owner. is willing to sell at a discount from appraised value. 2) .Funding assistance is available from another agency. 3) An eminent threat of development exists. 4) An approved and funded restoration or resource based park plan exists. FF f } t ' a 1 g CLASS "C" _ Any site with a point total from thirty (30) to forty-four (44) (or due to capacity in class "B") will be in this classification. Sites in this classification may be considered for acquisition by satisfying at least one of the following: 1) Owner is willing to sell for 80% of appraised value. 2) There will be sufficient funds within one year to purchase the Class "C" site proposed and approximately 75% of all Class "A" and "B" sites scheduled for acquisition. 3) There are no more than six Class "A" and "B" sites. 4) The site can be acquired at less than appraised value with 50% of the funding from another agency. 5) An approved and funded restoration or resource based park plan exists. <.4 Sites That Meet Criteria for .5th Year ' • -..... . .., ' f ( ¦ % 1 r ! ¦ !¦ ! ¦ p 1 - . ¦ 11 1 L awn f I ¦?,? r ? ! ' 1NtVt Ih111 LM IRI L<~r!!? •- ti,? ? +?• , ?+ •1 r 1 •.1 71 ? . ...•. ? 1. .' ? ? • ? ? y? :5 , ?• • ?• ?1?? • •• r .•/•'??•?? ?r?rrfl¦rrrrrlrln• ` ?•• j•.• r?ri~? .? '-?' ??• .: it.¦t?• ti. •.. / .. y " L 7 ... r - ? •• • • -' ?:X t1 ? i'_ ![-^ 1 Lr•r r.?crn?nrw 1 i SITE LOCATION MAP ¦ u r •• ?.5 { `a W 0 ¦ r ,.0 proy Roa;•,% r r n n N N n N Y n gna35 a•noi o3Tsgr? on e o N p e o r4 n sapjasO3 1 3 ¦•¦adA u 7 3n0aI ! e N v ^ w wr e Ij3U rF( x••a? )Td T2 N c" ?. n ., dr w N on sapT2xo3 n ?'+ N r ,r N e e e .r .* •03=uru ST331'1 gn25S 4:13 unS.r Y e N b e G ?-, n o 339sL •UO®TS o n o R o .. n e .. •3TS VOPTOgS R N n N N n N n 3uTOd ruTa N r N ^ Y r N V N N CI 40MOL i•tro?{ O Y n y n n Q n 4 ?+ N u0T3ra03sal 10423 ,C0u4T•Q N n o V - o n n ,r n uOT3txO3.0y 300a35 0442443 N n a w n o w Y • n r gOUTV 0"03 n n n n N n Y v N R3a0doad a03rns?rT3 , n o n w r er w n N N ¦a0prKp••g x••x3 ]410020 n N - Y N - r N n N x••43 a03enx3•Tg w Y N { N N w Tv r?1 w Y. N IR f1 N N M1 HS N r M w .Y .t r .* ?! 4 .t Y a a ? ^ n n n n n n ^ n R n w ? N N N N N N N N M N N N 1ppp? .? r '? N r N .a N ?..? '+ r M C W N O O O p p O O O O O O u d y Y { 4 O 0 U 4W1 W • w 4 v r ¦ r Y • 9 •"• w O .. • 6 C. u w r 7 o " w i r • r "i . a7 ?r n+N a0? w ? : W r M b -Yr t 1 C . we ?a 1 r a: C • q i u 3 ? r do w A i M o. t i • • 55 W • 7 Y b . . w a 3, t O w r L.7 '+ M • M W • Q w r Y L r ~ r M • w w Y Y G • O b N !? 4. Z Y ti .y Y Y • 4 Y O ? .1 i to Y Y _ 6 r V i 2 .i . C • o q Y • m C -C Lb 13 ~ Y M Y C p C > 7 0 C 'a L O V: w C to . Y .+ y e Y a= r w Y 7. ¦ r r w 9 G > Y r w O w v/ w O 4, Y `w q Y 6 O 9 r I O ¦ 0 • ri Y ¦ M w r • • • ¦ ¦ • r L' ¦ w M w 7 4 C Y • • y p 4p O N C b O w Y 4r • w O C do to c < 7 w ] O M r • 4 ? ? • 4 C ? •0 u ti + i 4 ,7 O p y O ? O r 0 . ,. • y? • •i O• ? ?• w w Y Y Y Y w y o w O Y tl ? Y • Y • • i i G r x cr d w O • 4 r v Y Y • • y u • WO O O . . . . r 0 r7 M Y u r 7 w W r w m t Y 4 W M Y G v • C r Q •• Y • D ¦ N r ? • ? ? •O h 4 OY ? r r n .. 4V N o• •. n r 07 ? V a 4 r ? r h N n N 10 N 07 O+ Y1 b ? Y h o •o n Y to r ftl cr. Le C r h M n u r ¦. r at •% n n V to N Q G m M1 r .An in „ 07 aO O r V N n O Y Y y ¦ a a R A d Y W • 4 N n •? R ? G 9 • w w a w o •e ? N ? 3 0% so %D A7 h r •• W t w H ¦ O O O O K N Y {O! M Y ..1 h •i r.1 r w. ?.i E O< L C 0 ? a p p Iw b x Q y 8 I I • 7 ? J 0 9 F w d A Mp Y g Y O a O w .» 6 • r d ¦ H CC w " y O . ? ` py } • O• r w Y w 0 ¦ C w O w o • O i • M ¦r • Q M G A H N w w .4 N r1 v ¦ Y Y V [ { 8 4 y r aa •i A ? • L { * 4 £ Y • • p A r Q d • O bb • r Y Y ? • r f N iF • ¢ A M } Y r r r> 9w a 1 Rf.P P?+ H r r Y N Y M Y Y 'J G I • Nr Y "• "• r 7 • V N M N Nz a O g 0 0 0 i a N Y Y N L k 1. M M 4 M = M ? W w rrrrrr r ¦. I ? tr THEODORE C. TAUB, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1040 FIRST UNION CENTER 100 SOUTH ASHLEY DRIVE TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TAMPA (010) 220.0000 TELECOPIER (013) 229-0550 M E M O R A N D U M IN TO: FROM: DATE: Frank Blandford Ethel Hammer August 13, 1992 MAILING ADDRESS; POST OFFICE BOX 3430 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33601 RE: Ranking of the Clearwater Property for ELAPP Acquisition ---------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to our discussion, I spoke with Pete Fowler of the Hillsborough County Parks and Recreation Department regarding the final ranking for the City of Clearwater property in the ELAPP site selection process. The purpose of my discussion with Pete was to explore the basis for the specific numerical rankings and to ascertain the difference between an "A" site and a "B" site. According to Pete, there is very little flexibility in the actual numerical ranking that is assigned to each category. Internal policies have been developed which-provide guidelines to staff on the ranking of each category. For example, category 12 which evaluates the degree of endangerment to the site due to development is actually scored on the basis of the level 'of development approvals which have been obtained by the property owner. A nine or a ten ranking might be assigned in this category to a site which is platted and ready to pull building permits. Although the Clearwater property has been assigned a "B" rating, Pete Fowler advised that there is virtually no difference between an "A" and "B" site. The County Real Estate Department has been directed by the Board of County Commissioners to establish "A" sites for the purpose of entering into negotiations with property owners of those sites prior to any other sites. However, should the owner of a "B" site approach the County, that site could be considered concurrently with a site which has an "A" ranking. As pointed out in Pete's letter of August 11,:1,992, "B" sites will be considered if the criteria enumerated in the letter are met. f t? j' `. 6 1}. I? I I1 • S I 1 ' iet if ?? 3 t I .E E, I ' S 77EfiE 41: ?I. I w ?I r ` Mr. Frank Blandford Page Two August 13, 1992 Pete advised that the County has construed the discount from , appraised value to mean any monetary,figure less than the actual. z appraisal. If you should need any additional information-regarding this, please feel free to call, me.. h: EAH/ j t 1 1 "?sX 11, A I 1 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA Report To The Board of County Commissioners Recommendations Concerning HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY'S ENVIRONMENTAL LANDS ACQUISITION AND PROTECTION PROGRAM (ELAPP) • FIFTH YEAR ELAPP Site Assessment Team ELAPP Site Review Team ELAPP Site Selection Team Parks & Recreation Department Real, Estate Department August 1992 S} 1 • 1 Table of Contents ' Staff Recommendation . .. . ............... •• = Executive Summary . .............. ... ........... .. .. .. , " Re ?. port ......... .......................................... 3 .. ...., Appendices . ............... • . . . .. ..:................. Separate. Document ' ELAPP information and files are available at the Hillsborough County Parks and Recreation De artm p . ent, 1101 East Rivercove Street, Tampa, Florida 33604,.te)epone number (813) 272-5840 d ? R , an the Hillsborough County Real Estate De artment p , 412 Madison Street' Suite 816 T V , ampa, Florida 33601. _ 1 ? 1 ? f•~l i 1 7 tsi s e Executive Summary On March 3, 1987, a referendum providing for the collection of a .25 mil tax, for four years, for the purchase or protedtion of environmentally sensitive lands was approved by the voters of Hillsborough County. This four year quarter mil tax should provide approximately twenty-one million dollars. Administration of the program was assigned to the Parks and Recreation Department. To ensure citizen involvement, three teams were established for the purpose of assessing, analyzing, and selecting sites. The ELAPP Advisory Committee was established to guide the preservation and acquisition process (appendix B). Also, in February of 1989, a position of Acquisition Manager was established in the Real Estate Department to carry out these processes. In 1990, the voters approved another ELAPP referendum, authorizing the County to issue bonds up to $100 million that would be retired by the levy of ad valorem taxes not to exceed .25 mil in any one year, to designate a portion of such funding for site restoration and management, and to permit the conveyance of such lands to other public agencies for the purpose of preservation, provided the proceeds be used to acquire additional land or retire bonds. Through the first four years, the ELAPP Teams have completed one hundred twenty reviews and identified forty-nine as meeting the ELAPP criteria for protection or acquisition. The program has acquired approximately 10,500 acres at a cost of around $40.3 million. There is an additional 755 acres contained in pending agreements that total nearly $1.8 million. The County has received or has agreements in place with other government agencies for joint acquisitions that total $11.4 million on acquisitions M completed by the County, which means that over half of the acquisitions have been through partnerships with other government agencies. There is an additional $2.7 million approved through the Florida Communities Trust for the Cypress Creek Preserve. Currently approved sites are in various stages of negotiations and are referenced in the ELAPP Status Report available from the Real Estate Department. The fifth year nominations submitted through November 1, 1992, totaled twenty seven. Sixteen of these were found to meet the selection criteria. 2 it .l 11 P* 0 Environmental Lands Acquisition and Protection Program (ELAPP) Rclx)rt On January 7, 1987, the Board of County Commissioners approved an Environmentally . Sensitive Lands Ordinance which took effect upon the passage of a referendum on March 3, 1987. The voters of Hillsborough County passed the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Referendum by a three to two margin providing for a one-quarter mil tax over a four-year period to purchase sensitive lands in Hillsborough County. The tax was projected to raise approximately twenty-one million dollars in revenues over a four-year period for the purchase or protection of these lands. The Environmental Lands Acquisition and Protection Program (ELAPP) was established for the purpose of acquiring,, preserving and protecting endangered and environmentally sensitive lands, beaches, parks and recreational lands in Hillsborough County. The purpose of acquiring such lands will be for resource protection; however, all lands shall be open for public use and enjoyment to the extent that the County finds such use compatible with the preservation and protection of these lands. County staff and the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Committee developed guidelines and criteria for nominations (appendix A), assessments, review, and selection of environmentally sensitive lands to be acquired and protected by Hillsborough County. Additionally, in order to proceed with the implementation of EL.APP, the Committee's structure was extended to include the appointment of Site Assessment, Site Review, and Site Selection Teams. On June 23, 1988, the Board approved the first year recommendations to pursue acquisition or protection of each of the eighteen sites determined to meet the criteria. An advisory committee has been appointed to guide the acquisition and protection process for real estate aspects.of the program (appendix B). Additionally, in February 1989, a position of Acquisition Manager was created and staffed within the Real Estate Department. . In 1990, the voters approved another ELAPP referendum, authorizing the County to issue bonds up to $100 million that would be retired by the levy of ad valorem taxes not to exceed .25 mil in any one year, to designate a portion of such funding for site restoration and management, and to permit the conveyance of such lands to other public agencies for the purpose of preservation, provided the proceeds be used to acquire additional land or retire bonds. ELAPP has now accomplished the fifth year task of producing a listing of eligible projects from current projects and newly nominated sites. 3 The County advertised, through local media, that nominations would be accepted through November 1, 1991 for sites meeting the criteria of ELAPP. Twenty seven forms were received by the County Parks and Recreation Department and provided to the Site Assessment Team. Site Assessment Team members visited the sites in the months of November and December to develop Preliminary Site Assessments. These assessments contained information relative to the qualifying criteria, location maps, and recommendations to the Site Review Team. The Site Review Team received the Preliminary Assessment Report in January. Upon the Site Review Team's recommendation, sixteen of these sites %yere referred back to the Site Assessment Team for a full assessment, four were placed in a pending status, and eleven sites were identified as not meeting the selection criteria. Ultimately, sixteen sites were determined to qualify for the program. The Site Selection Team was provided complete assessment reports for the new sites and advised of any changes to previously approved sites since fourth year report. On July 14, 1992, a public meeting was held to receive information from individuals, groups, nominators and property owners. Each property owner and nominator was notified of this opportunity. Information from these collective sources, along with individual research by Team members, has been used to formulate the Site Selection Team's fifth year program recommendation. Tile adopted ranking policy scores a site on fifteen factors (appendix D). The majority of the factors are concerned with environmental characteristics of the site, but several factors address practical aspects such as ease of acquisition, cost relative to size, and threat of development. Once all the factors have been assessed, the site's total score is determined. The score a site receives will determine its classification. Each classification has a priority, but no site within that group is given priority over others within the same classification. Each classification has requirements for considering a site within that group. The policy was designed to permit multiple acquisition efforts and does not restrict negotiations. Additionally, once a site has been classified it is not re-ranked due to additional sites entering the progr?im. A site can be re-ranked due to changing conditions, new information, or other factors that effect the site itself. The following list of sites is classified according to the ranking policy. All sites meet the established selection criteria, and will be considered for acquisition or protection, although efforts will be concentrated on sites in Groups A & B. New sites are listed at the end of each group for convenience, not due to preference. The Parks and Recreation Board reviewed and approved the recommendation at their monthly meeting on Thursday, August 20, 1992. 4 CLASS "A" SITES NEW STNS Trout & Q?Vress Creeks Corridor :4! 400 acres Location: Land between 1-75 and CR 581 in northern Hillsborough County, which includes a section o£ Trout Creek, adjacent to SWFWMD's Wilderness park , and connects with the Cypress Creek ELAPP site. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition CURRENTLY APPROVED "A" SITES _Alderman's Ford South Prong Addition +/- 650 acres Location: Land stretching from the east boundary of Alderman's Ford Park along the South Prong of the Alafia River to C.R. 640, where it meets the South Prong Portion of the South Hillsborough Wildlife Corridor. This site also includes the Van Horne site. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition with owners. Buc_ khom Creek +/- 146 acres Location: South of Bloomingdale Avenue, East of Hwy 301, and West of Bell Shoals Road. Recommendation: Long term lease or acquire with water rights jointly with Southwest Florida Water Management District. This project is currently in the Save Our Rivers Program. Gardinier has been contacted and is agreeable to negotiate. Cockroach and Pine Point Creeks +/7 3,228 acres (formerly "B" site Location: On the eastern shore of Tampa Bay, just north of the Manatee County line. Recommendation: Protection through establishment of upland buffer zone perpetual conservation easement or acquisition by donation. Cypress_ Creek +/__5000 acres Location: Land on both sides of Cypress Creek east of Livingston Road, west of Interstate 75, and north of C.R. 581. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition with owners. 5 Fish Hawk Ranch +/- 1(HH) acres (Portion of South Hillsborough Wildlife Corridor) Location: Southeast County, south of the Alafia River, north of Boyette-Bell Shoals Road between Fish Hawk and Little Fish Creeks and west of Lithia- Pinecrest Road. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition with owners. Seek possible joint funding source. Greenwood Tract +/- 47 acres Location: The south end of Greenwood Avenue in Tampa, on the shores of the Hillsborough River Reservoir, just south of the City of Tampa's Temple,,Crest Park. Recommendation: Pending commitment from City to protect their property prior to consideration of acquisition. Lithia Springs +/ 160 acres Location: At the west end of Lithia Springs Road, two miles off County Road 640. Recommendation: Lease or acquire with water rights, jointly with Southwest Florida Water Management District, as the project is currently on their Save Our Rivers list, Gardinier has been contacted and is agreeable to negotiate. River Crossin Estates + - 59 acres Location: Land within the Bloomingdale subdivision, approximately 1/2 mile east of Bell Shoals Road, along the north shore of the Alafia River. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition. Upper Little Manatee +/- 500 acres (Portion of South Hillsborough Wildlife Corridor Location: Along the Little Manatee River, upstream of U S Highway 301, just north of the Manatee County line. it Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition with owners. 6 .ri A E CLASS "B" SITES NEW Si'1'ES Bl_ackwater Creek ±1,3,600 acres* Location: Land located in Northeast Hillsbomugh County along Blackwater Creek from US 301 to SR 39. .. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition Brooker Creek 1,600 +1- acres * Location: Land in Northwest Hillsborough County north of Van Dyke Road south of Lutz-Lake Fern Road, west of Carlton Arms apartments and the Cheval subdivision. Recommendation: Negotiate Protection or acquisition. Any realignment of the major highway, currently planned for land to the east, on to this site, would eliminate this project from consideration. Cypress Street +/- 60 acres* Location: Land located at the end of Cypress Street on Old Tampa Bay in the Westshore District. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition contingent upon funded and approved restoration program. Little Manatee Corridor +17 1,400 acres ' Location: Land in southern Hillsborough County along the Kittle Manatee River Corridor from 1-75 upstream as far as Leonard Lee Road. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition. * The above sites have been temporarily place in the "B" category due to category "A" being at the capacity of ten sites. Upon the completion of a preservation or acquisition of a site in "A" these sites will be moved up in accordance with the site ranking policy. 7 1. rr ? .?. 4 II ? I n f %t Clearwater Proncrty +/- SUO acres Location: Land located in Northwest Hillsborough County south of Tarpon Springs-Lake Fern Road, west of Patterson Road, Directly east and adjacent to the Pinellas County line. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition. Valrg Road +/- 64() acres Lrocation Land located in extreme south Hillsborough County between US 41 and 1-75 adjacent to the Manatee County line. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition. CURRENTLY APPROVED 'B't SITES Baker Creek +/- 775 acres Location: Land containing portions of the floodplain of Baker Creek and several tributaries south of Lake Thonotosassa including the original Lake Thonotosassa Site, currently ranked as. a class "C" site. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition contingent upon approved restoration program. y? i? WwrninpdaleMuckhorn Creek +_/ 34 acres Location: Land east of US Highway 41, between US 41 and "Old 41A", south of Madison Avenue, adjacent to the southern half of the Pendola Point site. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition contingent upon long term protection of the Buckhorn Springs Site. 1 i Bullfrop, CreekMe Kitchen lGibson_Land .+1_629 acres , Location: The shoreline of Hillsborough Bay from the mouth of the Alafia River south to the man-made peninsula on the south side of Whiskey Stump Key. Recommendation: Acquisition with grant application., Multiple ownership with some willing to sell. 8 S i r E? Desoto Park Addition +/- 24.2 acres Location: East of Desoto Park on the north shore of McKay Bay. Recommendation: Pursue joint acquisition with the City of Tampa Parks Department or the SWIM program. Site requires extensive restoration. Dick Creek +1- 60 acres 1 Location: North of Old Memorial Highway, west of Sheldon Road, ulong the east and west shoreline of Dick Creels in Northwest Hillsborough County. Recommendation: Obtain conservation easement to protect site. Florida College 166 acres (revised _from _231 acres) Location: East bank of the Hillsborough River upstream of Riverhills Park in Temple Terrace. Recommendation: Acquisition by purchase. Conservation easements will be used where feasible. (See "Acquired Parcel" page 11) Fulkerson Road +/- 155 acres' Location: Land on the southeast edge of Cockroach Bay, adjacent to the Hillsborough Community College Environmental Studies Center. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition contingent upon approved restoration plan and available funding. Golden Aster Scrub +/- 400 acres Location: Undeveloped area west of 1-75 north of Big Bend Road behind maintenance complex. Recommendation: Acquisition by purchase. Fake Flynn +/- 150 acres Location: North side of Sinclair Hills Road east of 1-275 and west of Livingston Road. Recommendation: Substantial public support was demonstrated. Recommend ' acquisition. Owner has recently expressed interest to sell. 9 A McKay Bay Causeway +/ 45 acres Location: Land on the southeast corner of McKay Bay, north of the 22nd street causeway, within the Tampa city limits. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition contingent upon approved and funded restoration program. North Prong AlaGa +17 900 acres (Portion of South _HillsbOrough.Wildlife Corridor Location: Along the north prong of the Alafia River, from Keysville Road to the Polk County line. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition with possible joint funding source and grant program assistance. 1 Sever-Packard +/- 18 acres Location: Southeast corner of intersection of Fowler Avenue and the Hillsborough River. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition with possible joint funding source or grant program assistance. South Prong Alafia +/7 600 acres Portion of South Hillsborough Wildlife Corridor Location: Along the south prong of the Alafia River near the community of Welcome, southeast of Alderman's Ford Park. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition with possible joint funding source and grant program assistance. Wolf Branch +L- 360 acres Location: The shoreline of Tampa Bay between E. G. Simmons Park and Apollo Beach, and the drainage basin of Wolf Branch from its mouth upstream to U.S. 41. Recommendation: Consider acquisition of upland buffer, but pursue donation and negotiate protection methods. 1Q r; CLASS "C" SITES NEW SITES Marina Point +/- 60 acres Location: Land located in Western Hillsborough County along Channel "A" south of Hillsborough Avenue and adjacent to the Bower Tract Preserve, Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition. Hamner Tower +/- 60 acres -Location: Land located at the northwest corner of the intersection of North Boulevard and Fletcher Avenue. ' Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition. Tri le Creek Ranch +L 800 acres Location: Land located along Bell Creek between Fish Hawk Ranch and Balm- Boyette Scrub. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition. Cone Ranch Addition +1-'5,500 acres * Location: Land located in the extreme northeast corner of Hillsborough County } adjacent to the County owned Cone Ranch, Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition. Simmons Tract-+/7 80 acres * Location: Land located adjacent to the Boyette Tract on Pringle Branch, 'a tributary of the Fish Hawk Creek. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition. r l? { i T Sun City Scrub +/- 40 acres Location: Land located in southern Hillsborough County between US 41 and,the railroad tracks south of Old Sun City. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition. * The above sites have been temporarily place in the "C" category due to category "B" being at the capacity of ten sites. Upon the completion of a preservation or acquisition of a site in "B" these sites will be moved up in accordance with the site ranking policy. a Delaney Creek Restoration +1. 22 acres Location: Land located on the south side of Delaney Creek, north of Hartford Street and east of the CSX railroad. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition contingent upon approved and funded restoration program. ,J Sheldon_ 4,)- 340 'acres Location: Land north of Old Memorial Highway and west of Pistol Range Road, adjacent to the Countryway subdivision, due north of the Bower Tract but separated by a 2000' wide strip of undeveloped land and S.R. 580. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition contingent upon available funding. Valrico Fire Tower +/- SO acres Location: Land in the location of State Road 60 and Dover Road Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition. I2 .t f 0 CURRENTLY APPROVED 11c" SITES Cowhouse~ Creek ±L110 acres Location: Along Cowhouse Creek, between the Hillsborough River and Interstate Highway I-75, just north of Fowler Avenue. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition with possible joint funding source and grant program assistance. CSX/Dclancy Crcek_Pop-Off +/- 70 acres Location: Land east of U. S. 41, between U.S. 41 and "Old 41 A", south of Madison Avenue. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition contingent upon available funding. Gray Road +L- 69 acres Location: Land south of Gray Road and west of S.R. 39, about one mile north of C.R. 672. Recommendation: Negotiate protection or acquisition contingent upon available funding. Hoedt Road +/- 180 acres Location: Land east of Dale Mabry and north of Bearss Avenue in Northwest Hillsborough County. Recommendation: Negotiate protection measures for the site, > Lake Park +1- 600 acres Location: Land at the southwest corner of Van Dyke Road and Dale Mabry Highway. r ., Recommendation: Negotiate long term lease with City of St. Petersburg. Acquisition to be pursued only if property marketed by City. 'f 13 t Lake Rogers ±/- 473 acres Location: Land located south of North Mobley Road and west cif Gunn l-lighmay in Northwest Hillsborough County. Recommendation: Negotiate long term lease with City of St. Petersburg. Acquisition to be pursued only if property marketed by City. Pendola Tract +I- 280 acres , Location: Eastern shoreline of Hillsborough Bay between Pendola Point and Delaney Creek with an eastern boundary of US Hwy 41. Recommendation: If the Tampa Port Authority uses the northern 150 portion as a mitigation site, consider protection or acquisition of remaining parcel owned by G ardinier (130 acres). Riverhifis Park Addition +/- 51 acres - Location: North bank of Hillsborough River upstream of Riverhills Park in Temple Terrace. Recommendation: Possible acquisition using Land and Water Conservation Fund grant through the City of Temple Terrace, using ELAPP funds as local match. Williams Road +ta 10 acres Location: West of Williams Road and East of 1-75, South of Harney Road. (This has been the site for several archeological digs.) Recommendation: Pursue purchase of undeveloped areas and conservation easements for existing homesites. A ACQUIRED SITES Alderman Ford Addition +L- 1,100 acres (formerly Cedar Kirk Location: Lands on either side of the Alafia River from Alderman's Ford Park westward between State Road 39 and Lithia Pinecrest Road, , Status: In June of 1990, the County acquired 542 acres of property known as the Sheldon site for $1,500,000. The site has been nominated to the State CARL program, but did not rank high enough to receive funding. The site will be managed as an addition to Alderman's Ford County Park. The County will attempt to negotiate acquisition of the remainder of the site. 1.4 W Balm-Boyette Scrub +/: 4,940 acres (Portion_of_South I-Iillsborough Wildlife Condor) location: A six mile long site both sides of Balm-Boyette Road and Balm Riverview Roads approximately 1 1/2 miles north of County Road 672. Status: In March of 1992, the County acquired 4,920 acres of this site from the Williams Acquisition Holding Company for $16,123,000. This included the 1,300 acre portion that has been partially reclaimed from phosphate mining. Approximately 3,600 acres has been approved for acquisition through the CARL Program and the State currently has an option to acquire all but 60 acres for $6,373,000. This sixty acres is being sought by Tampa Electric Company (TECO) for a major transmission corridor and County staff has been in negotiations with TECO to maintain the preservation of this site. (This purchase by the State is being funded from the third year of Preservation 2000 legislation.) Bo Scout +L--600 acres Portion of South Hillsixwou h Wildlife Corridor Location: An area northeast of Lithia Pinecrest Road intersection with Lithia Springs Road, along the Alafia River. Status: In December 1991, the County acquired 195 acres of the River Hills Development from' the Arvida/JMB Partners for $700,000 and 195 acres from the Fish Hawk Ranch for $1,290,000. 'With the exception of a few parcels, a portion of the site is protected through regulatory requirements associated with the River Hills development and a large tract in the site is being used as a Boy Scout Camp (it is felt that the nature of their use should not have a substantial impact on the . wildlife corridor). Brackins Tract +/- 10.3 acres Location: Just north of the Howard Franklin Bridge on the east shore of Tampa Bay. Status: Acquired site for $400,000 with joint equal funding from the Aviation f Authority. F 15 Q-)ckrottelt 13n Ad fition__-i1-_1faM acres (formerly U-isey Shell Pits) Uwation: Majority of the land west of Gulf City Road and north of Cockroach Bay, adjacent to titre Cockroach Bay Aquatic Preserve and two ELAPP sites (Cockroach Bay Islands and Piney Point/Cockroach Bay). Status: The County has acquired approximately 710 acres for about $2.1 million. A multi-agency effort with the Surface Water Improvement and Management Program (SWINI), Department of Environmental Regulation, Environmental Protection Commission, and the Department of Natural Resources has been developed to restore the site into a preserve and resource based park. Dai Faarin +/7 353 acres Location: East of the Hillsborough River, west of Hwy 301, south of Hillsborough River State Park, and north of Wilderness Park. Stratus: On January 30, 1989, the Real Estate Department completed the acquisition of this site with a total purchase price of $1,750,700. The Real Estate Department, working with the Parks acid Recreation Department, prepared and the Board approved a lease to the site State as an addition to Hillsborough River State Park. They will be responsible for managing the site and they are formulating plans for planting and restoration efforts. English Creek +/_619 acres I-Aw ation: North of Hwy 39, Southeast of Plaint City, on English Creek and Howell Branch. Status: The County acquired a 123 acre tract in September 1989 for $255,000 and a 133 acre tract in 1990 for $1,100,000 which provides a manageable unit. A lease with Hillsborough Community College is being prepared to allow the site to be used for environmental studies for the public. 0 '1 Isles of Cockroach Bay +/ 220 acres Location: The islands from the Little Manatee River to Cockroach Bay and approximately two miles of mangrove shoreline. Status: The County acquired the majority of islands from the Whittaker Family in August of 1989 for $1,000,000. The site is currently under consideration through . the State CARL program, and is planned to be managed as part of the Cockroach Bay Aquatic Preserve. Owners of the remaining island are reluctant to sell. 16 e.) I ' t L t n Lithia Sprina Addition +C- 54 nacres Location: Three sites on the north bank of the Alafia River bordering the Lidila Springs site, currently leased by i•lillsboroubh County arid previously identified as 14 nominated site. Status: Acquired 40 acres adjacent to Lithia Springs Park for $110,000. Little; Manatee River +/- 1,789 acres Location-. The section of the Little Manatee River west of Hwy 301 and east of Hwy 41. Status: The Real Estate Department -has completed the purchase of approximately 909 acres of the Site comprised of five tracts with a total acquisition cost of around $5.25 million. An additional 390 acres is under contract and the purchase: of 228 acres is being finalized. Most of the site is currently under consideration for joint preservation through tite Save Our Rivers Program. The basis for this joint effort was established through an interlocal agreement between the County and the Southwest Florida Water Management District. McKay Bay +LL 56 nacres Loc::ation: Oil tile: shoreline of McKay Bay, in the extreme northeast section of Hillsborough Bay. Status: The County acquired this 56 acre site in February of 1990 for $150,000. A lease is currently being negotiated with the City of Tampa which would allow a restoration project in association with the Southwest Florida Water Management District, SWIM program. Oalridac_ +/?- 925 nacres s Location: The east side of Morris Bridge Road one mile south of Pasco County. Borders Wilderness Park and Hillsborough River State Park. Status: Acquisition was completed and property conveyed to the Southwest Florida Water Management District for preservation through the Save Our Rivers Program. This conveyance returned 51,163,600, of the $2.15 million purchase price, to the program to preserve additional land. 17 t f .7 r Rhodine Road +/- 640 acres Location: North of Rhodine Road approximately one milt: east of Balm Riverview Road, adjacent to Rhodine Bell County Park. Status: The County completed acquisition of 452 acres of this tract in August 1991. A three acre tract was excluded to address minor contamination, which has been resolved and should be acquired in September. South MacDill +/- 48 acres Location: Interbay region of Tampa, in undeveloped parcel north of Napoleon Avenue, west of MacDill Avenue, south of Interbay Boulevard, and east of Himes Avenue. Status: In April, after lengthy negotiations, the County acquired this site for $700,000. It is anticipated that this site will be managed by the City of Tampa for a resource based park. Sterling Downs +/- 60 acres revised from 133 acres Location: South of Boyette Road and cast of McMullen Road in the Sterling Downs subdivision. Status: The County acquired 60 acres of this site for $$16,000 in May of 1990. There have been preliminary discussions with the University of South Florida regarding the site management. Troydale Road +/- 308 acres Location: The east bank of Rocky Creek, west of Troydale Road and South of Hillsborough Avenue. The site adjoins the eastern boundary of the Bower Tract. Status: In April 1992, The FDIC completed the donation of 256 acres to the County. As a requirement of the donation, the County paid the associated expenses and these expenses totaled $35,000. In July, 1992, the County acquired an adjoining 23 acres from C & S Bank for $75,000 (66% of average appraised value). 18 ACQUIRED PARCEL Bullfrog CreckLThe_Kitchen/Gibson_Lands +/- 629 acres Location: The shoreline of Hillsborough Bay from the mouth of the Alafia River south to the man-made peninsula on the south side of Whiskey Stump Key. Status: The County has acquired 27 acres adjacent to Dug Creek for $90,000 Fish Hawk Ranch +/- 1({}{l acres (Portion of South Hillsborough Wildlife Corridor Location: Southeast County, south of the Alafia River, north of Boyette-Bell Shoals Road between Fish Hawk and Little Fish Creeks and west of Lithia- Pinecrest Road. Status: The County has completed two acquisition totalling $2,880,000 totalling 286 acres adjacent to Fish Hawk and Little Fish Hawk Creeks. Approximately 600 acres owned by Wayne Thomas, Inc. remains in the site and the owner has stated that they are not willing to sell at this time. Florida Celle c +/- 65 acres Location: East bank of the Hillsborough River upstream of River hills Park in F Temple Terrace. Status: On March 20, 1989, the Real Estate Department completed the purchase of a portion of the Florida College site, a 65 acre tract owned by Edward and Ramona Bolding. The site was purchased for $900,000 which is $425,000 below the appraised value. Peppermournd Creek +/- 324 acres Location: Between Sweetwater Creek and Woods Creek, at the mouth of Peppermound Creek, north of the Courtney Campbell Causeway. ' Status: In conjunction with the zoning approvals associated with the development of this property, and its nomination to the program, the developer donated six acres of the upland areas not under environmental jurisdiction to be used for environmental studies and preservation. The developer also agreed to donate a conservation easement over the remaining wetlands to permit restoration i5 activities. 19 Agreernents Pending i SaEfold -+- 355 acres LAUcdtiOn: Land along the Little Manatee River just north of the Manatee Count line and west of C.R. 579. Y ' Status: The Real Estate Department has negotiated the purchase of this site. This contract will be finalized in the near future and it is anticipated !that it will be presented to the Board in September, 1992, Implementation Upon approval of the Board, the County Real Estate Department's Site Acquisition Manager will proceed to protect and acquire sites according to the acquisition policy and available funds. Projects and management plans will continue to be reviewed and approved by the Park and Recreation Board prior to presentation to the Board of . County Commissioners. 1> r , 20; Sac 1 S At j.t Y..3b Ac j 1 ,. J C C un?al . - fake ,r c hL? ? ( 35; ?rJQ? rr ¦ ?I K ? ?J 1497. ?I J u 1 fG i . 15az ?n.f i f?nL? x515 ?O?G 10 rE? __. -?? 511 01 AL 1.7 Ae, it G9? i.74 6?6 11 ?Ory n ! 10 4 Y 1 zz.aa. 1631 i894 f 4o At. SC Sa AL t CrrC??` •? ??? a n j !I Ai 1?. ?P G i :i i 1 0 , C? G? Y Q4- ' ``t?1 y cl , was s try . . .. '. . CITY. OF CLEARWATER. ELAPP.NOMINATION Prepared for: =. y City of Clearwater, .; t Post Office Box 47,48 Clearwater, Florida 34618'• to . .. - AF N r c r r r r r 9 l a rF, F Index i f 1. Executive Summary ' 2. Aerial Photograph 7€` 3. Graphic of site ' 4. City'of Clearwater Environmental Assessment 5• Letter from William Davis, Lake Tarpon Management Committee 6. Letter of Support from Keystone Civic Association r.: k 7. Letter of Support from Keystone Lakewatch Committee 8• Letter of support from Lake Keystone Property Owners Association 9• Letter of Support from League of Women Voters of North Pinellas County '?- 10. Letter from Craig Huegel, Director, Brooker Creek Preserve !,:'• 11. Newspaper Articles fI 5 F f l- e J1 . . ? 4 '£ [ p. r F A f f i ?a .t 11F -1 4 4 r,; + ; i Executive Summarys ?.: ... . r r e _ 1i• ,:i j'?. f el .. i' 5 ? •, ff `1` •rf 1 : l , F .. .. O F w , S a4 City of Clearwater ELAPP Nomination Summary The City of Clearwater's site was nominated for ELAPP acquisition by the City of Clearwater. The property was acquired by the City in May 1982, and has been utilized as a land spreading area for their municipal wastewater treatment system until August' 1991. The Clearwater city commission has made a decision to sell this site with the proceeds from the sale being applied to sewer bond indebtedness. if Historically, much of the open area of the site has been used for citrus groves and pasture land. However, the site has significant natural features which make it an excellent candidate for ELAPP acquisition. First, Brooker Creek flows through the site. Brooker Creek has long been the focus of concern of many of the residents of northwest Hillsborough County, as well as the environmental regulatory agencies. This creek, which is one of the principal water sources for Lake Tarpon, has been significantly affected by residential development in the area. In 1978 SWFWMD prepared a lengthy study of the Brooker Creek Watershed, with strong recommendations for public acquisition of the entire riverine system. Pinellas County has recently acted on this recommendation by acquiring over 4600 acres (called the Brooker Creek Preserve) and is currently negotiating for the acquisition of an additional 1700 acres, which will bring their total ownership to 6300 acres. None of the creek system in Hillsborough County, which includes the sensitive headwaters, has been placed in public ownership. In addition, approximately half of the site is comprised of cypress and mixed hardwood swamps and the Brooker creek riverine system. Preservation of these wetlands and adjacent uplands for buffer is important to the long term viability of Lake Tarpon and the Brooker Creek system. We feel the site meets the ELAPP criteria based upon two very important factors. As previously mentioned, the site abuts the Pinellas County line, which actually makes"this property contiguous to the Brooker Creek Preserve. Acquisition of this site would actually extend the effect of the Preserve in an easterly direction. Expansion of the Preserve is important to establishment of wildlife corridors, and to the protection of water quality in, Lake Tarpon. Many of the residents in the area can attest to the diversity of wildlife in the area, such as deer, bobcats, fox, and others. Preservation of both wetlands and uplands is important to the future viability of these populations. i i 1 17 71 i " Secondly, since Brooker. Creek traverses the site, acquisition of this property affords an opportunity to protect s' on both sides of the creek and to pro the upland areas impacts of any future development in th vide a buffer against the ?. creek system in Pinellas County has been area. Virtually all of the Acquisition of this parcel would be a positive in the Preserve. protecting this sensitive area in Hillsborou h County. f , 1 ' 1 • Z aw/. t ! 3 i .. t ti . - . . . {1 i`s .. .` . . . , . . ,. }j I R 'i E . ' "^k .. i' . 1 ; y , } 7rr,. ,. t .. }?'' :1; ,t . is , ? ', .C ',.,- i i? ig ' ' . . .. ,.fir . - . i q' .: . ; a 1X y, I' - F e f _I.:,i>.. rj, ,'J<r.. / "F N 7 Q •I . r' i. f'r . r L i? Y•Y' '. 1 ws F .. „ ¢t : . Y ; . tw ?s 1 Y ra p h ; qq ; ti., L 'S ,. ' a1 Photo Yl. "F 'cN.% ?# ri g ti {. rAe .."it''' i rl. < ., . 0.' NY= ' ¢ 'i ? b 4' ":il'. ' : t". v ." 1 » " r + .`r 'S -" -'-' F ES . . :1. 4E:r it r, ., a'.,' i? .i '.-i is""'e r-." . 1 ?.f Y4' 'l, ` 1I ?'. ?'! Y w.. : r."' r . _ t . " . . :,f.:`t:,?,:.j -' a.H.R".!: , ?V,, i" .,%4!, .. IF .,3 , ?', "e} ",F .I • t , „b ' , }'., ' w' } S ;s \. • t Ti, i ,4 a Y.-. ;?? ., z..• . 1. . ," :'7: :;1 3 .. 1 i 3`•r a 1 i (:': k ..}t 1 91 .. +`1 5 .. I- `i;; ..'d;' r'4 t r.fA .tit F S.. .'Fa ::;::-- ,E fem. I, t.' ..t s1,...: °H3 5` ` ] 'f.", , . .. , '. r i h .P?• I [ I ' ' '{' .1?C .7" _ ! " e' ti.. .,,,j E s C °? >.' . . •?". * [ ryeq- '}:' L {x . E ` S'r . `. - .,$ . := 4 ? `r ! 1 . 11 . . . ' t. ..E i . . . T' ! i : ^. ?i r"+• ii ?F l F ' . +fh ??•it '•?rr a #?a I 4* ?,j5 •??. ? °' is ! rt • 't " i' S?'. • S' N r a J ;e 'i •.?'R7: e'...-..;,4: d•S "..•..3'#=k ,rte:.riiA,i'r:,1tr_s'.:s>:. S' ??sl 3 • ' ' I fk? ? aS of} t' r l•? 2? ): it f .r t . t . , •,r .. . , F` , "' , " " . I. . . . l .% . . I . - I ? . I I ? ? . ? ? .- - . I' I . . - . . , . .% S? , ; . ? . ? " . . r): . ., . : . . . , . , . • . . _ } .. • i' ;a .. i': 1 . ,, ? Y ,.,.....r_.. ...-,.., .. ;. .. .,-,.- „- ___,...... .-...,_.,r,. ,.... , .._., _..L :: t 5,1, , , .. t ", .', , , ' ` @ "• .. r € ., r . ' . ' , a . . . l .. .. - .i r. €. 1 _ ' ' : - . , ':i' - tt'' , E" j. . ( . >G :.s':. J :1 . ryv ? " A ` 'I .1 jI .. . .. I rr .? °Vr y," ..l.:b . .. .. .•S , 5 • ' - .. . 1. j' ' ' . r 1 _ 7 Vi'i' •'!?,, f; '{ : -j]] e i " 4 . ' I . E S Y ' 11 .: 3" . (: ° ' .. '3 3 ' , ... j. , ''r1 . . r, Yr Iv.:.Y^,' '1','[r. ,hW. , ' .: S It .? r.' . / Nk .. of Graphic'- 'r 1?. , _ ? % 4 , " . 'n r r ';` f I . .. . L' i s . .f :e, 1 - , ; ? r ,1 E f'. e F ...',•. S';' , I , • !1 } a, E ,. , ? .. .:1 . , •f •.' . ,;.' ', ' ",Ski. 1,. ' i,; en ' T. j'r'< ,T, . .. • ty .. , - I :, ,- s e r A . , } , I. , F " j .. •,' - .. . - it - ,r- : % A II r. ? 1 iI F .? • ? IIII '1 6 } :i H f? V ' Swti. i yr 1 I 2'tl l r f f 4UO E • 1 - , 3 i 3 ' yJ i t ' 1 ' NOW i aver 1 ` a is „ x } 0 'f R I VII. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND-NEE-D. FOR PROTECTION The City of Clearwater's property in northwest Hillsborough County is being nominated for evaluation and consideration for ELAPP acquisition for the reasons outlined below. The points included in this outline are based upon the qualifying criteria set out in Hillsborough County's guidelines for submitting nominations. The city's environmental management staff also has conducted field surveys of the site and their findings are included in this outline under A and B below. A. Land, Containing native,__relatively unaltered.flora and_fauna-representing_a_natura.l_hab,itat u.nicLue_to or scarce within the State or County.. DATE 1_.. r r? 1, Pasture Land Commun4t_y The pasture land was originally a pine flatwoods existing between the cypress swamps that later was converted to a cattle range. It ls,now being farmed to yield hay. The pasture land is comprised of fields of bahla hay with intrusions of common invader plant species such as dog fennel, etc. . l October 23, 1991 SUBJECT: Nomination by the City of Clearwater for purchase by Hillsborough County's Lands Acquisition and Protection Program, for approximately 653 acres In northwest Hillsborough County. ABSTRACT: The subject property was inspected to determine its potential value as an environmentally sensitive watershed preserve and wildlife corridor. Plant communities and animal habitats are defined and analyzed in the following report. SUBMITTED BY: Mr. Alan Mayberry, Urban Forester, Environmental Management, City of Clearwater. Mr. Gregory B. Howe, Nature Park Specialist, Parks and Recreation Department, City of Clearwater. Mr. Craig Heugal, Urban Wildlife Specialist, Pinellas County. REPORT: The property displays four basic communities: pasture land, xeric scrub, isolated cypress/ mixed hardwood swamps and a riverine system with associated wetlands. These communities are identified on the accompanying aerial photograph. r r The pasture land contains virtually no woody plants such as trees or shrubs, with the notable exception r" of numerous live oak Quercus virginiana clusters 1 that periodically break-up the pasture land. For the most part, the live oaks comprising these stands are mature with some achieving specimen tree status. The pasture lands provide forage-areas for wildlife use, and also large expanses of edge habitat (i.e., where woodlands meets meadow). The following animal species were either directly ' observed, heard, or determined to be present due to physical evidence such as nests or tracks: Birds: Red-shouldered Hawk, Buteo lineatus, Wild Turkey, Meleagrio gallopavo, (13 observed) Snowy Egret, Leucephoyx Chula, Killdeer, Charadrius vociferus, Turkey Vulture, Cathartes aura, Cattle Egret, Bubulcus ibis, Boat--tailed Grackle, Cassidix mexicanus, Blue Jay, Cyanocitta cristata, Eastern Mockingbird, Mimus polyglottos, Mourning Dove, Zenalda macroura. Mammals- Nine-banded Armadillo, Dasypus novemcinctus, Virginia Oppossum, Didelphis virginiana, Cottontail Rabbit, Sylvilagus floridanus, Gray Fox, Vrocyan cinereoargenteus. Reptiles: Six--lined Racerunner, Cnemidophorus sexlineatus, Gopher Tortoise, Gopherus polyphemus. 2. Xeric Scrub Communit The xeric scrub area comprises only a small portion of this site (i.e. approximately 5 acres). The xeric areas for the most part are fragmented, existing as small fringes on the edges of transitional areas. One area however, consists of approximately 3 acres of unique scrub area. This area was apparently scraped (according to aerials from 1984) of most vegetation so that it now f appears as a meadow. The over story consists of i? infrequent stands of sand live oak Quercus geminata. The ground cover for the most part is an unusual proliferation of shiny blueberry Vaccinium myrsinites to the extent that this plant almost represents' a monoculture for approximately two acres. Two Florida Golden Aster plants, Chrysopsis 3 1 I` r E F f F N fIorida. Florida prefers growing without species 7a, were also discovered in this area. The Golden Aster is an endangered specie that disturbed scrub sites. The plants are on a small open patch of disturbed land competition from, other plants. Other identified in the xeric area, include: Blazing Star, Liatris chapmanii, Wiregrass, Aristida stricta, Bear Grass, Yucca filamentosa, Prickly Pear? Opuntla compressa, Rusty Lyonia. Lyonia ferruginea, Fetterbush, Lyonla lucida? Gallberry, Ilex Glabra, r r Three active gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus burrows were observed in this area. The gopher tortoise is classified as a species of special concern. Other animal species observed in this habitat duplicated those noted in the pasture land community. 3. 9,press Swamp/MIxed Hardwood Community The Cypress swamp wetland communities are numerous and cover a considerable percentage of this site. The accompanying soil survey map illustrates these swamp/wetland areas in blue.' Some of these areas are small isolated cypress domes while other areas represent large cypress dominated wetlands with mixed bottomland hardwood tree species and transitional areas around the fringes. The wetlands for the most part were Judged to be healthy, although impacted by the addition of rim ditches and the intrusion of transitional plant species. Approximately 40 years ago rim ditches were dug around the borders of most of the wetlands in an effort to facilitate drainage of the cattle fields. The ditches consequently retained water that would normally sheet flow into the wetlands. However, based on the absence of tree die back or decline in other plant species, as well as the limited number of transitional species occurring In these areas, the ditching activities do not happen to have adversely affected the wetlands. The minor intrusion of transitional plant species observed includes laural oak, Quercus laurifolla and wax myrtle, Myrica cerifera. However, the trees are young saplings which Indicate that they appeared only within the last few years. This 0 N l 1 condition was likely caused by the recent years of drought. Due to the abundant rains this past summer, some of these plants are now standing in water. e Bald cypress, Taxodium distichum was the predominate overstory tree scattered throughout the wetland areas. Other trees occurring frequently in these areas included red maple, Acer rubrum, black gum, Nyssa sylvatica Var. Bi-Flora, and sweetbay, Magnolia virginiana. The most common ground cover observed include netted chain fern, Woodwardia areolata, cinnamon fern, osmunda cinnomomea, and royal fern, osmunda regalis. Other plants observed In the wetlands and fringe areas include: Wax Myrtle, Myrica cerifera, Persimmon, Diospyros virginiana, Buttonbush, Cephalanthus occidentalis, Coastal Plains Willow, Sallx caroliniana, Elderberry, Sambucus simpsonii, Saltbush, Baccharis halimifolia, Sparkleberry, Vaccinium arboreum, Swampbay, Persea palustris, Saw Palmetto, Serenoa repens, ` Dahoon Holly, Ilex cassine, Shiny Shumac, Rhus copallina, Cabbage Palm, Sabal palmetto, Arrowhead, Sagittaria lancifolia, Pickerelweed, Pontederia cordata, Soft-stem Bulrush, Scirpus validus, r ,Woolgrass Bulrush, Scirpus cyperinus, Canna, Canna flaccida, Duckweed, Lemna minor, Blue Flag, Iris virginica St. Johns Wort, Hypericum cistifolium, . Goldenrod, Solida qo fistulosa, 'Primrose Willow, Ludwlgia octovalis, +r , Sand Blackberry, Rubus cunei fol i us, Slash Pine, Pinus elliottli, Caesar Weed, Urena lobata. r The cypress swamps are important as wildlife refuge areas. In addition, they serve as bird rookeries and. turkey roosting areas. Animals observed in these areas include: Amphibians: i i t ?f } r 1 r r r ,.. r-? , 1 I? Pig Frog, Rana grylio. Birds: Red--shouldered Hawk, Buteo lineatus, Pileated Woodpecker, Dryocopus pileatus, Red--bellied Woodpecker, Melaneres carollnus, Northern Cardinal, Cardinalis cardinalis. Mammals: Raccoon, Procyon lotor. 4. Riverine System The final system analyzed was the riverine system that Includes Brooker Creek and. Its adjacent floodplain. The accompanying soil survey map illustrates the riverine system in green. The creek transverses -the western portion of this site in a south--westerly direction and ultimately empties into Lake Tarpon. For the ., most part the area within this corridor is pristine. However,: minor disturbances occur along the corridor including the aforementioned rim ditches. The creek is shallow as It flows through this system, but is relatively well defined, The areas flanking the creek demonstrate swampy conditions with cypress trees growing in standing water and other plant species typical of damp hydric soils. The plant species are, basically the same as those previously listed for the cypress swamps with the exception of the submerged species located in the creek. The Brooker Creek watershed is vital to the ecology of the Lake Tarpon system. Much of the system located in Hillsborough County has been fractured due to past agricultural practices. The subject parcel represents a link to the headwaters of the Brooker Creek system. For this reason, it is important to preserve this section of the system along with associated pasture areas to act as a buffer and protect the system from adverse impacts. The wildlife observed in 'the riverine system, in addition to those species observed in the cypress swamps, include the Leopard Frog, Rana piplens, the Carolina Wren, Thrythorus ludoviclanus, and the Green Heron, Butorides virescens. Several species of minnows, tadpoles, and small fish were also observed in Brooker Creek. The creek attracts many f t Y r N animal species that us'e the creek for drinking water or a place to seek food. Overall this property features outstanding wildlife values. It is connected to.the vast Lake Tarpon watershed which, according to Craig Huegal, Pinellas County Urban Wildlife Specialist, is one of the last strongholds capable of supporting populations of wildlife. These natural corridors are critical to the survival of animals that require large areas to roam in search of food and to mate. There are two breaks in this corridor, one at Patterson-Road in Hillsborough County, and one at McMullen-Booth Road in Pinellas County. However, wildlife continue to use the corridors according to Mr, Huegal. This property may also be considered valuable in its ability to protect Lake Tarpon from further water quality degradation that typically occurs from the transition of these aras to urban land use. This system also provides an opportunity for groundwater recharge. Time did not permit a more thorough inspection of the property. Many other species of plants and animals existing there consequently are not identified. Additional species that would typically live in these four communities are included in #12 in the Appendix. In summary, the subject property has true value both as a watershed preserve and wildlife corridor. s r P B. Land. that provIdes,or _could provl_de a significant habi tat im octant to the suppoz?t._or_protection of endangered or threatened plants and animals. The?City property provides habitat for one endangered plant specie and one animal specie of special concern: - 1. The upland scrub area of this-site contains two Florida Golden Aster plants. The Golden Aster is listed as an endangered specie. The Aster is intolerant of competition from other plants and consequently does well on disturbed sites. The City property was scraped of vegetation prior to' 1984. This factor has likely enabled the Aster to establish. As there are areas with little plant converage, this site could be used to cultivate colonies of the Golden Aster if the ?.F area is preserved. 2. Three gopher tortoise burrows are present in the area since there is an adequate food source and proper drainage. The gopher is considered a specie of special concern as its habitat is dwindling. Although no threatened, endangered species, or species of special concern were observed in the wetland areas during this preliminary " assessment, it is conceivable that they do exist. The riverine system is a significant feature of the Lake Tarpon watershed and therefore could be utilized by any number of threatened or endangered species that might frequent the area for forage but were iM not present during this review. Some examples of species observed in other areas of Hillsborough County that are known to frequent this type of area could include the Florida Gopher Frog (Rana areolata), Little Blue Heron (E'gretta caerulea), Tricolored Heron (Egretta tricolor), Wood Stork (Mycteria americana), American Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Florida Round-tailed Water Rat (Neoflber alleni), Pine Lilly (Lllium catesbaeiCurtis' Milkweed (Ascleplas curtit'sii l , Carolina Holly (Ilex ambiqua), and Silk Bay (Persea hemilis). l 1 1 1 S f t i, F I 0 1 Ecological Communities Existing on the City of Clearwater's Property in Northwest Hillsborough County Cypress swamp-- Mixed Hardwood ¦x This ecological community occurs along creeks, lake margins, or interspersed throughout other communities. This community is poorly drained and water is at or above ground level for a large portion of the year. Wildlife generally found in this community: Mammals - Deer, raccoon, otter Birds - Anhinga, Barred Owl, Egrets, Herons, Limpkin, Pileated Woodpecker, Prothonotary ?t Warbler, Wood Duck, Wood Stork. Reptiles - Alligator, frogs, turtles, salamanders, variety of water snakes. r7 Environmental Value: 41 This community has a relatively low diversity of plant species due to the fluctuating water levels and low nutrient availability, however, it provides water storage areas by . holding excess water and slowly releasing it in to the water table.' it also is very important as a wildlife refuge area, bird rookery, and as a turkey roosting area. Riverine system This community occurs throughout Florida generally following major drainage paths, bordering creeks, and in basins which are either submerged or saturated part of the year. Wildlife generally found in this community: Mammals - Black bear, Bobcat, Deer, Gray Squirrel , Otter, Raccoon ' Birds` - Barred Owl, Hawks, Great Horned owl,, Pileated Woodpecker, Wild Turkey, Wood Duck Reptiles - Turtles, various snakes Environmental Value: This community is of great value for maintaining good water quality and quantity and for wildlife and wilderness areas. It serves as a natural storage area for floodwater. Wildlife often use this community for food and cover and for travel lanesIbetween developed areas. r .s City owned Property in Northwest Hillsborough county (cont'd) Disturbed-Rangeland/Citrus This man-made community occurs mostly on converted South Florida Flatwoods which boarders Cypress Swamps and Swamp Hardwoods. Swales, berms and rim ditches quickly drain these disturbed sites. Wildlife generally found in this community: Mammals - Cotton-tailed rabbits, Raccoon, Opossum, Fox ' Birds - Hawks, Turkey vulture, Killdeer, Meadowlark Reptiles - Eastern Diamondback rattlesnake, Gopher Tortoise, various lizards, Eastern Indigo i; ' Snake. Environmental Value: Some South Florida Slash Pines and Sand Live Oaks are still supported on these disturbed sites. The grasses and citrus groves provide forage areas for wildlife and there is a urge expanse of edge habitat (woodlands meet meadow). i' f t• , ' f • i i. • t S i • c E • ' 1 t 3 : R 1 Wildlife typically found on the Ecological Communities Similar to the City owned property a. Cypress__SwamplMixed Hardwoods Amphibians - Little Grass Frog - Hyla ocularis Dusky Salamander - Desmognathus Juscus Dwarf Siren - Pseudobranchus striatus Y *Pig Frog - Rana grylio Birds - Wood truck - Aix sponsa Great Blue Heron - Ardea Herodia a Great Horned owl - Bubo virginianus *Red-shouldered Hawk - Buteo lineatus *Pileated Woodpecker - Dryocopus pleatus Southern Bald Eagle -- Haliutus leucocephalus *Red-bellied Woodpecker - Helaneres carolinua Black-crowned night Heron - Nycticarax nycticorax Osprey - Pandion halisetus Prothonotary Warbler - Protonotaria citrea *Northern Cardinal - cardinalis cardinalis Mammals - River otter - Lutra canadensis *Raccoon - Procyon lotor ` Reptiles - Striped Mud Turtle - Rinoslernon baud Brown Water Snake - Nerodia taxispilota Florida Ribbon Snake - Thamnophis sauritus 2. Riveleine System: Amphibians - . Green Tree Frog - Hyla cinerea Southern Spring Peeper - Hyla crucifer Little Grass Frog -.Hyla ocularis *Leopard Frog - Rana Oipiens Birds -- Cedar Waxwing - Bombycills cedrorum Great Horned Owl - Bubo v.irginianus *Red-shouldered Hawk -,.Buteo lineatus Yellow-rumpet Warbler - Dendroica coronate *Pileate Woodpecker -- Dryocopus pileatus *Red-bellied Woodpecker t - Helanerpes carolinus r Screech owl - otus asio Tufted Titmouse _ Parus bicolor chickadee - Parus carolinensis ' Woodcock - Philphela minor Blue-grey Gnatcatcher - Polioptila caerulea Barred owl - strix varia *Caroline Wren - Thrythorus ludovicianus *Green Heron - Butorides virescens *Indicates wildlife that wan observed, heard or saw evidence of its existence on the property. L i ¦ r Wildlife typically found on the Ecological Communities ?. Similar to the City owned property 2. continued Mammals - } River otter Gray Squirrel Reptiles - s Moccasin/Cottonmouth Green Anole Mud Snake Banded Water Snake ?y 3. Disturbed Ranael and /Farmind/Citrus Birds - *Cattle Egret .: *Boat-tailed Grackle *Turkey vulture *Killdeer. Bobwhite Quail *Blue Jay Sandhill crane *Snowy Egret *Wild Turkey *Eastern Mockingbird Meadowlark *Mourning Hove _ Mammals - *Nine-banded Armadillo *Virginia Oppossum Striped Skunk White-tailed Deer Cotton Mouse *Eastern Cottontail Rabbit *Giay Fox Reptiles - *Six-lined Racerunnex Eastern Coachwhip Diamondback Rattlesnake Eastern Indigo Snake *Gopher Tortoine Eastern Glass Lizard L f4 M -- Lutra canadenais - 5ciurus carolinens.is - Agkistrodon piscivorus - Anolis carolinensis - Farancia abacura - Nerodia fascia to - Subulcus ibis - Cassid.ix mexicanus - Cathartex aura - Chaxadrius vociferus - Colinus virginianus - Cyanoc.itta cristata -IGrus canadensis - Leucephoyx thula - meleagrio gallopavo - Mimus polyglottos - Sturnella magna - Zenaida macroura - Ossypus novemcinatus - Didelphis virginiana - Mephitis mephitio - Odecoileus virginianus - Peromyscus gassypinus - Sylvilagus floridanus - Vrocyon cinereoargenteus - Cnemidophorus sexlineatus - Coluber flagellum - Crotalus adamanteus - Drymarchon corgis - Gopherus polyphemus - Ophisaurus ventralis *Indicates wildlife that was observed, heard or saw evidence of its existance on the property. .,) } E F 0 { Wildlife typically found on the Ecological, communities Similar to the City owned property Listed here are but a few of the more common wildlife that occur or should occur in these ecological communities. There are many more, some threatened or endangered, but without a more thorough investigation, it would be very speculative to say. The most outstanding feature of this property is by far the fact that with the exception of the break caused by Patterson Road the Swamp Hardwood and cypress Swamp ecosystems make a continuous wildlife corridor, from Lake Tarpon via Brooker Creek, which -. transects the northern section of the property, into Upper Hillsborough County. Submitted by; Gregory B. Howe Nature Park Specialist Moccasin Lake Nature Park - An Environmental and Energy Education Center, Parks and Recreation Department October 18, 1991 • 6 3 i t ' i i ? .. ? y i• ? f is w 0 ,s r++F ? ' ' ... ? .. , .: 45 ' [ , ' ` • 1 ,, •;.: ter, from Willi a ,? ^ 1 am. D vis Laic e Tarpon' i 4: Mana Bement committee '.ens?? 1 .. .. - f F F r r PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ]MMI5 ?II?I1C Ii5 FBA"13Ar1A 3 IErN TQDO . r.11n111MA01 r%conGE GrtEC11 - %AcCCi+nli3µnl+ al iN C1IESNUT. in. 11MILES E. 11A1NEY -nur8 T'+ MALL DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 440 COUNT STSEET CLEARWATER, FL 34616 PHONE: (813) 462-4761 FAX: (813) 462-4103 January 6, 1992 T` i. Mr. Ed Radice Director ?- Parks & Recreation Department Hillsborough County 1 101 East River Cove Drive Tampa, FL 33604 SUBJECT: Brooker Creek ELAPP purchase. 1ri ,rt Dear Mr. Radice: It has come to the attention of the Lake Tarpon Management Committee that the City of Clearwater has nominated a parcel of land identified as the Brooker Creek Riverine System and Adjacent Wetlands/Uplands (South of State Road 582) for acquisition by the ` Hillsborough County ELAPP program. The Lake Tarpon Management Committee is made up of representatives of governmental entities having jurisdiction in Lake Tarpon and its watershed, •as well as H representatives of homeowners in the Lake Tarpon watershed. The t committee advises the Pinellas County Board of County commissioners in areas related to the management of Lake Tarpon, r and also serves as the advisory committee to the Southwest Florida Water Management District's SWIM program. At its January, 1991 meeting, the committee voted to support the L purchase of the above mentioned parcel by the ELAPP program. Because the property is contiguous to the 4800 acre •Brooker Creek Preserve owned by Pinellas. County, the committee feels that preservation of this land, will provide expansion and protection for the preserve. Furthermore, if properly protected and managed, the Hillsborough County parcel would consequently experience greater wildlife diversity than would other parcels due to the proximity of the Pinellas parcel. 1 ' "PINELLAS COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPOnTUNITY FMPLOY1=n" Member•Pinullas Pailnership lor;r Drug Free Workplace LM p+inledOniecycledpaper ,fr . r 't t F E i 3 r kk i Page 2 We therefore urge that the Hillsborough County Commission place this parcel high on its list for purchase by the ELAPP program. It should be noted that the unanimous vote of support purchase occurred with full knowledge of the prevus use ras ha sludge disposal area and the need for upland management and rim ditch restoration. sincerely, William M. Davis, Chairman Lake Tarpon Management committee cc: Mayor Rita Garvey, City of Clearwater ...' Frank Blandford, Tourtelot Brothers ` " water316 DDM p. a a Y E r 4 v ei S• • ? 3 m • t` f.:,.. . ? ' ? ' ? ° ' ? .. ;?:; ;; ry .. . . ' . - t .. , Letter. of support from Ka ystone'. Civic Associa on `1 _: CLEAN AIR CLEAN WATER IN NORTHWEST HILLSBOROUGH Keystone Civic Association February 11, 1992 Mr. Ed Radice Hillsborough County Parks and Recreation 1101 Rivercove Drive Tampa, Florida 33604 Dear Mr. Radice, Subject: Support of ELAPF Program,, The Keystone Civic Association would like to go on record as being in support of the acquisition of four parcels that have been submitted for acquisition in our area for the Environmental Lands Acquisition and Protection Program (ELAPP). These parcels consist of Cypress Bend (960 acres North of. Van Dyke Road),i Patterson Road and Tarpon Springs Road (665 acres), and two smaller parcels that are attached to the above. This approval was not only given unanimously by the Board, but was also , endorsed by a majority approval at the General Membership Meeting on January 23, 1992. We look forward to your endorsement of these parcels. Sincerely, Marcia Strom Corresponding Secretary' 4 cc: Peter Fowler, Chan. ELAPP Board f "I ?i t' 1 P.O. Box 96 Odessa, Florida 33556 ". k N ?.?"? ? ' 1? . . -. . . . ? . . . , ... .. a "... . .. .. .. .. .. . ?f .. '. • • • ." : i .. .. , 0 111 ' ?1.? ? .. Letter of Support?from.Keystone Lakewatch Committee . 4 § I .' . C I } f A ?e^,;zaZ, _1 _2, 1992 TO _IAPP Board - ..__-sbcr0UCh C,)Unzy At n: Chairman _,01 4 R* ver Cove Tampa, F -I 33604 :RCM: Revstone Lakewatch Comm_:tee NaL.han C :fart, Chair;nan 76111 F,hr _i.ch Road `I'amna, F:J 33625 At to is time we are delichted to find t:?at there are at least 4 separate sites that have been nominated into he 1992 ELAPP procram. One or _he 2 large= sites known as Cypress Bend (960 acres) was nominated by our croup and has a smaller adjacent site known as the McMichael (170 acres) are both in the northeast headwaters section of Brooker Creek. Both of these sites, we believe, will be pound to have suz-fficient merit to qualify under the 1992 ELA.PP qualifications criteria. Of particular interest is the Cypress Bend site as it is currently being aggressively marketed, for sale, to potential developers under a 5 year vested rights approved development order. Additionally, it has been brought to our attention by the property manager, Mr. Sam Cagle (phone: 884--7640), that there is significant wa varieties and numbers of both 'protected and endangered species on the site. The other large site known as City o= Clearwater (655 acres) and its smaller privately owned 67 acre site also should be found to have sufficient merit to aual; ry for acquisition as well. Again, the larger City of Clearwater site seems especially attractive because of its geographical location in the j Brooker Creek Water Shed which is next to the Brooker Creek Preserve in Pinellas County and because of the wildlife and artifacts that are to be found on the site. Additionally, the pricing and terms that might be necotiated between the 2 local cavernments should make this site very desirable. The Lakewatch Group would like to register our strong support for all of these sites and point-out that our long term goal is to have the ent=ire 6000 plus acres oT the Brooker Creek Water Shed area, in northwest Hillsborough County, acquired as a preserve under both the county's :LAPP and the state's Save Our Rivers Program. As we have urevi.ously pointed out, the 4200 acres of the Brooke= Creek 'pater Shed area In Pinellas County has been saved As a preserve and we expect the same cons ider1, ation for the headwaters in our community. We are looking forward to arranainQ the first f:s e? d tr=ins to these sites, with your staff:, -;n =ebruarv and March. ?lease don't hesitate to ca-1-1 me personally for assistance in arraneina visits to these si.zas. S_: cere i v Vataan C Harz cc: Ppte Fowler .! . 1 ' Y s 5' ? ? ? ? ` .. i '. i". ., ? ..f •° ?. ., ir! ' J X 4., a' ; ' ?y,, ?` •1: , . 1 .ra • „ . _ci1 .. - .'f ' ML -}J .. `. Letter of Su ort PP From L ake; Keys Party'' owne tone .:. # . rs As s ociati on ?? ''s: •`#; . . t 5(' . 1F [ ' ... ', .. __ ? ., _ - ? ` . - ,,i is r - ... f - . • , - ul'a? } 41 Proper f J r? .. V February 13, 1992 TO: Hillsborough County Attn: ELAPP Board 1101 E River Cove Tampa, FL 33604 Parks Department Chairman We . are writing you in reference to the 6 ELA_P? sites that we understand rA have been nominated into the 1991-92 ELAPP program. We would like for you to know that our group of over 200 property owners on Lake Keystone are very much in support of the efforts being put forth by the state's Save Our Rivers Program (SORB), Hillsborough County's ELAPP, Keystone Civic Association, Keystone Lakewatch Committee and other citizens' groups. We ' are all endeavoring to create a Brooker Creek Water Shed Area (BCWSA) preserve in Hillsborough County patterned after the BCWSA preserve recently established in Pinellas County. We would like to bring to your 1. attention that currently no preservation status now exists for any part of Hillsborough County's section of BCWSA and our section of BCWSA is not only the headwaters, much larger and is located directly over the tri- county area's primary well field system. Furthermore, it is under imminent threat of being over run by urban sprawl development radiating out from the Carrollwood/Northdale area. We understand that even Pinellas County, City of Clearwater and Lake Tarpon Management Committee will formally be supporting the Hillsborough County BCWSA preserve that is immediately up stream from their Pinellas.County preserve. It has become obvious, to fully protect their lower portion of the BCWSA you must also protect the headwaters in our county. We propose that all governmental agencies and citizens' groups redouble their efforts in the pursuit of creating a preserve for all of BCWSA as time is rapidly running out because of a variety of reasons from individual rezoning petitions and large DR1 development orders pending to the Northwest Expressway and the Suncoast Corridor scheduled to break ground in late 1992. Other concerns such as loss of the state's P--2000 budget funding for the acquisition of environmentally sensitive' lands in our area is also of major concern that we all should take action to insure that the P-2000 budget is left intact and well funded for the future. t? While we are not familiar with all the specifically nominated sites, we are keenly interested in the headwaters section of BCWSA immediately east and northeast of Lake Keystone. This area contains thousands of acres of t wetlands that discharges swamp water directly from Brooker Creek into Lake Kevstone which is Hillsborough County's second largest lake at 420 acres Foati Of-fir= ] 757, Waazza, M 33556 r Keystone which is Hillsborough County's second largest lake at 420 acres and is reported to have a direct correlation to the underground Florida Acuifer that in turn provides the tri-county areas with drinking water. Thus, protecting this area is of paramount concern to all'the citizens of the tri-county area and is currently the section where urban sprawl has already encroached. However, most of the vested rights developments that w are approved in the BCWSA we are told-are setting dormant because of poor market conditions creating possibly the last opportunity for the government to acquire the properties prior to development and at the lowest possible cost. In most cases we would ask that SOR-D/ELAPP agencies i focus the ;r acquisition efforts on the largest sites first, as the greatest long term benefits can be realized immediately. We believe this will be the first step in saving Lake Keystone from the pollution, fish ' kills and public health problems that have plagued other large lakes such as Lake Thonotosassa and Lake Tarpon because of poor land use management practices of the past. Again, we support all the BCWSA sites proposed, including the large site p? down stream from Lake Keystone, and look forward to working' with the various governmental agencies and other groups who are directly involved so that' we may participate and assist in the site selection process as property owners•o.f the Aeystone Lake Owners' Association. At this time would you please provide us with an updated list of all the nominated 1991-92 sites and the schedule of various site review meetings that we might participate in leading up to the September 1992 Public Hearing for the final site selection. Please feel free to call us at any time in reference to this-matter. Sincerely, Gary Leech (9213-764 President cc. Pete Fowler, ELAPP -- Fritz Musselman, SWFWMD/SORP Chariman of BOCC Margaret Sistrunk, SWFWMD ?. Brian Rush, State Representative f ' f M r f 'Letter of Support-from League of-Women ' Voters. of North Pinellas County :7 I? mr. ileter Fotvlcr Hillsborotich county Tarks and Recreation Uepartm(mt 1101 Rivercove Drive Pampa; VL 33004 Dear Mr. Fowler: 6 The two local Leagues of %vomen Voters representing Pin- ellas County Slipport the City of Clearwater's nomination of a 653 OWL) acres property which the `Mvn5 in Hills- Uoruijl;h e:oujity for ampHsi tion trotter the Lo'unty's envir- onmental, Lands icquisi ticm and vrtitecr on Proeram (.Ut 1 j). Phis property abuts i itiellas Lottrtty,s 4000_ar_re 13 roolcer Crack Preserve and represents a link to the headwaters of the urooker Creek system. It is valuable in its ability to protect Lake !'arnon from further water quali tv degra- dation. It".is important to Hillsborough for mound water recharge anci as a wildlife preserv.i t•ion area. vve ho?ie Hillsborough will acquire this onviroamen tally ; sensitive land mider the 1-'Ul Vlj plan ,before 'it is placed for sale on the oven market. - p- /_211 1;4a4-0 W , i f t i ' 1 i s: ki • 3 j 1 1 s I ti 3 i . j` ... .. .?v_» l . ! 4 1 F • Letter from Craig 'HuegeL'; Director, Brooker Creek Preserve . ?' {. ; •? a :: _.} , .. .. 4 <T YYY[ ' ? • - .. a .. ?? .e • .. . ? F 1 University of Florlidrs Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences School of Forest Resources -and Conservation l ! DEPARTMENT OF WIL©1-IFS AND RANGE SCIENCES Pinellas County Extension Office 12175 125th St. N Largo. PL 33544 ai3t586.5477 May 21, 1992 Rob Hl;ath Hillsborough Department of Parks and Recreation P.0. Bqx 1110 Tampa, Fb 33601 Dear Rob, r"', [14 f. 1 P_? I am writing to express my support for the additions of the Clearwater tract which is adjacent to the Brooker Creek Preserve and which ourrently is an HLAPP nominee in Hillsborough County. it is my opinion that the addition of this, acreage would significantly improve the ability of the Brooker Creek area to "preserve" the biological integrity of this- region. Rvery opportunity to add to thin preserve should be taken now while the possibility exists. As this regions becomes increasingly an island of wilderness within an urban landscape, the steps that we take now to buffer these impacts will help ensure that a diversity of wildlife and their habitats will, remain intact. Some of the Clearwater piece is in a natural condition and is an important addition to the existing preserve. I feel that it is equally important, however, not to overlook the potential importance of the disturbed section, once used for dumping sludge. Although disturbed in its present condition, this area could be restored. Even without our input, it will, restore itself in time. The preserve will exist for future generations. When looked at in the long term, the sludge area eventually 'Will be indistinguishable from areas that are now natural, if allowed to be developed, the impacts of that development will creep further into the preserve and influence the"plantxs and wildlife within LQ even a greater extent. i ?LLECE OF ACCRICULTURE AGAICUt.YURAL 1eXPr6MIMCNT STATION COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE SCHOOL OF FOXIEST RESOURCrS ANO CONSCnVATION ce."TI;R •on IMOPICA%. AQRkCU%.TVVkC Tna IMMul? Of Food 161%43 Apfrtullwal Safancts It In Equal EMP10Yman1 OpoOftunlty • Aftlemattre ALtlom CMDIOV*r al/snorltact to AfOrlga 1,9"& 6n, ?19V6atlon/t IA}oernatlpn and Otnef setvIGas og%ly to InatVldUali an* Irmilytloms Inat NrMtlon wlthOUt ?agard to fall, eolof. WK. Of nat+enal Ortptn, of M n r VV9t. tit I wirties involved 110t. Lo minimirv! the valur.' uf, preserving prupc:rLy nd,lar:cnt to the Currently +-stabllshced boundurios of Lh(.. Brookor Creek Preserve and to Lake Lhf-•' cur-renl. oppUrttin%t,y LO "L aside the Clearwater tract in its entirety, The Br•uvkcr Creek preserve will be one of the State's most important centers for environmental education and biological rN:?crxcc:h. 1 trust that; those Who rank EL.APP nominees will sec that all opportunities to expand this Preserv«: will•prav-i'de-- bene£ii,Ls ffar, greater than those that. would be obtained by protecLln-g a tracL of equal size that would stand alone. Zf l can be of further nssistanre, please contact mi?. Sincerely. F.A• Craig Huegel Urban Wildlife specialist future director, Brooker Creek PrCservc- QC: Fredez?ick B. Karl , Hi llsbo-rough County Administrator Hillsborough Board of County Commissioners: Phyllis Dusansky r Jot. Chi l 1 urns Pa [a Tr)r.•i o ?.: Syly i'a Kimbell. Jan Platt Jamr>s D. Selvey Rd Tu ranch i k i t' ?e '- V f +. .S E i? ¦ :l 1 1 1 1 t Cre ik s Z ?' ?6'with ELAPP. n 00We it cooperatively ristine. The ma Y prate??acres are far frompCreek have been anon of a group buy The 960 bordering Brooker uch drier to the deterWnM3 a 960-acre ears and are now m Thanks largely ounty h°mNorth Hillsborough is wetland aed over they The uplands have Igh of Hillsboro, Iand in rotection. channelix be if restored; the past. purchase and p WD?d b for agriculture in parcel of undevelop ed both Pinellas and than they eatedly urchase. being considered ffor or people in been cleared rep to reject it for p That'd good news eland in question is part Of be reason are strongly the need to because tli , which spa But that is nO even m ublic ownership Hillsboroug?,basin for Brooker Creek and is near Xnstead, it points up land in p the drainag end of both counties, put the it to protect the head' the northern thousands of people. and mono e Creek. water for Brooker- nking The e h stare waters o eadwa- sources of dri the Key site creek meanders from ke goad and A committee of th real es- Nominated JLu,:•i.axB of Van. y actors ration, led by Fem Rd. ter5 tiorth HtghwaY Civic Assoc has lobbied east of Gunn hand pmel- -ate art tate broker N the and to be pre- northern Hillsboroug Lake Tarpon, for years 101 group has formally ias, and empties into ()Id Tampa into served. The that area for ?., ties into nominated land in ,.,,. which emp, res!dents are h Hillsborough S t about the purchase through A (ELAPP) Ba ht toe be concerned along that Envlronmentol »G Program •,,, • quality of water flowing and Protection u givers Program van Drxe`Rd• path. County has purchased and the Save Our the Southwest Pinellas of Land in the administered br?lanagenLent Dis' tK.a?Ce?ane thousands of acreS North Pi Water Creek basin in r and Florida - trict (swift" n ected pur- Brooker Bu of the county Lt Swiftmud re] rs ago. ?ma'a`` nellas to protect s. to nearby well field a nature pre' land some yea d manage chase . the housing developments a group to event built there. Swtf trnu to b be could be restrictions even is see part the land. were the land certain restri 5erve on part own the An contended that protected by placing certthe land. And the l ers who on the developers who own any nominated for on the of land Hart and comp eat that it amount last year was s° ? ELAPP purchase criteria, , couBut ldn't meet ELAPP didn't give up, Since last homeowners Worked with Hart the hom bers have county staff mem needs pse rotection, and year, the area that veral of to better define could meet filed another this years nomination hopes of Hart has even ELAPP's req, Save Cur givers m ht or nomination With the land outright persuading S`h tmud t0 buy when the deve op . se}ling, is a 8 Now, interested The tract is borough tract aPinellas, example. could serve as time to follow recharge area and also in the important dlife endangered by growth habitat for ties. northern p°rtions of both coon ding in dawn- datOffn??fronp It is a fax better M ndi say a ocks Couple of bl than, , town Tampa. 1 I r r r ' f .s f - Group pushes to protect Clearwater-owned land By KATHY GOODWIN 011 1'v hich once was a sludge, or fertiliz- Tribune Staff'Wrfter . r 1 er. field, at the association's meet- KEYSTONE - Keystone Civic Ing at 7:30 p,m, Thursday at Keystone Park's recreation center Association members hope 655 off Gunn Highway. „ acres of environmentally sensitive The 655-acre tract Is about 60 land in northwest Hillsborough County that are owned by the city percent uplands and 40 percent wet- of Clearwater soon will be in 14111s- lands, Blandford said. The property borough's hands. Is adjacent to the Brooker Creek y The irregularly shaped property Preserve, which Is 4,800 acres of runs south of Tarpon Springs' Road undeveloped land In northeast Pi- and north of Race Track Road and nellas County. Pinellas 'officials are in the pro- contains part of the Brooker Creek watershed, which meanders through cess of picking a firm to manage northwest Hillsborough and dumps ' their land. The tract one day may include a Into several of the area s lakes. Clearwater has nominated the blotogical research center, an envi- property for purchase under Hills- ronmental education center and a borough's Environmental Lands Ac- nature preserve to help protect and quisition and Protection Program restore native plants. Another major parcel of north- ?•? IELAPPI, which protects sensitive land, west • Hillsborough land has been nominated to the ELAPP list, Hart "The headwaters of Brooker ' said. Creek dumps Into Lake Keystone. a The 960-acre Cypress Bend site 418-acre lake," association member runs parallel to Gunn Highway on plate Hart said Monday. "We think the east side from about Van Dyke we have a good case as to why this Road to Lutz-Lake Fern Road. piece of property should qualify." ELAPP Is funded by'a special Hart said the creek needs pro- property tax, approved In 1987 and tectlon to preserve the quality and extended in a November 1990 refer- quantity of the area's well fields, endutn. The tax costs the average which provide water for three coup- homeowner about $12.50 a year and ties: Hillsborough. Pinellas and Pas- will raise about $130 millton'over its co. Also, protection is needed for 2u-year life. about 30 fakes scattered about Hillsborough County staff Is ana- northwest Hillsborough. lyzing more than 30 nominations. A Real estate agent Frank Bland- list of the best candidates should be ford will discuss the property, ready in September. i ? i I • v ti 0 'E? .W yi. !! z s ., a lz _ i m Ju a a } s. G t T y cj d' ?+f f I? n C? n V ?U :- V v a C w •i r CLEARWATER-PASS BRIDGE STATUS REPORT TO CITY COMMISSION ? September 14, 1992 1. Bridge Profile Model. In order. to allow the public to better visualize the bridge slope, a model depicting the profile. was constructed. The model is presented to the Commission for public availability. ' . 2. Project Status Environmental and Bridge Permits At this time DER and DNR are the key agencies. Applications have been made to all concerned agencies. The status of each is summarized as follows: *u S Ca st G and - the only outstanding item is the DER permit which must be issued prior to Coast Guard approval. *Deoartmgnt of-Environmental Regulation _ additional data regarding the pass has been requested including soil sampling, benthic sampling, heavy metal sampling, and pass bottom stability modeling, Supplemental work is required. *u S Arm Corps of En ineers _ additional data has been requested regarding handling of dredging spoil. *Qegartmgnt of_ _Natural_ _Resources - addi tional data regard! ng i nl et ' management to assess coastal shoreline stability has been requested. Supplemental work is required. This could becGme a major additional effort. An attempt is being made to resolve this on the basis of existing data. ` *Pinellas Count Water and Navigation Control Authority - additional data has been requested regarding environmental monitoring, disposal of the existing bridge and waterway usage. 3. Construction Documents Status *Right--of-Way - 60% stage plans have been submitted to FDOT for review. *Bridge - EDOT in Tallahassee is reviewing th6 evaluation of alternative span lengths, members and foundation concepts along with the recommended design. *Roadwa - review comments to the 30% submittal were received in August. Work is in progress toward 60% plans submittal. 4. City utilities ; This supplemental work is associated with preparing construction documents for the relocation of City-owned water and sanitary utilities. The ` construction will be accomplished through a Joint Project Agreement with FDDT., DAVII)VOJ,KER'1` •ASSOCIA'1'LS, INC. 4r . w N Q` MANDALAY AVENUE STREETSCAPE o l Basic Plan Remove all sidewalk on east side of Mandalay Ave. from Marianne Ave. to Papaya St. Replace with all new standard concrete. Contractor will leave open spaces every 25 feet, near curb, for Parks and Recreation to plant palm trees. costs - sidewalk $11,200 trees 5,000 Total $16,200 Full. Plan Remove all sidewalk on east side of Mandalay Ave.'from Marianne Ave. to Papaya 5t. Replace with-all new standard concrete with decorative pavers used as a border along curbline and around tree wells. Install palm trees.as described in basic plan. Build two Pedestrian Stations as depicted in attached sketch (includes benches, newspaper rack, planter, plantings, lighting, etc.). Pedestrian stations to occupy parking space adjacent to pedestrian crosswalk. Install irrigation line and electrical line. costs - sidewalk $16,800 pavers 5,000 trees 5,000 Ped.Sta.2 @10,000 20,000 Irrigation 4,000 Misc. bike racks, trash recep., etc. 3.000 q Total $530800 Difference Difference in basic plan (routine expenditures) and Full Plan (unbudgeted capital betterments). $53,800 - full -16,200 -- basic $37,600 -- diff. z ?f 5.f / .f S1AL-or TEWI Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum 11ORK SESSION ONLY Item 9 Meeting Date: 09/14/92 WORK SESSION PLD 11 SUBJECT: Appointment of a City representative to Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services (CNHS) Board. RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: City Commission provide direction to staff regarding City representation on the CNHS board. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: The Planning and Development Director has been a member of the board of CNHS since its formation. in 1978. In 1992, the Department of Housing and Urban Development monitored the Community Development function and cited Mr. Polatty's membership on the CNHS as a possible conflict of interest. In order to avoid any possible appearance of a conflict, the City Manager has requested that all City staff resign from the boards of funded agencies. The CNHS Board has responded favorably to a recommendation made by the Director of Planning and Development that the CNHS board position be reserved for a City Commission member if a member so desires. If a Commission member does not desire to serve, the City Commission can name either a staff member or a citizen member. An amendment is necessary to change the CNHS by-laws which state the member is a city employee. The CNHS staff has suggested wording for the by-laws to be considered by the Board on September 27, 1992 as follows: One of whom (member of the board of CNHS) shall be a City of Clearwater Commissioner or other appointee by the City Commission. In addition one City of Clearwater employee appointed by the City Manager may serve as a non-voting ex-officio member of the Board. Prior to consideration by the CNHS board, the City Commission may wish to express an opinion on the proposed by-law amendment. The board meets six times per year, and this is the minimum time commitment necessary. CNHS has an extensive committee structure to govern functions such as residential loans, finance, and economic development. City staff from Planning and Development and Administrative Services will continue to attend committee meetings to provide technical assistance. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: 00 Costs: N/A Coumission Action: Legal h?/ A To-cat ? Approved Budget N Purchasin urchasin P PLANNING i DEV [ NT © Approved w/conditions g g Risk Mgmt. User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. © Denied Cis ACM Funding Source: 0 Continued to: Other 0 Capital imp. Advertised: N / A 13 Operating Attachments: Date: 0 other None Paper: 0 N t R i d o equ re ?--? 5?7°? Affected Parties 13 None f ? ? Notified Appropriation code: City Ma ag r ? 13 Not Required 6.o Pr nted on recycled paper q f . f?111 3 M E M 0 R A N D U 14 /fTO: 60 FROM: RE: GATE: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney Straw Ballot Questions September 10, 1992 Enclosed' is the first draft of a 'resolution placing straw, ballot questions regarding the use of the Maas Brothers property on the general election ballot. This shows only one question, with a blank to insert an option, followed by a list of options. For each additional option, additional questions following the same form will be necessary. The final draft will have as many questions as you want to put on the ballot, without the list of options. The list of options is deliberately long, on the theory that it is easier to short-list than to create a new list. I have indicated with a bracket how some of the options are grouped, so by selecting one from a group you can delete the others. I would have preferred one multiple-choice question, but the statute requires that each "public measure" be written so as to be answered with a yes or a no. This means that you will need a separate question for each option, each with a yes or no answer. Although you can ask the voters to vote yes on one only, and no on the others, there is no practical way to discard the ballots for anyone who votes yes for two or more options. To have this ready for your vote on Thursday, September 17, you will need to tell me on Monday which options and how many questions you prefer. MAG:a Copies: Michael Wright, City Manager Cynthia Goudeau, City Clerk F .i ? .1 !1 F 1 1 RESOLUTION N0. 92^ AN RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE PLACEMENT OF STRAW BALLOT QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE USE OF THE "MAAS BROTHERS PROPERTY" TO BE PLACED ON THE BALLOT 'AT A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 1992, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION, TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THE CITY VOTING 'AT SUCH ELECTION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to solicit the opinions of the voters of the City regarding the use or uses to be made of the "Maas Brothers" property at Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue, and has approved non-binding straw ballot questions as set forth in this resolution for such purpose; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that the submission of the straw ballot questions to the voters serves a proper public purpose; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following straw ballot questions shall be submitted to the qualified voters of the City at a special election which shall be conducted on Tuesday, November 3, 1992, in conjunction with the general election: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA STRAW BALLOT QUESTION NO. ONE ,1 n Do you approve the use of the former Maas Brothers Department Store property, at Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue, including the properties to the bayfront and north to the Main Library, but not including the Main Library or Coachman Park, as a Yes No *[Complete the sentence by inserting one of the following; add additional questions for each option desired:] --an arts facility constructed, maintained and operated by the Florida Gulf Coast Arts Center, Inc. --a passive park. r t r? i' M - s. --a park, including tennis courts. --a park, including tennis courts, handb all courts, and a marina. --commercial, including retail shopping, restaurants, and theaters. --commercial, including retail shopping, restaurants, and theaters, and a boat dock. --high density residential: --professional office space, --a combination commercial, professional office,'and residential development. ' --a combination commercial, professional office, and residential development,, and a park. --a hotel and convention center. --an entertainment/recreation complex. ?jii --a consolidated city hall. , 4 --a combination city hall, arts facility and a civic center/auditorium. --any use that generates property tax re venues. ' Section 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. ,. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of September, 1992. t Attest: Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Cynthia E. Gou eau, City Clerk 2 . f rtl.l ?; M E M D R A N D U M TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission FROM: M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney RE: My Evaluation DATE: September 11, 1992 In preparation for my annual evaluation next Monday, let me review with you some of the highlights of the past year. This will be an abbreviated version of similar memoranda you have seen in prior years. During the past year I drafted or re-drafted a large number of ordinances for various departments, although we did not approach what may have been the record the year before. The list includes ordinances relating to the election code, various utility rates, water use restrictions, roll-off containers, taxi regulations, lot clearing, marine improvements, flood protection, travel reimbursement, housing discrimination, the public service tax, and of course a variety of amendments to the land development code including building heights, child daycare, group homes, and sign regulations. We repealed five chapters outright, and a recodified edition of the code is about to emerge when our publisher completes the task. We drafted a charter amendment regarding the use of the Bayfront that was approved by the voters, and we are drafting a referendum question, an ordinance, a'contract, and straw ballot questions relating to the use of the Maas Brothers property. Some of this is still "work in progress," as your next agenda shows. On the litigation front, this has been neither a great year nor a terrible year, but something in between. Ile lost the flag case in federal district court, but oral argument on our appeal will be held in Atlanta on October 5 and I am still optimistic about our-chances. The challenge to the no-beer decision at the Pick Kwik store on Clearwater Beach suffered a body blow in the state appellate court, but the case is still pending and the fat lady has not yet sung. We settled a challenge to the sewer/annexation policy in the Countryside Christian case, but a new challenge has been filed and is pending on our motion to dismiss. A wrongful death case was dismissed, and several civil rights and personal injury cases were settled on favorable terms. • We made some money in several civil forfeiture cases. I have given you more details in the quarterly reports and on a daily basis whenever new developments occur. We were prepared to lobby in Tallahassee against bills that would interfere with your ability to serve the public and cost the City money, such as bills relating to impact fees and billboards. Fortunately, they wer6 distracted by redistricting and the budget and had little spare time for mischief. We have the same personnel in the Legal Department that we had a year ago, except for one new secretary who started in January, and the intraoffice working relationships have never been smoother or more professional. We stayed within the budget. All things considered, this has been a pretty good year.., I my salary information .r history with the City is attached as Exhibit A. '?. , For your M eighth year with the.City begins this month. ob•ective is o do the best dail J M job city attorney of your'own home y y town. duri make he-ones comments t n I can, I always welcome your ones th , s and problems arise from I hear aq uestions ane e annual evaluation but ' meeting to the next. MAG: a :j Enclosure : i} ' I ffff t , It 1 . k' t f I j , ` y .. 1 f • Sa1ar Histor i 1985-86 55,000/year, ; 1986-87 57,750/year 5.00% increase 1987-88 61,000/year 5.63% increase ` 1988-89 65,000/year 6.56% increase 1989-90 68,250/year 5.00% increase 1990-91 72,500/year 6.23% increase 1991- 75,400/year 4.00% increase These figures do not to the ICMA deferred include the city's compensation plan, contri bution of 6 percent of my salary No cost of living increases under the executive a plan are available•"to the city attorney.' ' E `t 47i 15' d Exhibit A: i w 6 TO: Mayor and City Commission FROM: Michael W g , City Manager SUBJECT: 1992 Performance Evaluation DATE: September 11, 1992 CITY OF CLEARWATER Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet t i? •'t is ? I i?: LU.v:1tKiSSiU41s PR Date SEP 1.1 X992 CITY CLEW\ In the absence of a formal review procedure, please allow me to'refresh your memory regarding a number of projects that were accomplished during the past year, some that are on going and others that I anticipate being concluded during the next fiscal year. In no particular order, these projects are: *EMPLOYEE RELATIONS: After concluding three year labor contracts, a number of employee morale improvements were instituted including the Labor-Management Committee, weekly "coffee meetings with employees to discuss current topics, the Morale Study, of which the follow up study will soon be conducted under the auspices of the Labor Management Committee, Special Reflection newsletters to inform employees, the Accident Review Committee and full day orientation meetings for new employees. 'MUNICIPAL FINANCES: Financial forecasting was introduced as a means of fiscal control that eliminated crisis management in the budgeting process. It is now used by a number of cities in Florida and was showcased at both the state meetings of the Finance Officers and the League of Cities. Changes in the gas system resulted in a 400 per cent increase in net profits to a projected $1.9 million this year, The ad valorem tax rhte was kept constant and no increase is anticipated one year from now either. Rate studies were completed for the water, waste water and solid waste utilities and adjustments made accordingly. *UTILITIES: In addition to the items mentioned above, a site plan was approved for a new solid waste complex and a major recycling pilot program was instituted to determine what level of participation the city will have in the future in this area. , Clearwater has taken the initiative to become the leader in the development of a sub-regional storm water master plan to include the neighboring jurisdictions and funded in part with a $1 million plus water management district grant. The City has become one of the municipal leaders in Florida in dealing with the deregulation of the natural gas supply system. In addition, within the next few weeks, the Commission will be asked to make major decisions as to the immediate future of the water reuse utility as the preliminary engineering work for this proposed utility? nears completion. L'* Printed on Recycted Paper, • irl *DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT: The marketing of the East End land brought proposals forward from two well known development groups in a time of economic uncertainty. Major work was done on the feasibility of purchasing an existing building for city hall and now the work begins on the construction of a new building. Significant effort was expended to attempt to locate a cruise line in downtown Clearwater and now work begins to finalize negotiations with a major, national retailer to locate a large new store in the redevelopment area. *MISCELLANEOUS; A number of new efforts came into their owii during the past year. These included the completion of the first series of new houses financed by the city's innovative public-private partnership, the creation and expansion of the Film Commission, the beginning of Community Outreach meetings, the Summer Jobs and expanded recreation programs and the hiring of two new department directors. I will be the first to admit I did not accomplish everything mentioned above without the significant help of my two chief assistants, the department heads and the employees as a whole. No manager can be any better than the employees who work for him. My chief disappointments are probably in the area of not moving faster with the water reuse utility and the storm water master planning. In both cases, the emphasis for both these major initiatives changed during the year and in some cases, I was simply not satisfied with the' level of planning that was forthcoming from the consultants and staff. However, both programs should be presented to the Commission before the end of the calendar year. Prehaps the most significant action I hope the Commission will take during the next year will be the development of a strategic plan. As we move into the 1990s, it will be extremely important for the city to know the direction it will take, it's priorities, it's assets and it's liabilities so it can adapt to what will be new and-changing circumstances. This information is not intended to be all inclusive of every activity we were involved with last year, only some of the highlights. Please advise if I can provide additional information. .y Prinred on Recycled Paper r E ' c ? f i i y. i ?. f i t i i FINAL AGENDA - CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION MEETING - September 17, 1992 (6:00 P.M.) Welcome. We are glad to have you join us. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state your name and address. Persons speaking before the City Commission on other than Public Hearing items shall be limited to 3 minutes. No person shall speak more than once on the same subject unless granted permission by the City Commission. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Invocation 3. Service Awards 4. Introductions and Awards 5. Presentations 6, Minutes of Regular Meeting September 3, 1992 7. Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda Not Before 6:00 P.M. - Scheduled Public Hearings (1) (2) (3) (4) Presentation of issues by City staff. Statement of case by applicant or representative (5 minutes). Statement of case by opposition (5 minutes). Commission questions. (5) (6) (7) (8) Comments in support and in opposition: (a) individual (3 minutes); (b) spokesperson for groups (10 minutes). Commission questions. Rebuttal by opposition (5 minutes). Final rebuttal by applicant or representative (5 minutes). PUBLIC HEARINGS 8. a. Second Reading Ord. #5257-92 - 11. Florida Gulf ,Coast Art Center Relating to LDC, amending Ch. 134, a. Declare part of Maas Brothers property regarding signs and sign regulations; surplus amending Sec. 137.005 b. Second Reading Ord. #5283-92 - to b. Res. #92-59 - amending Res. #92-38 Provide portion of Maas site be sold for which established a schedule of fees $750,000 to Florida Gulf Coast Art Center 12. Public Hearing - Declare property located at #9 Not a Public Hearing but action needed prior 401 S. Prospect Ave., Coachman's Heights to Budget being adopted Revised, Blk C, westerly 110' of Lots 4-6, 9. First Reading Ord. #5284-92 - Relating to as surplus to City needs for the purpose of utilities; amending Secs. 50.05(e)(1) and leasing to the IAFF (AS) (3), 50.05(f)(1) and 50.05(g)(1) to decrease 13. (Cont. from 712192) Public Hearing - domestic water and wastewater rates (AS) Vacating Spruce St., between Blk 2, E of 10. 1992193 Budget (AS) Lots 14-18 & Blk 3, W of Lot 19-21, J.H. a. Second Reading Ord. #5280-92 - millage Rouse Sub., subject to the r-o-w being rate for FY92/93 retained full width as a drainage & utility b. Second Reading Ord. #5281-92 - easement, elimination of existing business operating budget' for FY92/93 on the W side of Spruce St. & filing a replat c. Second Reading Ord. #5282-92 - capital or Unity of Title covering the property on improvement program budget for FY92/93 both sides of Spruce (Jimmie V92-07)(PW) 9/17/92 "0 , 14. (Cont. from 9/3/92) Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5263.92 - IPD Zoning for property located at 22067 US19N, Clearwater 19 Commerce Park, Lot 1 (Kunnen Z92-07)(PLD) 15. Variances to Sign Regulations for property located at 1500 Belleair Rd., Sec. 23-29- 15, M&B 34.04 (Fortune Fed'I S&L Assn/Fortune Bank SV92-14)(PLO) 16. (Cont. from 913192) Public Hearing & First Reading Ord. #5264.92 - relating to height limitations, amending Sec. 136.004 & 137.005 (LDCA92-12)(PLD) 17. Declare property located at 1002 N. Garden Ave., Joseph J. Eldridge Sub., Blk C, Lot 31, as surplus to City needs for purpose of selling or exchanging (PLD) Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances 18. Ord. #5219-92 - Roll-Off Container ordinance revision, amending Secs. 54.20 thru 54.22 and 54.24 thru 54.26, repealing Sec. 54.23 19. Ord. #5265-92 - amending Ch. 146 regarding flood protection, redefining time limit of cumulative total for definition of substantial improvement to Clearwater Beach and Sand Key 20. Ord. #5266-92 - Vacating Fifth Avenue South and portions of Main Street and Fourth Avenue South, lying within Sec. 32- 28-16 (City/Dimmitt V92-13) 21. Ord. #5267-92 - Relating to finance and taxation, amending Sec. 44.21 regarding exemptions from public service tax 22. Ord. #5268-92 - Vacating S 1' of the 10' drainage and utility easement lying along the N side of Lot 78, Clubhouse Estates of Countryside Unit 2, less the E 5' and the W 5', located at 2670 St. Andrews Dr. (Burr V92-16) CITY MANAGER REPORTS CONSENT AGENDA (Iteins #23-43) The following items require no formal public hearing and are subject to being approved in a single motion. However, any City Commissioner or the City Manager may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to allow discussion and voting on the item individually. Agreements 23. Amendments to the City's'Firm 24. Transportation Service Agreement dated 10/1191 and commensurate amendments to the General Service Agreement dated 11/16/89 (GAS) 9/17/92 2 Supplemental Agreement No. 5 to contractual agreement with David Volkert and Associates, Inc., to provide additional studies required by permitting agencies and to design utility accommodations regarding Clearwater Pass Bridge,Replacement Project, increasing the amount by $111,086 for new total $1,153,294.34 PW I . f r' Bids & Contracts 25. Cash Purchase of an Uninterruptable Power System from DataComm, Tampa, FL, for $7,416.86 (AS) 26. Purchase of a combination engine and aerial ladder truck for the Fire Dept from Saulsbury Fire Equipment Corp., Tully, NY, for $459,601 and authorize lease/purchase from the City lease/purchase vendor (FD) 27. Contract for digitizing of 210 gas atlas pages to Digital Engineering Consultants, Clearwater, FL, at an est. $10,500 (GAS) 28. Purchase of Black 3408 Polyethylene pipe and fittings from Phillips Engineering Co., Clearwater, FL, and to Perfection Corp., Madison, OH, for the period 9/18/92- 9/17/93, for total est. $268,745.80 (GAS) 29. Contract for construction of 9,000' of 4" and 3,500' of 2" gas main in West Tarpon Springs (Meres Blvd. Phase 11) to Visk Construction, Inc., Riverview, FL, at a total est. $80,450 (GAS) 30. Purchase of 2 Modular Secretarial Work Stations from Pride of Florida, Polk City, FL, for $7,500 (GAS) 31. Extension of security guard service contract with Janus Securtiy Services for the period 8/15/92-8/15/93, for approx. 2,314 hours, at an est. $15,272 (LIB) 32. Purchase of 6 EDACS FMD Scanning 12 watt radios and 1 EDACS MPA system portable radio with DES voice guard for the Police Dept. to General Electric Co., Lynchburg, VA, for $15,296 (PD) 33. 1 year extension to contract for purchase of miscellaneous cast iron meter/valve boxes, lids, covers, etc., with Sunshine Foundry and Machine Co., St. Petersburg, FL, for the period 10/l/92-9/30/93, at an est. $46,837.50 (PW) 34. Purchase of computer hardware for the PW Dept. from National Data Products, at an est. $6,103.65 (PW) 35. Extension of contract for mowing Clearwater Airpark with Greenturf Services, for the period 10/l/92-9/30/93, for a total cost not to exceed $17,000 (PW) 36. Purchase of a Microwave Digestion System for the Water Pollution Control Division from Questron Corp., Princeton, NJ, for 619,800 (PW) 37. Purchase of 3 acid storage cabinets for the Water Pollution Control Division from Descon International Inc., Lindenhurst, NY, at an est. $4,100 (PW) Plans & Plats 38. Receive Modified site plan for the Sayview Baptist Church located on Meadow Lark Lane and Kentucky Avenue and authorize the DRC to approve the final site plan subject to signs and fencing/walls being subject to separate review and permitting processes (PLD) Receipt & Referral 39. (Cont. from 8/13/92) - Land Use Plan Amendment to Commorcial/Tourist Facilities, CPD Zoning and Preliminary Site Plan for property located in the NW 1 /4 of the SW 1 /4 of Sec.-29-15, M&B 32.01 (Sun Bank of Tampa Bay LUP92-14, Z92-08)(PLD) 40. Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment to Medium Density Residential and RMH Zoning for property located at 2975 Gulf to Bay Blvd., William Brown's Sub, of Bayview, Lot 17 and the S 88.44' of the W 153.92' of Lot 2, 2.4 acres (Kirkpatrick A92-1 1,LUP92-18)(PLD) 41. Proposed Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code Amendments (PLD) CITY ATTORNEY Agreements, Deeds & Easements 42. Quitclaim deed - South 30' of right-of-way of Allen Avenue (Northwood Estates) 43. Sanitary sewer lien agreement - Carlton Terrace 1 st Addition, Blk F, Lot 4 (2717 & 2719 South Drive - Black) 9/17/92 3 4 ' 1 6T HER M T MA A R REPORT 44. 1991192 Third Quarter Budget Review (AS) 46. Res. #92-57 - authorizing issuance of a a. First Reading Ord. #5278-92 - operating guarantee for loans made under the CNHS budget economic development loan program WI-D) b. First Reading Ord. #5279-92 - capital 47. Development Code Adjustment Board - 1 ; improvement program budget . appointment (CLK) 45, Staff update on the Annexation Committee and Annexation Incentive Program and receive direction regarding recommendations (PLD) 48. Other Pending Matters `.' 49. Other City Attorney Items { 50. City Manager Verbal Reports a. Bordner Survey 51. Other Commission Action ; a. Appointment of replacement i for Commissioner Regulski ; 52. Adjournment 1 • e ? rr > 1 r '. 9117192 q j4. r 4 ? ' f 3 ,^SEAt CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Agenda Cover Memorandum Item # Meeting Date: 9111/92 Subject: SERVICE AWARDS Recommendation/Motion: The following employees be presented with service awards for their length of service in the employment of the City of Clearwater. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: 5 Years: Trent D. Whitter Robert S. Tellone Elaine A. Muldowney Gina L. Morrow Corine Woodard Richard D. Debord I Y as Doreen B. Feldhaus Margaret L. Simmons 20 Years: Emmanuel Hutchinson Parks & Recreation Fire Planning & Development Parks & Recreation Parks & Recreation Public Works/Infrastructure/Water Planning & Development City Manager's Office Public Works/Utilities/Solid Waste i , Reviewed by Originating Dept.: Costs: Commission Action: Legal H uman Resources Total ? Approved Budget ? Approved w/conditions Purchasing User Dept.: Current FY ? Denied Risk Mgmt. ? Continued to: DIS Fundin Source: g ACM Advertised: ? Capt. Imp. Other Date; ? Operating Attachments: Submitted by: Paper: ? Not required ? Other Affected parties Appropriation Code: ? Notified City Manager ? Not required CJ None 0 ?Y i? t i t TO: Mayor Rita Garvey FROM: Betty J. Blunt, Confidential Clerk Receptionist F COPIES: City Commissioners, Michael Wright, Cyndie Goudeau SUBJECT: Presentations at the September 17, 1992 City Commission meeting DATE: September 17, 1992 The following presentations will be made at the September 17, 1992 City Commission meeting. SERVICE PINS 5 ears Trent Whitter, Parks and Recreation (permanent part-time does not get a service pin - only a letter) Gina Morrow, Parks and Recreation Corine Woodard, Parks and Recreation t E. i i 20 years Emanuel Hutchinson, Public Works/Utilities/Solid Waste (watch) ?.. PROCLAMATION Safety Awareness Week - Milt Cason PROCLAMATI N & PRESENTATION POW/MIA Recognition Day - Ed Mazur .E I. ¦.: ? i i _ w 0 Agenda No. . 9/17/92 MEMORANDUM TO: Meeting Date. The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT' City Commission 1,1inutes of Regular Hectang 9/3/92 RECOMMENDATION: Approve minutes as submitted by the City Clerk Q And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: Subject minutes were submitted to tine Commission with regular daily mail. r t Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: 1. Approved as Recommended/Revi"Conditionaf 2 Continued to Submitted by: Advertised: 0Affected Costs: ?Attachments: Parties Funding Source: Date: Notified ? Capital Improve- City Manager Paper: of Meeting meni Budget 0 Operating Budget 0 Not Required CO Not Required ? Other artment: Ori inatin De g g p Date &Sequentiai Appropriation Code Reference ? None A ¦ 8 ORDINANCE NO. 5257-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING CHAPTER 134, CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO SIGNS AND SIGN REGULATIONS; AMENDING SECTION 137.005, CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS; [PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 11. Section 134.006, Code of Ordinances, is amended to react: Sec. 134.006. Definitions Key-de-f4n444-ens. Abandoned sign: Any-sign-on which is advertised a business that is n er licensed,-no longger has a certificate of occupancy, or is no longer loin ness at that location and such circumstances have continued for a period o Architectural detail: Anv oro.iection. relief, chance of material, windo or door opening, exterior lighting, inlay or other exterior building features no specifically classified herein as a sign. ? The term includes but is not limite to, relief or _inlay- features or patterns that _distinguish whitlow or _doo openings, exterior lighting that frames building features, and changes in_facad materials to create an architectural effect. ' t t i i 41ie following select F C7 nr? r{ 'd?Yt?a{??e?tT????B1ivn bas+*C 111 ding of this ehpter. .n p the user-IF, of r-e ferenee. n???r?. ,J-_F.-4.4. } .? r1 i n ,, ,?4y "rt-L,',fTI "?' 'FJ'.?ar?7? v7?rC(?-f 'CI'CfS?4 E'7fATVGV-Tom" T 5ti of )f " ? .n'Cf V7Ts e9e to ined eh??'C(?Y 37, se en 137'j"-009, shall Area or surface &u-e- area of a-shin: The area ins ware feet enclosed by a rectangle, parallelogram, triangle, c'Err_le, semi-circle, cross,. other geometric figures, or other architectural design, the sides of which make contact with the extreme points or-edyes of the sign,-excluding the supporting structure which does not form part of the sign proper or of the display. The area of a sign comosed? of characters of words attached direct] to a large,- uniform building wall surface shall be the . smallest rectangle, -triangle, circle, parallelogram, ---attest geometric figure, or _other _- architectural design, .. or combination of not more than two of such figures or designs, which encloses the whole croup of words or characters. Unless otherwise indicated, "area" means area per sign face. The-smallest r e e mgu-l-a ry=a-pe z E)idad ; --tr-i-ate a r ; ? 4a - or sef)O-e ?c-1#? alma f'a- 6 ?--a-S 1 -w l-?h--Ff f--EilG-eiii?u -a-1l-e r-PffN ? r,-Q,f-t„e sign, --eme1•L!§-i-ye--of-§uppe)-t5 upp4ghts, br-aGes and -fi"mePC e-purpose of- 4etef iLS_Y11n ,heL??..„vl`-r ee a?lo- p;oy??"ed-of lettering placed on ' .."t7 r ar_ F ?{l { 't j ^t? LY t • dew ,--t he area -sTibe-the smallest or in a lar area A?,.,?h £.-, -11 neompa-&9e-,-0e-4ue s sage or llle s?a?2S-:- , Art works -Drawings, pictures, symbols, paintings or sculpture which in no wa identify a product or business and which are not displayed in conjunction witha commercial, for-profit or a_non=profit enterprise. Attached sian: Anv sign attached to. on. or supported by any part of a enc poses or covers usawe space. Auxiliary freestanding sign: An additional freestanding sin allowed due to exceptional-property frontage characteristics. Banner: A sign having characters, letters, numbers, illustrations, symbols or ornamentation backed by fabric, paper or? similar material and attached to a pole, halyard, rope, wire, string, cord or similar device or to a building at one or more edges or by one or more corners. The term does not include flans as Beacon: A stationarv or revolvina light which flashes or nro.iects illumination, single color or multi-colored, in any manner which is intended to attract or divert attention, exce t however this term is not intended to include any--kindof lighting-device whicil is required or necessary under the safety, -regulations _ described by the Federal Aviation Agency or similar agencies. , Bench signs/bus-shelter-signs: A„bench „or bus shelter upon which a sign is drawn, painted, printed, or otherwise affixed thereto. Building setback line:- A line _beyond _which no building may extend, as established by ordinance. A building setback line,,- in some instances, may coincide with the property line. - Bulletin board: Sign of-permanent character, but with removable letters, words, numerals or symbols, indicating t_henaines or-persons associated with, or events conducted upon, or products or services offered upon, the aremises up-an which such a sine is maintained. -' 2 Business establishment: rshin. corporation, of Canopy (awning) sign: Ai ony. or other fabric. Alas nalviaua i person, non-profit organiza anization or legal entity holding a listinct and separate physical space. i that is a part of or attached to_an_aw structural nrotective cover over a Directional sign: An sin which exclusively contains information providing direction or location of any object, place, or area including-but-not limited to, those signs indicating avenues of ingress/egress. Directory/ informat_ion sign: __ Any sign providing information gr_imari_ly intended to direct persons to atenant or service located or provided in a multi-- tenant building or oroperty. Erect: To build,_ construct, attach,--hang, Place, suspend or affix._ The term includes, but is not limited to, the painting of a sign. Exempt sign: Any sign for. which a Permit is not required. An exempt "inn shall comply-with _all_other terms and conditions of these regulations. Fla : A Manner containing distinct colors patterns or s mbols used as a symbol of a government, political subdivision corporation, business, or other entity. Freestanding sign: Any sign supported by structures or supports that are placed on or anchored in_t_he__gro_und and that are independent of any building or other structure. Frontage, property: The length of the property line for a_ parcel which runs parallel to, and along, a road right-of-way or street exclusive of alley- ways. 3 J! m 0 Gasoline price display sign: AAn sin which displays the rices asolines for sale. Government or public-purpose-sign: A signserving apubl_ic purpose installed or -approved_by a _Publis agency. The term includes but is not 1imi to traffic/directional signs, ?conwiunity identity and entrance signs, signs banners for special community events as determined by the cit. commission or -c manager, signs for parks and stadiums (including signs promoting events schedu to be held in the parks and stadiums), signs located on private properly wh promote-special events for the benefit of charitable, non-profit organizati_o and public -signs that provide _ direction -- to places of interest. The term does ., include signs containingw advertising except to the extent allowed by t chapter. - -' - ? -' Height: The vertical distance measured from ground level nearest the base of the sign to the highest point of the sign. T Identification sign: Any, sign which indicates no more than the name, Integral sign: Any sign which specifies thename _-of_ a budding, date of ection monumental citations and the like when carved into-stone, , concrete or milar material or made of bronze aluminum or other permanent construction and de an integral part of the building. Maintenance: The replacing, repairing or repainting of a portion of a sign ructure periodically changing changeable co or renewing copy-which has been de unusable by ordinary wear or weather or accident. Menu sign for drive-throe h establishments : Ac sign laced so as to be ewed from a drive-through lane and containing _only a listing of products, with ices,_ offered for sale by the business. A menu sign may include a mechanism r ordering products while viewing the sign. 4 r----ee}amm" a a tana i n any-number -Incidental attached sign: -Any sign such as credit card or bu signs, -which provides inforpiatfon incidental to the identifica business to which the sign is attached. Multi-tenant building: by a common entrance, and wl story or otherwise be withot Nonconforming sign: A these regulations. 1 where more than one business is serviced businesses-may be located above the first on a public right-of-way_ at does not conform to the requirements of l On-premise sign: Any sign which identifies a use, business or a..product ?for_sale or service to be rendered on the lot where_ th located. - - - - Political-sign. An si n which constitutes a olitical advertise the primary purpose is related to the candidacy of any person for pub or any public issue in an upcoming election. Portable sign: An si n not permanently attached to the roun permanent structure or a sign designed to be trans orted including limited to: signs designed to be transported by_meansof wheels; ba other inflatables; and umbrellas used for advertising. Primary attached sign-- An attached sign intended to serve as t identification of the specific business or building to which th, attached. Projecting sign: Any sign affixed perpendicularly to a buildi in such a mariner that its leading edge extends more than one foot surface of such building or wall. dvertis e e primary sign is a or wall Real estate sign: Any sign advertising the sale, rental or lease of premises, or part of the premises, on which the sign is displayed. Roof sign: Ariy sign erected and constructed wholly on or above the roof of a buildina, sunoorted by the roof structure. except integral roof signs. Sign: Any writing, picture, symbol, banner or other graphic communication or device which is primarily used to convey information, attract attention, or advertise and is prominently visible from an outdoor location. The term includes the sign structure. Sign face: The riart of the sign that is or can be used to identify, 5 ¦ = . 1 .. display, advertise, communicate information,or for visual representation which attracts. or intends to?attract _ the attention 'of-the public-for any purpose. Sign structure: Any structure which. is designed specifically for the purpose of supporting a sin has supported, or is ca ahle of supporting a sign. This definition shall include an decorative covers braces wires su orts or components attached to_or-placed _around the sign structure. The suppe tip', u p *:$ 1 b- r i)d frame of-a-s4go, Sni a si n: A off-premise sin which is tacked nailed posted, pasted, glued. or otherwise attached to trees, pales, stakes, fences, or ..-to.- other la the name L V_ Subdivision sign: A sign which is primarily intended to dis of a fatted subdivision or other residential development,. including a mobile home park, but may contain supplemental information, so long-as- such supplemental information is clearly incidental to the display of the -name of the _Dlatted subdivision or other residential development, including -a mobile home park._ c?a 1 eir-Gular ?y?.?lI StiiY-1'Lte'ea're'a7 mallest ?c-4Fc-ular area of r??.1 g7cT'f'al?r??f?!!T?na•p ", LTTLt ?GTT ' fl_Wjl.i l`ji ,L£l,l _hTTCVm .,-,ightsi br-aees and POP Temporary sign;- A_sign- wi}icth i s displayed for a_limiLed period of time usually less than one year but not to exceed the time authorized by_ this develo ment code fora articular temporary sign use. Tiine_ and temperature -sign: A sign containing- illuminated numerals and displaying the time and temperature only. Vehicle sign: A sign- attached to or laced on a vehicle including automobiles trucks, boats, campers, „andtrailers that is parked on or otherwise utilizing a public right-of-way, public_propertyr or_on private property so as to be intended to be viewed from a vehicular right-of-way for the basic purposes _of providing advertisement of products or services or directing eo le to a business or activity. This definition is not to be construed to include those signs that identify a firm or its principal products on a vehicle unless such vehicle is parked in such a manner that it is intended to provide advertisement of products or services or to direct .. people to a business or activity) or such advertising devices as may be attached to and within the normal unaltered lines of the vehicle of a licensed transit carrier when and during that period of time said vehicle is regularly and customarily used to traverse the public highways during 6 M! M't .I 1s the normal course of business. Wall sion: A Sign parallel t cture tiv o Window sion: A si4n located on a window or within a building or other enclosed structure, which is visible from the exterior through a window or other o enin . Window signs may be permanent or temporary, with different re uirements for each type of window sign. Section 2. Article II of Chapter 134, Code of Ordinances, consisting of Sections 134.007 through 134.012, is amended to read: ARTICLE II. SIGN STANDARDS [Note: Substantial revision. See current code for existing text.] Sec. 134.007. Permitted sign types. The following sign types shall be permitted in the, various zoning districts: (1) Freestanding signs (including auxiliary freestanding.signs). (2) Attached signs: - Wall signs - Canopy or awning signs - Permanent window signs - Temporary window signs - Projecting signs - Incidental attached signs - Integral signs - Integral roof signs - Machinery signs - Attached menu signs (3) Freestanding or attached'signs: - Bulletin board signs. - Construction signs. - Directional signs, - Directory/Information signs.! - Garage and yard sale signs. - Gasoline price display signs. - Menu signs for drive-through establishments.• 7 E ?r S 4 ?I ? F. V4 r, i? i?: f ?= - political signs. - !teal estate signs. - Sandwich board signs: - Theater/movie announcement signs. - Time and temperature signs Sec. 134.008. Visual clearance, sight triangle, and clear distance. •1 (1) The visual clearance and sight triangle, to assure adequate sight distance at the intersection of two public roadways and at the intersection of a public roadway and an accessway or driveway, shall follow the criteria of the Florida Department of Transportation's Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction, and Maintenance for Streets and Highways, or criteria otherwise specified by the city manager or designee. (2) For any sign which projects over a sidewalk or other pedestrian access area, a minimum clear distance of nine feet shall be maintained as measured from ground level to the bottom portion of the sign structure which projects over the sidewalk or other pedestrian access area. For any sign which projects over a right-of-way or other vehicular access area, a•minimum clear distance of 14 feet shall be maintained as measured From ground level to the bottom portion of the sign structure which projects over the right-of-way or other vehicular access area. Signs that project over public sidewalks and rights-of-way shall require the approval of the director of public works. Sec. 134.009. Exempt Signs. The following types of signs are exempt from the permitting requirements of this chapter, provided that number, area, and other limitations set forth in this section are satisfied. The area of exempt signs shall not be.included in determining compliance with maximum allowable sign area requirements. Exempt signs are allowed in addition to signs for which permits are required. An otherwise exempt sign which exceeds the limitations of this section shall require a permit. (1) Address signs for residential properties, limited to one address sign per residential property or per each platted residential subdivision or property entrance. ' The address numbers shall be at least three inches in height, in arabic numbers, and of contrasting color to the background. Address signs shall be displayed on the front of the property. Address signs for non residential properties are not exempt. The area of address signs shall be limited as follows: Zoning district Single family residential Multiple family residential (2) Art work. (3) Architectural detail. .-I Maximum-siggn area 2 square feet 6 square feet 8 11 l t i .i i` x, (Q) Changeable message on permitted signs. This exemption does not include changes to the sign structure. (5) Commemorative signs for religious holidays, limited to displays during a period of time beginning 30 days before and ending 15. days after the holiday. This exemption includes lighting, figures, and other similar displays that may be regarded as a sign, but does not include commemorative signs of types which are expressly prohibited by this chapter. (6) Construction signs, limited to one sign per lot frontage. Construction signs may be displayed only during the time a valid building permit is in force. The area of construction signs shall be limited as follows. Zoning district Maximum sign area Single family residential 16 square feet Multiple family residential 32 square feet Nonresidential 32 square feet (7) Flags, limited to one flag on any single-family residentially zoned property; not more than one flag per dwelling unit, displayed at the dwelling unit, on any duplex or multi-family residentially zoned property; not more than two flags on any nonreslidentially zoned-property; and not more than three flags on public property. On duplex, or multi-family residentially zoned properties, "displayed at the unit" means one flag may be displayed on or at each dwelling unit, and may not be combined with flags from other dwelling units in a multiple- flag display. Flags shall be positioned so that no part of a flag is able to encroach over a public right-of-way. (8) Garage and yard sale signs, not to exceed four square feet in area, and not to exceed one sign per lot frontage. Directional off-site garage or yard sale signs may be permitted for a particular lot only on those days when there is a garage or yard sale in progress. No sign shall be placed within a street right-of-way. (9) Government and public purpose signs. When located in a public park or other public property, stadium signs and signs erected for special community events may include commercial messages-for vendors and event sponsors. Signs located on private property which promote special events for the benefit of charitable, non-profit organizations shall not be erected for longer than four days for each event, nor shall such signs be erected more frequently than two times per calendar year; such signs may include commercial messages for vendors and sponsors. (10) Incidental attached signs, provided that the total area of all incidental attached igns shall not.exceed two square feet per building frontage. (11) integral signs. ' Integral signs shall be allowed so long as the total area-of such signs does not exceed two square feet per building facade. (12) Machinery signs. Examples are signs on newspaper machines, vending machines, gasoline pumps, and public telephone booths. 9 (13) Marina vessel slip signs. Each individual vessel slip at a marina may be identified with a sign not exceeding four square feet in area placed in the vicinity of the slip. (14) Menu signs (attached) placed in the vicinity of entrances or service windows of restaurants and not exceeding a'total of four square feet per entrance or service area. , (15) On-site directional signs. No individual sign shall exceed four square feet in area unless otherwise specified. Business logos or other symbols may be placed on on-site directional signs so long as they do not exceed 25' percent of the area of the sign and are clearly incidental or complementary to the directional message of the signs. (16) Political signs. One sign shall be allowed for each candidate or issue per each road frontage. Signs in residential districts shall not exceed six square feet in area. Signs in nonresidential districts shall not exceed 32 square feet in area. Political signs shall be erected no sooner than 60 days prior to the election for which they are intended, and shall be removed within seven days after the election for which they are intended. (17) Real estate signs. Signs in residential districts shall not exceed six square feet in area. Signs in. non--residential districts shall not exceed 32 square feet in area. Freestanding real estate signs shall be placed a minimum of five feet from all property lines. One real estate sign per saleable or leasable unit shall be permitted. However, only one freestanding real estate sign per property frontage shall be permitted; any additional allowable signs shall be attached signs. Directional off-site real estate signs shall be permitted for a particular lot only on those days when there is an open house. Waterfront parcels shall be permitted one real estate sign oriented toward the water in addition to the real estate sign(s) permitted for non-waterfront property; such signs may be freestanding or attached in single family zoning districts, but shall only be attached signs in other zoning districts. Saleable or leasable units fronting on two or more streets shall be allowed the permitted real estate signs for each frontage, but these signs cannot be accumulated and used on one street in excess of that allowed for the saleable or leasable units based on that one street frontage. For parcels with over 500 feet of street frontage on one right-of-way, one additional freestanding real estate sign may be permitted. (18) Stadium signs that face inward toward a stadii1111 and are not intended for viewing from adjacent properties or rights-of-way. (19) Temporary window signs. Signs shaTI be allowed in nonresidential zoning districts for a period not longer than 30 days. The maximum area of said signs shall be 20 percent of window area or 100 square feet, whichever is less. The area to be used for such signs shall be clearly delineated with paint, tape or other markings to a i d in the enforcement of the area requirements of this section. (20) Warning signs, not to exceed two square feet in area. 10 Sec. 134.010. Prohibited signs. The following types of signs are prohibited: Abandoned signs. Abandoned signs and/or sign structures which are determined to be nonconforming with the provisions of this section shall be required to be removed by the property owner within 30 days after receipt of notification (or refusal to accept delivery of notification by certified mail) that such removal is required. Alternately, the sign..panel(s) within the abandoned sign structure may be removed'-and replaced with sign panel(s) of neutral color and containing no message. Banners, flags, balloons, cold air inflatables, streamers, and strings of pennants, except where allowed as governmental and public purpose signs for sppecial events of limited time and frequency, as approved by the city manager or tfte city commission, and except banners and flags where allowed as an exemption from the permitting requirements of this chapter 'or where permitted as free- standing or attached signs. , Bus shelter signs and bench signs. This prohibition shall not be construed to include the identification of the transit company or its route schedule. Changeable message signs, except menu and time and temperature signs, in which the message changes more rapidly than once every 24 hours. Menu signs in which the message changes' more rapidly than once every three hours. Pavement markings, except official traffic control markings and street addresses. Portable signs. Roof and above-roof signs. Sandwich board signs, except in the Core and Eastern Corridor subdistricts of the Urban Center District. Signs attached to. or painted on piers or seawalls, other than official regulatory or warning signs. Signs in or upon any river, bay, lake, or other body of water. Signs located on publicly-owned land or easements or inside street rights- of-way, except signs required or erected by permission of the city manager or city commission, and sandwich hoard signs to the extent permitted in the Core and Eastern Corridor subdistricts of the Urban Center district. Prohibited signs shall include, but shall not be limited to, handbills, posters, advertisements, 11 e or notices that are attached in any way upon lamp posts, telephone poles, utility poles; bridges, and sidewalks. r Signs that erflt sound, vapor, smoke, odor, particles, or gaseous matter. Signs that have unshielded illuminating devices or which reflect lighting onto public rights-of-way thereby creating a potential traffic or pedestrian hazard. Signs that move, revolve, twirl, rotate, flash, including animated signs, multi-prism signs, floodlights and beacon lights except when required by the Federal Aviation Agency or other governmental agency. Signs that obstruct, conceal, hide, or otherwise obscure from view any official traffic or government sign, signal, or device. Signs that present a potential traffic or pedestrian hazard. This includes signs which obstruct visibility. Signs attached to or placed on any tree or other vegetation. Signs carried, waved or otherwise displayed by persons either on public rights-of-way or in a manner visible from public rights-of-way. This provision is directed toward such displays intended to draw attention for a commercial purpose, and is not intended to limit the display of placards, banners, flags or other signage by persons participating in demonstrations, political rallies and similar events. Snipe signs. Temporary window signs in residential districts. Three-dimensional objects that are used as signs. Time and temperature signs in which the message changes more rapidly than once every 15 seconds. Vehicle signs, and portable trailer signs. Any sign that is not specifically described or enumerated as permitted within the specific zoning district classifications herein. Sec. 134.011. Permitted signs; sign standards. (a) Purpose. It is the intent of this section to regulate signs by sign type. Permits are required for these signs. The requirements of this section are in addition to all other applicable: requirements of this chapter. In the event of a conflict between the requirements of this section and other applicable requirements, the more stringent requirements shall govern. (b). Sign standards, general rules. 12 (1) Area computation. The area of a sign shall be computed on the basis of the smallest square, circle, rectangle, cross, other geometric figure, that will encompass the extreme limits of the writing, representation, emblem, lighting, or other display, together with any material, color, or border trim forming an integral part of the background of the display or used to differentiate the sign from the backdrop or structure against which is placed. The computation of a sign area does not include any framework, bracing, fence or wall that is reasonably necessary to support the sign. (2) Area and sign face. The area of a sign shall be computed on a per sign face basis and a l l requirements with.respect to sign area refer to the area of a single face of a sign. A double-faced sign shall be permitted to have the allowed area for a single-faced sign on each of the two faces of the double-faced sign. (3) Minimum setback. The setback of a sign shall be measured from a property line to any portion of the sign structure. a. For attached signs, there shall be no minimum setback. -b. For all other signs, the minimum setback shall be five feet from each side and rear property line. The minimum setback from a street shall be as set forth in this chapter. (4) Lots fronting on two or more streets. Lots fronting on two or more streets functionally classified as collector or arterial streets are allowed the permitted signage for each frontage, but such signage cannot be accumulated and used on one street in excess of that allowed for the lot based on that one street frontage. (5) Shopping centers, office complexes, retail complexes, and multi- tenant buildings. Properties developed as shopping centers, office complexes, retail complexes, or multi-tenant buildings are allowed the permitted area of attached signage for each occupancy that has a separate and distinct public entrance, but such signage cannot be accumulated and used on any one occupancy in excess of that generally allowed for the zoning district in which the property is located. (6) All unauthorized signs found within any public property including existing rights-of-way shall be moved by the owner of the sign at no expense to the city or the governmental agency having jurisdiction over the property. Nothing shall prohibit a duly authorized local official from removing a sign from ' public property and properly discarding it. (7) All signs shall comply with applicable building and electrical code requirements. (8) Nothing in these regulations shall be construed to prevent or limit the display of legal notices, warnings, informational, directional, traffic, or other such signs which are legally required or necessary for the essential functions of governmental agencies. 13 (c) Sign standards, by type of sign. (1) Attached signs. a. Viewable from a street right-of-way: The permitted area for attached signs viewable from a street right-of-way shall be based upon 1.5 square feet for each linear foot of building width. Such signs shall be oriented in a manner generally parallel to the street frontage toward which the sign is to be oriented. Building width shall be measured along the street frontage toward which the sign is to be oriented. b. Associated with a business entrance, not primarily viewable from a street right-of-way: Attached signs associated with a business entrance and not primarily viewable from a street right-of-way may be permitted so long as the area of such signs does not exceed the allowable area for attached signs established in the preceding paragraph. Such signs shall be located above or in otherwise close proximity to a business entrance that is not primarily. viewable from-a street right-of-way. In calculating the allowable area for such signs, building width shall be measured along the building wall on which the sign is to be oriented. (2) Freestanding signs. a. , Number of sign message panels: No freestanding sign shall have its allowable surface area divided into more than two separate message panels. In computing the area of such signs, the area of the space between the message panels shall be included in the calculation of the area of the sign. b. Height: The height of a freestanding sign shall be computed as the distance from the base of the sign at ground level to the top of any portion of the sign or sign structure, whichever is taller. C. Auxiliary freestanding signs: Auxiliary freestanding signs, where permitted, shall be oriented towards the street that permits their use. (3) Directory/information signs shall be allowed in all nonresidential districts except where specifically prohibited. Not more than one directory/ information sign shall be permitted per street frontage. The maximum height of a directory/information sign shall be eight feet. (4) Illuminated signs. ?? ' a. The light from any illuminated sign shall be shaded, shielded, or directed away from adjoining street rights-of-way and properties. b. No sign shall have blinking, flashing, or-fluttering lights or other illumination device which has a changing light intensity, brightness, color, or direction. C. No colored lights shall be used at any location or in any manner so as to be confused with or construed as traffic-control devices. 14 I i f { a f Z 3 A d, Neither the direct nor the reflected light from primary light sources shall create a traffic hazard to operators of motor vehicles on public thoroughfares. (5) Banners and f lags. A banner or flag may be used as a permitted free- standing or attached sign and, if so used, the area of the banner or flag shall be included in, and limited by, the computation of allowable area for free- standing or attached signs an the property. .. (6) Garage or yard sale signs shall be subject to the following: a. Maximum area: Four square feet per sign. b. Duration: Signs shall be erected for a period of not longer than three days per event and not more frequently than two times (events) per calendar year. C. Off-premise directional signs for garage or yard sales shall be permitted only on each day during which an active garage or yard sale is taking place. Such signs shall be placed on private property only. (1) Gasoline price display signs shall be allowed in all nonresidential districts except where specifically prohibited. Gasoline price display signs shall be placed in the vicinity of the pump islands and shall not extend above any pump island canopy, or they shall be attached to the primary freestanding sign for the property. If attached to the freestanding sign, the area of the gasoline price display sign shall be counted toward the allowable area for the freestanding sign. (8) Theater/movie announcement signs may be either freestanding or attached, but not both, unless required by zoning district regulations to be freestanding or attached signs. Freestanding theater/movie announcement signs shall be allowed in addition to other freestanding signs allowed for properties developed as shopping centers, office complexes, retail complexes, or multi- tenant buildings. Freestanding theater/movie announcement signs shall be allowed as substitutes for the allowable freestanding signage for other properties. Attached theater/movie announcement signs shall be in addition to the allowable attached signage. r (9) Time and temperature signs shall be allowed in all nonresidential districts except where specifically prohibited. The maximum area for the time and temperature portion only shall be 20 square feet. The area of a time and temperature sign, whether attached or freestanding, shall be included in determining the cumulative area of signs on a property. (d) Requirements in specific zoning districts. (1) Residential zoning districts. The following types of signs are permitted in residential zoning districts, including Mobile Home Park and Residential Planned Development districts: 15 R? } a. Subdivision/entryway signs: 1. Maximum number: Two signs for each platted subdivision or property entrance. If two signs are used for an entrance, each sign shall be a single- faced sign, and the signs shall be located on opposite sides of .the entrance to which they are oriented. 2. Maximum area: 24 square feet. 3. Maximum height: Six feet. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. b. Residential identification signs (e.g., nameplates): 1. 'Maximum number; One sign. 2. Maximum area: Two square feet., 3. Such signs shall be attached signs only. C. Signs for nonconforming uses in residential districts: 1. Maximum number: One sign. ` 2. Maximum area. 24 square feet. 3. Such signs shall be attached signs only. (2) Public/Semi-Public, Open Space/Recreation and Recreational Planned Development zoning districts: The following types of signs are permitted in Public/Semi-Public, Open Space/Recreation and Recreational Planned Development zoning districts: a. Freestanding signs: I. Maximum number: One sign per lot. For parcels with over 500 feet of street frontage on one right-of-way, one auxiliary freestanding sign may be permitted; such auxiliary sign shall be spaced at least 300 feet from all other freestanding signs on the same property. ti 2. Maximum area: 48 square feet. The total maximum area for an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be 24'square feet. 3. Maximum height: 12 feet. The maximum height for an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be eight feet. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. ti b. Attached signs shall be,°perwitted per occupancy as follows: 16 w w 1. Maximum area: 48 square feet. 2. Type: The following types of attached signs may be permitted, provided th e cumulative area of the attached signs does not exceed the maximum allowable a rea for attached signs: Wall sign Canopy or awning sign Permanent window sign Projecting sign' Integral roof sign 3. Maximum number: Five. Not more than three-.attached signs shall be of any sing le type listed above. C. Directory/information signs shall be permitted on lots developed with two or more multi-tenant buildings containing a minimum cumulative area of 25,000 square feet of gross floor area, as follows: 1. Maximum area: 20 square feet. c. Minimum street setback: Equal to the required structural setback for the zoning district in which the sign is erected. d. Theater/movie announcement signs: 1. Maximum number: One sign per lot. 2. Maximum area: 64 square feet for a single theater, plus an additional eight square feet for each additional theater. 3. Maximum height: 20 feet, for, a freestanding theater/movie announcemen t sign. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. e. Menu signs for drive-through establishments. jt 1'. Maximum number: One sign per drive-through lane. 2. Maximum area: 24 square feet. L 3. Maximum height: ..Six feet. 4. Minimum street setback: 25 feet. f. Bulletin boards for government-office, recreational area, school, and church uses : 1. ' Maximum number: One bulletin board per frontage. s . 2. Maximum area: 24 square feet. 17 3. Maximum height: Six feet. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. (3) Limited Office, Neighborhood Commercial, and North Greenwood Commercial districts. , The following types of signs are permitted in the Limited Office, Neighborhood Commercial and North Greenwood Commercial zoning districts. However, signs erected in the North Greenwood Commercial District shall be designed, located and illuminated in accordance with the design standards adopted by.the city commission by resolution. a. Freestanding signs shall be permitted as follows. However, freestanding signs in the North Greenwood Commercial District shall only be permitted for developed properties fronting on North Greenwood Avenue which maintain a building setback of at least 15 feet from any right-of-way. 1. Maximum number: One sign per lot. For parcels with over 500 feet of street frontage on one right-of--way in the Neighborhood Commercial district, one auxiliary freestanding sign may be permitted; such auxiliary sign shall be spaced at least 300 feet from all other freestanding signs on the same properl1y. 2. Maximum area: District Maximum area (square feet Limited Office 24 Neighborhood Commercial 50 North Greenwood Commercial 15 The total maximum area for an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be 25 square feet in the Neighborhood Commercial district. Auxiliary freestanding signs shall be prohibited in the Limited Office and North Greenwood Commercial districts. 3. Maximum height: District Limited Office Neighborhood Commercial North Greenwood Commercial a 20 12 Maximum height (feet) The maximum height for an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be ten feet in the Neighborhood Commercial District. 4. Minimums street setback: Five feet. 5. Time and temperature signs: Time and temperature signs shall be allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial district. Such signs shall be prohibited in the Limited Office and North Greenwood Commercial districts. 18 w b. Attached signs shall be permitted per occupancy as follows: 4 1. Maximum area: The maximum total area for all attached signs shall be 24 square feet in the Limited Office district, 48 square feet in the Neighborhood Commercial district, and 20 square, feet in the North Greenwood Commercial district. 2. Type: The following types of attached signs may be permitted, provided the cumulative area of the attached signs does not exceed the maximum area above: Wall sign Canopy or awning sign Permanent window sign Projecting sign Integral roof sign 3.. Maximum number: Five attached signs, with not more than three attached signs being of any single type listed above. 4. Permanent window signs: In the North Greenwood Commercial district, in addition to the attached signs otherwise allowed, permanent window signs may occupy not more than 20 percent of the window area of a building. C. Time and temperature signs. Time and temperature signs shall be allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial district. Such signs shall be prohibited in the Limited Office and Borth Greenwood Commercial districts. d. Directory/information signs shall be prohibited in the North Greenwood Commercial district. Directory/information signs shall be permitted in the Limited Office and Neighborhood Commercial districts on lots developed with two or more..muIti -tenant buildings containing a minimum cumulative area of 25,000 square Feet of gross floor area, as follows: 1. Maximum area: 20 square feet. 2. Minimum street setback: Equal to the required structural setback for the zoning district in which the sign is erected. e. Gasoline price display signs. 1. Maximum number: One sign per pump island. 2. Maximum area: 24 square feet, cumulative for all signs, regardless of property frontage. (4) General Office, Resort Commercial "Twenty-four"'and "Twenty-eight," 98," and Office Planned Development districts. The following types of signs are permitted in the General Office, Resort Commercial "Twenty-four" and "Twenty-eight," "s," and Office Planned Development k zoning districts: 19 M a. Freestanding sighs: 1. Maximum number: One sign per lot. For parcels with over 500 feet of street fr ontage on one right-of-way, one auxiliary freestanding sign may be permitted; s uch auxiliary sign shall be spaced at least 300 feet from all other freestanding signs on the same property. 2. Maximum area: 50 square feet. The total maximum area for any auxiliary freestanding sign shall be 25 square feet. 3. Maximum height: 20 feet. The maximum height for an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be ten feet. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. b. Attached signs shall be permitted per occupancy as follows: I. Maximum area: 56 square feet. 2. Type: The following types of attached signs may be permitted, provided the cumulative area of the attached signs does not exceed the maximum area above: Wall sign Canopy or awning sign Permanent window sign Projecting sign Integral roof sign 3. Maximum number: five attached signs, with not more than three attached signs.being of any single type listed above. C. Directory/information signs shall be permitted on lots developed with two or more multi-tenant buildings containing a minimum cumulative area of 25,000 square feet of gross floor area, as follows: l.. Maximum area: 20 square feet. 2. Minimum street setback: Equal to the required structural setback for the zoning district in which the sign is erected. d. Gasoline price display signs. a 1. .k? i Maximum number: One sign per pump island. 2.' Maximum area: 24,square feet, cumulative for all signs, regardless of property frontage. e. Theater/movie announcement signs. 1. ,f Maximum number: One sign per lot. 20 I . J F T f 0 2. Maximum area: 64 square feet for a single theater, plus an additional eight square feet for each additional theater. 3. Maximum height: 20 feet, for a freestanding theater/movie announcement sign. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. f. Menu'signs for drive-through establishments. 1. Maximum number: One sign per drive-through lane. 2. Maximum area: 24 square feet. 3. Maximum height: Six feet.' 4. Minimum street setback: 25 feet. (5) General Commercial, Research, Development and Office Park and Limited Industrial districts. The following types of signs are permitted in 'the General Commercial, Research, Development and Office Park and Limited,{Industrial zoning districts: a. Freestanding signs shall be permitted as follows: 1. Maximum number: One sign per lot. For parcels with over 500 feet of street frontage on one right-of--way, one auxiliary freestanding sign may be permitted; such auxiliary sign shall be spaced at least 300 feet from all other freestanding signs on the same property. 2. Maximum area: 64 square feet. ? The total maximum area for an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be 32 square feet. 3. Maximum height: 20 feet. The maximum height for an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be ten feet. i 4. Minimum street,setback: Five feet. b. Attached signs shall be permitted per occupancy as follows: 1. Maximum area: 64 square feet, 2. Type: The following types of attached signs may be permitted, provided the cumulative area of the attached signs does not exceed the maximum area above: Wall sign _'. Canopy or awning sign ?. Permanent window sign Projecting sign integral roof sign 21 I i t ?F 3. Maximum number: Five attached signs, with not more than three attached signs being of any single type listed above., c. Directory/information signs shall be permitted on lots developed with two or more multi-tenant buildings containing a minimum cumulative area of 25,000 square feet of gross floor area, as follows: 1. Maximum area: 20 square feet. 2. Minimum street setback: Equal to the required structural setback for the zoning district in which the sign is erected. d. Gasoline price display signs. 1. Maximum number: One sign per pump island. 2. Maximum area: 24 square feet, cumulative for all signs, regardless of property frontage. e. Theater/movie announcement signs: 1. Maximum number: One sign per lot. 2. Maximum area: 54 square feet for a single theater, plus an additional eight square feet for each additional theater.. 3. Maximum height: 20 feet, for a freestanding theater/movie announcement sign. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. f. Menu signs for drive-through establishments. 1. Maximum number: One sign per drive-through lane. 2. Maximum area: 24 square feet. 3. Maximum height: Six feet. 4. Minimum street setback: 25 feet. (5) Highway Commercial district. The following types of signs are permitted in the Highway Commercial zoning district: a. Freestanding signs shall be permitted as follows: 1. Maximum number: One sign per lot. For parcels with over 500 feet of street frontage on one right-of-way, one auxiliary freestanding sign may be permitted; such auxiliary sign shall be spaced at least 300 feet from all other freestanding signs on the same property. 22 ¦:I ,, 2. Maximum area: 112 square feet. The total maximum area for an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be 56 square feet. 3. Maximum height: 20 feet. The maximum height for an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be 12 feet. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. b. Attached signs shall be permitted per occupancy as follows: 1. Maximum area: 150 square feet. 2. Type: The following types of attached signs may be permitted, provided the cumulative area of the attached signs does not exceed the maximum area above: Wall sign Canopy or awning sign Permanent window sign Projecting sign Integral roof sign 3. Maximum number: Five attached signs, with not more than three attached signs being of any single type listed above. c. Directory/information signs shall be permitted on lots developed with two or more multi-tenant buildings containing a minimum cumulative area of 25,000 square feet of gross floor area, as follows: 1. Maximum area: 40 square feet. 2. Minimum street setback: Equal to the required structural setback for the zoning district in which the sign is erected. d. Gasoline price display signs. 1. Maximum number: One sign per pump island. 2. Maximum area: 24 square Feet, cumulative for all signs, regardless of property frontage. e. Theater/movie announcement signs. 1. Maximum number: One sign per lot. 2. Maximum area: 128 square feet for a single theater, plus an additional 16 square feet for each additional theater. 3. Maximum height: 20 feet, for a freestanding theater/movie announcement sign. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. 23 ,1 r 1 T i =?1 f. Menu signs for drive-through establishments. 1. Maximum number: One sign per drive-through lane. 2. Maximum area: 24 square feet. 3. Maximum height: Six feet. 4. Minimum street setback: 25 feet. (7) Commercial Center district. The following types of signs are permitted in the Commercial Center zoning district: a. Freestanding signs shall be permitted asJollows: 1. Maximum number: One sign per lot. For parcels with over 500 feet of street frontage on one right-of-way, one auxiliary freestanding sign may be permitted; such auxiliary sign shall be spaced at least 300 feet from all other freestanding signs on the same property. 2. Maximum area: 150 square feet. The total maximum area for an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be 75 square feet. 3. Maximum height: 20 feet. The maximum height for an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be lb feet. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. b. Attached signs shall be permitted per occupancy as follows: 1. Maximum area: 150 square feet. 2. Type: The following types of attached signs may be ermitted, provided the cumulative area of the attached signs does not exceed the maximum allowable area: Wall sign Canopy or awning sign Permanent window sign Projecting sign Integral roof sign 3. Maximum number: Five attached signs, with not more than three attached signs being of any single type listed above. C'. Directory/information signs shall be }permitted on lots developed with two or more multi-tenant buildings containing a minimum cumulative area of 25,000 square feet of gross floor area, as follows: 1. Maximum area: 40 square feet. 24 } F Mt 2. Minimum street setback: Equal to the required structural setback-for the zoning district in which the sign is erected. d. Gasoline price display signs. 1. Maximum number: One sign per pump island, 2. Maximum area: 24 square feet, cumulative for all signs, regardless of property frontage. e. Theater/movie announcement signs (may be either freestanding or attached, but not both). 1. Maximum number: One sign per lot. 2. Maximum area: 128 square feet for a single theater, plus an add.itional 16 square feet for each additional theater. 3. Maximum height: 20 feet, for a freestanding theater/movie announcement sign. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. f. Menu signs for drive-through establishments. 1. Maximum number: One sign per drive-through lane. 2. Maximum area: 24 square feet. 3. Maximum height: Six feet. 4. Minimum street setback: 25 feet, (8) Urban Center, Beach Commercial and [leach Commercial Planned Development districts. . The following types of signs are permitted in the Urban Center, Beach Commercial and Beach Commercial Planned Development zoning districts: a. Freestanding signs shall be, permitted in the Eastern Corridor subdistrict of the Urban Center district as follows: 1. Maximum number: One sign per lot. For parcels with over 500 feet of street frontage on one right-of-way, one auxiliary freestanding sign may be permitted; such auxiliary sign shall be spaced at least 300 feet from all other freestanding signs..on the same property. 2. ' Maximum area: 64 square feet. An auxiliary freestanding sign shall be a maximum of 24 square feet in area. 3. Maximum height: 20 feet. The maximum height. for an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be eight feet. i i r 3 i I 25 t ' t 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. b. Attached signs shall be permitted per occupancy as follows: 1. Maximum area: 48 square feet in the Bayfront and Core subdistricts of the Urban Center district and in the Beach Commercial and Beach Commercial Planned Development districts, and 64 square feet in the Eastern Corridor subdistrict. 2. Type: Tile following types of attached signs may be permitted, provided the cumulative area of the attached signs does not exceed the maximum area above: Wall sign Canopy or awning sign Permanent window sign Projecting sign Integral roof sign, However, no individual projecting sign shall exceed 16 square feet in area, nor shall such signs project more than 42 inches from the facade of the building to which they are attached. 3. Maximum number. Five attached signs, with not more than three attached signs being of any single type listed above. 4. Permanent window signs: In the Beach Commercial district and the Urban Center Bayfront and Core subdistricts,"in addition to the attached signs otherwise allowed, permanent window signs may occupy not more than 20 percent of the window area of a building. 5. Special allowance for lots fronting on two or more streets: In the Beach Commercial district and the Urban Center Bayfront and Core subdistricts, notwithstanding other provisions of this code to the contrary, a lot fronting on two or more streets shall be allowed the permitted attached signage for each street frontage regardless of street classification. However, such signage cannot be accumulated and used on one street frontage in excess of that allowed for the lot based upon that one street frontage. C. Directory/information signs shall be permitted on lots developed with a multi-tenant building or buildings containing a minimum cumulative area of 25,000 square feet of gross floor area, as follows: A.? 1. Maximum area: 20 square feet. 2. Minimum street setback: Five feet. d. Gasoline price displaytsigns. 1. Maximum number: One sign per pump island. 2. Maximum area: X24 square feet, cumulative for all signs, regardless 2G t i t i 3 ?I ,, of property frontage. e. Theater/movie announcement signs may be either freestanding or attached in the Eastern Corridor subdistrict of the Urban Center district, but not both. Theater/movie announcement signs shall be attached signs in the Beach Commercial and Beach Commercial Planned Development districts, and the Bayfront and Core subdistricts of the Urban Center district. 1. Maximum number: One sign per lot. 2. Maximum area: 64 square feet for a single theater, plus an additional eight square feet -for each additional theater. 3. Maximum height: 20 feet for a freestanding theater/movie announcement sign in the Eastern Corridor subdistrict. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. f. Sandwich Board Signs, Sandwich board signs shall be permitted in the Core and Eastern Corridor subdistricts of the Urban Center district only. 1. Maximum number: One sign per street frontage. 2. Maximum area: Six square feet.. 3. Maximum height: Four feet. 4. Placement. Sandwich board signs may be placed on public property during the hours of operation of the business or activity to which the sign relates, and in conformance with placement standards developed by the Public Works Department to insure safe pedestrian travel, vision clearance and other safety factors. g. Menu Signs for Drive-Through Establishments. 1. Maximum number: One sign per drive-through lane. 2. Maximum area: 24 square feet. 3. Maximum height: Six feet. 4. Minimum street setback:' 25 feet. (9) Commercial and Industrial Planned Development Districts. Signs in Commercial and Industrial Planned Development"'districts shall generally be permitted depending upon a determination by the city commission as to which of the requirements are most appropriate to the Commercial or industrial Planned Development district given surrounding land uses. In its determination, the city commission may modify,any or all of the requirements for particular 27 r, f Commercial or industrial Planned Development districts. (10) Aquatic Lands-Interior and Aquatic Lands-Coastal Districts. Signs permitted in the Aquatic Lands-Interior and Aquatic Lands-Coastal districts shall be associated with a marina, and shall be limited to marina vessel slip signs allowed as exempt signs and the connnercial marina vessel slip signs allowed as bonus signs. Sec. 134.012. Sign bonus provisions; temporary signs. This section is established to recognize unusual circumstances which create the need to modify, in a consistent and uniform manner, the requirements of this code for sign area, height, number and type. (a) Area bonuses. The maximum allowable area for an attached sign may be increased under the following circumstances. However, allowable sign area bonuses cannot be combined if a sign,is eligible for more than one sign bonus. In no case shall any sign bonus allow a sign which exceeds 1.5 square feet for each linear foot of building width. (1) An attached sign on a building for which the minimum required setback from an adjoining street right-of-way is 100 feet or greater is eligible for a sign area bonus according to the following schedule. Only the primary sign attached to the eligible building facade, and oriented towards the adjoining street right-of-way, is eligible for an area bonus. The following formula shall be used to determine the allowable sign area for signs eligible for such bonus: (Allowable area zoning- district attached signs) x sign area Setback Less than 100 feet 100 to 109.99 feet 200 to 300 feet Greater than 300 feet for attached signs under applicable LESS Area of incidental/auxiliary (1 + Allowable area bonus) = Allowable Allowable additional area bonus Not available 0.25 0.75 1.25 (2) Attached signs in the Urban Center District may be eligible for a sign area bonus of 50 percent if judged to reflect one or more of the following characteristics and is found to create a positive image for the District as determined by a downtown sign review committee consisting of five inembers appointed by the city manager, including the development code administrator and four others. Use of classic or historic design or style Use of creative images reflecting Clearwater's waterfront heritage - Use of symbols rather than text - Use of hand-painted lettering or graphics - Use of. sculpted wood, metal or other materials 28 ., k.. r E ' f .1 ?, ¦ 0 Use of sculpted wood, metal or other materials (3) Attached signs located 100 feet or more above ground level may be eligible for a sign area bonus according to the following schedule. only the primary sign is eligible for a sign area bonus. The.following formula shall be used to determine the allowable sign area for signs eligible for such bonus: (Allowable area zoning district attached signs) x sign area Height of sign (c) (lumber bonus. For commercial marinas having separately licensed slips for commercial vessels, each licensed slip shall be permitted one sign containing not more than eight square feet in area placed in the vicinity of the slip to identify the vessel, rate/embarking schedules, or other information. Such sign shall be in addition to marina vessel slip signs allowed as exempt signs. Less than 100 feet Not available 100 to 150 feet 0.5 151 to 200 feet 1.75 Greater than 200 feet 2.0 (b) Height bonuses. The allowable height for freestanding signs on properties which front on overpasses or elevated roadways may be increased so that the maximum allowable sign height does not exceed ten feet above the crown height of the overpass or elevated roadway as measured from a point on the roadway that is perpendicular to the sign location. A height bonus is available only for signs which face or are oriented to the overpasses or elevated roadways. Auxiliary freestanding signs are not eligible for height bonuses. (d) Sign address bonus -for nonresidential properties. A freestanding or attached sign identifying a nonresidential property shall be allowed additional area according to the following schedule, provided that this allowance is used exclusively for the street address number,' numbers or number range, depicted in Arabic numerals'-of at least three inches in height. Such numbers shall be of contrasting color to the background and displayed on the front of the establishment. One address sign bornrs shall be allowed per occupancy. Property area i Less than one acre 100 to 150 feet for attached signs under applicable LESS Area of incidental/auxiliary (1 + Allowable area bonus) = Allowable Allowable additional area bonus Additional-sign area 6 square feet 8 square feet (e) Temporary signs. In the event of a major public works project, such as but not limited to a road widening project, or in the event of a major storm event which results in the widespread destruction of existing signs, temporary signs may be erected upon property affected by such project or event as provided here1 n . 29 1, h¦ w (1) Property location. The property upon which the sign is to be erected shall be located within an area designated by a resolution of the city commission as an area adversely affected by a major public works project or by a major storm. (2). Sign types, number, size, height, and location. The following may be erected on any property located as described in paragraph (1), in addition to any other sign which may lawfully be erected on such property: a. One freestanding directional sign for each driveway on the affected roadway, each sign not exceeding twenty (20) square feet in area and not exceeding six (6) feet in height, placed no closer than five (5) feet from any property line; or b. One banner per property in districts other than the Commercial Center district, or one banner per freestanding building in the Commercial Center district, each banner to be attached to the building and not exceeding forty- eight (48) square feet in area. c. For the purposes of subparagraph a above, "freestanding directional sign" means any sign supported by structures or supports that is placed on or anchored in the ground and that is independent of any building or other structure, and which exclusively contains information providing direction to or location of any object, place, or area including but not limited to, those signs indicating avenues of ingress/egress. (3) Duration. Each sign erected.,pursuant to this subsection shall be removed not later than seven (7) days following completion of the public works project or portion thereof affecting the visibility of the property or not later than forty-five (45) days following the storm event, whichever is applicable. As used herein, "completion" means that active construction shall have ceased and construction equipment shall have been removed from the public works project or portion thereof affecting the visibility of the property, whether the public agency has accepted the construction work or not. Section 3. Section 134.014, Code of. Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec, 134.014. Inspections. The development code administrator and the building official -44-=ee-ter- sha11, as each may determine necessary, inspect the property to ascertain that the sign is in accord with all provisions of this development code and the building code, fe"eetiyely, and in accord with all terms upon which the sign permit may have been conditioned. Section 4. Section 134.015, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec, 134.015. Nonconforming signs. (a) No nonconforming sign may be constructed, reconstructed, altered, renovated, relocated, replaced or otherwise changed after October 13, 1985, 4he ef-f-ec-ti e date- of this ehapier•, unless such action brings the sign into 30 'I N 0 conformance with the provisions of this chapter, except to the extent permitted by subsection (b) below. (b) Notwithstanding the terms of subsection (a) above: (1) Any nonconforming sign exis L 4ig-e"c- eber 1-3, !986--, that is damaged to the extent that the cost for complete repair does not exceed 50 per cent of the replacement cost of the sign may be repaired. (2) The message on any nonconforming sign exis ;ng ^n n 13, 1 ,g5; may be changed one or more times after that date, provided that no alteration is made to the sign structure. However, this paragraph shall not be construed to allow a nonconforming sign which is painted on a fence or wall or the roof or a wall of a building to be altered, renovated or otherwise changed unless such action brings the sign into conformity with the provisions of this chapter. (3) A nonconforming sign may be relocated upon the same property whenever a portion of the property is acquired through the exercise of the power of eminent domain, or otherwise acquired for a public purpose by any agency having the power of eminent domain, if the--eelaeatien- is --- Reeessa y to=reduee the parag r-aph aka?-nat be enlarged-,-, fter--4i}'.}g"'ep4eed by??,pn eenstriT7 CrueteT ?Tia t e r- i a l mere durable ^C7S17l. the sign- ie4# A •r e l e *_5_tn r?- such a «YS? g n" rnTiair-el eeneenfer-ming Sig shall continue to be deemed a -lawful b- nonconforming sign and shall continue to be subject to the requirements of subsection (c) below unless specifically exempted therefrom. ,APy- sueh ~eleeaten- all aet?e deemeci-an extene-ien-of t e r-e?iieyal 4) A sign that is conforming with all aspects of this chanter but is made i i nonconforming with regard to setback requirements whenevera portion- of the propert is acquired through the exercise of the ower of eminent domain or otherwise acquired for a public purpose by any agency having the_power-of eminent domain shall not be--required- to bebrought _ into compliance with setback requirements unless the sign is damaged or destroyed to an extent equal to 50 percent or more of its replacement cost. However, should the owner of the property on which the sign is erected desire to relocate the sign to a conformin4 situation with regard to setback. and such relocation can onlv be accomplished through .^the removal of one required parking space, no variance shall be required to the narkinn requirements to allow such relocation. (c) All signs and sign structures which are nonconforming to the requirements of this chapter as amended by Ordinance 4753-88 and Ordinance 5257- 92 but which were erected lawfully and conformed to the requirements of Ordinance 4035 shall not be required to conform to these regulations until seven years after the effective date of Ordinance 4753-88 or Ordinance 5257-92, whichever is anplicable, unless such signs and sion structures are damaged or destroved to an extent equal to 50 percent or more of their replacement cost. All signs and sign structures which were erected orior to October 13. 1985. and which were rendered i 31 rey l eus-?y k_.. M ex4 s-t- g sig was issued, shall, within seven, be removed or brought into compliance with the terms contained herein, the value of such signs having been considered to be full amortized over the seven ear period between October 13, 1985 and October 13 1992, except for the following: (1 Any nonconforming sign located on an interstate or federal aid primary highway i.e., U.S. Highway 19 and State Road 580 east of U.S. Highway 19) which is protected from removal by the Federal Highway Beautification Act or Ch. 479, F.S., by reason of providing compensation for removal shall be exempted from the removal terms of this sa4section. This shall not, however, preclude the city from seeking to remove any such sign through an eminent domain proceeding, nor achieving sign conformance by other lawful means. In the event the Federal Highway Beautification Act or Ch. 479, F.S., is repealed, amended or adjudicated to not require compensation, then the removal provisions contained in this section shall apply. (2) Any nonconforming sign located on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard east of Highland Avenue which, if said boulevard was classified a federal aid primary highway, would be protected from removal by the Federal Highway Beautification Act or Ch. 479, F.S., shall be made to comply with the terms contained herein or shall be removed by January 19,_1996 seven of Ord4nsnee ^re-,-44&3-89. ( LEI" `^ • "1'm cIIe--IICi fi i_n i rfr+atnr? r{»11 prepare an invewyni4-T-no-M Q104 Legal nonconforming signs which exist on property annexed into the city on or before October 13, 1992, shall be subject to the removal or compliance provisions contained in ?rFr° this section. After October 13, 1992, sign compliance shall occur in a time and manner prescribed by the city commission in conjunction with consideration of the annexation application. A? Lej-(4 Any person aggrieved by the provisions of this section may apply to the city commission for a variance ??'i?n`?accordance with section 137.012. Any request f r i?,ao"Cn rC?Tj'R4-e- d wi t1 11L Vev-e -&pmerte"e-ad{?1zTS'i s tr a tar-a" 4eaast-Q-4 a . prior te c-tamer-- ;---? 2-= The City Commission may grant a variance only after a public hearing and upon a demonstration by the owner/lessor of a hardship different in kind and magnitude from that suffered by other sign owners or lessors similarly situated. h is in violat 32 vnrr.?trrt nrti 'VLR'LZ'?CVTTTt'ftY ,-"TZo7T?•?n,rGT17-MIal l W- ` .ure to iYe or be in continued violation of this chapter as if Ordinance 5257-92 had not been adopted. In such cases the adoption-of--Ordinance 5257-92 shall not interfere with an pending roceedin s before the municipal code enforcement board or the count court or re uire the issuance of a new citation or notice to appear. An -sign which is in violation of Ordinance 4035 or Ordinance-4753-88 but which is rendered conformin in all respects by-Ordinance 5257-92 shall be considered to have been brought into compliance-with this chapter,- and an pending citation or notice to appear before the municipal code enforcement board or the count court shall be dismissed. Section 5. Subsection (e) is added to Section 134.018," Code of Ordinances, to read: Sec. 134.018. Interpretation and variance. (e) It is the intent of the city-commission that protection of First Amendment rights shall be afforded such that an sign, dis 1a or device allowed under these regulations may contain in lieu of an other copy, an otherwise lawful non-commercial messy a that does not direct attention to a business operated for profit. or to a commodity or service for sale. and that comalies with the size, lighting , and spacing requirements of these regulations. Section 66. Subsection (a) of Section 137.005, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: [dote: Asterisks (* * *} and ellipses (. .} indicate that portions of existing text have been omitted. Omitted portions of text are not affected by this amendment.] Sec. 137.005. Definitions. (a) Words and terms used in this development code shall be given the meanings identified hereinafter: Certificate of occupancy/use: Certificate by the building director that a building, structure or use conforms to all applicable city ordinances. . .. 33 3 i F t k o f-- a 44 1 u t4 Zia a+-Qnn.. rf?of rah.'?i.-ng°ahle p`°ter4,a-"'pane Change of use (or changed use):. A change of use of a building, structure or property. .. ,l Development: Any man-made improvement to property,. .. § ?F{ -?fJ i E IS-pe EIS r-? d f15 er--mA-6' 1 tr-4 u I as ' '?-?il.i_i th i p _-1 he per+m4ted surf rae area- - - District: Any section or sections of the city. .. Dock: Any structure constructed on piling over open water or supported by flotation on the water. r?1i ] Sign. A _ rtnT ri. r.r? TTT*tiCf'1 . 'LT a (71faces air_+l .-rr . _rfann. area µ 22) Double frontage lot: A lot bounded on apposite or approximately opposite sides by streets. Gross leasable -a-5eab-le floor area. The floor area designed for tenant occupancy. Greund sign. A low sign pe'rm'Rently 4ii r? i'TRTO??L"Ti rrlr? -Preestandin dam--aA y4u ng' a n d vii ?1-2-a -i o n o f--,a--p&1-e- : Group care, level I: A dwelling unit licensed to serve clients of the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. .. Hotel/motel unit. An accommodation within a hotel/motel building. . .. A !i L i Impermeable lot coverage. Any permanent installation on or improvement to ! the natural earth surface, . 5 Model home; A residential building. . ?fl-- i c --SCI dEL-c3rea. Net acre: That upland area within a contiguous parcels). ., 3A E Personal service: A business offering a service primarily for, an individual's convenience. . . . Plaee•-?a sign); £-reet, le£aie,-eenstruL, 4er--,-+i9Ye or replare a_stinH. t Plat: A map, plan or layout, drawn to scale, of a tract of land to be subdivided. ., Polp.siL'S -qn s.ihieh ir_ supper-ted by nrt?ii v+ ?m?' tl ??zt 5 , ` or ?J'.Paces `J a Gf and int-q `J ? u-}4-+- Portable building: A portable building is any building or vehicle comprised of one or more units. . .. t r a i-Ter--- ha s s r Preferred land use: The select use or uses for which a zoning district is characteristically established. .. ok dr ?k k Principal structure or use: The main or primary structure or use of land. 0 Property: Land which has been or which is proposed to be used, developed, or built upon as a unit under single ownership. Property lines: The lines which bound a property. Rea4- r' dYe i?ses for .? 1e' leans nv. " °nt the laYFYl TStiG?taTi'tP."'CJ?{???#?^"a ?i{?9r}?n .,h 7-rc,rib n-the -5 -5-i $ vr-a-v nv.nn ? n h{}-7 { 11"' ? PF{-- k7 T?r, l3_ (tear property line: A property line which runs generally parallel to the property line from which a property is addressed. adYertise a, v0h ue-li-- s-- pr-ofii4-nen-t4i--v4-54amain-a n -euUoor--l-oc-a-t-4e off Te 35 i '' Side property line: A property line which runs generally perpendicular or radial to the property line from which a property is addressed. 41 -pr-e13,Ue s . S.gr,-`sue- -ers-andfr- X132--9f-7a-signr Standard lot: Any lot which is not a double frontage lot. Subdivision plat: A document (plat) displaying the manner in which land is to be subdivided. . .. Surf e-area:- The reeta-ng ul r trane?nT / hheahr--flu1-1. i eneempa&ses and all eM extr of the Temporary retail sales and displays: Any nonpermanent sales or displays. :"nn end +em ty? 77T ?I•rT?' ' n n l ? . a-,17 -i' {?????Ti7?C?`CSui se'?'?s T[ n _ display ?e??f i ?- n...?n_YS_5 l'. ? v.n • ? Townhouse building: A building which contains two (2) or more townhouse units, each unit located on its own lot with individual title thereto and each lot'possessing direct street access and requisite parking to serve the unit. Video/electronic game rooms- A specific type of indoor commercial entertainment. 3 Wa44-s4-gR+--A-sign pa??lS ?4L.Z'""tl ?Go--and-p-!aee "4--her-44-r-ee:4y--on 77or? a'tte e4 Vie---the--e?-;'vrwall --o f-a-bt i - 1 4 4 g - - e r - s t r c4-u rze , J Waterfront property: That upland property, whether in one or more lots, parcels or ownerships which, combined, abut the waterfront. • i. Wholesaling/distributing: The selling and/or distributing of goods in i large quantities to other than the individual retail consumer. Widow-sgn-i--A---r.i?n-}lac-eci--en-the-- fe--ef--any w4ndeyo of --a ?. 36 5 tI Swimming pool: A tank or tub for swimming or wading. . . . S-l d ,? e* w- dGwr Section 7. The provisions of consistent with.-the City of Clearwater this ordinance have been Com reh i found to be p ens ve plan. :- I< Sec___tion 8, This ordinance shall take effect on October 13, 1992. PASSED ON FIRST READING September 3 1992 :. PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED t Rita Garvey ' Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness; MA. Galbraith, r. -, City Attorney is .. 37 r ; 4 ] .i C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R Interdepartment Correspondence To: Mayor and City Commission FROM: James M. Polatty, Jr., Planning and Development Director; SUBJECT: Sign Code Amendments (Ord. No. 5257-92) COPIES: Michael Wright, City Manager Kathy S. Race, Deputy City Manager M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney Scott Shuford, Planning Manager John D. Richter, Code Enforcement Manager DATE: September 16, 1992 L? At the September 17 Commission meeting, you will be furnished with e+* motions to amend Ordinance No. 5257-92: Motion #1 proposes that signs on movable canopies and valances maintain a clear distance of eight feet and seven feet, respectively, above pedestrian access areas. This will bring the sign code into conformance with the building code. Motion #2 proposes that the sign bonus provision be based upon the existing, rather than the minimum required, setback. Furthermore, it proposes that, where road widening projects are planned, the setback be calculated from the proposed street right of way as shown on the Transportation Improvement Program or the adopted transportation element of the comprehensive plan. Motion #3 proposes that signs placed consistent with Ordinance No. 4035 (the 111985 Code") be granted lawful nonconforming status in the event such signs do not comply with the amendments now proposed to the sign code. Motion #4 proposes that freestanding signs be allowed in the Beach Commercial District on properties where all buildings are positioned at least 15 feet distant from the street right of way. The size and height of such signs have yet to be determined. In addition to the above-referenced motions, staff recommends the Commission consider the following amendment: -`,` Amendment # 1 proposes that the sign bonus provision recommended by Mr. Bill. Jonson be adopted. In particular, Mr. Jonson's recommendation is that attached signs less than 300 feet from the right of way be allowed no bonus, signs 301 to 540 feet be allowed a 25% bonus, signs 501 to 699 feet be allowed a 50% bonus, and signs greater than 700 feet be allowed a 67% bonus. Mayor and City Commission r September 16, 1992 Page 2 1 q At the September 14 worksession, the Commission requested a resolution that, if approved, will establish a time frame within which sign owners could request variances for noncorming signs at E a reduced 'gout-of-pocket's application fee of $50.00, i Finally, staff requests permission from the commission to bring i forward amendments in the future as the need arises. staff would like window signs to be ',framed" with For e-va a tin p?to s facilitate measurement. jmccord5.257 4 }}i f 1 3 i ' . 1 t j { 1 ij is 1 ?e " r • Y i' F i. f ' M ,f {4? I k {i 1 f r j MOTION TO AMEND. ORDINANCE 5257-92 On page 8, amend the first sentence of Section 134.008(2) to read: Sec. 134.008. Visual clearance, sight triangle, and clear distance. (2) For any sign which projects over a sidewalk or other pedestrian access area, a minimum clear distance of nine feet shall be maintained as measured from ground level to the bottom portion of the sign structure which projects over the sidewalk or other pedestrian access area, unless a lesser clear distance is specifically allowed b the standard building code based upon the design of the sign structure. For any sign which projects over a right-of-way or other vehicular access area, a minimum clear distance of 14 feet shall be maintained as measured from ground level to the bottom portion of the sign structure which projects over the right-of-way or other vehicular access area. Signs that project over public sidewalks and rights-of-way shall require the approval of the director of public works. NOTE: This amendment will allow movable canopies (8 feet) and valances (7 fee, N (REVISED) MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5257-92 On page 28, amend Subsection 134.012(a)(1) as follows: Sec. 134.012. Sign bogus provisions. This section is established to recognize unusual circumstances which create the need to modify, in a consistent and uniform manner, the requirements of this code for sign area, height, number and type. (a) Area bonuses. The maximum allowable area for an attached sign may be increased under the following circumstances. However, allowable sign area bonuses.cannot be combined if a sign is eligible for more than one sign bonus. In no case shall'any sign bonus allow a sign which exceeds 1.5 square feet for each linear foot of building width. (1) An attached sign on a building for which the existing mi-n-- En ppawipe setback from an adjoining street right-of-way, or a proposed street right-of,-way as shown on the Transportation Imurovement Program or the adopted transportation element of the_city's_comprehensive plan,- is 100 feet or greater is eligible for a sign area bonus according to the following schedule. Only the primary sign attached to the eligible building facade, and oriented towards the adjoining street right-of-way, is eligible for an area bonus. The following formula shall be used to determine the allowable sign area for signs eligible for such bonus: f NOTE: When this ordinance was up for first reading, you considered but did not adopt an amendment similar to the above, except that that following appeared after "An attached sign" at the beginning of paragraph (1): This motion does not include this language. Also, we have no minimum required setback of 100 feet or greater; this amends the phrase to ''existing setback. . .100 feet or greater." I r F :f I MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5257-92 Beginning on page 30, delete Section 4 and substitute the following: Section 4. Section 134.015, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 134.015. Nonconforming signs. (a) No nonconforming sign may be constructed, reconstructed, altered, renovated, relocated, replaced or otherwise changed after October 13, 1985 -t-he ef4eetive---date of th4s---e is , unless such action brings the sign into conformance with the provisions of this chapter, except to the extent permitted by subsection (b) below. (b) Notwithstanding the terms of subsection (a) above: (1) Any nonconforming sign e) I s t i ng °eteber 13, 1985 , that is damaged to the extent that the cost for complete repair does not exceed 50 per cent of the replacement cost of the sign may be repaired. (2) The message on any nonconforming sign ex4sting an geteber 13, , may be changed one or more times after that date, provided that no alteration is made to the sign structure. However, this paragraph shall not be construed to allow a nonconforming sign which is painted on a fence or wall or the roof or a wall of a building to be altered, renovated or otherwise changed unless such action brings the sign into conformity with the provisions of this chapter. (3) A nonconforming sign may be relocated upon the same property whenever the a portion of the property upon which the sign is located is acquired through the exercise of the power of eminent domain, or otherwise acquired for a public purpose by any agency having the power of eminent domain, if the releeat-ie.. neeessar-y to reduee the u i-s-i-t-i a e--prepeety However, a sign relocated pursuant to this paragraph may not be made more nonconforming enlarged, nor may the sign be replaced by a sign constructed of material more durable than the sign being relocated A lawful nonconforming sign which is relocated pursuant to this paragraph (3) shall continue to be deemed a lawful but nonconforming sign and shall continue to be subject to the requirements of subsection (c) below unless specifically exempted therefrom. Any such relocation shall not be deemed Feleeat4an be dee grounds for a variance from the requirements of subsection (c). Y (c) All signs and sign structures and which were rendered nonconfo t 13, 1992, except ng: e (1) Any nonconforming sign located on an interstate or federal aid primary highway (i.e., U.S. Highway 19 and State toad 580 east of U.S. Highway 19) which is protected from removal by the Federal Highway Beautification Act or Ch. 419, F.S., by reason of providing compensation for removal shall be exempted from the removal terms of this xu4section. This shall not, however, preclude the city from seeking to remove any such sign through an eminent domain proceeding, nor achieving sign conformance by other lawful means. In the event the Federal Highway Beautification Act or Ch. 479, F.S., is repealed, amended, or adjudicated to not require compensation, then the removal provisions contained in this z,u4sect i on shall apply. (2) Any nonconforming sign located on Gulf--to-Bay Boulevard east of Highland Avenue which, if said boulevard was classified a federal aid primary highway, would be protected from removal by the Federal Highway Beautification Act or Ch. 479, F.S., shall be made to comply with the terms contained herein or shall be removed b January 19, 1996, which date is within seven +4 years from the enactment of Ordinance No. 4753-88. a4 ,, T71i strater sT n1 4f.f the nrepertry-e 9l r-s i n awneri.lesser. Wentif'y4 nn_ JL(e+ Legal nonconforming signs which exist on property annexed into the city on or before October 13, 1992, shall be subject to the removal or compliance provisions contained in subseetlen-(e) of this section. After October 13, 1992, sign compliance shall occur in a time and manner prescribed by the city commission in conjunction with consideration of the annexation application. Jel? Any person aggrieved by the provisions of this section may apply to the city commission for a pv.?a,rriancei{1?nj?ja`cc?jcoorpdance with section 137.012. Affy y 7 i ue5 • f oN Y"rl ane4 ..J11?e+ f i led t-iLy,1 -y11ydpme }(. "_ - e9V?+ [A41r' strata art least go days nr-iGr ,getabor 13, 19 The city commission may grant a 2 IIFthe-awRe --ef--the-preperty-er be removed or brought into compliance with the Ue r-$meyal date spe if4ed in subseetien -(e) of Ws -aaet4eWunder --ne fir-eirnr ees, heweyer-,--shall ---failure t0 gi-ye-o1- r"'eee4ye--notiee eanstitute r-unt, t me3. y-?emp4i ane-e-,- variance only after a public hearing and upon a demonstration by the owner/lessor of a hardship different in kind and magnitude from that suffered by other sign owners or lessors similarly situated. ti t j E ff 3 MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5257-92 On page 25, amend subsection (5).of section 134.011(d) to read: (8) Urban Center, Beach Commercial and Beach Commercial. Planned Development districts. The following types of signs are permitted in the Urban Center, Beach Commercial and Beach Conunercial Planned Development zoning districts: a. Freestanding signs shall be permitted in the Eastern Corridor subdistrict of the Urban Center district and in the Beach Commercial and Beach Commercial. Planned Development districts as follows: 1. Maximum number: One sign per lot. For parcels with over 500 feet of street frontage on one right-of--way, one auxiliary freestanding sign may be permitted; such auxiliary sign shall be spaced at least 300 feet from all other freestanding signs on the same property. In the Beach Commercial and Beach Commercial Planned Development districts freestanding_ signs shall be permitted only on ro erties having a principal building structural setback of not less than 15 feet over not less than 100 percent of the total property frontage on which the sign is located. 2. Maximum area: 64 square feet in the Eastern Corridor subdistrict of the Urban Center district; ( * 1 square feet in the Beach Commercial and Beach Commercial Planned Development districts. An auxiliary freestanding sign shall be a maximum of 24 square feet in area. 3. Maximum height: 20 feet in the Eastern Corridor subdistrict of the Urban Center district; _[_ ** 1 feet in the Beach Commercial and Beach Commercial Planned Development districts. The maximum height for'an auxiliary freestanding sign shall be eight feet. 4. Minimum street setback: Five feet. NOTE: Blanks to be completed as part of the motion. - * maximum area ** = maximum height ?. , r i o, ! M 0 . w X17-1992 ' 1505 FROM CITY OF CLW.. ENG I NCR I NG TO E 0 i ] c l re hAhlFat,'sR P.02 C I T Y O! C L S A R W A T E R ' xntardapnrtnent correspondence TO: Mayor Rita Garvey FROM: James M. Polatty, Jr., Planning and Development or so>aaECT; Notification for sign Compliance COPXEB: Michael Wright, City Manager Kathy $. Rice, Deputy City Manager DATEt September 17, 1992 No.ice of the City's sign amortization program has been 'given annually for the past five years as part of the City's occupational license renewal effort. The sign amortization notice has beeri included in the same envelope with the license renewal notice. The envelopes were put in the Ynail on the following dates: .September 1, 1992 August 29, 1991 August 30, 1990 on or about August 30, 1989 On or about August 30, 1988 Additionally, when variances have been granted conditioned upon sign compliance by October 13, 1992, the compliance requirement has been included on the sign permit. jmrgnoti.ce2 ?o TUTFL P.02 F ; i' ' i 7 E.. r' a f i• F q11 71? z-- To: Mayor Garvey and City of Clearwater Commissioners In 1984 when I was on Planning and Zoning Board, this sign ordinance was on the agenda and we reviewed it during many meetings. We placed more,emphasis on billboard signage than on the small business..signs. Our main objective was to reduce the ammount of signs in order to reduce the cluttered look that so many of?our roads have. It was never our intention to make small business owners dramatically reduce 1 or eliminate their signs altogether, but rather to simply reduce some of the oversized signs and billboards., E The St.Petersburg Times editorial that was written this ! week was totally off base. It stated that large stores such as Target and K-Mart do not need larger signs, and we agree! However, we are talking about the smaller stores that would be greatly affected by having to reduce and eliminate their signs. With many small businesses, signage is their only means of advertising. Running a successful business is a very difficult job. Not many small, business owners are able to take part in, or run for office as all their spare time is spent on bettering their business. In this time of numerous small business failures many of us are just making it. I do not believe that this ordinance was inacted with any idea of the hardship it could cause. If the businesses of. Clearwater cannot make it, then there will be no Clearwater. t You speak of asthetics... and I agree that some signs are tacky; however what I think and what you think may not be the same. Asthet;ics -is subjective. Why not take one step back and review this ordinance. Listen to the logical information from the business community rather than relying on information from only the city ' employees. Sincerely: v? Peg Rogers Owner Advantage Yours Tennis i i c N ,> e 1 z RESOLUTION OF AFFECTED cITIZRNH SEEKING REVIEW OF ADOPTED BYGN REGULATIONS 1 LL' w ? .J WHEREAS, in 1985, the City of Clearwater ("City") adopted specific regulations affecting the construction and location of sign structures; and WHEREAS, these regulations contained an amortization clause relating to non-conforming sign structures; and WHEREAS, the City intends to initiate enforcement of the 'r amortization clause on October 13, 1992; and i WHEREAS, after that date and during a time of economic turmoil, all sign structures will be required to comply, at the owners expense, with the performance standards and criteria i contained in the sign regulations; and WHEREAS, many business owners, employees, property owners and i affected citizens (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Citizens") within the city believe that application of these f, ;If standards and criteria will significantly and adversely impact d.; their interests; and s• 4 °' WHEREAS, the Citizens would like an opportunity to work with the City to propose alternative standards and criteria for the regulation of sign structures. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 3. 1. The Citizens oppose the enforcement of the city sign regulations because such action will significantly and adversely affect their interests. y, ' 2. The Citizens will work with the city to develop Vh reasonable sign regulations. y 3. The citizens respectively request that the City defer enforcement of the,sign regulations in order to provide fit' E time for consideration of alternatives to the'. existing ?;. regulations. '?• F (COMPANY NAME) (NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES) (TYPE OF BUSINESS) (SIGNATURE) r (DATE) ' ' . % r Er i RIG" b of _ 2R c 7? c3VQ ?2 3Q ae aQ 3Q oCe 3E 3E G .X m N w N r ti t Cf) N co NN N O Li! C%j im CL Vp ?r (1) N 0) `9 m 0) (a c co O c+7 atpp '?t O '? O CO CO W 00 CO 0 r) In `' cD o0 n (Ca ti h h r M M c?7 c7 ch EM M r LV N r T r r N O Cr7 M m m M u? 3 ai c t L t ??? LO in tf)tn 1Lri1Ln 1nLo tnto Z C r T l? h N T r w N r cv r? T N m ? Q (D :3 H 0 r 0 4 0 0 O C C] Q N p 0 0 0 0 0 Z In 117 In l17 In 117 Ln 1n 1n Ln Lo L:7 LO to m cm r r r r r r r r w r r r r r 0 Z N 3 OI 1= G N N CA fO M N O N O N W N to LO? X CO co r (0 ?T N v- tV r- r r r r 4n W m m?m r3 O .O Gf d Q Ut r O N ? N T O 0 O 0 `c c c rn a) rn a) M (M m _: M 0 (M a) 0) 433 ca = c ca ca to od ciS ? ca ad ad ca ca CU N M 4. a 0 E c CD a) c C 3 1 3 } 3 f ? Lr? .. rn 0 r Q r .. 1 = c c = = L 4 d ? V ° r ?7 L V W W W to cq Cr? ? p ? © © C3 1 ? N C'3 L 5 c N c .., r v a m E 0) 0 'D «. r W ° y= CL o c rn p L c m o ro N c p t m ii, cc L) am d) CL mit = co Q ? ? I A i C71 C m m G _0 2 E pEp C) N O Q1 0 H m CC m O III n. N X Z t7 3 J U M: ?a a ? ?' ae ? ae ae aQ aQ aE ;e s? apQ ae ? ? ae aQ ae +U. a trD N C', CD r M N tD C d O Q to r rr T N r r 0 N r N r +' a p N C O lfJ to ll to rr Ln ti Ln bo ll¢ co a co _ .0 r T T r T •-- r T N r c[VV r N r 3 aS in 3 @ o y t? ? N N N n to N N m N ? ?X Cl) cV c v A 4 L? a7 O C U O O G to 0 O to I- tn ttn N N N tq tD tD N to N tD N z m @ CL N >% C O Q .L7 C V O m <b L C @ CD QI CO C 4 O O p L V :3 CD w V LO N N N N N N N Z O N ti h N N N N N N Q r r r r r r r T T" r .y ? _ wN O 0 O to O O O 0 C " Q O O m 0 O t? ? C T T T r T T F_ T T T T in T m T r @ Q `? s 3 V rn C Ul tq S N po r N N N N N (D N Ln 00 E N d W co tD 00 V N v N N co y ll! ? r M T. N r r r r r- r r M S 0) cm r? 1= H O .a C1 CL E is th to T N Ln CD O h O to C 0 cri (M d} [7I Q7 t? _ to 0 t3) O1 t71 C ca cd ca ca r r ca T 06 CL O, D_ ca ca 06 ca 06 ... r O LO d7 W w c, e- a °- 3 3 3 3 3 ro 0 w w to c c m m d m 3 y r a i w w c w a cn a cn cn o © 0 0 [? vy co on to a :n 0 E LI) U) H N C) Q - m m N d tC?f 'G td?1 ED O O = D C M [f its m 0 ?C p us cs a x w C) p 4) CL ° m o o .. w d a m -s? 0 a cn rt Y ? ¢ ? ? 2 F- Y Cn t {t3 « c c 0 QE V N a r CD cc tU 01 IL to M Z C'3 ZJ U i r i ,j = 11 M C 7tn+ c 0 0 41 C CJi ? I-Cp? N O a 4? O C a1 cD CL m ClJ v C N 0 p 0 iL in C 7 r N 1` T N N c? V ? 431 Z' C 0 U Ln C4 r L N r ? Ln Lo ? N r ? N t- N r N N N ? r N ? r N r N r N T N T 72 N C Oy •N Q 0 0 0 0 O C] O O IN O O d O O O '} C M U) r tr) LO r to to m` to in ?, T LO tn LO M Ln m m °1 Le) CA ch a) Z ? N co co co N co co co N r Co T N co N co U U Y r rn C l Q) C71 CD N Lh r r CV cc) 0) ? r cD C'7 M +" C to N r N N r C7 r tM?t r N '- r U7 Kr C7 m tM C O 41 C N 43 4 - TL 44 Q N r U C u07 G R1 p OS 1? N -- d C4 It] r Cl O C1 [? CV E M Cl) N N ? c7 r 47 r N N r d r CA 1? C M C1 et M !? 0 co a a L^' t 0 LO N 4C! Q Qyy ) ti g ti n P- G 1g m E C7 w v N r r T r N M N C7 C7 to G N T Q ti r , , _C C C C L? Q N O to N to M Q cm o N O N - C4 N .- C y r r r d N qT N in N tr M O ? C7 O N ? Cl O1 O O] Q1 CA CI1 ? ? ? ? G1 Q1 Q1 Q1 C b O G « :. ca ad Qd ai aiS ot7 utf Ca ad niS 00 ca _ ? x v ? N c•3 ? & & & a1 a "' q1 , 3 3 3 2 - o o ? 'M .+ Y Y C C C 41 41 d % 41 % Q1 } . ? W C I C W (n (n U} O O 0 ? fl U) C1 N V1 C C3 N C9 r E o U E o r_ CL V7 C ? =O C U) M (A 0 CL rr 2 (n C) In W r - ° M v Q o m v .i7 LO ?+ 0) CL O 1 p E LM N w O a m -? ? Q CL vo M 1 ? Q 2 tt = IT ?q I (nQ M m ? F as c c _o E E U t G An Q r d C71 ' N X U) U) U .1 , F f? ' S f 5 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: COPIES: DATE: :r p D Lq y PFP 1 crry CLERK C I T Y OF C L EA R W A T E R Interdepartment correspondence Mayor and City Commission James M. Polatty, Jr., Planning and Development DirectorTfA Notification for sign compliance fMichae`W?ghty' -City= Manage Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Manager September 16, 1992 The purpose of this memo is to share with the City Commission the way in which documented notification of the City's sign amortization program has been given to the owners of affected signs. Notice has been given in three ways: (1) for the past five years, notice has been mailed annually with occupational license renewal notices, (2) notice was mailed in April 1991 following completion of the sign inventory, and (3) notice has been given on sign "face change" permits. . A sample of each, is included for your reference. Two sign permit applications are attached because the form has changed over the last seven years. In each, you will see, a statement exists that conformance is required by October 13, 1992. jmccnoti.ce 3? 0 I .? C i t Y of C l e a r w a t e r , , F I o rr i d a Sigh Permit Number SN-86342 i Project: REPLACEMENT RENT A CAR INC. Location:2570 GULF TO BAY BLVD Parcel : 00/00/00/00000/000/000o Date of issuance:12/18/86 Sign contractor:TINY SIGN CO INC Contractor's license number:708760 Sign area: 100 square feet Sign type:POLE Sign value:$$$1565.00 '111is sign permit is conditioned upon the following: 1. This sign permit is valid for a,maximum of 180 days after the date of issuance. Failure to place the sign within this time period shall void the permit. 2. The sign permit number must be permanently marked on the sign in a visible location. Remarks: TIIIS SIGN IS NON-CONFORMING AND MUST BE MADE TO CONFORM TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE NO LATER TRAN OCT. 13, 1992 Issued by: CI - UUti ? Z1'Y .4-7-7 A BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION AII AI cOF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT C -° 10 SOUTH MISSOURI AVENUE P.O. BOX 4748 ?CLEARWATER, FLORIDA E , E (813) 462-6567 SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY PROPOSED SIGN SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN DUPLICATE, DRAWN TO SCALE AND INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: (a) Site Plan. (b) Dimensions and elevations (including Ilia message) of Ilse sign. (c) Lot frontage on all street rights-ol-way. (d) Maximum and minimum height of the sign, as measured train finished grade. (e) Location of the sign In relation to property lines, public rights-of way, easements, buildings, and other signs on the property. (Pole signs must be a minimum of 5 feel from properly line.) (f) Dimensions of the sign's supporting members. (g) For Illuminated signs, the type, placement, Intensity and hours of illumination. (Not more than live (5) foolcandles of light In- tensity for commercial signs.) (h) Construction and electrical specflications, for the purpose of enabling determination that the sign meets all applicable structural and electrical requirements of the Building and National Electric Codes. (Indicate if UL rated.) (1) Inventory of all existing signs on the same property and/or building on which the sign Is to be located. Indicating the number, type, use e.g. property identification, business Identification, etc.) location and surface area. (it "none," so indicate.) `All applications for signs (with the exception of wall signs or signs which are 32 square feat or less) shall Include structural drawings signed and sealed by a licensed Florida engineer or architect. ALSO, please note that wind toad requirements should conforrn to Ilia 1891 edition of the Southern Standard Building Code. PROJECT ADDRESS LOT BLOCFVTRACT PARCEL NUMBER 1 OWNER ADDRESS LESSEE (OF PROPERTY OR BUILDING) CITY TELEPHONE STATE ZIP BUSINESS NAME ADDRESS CITYlSTATEIZIP CODE TELEPHONE CONTRACTOR TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP M M a v ro r- z O i r F 3 1 s i STATE NO. CLEARWATER LICENSE NO. TYPE OF SIGN: POLE PROJECTING WALL GROUND SURFACE AREA IN SO. FT. VALUE OF SIGN ELECTRIC PERMIT NEEDED? FOR SIGNS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY EASEMENT ALONG US 19, ESTIMATED REMOVAL COST • over SUBDIVISION ! Jr WINDOW CANOPY, AWNING OR MARQUEE PORTABLE OTHER Stalement of Authorization • Any application form which is signed by an individual other than Ilia properly owner shall be accompanied ' by a notarized siolement of aulhorization consenting to the sign placement or, It Ilia property or building upon which the sign is to be located is leased, a copy of the executed lease shall accompany the application form, In Ilia event the building or properly Is leased and the npplication form is signed by an individual other than the lessor, the application shall be accompanied by a notarized statement of authorization signed by the lessor consenting to the sign placement and a copy of the executed lease, (Not required for portable signslface changes or signs approved by variances.) CERTIFICATION I certily ilial all information submitted on this application and attachments thereto are true and correct to the bast of my knowledge and belief. I understand Ihnl any Inaccurate Information may result In revocation of Ilia sig"ermil and removal of any sign erected pursuant to such permit. I will be responsible for the installation of the subject sign in accordance with the sign regulations of the City of Clearwater. I acknowledge that all nonconforming signs are subject to the amortization provisions contained in Section 134,415 of Ilse City of Clear- water Code of Ordinances and must be brought into compliance before October 13, 1992. Furthermore, I understand that any Investment made in or to a nonconforming sign during the amortization period, Including but not limited to message changes, shall not constitute grounds for noncompliance or compliance later than October 13, 1992. Properly Owner's Signature (or authorized representative) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) Alias Page Zoning._. - r Signage Permitted Zoning Approval Dale _ _ Traffic Eng. Approval Building Approval ,j 7.92 i l r'rrnltd art raYcrrd puxr RA NOTICE SIGNS September 1, 1990 According to Section 134.015 of the City of Clearwater's Land Development Code, all signs and sign structures which are nonconforming to the requirements of the City's Current sign regula- tions must be removed or be brought into compliance prior to October 13, 1992. Any person aggrieved by the City's sign compliance requirements may apply to the Develop- ment Code Adjustment Board for a variance In accordance with Section 1371012, Clearwater Code of Ordinances. For Information pertaining to signs and variance procedures, please contact the City's Planning and Development office, 10 S. Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, telephone 462.6550. 1 .." ' - it - 1 1 1 f ' • k ` A r N f( , ,r DI:I'A1tTMENT 01' MANNING AND i)ENE. PA11;NT Tcieplroate (813) 462.6555 • ,1 s April 12, 1991 Nlr. IJyrts! Ntr. 5nbmnrlne 1010 Clevelntnl St. Clenrwnter, M 34615 , Dear 51r or Madmn: In 1993, the Clenrwntcr City Connnisalnt? ndoplcd cirri rcpnlatinns to hnprove the nppcarnoce of our community. Ax part orlltese regoimicitra, existing Fives. which do First conrorns to the regulation "i "re retlultcd to he hnmp,11% into complinnee by October 13, 1992, You may have already received some nulice of this requitement through Hair ocropnNonnl Nernst oliice. A recent Inventory of lilt siFrst fit the City sliun rtl tliut store or anarn sil;ns ,it y"nr properly are lint in eompiinuce"%ith file City's algis regulodort_+. Tire problem we have identified wills yocir sign or stigits is itmre filly described below. Your pole sign Is within live feet of it property iinc. The entire aHitcturc of n sign fa regnircd to be five feet or more rrom any property line, ne tiewit or your rote sign is above the autswabte mnximum height Or 20 feet. Yon have more Ill on line hualnesit idelilirtenlion sipi. I he Avis rcgutntions permit "illy ant such sign excepl far huxineaFCa on the corner or two designated atirrinl streel7, Your biisinex>! Identificalinn wall sign is latrcr titnn the 15 miunte Net pcianilled r"r yot?r business. Ire ndditlon to your property blenlificalim) and 1111shtcas ittentitiention sign(s), you hnve ndditional wsii signs which are not authorized. Only signs specifically aisthormcd tty 4lic sign rcgulallona are pe?misied, rlense bring your sign or signs into compliance Willi Ole City orCirnrwaler sign rcgalrriions nn or hcrure Octol+er 13, 1992. Failure to comply wM this request may result in code enforcement acdon and xulr-.lrrnlial lines lop in SSOO per Jay). I'tensc obtain a sign permit berare making any alteration to your sign. You navy call 462.6555 Fir 462.6565 to obtnin pct milling IrsfarninIlost or other lnrormnlian regarding any modifications you intend to mske to achieve compliance, 11 you arc Gderesled in icceiving inf"rntnliton tilt how its npply for n vniinnce to the sign regulations please call 462.6567. Be advised that you will have In prcarnl inraosnnllnn Showing a nnig+tc lanrdsbip nol feinted to Grinneini interests in order to obtitin a variance. The current fee for variance applications is $450 for the first vnrinscc rrgitestcd, plum $50.00 for cacti nddiiionnl variance. If you reel dint an cant has been orndc Willi rcgntd In our mensuremcnt nryour sign or signs, or it you have questions conctroing this letter, please call 462.6555 or 462-6565. ff Tbmnk you ror your coapcrali"it ill Ibis nlntrer, 's Sincerely, y ,Seol! Jfmfotrl t Scott Shuford Development Code Adidrilsralor A 1 i ? ?1 I f Y F 1 I i 4 z r i i r Wtb% 3Wo i?L Q tE TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF CLEARWATER tnterdepartment Correspondence Mayor and City Commission? James M. Polatty, Director of Planning &. Development Sign Code Revision COPIES: Michael J. Wright, City Manager Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Manager M. A. Galbraith, City Attorney Cyndie Goudeau, City Clerk Scott Shuford, Planning Manager John Richter, Code Enforcement Manager DATE: September 11, 1992 At the September 3, 1992, City Commission meeting, the Commission had several questions concerning the Sign Code which need to be resolved. Our responses to these questions are as follows: CapJain_Blieh's Freestandina_Sigp. The Commission wanted staff to check on the freestanding sign for this property to determine whether it was legally erected. Our review indicates that it is a nonconforming sign for which a "face change,' permit was issued in 1989 to allow conversion of the existing sign to advertise the current use. to Freestanding Signs in (lie Beach Commercial District. At the first reading of this ordinance, substantial discussion focused on the prohibition of freestanding signs in the Beach Commercial District (a rule which has been in effect since 1985). The prohibition was enacted because the physical development of the District is characterized by buildings which are placed side-by-side, either adjacent to or near the public sidewalk, malting the District primarily a pedestrian district; freestanding signs are designed primarily to attract motorists. Despite this argument, there are reasons to consider relaxing the prohibition. Some buildings in the district are positioned distant from the right-of-way, and some properties are across the street from Resort Commercial zones where pole signs are allowed. Staff feels that buildings and properties in these situations should be treated differently, and, therefore, recommends that the prohibition be lifted. In reviewing the two primary Beach Commercial Districts, with the causeway as the dividing line between the Districts, it seems to us that the "South Beach" is different from the "North Beach" in terms of signage needs. On the South Beach, there is greater proximity to Resort Commercial zoning districts, typically greater structural setbacks, and more nonconforming freestanding signs. The North Beach is more pedestrian oriented, with buildings typically placed with little or no setback. Tile Commission may wish to differentiate between these two Beach Commercial "subareas" in designing regulations. The attached table provides three possible approaches to the freestanding sign issue. Option 1 establishes larger and taller sign Memo - City Commission Sign Code Page 2 allowances for the South Beach than for the North Beach. Options 2 and 3 treat both areas the same, with Option 3 allowing the same size sign as permitted in the Resort Commercial districts. Regardless of which option is ultimately chosen, staff would suggest including the following language to restrict freestanding signs to properties with significant setbacks: Freestanding signs shall be permitted in the Beach Commercial District for properties that have a minimum structural setback of ten (10) feet over at least twenty-five (25) percent of the total property frontage on which the sign is located. ? Revised Comparison Chart. The Commission requested that staff revise the attached sign comparison chart to more accurately reflect the most likely situation concerning the sizes for attached signs. This has been done, and the chart is attached. ? Removal of Construction Sigtls. Another issue touched upon at the first reading of the ordinance concerned the point at which construction signs should be required to be removed. Staff recommends that construction signs be required to be removed prior to the issuance of certificates of occupancy for more than 50 percent of the leasable area for the development, or phase thereof, to which the sign applies. This would require an amendment to Sec. 134.009(6) of the proposed code. ? Grandfathering of Signs Permitted Under _Current Cade. The staff recommends that signs permitted under the current code should be allowed to remain. The owners of these signs have made a good faith effort to comply with our Sign Code and should not be "penalized" by a separate amortization provision. Relatively few signs would be effected by such an amortization program; consequently, the effect on the City's visual environment by allowing these signs to remain will be minimal. ? Sign Bonus Revision. The recommended bonus for attached signs with exceptional setbacks is provided in the following table: SIGN/BUILDING SETBACK SIGN AREA BONUS 100 - 199 FEET 0.25 200 - 299 FEET 0.75 300 OR MORE FEET 1.25 I hope that we have adequately answered your questions. Please contact either John Richter or me should you have questions or comments. , JMP:SS:djs Attachments m A 1 w1 V V H V3 U a a 0 w 0 a 0 A w O a F f f 1 # ?k It i' i :Y 1) r COMPARISON OF ALLOWABLE ATTACHED SIGNAGE i i ZON1110 CURRENT PROPOSED COUNTY- DISTRICT CODE CODE WIDE CODE OL, OS/R FO/B - 15 24 FOR OL 100(OL) OC - 4 48 FOR OS/R 48(OS/R) P/SP FO/B - 15 48 48 OC - 4 CNG 15/20 20 100 CN, OG FO/B - 15 48 100 OC - 4 C014 - 48 SC/T - 48 SC/MT - 128 CR-24, CR-28 FO/B - 15 56 100 OC - 4 COM - 48 SC/T - 48 SC/MT - 128 CG FO/B - 15 64 150 OC - 4 COM - 48 ., SC/T - 48 SC/MT - 128 CH FO/B - 15 150 150 OC - 4 COM W 48 SC/T -- 48 SC/MT -- 128 CC SC/T - 48 150 150 SC/M'T' - 123 IL FO/O - 15 64 150 O C -- 4 COM - 48 CB 48 48 100 - UC(B) - 40 - 48 N/A - UC(C) - 48 - 48 - UC(EC) - FO/B -: 15 - 64 OC - 4 COM - 48 SC/T - 48 SC/MT - 128 KEY: FO/B -- FREESTANDING OFFICE OR BUSINESS OC - OFFICE COMPLEX SC/T SHOPPING CENTER TENANT SC/MT - SHOPPING CENTER MAJOR TEIIAN'T' COM - COMMERCIAL COMPLEX SEP 1 6 MR CITY CLERK DEFT C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R znterdepartment Correspondence TO: Mayor and City Commission FROM: James M. Polatty, Jr. , Planning and Development Director Um SUBJECT: Processing variances for Nonconforming Signs COPIES: ?`Michae "fWr3ch`t'+i?? Wage Kathy S. Rice, Deputy City Manager Scott Shuford, Planning Manager DATE: September 16, 1992 in the event the City chooses to subsidize the larger part of the variance application fee for nonconforming sign variances, staff estimates that the City will process approximately 500 variance cases. This will not be part of the sign enforcement process; it will a step in addition to the enforcement process. Accordingly, it will be necessary to augment staff with additional help to perform this task. The number of staff necessary will be based upon the time frame within which the project is to be completed, and the Commission's willingness to temporarily set aside existing scheduled work. For example, if the project is to be completed within 90 days and if the commission is amenable to postponing certain planning Service Division work tasks, such as the annexation incentive program, we' estimate a need for two zoning technicians and two staff assistant I's. If the project is to completed within two years and no work is to be rescheduled, we estimate a need for one planner 1, one zoning technician, and one staff assistant 1. jmccvari.anc W N s ii-- <R L, RESOLUTION NO. 92-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 92-36 WHICH ESTABLISHED A SCHEDULE OF FEES TO BE CHARGED FOR APPLICATIONS FOR REVIEW OF SITE PLANS, SUBDIVISION PLATS, ANNEXATION REQUEST, LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS, CONDITIONAL USES, VARIANCES, APPEALS TO HEARING OFFICERS AND CERTAIN CONTINUANCES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on June 4, 1992, the City Commission adopted Resolution No. 92-38 which established fees to be charged for applications for review of site plans, subdivision plats, annexation requests, land use plan and zoning atlas amendments, conditional uses, variances, appeals to hearing officers and certain continuances; and WHEREAS, the'City Commission finds it necessary to amend Section 1E(1)' to include a fee for sign variances involving existing nonconforming signage; now, : therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY ',T11E CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Section 1E(a) of Resolution No. 92-38 is amended to read: E. Variance or Conditional Use Requests: (1) Variances jal Si n variances involvin existing leoal but nonconforming sion. . . . . . . . _? 5f1.0[] Other variances VaM-aoee& for residentially zoned properties . . . . . . . $200.00 Lc}.-(44 Other variances ". „ee?& for nonresidentially zoned properties Single variance request. . . . . . . . . . . . $475.00; plus Any additional request for variance with respect to the same property or contiguous properties by the same owner . . . . . . . . $ 55.00 F? t [ ? f i I ` if Clearwater City Commission ., Agenda Cover Memorandum b?a item C(A Meetittg Dtttc: 9117192 SUBJECT: Revision of 1011192 Water and Sewer Rate Increases RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Pass on First Reading Ordinance #5284.92 which revises the Water and Sewer Rate increases already scheduled for 1011192. ' and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: In December of 1991, 'Camp Dresser & McKee completed an extensive rate study encompassing both water and sewer rates. Based on their study, the City Commission approved rate increases for both water and sewer, effective February 1, 1992, October 1, 1992, and October 1, 1993. As indicated on the attached schedules, it now appears that actual results for Fiscal 1992, and projected results for 1993 are tracking well ahead of the original CDM projections. The Fiscal 92 cash deficit, originally estimated by CDM to be $2.5 million, is now projected to be less than $600,000. Further, the 93 budget (with original rate increases) is currently projecting a $2.0 million cash surplus, as compared with CDM's original break-even projection. Reasons for the favorable forecast include increased consumption, and reductions in the insurance reserve and pension contribution requirements. In addition, the CDM study included a 5% "inflation factor," and we have been successful in holding most line item expenditure increases to less than this amount. As a result of these favorable factors, we are pleased to be able to recommend reductions in the rate increase scheduled for 10!1192. The attached Ordinance revises the 1011192 scheduled increases (6.8% water and 9.5 % sewer) to 4% water and 6% sewer. The Ordinance does not propose to modify the increases already scheduled for 10/1193, however, we intend to monitor the adequacy of our rate structure every six months, and we will likely be able to recommend a corresponding reduction in the 1011193 proposed rates. As the attached schedule shows, the proposed rate revision is still projected to generate a FY 93 cash surplus of $1.2 million, which should recover the FY 92 cash deficit plus about $600,000. We believe this is a reasonable water target given the uncertainty surrounding demand for next year, and the potential impact of additional mandatory conservation measures. Reviewed by: -4-- Legal Budget Purchasing k-- NIA Risk hignit. NIA Cis NIA i ACnt Other 5u City Originating Dept: User Dept: 9 Public Works Advertised: Date: Paper: ? Not Required Affected Parties ? Notified 13 Not Rcquired Costs: NIA Total Current FY Funding Source, ? Capital imp. ? Opcniting ? Other Appropriation Code: Z Co ninission Action: pproved ? Approved w1conditions ? Denied ? Continued to: Attachments: Ordinance #5284-92 Fiscal Ycar 1992 Projection Fiscal Ycar 1993 Projection ? Norte I RT E t' a ORDINANCE NO. 5284-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO UTILITIES; AMENDING SECTIONS 50.05(e)(I)a AND (3)a, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO DECREASE DOMESTIC WATER AND WASTEWATER RATES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE` IT ORDAINED BY RE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Sections 50.05(e)(1)a and (3)a, Code of Ordinances, are amended to read: Sec. 50.05. Deposits, fees, charges and other rates. (e) Rates: (1) Water rates. Water rates for all water furnished by the city shall be as follows: a. Domestic water rates shall be the following based on monthly consumption and will take effect on February 1, 1992, October 1, 1992, and October 1, 1993, as shown in the following table, and shall remain in effect thereafter unless amended: February 1, October 1, Meter size: 1992 1992 1993 Under 1 inch Minimum charge with usage 6.12 up to 400 cubic feet $ 5.88 $ 6.28 $ 6.76 x86 Plus, from 401 to 1,200 cubic 1 _ feet, per 100 cubic feet 1.78 -1--30 2.05 Plus, from 1,201 cubic feet 2.20 up, per 100 cubic feet 2.11 2.26 2.44 1 inch Minimum charge with usage 13.76 up to 900 cubic feet 13.23 14.1-3 15.21 Plus, from 901 to 51400 cubic 1.86 feet, per 100 cubic feet 1.78 4-rga 2.05 Plus, from 5,401 cubic feet 2.20 up, per 100 cubic feet 2.11 2.26 2.44 1 1/2 inch Minimum charge with usage 204.86 up to 13,400 cubic feet 196.98 210.38 226.46 Plus, from 13,401 to 18,700 1.86 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet 1.78 4,9& 2.05 Plus, from 18,701 cubic feet 2.20 4 up, per 100 cubic feet 2.11 -9? 2.44 I 0 2 inch Minimum charge with usage up to 31,100 cubic feet Plus, from 31,101 to 45,800 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet Plus, from 45,801 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet 3 inch Minimum charge with usage or two 2-inch up to 48,000 cubic feet in manifold Plus, from 48,001 to 63,400 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet Plus, from 63,401 cubic feet up, per 100 cubic feet 4 inch i Minimum charge with usage up to 92,400 cubic feet Plus, from 92,401 to 130,900 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet Plus, from 130,901 cubic feet up, per 100 cubic feet 6 inch Minimum charge with usage up to 237,300 cubic feet Plus, from 237,301 to 270,700 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet Plus, from 270,701 cubic feet up, per 100 cubic feet ,, 8 inch Minimum charge with usage -up to 400,000 cubic feet Plus, from 400,001 to 456,300 cubic feet, per 100 cubic feet Plus, from 456,301 cubic feet up, per 100 cubic feet 2 457.17 1.78 2.11 705.60 1.78 2.11 1,358.28 1.78 2.11 3,488.31 1.78 2.11 5,880.00 1.78 2.11 475.46 4,98.27 525.59 1.86 4-roa 2.05 2.20 2.26 2.44 733.83 753.a 811.20 1.86 i.9a 2.05 2.20 2.26 2.44 1,412.62 48-68 1, 561.56 1.86 i.9a 2.05 2.20 .2126 2.44 1 3.627.85 4- ' 4? 4,010.37 1.86 4 x94 2.05 2.20 ?,6 2.44 5,115.20 6,289.00 6,760.00 1.86 4-1-9a 2.05 2.20 2.44 0 ,(3) Wastewater collection utility rates: a. There is hereby established a uniform schedule of rates and charges, for the use or availability of use of the wastewater collection system. The wastewater collection utility rate shall be a monthly fee consisting of a minimum charge for an assigned volume of domestic water associated with each water meter size, shown as the basic allowance in the following table, plus a charge per one hundred (100) cubic feet for water consumed above the assigned volume. Such rates shall take effect on February 1, 1992, October 1, 1992, and October 1, 1993, as shown in the following table, and shall remain in effect thereafter unless amended: Base Monthly Charge With or Without Consumption Basic February 1, October 1, Allowance Size of Meter 1992 1992 1993 (cubic feet) 9.44 under 1 inch $ 8.88 $ #174 $ 11.00 400 or less 21.24 1 inch 19.98 21.87 24.75 900 or less 316.24 1 1/2 inch 297.48 3' 368.50 13,400 or less 733.96 2 inch 690.42 766-73 855.25 31,100 or less 3 inch or 2-2 1,132.8.0_ inch manifold 1,065.60 4-,-4-66,44 1,320.00 48,000 or less 2,180.64 4 inch 2,051.28 2,245.32 2,541.00 92,400 or less 5.600.28 6 inch 5,268.06 &4,66.39 6,525.75 237,300 or less 9.440.00 8 inch 8,880.00 9,728-04 11,000.00 400,000 or less Charge per 100 cubic feet of water used over the basic allowance: 2.22 2.36 3,43 2.75 ?? 3 ,.+ Y E COMBINED WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM CASH BASIS PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 1992 Current Projections Projections from variance . per Preliminary Favorable Original Third Quarter or CDM Study Budget--Review (Unfavorable) Revenues: Water Sales 12,117,782 12,900,000 782,218 Sewer Sales 14,126,573 14,020,000 (106,573) Interest 11747,742 11504,620 (243,122) Safety Harbor 575,000 550,000 (25,000) Other ,770,500 847,840 77,340 Total Cash Revenue 29,337,597 29,822,460 484,863 Expenses: Personal service 5,022,098 4,775,390 246,708 Utilities 'and Operating Supp. 3,014,620 2,542,970 471,650 Purchased Water 5,402,755 6,242,800 (840,045) Other Oper. Exp. 3,772,890 3,697,050 75,840 Internal Services 894,250 880,940 13,310 Debt Service 7,342,119 7,120,840 221,279 0 Renewal and Replacement 1,394,390 1,379,390 15,000 CIP and Minor Capital 3,890,044 2,592,360 1,297,684 Genl. Fund Transfer 1,125,280 1, 125,_280 Total.Cash Expenses 31,858,446 30,357,020 1,501,426 Projected Cash Deficit (2,520,849) (534,560] 1,986,289 5 A COMBINED WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM CASH BASIS PROJECTIONS FISCAL YEAR 1993 Revised Budget Variance Projections Projections Favorable Per Original. With Original, or CDM Study Rate Increase Unfavorable Revenues: Water Sales 12,839,088 13,243,200 404,112 Sewer Sales 16,072,133 16,000,000 (721,133) Interest 1,536,313 11710,800 174,487 Safety Harbor 5751-000 500,000 (75,000) Other- 770,500 „796,500 26,000 Total. Cash Revenue 31,793,034 32,250;500 457,466 Expenses: Personal Services 5,273,203 4,868,390 404,813 Utilities and Operating Supp. 31231,659 2,806,850 424,809 Purchased Water 5,448,713 5,448,713 - Other Oper. Exp. 31961,536 3,665,640 295,896 Internal Services 938,963 847,410 91,553 Debt Service 7,361,708 7,142,840 218,868 Renewal and Replacement 1,516,550 11502,920 13,630 CIP and Minor Capital 2,714,920 2,808,230 (93,310) Genl. Fund Transfer 1._364,-,895 1,127,730 237,165 Total Cash Expenses 31,812,147 30,218,723 1,593,424 Projected Cash Surplus or (Deficit) (19,113) 2,031,777 2,050,890 Est. Revenue Reduction with New Rates „(858,615) Projected Cash Surplus with New Rates 2.173,162 r J ,} 1 1 r r 1 5 t , alas Law • 'R ti ?? ? ? y1 1 t, t. i r % r 1 4 ' 'R ? t i ' R 'S ° N' LIOM A i Ma L L 's M' d 1-k" kl I D .I. •r R I R' I z Ito • r LL Ca? tL Lit **VF 0 s. 01 3-4UOM1SbW-4q 1 14MU K:80 Z%T-T T-dM M •cl -mloi c Imc C 0 2 ICL 0 lomw ti F c to r i 4 t ? 4r r ? ? : : ti r S 3 .? r • r ? , S ?r S S ?1 rt r .rr r , • •• _ i r • •rr .•. •• r ,• 1 s S ?,. ? 5 S r ti S L 'k ? 1. Ql 3dUon1 J.SU8--"I blQ? tV80 Z66T--T T-d35 i. W t0 455 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Commission FROAL Michael J. Wright, Ci ger SUBJECT: Changes to the 1992193 R mended Budget DATE: September 11, 1992 The final budget ordinances for the FY 1992193 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget reflect the following changes a result of the Commission.workshop of September 8, 1992 on the City Manager's Recommended budget, and will also reflect all changes approved by the Commission at the first public hearing on September 3, 1992: GENERAL FUND REVENUES: Fines and Forfeitures Increase $ 49,100 The budget adjustment reflects'an increase in Court Fines to offset the proposed increase in expenditures detailed below. GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES: City Commission Increase $ 7,100 The budget adjustment reflects an increase in Official Recognition to S 10,000 upon Commission request a the September 8 budget workshop. Affirmative Action Note: All expenditures of the Community Relations division of the Planning Department have been transferred to the Affirmative Action division. Also, the expenditures for the Summer Youth program of $130,000 and $62,000 in Social Service Agency funding has been transferred to the Affirmative Action Office. Increase $ 42,000 Contractual wages in the Community Relations division have been increaser) by $ 15,000 and Salaries and Wages have been increase by $ 22,000 to provide one additional Staff Assistant position and an additional $ 5,000 for a proposed merit increase for rot Department Director. WATER AND SEWER FUND REVENUES Water Revenues Decreasd$ 347,200 Sewer Revenues Decreast$ 511,415 To reflect a revision to the water and sewer rate increase scheduled for 1011192 as proposed to the Commission on117192. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND Laptop Computer Program The project is amended to reflect only the purchase of 50 laptops in fiscal year 1997198, and a decrease in funding for the FY 1997198 of $225,000. b? N I AS 5 1LIILLAGE ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 5280-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, DECLARING THE MILLAGE RATE TO BE LEVIED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1992, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1993, FOR OPERATION PURPOSES INCLUDING PENSIONS AND DEBT SERVICE, AND ROAD AND DRAINAGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the estimated revenues to be received by the City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1992, and ending September 30, 1993, from ad valorem taxes is $20,477,340; and WHEREAS, based upon the taxable value provided by the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, 5.1158 mills are necessary to generate $20,477,340; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. It is hereby determined that a tax of 5.1158 mills against the non-exempt real and personal property within the City is necessary to raise the sums to be appropriated for operation purposes, including pensions and debt service, road and drainage capital improvement projects, For the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1992. Section 2. The levy of 5.1158 mills constitutes a 1.0696 decrease from the rolled back rate. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect October 1, 1992. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner a) Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney 0 , I n NIQTION TO-AMEND OPERATING BUDGET ORDINANCE NO. 5281-92 To reflect the following changes to "Exhibit A - 1992-93 Budgeted Revenue: To record an increase in General Fund - Fines and Forfeitures of $ 49,140 to reflect an increase in Court Fines. To record a budget decrease of $ 858,615 in Water and Sewer Fund Operating revenues to reflect a revision to the water and sewer rate increase scheduled for 1011/92 as proposed to the Commission on 9117192. To reflect the following changes to "Exhibit A - 1992-93 Budgeted Expenditures: To record an increase of $7,100 in the City Commissions budget reflecting an increase in Official Recognition to $10,000 upon Commission request at the September 8 budget workshop. To record an increase of $ 5$3,330 in Administration reflecting the transfer of the Community Relation Expenditures from Planning and Development; the transfer of $130,000 for the summer youth program from the Non-Departmental division; the transfer of $ 62,000 of Social Service Agency funding from the Non-Departmental division; and an increase of $42,000 representing $15,000 in contract services, $22,000 for the addition of a Staff Assistant I, and $5,000 for a merit increase for the Department Director. To record a decrease of $192,000 in the Non-Departmental budget reflecting the transfer of $130,000 for the Summer Youth Program and $ 62,000 of Social Service Agency funding to the Affirmative Action Office. a To'record a decrease of $349,330 in Planning and Development reflecting the transfer of Community Relations to the Affirmative Action office, r•,? I I i i. k ' i I C^ 'r i, S t. k' }k I' OPERATING BUDGET ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 5281-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ADOPTING AN OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1992, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,1993; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE SUCH INSTRUCTIONS THAT ARE NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE AND ACCOMPLISH THE SERVICE PROGRAMS SO AUTHORIZED; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO TRANSFER MONEYS AND PROGRAMS AMONG THE DEPARTMENTS AND ACTIVITIES WITHIN ANY FUND AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTER 41 OF THE CLEARWATER CODE OF ORDINANCES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Manager has submitted an estimate of the expenditures necessary to carry on the City government for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1992, and ending September 30, 1993; and WHEREAS, an estimate of the revenues to be received by the City during said period from ad valorem taxes and other sources has been submitted to the City Commission; and WHEREAS, a general summary of the operating budget, and notice of the times and places where copies of the budget message and operating budget are available for inspection by the public, was published in a newspaper of general circulation; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has examined and carefully considered the proposed budget; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 41 of the Clearwater Code of Ordinances, the City Commission conducted a public hearing in City Hall on September 3, 1992, upon said budget and tax levy; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA; Section 1. Pursuant to the City Manager's Annual Report and Estimate for the fiscal year t beginning October 1, 1992, and ending September 30, 1993, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, the City Commission hereby adopts a budget for the operation of the City, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 2. The budget as adopted shall stand and be,the budget of the City for said fiscal year, j subject to the authority of the City Commission to amend or change the budget as provided by Section 41.06 of the # Clearwater Code of Ordinances. Section 3. The City Manager is authorized and directed to issue such instructions and directives that are necessary to achieve and accomplish the service programs authorized by the adoption of this budget. c? 1 r 0 i Section 4. The City Manager is authorized for reasons of economy or efficiency to transfer part or all of any unencumbered appropriation balance among programs within an operating fund, provided such action does not result in the discontinuance of a program. Section 5. It is the intent of the City Commission that this budget, including amendments thereto, is adopted to permit the legal appropriation and encumbering of funds for the purposes set forth in the budget. All appropriated and encumbered but unexpended funds at the end of the fiscal year may be expended during the subsequent fiscal year for the purposes for which they were appropriated and encumbered, and such expenditures shall be deemed to have been spent out of the current budget allocation. It shall not be necessary to reappropriate additional funds in the budget for the subsequent fiscal year to cover valid open encumbrances outstanding as of the end of the current fiscal year. Section b. Should any provision of this ordinance be declared by any court to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any provision thereof, other than the provision declared to be invalid. Section 7. This ordinance shall take effect October 1, 1992. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AS AMENDED Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Vi f- ¦ EXHIBIT A 1992-93 BUDGET REVENUE Actual Budgeted Budgeted Revenues Revenues Revenges 1990/91 1991/92 1992/93 GENERAL FUND: Property Taxes 19,020,304 19,096,733 18,992,340 Sales Tax Revenue 3,430,399 3,494,400 3,770,220 Franchise Fees 4,949,635 4,955,700 5,147,520 Utility Taxes 9,530,675 9,364,325 10,090,080 Licenses & Permits 2,051,143 2,082,000 2,007,000 Fines, Forteitures & Penalties 1,363,932 1,338,200 1,450,100 Intergovernmental Revenue 6,906,285 6,488,920 6,624,940 Charges for Current Services 1,061,598 887,690 949,940 Use & Sale of City Property & Money 1,218,363 1,050,640 1,113,750 Miscellaneous Revenue 188,081 132,500 130,000 Administrative Service Charges 2,561,920 2,595,230 2,703,820 Other Service Charges 1,742,657 1,850,980 1,919,810 ,Interfund Charges 3,475,210 2,868,580 2,752,910 Transfer from Surplus 0 0 2,941,330 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 57,500,202 56,205,898 60,593,760 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: Special Development Fund Special Program Fund Utility Fund Bridge Fund Marina Fund Parking Fund Pier 60 Fund Airpark Fund Administrative Services General Services Fleet Maintenance Insurance Fund 9,165,497 8,456,785 ]],727,680 1,798,467 3.;000,000 901,000 52,476,672 59,563,470 60,223,655 2,252,678 1,701,600 1,630,100 1,728,912 1,743,750 1,591,640 2,256,856 2,460,210 2,750,850 306,945 326,000 72,880 48,951 0 0 3,820,812 3,910,415 4,161,740 2,448,997 2,475,480 2,604,030 5,843,289 6,735,070 7,092,910 7,339,992 7,132,000 6,655,150 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 146,988,270 151,710,678 160,005,395 N EXHIBIT A (Continued) 1992-93 BUDGET EXPENDITURES Actual Budgeted Budgeted ,Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures 1990191 1991192 1992193 i i GENERAL FUND: 211,328 126,525 135,110 City Commmission 905,933 780,340 1,358,930 Administration 173,784 182,390 163,870 Public Information Office 94,702 99,080 104,530 Economic Development 603,585 658,488 687,310 Legal 449,177 550,450 524,220 City Clerk 1 541,294 1,633,670 1,875,920 Administrative Services , 639,898 721,390 823,960 Human Resources 3 627,017 3,881,945 5,561,140 Non-Departmental , 6,553 5,380 7,200 Emergency Management 16,425,044 17,561,270 18,768,990 Police 8,661,403 8,989,634 9,506,750 Fire 042,912 2 2,110,340 2,159,300 Public Works - Engineering , 62,745 55,000 64,980 Public Works - Airpark 214 964 214,510 224,230 Public Works - Environmental , 565 2 642 2,637,570 2,450,870 Public Works - Transportation , , 2,083,364 1,794,480 1,452,620 Public Works - Infrastructure 2,564,723 2,777,760 2,420,150 Planning & Development 7,963,312 8,428,110 9,101,800 Parks & Recreation 0 57,150 75,040 Sailing Center 2,781,601 2,940,430 3,128,440 Library 53,691,994 56,205,898 60,593,760 TOTAL GENERAL FUND ALL OTHER FUNDS: 019 646 10 9,456,785 11,350,480 Special Development Fund , , 1 760,647 1,000,000 811,000 Special Program Fund , 60,150,746 59,266,980 57,277,640 Utility Fund 2,101,836 1,1.02,690 1,048,560 Bridge Fund 1,625,030 1,669,450 1,564,240 Markin Fund 4,784,502 2,460,210 2,600,850 Parking Fund 301,92^= 308,910 64,820 Fier 60 Fund 62,745 0 0 Airpark Fund 3,605,140 3,910,415 9 4 131. Administrative Services 377,679 2 2,385,570 0 0 , General Services , 6,564,678 6,735,070 7,092,910 Fleet Maintenance 4,140,080 5,877,760 5,676,290 Insurance Fund 151,813,019 149,379,738 154,815,670 TOTAL ALL YURDS m r r CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 5282-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1992, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1993; APPROVING THE SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WHICH SHALL BE REEVALUATED AT THE BEGINNING OF EACH FISCAL YEAR; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE SUCH INSTRUCTIONS THAT ARE NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE AND ACCOMPLISH THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SO AUTHORIZED; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO TRANSFER MONEY BETWEEN PROJECTS IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; APPROPRIATING AVAILABLE AND ANTICIPATED RESOURCES FOR THE PROJECTS IDENTIFIED; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Manager has submitted a proposed Six-Year Capital Improvement Program, and has submitted an estimate of the amount of money necessary to carry on said Capital Improvement Program for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1992, and ending September 30, 1993; and •r WHEREAS, an estimate of the resources available and income to be received by the City during said period from ad valorem taxes and other sources has been submitted to the City Commission; and WHEREAS, a general summary of the Capital Improvement Budget, and notice of the times and places when copies of the budget message and capital budget are available for inspection by the public, was published in a newspaper'of general, circulation; and WHEREAS, the City Commission has examined and carefully considered the proposed budget; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 41 of the Clearwater Code of Ordinances, the City Commission conducted a public hearing in the City Hall upon said proposed budget on September 3, 1992; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Pursuant to the Capital Improvement Program Report and Estimated Budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1992, and ending September 30, 1993, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, the City Commission hereby adopts a budget for the capital improvement fund for the City of Clearwater, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 2. The Six-Year Capital Improvement Program and budget, a summary of which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit B, is approved in its present form, but prior to the beginning of each fiscal year F the City Commission shall reevaluate priorities, hold public hearings and formally adopt additions or corrections thereto. Section 3. The budget as adopted shall stand and be the Capital Improvement Program budget of the City for said fiscal year, subject to the authority of the City Commission to amend or change the budget as provided by Section 41.06 and 41.08 of the Clearwater Code of Ordinances. Section 4. The City Manager is authorized and directed to issue such instructions and directives that are necessary to achieve and accomplish the capital improvements authorized by the adoption of this budget. Section 5. The City Manager is authorized to transfer appropriations within the capital budget, provided such transfer does not result in changing the scope of any project or the fund source included in the adopted capital budget. Section 6. Should any provision of this ordinance be declared by any court to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole, or any provision thereof, other than the provision declared to be invalid. Section 7. This ordinance shall take effect October 1, 1992. PASSED ON FIRST READING 3 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney I Rita Garvey, Mayor-Conunissioner r EXMIT A . CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991192 CITY OF CLEARWATER t" Original . : Dudgat : X 1991192 ' . Police Protection Fire Protection. 1 547,580 Neu Street Construction . 1,500,000 Major Street Maintenance 1,437,785 r Sideualks"S Bike Trails 323,000 Storm Drainage 235,000 an Intersections ' 135,000 Parking 150,000 Miscellaneous Public Works 100,000 Parkland Acquisition 5!7,500 Park Development 289,000 r. . " Park Beautification 30,000 Marine Facilities 4,050,000 Libraries 670,030 Garage 1,880,210 Maintenance of Buildings 144,905 Miscellaneous 50b,510 ". Stormunter Utility 2,796,420 ry,; Water System !,336,500 Sewer System 6,278,000 Gas System 818,230 .: Solid Waste 452,000 g+', ( 24,209,950 n y g?iT B ' 'y. RESOURCES APPROPRIATIM FOft CAPITAL pRO'ECTS 199?.193 Or3.giual. Budget 1992193 GMUMAL SOURMt $789,005 General Operating Revenue 73,680 General Fund/County EMS 2,941,330 General Operating Revenuo/Prior Year Surplus 1,278,760 Spacial Development Fund 1,535,000 ' Road Millage 6,176,420 Infrastructure Tax 819,000 Transportation Impact Peaa 34,000 Drainage Impact 7ee8 1,200,000 ; Local Optiaa Gas Tax 227,310 Bond Interest Fund 7. s SELF $UPpGRrLNG guNDS: 1oo;aoa '?. at• Bridge R & R 95,000 Marina Operating Revenue 150,000 Park{.ng operating Revenue 4 ( ," utility systems 2,480,000 ; Water & Sewer Operating Revenue 605,000 II: Water R & R 1,050,000 Sewer impact Foes 650,000 ? • L' Sewer R L R 819,000 " Gas Revenue' „210,000 js.". Gap R L R 334,000 ai Solid Waste Revenue 1 1,127,920 Stormwater Utility Revenue t l INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 4,000 Administrative 5ervicas Fund 65,900 ; Garage Fund 250,000 General Services Fund BORROWING - GENERAL SOURCES 1,007,200 Lease Purchase BORROWING _ MM ER FUNDS 380,000 , ` ? Gas Bond Issue , 2,000,000 k Solid Waste Bond 1,816,500 " Garage Fund 3 $28,209,525 2 ,209,525 9 Tom, ALL FUNDING SOURCESs 8 w 3 ? t ti? y a t ;.. .. ` { t i„ i y , i 0 CIP EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUNCTION FY 1992-93 THROUGH FY 1997-98 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF CLEARWATER Schedule of Planned CIP Expenditures Junction 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996.97 1997-98 Total Police Protection Fire Protection New Street Construction Major Street Maintenance Sidewalks & Bike Trails Storm Drainage Intersections Parking Land Acquisition Park Development Park Beautification Marine Facilities Libraries Garage Maintenance of Buildings City Hall Miscellaneous Stormwater Utility Water System Sewer System Gas System Solid Waste 3 i 1 t 1 E 760,000 608,000 350,000 400,000 83,680 343,930 94,680 95,430 1,323,000. 3,250,000 3,000,000 4,750,000 1,440,000 1,440,000 1,440,000 1,440,000 300,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 34,000 0 0 0 735,000 735,000 535,000 535,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 500,000 300,000 300,000 466,500 960,000 815,000 225,000 770,000 0 0 170,000 0 295,000 205,000 820,000 105,000 487,000 450,000 460,000 470,000 1,882,400 2,148,334 2,341,684 2,552,436 466,525 199,500 167,000 271,000 ,F 7,509,320 2,200,000 0 0 260,680 70,000 1,004,100 160,000 2,577,920 1,453,500 1,250,000 1,250,000 960,000 1,075,000 3,075,000 3,085,000 3,750,000 2,200,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 1,405,000 1,426;200 1,464,200 1,497,500 2,330,000 345,000 370,000 365,000 ----------------------------------------------- -28,209,525 19,814,464 20,016,664 21,162,866 450,000 225,000 2,793,000 436,180 101,110 1,155,010 2,500,000 1,000,000 15,823,000 1,440,000 1,440,000 8,640,000 650,000 500,000 2,650,000 0 0 34,000 635,000 285,000 3,460,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 350,000 0 1,916,500 735,000 439,500 3,944,500 0 0 170,000 105,000 105,000 1,635,000 480,000 490,000 2,837,000 2,782,155 3,032,549 14,739,558 100,800 89,900 1,294,725 0 0 9,709,320 0 0 1,494,780 1,250,000 1,250,000 9,031,420 3,085,000 3,085,000 14,365,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 15,550,000 1,533,900 1,565,000 8,891,800 415,000 450,000 4,275,000 19,498,035 16,608,059 125,309,613 .?a=a__===e.s=a===ceseases=a==ae.ea.a M II OPERATING 11111)tiln' ORDINANCE NO. 5281-92 To relleet the following cltange,-s Io "rxhlb;l A - 1992-93 Budgeted Revenue: To record an increase in General Fund -Trines and Forfeitures of $ 49,100 to reflect an increase in Court Fines. To record a budget decrease of $ 858,615 in Water and Sewer Fund Operating revenues to reflect a reviFion to the water and sewer rate incttase scheduled for 1011192 as proposed to fire Commission on 9117192. t To relleict the following changti_ In "Exhihit A - 1992-93 Budgeted Expenditures: To record an increase of $7,100 in Cite City Commissions budget reflecting an increase in Official Recognition to $10,000 npott Commrtission request at the September 8 budget workshop. To record an increase of $ 583,330 in Administration reflecting the transfer of the Community Relation Expenditures frottt Planning and Development; the transfer of $130,000 for the summer youth program from the Non-Departmental division-, the transfer of $ 62,0M of Social Service Agency funding from the Nan-Departmental division; and an increase of $12,000 representing $15,000 in contract services, $22,000 for the addition of it Staff Assistant 1, and $5,000 fur it merit increase for the Department Director. To record it decrease of $192,000 in the Non-Departmental budget reflecting (lie transfer of $130,000 for tine Sumner Youth prograin and $ 62,000 of Social Service Agency funding to the Affirmative Action Office, To record a ? crease of $349,330 in Pinnninb and Development reflecting the transfer of Community Relations to the Affirmative Action office. e r .w 1 0 EXHIBIT A 1992-93 BUDGET REVENUE GENERAL FUND: Property Taxes Sales Tax Revenue Franchise Fees utility Taxes Licenses & P.F?rmits Fines, Forteitures & Penalties Intergovernmental Revenue Charges for Current Services Use & Sale of. City Property & Money Miscellaneous Revenue Administrative Service Charges Other Service Charges Interfund Charges Transfer from surplus TOTAL GENERAL FUND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: Special Development Fund Special Program Fund Utility Fund Bridge Fund Marina Fund Parking Fund Pier 60 Fund Airpark Fund Administrative Services General Services Fleet Maintenance Insurance Fund TOTAL ALL FUNDS ate, , .5agr? 9a, of Actual Budgeted Budgeted Revenues Revenues 1991192 Revenues 1992193 1990191 19,020,304 19,096,733 18,992„340 3,430,399 3,494,400 3,770,220 ,949,635 4 4,955,700 5,147,520 , 9,530,675 9,364,325 10,090,080 ; 2,051,143 32 2,082,000 200 338 1 2,007,0001450 -1-403,900 1,363,9 6,906,285 , , 6,488,920 6,624,940 1,061,598 887,690 949,940 1,218,363 1,050,640 1,113,750 188,081 132,500 130,000 2,561,920 2,595,230 2,703,820 ; 1,742,657 1,850,980 1,919,810 3,475,210 2,868,580 2,752,910 0 0 2,941,330 57,500,202 56,205,898 60754A-,fi68?,`?3'itoo , F' 9,165,497 8,456,785 11,727,680 t 1,798,467 11000,000 901,000 i ZZ-3 (o$S ?t 52,476,672 59,563,470 608 2,252,676 1,701,600 1,630,100; 1,728,912 1,743,750 1,591,640: 2,256,856 2,460,210 2,750,850 s .306,945 326,000 72,880 48,951 0 0 i 3,620,812 3,910,415 s 4,161,740 2,448,997 2,475,480 2,604,030(• 5,843,289 6,735,070 7,092,910 7,339,992 7,132,000 6,655,150 •i 146,988,270 151,710,679 160-.8-1-47 -01cYa5,3g5, jY i Z ? I ? S t c . S f. S , A M"" 0 EXHIBIT A (Continued) 1992-93 BUDGET EXPENDITURES Actual Expenditures 1990191 GENERAL FUND: City Commission Administration Public Information Office Economic Development Legal City Clerk Administrative Services Human Resources Non-Departmental Emergency Management Police Fire Public Works - Engineering Public Works - Airpark Public Works - Environmental Public Works - Transportation Public Works - Infrastructure Planning & Development Parks & Recreation Sailing Center Library TOTAL GENERAL FUND ALL OTHER FUNDS: Special Development Fund Special Program Fund 211,328 905,933 173,784 94,802 603,585 449,177 1,541,284 639,898 3,627,017 6,553 16,425,044 8,661,403 2,042,912 62,745 210,964 2,642,565 2,083,364 2,564,723 7,963,312 0 2,781,601 53,691,994 10,646,019 1,760,648 Budgeted Expenditurea 1991192 126,525 780,340 182,390 99,080 658,488 550,450 1,633,670 721,360 3,881,945 5,380 17,561,270 8,989,630 2,110,340 55,000 214,510 2,637,570 1,794,480 2,777,760 8,428,110 57,150 2,940,430 56,205,898 8,456,785 1,000,000 Utility Fund 60,150,746 59,266,980 Bridge Fund 2,101,836 1,102,690 Marina Fund 1,625,030 1,669,450 Parking Fund 4,784,502 2,460,210 Pier 60 Fund 301,922 308,910 Airpark Fund 62,745 0 Administrative Services 3,605,140 3,910,415 General Services 2,377,679 2,385,570 Fleet Maintenance 6,564,678 6,735,070 Insurance Fund 4,140,080 5,877,760 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 151,813,019 149, 379, 738 Budgeted Expenditurati 1992193 1.28;010• ?35,1?0 +;358,934 7-75,76 00 163,870 104,530 687,310 524,220 1,875,920 823,960 5; 759;1-4i} 5,51?11tyo 7,200 18,768,990 9,506,750 2,158,300 64,380 224,230 2,450,870 1,452,620 a,gate,tisd Z-,74,9-,-4-80 9,101,800 ; 75,040 3,128,440 6OT54*-,660 6o,5g3; 60 11,350,480 811.000 57,277,640 1,048,560 1,564,240 2,600,850 64 , 820 0 4,131,090 2,604,030 7,092,910 5,676,290 154716 6-,;5-7 ID Is `?,ai5,?-ro AIQTION-I'Q Ann:ND (3W?i?iC i?#3CrF ORDINANCE NO. 5282.92 i To reflect the following change to (lie CIP Expenditure Summary by Function The tine item for Police Protection is amended for fiscal year 1997-98 from 450,000 to 225,000 for a new line item total of $ 2,793,000, reflecting a decrease of SO in the number of laptop computers to be purchases in FY 1997198. t k ,S r • :t t i t (t k4S E ^1 ?f. K7111inIT ? j CAPITA. IHPR0VKMHNT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL. TEAR 1991192 CITY CP CLEARUATER Original Budget . 1991192 Police Protection Fire Protection 547,680 Haw Street Constructlon 1,500,000 Major Street Maintenance 1,437,785 Sidewalks L Bike TraLIs 325,000 • _ Storm Drainage s ? 235,000 Intersections 135,000 Parking 150,000 Miscellaneous Public Works 100,000 Parkland Acquisition 517,500 Park Development t 299,000 Park Beautification 30,000 Marine Facilities 4,050,000 LlbrarLae 670,030 Garage 1,880,210 Maintenance of Buildings 144,905'- Miscellaneous 506,670 Stormwater Utility 2,796,420 Water system .1,736,500 Fl Sewer System 6,278,000 Can System 818,250 Solid Waste 462,000 ------ ------ 24,209,950 ------------- 1 f I r 1 i • r. P I, . A ?.^ y •i ? . i ?i rv I I ff F §? r r•i y. l? I-. w EXHIBIT B RESOURCES APPROPRIATED FOR, CAPITAL PROJEUM 1992193 Origin! Budget ff MISS GENERAL SOURCES: General Operating Revenue General Fund/County ENS General Operating Ravenua/PriOr Year Surplus Special Development Fund Road Millage Infrastructure Tax Transportation Impact Fees Drainage Impact Fees Local Option Gas Tax Bond Interest Fund SELF SUPPORTING FUNDS: Bridge R L R Marina Opernting•Revenue ; Parking Operating Revenue Utility System: Water L Sewer Operating Revenue Water R L R Sewer Impact Feee Sewer R L R Gas Revenue Gas RLR Solid Manta Revenue Stormwater'Utility Revenue INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Adminisrrativo Services Fund Garage Fund General Services Fund BORIlowoc; _ GENERAL SOURCES Lease Purchase BORROWIMG - CrIM R FUNDS Gas Bond, Issue Solid Waste !land Garage Fund TOTAL M.L FUNDING SOURCESs ?I 1 1992191 $789,005 73,680 2,941,330 1,278,760 1,535,000 6,176,920- 813,000 34,000 1,200,000 227,310 3 100,000 ti 95,000 S 150,000 } ,f 2,480,000 }? 605,000 1,050,000 650,000 819,000, 210,000 330,000 1,127,920 4,000 iz 65,900 250,000• 1,007,200 380,000 2,000,000 1,8!6,500 $28,209,525 7 F 1 3 CIP EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUNCTION FY 1992.93 THROUGH FY 1997-98 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND CITY OF CL.EARWATER Schedule of Planned CIP Expenditures Function 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 Total a;D5,oco a 7c13, cc:o Police Protection 760,000 608,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 "450;000 3;018;000 Fire Protection 83,680 343,930 94,680 95,430 436,180 101,110 1,1559010 Now Street Construction 1,323,000 3,250,000 3,000,000 4,750,000 2,500,000 1,000,000 15,823,000 j. Major Street Maintenance 1,440,000 1,440,000 1,440,000 1,440,000 1,440,000 1,440,000 8,640,000 Sidewalks & Bike Trails 300,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 650,000 500,000 2,650,000 Storm Drainage 34,000 0 0 0 0 0 34,000 intersections 735,000 735,000 535,000 535,000 635,000 285,000 3,460,000 Parking 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Land Acquisition 500,000 300,000 300,000 466,500 350,000 0 1,916,500 Park Development 960,000 815,000 225,000 770,000 735,000 439,500 3,944,500 Park Beautification 0 0 170,000 0 0 0 170,000 Marine Facilities 295,000 205,000 820,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 1,635,000 Libraries 487,000 450,000 460,000 470,000 480,000 490,000 2,837,000 Garage 1,882,400 2,148,334 2,341,684 2,552,436 2,782,155 3,032,549 14,739,558 Maintenance of Buildings 466,525 199,500 167,000 271,000 100,800 89,900 1,294,725 City Halt 7,509,320 2,200,000 0 0 0 0 9,709,320 Miscellaneous 260,680 70,000 1,004,100 160,000 0 0 1,494,780 Stormwater Utility 2,577,920 1,453,500 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 9,031,420 Water System 960,000 1,075,000 3,075,000 3,085,000 3,085,000 3,085,000 14,365,000 Sewer System 3,750,000 2,200,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 15,550,000 Gas System 1,405,000 1,426,200 1,464,200 1,497,500 1,533,900 1,565,000 8,891,800 Solid Waste 2,330,000 345,000 370,000 365,000 415,000 450,000 4,275,000 3 ----------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 28,209,525 19,814,464 20,016,664 21,162,866 19,498,035 16;833;059 1-25T534-,"3 11qbp$rQ5q 125309,??3 E i i W 0 - City of Clear rater 9-8-92 `A` 1A00 GENERAL FUND - Financial For ecasting Model Budget Assumptions Proposed Page 1 r r J Revised Original Fi scal Yr " REVENUES 1991192 1992/93 '194 '95 196 1993194 1994195 1995196 P 599 518 20 + 340 20 527 0 n 0 y0 0 0 0 20 340 527 340 20 527 340 527 20 roperty Taxes , , , , . . . , , , , , , Franchise Fees 4,888,365 5,147,520 1.5 1.5 1.5 5,224,733 5,303,104 5,382,650 Utility Taxes 9,732,470 10,090,080 3.5 3.5 3.5 10,443,233 10,808,746 11,187,052 Licenses and Permits 2,021,895 2,007,000 0.6 0,6 0.6 2,019,042 2,031,156 2,043,343 Fines and Penalties 1,309,780 1,401,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,401,000 1,401,000 1,401,000= Intargovernmentals Federal Grants 228,550 244,800 0.0 0.0 0.0 244,800 244,800 244,800 ` Stata: Sales Tax 3,440,000 3,770,220 1.5 1.5 1.5 3,826,773 3,884,175 3,942,436 " Revenue Sharing 2,183,650 2,127,690 0.0 -0.5 -0.5 2,127,680 ,117,042 2,106,456 Other 536,810 556,700 0.0 0.0 0.0 556,700 556,700 556,700 County: Fire Tax 1,066,980 1,171,580 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,171,580 1,171,580 1,171,580 EMS Tax 21211,150 2,211,150 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,211,150 2,211,150 2,211,150 Other 300,430 313,030 0.0 0.0 0.0 313,030 313,030 313,030 Charges For Services:' ' Parka b Recreation Fees 549,459 575,250 5.0 5.0 5.0 b04,013 634,213 665,924 Library Foes 82,103 84,230 0.0 4.1 4.1 84,230 87,683 91,278 . Other 315,374 290,460 5.0 5.0 5.0 304,983 320,232 336,244 Interest Earnings 848,100 755,300 0.0 0.0 0.0 850,000 850,000 850,000 Other Misc Revenues 478,757 488,450 0.7 0.7 0.7 491,869 495,312 498,779 Interfund Charges: Administrative Overhead 2,595,230 2,703,820 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,757,896 2,813,054 2,869,315 t Charges for Services 1,868,000 1,919,810 5.0 5.0 5.0 2,015,801 2,116,591 2,222,420 Stormwator Utility 526,960 465,930 0.0 0.0 0.0 465,930 465,930 1 465,930 Interfund Transfers: ti Utility System 2,050,000 2,062,690 5.0 5.0 5.0 2,165,825 2,274,116 2,387,822' Gas System Dividend 371,810 .+ 224,290 0.0 0.0 0.0 700,000 700,000 800,000 Transfer from Surplus 2,941,330 TOTAL REVENUES ------ 58,205,391 ----------- ----------- 62,079,660 ----------- -------- 60,507,607 ------- ---------- 61,326,954 ---------- ------------ 62,275,252 ------- r .j I r ¦ City of Clearwater 9-8-92 GENERAL FU11D - Financial Forecasting Pegs 2 Budg et Assumptions Proposed Revised ,,Original Fiscal Yr # r "PENDITURES 1991192 ??'•1992193 - - - 094 '95 - 196 1993194 - 1994195 - - -- - 1995196 ---------- -------------------------- - Personal Services: ---------- -- - -- - - ---- -- - ---- ---------- -- - - - - Salaries & cages 30,867,861 32,002,100 4.2 4.2 4.2 33,346,188 34,746,728 36,206,091 Overtime & Special Pays 1,511,992 1,525,530 2.1 2.1 2.1 1,557,566 1,590,275 ' 1,623,671 Pensions 2,430,669 2,254,010 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,254,010 2,254,010 2,254,010 i Fire Pension 679,510 723,680 6.5 6.5 6.5 770,719 820,816 874,169 Social Security 503,666 497,580 4.2 4.2 4.2 518,478 540,254 562,945 Health Insurance 2,016,033 2,024,400 10.0 10.0 10.0 2,226,840 2,449,524 2,694,476 Workers Compensation 641,515 769,030 4.2 4.2 4.2 801,329 834,985 870,054 $ Other Fringe Benefits 2B9,004 325,980 0.0 0.0 0.0 325,990 325,980 325,980 Operating Costs: Utilities 2,022,251 2,152,090 3.5 3.5 3.5 2,227,413 2,305,373 2,386,061 Uucsida Agencies 1,077,627 1,287,360 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,287,360 1,287,360 1,287,360 Insurance ' 1,087,370 606,760 5.0 5.0 5.0 637,098 668,953 702,401 Ocher 4,559,138 4,581060 3.5 3.5 3.5 4,741,708 4,907,667 5,079,436 E r Internal Services: Garage Services 2,351,567 2,349,510 3.5 3.5 3.5 2,435,526 2,524,690 2,617,119 Computer Services 864,440 896,780 3,5 3.5 3.5 931,306 967,161 1,004,397 Building & Maint Services 977,428 918,140 3.5 3.5 3.5 954,003 991,266 1,029,985 Other 1,802,114 1,921,020 3.5 3.5 3.5 1,982,608 2,046,170 2,111,771 a Capital Expenditures: ?i Nachinary & Equipment 225,875 196,050 0.0 0.0 0.0 196,050 196,050 196,050 Office Equipment 77,140 42,450 0.0 0.0 0.0 42,450 42,450 42,450 ` Other 257,040 120,110 0.0 0.0 0.0 120,110 120,110 120,110 i Dabs Service 1,025,153 1,254,570 T T T 1,254,570 1,254,570 1,254,570 Transfers to other Funds Library Hooks & Mator.ala 40D,000 442,000 T T T 450,000 460,000 470,000 Tax Incremanc (CRA) 263,930 229,135 0.0 0.0 0.0 289,135 289,135 289,135 Road Millage 1,517,785 1,535,00D ' 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,535,000 1,535,000 1,535,000 Building Maint Projects 102,880 133,525 T T T 199,500 167,000 ° 271,000 Other Projects 333,862 3,231,490 T T T 466,930 239,680 240,430 Budget Adjustment 0 0 0 0 0 ' TOTAL EXPENDITURES ----------- 57,885,850 ----------- 62,079,660 ----------- ----------- 61,551,877 ----------- ----------- 63,565,208 ----------- -_---------- ,66,048,670 ------------ S: S1 ' ?-QC1I 9 -8-92 Pago 3 City of Clearwater 1 SUMMARY Of General Fund 1993194 1994195 1995196 Revenues or Expanditure- 1992193 Property-Taxes- ------- 20,527,340 20,527,340 20,527,340 20,527,340 + d Franchise Fees/Utll Taxes 15,237,600 15,667,966 16,111,850 16,569,702 Licenses, Permits & Fine- 3,408,040 3,420,042 3,432,156 3,444,343 Intergovernmental 10,395,160- 10,451,713 10,498,476 10,546,154 Chga Far Svcs, Inc & Misc 2,193,690 2,335,095 2,387,441 2,442,225 } Interfund Chgs/Transfera 10,317,870 81105,451 8,369,691 8,745,487 Total Revenues 62,079,660 60,507,607 61,326,954 62,275,252 f Personal Services 40,122,310 41,801,111 43,562,573 45,411,396 Operating Costa 8,fi27,570 8,893,579 9,169,353 9,455,257 i t Internal Services 6,085,450 6,303,442 6,519,288 6,763,271 s. Capital & Debt Service 1,613,184 1,613,180 1,6L3,180 1,613,180 Transfers to Other Funds 5,631,150 2,940,565 2,690,815 2,805,565 ; Budget Adjustment Total Expenditures 0 62,079,660 0 61,551,877 0 63,565,208 0 r: 66,048,670 .. Budget SurpluO (Deficit) 4 4,044,270 -2,238,254 -3,773,418 " ' MILLAGE Rate 5.1158 5.3761 5.6736 6.0562 . c, Change % 5.09 5.53 6.74 Value of One MILL 4,019,805 .4,012,538 4,012,538 ' 4,012,538 r r NEW Milloge Computation 5.0978 NEW Tax Rev based on MILLs 5.115 8 20,599,518 w a A1 w } ORDINANCE NO. 5283-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, PROVIDING THAT A PORTION OF THE "MAAS BROTHERS PROPERTY" BE SOLD FOR $150,000.00 TO THE FLORIDA GULF COAST ART CENTER, INC., TO BE DEVELOPED, MAINTAINED, AND OPERATED AS AN ARTS FACILITY, AS DEFINED HEREIN; DECLARING SUCH PROPERTY TO BE SURPLUS AND NO LONGER NEEDED FOR PUBLIC USE; PROVIDING FOR USE RESTRICTIONS AND A REVERTER CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE FIELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 1992, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION IN ORDER TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSED SALE TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THE CITY FOR APPROVAL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 2.01(4) of the Charter of the City of Clearwater provides that no real property shall be given away or donated without the prior approval of the qualified voters of the City at referendum, and that the real property must be declared surplus and no longer needed for public use at an advertised public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Florida Gulf Coast Art Center, Inc., has proposed to construct, maintain, and operate an arts facility, as described herein, to be located on a portion of the "Maas Brothers" property at Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue, to be purchased in accordance with the terms set forth in this ordinance; avid WHEREAS, the establishment of an arts facility at this location is consistent with the recommendations of the Maas Brothers Task Force; and WHEREAS, the City Cormmission finds that the sale of the property to the Florida Gulf Coast Art Center, Inc., for the purpose of establishing an arts facility, as described herein, would be in the best interest of the residents of the City and would serve a proper public purpose; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that the purchase price set forth herein is a fair price for the property, considering the use limitations to be imposed upon the property, the right of reverter to be retained by the City, and other considerations; and WHEREAS, the City Commission further finds that a sale of the property to i i 4' ¦ the highest competitive bid above the appraised value would not necessarily be in the public interest, and desires instead to proceed as if the property were being given away or donated subject to the approval of the voters of the City at a referendum to be held for such purpose; now, thereFore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section I. The eastern half, more or less, of the property known as the "Maas Brothers" property, as described more particularly in Exhibit A to this ordinance (which eastern half, more or less, is referred to herein as the "Property"), consisting of approximately 85,125 square feet, is hereby declared to be surplus and no longer needed for public use. Section 2. The sale of the Property to the Florida Gulf Coast Art Center, Inc. (the "Center"), for the sum of $750,000.00 is hereby approved subject to the following terms and conditions, which shall be incorporated in the contract for sale and purchase of the Property, shall survive closing, and shall be incorporated in the instrument of conveyance as covenants and restrictions to run with the land and be binding upon heirs, successor-s and assigns of the Center: (a) The Property shall be used as an arts facility, which is defined to mean [insert or attach a definition or description of the facility], and for no other purpose. The first draft of this definition or description will be prepared by the Center, and will include all primary and incidental uses to be allowed, such as a civic room with food service and dining facilities. (b) The City shall demolish the existing building on the Property at the City's expense prior to closing. Notwithstanding the demolition of the building, the Center, shall have the right to construct its building on the whole Property subject to applicable setback, open space, vista, and other requirements of the City's Code of Ordinances. (c) The development of the Property by the Center shall be subject to the 2 j! 4 I A ¦ applicable ordinances of the City, and the site plan shall be subject to review and approval by the City Commission, in the same manner and subject to the same rules which apply to similarly situated properties. The site plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Provision for'ali of the Center's required parking on the site, and provision for access and parking easements to and from other parking facilities which may be constructed on adjacent properties, to be granted by the Center to the City, matched by similar easements to be granted by the City to the Center, to accommodate reciprocal and shared usage of on-site and off-site parking facilities by the Center and its employees and patrons and by the general public; 2. Provision for retention of stormwater as required by the City for new developments, which may include on-site and off-site drainage and retention easements to be established as part of a master drainage plan for the City-owned property north of Cleveland Street and west of Osceola Avenue, as may be approved by the City; and 3. Provision for a civic room/auditorium to be not less than 350 and not more than 500 seats. (d) The Center shall observe the following schedule: e.) 1. The closing on the sale shall be not later than November 3, 1994. 2. A complete and acceptable application for the building permit for the building shall be filed with the City not later than November 3, 1995. "Complete and acceptable" means that the application is complete in all respects and accompanied by plans which comply with the requirements of the Clearwater Code of Ordinances, all fees have been paid, and any variances or approvals of other governmental agencies, if any are required, shall have been obtained. 3. Construction of the building shall commence within six months of issuance of the building permit, and the construction shall be prosecuted to completion such that the certificate of occupancy shall be issued not later than 3 i h 1 ? November 3, 1997. After commencement of construction, the Center and the City shall agree to reasonable extensions of time when necessary for reasons beyond the control of the Center, provided that such extensions shall not extend the deadline for completion of construction beyond November 3, 1998. (e) The Center shall cause its financial records to be audited annually, and shall provide a copy of the audit report to the City not later than December 31 each year. (f) Beginning with the month of January, 1993 and ending on the month S prior to closing, the Center shall pay to the city the sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.DD) on or before the 15th day of each month during such term. The monthly payments from the Center to the City shall be nonrefundable` and shall be paid as additional consideration over and above the Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($750,000.00) purchase price for the purpose of defraying the out--of-pocket costs incurred by the City when maintaining the Maas Brothers building. The center shall be relieved of its obligation to continue payments under this sub-section after (1) the City exercises its rights of reverter; or (2) the Center notifies the City of its inability to close the purchase of the ti Property thereby terminating the contract. In no event shall the sum of all payments made under this sub-section exceed Thirty-Three Thousand Dollars ($33,000.00). (g) The Center may not assign, convey, transfer or encumber any of its rights under this ordinance, or the contract for purchase and sale of the Property or any of its rights thereunder, or the Property or any rights therein, without the express prior consent of the City. The conversion of the corporate status of the Center from a corporation not for profit to a corporation for profit, or from a nonstock nonprofit corporation to a stock share nonprofit corporation, shall require notice to and the approval of the City prior to such conversion. 4 r MT M (h) The Center is a tax-exempt organization pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of the United States, and has represented to the City that it intends to retain its tax-exempt status indefinitely as an inducement to the City to adopt this ordinance and enter into the contract for the sale and purchase of the Property. The Center has further represented to the City that it intends to develop, operate, and manage the Property so as to qualify for exemption from property taxes. The loss of such tax-exempt status, from income taxes or property taxes, shall constitute a material breach of these covenants and grounds for the City to invoke the right of reverter retained by, the City, unless the loss of tax-exempt status is due to reasons beyond the control of the Center such as changes in federal or state tax law. Nevertheless, in the event of loss of such tax-exempt status, the Center shall pay all such taxes when due and shall not permit any tax to become a lien upon the Property or any improvements thereto. It is understood that the Property shall not be exempt from special assessments, if any, which may be levied for improvements benefitting the Property. (i) The City retains a right of reverter which may be invoked, at the r option of the City, at any time upon violation or noncompliance with the covenants and restrictions of the Center set forth in this section, following notice of such violation or noncompliance to be given by the City to the Center and a reasonable opportunity for the Center to take curative action. The right of reverter shall be, superior to all liens and encumbrances and shall not be subordinated by the City to any other lien or encumbrance, except tax liens. It is the intent of the parties that, in the event of such reversion, the Property shall return to the City free and clear of encumbrances upon the Property and any improvements thereto. Section 3. In addition to the terms and conditions set forth in Section 2 above, the sale shall be subject to the terms and conditions of a contract for 5 purchase and sale to be entered into between the City and the Center not later than September 30, 1992, the original of which shall be maintained on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Section Q. The proposed sale shall be subject to approval by the qualified voters of the City. A special election for such purpose shall be conducted on Tuesday, November 3, 1992, in conjunction with the general election, and the proposed sale shall be deemed approved upon the affirmative vote of a majority' of the voters of the City voting at that time upon the following ballot question: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA REFERENDUM QUESTION City of Clearwater Ordinance 5283-92 proposes to sell the eastern portion of the "Maas Brothers" property, after demolition of the building by the City, to the Florida Gulf Coast Art Center, Inc., t for $150,000.00. The property shall be used only as an arts facility, as defined in the ordinance, with a right of reverter to the City. The proposal includes access, parking and drainage , s i easements over nearby City-owned property. t Shall Ordinance 5283-92 Ue approved? ' Yes (for the sale) No (against the sale) i Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption, except that the proposed sale of the Property shall be subject to a contract for sale and purchase to be entered into between the City and the Center, and shall be subject to approval by the voters of the City as provided in Section 4. r` 6 °1 0 1, Section 66, This ordinance shall be recorded in. the public 'records of Pinellas County, Florida, following approval by the voters of the City as provided in Section 4. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL. READING AND ADOPTED Rita Garvey Mayon-Commissioner Attest: Approved as to form and correctness: Cynthia E. Gou eau M. A. Ga bran Jr City Clerk City Attorney is 3 S l ! ' t ' • t a? r ' • , r - DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY „ ::'.. Insert a description of the property, _ SUBJECT Avenue) TO [retain easement over S.E. corner {o r radial return for Osceola TOGETHER building] WITH [describe the . Angress-egress easement to the west of the 1 i' " 1 ! ? . • ' 7174[[ n ? yl. ¦ 4 f ail MEM0RANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: She Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney I Maas Brothers/Arts Facility Ordinance September 17, 1992 For tonight's 'meeting, a revised Ordinance 5283-92 has been prepared and a copy is enclosed. Section 2(a) has been changed' to delete the blank and the note that the Arts Center would prepare the description of an "arts facility." Instead, a reference to Exhibit B has been inserted. Exhibit A, the legal description of the property, and Exhibit B, the description of an "arts facility," have been added. Exhibit B is the same as the description that was faxed to you yesterday. The only other changes were made to reduce a 7-page ordinance to a 6-page ordinance. In Subsection (f) on page 4, the words-and-numerals dollar figures were changed to simple numerals (for example, "one thousand five hundred dollars" was deleted where "$1,500.00" appears). On page 6, the ballot question is now single-spaced. Procedurally, you should move to amend the ordinance by adding Exhibits A and B. The other changes are of such a nature that a formal motion to amend is not required. (Be prepared to be given a revised Exhibit A tonight. We are conveying the land subject to"'the retention of a radial return at Cleveland and Osceola, but that retention is not yet included in Exhibit A.) MAG:a Enclosure Copy: Michael Wright, City Manager Cynthia Goudeau, City Clerk Tim Mariani, Esquire ?fr? ) t? 1. t L r 0 s ORDINANCE 110. 5283-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, PROVIDING THAT A PORTION OF THE "MAAS BROTHERS PROPERTY" BE SOLD FOR $750,000.00 TO THE FLORIDA GULF COAST ART CENTER, INC., TO BE DEVELOPED, MAINTAINED, AND OPERATED AS AN ARTS FACILITY, AS DEFINED HEREIN; DECLARING SUCH PROPERTY TO BE SURPLUS AND NO LONGER NEEDED FOR PUBLIC USE; PROVIDING FOR USE RESTRICTIONS AND A REVERTER CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 1992, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION IN ORDER TO SUBMIT THE PROPOSED SALE TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THE CITY FOR APPROVAL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 2.01(d) of the Charter of the City of Clearwater provides that no real property shall be given away or donated without the prior approval of the qualified voters of the City at referendum, and that the real property must be declared surplus and no longer needed for public use at an advertised public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Florida Gulf Coast Art Center, Inc., has proposed to construct, maintain, and operate an arts facility, as described herein, to be located on a portion of the "Maas Brothers" property at Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue, to be purchased in accordance with the terms set forth in this ordinance; and t WHEREAS, the establishment of an arts facility at this location is consistent with the recommendations of the Maas Brothers Task Force; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that the sale of the property to the Florida Gulf Coast Art Center, Inc., for the purpose of establishing an arts f aciIity, as described herein, would be in the best interest of the residents of the City and would serve a proper public purpose; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that the purchase price set forth herein is a fair price for the property, considering the use limitations to be imposed upon the property, the right of reverter to be retained by the City, and other considerations; and WHEREAS, the City Commission further finds that a sale of the property, to I 0 the highest competitive bid above the appraised value would not necessarily be in the public interest, and desires instead to proceed as if the property were being given away or donated subject to the approval of the voters of the City at a referendum to be held for such purpose; now, therefore, E BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLbRIDA: ;A Section 1. The eastern half, more or less, of the property known as the "Maas Brothers" property, as described more particularly in Exhibit A to this ordinance (which eastern half, more or less, is referred to herein as the "Property"), consisting of approximately 85,125 square feet, is hereby declared to be surplus and no longer needed for public use. Section 2. The sale of the Property to the Florida Gulf Coast Art Center, Inc. (the "Center"), for the sum of $750,000.00 is hereby approved subject to the following terms and conditions, which shall be incorporated in the contract for sale' and purchase of the Property, shall survive closing, and shall be r I incorporated in the instrument of conveyance as covenants and restrictions to run with the land and be binding upon heirs, successors and assigns of the Center: (a) The Property shall be used as an arts facility, which is defined to 3 i mean as set forth in Exhibit B to this ordinance, and for no other purpose. { (b) The City shall demolish the existing building on the Property at the City's expense prior to closing. Notwithstanding the demolition of the building, the Center shall have the right to construct its building on the whole Property subject to applicable setback, open space, vista, and other requirements of the City's Code of Ordinances. (c) The development of the Property by the Center shall be subject to the applicable ordinances of the City, and the site plan shall be subject to review and approval by the City Commission, in the same manner and subject to the same rules which apply to similarly situated properties. The site plan shall include, 2 w 11 but not be limited to, the following: 1. Provision for all of the Center's required parking on the site, and provision for access and parking easements to and from other parking facilities i, which may be constructed on adjacent properties, to be granted by the Center to the City, matched by similar easements to be granted by the City to the Center, to accommodate reciprocal and shared usage of on-site and off-site parking facilities by the Center and its employees and patrons and by the general public; 2. Provision for retention of stormwater as required by the City for new developments, which may include on-site and off-site drainage and retention easements to be established as part of a master drainage plan for the City-owned property north of Cleveland Street and west of Osceola Avenue, as may be approved by the City; and 3. Provision for a civic roam/auditorium to be not less than 350 and not more than 500 seats. (d) The Center shall observe the following schedule: 1. The closing on the sale shall be not later than November 3, 1994. 2. A complete and acceptable application for the building permit for the building sha 11 be f i led with the City, not later than November 3, 1995. "Complete and acceptable" means that the application is complete in all respects and accompanied by plans which comply with the requirements of the Clearwater Code of ordinances, all fees have been paid, and any variances or approvals of other governmental agencies, if any are required, shall have been obtained. 3. Construction of the building shall commence within six months of issuance of the building permit, and the construction shall be prosecuted to completion such that the certificate of occupancy shall be issued riot later than November 3, 1997. After commencement of construction, the Center and the City shall agree to reasonable extensions of time when necessary for reasons beyond the control of the Center, provided that such extensions shall not extend the I! 3 N deadline for completion of construction beyond November 3, 1998. (e) The Center shall cause its financial records to be audited annually, and shall provide a copy of the audit report to the City not later than December 31 each year. (f) Beginning with the month of January, 1993, and ending on the month I prior to closing, the Center shall pay to the city the sum of $1,500..00 on or before the 15th day of each month during such term. The monthly payments from the Center to the City shall be nonrefundable and shall be paid as additional consideration over and above the $750,000.00 purchase price for the purpose of defraying the out-of-pocket costs incurred by the City when maintaining the Maas Brothers building. The center shad be relieved of its obligation to continue payments under this sub--section after the City exercises its rights of reverter, or after the Center notifies the City of its inability to close the purchase of the Property, thereby terminating the contract. In no event shall the sum of all payments made under this sub-section exceed $33,000.00. (g) The Center may not assign, convey, transfer or encumber any of its rights under this ordinance, or the contract for purchase and sale of the Property or any of its rights thereunder, or the Property or any rights therein, without the express prior consent of the City. The conversion of the corporate status of the Center from a corporation not for profit to a corporation for profit, or from a nonstock nonprofit corporation to a stock share nonprofit corporation, shall require notice to and the approval of the City prior to such conversion. (h) The Center is a tax-exempt organization pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of the United States, and has represented to the i City that it intends to retain its tax-exempt status indefinitely as an inducement to the City to adopt this ordinance and enter into the contract for the sale and purchase of the Property. The Center has further represented to the R r i +H +w E N? 1 i i 1?1 sM M " City that it intends to develop, operate, and manage the Property so as to qualify for exemption from property taxes. The loss of such tax-exempt status, from income taxes or property taxes, shall constitute a material breach of these covenants and grounds for the City to invoke the right of reverter retained by the City, unless the loss of tax-exempt status is due to reasons beyond the control of the Center such as changes in federal or state tax law. Nevertheless, in the event of loss of such tax-exempt status, the Center shall pay all such taxes when'due and shall not permit any tax to become a lien upon the Property or any improvements thereto. It is understood that the Property shall not be exempt from special assessments, if any, which may be levied for improvements i benefitting the Property, (i) The City retains a right of reverter which may be invoked, at the j option of the City, - at any time upon violation or noncompliance with the covenants and restrictions of the Center set forth in this section, following notice of such violation or noncompliance to be given by the City to the Center and a reasonable opportunity for the Center to take curative action. The right of reverter shall be superior to all liens and encumbrances and shall not be subordinated by the City to any other lien or encumbrance, except tax liens. It is the intent of the parties that, in the event of such reversion, the Property t? shall return to the City free and clear of encumbrances upon the Property and any improvements thereto. Section 3. In addition to the terms and conditions set forth in Section 2 above, the sale shall be subject to the terms and conditions of a contract for purchase and sale to be entered into between the City and the Center not later than September 30, 1992, the original of which shall be maintained on file in the e Office of the City Clerk. Section A. The proposed sale shall be subject to approval by the qualified voters of the City. A special election for such purpose shall be conducted on 1 5 i i 1 4 q Tuesday, November 3, 1992, in conjunction with the general- election, and the proposed sale shall be deemed approved upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the voters of the City voting at that time upon the following ballot question: CITY OF CLEARWATER,-FLORIDA REFERENDUM QUESTION City of Clearwater Grdinance 5283-92 proposes to sell. the eastern portion of -the "Maas Brothers" property, after demolition of the building by, the City, to the Florida Gulf Coast Art Center, Inc., for $750,000.00. The property shall be used only as an arts facility, as defined in the ordinance, with a right of reverter to the City, 1'he proposal includes access, parking and drainage easements over nearby City-owned property. i F Shall Ordinance 5283-92 be approved? Yes (for the sale) No (against the sale) Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoptiod, except that the proposed sale of the property shall be subject to a contract for sale and purchase to be entered into between the City and the Center, and shall be subject to approval by the voters of the City as provided in Section 4, Section 6. This ordinance shall be recorded in the public records of. Pinellas County, Florida, following approval by the voters of the City as provided in Section 4. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED 4 Rita Garvey Mayor-Comm is s i oner , Attest: Approved as to form and correctness: Cynthia E. Gou eau City Clerk 6 z M. A. Ga bran , Jr. City Attorney m r.° . F i ' Lot 3, less the Fast 15 feet thereof, and all of Lots 4 and 5 Edward Mill's Subdivision •i , according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 36, of the public r ecords of Pinellas County, Florida, and a portion of Lots I and 1-A, Rompon's & Baskin's Corrected Map of Causewa B i y us ness District, according to the plat thereof recorded in' Plat Book 57 Pa , ges I and-.2, of the public records of- Pinellas County, Florida, being mor described a s follows: e particularly BEGIN at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1, thence S 01026117" F along the East line of said Lot ., , Land-the West line 15 feet of said Lot 3, said line also being the West right-?of-waySli of Osceola Avenue fo 22 } , r ne 4.38 feet to a point on the South line of said Lot 3; thence N 89°58'26" I-l along the South line 3 4 and 5 d f , o , an said lots the South Zinc: of said Lot 1-A, said line also being the North right-of-way line of Clevela d f n Street, for 389.00 feet,, thence departing said line, run 11 00'00'15" 44 fo point 2 h r on t 17.30 feet to a e North line of said Lot 1; thence along the North line of said Lot 1 for the followin t g wo (2) courses: for 172.65 feet; (2) N 88°07' 14" E for 210 BEGINNING stileo " F 85 feet lt . o . PAINT INT OF i. k 1; ? i 3 i i EXHIBIT A w The Property shall be used as an arts facility and for no other purpose. The term "arts facility" is defined as a non--profit institution which is recognized as an, organ i zat ion exempt from federa 1 i ncome tax under Section 501(c) ('3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which is essentially educational and aesthetic in purpose, which owns, borrow-, and/or leases art objects and cares for them for the general purposes of encouraging the appreciation of, advancing the skills relating to, and pHromoting the understanding of the visual arts. To further the general purposes of the arts facility, the institution shall have the right: 1. To promote education in the arts and humanities; 2. To build, equip, maintain and operate studios for the development of production skills relating to art; 3. To maintain museums and other facilities for the preservation, display, appreciation and performance of art, including buildings, equipment, galleries, lecture halls, classrooms, roadways, parking facilities and related structures; 4. To maintain a library for the collection of books, manuscripts, periodicals, photographs, films and other similar data relating to art; 5. To cooperate with the United States Government, the State of Florida and their various political subdivisions and with civic, educational and artistic groups and foundations in the encouragement of the creation and appreciation of art of all kind; 6. To build, equip, maintain, operate and lease a community room; 7. To build, equip, maintain, operate and lease dining and/or catering facilities, provided however, that the total square footage of any restaurant .,which may be operated shall not exceed 25 percent of the total square footage of the art facility, exclusive of parking areas, terraces and outdoor patios; 8. To build, equip, maintain and operate all facilities ancillary to the general and specific purposes described above, provided, however, that the operation of all ancillar facilities shall be limited to the activities specified in Section 501(c?(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the regulations thereunder. EXHIBIT B 9,P?d EA `?04 Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum I 4Z__ l Heeti e: 09/17/92 PUBLIC SUBJECT: Lease Agreement with International Association of Firefighters (IAFF) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Declare surplus property described as Coachman's Heights Revised, Block C, the westerly 110 feet of Lots 4 through 6, except the right-of-way for Court Street, located at 401 S. Prospect and approve the lease of the property to the International Association of Firefighters (IAFF). ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The IAFF has requested to lease the small frame construction outbuilding next to the present Utilities building on South Prospect. That building, formerly occupied by Utilities, is vacant and in need of a tenant to provide security and upkeep through use. The IAFF does not now have a separate facility for its headquarters that is adequate to its needs and will provide the caretaking and occupancy that will benefit the property. The IAFF is being offered a nominal lease similar to the Haven House recently approved by the Commission with the Pinellas County Arts Council. The vacant Utilities outbuilding has been offered to other City-related activities. All unions were notified of houses on Fast End properties for disposal. The IAFF was the only union which approached staff and the only activity to express a sincere interest in using the building. The 1AF1= is willing to assume responsibility for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance which could cost up to $10,000 to $15,000 and, even though a non-profit organization, has agreed to a monthly rental of $275 or a total of $16,500 for the five-year lease term. In exchange, the City will pay such taxes and fees on the property that may be due. The City Commission is requested to consider and approve the lease agreement with the IAFF for the Utilities outbuilding at 401 South Prospect which contains the following major provisions: (1) terns is for five years renewable for an additional five years; (2) the IAFF will perform all structural, exterior and interior maintenance; (3) City will retain the responsibility to maintain the grounds to insure proper maintenance of the City's xeriscape exhibit partially located on the [eased premises; (4) the IAFF will take actions necessary to comply with the ADA; and (5) the City is responsible for all taxes and fees on the property which could be approximately $3,100 per year. The first quarter budget review for FY 1992/93 will establish the revenue budget of $3,300.00 ($275.00/month) in the General Fund Operating Budget and the offsetting expenditure of $3,100,00 in the General Fund Non-departmental Budget to provide the funds to pay fees and taxes on the property. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs: $ 3,100.00 Commission Action: Legal WAS Total d Approved Budget A d / diti s Purchasing L S 0 pprove w con on _ Risk Mgmt. cis NIA User Dept: Current Fisea[ Yr. Denied ? ! ACM Funding Source: f si Continued to. Other 17 Capital imp. Advertised; perating Attachments: Oate: p o Paper: Tribune 17 N d R i re ot equ submi Affected Parties Appropriation Code: 4 None 13 Notified . 010-1-7000 city Man, cr ® Not Required U LEASE AGREEMENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS This lease agreement is made and entered into this day of 1992, by and between the City of Clearwater, a Florida municipality, herein called the "Lessor", and the International Association of Firefighters, a non-profit membership organization formed under Florida Statute 305c , herein called the "Lessee". This agreement represents the whole and entire agreement between Lessor and Lessee and the following articles and sections are herein incorporated: ARTICLES Article I. TITLE :. Article II. TERM Article III. LEASEHOLD Article IV. RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES Section 1. Use of Premises 2. Maintenance of Premises r; 3. Repair and Improvements 4. Utilities 5. Quiet enjoyment Article V. LEASE RENTAL FEES AND PAYMENTS Article VI. TAXES AND FEES Article VII. INSURANCE Section 1. Minimum Scope of Insurance 2. Minimum Limits of Insurance 3. Additional Named Insured 4. Verification of Coverage Article VIII. DAMAGE TO OR DESTRUCTION OF PREMISES Section 1. Reparable Damage 2. Catastrophic Damage 3. Waiver of Recovery Rights Article IX. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION Article X. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT Article XI. NON--DISCRIMINATION Section 1. No Exclusion From Use 2. No Exclusion From Hire 3.-Observation of Various Laws 4. Breach of Nondiscrimination Covenants Article XII. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES Article XIII. ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE Article XIV. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION :i Article XV. RADON GAS ADVISORY Article XVI. NOTICE Article XVII. EFFECTIVE DATE i" t i 1 , 1 t. i i 1 ` F ii W I T N E S 3 E T H: WHEREAS, the Lessor has ownership of and control over the use of the city-owned structures and premises herein described and WHEREAS, Lessee desires to use such premises for public purposes; and WHEREAS, Lessor desires to lease out such premises; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the Premises and the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement, the Lessor and Lessee hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE I. TITLE The title of this lease is the International Firefighters office lease. ARTICLE II. TERM The term of this lease shall be for a period of five (5) years commencing on the day of October, 1992 and continuing through the 30th day of September 1997 ( the Termination Date), unless earlier terminated under the terms of this agreement. Lessor extends a first option to Lessee to renew this lease agreement, for an additional five (year) lease period, upon the same terms and conditions. ARTICLE III. LEASEHOLD The Lessor leases to the Lessee the following described property,' including all improvements thereon, located in Pinellas county, Florida, to wit: The Westerly 110 feet of Lots 4 thru 6, Block C, Coachman Heights Revised, as recorded in Plat book 20, Page 26 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, less and except the right-of--way for Court Street. ARTICLE IV. RIGHTS AND RESPONSIHILxTIES Section 1. Use of Premises. Lessee shall use 'the demised premises for an office and meeting space and for no other purpose. Lessee covenants and agrees to make no unlawful, improper, or offensive use of the leased premises. At the termination of this lease, Lessee agrees to'return premises to the Lessor in as good condition as at the effective date of this agreement. Section 2. Maintenance of Premises. The Lessee shall properly ! maintainithe leasehold in a clean and orderly condition. 2 t , section 2. Maintenance of Premises. The Lessee shall properly maintain the leasehold in a clean and orderly condition. section 3. Repairs and Improvements. a. Lessee may make whatever repairs, alterations and improvements to the premises it deems, necessary providing that the Lessor first agrees in writing to any such actions to repair, alter or improve the premises. If the property's physical condition falls into a state of disrepair in the opinion of the City Building Official, the Lessor may terminate this Agreement upon fifteen (15) days written notice. b. Repairs, alterations or improvements attached to the premises shall become the property of Lessor upon the termination or expiration of this lease or any extension hereof unless otherwise indicated by the Lessor. Section 4. Utilities. Lessee shall pay all bills for electrical and utility services before such bills become delinquent. Section 5_._ Quiet Enjoyment. Upon paying the rents herein required, and upon observing and performing the covenants, terms and conditions required by the lease, the Lessee shall peaceably and quietly hold and enjoy the leased premises for the term of the lease without hinderance or interruption by the Lessor. ARTICLE V. LEASE RENTAL FEES AND PAYMENTS Al section 1. Rental Fee. Lessee shall pay a total rental of Sixteen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ( $ 16,500 ) plus applicable sales taxes. section 2. Payment. Lessee shall remit payment monthly in equal amounts of Two Hundred Seventy Five Dollars ( $ 275 ) plus applicable sales tax. Each monthly payment shall be due and payable in advance on the first day of the month, starting the effective date of this agreement. Section 3. Delinquent -Payment. Monthly payments not made on or before the tenth day of the month due shall be considered delinquent. Any amount determined to be delinquent shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12 % ) per annum from date due until paid, plus a late charge of Ten Dollars ( $ 10 ) to cover partially Lessor's expenses in collecting such delinquency. Section 4. Place of Payment. All payments due Lessor from Lessee shall be delivered, to the Finance Department, City of Clearwater, P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748. 3 ARTICLE VI, TAXES AND FEES Lessor agrees to pay any real property taxes and impact fees that may be assessed and levied on the property or on the leasehold created by this document. ARTICLE VI1. INSURANCE Lessee shall procure and maintain during the term of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with this lease. Section 1. Minimum scope of Insurance. A Comprehensive General Liability policy covering the leased premises and activities occurring thereon shall be obtained and maintained in force by the Lessee. Section 2. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Insurance procured,in accordance with this article shall have minimum coverage limits of $300,000 for all occurrences and activities on premises. Section 3. Additional Named Insured. Each insurance policy issued as a requirement of this agreement shall name the City of Clearwater, Lessor, as additional named insured. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Lessor, its officials, employees or volunteers. .Section 4. verification of Coverage.. Lessee shall furnish the Lessor with Certificates of Insurance with all endorsements affecting coverage required by this article. These forms shall be received and approved by the Lessor's Risk Manager before execution of this Lease agreement by authorized City officials. ARTICLE VIII. CASUALTY DAMAGE TO PREMISES Section 1. Reparable Damage. Any time the building or premises is damaged or destroyed to the extent that the Lessee cannot therefore conduct its activities and the Lessor determines that the demised premises can be restored by making appropriate repairs, Lessee shall effect such repairs expeditiously and to the satisfaction of the City's Building Official. A $2,000 band or irrevocable letter of credit to guarantee the completion of such restoration shall be posted with the Lessor by the Lessee upon the execution of this lease by both parties to this agreement. Section 2. Catastrophic Damage. In the event of total destruction of or catastrophic damage to the demised premises, the Lessee or Lessor may terminate this lease as of the date of such damage or upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party to this lease. Section 3. Waiver of Recover Rights. Both parties waive any and all rights of recovery against ti)e other party for any direct or indirect loss occurring to the demised premises in the event of damage categorized in Sections 1 & 2 above which is covered by insurance. ARTICLE IX. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION Lessee agrees to asoume all risks of the Premises and all liability therefore, and shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Lessor, its officers, agents, and employees from and against any and all loss, liability and damages of whatever nature, to persons and property, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, death of any person and los's of the use of any property except arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of°Lessor or Lessor's agents or employees. This includes, but is not limited to, matters arising out of or claimed to have been caused by or in any manner related to the Premises or Lessee's activities or those of any approved or unapproved invitee, contractor, subcontractor, or other person approved, authorized, or permitted by Lessee in or about the Premises whether or not based on negligence. ARTICLE X. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT Lessee hereby affirms its intention to take any and all such actions that are reasonable and prudent to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 ( known as the ADA ). These would include modifications to the structure, revisions in operations and supporting communications capabilities and procedures and changes in functional location and layout. ARTICLE XI. NON-DISCRIMINATION Notwithstanding any other provision of this lease agreement, during the performance of this agreement, Lessee for itself, personal representatives, successors in interest and assigns, as part of the consideration for this agreement, does covenant and agree, that: Section 1. No Exclusion From Use. No person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination in the use of the premises on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, age, or national origin. Section 2.. NQ_Exclusion From _Hire. In the construction of any I improvements on, over, or under the premises, and the furnishing of services therein or thereon, no person shall be excluded from ' participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination on the grounds of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 5 Section 3. Observance of Various Laws._ The lessee shall observe the following laws: section I of the 14th Amendment, The Equal Pay Act, The Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1870, the Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Act, the standards of Merit System Personnel Administration, Executive Order 12246 as amended, Revised Order 4, the Age Discrimination Act of 1967, the Rehabilitation Act of 1975, Executive Order 11914 and the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. Section 4. Breach of Nondiscrimination Covenants. In the event of breach of any of the above nondiscrimination covenants, which breach has been finally adjudicated by an appropriate agency or court of law, the lessor shall have the right to terminate this lease and to re-enter and repossess the premises and hold the same as if said agreement had never been made or issued. This provision does not become effective until the procedures of 49 Code of Federal Regulations(CFR) Part 23, have been followed and completed, including expiration of appeal rights. ARTICLE XII. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties on the subject, hereof and may not be changed, modified or discharged except by written Amendment duly executed by both parties. Lessee agrees that no representations or warranties shall be binding upon the Lessor unless expressed in writing herein or in a duly executed Amendment hereof. Further, Lessor does not warrant and hereby disclaims any and all liability and responsibility for or on account of the condition of the Premises, or any portions thereof, or for or on account of anything affecting such conditions. ARTICLE XIII. ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE This Lease, or any part thereof or interest therein, may not be assigned, transferred or subleased by Lessee without the consent of the Lessor, which consent shall not unreasonably be withheld. It is understood and agreed that the Lessor may, at any time, with notice, assign or delegate any or all of its rights hereunder. ARTICLE XIV. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION section l.Termination b Lessee. This Agreement shall be subject to termination by Lessee in the event of any one or more of the following events: a. Lessor determines at a duly constituted City Commission meeting that the building or property (said premises) is needed for other municipal services and serves Lessee with sixty (60) days notice of such intended use. b. Lessor determines that the premises are so extensively damaged by some casualty that it is impractical or inequitable to repair such leased premises. 6 c. Material default by the Lessor in the performance of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this agreement, and in the failure of the Lessor to remedy, or undertake to remedy, to Lessee's satisfaction, such default for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt of notice from Lessee to remedy the same. Section 2. Termination by Lessor.. This Agreement shall be subject to termination by the Lessor in the event of any one or more of the following events: a. The material default by Lessee in the performance of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Lease Agreement, and in the failure of the Lessee to remedy, or undertake to remedy, to Lessor's satisfaction such default for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt of notice from Lessor to remedy same. b. The Lessor determines that a municipal need exists consistent with the City's charter. C. Lessee's vacating or abandoning the premises. section 3. Exercise. a. Exercise of the rights of termination set forth in Articles 1 and 2, above, shall be by notice to the other party. Forbearance of timely notice shall not be deemed a waiver of any breach. b. In the event Lessor exercises right of termination by virtue of Section 2b (above), Lessor agrees to pay Lessee for'the value of any improvements, equipment or furnishings that Lessee finds impractical or impossible to remove. Lessor agrees to compensate Lessee for the fair and just value of such improvements, equipment or furnishings as adjusted for normal wear and tear. Section 4. Removal of Property. Upon termination of this agreement for any reason, Lessee, at its sole expense, shall remove from the Premises all signs, trade fixtures, furnishings, personal property, equipment and materials which Lessee was permitted to install or maintain under the rights granted herein. Lessor may effect such removal at Lessee's expense should Lessee fail to remove said installed property within thirty (30) days notice. Lessee agrees to pay Lessor promptly in the event of such circumstance upon presentation of a proper invoice. Section S. Causes of Breach and Waiver. a. Neither party shall be held to be in breach of this Agreement because of any failure to perform any of its obligations hereunder if said failure is due to any cause for which it is not responsible and over which it has no control; provided, however, that the foregoing provision shall not apply to of failure of Lessee to provide the amounts of insurance contained in Article VIl of the Agreement. b. The waiver of any breach, violation or default in or with respect to the performance or observance of the covenants and conditions contained herein shall, not be taken to constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach, violation or default in or with respect to the same or any other covenant or condition hereof. 7 1f n 0 11, ARTICLE XV. RADON GAS ADVISORY Florida Statutes, the required by section'-404-056(B), As owin; Lessee shall take note of the fall occurring radioactive gas RADON GAS: Radon is a naturally that; when it has accumulated in sks itoi g in su who ficientare quantities, may present health r pers ex osed to it over time. Levels in° buildings i n Florida p e been found and state guidelines hav radon and radon testing may Additional information county public health unit. be obtained from your ARTICLE XVI. NOTICE i.ven by one party to the other in connection with Any notice gcertified mail, return receipt the Lease shall be sent by an fees prepaid: requested, with postage 11 1 1. If to Lessor, addressed to: City Manager City.of Clearwater Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748 2. if to Lessee, addressed to: President International Association of Firefighters 401 S. Prospect Clearwater, Florida 34618 8 i k ARTICLE XVII. EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this lease shall be the first day of October, 1992- I 0( r ' s 1 s• .Y; k I es ' 7 '1 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals this day of 1992. Countersigned: CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: Mayor-Commissioner city Manager Approved as to•f orm and correctness: Attest: i M.A. Galbraith, Jr. Cynthia E. Goudeau City Attorney City Clerk Witnesses as to Lessee: INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS By: Ed Hooper " President 4 ' k Attest: ?• ' 71 l • L F' 9 E TO: Ed Hooper . FROM: Sue Phillips' DATE: May .15, 1992 Property at 401 Prospect Street: Assessed: Building $ 340 (Assessed at $49,7$01Disc Land 1115 S60 ounted to $35,340) • $150,000 Discounted again Total assessed value is 134 700. The 1991 mall rate was 22.574 (per $1,000) r 1 t F .5 . T, E r TO: FROM: COPIES: SUBJECT: i. DATE : C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R znterdepartment correspondence Sheet ?)v Kathy Rice, Deputy City Manager Earl Barrett, Real Estate Services Manager Mfile Market rental rate survey re 401 So. Prospect Avenue July 8, 1992 I have obtained the following information regarding business property rental rates in the vicinity of the noted property pursuant to your request delivered by Susan Phillips on 7/6/92. The rates vary considerably from property to property, and can be generally described as "modified--gro^s" rates, i.e., the tenant is usually responsible only for interior zodifications such as carpeting, wall partitions, painting, decorating, janitorial, etc., and the tenant's own electric and telephone expenses. The property owner usually pays for exterior painting and maintenance, roof repair/replacement, any parking facility maintenance, taxes, casualty insurance, lawn care, management expenses, etc. The following rent figures were obtained from property owners or their agents: 325 South Garden - 1,000 S.F. at $6.00/S.F., street parking only. 807E Court St. - 1,000 S.F. at $5.40/S.F., two off street parking spaces. (owner said he would be glad to get $4.00/S.F.) 825 Court St. - 1,440 S.F. at $8.00/S.F., two off street parking spaces. Rent includes maintenance and utilities. 606 Court St, - 1,000 S.F.-at $8.50/S.F., street parking only. 325 Garden Ave. - 1,000 S.F. at $6.00/S.F., street parking only. 615 So. Missouri - ? S.F. at $7.50/S.F., off street parking. 629 Franklin St. - ? S.F. at $5.33/S.F., off street parking. In speaking with several Realtors the general opinion was that downtown commercial retail/office space in small Class B'or C buildings of this type should rent for $7.00 to $8.00 per square foot on a "modified-gross" type lease, although actual rents appear to be lower. 1 project that under this type lease the landlord's cost for items detailed in paragraph two would run $2.50 $3,50 per square foot plus vacancy and collection losses of five to ten percent, creating an effective net rental rate of a) perhaps $3.00 to $4.00 per square foot, tops. 0 The City building at 401 5o. Prospect is an older wood frame structure built in 1940, containing 1,953 square feet of space, ? two central air systems and three full baths according the Pinellas County Property Appraiser records. The total 1.991 C'? assessed value of the property was $150,900. If the property were on the tax rolls property taxes would have been about $3,272 in 1991. I have walked through the property with Dave Daiker of the Firefighters Association. There'appears to be active termite infestation, a leaking roof, badly deteriorated wood soffit in some areas, other deferred maintenance. Landscaping is excellent and maintained by Parks and Recreation. The maintenance and repairs noted above should be addressed as soon as possible to prevent further property deterioration. Please give me a call at 6638 if you need anything further on this matter. i r z CITYR%OF; CLEARWATER INT ERDEPARTMENT -CORRSgON9EVTR TO: Michael Wright, City Manager " %A C FROM: Dan Deignan, Finance Directo J COPIES: Kathy Rice, Deputy City Manager Betty Deptula, Assistant City Manager Jeff Harper, Director of Administrative Services Robert Davidson, Fire Chief Al Galbraith, City Attorney SUBJECT: Taxability of Property Leased to IAFF DATE: September 16, 1992 _j At your request we have researched the question of the taxability status of the City property proposed to be leased to the IAFF. The property is currently exempt from ad valorem taxation under Florida Statutes 196.199, which exempts property "owned and used" by a governmental entity. Since the leased property would.no longer be "used" by the City, the current exemption will cease to apply. The same statute also provides exemptions for municipal property that is leased to "religious, literary, scientific, or charitable" organizations. Merely being "not for profit," however, is not sufficient to qualify for tax exemption. Additionally, the statute exempts property owned by labor organizations which is used predominantly for educational purposes, but only the portion so used qualifies for exemption. In summary, there does not appear to be any basis for exempting. the subject property from ad valorem taxation once it is leased to the IAFF. This same conclusion was reached independently by Marilyn Daly of the Pinellas County Property Appraisers Office, and is consistent with the treatment of the FOP building at 652 Court Street, which is subject to ad valorem taxation. Please let me know if you would like any additional information..,, 5 9 Of ". A h? CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Agenda Cover Memorandum Item # PW I Meeti -N? 9117/92 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: Vacation Request 92-07 ( Jimmie ) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve the Vacation of Spruce Avenue between Block 2 and Block 3, J.H. Rouse Subdivision, subject to the right-of-way being retained full width as a drainage and utility easement, elimination of the existing business on the west side of Spruce Avenue, f iying a replat or Unity of Title covering the property on both sides of Spruce. BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the July 2, 1992 meeting at the applicants request. The applicant is requesting the vacation of Spruce Avenue lying between Seminole Street and Eldridge Street. The applicant owns the property on both sides of Spruce Ave. This request has been reviewed by the various Departments/Divisions concerned with vacations, The Engineering Division has no objection to the vacation request provided the right-of-way is retained full width as a Drainage and Utility Easement. The City has water and sewer lines within the Right-of-Way which only serve the applicant. Should the use of the property subsequently call for building in the retained easement, the easement can be vacated upon the relocation of the utilities at the applicant's expense or converted to private lines to be the responsibility of the property owner. The Planning and Development Department recommend approval subject to the following conditions. 1, Closing of his business on the west side of Spruce Avenue which is not zoned for the existing use. 2, Replat the property or file a Unity of Title to insure that no lot will be land locked. 3, The final reading and adoption of the vacation ordinance be held until the conditions are met. G.T.E., Vision cable and Florida Power have no objection to this vacation. The Public Works Director has reviewed the comments submitted by the reviewing departments and has no objections, subject to the concerns of the other departments being met. Reviewed by: originating Dept. = Costs: N/A Commission Acti Public 1lorks/Engineering ?l W ? f legal NIA (Current FY) i ?a1 Approved 4 Budget NIA i User Dept. Funding source: I Approved a G? = I w/conditions = Purchasing NIA i II Capt. Imp. Denied Risk Mgmt. NIA Advertised: Operating j Cont'd to DIS_ N/A Date: _6/4 & 6/11/92_ I Other N/A ACM Paper: Tampa Tribune_ _ Appropriation Code(s) Attachments: other N/A_ y Not required S -' - = N/A Petition Submitted y: Affected parties = Location sketch notified Yes City M i Not required ? ,VA`' VAC9207.AGN Vacation Number 92-07 "Jimmie,, V A C AT I O_ N___ _ R _EQ U E S T P R O C E S S I N G S H E E T PLEASE REVIEW THIS VACATION IN TERMS OF YOUR PRESENT USE AND FUTURE NEED FOR THE PROPERTY. INDICATE YOUR COMMENTS-BELOW: REFERENCE ATLAS SHEET NO 277B/ F--7 SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 29S RANGE ISE 1. ENGINEERING DIVISION: REVIEWED BY: G27 APPROVED BY: DATE: 5/Y/f2- COMMENTS: The Applicant is requesting the vacation of Spruce Avenue lying between Seminole Street and Eldridge Street. The applicant owns the property on both sides 'of Spruce. The Engineering Division has no objections to the vacation providing the right-of-way is retained full width as a drainage and utility easement. The city has water and sewer lines within the right-of-way. Florida Power has no objection to this vacation request provided it be retained for a Utility Easement. General Telephone, and Vision Cable have no objection to this vacation request. 2. TRANSPORTATION GROUP: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY DATE: COMMENTS: Seruee, 4vtdoes not SCrvC ms a 9r5n1_Gcnkf e.le-4Ae",' Of *(,L •Wa"6ppf7tt•fioH m1waeks Arad ire *Uis fee we yictv2 via ob'rafiu. (a `lie V?'11D+t.. Wkdt Is rroposej use- 0-F f!tm vncaies pro?" -4?? Cu?reH? Secvice_ is used 4r wetckad vektcic s'tvretie, w?`1 ovcrfi{o,.a or+ S&evi,, oie propcr?- Is t(trs ?t0at- 'h0 etta+n up {fie tIk( e-r e-ILk .")e. 'H+c ,uollky0.?d'!. f 4t,.a 54aetied vGlnecS4s d,r? ?I?Skio?e -{?'(ew? ["??•e410.5 ^C'r<<?j . 3. PLANNING & DEVELOPMREVIEWED BY : 3 -- BY: tQ I DATE: COMMENTS: We recommend approval conditioned upon the applican closing that portion of his business which is located on the property on the west side of Spruce Ave. as the applicant is illegally using the west side of the site, zoned RM 8, for outdoor storage of automobiles (the east side is zoned-IL). Another condition should resolve the question of access to the interior lots; either a Unity of Title or a replat should be required so that no lot would be land locked. (Note: the property owner has been given a Notice of Violation on the RM 8 property. The inspector has given him until after the vacation issue is resolved to relocate the part of the business which is in violation). The ordinance approving the vacation should contain these conditions, with the vacation not final until thespnQndi ions are met' t ?.. .. 3MI. -14iff SPECrnON :. w _ 1 REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: DATE: rJT'5?? COMMENTS: 7?e Uvc t 1CtS ro?-ev 5 vU - t acrca c!c..-e ray fr. Lis o r t 5 `3•L` r<' i 5. SANITATION DIVISION: REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY.- \l DATE : COMMENTS:. No o6?Qt???,s Page 1 of 4 r? Vacation Number 9207 3 ' 6. GAS DEPARTME T ? K.e.ll? D?r1 DATE: _-Izll4z REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY: COMMENTS: 00 06zc,-Hov t5 7. FIRE DEPARTMENT: ++?? REVIEWED BY : 3 C boej EO e APPROVED BY: COMMENTS: :MAY 2 8 'g? r'f,?T J ?.?k y,q•er? ,s,".'97'7.J9 ?-93. 8. POLICE DEPARTMENT: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:- ' DATE: ?? ???? COMMENTS: /1!d 0,ajZ'C77tbu1 work ,63r yic-2J kJ-lrf SAt't7E; 9. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY: DATE: COMMENTS: Garden Ave., Railroad Ave. (parallel to train on West side), and Myrtle Ave. are more than adequate for neighborhood North-South traffic. Spruce Ave. does not now,'nor will it in the future, function as a North-South carrier. The vacation of this segment of Spruce will allow the applicant:, who owns all property on both sides of Spruce, to establish a storage warehouse facility and to remove the junkyard ` presently there. The roadway should be retained full-width as a utility easement to accommodate existing utilities. Should the use of the property subsequently call for building in the retained easement, the easement can be vacated upon the re- location of the utilities by the applicant. This will allow the applicant to remove a neighborhood eyesore and improve the general environment. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ADVERTISING DATE: 06/04/92 AND _ 06111192 , PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 07102/92 COMMISSION ACTION:------APPROVED----CONTINUED----TABLED----DENIED---- ORDINANCE NO. DATE OF ADOPTION RECORDED IN 0. R. BOOK: PAGE: LETTER TO PROPERTY OWNER ADVISING COMPLETION OF VACATION VACATION CARD FILE: SHEET 2 OF 4 REVISED 11/90 VACPROC.DDM ¦. i i? i l t? t m ' ,i' ?" V l1 Z?? N It ft, SL U E T L. NAME, KILLION AND ASSOCIATES PHONE[ A13 443 7nfi7. '•- ,t; ; ADDRESS: 1254-A SOUTH III011{.ANp AVE.. CLEARWATER, DA 34616 HEREBY PETITION THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR THE VACATION OF TllE FOLLOWING t `. t , • EASEMENT TYPEt DECATED RIGHT-OF-WAY 10 ALLEY OTHER 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE VACATrDr SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" 3,. STREET ADDRESS OR SIMPLE LOCA'T'ION r f ; 609 SEMINOLE STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 4. PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PnOPERTYt FOR BUSINESS s 5. ZONING ON ADJOINING PROPERTYt I • NO RTH: INDUSTRIAL EASTk PINELLAS TRAIL (OLD R.R.R/W) k f SO UTH' RESIDENTIAL WESTt INDUSTRIAL I: ; t 6. ATTACHMENTS t ` LAND SURVEY OF PROPERTY IS REQUIRED IF THIS VACA'T'ION INVOLVES EXISTING ENCROACHMENT - DRAWING SHOWING PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY s (SURVEY, PLOT,PLAN, ETC.) a` X SEE RESOLUTION 02-3 (ATTACHED) ' ATTACHED LETTERS OF NO OBjECTIOH FROMt E X FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION X - GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY X VISION CABLE i OTHER 7. SIGNATURE OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY A13UTTING THAT 'PROPERT'Y ' PROPOSED TO BE VACATED: (APPLICANT) , 1 • STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY. OF' PINELLAS) 5ubacribnd and sworn to before we thlu l•_ day of. k C , kq 9-1 My Commisalon Expires s r'.It'r, ,,;.l k.• ;:CtrLE NOTAR PUBLIC SHEET 2 OF 2 ENG. DEPT. 3102 REVISED 0I189 1. f :r it }I, E' m 5 I _1 9?o._,7Wpk.-.I? SUnVEY OF LKCAL DRBCAIPTION FOR BPRUCK STRRRT VACATION EXIIIBIT "A" SPRUCE STREET, 'A DEDICATED STREET, AND A PART OF J.U. ROUSE SU13DIVIS1011 BETWEEN BLOCK 2 AND RLDCK 3, AS RECOMMIn III PLAT BOOK 11 4, PACE 90, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF IIILLSBOROUCH COUNTY, FLORIDA OF WHICH PINELI.AS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART OF, AND HORE PARTICULARLY DFSCRIBFD AS FOLLOWGi BECINNIHO AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I4,, BLOCK 2, FOR A POINT OF BECINNINGI THP.IICF DUE FAST, 40.00 FEET TO TIIR SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 21, BLOCK 3; THENCE NORTIIF.ASTF.RLY, ALONG THE WEST LOT LINKS OF LOTS 21, 20 AND 19, BLOCK 3, 327.8 FEET, TO TAE NORIJI WEST CORNFR OF SAID LOT 19; THENCE DUE WEST, 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON TIIF. NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 18; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE EAST LOT LINES OF LOTS 14-18 INCLUSIVE, 328 FEET TO THE POINT ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 14, AND THE r01NT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 12,512.77 SQUARE FEET OR 0.287 ACRES. r? ?F??liNdL? ?TdrlT i ,? V ° CST ?9 v • ell* e eor If 1 s for /-ot V /2d ,?4.,?• 1 ?a.o 'ap 1 ? ?r ? rf r BG DATE SURVEYED DOUNDAM SURVEY KILLION & ASSOCIATES Me 8UnM t1FJtrlMl SIP sI MNI AnE BASED on ncconU PLAT sunv ~YOf1B Job No. 89-471 - Data 3120/92__ _ u'?•--?-J Urawnby GFK Scala 1" 5Or 1254--A SOUTH 11#0111,AND•AVE. _ CLEARWATER FLO DA '?4f116 pa- MTAWMV LEG?tI? cAtcuurTn 11?fscarcT ?ne?KO?ErL$M13 EMO `nleWMAMr?ann?ir,uivRra?, ? awrrh orn+r<r?or.OA/Wrwnrrrutrvaooor,ruruunrrrtoevanou 0r6 irorrhoowrrei>. •n. fOVNglrlpflhDO ,r7orrr A?urw:r? ?rS7J- mf COXMVI 1,+arM+THf ?rdt- fatAfo=KIM?%r, MMEFrr Aw- rrornaFwAv •m- rconoo r,err r" a+t- ovrr?w+o ?rrr- rwiarv+awnrws 13Y "4c?-v GAY- COME$iWAIX Off vWMjt#Krv" Cl- MICr> IVVLOCK wrr- VOOM " 011D014 P. KILUMI cat- Oor;Cr;TIMMKIL•ruoco rno-errluulad?tcl?r? ,roruUASTATEPnorEGUIONALWIDGMVEYORNO.a136 i i i I N SCALE. N.T.S. SEMINOLE ELDRI DGE Note., This is not a SURVEY I# S E. Corner of Lot !4 ST. r N.W. CNn&f s or Lot 19 19 L 20 N ® r s ft I' t r? ? i E V r l 1 21 t ' i 4 ;r r j•' orner f 21 F e 4 r i F . ST. 1 ? r E 11JIMM16 } ?I. Vac. No. 92-07 ?•' Section 9-29-15 i•: Drawn by I Dale Draw D. D M. n% V26/92 Ravlrod 6/2/92 A,) t. S Al•• Item •''' Clearwater City Commission Meet in Da 9 / 17 / 92 9 ?_ 4 Agenda Cover Memorandum PUBU9- P L4> SUBJECT: NEARING Zoning Atlas Amendment for 22067 U.S. 19 (Clearwater "19" Commerce Center); Owner/ Representative: Frank C. Kunnen, Jr. (14.13 acres m.o.l.) (Z92-07) RECOMMENDATIONIMOTIO N: Approve the Zoning Atlas Amendment from IL to IPD for Lot 1, Clearwater 19 Commerce Center, and pass on first reading Ordinance 5263-92. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: This request is for a change of zoning from Industrial (IL) to Industrial Planned Development (lPD) for Lot 1, Clearwater "19" Commerce Center in order to allow a broader range of uses (including commercial uses) than that permitted under the existing zoning for this developed parcel. The property is located on the east side of U.S. 19 approximately 1950 feet north of Drew Street. The property to the north of the applicant's is not in the City; it is owned by Pinellas County and used by the County Highway Department. The property to the east is occupied by the Fairwood Forest Town House Development and has a zoning of RPD-12. The property to the south is occupied by Baywinds Apartments (RM-24), Acura Auto Dealer (IL - Lot 2, Clearwater "19" Commerce Center), and Performance Toyota (CH). The west side of the applicant's property fronts on U.S. 19 across from Carpenter Field. The City has previously approved a site plan for the Clearwater "19" Commerce Center. The applicant is not proposing any changes in the site plan, and it is this approved site plan that is proposed to be used as the required site plan accompanying the requested rezoning. The rezoning of Lot 1 will leave Lot 2 zoned as Limited Industrial. Lot 2 is just over 2 acres, which is less than the minimum size specified for an IL District in Sec. 135.148 of the Land Development Code. However, Lot 1 will continue to be used substantially as it has been, as a commercial/industrial complex, under the proposed zoning change, so the continued IL zoning of Lot 2 is not seen as a problem. w Reviewed by; Originating Dept; Costs: S MIA Commission Action: Legal N/A PLANNING & D Total El Approved Budget N/A _ NJA Purchasin s 13 Approved uJconditions g Risk Mgmt. N/A - User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. 13 Denied N CIS Continued to: AGM ? Funding source- - ` r ? Other -- IA - - ? Capital Imp. ?ti! l V1 L n al` Advertised: ? operating Attachments: Date: ""92 0 other ATTACHMENT A: PROPOSED USES Paper: TAMPA TRIBUNE ATTACHMENT S: DIMENSIONAL & 13 No Required NUMERICAL DEV. REQUIREMENTS Affect arties ATTACHMENT G: PARKING REQUIREMENTS COMPARISONS ® Notified Appropriation Code: Sai Ea Not Required ORDINANCE NO. 5263-92 A MAPS Cit ang ? None 0 Pri d on recycled paper Z 92-07 Page 2 At the time Clearwater "19" Commerce Park was established, as its name implies, it was anticipated that It would be utilizsd for commercial as well as light industrial uses. These combined uses have existed side by side in the development since its initiation. The intent of this zoning request is to bring the zoning for the property into agreement with its utilization. Portions of the development have been used for Indoor Commercial Recreation/Entertainment which is not an authorized use in an IL District. The applicant also desires to have the option to utilize portions of the development for other uses permitted in commercial districts. Sec. 137.079 & 137.080 authorize any single or combination of permitted or conditional uses identified or permitted in the Limited Industrial District or any commercially zoned district in the Land Development Code in an IPD District. The applicant is requesting the continuation of all permitted and conditional uses permitted in a Limited Industrial District, plus several additional uses permitted in commercial districts. A table listing the requested uses is included as Attachment A. The approved site plan provides for 516 parking spaces, twenty two (22) more than the 494 spaces which are shown on the plan as required. Parking requirements were calculated on the following basis: USE PERCENTAGE AREA (Sq. Ft.) PARKING SPACES Wholesale/Retail 9% 20,185 161 Office/Business 34% 74,805 249 Industrial/Warehousing 57% 125,885 84 TOTALS 100% 220,875 494 With the proposed rezoning, the use of the center will not substantially change and the parking presentlyr i provided will be grandfathered as long as the actual usage is in agreement with that shown in the above table. The applicant should be required to submit reports indicating business occupancies and the floor areas associated with such occupancies which indicate that the above percentages are being adhered to at the time of any new occupational license request. The center was constructed prior to current landscaping requirements, and remedial perimeter landscaping should be a requirement of approval. The provision of such landscaping is complicated by the existence of stormwater retention ponds and utility easements; however, a site inspection by Planning and Development Department staff indicates that sufficient room appears to be available to accommodate the recommended level of landscaping. Ultimately, some portions of this site may be "taken" by the MOT to allow the widening of US 19 as part of the Drew Street overpass. The applicant should be required to submit a revised site plan for review once the engineering drawing for this project,awdeveloped. Such site plan should include or v. address: ? All current site plan submittal information ? Perimeter landscaping as required under Sec. 136.023 of the Land Development Code Z 92-07 Page 3 ? Updated/revised allocation percentage table for various uses allowed under the IPD zoning ? If existing freestanding signage is relocated, such signage shall meet the requirements of the Highway Commercial zoning district On August 4, 1992, the Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval u-P this request by a unanimous vote. Approval was contingent on the certified site plan being amended to meet the following conditions. The staff will bring the certified site plan forward for review and modification by the Commission simultaneously with the second reading of the ordinance addressing the rezoning. 1 The applicant shall meet the perimeter landscaping requirements of Sec. 136.023 of the Land Development Code to the extent that such landscaping can be installed in areas outside of utility easements and retention areas; or ditch maintenance access areas. Such landscaping shall be installed within six months from the date of IPD zoning approval by the City Commission; 2) The applicant shall screen all dumpsters visible to residential areas with 6 1 /2 ft., tall concrete block walls, stuccoed and painted to match the exterior of the buildings within six months of the date of iPD zoning approval by the City Commission; 3) All freestanding signage, if relocated, shall meet the requirements of the Highway Commercial zoning district; all attached signage shall meet the requirements of the General Commercial zoning district; 4•) The applicant shall submit reports to the Planning and Development Director indicating business occupancies and the areas associated with such occupancies to demonstrate compliance with the use percentage table on the site plan at the time of each occupational license approval; 5) There shall be no more than a cumulative total of 20,185 sq. ft. of gross floor area for retail and restaurant uses; 6) New uses or revisions to existing uses within the center shall continue to be reviewed, on a case- by-case basis, for any required impact fees; 7) The applicant shall maintain all ditches and retention areas on the property for in utility easements) in accordance with City requirements to be developed by the Public Works Department; and 8) There shall be no additional door or window openings on any building wall which faces a residential area. No state, regional or subreglonai reviews of this rezoning request will be required, sVde the land use plan classification will remain as industrial. E ATTACHMENT A CLEARWATER "19" COMMERCE CENTER PROPOSED USES Prm, ilted Uses: A. Uses permitted in IL Districts (Sec. 135.149) (1) Manufacturing (2) Research and development (3) Wholesaling/distribution (4) Business Services (5) Indoor storage and/or warehousing (6) Business/professional offices (7) Indoor retail sales (8) Restaurants (9) Nonprofit social or community services (10) Public works projects and utility substations/facilities (11) Accessary dwelling (11) Accessory uses B. Uses Permitted"in Commercial Districts Requested for IPD (1) Medical clinics/laboratories [CH: 135.128.(4)] (2) Commercial or trade schools [CH: 135.128.(5)] (3) Indoor commercial recreation/entertainment [CH: 135.128.(6)] (4) . Personal Services [CH: Sec. 135.128, (8)) Conditional Uses: A. Uses per mitted in IL Districts . (1) Vehicle Service (2) Outdoor retail sales, display and/or storage (3) Alcoholic beverage sales (consumption on premises) (4) Alcoholic beverage sales (package sales) (5) Residential shelters (6) Noncommercial parking B. Uses Permitted in Commercial Districts requested for IPD (1) Child day care [CC: Sec. 135.135.(6)] (2) Animal grooming [CG: Sec. 135.123.(7)] (3) Veterinary offices [CH: Sec. 135.129.(6)] =; ATTACHMENT B , DIMENSIONAL AND NUMERICAL DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS CLEARWATER "19" COMMERCE CENTER DESCRIPTION IL CH PROPOSED/ EXISTING Building height 50 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. Open Space Lot Area 10 11,6 25 % 10% Front Yard 25 % s0 % 25% Maximum floor area ratio none 0.5' none Minimum Building Separation 40% of the sum 50% of the sum 40% of the sum Distance of the heights of of the heights of of the heights of adjacent adjacent adjacent buildings, but buildings, but buildings, but n.l.t. 20 ft. n.l.t. 20 ft, n.l.t. 20 ft. Maximum Building Coverage 60% 45% 60% Setbacks From street 20 ft. 35 ft. min. 35 ft. min. Side/Rear Prop, line 20 ft. min. non residential 10 ft. 10 ft, residential 15 ft. 15 ft, 1 i E r t I ? i Y r? } 1- F { A r i ATTACHMENT .C CURRENT PARKING REQUIREMENT COMPARISONS CLEARWATER "19" COMMERCE CENTER PROPOSED USE PROPOSED NUMBER OF CURRENT PARKING SQUARE FEET REQUIREMENTS WHOLESALE/RETAIL 20,185 ? ALL' WHOLESALE . 14 SPACES ?ALL RETAIL ? 122 SPACES OFFICE/BUSINESS 74,805 ? ALL OFFICE ? 336 SPACES ? ALL BUSINESS ? 258 SPACES SERVICES INDUSTRIAL/ 125,885 WAREHOUSING ? ALL INDUSTRIAL ? 84 SPACES ? ALL WAREHOUSING s 315 SPACES RANGE TOTAL 220,875 356 - 773 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED 516 SPACES 1 j [ j? r- r. 1. r ?. ' t E`'r 1:. I. t, i` }i. LUh i liki A 1 LA;i A140UMLU 1 Al' 1'1, I l,ril. lull DATE 4/28/92 NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER(S) FRANK C. KUNNEN, 3R._ ADDRESS 22067 U.S. 19, NORTH CLEARWATER, FL. 346251iilONE 447.1214 AUTHORIZED REPRESEN'TA'TIVE (IF ANY) ADDRESS PHONE LEGAL. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF REQUEST) LOT 1, CLEARWATER 39 COMMERCE CENTER GENERAL LOCATION 1500 FT NORTH OF DREW STREET ON THE EAST SIDE OF U.S. 19. ACREAGE 14 ACRES PRESEUT ZONING DISTRICT INDUSTRIAL LIMI'T'ED. T~ SEE ATTACKED. _ REQUESTED ZONING DISTRICT_ INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. CITY COMPREREPSIVE LAND USE CATEGORY INDUSTRIAL. COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE CATEGORY INDUSTRIAL REASOH FOR REQUEST THE HISTORICAL USE OF THE LAND IS INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL. 1) VEHICLE SERVICE 2) OUTDOOR RETAIL SALES, DISPLAY, AND STORAGE 3) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES 4) OUTDOOR COMMERCIAL RECREATION AND ENTERTAINMENT. _`•^?"?"?'KILT1157Ct`ZZAT?F.':"_____r_? _??_?.?._ .?___._.w IS THE 'REQUESTED ZONING DISTRICT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CLEARFiATER COMPREIIENSIVE LAND USE PLAH7 YES x NO Note: It the requested zone change is not consisteilt with the City's Land Use Plan, the applicant will be required to :Cite a corresponding application to amend the land use plan. I8 TKE REQUESTED ZONING DISTRICT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PINELLAS COUNTY s COh1PREliE14SIVE LAND USE PLAN? YES X NO LIST ANY OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION SUBMITTED ? i TSignu*uFey Reviewed by: ' F N k OnDINANCE 110. 5263-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF U. S. HIGHWAY 19, APPROXIMATELY 1 ,'7.510 FEET NORTH OF DREW STREET, CONSISTING OF LOT 1, CLEARWATER 19 COMMERCE PARK, W110SE POST OFFICE ADDRESS IS 22067 U. S. IJIGII14AY 19, AS DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY HEREIN, FROM INDUSIRIAL (IL) TO INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (IPD); PROVIDING All EFFf:CTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the amendment to the zoning atlas of the City as set forth in this ordinance is found to be reasonable, proper and appropriate, and in compliance with Florida law; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF TIIE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described property in Clearwater, Florida, is hereby rezoned, and the zoning atlas of the City is amended as follows: Property Lot 1, Clearwater 19 Commerce Park, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 95, Page 1, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida. (Z92-07) Zoning District From: Industrial (IL) To Industrial Planned Development (iPD) Section 2. The City Commission does hereby certify that this ordinance is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Section 3. The Planning and Development Director is directed to revise the zoning atlas of the City in accordance with the foregoing amendment. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED ,, t Approved as to form and correctness: M. A. Galbraith, Jr. C i Ly A L Lorr'iby Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Gouceau City Clerk s f i r f. ' i- t. i k Fl F. i S:' m r 1' !r4'y,y} 1' ?'i!, ,? F rl' ,t ,r r11,•?1. ''''?H 4.'r ,7'r.i a:j: ?'1'+?1•i PrryJ.+ a• ??\ tires-+??,r..r L/? *r?• r ?tC ? 1 1 .1. . j?..? ?.a 1. t rr tir. 1 r I•;; w'4 rria r. 7•L .? - , ...t'?.; ::.'1r' .,.. •? .:., ;'J,?r'r. 'r ?• 1''?,si,ll•i'••,•.•?,• 7 (i.,, •,c7' r. ; r 7 r+ t }1, a y 1 rt rl' }`'.!',,. #'.r,.fr. 1. i " ?.1 r1 F 'r4', f '• ?S? ?,' ?:_rJ: 1 11 1'?..tl;lf'i.?f i•.. t?'. ri? a 44. .r' tt r1 `? .; ... )? ?'' 4j ?•? ?Y i /.•, rrfin• 1' :- 1 11 • r1 .¢?' y!? f7} 1?1 1?j?}r5? 7'" I r'~?/w ?l•?1?\.1?4" Y'? +?{?? ?Ij?r't: ,a ?? ? jAi N? ?,f !( 11 ?1 r,la=:A , ? } ,3.'.?Ii. ti•?` t,h? III;h•• !'I lt'?yyrj.'.'•'}r.1 y'J•I,X?.'a711?. 1 Vi f ?r t'j},. );1:??•"1,i:7>? ?• ..:?. , ' f f .1Ir ?.?t .?>?311 ^ e .f. l?y_. t..' J ?rj.1, j?.; v !t .? F 1 •il?; r4.1? h r. r,,l 1''? 1?:t ;`1 „ 1 i! r; '., t}?{}:. f, r? I r tL. j a'fl 1 1 ',Fr 1• r rc?•lil. w 3 {` ?? ..T?•? tl#.0. r 11 rr?r. rr ?t (? li Cr Jj 1.c 11. ?• ".r €•!` l.r.'s :11..4. ? E•, r:,• z r. ; ? '.' +`? E1,??,? 1 ,.. 1 1 1 ?.i }IM1 t 1 r ! rlt':; ,7 r ,.,,rlr•?, ij .1' •'It• :'? 7f h ri .?1 N L1V ?, •' !' ?} lr X1, 1 , h 1 r t , q, ,•1 ,. rr`.R iti !`. a C. t%? r h. r it ? ?> ?r i,.+,# t? :'1t??•``??u?}'?j?, ?P1'1!4[.'?+i +11 SY??{7)Syi;I R•Ygl?•t??.:1- ?t?yc?''Si?"'{i ??.'''Y ???•r?'?S tit :t.?lr?!it ??r7 ?"i ?1(C:` 1?•I: ?1 ?Y.`{'v?7?',?1. s. 'I:??'fS E?'{?• s?}r ?l ?r?ky,7r Y ??i ??-?.:1'I,r..1r• ??.: A: +? rj j.f{ •.1?"??' r1•'i• +?.1?1:;• ''7i1;?•Fr/l1" t Srr J .?r'rS.`.,r ?,, ,{F!`?1??5,? 4 ..; ^r' 1 r I} 1 ,rl.` /^ SJ ?S?' i. 1'• r ry'?•. 3A f 1? i 1.14 ; ,.. t'' 1 t+; •41••''.M . j K. !r' 't I' f;:,[' VAIN N r. ~ ? r?•n? f 'rr } 1 .??r?,? ,?tKi?+'y '• Yi r• ji.ll ? r ??... ? Yl (jy• 1,??'•''{. I 1x }r y? } t?''11 ?' . ' 1 1. s•...t'?• td 7 1 • .' } .r r..! ?? 1r, 1 i1j?I?r ?1.7.1•?.Si6 I' 77.' yt«?J?,.t,.: r?Jf?l.:lil.rF.W Li n1:.':a ll:.?fi,.. ?{:G.?L7."?, ?? rr4••1 'R• 1 a ?-' r 1 ? 1y51 f C0 U N I` ? ': u? 4 ,..!G'7 y ;{!i' 7q*?y7?lti" vj?+?tP Y=??1' LilY7.r" ?`7f?' rr? 1 r!l GjJl;. ?' '? y y,71`;t<' ?3 {r 111 }_t~• '?F ?t? 4•rl Yew p r?.?yJ 11 L, i ,. l'r?FS $,. II. ?Jll4(?t, f /?i --+-i'J1 r71- 1} ./ " r ii F' 1 77 }?",r ct ;f? 1. { ! ff' ` ] '{f, S 1 vu'}! tiSk'i?,?4#"'?g' f lfl;'?f; 1.{I - Sd `? ?? ? `/'7'•? '?E r1' ??{.I 1. 1?}i ??r 1';.lr• } {I.??( ?.. 1'?' i 1',? tz? {F1 ?'r r''j??4?1! ;'re=f a to ? - t t Fi !.1 Yy.`46'''.t'r{i'r? rt,7J r?,. I•. , 1F? rT,![y'L Id. Iii 11h:f rLlr+'`'• i] !'? 1 vlilK I iY4ftf:.•ii 1!i 1 ;'; E?' tii}" tii?t t4'itY..; ?,?1 Attf2 .c :=SC?ii? rA1 „ ' r1 • r .?;' .:f;?'t7"1 r ?a?i t. ? 11ja'(Ji si ?,•, ' „??.?. ' a.. K ?f?f Ss=?I liy?i?=?rL:it?;?;+-x's?'i:css?•?ii=? 1x7 1x7 # _ r ? '.; 2?0?4 a'a? # ? • r,t ':'. Ft1F 1 i 796 acu -2210' '22159'rer ¦?u >J>r A& loo. ilo ! vte' # Aan 22o34 #" 717. 4 4 N r rs tv r ,l i + 77pG4 L2111;?7 rso- rrt r?. " 7r$ ?: # rid Tit " „i7 ? rr ?r2 x? ? © - it- LEARVIA'TER "l f}" 'COMME, RCE PARS{ L 7# 110.47 ?i 7] TOP 7lx?u r o f L, xr?¢? soo 1_., TPf EALL F? LLD xrRaJ z :1Qfa3 • •. . s?4.S'1 ??1 fiu•r , ? V ? f tut ? i OuJ , - ?1f • C37, .. -961F ecr n? C ; ? ?? 481 4 21) ?YOd' eV r F"rs ALii 0.? 11 w; ..Jig ? lyj lrci rn 331 01 T10 N IP) R M a 24,oz • ''' •. • i. LRS I l.. i n I/". --?I f 1 i? 7A . M r.. ? 1 PROPOSED REZONIrl'sVIG OWNER K U lj t?J C N F C z Q 2- 0 7 APPLICANT ? PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ZONING ?-°-' I C LEIA R LO 7N-C F-R i q G4 Ib{ ?? -6p_e_E FROM L TO P D ltd ACRES PLANNING and ZONING DOAIID CITY COMMISSION st=cTloti d 8 row H sltrr n n#lac 16 C ?+TI.AS rACr- 2, 8 2 A ' I fas single FamllY e = B1 1S 1 M C_:t I C LLI J r rw I v r. ¦ c Y - Y i SEP-17-1992 11:03 FPON CITY OF CLW. DIG1hEERIW TO CITY MPN;GER P,02 R -G- d PLO CITY OF CLEARWATER Interdepartment Correspondence j TO: City Commission, FROM: James M. P 1 es olatty, Jr,, Director Planning & Development U SUBJECT: Continuance of Rezoning Application Z 92-07 From IL to IPD for the Clearwater 19 Commerce Center COPIES: Frank Kunnen; Denise McCabe; Walt McAleer, Planner I DATE: September 16, 1992 It is my recommendation that we continue this for an indefinite period. s 1 have been told that the retention pond area on the south side of the property has not been built to specifications. Additional pavement has been installed on the south side of the building. It appears that there Is a 95% certainty that D.O.T. will eliminate the western portion of the south building, the building directly to the east of Acura. s The third reason Is the outparcel at the northwest corner Is slated for retention and for the improvement of U.S. 19. The fourth reason Is Mr. Kunnen would like to change the permitted uses and has proposed that conditions 1, 6, & 7 be changed. These changes should be discussed by the Planning and Zoning Board before the Commission considers this matter. r Therefore, please continue this to a date after the Planning & Zoning Board has considered these changes to the IPD application, and revisions to the approved site plan. JMPlpdf pInUMunnen.916 TOTFaL P.02 i S r i i } 0 S1?AL•. ? r? , l r Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum It Heetin Date- 9117/22 P(OD 14 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: Variance to the Sign Regulations; 1500 Belleair Rd.; Fortune Bank (Owner/Applicant); Catherine Dixon (Representative), (SV 92-14) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: ? Approve variance of 9 ft. to permit property identification sign 15 ft. in height for Sec. 23-29-- 15, M&B 34-04, subject to the following conditions: (1) No additional freestanding signs shall be erected on the property; and (2) The requisite sign permit shall be obtained within 30 days of the date of this public hearing. ? Deny variance of six sq. ft, for property identification sign to permit sign area of 30 sq. €t. for Sec, 23-29-15, M&B 34-04. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting two variances: The first to permit an existing pole sign 15 ft. in height; and the second to permit an addition to the pole sign to advertize an Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) at this location. Concerning the first variance request, in December 1991, the City issued a sign permit to allow a face change and relocation of this 24 sq. ft. pole sign. The owners were responding to notification that their pole sign was less than the required five foot minimum setback from their property line. The sign survey did not make note that the pole sign was over the allowable height, and, consequently, the owners were not notified of this violation. The applicants' property on the northwest corner of Highland and Belleair is zoned OI-, while the surrounding property to north, east and west is commercially zoned; to the south there is a condominium development under the jurisdiction of the City of Largo. The maximum sign height in an OL district is six feet under the current Sign Regulations; this height is proposed to be eight feet in the revised regulations. The commercially zoned property around the bank is permitted pole signs up to 20 ft. in height. Reviewed by: Origirmting Dept: Costs: S N/A commission Action: N LegaL PLANNING & d ELOPMENT - Total ? Approved Budget N/A purchasing N/ e / p 7 S ? Approved w1conditions Risk Mgmt. N/A C1S N User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. ? Denied ? Q ? AC14 Funding Source: Continued to*. l other _ N/A ? Capitat imp. Advertised: ? operating ? ttachments: ??? onto: 9/07/92 Other MAP Paper: TAMPA TRIBUNE APPLICATION 4 i d 13 Not Requ re su6raitt Affected Parties None ?O ! V 0 Notified Appropriation Code: Cit Manage W Not Required 40 Printc on recycted paper i ;l "2- The staff feels the requested height variance is warranted because: ? The sign height is less than other nonresidential signs at this intersection ? The area of the sign is less than that allowed for surrounding commercially zoned properties E ? Notification of the sign being over height was not provided to the applicant so that it could be corrected when the sign was moved back from the property line. The second request is for an addition of a sign panel of six sq. ft. to advertise the ATM being installed at this location. The existing pole sign has the maximum surface area permitted for an O! district,.24 sq. ft., and the added service of the ATM is not considered justification for a variance for additional surface area for freestanding signage. It should be noted that if this property was commercially zoned like the surrounding nonresidential development, the bank would be allowed a freestanding sign of 64 sq. ft. or larger,- depending on the applicable commercial zoning classification. I t, f t 1111 F?R'I'?JNE BANK September 17, 1992• Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Sox 4748 Clearwater, FL 34518-4748 Dear Ms. Goudeau, The purpose of this letter is to requesi a continuance for our sign variance hearing (SV 92-14) aahedu ed for September 17, 1992. We respectfully ask the City Co"i ssion to consider our variance request at the next scheduled Baring - October It 1992. Thank you for this consideration. Sincerely, Chris Steinocher Fortune Bank Marketing 'Of ficer ftE_vy4Ll5 I 'k r 1 16120 U.S. HIShwoy 19 North, Pact Office Box 0100, Clearwate , FL $4618-6100 • (813) 6*1000 E;uL1 Hot Inz Under a Mirnbrr FDIC • Fortune f1pk rAvinp Bark 0- • ?yjr;a Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum ? Lb PSWO PUBLIC Meet tgo 09/17/92 SUBJECT: Land Development Code Amendment - Height Restrictions. (LDCA 92-12) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve Land Development Code amendment addressing height restrictions and pass on first reading Ordinance 5264-92. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: Variances are frequently required to the City's height regulations, particularly for structures being erected in areas which have a minimum required floor elevation. The current code makes some provision for added height of structures, however, there is an associated "penalty" which requires additional setback for structures which exceed the "base" height requirement. The proposed ordinance: > Allows penetration of parapet walls for structures with flat roofs into the maximum allowable height, not to exceed 30 inches above such height. ? Eliminates the requirement that the peaks of pitched roofs extend no more than four feet above the maximum allowable height, relying simply on the average height of the elevation of the eave and the peak of pitched roofs to determine actual height for structures with pitched roofs. ? Establishes height as measured from either the actual grade or from the minimum required flood elevation as applicable. These proposed changes will greatly simplify the current code, especially as the code is applied to buildings constructed in areas having required minimum floor elevations. The Development Code Adjustment Board (DCAB) unanimously recommended approval of this code amendment on August 13, 1992, with one recommended change: Under the definition of "height," the Board suggested replacing the phrase "average of peak and eave heights" with "midpoint of the peak and eave heights of _the main roof structure". The Planning and Zoning Board considered the amendment on September 1, 1992 and unanimously recommended approval of the proposed ordinance, with the definition of height being revised as follows: Reviewed by: Legal Originating Dept: P PLANNING $ DEVEL Pl N Costs: S N/A Total C ission Action: nSe A A d 5-11 1 pprove ? , Budget Pu sin h N/A N/A S © Approved w/conditi ons g rc a Risk 99mt. NIA User Dept: Current Fiscat Yr. © Denied Cis ACM NI Funding source: 13 Continued to: other N/A LI Capital Imp. Advertised: [3 Operating Attachments: Date: ? Other ORDINANCE No. 5264-92 Paper: ® Not Re uired submi q Affected Parties l ? None t ? Notified Appropriation Code: ® Not Required City Manae 400 Pri d on recycled paper N 16 C.C. 9117192 LDCA 92-12 Page 2 Height: For buildings !dth-flat roofs, the vertical distance from the mean elevation of the exIsting i" grade to the highest finished roof surface, in FQr buildings with pitched roofs, the vertical distance from the existing building grade to a point reoresentin_g et the mi in of h k aDd v heights f r thg main r f gtrugture, r to- he . For other structures, the vertical distance from existing grade to the highest point of the structure above such existing grade, Where Elevation constitutes existin4_arad_e_ exceat_when the bonus L) -)ons of -rovi sectign 136.004(a) are applied. - - This revised definition includes the I language suggested by DCAB. It allows dormers and other architectural structures on a pitched roof to be excluded from consideration in height calculations xcg when they extend above the peak of the main roof. Staff would recommend inclusion of this change in the ordinance through a motion to amend to be developed by the City Attorney. ' 1. I, f 1?EE rt jj E?E.J t ? i It 4. f}F Is rJ (} 1' T• ORDINANCE NO. 5264 -92 All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWAiER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING SECTION 136.004, CODE Or ORDINANCES, RELAT I NG TO HEIGHT LIMITATIONS, TO ELIMINATE A ITEIGIIT BONUS PROVISION FOR PROPERTIES HAVING REQUIRED MINIMUM FLUOR ELEVA'T'IONS, AND TO ALLOW PARAPET WALLS 10 EXTEND ABOVE MAXIMUM 11E I GTIT LIMITATIONS; AMENDING SECTION 131.005, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REVISE THE DEFINITION OF "HEIGHT"; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DALE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF 111E CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: l? Section 1. Subsections (a) and (e) of Section 136.004, Code of Ordinances, are amended to read: Sec. 136.004. Height. ', (a) Height bonus benuse--. ?t?e-fe}-Tew nQ-Ise-igl??heruses r-e i I e-#a ??tg-Pr-a{?e??ies-;-#?ewe-ver; 444-----Aey-preperAj-wh4-E4i is-i-cien_t4f-Ted---as-subject to-41 o(P-nq eit}per-by de?gnat?en--erne-#?eed-#?a?a r-?-beu nda r-y-map-?prepa recl--bir-tl?e-f-ede?mer-Qeney 41a-eage?ne??-t--?4gefler}?r Fire"}u?-ien?rt-a-?i}e-?eadp-?-i-n-fiver-l-ay-A?S?E? and-w#?i?f} property is .0 big--de-veleped4n-aeeer-?-wit#??e?wes?I?ab-it?ib1e-f-leer-alevyt?er? ie?,el -,hall e-pE!i meted-a-be4gl}t-bonus-equa4--te-1 I)e-pas-i-t i-ve-da-f-f-er-enee,-between fie-required-4i-nst floor -ele"t4on and-the-bu44-d--ng-gr-adei-pr-ov4-ded-tl}a-W- a_.-fin- add4-t-i-9na4---5etae1(s-pr-av-ic#ed--f rem-a 1-1-? ide-preper- Y-iii" i=er--ate` b6444 fffj-who-c -des he--afo"ment4ened4he4glit-h©nf is sueh-add-449na1-s?tba& -te equal wend--F-i-ve (26)-per--eel -ef- 4he-ac-4ua-1-bonus?-app4ied te-bhe-bu-i-ld4ng,- #-.----?n-ad??aena-l--epee-spa?pre?ded?r--tl?e-pr-e a-rea-Ewhe-t-her--eg(?n--er=-ene-fe-,ed) 4s 4eEa ted?enea l h-t-#?e-bua-ling rseel?ddi t?enai ,.. open space to-l3e--pr-ev-ided-eumuia-t4ve4y-to-tha-t requ4r-ed-4n-the-aflne-and-to equal -the--a a--ef--lrlie par-IE-ing--(ine4ud4-ng--a4,-lei-} 1$c-a-ted-heneat4i-4ie--bu4444-n"s- 4eteriai ned- by-Wie-pr-c?-jec-ti-en-ef--a44-4leer-ar-eas--open--the--gr-oun? -4- Properties within a Multiple-Family Residential "Sixteen," "Twenty," "Twenty-four" or "Twenty-eight" District, General Office District, Beach Commercial District, Resort Commercial "Twenty-four" or "Twenty-eight" District, General Commercial District or Highway Commercial District shall be entitled to a ten-foot height bonus, provided -t-he bu44-d -ng-i-,-e4e ed--above--grade--n4 at least fifty (50) per cent of the area beneath the building (as determined by the projection of all floor areas upon the ground) or on the ground floor is used for parking. e) Para et walls constructed on buildings with flat roofs 80444-ng with -+-Ge-€-5-w1}i-c-h4ave a n)ed4r}-I}e-iijl}t-4-n--aEEer-danee-w4-tli-tlie-term-eon-t 4ne4 shall be permitted to extend not higher than 30 inclies Tour (4) fe over ¦ M3 W" the maximum height specified for the zoning district in which the building is located. Section 2. Subsection (a) of section 137.005, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: (a) Words and terms used in this development code shall be given the meanings identified hereinafter: Height: For buildings, the vertical distance from the mean elevation of the existing -W4.414-eg• grade to the highest finished roof surface in the case of a building with a fiat roof, or the vertical distance from the existing. b0444-ng~ grade to a point representing -at- the average of peak and eave heights me4-ianv -hea-9" of the roof of a building having a pitched roof. For other structures, the vertical distance from existing grade to the highest point of the structure above such existing grade. Where minimum floor elevations in flood grove areas have been established by law, the building height sliall be measured as though the rewired minimum floor elevations constitute existing grade exce t when the bonus provisions or section'-136.004(a) are auDlied. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL. READING AND ADOPTED Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Attest:, Cynthia E. Goudeau _--•---- City Cleric Approved as to form and correctness: M. A. Galbraith, r. City Attorney i 1 F i i? N W , n } ¦ 611 5 MOTION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 5264-92 On page 2, amend Section 137.005(a) to read: (a) Words and terms used in this development code shall be given the meanings identified hereinafter: Height: For buildings, the vertical distance from the mean elevation of the existing 1btt-ildinq grade to the highest finished roof surface in the case of a building with a flat roof, or the vertical distance from the, existin bulldlnqgrade to a point representing a-t- the midpoint of the peak and eave heights of the main roof structure }rte of the roof of a building having a pitched roof. For other structures, the vertical distance from existing grade to the highest point of the structure above such existing grade. Where minimum floor elevations in flood prone areas have been established b law, the building height shall be measured as thou'h the re uired minimum floor elevations constitute existing grade except when the bonus -provisions of section } 136.004(a) are applied. NOTE:` This amendment was recommended by the Development Code Adjustment Board. 'f } f. ' i .i . t i ` c ? 1 1 ? c •F I; g?A1ps Ite /17L92 Clearwater City Commission Meet I ng A t e_ ,D9 q 04 Agenda Cover Memorandum PLO 3 SUBJECT: HEARING Declaration of Surplus Property. RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Declare City-owned property located at 1002 North Garden Avenue, more specifically described on the Pinellas County Tax Rolls as Lot 31, Block C, JOSEPH J. ELDRIDGE SUBDIVISION, as being surplus to city needs for the purpose of selling or exchanging said property. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: The former owner of the property, Brenda Evans, received a federally funded Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) loan in the amount of $25,000 to rehabilitate the property in 1985. $10,000 of the loan amount was to be repaid with interest at 6 percent, and $15,000 was deferred and did not require monthly repayment. In April 1991, the Community Development Department learned that Ms. Evans homeowner's insurance had been canceled and that she had vacated the premises, causing a default under the terms of the mortgage. Ms. Evans was notified by letter on April 11, 1991, to comply with the terms of her mortgage. On May 3, 1991, Ms. Evans filed a petition in bankruptcy court and received a discharge of her debts. The City had the trustee of the property disclaim any interest in the property, and the bankruptcy court granted an order giving the City permission to commence foreclosure proceedings. The Commission authorized commencement of foreclosure proceedings at its meeting of 12/05/91. A foreclosure action was filed in Pinellas Circuit Court by the City Attorney's office and the property was subsequently purchased at public sale on 06/23/92, pursuant to the order or Final Judgment entered in the case. The property will be appraised and sold in accordance with the requirements of the City Charter. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: P Costs: S None C ission Action: Legal ''Planning 9 De el t Total Approved Budget N/A Ajr?- N/A Purchasin , S ? Approved w/conditions _ g Risk Mgmt. N/A User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. ? Denied CIS N/A ? Continued to: ACM Futidincl Source: Other N/A ? Capital Imp. Advertised: a Operating Attachments: Date: ? other Location Map Paper: ? N R i d equ ot re SL$pl 'tt by. Affected Parties 13 None ? Notified Appropriation code: city a Not Required 0 Pr nt d on recycled paper 0 S q70 68 0 /.?/a 26 25 _ -- .7_ 59--?_` 4 t r? 67 I / 71 60>z1q 6 2_: _-1!!? ?U r21,?6 O ?z S '? 15 h 14-15 S??Ey r Q ' -2 61 >z>z 7 X14 / J 28 1zog 6 5 1210 31208 ? o '~? trj 6 2 r to 1? !z>s 8 13 30 31 64 32 ,08 40 63 1211 9 12 rz>o n BIDL I 120(, 1207' 19 rzO8 12pg1209 L Sr 4 V 20 1209 55 10 11 1209 21 >zoe 38 5 22 _lz07 9 37 1204 ?- 10 12o6 36 35 34 h I-FO5 8 A 1207 3 004 25 26 27 p 120 120 1 18 a a O ?0 1203 7 5 4 ? O BLUFF >201 6 N 11 12 10 21 `• 23 25 27 a° A o 0 12ol 0 29 28 29 30 3i 32 55 1107 ?° O? j r. c w 40 5 h o 4o STREE7 !lo l0 14 rS 33 34 0? l0 5 4 13 1102 CO ° .2 0 fro 1102 35 320 22 36 1>00 1101 ~ A D. 24 2fi 28 30 ?B ci?ti r 14 1 2 >!00 15 5-14 ? o owl y 6 10r0 1 6 !o!z - M 15 1012 0 fol! 26 27 60 40 U r 3 38 39 40 sp 2! B 16 1009 25 28 1008 1011 37 40 rota 1oa 30 ' 17 C 1006 D roos 1006 1007 24 29 36 roos S1 Q7 Q 1$ a 100.1 it: to07 o? 1000 1005 23 30 35 CO n 19 `?' *?1 1006 oI 1003 Z' z` r3 7 i J E loot J. 22 ro loaf 34 43/ 20 1000 0 21 32 Al - o I '? 1 1 1000 33 44 , o 100 f 60 % 04 7--- 915 0 5 811 55 903909 ? ?8 2 807 x STREET m° 100 ! 9 906 R 110 1 5 C) 30.30 6r r 41 /01 30 40 9rr cA C1 cpi ° 8Q8 ,, Subject Property Location: 1002 North Garden Avenue T ¦ :,? { jj! CITY OF CLEA RWATER Interdepartmental Correspondence To: Mike Wright, City Manager FROM: Chris Papandreas, Community Development Manager SUBJECT: Payments made by Brenda Evans on foreclosed property COPY: Jim Polatty, Planning and Development Director DATE. September 9, 1992 f; t i In response to the question you asked at the agenda meeting today, I reviewed the file on the foreclosed property at 1002 N. Garden Avenue which was the security for a home rehabilitation loan taken out by Brenda Evans. Two loans were issued in 1985,, a $15,000 deferred payment loan and a $10,000 amortizing loan. Payments of $71.64 per month were required on the amortizing loan. She received a rehabilitation loan for owner-occupants. one of the terms of the mortgage was that she continue to occupy the property. Ms. Evans apparently vacated the property in 1990. She made payments on the amortizing loan from 1985 until May 1991, at which time she filed for bankruptcy and the payments ceased. Foreclosure was initiated and was accomplished in June, 1992. The home was boarded up in February, 1992. The condition of the unit at the present time is not known. It was occupied until 1391 by Ms. Evans sister. evans.mem 1 S 1 . r 1 f T r i a' t` 18 ORDINANCE NO. 5219-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO UTILITIES; AMENDING SECTIONS 54.20 THROUGH 54.22 AND 54.24 THROUGH 54.26, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO PROVIDE THAT THE PERMIT AND FEE REQUIREMENTS FOR ROLL- OFF CONTAINER SERVICE APPLY TO THE PLACEMENT OR SERVICING OF ROLL-OFF CONTAINERS WHETHER INSTALLED PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY WITHIN THE CITY, TO INCREASE THE PERMIT FEE FROM $5.00 TO $50.00; TO DELEGATE TO THE CITY MANAGER THE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE PERMIT APPLICATIONS, AND TO REVOKE OR SUSPEND SUCH PERMITS; REPEALING SECTION 54.23, RELATING TO SURETY BONDS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Sections 54.20 through 54.22 and 54.24 through 54.26, Code of Ordinances, are amended to read: Sec. 54.20 44--20,r Required. A permit is required undc-r-4 is-aricae- for persons placing or servicing roll-off containers., whether installed permanently or temporarily, within the c? t . Sec. 54.21 64-1. Application. Every person required to procure the permit provided for in section 54.20 shall submit an application for such permit to the director of public works -&uper-kt-endent of-F, an-tit-i-Grr. The application shall: (1) Be a written statement upon forms provided by the city (such application form shall include an affidavit to be sworn to by the applicant before a notary putlic of the state); (2) Require the disclosure of all information necessary in compliance with this chapter; (3) Be accompanied by aperrnit fee in the amount of -the f--gull ainGunt--of fie-fee -eha"eab l e-der--suc-"erm4t -tlie-per=nAt-4ee-sha44-be f i f t y f4ve• dollars ($50.00 &AG); (4) Be submitted to the city manager by the director of public works M s?? a eoden f-?ar?a at-ia together with all pertinent information required in this chapter, in order that a determination can be made by the city manager (5) Contain a complete record of all arrests and convictions against the applicant and every partner, officer or director of the applicant for violations of any and all laws and ordinances of the city, count state or federal government; ' (6) Contain the names(s). Name of employee(s) responsible for the operation of applicant's business, meaning those who will manage, administer and supervise the business under the permit when issued, including the amount of experience possessed by each such employee. If such employee is other than a partner or director of the applicant, then each such employee shall mue4 complete i a city police department background information report, executed under oath, and submit to a background investigation, photograph, and fingerprints. (7) Contain the following additional information: a. Number, type and size of waste collection vehicles in use t-0-be-used; b. The number of employees -to-be assigned to each waste collection vehicle; C. The name and location of every establishment in the city, including short--term construction _sites, ?eemmere,i-l-and-4ndust-r-4-a4-esttablishnw-? where roll-off containers are 4e--be placed and serviced by_the applicant. Sec. 54.22. Prerequisites to issuance. in determining whether or not a permit for the placement or p-Iae-ng--and servicing of roll-off containers should be issued, the city manager eemm4-ss4eff shall consider and base his 4-t4 decision on the following: (1) A review Re*4-ew of the material submitted pursuant to section 54_21 64-23 ; 2" Y? (2) A review of all convictions of the applicant, the reasons therefor and the conduct of the suet} applicant subsequent to release; (3) The license history of each -,uel+ applicant; (4) The certificate of approval of the director of public works -supef4ntendent-e sani-ta-t4ou to the effect that the applicant has satisfied the following: a. Tile adequacy of the equipment to be used; b. That the applicant has agreed to remit to the city each month a fee calculated in the following manner: Fifteen (15) per cent of the gross revenue billed reGe4ye4 by the applicant from the installation or servicing of roll-off containers within the city for the preceding calendar month, including roll-off containers installed permanently and temporarily, and has agreed to furnish a duplicate copy of the applicant's monthly billing; C. The applicant has agreed to make all books and records applicable to the business conducted under the permit r-equ4-r-e4-by---,eet4en44-.29 available to the city or its designee for inspection and audit; d. The applicant has provided a copy of a certificate of insurance demonstrating that the applicant's employees performing work pursuant to the permit are covered by workers' compensation insurance. Sec. 54.24. Liability insurance. The holder of a permit issued under this article shall maintain in effect at all times public liability insurance in the minimum amounts of.,five hundred thousand one-hunlrze"Gu-sand dollars ($500,000.00) 444-094, 0GA4 single limit -fermi-n?uries t any-ene per-sen-r--twe-Ii++ndr-e"iousand4e4-1-ar3-{ 88;09G,04 for personal injuries 4n-jur-y arising out of one occurrence and one-hundred thousand fifty-i=haus-and dollars ($100,000.00) 4694, 89= 4 property damage, and shall 3 0 furnish the city a certificate evidencing such h- insurance-. The city shall be named as an additional insured under such insurance. The permit holder shall furnish a certificate_or certificates of insurance demonstrating cannl_iance_with therequirements of this section. Sec. 54.25. Termination, denial and renewal; restrictions on issuance or renewal. f? E 5 (a) All ann"-1- permits under this article shall be valid for not more than one 1 year and'shall terminate on Se teiiber 30 of each year Ue-4ast-day of abil4ty -te se-l-feet, r-emeve-or d-ispese-of --a!!-aeeumu4-atei-en-%. (b) Each permit holder shall make a written application for renewal on forms provided by the director of public works -supep4f" dent of s nitatiaR on or before October first of each calendar year, which renewal application shall update the information Provided-by eet? a-in--sins anta?' the s me-infar-ma?isn-as the initial application and shall be'accompanied by a fee in the amount required for initial a lications Ue requi-red-fee. (c) Applications for renewal shall be processed in the same manner as an initial application. (d) No permits required by this article shall be renewed, 4ne4-ud4-ng-Ue-se i- i E E e?+ ir?d n?-Aetebe -;?8f-r and no new ?uc* permit shall be issued to any person unless the director off -public works -super-i-ntendent of s n4-to-t4a;v determines that the city is unable to collect, remove or dispose of certain 11 garbage, rubbish and other accumulations. In such case, lie then shall submit his written findings to accompany the applications and such findings shall be considered in this issuance or renewal process. (e) Such permit may be terminated or denied by the director of public works --uper4n-te-ndent of---san4ti a-Wei+ but only after the procedure set out in 4 i M section 71.12(9) of the Clearwater Code of Ordinances has been followed. M' The granting or renewal of a permit pursuant to this article shall not be construed as a grant of a franchise or of vested rights. Sec. 34.26. Revocation or suspension. The city manager -esmin4-ss4on, after affording the permit holder notice of the charges and opportunity to be heard with respect to any revocation proceedings, may, if the-city manager at finds this chapter to have been violated or that false statements were made on any application or application for renewal or on any submittal required by this article by the permit holder, agent or employee, revoke the permit in its entirety, suspend the permit for a stated period of time, place the permit holder on probation, or place other conditions thereon as the city maker E-eomn4-s-,4a finds necessary. Section 2. Section 54.23, Code of Ordinances, is hereby repealed. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED September 3^, 1992 Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Approved as to form and correctness: 1 Cynthia E. Gou eau M. A. Galbraith, City Clerk City Attorney 5 E t f w. €f. f S i f i A 19 ORDINANCE NO. 5265-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO FLOOD PROTECTION; AMENDING SECTION 146.004, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REVISE THE DEFINITION OF "SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT" IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH FLORIDA LAW RELATING TO THE LENGTH OF TIME IN WHICH CERTAIN COSTS ARE TO DE ACCOUNTED FOR AND LIMITED ON CLEARWATER BEACH AND SAND KEY, BUT NOT IN OTHER AREAS OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD WITHIN TIIE CITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 4 WHEREAS, the definition of "substantial improvement" in Section 161.54, Florida Statutes, has been amended by the enactment of (louse Bill 101 by the 1992 Florida Legislature, which will take effect on October 1, 1992; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the amendment, the costs of repair, reconstruction, or other improvements to structures in the coastal building zone must be accounted for and are limited during any five-year period; and WHEREAS, the islands of Clearwater Beach and Sand Key are in the "coastal building zone" as defined by state law in Section 161.54, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the definition of "substantial' improvement" in the floou protection ordinance of the City 'to eliminate an inconsistency in the length of time during which certain costs are to be accounted for and limited on Clearwater Beach and Sand Key; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Subsection (1) of Section 1'46.004, Code of Ordinances, as amended by Ordinance 5124-91, is further amended to read: Section 146.004. Definitions. As used in this chapter: "Substantial improvement" means: (1) (a) With respect to any property located an Clearwater Beach or Sand Key, any repairer reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, or other d? d 0e-ki M improvement of a structure during a five 5 ene--4 year period, the cumulative cost of which equals or exceeds fifty (50) per cent of the market value of the structure before the start of construction of the improvement, or (b) With respect to any property located in an area of special flood hazard other than on Clearwater Beach or Sand Key, any reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, or other improvement of a structure during a one (1) year per i od, the cos t of wh i ch equa 1 s or exceeds f if tY (50 ) percent of the market value of the structure before the start of construction of the improvement. Sec-- on 2. This ordinance shall take effect October 1, 1992. PASSED ON FIRST READING Se t:ember 3, 1992 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Attest: Cynt is E. Gou eau City Clerk Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form and correctness:. M. A. Ga rait Jr City Attorney ti ao ORDINANCE NO. 5256-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, VACATING PORTIONS OF FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH AND CHAUTAUQUA AVENUE (FORMERLY MAIN STREET), LYING WITHIN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 28 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN WATER AND SEWER EASEMENTS RETAINED BY THE CITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, it has been requested by Dimmitt Chevrolet, Inc., Larry Dimmitt Cadillac, Inc. and Richard R. Dimmitt (the Diminitts), owners of certain real property located in the City of Clearwater, that the City vacate the rights-of- way described herein; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that said right-of-ways are not necessary for municipal use and it is deemed to be to the best interest of the City and the general public that the same be vacated; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section I. The portions of the right-of-way of Fifth Avenue South and Chautauqua Avenue (formerly Main Street) as shown on the plats of Chautauqua Unit No. 1, Section A, and Chautauqua Unit No. 3, Section A, subdivisions (recorded at Plat Book 9, Pages 52 and lob, respectively, of the Official Records of Pinellas County, Florida), as more particularly described in Exhibits A and B attached hereto will be vacated, closed and released, acid the City of Clearwater will quitclaim and release all of its right, title and interest thereto, contingent upon the following conditions in accordance with Paragraph 8 of the agreement between the City and the Dimmitts dated June 10, 1992, regarding the subject vacation and the paving and realignment of Third Avenue South (the "Agreement": (a) Dimmitt executing the legal documents as set forth in Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Agreement and delivering said documents in escrow as provided in Paragraph 7 of the Agreement; (b) Pinellas County's vacation of Fourth Avenue South and acceptance of, the proposed realignment of Third Avenue South; arid (c) The Third Avenuc South road improvements and realignment between U. S. 19 and Chautauqua Avenue being constructed, completed and accepted by the City of Clearwater and the appropriate regulatory agencies which have issued construction permits. Section 2. The City of Clearwater reserves a 20-foot sanitary sewer easement and a 15-foot water easement over the property, each centered over existing sanitary sewer and water lines, respectively. Section 3. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, following compliance with the contingencies set forth in Section 1 above. The recording by the City Clerk of this ordinance shall be conclusive evidence of the full satisfaction Wall of the contingencies set forth in Section'l above. adoP-I-cd 'JO ? , 9 F 7 .i ° Section A. This ordinance shall take: effect il"110diately upon ada tiom . PASSED ON FIRST READING September 3, 1942 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Rita. Garvey Mayor-Coirimiss loner Approved as to form and and correctness: Attest: C; A.'Ga raiti, r. Cynt is E. Gou eau is City Attorney City Clerk • f. F. I S r it r ri 3 j• T R f I s ' 1 I/A us Ii VIA1Ar i rr Ca Pic LAC t Y.I c.t re: (.) A;41 y V1, Q.1: 6037, Et' Z033 rl F.! /.+/ Sp s'l 1 '•- ?l A! t4 ell ? r V a ? `a ?C4 N ? ....-ice 11 '1`` 11 , LE6E11U it UEfiUTES HOIITII S UEnQ1ES SOU111 E DIE ,IES EAST W ULfIOILS W13T 11 xx• IICFIPTus orcare ^^?I Yl Ax• 4 Cr+0r'1 M,IIUItt Willi UCAnIflas _ xx- uElrolES [ECOncs WITH OCARUfcs v F.O.O. PEno IES rolilr Or QE61111111i6 •6. VEIIuICS ACIIEs •, rs P.O.C. UCIIUrES Pouir or COMMEUCEI.EIFT flew UEIIUTES 1116111 Or HAY On. UEIIOTES OFFICIAL RECORD UU. UEIIOTCS DECD GOOK A 1lulus r 11 }1.• 6161/h .h.«n 1,n ..n 14 far Inl•nnrll•n•1 err ?.u1 1? n1 I. n•i L.I.n1.4 1. /.x161 r 1rf a.r ?ufae l.l•J M Ihan11.11. 2.I l1,+ .?•lah •h•rn h•1••n r.. 11 a?rral «II640 11.• 16n•nl al. ?, ZdA ?. ! • 1111• •14.11.0 .wf I/ 6r4i•.1 1. a..r,rnJ •1 ..6•rranf•, ra61?1.. If. n. .. rnr •Ihu r. Il.rr •F e•••r J d /r'A4'O/' ? 3.i l1,• Lan??la .hr«n ha ••n ar. ?ra•/ •n I1,. IYUI xn? •I f•.Il.n .I ' G7.N.,'' ,?1J [/n.kF? !2•Il.ti •a i•1,•r SUO.OU'D?"w, . i I Th. 6••161, •r1 7a V.l J•16001•w •N...n h.r.•n 011 M. min1,nrrw Q • G7. GN' 1•.1'.1 61 •..J.f1. •• ..1 1•x11. 1/ the 11.111• 006f1 .1 P.•1•ari.n• 4AAfa 1rnJ ?w ••1 •er 4. Ch.pl•1 214111•G. 1'141114 Aof-h blahs. C.J.. 6:14!• Sdr?F'G7'C prwu.l 14 L•`llru 472.02. 11.00. [la]•I•.. .S//U,(;,? a I F•. .1...1 2 ai •: Irr Llal Iuplr R. n., ? PIHI' ^'-`?'--"?;/ve:_^ rl 1,..4.11„_11. •1.•...•. .. ce.•r1.rlr. A. r•, NUT A OUHVUY MUM u= piMNil M%1Nl1GCMENT?? - ` - -- -- --- --_.___.._. -..? C: (7 11]C)1 A71()1 Far .,.Ir sma+..rxnmr wJic+crwr•rq 1+?. 'rfim AVENUE SOUTIi 2allap vs. 11rr la Ir..14 [I•rrrrl •r, II•rlJr J111) MOUtk Ahw» 101]) Jtl?i1,1 SKETC11 OF FIFTH AVENUE SOUTII -AL v -" 13-Al-C, PRAritI QYI CKU /' • /OO' 1/,i/ti - .6CwrC Q.C. rU. 1,U. JuU 110.1 S[C, Ivrf•. RCC. Sn[[r 110.1 N?•S Caa f• ooJ: • oc3o xs - xr ,? / o? t IXIITI3TT A f ' s'• I S I t, . s. i LEGAL DESCRIPTION: FIFTH AVENUE SOUTH A tract of land lying within Section 32, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southwest corner of said Section 32, thence along the West line of said Section 32, N 00°00'58" E, for 1,162.84 feet; thence leaving said line, S 89°58'25" E, for 100.00 feet to the intersection of the East right-of--way line of U. S. Highway 19, as it now exists and the North line of a Florida Power Corporation right-of-way, as recorded in Deed Book 1516, Page 581, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence along said North line, N 89°58'25" E, for 5513.48 feet to the Southwest corner of City oV Clearwater property, as recorded in Official Record Book 5495, Page 1208, the same corner being the Southeast corner of a vacates) riUhL-of-way (Main Street right--of-way) as recorded in Official Record Book 6037, Page 2033, both recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence along the East line of said vacated right-of- way, the same being the West line of said City of Clearwater property, N 00°01'50" 14, for 100.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, said point also tieing the Northwest corner of said City of Clearwater property; thence continue along the East line of said vacated right-of-way, N 0001150" 1-1, for 60.00 feet to the Southwest corner of Block 35, as shown on the Plat of Unit No. 3-Sec. A- Chautauqua "on the lake," as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 146, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida;' thence along the South line of said Block 35, the same being the North right--of-way line of Fifth Avenue South, as shown on said Plat of Unit No. 3-Sec. A-Chautauqua "on the lake," S 89°58'25" E, for 798.40 feet to the I-lest right-of-way line of Lake Shore Drive, as shown on said Plat of Unit No. 3-Sec. A-Chautauqua "on the lake," also being a point of intersection with a non-tangent curve concave to the Northeast; thence along said West right-of-way line, Southerly along the arc of said curve with a radial bearing N 70°33'19" E, and having a radius of 240.00 feet a central angle of 16°12'51", an arc length of 67.92 feet and a chord bearing S 27°33'07" E, for 67.69 feet to the point of intersection with a non-tangent line, the same being the North line of said City of Clearwater property; thence along said 11orth line, also heing the Soulh ri(jht-of-way lime of Fifth Avenue: South, 14 89"a51i'25" W, for 829.68 feet to the: 1'0I NT 01' BF G I 11111i{i . Street 2 of 2 Exhibit A ,-Mv C",QAIo,t' of .3i,/ I;1 [1f' sEr:. s2 lts-?.+ c ?--WEST Lc?/4? uf:.?l?i?f pFS?.3t•zrs•Iw. r1lcv' r9';fl'I? 1 a Jodfll?'1J P/A'L) ?Ive;1/r/e Jot/rN Uwt: clF ,?V6NL%6 ?rS.fi' f'?CUrI'3?<0r? A•?IJ _ I I i k Je4:lI'ts0'C? s° Jt rr Jo It to ?1 Lot u :A.' I36 ? For/J`771 .1ve. .Soul7f v eA rip .el+J AR. 6031, 0% Zo57 t t1L0?4 J' A1..11,1/ .7 r. fL C?/.-uiT:lu[/U.t r! T/l G.tt.6' r1./1 /' M 3 .i f ?S. •l r f l f. /7C. ?IOiE1 I 11• 01014, 0hwn 100.0 It hr Ld0r m.110 1,.1 rm 0i 10 0 1 1+100404 10 J.P101 a 0.0r0r p4rlrrP}I? In It's 11014. 1.1 110 rHlth 0M..0 3,1880+ .41 rr•r•00J .Ilhtul Ih0 1000111 ?I is 11110 4$010414 .1,4 I. 0r110t1 1• 0,43 .1,J +1 0410".6011, 000101t- lionr we 0nr .11-or r0H.rf rl r000r J. 3.1 11.0 10.0110 01..e hr189n r0 141.4 ?n Ih0 W001 nn0 •I 14411.1, !1.71.11.0 %.101++ SOO.OO'51"W, 0 hvion IN 4,1 11 tlplt.i 010nJ.rJi?l 41 00 0 1 1110rih $r Ih.FObrli0?00+r 41.01 I'rn?i41d.n.4 LtnJ fY.rtr.rl Id Chglor tII1ll•h, r10rli. AbuInI01r011ro COJ+, is,1rrU+nl 10 E0t1101, 4T?.02, 1141140 !4.441444 5.1 10. $M0, I .I 2 100 b1.1 Juupollen. 1.1 4,1946 S1r001 10 010+ InOwn It Ch..largw A.fnws. LEOEIIII N DE1401E1 NOnill 1 D[1101E1 a4Uill E DEIIOIEI EAST W DLHOILI WES1 Xx• UEIIUILS DEOnEE XX' O(HO[ES MINUILS Willi DEA11111Of xX" IUEHOiES SECOHOS Wlll1 0EAnuics DE1101ES roN11 Or ULIJU11.46 e, UCIIOIES ACAE1 r.0. G. U011UrLI hUNif Or CON0ILIIC1hrL141 n0W Ur11U 1 111a111 or WAY O.n, DEHOI10'EI OfIIclAl, 41EC0110 ?C4teL ?? , ?d Cf/.Ill /:tUf?lll '[It/ TNC U ?'? dv?r Iva ? A PLj. 4, fiT 5Z '%"A!0PaJaD qW I J NOT A. UUIIVL'Y r•i1E1'An[ Drll1)1MMITT IVI NAGEMENT C 01111011 A710N /A ib"vx~ A09004 is&; LW"' Is UR6Tj ?,."•?_?•?•, •74047 U.S. Il.r. t1 IIw U, TIIIEiU AVENUE SOUTH L4.,r,,tK. 110rIJa .14113 Ft-A",- SKETCH OF A POi3TION OF PI'w1' (+I?) 011-4441 MAIN ST. Ti/W SCA' All DAIEM UTI ° cx0 IIY t1 C. 1III r0: f 10-11-1110.1 SIC. IYA•. RTE. UTELTI1o 1 / 100• G?//??rJ .4.'.1143 J1V f/---?1 N/A IlCriy4 •P".0 c ./t • J'A • I4 / 00, J: EXHIBIT B I M ?m 0" M LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PORTION OF MAIN STREET A tract of land lying within Section 32, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being wore particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 32; thence along the West lime of said Southwest 1/4, S 00°00;58" 1.1, for 860.50 feet; thence leaving said West line S 89°34'50" E, for 100.00 feet to the intersection of the East right-of-way line of U. S. Highway 19, as it now exists and the South right- of-way line of Third Avenue South, as shown on the Plat of Unit No. 1-Sec. A- Chautauqua "on the lake," as recorded in Plat hook 9, Page 52, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence along said line, S 89°51'07" E for 537.05 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S 89°51'07" E, for 29.76 feet; thence N 00°05'47" W, for 21.26 feet; thence S 89°52'11" E, for 29.73 feet to the East right-of-way line of Main Street, as shown on the Plat of said Unit No. 1- Sec. A-Chautauqua "on the lake," said point being S 00°09'44" E, 5.03 feet from the Northwest corner of Block 36 of the said Plat of Unit No. 1-Sec. A--Chautauqua "on the lake," thence along the East right-of-way line of said Main Street, the same being the West line of said Block 36, S 00°09'44" E, for 259.39 feet to the South right-of-way line of Fourth AvelMe South, as shown on the Plat of Unit No. 3-Sec. A-Chautauqua "on the lake," as recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 146, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence along the South right-of-way line of said Fourth Avenue South, the same being the North line of Block 35 of said Plat of Unit No. 3-Sec. A-Chautauqua "on the lake" and the westerly extension thereof, N 89°46'42" W, for 60.06 feet to the East line of a vacated right-of-way {a portion of Main Street right-of-way} as recorded in Official Record Book 6037, Page 2033, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence along the East line of said vacated right-of-way and the Test right-of-way line of Main Street of said Plat of Unit No. 1-Sec. A-Chautauqua "on the lake" N 00°01`50" W, for 237.99 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. dl4 I , i Sheet 2 of 2 Exhibit B f !I al ORDINANCE NO. 5267-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO FINANCE AND TAXATION; AMENDING SECTION 44.21, CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO EXEMPTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC SERVICE TAX; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the public service tax is authorized by Section 166.231, Florida Statutes, and it is necessary and desirable to amend Section 44.21, Clearwater Code of Ordinances, to eliminate certain inconsistencies between the ordinance and the statute; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY 'OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: i Section 1. Section 44.21, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 44.21. Exemptions. (a) The United States of America, State of Florida, and political subdivisions and agencies thereof are hereby exempted from payment of the taxes imposed by section 44.20. Such tax shall not apply to sales of bottled water. (b) There is excluded from the tax levied and imposed under section 44.20 the following: (1) Purchases of special fuels as defined in Section 206.86, Florida Statutes F.S. Gh. 206; (2) The purchase of not more than five (5) gallons of fuel oil delivered at the seller's place of business into the purchaser's container of not more than five (5) gallon capacity; (3) The purchase of fuel oil or kerosene for use as an aircraft engine fuel or propellant or for use in internal combustion engines 44n-the--p-repu4s -orv e€?}? Rs;-me er a elm; aiaterhaa s-;-a4--era-f--t; rai4"ad-tra4-ns--and-other -media e€ tran?sr-tai-lee; f (4) The purchase of natural as or fuel oil by a public or private utility, including municipal corporations and rural electric cooperative adopl? Il r M associations, either for resale or for use as fuel in the generation of electricity; (5) The purchase-of local telephone service or other telecommunications service for use in the conduct of a telecommunications service for hire or otherwise for resale. M The purchase of an item otherwise subject to the to levied-by section 44.20 by any recognized church for use exclusively for church purposes. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect October 1, 1992. PASSED ON FIRST READING September 3, 1992 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: "&z &&V?' M. A. Galbraith, J City Attorney U .I Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner t i { r 2 Ii? ORDINANCE l30. 5268-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, VACATING THE SOUTH 1.0 FOOT OF THE 10-FOOT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LYING WITHIN LOT 78, CLUBHOUSE ESTATES OF COUNTRYSIDE UNIT TWO, LESS ME EASTERLY 5.0 FEET AND THE I4ESTERLY 5.0 FEET; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, it has been requested by Russell F. Burr, owner of certain real property located in the City of Clearwater, that the City vacate the drainage and utility easement described herein; anti WIJEREAS, the City Commission finds that said easement is not necessary for municipal use and it is deemed to be to the best interest of the City and the general public that the same be vacated; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following: The South 1.0 foot of the 10-foot drainage and utility easement lying within Lot 78, Clubhouse Estates of Countryside Unit Two, as recorded in Plat Book 76, Page 9, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, less the Easterly 5.0 feet and the Westerly 5.0 feet, is hereby vacated, closed and released, and the City of Clearwater quitclaims and releases all of its right, title and interest thereto. Section 22. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, following adoption. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Approved as to Porto and and correctness: M. A. Ga ait 3r. City Atto ney September 3, 1992 Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Cynthia E. Gou eau City Clerk i f i i as 1I 5' ?I I I I I ? I o I f '? I I nl h I v W C? f o ...i II I I u? a 0 . I 5, 5 i I ? r, I ?O"I 1? -k!?O 7$ J ? i i i } Drainage 9 Wit, Estnt. 0 r ? ?- N I. I I I I SCALE N. T.9 . I I Cb J' ST. ANDREWS NOTE= This Is not a SURVEY LI . DRIVE Burr" Vac. No. 92- 16 Sect. 20-- 28-16 Drawn by D.D.M. flgtn' Rid, i^'' f A W% r 1 t Clearwater City Commission Fleeting D 09 17 92 QZ= T 4 ??hfTE?t?oQ Agenda Cover Memorandum S ONSENT SUBJECT: FIRM SERVICE AGREEMENTS WITH FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve amendments to our Firm Transportation Service Agreement dated October 1, 1991, and commensurate amendments to the General Service Agreement dated November 16, 1989 ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: Our natural gas supplier, Florida Gas Transmission Company (FGT) has become an open access pipeline by order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). This allows other natural gas suppliers and local distribution companies (LDC's), like the City of Clearwater to transport gas over FGT pipelines. In order to reduce our gas costs'and make the Clearwater Gas System more profitable, we would like to convert 50 percent of our Firm Sales Service to Firm Transportation Service (FTS) which will allow us to purchase 50 percent of our gas supply on the open market. We are currently transporting only 30 percent. Under the FERC approved transition plan, each year FGT allows the LDC's to convert a certain percentage of their Firm Sales Service gas to Transportation Service. The 50 percent level represents the maximum that we can convert to FTS as of August 1, 1992. In order to accomplish this we are amending our existing General Service Agreement and Firm Transportation Service Agreement with FGT. The revised Sixth Exhibit A & B will be inserted in our original General Service contract with FGT, which reduces by 20 percent our Firm Sales gas and the revised second Revised Exhibits A, B and C will be inserted in our original Firm Transportation Agreement which increases 20 percent of our Firm Transportation gas. The revised Firm Transportation Agreement increases our Transportation Gas by the same amount as our original contract is reduced. This increased conversion will allow Clearwater Gas System to purchase natural gas from one of our five currently contracted suppliers (Citrus Industrial, Revit-wed by: (/., Originating Dept: Costs: i NIA Cowission Action: Legal 1*a*`' Clearwater Gas System 1 Total Approved Budget MIA N/A P hasin ? ?;; S H/A Approved w/conditions ? urc g Risk Mgmt. N/A User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. ? Denied Cis N/A O Continued to: ACM N/A Funding Source: Other ? Capital Imp. Advertised: ? Operating Attachments: Date: ? Other N/A Sixth Revised Exhibits A. 8 Paper: - General Service, Second O N R i d Revised Exhibits A, B & C ot equ re Submitted Affected Parties Firm Transportation ? d notified Appropriation Code: Hone N/A NatRequired City Man g Z) Pried on recycled paper cc 2 _ Coastal Marketing, Natural Gas Clearinghouse, MG Natural Gas and Reliance Gas) on the spot market. Fiscal year to date through July, 1992, Clearwater Gas system has saved $257,890 by buying natural gas on the spot market and transporting the gas to our gate stations as compared to purchasing this gas directly from`FGT. We recommend approval and execution of the attached Amendments with FGT. It is in the Clearwater Gas Systeml•s best interest to transport the maximum amount as allowed by the FERC transition plan so as to minimize our fuel.costs. S ' t? E AMENDMENT TO GENERAL SERVICE AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO GENERAL SERVICE AGREEMENT (Contract No. 4266) is made and entered into this day of , 1992, by and between FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY (the Company) and the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA (the City); WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into a General Service Agreement on November 16, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Company and the City are amending the Firm Gas Transportation Agreement which will increase the City's transportation gas volume by 20 percent, and it is necessary to reduce by 20 percent the City's General Service Agreement sales gas volume by amending the November 16, 1989, General Service Agreement; now, therefore, it is mutually agreed that: 1. The General Service Agreement, dated November 16, 1989, is hereby amended by substituting a Sixth Revised Exhibit A and B, a copy of which is attached hereto, to said agreement in place of the" Fifth Revised Exhibits A and B. 2. Except as modified herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Firm Gas Transportation Service Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have set their-hands and seals the day and year first above written. FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: t' By: 4 Michael J. Wright t z Title: city Manager Title: i Sixth Revised Exhibit A '.: To General Service Agreement Between Florida Gas Transmission Company and The City of Clearwater Dated November 1, 1989 Maximum Daily Contract Quantity During each day of *the months indicated below, the MDCQ applicable hereunder shall be as set forth below: Period MDCQ [therms] s October 37,480 . November-March 41,096 April 51 096 , May-September 23,261 ?i • Maximum Annual Contract Quantity: 9,847,230 therms Y. . rt ; ii j 4. • fj• SELLER BUYER S: FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER " BY : BY : TITLE: Vice-President, Marketing TITLE: i. Date of this Sixth,Revised Exhibit A superseding Fifth Revised Exhibit A dated October 1, 1991: August 1, 1992 '." CONTRACT NO. 4266 ; Fr I c, r.. s{la n ? Sixth Revised Exhibit B To General Service Agreement Between Florida Gas Transmission Company and The City of Clearwater Dated November 1, 1989 Description of Point(s) of Delivery POI 1. Clearwater East 16204 2. Clearwater North 16205 3. Clearwater South 16206 TOTAL MDCQ: *Seller shall not in the aggregate under G and FTS-1 or any oth Maximum Daily Quantity SELLER Maximum „ Daily --Quantities* (MMBtu) Oct Nov-March April May-Sent 50,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 37,480 41,096 51,096 23,261 ?f be obligated to deliver on a firm basis volumes Buyer's Service Agreements under Rate Schedules ar firm rate schedule of Seller which exceed the specified for each point, BUYER FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER BY: BY: TITLE:-Vice-President, Marketing TITLE: Date of this Sixth Revised Exhibit B superseding Fifth Revised Exhibit B dated October 1, 1991: August 1, 1992 . CONTRACT NO. 4266 .1 e i 6 f N AMENDMENT T4 FTRM_GAS TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO FIRM GAS TRANSPORTATION SERVICE AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of. , 1992, by and between FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSI014 COMPANY (the company) and the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA (the City); WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into a Firm Gas Transportation Service Agreement on October 1, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Company and the City are amending the Firm Gas Transportation Agreement which will increase the city's transportation gas volume by 20 percent, and it is necessary to reduce by 20 percent the City's Firm sales gas volume by amending the November 1, 1989, Firm Service Agreement; now, therefore, It is mutually agreed that: 1. The Firm Gas Transportation Service Agreement, dated October 1, 1991, is hereby amended by substituting a Second Revised Exhibit At B and C, a copy of which is attached hereto, to said agreement in place of the First Revised Exhibits A, B, C. 2. Except as modified herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Firm Gas Transportation Service Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: By: Michael J. Wr ght Title: Title: City Manager _ +j Second Revised Exhibit A to Firm Gas Transportation Service Agreement Between Florida Gas Transmission company and City of Clearwater Dated October 1, 1991 Description of Maximum Daily Ouantities* Point(s) of (MMBtu) _Receipt POI Oct Nov-March April May=Sept FGT MOPS REFUGIO 611 1,389 1,524 11895 863 SNG/NNG FGT SABINE 23062 1,660 1,820 20263 1,031 KAPLAN PROSPER ENERGY 10126 all 889 1,105 ? 503 PEARL RIVER { i 1 *Inclusive of 3.0% for Fuel. TRANSPORTER: SHIPPER: ' r FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY CITY OF CLEARWATER r; BY: BY: TITLE: Vice President, Marketing TITLE: Date of this Second Revised Exhibit A superseding First Revised Exhibit A dated October 1, 1991: August 1, 1992 f yE M3M.Frs E •a v i• 3 J Mr ?i 7 Second Revised Exhibit C to Firm Gas Transportation Service Agreement Between Florida Gas Transmission Company and City of Clearwater Dated October 1, 1991 Maximum Daily Transportation Quantity During each day of the months indicated below, the MDTQ applicable hereunder shall be as set forth below: Period MDT M14BTU October 3,748 November-March 4,110 April 5,110 May-September 2,326 Maximum Annual Transportation uantity: 984,723 MMBTU != TRANSPORTER: SHIPPER: FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY CITY OF CLEARWATER BY: BY: TITLE: Vice President, Marketing TITLE: Date of this Second Revised Exhibit C superseding First Revised Exhibit C dated October 1, 1991: 'August l,'1992 :o33c.F'i's • r? ¦ A Item # rCLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION M M p7fla Agenda Cover Memorandum CONSENT Pwf7 SUBJECT: Supplemental Agreement to Consulting Engineering Services, Clearwater Pass Bridge Replacement Project RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve Supplemental Agreement No. 5 to the contractual agreement with David Volkert and Associates, Inc. for Professional Engineering Services to provide additional studies required by permitting agencies and to design utility accommodations, increasing the contract amount of $1,042,208.34 by an additional amount of $111,086.00 for a new total of $1,153,294.34. ® And that the appropriate official be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this supplemental agreement No. 5 to the Clearwater Pass Bridge PD&E and Design Agreement with David Volkert and Assoc. is to provide for additional information required by the regulatory agencies in the construction permitting application process and to provide for utility accommodation design and coordination with the FDOT for the City's water, sewer and gas utilities. The City's engineering consultant has advised us that the Department of Environmental Regulation has requested additional information regarding the Dredge and Fill Application for the proposed Channel Relocation. Specifically, FDER has requested additional bottom samples for the analysis of the potential presence of heavy metals and further analysis of the benthic infauna (plants and animals living in the marine floor) in the areas proposed for dredging. The consultant will work with subcontractors to obtain the necessary data and submit this data to FDER for their continued application review. We are also advised that the Department of Natural Resources is implementing a new requirement which calls for the development of Inlet Management Planning Documentation prior to the issue of any permitting associated with marine inlets. The FDNR has applied this criteria to the Clearwater Pass Bridge Project. This Inlet Management Documentation will be prepared by' Dr. Bernard Ross of Hydrosystems Associates, Inc. At this time, the City proposes to relocate the existing City utility lines for sanitary sewer, potable water and gas to the new bridge structure. These utilities will be constructed at the same time as the new bridge. Because the costs of utility accommodation will not be included in the funding provided by the Federate Highway Administration, and because construction management will be continued: Reviewod by: Legal Budget Purchasing NIA Originating Dept. Public Works User Dept. Advertised: Date: Paper: Not required X Costs: $111,066.00 (Current FYI Funding Source: Capt. Imp. X operating Other Appropriation Code(s) 315-1-3481-6,541541 Risk Mgmt.? NIA OIS N/A ACM_ NIA Other NIA City Affected parties notified Not required X ,f Commission Action Approved_ Approved wlsonditions Denied Cont'd to Attachments: Supplemental Agreement No. 5 Page 2 continued: Agenda Memo (09/1--7/92) Supplemental Agreement to Consulting Engineering Services, Clearwater Pass Bridge Replacement Project (David Volkert & Associates, Inc.) 11 conducted by the FDOT, the FDOT requires that a formal Joint Project Agreement between the utility owner (City) and the FDOT be developed for utility accommodations. The proposed supplemental agreement provides for the design of the relocated utilities on the new bridge, the development of temporary utility arrangements during the construction process and formulation of joint project agreements with the FDOT. This portion of the supplemental agreement states that consultant engineering services will be provided on an hourly basis to allow portions of the utility accommodation plan and design to be prepared by the City's Engineering Division. Pertinent Facts 1. This item allows for an additional expenditure of $I6,322.00 for further bay bottom study required by FDER. 2. This item allows for an additional expenditure of $6,630.00 for the preparation of an inlet Management Plan (IMP) required by FDNR. 3. This item allows for an additional expenditure of $88,134.00 for the design of City utility relocations. 4. Compensation (hourly rates) for Volkert & Associates for this assignment of additional work is the same as existing and previously approved and have not been increased. History of Volkert Contract • Feb. 10, 1989 . Dec. 8, 1989 • May 29, 1990 . Sept. 12, 1991 f) . Feb. 21, 1992 Original Contract PD&E study & Bridge Design $812,660.00 Supplement 1 Bottom Studies and Survey- ing for Realignment of Channel Supplement 2 COE Channel Realignment Study Supplement 3 Reassignment of Work from subconsultants to Volkert Supplement 4 Additional ROW and FDOT requirements, Fee adjusted for delay of project Supplement 5 Further Permitting studies and Utility Relocation $ 43,827.00 $ 45,332.00 $ 0.00 $140,390.34 $111,086.00 The third quarter Budget Review will include an amendment to transfer $111,086 of Bridge Fund revenues to project #315-1-3481, Clearwater Pass Bridge Construction, to provide funds for this contract amendment. passco.agn 4 1 F F S s i k . i W.P.I. NO. 7126698 STATE JOB NO. 15140-1518 F.A.P. NO. BRM-1255-(8) F.E.I.D. NO. 63-6008050 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 5 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this clay of - _ , 1992, by and between the City of Clearwater, Florida, hereinafter called the City, and David Volkert & Associates, Inc.; of 3409 West Lemon Street, Suite One, Tampa, Florida 33609, hereinafter called the Engineer, WITNESSETH `,WHEREAS, the City and the Engineer heretofore on February 10, 1989 entered into an agreement whereby the City retained the Engineer to furnish certain consulting services in connection with the PD&E Study and Design Package for Clearwater Pass Bridge in Pinellas County; and . WHEREAS, Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 providing additional information" for permitting agencies, delegating services to be performed by subconsultants to the Engineer, and meeting certain surveying and FDOT requirements along with increased salary costs, was approved by the City on December 8, 1989, May 29, 1990, September 12, 1991, and February 21, 1392; WHEREAS, the City has determined it necessary, within the general description of the project as originally planned, to require certain changes in 'services of the Engineer and that the Engineer be granted increased compensation; NOW, THEREFORE, this agreement witnesseth that for and in consideration of the mutual benefits to flow each to the other, the parties agree that the Engineer shall perform the services as modified by the Scope of Services as modified by Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and that the Engineer shall receive for his services hereunder the increased amount of $111,086.00. Except as hereby modified, amended or changed, all of the terms and conditions of said agreement and any supplements and, amendments thereto shall mmain in full force and effect. Page 1 of 2 F i w { 1 ¦ r ¦ s: l s? IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made and executed this Agreement upon the terms and conditions above stated on the day and year first above written. ENGINEER CITY DAVID VOLKERT & ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3409 West Lemon Street Suite 1 112 Osceola Avenue South Tampa, FL 33609 Clearwater, FL 34616 By By ack W, Roberts, P.E. City Manager Senior Vice President Michael Wright i 1. Attest ?J Mayor - Commission Rita Garvey Attest: ? k Date City Clerk i Cynthia E. Goudeau i Approved as to form and correctness: ; i i 2 J City Attorney j M. A. Galbraith, Jr.' a(; t i Date Page 2 of ? ' s lb f I 3 }? 1i. y9 sl t €XHI6IT „A" SCOPE OF SERVICES PURPOSE In accordance With the Agreement dated February :o, 1989, the Engineer was required to provide documented information necessary for the City to reach a decision on the types design and location of improvements for the Clearwater Pass Bridge from Sand Key to Clearwater Beach in Pinellas Ccunty, in addition, the Engineer was required to provide the construction documents for the approved bridge improvements., The City desires the Engineer to perform adr.;,tional tasks trot included in the origin,al Agreement. The added services and changes to the Agreement are assignee.by the Supplemental Agreement No. a. 2. JUSTIFICATION ANC _SUf4MAR_Y OF SERVrC_ES A. During the development of the scope of work, the City was not. aware of the requirements of the various permitting agencies for special studies associated with obtaining permits for the relocation of the federal channel in Clearwater Pass and the bridge construction. In accordance with the original scope of work, Exhibit "AA", B, 5, the Engineer prepared the necessary permit drawings for submittal, The agencies have required an -analysis of heavy metals and a qualitative analysis of the benthic infauna in the areas of proposed dredging along with the t development of inlet management planning documentation. B. „ As a necessary part of the proposed bridge replacement, certain City oUrned utilities must be relocated. The City desires the Engineer to prepare the Construction Plans for the utility relocations to allow the construction to be performed concurrently with the bridge construction. 3. SUMMARY OF r .S A. In order to compensate the Engineer for additional work efforts in accordance with 2.A, the Lump Sum Fee for Phase II shall be increased by :22,952. B. In order to compensate the Engineer for additional work efforts in accordance with 2.8, the Engineer shall receive an increased amount not to exceed: Labor S 81,454 out-or-Pocket Expenses 5 61684 Total S 88,334 C. Grand Total of Compensation 5111,Q86 4. Q,TAI 5 OF ADDED.SERVICES AND, FEES For oetails of the added services and fees, see Exhibit B, f 5 METH O OF PAYMENT Payment shall be i A ri accordance with the original agreement, . Exhibit B, IV and as expanded as follows! For the-additional work efforts in accordance with 23, payment roject by each the d shall be baspd.on ification of l p on manhours expende personnel involved in accordance'w,ith the k ass et c attached Compensation Schedule (Attachment 8--1) plus out-Of-poc expenses. " .. - _ .• I is t ' r, EXHIBIT B I)I.'I'AIGS OF r\DI)EU SERVICES AND FEES A'1"I'ACIIMEN'!' • ..: '..... B-.I Summary Sheet B-2 Peninsula Design & Engineering, Inc.' J 1 B-3 Professional Services Industries, Inc. l B_4 Hydrosystems Associates, Inc. B-5 Utilities Relocation Plans 'TX 4.? S 7< w as U J i O ? ? H L'.1 W F? d a ?z d Ljr) J C a v ?r M L. CC OG .-+ ..r L =? u; L U ? V7 C v Y vi o ?a o U r, " ?= y ? Ln z ' oc m 8 Lr V L N Q , U j L. t^' r'•i ?C ` 1 1 C 7• r A QQ U N Y.d n i 'aQ ,? U 7 :0 Ln G• F H be ? , te; cp Z d J ? V " ? a ?% a ct oc 'n r_ r. r x Ln Q r. _ ? 1??„ ??, `w { C7 G. r N rr; ct {?.7 ? y ? ? • c C ? u a ? = v F C. ,e V: ? ? ? w ? «e F^' ?r oG _ _ ? , tn Y CA ? M L7 1 i r'_..1 ATTACFIN,T:isT B PENINSULA DESIGN ENGINEERING, WC. ENGINEERS ECOLOGISTS L.1NDSC;:V'E. ARC) 11TTC'T; i't.VIM:%t- `LANkEWRti July 13, 1992 RECEIVED JUL 1 4 1992 Mr, Thomas White, P.E. David Volkert & Associates, Inc. 3409 W. Lemon Street Tampa, FL 33609 RE: Oca water Pass Bridge Replacement Supplemental Benthic Sampling and Qualitative Analysis Dear Tom: Pursuant to our recent discussions regarding the above referenced project, Peninsula Design & Engineering, Inc. (PD&E) is pleased to submit this proposal for environmental services. As discussed with Ms. Trudy Bell (FDER, Tallahassee - memo attached), PD&E would propose to collect one (1) petite ponar grab sample at each of three (3) stations (outlined by DVA) within the area of proposed dredging. Each sample will be field sieved through a 500 micron screen. The retained material will be placed in a jar containing internal and external labels. Samples will be preserved with 10% buffered £ormalin containing rose bengal stain to facilitate benthic sorting and taxonomic identification. Laboratory analysis will consist of sorting, enumeration, and identification of organisms to species level or lowest practical taxon, for each of the three samples. A letter report including sampling methods, species list, data table, relative abundance, 90% composition and graphics as appropriate will be prepared. The lump sum fee for these services will be $5,800.00 including expenses estimated at $250.00. E S, r C:\WP59\92JULY\92P62LTK.TW 9720 PRINCESS PALM AVE., SUITE 106 P.O. BOX 820038 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33619 SOUTH FLORIDA, FLORIDA 33082-0038 (813) 626-5400 (305) 384-6581 FA'X NO. (813) 623-1034 ; Pagc Two # Mr. Thomas Whitc, P.E. July 13, 1992 Once again, we appreciate the opportunity to be of service and look ; forward to working with you on this project. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Peter Bottone or myself at your earliest convenience. Thank you. Best regards, PENIN ULA DESIGN & ENGINEERING, INC. Rober ?. itman, 3r. Vice President f; t RLW/ Is Attachment cc: Peter Bottone f Robert Whitman , e ' File ,? • ;- . ' ???: t f. ` l 5. Ca\WP51\92JULY\92P62LTR.TW t t w 0 1•;TTACH',1'FRT X3-•3 Professional Service Industries, inc. Jammal & Associates Division July 22, 1992 Revised David Volkert & Associates, Inc. ± 3409 West Lemon Street, Suite I Tampa, Florida 33609 Attention: Mr. Thomas White, P.E. Project Manager .` RE: Soil Sampling and Testing Clearwater Pass Bridge Pinellas County, Florida ; . W.P.Z. No. 7126698 State Project No. 15140-1518 s :. `. F.A. No. BEM-1255-(8) Proposal No. 079207.200 Dear Mr. White: .`„ Professional Service Industries, Inc./Jammal Division is pleased to submit the following proposal + for the subject project. This proposal was requested by Mr. Thomas White of David Volkert & Associates, Inc. per his request for proposal dated July 10, 1992, Project Description 7 1 , 1 1 9 The project, as we undeistand it, consists of sampling the bottom sediment scheduled for f { dredging near the Clearwater Pass Bridge, Pinellas County, Florida. The sediment is to be tested for heavy metals as defined by the Florida Department Environmental Regulation (FDER) completeness summary. In addition, separate testing of the elutriate and water medium for heavy metals is required, 1 • 5801 Benjamin center Drive, Suite 112 • Tampa, FL 33634 • Phone: 8131886-1075 • Faye: 813/888-6514 T. 5 '. o F ¦ David Volkert & Associates, Inc. Proposal No. 079207.200 Page 2 Scnne of Sen?icrs The scope of services for the project will consist of obtaining three (3) sets of sediment samples from within the proposed dredge limits. Each set will consist of three (3) samples. 'Samples will be obtained utilizing a boat and PVC sampling tubes: Samples will contain the upper N of an inch of sediment as encountered at the time of testing. The samples will be property, marked, stored, and shipped to our Clearwater office for heavy metal testing. The heavy metals tested for will consist of Aluminum, Arsenic, Cadmium, Copper, Lead, Mercury and Zinc, Professional Service Industries, Inc.lJammal Division has an approved quality assurance plan with the FDER. Sediment _Testing Test site locations will be approximated utilizing tape measurement and estimated right angles from existing land factors. Tide information and weather conditions will be obtained from pertinent published data for the time and day of the tests. Salinity testing, water temperature, water depth and test sample depth will be obtained at the time of sampling. Salinity tests will " be performed utilizing conductive testing methods. Eiutriate and Writer Testin 1 At the time of the sediment sampling, triplicate samples of the elutriate and water at each test location will be obtained for heavy metal testing. All threes (3) samples of elutriate at each test location will require testing which includes both water and sediment samples, Repozv Report will consist of issuing two (2) separate reports. for the subject testing. One (1) report will be issued presenting the results of sediment testing and one (1) report presenting the results of the elutriate and water sampling. i e t I S , F 5 , t` . i A i David V01kert Associates, Inc. Proposal No. 079207.200 Page 3 Fee The fee to perform the services requested is $7;494,00, with a l Professional Service Industries, Inc./Jammal Division appreciates the opportunity on Attachment A. s o Proposal for the subject project. If you have any questions re4ardin to submit this contact Mr. Sameer Moussly at our Tampa office. e g this proposal, please Sincerely, Professional Service Industries, Inc. JAMMAL DMSION Henri V. Jean, Staff Geotechnical ngineer r S. Mouss y District Manager 4 s Geotec` ` h'nical and Geo-Environm6 Services I:TVJ/SS?hlcac: 079207.200 Attachments: Attachment A ' t? =No= IV P sEr/ { I ATI' MWNT A F SEDIMENT TESTING t a CLEARWATER PASS DREDGE PROJECT 4 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA z EDT11fEA'T SAR?PLtNG ' Mobilization of Boat and Personnel Per Occurrence S Boat Rental 300.00 . 2 Days 0 5150.00/d2y Technician Time (Sediment Sampling and 300.00 Safety Crew) . . 3-Man Crew consisting of 2-Man Boat Crew and 1-Man Shore Safety 20 Hours 0 S75.W/br. Field Salinity Tests 1,500.00 2 Days 0 S150.001day 300.00 _r?aDRATDRJ' TESTING Heavy Metal Parameter Tests (Sediment) ' 6 Tests 0 5156.00/ea. S ` Heavy Metal Parameter Tests (Elutriate/Water) 936.00 ' 9 Tests 0 S156.001ea. Heavy Metal Parameter Tests (Elutriate/Sediment) 1404.00 r 9 Tests 0 $156. 00lea. ' Elutriate Sample Preparation 1,404.00 - ' . ; ?•?:: , E ?. 9 Samples 0 570.00/ea. l ?. L ' 630.00 . =}. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Time includes project management, laboratory and field coordination and report preparation, report generation Project Engineer S Hours 0 $65.001hr. < S Secretarial Services 520.00 .' ' 4 Hours 0 $25.00/hr. Drafting Services '100.00 i `. ` 4 Hours 0 S25.001hr. f 100.00 TOTAL: ? S r 7,494.00 .(- •`..?. GENERAL CONDITIONS' ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY ACTIVITIES 1. PARTIES AND SCOPE OF WORK: Frolessiona:5ervice Industries, irnc f'PS''i Shari inciuoe 52110 company. o' its panicula, division, sub5idiarvnr aff iiafe performing the wort, 'worn.' means the service(s) performeo by PS to, client a, at client t: direction 'This agreement' consists of PSI's vrooosa, PSI s SCnedule o! Fees anc Services clients written acceptance tnereo! It acceptea by PS., and these Genera' Conditions •Clrenf' reter5 to the person d' busrrress entrfy ardenrzg Ine wprh to be done by P,S,1 tI client IS ordering the w04- or, benalf W another, client represents and warrants that client is the duly autnorizeci agent at said pany° 1a, the purpose 0! ordering and directing said wor?. anc In such case the term `client' also MCludeS the principal to, wThom the work ii bung performec Prices ouotcd and charged by PSI for its w0rr, are predicated uadn the conditions and the allegations of riSxs and obligations CxpreSsecl in This agreement. Unless this agreement specihcaliy prowoe: Mat PSI is to perform its worn, pursuant to specified Feaera!. State o• local regulations, client assumes sole responsibility t0- determining whether the quantity and ine nalu(p of the wary, ordered by client is adequate and sufhCient lot client s Intenoea purpose. Client shall Communicate these Genera! Conditions to each and every third panv to whom client transmits anv pan o' PSI s wort. PSI snae have no duty o, coligation to any panv other than those duties ana obisgatrons expressly set forth in this agreement Groenng WOW from PSI snag' constitute acceptance of the terms a this agreement. PSI snail be under no obligation to inform other parties o' its activities io discoveries, put shall not be negligent if it does so. 2, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: PSI s work. shall include visual inspection, laboratory analyses and physicat testing a' sample subsurface materials for ine purpose o! detection, auantilicaPon or tdentAcauori of Ine extent, it any, of contamination of subsurface, soils or ground water by hazardous materials, which shal! include materials defined as such by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. 42 USCA. Sec. 6901, =, as amended ('RCRV), o• the Federal Environmental Protection Agency ('E,P.A ") Nothing contained within this agreement shall be construed o• Interpreted as requiring PSI to assume the status of a generator, starer, transporter, treater or disposal facility as those terms appear within RCRA a, within any Federal or state statute or regulation governing the generation Iransponalion, treatment, storage and disposal o' DDilulants Client assumes full responsibility to., compliance with the provisions of RCRA and any other Federal or stale statute or regulation povemrng the "handling, Ireatment, storage and disposal o' pollutants. 3. SCHEDULING OF WORK: The services set forth in PSI's proposal and client's acceptance will be accomplisheo in a timely and workmanlike manner by PSI personnel. If PSI is required to delay any pan of its work to accommodate the requests or requirements o' client. regulatory agencies, or Inird parties or due to any causes beyond the direct reasonable control of PSI, additional charges may be applicable, which client agrees to pay. 4. ACCESS TO SITE: Client will arrange and provide access to each site upon which it will be necessary lot P.S.I. to perform its wort.. In the event work is required on any site not owned by client, client represents and warrants to PSI twat client has obtained all necessary permissions for PSI to enter upon the silo and conduct its wort:. Client shall, upon request. provide PSI with evidence o! such permission as well as acceptance of the olner terms and conditions set forth herein by the owner(s) and tenant(s), it applicable, of such sitels) in form acceptable to PSI. Client acknowledges that it is not PSi's responsloility to notify any such property owner of the discovery at actual at suspected pollutants Client luriher recognizes Inal knowieoge of such suspected or actual condition may result in a reduction in a propeny's value and may provide incentive to owners a! properties affected to initiate legal action against client and/or others. Any work performed by PSI with respect to obtaining permission to enter upon and do work on the lands of others as well as any work. performed by PSI pursuant to this agreement shall be deemed as being done on behalf of client and client agrees to assume all risks inemo!, PSI Shall take reasonable measures and precautions to minimize damage to cacti site and any improvements located thereon as the result of its work and the use ol its equipment; however, PSI has not included in its lee Ine cost of restoration ol damage which may occur. It Client a. ine possessor of any interest in any site desires or requires PSI to restore site to its former conditions, upon written request al client. PSI will perform such additional wort, as is necessary to do ano client agrees to pay to PSI the cost thereof. S. CLIENTS DUTY TO NOTIFY ENGINEER: Client represents and warrants that he has advised PSI of any known or suspected hazardous materials, utility lines and pollutants at any site at which PSI is to do work hereunder, and unless PSI has assumed in writing the responsibility of locating subsurface objects, structures, lines or conduits, client agrees to defend, indemnity and save PSI harmless from all claims, suits, losses, costs and expenses. including reasonable attorneys lees as a result of personal injury, death or property damage occurring with respect to PSI's performance of its work and resulting to or caused by contact with subsurface or talent objects, structures, fines or conduits where the actual ar potential presence and location thereof was not revealed to PSI by client. 6. LIMITATIONS OF PROCEDURES, EDUiPMENT AND TESTS: Information obtained from inspections, analysis and testmo of sample materials shall be accurately reported on boring logs. Such information is considered evidence with respect to the detection, auantilicatlon ano identification o! pollutants, but any inference or conclusion based thereon is necessarily an opinion atsa based upon engineering judgment and shall not be construed as a representation of fact, Ground water levels and composition may vary due to seasonal and climalical changes and exinnsic conditions and, unless samples and lestino are conducted over an extended period o! time pollutants contained tnerein may escape defection. A site at which pollutants are not found to exist or at the time of inspection do not, in fact, exist, may later. due to intervening causes such as natural ground water flows or human intervention, become contaminated, There is a risk that sampling techniques may themselves result in contamination of certain subsurface areas such as when a probe at boring device moves through a contaminated area linking it to an aquifer, underground stream or other hydrous body not previously contaminated and capable of transporting pollutants. Because the risks set forth in this paragraph are unavoidable and because the sampling techniques to be employed are a necessary aspect of PSI's work on client's behalf, client agrees to assume these risks. 7. DISCOVERY OF UNANTICIPATED POLLUTANTS: The discovery of certain pollutants may make it necessary for PSI to take immediate measures to protect health and safety. PSI agrees to notify client as soon as practically possible should such pollutants be suspected or discovered. Ciienl agrees to reimburse PSI tot the reasonable cost of implementing such measures under the circumstances. B. SOIL AND SAMPLE DISPOSAL: Unless otherwise apieea in writing, soils known at the time to be contaminated will be placed in containers, labeled and left on the site for proper disposition by client, and samples removed by PSI to its laboratory will, upon completion of testing, be disposed by PSI in an approved manner. 9. WARRANTY: PSI's work wili be performed, its findings obtained and its reports prepared in accordance with this agreement and with Generally accepted principals and practices. In performing its work hereunder, PSi will use that degree of care and sk1h ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by members of Its profession in the community. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties or representations, either expressed or implied. Client agrees Inal the maximum liability at PSI, Whether under contrast or negfipence, shall be limited to 525,000.00 or the total amount of the lee paid to PSI under this agreement, whicnever amount is greater. In the event Client is unwilling at unable to limit PSI's liability in accordance with the provisions set lortn in this paragraph, upon written request of Client igdelner wile payment at an additional fee in the amount of 5% of PSI's estimated cost lot doing the Work received within five days of client's acceptance hereof (to be adjusted to 5% of the amount actually billed by PSI for its work on the project at time of completion), Ine limit at liability shall be increased to 5250,000.00. This charge will not be construed as being a charge for insurance of any type, but is increased consideration for Ine greater liability involved. 10, INDEMNITY: In the event that client or client's principal shall bring any suit, cause o! action at counterclaim against PSI, to ine extent that PSI shall prevail, ine pany initiating sucn action shall pay to PSI the costs ano expenses incurred to answer ano or defend such action, including reasonable attorney's lees and coon costs. In no event snail PSI indemnity any other party for the consequences of the party's negligence, including failure to follow PSI's recommendations. 11. PAYMENT: Client shall be invoiced once each month Ior wort, performed outing the preceding period. Client agrees to pay each invoice within thirty (30) clays of its receipt. Client lunher agrees to pay interest on all amounts invoiced and not paid or objected to tar valro cause in writing within said thing (30) day period at the maximum interest rate permitted under applicable law. until paid, Client agrees to pay PSI's cost of coliection at all amounts due and unpaid after sixty (60) days, including court costs and reasonable attorney's tees. PSI srlalf not be bound by any provision or agreement requiring or providing for arbitration dl disputes or controversies arising Out o1 this agreement any provision wherein PSI waives any rights to a mechanics' lien, or an; provision conditioning PSI's right to receive payment for its work upon payment to Clint by any tn;ra parry. These general conditions are notice, where reburied, trial PSI shall file alien whenever necessary to collect past due amounts. 12, TERMINATION: This Agreement may be terminate-. oy either parry upon seven day's brio' woven =,ice In the event a! ierminafion, PSI shall be compensated by client for a1 services ped&,-nec up to and including the termination date, including reimbursable expenses 13. WITNESS FEES: PSI's employees shall no' oe retained as expert witnesses except by separate written agreement Clien' agrees to pay PSI pursuant to PSI's then current fee scheaule for any PSI employee suppoanaeo by any party as ar, occurrance witness as a result dI PSI s wort,. 14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: Tn.sagreement containslneentireunoersiano?nooetweenlneparties Chen,ao.:nowiedge_ lnalnorepresentations. v:arranties unaerlakingS or prom,SeS have peen mace Olney Inan and except i^ose exriressty Con2neu nerein This agreernent. may be arneraeg, mpg l e-. er terminated only oy a written Instrument sidneg t each a' : dailies herelo PSI E•wX.154 4 r1 ATTAc}1>,i..;T B-G NYDROSYSTEMS ASSOCIATES. INC. 1 July 24 1992 1 1915 3RiG1 : Vti ATcF. BLVD, • TAMPA, FLORIDA 333617 • (813) 988.5522/974.2581 Volkert Project No. 8100.13 Mr. Thomas White P.E. David Volker & Associates Inc. 3409 West Lemon Street, Suite 1 Tampa, Fl. 33609 G? RECEIVED JUL 2 7 1992 Dear Mr. White: This document is a proposal to prepare a report for the City of Clearwater to be used to apply ..for. a permit with DNR regarding the construction of the new Clearwater Pass Bridge. While anticipating the guidelines from DNR, It can be speculated that the requirements will be rational and that most of their concerns regarding the effect of the bridge can be answered with data extracted from our previous studies of Clearwater Pass. The scope of the effort involved in this report cannot be construed to be that of an Inlet Management Plan (IMP), which involves field measurements , map studies, and alternative analysis for a portion of the shoreline and the inlet. However, the previous studies discussed are integral and important parts of a future IMP related to the effect of the bridge. The scope of this effort does not include extensive rerunning of the model but does include access to all data previously calculated whether the data appear in a previous report or not. It is expected that it will require five working days to analyze the concerns , to form answers based upon the accumulated data, to write the report, to proof and print the same. The expected cost would be covered by a fixed fee of $ 5400. Sincerely, 0-e"?f' Bernard E. Ross Hydrosystems Associates Inc. mathematical modeling, environmental and hydrologic consultants 1 ? t 7 ? ;s ,r l li ATTACBM NT "E-5" UTILITY RELOCATION PLANS A. OBJECTIVE City utility lines are currently carried across Clearwater Pass, supported by the existing bridge and subaqueously. The planned bridge replacement at Clearwater Pass necessitates relocation of these utility lines. Services required of the'Consultant involve providing certain ... engineering services in connection with the proposed construction of: r *Relocation of a 12 inch water main from the existing bridge to the proposed bridge. *Relocation of a 16 inch'sanitary force main from the existing bridge to the proposed bridge. *In--place io;gering of subaqueous 16 inch water main. B. SERVICES The Consultant will provide the following engineering services for the above: c 1. Construction Plans and Special Provisions Prepare one (1) set of construction plans and draft all special provisions for all phases of construction within the project limits for utility relocation. Plans will be prepared in` accordance with the latest standards adopted by AASHTO, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Standards and Specifications, and the desires of the City as made known to the Consultant and all applicable National, State, County and Local codes, laws and regulations, 2. Preliminary Estimates and Record Com utation Book a. Prepare preliminary estimates of construction on coding sheets furnished by the FDOT. The estimates will be included with . each phase submittal, b. Prepare and furnish a Record Computation Book showing quantity computations in a format'comparable to examples furnished by the FDOT. 3. Health Permit Prepare applications for submittal to Pinellas County Health Department. 3 i `r J w I` .1 I 1> ?l 4. Environmental Permit-Drawin-gs Prepare all necessary permit drawings required for submittal by the City to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, Florida Department of Natural Resources, and Pinellas County Water and Navigation Control Authority, 5. Pro'ect Schedule E Prepare and submit a schedule for Consultant activities.on the ` project, and make periodic progress reports as directed by the City. Schedule shall be based on the bridge replacement ;'. schedule. ; ` . 6. Pro.iect Coordination Make such reviews, attend such meetings and make such contacts as are necessary for proper preparation of plans and special , provisions for the subject project. Coordination meetings with = is the City and FDDT are expected.' 7. Surveying Provide through a State of F16rida registered surveyor survey information documenting the location of the existing utilities ; .: adequate for tie-in of relocated utility lines. " 8. Shoo Drawings The Consultant shall be responsible for the review of shop drawings. The fee for these services shall be established when they are needed. 9. Expert Witness The Consultant shall serve as an expert witness in-legal proceedings related to the project if required by the City. The is fee for these services shall be established if and when they are :. needed. C. Design Documentation The Consultant shal.,l submit to the City design notes and computations i to document the design conclusions reached during the development of ; the construction plans. The design notes and computations shall be recorded on 8 112" x 11" i;. com putation sheets, fully titled, numbered, dated, indexed and signed i by . the designer and checker. Computer output forms and other oversized she ets shall be folded to 8 112" x 11" size. The data shall be bound .., s? in a hard back folder for submittal to the City. .' M r One Copy for the design notes and computations shall be submitted to the City with the preliminary review plans. When the plans are submitted for final review, the design notes and computations, corrected for any City/FDOT comments, shall be resubmitted. At the project completion, a final set of the design notes and computations,' properly endorsed by the Consultant, shall be submitted with the record set of p l ans and tracings . ,, , D. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The City.will provide the following; 1. All available data concerning the proposed facility. } 2. Prints of right-of-way maps on existing City streets within the area of the project. 3. Provide copies of City Standard Specifications for project inclusion/adaptation. 4. Expose the existing utilities at selected points (upland) for vertical and horizontal location verification. E. GENERAL 1. The construction plans shall be accurate, legible, complete and drawn to scales acceptable to the City/FOOT. The completed plans F shall be furnished on reproducible materials and in a format ; acceptable to the City/FDOT. 2. The Consultant shall furnish preliminary prints'and sepias as require: by the City/FOOT to adequately control, coordinate and i approve the design, s 3. The Consultant shall make such reviews, attend such meetings-and make such contracts as are necessary for proper preparation of., i plans and special provisions for the project. F. BEGINNING AND LENGTH OF SERVICE 1 4 Services are to commence upon written notification from the City and ; will be completed within 14 months with the intent of meeting the FOOT i schedule for bridge construction.. i r k ? e 1? } 1 , ?F ?i { 9 , 11111 { 1 ? .a I? ATTA CHMENT _" B-5"____(_c_ o_ntinued 1 MANHOU R ANALY SIS „ CLEARWATER PASS BRIDGE - UTILI TIES No. Sen. Staff Sen.. Staff Sheets Rar-, Eng. Ena• Tech,_ Tech, !. Clerical DRAWINGS Key Sheet 3 2 4 4 2 12 --- Quantity Sheets 3 4 4 8 4 .20 --? Plan/Profile 1" = 20 12" W.M. 8 6 16 48 8 40 ---- 16" SS 8 6 16 48 8 40 --- 16" W.M. 4 6 8 24 4 20. --- Typical Sections 3 4 4 16 4 12 --- Construction Details 3 4 28 32 8 32 ---- Special Details 3 8 64 20 8 48 Subtotal 35 40 144 200 46 224 0 Sen. .Staff Sen. Staff REPORTS. MEETINGS Mgr, Eng^ Enc, Tech_ Tech. Clerical PERMITS,_ETC._ Develop Lowering Method 12 42 34 4 --- 2 Develop Relocation Method 20 80 .20 12 ---- 4` Construction Phasing 6 40 8 12 ---- - DOT Meetings (3) 18 --- --- ---- 2 :t City Meetings (6) 24. 42 --- --- --- 6 ; Coord. Other Utilities 12 4 --- --- a Specifications 8 50 8 --- --- 12 Quantity Booklet {3}• 6 6 12 60 8 2 Peer Reviews 4 60 --- --- --- .4 Environmental Permits 8 8 20 8 16 4 Health Dept. Permit 4 8 32 4 4 2 Subtotal 92 346 138 100' 28 40 TOTAL 132 520 338 146 252 40 \ i S *included',,,in Bridge Contract • p= FF is ` e h r w m ' ATTACHMENT "B-5" (44nt inues-) # 0UT-0F-POCKET EXPEN SES k ? Basic Services Utilit'e Mylars 35 at $8.00 $ 280.00 Reproduction $2,400.00' Shipping and Telephone $ 200.00 Travel $ ' 300.OO ?. 3-Man Dive Team with Boat 1 day) $1,500.00 , survey Crew Allowance (2 days) $2,000.00 ;'. , TOTAL I $6,680.00 ,,k I ? . i. ' - ? .. .. •.' .,rte . F r. f 1 l s , 1: ?E#L"+? I t e # •,i,? D 09 S7 92 Clearwater City Commission Meeting Agenda Cover Memorandum CONSENT SUBJECT: Purchase of Uninterruptable Power System RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Authorize cash'purchase of an Uninterruptable Power System at a cost of $7,416.86 from DataComm, Tampa, Florida, who submitted the lowest and most responsive quotation. 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: In July, 1992, the City took delivery of a VAX 4000 computer to run the Ross Financial System software. This project has progressed to the point where the Finance Division staff is ready to start loading data into the live database. Now that we are working with live information, it is strongly recommended that an Uninterruptable Power System (UPS) be purchased to protect the computer from the effects of storms and power surges, and to prevent user interruption and file rebuilding if City Hall experiences transient power outages. The Computer Information Services Division (C.I.S.) has a $7,800 surplus in Budget Code 555-1-9860-640/590, Machinery and Equipment. This surplus was brought about by a mid--year budget transfer of $7,280 for the purchase of an additional Maclntosh computer for C.I.S. (to be used for presentation/graphics purposes), and by a price reduction in the DEC tape drive purchased for the Utilities/Customer Support Division. C.T.S. will not be purchasing the Maclntosh system, as an additional Maclntosh computer has been included in the Graphics Layout System project (which was brought to the commission September 3, 1992). C.I.S. is requesting authorization to purchase the proposed UPS with these surplus funds. Since the UPS is under the Purchasing ordinance $10,000 formal bid threshold, C.I.S. received three written quotes for this unit. The lowest quoted price was $7,416.86, including delivery, installation, and a three year warranty. Reviewed by: originating Dept: Costs: S 7,416.86 C ission Action: Legal NZA C.1.S. V ? Totat ?? _ ? C?\ Approved Budget LA.) 1 1 ' ? Approved u/conditions Purchasing S 7,416.86 Risk Mgmt. NIA User Dept; Current Fiscal Yr. ? Denied Ct5 - /M gOASlFinance ? Continued Cc: ACM Funding Source: Other N/A ? Capital Imp. Advertised: ? Operating Attachments: ? Date: ® Other Capital i Paper: ® Not Required S Affected Parties Appropriation Code: ® None % ? Notified 555-1-9860.640/590 C an ® Not Required Q* Vrinted on recycled paper S(ur? I Clearwater City Commission }ieeti 9 7 92 =• Agenda Cover .Memorandum nQNSPUT SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF A FIRE ENGINE WITH AERIAL LADDER RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award a contract to purchase a combination engine and aerial ladder truck for the Fire Department at a cost of $459,601 from Saulsbury Fire Equipment Corporation, Tully, New York, which is the lowest, most responsive and responsible bid submitted in accordance with the specifications and authorize lease/purchase from the City lease/purchase vendor. ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: A replacement for the 1965 Pitman snorkel aerial truck is required. The snorkel has exceeded its useful life, has become unreliable, and is economically not feasible to continue repairing. The Pitman snorkel is an aerial ladder truck only, meaning it does not possess a water tank and requires an accompanying engine to permit pumping of water. The requested replacement unit is a "quint", type unit, meaning it possesses normal fire engine pumping capabilities and can also function as a ladder with no accompanying engine. An existing quint with a longer wheel base and ladder is currently assigned to the Beach Fire Station. It will be reassigned to the Belcher Road Station to replace the existing snorkel because its maneuvering characteristics are more conducive to the environment in the central part of the City. The requested quint unit is designed primarily for the Beach Fire Station, possessing the characteristics such as a shorter wheel base and reduced ladder overhang at the front and rear to permit maneuvering in restricted beach areas and streets. Although designed for use at the beach, the requested quint can also routinely function as an engine or ladder anywhere in the city. Bids were sought from all major fire apparatus manufacturers based on defined needs. All but one manufacturer desired to provide only their "standard custom" unit on their cab and chassis, rather than meet our specified operational needs on a commercial chassis. ReviL%oed by: Legal N/A Originating Dept: Fire Costs: S 459,601 Total Caamission Action: ??v{l Approved Budget bo- / ? Approved w/conditions 4- pu hasin g rc Risk 14gmt. 'MIA Current Fiscal Yr. ? Denied Cis N/A User Dept: N/A ? Continued to: ACM Funding Source: Other Finance ® Capital Imp. Advertised: ? Operating Attachments: Date: 5-22 & 6-5/5-29 & 6-26- ? other 1. Bid Tabulation 8 Suamary 92 Paper: PC Rev/Tampa Trib. L7 Not Required ? None _ submit Affected Parties Appropriation Code: ? Notified 315-1-1218-640/522 City an ger 0 Not Required 0 ?inted on recycled paper N .2 - 4] a? 1 The bid price includes alternate payment methods. If the chassis and ladder are paid for upon receipt at the manufacturer's facility, the total price for the requested quint would be $448,959 and the city would acquire title for these elements upon payment. If the City desires to pay for the complete unit upon delivery, the bid price would be $459,601. Based on the contract for City lease/purchase monies coming due for competitive rebids after action on this request, it is not known at this time which payment method will`be desirable or whether "splitting" the overall payment into three segments will be permitted ; under the forthcoming lease/purchase contract. Consequently, this request is based on the higher $459,601 figure and would automatically be reduced to the $448,959 figure if under the subsequent City lease/purchase contract it would prove to be both permissible under the contract and financially beneficial for the city., The CIP project initiated-in FY 90/91 estimated the cost at $455,000. However, lease/purchase monies have been requested in the FY 92/93 Fire Department operating budget to sufficiently fund the purchase at the requested $459,601 figure. Fiscal Year 92/93 impact is as follows: $61,740 principle and $16,800 interest z ,, r , r, r t I i } t t E CITY OF CLEARWATER FIRE ENGINE UITU AERIAL LADDER DID 113-92 OPENED 07120192' DID TAD SAULSBURY FIRE EQUIP TULLY NEW YORK ITEM 140. DESCRIPTION , QUANTITY PRICE 1. 171RE ENGINE WITH AERIAL LADDER 1 448,959.00 i FINANCE CHARGE (IF APPLICABLE) 10,642.00 TOTAL INCLUDING FINANCE CHARGE 459,601.00 TERMSs $129,000.- UPON RECPT OF CHASSIS . , $129,000 - UPON RECPT : OF AERIAL' BALANCE - NET DELIVERY: 1 YEAR SUMMRY OF BIDS BIDS SOLICITEDt 15 BIDS RECEIVED: 1 NO RESPONS£t 8 NO-SID RESPONSES 6 CITY OF CLEARWATER ' F-b ESTIMATED 5 YEAR LEASE PURCHASE AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE Equipment Description: Fire Engine with Aerial Total Purchase Price: $459,601 First Payment Date: S? Prime Rate: 3/30/92 f Contract Rate: 6.00$ b.ue 5 10 0015 Pmt Date Total-pmt Principal ----- Interest -------- Princ Bal. --.- 12 $26,180 26,180 $20,320 20 579 $5,860 ------ $439;281 3 4 26,180 26 180 , 20,841 1 5601 ' 5,338 418x702 397,861 5 , 26,180 2 107 ' 21,376 5,073 4 804 376,754 6 7 26,180 26 180 211549 , 4,531 355,378 333,729 8 , 26,180 21,925 22,204 4,255 976 3 311 804 , 9 10 25,180 26,180 22,487 22 774 , 3'692 289,600 267,112 11 12 26,180 26 180 t 23,064 3,406 3,115 244,338 221,274 13 , 26,180 23,359 23,656 21821 2 523 197,915 14 15 26,180 26 180 23,958 , 2,222 ' 174,259 150,301 16 1 , 26,180 24x263 24,573 1,916 1 126,037 ' 7 18 26,180 26 180 24,886 1 ,294 101,578 76,578 19 , 26,180 25,203 25,525 976 655 51,375 20 26,180 25,850 330 25,850 0 Total 523,596 459,601 63,995 ?+SE?IMti??? I t IMeeting 0 04 17 92 Clearwater City Commission q? 04 Agenda Cover Memorandum CONSENT SUBJECT: DIGITIZING OF GAS ATLAS MAPPING FOR AUTOCAD RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award a contract for the digitizing of 210 gas atlas pages to Digital Engineering Consultants, Clearwater, Florida at an estimated cost of $10,500 which is the lowest and most responsive bid submitted in accordance with the specifications. ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The Gas System has been in the process of digitizing the existing gas atlas mapping system which has previously been drafted manually on mylar. The manual drafting process is very labor intensive, and incompatable with the AutoCad system utilized by Public Works and for our construction permitting preparation. In the last year as time allowed, we have digitized 87 atlas pages onto AutoCad. Through the Public .Works Department, we have been able to obtain digitized atlas page backgrounds for the areas within the Clearwater city limits. However, the Gas System's service area and mapping system spands from S.R G88 (Ulmerton Road) to the Pasco County line. There are 210 atlas pages outside of Clearwater city limits that still need to be digitized. This contract will expedite the process by contracting out the digitizing of these 210 atlas page backgrounds so that we will only need to overlay our gas mains and facilities. Once these atlas pages have been digitized, we will be able to produce all mapping, posting, updating and permitting on the AutoCad system. This will reduce labor demands, while expediting the process. This will enhance operations and our ability to serve our customers. Fourteen bids were solicited, five bids were received, and nine vendors failed to respond. Digital. Engineering Consultants of Clearwater was the lowest and Reviewed by: Originating Dept: \ Costs: ,f, 10,500 C ission Action: Legal N/A_ Clearwater Ga s System J Total Approved Budget h i © d Approved wlconditions Purc as ng Risk Mgmt. /-N/A k User Dept: Dep Current Fiscal Yr. D Denied Cis ACM N/A NIA Clearwater Ga s System Funding Source: 13 Continued to: Other ® capi tat lisp. Advertised: Operating ment a At Date: 07/31/92 08/07/92 13 other t rb suirrnar y ,,,o Paper: PinCoRev Tampa Trib is N uired t R Submit by: eq o Affected Parties Appropriation Cade: ? None ? Notified 315-1.6349 Not Required city U 0 Printed on recycted paper SEAi.M• 1 t i. ' Mecting D 04 17 4 ''? - Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum w?rEgE` CONSENT SUBJECT: DIGITIZING OF GAS ATLAS MAPPING FOR AUTOCAD RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award a contract for the digitizing of 210 gas atlas pages to Digital Engineering Consultants, Clearwater, Florida at an estimated cost of $10,500 which is the lowest and most responsive bid submitted in accordance with the specifications. 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The Gas System has been in the process of digitizing the existing gas atlas mapping system which has previously been drafted manually on mylar. The manual drafting process is very labor intensive, and incompatable with the AutoCad system utilized by Public Works and for our construction permitting preparation. In the last year as time allowed, we have digitized 87 atlas pages onto AutoCad. Through the Public Works Department, we have been able to obtain digitized atlas page backgrounds for the areas within the Clearwater city limits. However, the Gas System's service area and mapping system spands from S.R 688 (Ulmerton Road) to the Pasco'County line. There are 210 atlas pages outside of Clearwater city limits that still need to be digitized. This contract will expedite the process by contracting out the digitizing of these 210 atlas page backgrounds so that we will only need to overlay our gas mains and facilities. Once these atlas pages have been digitized, we will be able to produce all mapping, posting, updating and permitting on the AutoCad system. This will reduce labor demands, while expediting the process. This will enhance operations and our ability to serve our customers. Fourteen bids were solicited, five bids were received, and nine vendors failed to respond. Digital Engineering Consultants of Clearwater was the lowest and Reviewed by: originating Dept: Costs: S_M500 C ission Action: Legal NIA Clearwater Gas System J Total Approved dget P $ 0 © Approved w/conditions u Risk Mgmt. N/A User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. 13 Denied Cis RCM N/A - N/A Clearwater Gas System Funding Source: 13 Continued to: other 19 Capital lma. Advertised: [_ operating Attachments: Date: 07/31/92 08/07/92 0 other Bid Tab,B Summary r ? .Paper: PinCoRev Tampa Trib 0 N t Re uir d Submit by: q o e Affected Parties Appropriation Code: © None 0 Notified 315-1.6349 Not Required © Cit n V i Printed on recycied paper I c + a a ? A ? in ul 9-4 1 N 17, 1 N ? ? 1 4 r .. r_y a p a W 7 p 1 in A [.y W C r E y ? r , `r ` aa v O 1 o i ':44t A .kr., ? ' a fl a • . E, w IQr1 •? ? ? t? ii p 1 m ± M A LM H x A. co j A. N M W O - _ ? C 4 N P4 K H r N O cn W P. ? . F n ? qq G w W f7 [i1 b k C ? N ] N V) Cn g l , pa , f r e ' 1111€.: ?ySE><1?.. I g I09 17 92 Clearwater City Commission Heatin ?? oQ Agenda Cover Memorandum TER , CONSENT SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF BLACK 3408 POLYETHYLENE PIPE AND FITTINGS RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award an annual contract (69/18/92 to 09/17/93) to purchase Black 3408 Polyethylene pipe and fittings to Phillips Engineering Company, Clearwater, FL, at an estimated cost of $260,533.75; and to Perfection Corp., Madison, OH, at an estimated cost of $8,212.05 for an estimated total of $268,745.80, which are the most responsive and responsible bids submitted in accordance with the specifications ® and that the appropriate officiate be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: This bid represents the Gas System's estimated annual requirement for Black 3408 Polyethylene pipe and fittings to be ordered as needed. The pipe and fittings are required to construct new mains and services to new customers in the north expansion area. This is the only type of material approved by the Florida Public Service commission for use in our 100 PSI pressurized north expansion area. Thirteen bids were solicited. Five bids were received, four vendors failed to respond and four vendors responded with "No Bid". Phillips Engineering Company and Perfection Corporation were the only vendors that met the specifications regarding melt index, density and fusion characteristics. After careful evaluation, the Gas Superintendent recommends awarding the bid as follows: Item 1-53, 56 & 57 to Phillips Engineering company $260,533.75 Item 54, 55 & 58 to Perfection Corporation r. 8.212.05 Total $268,745.80 Reviewed by: originating Dept: Costs: S 268,745.80 _ Cq+mission Action: Legal N/A Clearwater Gas System Total s Approved Budget Purchasing 1! 74 $ 11 197 0 Approved w/conditions Risk Ngmt, NIA user dept: - , Current Fiscal Yr. O Denied cis ACM NIA N/A Clearwater Gas System Funding Source: ? Continued to: other _ 0 capital Imp. Advertised: D operating Attuch=rsts; Date: 07/31/92 08/7192 l3 other Bid Summary ` Paper: Pinellas County Review Bid Tab '`i Tampa Tribune O Not Required ? None Submit Affected Parties Approprlotion code: 0 Notified 423.1-0141-120 City a g IS Not Required 40 Printed on recycled paper t -2 -- a 4 i . The.Purchasing Officer concurs with this recommendation. Purchase will be funded by the Gas System Inventory C ode and charged to the appropriate projects T as withdrawn from inventory. ' kThere are sufficient funds in the FY 1991/92.Budget for costs incurred before + 10/,1/92, and there are funds for the costs to be incurred after 10/1/92 in the ` i recommended 1992/93 Budget. FY 1991/92 $ 11,197.74 l FY.1992/93 257546.06 ' TOTAL $268,745.80 1 ' !; i P 7 i 1 e f i 3 .. '' SUMMARY FOR IFB N0. 147--92 " k BIDS SOLICITED . . . . . . . . =.13 e QUALIFIED BIDS RECEIVED . . . . . 2 .. NON-QUALIFIED BIDS RECEIVED 3 N0'-RESPONSE . . . . . . . . . 4 "NO BID" RESPONSE .:. 4. SUMMARY OF NO BID DO NOT OFFER PRODUCT :-, 3 INSUFFICIENT TIME TO RESPOND 1 f t. ! 31- 'S . n A O p 0 A D A 4 A Q 4 ?4 A D 1-4 P4 in a 0-4 H Ci C1 0 O ?d m a H O M g 0 O C] in W A A o R3 d m G 0-4 r 0 P-4 In =. ? P-4 HH H m {73 W -4 iA 0 R1 is W 0 T D O O C T O P 7 Q O y d 2 x S x 1 C ? Q Q O z R Z 0 0.2 z z ? ' ' ? ?i x ae ? I S w a. a a i m 4 T ` M 0 0 0 O a +/1 0 v 0 0 a o 0 n v5 N O a O vl o e- O h v1 tY 10? O ? O O , t!? N O a O +n O n O o O In x W d o O n v7 N a M o v Ln O n O vl O N m C. 17 H H 1-4 Rl R5 1?'1 F1 C, N rl .+ -7 N w M O V7 N +7 %b v Y7 kp M m N v N to M ^ ?7 T v ?D In •1 . , a W H H? N b v O0 6 _M. N N .r r l r- f "' a h Ln , a d N " r a O V O Q O ?O O O f"1 M O Ch O vl M M O 1'1 h M V'/ ?6 O tiT O M d M O P'1 O t? tn (IN 0 0 13% N a 4n }- ` H w 1E•1 ?? N v ri ? M O + ' O a o , O N 1 m o M _mi , v vl P, m v N N N d? .v v:: .O _W1 N N M M M .7 W W M v n .vi fN'1 i a a U 'k '3 f tOj [? 0 0 O O O n O N N O vl vl O O O 00 I+l vl wl 000 0 O vl 4m 4n y 0 0 0 ?v Hl r ?1 1 W .a W .q y cNv 4 E' o v h o o O a } C W w M M µ in in %n N w ? I s :. 3 • z k x } e ra M 4 C aa? ? P4 tea] Y.7 {{sy7 P4 ,?7j W l !!l[[ . i H P. .. 1 ' N •? C4 Q µ1 ?W' C? ?y tt 6"1 Q Cad y.? ..? % v m y xU . a 6i !••1 P. H ? h W t7+ R 09 , C C IS Q Q _, M CS W W O A ? e H W y V N P4 en A. of H .-? H v U U z ? O N Z G7 to U a x H m rn a v x ?"? v v .M7 W EK M [-+ E E-? t? LS r•? o 0 1•? O H M % 1 ([?+N§7 LO U U x C?.1 x '..? U T to.1 tJ M U w 0 v CSY7 U U 6 -M ?. M H -4 •7 ~i U H U U H H c0 0 r4 .1 C xx} N ? 7 -+ s ?C N tt T 1•i ' DI a~ M M N~ w N V %O h .a .1 N V a N v F o ?D v N -? -1 1" l . -1 R 1A N ,7 w .1 W N v cp y N a !. ? en N Q ,",,, H? • N r,µ„1 . . Ma • .?•1 -F -4 • N 64. N ..41 N M N N N N g N Ca N O? N O M ra m N m ? : Q P U M i M 11 f 0 'Im c a 0 o a a o 0 0 O p a 0 o o ., .. -. ?. a a ° h un o in o 0 0 0 ' ? ; ? F 4n N W I q .# • O O 0 N ? ' H cn u 13 H .r ra .. V 4 ? O H ? cral m y q gyp! W M P• 7 H R a. N x x ??T. M r+ ?'? 0 a 4 4 t7 yy y ytl? , ?? P-4 P4 W N N N «a Cmi M .. W t4j .r v •-r 4 eq z z u ti W H N n x x x py p "' ? ?-+ b ' .. ?'? tx-i HH W M ?i HH N N N M H H ? y ?,y M PY W U u U U ?7 p ? .. 3y P ,.,? O .-? .r K p .+r ~-? w N N N N N N ..-i N Z Y{ }i SC ? H U ti ca y 7h? .r H H H M x M p'? ti .n !1f ,7} : l '..!' i'C N fla H .r Y. .p 14 44 x ,? F N K .O i< N x .7 k •a P{ P N .7 .O N K ..a ..r N K •p O .? N 7 +? ^+ W ?,,, p i Ch t ? v N 4 x . K K ? .7 V h in N cif in v1 * +n v1 n L'1 in G C7 ri ri ri F7 ty M V K IT K V ? Pi Aa W ? E' t t FFtt . ? , M ac H C4 O p z O O O QZ z z x z ., N n z x o , U S O w ~ '7 1,4 O A t ? 4 in W h N COO o b _ ,4?' H Ml m O N7 m `T , GT4a, a I{i a ? a• w G. W w o ri m o a O O O O G O O ? G G 0 o c n o o 'n o o C ° n o0 0 0 0 o CY 0 o G La7 U . K N K O •O + '. 4 ?e1 K n K O ^ K v M v O b m O M1 N yl p a f' +• M K K fn W M n .M1r n. .A-i N N K .r N h O H V% r? • W F a? .? GO .. .+ A e•y Try M[ T ti t-4 } fw. O C O O O ?,• ?^ 1 n H9 O O Q O O 4 O d O O O O G W y q .7 ^ t. [psFQ1 W [? !a1 .S V O O O? M'1 M ri A n M1 n A !'+ K ?T M w'i Q O N N N N M M ..r .? ..i N .! T A GO •O V O v N 0. a. t„ n a, to 00 cq fj? M U ?• 4 43. U t + 0 m a a p o o a a a a o 'p o p° o v? M y M N N N N W M H W •i H M N N n N N N m O 1004 T I1[ 4 U W W RS F7 W Rl F1 Ci a7 ra F1 W Q RI 4 K u1 K vl m t•1 N "t•3 4 4 A em 'iClearwater City Commission Mccting j9L 17 92 o Agenda Cover Memorandum CONSENT S BJECT : CONSTRUCTION of NEW GAS MAINS AND SERVICE LIKES - MERES BLVD. PHASE 11 RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award a contract for the construction of 9,000 feet of four inch, and 3,500 feet of two inch gas main in West Tarpon Springs, to Visk Construction, Inc., Riverview, F1. at a total estimated cost of $80,450 which is the lowest and most responsive bid submitted in accordance with the plans and specifications. 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: In order to provide timely installation of new gas mains and services without increasing our staff, we propose to award this contract to Visk Construction Co. of Riverview, Fl. to install 9,000 feet of four inch and 3,500 feet of two inch gas main to serve three public schools and one laundry. This contract represents the second of three phases of construction. The first phase previously completed served two new sub-divisions. The final phase will be to install a two inch gas main to serve the Anclote Manor Hospital. The estimated return on investment for the entire project should provide a six year payback. The contractor will furnish all labor, equipment, and sod. The city will supply the gas-related material, such as Polyethylene pipe and fittings. The material cost for this project is $50,624. Nine bids were solicited and six bids were received. Visk Construction of Riverview was the lowest and most responsive bid. Capital Improvement Project 345--6339, Additional Lines includes sufficient funds for this contract. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: \ Costs : f $0.450-00 Comission Action: legal Budget H Clearwater Gas System ?1G? Total Approved Purchasing { ? Approved w/conditfons Risk Mgmt, N/A User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. 0 Denied Cis ACM N/A MIA Clearwater Gas System Fundi ng Source: ? Continued to: Other 0 Capital imp. Advertised- 0 Operating Attachments: Date: 08/14/92 08107/92 ? Other Bid Tab & Summary Paper: Pin.Co.Rev. Tampa '. Trib. © Not Required © None Submitt Affected Parties Appropriation Code: 0 Notified 345-1-6339-638/532 City Ma ag ? Not Required 0 Pri d on recycled paper A It , g q g g 8 ? A W r ? ?F t -. ? s ?tl ? .; S d g ^ ° ° P w ? ? q 5 n? y tM n ° 1. 5 .1 e .. ? F W1 p P Y f 13 - 1. W M1 h ° i op N V ? y 9 (F r- t f N {y N y1 ? n N • LL f f ?, t fP?k ry 1 4.' ~y ?11l1I1 ? M ? ?p? P n n ? t i e {y kL i H a a p o p F r N ^ p F ?vwl V N ? N ? ? I, . w r?i V N r 1 a w i . 1 SEP ! 1 I99Q C I T Y OF C L E A R W A T E R interoffice Correspondence Sheet TO: Michael J. Wright, City Manager FROM Chuck Warrington, Gas System Managing Directorz;pzi COPIES: Terry Neenan, Gas Superintendent; Jim Lewin, Asst. Gas Superintendent; Cyndie Goudeau, City Clerk SUBJECT: Gas System Cost Feasibility Formula DATE: September 10, 1992 Clearwater Gas System utilizes a cost feasibility formula that was adopted approximately ten years ago. This formula is applied to all new customer requests that require a main extension. The formula was created to assure that new main extension requests were cost justified based on construction cost, cost of gas, incremental overhead expenses, interfund expenses, allowances for general fund dividends and payments in lieu of taxes, and a reasonable payback period. The payback period was established as seven years. The first attachment dated 3/14/91 explains the cost feasibility formula in detail. This attachment was prepared in 1991 and was updated at thaL.time based on 1990 costs. We will be readdressing this formula i' the near future to determine if any changes need to be made. Since the profit margin on gas sales has increased over the last year to above 700, the 0.37 factor will probably need to be increased if anything. The effect of this would be an increase in the Percent of Return calculation and a reduction in the Years of Payback. I have also provided a second attachment which applies the formula to the West Tarpon springs project. Phase I is in process, and Phase 11 has been updated to reflect the actual contractor construction bids which are being brought forth to the commission at this time. Including Phase III you will note that the overall project payback is 6.14 years which falls within our cost justification criteria. If you have any questions on this, please call me. CSW/sh Y 3/14/91 CLEARWATER GAS SYSTEM COST FEASIBILITY FORMULA l bClearwater Gas System strives to achieve at least a 14% rate of return on investments for all main line extensions. Earning at least 14% of the full weighted costs of the line extension from new customers on the line each year for seven years generates total earnings of 98% of the costs of constructing the line ( .14 x 7 yr. _ .98). This length of time (7 years) is described as the pay back period. This has been Clearwater's accepted practice for pay back when deciding whether to extend new lines. Natural gas systems in the industry strive for a pay back period between four and ten years.. It is often common in the regulated utilities to use different pay back periods for different classes of customers and in different,geo-- graphic regions of their service territories. Estimated incremental overhead costs are included by Clearwater Gas in determining the rate of return to be gained from a potential time extension to account -for the capital costs and overhead costs incurred by the line extension. The formula used in calculating rate of return is as follows: Estimated ` Annual Revenue (EAR) X .37 X 100 = X Percent Return on Construction Cost Investment Estimated Annual Revenue (EAR) = Revenue from sales of gas to that account. .37 is the estimated net earnings from each $1.00 of gas sales to new accounts after incremental costs attributed 'to the new construction and overhead to serve the new accounts are subtracted out. The .37 estimated net earnings factor considers the following: . Cost of wholesale gas purchased . Estimated incremental overhead attributed to the new customer Interfund administrative overhead transfers to the General Fund . Payments to the General Fund for dividends and payments in. lieu of taxes, calculated at FY 1990 levels. PAGE 1: Or '2 PAGES } ,E w , } t F WEST TARPON SPRINGS FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS COST . ESTIMATED ANNUAL REVENUE CONSTRUCTION C05T - $ 45,656 Phase I $ 94,55a . .. 300788 : Phase II 143 1 316 , . 23,700 #:= Phase III 37,368 $ 121,144 ' Total $ 27S,23q ,o COST FEASIBILITY FORMULAS: '. 144 X 37 X 100 = 16.29 Percent of Return 121 . $275, 234 i ? ~a 100 -- 6. 14 Years Payback 16.29 :Y. 1 { F . t • I t l F ? , r'tFlk% I t Meetin 39LEJ-92 • Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum CONSENT SUBJECT: Modular Secretarial Work Stations RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Confirm and approve the purchase of two modular Secretarial Work Stations from Pride of Florida, Polk City, Fla. at a cost of $7,500, which was the lowest most responsive quote submitted in accordance with the specifications 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: In order to improve office efficiency, Clearwater Gas System investigated building and installing two modular secretarial work stations in the administrative office area. The City's Building and Maintenance Department was called about building the modular furniture, and we were informed that they did not do modular type office furnishing. We felt that it was important that this furniture be modular rather than "built in place" to provide flexibility for the future. Therefore, with the assistance of Purchasing we secured three quotes from outside venders who could provide the modular furniture which included two work stations and two lateral files. Of the three vendors, only Pride of Florida could provide the lateral files. Pride of Florida was also the lowest bidder for the work stations. Clearwater Gas system initially budgeted sufficient funds for this project in the building and maintenance variable code because we anticipated building these modular work stations inhouse. However, since we had to purchase these work stations from an outside vendor, we need to move $7,500 from the building and maintenance code into the Capital Code "Furniture & Office Equipment". This agenda item is being submitted after the fact as the equipment has already been installed. Since the funds for this project were budgeted and the cost was below $20,000, we had understood that this did not need commission approval. We now understand that any Capital purchase above $500 must be specifically approved by the commission. we apologize for this misunderstanding, and respectfully request the Commission's confirmation and approval of this purchase. We will make third quarter budget adjustments to transfer $7,500 from the Building and Maintenance code 423--1-2061--416/532 into the Furniture and Office Equipment code 423-1-2061-642/532 to fund this purchase. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs: S 7, 500 Co?nission Action: Legal Bud et N A CLEARWATER CAS SYSTEM ?? '? 6 Total - 1 Approved g Purchasin $ 7 500 ? Approved w/conditions g Risk Mgmt. N/ User Dept: . Current Fiscal Tr. El Denied cis N/A ? Continued to: ACM N/A Funding source: Other ? Capital Imp. Advertised: 0 Operating Attachments: Date: ? Other QUOTE TABS Paper: 0 Hone 0 N t R i d o equ re 5 fitted by / : "= ?'? Affected Parties C1 Appropriation Code: q CL ? Notified 423.1-2061- 642 © N Not Required ity Manager 40 Printed an recycled paper s • Z s w Z GGo O r e. Cl) to to a. o - z - V ? ? ? t 4 O Lc. a t (7) o co co VF VJ Cl) t6 12 u o Z O D O O { . L k . e. . 1 .. .??, r w. 0 C C7 ' C CO 0 y Ln 0) fl a O v? ti :. 3 . „ v a s J C) o C) Q I SIUI t a) CCQ fl HI, Co. 0 o 0 -1 . - US a 0 " S W s ? i j CO ? C7 Y z k, Q i Z r N , ? ± 1 ' J •f ? ? •'? , ? it • ,l skw Ilk. Agenda Meeti n 09/17/92 Clearwater City Conunl;ssi m . oll Agenda Cover Memorandum CONSENT SUBJECT: Security Guard Service at Main Library RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Extend security guard service contract with Janus security Services for approximately 2,314 hours at an estimated price of $15,272 for the period August 15, 1992 through August 15, 1993. ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute sarue. BACKGROUND: Security guard service at Main Library helps provide a safe environment in which to conduct library business. Janus Security Services was selected in'August, 1991, as the lowest responsive bidder, and has quoted the same rate for renewal: $6.60/hr. for the same work schedule. The 1991/92 and 1992/93 Library Department operating Budget includes sufficient funds for this contract. This is the first of two extensions allowed by the contract. The need to renew the contract was overlooked and is therefore coming forward for renewal after the expiration date of the current contract. Reviewed icy: Originating Dept, Costs ; i_15 .272_ Coamission Action: Legal, d NIA LY'" library ?- A) Total - Approved Bu get Purchasin $ 1 700 13 Approved w/conditions g Risk Hgmt. ,? User Dept: _ _ _ Current , Fiscal Yr. ? Denied cis ACM H A rwrdi ng Source: 0 continued to: other © Capi tat 1111p. Advertised. Q operating Attachments: Date: a other Renewal Ouote from Janus Paper, Security Services El N i d R equ re ot sub Affected Parties ? Ai4jropriation Code: © None * Notified 010.1 1720.30 3.571 Cft Ma p Not Required 4«n 1 P ted on recycled paper ?e .A,U G- 2 ' M - 9 2 T U E 1 1 : 1 9 P R A N K L I N A S H I L L S B O R O U G H P.0211 3AMUS JANUS SECURITY SERVICES ?'W/7ce 1974 r, i SRViC? GUAfrWd -IVI(J', a PA7111)l'dJ?V114'; August a5, 1992 ¦ ?LE.r: [ill Ir•.il , , Mrs. Schaeffer Lily of Clearwater Public Library Osceola Avenue LIvar•water, FL 33515 AX: 462-6420 Uvdr Mrs , Schaef fer ; .. a Pursuant to our tei ephono cornversation this • date, Janus 5t,cu'r''I ty (a hart of National Building Maintenance, Inc. of Florida) will -renew its contract to provide unarnied sacurit guard main Clearwater Library,for the August 1servi 992 through Aullust 15, 1993 at the same hourly rate period $6.60perlhour witr,the same, hours of service as provided at present. We Iippreciate your renewal and look forward to many more yours cll 11$$?ciation, i n1: L.re I•y, I 1r I I ' Ao 1.. ( r . ,. , f (W(-!.lury Ardrey Ili rot:l,ur.' of Marketing IIIIII;rN II-11-1111U'•nYl!i1111• . ?Allljlll, 111111 611.11 lilt nn1111 I•niur, I 1 il.llil•1 111 1'11 dd / /;!I,; I ! `I,vu,?.r Ini SEA1?s ? A Clearwater City Commission fPI Agenda Cover Memorandum Meet, g 09 17 92 I L % CONSENT SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF SIX (6) MOBILE AND ONE (1) PORTABLE RADIO FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award a contract to General Electric Company, Lynchburg, Virginia, for the purchase of six (6) EDACS FMD Scanning 12 watt radios, and one (1) EDACS MPA system portable radio with DES voice guard for the Police Department, at a total cost of $15,296.00, in accordance with Section 42.23 (2), Sole Source, Clearwater Code of Ordinances. 0 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: The city's 800 mhz trunked radio system has experienced some transmitting and receiving difficulties on a limited basis in isolated areas throughout the city. City radio communications personnel, in cooperation with engineers from General Electric, have employed several strategies in an attempt to correct the problem. Included in these techniques was the installation of hole fillers. Although success has been made, some locations continue to experience problems as a result of building construction. Some areas of current concern include Countryside Mall, as well as the sergeant's offices of the Countryside Substation and police headquarters located downtown. Supervisors have experienced difficulty in scanning and transmitting from these facilities. Although technology and considerable expertise may be needed to solve the problems at the areas mall, the purchase-of scanning mobile radios that can be desk mounted can solve the problem for our supervisors. Concurrently, the purchase of the requested equipment will enable communications personnel the ability to set up offsite communications should the Communications Center experience a shutdown for any number of reasons. These units may also serve as emergency reserve units should utilities dispatch experience a similar problem. Reviewed by: originating Dept: Costs: _S 15.296.00 C ission Action: Legal N/A police Total Approved Budget Pur h in S 15 296 00 13 Approved w/conditions c as g Risk Mgmt. NIA User Dept: , . Current Fiscal Yr. ? Denied cis N/A ? Continued to: ACM Funding source: Other , ? Capital Imp. Advertised: ® operating Attachments: Date: ? Other Paper: d R i ® N equ ot re 5 tad Affected Parties ® None ? Notified Appropriation Cade: 010-1-1145-640/521 Not Required Cit Ma a er Co Unted on recycled paper i r ' ' E 2 ?36 v This purchase would include one (1) unit each for the Beach, Headquarters and Countryside supervisors' offices and three (3) for Communications'Center backup. Included in this purchase is one (1) additional portable radio for the Vice and Intelligence Section. Total cost for the purchase is $15,296.00. The City Commission at its 1991/92 Budget Hearing Meetings approved the purchase of mobile and portable radio units and accessories for the Police Department. Fiscal year 1991/92 budget impact is $15,296.00, and funding is provided in the Police Department's operating code, 010-171145-640/,521. } • 5 • yr t ?=':f . i t a fl,? ? Stitil*'? ?R Mec gm a 9 17 92 Clearwater City Commission == Agenda Cover Memorandum CflNSEW SUBJECT: Annual contract for cast iron meter/valve boxes, lids, covers, etc. RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award a one-year extension to an existing annual contract to purchase miscellaneous cast iron meter/valve boxes, lids, covers, etc. from Sunshine Foundry and Machine Company of St. Petersburg, Florida, for an estimated amount of $46,837.50 during the period of October 1, 1992 to September 30, 1993. ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The recommended vendor, Sunshine Foundry and Machine Company of St. Petersburg, Florida, currently supplies this material to the city through a contract (P.O. #2486-91) that expires on September 30, 1992. The vendor has agreed to extend the contract and the prices for the period from October 1, 1992 to September'30, 1993. This is the third extension of this contract. There is only one other known source for this material and it is located in Wisconsin. Freight costs associated with shipping this material from a remote location make it cost prohibitive to deal with that vendor. Sunshine Foundry and Machine Company provides manufactured castings that match the vast majority in place throughout the water distribution system. for the replacement of lids, box covers, etc. inst, meter or valve boxes. The local manufacturer also reliable delivery of'material. quality, U.S.A. of similar items presently In many cases, this allows ?ad of replacing complete provides convenient and Cast iron meter/valve boxes are used in conjunction with various water main expansion/replacement/maintenance projects throughout the city. Some of the items included in this contract will be installed as part of new installations and other items (valve box caps, lids) will be used to replace broken or damaged facilities in the field. Material will be purchased, as needed, during the contract period with a Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs: f 46,837.50 (est.) Co Tssion Action: Legal N/A Public Works/Infrastructure- Total Approved Budget Purchasing Water " - ' -$ 0--?-- Approved w/conditions Risk Mgmt. Current Fiscal Yr. © Denied cis tt A User Dept: ? 'C'ontinued to: ACM N A Funding Source: Other H IA ? Capital Imp. 13 Operating Advertised: ? Other Water Division Attachments: Date: N/A Contract Extension Agreement b5, Paper: Inventory Letter ® N i d t R o equ re Su by": Affected Parties Appropriation Code: k ? Notified 421-1-0141-110 None m tint Required City Ma F L/ P 4 -2- Water Division inventory code and placed into stock' Water the material will'be ithdrawn i in the charged to i , s w warehouse. As it the appropriate Operating or C.I.P. budget code. s All material will be purchased during FY 92/93. The FY 92/93 Water Division Operating Budget includes requests for 4 sufficient funds for this contract.. The provisions of the original contract allow for this extension. 1 S, '{ it r3' i , P A .i ate, September 1, 1992 Ciby of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, F1. 34618-4748 Attention: 2%1r. Tom Hackett, Water Supt. Dear Mr. Hackett: i We wish to advise we will be very pleased to ext P.O. # 2486-91 for Miscellaneous Cast Iron Meter Boxes, Lids, Covers etc. contract period 10/1/92 There will be no changes in current bid pricing, Trusting we may continue to be favored with your business, we remain, and Bid/Contract Boxes, Valve to 9/3x/93. payment terms etc, most appreciated Very truly yours, S shine Foundry ~€c Machine Co. ohn M. mss 111 res . • ti ? . ED WATER DIVISION ? TRH ? SCtvi E) JED, SEP 0 3 1992 ? P[WH ? ??L C3 -M . ?1 ?SIDN c3 1::Lr ? era C1 W" ? RCP C1 EB ? RGS ? B. BOARDS ? FILE ? OTHER 4 4 PLANT ADDRESS Phone ($13) 327-3396 MAILING ADDRESS 2331 - 61h Ave. South P.O. Box 10306 St. Petersburg, Florida 33712 St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION Agenda Cover Memorandum SUBJECT: Computer Hardware for Public Groups item Mectl c 9-17-92 PW 3 rks, Transportation and Environmental RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve the purchase of computer hardware from National Data Products at a cost of $6,103.65, which is the lowest most responsive quote, for the Public Works Department's local area network. And that the appropriate official be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The one file server in Public Work's local area network (LAN) is currently utilized by Public Works Administration, Utilities Administration, Engineering, Traffic Engineering, Watershed Management, and Environmental Management. The Public Works Department recently exceeded the memory capacity of its one file server, and this caused work disruption and lost files in the LAN. This disruption resulted in the need to redo lost work and serious delays to on-line design and modeling runs in Engineering. Computer Information Services (CIS) has recommended that the only permanent solution is to dedicate another software integrated file server to the Public Works Department. This additional hardware is not in the CIS Long Range Plan at this time. The new software integrated file server will be used on a new Traffic Engineering, Watershed and Environmental Management LAN. The lowest competitive quote for this hardware is $6,103.65. Traffic Engineering has $2,500 available in its Machinery and Equipment code to partially fund the hardware. Although this money was envisioned for video surveillance system enhancements, they now prefer to expend the $2,500 for this computer hardware. The Stormwater Utility, Watershed Management Division has the remaining $3,603.65 required in its Professional Service Fees budget code. These professional fees were envisioned to do laboratory water quality testing. The volume of testing could be reduced without hurting the water quality program for the balance of the year. The third quarter FY1991/92 Budget Review will include an amendment to provide the necessary $3,604 to Machinery & Equipment code #419-1--1365-640/539 from the Professional Service Fees code #419-1-1365-301/539. The available balance in Machinery & Equipments code #010-1-1331-x640/541 is sufficient to provide the additional $2,500 necessary for this joint purchase. Revicwcd by: Legal NA Budget 1-0 Purchasing Risk Mgmt, NA CIS ACM NA other NA tt city i serverl.agn Originating Dept. E Costs: $6 103.65__ - Pubtic Works Li (Current FY) $6,103.65 User Dept. Funding Source: Advertised: Hate: Capt. Imp. Capital Outlay Operating X other Paper: Not,,required X Affected parties notified Not required X Commission Action Approved Approved w/conditions Denied Cont'd to Appropriation Codes} ; Attachments: _010-1-1331-640/541 419-1-1365-640/539 _ "t 0 CLEARWATER`CITY COMMISSION pW Agenda Cover Memorandum SUBJECT: Annual Airpark Mowing Contract Item 0 14 9/17/92. RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Extend the contract with Greenturf Services for mowing Clearwater Airpark for a second year, from October 1, 1992 to September 30, 1993, at the current rate of $500 per mowing, for a total cost not to exceed $17,000. ® And that the appropriate official be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: Greenturf Services of Pampa, Florida, being the lowest responsive and responsible bidder was awarded the Clearwater Airpark mowing contract for FY-91/92 at the rate of $500 per mowing. Greenturf Services has performed well under the contract and has offered to extend the contract for a second year, from October 1, 1992 to September 30, 1993, at the same rate. The 1992/93 Airpark Operating Budget requests sufficient funds for this project. Reviewed by: Legal N/ Budget •? Purchasing Risk Mgmt. DI5 N ACK N/A_ Other N/A City OriginAting Dept. V Costs: S17 000 ` Public Works tM-A- I ' f (Current FY) User Dept. ? Funding Source: Capt. Imp. Advertised: operating X Onte: other Paper: Not required X r Affected parties notified Not required X Commission Action Approved Approved w/conditions Denied Cont°d to Appropriation Code(s) Attachments: 010-1-1325-304/542 11 Letter from ' Greenturf Services , ;I t Y 4 i l a 4 . • A 5 • 'ir . i , 8510 N. Paddock G et'.?tur ?' Tampa, Florida 33614 ! (813) 933-2647 ' S eTV ices f LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Commercial & Industrial 's August 27, 1992 E ,F f: Mr. Bob Brunback City of Clearwater a , Finance Department 1 Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748 Re: Clearwater Airpark Dear Mr. Brunback; As per our conversation in regards to the above account, please be advised that we will extend our contract from October 1, 1992 to September 30, 1993 for the same price of $500.00 per cut'Wth a 5% discount if paid within 30 days. Thank you for your cooperation in this regard. Ve fuly you Nelson Martinez NM:kp i a a t f 3 gE,A .,. MeetiI 17 92 Clearwater City Coltrusslon % Agenda Cover Memorandum Pu) CONSENT SUBJECT: Purchase of Microwave Digestion System for Water Pollution Control Laboratories. RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Award a contract to purchase a Microwave Digestion System for Water Pollution Control Division at a cost of $19,800.00 from Questron Corporation, Princeton, New Jersey, being the most responsible bid submitted in accordance with the specifications. ® and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The City is required under the terms of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) permits to make quarterly analyses for contaminating parameters in-plant sludges. Testing is also conducted for plant influent monitoring and stormwater discharge quality. Existing digestion equipment consists of a large (12 X 24) hot plate which does not have either the capacity, or speed needed to digest solid samples. The proposed microwave digestion system can digest 12 samples at one time in 20-30 minutes without loss of sample, which improves the accuracy of the results. The hot plate method requires the continuous attention of one Laboratory Technician for three to five days for each digestion. Prior to the bid process, the Chemist offered three vendors the opportunity for an on-site demonstration of their product, at which time product features could be questioned and explained by factory representatives. After the demonstrations were completed, a list of specifications was compiled. These specifications were written after evaluating all the options for equipment performance, reliability, speed of the digestion process, computer and software programming requirements, and employee safety. It is the judgement of the WPC Staff that these specifications would supply the City with the system most appropriate for the City's needs and the tasks to be accomplished. Reviewed by: a l N/A Le Originating Dept: Public Wo k /WPC Costs: 19 800.00 C fission Action: gg u et r s o a Approved g Purchasing APProved w/conditions 13 Risk Mgmt. CIS User Dept: Current fiscal r. ? Denied ACM 1 Funding Source: 13 Continued to: Other ® Capital Imp. Advertised: ? Operating Attachments: Date: 03/27/92, 04/03/92 ? Other Bid Tabulation Paper; Pinellas County Review, Tampa Tribune Subm ? Not Required Affected Parties Ilppropriation Code: D None 17 Notified 315-1-6645-640/535 City Mana e ? Not Required v ¦ There were five bids solicited, of this total, two bids were received. There were two "no bid" responses and one no response. Although CEM Corporation was the lowest bidder, they were not selected because they could not meet the following specifications: CEM could not supply a microwave equipped with a quick connect/disconnect plug for pressure and temperature control; they could not supply two sets of twelve triple-walled digestion vessels; their temperature measuring device did not consist of a teflon coated thermocouple; their temperature and pressure sensors were not permanently mounted in the probe vessels; CEM could not supply a system with a sealed pressure control; CEM could not operate their system by a computer remote from the digestion module; CEM's bid did not include a 386 PC Compatible laptop computer with specified hardware and software; and CEM could not supply a system equipped with a secondary shield for additional employee safety. It was for these reasons that the CEM Corporation bid was•not acceptable. The WPC ' Staff believes that Questron Corporation is the only responsible bidder to meet all of the specifications. Funds to purchase this equipment are available in Project 315-1-6645, Laboratory Upgrade. } 0i 1 i i i i t. w rP CITY OF CLRARUATn' FLORIDA HICROSLA'7E DICRSTION 818TER DID 87-92 OPENED 04114192 i DID TAB CEN CORPORATION gUESTROH CORPORATION VAIMIEKS H._ CAROLINA PRIHCETOH. NE41 JERSET DE,SCAIPTIOR PRICE PRICE 1. MICROWAVE EYSTEH 16,475.00 151500.00 2. INSTALLATION Y INCLUDED INCLUDED 3. ON-BITE TRAINING INCLUDED INCLUDED 4. FIRST TEAR SERVICE CONTRACT 830.0D 12300.00_ GRAND TOTAL. 17,323.00 19,500.00 .......... s DELIVERY 1 {PEEK 0 REEKS TERNS NET 30 NET 13 GU?1l1 T ]r(M IlB 87-92 )LIDS SOLICITED 3 ' BIDS RECEIVED 2 'NO RESPONSE 1 NO BID RESPONSE 2 DO NOT OFPn PRODUCT 1 UNABLE TO HEFT SPECIFICATIONS 1 e ' a`? 4. ' f CE. 0 . A6 n-Y rA 4%1 rS BID RESPONSE FORM 87-92 -` Item Qty. Commodity Description Total Price 1. 1 1000 Watts Microwave System Complete with operating parts $ 1.8.:500• and accessories (Per Attached Specifications) 2. installation $ INC 3. One day on-site training $ INC 1 4. Charge for extended first'year ' full service contract $ 1,300• F.O.B. CLEARWATER, FL Contact F.J. Janocha, 813/462--6560 with questions regarding this bid. BIDDER REPRESENTATION I represent that this bid is submitted'in compliance with all terms, conditions and specifications of the Invitation for Bid and that I am authorized by the owners/principals to execute and submit this bid on behalf of the business identified below. BUSINESS NAME: Questron.CorPoration FID# 222 574 114 STREET ADDRESS: 4046 Quakerbridge Rd. CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE: Mercerville, NJ 06543 PRINT/TYPE NAME OF AUTHORIZED REP: John Poling TITLE/POSITION OF AUTHORIZED rftp.. M.P. sa es SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REP: DATE SUBMITTED: 4/2/92 TELEPHONE:609- 7•-6896 -3-- i.qu L I QUOTATION # 15473JP '-3 C?RPOF?A'10N GM b ?• TO: George E. McKibben Inquiry # Verbal City of Clearwater Date: April 2, 1992 Purchasing division Terms: Net 15 711 Maple Street Delivery: ' 6 - 8 weeks Clearwater, FL 34615 Bid # 87-92 Prices quoted 813 462-6660 F.J,Janocha are P.O.U.: See below Item Quantity Description Price Amount 1 1 1000.000_Stanr and Q-WA;YE 1000 MICROWAVE SYSTEM $15,$00. $15,800. Includes: 1010.000 Oven & Computer Module The Oven Features: 1000 Watts Delivered Power PFA Lined Cavity 1 Sec, Duty Cycle Sealed Electronics Dual Exhaust System The Controller Features: Direct Reading in Watts Remote System Status & Operation Remote Microprocessor Programming 386 Computer 1020,000 Entranced Software Module Includes EPA Calibration Kit and Software for: • - EPA Calibration EPA Time-to-Temperature Mode Advanced Graphics Automated Pressure Control Automated Temperature Control Concurrent Pressure/Temperature 1030.000 Automated Pressure Control Includes: Pressure Control Interface Pressure Control Probe " (Requires Advanced Software Module) 1040.000 Automated Temperature Control Includes: Temperature Control Interface Temperature Control Probe • (Requires Advanced Software Module) E P.O. Box 2387 Princeton, NJ 08543-2387 (609) 587-6898 Fax: (609) 567-0513 0. N QUES N :;F' noN ?TkO QUOTATION # 15473JP ( n A G? b VL Item Quantity Description Price Amount 1050.000 Digestion Vessel Module Includes: 12 Standard Thermally Balanced Digestion Vessels 120 Rupture Discs 12 PFA Liners 1 Circular Vessel Rack I Collection Reservoir and 12 Vent Tubes All capable of safe, long-term operation ht-up to 200psi 1050.160 Pressure/Temperature Sensor Cap 1060.000 Spare Parts Kit Includes: Tool Kit and Fuses Operation and Service Manual Applications Manual RC M E ED N L E F E ; 2 1050.000 Digestion Vessel Module .. 1,900. 1,900. Includes: r 12 Standard Thermally, Balanced Digestion Vessels 120 Rupture Discs 12 PFA Liners • •1 Circular Vessel Rack 1'Collection Reservoir and 12 Vent Tubes ' All capable of safe, long-term operation at up to 200psi 3 1050.160 Pressure/Temperature Sensor Cap 800. $QQ, System Total $18,500. 4 ,X_ TENDED Ist YEAR FULL_SER)aQE QQVERAG Includes: Parts, Labor, Travel, Living expenses, and Access to our Toll Free 24 Hour Service Hot Line. $1,776. less 25% when purchased with system. 1,300. 11300. Please reference our Quote number on arty corrapandence regarding this Quotation. I YFAR WARRANTY (on reverse of this form) Quotation valid for 30 days Remains the property of Questron Corp. until paid in full. FOB: Princeton, NJ. (rippin a d lean ii ch gcs urc added to invoice. Please include with your do gro e c tt compliance witlun your jurisdiction, C n n n i c Pg. 2 P.O. Box 2387 • Pr1nc©ton, NJ 08543-2387 9 (609) 587-5898 Fax: (609) 587-0513 WARRANTY 1. - 1 year warranty on parts and in-house labor, at Questron's service center. 2. - 90 day warrantyfor on-site labor, travel and living expenses, s After the initial 90 days have expired the warranty will cover all parts, and labor (at Questroa's Service Center, Merceyville, N.J.), necessary to maintain the equipment at its' original manufacturer's specifications. If a field service call, is necessary, after 90 days, a separate purchase order to cover labor, travel and living expenses is required. It will be the customers responsibility to retain all original shipping cartons, should the need of warranty repair arise. It is also the customers responsibility to ship the equipment to Questron's Service Center prepaid. In return, Questron will ship the equipment back to the customer prepaid. Questroh will make every effort to .perform the repair, and ship the equipment back to the customer, as expeditiously as possible. Items not covered by this warranty include: Consumables • Areas of Sample Introduction Misuse or Abuse Acts of God - flooding, improper line voltage, etc.... Any modifications to the equipment performed without Questrons consent Shipping Address { Questron Corporation 4046 Quakerbridge Road Mercerville, New Jersey 08619 Attn: Service Department i ? i . j , I - i i S1, a P Clearwater City Commission A 11 c M A Item # Meeting Date: 09/17L92 rEiEgcn a over irmoran um W? 3r7 CONSENT SUBJECT: Purchase three acid storage cabinets for the water Pollution control laboratories, RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Approve the purchase of three acid storage cabinets from DESCON International Inc., Lindenhurst, N.Y., at an estimated cost of $4,100, being the most responsive quote received. 9 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The purchase of three polypropylene acid storage cabinets is needed for bulk storage of acids and corrosive materials for the Water Pollution Control laboratories. The acid storage cabinets will be utilized at each of the City's three AWT Facilities. The use of acid storage cabinets for bulk storage of acids and corrosives is mandated by and is in accordance with the Florida Department of HRS, OSHA and NIOSH safety requirements. The utilization of these cabinets has been incorporated into the WPC laboratory Quality Assurance (QA) Manual as is required by HRS. Quotes ranged from $1,036 through $1,495 each,' with the DESCON International quote being the one recommended for purchase. These acid storage cabinets are constructed completely of polypropylene, which is resistant to strong acids such as sulfuric acid and nitric acid. Other vendors can only supply cabinets made of metal or wood with polypropylene lining making them more susceptible to corrosion and deterioration. Due to the HRS, OSHA, and NIOSH requirements, employee safety, and the City's loss control specialist recommendation, the WPC staff strongly recommends the purchase of these cabinets. The WPC Division is requesting $4100 be transferred from 421-1-1350- 510/535 (Laboratory Supplies and Chemicals) into 421--1-1350--640/535 (Machinery and Equipment), at the Third Quarter Budget Review to provide funds for this purchase. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: costs: $ 4100 _ Copmission Action: Legal N/A B d PUBLIC WORKS/WPC Total. 3 Approved u get c c 4 $ 10 ? Approved w/conditions Purchasing ' 0 - Risk Mgmt, H IA User Dept- Current Fiscal Yr. ? Denied cis N/A ? continued to: ACM N/A Funding source: O h 0 t er capita! Imp. Advertised: ® operating Attachments: Date: ? other Paper: i d Not Requ re S 't Affected Parties Appropriation Code- N None E3 Notified 421-l-1350-640/535 City Ma er ® Not Required V SEAim* Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Item Meeting 09 1792 P1-0 10 SUBJECT: Bayview Baptist Church, located on Meadow Lark Lane and Kentucky Avenue; Skycrest Baptist Church (owner); Curtis J. DeYoung, P.E. (representative) (PSP 87-46) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Receive the site plan for the Bayview Baptist Church and authorize the Development Review Committee to approve the final site plan subject to preliminary condition listed below. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The subject parcel consists of 1.82 acres M.O.L. and is zoned Public/Semi-Public (PISP). The applicant proposes to construct a metal church structure consisting of 3,200 sq. ft., and 17 ft. in height. Fifty parking spaces are proposed, with 43 spaces being grass surface spaces and aisles (85%), with seven paved spaces, including three handicapped spaces. One access drive is proposed off Meadow Lark Lane. The applicant submitted a preliminary site plan in 1987 which was never certified. Staff has retained the site plan number assigned to the project at that time in order to keep records consistent. SURROUNDING LAND USES NORTH: Residential SOUTH: Residential EAST: Fraternal Organization WEST: Residential ACCESS: One driveway-off Meadow Lark Lane PARKING: One space per three seats = 50 spaces, with three handicapped spaces DRAINAGE: SWFWMD design standards UTILITIES: Essential services to be provided by the City of Clearwater CONCURRENCY: De minimus PRELIMINARY CONDITION: 1) Signs and fencing/walls are subject to separate review and permitting processes. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs, f N/A l 37" iission Action: Legal N/A PLANN,?NG & DEVE PME T Tota Approved Budget -NIA N/A h i P ? Approved w/corxiitians urc as ng Risk Mgmt, N/A - - User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. 13 Denied k cis 11 Contfnued to: ACK ACM Funding Source: Other /A O Capita( Imp. Advertised: 1) Operating Attachments: Date: 11 Other LETTE Paper: APPLICATION ® N ed t R ui MAPS o eq r S Affected Parties ? None 7 D Notified Appropriation Code: ® Not Required C ag9 r V s: i.1 Printed on recycled paper . DeYOUNG ENGINEERS, Inc. ENGINEERS SURVEYORS t i RE V1 L Vi# August 25, 1992 CITY t)F Czl:,??+n Y 1 A11113 2 1992 j CITY OF CLEARWA'TER Department of Community Development ey { n. 0. Box 4748 "??-?--?-- Clearwater, Florida 34618-4748 a Attn: Louis R. Hilton, Jr. Re: Bayview Baptist Church at Meadow Lark Lane and Kentucky Avenue Project No. 10080--001 Gentlemen: Enclosed herewith are twelve (12) copies of the revised site plan which we understand was previously submitted and approved under No. PSI'87-46. We understand there may he certain additional fees associated with this site plan review and respectfully request that the necessary steps be taken to waive them, since fees for this project were paid in 1987. We further understand churches such as this are not required to pay a parks and recreation impact fee, however should they be{required, we respectfully request the necessary steps be taken to waive those also. Your review and approval would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any question, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, DeYOUNG ENGINEERS, Inc, ?l Curtis J. De oung, P. President CJD/mc Encl. 802 NORTH BELCHER ROAD bLEARWATER. FLORIDA 34625.2136 101314 47-4 6 22 It s" t: U1 (Y Ul' ULL/WW/0).)1 . Ut:41i111111-111 W 1 X1,11 11 111 141 to IJUVi:101111wili ' City Ifall Annex. 10 So. Missourl Ave., 11.0. 110x 4740 Clearwaler, 11 34610.4740 t 'Telef[Ilorrc: 112131 462.611:10 1rax 402-GG41} ? -3 APVL,IC/11 [ON Foil S111 PLAN BEVIEW Applicant (Owner U( fieCCIrdl: Sky crest 13aptist Churcli,?Inc. __Ilhoflnj 813 1 791-7107 Address: 325 North Belcher Road City: C:lenrwater SI;)Iv: FL Zip: 34625 Representative: Curtis J. I}eYoung Tciepfrurrc+: _) 813) 447-4622 Address: ?802. North Belcher Road City: Clearwater State: Fl. Ziff: 34625 Preparer of Tian: UeYOUNG ENGINEERS, Inc. Professional Title: Address: X302 NQrrl Belcher Rnar] ?,chy:_ Clerlrwatt;r Slrite:?El,_ Zip: 34623 Telephone: [ 813 1 447--4622 Title of Proposed Site Planli'roject: Bayview Baptist Church _ _ _ ._ •__ _ .- - _ 16 29 16 Parcel Nurrmbor:_ 16 Z_29_1 16_ CC}52gz }} (() f zr} i [052 . / 801 c}i}tT I r, [11U ? 892'91 / 003 / 0??0 General Location of Property: Between Nandlow Lnrk Ig-me aria a St per nr Kentucky Avenue - Ra view Zoning: P/SP Land Use [,fail Classillcation: PSP Existing Use of Properly: Vacant Proposed Use of Property: Church if variances and/or conditional uses are involved, explain lit [flare space required allach solmrafe sheet): City Ordinance No. 3120-03 and No. 3129-133 require a parks anal reciention impact fee to be paid for all nor?residential projects over 1 acre in size and all residential developments. Iles this properly complied will[ these ordinances? If yes, explain flow and when: Assessed just value of property (attach verification):_ $971100.00 ": Most recent sales price (attacli varificalion): $38, 000.00 As of (dale}: June 7 Fee for Site Plan Review: 1. Base clarUe for each silo plan ............................................. $790 plus la) For each acre or traction thereof ........ . ............................. $55 2. Revalidation of a certified site plan ...........................................$150 3. Site plan amendment (after certification) .................... . ..................$150 . Tile applicant, by filing this application agrees he/she will comply with Section 137.010 of .ilia City's Land Development Code. 5ignalure ?„ {Owner of Record) 'If the application is signed by an individual other than Ilia properly owner (e.g. 011 represcnla(ivc), picasc 11111101 a SWIC"10111 signed by file property owner authorizing tirls individual to sitin the application. NOTES: 11 TIIE SITE PLANS MUST BE DRAWN WI TII ItIE NOrtTIf AftftrJW TU T1 (C TOP OF 'II(L ['AGE. C . t ? l I 1 L t .C •1l.7 q 21 `TIIE SITE "NS MUST 61: FOLDED TO NO LA113E11 41 IAN 9" x 12'. 3) IT 15 RECOMMENDED TIIE 5liE PLANS SUBMITTED nE LIMITED 1.0 ONE PACE. Flev. 3/92 I i s f wn. IJ t}j DFC i33 D ? N y , a q to i b i °i u r+ '- I? I J 4 0? a N II ?L[ I L Y1 r1 p Y1 ,p ?x P N 1 11,. Ijf 4 I. '_, II{Lt.I 12 ,..1 ?0 9; a.4d o n 8F1 x TENNESSEE 0 4[b h 1 2 3 4 ?JJY m 33i CAROUNA i ? !17 h? i o°? ?o 0 •7 h h b 1 2 3 4 5 6 14/07 9 4 3 a _ _ 12 II IO 9 13 7 C3 } h +? '60 J 50 4 0a lU' H/W 5925-M5 ? A 4k`?''?S 5p tJ w F? , 60E yD;O =. L I J OS/R ' t 22/21 • r o . CHESAPEAKE PARK ?j Q ? Ci?Y OYi11CD 22/35 ` c PAllx f T 22/36 .? i 0 C14 to C4 p • ? t4 '! • ? e y M •'7 fj N 511 •' ? ' ' ' 21/1 . 22/2 4 N x/29 cV ; , 65? 24. +.;?. ` .M ., 1 .' r1 ' . • • b •? , `'; •, , L .. . ry : ..?.F. ; 1i,:. r}s': ?:' .k' ?r : ??, y . Vi ? ' ' • •f. J: ,. .. :=r i; ? •j • _ '.k,... ?? i +. • j - .. ARW? TM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 zoo 2 I T R _ A R 'r 1 23 2 21 20' 19 18 17 16 15 CU ?WA Ell ' O rn a '- • 18 ' i 217 tot Soo zon •7•' '?'• '1 • K F• z 7 A O r., k .•F • ••? , p A 1 $ 7 p8 m AvE?'? E 1 2A aav JJ7 z4 /05 a 0 7Q ---- dd• S. R. 60 GULF m ,in Uwumurl 0 a n.? V 1 w J 1. 6' 1 C (1 -1e416 Pnf log ? 3g I ?i I ]" r • 74 w S Alk? 37e-09 Clearwater City Commission Meeti 17 92 Agenda Cover Memorandum rwwwww nw?. CONSENT SUBJECT: Amendments to Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas, and Associated Site Plan; 2201 Sunset Point Rd. (former branch bank); Owner: Sun Bank of Tampa Bay; Representative: Theodore C. Taub. (LUP 92-14, Z 92-08 & PSP 92-10) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Receive the applications for Land Use Plan Amendment to Commercial/Tourist Facilities, Zoning Atlas Amendment to Commercial Planned Development, and Preliminary Site Plan for a portion of the NW 114 of the SW 1 /4 of Sec. 6-29S-15B, M&B 32101; refer the amendments to the Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas to the City Clerk to be advertised for public hearing; and authorize the Development Review Committee to review the final site plan, subject to the preliminary conditions listed on page three, with approval of the final site plan by the City Commission. r a,nAa 4Cr-ikon c-F.Ict?t ed P;wWas G'rctjes eckserne-6411n-t-ke- NE,lg4?-5-E`61 o? Sec- I-a`l-15 ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the August 13, 1992 Commission meeting at the applicant's request. The request is to amend the existing Land Use Plan from Residential/Office to Commercial/Tourist Facilities, and the Zoning Atlas from Limited Office (OL) to Commercial Planned Development (CPD) for approximately 1.24 acres at the SW corner of Sunset Point and Belcher Roads. The site plan is submitted in support of the requested CPD zoning. CPD zoning is requested in order to permit the development of the property as a gas station/convenience store, such development to be carried out in accordance with the approved site plan. Also, the CPD zoning will enable the City to restrict the potential uses of the property to those specifically permitted. Prior to this development proposal, the subject property was used as a bank with drive-through teller lanes. The bank facility has been vacant and unoccupied for several years. The applicant proposes to raze the existing bank building and construct a gasoline station/convenience mart with a car wash/storage facility. The applicant desires to obtain a conditional use for package alcoholic beverage sales at a later date. Reviewed by: Le al N/A Origirmting Dept: N N OP LA & Costs: S NIA _ C fission Action: - g _ P N I G DEVE Total Approved Budget N/A Purchasing N/A S 13 Approved w/conditions Risk Mgmt. N/A User Dept: Current Fiscat Yr. ? Denied cis NIA ACH 47 +-_ Fording Source: 0 Continued to: Other N/A 17 Capital Imp. Advertised: O Operating Attachments: Date: ? other APPLICATION; HAP; COUNTY f Papers SPECIAL RULES FOR SCENIC 0 N R d i CORRIDORS ND E ot equ re ; A LETT R, MS. S. Affected Parties HAMMER TO MR. POLATTY DATED 17 Notified Appropriation Code; 6/12/92. ® Not Required ? Horse Cit an ge n o tinted on recycled paper ;.l LUP 92-14/Z 92-08/PSP 92-10 CC - August 13, 1992 Page 2 Belcher Road is identified as a scenic/noncommercial corridor on the Countywide Land Use Plan. This designation is intended to preclude commercial land use plan amendments under the Countywide Rules unless "specifically determined to be consistent with the purpose and intent of such corridors through the plan amendment process." It should be noted that the Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) is reviewing its scenic/noncommercial corridor requirements. Under the preliminary draft of the PPC study, according to the applicant, "The section of Belcher Road between Sunset Point Road and State Road 60 was recommended ... for inclusion in the Enhancement Corridor." Also according to the applicant, Enhancement Corridors "are areas which are no longer worthy of 'scenic' status, but in which new development should be encouraged to develop in a manner which will enhance the visual aesthetics of the corridor." At the current time, however, the proposed CPD zoning is a violation of the PPC rules for scenic/noncommercial Corridors. The City's policy on scenic/noncommercial corridors dates from October 20, 1977 when the Commission adopted Resolution No. 77-106 establishing certain roadways as scenic/noncommercial corridors. Belcher Road, from Belleair Road to Curlew Road, was listed on this resolution. However, the City's Comprehensive Plan, adopted in November, 1989, listed only the following roadways as scenic/noncommercial corridors: Memorial Causeway, Edgewater Drive, Courtney Campbell Causeway, and Bayshore Blvd. (Objective 22.4). Belcher Road was not included on this updated list. A review of the surrounding zoning configuration reveals that three of the corners at the Sunset Point/Belcher intersection are developed as other than "open space, rural estate, suburban, and low density residential", one of the purposes included in the Pinellas Planning Council's Special Rules, scenic/noncommercial corridors (attached). The northeast corner is developed as a mixed use (commercial/office) complex. The northwest corner is undeveloped, but is zoned by the County as Residential Planned Development (RPD-7.5). The portion of this parcel directly north of Sunset Point Rd. is occupied by Beckett Lake. The southeast corner is an office complex (OPD). This zoning appears to have been established to reflect the scenic/noncommercial corridor issue, as well as to protect surrounding residential development. The property adjacent to the applicant's on the south and west is in the County and has been developed as a mini-storage facility. The land to the south of the mini- storage facility on the west side of Belcher to south of the railroad, Palmetto Ave., has a land use classification of Industrial except for the portion occupied by the City's fire station. Due to road improvements (widening and intersection improvements) to Belcher Road and Sunset Point Road, right-of-way has been acquired from the subject property on the north and east sides of the property, consequently reducing the site area for sufficient above-ground stormwater pond retention. The applicant is proposing a stormwater vault to be maintained by the proposed business owner. Belcher Road appears to have adequate capacity for this proposal and is functioning at Level of Service "C" with a mostly passer-by trip clientele. 'f ? y LUP 92-1412 92-081PSP 92-10 CC - August 13, 1992 Page 3 SURROUNDING LAND USES NORTH: Beckett Lake (County) SOUTH: Dol,{ar Mini-Warehouse EAST: Offices WEST: Vacant/Dollar Mini-Warehouses ACCESS: Sunset Point Road/Belcher Road PARKING: Exceeds parking requirements DRAINAGE: SWFWMD standards UTILITIES: All City utilities are available to the site CONCURRENCY: Concurrency review to be performed PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS: i 1) Signs and fencing/walls are subject to separate review and permitting processes. 2) Conditional use permit request for alcoholic beverage sales shall be submitted prior to certification of the final site plan. 3) Site lighting structures shall not exceed 18 feet in height (same as building heights) and shall be directed away from rights-of-way and adjoining properties. 4) Open space requirements shall meet Neighborhood Commercial standards: 30 percent of lot, and ) 55 percent of front yard. 5) Stormwater calculations, retention area and stormwater vault details shall be submitted for prior to Development Review Committee review. 6) Soils information relating to the Stormwater vault g performance shall be required prior to Development Review Committee review. 7) A landscape plan shall be submitted prior to Development Review Committee review. 8) The applicant shall obtain approval from the City Commission to amend the land use plan from Residential/Office to CommerCial/Tourist Facilities and amend the zoning district from Limited Office (OL) to Commercial Planned Development (CPD). 9) As part of the CPD application, the applicant shall submit elevation drawings illustrating how the site will look after completion of all site work. } A - LAND US15 FLAN Al.ti.NDMENT A1111LICATIUN DATE NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER(S) Sun Bank of IaM Bay ?' - 1 ADDRESS 315 East_Mclison Street, T?z_'FL 33602 - PHONE (013) 224-2071 REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) Theodore C. Taub, P.A. ADDRESS 100 S. Ashley Dr., Suite 1940, Tampa, FL 33602 PHONE (813) 228-8000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF REQUEST) - See Exhibit A GENERAL LOCATION Sout}naest corner of Sunset Point Road and Belchar Road ACREAGE 1.24 acres PRESENT ZONING DISTRICT LimitW Office Dist rict.•(OL) REQUESTED ZONING DISTRICT Camsercial Planned Develo2ment District (CPA)_ Note: A separate application is required if the zoning district is proposed to be changed. PRESENT CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN CLASSIFICATION Residential Office (R/0) REQUESTED CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN CLASSIFICATION Ccmmrcial Tourist REASON FOR REQUEST To enable develownnt of the pro M? y with negi hborhood?-servvinc ccm excial uses. PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN CLASSIFICATION IS THE REQUESTED LAND USE CATEGORY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PINELLAS COUNTY LAND USE PLAN CLASSIFICATION? YES NO X • Note: s County Land Use Plan amendments require the approval of the Pinellas County Planning Council and the State of Florida (Chapter 163 F.S.). • State Growth Management Legislation limits final approval of Land Use Plan amendments by the City CommI'ss?on to twice a year. ? ?? •]??? inatu e { Reviewed by: - f F •a n i t - Z0I1II10 A'T'LAS A)AL•'BOMEsNT APPLICATION i 1 DATE. jullp NAME UP PROPERTY OWNER(S) &,Un ADDRESS 315 T_ist Mattison Street, Timina. rL_ 33602 PHONE _(8131 24-2071 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) 'ilieodore C. Tauub P.A. ADDRESS 100 S. Ashley Drive, suite 1940, lraitpa, EL, 33602 PHONE (813) 228-8000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF IIEQUEST} See Wiihit A i GENERAL LOCATION Southwest corner of Sunset Point Road-and-Belcher Road_ ACREAGE 1.24 acres PRESENT ZONING DISTRICT_ Lintited Office District (OL)- - - - ? REQUESTED ZONING DISTRICT Ccmmrcial Planned Development District (CPD) ' CITY COMPREIIENSIVE LAND USE CATEGORY Residential office (RIO) ? F COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE CATEGORY Residential Office (R/o) REASON FOR REQUEST To .develop t11e2mperty-wiiq1 neiorhood-servincLconmercial uses. _ y -__-_.. --- •- _ ?__?__ _... I IS THE ItEQUBSTED 7,ONI140 DISTRICT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN? YES --NO-? Note: If the requested zone cthang& Is not consistent with the City's Land Use Plan, the applicant will be required to file a corresponding application to amend the land use Plan. IS THE REQUESTED ZONING .DISTRICT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PINELLAS COUITTY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN? YES NO X LIST ANY O'1imt PERTINENT IHFORMA'TIoN SUBMITTED prix cz //e7 gna . red' Reviewed by,, 0 27 2? zres zra± _ _ . _, -- C o u N T\? Zd tJ 1 ?" G , 1'?. 7, ? orJ 1`951' zi s i J ,T,?o 23 r`I f ) t,. tr p {? / p .o?, ?.. • 3 ??? ??b 26 25 24 C P,.D RS ROAD SET ROAD , SUNSET PT RD i 7ot -- 706 ;??K tk` t" f?,'?,?,'?`' ?1 "??,?{ '? •;• t s: ?cr;t~ & 5 0 4 b 3 z F 1 14 14 LLAGE F ? ;in<!I 32/01 y 14 4 repa G 601 Goa r>>?i? i M ?• O L p RS 61 ? ? -?:{?• { ?y elbf • ` ?, as 1676 ? raga N Z ;' V" 7 30 31 54 ?, V i /r ' • loop lase ej ?? u N t' , } ? •r g 29 „ 32 53 ! `, O?? .i7 !I 4 •` , r. 1r 32/011 y? faE1? 28233 52 •?j? t t •z 1 + 'a • _ d f86a 1864 \J g ": g ® re57 27 1857 ~ 57 fesa tr- 34 51 rasa . 1541 ,'+3?.' Yd'• s'?;'? G7 marll 26 rear 50 ] 1504 1401 - 1405 ys 4{s f " t? Vi i, s ta6P 35 re6z :: 1846 25 reps D'E.- 12 l i Q ' UPS wo 36 49 reu ', ? ' W Y of , ' • • rasa sea ? c3 13 24 ' 3-re10 -.37 481840 Y o 5 fesa - 23 I L rasa W Y ?Cjg x. rest 1 ras 38 47 1834 ri t 6 rear 22 rerr m `o a 1 4 1 15 faze 39 9 6 1828 rezr U r8z7 N . O 16 21 40 45 f o re1R t! < P.O.W. O.R. 5854-1727 RESOLUTION ? O.R. 5318-435 rats lera O.C.D. R.O.W. S p _ 17 20 rata 41 44 1616 a m Q.R. 5298--2044 J Ix J f ?? . W 18 19 42 143 C7V? ?e? 60 1804 41"o 50 IMP rA+n PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT and.REZONING OWNER 2 q 2 -b $ • 1.l1P Q 2-- 1 y APPLICANT SV?1 8A N 1L of T'M ?? $ p,? PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ',.AND USE PLAN ZONING M ?t 8 2 2 o l FROM 'R E S t D E i.?Tt A i~ t. TO GpN1MF-910- 1 T F C p D 112y ACRES PLANNING and ZONING BOARD CITY COMMISSION SECTION O G TOWNSHIP 2,q S RANGE 16 E ATLAS PAGE ?2 6 3 A •Singl. Famlly 8 = 8VG1 4ZSS \f= VA CAN [ q?So Sic-?tOYi d? -- 0 . 8 a ??Ys? ? ? UI 111 / ?n ` 04 1 70 rA ?? u K 1 N F .n 1 p? Moog tia;jny(a!?• n/? S * ? l o v .? I ?i aPcS: 1 F ? 61 'S L p ??. V + ry 'y ? ? d ? +?+ ? 'phi ?o?ajaR L O + , 'R DAB sa;n?saH N K a f n w? ? ? r b n d u ,, n q D p?j auaay I v o Ad• "a a, 9 ? I .+ ac a t • DAY a ?S ? w u + aAy puFIV?TH - + 4 ncnySl!{ sgu1:. e i ?n 3At' [Sf10SSt}\ ?C3 r i ? . a r ?? a te_ r^u?? '?l? x f 10 23.3.8 SPECIAI. DESIGNATIONS - CONT. 233.81 CatettnrylSvmbal - Scenlc/Non-Commerclal Corridor (As noted on FLUE1. use - See Article 4, Section 4.23, Special Rules. Use Characteristics - See applicable Plan categories. Locational Characteristics - Corridors shall be as set forth herein and depicted on the FLUP map including: r • McMullen-Booth/East Lake Road Corridor - From State Road 60 to the Pasco County Line. E • Belcher Road Corridor - From Tyrone Boulevard to Klosterman Road. • New Ridge Road/I lath Street Corridor - From State Road 699 "deh Bench Causeway) to State Road 686 (West Bay Drive). • State Road 586 (Curlew Road) Corridor - From Alternate 19 to McMullen-Booth Road. i • Edgewater Drive Corridor - From Sunset Point Road to Scotland Street. • Alderman Road Corridor - From Alternate 19 to Fish Hatchery Road (formerly Lakepointe Drive). Traffic Generation Characteristics - The countywide plan standard for the purpose of calculating typical traffic impacts relative i to a plan amendment for this category shall be based upon the underlying plan categories. f Densi ntensi Standards - See applicable Plan categories. Other Standards - See Article 4, Section 4.2.7, Special Rules. !_ 1! j i , 4 Countywide Flan RU1rs 2-34 March 15, 1992 t Q .E rid l , , f A J S f° SEC. 4.2.6 OTHER STANDARDS. Local future land use plans and development regulations shall Include policies and/or standards consistent with the "other standards" contained- in the description of each FLUP category. Where no such standards are In place in the lo.:al future land use plan or land development regulations, the local future land use plan or hind development regulation shall be amended to provide for same or be found inconsistent. This shall not be Interpreted to require that a local government provide for the secondary use characteristics listed under Other Standards or to preclude the local government from having a smaller, mono restrictive acreage threshold for plan amendment. SEC. 4.2.7 SPECIAL RULES. 4.2.7.1 Scenic/Non-commercial Corridors. 4.2.7.1.1 Designated scenic/non-commercial corridors, as set forth in these Rules and depicted on the FLUP, shall be deemed to have countywide significance and will be recognized as a scenic/non-commercial corridor. 4.2.7.1.2 The purpose and intent of the scenic/non-commercial corridor designation is several-fold as follows: A. To preserve and enhance those scenic characteristics that provide opportunities for open, natural vistas and visual relief from the monotony and clutter of the urban development pattern; ?f B. To discourage the proliferation and extension of other than open space, rural, estate, suburban, and low density residential uses along and abutting these corridors; , C. To preclude the introduction or expansion of off-premise signs; D. To preserve, through careful scrutiny of any proposed plan amendment, the traffic carrym ca a i of these highway corridors; and E. To create opportunities for enhanced urban designand landscape tmatmen that will contribute to the scenic qualities of these corridors. 4.2.7.13 Within scenic/non-commercial corridors, the following standards shall apply: A. Residential Use classification - No dwelling unit or structure accessory thereto shall be located within the right-of-way that is required to implement the current M.P.O. Long Range Transportation Plan and the local government with jurisdiction shall require setback from such right-of-way consistent with any specific standard therefor as set forth in the FLUP or these Rules. Signage and outdoor advertises that Is not related to existing or proposed on-site residential development (e.g., oroiect identification sim) shall be nr60611t.ed. 4); Countywide Plea Rules 4-7 Ma h 15.1992 B. CommercialAndustrial/Mixed Use classifications - No new-or ad0jtipnaL commercial, industrial, or mixed use plan category shah be permitted thin 500 feet of the sight-of-way of a designated scenic/non-commercial corridor,, unless specifically determined to_be_consistent _with- the . purpose. and intent of said corridors ihrou the plan amendment process. No off,premise sign shall be located within 500 feet of the designated corridor. The designated. 500-foot setback shy b_e measured film the rigtit-o ay_Xhat: rrgvired to impierri nt the cu tt M.P.O. Lang Range Transportation flan, 4.2.7.2 Transferable Development Rights. Permitted densitylintensity as provided for under the FLUP and these Rules may be transferred from one FLUP category to another FLUP category as part of a FLUP amendment or local government action, consistent with the otherwise applicable provisions of the FLUP and these Rules and as hereinafter provided for. 4.2.7.2.1 Transfer of density/intensity shall be as provided for in the applicable local government comprehensive plan and land development regulations, subject to the following; A. The land use characteristics within any given FLUP category shall be consistent with those land use characteristics enumerated for each FLUP category and no transfer of density/intensity shall be permitted which is inconsistent with the use characteristics of a given FLUP category. B. The maximum permitted density/intensity of any parcel of land to which density/intensity is transferred (receiving parcel) shall not exceed the densityjntensity standards for said parcel as set forth in the FLUP and these Rules, except as specifically provided for in paragraph C. below. C. The resulting densityrntensity for a parcel of land to which density/Intensity is transferred (receiving parcel) may exceed the maximum density/intensity for the applicable FLUP category by an amount not to exceed; , 1. For parcels receiving density/intensity transferred from seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line - As determined by the local government plan and regulations. 2. For parcels receiving density/intensity transferred from all areas other than seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line - one (1) dwelling unit or five (5) percent floor area ratio per acre, or both, as is applicable based on the use characteristics to be utilized in the receiving parcel, for the area from which the density/intensity is transferred (sending parcel).. I D. Where development rights have previously been transferred from a sending parcel through a local government approved or FLUP approved process, no additional development rights shall be transferable from that sending parcel. Countywide Plan Raba 4-8 March IS, t992 i 3 A { i 4 THEODORE C. TAUB, P.A. ATTORNEYS AV LAW 2100 F IRS1 UNION CE:NrEn 100 50UTFI ASIILty 014WL TAMPA, FLORIDA 3:.1602 TAMPA (810j 228.9000 TELECOMER 1013122D,0550 June 12, 1992 Mr. James Polatty, Director City of Clearwater Department of Planning and Development City Hall Annex 10 S. Missouri Ave., Clearwater, FL 34618 MAILING A013RES9' PGS7 OI"FICE FSOX 3430 TAh1E'A, FLl7RMA :3:1601 Re: Rezoning Application for southwest corner of Sunset Point and Belcher Road Dear Mr. Polatty: Enclosed is our zoning application to rezone the 1.24 acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Sunset Point Road and Belcher Road from Limited Office (OL) to commercial Planned Development Distract (CPD). We have. also filed a land use plan amendment application to amend the plan from Residential/Office (R/O) to Commercial Tourist. We feel this application is reasonable for many reasons, including: a. surrounding Zoning Pattern. The zoning to the immediate west and south of the site is C-2. This Euclidean zoning district permits more intense uses than what is requested for the subject site. To the immediate northeast of the site is a CPD zoning district, which has been developed as an Albertson's shopping center. To.the immediate east is t another non-residential zoning district, an Office Planned Development, which has been., developed as a small office park. To the north is a parcel zoned RPD, the majority of which is a lake, which cannot be developed. The general zoning pattern to the southwest is industrial, which has been developed with a mix of both commercial and industrial uses. b. Surrounding Land Uses. The parcel of land to the immediate west and south of the subject site is developed as a mini-warehouse project. The corner to the immediate north is zoned RPD, but the majority of the site is a lake. The other two corners of the intersection are already developed in non-residential uses. 4 f t i 1 1 f A Mr. James Polatty June 12, 1992 Page Two c. Existing Use of the Site. The site is currently developed as a branch bank facility. The use of a gas station will generate less new trip ends on a daily basis than the existing branch bank facility, according to the Pinellas County Impact Fee Ordinance. A much higher percentage of trips utilizing this facility will be "passer-by" trips; therefore, this facility should put less of a demand on the overall transportation network than the branch bank. d. Analysis of Non-Commercial corridor Designation. The subject property was included in the preliminary study of the Pinellas County Scenic Corridor Master Plan conducted by King Engineering. The section of Belcher Road between Sunset Point Road and State Road 60 was recommended in the report for inclusion in the Enhancement Corridor. These are areas which are no longer worthy of "scenic" status, but in which new development should be encouraged to develop in a manner which will enhance the visual aesthetics of the corridor. We have designed our site plan in accordance with this goal by k.} exceeding the standards for landscaping and setbacks from the roadway corridors. In addition, we have proposed landscaping the right-of-way areas in front of the parcel to further enhance the appearance of the site. e. Recent Development Approvals. In addition to the approval of the Albertson's shopping center on the northeast corner of the intersection, there has been a recent site plan approval for a bar-be-que restaurant at the intersection of Belcher Road and Calumet Street. Although this parcel is zoned industrial, a restaurant is a permitted use within the industrial zoning district. Therefore, other commercial uses will soon be introduced to the immediate area. f. Scheduled Roadway Improvements. The widening of Sunset Point Road by Pinellas County is budgeted for the 1992/93 Fiscal Year. This roadway improvement will also include intersection improvements, including the widening of Belcher Road for the entire length of the subject property. As a result of the widening, a substantial amount of existing vegetation will be removed from the north and south sides of Sunset Point Road at this location, as well as the Belcher Road frontage of the subject parcel. The applicant proposes to not only replace most of the vegetation which will be removed for the widening, but to provide additional landscaping in the right-of-way,adjacent to the site. Mr. James Polatty June 12, 1992 , Page Three We encourage you to recommend approval of our request. Because of the configuration of our site, it is necessary to request the following waivers of the zoning requirements: a. Waiver of the Side Yard Setback. The Zoning Code requires a to foot side yard setback. Because of the utility easement that traverses the property, it is not feasible to provide a 10 foot setback for the car wash. We request a waiver of this requirement to reduce the allowable setback to 4 feet. We feel this is a reasonable request, because the adjacent property is zoned C-2, and is developed commercially. b. Waiver of Number of Parking Spaces. The Zoning Code does not have a parking standard specifically for gas stations. Instead, we have been advised to use the standard for general retail, or 6 spaces/1000 square feet. This standard would necessitate a total of 14 spaces to accommodate the size of structure proposed on the site plan. In order to increase the amount of on-site landscaping, we have reduced the number of spaces to 10. In addition, we feel the reduction in spaces is justified given that most customers will. leave their vehicle parked at the pump islands. Gas stations traditionally do not require as many parking spaces per square foot of retail space as other retail uses because of the parking patterns associated with the use, C. Waiver of Parcel Size for Commercial Planned Development District. The Zoning Code requires a minimum of 4 acres for establishment of a new CPD zoning lot. This parcel of 1.24 acres is an isolated parcel within the Clearwater City limits, and can not be combined with any other parcels. It is currently developed as a bank, and would be a logical extension for the existing commercial development at the node. We request your support of this petition. We feel that it is a reasonable request and is consistent with existing land uses in the immediate vicinity. Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, Ethel Hammer Director of Planning.,. f ?PP_ AgendQ.in gs 3'IF i. ' M A SEki.?• Meeting e• O9 77 92 Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum rtA CONSENT SUBJECT: Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment, and Zoning Atlas Amendment for 2975 Gulf to Bay Blvd.; Business: Bay Breeze Trailer Park; Owner: William & Virginia Kirkpatrick. (Approx 2.4 acres) (A 92-11 & LUP 92-18) RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Receive the Petition for Annexation, Land Use Plan Amendment to Medium Density Residential, and Zoning Atlas Amendment to RMH for Lot 17 and the South 88.44 ft. of the West 153.92 ft. of Lot 2, William Brown's Subdivision of Bayview and refer the request to the City Clerk to be advertised for public hearing. ? Authorize the City Manager to execute an annexation agreement. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The request for annexation is for the portion of Bay Breeze Trailer Court not currently in the City, except for the recreational area on the bay side of the trailer park. This latter area will be the subject of an agreement between the City and the applicants, which will require this property to be annexed within the next five years. The applicants are requesting annexation in order to connect the remaining 29 unsewered mobile homes to the City's sewer system. Sewer service is currently being provided by the applicants' community septic tank. There is an existing, City sewer line along the south side of the property proposed for annexation which currently provides sewer service to part of the trailer park and which can provide service to the mobile homes on the property to be annexed. Two previous annexations have incorporated parts of the Bay Breeze Trailer Park into the City. The frontage along S.R. 60 was annexed when the road was annexed into the City, and lot 16 and part of lots 3 and 15 were annexed in November, 1967, apparently to obtain sewer service for an addition to the trailer park. The original portion of the trailer park remained on its own sewage system, and has continued to do so until the present. The applicants now wish to abandon their sewage treatment facilities and connect into the City's system. The applicant has paid all applicable fees with the application, and wishes authorization to connect immediately into the City's sewer system. Reviewed by: originating Dept: Costs: S NIA lssion Action: C Legal N/A PLANNING I DEVE OPME T Total Approved Budget NIA - NIA Pur hasi 1A P 13 Approved w/conditions c ng Risk Mgmt. NIA User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. (3 Denied CIS N ACM Funding Source: © Continued to: other _ NIA 11 Capital Imp. Advertised: L) Operating Attachments: Date: ? other PETITION Paper: MAP ® N R i d equ re ot Su6mitt Affected Parties ? None Notified 13 Appropriation Code: city Manager ? Not Required equi red <45 Printe on recycled paper C.C. 9/17192 A 92-11, LUP 92-18 Page 2 It is therefore requested that the City Manager be authorized to execute an agreement with the applicants whereby the City agrees to provide sewer service in exchange for the applicants' agreement to complete the annexation of the property currently being proposed for annexation, within five years annexing his remaining property on the bay side of the trailer park which is currently being utilized as a recreational area for the occupants of the trailer park, and further agree that any construction on said property would be in accordance with the requirements of the City. Upon execution of this agreement, the applicant would be permitted to connect to the City's sewer system. There is a dedicated street, Rogers Street, passing through the property proposed for annexation, The abutting portion of this street will be annexed with the applicants' property. The section of the trailer park proposed to be annexed does not meet City requirements for the RMH district; the minimum lot size, separation between units, access drive right-of-way and setback of units from drive are not in accordance with City requirements. The existing development will be nonconforming, and allowed to continue as presently developed. Tho County and Countywide Future Land Use Classification for this property is Low Medium Density Residential (10 u. P.a. max.) whereas the proposed City Future Land Use Classification for this parcel is Medium Density Residential (16 u.p.a. max.). The proposed Land Use Classification will be subject to review by the Pinellas Planning Council. Ultimately, the property will be included in the residential low medium category on both the City and countywide plans as part of the consistency program. AI tt F r is i' i. f t l ? F Is f PETITION FOR ANNEXATION City Commission City of Clearwater P.O. Sox 4748 Clearwater, Florida Commissioners: ' We, the undersigned, being all owners of the described real property, contiguous to the present boundaries of the City of Clearwater, and r situated in an unincorporated area of Pinellas County, Florida, do hereby request that said property be annexed into the corporate limits of the City of Clearwater, Florida. We hereby further request that said property be zoned and classified under the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Clearwater, as set forth on the following page. Attached hereto is a curzent survey of the described property, together with a certificate of title from a title company or a licensed attorney setting forth the names of all persons, firma or corporations owning any interest in the described property. The undersigned have been advised of, understand and in consideration of annexation, utility services, and other good and valuable consideration, do hereby agree and convenant as follows: 1. all contiguous property under the ownership of the petitioner(s) is included in this petition for annexation; 2. all structures and improvements which are erected upon said property subsequent to the date of this petition for annex- ation shall comply with ail•applicable City of Clearwater regulations-and ordinances as set forth in the City Code of Ordinances; 3. to convey such recreation land, recreation facilities and open space land dedication and/or fees'in the amount and manner prescribed by Ordinance Nos. 3128-83 and 3129-93; and 4. when any substandard abutting street or utilities are subsequently upgraded by the City to meet City Standards, said improvement will be done on an assessment basis, consistent with City procedures therefor. We, the undersigned hereby certify that we have read and examined all of the statements and allegations in the foregoing Petition including attachments and after being duly sworn, depose and say that such statements are correct, complete and true and voluntarily made with full knowledge thereof. STATE OF FLORIDA ) ! _ COUNTY. OF PINELLAS ) r?. 7 Subscribed and sworn to before me this ?..?'? day of J. r.l, 19 _ - f My,Commission Expires: t M?B b1TH A. GAITVEY otar Pob,i,.. Stalo o! F1crida y mm.Erpp'lrestioc.28,19N U0. CC47.&I-0 o WON= ry P?A':_ l1r?.ShnlOri . - , - nn 7 }t' } .I .-t ro ' tw -t 4A u ? c OH ? c? o roc p ?. A. n ? U ..+ td 7 1.... 4) U •.{ u .. ? u y . N th •rf p•tN 1 C?44 b 7 61 O ' . • 4+ 'L7 . N ri N O C1 O Vl O u w ao fro ': c M rf a oe ?• n :A c . ' 0 1 L . V ? 3 rd N ro al U O O 14 •rS 0s ro O U O IJ ?? 4 .,1 u L 1j ci LO) td u U4 V N % o. " ' • U -4 a F m r-( Ln = N 4 r4 5 ? H e a w•.r v I n •., a u '? ? V vi G .,j ? .4 i ? 0 • ^ 0 r u b ti . to N U td Ci d .. . u V1 u to w td Ob !? R. C7'•rt' ' .O of H O dl ul M . 5D IJ ? 1-? 13+ Ln 4)44 c EE O O K N Ef M PG p ? ? ? .1 r Q1 , in 9: d) ?. ? c t3 41 aJ •rt . 6J e--4 G1. ..a x w .c a. to :3 ti lu o u to C3 N 4) C) rz G. O = •.4. 0 .rf U •O fir. +j k" 0 :9 c •b co - . 7•. 61 0 0 Lr w r- - 4j go 0) d) .-i ? < u u r_ cc 41 W •r Ln =. r- t" 13 > 0 .? u Od . n N b C. A 4. rr v Oi .a n 0 r-4 td • to rl .0 N . to •-4 (U c ro 0 w = O O 0 CO tin •.'t a., .4 co •-t NE: n r-t ro u h u ra 4J U ?• U •ri to O , ..+ 3: =,4 N u 'C n F.• LW ' •H 'LY Ot ' •rt W ?••' a x } to .= to M .Q c u J.! .. n m y ! O In f u 0 f to m V. .? n u u . . to o ea m a o E N LL. c r In' a b ?' . ? !J VI O F . . l rl u r r F. t.5 W u i . -o u r-4 41 = c r-t a ? v, a v: to O •.+' i M O n t.3 v z V. N •ri •.•1 U H •y u F G G c w c O ?z N u T Z C 4u r- L E ' Vi t] •r+ ? ? r c • ? ac ? , .-t N to r ) ?' u R W , t a a i to .. .. , c . ;. u Lo i. ' i n I 1 ? I N 0 1L' Row 50 Sp ngnh ,?? s0 -? n ., _? -.... -- -- -•- ? ? `° '^ 4 p}? ?? of 4p R •n 59:5--t:fl5 T ?V ]? • 5271- 1140 4i 6sd? 1733 ? U F To S V G7 0 6'jY vs CIG ,- C f sc? ti(Y ?o? 5to 60a TO WN 3 1? ti2u ,1° •1 .cfl 541} It .- ,?oTRAlLF 4 ` ?a R _6 OF j? 547 3 4 1 '"P% tie .t n. ,i .r..r+*., Bas t , 1 ?- h ?TIB3.164 4926 IQs }? ' ;t, ,? y:r.'e':? •SQi1 VIEW ?.. :. ?f 196 63a2-1729 , if<; 4yi +? ?'' ,6 i 1 F 1? J w i? •, • •F,. " c T, I 18 29 h2a 47 ?: rn 120 19 32tl f9 t4y t 12 2 19 28 16 - •: ,,' . ? ' . , 6 p7 It BA1 •zz ?zr 322 32-1 .r E V 15 9 ?} :i'rIi•f ;f. ??,/ 32 ?DS g06 424 4zs 324 92 16 4 21 26 14 AN 1+ To 426 W26 4 . Z c k# 1' , f f ?' 7 p o 5 22 M r4 29 K 1 . 427 Ulf 327 1 6 23 24 12 Z p 13Q E'3 330 329 rw r. En7 fit 7 ,p r. if Sv. in '1 .IaB 0 17 ri q yr r` aJ ?' .Y' f? N h b h h L,. 1f. Gt1 7. 7 B 9 ? 117 • 11 .r: •?; ::. ? ?=f:," 3ryf P/ S ! r a?4?(?'?• fit- t4 F i . SV^. 5,1, `.+ ? r•?t-r •,??,. ' 637-1056 il?`•>iti F' 't ?? ;?,. v r' .i,.?: :w, f` U 's?Tr?, ?¢ q4? !:J ? t4ir r?ii?vi• n.s ?y ,i ?' }a. r..i r.Y.K 1P? A 4339 i K, •' ? irrµ •,:?t ? r 'CI . A ib37-1092 85 TRA. T , 32/o 71g iJ iJ?d ? .,ti.r . E+,; at"r;, 6 • • ` 5776-•12S ` ' ,y,:l. •w.`Y. J '1'(, 'x"'' .? ?• ;17.1 ?{'??•,' rk. t? ? •.? AL/C PROPOSED ANNEXATION LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT and ZONING OWNER KIgKPA-rIR1C.Ki w APPLIC R Q V B AQI - It LUP.QZ-Jg ' N e ANT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION J?Mw1w _r 'LAND USE PLAN ZONING SOY 17, I,°>'Pn,CtT v LO-r z wit Lpm $Rouim"5 St! C?Dlvl S?o? 0 FROM CF 'BAYVIEW 7 U14CLAS SIF IAA COUNTY R-G 2 la ACRES TO MEDIUM aEb3slTy R ? , 1 r RIGHT OF. WAY lxxlTlJll 4?ART - Ro GL?RS s't' RESI0CWTIAL ? ACRES PLANNING end'ZONING BOARD CITY COMMISSION SECTION 17 TOWNSHIP 2,q S RANGE 16 E ATLAS PAGE SOD $ -: M ?A r M0SILE i4oMEs Nf= VA c AI\'T 0 - -------------- w J_ w tz v ¦ I j i r i i" i f ?f - ?I SE?1?• ? rEa??o4 Clearwater City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum Pic 9 MeetAng 0 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code Amendments - Pinellas Planning Council Consistency Program RECOMMENDATION/MOTION: Receive proposed Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code Amendments and refer to City Clerk for advertisement for public hearings. ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) Consistency Program is a countywide effort to bring local government comprehensive plan and zoning intensity standards into general consistency. The effort is being made to resolve problems that have occurred with, for example, the floor area ratios allowed under one local government's plan classification of neighborhood commercial being different from that of other local governments. These local differences have complicated coordination of proposed amendments to the countywide plan. A number of Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code amendments must occur for the implementation of the PPC Consistency Program. These amendments are primarily changes In nomenclature, but do include a significant expansion in the number of Comprehensive Plan classifications (from nine to 22), as well as a complete revision of the City's Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Plan) map. The amendments also resolve a number of differences between the City and countywide comprehensive plan maps. Numerous Land Development Code amendments associated with the Consistency Program must also be processed. These changes primarily involve density and intensity standards, but also include several new zoning, planned development and overlay districts. There are also amendments to definitions and some nomenclature changes. A summary of the major changes to the Code is provided on page 2. it should be noted that the section numbers associated with these code amendments are subject to change due to the recodification project currently nearing completion. Reviewed by: originating Dept: Costs: S N/A Commission Action: Legal Planning & Devel r ? Total Approved ?RL Budget N/A_ ? NIA ? Purchasin I b N/A ? Approved w/conditions g Risk Mgmt. N/A _ User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. ? Denied cis N A ? Continued to: ACM Funding Source: Other N/A _ Ci Capital Imp. Advertised: 0 operating Attachments: Date: ? Other - PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS Paper: - DRAFT ORDIHANCE ® R i d - TABLE LISTING AMENDMENTS equ re Not S Affected Parties ? None 7 13 Notified Appropriation Code: ® Not Required C yMana R.i PH U on recycled paper 1 , ?f C. C. 9!17192 PPC Consistency Program Page 2 The Comprehensive Plan amendments and the Code changes are being considered now in order to meet state review deadline requirements and the March 15, 1993 PPC deadline. Because scheduling difficulties precluded including the required Comprehensive Plan amendments in the City's second biannual submittal to the state this year, staff is proposing to initiate an early submittal of the City's first biannual Comprehensive Plan amendments to meet the PPC deadline in March. Normally, we would submit our first biannual set of Plan amendments in February, but to meet the deadline we would propose a November submittal. A copy of the proposed Comprehensive Plan ex and Land Development Code amendments is attached. The proposed Comprehensive Plan map amendments will be presented to the Commission separately. SUMMARY OF MAJOR CODE AMENDMENTS PPC CONSISTENCY PROGRAM ? Conversion of density allowances from a Del density approach to a more standard _gross density approach (see the following attachment listing the proposed changes in density) ? Creation of the following new zoning districts: ? RS-1 - A one unit per acre single family district r RM-10 - A ten unit per acre multifamily district ? Preservation - A new district which replaces the Aquatic Lands/Coastal and Aquatic Lands/Interior zoning districts r Three new planned development districts - (1) Research, Development and Office Park Planned Development District; (2) Public/Semi-Public Planned Development District; and (3) Urban Center Planned Development District r Two new overlay districts - Activity Center/Primary and Activity Center/Secondary ? Creation or revisions to some density, open space and/or floor area ratio requirements in the following zoning districts: r Neighborhood Commercial ? North Greenwood Commercial r Beach Commercial ? Highway Commercial r Limited Industrial ? Public/Semi-Public ? Open Space/Recreation n -H 0 44 4-) -H r. 44 0 b •d `-' 0 ra N O O t a U b • W o N p a r-I 44 > 0a (1) 4-J (a ra ?4 a ?UO0 4J (1) 0 >1 44 14 4J r. a C ,H .,f (a N ,0 •m (d g , 0 rd 44 in td W w M O O •rl >, U a, a W ? 4 Q 'a) 0 •? •? ? Q1 ) W . P 4- U is+ a O fa lea 04 ta r I Q) •,•I 0 '"A In k N a •ri to a 0 P4 Q) 4J 'r' 4J E-1 P4 u a A Gc7 q a O N C a k a 4J •rl a N,? O N.. y, b H ? 4 04 a 4J 9 '0 U to • r.? •'? 0 O H r i b a ro p Q1 ? A b Q1 r-I U v ra 9 4 x ? fu 0mH4.J ara>, 0Q14-Jb 1 4Jb w c? z a iar • N N o o A a 9U,N r-i (n •H ~ U N 3 ! r. ?3 . >'? ? 4J 0 >1 •rI P' Q) ro . U j a+ O O 4 ,d rd a r 4J co rq U) u >4 E-1 B P4 p 4-3 (0 4-) 0 b rti - U (V a iH 44 (p -"? to a -H > j U' W is E-1 b o v +- {!1 . ca N p a N 'r1 U ro N 4j r-{ U H H b Q)b'O Q} J 0 rdH W r4 A H (i) .,,1 •O N -r -I p .? .,OI a 4 a H E A , O a •rl 'r-l R, ?s 4J r. N 03 H W; 41 U O O Q?1 0 0rz 4J > la .,1 -H . © C7 p I I j -P 't7 O .'. N '? U . w a (1) 01 r- t3) J r- U a .O . I ra N C .g r H (n 4 4) ?r 0? E-1 x U) H a) P4 to p 0 V) U -H 4-1 04 s~4J O a 04"1H 0 W H ,-I A 00..tnfatn 44 OCaR, W n. U 44 .0 0 N ? In N ^ R, 'd a rt9 B O A a s 4J a r W 0 c4 Q) t 9z F: M m ? 'tf s~ 4-) 4-J tn fa 4J O U 0 •rl a r• M Wj UO g+ 4 J a a ( U Nrd a U) 4J rdr%I U 4J r o G4 a 0 O4-J 9Z ?, a s •rl to 4J W •,1 0 a N a 4J N 44 th 0 0 •W = -r-1 w ?? Q) rd ,j •• •U) H z H rCf •-I r{ 4J 4J •rt •H A W N t. rO 44 N to rd 4J 0 i-J to H N H w b O 0 -4 4J a Z 0 C 0,-I a •"' I r; b In a ra r4 "I Z U 7C w w .. ? H 0 N . z r? z •? a H 4 H 4H F4 H F4 U F{ I?.? OC9 C4 H H z H H Ix W w w 'a w a ,o o w° wAO A H H W H H M H ?Y En M En In W W En M (n ,may ++?? E-1 H a w I I I IYi H P4 H H m 44 w H w w HW a H a a t?H0 w zH zH HH x 4 4 z z H 4 a 4 a a a44 P4 a>4 a w H 44 z ww ww wa wwH 3twM 0 3a 3a 30 3aa Ar1?o H AC7 AU Az AC7A zz E., U z z H zZ: RS W ? U 3A 3 N ? : w ? H W H W H E-r W O : &4 W N W H H W H wO WO wa rL.0(n HP tri a a 0z 9 a z ow ow o oacl A a U 0 0 0? LO ?3 O o •31n O O r I N In n ui a ri ?- g to U co H M (Z, H + N dr CO H I A El) W U) U) r P4 a % r -1 I z w o c 'x z H E-t "" 3 , W ? a z U H a 3 H a .-. U .-. H H 14 H O r. ?-4 E 1 w z ? a z E-+ ? W a " H U A A H q H z ril to W P4 Ix in a ar H w a r {F % uH U Ut1;u]w rs+ Uuna 0 t/ w Ix p ? zDIwo w F4 z 4W a z U +? •+? 4 p4 W4 t:)WE-1H° 4Ot-c W4?H>4 +H-i?w wEE -+H H W WiL, HHH ix z W H a P4H04 am a pJ a tn? w W a wH w aEnMn t4 Q W %WLn ZA W A7+ Atn r4HzO tha tom to OHO) W O HHI4 OHF-iZ AHH W E-1 H>4 E-4 E-1 HH HQ O° H?mA HXW? 114z E-4 0 °A`zx' z ° H z OaL1U U W ?a UHH , ? A a H ? V' ChA4 0 E q x? Z ? 0 zHQ Wt nH?x4 H -O z U' - ZH Z OH wOk+ AH HH H x t -ttnx •;H ? ZN W4 0H H(nC4WE-r pox 010 Z 1.3E 1-?{7z cAtl] 0w HwOaz 4 w 0 x z x(f] W w dw a aHw am xwwrHpz?? M aW 4 w A acnww o P H a tH a 3 wN MH W PM :3: 0 to a z H owwo0UH >4 n A Aa H ? ° g' Z 94 E-4 p4?a w xi4W a- C4 P4H m O x t?4E+? WH W , WE-U H WSHL1W WE-1Ln43 ODUFcCH ?U to 3xyH t3: zK H wZt- U?+ zzt- U>+ H FC4H[-+a z W W w0 a N H H ww zo G4A[xH WHU ?W •H0 WAOG4H Ww 4400CL4 H 4C4 ZWH? A x H w x 0 H W H W H W x Q H W W H? H Hz 4HZ HN0 C4 ° x P ° %wa4 Hz? ° W u]AO 0 0 M ° 41 H 9 4 H -1 atn WQE oa •'H a •- - wmOwQWH 1 off 0HEH O H??i HH (n W O U) E-4 4 W aHE-+Zp4H zto H H •A H A?- N R 09H ,7„toz NW° o° aa tnIx a •w?? •P ? -IGO [z ? ' + H0 m° ri z°aW' z r4 z t r 4 r? i + i-? i--+ co N E O ? N t-I t74 U eh ? O O N t U o 0 A a U o N I ? U x c? H H C7 x ? a to ? H W W H W H a E -i z 0 E H A "? E-1 w H a -400 z Ja w m E4 ?. z .1 W a QUID ? V a aH?. W A ? W tnH ?H p H H ? 44 z c n w a 4 o 04 W pW4 a U3 u W pw :I W W W O A x ? '1 UatoWGC Uri aH Utn 0wm >+ W LO ko x 4Wcnax z ?Q?AW o?H W ?w H U g]EnH Z U ' ::) W P a H fn z HQ P4WQH0 O a0H C4 r W44 H Pa a W H W EH4 P4 z to 0 W HW N z z o ww z H a ?-a Ln w H O z w W Oa w H P4 W I M F-I H FA 0 W w H P4 W co H ? ?? rn cn tn0EHCD AQH U)H??9 in H??H tn0H - z ? W HW :D E-4 H O W Z ` H ?CH H H Z H IG ?w H 00 H >40 z H aHW9 U W t!}?Z H z W HG Z „oA,e w A A H Eau>4 6 WH H tn Ho ? U) P H W H N pi ?cn rw4HZU P4 ? 4 o ? D cD H H?w 0 ozou 0 0 H w 0 H xwU WKc zHw •? -o 9 Z z .ZOw z -ZUP4 z -o ABC w P;U w tnx •+ ow V1 >S HU3 UH 0 W P4 H Htn P4 0 W P4 W>4 HOW<•- a W w to p4 H 1%I4HH W O O to w 0W Z OMZNWHO 4tln0 Cl Q 0NOFH W w OMIT OM H ? 2 AO ? C7Q WQO WUH o w`rP w 5 W 4,0 A ° :7 Q IXU? A wtn?x 4 WH? ?awLe) C4 4•-Z Woo w 4 : to >4 4H E + N H?H ! o P4HP4 ,c E"H P4::) a w? 4 H HP 9 P H0 - H 0 UH z4 W? x Z WWH WWI 4 WW Ez u IE-4 5 C 7 W 4HW H w wHozW WW w4 HW>? 44 ?0H iL4 ?o ?C HWxim H wo H H HwxQHH O Ham, A P4 En P4 ? H H ?H P4 U) Q Z P4 W A 4 >+ Pi to P., ? H U z aW W U ix z a 44 O? O H to tnW OW to off (n w z H OW 4 • OW H x •- H 3 O P4 to W W? a .-0 W P4 C4 0 H<Z w Z ? P o w0 I Wz 4 E-f 4 IH ? E-t WW ? C -a G? ° w ? f ? n P ° 8 ° A Hr ZHA ?w w? HW ?Q vw 0zzUa ° x4 ,Dim oz , a0 . 4 u x u 0 U U H U U U A U U O z u w w `a w a a H w ° ? t Z Z w 0aa x H ?, a w c? H s w o . HN0 04 zU 4U 4U aa CH ? EH W P: a U U r a H a z a PS H H w ° ? w o o z z a u U H ,H O U :.a r En w H H W pp?? z H ?; H W W U H M :4 0 VU H ?u w -1 W W? a H %H W W w 0 u aa H 4 H a o°0 Pj H° Ho PU'.a w Z w U1 H H U U p3; ?4 •+ i H ZWa Hn HM E-4 44 ? ? cv • R? • 9 g w L UOwH u - + • Cn PQ W - ro to ? a 0 O H n •- r cn 0 z ? w H E-4 0 z 0a u owuw w 0 WP4 . w w P w 0 H H o U) ? - H (Q 0 "W Ej Ul O A?7WH t p U7 a w HNP; •+ 0 MZH HN oH O awU3In19 P H A HH0ww H ?Z cnH 4 tn w w El)>40z0u P4 H w U HW H U HH U}E4zHx0 wzow Z?H A a H z awz0 W A?a wwRR;;U A 4 PiHH?MO >C 1 -I wwa 40 z0 P; 4 w wH H:D ?H WN? O C H ? £M Z HWw N :3: EH 44 WW Z;, HU to "4 0? W UHHW Hw o w -H wA W - w44 tn?z z? >CP EnH HP4 z Hto0U) H0: 0 WWH wH x w ~H O x z :3: ? 0 Z ? z 0 W x 4oW +?0E-1 HE- Z>4>4 ?W NPS E-1 U z E4 -I ; w U {? LnOW099 ?iZH O E-+H OH L MAZa? ° r P ° ° rlC4H O o wwa o wwo ?w z v ow] NP u uu 4 z o cn H H U P4 PL4 A c1 a = n o w N a to w a a U w w H z U w .-. H H 0 H z P:< ., ?. 0 w pGG W`f H.. 4H W H W H H `? u a P O :14 H U 4 H tan 1 t ? .? U P H U H f '¦ City of Clearwater Zoning Districts Amendments for PPC Consistency September 1992 City zoning Current Proposed Countywide District Density/ Density/ FLUP: Intensity Intensity Density/ Standards Standards Intensity Standards RS1 (new) (new) 1 upga; RE: 1 upga; .40 ISR .60 ISR RS2 2 upna; 1.8 upga; RS: 2.5 upga; .40 ISR .40 ISR .60 ISR RS4 4 upna; 3.75 upga; RL: 5 upga; .45 ISR .45 ISR .65 ISR RS6 6 upna; 5.5 upga; RU: 7.5 upga; .55 ISR .55 ISR .65 ISR RS8 8 upna; 7.5,upga; RU: 7.5 upga; .65 ISR .65 ISR .65 ISR RM8 8 upna; 7.5 upga; RU: 7.5 upga; .65 ISR .65 ISR .65 ISR RM10 (new) (new) 10 upga; RLM: 10 upga; .65 ISR .75 ISR RMH 10 upna; 9.5 upga; RLM: 10 upga; .60 ISR .60 ISR .75 ISR RM12 12 upna; 11.5. upga; RM: 15 upga; .65 ISR .65 ISR .75 ISR RM16 16 upna; 15 upga; RM: 15 upga; .65 ISR .65 ISR .75 ISR RM20 20 upna; 18.5,upga; RH: 30 upga; .70 ISR .70 ISR .85 ISR RM24 24 upna; 22.5 upga; RH: 30 upga; .70 ISR .70 ISR .85 ISR RM28 28 upna; 26 upga; RH: 30 upga; .75 ISR, .75 ISR .85 ISR 7M A r f' r> F: r, 4 , r M PD (Density/ Intensity standards as determined by ?- -- -- underlying zoning district) OL 16 upna; *7.5-15 upga; ROL: 7.5 upga; .30 FAR; .30 FAR; .40 FAR; .70 ISR .70 ISR .75 ISR ROG: 15 upga; .50 FAR; .75 ISR OG 16 upna; *7.5-15 upga; ROL: 7.5 upga; .40-.60 FAR; *.40-.50 FAR; .40 FAR; .75 ISR .75 ZSR .75 ZSR ROG: 15 upga; .50 FAR; .75 ISR CN 16 upna; *10-15 upga; CN: 10 upga; .30 FAR; .30 FAR; .40 FAR; .70 ISR .70 ISR .80 ISR CL: 18 upga; .45 FAR; .85 ISR 'CNG 16 upna; 15 upga; CG: 24 upga; .60 FAR; .55 FAR; .55 FAR; .85 ISR .85 ISR .90 ISR CB 28 upna, 42 26 upga, 40 RFH: 26 upga, upna (h/m); upga (h/m); 50 upga (h/m); 1.2 FAR; 1.2 FAR; 1.2 FAR; no max. ISR .95 ISR .95 ISR CR24 24 upna, 22.5 upga, RFH: 30 upga, 36 upna (h/m); 35 upga (h/m); 50 upga (h/m); .75 FAR; .75 FAR; 1.2 FAR; .70 ISR .70 ISR .95 ISR CR28 28 upna, 26 upga, RFH: 30 upga, 42 upna (h/m); 40 upga; 50 upga (h/m); 1.05 FAR; 1.05 FAR; 1.2 FAR; .75 ISR .75 ISR .95 ISR i i x s f, A m ••.N CG 28 upna, *18--24 upga, ROR: 18 upga, 42 upna (h/m); *30--40 upga 30 upga (h/m); .40 FAR; (h/m); .40 FAR; .85 ISR .40 FAR; .85 ISR .75 ISR CG: 24 upga, 40 upga (h/m); .55 FAR; .90 ISR CH 28 upna, *18-24 upga, ROR: 18 upga, 42 upna (h/m); *30-40 upga 30 upga (h/m); .50 FAR; (h/m); .40 FAR; .75 ISR *.40--.50 FAR; .85 ISR .75 ISR CG: 24 upga, 40 upga (h/m); .55 FAR; .90 ISR CI (new) (new) 24 upga, 40 CG: 24 upga, upga (h/m); 40 upga (h/m); .40 FAR .55 FAR; .75 ISR .90ISR CC .50 FAR; .50 FAR; CG: 24 upga, .75 ISR .75 ISR 40 upga (h/m); .55 FAR; .90 ISR UC(C) No limit No limit CBD: As per plan UC(B) 42 upna; 42 upga; CBD: As per ' 2.0 FAR 2.0 FAR plan UC(E) 70 upna; 70 upga; CBD: As per 3.0 FAR 3.0 FAR plan, UC(T) (new) (new) 28 upga, 42 CBD: As per upga (h/m); plan .30 FAR IL No FAR; *.65-.75 FAR; IL: .90 ISR *.85-.90 ISR .65 FAR; .85 ISR IG: .75 FAR; .95 ISR .I 'RD No density; 40 upga (h/m); IL: 40 upga .40 FAR; .40 FAR; .(h/m); .60 ISR .60 ISR .65 FAR; .85 ISR P/SP 1.0 FAR; *.65-.70 FAR; 1: 12.5 upga; .75 ISR .75 ISR .65 FAR; .85 ISR T/U: .70 FAR; .90 ISR OSR No FAR; .25 FAR; ROS:. No ISR .60 ISR .25 FAR; .60 ISR P (new -- No FAR; .10 FAR; P: replacing AL/I No ISR .20 ISR .10 FAR; and AL/C) .20 ISR FO N/A N/A N/A AC/P and AC/S (new) 1.5-2.5 times AC/P and AC/S: (new) the density/ 1.5-2.5 times intensity of the density/ underlying intensity of zoning underlying zoning, as per plan upga=units per gross acre; upna=units per net acre; FAH=tioor area ratio; ISR=impervious surface ratio; h/m=hotel/motel. * depends on LUP classification assigned to property zdPPCcons.tab i ? t ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING OR CREATING VARIOUS SECTIONS WITHIN CHAPTER 135, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REVISE THE CORRELATION OF THE ZONING DISTRICTS WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; TO CREATE A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL "ONE" DISTRICT, A NEW MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL "TEN" DISTRICT, AND NEW RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND OFFICE PARK, PUBLIC/SEMIPUBLIC AND URBAN CENTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS; TO REVISE THE ALLOWABLE DENSITY, OPEN SPACE, AND FLOOR AREA RATIO REQUIREMENTS OF VARIOUS ZONING DISTRICTS; TO CONSOLIDATE THE AQUATIC LANDS/COASTAL AND AQUATIC LANDS/INTERIOR DISTRICTS INTO A NEW PRESERVATION DISTRICT; TO CREATE THE ACTIVITY CENTER/PRIMARY AND ACTIVITY CENTER/ SECONDARY OVERLAY DISTRICTS; AND TO CALCULATE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY ON THE BASIS OF GROSS DENSITY, RATHER THAN NET DENSITY; AMENDING SECTION 136.011, CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO TRANSFERS OF DENSITY ACROSS THE COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE AND OTHER AREAS; AMENDING SECTION 136.012, CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO DENSITY OF TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENTS; AMENDING SECTION 136.014, CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO FLOOR AREA FOR HOTEL AND MOTEL UNITS; AMENDING SECTION 136.021, CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO DENSITY FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS; AMENDING SECTION 136.029, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REFER TO PRESERVATION DISTRICTS INSTEAD OF AQUATIC LANDS DISTRICTS; AMENDING SECTION 137.005, CODE OF ORDINANCE, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS; AMENDING SECTION 137.015, CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO THE STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL FOR. ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS; AMENDING SECTION 137.016, CODE OF ORDINANCES, TO REFER TO THE "COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AGENCY" RATHER THAN THE "COUNTY PLANNING COUNCIL;" REPEALING SECTIONS 135.171 THROUGH 135.175, CODE OF ORDINANCES, RELATING TO THE AQUATIC LARDS-INTERIOR DISTRICT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Section 135.005, Code of Ordinances, is amended to react. Sec. 135.005. Correlation of zoning districts with coinnrehensive land use plan. No development shall occur other than as is consistent,fwith these zoning regulations and the city coarehensive land use plan. For the purpose of correlating these zoning districts with the land use plan and determining consistency between such districts and plan classifications, the following shall apply: M The Single Family Residential "One" Di ntial estate plan classification. u ial "Two" Distr n e Family Residential "Four" Distric M 4? The Single-Family Residential eur", "Six"; and "Eight" Districts, and the Multiple-Family Residential "Eight" District; and-4}h-Res4defitial P4-a"e"eyeleRme-nt-D4s-tr4e t -(w-4h a-net-dens ty Of -net-aEeve-- -tan-e- -gh t (9 --units per- ae-re-} shall be consistent with the urban --1$w-dens4-y residential plan classification. x-{-24 Tile Multiple-Fami l y Residential "Ten" owe4ve" an 'M*t-een- District Distpi ts, and the Mobile Home Park District;--and-Ue-Ree4den!44-W-anned Devel$pment 04-s-Wet--(wi' net--density of --new}ere-mars-men (16) it"ter---aere4 shall be consistent and-app-lied-only 4n-eerjune -erg with the residential low medium 4ens4ty resWent44- plan classification. IL +3? The Multiple-Family Residential "Twelve" and "Sixteen" "twenty" -T` "'nom, f W„ r'uT n?# ' Twe I W Districts an"e--Res 4 efA4a ! P l a toned--8eyel epme" afl;rTtrrE-t 1.1.h. i4ii n "nsity of .r} n sixteen-444-units but not more •-than twent,,__ 'I---a-1r-?t'1YYr'I eight (2.8) units per aere)' shall be consistent and-appl-ied--and 4n on jtrnat4G1+ with the 44-91v den5ity residential medium plan classifications unless otherwise permitted within this section. JL The Multiple-Family Residential "Twenty," "Twenty-four," and "Twent - Ei ht" Districts shall be consistent with the residential high plan classification. The Limited and General Office Districts shall be consistent with the residential /office limited classification unless otherwise oermitted within this } The Limited and General Office Districts, and the Multiple-Family Residential "Twelve" and "Sixteen" Districts; t#e-Fles"t3l;lti;iI I ned--De-rel-ep1m Distr4et (with net density of meare?tha'n-ems-" (B) units bu-t-neti''ntT? e?- tt an sixteen "J? "iee PTanT ne"eve4eppmeflt- n?i-p-r?c roc 561d11 be (16) Yn is per- gress---aer_i,f and Li consistent a "unc-ta$n-with the residential /office Qeneral plan classification unless otherwise permitted within this section. 10 4-4 The Resort Commercial "Twenty-four" and "Twenty-eight" Districts, the Neigll1 epheed#; Deacti -Geeera, and Highway Commercial District. Dist=Te s, the C-eniffiere4a4 Geri er Distr;^+ and the Beach Commercial Planned Development district shall be consistent afld applied only its-Deaf -net4en--with the resort facilities_ high £sri"r a-l/teur4st f-64& plan classification. 11 -(4 The Urban Center District (including the Bayfront, Core and Eastern Corridor subdistricts) and the Urban Center Planned Developm shall be consistent a-nd-applied en's, y-! -c-Gnjuflet-i-en-with the Central Busir Deyelep+nent-- District 12 The Neighborhood Commercial District shall be consistent with the commercial limited or commercial neighborhood plan classification. 13 The Highway Commercial District shall be consistent with the residential/officelretail plan classification unless otherwise permitted within this section. 2 plan classification. 15 4-4 The Research, Development and Off ice Park District L-40-te A-Adustrial ?.1 17 •(g8 The Public/Semipublic District and the Public/Semipublic. Planned Development District shall be consistent afldpd--e?'yR----eo+au^-::ith the institutional. ortransp-ortationlutili.ty ""?e1wi-pub4c- plan classifications el ass 44-&?. 18 -09 • The Open Space/Recreation District and the Recreational Planned Development District shall be consistent a-nd--aped--e^'y-in ^^-4unet4ae-with the recreation epee spa plan classification. 19 The Preservation District shall be consistent with the preservation plan classification. C/S) Overlay District may be applied in conjunction with any comprehensive Dl Section 2. Article II of Chapter 135, Code of Ordinances, is amended,to read: ARTICLE II. ZONING DISTRICTS Division 1. Single-Family Residential "One" District (RS 1), Sec. 135.0051 General description. wermitted density of one (1) dwelling unit per acre. Land areas assi are reserved for single-family residential development. 3 A t "ism and the Research Development and Office Park Planned Develo ment District 4-n4ust-rial--P4a-n-ned De-ye4pment--Distr; shall be consistent ?aflju n ton-with the industrial limited plan classification. 21 -{-1:+ The Ploodplain Overlay District and Historic Overlay District shall be ^ istent_a may be applied in conjunction with any comprehensive land use plan classification. Sec. 135.0052 Establishment Contraction. 0 Sec. 135.0053. Permitted uses. Within Single-Family Residential "One" Districts,. only the fol structures designed for such-uses)-shall be permitted: 11) Detached single-family-dwellings. - J21 Family care. L31 Accessory uses. Sec. 135.0054. Conditional uses. Within. Single--Family Residential "One" permitted as a conditional use: Reserved. Sec. 135.0055. Use limitations. (1? U to two horses ma be kept on a lot with an area of one acre or more. (2) Family care. _L3j Accessorry uses shall comp_ly_with all terms contained in section 136.008. 14) All uses. whether permitted. conditional or nonconforminn. shall he Sec. 135.0056. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The following __dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to all development with Single FamilResidential "One" _ . Di - 'stricts: M Maximum density: One dwelling unit per dross acre. JL Minimum lot area-per dwelling unit: one acre (A3.560 square feet). La Minimum lot width at setback line: a. Interior lots: 100 feet. b. Corner lots: 120 feet. ,(4) Minimum lot depth: a. Standard lots: 100 feet. K Double frontage lots: 125 feet. it 60 n t F 4 J 1 F a. 1. 2. 3. b. 1. 2. 3. Principal and accessory structures: From a street right-of-way: 35 feet. From a side_property_line: 15 feet. Fro-in a rear property line: 25 feet. JL Maximum bui_ldine_coyerage:_25 per cent. 8) Minimum open space: a. For the lot: 60 per cent of the lot area. F For the front _Yard: 75-per cent of the front yard area Division 2 4~. Single-Family Residential "Two" District (RS 2) Sec. 135.006. General description. This district is created to provide a" low density residential district with a maximum permitted density of 1.8 -two-+2+ dwel l ing units per gross -ne - acre. Land areas assigned this zoning are reserved-for single-family residential development. Sec. 135.011. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to all development within Single-Family Residential "Two" Districts: (1) ,hIaximum density: 1.8 -Twe-(-2) dwelling units per gross -net- acre. Division 3 .2?. Single-Family Residential "Four" District (RS 4) Sec. 135.012. General description. This district is created to provide a low density residential district with a maximum permitted density of 3.75 four- dwelling units per gross iiet acre. Land areas assigned this zoning are reserved for single-family residential development. Sec. 135.017. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. 1 f 5 The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to all development within Single-Family Residential "Four" Districts: (1) Maximum density: 3.75 Peui=- 4 dwelling units per gross fle-t- acre. Division 4 -3, Single-Family Residential "Six" District (RS 6) Sec. 135.018, General description. This district is created to provide a low density residential district with a maximum permitted density of 5.5 six dwelling units per gross -net acre. Land areas assigned this zoning are reserved for single-family residential development. Sec: 135.023. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The fallowing dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to all development within Single-Family Residential "Six" Districts: (1) Maximum density: 5.5 Six (6) dwelling units per gross acre. Division 5 4. Single--Family Residential "Fight" District (RS 8) Sec. 135.024. General description. This district is created to provide a low density residential district with a maximum permitted density of 7.5 e4-ght?() dwelling units per gross -net- acre. Land areas assigned this zoning are reserved for single-family residential development. ' 3r 'k 9r k Sec. 135.029. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to all development within Single-Family Residential "Fight" Districts: (1) Maximum density: 7.5 £y-ght (9) dwelling units per gross fle•t- acre. Division 6 §. Multiple-Family Residential "Eight" District (RM 8) Sec. 135.030. General description. This district is created to provide a low density residential district with a maximum permitted density of 7.5 e4-@I it (8) dwelling units per gross -net acre. Land areas assigned this zoning are reserved for single-family, two-family, three-family 6 3 4 s t m , 'f Within Multiple-Fami lv Residential "Ten" Distrii uctures designed for such uses) shall be permitte Multiple-family dwellings. Townhouses. j31 Three-family dwellings. Two-family dwellings Detached single-family dwellings. Family care. _(7) Level I group care. (8) Accessory uses. Sec. 135.0374. Conditional uses. Within Multiple-Family Residential "Ten" Distr witted as conditional uses: Level 11 group care. Congregate care. (3) Noncommercial parkin4. Lq Residential shelters. Sec. 135.0375. 'Use limitations. L11 Townhouses shall be governed by t_he_ dimen mirements contained in section 136.012. ollowi 3 f c?'tis .. f F d following uses may he i f 4 i d numerical development ! i contained in section 135.029. f J31 Family-group-and congregate care facilities shall comply _with _section 136.020. - - - ?. Accessory uses shall- comply-with _section _ 136 008. All uses, whether permitted, _conditional _ or nonconforming, shall be conducted in consonance with the use standards contained in section 136.005. Sec. 135.0376. Dimensional and numerical develoament requirements for two- 8 ¦ A r 0 01 a Nellin development within Multiple-Family Residential "Ten" D MaxilMAITt density: Ten dwelling unites per dross acre. Minimum lot area: 7,000-square feet. Minimum lot width at setback line: a. Interior lots: 70 feet. b. Corner lots: 90 feet. jq Minimum lot depth: a. Standard lots: 100 feet. b. Double frontage lots: 125 feet! 15) Minimum setbacks: Each structure shall be subject to t etbacks. or to anv greater setback reauirernents which may be arml a. 1. 2. 3. b. 1. 2. 3. form development regulations contained in chapter 136. Princi al and accessory structures: From a street right-of-way: 25 feet. From a side property line: 6 feet. From a rear property line: 10 feet. I Y-to two-fa ct5 Maximum building coverage: 42 per cent. _C8 I Minimum open space: a. For the lot: 35 per cent of the lot area. V. For the front yard- 50 Per cent of the front yard area. Sec. 135.0377. Dimensional and numerical development requirements for three- family dwellings. The following dimensional and numerical re uirements shall apply to three-family nn l ek-.,.n# M- l+; n Ia_?5nti I - D- ir?o ri f-; ?I 11'Tan 11 D;rhv.i?3'c. JLJ Maximum densit : 10 dwellin g units per gross acre. 121 Minimum lot area: 10,000 sq uare feet. y 1 F k, (3) Minimum lot width at setback line: a., Interior lots: 80 feet. b. Corner lots: 100 feet. 141, Minimum lot depth: a. Standard lots: 100 feet. F double frontage lots: 125 feet. (5) Minimum setbacks: Each structure shi acks. or to anv greater setback reau irements ulations containe a. Principal and accessorv structures: es e ano 1 1. From a street ri ght-of-way : 25 feet._ 2 . From a _ side _ prop eriy 1_i ne : 8 feet. 3. From a rear prop erty line: 12 feet. b. In-g round swimmi ng pools and screened pool enclosures: 1. From a street ri ght-of-way : 25 feet. 2. From a side prop erty line: 6 feet. 3. From a rear prop erty line: 8 feet. Maximum building coverage: 42 per cent. Minimum open space: a. For the lot: 35 per cent of the lot area. b. For the front yard:, 50 percent of the front yard area. Sec. 135.0378. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Multiple-Family Residential "Ten" Districts not expressly regulated elsewhere: Maximum density: 10-dwelling units per gross acre. Minimum lot width at setback line: 100 feet. L31 Minimum lot depth: 100 feet. (4) Minimum setbacks: Structures shall be afforded setbacks which measure not less tnan nereinaTter sex Tortn or less rnan an ni ner stangarg wnlcn may De applicable in accord with the uniform development regulations contained in chapter 136 a. Principal and accessory structures,: ' lp I . From a street ri ght-of-way : 25 feet. 2. From a side prop erty line: 10 -feet. 3. From a rear Prop erty line: 15 feet. b. In- rou nd swimming--pools and screened pool enclosures: 1. From a street ri ght-of-way : 30 feet. 2. From a side prop erty line: 8 feet. 3. From a rear prop erty line: 8 feet. M Maximum height: 25 feet; except that such height limitation shalI,_wher :able. be increased or reduced in accord with the height bonus provisions Maximum buildin g coverage: 42 per cent. Minimuin open sp ace: a. For the lot: 35 per cent of the lot area. b. For the front y ard: 50 per cent of the front yard area. .(8 Maximum number of units in a row per structure: 7 units.. M Minimum buildin g separation distance within a development: Each building within a de velopmen t shall he separated -from each other building within the same development by a distance e qual to 50 per cent of the sum of the heights of such two adiacent buildinas. but in no case shall the separation distance be less than 20 feet. Division 8 6. Multiple-Family Residential "Twelve" District (RM 12) Sec. 135.038. General description. This district is created to provide a medium density residential district with a maximum permitted density of 11.5 -twe-l dwelling units per rg oss -net acre. Land areas assigned this zoning are reserved for single-family, two-family, three- family and/or multiple-family residential development. Sec. 135.043. Dimensional and numerical development requirements for two-family dwellings. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to two-family dwelling development within Multiple-Family Residential "Twelve" Districts: (1) Maximum density: 11.5 Twe4e4I.2L)- dwelling units per gross •net• acre. •k k k •k k Sec. 135.044. Dimensional and numerical development requirements for three- 11 ?s M family dwellings. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to three-family dwelling development within Multiple-Family Residential "Twelve" Districts: (1) Maximum density: 11.5 -Twelve-(-12) dwelling units per gross -ne-1: acre. Sec. 135.045. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Multiple-Family Residential "Twelve" Districts not expressly regulated elsewhere: (1) Maximum density. 11.5 Xwe- ("` dwelling units per gross *e•- acre. Division 9 -7, Multiple-Family Residential "Sixteen" District (RM 16) Sec. 135.046. General description. This district is created to provide a medium density residential district with a maximum permitted density of 15 ilutee"' r,4 dwelling units per rays fled acre. Land aveas assigned this zoning are reserved for single-family, two-family, three-family and/or multiple-family residential development. 9r * * ? •k Sec. 135.051. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Multiple-Family Residential "Sixteen" Districts not expressly regulated elsewhere: (1) Maximum density: 15 3-i-3c-t-een-4-4 dwelling units per gross acre. Division 10 &. Multiple-Family Residential "Twenty" District (RM 20) Sec. 135.052. General description. This district is created to provide a high density residential district with a maximum permitted density of 18.5 tw"-?-Y dwelling units per _gross _ nei acre. The preferred land use in this district is multiple-family development. k ?• ?r -k ?r z Sec. 135.057. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. 12 .t r i •r. a 0 The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Multiple-Family Residential "Twenty" Districts not expressly regulated elsewhere: (1) Maximum density: 18.5 -Tweflty (20) dwelling units per gross -net acre. Division 11 4. Multiple-Family Residential "Twenty-four" District (RM 24) Sec. 135.058. General description. This district is created to provide a high density residential district with a maximum permitted density of 22.5 tweAI49urdwelling units per gross *et? acre. The preferred land use in this district is multiple-family development. Sec, 135.063. Dimensional and numerical development requirements- The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Multiple-Family Residential "Twenty-four" Districts not expressly regulated elsewhere: (1) Maximum density: 22.5 :Fwerity four (24) towelling units per gross acre. Division 12 44. Multiple-Family Residential "Twenty-eight" District (RM 28) Sec. 135.064. General description. This district is created to provide a high density residential district with a maximum permitted density of 26 dwelling units per ross Pe4 acre'. The preferred land use in this district is multiple-family development. Sec. 135.069. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Multiple-Family Residential "Twenty-eight" Districts not expressly regulated elsewhere: (1) Maximum density: 26 .Oenty eigh 2- dwelling units per dross Re4 acre. Division 13 41-. Mobile Home Park District (RMH) Sec. 135.074. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. Unless specifically preempted by the following section 135.075, the following 13 ¦ dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to all development within Mobile Home Park Districts: (1) Maximum park density: 9.5 Ten (10) mobile home units per grass -ne-i" acre. (9) Recreation area: Not less than ten (10) per cent of the gross fe4 land area of the mobile home park shall be reserved, designed and improved for the exclusive recreational use of the mobile home park residents. Division 14 4-9. Planned Development District (--PD) f Sec. 135.077. Subdistricts. The planned development district shall be comprised of the following 9 six(6) subdistricts, the preferred land use in each implied by the subdistrict title: (1) Residential Planned Development District (RPO). (2) Office Planned Development District (OPD). (3) Commercial Planned Development District (CPU). (4) Industrial Planned Development District (IPD). .L Research Development and Office Park Planned Development District RDPO . Recreational Planned Development District (RecPD). J71 4 4?- Clearwater Beach Planned Development District (CBPD). J,Aj PUblic[Semipub_lic Planned Development District (PSIT0. (9) Urban Center Planned Development District UCPDD . Sec. 135.078. Establishment/contraction. It is intended that four (4) acres or more be provided to establish a new Residential, Office, Commercial, Industrial, Research, Development and Office Park. Public/Semipublic, Urban Center or Clearwater Beach Planned Development District and that -50 f-f-ter--+50-? acres or more be provided to establish a Recreational Planned Development District, unless eel determined by ordinance # to be in the public interest. Furthermore, it is intended that no existing Residential, Office, Commercial, Industrial or Clearwater Beach Planned Development District be contracted to an area of less than four -4+ acres, and that no existing Recreational Planned Development District be contracted to an area of less than 50 pmt-L--(.9?} acres, unless the city commission determines_ by ordinance 4e,,;°'? 1 °," %-J ^r-f#i-ranee-)-determ ne?that a reduced area is in the public interest. Sec. 135.079. Permitted uses. 14 I- f f? f E Within each of the subdistricts of the Planned Development District, only the following uses may be permitted and all require city commission approval in conjunction with site plan approval: (1) Residential Planned Development District: Any single or combination of residential uses identified as permitted in the residential zoning districts contained ` in this chapter. (2) Office Planned Development District: Any single or combination of uses identified as permitted in the office or residential zoning districts contained in this chapter. (3) Commercial Planned Development District: Any single or combination of uses identified as permitted in the commercial, office or residential zoning districts contained in this chapter. (4) Industrial Planned Development District: Any single or combination of uses identified as permitted in the limited Industrial District or any commercial zoning district contained in this chapter. M Research; Development and Office Park Planned Development District: An single or combination of uses identified as permitted in the Research Development an Office Park Zonina District contained in this chanter. Recreational Planned Development District: Any single or combination of uses identified as permitted in the Open Space/Recreation District, plus, retail sales and restaurants which are integral to and limited in size and scope so as to complement the recreation use which they directly serve. Clearwater Beach Planned Development District: Any single or combination of tourist-oriented hotel, motel, restaurant, retail, service, entertainment or mdjor- office uses. M Public of uses identified chapter. s Urban Center Planned Development District: An single or combination of uses identified as permitted in the Urban Center District contained in this chapter. Sec. 135.080. Conditional uses. Within each of the subdistricts of the Planned Development District, the following uses may be permitted as conditional uses: (1) Residential Planned Development District: Any single or combination of uses identified as conditional in the residential zoning districts contained in this chapter. ; r(2) Office Planned Development District: Any single or combination of uses identified as conditional in the office or residential zoning districts contained in this chapter. 15 f A (3) Commercial Planned Development District: Any single or combination of uses identified as conditional in the commercial, office or residential zoning districts contained in this chapter. (4) Industrial Planned Development District: Any single or combination of uses identified as conditional in the Limited Industrial District or any commercial district contained in this chapter. M Research, Development and Office Park Planned Develo single or combination of uses identified as conditional use Development and Office Park Zoning District contained in this chapter. fi 44? Recreational Planned Development District: Only alcoholic beverage sales consumption on premises) may be considered as a conditional use and only where such" use is integral to and limited in size and scope so as to complement the recreation use which it directly serves. 7) {4 Clearwater Beach Planned Development District: Any single or combination of uses identified as conditional in the commercial zoning districts contained in this chapter. u chapter. ict: Anv single or combinatio er Pla x• -Ser=. I "82-r-04iiien?"'ona4-and-nuiiieMc-"evelopment-Pequ4-eeate+t-s-rThe anew i nc34Eieen-Aena-1•-and-nun3e-i eat-de-ye epment requafemer- shall apple a-1-1-de y ei e p it wit-h-n t?e4-Be-oe-l a p+ne t D i s t r i e t s z- (1) Ma(4-mu*--d ht (28)?dwe44 -ng-un ts- or -fart ,_twe (net •he t-e-1?me te-l-ups--per-o e-t--a Ere. Division 15 43. Limited Office District (OL) Sec. 135.087. Use limitations. (g) Nursing homes shall have a maximum density of 15 -sox*een (16 units per gross acre. IG Or," A Sec. 135.088 134-,r988. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. jal The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Limited Office Districts not expressly regulated elsewhere: Division 15 44. General Office District (OG) Sec. 135.093. Use limitations. (b) Nursing homes shall have a maximum density of 15 sixteen (1- units per net acre. Sec. 135.094, Dimensional and numerical'development requirements. (a) The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to all development within General Office Districts: ik ?' k k ?Ir k (7) Maximum floor area ratio: Four-tenths (0,4). This floor area ratio may, however, be increased by up to 0.1 twe--tenhs (0-9) where additional open space for the lot is provided in excess of the minimum specified in preceding paragraph (6) reel taAny development having such additional open space shall be permitted, in a linear progression, a floor area ratio of from 0.4 -four tenths .01.4, to 0.5 54M tenths where, also in a linear progression, 25 twenty f;,.^ ' 26, r'6' per cent to 50 f4ft--(-54 per cent of the lot is reserved as permanent open space, r Maximum density: 7.5 units per gross acre. Maximum floor area ratio: 0.4. 17 f E? ,a Maximum densit : 7.5 units per gross acre. M Division 17 -14. Neighborhood Commercial District (CN) i I i Sec. 135.100. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. i-al The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Neighborhood Commercial Districts not expressly regulated elsewhere: (1) Maximum density: 15 Sixteen(16) dwelling units per dross -net- acre. lb? The following special dimensional and numerical development requirements } shall apply to develo ment within Neighborhood Commercial Districts which are classified c_ommercial_ neighborhood on the comprehensive plan: (1 , Maxilnum density: 10.0 units _per„ gross acre. Division 18 4-64. North Greenwood Commercial District (CNG) Sec. 135.1006. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. (1) Maximum density: 15 Sixteen (4-6. dwelling units per gross acre. r,} (5) Maximum floor area ratio: 0.55 94 tenths (0.6). Division 19 16. Beach Commercial District (CB) Sec. 135.107. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. •? (1) Maximum density: 26 Twenty ei-g# 4 dwelling units or 40 er-t .-}we (-('- hotel/motel units per gross gel acre. Minimum open space for the lot: 5 per cent of the lot area. Division 20 44. Resort Commercial "Twenty-four" District (CR 24) 18 j a r 0 Sec. 135.113. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Resort Commercial "Twenty-'Four" Districts not expressly regulated elsewhere: (1) Maximum density: 22.5 Twe*t-y---eur-' (24) dwelling units or H thirty six +M4 hotel/rnotel units per gross net acre. Division 21 4-8. Resort Commercial "Twenty-eight" District (CR 28) Sec. 135.119. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Resort Commercial "Twenty-eight" Districts not expressly regulated elsewhere: (1) Maximum density: 26 Twenty eight-) dwelling units or 40 forty hotel/motel units per gross iW-t acre.. Division 22 44. General Commercial District (CG) t r E T { e 7 Sec. 135.125. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. La1, The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within General Commercial Districts: (1) Maximum density: 24 Twenty eight (28) dwelling units or 40 fe'"?-1 - 9 (42) 04 hotel/motel units per gross fled acre. (2) Reserved. Division 23. Reserved. s Division 24 2-4. Highway Commercial District (CH) 19 i f, ?I F M M_aximum_ _density: 18 dwelling units or 30 hotel/motel units per gross acre. M Sec. 135.131. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. (a) The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Highway Commercial Districts: (1) Maximum density: 24 -Twee-e4t-lvt-618? dwelling units or 40 forty -t e (42) hotel/motel units per gross e acre. (b) The following special dimensional and numerical development requirements shall apply to development within Highway Commercial Districts which are classified ,designated residential/office/retail on the c-etn+t-y comprehensive la use plan: (1) Maximum density: 18.0 men-- dwelling units or 30 hotel/motel units per gross -nel: acre. (2) Maxim u -4inpe-r-i1eab l e -lot eey F4-fty ; U4-p"-ee n t. (2) 4-3. Maximum floor area ratio: 0.4. F-reper-t4es de aa"Hum f 19 er-arz^ e- twe (0.2) fop preeed p eable e -requ+r-emiftni Division 25 24, Commercial Center District (CC) Division 26 22. Urban Center District (UC--) Sec. 135.144. Development requirements for the Bayfront subdistrict. (a) Dimensional and numerical requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within the 8ayfront subdistrict of the Urban Center District: (1) Maximum floor area ratio: 2.0 -Two--(2.0). (2) Maximum density: 42 Forty the -(42) dwelling or hotel units per gross *e-t acre. Sec. 135.146. Development requirements for the Eastern Corridor subdistrict. (a) Dimensional and numerical requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within the Eastern Corridor subdistrict of the Urban Center District: (1) Maximum density: 70 Seyenty(70) dwelling units or hotel/motel units per gross fled acre. 20 0 Division 27 13. Limited Industrial District (IL) -Sec. 135.151. Use limitations. (f) Residential shelters shall have a maximum of 37 beds per gross acre -d? S-}--up s-Rer--netl-ae-e. J?jj In areas classified limited industrial on the comprehensive plan, the ; following uses shall be limited to a maximum contiguous area of five areas: Business services- business rofessional offices: indoor retail sales; restaurants- nonprofit social or community services; public works prolects _and utility substations facilities, vehicle service, outdoor retail sales displays and/or, sstorage; alcoholic beverage sales (consumption on premises); alcoholic beverage sales package sales ; child day _care, _public and private elementary, middle and high schoolls• universities colleges, academies and similar facilities for learning: and correctional facilities. jj,), In areas classified general industrial on the comprehensive plan, the following uses shall be permitted only as accessory uses located within the structure i to which it is accessory and shall not exceed 25 percent of the floor area of the principal use to which it is accessory: Business services,business/professional offices;-indoor retail sales; restaurants; vehicle service; alcoholic beverage sales consum tion on premises); and alcoholic beverage sales acka a sales). Outdoor retail sales displays and or storage use shall be-Permitted only r in areas classified as ]united industrial on the comprehensive plan. ?' ?r tk ? k 1 i Sec. 135.152. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. (a) The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Limited Industrial Disti?icts: (7) Maximum floor area ratio: 0.75 Kane. } i i 1 Maximum flour area ratio: 0.65. 21 0 ) Minimum open space for the lot. 15 per cent... Division 28 43A. Research, Development and Office Park District (RD) Sec. 135.1525. Use limitations. ' •k * k it * . (3) Residential shelters shall have a maximum o•f",37_beds per_gross acre rhor1 r.if .. n? #..renty e4sy;?:l (252_l__. i..4tr_ Pak r. ra+Z: aC e. - 77 ?k Yt ?7 ZO The following uses shall b_e_ limited to a„ maximum contiguous area of five acres: Business services: business rofessionaloffices, restaurants' personal services; _and_alcoholic beveraoe sales (consumption on nremises). . Sec. 135.1526. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to development within Research, Development and Office Park Districts: •k ?r 7k 4r k i0 Maximum densit : 40 hotel motel units er cross acre. 3 Division 29 •24. Public/Seinipublic District (P/SP) Sec. 135.157. Use limitations. (c) Nursing homes and residential shelters shall have a maximum density of 15 Steen units per rp oss -fie-t acre. Sec. 135.158. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to all i , 22 ill 1 k i 1 t J 7 development within Public/Semipublic Districts: 7) Maximum f loon area ratio; 0.7 for properties with transportation/_util n Dr- -C-- .,r.,..nNt ?r I-+-4, ;ncF;i?if;nrtsl nlan rlncci-firntinn Division 30 2?&. Open Space/Recreation District (OS/R) Sec. 135.164. Dimensional and numerical development requirements. ,f The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to all development within Open Space/Recreation Districts: (3) Minimum open space: the _Pent yard. Seventy fiYe (75) per Gent. i a. Eo_r_ the lot:-40 _ der _cent._ b. For the front yard: 75 per cent.. IL Maximum floor area ratio: 0.25. J51 -(4}- Minimum building separation distance within a development: Each ' building within a development shall be separated from each other building within the same development by a distance equal to 50 fifty (64 per cent of the sum of the heights of such two - -} adjacent buildings, but in no case shall the separation distance be less than 20 twenty (20 feet. (6) 4-4 Except as provided herein, no residential or commercial uses may be developed within the open Space/Recreation District. However, if the adjoining upland property is developable and under the same ownership as the Open Space/Recreation District property, the allowable uses for the open Space/ Recreation District property shall be deemed to be equivalent to the allowable uses under the zoning district. regulations applicable to the adjacent property for the limited purpose of considering a transfer of development rights to the adjacent property pursuant to section 136.011, t provided that the density or intensity of uses available for transfer shall not exceed !. the maximum allowed on the adjoining property. Division 31 -26. Preservation (P) Aq a-e-6afids-Ge stal #$t,-ie-t '-t-„ 'r Sec. 135.165. General description. This district is created to protect the waters, waterways and coastal wetlands E of the Gulf. of Mexico and•1•ampa Bay and noncoastal wetlands, environatenta'liy_sensitive palustrine, lacustrine and riverine areas, natural and artificially made interior 23 bodies of water and other submer ed lands through the control of development of these areas so that their ecological and aesthetic values may be preserved for the health and enjoyment of present and future generations esnsistekwith ehapter 7" 663, Sec. 135.166. Application. It is intended that the Preservation District be applied to all naturally and artificially made coastal and noncoastal bodies of water and wetlands of the Gulf of Mexiee and T?m?a-8a?; including spoil islands, spoil banks, _ basins, bays, bayous, canals, br h-streams, creeks, ponds, swamps, _marshes, bogs, lakes and rivers.- and ether waters aRd waterways of the Gulf of exiee and Tampa , whether publicly or privately owned. The Preservation District shall apply to all surface waters and water- n - and submerged lands thereunder for coastal waters submerged lands shall be considered those lands seaward from the established line of mean high tidej_ and wawa Furthermore, the Preservation Arty. tae Lands Geast l District shall be applied to all upland areas 30 thirty (3 feet landward of mean high tide where mangroves exist. (Mangroves are recognized of special ecological value to the city and are defined in section 98.01 of the Clearwater Code of Ordinances.) Sec. 135.167. Permitted uses. Within Preservation Aqua ?ieLands easeal Districts, only the following uses (and structures designed for such uses) shall be permitted: (1) Recreation activities which are not environmentally disruptive-; a: Fishing. f„ 77"i?Qgt-i-H g' ? l Sec. 135.168. Conditional uses. Within Preservation Aquatie ds Ge tal Districts, the following uses may be permitted as conditional uses: develo S E Sec. 135.1701. Dimensional and numerical development re uirements. W 1 24 Minimum open space: 80 per cent of the lot area. ,(2) Minimum floor area ratio: 0.1. JL Except as rovided herein no residential or commercial uses may be developed within the 0 en S ace Recreation District. However, if the adjoining upland property is developable-and under the same ownershi as the Open Space/Recreation District property, the allowable uses for the Open Space/Recreation District property shall be deemed to be a uivalent to the allowable uses under the zoning district regulations applicable to the adjacent property_for_t_he limited purpose of considering a transfer of development rights to the adjacent property pursuant to section 136.011- provided that the-densityor intensity of uses available for transfer shall not exceed the maximum allowed on the adjoining property._ IL A 25-foot wide vegetative bu f fer sha l l be provided in accordance _with Sec. 136.029. T - - Division 32 24. Floodplain Overlay District (FO) Division 33 24. Historic Overlay District (110) Division 34. Activity Center/Primary (AC/P) and Secondarv (AC/S) Overlay District Sec, 135.1851. General description. These districts are created to denictTwonerties that are now developed. or are ap ropriate to be developed, to facilitate high intensity development as regional and subregional focal Points of commerce, employment, or- housing and to provide separate standards for density/intensity-of use consistent with the purpose, character, and service capacity of such Properties. These properties may include areas identified as Reaional Activitv Centers in state and regional Plans. Sec. 135.1852. Establishment/contraction. ¦i Sec. 135.1853. Permitted uses. The uses permitted are those detertl+ined by the underlying ^zoning district j unless further restricted by the City Commission in establishing the overlay district. Sec. 135.1854. Conditional uses. 25 r" t } 0 The uses permitted as conditional uses are those de zoning district, unless further restricted by the City Corms overlay district. Sec. 135.1855. Use limitations. Primary activity centers may include re( ona _La I office and employment centers, pubIic.faciIities_, commercii high density residential uses. es 1vir nters, ma.ior Sec. 135_._1856. Dimensional and Numerical Development_Requuirements._ i The following dimensional and numerical re uirements shall apply to development t within the Activity Center Overly Districts not expressly regulated elsewhere: 1) Maximum density/intensity: a. Within Primary Activity Center Overly Districts: 2.5 times the otherwise permitted density/intensity of the underlying„ zoning district: actual dens itintensity shall be determinedby the-City Commission in. establishing the overlay district. b. Within Secondary Activity Center Overly Districts: 1.5 times otherwise ermitted densit intensit of the Underlying zonin district; actual density/ intensity shall be determined b the City Commission in establishing the overlay district. JL Maximum height: 1.5 times otherwise permitted height of the underlying s zonina district: actual heiaht shall be determined bv tile Citv Commission in the same as required in the underlying zoning district or as otherwise determined by the City Commission in establishing the overlav district. Section 3. Section 135.187, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 135.187. Interpretation and variance. 26 I (3) Maximum building coverag e: 1.5 times otherwise permitted bui coverage-of the underlying zoning district; actual building - coverage sha determined b the City Commission in establishing the-overlay district. M All other dimensional an d numerical development req uirements, su minimum lot size and setbacks, within the activity renter overlav districts she t;¦ :m ¦ e r-pose-Gf-de-ter-iii -F?4g--t- }e--fi t?ge of a s i to et -mere than G 4 x D x P-A = U P Or, if the permitted unit count is known and the actual non-residential floor area ratio is to be determined, use the following formula: P- UxP =A (G # x D) Or, if the permitted unit count is known and the actual non-residential floor area ratio is known, but the required net acres of the site is to be determined, use the following formula: -- -(U_ x P) = G t4 D x (P - A) Where G..=_ gross acres of the site P!-=-n of the s4t-e D = maximum permitted density P maximum permitted floor area ratio of the zone where the property is located A = actual nonresidential floor area ratio U = maximum permitted number of units +L4 For the purpose of determining the actual number of residential dwelling units or hotel/motel units which may be permitted on a given parcel of land, fractions of units which result from mathematically computing such unit count shall not be deemed to equal a unit. . . . .. . I1 ? d---$n i-ng- bay -a (g) it is hyp esi2ed t at raer-ta n uses are "preferred" within zoning LdJ 444 May request for variance from the standards set forth in this chapter shall be according to the process and criteria for variances to this land development 27 k 3 S (c)+ }- Any mixed use development comprised of a density-regulated use and a nondensity regulated use shall have the permitted unit count determined by the following formula: code set forth in Oiaoer 13?, section 137.012. No variance shall be authorized to the list of permitted or conditional uses, the maximum permitted density in any given zoning district, the maximum permitted floor area ratio, or such like areas of legislative prerogative which shall not under any circumstances be varied. Section 4. Section 136.011, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 136.011. Transfer of development rights. _I Densityllntensit s s jjj For parcels receiving density/intensity transferred from seaward of the astal Construction Control Line the density or intensity of uses available for ansfer shall not exceed the maximum allowed on the adjoining property. (2) For parcels receiving dens it intensit transferred from all areas assif Jed as reservation on the comprehensive land use plan other than those areas award of the Coastal Construction Control Line: one dwelling unit or five percent oor area ratio per acre or both as applicable, based on the use characteristics be utilized in the receiving parcel. L3)_ For other parcels, as approved b the city commission in authorizin ansfer, consistent with the dens it intensit standards of the applicable z stricts and comorehensive land use olan classifications. (q) -?4 Developments with transfers and variances. The following shall apply to developments for which transferred development rights and one or more variances from the otherwise applicable dimensional and numerical development requirements contained in this development code are proposed: h +g- Transfers authorized prior to this development code. The provisions contained herein pertaining to transfer of development rights shall not preclude the initiation and completion of buildings authorized under a certified site plan prior to the adoption of this development code provided the certification remains valid and in force pursuant to the time constraints contained in the conditions of ; certification. Section 5. Subsection .(c) of Section 136.012, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: f Sec. 136.012. Townhouse development. (c) Dimensional and numerical requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to all townhouse developments: (1) Maximum development density: 11.5 -Twe4 - townhouse units per net acre, unless a more restrictive density is identified in'chapter 135 for the zoning district assigned to the property in which case the more restrictive density shall apply. 28 4 W s Section 6. to read: Subsection (b) of Section 136.014, Code of Ordinances, is amended Sec. 136,014. Habitable floor area. (b) Hotel and motel units. Hotel and motel units shall be provided with a minimum habitable floor area of 280 -twG-h"dred eighty -284 square feet but not greater than 550 square feet. Section 7. Subsection (c) of Section 136.021, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 136.021. Recreational vehicle parks. (c) Dimensional and numerical requirements. The following dimensional and numerical requirements shall apply to all recreational vehicle parks: (1) Maximum park density: 11.5 Twelye (12 vehicle spaces per gross iiet acre. Section 8. Section 136.029, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 136.029. Veg?eta'tiJve buffer' adjacent to Preservation District -Aq„ i(a) A vegetative buffer, being necessary to protect the ecological and aesthetic integrity of interior or coastal wetlands, shall encompass all lands within 25 -twenty e (25) feet of the boundary of any property designated on the zoning atlas as Preservation _ (P) Aqua-?? &--I- nt-e - A I , -- Aqu to e--L-nd s- a4 ?,46C4. However, this requirement shall not apply to existing seawalls or other structures creating an abrupt transition between the aquatic lands and the adjoining upland property. (b) When a proposed development is adjacent to property designated Preservation Aqua14c--6ands-I•nterior--e?Aquat??-a?fcis?va a , the vegetative buffer shall be provided by the owner in accordance with the requirements of this section. The vegetative buffer may be provided within or over other required setbacks. The buffer shall be designated on the site plan, plat or repiat of the property as an. "Preservation Aquatie Lands Protection Buffer." (e) Within the vegetative buffer, any native vegetation shall be protected so that the buffer will retain the character of the immediately adjacent vegetation within the Preservation •Aqu t4-& nd into or,-ter qu-AAF- nds-C-earytal district. Native vegetation within the buffer shall not be removed or altered without the approval of the Division of Environmental Management. If removal or alteration is proposed, the owner shall present a plan for approval by the Division of Environmental Management showing that the proposed removal or alteration of the vegetation will not. 29 i ,I ¦ adversely affect the hydrological or ecological integrity of the adjacent wetland. If approved, the plan shall be incorporated in the approval and the terms thereof shall be binding upon the owner. Any exotic vegetation within the buffer shall be removed by the landowner and shall be prevented from re-emergence. This subsection shall not be construed to prohibit routine maintenance trimming of nonwetland vegetation in accordance with procedures developed by the Division of Environmental Management and approved by the City Manager. Section 9. Section 137.005, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 137.005. Definitions. (a) Words and terms used in this development code shall be given the meanings identified hereinafter: Density: Units per gross *e-t acre. Gross acre: The total area within one or more cant nersnin. intensit : 1ne measure of permitted aevela ment ex ressea as a minimum open for the lot or a maximum floor area ratio, or both. Piet aere; That upland area within a eentiqueus pareel(s) of awner-ship e*elud4ng Section 10. Subsection (e) of Section 137.015, Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 137.015. Zoning atlas amendments. (e) Standards for approval. The following standards shall serve as the basis to evaluate any requested amendment to the zoning atlas and no amendment shall be approved unless it comports with all of the enumerated standards: (11) The amendment will be consistent with flat in any "y deter ;'iplement t 30 0 4 I of the comprehensive plan. Section 11. Section 137.016; Code of Ordinances, is amended to read: Sec. 137.016. Comprehensive land {-and use plan amendinents. Section 13. The provisions of this ordinance have been found to be consistent with the City of Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Section 14. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk Rita Garvey Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form and correctness: M. A. Galbraith, Jr. City Attorney 31 is 1 A (9) Any approved amendment to the city comprehensive land use plan which correspondingly requires amendment to the countywide eou*t-y comprehensive land use plan shall, upon its effective date, be forwarded by the director of planning and urban development to the countywide pus} planning a enc c-4 for review and determination in accord with.the established procedures of the agency eau ei l . Should the countywide planning agency e"nc-4 fail to approve any plan amendment, the plan and associated zoning designation shall be amended to the extent of and so as to obviate any conflict with the countywide "mity comprehensive land use plan. Section 12. Sections 135.171 through 135.175, Code of Ordinances, are hereby repealed. 4 ' l ?° PLD a # y/ MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission PROM: M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney RE: Corrections to Ordinance Amending Land Development Code DATE: September 16, 1992 One of the items on your agenda tomorrow evening is the receipt and referral of a proposed ordinance amending the Land Development Code to eliminate certain inconsistencies between the code and the comprehensive plan. This was Agenda Item 9 under Planning and Development on your Monday agenda. The ordinance has been assigned no number, yet. I have been asked to make some last-minute corrections to this ordinance. Because this is for receipt and referral, and considering the nature of the corrections, I have made the corrections in the original of the ordinance and a motion to amend will not be necessary. However, you should be advised of those corrections. They are: Page 2: "Neighborhood Commercial" added to the list of districts which "shall be consistent with the commercial general plan classification" (subsection 14). Page 3% "recreationjopen- space" changed to "recreation/open space" in subsection (18). Pages 5, 9, 10, and 11: The maximum height in the RS-1 and RM-10 districts was increased from 25 to 30 feet. Page 21: "correctional facilities" was deleted from the list of uses in the limited industrial classification which are limited to a maximum contiguous area of five areas. Page 25: "Open Space/Recreation District" was changed to "Preservation District." Page 28: "net acre" was changed to "gross acre" MAG:a Copies: Cynthia Goudeau, City Clerk Jim Polatty, Planning and Development Director F f E I N r i qa Q1117CLAIH DEED 11115 QUITCLAIM DEED, made this it day of i t+t i0,' ". 1992, by NOR10WOD0 ESTATES, a Co-Partnership un cr t o lorida n orm Partnership Act,. of the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, whose post office address is c/o William G. Blackburn, Electra Lite, Inc., 18167 U.S. highway 19 tiorth, Suite 250, Clearwater, Florida 34624, hereinafter called the Grantor, to Lite CITY OF CLEARWATER, a Florida municipal corporation, whose post office address Is P. 0. Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 34618 hereinafter called the Grantee (the words "Grantor" and "Grantee" to include their respective successors and assigns): WITNES5ET11: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $1.00 and other ggood and valuable consideration, in hand paid by the Grantee, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does remise, release and quitclaim to the Grantee, all the right, title, and interest which the Grantor has in and to the following real property, situated in Pinellas County, Florida: Commence at the Northwest corner of the Southwest 114 of Section 28, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, and go S 89°39115" E, 26.98 feet, along the north boundary of the southwest 114 of Section 28, to a point on a curve that Is 50.00 feet southerly of and parallel to the centerline of State Road 580, the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S 89°39'15" E, 1264.10 feet, along the north boundary of the Southwest 114 of said Section 28; thence S 00°13'05" W, 30.00 feet, along a line 50.00 feet westerly of and parallel to the east boundary of the West 112 of the Southwest. 114 of the said Section 28; thence N 89°34'15" W, 1290.96 feet, along a line 30.00 feet southerly of and parallel to the north boundary of the Southwest 114 of said Section 28; thence 5 84°38'22" W, 52.41 feet, to a point on a curve that is 50.00 feet southerly of and parallel to the centerline of State Road 580; thence on an arc to the left of 85.02 feet, 50.00 feet southeasterly of and parallel to the centerline of State Road $80, with a radius of 527.47 feet, subtended byy a chord of 84.03 feet, chord bearing of li 69°11'36" E, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; containing 0.895 acres, more or less. 4 This deed is executed and delivered for the purpose of releasing the above- described property from the use restrictions set forth In the warranty deed dated June 24, 1975, and recorded an July 15, 1975, at Official Records book 4309, Page 42, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the described premises to Grantee, together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever of the Grantor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has signed and scaled this deed on the date written above. Witnesses: NORTHWOOD ESTATES, a Co-Partnership By: WILLIAM G. BLACKBURN, Partner Print name Print name STATE OF FLORIDA } COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) The foregoing quit claim deed was acknowledged before me this -A Jay of r ti, i'l i '-:I ,' 1992, by WILLIA4 G. BLACKBURN, a Partner, on a ial of 1ORTOWOOD AT a Co-Partnership, lie Is personally known to me or has produced asidentificationand did (did not tae an Nth. Notary Pu lbl?c My Commission Expires: Fn7{01Y NISSMM RTATUOF n' WZL 1 f. f' 3 . r f ' CITY OF CLEARWATER Interdepartmental Correspondence Sheet TO: Cecil Henderson, Assistant Public Works Director FROM: M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney • is .> RE: Allen Avenue ?F DATE: July 28, 1992 ' The deed for the south 30 feet of Allen Avenue contains a use restriction, "for road right of way purposes." The DOT's proposed > improvements will essentially wipe out the public's right to travel over the intended right of way. The decision in Shadow West Apartments, Ltd._, V, State of Florida, _ Department of s Transportation, 498 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), copy enclosed, ' allows a question to be raised as to whether the DOT's proposed i improvements will violate the use restriction. Because of the use restriction, it would be good if we could obtain a deed from the original grantor, Northwood Estates, a partnership, over the same property, if we can. MAG:a Enclosure • 1 1 • ?S F t j i E s1 ' r 1' I (a C I T Y O F C L E A R A T E R Tnterdepartment Correspondence Sheet TO: M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney FROM: Cecil M. Henderson, Jr,, Asst. Director of PW/E g f SUBJECT: Allen Avenue deed to Florida Department of Transportation DATE: July 23, 1992 The Florida Department of Transportation is asking the City to convey a portion of Allen Avenue lying between State Road 580 and Daniel Street to them. The State is proposing to widen State Road 580 between Countryside Boulevard and Kendale Drive. As part of their construction they propose to construct a water storage area at the intersection of State Road 580 and Allen Ave. The storage area will extend into the existing right-of-way of Allen Ave. ' The City annexed the abutting right--of-way of Allen Avenue on June 16, 1975 (Ordinance 1573), as part of the annexation of a large tract of land south of Allen Ave. As part of the required right-of-way donation, the City received a deed for the south half of Allen Avenue, June 24, 1975. The deed was for right-of-way purposes. The north half of Allen was platted as part of Ackers Subdivision. The adjoining plats of Northwood Estates Tract "C" and The Vinings do not include the land deeded to the City. The Engineering Division is processing vacation papers to vacate the portion of right-of-way needed by the state. We believe that the City should be able to declare the land surplus to City needs, vacate it as right-of-way and deeded it to the State. it is also our belief that since the deed was not part of the adjoining subdivisions, the abutting property owners should have no claim to the vacated land. Please review this proposal and advise. ?1? ?j. `/? ?-~r' ,? t• ?.r?. stir . ?"? / 4 CMH/WJ ae Enclosure sR5x0.WJS RECEIVED JUL 2 7 1992 G1TY ATTORNEY 43 T11I0 AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 19 , by and between Cha2tcr A. black anA of 2717 i 2719 south-Drive, Clearwater, Florida 34619, hereinafter referred to no "Owner," and the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City;" W I T N E S S E T U s WHEREAS, the Owner presently owns the real property described heroin, and has requested that the City install a sanitary sewer line and facility to make sanitary sower service available to serve the property and that the owner be permitted to tap into the sanitary sewer lino upon installation; and WHEREAS, the Owner is agreeable to have the city of Clearwater complete said special improvement and upon completion thereof to have the City immediately file a lion against the property In the amount of their pro rata share of the cost of installation of the sanitary cower line and facility; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to install the sanitary sower line and facility to serve the property under certain conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing promises and other good and valuable considerations, the parties hereto agree as follows: 5I 1. The owner agrees that the City may immediately commence. and complete the installation of a sanitary sower lino and facility to serve the real property owned by them;'logally described as follows: Lot 4, Block F, CARLTON TERRACE 1st ADDITION according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 43, page 39, Public Records of Pinellas county, Florida. Known an: 7717 & 271918outh Drive Clearwater, Florida 34619 and that upon completion of said work that the City may immediately file a lion against the real property in the amount of $1.36a.40 which is the Owner's pro rata share of the installation of the sanitary sower lines and facility. Said lion shall provide that it may be paid in ton equal annual payments in the office of the city Clerk with interest at the rate of at per annum from the date of the lion until paid and in case of default in the payment of said minimum annual' payments, together with the interest thereon, that the City may take immediate steps to enforce said lien by foreclosure or other proceedings. Said lion shall also provide that if the city is required to enforce the collection thereof by foreclosure or other proceedings, that the owner shall be responsible for the payment of legal foes and all coats of said proceedings. 2. The owner by this Agreament specifically grants unto the City ;j of Clearwater a lion in the amount out forth in Paragraph 1 above, 11 which Is the owner's pro rata share for the installation of the sanitary sewer line and facility against the Above doacribod real property and waives all requirements for and entitlement to the conduct of and notice of eny public hearing by the city of Clearwater for a spacial improvement assessment against their property for the inotallation of said sanitary sewer line and facility. The Owner further agrees upon the request of the City to execute all additional instruments, if any, which may be required to formally grant unto thu City a lien against their described real property. 3. The city agrees to permit the owner upon the completion of said installation to connect to the sanitary sewer line under the some conditions as other owners are permitted to do no. 4. This agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, Administra- tors, personal representatives, succossors and assigns of the parties hereto and a copy thereof may be. immediately recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, by the city so as to serve as notice thereof to all other persons. E 1 ' E i t I6 ' s-l 0 ?{3 1 I, IN VITNERS 11NEREOP, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed an the data first above written. n WITH888 Cheater A. blank Route 4 no% 4196 , Nantlc¦lio, R1. 323Q4-9704 N tnaya Printed 8 gnatura TNESS rauc¦a black, his wife Route 4 Box 4196 Monticello, rl. 32344-9304 k tneas Printed o1qnatuF-a .k Countersigned, CITY OF CLU"WATER, FLORIDA ny, Rita Garvey Michael J. Wright Mayor-commissioner City ?manager •tit'DnCkcorruotnebbfarm AttotetS Sys H.A. Ga Mr- th, Jr. Cynthia E. Goudoau City Attorney City Clark STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Ths foregoing instrument was acknowledged before ma this :?/Sday of .. , 19 "? by CHESTER A. nLACR A110 FRANCEp 1?f.ACK. N2r1 NTFE., who a personally nown to me or who has produced as identification and who j )did ( )did not take an oath. &L 'j. S gnatu of person taxing acknowledgment S . ?.S O Y1 T pa/pr nt/stamp name of acknowledger Title or ran X, and Serial 14o., it any 1107ARy poBtfa. SiAif OF FORMA STATE OF FLORIDA 1 my con,miti,an 41PIA's Ott. 30. 147; COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) n&PORE HE personally appeared Hichaol J. Wripht. l?CA 1jjraith. 37r. - Qvilthin C. G2magala" -and -Rita It rvsv____, to ma wall known, and known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument as City Manager, city Attorney, City Clerk, and Mayor- Commissioner, respectively, of the City of Clearwater, Florida, a municipal corporation, and that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument Is the City seal of said City and the said instrumant is the free act and dead of said City. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of , 19 Signature of person tak ng anknowladgment Type/print/stamp name of acknowla ger t . Title or rank, and Serial flo., it any t? • I. u i 7. 111Et7nnrandum TO: Mayor and City Commission FROM: Michael W City Manager COPIES: Assistant Ci anagers, Department Directors SUBJECT: Third Quarter Review - Amended City Manager's Annual Budget Report DATE: September 11, 1992 A's 'i Attached is the Third Quarter Budget Review in accord with Section 41.10 of the Clearwater Code. The basic format of the report remains unchanged from prior years, and pages 1 and 2 provide a Table of Contents and a definition of format terminology. The Report includes comments on major variances, as well as explanations of proposed amendments. A summary of administratively approved change orders is provided on page 61 This report is based on nine months activity (October, 1991 through June, 1992) in this fiscal year, and although in some instances variances have been noted in revenues and expenditures, some amendments are not proposed until additional data can be analyzed. General Fund Budget As FY 91/92 As Amended As Amended Amended Third Adopted First Quarter Mid Year Quarter Revenue 56,2050898 56,434,113 56,368,065 55,987,821 Expenditures 56,205,898 56,434,113 56,368,065 1 55,987,821 The General Fund revenue adjustment reflects budgeted increases in licenses and permits, charges for service, interfund other charges, and fines and forfeits, resulting in a net increase in general fund revenues of $230,043 at third quarter. General Fund expenditures are reduced by $380,244 reflecting savings across all general fund departments. Other amendments include the transfer of $200,000 in salary savings in the Police Department budget to the Capital Improvement Program to fund nine patrol vehicles for the west district. Non-Departmental division adjustments include funding of $19,247 for FY '93 social service agency requests as approved by the Commission at the September 3, Commission meeting, funding of $13,500 to establish a Special Program project to track operating expenditures on the Maas Property, and $20,000 to fund a Capital Improvement Project to provide drawings of the new City Hall. The net transfer to General Fund Surplus at third quarter is $610,287, for a total transfer for FY 1991192 of $944,828. Utility System Budget As FY 91192 As Amended As Amended Amended Third Adopted First Quarter Mid Year Quarter Revenue 59,563,470 59,563,470 57,269,122 57,769,122 Expenditures 59,266,980 59,266,980 56,410,715 56,792,055 Water operating revenues are increased by $500,000 and inventory purchases are increased by $371,000 at third quarter due to increased water consumption. + ??„ Bridge Budget As FY 91192 As Amended As Amended Amended Third Adopted First Quarter Mid Year Quarter Revenue 1,701,600 1,701,600 1,576,470 1,576,470 Expenditures 1,102,690 1,102,690 1,088,920 1,200,006 Bridge fund expenditures reflect funding for the amendment to the Volkert contract for Clearwater Pass Bridge as presented to the Commission.on September 17, 1992. 111ttrina Budget As FY 91192 As Amended As Amended Amended Third Adopted First Quarter Mid Year Quarter Revenue 1,743,750 1,743,750 1,664,750 1,694,250 Expenditures 1,669,450 1,669,450 1,664,250 1,664,250 Marina operating revenues are increased by $30,000 at third quarter due to a slight increase in projected sales. Parking Budget As FY 91192 As Amended As Amended Amended Third Adopted First Quarter Mid Year Quarter Revenue 2,460,210 2,460,210 2,332,891 2,332,891 Expenditures 2,460,210 2,414,402 2,332,891 2,332,891 No amendment to the Parking Fund are prepared at this time. Pier 60 Budget As FY 91192 As Amended As Amended Amended Third Adopted First Quarter Mid Year Quarter Revenue 326,000 326,000 293,000 275,500 Expenditures 308,910 308,910 289,500 275,500 Pier 60 revenues and expenditures are amended at third quarter to reflect the effect of the Pier closing for several weeks for structural repairs, and the continued effect of the slow economy. Internal Services Budget As Funds FY 91192 As Amended As Amended Amended Third Adopted First Quarter Mid Year Quarter Revenue 20,252,965 20,263,819 20,697,922 20,729,703 Expenditures 18,908,815 18,820,979 19,196,925 L 18,557,405 The proposed budget amendments reflect an increase of $3,000 in the Purchasing Division budget for the purchase of a labeling machine for bulk mailings. The Graphics Division included a budget increase of $6,942 for training and software for the desktop publishing system as approved by the Commission of 913192, and the Self Insurance Fund reflects amendments to health insurance premiums reflecting the anticipated cost for health insurance, for fiscal year 1991192. 41'. •sa ?? ? r f ? .'S i ?? .. is j ? ' } i..' .?j9 ?`? .. f X11„? < ? ??j t ? #'? THIRD QUARTER REVIEW AMENDED CITY MANAGER'S FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 REPORT PAGE # General Fund Operating Budget .............................................. 3 Utility Fund Operating Budget .............................................. 22 Enterprise Funds Operating Budgets ........................................... 30 Internal Service Funds Operating Budgets ....................................... 35 Capital Improvement Program Budget .......................................... 42 Special Program Fund Budget .............................................. 55 Special Revenue Funds ................................................... 60 Schedule of Administrative Change Orders ....................................... 61 Schedule of Special Law Enforcement Trust Funds .................................. 63 Ordinances .......................................................... 64 Third Quarter budgets were projected in the following manner: All department expenditure budgets have been established on a month-to-month basis so that projects identified in the report are not simply time percentages applied to annual budgets but rather department director's judgment of month-to-month expenditures. This technique was also used for revenue projections. The actual and projected data contained in this review represents nine months, October 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992. no adjustments, however, represent all data available at the time of the report, including action taken by the City Commission after June 30, 1992. The operating funds information is presented as follows: Original Budget The budget as adopted by the City Commission on September 5, 1991. End of Previous Quarter Amended Budget Reflects any adjustment enacted by the City Commission at the prior quarterly review. Third Quarter Projections Monthly budgets submitted by departments are based on prior year experience and unique circumstances and adjustments approved by City Commission during First Quarter and Mid Year Reviews, Third Quarter Actual Self-explanatory. Variance Difference between Third Quarter projected and Third Quarter actual. A minus sign () indicates an over expenditure. Variance % of variance to Third Quarter projection. A minus sign (-) indicates an over expenditure. Adjustments Adjustments which have been approved by the City Commission, made at the Manager's discretion, and/or adjustments proposed based on mid year review. Amended Budget Adding the End of Previous Quarter Amended Budget and Adjustments. Amended Budget % Percentage change of amended budget to original budget. 1 3 f Capital Improvement Prole-vL5 i;. The amended I991/92 Capital Improvement Projects budget report is submitted for the City Commission review. This review provides the opportunity to analyze the status of all active projects and present formal amendments to the project budget. The Capital Improvement and Special Program funds infarmation is'presented as follows: ' Budget The budget as of October 1, 1991 which includes budgets from prior # years which have not been completed. Amendment Amendments which have been approved by the City Commission, made at tho Manager's discretion, and/or adjustments proposed as a result of . ; the Third Quarter review. Revised Budget Adding columns one and two. Expenditure Self-explanatory. Encumbrance Outstanding contract or purchase order commitment, i- = Available Balance ' Difference between revised budget and expenditure. e Ire. Status C - project is completed L.P. - project will be financed through lease purchase Amend Ref Reference number for description of amendment. { t a l r 5 ' ii 1 t S i { i , t 1 i F k . 4S. 1 1 1 ! 1 1 I i ' t 4 I. f t, City of Clcatrwater GENERAL FUND Third Quarter Revenues FY 1991-92 Some of the variances, both favorable (positive) and unfavorable (negative), appear to be the result of timing differences and are expected to be immaterial by year end. In other cases, budgets have been amended due to Commission action during the first half of the fiscal year, the receipt of additional information or a change in the underlying Budget assumptions. The adjustments proposed below are known and quantifiable at this time. Property Taxes No Amendment The estimated actual collection of taxes levied for the current year is approximately as budgeted. Franchise Fees Decrease $ 80,000 The third quarter budget review reflects a decrease in franchise fees based upon actual collections through August of the current year. Utility Taxes No Amendment The first quarter and mid year budget reviews reflected anticipated increases in utility taxes. Collections are expected to remain as amended, and no amendment is proposed at this time. Licenses and Permits Increase $ 35,000 The budget amendment reflects an anticipated increase in Occupational licenses for the fiscal year. Fines and Forfeits Increase $ 187,680 The budget amendment reflects an anticipated increase of $164,000 in court fines, $12,300 in revenues from Crossing Guards, $4,000 in Code Enforcement Board fines, and $7,380 in Alarm Service charges for fiscal year 1991192. Intergovernmental Federal Inereasc $ 9,250 The budget amendment reflects an increase in federal assistance promised for the EEOC program. State No Amendment .The estimated actual collection of taxes for the current year is approximately as budgeted. County Decrease $ 32,090 The budget amendment reflects a $18,000 decrease in anticipated revenues from Pinellas County for the EEOC program, and a decrease in Fire Tax of $44,000 from Pinellas County due to an error by the County which will be conwed and has been budgeted for in FY 1992193. Also reflects an increase in Other Grants of $13,000 and $18,400 in Occupational licensor based upon anticipated collections. Charges for Service Increase $ 85,953 The budget amendment reflects numerous increases and decreases to this revenue category based upon actual collections including: an increase in land Use Modification revenues of $9,750, an increase in Public Safety, revenues of $11,490, an increase in Parks and Recreation revenues of $ 9,613, an increase in Library charges of $14,000, and an increase in Other Charges of $26,900. 3 A City of Clearwater ' GENERAL. FUND Third Quarter Revenues FY 1991-92 Use and Sale of City Property Decrease $750. The budget amendment reflects anticipated decreases in revenues from the sale of i scrap. Other Service Charge Increase $ ?5,400 The budget amendment reflects an increase in revenues from Concrete costs initiated in the Infrastructure division for work on Utility and Enterprise fund projects, and charge to Utility and Enterprise funds based upon a reimbursement basis. Transfer to General Fund Surplus Lhcrease $ 610,287 The budget amendment primarily reflects savings in the General Fund Department operating budgets of $380,244, amd an increase in General Fund revenues of $230,043 resulting in a net increase in the transfer to General Fund Surplus of $610,287. AT THIRD QUARTER, CURRENT YEAR PROJECTED REVENUES EXCEED CURRENT YEAR BUDGETED EXPENDITURES BY $ 610,287, AND THAT AMOUNT IS ADDED TO THE GENERAL FUND SURPLUS. • 1 r 7 7 1 s N GENERAL FUND REVENUE REVIEW TNIRII QUARTER - October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 End of Third FY 91192 Prev Qtr Third Third Quarter Revenue Source Adopted Bud et Amended. B d t Quarter Quarter Variance Amended Budget g u ge Protection Actual Amount 3 Adfustment Amount 4 Property Taxes 19,096,733 19,096,733 18,031,760 18,295,895 264,135 It 0 19,096,733 Ok Franchise Fees 4,955,700 4,888,365 3,188,615 2,833,762 -354,853 -lit -80,000 4,808,365 -3k Utility Taxes 9,364,325 9,732,470 6,739,265 6,358,033 -381,232 -6k 0 9.732,470 44 Licenses and Permits 2,082,000 2,021,895 1,086,160 1,027,755 -58,405 -5k 35,000 2,056,895 -14 Fines, Forfeiture S Penalties 1,338,200 1,309,780 975,180 949,873 -25,307 -3k 187,680 1,497,460 12k I ntergovernmenta I Federal State 228,550 6,176,210 228,550 6,160,460 0 4,302,570 0 3,916 665 0 -385 905 " 9,250 " 237,800 04 C ounty 3,578,560 3,578,560 2,611,284 , 2,477,398 , -133,882 0 -5k -32,090 6,160,460 3,546,470 -104 Charges for Services 887,690 946,936 726,605 697,941 -28,664 -4k 85,953 1,032,889 164 Use and Sale of City Property and Honey 1,050,640 1,190,270 480,910 280,347 -200,563 -42% -750 1,189,520 13% Miscellaneous Revenues 132,500 136,587 103,477 82,663 -20 814 -20% 0 136 , ,587 44 Interfund Administration Service Charge 2,585,230 2,595,230 1,951,370 1,951,380 10 0% 0 2,595,230 Ok Interfund Other Service Charge 1,850,980 1'868,000 1,400,815 1,413,726 12,911 Ok 25,000 1,893,000 Ok Interfund Transfer 2,868,580 2,948,770 2,211,610 2,211,580 -30 0% , 0 2,948,770 3% Subtotal,, General Fund 56,205,898 56,702,606 43,809,617 4 2,497,018 -1 ,312,599 '-34 230,043 56,932,649 It Transfer to Surplus 0 334,541 0 0 - 0 610.287 944,628 - TOTAL, GENERAL FUND 56.205,898 56.368,065 4 f 3,809,617 42,497,018 -1,312,599 -34 -380,244 5 5,987,821 0k 5 t 's r s City of Clearwater GENERAL FUND Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 City Commission Adjustments: Other Operating Increase $ 1,000 The, budget amendment provides $3,000 for the purchase of promotional items as recommended and approved by the Commission on 7116/92, and a budget decrease of $2,000 in travel expense. Capital Decrease $1,000 The budget amendment reflects savings in the purchase of capital equipment. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is equal to the Original 1991192 Budget M O R City Manager The mid year budget review included a budget increase of $9,543 reflecting increases in insurance and pensions costs of $7,818, increases in internal service costs of $1,125, and an increase of $600 for the purchase of a cellular telephone. Adjustments: Other Operating Decrease $ 4,504 The budget decrease reflects savings in equipment service and repair of $1,500 and employee travel expense of $3,000 offsetting an increase of $2,540 in Capital expenditures. Capital Increase $ 2,540 The budget amendment provides for a budget increase for the purchase of an upgraded fax transcriber for the City Manager's office. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 7,583 more than the Original 1991192 Budget. E Affirmative Action The first quarter and mid year budget reviews reflected a net decrease of $31,096 in Personnel Service costs recognizing salary savings from vacant position, the transfer of one position to Human Resources, and salary adjustments for COLA and merit increases which were no included in the original budget; a net decrease in Other Operating costs of $348; a net increase of $3,255 in Internal Service costs for production of the Affirmative Action calendar; and a $10,000 increase at first quarter for the purchase of a computer system. Adjustments: Other Operating Decrease $ 3,250 The budget amendment reflects savings in auto allowance of $1,400, memberships and subscriptions of $1,000, and training and reference of $1,700, and includes an increase of $850 in computer software to provide funding for the purchase of computer software for the recently purchased computer network for the Affirmative Action office. 6 ,if_ . 0 City of Clearwater GENERAL FUND Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 Capital Decrease $ 850 The budget amendment reflects savings in the Capital code for furniture and equipment. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 22,269 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. sss Internal Audit The acid year budget review reflected an increase of $4,312 in Personal Services which included SAMP increases which were not included in the Department's original 1991/92 operating budget, acting pay for the Internal Audit Manager to serve as Finance Director, and an increase for SAMP life insurance. Adjustments Other Operating Decrease $ 1,000 The budget amendment reflects savings in equipment service and repair of $700, and training and reference of $300. Capital Decrease $ 100 The budget amendment provides savings in construction material expenses. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 2,987 more than the Original 1991192 Budget. t s • Public Information Office The first quarter budget review reflected the transfer of a Public information Representative to the Information Central at the Library with a net budget decrease in the Public Information Office of $18,691. Adjustments: Personal Service Decrease $ 560 The budget transfer is requested to provide funding in the Other Operating code for contractual services for the unanticipated need for temporary clerical assistance during the period of the vacancy of the Staff Assistant position. Other Operating Increase $ 1,060 A budget transfer of $560 from Personal Service codes provides funding for the unanticipated need for temporary clerical assistance during the period of the vacancy of the Staff Assistant position, and $500 from savings in Capital codes to the equipment rental code for the rental of a mobile telephone. Capital Decrease $ SOO To provide a budget transfer of funds to Other Opeming codes to offset budget increases in that area. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 18,691 less than the Original 1991/92 Budget. ass 7 t S i f I City of Clearwater GENERAL FUND Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 Economic Development All costs associated with this Department are reimbursed by the Community Redevelopment Agency and are reflected as an offsetting revenue to the General Fund. Adjustments: Personal Services Decrease $ 590 The budget transfer is requested to provide funding in the Other Operating code for contractual services for the unanticipated need for temporary clerical assistance during the period of the vacancy of the Staff Assistant position. Other Operating Increase $ 90 The budget amendment provides funding in the from Personal Services for the unanticipated need for temporary clerical assistance during the period of the vacancy of the Staff Assistant position in the amount of $590, and savings of $500 in training and reference. Capital Decrease $ 500 The budget amendment reflects savings in capital expenditures. Debt Service Decrease $ 590 The budget amendment reflects savings in debt service expenditures. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 1,590 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. • • Legal The mid year budget review included a budget increase in Personal Service costs of $12,852 for SAMP increases which were no included in the Department's original 1991192 operating budget. A decrease of $500 in other operating expenditures was reflected at first quarter. Adjustments Other Operating Decrease $ 19,000 The budget amendment reflects savings in the equipment service and repair of $2,000, employee travel of $3,000, and other services and charges of $14,400 due to savings in court costs. Internal Service Decrease $ 5,180 To record savings in building and maintenance-variable charges of $1,000 and messenger- variable of $180, and document reproduction of $4,004. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 11,828 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. sss 1 t 4 i i s I S t i F City of Clearwater GENERAL FUND Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 City Clerk The first quarter and mid year budget reviews include amendments to increase Personal Service casts in the City Clerk's department by $7,629 to reflect merit, COLA, and SAMP increases which were no included in the Department's original 1991/92 operating budget; decrease Other Operating expenditures by $9,190 transferring budgeted tuition reimbursement expenditures to the Human Resources Department and to offset increases in Internal Service and Capital codes; increase Internal Service expenditures by $1,399 for numerous adjustments, and increase Capital expenditures by $3,000 to provide for the. purchase of an additional transcriber. Adjustments Other Operating Decrease $ 9,580 The budget amendment reflects savings advertising of $6,000, equipment service and repair of $2,580, and other services and charges of $1,000. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 6,742 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. rsr Administrative Services, Office of Management and Budget The mid year budget review included a budget increase of $14,090 in Personal Service costs for COLA and SAMP increases which were not included in the Department's original budgeted and the effects of the establishment of the position of Budget Director and the elimination of a position of Budget Analyst; and budget decreases in Other Operating costs of $3,420, Internal Service costs of $390, Capital of $500, and Debt Service of $2,040. No amendments are proposed at third quarter. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 8,140 more than the Original 1991/92 Budget. Administrative Services, Finance The first quarter and mid year budget reviews included budget increases of $25,460 in Personal Service costs for SAMP and COLA increases which were not budgeted in the original operating budget, funds for the Temporary Accounting Projects Manager, and salary and fringe benefits to hire a Payroll Clerk to replace a retiring employee; a net budget decrease of $12,490 in Other Operating costs to offset Personal Service increases; an increase of $1,040 in Internal Service codes reflecting numerous adjustments; an increase of $3,800 in Capital for the purchase of two additional computer work stations; and a decrease in Debt Service costs of $12,750 due to the delay in the purchase of the General Ledger hardware and software. Adjustments Other Operating Decrease $ 8,000 The budget amendment reflects savings in employee travel of $5,000, and equipment service and repair-oilier of $3,000. Debt Service DQrrease $ 20,000 The budget amendment reflects savings in lease purchase payment due to the delay in the purchase of the financelbudget/purchasing system. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 22,940 Ims than the Original 1991192 Budget. 9 City of Clearwater GENERAL FUND Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92. Human Resources The first quarter and mid year budget reviews include a net decrease of $26,922 in Personal Service costs reflecting the transfer of one position from the Affirmative Action office, increases for SAMP, merit, and COLA increases which were not included in the Department's original budget, and salary savings from several vacant positions; a net increase of $43,496 in Other Operating costs primarily representing the transfer of budgeted tuition reimbursement expenditures from all departments to the Human Resources Department; and a budget increase in Capital for the purchase of two Mackintosh work stations. Adjustments Other Operating Decrease $ 4,500 The budget amendment reflects savings in computer software of $2,500 and other services and charges of $2,000. Capital Decrease $ 1,483 The budget amendment reflects savings due to a the elimination of the need to purchase a scantron machine which is no longer considered necessary. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 29,152 more than the Original 1991192 Budget. s:• Non-Departmental The first quarter and mid year budget reviews reflected a budget decrease of $930,000 in Personal Service expenditures allocating the $930,000 Salary Adjustment funds to the General Fund operating departments to offset the approved 4% COLA increase; reflected an increase of $60,000 in Other Operating costs to provide funds to the Clearwater Bomber organization and Ervin's All American Youth Club and provide contract professional services to review and negotiate franchises with Florida Power and Vision Cable; a budget increase of $6,250 in Capital for the sound system in the Commission Chamber; and budget increases in Transfers reflecting adjustments to various Capital Improvement projects. Adjustments Personal Service Decrease $ 10,000 The budget amendment reflects savings in the payment of unemployment compensation Other Operating Increase $ 19,447 The budget amendment reflects an increase in contractual services of $10,000 for the Institute of Government at the University of South Florida to conduct a Citizens Survey for the City of Clearwater (Bordner Study), offset with savings of $8,000 in property tax refund, and $1,800 in taxes, and an increase in Social Service Agency funding of $19,247 for FY '93 requests as approved by the Commission at the first public hearing of the 1992193 budget on September 3, 1992. Internal Service Increase $ 2,700 The budget amendment reflects an increase of $ 3,200 in postage costs and a decrease of $500 in printing and binding charges. Capital Increase $ 750 The budget amendment reflects an increase of $750 in capital costs related to the Sound System in the City Commission Chambers. 10 City of Clearwater GENERAL FUND Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 Transfer Increase $ 26,412 The budget amendment reflects a transfer to the Capital Improvement program of $20,000 to' establish a project to provide funds for drawings of the proposed City Hall, a return of funds from project 315-3509, Countryside Library, the transfer of $13,500 to establish a Special Program project to track operating expenditures on the Maas Brother property, and the reallocation of FROG grant sales proceeds of $1,350 which were returned to the General Fund at the end of FY 1990191 to establish a project to reprint and reissue the revised 'FROG' document. Funds will be provided from savings in other department budgets. The Third Quarter Budget Amended Budget is $ 474,548 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. r.• Planning and Development The first quarter and mid year budget reviews included a budget decrease of $63,150 in Personal Service expenditures reflecting the effects of SAMP, merit, and COLA increases offset by savings due to over budgeting for one position, and salary savings from a vacant position; a net increase of $22,934 in Other Operating expenditures primarily for consultant services to modify the software of the Code Enforcement division, unanticipated equipment repair and additional operating supplies offset by salary savings; an increase in Internal Service costs of $12,438 offset by salary savings; a net increase in Capital of $20,377 for the purchase of band held computers for building inspectors; and a decrease in anticipated Debt Service costs of $4,100. Adjustments: Personal Service Decrease $ 3,939 The budget amendment reflects salary savings from a position vacancy. Other Operating Decrease $ 21,640 The budget amendment reflects savings of $3,000 in operating supplies, $ 3,500 in employee- travel, $1,200 in memberships and subscriptions, $3,500 in equipment service and repair, $ 1,900 in training and reference, $ 2,500 in lot clearing $ 2,000 in computer software, $2,500 in contractual services, and $1,500 in advertising. Interrutl Service Decrease $ 2,700 The budget amendment reflects savings in garage charges of $2,800 and garage variable of $4,800, offsetting budget increases in building and maintenance variable charges of $2,100. Capital Increase $ 4,339 To record a transfer of savings from Internal Service codes and Other Operating codes to provide a budget increase to construction material and services for additional work at the Central Counter, and $ 3,500 for the installation of a gas air conditioner in the Community Relations office. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 35,451 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. rs• Library The first quarter and mid year budget reviews included budget amendments to decrease Personal Service expenditures by $23,324 reflecting the transfer of salary savings due 'to the vacancy of the Director positions to Other Operating expenditures to provide maintenance for the Library computer system and the transfer of one position from the Public Information Office to support "Information Central"; a net increase of $35,000 in Other 11 City of Clearwater GENERAL FUND Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 Operating primarily for the contractual maintenance on the Library computer; a net increase of $1,715 in Internal Service expenditures for postage related to the interlibrary loan service; and an increase in Capital for the purchase of four fax machines for the City branch libraries. Adjustments: Other Operating Decrease $ 3,000 Internal Service Increase $ 3,000 The budget amendment reflects a transfer from Other Operating "operating supplies and materials' code to the Internal Service code for Telephone Service - variable to offset some additional anticipated expenditures in this code. Debt Service Decrease $ 64,160 To provide savings from the delay in the purchase of the Library upgrade offsetting a budget increase in transfers to the capital improvement fund. Transfers Increase $ 36,150 To record a budget transfer to Capital Improvement project 315-3513, Library System Upgrade, to provide funding for the purchase of conversion services and installation and training for this project as approved by the Commission on September 3, 1992. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 11,819 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. • r s Parks and Recreation The first quarter and mid year budget reviews included a budget increase in Personal Service costs of $195,151 reflecting the effects of SAMP, merit, and COLA increases, the transfer of the lighting section from Public Service, and provide funding for the midnight basketball program; a net budget increase of 35,445 in Other Operating costs for contractual services for the Morningside Pool bath house, parking arrangements for Jack Russell Stadium, turtle inspections prior to beach cleaning, funds related to the transfer of the lighting section from Public Works, and increases in utility charge estimates; a net budget increase of $27,422 in Internal Service codes o ('$32,022 due to the move of the lighting sections along with other budget increases; a net increase in Capital of $ 38,107 for the purchase of a spray rig attachment, funding for the Phillies ticket office, funding for the removal of an oil tank at the Parks Field Office, repairs to the Memorial Civic Center, and planter repairs on Cleveland Street; and a budget decrease in Debt Service costs of $1,777. Adjustments Personal Service Increase $ 12,000 To provide funding for additional lifeguards to monitor Holt Pool for the summer months as approved by the Commission. Capital Increase $ 30,000 To provide funding for a $10,000 modification to the Bomber stadium bleachers due to small children falling through the bleacher openings, and to provide $20,000 of funding to the Shuffleboard Club for the construction of their outdoor canopies as approved by the Commission on June 4, 1992. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 336,448 more than the 1991192 Original Budget. 12 ,if City of Clearwater GENERAL FUND Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 * * • Palice The first quarter and mid year budget reviews provided a budget increase in Personal Service costs of $398,694 at mid year primarily for the effects of SAMP, merit, and COLA increases and funding for retirees extending their employee period which were not budgeted in the department's original operating budget; a net budget decrease of $21,440 in Other Operating costs; a budget increase of $19,600 in Internal Service costs for garage service charges due to the acquisition of additional vehicles; and a net budget increase in Capital of $47,995 for the purchase and installation of equipment on seven Patrol vehicles, the replacement of a heavy document ,shredder, and the remodeling g of the Community Relations/Crime Prevention Section. Adjustments: Personal Service Decrease $ 200,404 The budget amendment reflects a transfer of salary savings to the line item for transfers to provide funding for the establishment of a capital improvement project to purchase of nine patrol vehicles in the West district. Other Operating Decrease $ 62,500 To record savings in contractual services of $30,000, postage of $4,500, printing and binding of $5,000, rental equipment of $ 8,000, equipment service and repair of $2,500, equipment service and repair-other $10,000, employee-travel $15,000, other services and charges of $15,000, operating supplies $500, and employee-training and reference of $ 12,000, and an increase of $ 40,000 in uniform expense for specialized tactical equipment. Internal Service Decrease $14,500 To record savings in garage-variable charges. Capital Decrease $ 30,000 To record a savings of'S30,000 in capital expenditures. Debt Service Decrease $12,230 To record savings in anticipated debt service expenditures of $ 12,230. Transfer Increase $ 200,000 The budget amendment reflects a budget transfer to the capital improvement program for the establishment of a project to purchase of nine patrol vehicles in the West district provided from salary savings. s The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 325,819 more than the Original 1991/92 Budget. * * * Fire The first quarter and mid year budget reviews provided for a budget increase in Personal Service costs of $212,940 primarily for the effects of SAMP, merit, and COLA increases, funding for retirees extending their employment period, and salary savings for the abolishment of one Fire Inspector position; a budget decrease in Other Operating 13 City of Clearwater GENERAL FUND Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 costs of $3,165; a budget decrease of $2,435 in Internal Service costs of $2,435; an increase in anticipated Capital expenditures of $10,300 for the tenting of the main station, the removal of the rusted fuel tank at Station #48, the installation of exhaust fans at stations, the replacement of dive team equipment, and the procurement of fixed and mobile dispatching equipment. Adjustments Personal Service Decrease $ 60, 840 To record salary and related savings due to positions vacancies in the Department at third quarter. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 120,250 more than the Original 1991192 Budget. + i 1 Public Works, Engineering Group The first quarter and mid year budget reviews included a budget increase in Personal Service costs of $15,730 for SAMP and COLA increases which were no included in the Division's original budget and an increase in overtime related to Stevenson Creek and the Clearwater Pass Bridge; a net budget decrease of $2,630 in Other Operating costs; a budget decrease of $6,710 in Internal Service codes; and a budget increase of $1,930 for the replacement of the engine on the Engineering work boat. No amendments are proposed at this time. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 8,230 more than the Original 1991/92 Budget. •es Public Works, Environmental Group The mid year budget review included a budget increase to Personal Service codes for SAMP, merit, and COLA increases which were not included in the original budget, and budget decreases in Other Operating costs of $2,040, Internal Service costs of $850, and Capital costs of $50. No amendment is proposed at this time. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 1,460 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. s 0 t Public Works, Transportation Group The first quarter and mid year budget review included amendments decreasing Personal Service costs by $20,558 reflecting salary savings the abolishment of the position of Traffic Service Superintendent and other position vacancies; and a net decrease of $171,575 in Other Operating costs due to savings in utility power charges and equipment service and repair; and an increase of $18,000 in Capital for the provision of paved parking spaces at the Sign Shop facility. 14 City of Clearwater GENERAL FUND Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 Adjustments Other Operating Decrease $ 123,500 To record anticipated savings in power charges of $120,000, rental equipment of $2,000 and employee-travel of $1,500. Internal Service Decrease $ 5,000 To record budgeted savings in garage-variable charges. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 302,638 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. aai Public Works, Infrastructure Group The raid year budget review included a decrease in Personal Service costs of $106,410, a decrease of Other Operating costs of $900, and a decrease in Internal Service costs of $14,030, all primarily reflecting the transfer of the lighting section to the Parks & Recreation department. No amendment is proposed at this time. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 121,340 less than the Original 1991/92 Budget. ?s* Emergency Management The mid year review reflected minor decreases in Other Operating and Internal Service codes.. Adjustments Other Operating Decrease $ 750 To record a savings in the purchase of other operating supplies. Internal Service Decrease $ 700 To record savings of $300 in document reproduction, $300 in telephone service, and $100 in printroom charges. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 1,590 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. asa Airpark The mid year budget review reflected a budget decrease of $10,240 in Other Operating costs offsetting an increase of $10,000 in Capital costs to provide water and upgrade the electrical connections to the shade hangers. Adjustments Other Operating Decrease $ $,750 To record savings in professional services of $1,500, lot mowing of $5,000, advertising of $750, equipment service and repair $500, and other services and charges of $1,000. 15 t 3 r Y, City of Clearwater .r GENERAL FUND Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 Internal Service Decrease $1,000 The budget amendment reflects savings in building and maintenance-variable charges. Capital Dwrease $11,000 The budget amendment reflects savings in contract-other costs of $7,000 and construction material and supply costs of $4,000. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 21,490 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. •rs Sailing Center AdUustments Other Operating Increase $ 2,210 The budget amendment reflects a transfer of savings from Jnternal Service codes to provide additional funds for operating supplies. Internal Service Decrease $4,590 " The budget amendment reflects savings in building service costs because the Sailing Center building is still under warranty. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 2,380 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. s•s . i f S 16 s N c? GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE REVIEW THIRD QUARTER - October 1. 1991 - June 30, 1992 End of Prev, qQtr Third Third Amended Original Amended Quarter Quarter Variance Budget Department Budget Budget Projection Actual Amount % Adjustment Amount % CITY COMMISSION Personal Service 67,380 67,380 49,255 46.327 2.928 6% 0 67,380 0% Other Operating Exp 22,500 22,500 17,064 10,181 6,883 40% 1,000 23,500 4% Internal Service 34,645 34,645 25,984 26,844 -860 -3% 0 34,645 04 Capital 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 1,000 100% -1,000 0 -100% Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - Transfer 1,000 1,000 1,000 11000 0 0% 0 11000 0% TOTAL 126,525 126.525 94,303 84,352 9,951 11% 0 126,525 0% CITY MANAGER - ADMINISTRATION Personal Service 378,950 386,768 286,000 291,258 -5,258 -2% 0 386,768 2% Other Operating Exp 69,810 69,810 52,357 35,294 17,063 33% -4,500 65,310 -6% Internal Service 65.170 66,295 50,000 52,105 -2,106 -4% 0 66.295 2% Capital 1,500 2,100 2,100 4,560 -2,460 -117% 2.540 4,640 209% Debt Service 7,030 7,030 5,600 51611 -11 0% 0 7,030 0% Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - TOTAL 522,460 532,003 396,057 388,829 7,228 2% -1,960 .530.043 1% CITY MANAGER - AFFIRMATIVE ACTI ON Personal Service 97,770 66,674 50,358 47.969 2,389 5% 0 66,674 -32% Other Operating Exp 10,410 10,062 7,540 1,523 6,017 80% -3,250 6,812 -35% Internal Service 10,600 13,875 9,949 9,982 -33 0% 0 13,875 , 31% Capital 0 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 100% -850 9,150 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 - Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - TOTAL 118,780 100,611 77,847 59,474 18,373 24% -4,100 96,511 -19% CITY MANAGER - INTERNAL AUDIT Personal Service 128,830 133,142 100,180 98,731 1,449 1% 0 133,142 3% Other Operating Exp 5,500 5,275 3,230 21068 1,162 36% -1.000 4,275 -22% Internal Service 4,670 4,670 3,501 3,277 224 6% 0 4,670 0% Capital 100 100 100 0 100 100% -100 0 -100% Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 " Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - TOTAL 139,100 143,187 107,011 104,076 2,935 3% -4100 142,087 2% CITY MANAGER - PUBLIC INFORMATI ON OFFICE Personal Service 125,260 106,569 73,786 77,352 -3,566 -5% -560 106,009 -15% Other Operating Exp 30.010 29,650 23,000 21,072 1,928 8% 1.060 30,710 2% Internal Service 26,030 26,980 19,522 23,748 -4.226 -22% 0 26,980 4% Capital S00 SOD 500 0 500 100% -500 0 -1004 Debt Service 590 0 0 0 0 0 0 -100% Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - TOTAL 182,390 163,699 116,808 122,172 -5,364 -5% 0 163,699 -10% J 17 0 GENERAL. FUND EXPENDITURE REVIEW THIRD QUARTER - October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 End of Pmv Qtr Amended Original Amended Quarter Quarter Variance Budget Department Budget Budget Projection Actual Amount % Adjustment Amount % CITY MANAGER - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Personal Service 82,320 82,685 60,434 60,323 111 0% -590 82,095 0% Other Operating Exp 91100 8,665 6,660 4,796 1,864 28% 90 8,755 -44 Internal Service 6,570 6,640 4,927 4,745 182 4% 0 6,640 1% Capital 500 500 500 0 500 100% -500 0 -100% Debt Service 590 590 442 0 442 100% -590 0 -100% Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - TOTAL 99,080 99,080 72,963 69,864 3,099 4% -1,590 97,490 -2% LEGAL Personal Service 376,220 389,072 287,000 289,171 -2,171 -1% 0 389,072 3% Other Operating Exp 223,668 223,168 166,276 113,467 52,809 32% -19,000 204,168 -9% Internal Service 38,860 38,860 29,145 23,626 5,519 19% -5,180 33,680 -13% Capital 14,500 14,500 11,350 13,127 -1,777 -16% 0 14,500 0% Debt Service , 5,240 5,240 3,930 3,929 1 0% 0 5,240 0% Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - TOTAL 658,488 670,840 497,701 443,320 54,381 11k »24,180 646,650 -2% CITY CLERK Personal Service 306,650 314,279 232,156 226,074 6,082 3% 0 314,279 2% Other Operating Exp 171,490 162,300 122,560 70,306 52,254 43% -9,580 152,720 -11% Internal Service 68,510 69,909 51,381 51,274 107 0% 0 69,909 2% Capital 3,800 6,800 1,100 1,042 58 5% 0 6,800 79% Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - TOTAL 550,450 553,288 407,197 348,696 58,501 14% -9,580 543,708 -1% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Personal Service 295,870 309,960 232,630 229,369 3,261 1% 0 309,960 5% Other Operating Exp 11,480 8,460 6,150 3,672 2,478 40% 0 8,460 -26% Internal Service 30,500 30,110 23,124 21,886 1,238 5% 0 30,110 -1% Capital 2,000 11500 1,500 520 980 65% 0 1,500 -25% Debt Service 8,500 6,460 4,850 4,847 3 0% 0 6,460 -24% Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - TOTAL 348,350 356,490 268,254 260,294 7,960 3% 0 356,490 2% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - FINANCE Personal Service 713,890 739,350 531,539 530,351 11188 0% 0 739,350 4% Other Operating Exp 169,130 156,640 138,450 96,225 42,225 30% -8,000 148,640 -12% Internal Service 345,880 346,920 259,411 259,588 -177 0% 0 346,920 0% Capital 1,970 5,770 1,970 1,879 91 5% 0 5,770 193% Debt Service 54,450 41,700 35,136 18,421 16,715 48% -20,000 21,700 -60% Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - TOTAL 1,285,320 1,290,380 966,506 906,464 60,042 6k -28,000 1,262,380 -2% 18 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE REVIEW THIRD QUARTER - October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 End of Prev Qtr Department Original Bud et Amended B d Quarter Quarter Variance Amended Budget g u get Protection Actual Amount % AdJustment Amount - HUMAN RESOURCES Personal Service Other Operating Exp 541,320 106 780 514,398 380,000 355,898 24,102 6% 0 398 Internal Service , 71,080 160,276 71 075 13D,354 53 309 97,456 5 41,898 30% -4,500 155, 155,77 6% 4 Capital 2,200 , 10,766 , 8 700 3,963 8 683 -654 -It 0 5 71,015 % ? Debt Service , 0 , 17 Ok -1,483 9,283 322 % Transfer 0 0 0 O 0 0 - TOTAL 721,380 756,515 0 .581,363 0 516,000 0 65.363 11% 0 -5,983 0 750 532 _ 4 NON-DEPARTHENTAL EXPENSE , % Personal Service Other Operating Exp 940,000 1,877 905 10,000 2 117 556 10,000 1 p 10,0 10 -1 -I Internal Service , 0 , , ,500,000 1,480, 985 15 19,015 1 lx 9.447 19,447 3 2,137 003 14% 14?Y Capital Debt Service 0 0 6,250 0 6,250 469 7,000 -469 -750 -12% 2.700 750 , 2.700 - Transfer 534,610 529 430 534,610 699 672 400,957 6 321,144 79,8 13 20% 0 7,610 000 534 TOTAL , 3,881,945 , 3,368,088 99,672 2,616 879 673,981 2 483 579 25,691 133 3 4% 26,412 726,084 37% , , , , 00 5% 39,309 3,407,397 -12% PLANNING b DEVELOPMENT Personal Service Other Operating Exp 2,123,89D 218 230 2,060,740 2 1,532,930 1,516,760 16,170 1% -3,939 2,056 801 -3% Internal Service , 339,980 41,164 352 418 164,806 254 979 144,639 20,167 12% -21.600 , 219,564 1% Capital 60,070 , 80,397 , 67 815 253,867 68 822 1,112 0% -2,700 349,718 3''; s Debt Service Transfer 35,590 31,490 , 26,693 , 23,590 .1,007 3 103 -1% 12% 4,339 84,736 41k 0 0 0 0 , - ° 31,490 -12 TOTAL 2,777,760 2,766,209 2,047,223 2,007,678 0 39,545 28 0 -23,900 0 2 742 309 - .. 1 LIBRARY , . - % Personal Service Other Operating Exp 1,787,140 1,763,816 1,293,740 1,295,462 318 -1,722 at 0 1 763 816 Internal Service ,840 315 470 353,840 317 185 286,295 234,795 51,500 188 -3,000 , ,350,840 -14 10% Capital , 37,260 , 40,060 235,317 37 935 240,685 -5,368 -2% 3,000 320,185 1% Debt Service 81,720 81,720 , 61 290 14,036 14 884 23,899 63% 0 0 4,060 8% Tranfer 400,000 400,000 , 400,000 , 400 000 46,406 76% -64,160 1 7,560 - 79 TOTAL 2,940,430 2 .956.621 2 ,314,577 2 , ,199,862 715 0 114 0% 5% 36,150 436,150 9% , -28,010 2 ,928,611 0t PARKS AND RECREATION Personal Service Other Operating Exp 5,089,940 5,285,091 3,762,380 3 1 634 380 1 6 ,705,256 57,124 2? 12,000 5 297 091 4% Internal Service , , , 69,825 1,224,334 1,197,549 1,544,900 1,572,422 1 174 729 1 17 26,785 2k 0 1 , . ,669,825 2 capital 110,210 , 148,317 , , 106 562 2,287 72 553 2,442 0% 3 1 1 x % Debt Service 48,680 46,903 , 36 511 , 29 278 4,009 324 30,000 i 8 ,317 62% Transfer ° , 0 , 7,233 2 0% 0 46,903 - 4% TOTAL 8,428,110 8, 722,558 6, 304,516 6, 0 176,923 O 127,593 2k 42 000 8 - , ,764,558 4% i r 19 ;E .1 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE REVIEW THIRD QUARTER - October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 .11 Department POLICE Personal Service Other Operating Exp Internal Service Capital .Debt Service Transfer TOTAL FIRE Personal Service Other Operating Exp Internal Service Capital Debt Service Transfer TOTAL End of Prev Qtr Original Amended Quarter Quarter Budget Budget Projection Actual 14,281,210 14,679,904 10,807,820 10,782.103 1.295.040 1,273,600 957,080 710,027 1,879,210 1,899,010 1,404,331 1,362,905 43.770 91,765 77,185 17,020 62,040 62,040 46,530 26,526 0 0 0 0 17,561,270 18,006,319 13,292,946 12,898,581 Amended Variance Budget Amount % Adjustment Amount % 25,717 0% 247.053 26% 41.426 3% 60,165 78% 20,004 43% 0 - 394,365 3% -200,000 -62,500 -14,500 -30,000 -12,230 200,000 -119,230 14,479,904 1% 1,211,100 -6% 1,884,510 0% 61,765 41% 49,810 -20% 200,000 - 17,887.089 2% 7,990,760 8,203,700 6,246,900 6,237,920 8,980 Ot -60,840 8,142,860 2% 441,310 432,645 322,530 276,279 46,251 14% 0 432,645 -2k 310,070 307,635 230,720 215,698 15,022 A 0 307,635 -1% 47,040 57,340 35,280 22,153 13,127 37% 0 57,340 22% 200,450 169,400 145,810 141,646 4,164 3% 0 169,400 -15% 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - 8,989,630 9,170,720 6,981,240 6,893,696 87,544 1% -60,840 9,109,880 1% PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING GROUP Personal Service 1,824,470 1,840,200 1,366,952 1,364,663 2,289 0% 0 1,840,200 lac Other Operating Exp 71,830 69,200 51,000 32,943 18,057 35% 0 69,200 -4% Internal Service 173,160 166,450 125,670 122,693 2,977 24 0 166,450 -4k Capital 17,050 18,980 17,050 13,144 3,906 23% 0 18,980 11% Debt Service 23,830 23,830 17,872 19,017 -1,145 -6k 0 23,830 0% Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 TOTAL 2,110,340 2,118,660 1,578,544 1,552,460 26,084 2% 0 2,118,660 0% PUBLIC WORKS - ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP Personal Service 174,160 175,640 130,100 129,700 400 0% 0 175,640 1% Other Operating Exp 13,700 11,660 9,090 51888 3,202 35% 0 11,660 -15% Internal Service 23,100 22,250 17,450 17,915 -465 -3k 0 22,250 -4k Capital 3,550 3,500 3,050 2,531 519 17-N 0 3,500 -1% Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - TOTAL 214,510 213,050 159,690 156,034 3,656 2% 0 , 213,050 -1% PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION GROUP Personal Service 905,560 885,002 661,700 647,597 Other Operating Exp 1,486,760 1,315,180 972,930 883,779 Internal Service 212,600 212,600 159,449 149,347 Capital 18,510 36,510 36,510 8,967 Debt Service 14,140 14,140 10,605 10,604 Transfer 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2,637,570 2,463,432 1,841,194 1,700,294 20 14.103 2% 0 89,151 9% -123,500 10,102 6% -5,000 27,543 75% 0 1 0% 0 0 - 0 140,900 8% -128,500 885,002 -24 1,191,680 -20% 207.600 -24 36,510 974 14,140 0% 0 - 2,334,932 -11% e r i t h 1 GENERAL F UND EXPENDITURE R EVIEW THIRD QUARTER - October 1. 19 91 -.lone 30, 1992 End of . Prev Qtr Department Original Amended Quarter Quarter Variance Amended h Budget Budget Protection Actual Amount 4 Adjustment Budget PUBLIC kORKS - INFRASTR UCTURE GROUP Amount ? Personal Service Other Operating Exp 1,000,150 $93,740 695,008 703,444 - -14 Internal Service 354,600 4 353,700 262,785 241,194 2!,591 88 p 0 893,740 -114 Capital 39,730 425,700 329,796 334,710 -4 914 -1% 353,700 04 Debt Service 0 0 0 , D 0 - O 425,700 -3k Transfer 0 0 p D 0 0 0 - TOTAL 1,794,480 O 0 0 1,673,140 1,287,589 1,279,348 0 D - 0 8 241 14 - 0 PUBLIC WORKS - EMERGENCY MAXAGEMENT , . 0 1,673,140 -74 Personal Service 0 • Other Operating Exp Internal Service 4,180 0 0 D 4,140 3485 , 2,259 0 O 1 226 354 - 0 Capital 1,200 11100 900 119 , -750 781 874 -700 3,390 -194 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 O 400 -674 Transfer 0 0 0 D 0 - TOTAL 5,380 5,240 4,385 2,328 D 0 2 007 0 PUBLIC WORKS - AIRPARX , 464 -1,450 3.790 -304 Personal Service 0 Other Operating Exp Internal Service 40,400 0 0 D 30,160 30,299 10,944 0 19 355 644 _ Capital 2,600 2,100 2,575 95 , -8,750 2 480 964 21,410 »474 Debt Service 12,000 21,000 10,500 i 217 , -1,000 9,283 884 -11 000 11100 -584 Transfer O 0 D 0 , p - 11,000 -84 TOTAL 0 55,000 0 0 54,260 43,374 12,256 0 31 118 724 p - MARINE - SAILING CENTER , -20,750 33,510 -394 Personal Service Other Operating Exp 32,140 32,140 24,005 22,630 1 375 64 Internal Service 14,460 700 6 16,910 12 790 ? 13,522 , 0 -732 -64 2 210 32,140 04 1 Capita] , 3,850 6,100 5,025 1,058 1 400 , 3,957 79% -4,590 9,120 324 2 410 -694 Debt Service 0 , 1,400 1,400 0 04 D , Transfer 0 0 0 p - 1,400 -644 TOTAL 0 57,150 0 Q O 57,150 43,220 38,610 O 4 610 1 - O TOTAL, GENERAL FUND , 14 -2,380 54,770 -44 Personal Service Other Operating Exp 39,263,880 38,940,250 28,814,873 28, 658,358 156 515 14 Internal Service 8,601,513 8,746,386 6,480,065 5,690,863 5,951,235 5 995 549 4 , -263,929 38,676,321 -1k 789,202 124 -246,123 8 500 263 14 Capital Debt Servi , 381,380 5 , , , - ,471,194 4,402,7 68,307 24 27,970 967,57 0% 60,055 438,357 258 654 179 - 5, 9 ce Transfer , ,703 414 -7,804 1,077,460 1,025,153 796,226 619,497 176 729 224 552,25 454 TOTAL 930,430 1,100,672 1,100,572 1, 074,981 , -96,980 25 691 24 328,273 »144 , 262,562 1, 56,205,898 56,368,065 42,101,387 40,705,240 1 396 147 34 363,234 474 , , -380,244 55, 987,821 04 21 i t i 1r 4 i r . 1. 11 City of Clearwater UTILITY FUNDS Mid Year Revenues FY 1991-92 WATER AND SEWER FUND Adjustments Operating Revenues Increase $500,000 To record a budget increase of $ 500,000 in Water Revenue due to the unanticipated increased consumption and demand for water during the second half of fiscal year 1991/92. r+s GAS FUND Gas Fund Operating Revenues are 3 % above projections for the third quarter, imd approximately 20% above actual collections for the same period last year, No amendments are proposed at third quarter. r SOLID WASTE FUND Solid Waste Fund Operating Revenues are approximately as anticipated at third quarter, and approximately 1 % less than actual collections for the same period last year.' No amendments are proposed at third quarter, s«« STORMWATER UTILITY Stormwater Utility Revenues are approximately as anticipated at third quarter. No amendments are proposed at third quarter, t 22 I? 0 UTILITY FUND REVENUE REVIEW TNIRD QUARTER - October 1. 1991 - June 30. 1992 End of Amended prev Qtr Third Third Variance Budget Original Amended Quarter quarter Actual Amount % Ad justment Amount % Budget Budget Projection HATER AND SEWER FUND e 363 513 6% 500,000 12,9004000 -3k Operating Revenu ue 13,355,000 12,400.000 8,982,000 9,495,363 , 27 102 0% 0 14,020.000 -17% Water Reven ue 16,976,000 14,020,000 10,500,000 10,527,102 540 465 3% 500,000 26,920,000 -11% Sewer Reven e 000 331 30 26,420.000 19,482,000 20,022,465 , Total Operating Revenu , , 0 OOO 836 .4k Other operating 068,000 868, 836,000 609,500 587,541 606 576 -21,959 114,93fi -4k 25k 0 , 1,470,420 B% 361,000 1 1,470,420 461,67D , Other Revenue Other (Non-Revenue) , 850 889 474,600 1 260,600 552,580 291,980 112k 4% 0 000 500 1,474,60D 30,701,020 66k -8% Financing Sources Fund , 449,850 33 , 30,201,020 20,813,770 21,739,192 925,422 , tal Water and Sewer To , , 615 FUND Operating Revenue Other Operating Other Revenue Other (Non-Revenue) Financing Sources Total, Gas Fund SOLID WASTE FUND Operating Revenue Other Operating Other Revenue Other (Non-Revenue) Financing Sources Total, Sanitation Fund STORFMATER FUND Operating Revenue Other Revenue Total, Storimater Fund Total, Utility Fund 9,175,000 10,159,825 8,437,269 8,649,992 212,723 3k 159 -21% 65 0 i0,159,B25 llk 0 169,381 -24% 556,020 420,381 304,807 239,648 157 557 , - -32,670 -6k 0 810,081 lk 802,560 810,081 589,827 , O ... 0 393,89-, Ok O 393,890 393,890 177 9,331,903 784 470 11 D 9,446,797 114,B94 1% D 11,784,177 Sk , , 10,927, 11,165,000 10,961,000 8.206,000 8,212.732 6,732 179 -1 Dk -1k 0 10,g6I,000 0 123,610 -2k ' a4 118,500 123,610 93,480 92,301 297 147 . -7,258 -5k 0 762.525 9k 702,550 762,525 154,555 , 0 0 11,986,150 11,847,135 0 8.454.035 0 8,452,330 O -1,705 - 0% 0 0 0 11,847.135 - -lk 000 3,436,790 200 3 2,585,000 ` 2,543';272 -41,728 -o% 0 3,a3fi,790 O 0 7k D% , , O e 3,200,000 3,436,790 0 2,585,000 0 2,543,272 0 -41,728 -2k 0 3,436,790 7% 59,563,470 57,269,122 41,184,70 42,181,591 996,883 2% 500,000 57,769,122 -3k 23 i? i? , r: City of Clearwater UTILITY FUNDS Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 WATER AND SEWER FUND Public Works, Infrastructure Group: Sewers and Lift Stations The first quarter and mid year budget reviews included a budget increase of $37,350 in Personal Service codes for COLA and merit increases which were not included in the division's original budget; a budget decrease of $1,800 in Other Operating codes; a budget increase of $3,390 in Internal Service codes reflecting the transfer of a vehicle from Water Pollution Control; an increase of $1,600 in Capital codes for the replacement of a steam cleaner. No amendments are proposed at this time. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $40,540 more than the 1991192 Original Budget. ssit Public Works, Infrastructure Group: Water Distribution The first quarter and mid year budget reviews included a budget increase of $67,580 in Personal Service costs primarily for COLA, SAMP, and merit increases; a budget increase of $714,970 in Other Operating codes for additional inventory purchases of water from Pinellas County; a net decrease in Internal Service costs of $9,770; and budget decreases in Capital codes of $960 and Transfers of $57,539 closing a Capital Improvement Project. Adjustments: Other Operating Increase $ 371,000 The amendment reflects an increase in water inventory purchases due to the anticipated increase in water-domestic and lawn demand/consumption during the second half of FY 1991/92, and the related cost of purchasing needed water from Pinellas County to meet this demand. ` The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 1,085,281 more than the 1991192 Original Budget. K Public: Works, Infrastructure Group: Field and Support Services The mid year budget review included an increase in budgeted Personal Service costs of $18,920 for COLA and merit increases; and budget decreases of $12,240 in Other Operating codes, $3,500 in Internal Service cosies, $1,120 in Capital codes, and $2,520 in Debt Service codes. No amendments are proposed at this time. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 460 less than the 1991192 Original Budget. + r * 24 i i e 5 3 City of Clearwater UTILITY FUNDS Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 Public Works, Engineering Group: Water Pollution Control The first quarter and mid year review included a budget increase of $83,590 in Personal Service costs due to COLA and merit increases; a decrease of $268,840 in Other Operating codes primarily reflecting decreases in utility charges due to the backup generator system and contractual services as a result of going to cake sludge hauling; budget decreases of $3,390 in Internal Service codes and $ 1,080 in Capital codes; and a decrease of $2,450,621 in budget Transfers reflecting the deferment of the Marshall Street Interceptor project and the closing of other miscellaneous CIP projects. Adjustments: Other Operating Decrease $ 4,500 Capital Increase $ 4,500 The budget amendment reflects offsetting transfers to provide funds for the purchase of three (3) polypropylene cabinets for bulk storage of acid and corrosive materials for the laboratories at Marshall Street, Northeast and East facilities. The required use of these cabinets is mandated by and is in accordance with the Florida Department of FIRS Laboratory guidelines, OSHA, and NIOSH safety requirements, and has been recommended for purchase by the City's Loss Control Specialist in Risk Management. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 2,640,341 less than the 1991192 Original Budget. * * GAS UTILITY FUND The mid year budget review included a budget increase of $30,075 in Personal Service codes to reflect COLA, SAMP, and merit increases and other salary savings; a budget decrease in Other Operating codes of $73,829 related to gas inventory purchases, a budget increase of $12,892 in Internal Service codes; an increase of $13,500 in Capital for office furniture and equipment and the replacement of the old gas air conditioning unit; a decrease of $251,459 in Debt Service costs due to the refunding of the gas bond issue; and a budget increase in Transfers of $597,440 providing funds to the Capital Improvement fund for the construction of new mains and extensions. Adjustments: Other Operating Decrease $ 2,000 Internal Service Decrease $ 27,262 Capital Increase $ 29,262 The budget amendment reflects the transfer of funds from Other Operating and Internal Service codes to Capital to provide for the purchase of AUTOCAD work stations for the Gas Department as approved by the Commission on September 3. 1992. The budget amendment also includes a transfer of $10,000 from the internal service building and maintenance-variable code to the Capital code for furniture & equipment for the purchase of modular units which were originally scheduled to be built by the Building & Maintenance division, but which will now be purchased from outside vendors.- The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 328,619 more than the 1991192 Original Budget. rss i 25 City of Clearwater UTILITY FUNDS Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 SOLID WASTE FUND Public Works, Utilities Group: Solid Waste Administration The first quarter and mid year budget review included a budget increase of $5,500 for SAMP, COLA, and merit increases; and budget decreases of $350 in Other Operating and $12,850 in Internal Service codes. No amendments arc proposed at third quarter. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 7,700 less than the 1991192 Original Budget. * * M Public Works, Utilities Group: Solid Waste The mid year budget review included a budget increase of $11,512 for COLA and merit increases along with a n increase in part-time salaries for emergency and temporary hires to support the recycling program; a budget decrease of $237,800 in Other Operating codes primarily due to the County Dump fee and professional service; a budget increase of $48,290 supporting new Solid Waste vehicles, and budget decreases of $10,340 in Capital codes, $1,081 in Debt Service codes, and $5,725 in budget Transfers. Adjustments: Capital Increase $10,340 To record a budget increase of $10,340 in Capital to correct an error in the mid year budget review reducing the Capital budget for Solid Waste, and restoring the Capital budget codes to the original 1991192 budget request of $ 8,100 for FY 1991192. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 184,804 less than the 1991192 Original Budget. . • • STORAIWATER UTILITY FUND Public Works, Engineering Group, Watershed Management The mid year budget review included a budget decrease of $ 3,580 in Personal Service costs due to salary savings, budget decreases of $1,620 in Other Operating, $1,510 in Internal Service and $1,650 in Capital codes; and a budget increase of $8,000 in budget Transfers providing additional funding to support the Capital Improvement project for Stormwater Quality Improvements. Adjustments: Other Operating Decrease $ 3,604 Capital Increase $ 3,604 The budget amendment provides for the transfer of $3,604 from recognizing savings in professional services to Capital to provide partial funding for a new file server for the Environmental /Watershed Management group and Traffic Erigineering due to the limited capacity of the existing file server serving the Public Works Department, as presented to the Commission on September 17, 1992. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 360 less than the 1991192 Original budget. 26 99 S i r City of Clearwater ` UTILITY FUNDS Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 f . R t R • 1 • I Public Works, Infrastructure Group, Public Service The mid year budget review included a budget increase of $10,270 in Personal Service costs due to COLA-and merit increases and a budget decrease of $24,920 in Other Operating costs related costs of Operating supplies and materials. to the County dump fee and the 1 No amendments are proposed at third quarter. t The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 14,650 less than the Original 1991192 budget. (YRR , •t } I a .i 1+ r"i t f"4. . 1 , L'. :n 27 ;ti UTILITY FUND EXPENDITURE REVIEW n1INU QUARTER - October 1, 1991 - June 30. 1992 End of Prev Qtr Third Third Amended Original Amended Quarter Quarter Variance Budget Department budget Budget Projection Actual Amount k Adjustment Mount WATER A SEWER FUND INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP/sewers Lift Stations Personal Service 1.D88,170 1.125,520 855,000 856,417 -1,417 0% 0 1,125,520 3% Other Operating Exp 427,980 426,180 320,516 272,243 48,273 16% 0 426,180 0% Internal Service 215,980 219.370 168,000 173.128 -5,128 -3k 0 219.370 2% Capital 5,500 7,100 7,100 8.296 -1,196 -174 0 7,100 294 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - Transfer 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 TOTAL 1,737,630 1,778,170 1.350,616 1,310,084 40.532 3% 0 1,778.170 2% INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP/Water Distribution Personal Service 1,262,820 1,330.400 997,600 995,341 2.259 0% 0 1,330,400 5% Other Operating Exp 6,493,310 7,208,280 5.511,500 5,561,554 -50,054 -1% 371,00D 7.579.280 Ilk Internal Service 1,001,030 991,260 746,050 740,237 5,813 1% 0 991,260 -1% Capital 3,600 2,640 2,640 2,637 3 0% 0 2,640 -27% Debt Service 4,160 4,160 3,120 3,121 -1 0% 0 4.160 0% Transfer 1,944,220 1,886,681 1,650,665 1,646,702 3,963 0% 0 1,886,681 -3k TOTAL 10,709,140 11,423,421 8,911,575 8,949,592 -38,017 0% 371.000 11,794,421 10% INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP/Field and Support Services Personal Service 369,960 388,880 291,670 289,456 2,214 tic 0 388,880 58 Other Operating Exp 96,340 84,100 63.700 51.378 12,322 19% 0 84,100 -13% Internal Service 68,370 64,870 46,800 46,742 58 0% 0 64,870 -5% Capital 2,930 11810 1,810 1,802 8 Ok 0 1,810 -38% Debt Service 5,060 2,540 2,540 0 2,540 100% 0 2,540 -50% Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - TOTAL 542,660 542,200 406,520 389,378 17,142 4% 0 542,200 OTC ENGINEERING GROUP/WPC Personal Service 2,062,000 2,145,590 1,638,800 1,642.880 -4,080 0% 0 2,145,590 4% Other Operating Exp 3,399,580 3,130,740 2,353,880 2,001,809 352,071 15% -4,500 3,126,240 -8k Internal Service 871,350 867,960 650,121 648,204 1,917 0% 0 867,960 0% Capital 22,050 20,970 20,970 20,824 146 1% 4,500 25,470 16% Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - Transfer 5,628,450 3,177,829 2,704,000 2,703,505 495 Ot 0 3,177,829 -444 TOTAL 11,983,430 9.343,089 7,367,771 7,017.222 350,549 5% 0 9,343,089 '-22% Non-Departmental Personal Service 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - Other Operating Exp 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 - Internal Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Capital 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 „0 Debt Service 8,195,190 7.114,140 5,510.000 5,506,253 3,747 0% 0 7,114,140 -13% Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 - O 0 " TOTAL 8,195,190 7,114,140 5,510,000 5,506.253 3,747 0% 0 7,114,140 -13% 28 UTILITY FUND EXPEND ITURE REVIEW THIM QUART ER - Octobe r 1, 1941 - June 30, 1992 End of ??? Prev Qtr Third Third Budget Original Amended Quarter Quarter tual A variance Amount % Adj ustment Amount % Department Budget Budget Projection c GAS Personal Service 2,178,140 2,208,215 1,660,600 00 1,664,483 963 411 4 -3,883 137 95 0% 2% Q -2,000 2,208,215 5,650,491 1% -1% Other Operating Exp 5,726,320 5,652.491 4,507,1 605 02 468 , , 010 454 , 14,595 3% -27,262 610,440 -24 internal Service 624,810 750 27 637,7 250 41 , 30,000 , 29,026 974 3% 29.262 70,512 154% Capital Debt Service , 799,640 , 548,181 411,130 381,316 29,814 7k 0% 0 0 548,181 -31% 2,168,250 38% Transfer 1,570,810 2,168,250 089 1,920,000 435 997 8 1,918,745 543 859 8 1,255 137,892 2% 0 11,255,089 3% TOTAL 10,927,470 1 1,256, , , , , SOLID WASTE UTILITIES GROUP/Administration 910 137 143,410 106,890 104,714 2,176 24 0 143,410 4% Personal Service , 430 9 9,080 6,810 6,571 239 4% 0 3,080 -4% Other Operating Exp , 200 34 350 21 16,600 17,061 -461 -3% 0 21,350 -38% Internal Service , , 700 700 0 700 100% 0 700 0% Capital 700 0 0 0 0 - 0 D Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer 0 240 182 0 174,540 131,000 128,346 2,654 2% 0 174,540 TOTAL , UTILITIES GROUP/Solid haste 220 249 3 260,732 3 2.446,660 2,436,455 10,205 0% 0 3,260,732 0% Personal Service Operating Exp Other . , 5,040,700 , 4,802.900 3,490,740 3,404,239 86.501 2% 0 0 4,802,900 590 522 2 -5% 2% . Internal Service 2,474,300 2,522,590 1,889,640 1,912,865 2 -23,225 858 4 -1% 60% 10,340 , , 81100 % Capital 31100 620 112 -2,240 111,539 81100 105,260 3,24 102,537 , 2,723 3% 0 111.539 - Debt Service , 970 918 913,245 788,040 787,243 797 0% 0 913,245 -1% Transfer , 910 803 11 765 608 11 8,728,440 8,646,581 81,859 1% 10,340 11,619,106 -2% TOTAL , , , , STORMHATER FUND ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP/Watershed Management 230 650 154 400 116 105,925 10,475 9% p 154,650 -2% Personal Service 158, 980 34 980 , 33,360 , 28,922 10,718 18,204 63: -3,604 29,756 -15% Other Operating £xp , 870 9 8,360 6,430 3,627 ,803 44% 0 ,360 15% Service , 14 14 900 13,250 8,670 8,672 -2 0% 3,604 166,85 . I3% Capital , , 0 0 D 0 0 0 Debt Service 573,3B0 1 1,581,380 1,449,650 1.449.650 0 0% 0 1,581,380 1% Transfer TOTAL , 1,791,360 1,791,000 1,610,072 1,578,592 31,480 2%''+ 0 1,791,000 INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP/publi c Service/Storaater Utility 780 90 549 441 549 339 0% 0 735.290 lk Personal Service 725,020 850 427 735,2 930 402 , 304,960 , 275.504 29,456 10% 0 402,930 % 6 Other Operating Exp , 880 221 , 880 221 166,411 158,194 8,217 5% 0 221,880 % Internal Service , 200 19 , 19,200 11,600 11.628 -2B 0% 0 19,200 0% % capital , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Debt Service 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 Transfer 0 950 393 1 1,379,300 1,032,751 994,767 37,984 4% 0 1,379,300 -1% TOTAL , , TOTAL, UTILITY FUND 59,266,980 56,410,715 44,046,180 43.3BO,358 665.822 2% 381,340 56,792,055 -4% i s 29 City of Clearwater OTHER ENTERPRISE FUNDS Third Quarter Revenues FY 1991-92 Bridge Fund At Mid Year, revenues from Bridge tolls and the sale of tokens were below projections due to the closing of the bridge for repairs, and Operating Revenues were decreased by $49,130. Also, a decrease in Other Bridge revenues of $76,000 reflected the elimination of the subsidy from the Parking Fund to the Bridge Fund for fiscal year 1991192. At Third Quarter, actual revenues for Fiscal Year 1991192 are expected to be approximately as budgeted. No amendment is proposed at this time. rrr Marina Fund The Mid Year budget review reflected a decrease in Operating Revenues of $125,000 recognizing fuel sales below anticipated projections. Also, the mid year amendments included the use of $44,000 of prior year retained earnings to fund the Marine Sidewalk and Replacement project. At Third Quarter, fuel sales have recovered reflecting a slight increase in projected sales for the second half of the fiscal year. Adjustments: Operating Revenues Sales/Rentals Increase $ 30,000 *rr Pier 60 Fund The effects of the slow economy and recession were reflected in the'Mid Year budget review reducing Operating Revenues by a net of $33,000. At Third Quarter, the effects of the closing of the Pier for structural repairs from June 18 through July 7, and the continued slow activity at the Pier are reflected in the adjustments below. Atl<justments: Operating Revenues F.i Admissions Decrease $ 500 Sales/Rentals Decrease $ 25,000 Other Financial Sources Increase $ 8,000 Prior year surplus is appropriated to fund the deficit balance in the Pier Fund due` to the loss in Operating Revenues. rrr 4 Parking Fund The Mid Year budget review reflected a decrease in parking receipts of $129,840, a decrease of $52,260 in interest earnings, and an increase in Other Financing Sources due to the use of prior year retained earnings to offset the decline in parking receipts. At Third Quarter, actual revenues for Fiscal Year 1991192 are expected to be approximately as budgeted. No amendment is proposed at this time. rrs , 30 I:= EHTERPRISE FUNDS REVENUE REVIEW THIRD QUARTER - October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 End of Prev Qtr Third Third Original Amended Quarter Quarter Variance Amended Budget Budget PrOJeCtion Actual Amount -V Adjustment AmounBudget4 BRIDGE FUND Operating Revenues Tolls Sale of Tokens 1,370,000 255 000 1,300,000 275 870 922,880 929,552 6,672 14 0 1,300,000 -54 Other Revenues , , 2I7,730 199,411 -18,319 -84 0 275,870 8% Interest on Investments . 0 0 Miscellaneous 76,600 600 0 380 0 682 - O 500 -34 Other (Non-Revenue) 302 2 794 0 600 -994 Financing Sources 0 0 Total, BRIDGE I,701.600 1,576,470 0 1,140,990 0 1,129,885 -11 105 _14 0 0 , 0 1,576,470 -14 MARINE FUND Operating Revenues Sales Rentals 865,600 625 000 740,600 630 000 538,910 4 578,761 39,851 71t 30,000 770,600 -114 Other Revenues , 253,150 , 249,650 82,090 175 860 470,453 166 313 -11,637 -24 9 0 630000 , 14 Other (Non-Revenue) , , - ,547 -5% 0 249 650 249 ,650 -lk Financing Sources Total, MARINE 0 44,000 44,000 0 -44,000 .1 0 1,743,750 1,664,250 1,240,860 1,215,527 -25,333 -24 30,000 44,000 1,694,250 -34 PIER 60 Operating Revenues Admissions Sales/Rentals 142,000 170 500 130,000 86,880 86,459 -421 D4 -500 129 500 .9% Other Revenues , 13,500 149,500 I3 500 101,030 7 030 85,301 -15,729 -164 -25,000 , 124,500 -274 Other (Non-Revenue) , , 6,305 -725 -104 0 13,500 04 Financing Sources 0 0 ' Total, PIER 60 326,000 293,000 0 194,940 0 178,065 •• 0 -16 875 -99 8,000 8,000 , : -17,500 275,500 -154 PARKING FUND Operating Revenues Parking Receipts Other Revenues 1,774,970 1,648,520 1, 322 564 187,850 1,174,808 -13,042 -14 0 1 648 520 -74 Other Mon-Revenue) , 270,300, 39,750 76,084 36,334 914 0 , , 270.300 -164 Financing Sources Total, PARKING 362,680 414,071 51,391 0 -51,391 -10 O 2,460,210 2, 332,891 1,278,991 1, 250,892 -28,099 2% 0 414,071 144 2 ,332,891 -54 31 Clearwater, Florida OTHER ENTERPRISE FUNDS Third. Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 Bridge The first quarter and mid year reviews provided for a budget increase of $11,030 in Personal Service costs reflecting the effects of COLA and merit increases which were not included is the Division's original operating budge; a budget decrease of $28,360 in Other Operating and$630 in Internal Service codes; and a budget increase of $4,190 in Capital codes for the purchase of a change counting machine at the toll plaza. Adjustments Transfers Increase $ 111,086 To record a budget transfer to provide funds for the contract amendment to the David Volkert contract for the Clearwater Pass Bridge Construction, project 315-3481, as presented to the Commission on September 17, 1992. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 13,770 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. * * * Marina The mid year budget review included a budget increase of $19,650 in Personal Service costs for COLA and merit increases; a decrease of Other Operating codes of $104,850 due to a decrease in the costs of Marina fuel for resale; and an increase in budget-Transfers of $80,000 to provide funding to the Capital Improvement project for Marina Sidewalk Replacement. No amendments are proposed at this time. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 5,200 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. * * * Parking The first quarter and mid year reviews provided a budget increase of $5,627 in Personal Service costs for the effects of COLA and merit increases; a net decrease of $10,800 in Other Operating costs; a net increase in Capital of $8,300 primarily for the purchase of tow units to house the additional change machines to accommodate the parking meters on Clearwater Beach; and a decrease in budget Transfers of $189,966 eliminating the Parking subsidy to the Bridge fund and due to the closing of several Capital Improvement projects funded by the Parking Fund. No amendments are proposed at this time. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 187,639 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. **s 32 w Clearwater, Florida OTHER ENTERPRISE FUNDS Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 Beach Guards The mid year budget review included a budget increase of $62,540 in Personal Service costs providing for COLA ; and merit increases and the addition of four part time seasonal beach guards; and a decrease of $1,500 in Other , Operating, $120 in Internal Service codes, and $600 in Capital codes. No amendments are proposed at this time. ; The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 60,320 more than the Original 1991192 Budget. . sss . Pier 60 The mid year budget review included a budget increase of $5,020 in Personal Service codes for COLA and merit increases; and budget decreases in Other Operating codes of $24,180 and Internal Service codes of $250. Adjustments: Other Operating Decrease $ 14,000 +) The budget amendment reflects a decrease in inventory purchases partially due to the closing of the Pier for. repairs and partially due to the slow activity of the Pier operations. I The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 33,410 less than the Original 1991192 Budget. i • sss ?. ,• t ' t E I i.. . i 33 l Department BRIDGE Personal Service Other Operating Exp Internal Service capital Debt Service Transfer TOTAL WINE Personal Service Other Operating Exp Internal Service Capital Debt Service Transfer TOTAL PARKING Personal Service Other Operating Exp Internal Service Capital Debt Service Transfer TOTAL BEACII GUARDS Personal Service Other Operating Exp Internal Service Capital Debt Service Transfer TOTAL PIER 60 Personal Service Other Operating Exp Internal Service Capital Debt Service Transfer TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS EXPENDITURE REVIEW THIRD QUARTER - October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 End of Prev Qtr Third Third Original Amended Quarter Quarter Varia nce A Budget Budget Projection Actual Amount Adjustment Budget t Aa mnt % 323,720 329,880 334,750 301 520 247,660 249,563 -1,903 -1? 334,750 3% 9,590 , 8,960 220,000 6,720 188,536 6 269 31,464 14% b 301,520 -g% 1,310 5,560 4,440 , 4,442 451 -2 7% 0% 0 8,960 _7% 326,420 326,420 244,814 279,412 -34,598 _14% 0 0 5,560 306% 111,710 111,710 83,781 83,781 0 0% 111 086 326,420 0% 1,102,690 1,088,920 807,415 812,003 -4,588 -1% , 111 086 222,796 9 , 1,200,006 9% 434,510 454,160 339,280 341,200 -1,920 -IV 0 1,042,300 937,450 705,300 704,963 337 04 454,160 ? 28,420 28,420 21,314 22,487 -1 173 -6% 0 937,450 _IO% 18,800 18,800 18,000 16,567 , 1 433 84 0 28,420 Oak 81,390 81,390 61,043 63,862 , -2 819 _5% 0 18,800 0% 64,030 144,030 144,030 144,025 , 1 5 0% 0 81,390 0% 1,669,450 1,664,250 1,288,967 1,293,104 -4 137 0% 0 144,030 125% , 0 1,664,250 0% 243,520 1,277,270 249,147 1,266,470 185,230 947 180 186,954 93 -1,724 -1% 0 249,147 2% 21,140 21,140 , 15,853 0,838 16 015 16,342 2% 0 1,266,470 -1% 6,950 14,450 81500 , 8,344 -162 156 -1% 2% 0 21,140 O% 338,190 338,190 253,643 271,254 -17 611 -7% 0 I , 0 108% 246,000 56,034 56.034 54,443 , 1 591 3% 0 19 3388 ,190 0% 2,133,070 1,945,431 1 ,466,440 1,467,848 , 408 -1 0% 0 56,03 _77% , 0 1,945,431 1 -9% 221,750 284,290 187,500 186,547 953 0 41,190 39,690 29,880 28,387 1 493 5% 284.290 28% 30,690 30,570 23,080 22,845 , 235 it 0 39, 0 -4% 33,510 32,910 32,910 32.903 7 0% 0 57 30 ,570 O% 0 0 O 0 - O 32,910 -2% 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 327,140 387,460 273,370 270,682 21688 it 0 O - 0 387.460 18% 119,480 124,500 91,970 92,634 . -664 -1% 0 184,460 4,970 160,280 '4 720 120,000 109,253. " 10,747 9% -14,000 124,500 4% 146 280 -21% 0 , 0' 3,500 0 3,005 495 144 0 . 4,720 -5% 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 - - 0 0 - 0 0 0 308,910 289,500 215,470 0 204,892 0 10 578 - 5% 0 0 0 - 0 , -14,000 275,500 -11% 34 City of Clearwater INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Third Quarter Revenues FY 1991-92 Internal Service Funds are utilized to finance and account for services and commodities furnished by a designated department to other departments within the City or other governments on a cost reimbursement basis. The four Internal Service Funds of the City are: Administrative Services, General Services,. Garage and Self Insurance. ,1dmini, totive Services Fund This fund accounts for the Graphics, Purchasing and Computer Information functions within the City. At mid year, the budget amendment reflecting a net increase of $ 60,033 due to an increase in anticipated interest earnings, and the use of prior year retained earnings to offset increases dua to salary adjustments. Adi<jusbnents Other Financing Sources Increase $ 9,942 Increase in anticipated prior year retained earnings to fund expenditures for the purchase of a labeling machine for purchasing and training and software for the desktop publishing system in Graphics. * * * General Services Fund This fund accounts for the General Services administration, the Building Maintenance and Energy activities within the City. Mid year amendments reflected a $9,960 reduction due to a decrease in estimated custodial charges. Adjustments Other Financing Sources Increase $22,339 Increase in anticipate prior-year retained earnings to fund project transfers to reestablish project funding in the 800 MHZ radio network system. 0** Garuee Fund The Garage Fund accounts for the Fleet Maintenance and Radio Communications programs in the City. Mid year amendments reflected an increase of $123,030 representing an increase in anticipated interest earnings and a transfer of finds frons the Special Law Enforcement Trust Fund for the purchase of nine Police pursuit vehicles. Fund revenues are approximately as projected 'at third quarter. No amendments are proposed at this time. sss Self.IVL-;ptllnre Fund The Self Insurance Fund provides for risk retention, insurance reserves, insurance payments, as well as the safety and industrial nurse programs in the City. Mid year amendments reflected a net increase of $261,000 for employee life insurance which was not reflected in the original budget and a $25,000 decrease in interest earnings. Fund revenues are approximately as projected at third quarter. No amendments are proposed at this time. woo 35 • i i INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS REVENUE REVIEW THIRD QUARTER - October 1, 1991 - June 30. 1992 j End of Prev Qtr Third Third Aaended F Original Amended Quarter Quarter Variance Budget ." Budget Budget Protection Actual Amount % Ad3ustment Amount k Administrative Services 3,910,415 3,981,302 2,872,831 2,834,600 -38,231 -1k 9,942 3.991,244 28 General Services 2,475,480 2,465,520 1.846,690 1,873,022 26,332 1% 22,339, 2 487 859 1k ' i ` , , . . Fleet Maintenance 6,735,070 6,858,100 4,774,480 4,647,851 -126,619 'S -3% 0 6,858,100 2% Insurance 7,132,000 7,393,000 5,197,410 5,556,011 358;601 74 0 7,393,000 0. s • r: j •,I a S i a" 6 r itm' A 1 City of Clearwater INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 GENERAL SERVICES FUND Department of General Services General Division The mid year budget review included a budget increase in Personal Service codes of $7,664 for SAMP, COLA, and merit increases; a budget increase of $24,368 in Other Operating nodes as a result of an increase in the number of telephone lines; and budget decreases of $459 in Internal Service and $7,621 in budget Transfers. Adjustments Transfer Increase $ 46,760 The budget amendment reflects a budget transfer to project 181-9976, Energy Coalition, to close this project which is now complete. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 70,712 more than the Original 1991/92 Budget. ««s 0 Building and Maintenance The mid year budget review included a budget increase in Personal Service codes for SAMP C COLA, and merit increases an increase in overtime related to the Americans with Disabilities Act; and budget decreases in Other Operating codes of $1,179 and Internal Service codes of $5,256. No amendments are proposed at this time. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 31,577 more than the 1991192 Original Budget. ««« ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FUND Public Information Office: Graphic Communications The mid year budget review included a increase of $8,875 for COLA and merit increases; a budget decrease in Other Operating codes of $ 9,637, a budget increase of $572 in Internal Service codes; and a budget decrease of $17,060 in Debt Service due to the delay in the purchase of capital equipment. Adjustments Other Operating Increase $ 6,942 To record a budget increase for training and software for the desktop publishing system as approved by the Commission on 913192. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 10, 308 less than the 1991192 Original Budget. 37 i ¦ M i } i r f. i t} City of Clearwater INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 Computer Information Services The first quarter and mid year budget reviews included a net budget increase of $1,550 reflecting the effects of SAMP, COLA, and merit increases not included in the division's original budget, an increase in part time salaries the fund the temporary Training Specialist position, funding to replace the programmer position due to an employee retirement, and salary savings due to position vacancies; a $6,860 net increase in Other Operating codes to provide for the licensing of the equipment which performs file management on the Unisys A-4; a budget decrease of $1,680 in Internal Service codes and $2,410 in Debt Service codes; and a net budget increase of $26,060 in Capital codes for the purchase of a vehicle for CIS and the purchase of a DEC tape drive. No amendments are proposed at this time. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 28,380 more than the 1991192 Original Budget. • M i Purchasing The mid year budget review included budget amendments recording a budget increase in Personal Service costs by $4,798 for SAMP, COLA, and merit increases; and budget decreases of $960 in Other Operating codes and $2,731 in Internal Service codes. Adjustments Capital Increase $ 3,000 To record a budget increase for the purchase of a labeling machine requested due to the large number of mailings for community meetings, occupational license, etc (approximately 8,300 per month) requiring manual application of labels. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 4,107 more than the 1991192 Original Budget. • i w Utility Customer Support The mid year budget review included a budget increase of $58,650 in Personal Service codes for the effect} of SAMP, COLA, and merit increases which were not included in the division's original operating budget. No amendments are proposed at this time. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 58,650 more than the 1991192 Original Budget. .. • GARAGE FUND Department of General Services Fleet Maintenance The first quarter and mid year budget reviews included a budget increase of $47,541 in Personal Service costs for SAMP, COLA, and merit increase; budget decreases of $1,275 in Other Operating and $5,740 in Internal Service 3 u° City of Clearwater INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Third Quarter Expenditures FY 1991-92 codes; a budget increase of $8,700 in Debt Service to provide a special sinking fund for future debt service; and a net budget decrease of $ 111,628 in Transfers to correct an error in the original budget, provide funding for the purchase of Police pursuit vehicles, and return funding from the Capital Improvement program from closed projects. Adjustments Transfer Increase 5102,938 To record a budget transfer of Garage Fund revenues to Capital Improvement Project 315-4208, 800 MHZ radio, to reverse the mid year project amendment closing this project in error. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 40,536 more than the 1991/92 Original Budget. #s# Radio No amendments are proposed at this time. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is $ 534 less than the 1991/92 Original 'Budget. # W # SELF INSURANCE FUND Department of Administrative Service Risk Management The mid year budget review included budget increase in Personal Service codes of $4,940 to provide for COLA, SAMP, and merit increases and an increase in the cost of unemployment compensation; an increase of $4,590 in Other Operating for computer software; a budget decrease of $1,770 for Internal Service costs; and a budget increase of $216,870 in Transfers providing for a loan for the purchase of the Ross System finance hardware, the restoration of the Countryside Community Park Restroom, and the replacement of two police patrol vehicles. Adjustments Other Operating Decrease $ 582,294 To record a budget decrease in anticipated health insurance premiums to reflect the anticipated real cost for health insurance provision for fiscal year 1991/92. Transfers Decrease $ 216,870 To record a budget decrease in transfers to other funds of which 5 168,594 of this amount should be reflected in the financial statement as a loan to the General Fund for the Ross System finance hardware, and $ 48,276 as claim payments to other funds. The Third Quarter Amended Budget is 5 511,050 less than the 1991/92 Original Budget. M # i 39 i' 1' n ¦f INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS EXPENDITURE REV IEW THIRD QUARTER - October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 End of Prev Qtr Third Third Original Mended Quarter Quarter Variance Mended Department Budget Budget Projection Actual Mount % Adjustment Bud Aunt get % GENERAL SERVICES - ADMINISTRATION Personal Service Other Operating Exp 160,520 671 600 168,184 695 I25,970 I26,213 -243 0% 0 168,984 5% Internal Service , 7 940 ,968 7 481 503,939 5 487,066 16,873 3% 0 69 ,968 0 Capital , 0 , O ,610 5,410 200 4% 0 7,481 7,481 -6k Debt Service 0 D 0 0 O _ 0 0 ' 'Transfer TOTAL 0 -7,621 0 -7,621 0 -7,621 0 0 _ 0% 0 46,760 0 39 139 _ 840,060 864,012 627,898 611,068 16,830 3% 46,760 , 910,772 8% BUILDING AND MAINTENANCE Personal Service Other Operating Exp 899,010 527 780 937,022 5 699,210 702,769 -3,559 -14 0 937,022 4% Internal Service , 112,230 26,601 106,974 395,819 80 230 302,468 80 251 93,351 24% 0 526,601 0% Capital 700 700 , 700 , 0 "21 Ok 0 106,974 -5% Debt Service Transf 5,790 5,790 4,342 4,345 700 -3 100% 0% 0 0 700 Ok er 0 0 0 0 0 - 51790 0% TOTAL 1,545,510 1,577,087 1,180,301 1,089,833 90 468 84 0 0 - , 0 1,577,087 2% PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE r GRAPHIC COMMUNICATION Personal Service Other Operating Exp I43,760 113 160 152,635 102 114,100 113,729 971 1% 0 152,635 6% Internal Service , 12 840 ,381 14 554 75,810 58,504 17,306 23k 6,942 109,323 -3% Capital , 31500 , 3,500 10,771 3 500 10,748 3 406 2 3 O% 0 19,554 13% Debt Service Transfer 37,660 20,600 , 15,450 , 13,679 94 1 771 3% 11% 0 0 3,500 0% 0 0 0 0 , - 20,600 -45k TOTAL 310,920 293,670 220,231 200,066 0 20,165 9% 0 6,942 O 300,612 ' -3% DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES Personal Service Other Operating Exp 592,170 251 260 593,720 2 437,229 427,989 9,240 2% 0 593,120 0% Internal Service , 70 430 56,120 68 ;50 216,065 5 160,446 55,619 26% 0 256,120 2% Capital , 300 1 26,360 1,500 11 800 48,251 11 818 3,249 6% 0 68,750 H2% Debt Service Transfer 267,420 265,010 , 200,565 , 195,332 -18 5,233 0% 3% 26,310 86 814 0 0 0 O 0 - 265,010 -1k TOTAL <.} 1,181,580 1 ,209,950 917,159 843,836 73 323 8% 0 0 0 - , 1,209,950 24 PURCHASING Personal Service Other Operating Exp 169,630 275 090 174,428 2 129,120 130,038 0 174,428 Internal Service , 38,330 74,130 35 599 211,475 26 790 156,159 2 55,316 26% 0 274,130 0% O% Capital 0 , 0 , 4,482 2,308 9% 0 35,599 - 1k Debt Service 0 0 0 0 - 3,000 3,000 - Transfer ? 0 0 0 - 0 0 - TOTAL 483,050 4114,157 O 367,385 0 3I0,679 0 56,706 - 15% 0 3 000 O 8 - , 4 7,157 1% 40 t r F ? .s 3 1 ¦ Department UTILITY CUSTONER SUPPORT Personal Service Other Operating Exp Internal Service Capital .Debt Service Transfer TOTAL FLEET MAINTENANCE Personal Service Other Operating Exp Internal Service Capital Debt Service Transfer TOTAL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS Personal Service Other Operating Exp Internal Service Capital Debt Service Transfer TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS EXPENDITURE REVIEW TIIIRD QUARTER - October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 End of Prev Qtr Third Third Amended Original Amended Quarter Quarter Variance Budget Budget Budget Pro3ection Actual Amount k AdJustment Amount k 1,228,140 1,286,790 310,260 310,260 269,845 269,845 9,880 9,880 116,740 116,740 0 0 1,934,865 1,993,515 959,870 207,693 227,382 880 87,555 0 1,483,380 944,277 166,045 217,231 880 86,761 0 1,415,194 .** GARAGE FUND *** 15,593 24 41,648 20% 10,151 4% 0 0% 794 It 0 - 68,186 5% 1,500,680 1,548,221 1,154,380 1,160,203 2,742,990 2,141,715 2,057,242 1,829,863 129,110 123,370 92,530 89,194 9,000 9,000 91000 466 1,958,990 1,967,690 1,643,527 1,712,553 183,400 71,772 84,710 84,710 6,524,170 6,461,768 5,051,389 4,876,969 138,340 137,806 46,870 46,870 6,190 6,190 19,500 19,500 0 0 0 0 210,900 210,366 *** CENTRAL INSURANCE FUND *** RISK MANAGEMENT Personal Service Other Operating Exp Internal Service Capital Debt Service Transfer TOTAL TOTAL, ALL FUNDS iI 261;600 272,540 5,569,970 5,574,560 35,740 33,970 0 0 4,450 4,450 0 216,870 5,877,750 6,102,390 4,177 0% 227,379 Ilk 3,336 4% 8,534 95% -69,026 -4k 0 Ok 174,400 3% 0 1,286,790 5% 0 310,26D Ok 0 269,845 Ok 0 9,880 0% 0 116,740 Ok 0 0 - 0 1,993,515 3% 0 1,548,221 3% 0 2,741,715 0% 0 123,370 -4k 0 9,000 0% 0 1,967,690 Ok 102,938 174,710 -5k 102,938 6,564,706 1% 103,752 94,217 9,535 9% 35,152 22,704 12,448 35% 4,642 4,409 233 5% 4,300 4,283 17 0% 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 147,846 125,613 22,233 15% 196,989 4,177,432 26,804 0 3,337 216,870 4,621,432 177,557 3,388,590 19,044 0 3,336 227,955 3,816,494 0 137,806 0% 0 46,870 0% 0 6,190 Ok 0 19,500 Ok 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 210,366 0% 19,422 10k 0 272,540 24 788,842 19k -582,290 4,992,270 -10% 7,760 29% 0 33,970 -5k 0 - 0 0 - -1 0% 0 4,450 Ot -11,085 -5k -216,870 0 - 804,938 17% -799,160 5,303,230 -10.11 18,908,815 19,196,925 14,617,021 13,289,772 1,327,249 } 41 9% -639,520 18,557,405 -2k r. Clearwater, Florida CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Third Quarter Summary FY 1991-92 The amended 1991-92 Capital Improvement Program budget report is submitted for the City Commission's mid year review. The net proposed amendment is a budget decrease of $ 705,585. This review provides the opportunity to examine the status of all active projects and present formal amendments to the project budgets. Fiscally significant budget increases encompassed with this review follow below. The following Capital Improvement Budget increases have_not been previously approved by the Commission. Police Pursuit Vehicles: A budget increase of $ 200,000 of General Fund revenues is appropriated for the purchase of nine (9) additional marked cruisers for the Department's West District. City Hall Renditions: A budget increase of $ 20,000 of General Fund revenues is appropriated for the cost of design drawings of the proposed New City Hall. Marshall Street AWT Facility East AWT Facility Sludge Treatment Facility - Bond: Budget increases to these projects reflect the transfer of remaining bond revenue funds to the projects and additional receipts from Safety Harbor. The following Capital Improvement Budget increases have been previously approved by the Commission. Commission Project Budget Amount Approval Library Automation Upgrade $ 36,150 913192 Electronic Monitor and Control 36,638 12/19/91 ?1) 42 'f F t A Clearwater, Florida CAPITAL DIPROVEbIENT FUND Third Quarter Amendments FY 1991-92 1. Increase Amendments 1. 315-1118 Police Pursuit Vehicles To record a budget increase of $200,000 of General Fund revenues provided by savings in the Police Department operating budget for the purpose of establishing a project for the purchase of nine (9) additional marked cruisers for the Patrol Division's west district. 2. 315-2128 Countryside Boulevard To record a budget increase of Infrastructure Tax revenues to correct the project budget to the actual Infrastructure tax revenues included in the project. 3. .315-2139 Highland Avenue Widening To record a budget transfer of $60,000 from project 315-2255, Road Underdrain System, to provide funding for an anticipated property acquisition necessary for the completion of the Highland Avenue Widening project. 4. , 315-2496 Storm Drainage R & R To record a budget transfer of $ 340,000 from project 315-2256, Street Resurfacing, to provide funding for the estimated drainage portion of CIeveland Street Water/Sewer/Drainage and street resurfacing project. 5. 315-3243 Forest Run Park To record a budget transfer of $685.99 from 315-3239, Countryside High Renovations, to " close project 315-3243 which is now complete. 6. 315-3278 Sand Key Sailing Center To record a budget transfer of $44.05 from 315-3239, Countryside High Renovations, to close project 315-3278 which is now complete. 7. 315-3513 Library Automation Upgrade To record a budget increase of General Fund revenues to provide funding for conversion services and installation and training for the new Automated Library Management System. Approved by the Commission on 913192. 8. 315-4208 800 N= Radio Network To record a budget increase of $102,937 in Garage revenues to reestablish firnding which was eliminated at the mid year budget review in error. t' 9. 315-4415 City Hall Renditions To record a budget increase of $20,000 of General Fund revenues to establish a project s. to cover the cost of design drawings of the proposed New City Hall. 10. 3154752 Air Park Facilities To record a budget increase of $57,173 in grant revenues from the Florida Department of Transportation, representing matching funds received from the State. 43 ,9, j 1 Clearwater, Florida CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND Third Quarter Amendments FY 1991-92 1. Increase Amendments 11. 315-4792 Field Automation - Parks and Recreation To record a budget increase of $ 7,533 in lease purchase revenues to correct the project budget to the exact amount of the contracted lease purchase as approved by the Commission. 12. 3154796 Gas Computer Network To record a budget increase of $ 226 in lease purchase revenues to correct the project budget to the exact amount of the contracted lease purchase as approved by the Commission. 13. 343-6201 s{ 14. 315-6350 15. 343-6626 16. 343-6627 17. 345-6338 18. 345-6336 Northeast AWT Facility - Bond To record a budget increase of $ 156,356 of additional revenues from Other Municipalities, and $67,376 in Sewer Bond Issue revenues, for a net budget increase of $ 223,732, by transferring the remaining bond revenue funds and additional receipts from Safety Harbor to the project. Electronic Monitor and Control To record a budget increase of $ 36,638 in lease purchase revenues to correct the project budget to the exact amount of the contracted lease purchase as approved by the Commission on December 19, 1991. Marshall Street AWT Facility To record a budget increase of $ 238 of additional revenues from Other Municipalities, and $55,000 in Sewer Bond Issue revenues, for a net budget increase of $55,238, by transferring the remaining bond revenue funds and additional receipts from Safety Harbor to the project. East AWT Plant To record a budget increase of $ 3,797 of additional revenues from. Other Municipalities, and $60,000 in Sewer Bond Issue revenues, for a net budget increase of $63,797, by transferring the remaining bond revenue funds and additional receipts from Safety Harbor to the project. Sludge Treatment Facility - Bond To record a budget increase of $ 6,175 of additional revenues from Other Municipalities by transferring additional receipts from Safety Harbor to the project. Tarpon Springs Gas Extension To record a budget transfer of $ 110,000 from 345-6351, New Main Extension Service Lines, to provide additional funding to project 345-6336. 44 t, i Clearwater, Florida CAPITAL MIPROVENIENT FUND Third Quarter Amendments FY 1991-92 l F 1. Increase Amendments • 4 19. 345-6337 System Completion F To record a budget transfer of $ 40,000 from 345-6351, New Main Extension Service Lines, to provide additional funding to project 345-6337. 20. 345-6341 Gas Main Extensions To record a budget transfer of S 90,000 from 345-6351, New Main Extension Service ' Lines, to provide additional funding to project 345-6341. ' i 21. 315-6349 System R & R - Maintenance To record a budget transfer of $30,000 from 315-5342, System R & R, to provide additional funding to project 315-6349, System R & R - Maintenance. 22. '315-6703 System R & R To record, the following budget transfers to provide $40,000 for additional repair or } replacement of water mains, service lines, valves etc. and approximately $90,000 for the I replacement of the Reservoir I building. Fi Budget transfer from 315-6721, System R & R - Maintenance S 30,000 ` Budget transfer from 315-6722, QOD Line Relocation - Maintenance 100, 4 Net budget amendment $ 3L000 23. 315-6735 Brackish Water Supply Study To record a budget transfer of $ 86,395 from 315-6731, New Well Development, to provide funding to establish a project for Phases I & II of a six-phase Hydrogeological evaluation of the potential for development of a Brackish Groundwater supply in the Clearwater area. ` { F 7 45 i M Clearwater, Florida CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND " Third Quarter Amendments FY 1991-92 II. Decrease Amendments r 1. 315-2255 Road Underdrain System To record a budget transfer of $60,000 to project 315-2139, Highland Avenue Widening, to provide funding for an anticipated property acquisition necessary for the completion of the Highland Avenue Widening project. 2. 315-2256 Street Resurfacing To record a budget transfer of $ 340,000 to project 315-2496, Storm Drainage R & R, to provide funding for the estimated drainage portion of Cleveland Street Water/Sewer/Drainage and street resurfacing project. 3. 315-2328 Downtown Streetscape To record a budget decrease of $32,568 in Community Redevelopment Fund revenues to recognize the completion of this project, and the return of funds to the CRA Fund. 4. 315-3117 Betty Lane/State Street Park To record a budget decrease of $ 5,783 of Recreation Open Space fees to close project 315-3117, which is now complete. 5. 315-3226 Soule Road Park To record a budget decrease of $ 24,600 of Recreation Facility impact fees to close project 315-3226, which is scheduled to be funded with Infrastructure tax dollars at a later date. 6. 315-3227 Lake Chautauqua Park To record a budget decrease of $ 18,000 of Recreation Facility impact fees to close project 315-3227, which is scheduled to be funded with Infrastructure tax dollars at a later date. 7. 315-3239 Countryside High Renovations To record the following budget transfers to close projects 315-3243 and 315-3278 which are now complete: Budget transfer to 315-3243, Forest Run Park $ 685,99 Budget transfer to 3I5-3278, Sand Key Sailing Center 44.05 Net Budget Amendment $ 730.04 8. 315-3509 Countryside Library To record a budget decrease of $8,438 in General Fund revenues to recognize the completion of this project, and the return of funds to the General Fund. 9. 315-4413 Land Acquisition Phase U To record a budget decrease of excess Special Development Fund revenues of $984,000, returning funds to the Special Development Fund, making the funds available for other projects. 1 46 S t° s i. In Clearwater, Florida CAPITAL DIPROVEMENT FUND Third Quarter Amendments FY 1991-92 H. Decrease Amendments 10. 315-4755 General Ledger Package To record a budget decrease of $ 210,995 of lease purchase revenues which were budgeted for this project in prior fiscal years, and correct the project budget to the exact amount of the contracted purchase. 11. 315-4782 CRA Land Acquisition To record the following budget amendments to close project 315-4782, and return all funding to the Community Redevelopment Agency. i Budget increase recognizing the FY '91 year end adjustment to the uroject $ 502,893 i Budget decrease to close project to the CRA fund - $28,693 I Net Budget Decrease - $ 325,800 i 12. 315-6342 System R & R To record a budget transfer of $30,000 to 315-6349, System R & R-Maintenance, to provide additional funding to project 315-6349, System R & R - Maintenance, 13. 345-6351 New Main Extension Service Lines To record the following budget transfers to provide additional funds to the given projects: Budget transfer to 345-6336, Tarpon Springs Grs Extension $ 110,000 Budget transfer to 345-6337, System Completion 40,000 Budget transfer to 345-6341, Gas Main Extensions 90,000 Net Budget Transfer $,240 000 14. 315-6721 System R & R - Maintenance To record a budget transfer of $ 30,000 to project 315-6703, System R & R, to provide funding for additional repair or replacement of water mains, service lines, valves etc. and the replacement of the Reservoir 1 building, 15. 315-6722 Line Relocation - Maintenance To record a budget transfer of $ 100,000 to project 315-6703, System R & R, to provide funding for additional repair or replacement of water mains, service lines, valves etc, and the replacement of the Reservoir 1 building. in 47 e S ' ' Clearwater, Florida CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND Third Quarter Amendments FY 1991-92 H. Decrease Amendments M. 315-6731 New Well Development To record a budget transfer of $ 86,395 to 315-6735, Brackish Water Supply Study, to provide funding to establish a project for Phases I & II of a six-phase Hydrogeological P evaluation of the potential for development of a Brackish Groundwater supply in the Clearwater area. 1 M. Memorandum Amendments •. is 1. 31S 2141 Drew Street Widening i To record a budget decrease of $ 700,000 of Infrastructure Sales Tax in this project in exchange for an increase of $700,000 of Local Option Gas Tax, using the more restrictive funds to complete the Drew Street project, and malting the Infrastructure tax revenues available for future capital projects. 2. 315-2555 Intersections Improvements ;. To record a budget decrease of $ 600,000 of Infrastructure Sales Tax in this project in, exchange for an increase of $ 600,000 of Transportation Impact Fees, using the more F restrictive funds to complete the Intersection improvement project, and making the , Infrastructure tax revenues available for future capital projects. E . ] 7 ' a 48 6 ' 41 t ' i. n' 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER FROMM i STATUS SUl41ART THIRD QUARTERt October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 Actual X"aditurer ' Budget Amended Revised Project Open Available Amend Description 1011191 Prov Qtr Amendnente Budget To Date Rncumbr Balance Status* Ref PUBLIC SAFM Police Protection 1111 Mobile Digital Terminals 129,750 129,750 0 129,750 0 0 129,750 1115 Easrgency Operations Center 133,523 103,523 0 103,523 73,013 0 30,510 11I6 Police Parking Lot 600,000 538,197 0 538,197 538,197 0 0 C 1117 Police Equipment Fund 62,000 49,433 0 49,433 49,433 0 0 C 1118 Pollee Pursuit Vehicles 0 0 200,000 200,000 0 0 200,000 I-1 Sub-Total 925,273 820,903 200,000 1,020,903 660,643 .0 360,260 Fire Protection 1213 Fire Apparatus Refurbishing 102,750 102,750 0 102,750 58,159 0 44,591 1218 Firs Engine Replacement 455,250 455,250 0 455,250 0 0 455,250 1219 EMS Capital Equipment 590,353 590,353 0 590,353 441,552 0 148,801 Sub-Total 1,148,353 1,148,353 0 1,148,353 499,711 0 648,642 TRANSPORTATION Now Street Countraction 0 2103 Court/BighlandlHilleresc 150,000 59,962 0 59,962 59,962 0 0 C 2128 Countryside Blvd Widening 2,083,691 2,033,691 100,000 2,133,691 1,977,101 0 156,590 I-2 2131 Court Street Widening 900,000 900,000 0 900,000 900 0 899,100 2132 City Complex Intorconnector 184,000 184,000 0 184,000 0 0 184,000 2138 Landmark Drive 597,845 652,543 0 652,343 585,254 6,440 60,849 2139 Myrtle Avenue 146,484 135,571 0 135,571 70,673 64,898 0 C 2140 Highland Avenue Widening 663,713 780,713 60,000 840,713 589,784 182,326 68,603 I-3 2141 Drew Street Widening 2,000,000 500,000 0 500,000 133,818 362,906 3,276 2143 Hampton Road 0 604,300 0 604,300 0 0 604,300 Sub-Total 6,725,733 5,850,780 160,000 6,010,780 3,417,492 616,570 1,976,718 Major Street Maintenance 2255 Road Underdrain System 671,302 721,302 -60,000 661,302 389,854 218,231 53,217 II-1 2256 Street Resurfacing 3,952,292 3,852,292 -340,000 3,512,292 2,012,879 -45,871 1,545,284 II-2 2258 Paving Unpaved Streets 100,000 100,OOD 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 Sub-Total 4,723,594 4,673,594 -400,000 4,273,594 2,402,733 172,360 1,698,501 Sidewalks and Bike Trail i f 2328 Downtown Streetscape 375,123 375,123 -32,568 342,555 342,555 0 0 i C I1-3 2330 Sidewalk Construe-Can 383,899 383,899 0 383,899 253,792 63,089 67,018 2331 Sidewalk Conatr-City 99,240 50,295 0 50,295 45,546 0 4,749 2332 Sidewalk RLR City 318,580 318,580 0 318,580 166,688 0 151,892 2334 Bicycle Paths 150,000 150,000 0 150,040 2,337 107,000 40,663 Sub-Total 1,326,842 1,277,897 -32,568 1,245,329 810,918 170,089 264,322 } Storm Drainage 2403 Stormwatar Mgmt Master Plan 750,000 750,000 0 750,000 395,191 348,325 6,484 2404 Unspecified Storm Drainage 573,040 518,100 0 518,100 68,107 0 449,993 2412 Fire Station 148 Rat Wall 25,385 23,707 0 23,707 23,707 0 0 C 2413 Forest Wood Estates 82,663 0 82,663 82,663 0 0 C 2414 Jaffords Street. 48,200 0 48,200 37,971 0 10,229 2415 Highland/Linwood/Sandy Ln 52,287 0 52,287 52,287 0 0 C 2492 Stevenson Crook Stm Sys Upg 2,767,207 2,767,207 0 2,767,207 2,031,817 216,116 519,274 ; 2496 Storm Drainage RLR 927,112 977,112 340,000 1,317,112 894,491 9,867 412,754 I-4 2498 Misc Panding 121,901 121,901 0 121,901 8,599 0 113,302 Sub-Total 5,313,080 5,341,177 340,000 5,681,177 3,594,833 574,308 1,512,036 49 .1, 4 . N C17T OF CL AIWATER ' PROGRAM L STATUS SUMMARY TUIRD QUARTERS October 1, 1991 - Juno 30, 1992 Actual Expenditures ' Budget Amended Revised Project Open Available Amend Description 1011191 Prev Qtr Amendments Budget To Date Encurbr Balance status* Ref Intersections 2548 CompuCerized Signal System 1,432,300 1,432,300 0 1,432,300 604,811 0 827,489 2551 City-Kids Intersection Impr 261,778 261,778 0 261,778 126,392 0 135,386 2552 Signal. Renovation 186,148 186,148 0 186,148 102,795 8,400 74,953 2553 New Signal Installation 158,952 158,952 0 158,952 51,556 0 107,396 2555 Intersection Improvements 471,322 904,322 0 904,322 95,665 375,657 433,000 Sub-Total 2,510,500 2,943,500 0 21943,500 981,219 384,057 1,578,224 Parking 2612 Street Light Equipment 15,000 15,000 0 15,000 9,497 0 5,503 2629 McKay/Mariann¦ Parking Lots 71,678 12,359 0 12,359 12,359 0 0 C 2630 Parking Lot Resurfacing 343,199 243,199 0 243,199 0 0 243,199 2632 Parking Garage Structure Rp 50,000 50,000 0 50,000 4,000 0 46,000 2633 S. Gulfviaw Attendant Pkg 0 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 Sub-Total 479,877 420,558 0 420,558 .25,856 0 294,702 !ll.scnl,laaeoas . 2808 Public Svc Operations Compl 11393,305 1,393,305 0 1,393,305 1,266,234 0 127,071 2811 Spoil Island 25 Stabilizsti 107,000 96,929 D 96,929 96,929 0 0 C 2813 Christmas Light Raring 35,000 35,380 0 35,380 35,380 0 0 C 2814 Dunedin Pass Dredging 120,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 2815 6nvir/Habitat Restoration 50,000 50,000 0 50,000 10,352 0 39,648 2816 North Greenwood Business Ar 300,000 300,000 0 300,000 71,521 0 228,479 2817 Beach Trolley Replacements 35,391 35,391 0 35,391 15,391 0 0 C 2819 Office Modif i Ctrl Cutr Ex 33,492 33,492 0 33,492 28,430 0 5,062 Sub-Total 2,074,188 1,944,497 0 1,944,497 1,544,237 0 400,260 1. MURE Park Acquisition 3111 Parkland Acquisition 852,500 417,500 0 417,500 14,155 0 535,000 3117 Betty Ln/State St Park 164,000 164,000 -5,783 158,217 158,217 0 0 C 11-4 3119 Softball Cmpl.x Land,Purchas 200,000 200,000 0 200,000 0 -0 200,000 3121 Sall's Lake Park Property 190,000 188,112 0 188,112 188,112 0 0 C Sub-Total 1,406,500 969,612 -5,783 963,829 360,484 0 795,000 Park Developoent 3201 Pool Renovations 278,338 277,088 0 277,088 276,986 0 102 3226 Soule Road Park 24,600 24,600 -24,600 0 0 0 0 C 12-5 3227 Lake Chautauqua Park 18,000 18,000 -18,000 0 0 0 0 C 11-6 3228 Jack Russell Stadium 71,898 150,713 0 150,113 152,857 0 -2,144 3229 Tennis Ct/Pkg Lot Ref 117,433 112,433 0 112,433 53,532 0 58,901 3230 Playground Equip Repl/KU 126,530 126,530 0 126,530 111,868 0 14,662 3239 Countryside High Renovation 79,000 79,000 -729 78,271 77,094 0 1,177 11-7 3240 Downtown Park 230,000 230,000 0 230,000 229,761 0 239 3241 Martin Luther Kng Game Room 158,028 161,078 0 161,078 161,078 0 0 C 3243 Forest Run Park 235,925 248,925 686 249,611 249,611 0 0 C 1-5 3244 U.S,19 4/cr TwrJSoccer Field 66,000 25,540 0 25,540 25,540 D 0 C 3245 Clrutr Bch Shwrm L Restroom 104,776 104,776 0 104,776 86,507 0 18,269 3247 Sailing Ctr Pkg Lot 50,000 4,192 0 4,192 4,192 0 0 C 3248 Marymont Park 50,000 50,000 0 50,000 3,946 0 46,054 3249 Now Parking Lots 41,649 41,649 0 41,649 7,723 0 33,926 50 CITY OF CLEARWATER PROGRAM L STATUS SUMMARY THIRD QUARTERt October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 Actual Rape Budget Available Revised Project Open. Available Description 1011191 Balraco Amendments Budget To Date gncnabr Balance 3251 Morningside Rec Complex 70,000 89,200 0 89,200 88,116 0 1,084 3252 Mocc Lake Nature Park 100,000 169,460 0 169,460 117,760 41,167 10,533 3254 Nursery Div Equipment 49,000 49,000 0 49,000 26,746 0 22,254 3255 Nursery 4 Park Equipment 92 58,056 58,056 0 58,056 41,049 0 17,007 3256 Recreation Ponca Replacuent 22,551 22,551 0 22,551 20,537 0 2,014 3257 Picnic Shelter-Ross Norton 0 30,028 0 30,020 2,975 0 27,053 3258 Countryside Comm Park Bldg 0 30,000 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 3269 Light Replacement 247,863 247,863 0 247,863 164,725 0 83,138 3278 Sand Rey Sailing Center 473,704 478,152 43 478,195 478,195 0 0 C 3299 Carpenter Field 73,000 73,000 0 73,000 34,841 0 38,159 Sub-Total 21746,351 2,901,834 -42,600 2,859,234 2,415,639 41,167 402,428 I-6 Beautification 3310 Cleveland St Beautification 57,192 56,2;41 0 56,241 56,241 0 0 C 3316 Bayfront Park Renovations 170,000 178,925 0 178,925 8,913 0 170,012 3317 Beach Access Beautification 84,000 84,000 0 84,000 6,481 0 77,519 3318 Courtny Campbell Pkwy Beaut 200,000 150,000 0 150,000 140,352 0 9,648 3319 Clearwater Beach Imprv 30,000 30,000 0 30,000 446 0 29,553 Sub-Total 541,192 499,166 0 499,166 212,433 0 286,733 Marine Facilities 3413 Utilities Svcs Replacement 115,328 ,z 115,328 0 115,328 113,569 0 1,759 3429 Dock Replacement L Repair 53,740 53,740 0 53,740 52,382 0 1,358 3436 Waterway Maintenance 73,103 73,103 0 73,103 71,201 0 1,902 3443 Seminole St Btrmp Dredging 191,363 191,363 0 191,363 185,109 0 6,254 3462 Dunedin Pass Dredging 200,000 320,000 0 320,000 16,116 0 303,884 3463 Druid Rd Bridge at Allen 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 3466 Boat Slips Dredg-lal Ent 40,000 40,000 0 40,000 2,918 0 37,082 3468 Sand Key Bridge Replacement 960,463 1,085,321 0 1,085,321 560,489 514,495 10,337 3469 Sand Rey Bridge RLR '89 1,668,857 1,543,999 0 1,543,999 1,334,740 104,304 304,953 3470 Bridges, Docks 6 Seawalls 70,000 70,000 0 70,000 13,400 0 56,600 3471 Big Pier 60 RLR 89 221,628 165,033 0 165,033 115,941 49,092 0 C 3473 Marina Site Studies 73,086 73,086 0 73,086 17,134 0 55,952 3474 Rockaway Pier 288,378 157,623 0 157,623 157,623 0 0 C 3475 Reconstruct Fishing Piers 607,200 82,525 0 82,525 82,525 0 0 C 3477 Marina Roof Replacement 47,825 81,850 0 81,850 571rr 5 0 24,485 3478 Marina Parking Lot 68,452 63,719 0 63,719 63,719 0 0 C 3479 Clw Pass Bridge Monitoring 100,000 100,000 0 100,000 500 0 99,500 3480 Marina Sidewalk Replacement 270,066 350,066 0 350,066 18,600 0 331,466 3481 Clw Pass Bridge Construct 2,000,000 2,000,000 0 2,000,000 8,892 0 1,991,108 3482 New Pier 60 1,200,000 1,912,025 0 1,912,025 4,206 0 1,907,819 Sub Total 8,424,489 8,478,781 0 8,478,781 2,876,429 667,891 4,934,461 Libraries 3509 Countryside Library 1,505,191 1,518,466 -8,438 1,510,028 1,510,028 0 0 C I1-8 3510 Materials Collection-MLE 2,122,689 2,122,689 0 2,122,689 1,963,031 0 159,658 3511 Library Long Range Planning 10,000 7,700 0 7,700 7,700 0 0 C 3512 Library Telephone System 0 29,849 0 29,849 29,849 0 0 C 3513 Library Automation Upgrade 270,030 270,030, 36,150 306,180 0 0 306,180 1-7 Sub Total 3,908,110 3,948,734 27,712 3,976,446 3,510,608 0 465,838 51 CITY OF CLFl QATER FROCRAM i STATUS SUMMXRT 'LliM gllARTM% bctiober 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 Actual Expo Budget Available Revised Project Open Available Description 10/1/91 Balance Amendrent¦ Budget To Date Encuahr Balance General Public Buildings Garage 4208 800 MHZ Radio Nate 4,575,583 4,472,646 102,937 4,5759583 4,470,095 17,068 88,420 4210 Tie/Fuel Facility 486,167 486,167 0 486,167 3,500 0 482,667 4212 Motorized Equip -L/P 8,440,880 8,455,380 0 0,455,380 6,532,946 0 1,922,434 4213 Motorized Equip -Cash 1,763,464 1,868,325 0 1,868,325 1,467,483 13,345 387,497 4216 Computer Link Software 14,000 14,000 0 14,000 0 0 14,000 4218 Grand Ave Garage Project 3,848,468 3,848,468 0 3,846,468 39472,853 86,016 289,599 4220 Fuel Site Enhancement 51,968 51,968 0 51,968 16,746 0 35,222 Sub-Total 19,180,530 19,196,954 102,937 19,299,891 15,963,623 116,429 3,219,839 City Sall Annax , 4410 Electrical Power System 11,000 3,379 0 3,379 3,379 0 0 C 4412 Central Permitting 799000 70,751 0 70,751 70,751 0 0 C 4413 Land Acquisition Phase II 3,449,535 3,449,535 -984,000 2,465,535 1,479,966 0 985,569 4414 Maas Property Acquisition 1,925,000 1,926,710 0 1,926,710 1,926,710 0 0 C 4415 City Hall Renditions 0 0 20,000 20,000 0 0 20,000 Sub-Total 5,464,535 5,450,375 -964,000 4,486,375 3,480,806 0 1,005,569 Building Maintenance 4506 5-yr Energy Management Prog 108,900 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 4508 Air Conditioner Replacement 7,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 4509 Roof Replacements 547,825 513,800 0 513,800 399,221 0 114,579 4510 Air Cond Replacement-City H 224,939 224,939 0 224,939 91,973 0 132,966 4511 Carpet Replacement 90,000 B7,045 0 87,045 87,045 0 0 C 4512 Roof Repairs 252,807 252,807 0 252,807 237,249 0 15,558 tub-Total. 1,231,721 1,078,591 0 1,078,591 815,488 0 263,103 4705 Solar Hater Heacera 14,338 10,730 0 10,730 10,730 0 4748 Payroll/Paraonnel Software 114,400 114,429 0 114,429 114,429 0 4750 Communication Processors 45,200 0 0 0 0 0 4752 Air Park Facilities 754,000 754,000 52,173 $06,173 607,981 10,178 4755 General Lodger Package 240,995 664,140 -210,995 453,145 47,659 0 4760 Asbestos and Environment Su 64,969 61,549 0 61,549 61,549 0 4774 Aerial Photographs 35,000 25,604 0 25,604 25,604 0 4776 City Clark's Furniture 30,000 25,468 0 25,468 25,468 0 4781 Vint Street Resurfacing 26,860 24,810 0 24,810 24,810 0 4782 CRA Land Acquisition 325,800 325,800 -325,800 0 0 0 4786 Tape Drive 19,000 19,000 0 19,000 0 0 4787 Printer Central Counter 51,871 51,871 0 51,871 0 0 4789 Computer Equip P L D 33,290 33,290 0 33,290 12,871 0 4790 Duplicator/typesetter 159,580 159,580 0 159,580 119,100 0 4791 Tape Drive-CIS 19,000 0 0 0 0 0 4792 Field Auto P L R 29,600 29,600 7,533 37.133 37,133 0 4793 Office Network Fire 10,200 10,200 0 10,200 8,895 0 4794 File Server PIO 5,000 5,000 0 5,000 0 0 4796 Gas Computer Network 0 19,853 226 20,079 20,079 0 d Sub-Total 1,979,103 2,334,924 -476,863 1,858,061 1,116,308 10,178 52 0 C 0 C 0 C 188,014 405,486 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 19,000 51,871 20,419 40,480 0 C 0 C 1,305 5,000 0 C 73!,575 1-8 II-9 I-9 I-10 11-10 II-11 I-11 I-12 0 1, CITY OF CLBARVATKR PROGRAMS STATUS St1eMy TBIRD QUASTERr October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 Actual 8tpe Budget Available Revised Project Open Availabla Description 1011191 Balance AMMMdmnnts Budget To Data Rncumbr BaLnce 6101 Allen's Creek Iuprv 150,000 150,000 0 150,000 0 0 150,000 6102 Steven's Croak Imprv 1,600,000 1,600,000 0 1,600,000 2,500 15,505 1,581,995 6103 Stmxtr Quality Imprv/Prop 602,920 610,920 0 610,920 2,250 0 608,670 6104 Storm Drainage R L R 443,500 443,500 0 4432500 0 347,047 96,453 Sub-Total 2,796,420 2,804,420 0 2,804,420 4,750 362,552 2,437,118 Slater System 6703 System R L R 1,197,665 1,197,665 130,000 1,327,665 1,175,490 0 152,175 6704 Line Relocation 2,378,495 2,378,495 0 2,378,495 1,384,718 15,B84 981,891 6705 Motor Changeout Program 446,848 496,848 0 496,848 453,094 0 43,754 6706 System Expansion L,049,034 1,049,034 0 1,049,034 776,366 0 272,668 6707 Main Construction 12,835,190 12,876,181 0 12,876,181 6,546,572 947,329 5,382,280 6710 Reservoir 11 Nally 1,015,761 1,015,781 0 1,015,781 575,570 260,776 179,435 6714 Standby Generators 113,097 107,948 0 107,948 107,948 0 0 C 6719 Engineering Fa a-Watar Bond 604,000 607,052 0 607,052 305,914 0 301,138 6721 System R i R -Maintenance 540,000 495,149 -30,000 465,149 363,696 0 101,453 6722 Line Relocation-Maintenance 245,000 245,000 -100,000 145,000 3,615 0 141,385 6724 Wall Imp L Water Treatment 897,716 908,391 0 908,391 762,810 0 145,581 6725 Subacquaeous Main Replaceme 787,800 746,809 0 746,809 746,809 0 0 C 6727 Reverse Osmosis Pilot Study 65,000 1,701 0 1,701 1,701 0 0 C 6729 Engineering Fees Various 71,000 71,000 0 71,000 51,726 0 19,274 6730 Evaluation of Hater System 80,000 76,948 0 76,948 76,948 0 0 C 6731 Now Well Development 923,000 923,000 -86,395 836,605 0 0 836,605 6732 Elevated Storage Tank Rehab 550,000 550,000 0 550,400 36,043 388,995 124,962 6733 Mater Shop Vahicles 21,500 21,500 0 21,500 20,654 0 846 6735 Brackish Water Supply Study 0 0 86,395 86,395 0 0 86,395 6799 slater Systam Prelim Costa 30,000 19,325 0 19,325 19,325 0 0 C Sub-Tota1 23,851,126 23,767,827 0 23,787,827 13,404,999 1,612,984 8,769,844 Sever System 6201 Northeast AWT Facility - Bo 20,461,919 20,467,432 223,732 20,691,164 20,463,246 0 227,918 6210 Pump Station Monitor Contro 250,000 250,000 0 250,000 207,831 0 42,169 6254 HE AWT Plant 7,430,172 7,464,197 0 7,464,197 7,378,119 0 86,078 6261 £ Lake Chautauqua Pump Stat _ 32,772 5,286 0 5,296 5,286 0 0 C 6262 E Lake Chautauqua Intercept 40,000 3,139 0 3,139 3,139 ? 0 C 6292 Marshall St Anaerobic Diges 160,000 125,975 0 125,975 125,975 0 0 C 6294 Computer Reporting System 86,967 84,058 0 84,058 84,458 0 0 C 6624 Sanitary Sewer Interceptor 2,364,599 1,841,559 0 1,841,559 1,824,379 0 17,180 6625 Line Relocation 821,532 82L,532 ? 821,532 522,124 14,248 285,160 6626 Marshall St AWT Plant 19,118,253 19,358,208 55,238 19,413,446 19,269,424 4 144,022 6627 East ANT Plant 16,821,948 16,733,902 63,797 16,797,699 16,341,854 0 455,845 6628 Sand Ray Sub-acqueou¦ Inter 600,000 419 0 419 419 0 ? C 6629 Lift Station RLR 679,617 679,617 0 679,617 492,094 0 187,523 6630 Sanitary Sewer Ext 712,002 502,002 0 502,002 102,995 0 399,007 6631 WPC RLR 962,485 611,685 0 611,685 439,992 0 171,693 6632 Sanitary Sewer R&R 4,103,243 3,783,243 0 3,783,243 1,737,813 46,424 1,999,006 6633 S. Sanitary Sour Intercep R 21500,000 1,579,700 0 1,579,700 1,240,171 230,956 108,573 6634 Situ Utility Roloc Accomdtio 425,000 425,000 0 425,000 1,610 0 423,390 6635 Pk Shaving Generator Study 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 53 1-22 11-14 1I-i5 r". 11-16 r• I-23 4 1-13 I-15 1-16 CITY OF CLFARVATER PROGRAM i STATUS SUHHART THIRD QUARTERt October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 Actual Rxpa Budget Available Revised Project Open, Available Deacription 1011191 Bal nce Amendments Budget To Data Encumbr BaIance r? 6636 Water ConservacionlRousa 1,697,000 1,697,000 0 1,697,000 145,126 71,3B2 1,480,492 6637 Marshall St Interceptor 2,200,000 3,400,300 0 3,400,300 202,507 2,764,670 433,123 6638 Sludge Treatment Fac-Band 2,453,052 3,742,608 6,175 3,748,783 207,650 0 5,541,133 6640 Pump Station 042 341,360 312,226 0 312,226 312,226 0 0 6641 Northeast Engine Generator L,060,000 1,068,040 0 1,068,040 1,025,042 0 42,998 6642 Automatic Analycical System 49,716 49,716 0 49,716 49,716 0 0 6641 Marshall St. lntsrceptorlRe 2,400,000. 0 0 0 0 0 0 6644 pump Station 014 Restoratio 278,000 278,000 0 278,000 122,832 96,861 58,307 6645 Laboratory Upgrade 10D,000 100,000 0 100,000 0 0 100,000 6646 East Plant Outfall Coast 680,000 1,090,000 0 1,090,000 42,446 660,305 387,249 6699 Preliminary Costs - Bond Is 290,608 268,765 0 268,765 268,765 0 0 Sub-Total 89,145,245 86,743,609 348,942 87,092,551 72,616,839 3,884,846 10,590,866 Gas System 6336 Tarpon Springs Can Ext 1,625,819 1,696,886 110,000 1,806,886 1,766,393 25,742 14,751 6737 System Completion 662,146 591,079 40,000 631,079 599,821 23,250 8,008 6339 Additional Lines 652,223 978,949 0 978,949 699,806 0 279,143 6340 Line Relocation Capitalized 1,756,833 1,756,633 90,000 1,846,833 919,956 224,389 702,488 6341 Gas Hain Extensions 700,405 958,643 0 958,643 468,203 10,329 480,111 6342 System R G R 1,243,092 1,173,092 -30,000 1,143,092 852,674 24,318 256,100 6348 Line Relocation-Maintenance 133,250 133,250 0 133,250 79,428 0 93,822 6349 System R G R-Maintanance 364,721 364,721 30,000 394,721 368,251 0 26,470 6350 Electronic Monitor 4 Contro 100,000 100,000 36,638 136,638 125,235 0 11,403 63551 Now Hain Fact Svc Linen 1,499,937 2,237,453 -240,000 1,997,453 1,5841973 0 412,480 6352 Gas Meter Change Out 257,500 257,500 0 257,500 235,948 0 21,552 6353 CAB Bast Pumps 60,000 60,000 0 60,000 0 0 60,000 6354 Gas Marketing Plan 60,000 60,000 0 60,000 0 0 60,000 6355 Hydraulic Trucks 48,590 48,590 0 48,590 0 0 46,590 6356 liquid propane Can Svc 25,000 25,000 0 25,000 5,455 0 19,545 6357 Can Vehicles '92 40,000 4D,000 0 40,ODO 0 0 40,000 Sub-Total 9,229,516 10,461,996 36,638 10,518,634 7,676,143 308,028 2,534,463 Solid !Waste 6424 Mini Transfer Station 433,695 433,695 0 433,695 59,885 0 373,810 6426 Facility R L R 332,152 332,152 0 332,152 207,220 0 124,932 6+427 Residential Container Acq 1,093,996 1,093,996 0 1,093,996 979,032 0 114,964 6428 New Facility 1,054,000 1,054,000 0 1,054,000 829,039 0 224,961 6429 Commercial Container Acq 974,567 974,567 0 974,567 829,991 0 144,576 6433 Recycling program 845,358 845,358 0 845,358 737,924 0 107,434 6434 Computer Upgrade 47,000 47,000 0 47,000 18,554 +`.'1 0 28,446 6435 Tsf Station Fuel Tank Rpl 80,000 80,000 0 80,000 0 0 80,000 Sub-Totol 4,860,768 4,860,768 0 4,860,768 3,661,645 0 1,199,123 Hiscellxneons 6503 Utility Building Renovation 67,771 67,771 0 67,771 59,445 0 8,326 6509 Heating System Renovation 65,000 65,000 0 65,000 20,461 0 44,539 6510 Utilities Auxiliary Buildin 44,136 43,314 ? 43,314 43,314 0 0 6511 Computerized Cashiering Sys 42,412 42,675 0 42,675 42,675 0 0 6512 Telephone System Upgrade 30,100 20,267 0 20,267 20,267 0 0 Sub-Total 249,419 239,027 0 239,027 186,162 0 52,665 TOTAL ALL PROTECTS 200,242,465 198,197,877 -705,565 197,492,292 142,239,998 8,921,459 46,362,490 1. 54 1-17 C C C C 1-18 I-19 1-20 II-12 1-21 1-I4 11-13 r C C C + Clearwater, Florida SPECIAL PROGRAM FUND Third Quarter Amendments FY 1991-92 L Increase Amendments 1. 181-9129 Sign Amortization Program To record a budget increase of $ 50,040 in Undesignated Special Development funds to provide funding to establish a project to fund the Sign Amortization Program. 2. 181-9317 Police Education Fund To record a budget increase of $ 320 in Revenues from Other Municipalities and $ 19,576 in Police Education-pines, for a net amendment of $ 19,896 to match budgeted revenues with actual revenues received. 3. 181-9320 Victim Assistance Program To record a budget increase of $ 118 in Donations to match budgeted revenue with actual revenues received. 4. 181-9329 Investigative Recovery Costs To record a budget increase of $ 3,323 in Court Proceeds to snatch budgeted revenues with actual revenues received. 5. 181-9330 Florida Contraband Forfeiture To record a budget increase of $ 22, I80 in Court Proceeds to snatch budgeted revenues with r actual revenues received. 6. 181-9357 Preliminary Safety Belt Program To record a budget increase of $ 5,000 of Federal Highway Safety grant funding for testing concepts to be used in a mayor study to provide an automated warning to drivers found no using vehicle safety belts. 7. 181-9455 Public Services 192 To record a budget transfer of $ 15,000 from 181-9457, Infill Housing Development, to j support the Ervin's Youth Club as approved by the Commission on 7!2192. 8. 181-9456 Housing Rehabilitation To record a budget transfer of $ 14,000 from 181-9457, Infill Housing Development, and it, budget increase of $ 10,724 of program income, for a net budget amendment of $ 25,724 to support the City Housing Rehabilitation program as approvers by the Commission on 712192. 9. 18I-9547 North County Discrimination Supplement To record a budget increase of $ 7,500 in County funding to provide additional funding for contractor assistance with the increased case load. 10. 181-9598 Challenge Loan Guarantee Fund To record a budget transfer of $ 7,498 from project 181-9599, Infill Housing Development Program to cover additional costs associated with the Challenge program. 55 ,,, , Clearwater, Florida. SPECIAL PROGRAM FUND Third Quarter Amendments FY 1991-92 1. Increase Amendments 11. 181-9903 Frog Reissue Program To record a net budget increase of $ 2,354 representing an increase of 1,350 in General fund revenues returning prior year sales revenues from the "Frog" project, and a budget increase of $ 1,004 in Sales revenues, to establish a project for the purpose of reprinting and reissuing the revised "Frog" document. 12. 181-9910 Library Special Account To record a budget increase of $ 5,029 in Donations, for a net budget amendment of $ 6,323 to match budgeted revenues with actual revenues received. 13, 181-9918 PACT, Inc. # To record a budget increase of $ 1,883 in Donations to match budgeted revenue with actual i' revenues received. 14. 181-9941 Moccasin Lake Nature Park To record a budget increase of $ 3,631 in Sales revenues and $ 3,017 in Donations, for a net budget amendment of $ 6,648 to match budgeted revenues with actual revenues received. 15. 181-9950 IDB Fees To record a budget increase of $ 7,000 in Industrial Revenue Bonds to match budgeted revenue with actual revenues received. 16. 181-9960 Parks and Recreation Gift Giving Frogram To record a budget increase of $ 26,178 in Donations to match budgeted revenue with actual revenues received. 17. 181-9976 Energy Coalition To record a budget increase of $ 46,760 in General Service Fund revenues to fund the project deficit and close project 181-9976, which is now complete. 18. 181-9987 Countryside Recycling To record a budget increase of $ 400 in Donations to match budgeted revenues with actual revenues received. 19. 181-9993 Sailing Center Donations To record a budget increase of $ 424 in Donations to match budgeted ; revenues with actual revenues received. 20. 181-9994 1992 Summer Food Program To rocvrd a budget increase of $ 20,671 in grant revenues from the Florida Department of ! Education to match budgeted revenues with actual revenues received. 21. 181-9995 Water Conservation Devices To record a budget increase of $ 30,000 in Undesigaated Special Development Fund revenues to establish a project and fund the purchase of water conservation devices. 56 k ,ef f i r Clearwater, Florida SPECIAL PROGRAM FUND Third Quarter Amendments FY 1991-92, 1. Increase Amendments 22. 181-9996 Clearwater Film Commission To record a budget increase of 5 3,290 in Donations received during a fund raiser for the purpose of marketing the Clearwater Film Commission. 23. 181-9997 Maas Brother Property To record a budget increase of $ 19,500 of, eneral Fund revenues to establish a project for the purpose of providing funds for maintenau of the Maas Brothers building through March of 1993. U. Decrease Amendments 1. 18I-9457 Will Housing Development '92 To record a budget transfer of $ 15,000 to 181-9455, Public Services '92, to support the Ervin's - Youth Club, and $ 14,000 to 181-9456, Housing Rehab '92, to support City Wide Rehabilitation projects as approved by the Commission on 712192. 2. 181-9544 North County D&ximination 192 To record a budget decrease of $ 18,000 in grant funding to reduce budgeted revenues to the actual revenues anticipated to be received for fiscal year 1991/92. 3. 181-9599 Infill Housing Program To record a budget transfer of $ 7,498 to project 181-9598, Challenge Loan Guarantee Fund, to cover additional.costs associated with the Challenge program. 4. 181-9607 Downtown Electrical Repair To record a budget decrease of $ 9 to close project 1819607, which is now complete. t 57 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER SPECIAL PROGRAM STATUS SUMMARY THIRD QUARTER REVIEW: October 1, 199 1 - June 30, 1992 ' Actual Expenditures Boidget Revised Revised Project Open Available [ascription 10/1/91 Budget Amendments Budget To Date Encumbr Balance' Status' Amend PLANNING PROGRAMS 9126 Pinellas Planning Grant 12,000 12,000 0 12,000 12,000 0 0 C 9127 Land Development Asst Grant 76,804 76,804 0 76,804 76,804 0 0 C 9128 Countywide Consistency Grant 0 15,000 0 15,000 0 0 15,000 9129 Sign Amortization Program 0 0 50,000 50,000 0 0 50,000 I-1 SUBTOTAL 88,8D4 103,804 50,000 153,804 88,604 0 65,000 PERSONNEL PROGRAMS 9297 Minority Recruitment Program 14,758 14,758 0 14,758 14,379 0 379 SUBTOTAL 14,758 14,758 0 14,758 14,379 0 379 PUBLIC SAFETY PROGRAMS 9317 Police Education Fund 407,780 437,229 19,896 457,125 435,085 0 22,040 1-2 9320 Victim Assistance Program 80 80 II8 198 41 0 157 1-3 9324 Greenwood Gardens 33,700 33,311 0 33,311 33,311 0 0 C 9325 Citizens Police Academy 7,500 10,500 0 10,500 8,887 0 1,613 9329 Investigative Recovery Costs 18,000 21,111 3,323 24,434 16,236 0 8,198 1-4 9330 F1 Contraband Forfeiture 35,073 77,012 22,180 99,192 84,010 0 15,162 1-5 9331 Law Enforcement Trust 191 399,646 491,268 0 491,268 349,244 0 142,024 9332 Officer Friendly Program 18,950 22, Al 0 22,581 14,467 0 8,114 9333 Bicycle Jamboree 246 1,126 0 1,126 613 0 513 9350 Forfeiture Investigations 15,723 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 9351 Drug Elimination Grant 49,186 49,186 0 49,186 49,186 0 0 C 9352 Say No to Drugs Festival 2,124 2,124 0 2,124 2,124 0 0 C 9353 Consol Int/Intradiction 0 63,000 0 63,000 18,033 0 44,967 9354 Law Enforcmt Apprent Program 0 13,000 0 13,000 0 0 13,000 9356 Greenwood/Gardens Youth 0 2,389 0 2,389 631 0 1,758 ; 9357 Preliminary Safety Belt Prgrm 988,008 0 5,000 5,000 0 0 5,000 I-6 , SUBTOTAL 1,976,016 1,223,917 50,517 1,274,434 1,011,868 0 262,566 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9442 Public Facilities & Impr 190 111,000 111,000 0 1111000 87,001 0 23,999 9444 Housing Rehab 190 250,336 250,336 0 250,336 250,336 0 0 C 9445 Special Economic Dev 190 30,000 30,000 0 30,000 7,929 0 22,071 9446 Program Adm '90 80,000 80,000 0 80,000 80,000 0 0 C 9447 Public Facilities '91 172,249 194,622 0 194,622 194,622 0 0 C 9448 Public Services 191 103,50D 104,674 0 104,674 104,674 0 0 C 9449 Housing Rehab '91 377,000 377,000 0 377,00D 357,728 0 19,272 9450 Infill Housing '91 180,000 173,994 0 173,994 25,378 0 148,616 9451 Special Economic Deveipmnt 191 50,000 50,000 0 50,000 4,500 0 45,500 9452 Program Administration '91 80,000 60,000 0 80,000 59,647 0 i 20,353 9453 Infill Housing '90 233,185 233,165 0 233,185 21,129 0 212,056 9454 Public Fac 9 Improv 192 29,000 29,000 0 29,000 25,856 0 3,144 9455 Public Services 192 126,282 126,282 15,000 141,282 70,224 0 71,058 1-7 9456 Housing Rehab '92 315,688 127,138 24,724 151,862 32,778 0 119,084 1-8 it. 9457 Infill Housing Devel 192 344,000 284,000 -14,000 270,000 23,287 0 246,713 11-1 9458 Special Economic Dev 192 90,000 78,000 0 78,000 6,330 0 71,670 ` 9459 Program Adm 192 80;000 120,000 0 120,000 12B 0 119,872 9460 Contingencles 191 35,352 19,087 0 19,087 0 0 19,087 SUBTOTAL 2,702,622 2,623,89B 25,724 2,649,622 1,351,547 0 1,298,075 58 t 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER SPECIAL PROGRAM STATUS SUMMARY THIRD QUARTER REVIEW: October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 Description SOCIAL SERVICES 9518 H County Distrim Cade Enf Prgm 9529 Community Svc 81k Grant 86/87 9531 Comm Services Trust FD 188 9534 88 Comm SVC Block Grant- 9538 Affordable Housing Impact Fees 9539 '90 EEOC Charge Resolution 9540 HUD Fair Housing Assistance 90 9541 H. Cty Discrimination 191 9542.• EEOC Charge Resolution 191 9543 HUD Fair Housing Asst. '91 9544 H. Cty Discrimination 192 9545 EEOC Charge Resolution '92 9546 HUD Fair Housing Asst '92 9547 N. County Discrimination Suppl 9598 Challenge Loan Guarantee Fd 9599 Infill Housing Development Pgm SUBTOTAL TRAFFIC 9607 Downtown Electrical Repair 9649 Sign Fabrication Grant 9610 Overhead Signing Grant SUBTOTAL MARINE 9701 Clearwater Beach Nourishment 9704 Sembler Mitigation Project SUBTOTAL MISCELLANEOUS PROGRAMS 9903 Frog Reissue Program 9910 Library Special Account 9918 PACT, Inc, 9928 Nagano Sister City Program 9941 Moccasin Lake Nature Park 9950 IDB Fees 9962 Parks 8 Rec Gift Giving Pgm 9970 Tree Replacement Project 9976 Energy Coalition 87 9980 1987 Sumner Food Program 9985 Comm Info Referral Centers 9986 Park Thoughts 9987 Countryside Recycling 9988 Clearwater Convention Ctr Stdy 9989 Media Radios 9990 Pier 60 Architect Contrt 9991 1991 Summer Food program 9992 Frog Grant Year 2 9993 Sailing Center Donations 9994 1992 Sumner Food Program 9995 Water Conservation Devices 9996 Clearwater Film Commission 9997 Maas Brothers Property SUBTOTAL TOTAL ALL PROJECTS Budget Revised Revised 10/1/91 Budget Amendments Budget Actual Expenditure's project Open Available To Date £ncumbr Balance Status* Mend 536.059 536,059 0 535,059 536,059 0 0 C 2,042 2,451 0 2,451 2,451 0 '0 C 16,360 17,280 0 17,280 17,280 0 0 C 3,150 3,150 0 3,150 3,150 0 0 C 50,000 79,547 0 79,547 54,850 0 24,697 0 13,640 0 13,640 13,640 0 0 C 24,050 24,050 0 24,050 24,050 0 0 C 108,600 112,400 0 112,400 112,400 0 0 C 63,438 60,888 0 60,688 60,888 0 0 C 54,000 54,000 0 54,000 54,000 0 0 C 0 121,075 -18,000 103,075 3,248 0 99,827 I1-2 0 61,071 0 61,071 0 0 61,071 0 56,800 0 56,800 0 0 56,800 0 0 7,500 7,500 0 0 7,500 1-9 0 13,812 7,498 21,310 0 0 21,310 1-10 375,000 380,002 .7,498 372,504 3,495 0 369.009 11-3 1,222,699 1,536,225 -10,500 1,525,725 885,511 0 640,214 7,500 7,500 -9 7,491 7,491 0 0 11-4 0 9,750 0 9,750 8,300 0 1,450 0 6,462 0 6,462 365 0 6,097 7,500 23,712 -9 23.703 16,156 0 7,547 2,500 2,500 0 2,500 300 0 2,20D 200,000 273,108 0 273,108 0 0 273,108 202,500 275,608 0 275,608 300 0 275,308 0 0 2,354 2,354 0 0 2,354 1-11 65,113 58,489 51029 73,518 52,767 0 20.751 1-12 28,766 33,558 1,883 35,441 35,441 0 0 C 1-13 18,734 19,234 0 19,234 20.172 0 -938 . 27,184 29,760 6,648 36,408 22,598 0 13,810 1-14 38,131 38,131 7,000 45,131 26,829 0 18,302 I-15 79,110 92,555 26,178 118,733 90,312 0 28,421 1-16 61,167 63,927 0 63,927 38,138 0 25,789 325,653 325,663 46,760 372,423 372,423 0 0 C I-17 63,418 60,643 0 60,643 60,643 0 0 C 23,600 23.407 0 23,407 23,407 0 0 C 1.885 1,885 0 11885 2,007 0 -122 933 933 400 1.333 0 0 1,333 I-18 50,000 24,400 0 24,400 24,400 0 0 C 7,662 7,662 0 7,662 1,842 0 5,820 1,500 1,500 0 1,500 11500 0 0 C 19,566 1B,887 0 1B,887 18,887 0 0 C 30,000 30,000 0 30,000 - 14,877 0 15,123 0 2,766 424 3,19D 3,051 0 139 1-19 0 0 20,671 20.671 3,099 0 17.572 1-20 0 0 30,000 30,000 22,993 0 7,007 I-21 0 0 3,290 3,290 2,346 0 944 I-22 0 0 13,500 13,500 0 0 13,500 I-23 842,432 B43,400 164,137 994,037 837,732 0 156,305 6,069.323 ......... 6.645.322 ......... 279.869 .».?.?. 6,925.191 4.206.297 0 2,705,394 ?„ 59 0 , n SPECIAL RHVXM TUNAS Third Quarters October 1, 1991 - June 30 ,1992 SPECIAL DEPIr3MM" FUND Hid Year Third Quarter Original Amended Amended Budget Budget Budget 1991/92 1991/92 1991192 Axeadmrats Revenuest ------------- - ------------ - ------------ - ------------ Ad Valorem Taxes 1,502,785 .1,502,785 1,487,285 -15,500 Rental Fans 42,000 42,000 42,000 0 Rentals-Commercial Prop 0 0 86,600 86,600 Development Impact Fees 100;000 704,300 650,000 -54,300 Drainage Impact Fees 5,000 5,000 18,700 13,700 Interest Earninge 400,000 400,000 400,OOD 0 Open Space page 150,000 150,000 160,000 10,000 Recreation Facility Fees 20,000 20,000 15,000 -5,000 Recreation Land Feu 20,000 50,000 50,000 0 Tranepartation Impact 500,000 500,000 350,000 -150,000 Infrastructure Tax 5,100,000 5,100,000 5,000,000 -100,000 Local Option Gas Tax 280,000 650,000 650,000 0 Prior Year Working Capital 337,000 0 0 0 ----------- 0 8,456,785 ----------- 9,124,085 ----------- 8,909,585 ----------- -214,500 Expenditures$ Transfer to CIP 8,130,285 5,193,819 4,289,819 -904,000 Payment to Center , Foundation 0 250,000 250,000 0 Debt Service - Vogel L Coopers Paint 326,500 326,500 326,500 0 ----------- 8,456,785 ----------- 5,770,319 ----------- 4,866,319 ----------- -904,000 SPECIAL PROGRAM FUND Revenues: Pines L Forfeits 0 180,658 225,737 45,079 Grant Proceeds 0 319,301 349,463 30,162 Intergovernmental: CDBG Grant 773,000 773,ODO 773,000 0 Program Income 80,000 0 0 0 Hiecellansous 0 61,513 204,531 143,018 Interest Earnings 50,000 144,527 144,527 0 Operating Transfers 0 0 61,610 61,610 Prior Year Working Cap , 97,000 ----------- 97,000 ----------- 97,000 ----------- 0 -- - - 1,000,000 1,575,999 1,855,868 --- ---- 279,869 Expenditures: ' Planning Programs 0 15,000 65,000 50,000 Public Safety Programs 0 235,909 286,426 50,517 Community Develop Prog 1,000,000 921,276 947,000 25,724 ! Social Service Programs 0 313,526 303,026 -10,500 Traffic 0 16,212 16,203 -9 Marine 0 73,108 73,108 0 Miscellaneous 0 ----------- 2,766 ----------- 166,903 164,137 1,000,000 1,577,797 ----------- 1,857,666 ----------- 279,869 fi(l t ik j City of Clearwater, Florida Administrative Change Order Third Quarter Review FY 1991192 In accordance with City of Clearwater Code Section 43.30,(8), the City Manager may approve and execute change orders without City Commission approval within certain limitations. The following change order have been administratively approved since the last report to the Commission based on the code specified criteria; 1. Increases do not exceed $10,000 over Commission approved amount on a cumulative basis. 2. Change does not change the scope of a project. 3. Price increases do not require additional appropriation to the project,. 4. Contract price decreases may be approved without limitation. 5. The time for completion may not be extended by more than thirty' (30) days, in any one change or cumulatively for the same project. swasr 612192 Administrative Change Order No. 1 and Final - Marshall Street South Interceptor Phase III (92-11). This change order adjusts the contract quantities to those amounts actually used in the construction of the project. Insituform Southeast, Inc. -$ 166.40 6/3/92 Administrative Change Order No. 1 - Clearwater Pass Bridge Monitoring Program. This change order allows for an additional bay bottom measurement and evaluation with no adjustment to the agreement amount. Kissinger, Campo and Associate - 0 - 6111192 Administrative Change Order No. 1 - Moccasin Lake Nature Park Classroom Building (92-10). This change order provides for a concrete slab around east end of build, additional electrical work and the installation of plywood over the exterior porches. None of the work was included in the original plans by the architect. Oakhurst Construction Company, Inc. + $ 3,328.00 6122192 Administrative Change Order No. 1 - Main Library Roof (Purchase Order No. 3971-92). This change order covers enhancements which could only be seen after beginning the repair of the existing roof structure. J & R Co-Op Construction, Inc. + $ 1,200.00 7/6192 Administrative Change Order No. 1 - Modification of South Beach Pump Station No. 14. The change order covers the replacement of additional valves at Pump Station 14 instead of reusing as originally planned. Kimmins Contracting Corp. + $ 4,980.10 7/8/92 Administrative Change Order No. 1 - Countryside Community Park Restroom Building Renovations (92-17). This change order provided the labor for the demolition and removal of the block walls in the mens' restroom; removal of debris to appropriate dump; and, reinstall the block walls according to original specifications for the building. Oakhurst Construction Co., Inc. + $ 4,335.65 61 0, i I A ii f City of Clearwater, Florida Administrative Change Order Third Quarter Review FY 1991/92 718/92 Administrative Change Order No. 1 and Final - Magnolia Dr.-Druid Road to Clearwater Harbor Drainage Replacement (91-24). MTM Contractors, Inc. + $ 19.50 7/29/92 Administrative Change Order No. 2 and Final - Structural Repairs to Sand Key Bridge (Bridge No. 155508) (92-4). There was an oversight of an under= for actual pile length driven in change order }/1. When the fu?al spreadsheet for payment was run the underrun became evident, and this change order corrects the oversight. Misener Marine Constr., Inc. -$215.00 8/20192 Administrative Change Order No. 2 - Moccasin Lake Nature Park Classroom Building (92-10). None of the work in Change Order No. 2 was included in the original plans by the architect. The need for these changes has been discovered since the project construction. If this work had been included in the original contract, it would have cost approximately the same as proposed now. Oakhurst Construction Company, Inc. +$2,105.00 911192 Administrative Change Order No. 1 - Memorial Civic Center Wall Repair and Morningside Recreation Center Wall Replacement (92-23). None of the work which is proposed in Change Order No. 1 was included in the original plans by the structural engineer. The need of these changes has been discovered since the project construction. If this work had been included in the original contract, it would have cost approximately the same as proposed now. MPJ Miller Construction, Inc. +$1,500.00 1 SS .t j i 62 r r`. i. 4 ? 4 f-' i ' j ? . t , 1. y t t t 9 1 4 i i t) ) 1 i• CITY OF CLEARWATER SPECIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST FUNDS (Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act Funds, F5 932.704) 3rd Quarter Budget Revised Actual Available Balances Budget Admendment Budget To Date Balance ----------- ---------- ---------- ----------- --------- ---------- Beginning Balance Available at October 1,1991 258,987.34 October 1, 1991 - June 30, 1992 Revenues - Net of Administrative Expenses 95,573.88 Expenditures (207,561.03) ------------ Available Balance at June 30, 1992 147,000.19 Appropriation: Expenditures approved and completed Computer software for CAOTAP & False Alarm systems Vehicle computer stand installation Radar units Five shotguns for Vice and Intelligence Two mountain bicycles for Patrol Division Twenty laptop computer vehicle adapters K^9 protection body suit Ten work stations for Records Unit Hostage negotiator telephone system citizen Police Academies Mobile office for Forfeiture Unit LaserJet printer for Records Division Photo ID system for Records Division Furniture for Patrol Division File server upgrade for Police micro computer network Laptop computer d software for Administrative support German Shepherd for K-9 Unit Funding Greenwood/Gardens Youth Program Thirty five expandable batons for Investigations Division Construction of conference coon Supervisory Training course Video camera for surveillance Three pre-leased vehicles Management Training course Forfeiture Unit Support Equipment Specialized Patrol Equipment sub-total 3rd Quarter Appropriation Amendment: supervisory Personnel Law Training Course Network work station for Deputy Chief Exchange of six undercover vehichles Total Unspent Appropriation Balance PROJECTED BALANCE at September 30, 1992 63 147,000.19 205,704.42 205,704.42 205,704.42 0.00 36,000.00 35,000.00 35,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 14,000.00 14,000.00 6,425.00 7,575.00 1,491.50 1,491.50 1,491.50 811.50 811.50 811.50 0.00 1,580.00 (2.00) 1,578.00 1,578.00 0.00 1,007.93 1,007.93 1,007.93 0.00 7,674.50 7,674.50 7,674.50 0.00 4,790.00 4,790.00 4,790.00 60000.00 6,000.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 7,500.00 436.22 7,935.22 7,936.22 0.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 21400.00 3,395.00 3,395.00 3,395.00 5,012.00 5,012.00 5,012.00 7,000.00 (350.00) 61650.00 5,650.00 6,245.00 61245.00 6,245.00 2,846.00 13.69 2,859.89 2,859.69 0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 0.00 1,216.25 1,216.25 1,216.25 6,400.00 135.41 6,535.41 6,535.41 0.00 11000.00 18000.00 11000.00 0.00 4,719.00 4,719.00 1,119.00 3,500.OD 33,000.00 33,000.00 33,000.00 3,000.00 (429.87) 2,570.13 2,570.13 2,090.00 2,090.00 2,090.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 401,983.10 (196.35)401,686.75 283,651.67 116,034.88 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- 2,437.20 21437.20 2,437.20 2,730.00 2,730.OD 2,730.00 4,200.00 4,200.00 4,200.00 9,367.20 9,357.20 0.00 9,367.20 ---------- ---------- ---------- -- ------- 401,863.10 9,170.85 411,053.95 283,651.87 127,402.OB 19,598.11 r . i ORDINANCE NO. 5278-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1992; TO REFLECT INCREASES AND DECREASES IN REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE GENERAL FUND, SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT FUND, SPECIAL PROGRAM FUND, UTILITY FUND, BRIDGE FUND, MARINA FUND, PIER 60 FUND, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FUND, GENERAL SERVICES FUND, GARAGE FUND, AND CENTRAL INSURANCE FUND, AS PROVIDED HEREIN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1992, for operating purposes, including debt service, was adopted by Ordinance No. 5116-91; and WHEREAS, at the Third Quarter Review it was found that an increase $279,869 is necessary in the Special Program Fund; an increase of $381,340 is necessary in the Utility Funds; anm increase of $111,086 is necessary in the Bridge Fund; an increase of $9,942 is necessary in the Administrative Service Fund; an increase of $46,760 is necessary in the General Services Fund; and an increase of $102,938 is necessary in the Garage Fund; and that sufficient revenues are available to cover these additional expenses; and WHEREAS, a summary of the amended revenues and expenditures is attached hereto and marked Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, Section 41.08 of the Clearwater Code authorizes the City Commission to provide for the expenditure of money for proper purposes not contained in the budget as originally adopted due to unforeseen circumstances or emergencies arising during the fiscal year; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA; Section 1. Section I of Ordinance No. 5116-91 is amended to read: Pursuant to the mended City Manager's Annual Report and Estimate for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1991, and ending September 30, 1992, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, the City Commission hereby adopts an amended budget for the operation of the City, a copy of which is attached hereto' as Exhibit A. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING Attest: Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form and correctness: Cynthia E. Goudeau, City Clerk M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney 64 ¦ EXHIBIT A 1991-92 Budget Revenue . First Third Quarter Kid Year Quarter Origi.al Amended Anandod Amended i Budget Budget Budget Budget 1991192 1991/92 1991192 1991/92 Difference General Fund: Property Taxes 19,096,733 19,096,733 19,096,733 19,096,733 0 Franchise Fee¦ 4,955,700 4,955,700 4,888,365 4,808,365 -80,000 Utility Taxes 9,364,325 9,622,418 9,732,470 9,732,470 0 Licenses & Permits 2,082,000 2,082,000 2,021,895 2,056,895 35,000 Pines, Forfeitures or Penalties 1,338,200 1,025,700 1,309,780 1,497,460 187,680 Intergovernmental Revenue 9,983,320 10,182,283 9,967,570 9,944,730 -22,840 Charges for Services 887,690 887,690 946,936 '1,032,889 85,953 Use and Sale of City Property and Honey 1,050,640 1,199,250 1,190,270 1,189,520 -750 Miscellaneous Revenues 132,500 132,500 136,587 136,587 0 Interfund Administration Service Charge 2,595,230 2,595,230 2,595,230 2,595,230 0 Interfund Other Service Charge 1,850,980 1,868,000 1,868,000 1,893,000 25,000 Interfund Transfer 2,868,580 2,948,770 2,948,770 2,948,770 0 Transfer to Surplus 0 -162,161 -334,541 -944,828 -610,267 Total, General Fund 56,205,898 56,434,113 56,368,065 55,987,821 -380,244 Special Revenue Fundet Special Developmont 8,456,785 8,706,785 • 9,341,085 9,126,585 -214,500 Special Program Fund 1,000,000 1,572,202 1,575,999 1,855,868 279,869 ?I Utility Fund 59,563,470 59,563,470 57,269,122 57,769,122 500 000 Bridge Fund 1,701,600 1,701,600 1,576,470 1,576,470 , 0 Marina Fund 1,743,750 1,743,750 1,664,250 1,694,250 30 000 Parking Fund 2,460,210 2,460,210 2,332,891 2,332,891 , 0 Pier 60 326,000 326,000 293,000 275,500 4 -17,500 I Administrative Services 3,910,415 3,921,269 3,981,302 3,991,244 9 942 General Services 2,475,480 2,475,480 2,465,520 2,487,859 , 22 339 Garage Fund 6,735,070 6,735,070 6,858,100 6,858,100 , 0 Insurance 7,132,000 7,132,000 7,393,000 7,393,000 0 Total, All Funds 151,710,678 152,771,949 151.118,804 151,348,710 229,906 65 A 0001 : EMUIT A moatizued) 1990-91 Budget Expenditures First Third Original Aaendad Amended Amended Budget Budget Budget Budget 1991192 1991/92 1991/92 1991/92 Difference General Fundt City Commission 126,525 126,525 126,525 126,525 p . Administration 780,340 769,115 775,801 768,641 , -7,160 Public Information office 182,390 163,699 163,699 163,699 0 Economic Devalopment/CRA 99,080 99,080 99,080 97,490 -1,590 Legal 658,488 657,988 670,840 646,660 -24,180 City Clerk 550,450 547,450 553,288 543,708 -9,580 Management and Budget 348,350 348,350 356,490 356,490 0 Finance 1,285,320 1,284,870 1,290,380 1,262,380 -28,000 Human Rasouress 721,380 787,080 756,515 750,532 -5 983 Hon-Departmental 3,881,945 4,018,838 3,368,088 3,407,397 1 39,309 Emsrgsncy Management 5,380 5,380 5,240 3,790 -1,450 Police 17,561,270 17,591,472 18006,319 17,887,089 -119 230 Firs 8,989,630 8,983,630 9,170,720 9,109,880 , -60,840 Public Works - Enginaering 2,1I01340 2,109,840 2,118,660 2,118,660 ) 0 Public Works - Airpark 55,000 55,000 54,260 33,510 -20 750 Public Works - Environmental 214,510 214,510 213,050 213,050 , p Public Works - Transportation 21637,570 2,637,265 2,463,432 2,334,932 -128 500 Public Works - Infrastructure 1,794,480 1,794,480 11673,140 1,673,140 , 0 Marine - Sailing Center 57,150 57,150 57,150 54,770 -2 380 Planning and Development 2,777,760 2,798,460 2,766,209 2,742,309 , -23 900 Parks ¦nd Recreation 8,428,110 8,427,310 81722,558 8,764,558 , 42 000 Library 2,940,430 21956,621 2,956,621 2,928,611 , -28,010 Total, General Fund 56,205,898 56,434,113 56,368,065 55,987,821 -380,244 Spacial Revenue Pundst Special Development 8,456,785 9,028,987 6,396,405 5,492,405 -904 000 Special Program 1,000,000 1,250,000 1,575,999 1,855,868 , 279,869 Utility Fund 59,266,980 59,266,980 56,410,715 56,792,055 381 340 ` Bridge Fund 1,102,690 1,102,690 1,088,920 1,200,006 , 111 086 Marina Fund 1,669,450 1,669,450 1,664,250 1,664,250 , 0 Beach Guards 327,140 327,140 387,460 387,460 0 Parking Fund 2,131,070 2,087,262 1,945,431 , 1,945,431 0 Pier 60 308,910 308,910 289,500 275,5n0 -14 000 Administrativs Services 3,910,415 3,921,269 3,981,302 3,991,244 , 9 942 General Services 2,385,570 2,385,570 21441,099 2,487,859 , 46 760 Garage Fund 6,735,070 6,636,380 6,672,134 6,775,072 , 102 938 Insurance 5,877,760 5,877,760 61102,390 5,303,230 , -799,160 I Total, All Funds 149,379,738 15 0,296,511 145,323,670 144,158,201 -1,165,469 66 r ORDINANCE NO. 5279-92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT AND BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1992, TO REFLECT AN INCREASE IN BUDGET EXPENDITURES TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF PROJECTS IN THE FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES OF STORM DRAINAGE, POLICE PROTECTION, NEW STREET CONSTRUCTION, LIBRARY, GARAGE, SEWER SYSTEM, AND GAS SYSTEM, AND TO REFLECT A DECREASE IN BUDGET EXPENDITURES TO REDUCE THE SCOPE OF PROJECTS IN THE FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES OF MAJOR STREET MAINTENANCE, SIDEWALK AND BIKE TRAILS, PARKLAND ACQUISITION, PARK DEVELOPMENT, CITY HALL ANNEX, AND MISCELLANEOUS GENERAL MISCELLANEOUS, FOR A NET DECREASE OF $705,585; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Program Report and Budget for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1992, was adopted by Ordinance No. 5117-91; and WHEREAS, unanticipated needs necessitate an increase in expenditures for the following: Police Protection $200,000; New Street Construction $160,000; Storm Drainage $340,000; Library $27,712; Garage $102,937, Sewer System $348,942, and Gas System $36,638, and WHEREAS, funds of $1,216,229 are available to finance these projects through use of General Fund Revenues, Development Impact Fees, Infrastructure Tax Revenues, revenues from Other Municipalities, Local Option Gas Tax, Grant Revenues, Garage Fund Revenues, Sewer Bond Revenues, and Lease Purchase Financing, and WHEREAS, Section 41.08 of the Clearwater Code authorizes the City Commission to provide for the expenditure of money for proper purposes not contained in the budget as originally adopted due to unforeseen circumstances or emergencies arising during the fiscal year; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA; Section 1, Section I of Ordinance No, 5117-91 is amended to rend: Pursuant to the Third Quarter Amended Capital Improvement Program Report and Estimated Budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1991 and ending September 30, 1992, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, the City Commission hereby adopts a Third Quarter Amended budget for the capital improvement fund for the City of Clearwater, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 67 It, , J F Z L i a D Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING .. r Rita Garvey, Mayor-Commissioner ? . Attest: Approved as to form and correctness: ? ' ? 1F1 bft$MFr 1 yySSS ? 1 ItI Y 63 ¦ 4 A 1 q CAPITAL IRPROVEHENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL TEAR 1991/92 CIT! OF CLBARWATER Third First Qrr Rid Year Quarter Original Amended Amended Amended i Budget Budget Budget Budget k { 1991/92 1991/92 1991192 1991/92 Amendments C{{ Policy Protection Firm Protection 0 -12,567 -104,370 95,630 200,000 Hew Street Construction 547,680 47 547,680 547,680 547,680 ., ' Haar 5rrasr Maintenance 1,5 000 r 1,500,000 625,047 785,047 ' 160,000 Sidewalks L Bike Trails 1,437,785 1,437,785 1,387,785 987,785 -400,000 Storm Drainage 325,000 276,055 276,055 243,487 -32,56a r Intersections 235,000 235,000 263,097 603,097 340,000 f Parking 195,000 ' 135,000 568,000 568,000 Miscellaneous Public Works 150,000 . 150,000 90,681 90,681 Parkland Acquisition 100,000 10D,380 -29,691 -29,691 ?. Park Development 517,500 82,500 80,612 74,829 -5,783 j' Park Beautification 289,000 342,740 453,539 410,939 -42,600 t Marine Facilities 30,000 30,000 -12,026 -12,026 Libraries 4,050,000 4,084,025 4,104,292 4,104,292 ,1 Garage 670 030 699,879 710,654 738,366 27,712 City Hall Annex 1,880,210 1080,210 1,896,634 1,999,571 102,937 Maintenance of Buildings 0 0 -14,160 -978,160 -964,000 Miscellaneous 144,905 107,925 -8,225 -8,225 Star=water Utility 506,670 506,875 862,491 385,628 -476,863 Water System 2,796,420 2,796,420 2,804,420 2,804,420 Sewer system 1,736,500 1,336,500J 1,273,201 1,273,201 Gan System 6,278,000 6,278,000 3,876,364 4,225,306 348,942 Solid Waste 618,250 818,230 2,070,730 2,107,368 36,638 Miscellaneous Utility 462,000 462,000 462,000 462,000 ? 0 0 »10,392 -10,392 ` TOTAL ALL FUNDING SOURCES: 24,209,950 23,794,657 22,174,418 21 468 833 7 , , - 0515a5 M, a 1 f `' i i G ! . C.5 69 t i 10ll901T A i RESOURCES APPROPRIATED FOR CAPITAL PRDJECTS 1991192 First Qtr Hid Year Third Quarter Original Amondod Amended Amended ; Budget Budget Budget Budget i 2991192 1991/92 1991/92 1991192 Amendments GENERAL SOURCES: General Operating Revenue 631,630 694,843 728,192 975,904 247,712 F 3 Special Davalopmant 0 0 2,935 -981,065 -984,000 ; Road Millage 1,502,785 1,502,785 1,326,107 1,326,107 v Infrastructure Tax 6,010,000 6,010,000 3,000,897 1,800,897 -1,200,000 Open Space Impact Fees 83,000 -83,000 -84,888 -90,671 -5,783 Recreation Land Impact Pass 134,500 -134,500 -134,500 -134,500 Recreation Facility Impact Pass 25,000 1,315 70,343 27,743 -42,600 Development Impact Feu 285,000 285,000 768,124 768,124 County EMS 73,680 73,680 73,680 73,680 Transportation Impact Pass 90,000 90,000 90,000 690,000 600,000 ;i Donations 0 -3,862 -3,442 -3,442 Special Program 0 0 8,925 8,925 Community Redevelopment Agency 0 0 1,926,710 1,568,342 -358,366 Local Option Gas Tax 0 0 0 700,000 700,000, ti Other Municipalities 0 0 0 166,566 166,566 Grant Revenue 0 0 0 52,173 52,173 SELF SUPPORTING FUNDS: Bridge R L R 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Marina Operating Revenue 64,025 64,025 144,025 144,025 Parking Operating Revenue 150,000 104,192 38,769 38,769 Utility Systems Water L Sewer Operating Revenue 4,728,000 4,728,000 2,257,640 2,257,640 Water Impact Pees 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Water R L R 495,000 495,000 495,000 495,000 Sewer Impact Pons 100,00 100,000 100,000 100,000 Sowar R i R 778,000 778,000 778,000 778,000 j Sewer Bond 0 01 0 182,376 182,376 , i Gas Revenue 578,250 578,250 1,174,310 1,174,310 Gas R L R. 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Can Bond 0 0 652,480 652,480 j Solid Waste Revenue 415,000 415,000 409,275 409,275 Stormwater Utility 1,046,420 1,046,420 1.054,420 1,054,420 } INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS { t Garage Fund 84,710 84,710 71,773 174,710 102,937 Central Insurance 0 0 216,870 216,870 4 Ir General Services 0 0 -116,521 -116,521 BORROHI.NG - GENERAL SOURCES i Lease Purchase 1,139,450 1,169,299 1,329,794 1,163,196 -166,598 { BORROWING - ENTERPRISE FUNDS Marine/Borrowing 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 {. Bridge/Interaal Loan 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Water/Sewer Sorrowing 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 BORROWING - INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS Garage Luse Purchase... I 1,795,500 1,795,500 1,795,300 1,795,500 i. TOTAL ALL FUNDING SOURCES: 241209,950 23,794,657 22,174,418 2L,468,833 -705,585 70 dOO 4 t 10 rn oil G a - i . u } lE i r n al? '? l SE?IRw I c7 Ob PLO 5 Meetin 49/17142 Clearwater Clay Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum ATE SUBJECT: Loan guarantees for economic development loans RECOMMENDATIONIMOTION: Consider Resolution 92-57 to authorize issuance of a guarantee for loans made under the Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services Economic Development loan program ? and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The City currently provides funds for Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services (CNHS) operation of an economic development program to promote business expansion and job creation in the North Greenwood neighborhood. Funding is derived from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Since being re-activated in early 1991, CNHS has organized an economic development committee to recommend policy directions to the board, organized a loan committee to consider applications, made two loans for retail/service business creation, and established proposals for private funding of a one- stop business center, a bank line of credit, and a business ambassador program to share expertise. Both the City and CNHS have been working toward maximizing private capital to leverage CDBG funding investments in the housing programs. Staff has received a request to extend leverage by guaranteeing economic development loans made to qualified businesses. In the request previously received, the loan was initially approved by the loan committee for 50% CDBG/50% bank funding, however the bank later expressed a willingness to lend the entire amount if the City would guarantee repayment of 50% of the loan. The guarantee will be secured by a pledge of CDBG revenues, and is limited to CDBG revenues. A reserve against loan loss will be set aside in the CDBG program to provide for repayment. Security for this loan guarantee was reviewed by the loan committee and was determined to provide adequate collateral. This practice will continue should additional guarantees be requested. Reviewed Fry: f, / Legal A. originating Dept PLANNING & DEVE P Costs: % MIA Total C ission Action: ?t _ d Approved 1Z is Bu get {N Purchasing ?A ? 13 Approved w1 conditions _ Risk Mgmt. NIA User Dept: Current Fiscal Yr. ? Denied CIS L LA AGM ----??,?w Funding source: Continued to: other ? Capital Imp. Advertised: ? Operating Attachments: Date: ? other Resolution 92-57 Paper: Guarantee letter ® i d Not Requ re Sulmi by Affected Parties ? None 0 Notified Appropriation code- - Manager City ® Not Required 40 Printed an recycted paper -2- Loan guarantees are expected to comprise a very minor part of the CNHS economic development activity. Commission authorization is requested for very limited circumstances. Budgeted CDBG expenditures for economic development will govern operation of the entire program. Resolution 92=57 grants the City Manager authority to guarantee loans within the budget for Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services (CNHS) Economic Development loan program. All requests for loan guarantees must be reviewed and recommended for approval by the Commercial Loan Committee of CNHS. This committee is composed of local bankers who review all requests for loans and insure that adequate collateral and security are available for 100% coverage of loans. All loans are made for a term of up to 15 years. If the City Commission approves this loan guarantee s policy, staff recommends that guarantees be made for a term not to exceed 7 years. The principal balance of the guaranteed loan may be fixed over the term of the guarantee period. Loan guarantees F will not be renewable A related policy issue is the appropriateness of using CDBG funds to provide jobs in Alcoholic Beverage establishments. Currently funds must be used to create one full time job for each $70,000 3 loaned, but there are no restrictions on the types of businesses to be funded. CNHS appointed a committee to study the issue of assistance to alcoholic beverage establishments. The committee's recommendation is expected to be considered at the November board meeting. Several establishments which sell alcoholic beverages have previously applied for CDBG loans, however the loan committee declined approval of their applications'. The Commission may wish to consider establishing a policy which limits CDBG assistance to businesses which do not sell alcoholic beverages. P i Resolutign o -s A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING A GUARANTEE OF LOANS MADE UNDER THE CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LOAN PROGRAM, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE SAME AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater has recognized a need to conserve and upgrade the economic environment in the North Greenwood neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the City has granted funds to Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services (CNHS) to make economic development loans in this neighborhood in accordance with lending criteria adopted by CNHS which specifically consider j'ob creation and retention, security and collateral in review and approval of loan applications; and WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to increase the number of jobs available to residents of the North Greenwood neighborhood and increase the level of funding available to conserve and upgrade the community's business environment; and WHEREAS, several banks and savings institutions have agreed to provide business loans to qualified clients which will significantly leverage the City's and CNHS's resources; and WHEREAS, this leveraging requires the establishment of a loan guarantee mechanism using federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds; and WHEREAS, the City will provide for each loan made a certification identifying the loan as eligible for CDBG guarantee; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA. Secti.on1. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute various letters of guarantee or, behalf of the City, not to exceed $75,000 for 199192 and $40,000 for 1992-93. Section 2_ Funds used to purchase guaranteed loans which must be acquired due to default by mortgagees shall come from federal. Community Development Block Grant funds. Section 3. Letters of guarantee do not constitute, directly, indirectly or contingently, an obligation of the City of Clearwater or the taxpayers thereof to make any appropriation of any kind or pledge and form of taxation to support the financial obligations which may be incurred under this pledge to purchase loans which may r f 3 ?E fall into default, t. Sectio This upon its adoption. Resolution shall become effective immediately (_r PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF SEP'T'EMBER 1992 , . ?I i R to Garvey I Mayor-Commissioner Attest: ; Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk econdev,gar 1 r w M , ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LOAN GUARANTEE Tlie City of Clearwater agrees to guarantee repayment of a portion of a loan made by , , Clearwater, Florida, 34618, to in cite amount of $ to be sec:creel by a second mortgage on slid following described property,. PARCEL 1: (insert legal description) PARCEL 1: (insert street address) This guarantee shall remain In effect for Ilia full terns of [tie loan, or seven years from the date of this guaratlice:, whiclie:ver term Is shorter. Tita City's guarantee will he reduced asthe3 Borrower reduces tho principal balance of the loan. The City's guarantee snail cover tba unpald principal balance of the loan and shall not include any interest due up to the bate of notification of default, and shall not include Interest, costs of foreclosure, or other similar collection costs. 'Ilils obligation is limited to the availability of funds provided wider the Federal Coutitutsitity Development Block Grants, as permitted under applicable regulalions. It) (lie! even( that Such funds are not available: to ilia City for such purpose, there shall be: no obligation for ilia: City to gttaran(ct; ilia loan. Ilia; City and llte taxpayers thereof are not tiiree:tly, indirc:e:tly or conling illy obligated lei mike any appropriation of any kind or pledge any forth ')f'taxadon or colter revenue source: its sopput[ tiie litiaticlal obligations which may be incurred under tills 1)' -dge, except from Federal Cominimity Mock (start( funds as described herein, .I: Ile' Lender ttl;rces uttele:r (Ills certification it) exercise duel diligence lit (lie collection of this loan, and to notify Ilie City of lira paymctti sia(us cif this Ioatl at any little as payments become snore titan 30 days In arrears, and it) aq care tit) less than anew per year on ilia anniversary date of this guarantee. CITY OF CLEARWATER 11y: '1'11113: City Manager DATE: ATI.1 ST: City Clerk econde:v.guar l I o 7 1 } i {{•i J' I } F (: jA C I T Y O F C L E A R W A T E R interdepartmental correspondence TO: Mike Wright, City Manager FROM: Chris Papandreas, Community Development Manager SUBJECT: Membership on CNHS economic development committees COPY: Jim Polatty, Planning and Development Director DATE: September 11, 1992 In response to your question at the agenda meeting this morning, I have received from Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services a list of members of the economic development and commercial loan committees. Membership is as follows: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Mark Edmunds, Commercial Loan officer, First Union National Bank Thomas Hamilton, Vice-President, Southeast Bank Ruth Hunter, Vice-President, Great Western Bank jJack Russell, Vice-President, Barnett Bank NA Bertha Kelley, Realtor, Bayline Realty Elizabeth Floyd, Resident, 1471 Fairmont Ave (bank employee) Muhammed Abdur-Rahim, Resident, 1028 N. Madison Ave. Alex Ayscue, Vice--President, C&S Bank Arthonio Godwin, Resident, 911 Myrtle Ave. David Stone, President, Citizens Bank of Clearwater Jay Ferriero, Senior Vice-President, Comerica Bank of Florida Ex Officio: Charles Benton, CNHS; Chris Papandreas, City f COMMERCIAL LOAN COMMITTEE Elizabeth Floyd Ruth Hunter David Stone Arthonio Godwin Alternates: Mark Edmunds, Muhammed Abdur--Rahim, Bertha Kelley Ex Officio: Charles Benton, Chris Papandreas econ-com.mem s r} 4 f J l E 4r1 ,I< APPOINTMENT WORK( HEET FOR COMMISSION MEETING September 17, 1992 APPOINTMEN"fS Agenda # BOARD: Development Code Adjustment Board MEMBERS: 5 TERM: 3 years CHAIRPERSON(S): Alex Plisko APPOINTED BY: City Commission MEETING DATES: 2nd & 4th Thursdays FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Required PLACE: Commission Chambers RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT: City of Clearwater APPTS. NEEDED: 1 DATE APPTS TO BE MADE: 9117/92 SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS: "members of the board shall possess professional training or.. acquired experience in the fields of planning, law, architecture, landscape architecture or development control. THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER(S) HAVE TERMS WHICH EXPIRE AND NOW REQUIRE EITHER REAPPOINTMENT FOR A NEW TERM OR REPLACEMENT BY A NEW APPOINTEE. Date of Original Attendance Willingness Name-Address-Phone Appointment Record To Serve ,t 1. Thomas "Jim" Graham 1989 NA NA i "Architect" - RESIGNED - moved out of Clearwater THE FOLLOWING NAMES ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION TO FILL THE ABOVE VACANCIES: W; R. Name-Address-Phone Submitted-By Comments-Related Experience, Etc. 1. George Athens Self Restaurant Manager 1018 Bay Esplanade Dr.,34630 H:442-1196 W:441-2005 2. Charlie Harris Self Employed wl Combined Realty 1550 Long St., 34615 prior employment w/ US Postal Service H:443-1022 0:442-6857 3. John B. Johnson, Jr. 3237 San Pedro St., 346', '? Self Past member PZ H:726-3564 _?___.?.•- 4. Joyce Martin Self Retired Personnel Mgmt Specialist 19029 US19N,BIdg9,#410,34624 H:538-0042, 5. H. Virginia Robinson Self Nurse, Red Cross Volunteer 1005 Amble Ln., 34615 H:442-0401 0:461-9736 { ° t m C=14! -OF Anne.' cats an ..= Boa=--4s (must Ce Clea=wa-zap rssi dent ) tame George_ Athens.- Rcme 3dd_sss : Q?=ic_ddrass 1018 Bay Esplande_ Tyr--- 1120 Maur aI a,r _Ame Clearwater,, Florida 3630 ClparwateX:- Plnridn Ih6?Q Talennone (81-3) -442- li96 Telephone uul-2nD5 _ Bcw Lone a resident oz the C:tr o2 Clea=Wa=ar7 21 ypgra Occ'?aat;On Restaurant Manager '-:'n-ziover Ocean Garden Restalrant E.- ersencn: .e? c or: Educatwcn: Ot er Wa=lk 1 Bachelors/Business/ FSU Real,Estate'Brokers License Moonbeams/ One ?bpf Tn 1 - • C?uni L r 3c wi.?rites : Chu v - Holy, Trinity areek Orhtodox Church :i Iti• Other Interests : Environmental Issues OffibQce Autos Ecard Sew-rice (c•??•_snt and past) Saar- ar erence ; - DCAB Additiahai Comment-a; j Signed: 7y Date : 2 ?`?•:? ?.. - Please sea atttached list for Boa-*?s that reau ;e Fw*?znc' al :, Disc? asu-e . p r.pA Z RETURN T=S poMx_ T0: Cs tlr Cl e=k' s Depa--=enz P.O. Box 4748 Ci earrater, FL 34618 .?I?? ?- ?-; : ° FEB 26 1992 CITY rLrPw QErT. ' 1? M CIT7 O CLZARWATER Application for Adv:.sory Boards (mus ;. be Clearwa ter resident ') Name Rome Address: Of ice Address: j 5- 1;2 "57 Telephone Telephone, ?•?5,? How Long a resident of the City of Clearwater? Occuoati,on X??L Employer ?Ov?r??•?r.?? .C?Giy •' yield of Education: Other rgork Exuerience:' K G / S l?•!.. ?.. ---- - r?.? rtJ2r7.?E Cc?,r/s?/,yi?r,? Si o'.?-? a ,/ ?n •5. i ? ?l? ? ?/S??1r7?C? !?'o fib' ?7 C1 W. JQDr?17 d .? . .. _ _ ? If retired, former occupation /./• S' . ???r? S'd/C? Community Activites : Other Interests: Board Service (current and past) Board Preference: • . , •??7 ?//? - .. _ _. %?: ?/?Gd/??:.?T Canes • rs???"vs; ??.,ri? F Additional Comments: 'i Signed: r OC- - Au+kor? Date: X-9 / F Please `,see attached list for Boards that recuire' Financial Disclosure . PLEASE. RETURN THIS FORM TO: City Clerk's Department , P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618 n E. F 1 i 1 i CITY OF CLEmiTATER Application for Advisory Boards (must be Clear-jater resident) Name JOHN B. JOHNSON, jg, Some Address: Office Address: 3237 San Pedro St. Clearwater, Fl. 34519 f Telephone 725-3564 Telephone How Long a resident of the City of Clear-gater? 77 yaar Occupation Retired Employer Field of Education: Other Work E,-=erience: Business Administration Property & _ Casualty insurance 38 ears with Firpmanl-g If retired, f o=er occupation Wi ce Presidgnt. ' Community Activites: Plannin & Zoning Board 6 President, Del Oro Homeowner's Assoc. Presentlyttf&as Bros. Task Force Other Interests: Sports, Fl yi nn _ Hoard SerPice (current and past) Board Preference: Planning/ } Additional Comnients : Signed: Hate: Nnv_ G. ]44rt Please see attached list for Boards Disclosure. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 34618 DCAB that rec wire Financial. City Clerk's Department 4l L MAR 16 1992 x 0 -;LT 17 sr, 13 7_ca :_..n .r,._ mac7 wsc7-/ Paa?wS (=ust ."/e _ag?re?n- i MAR Z '7 092 •J i• t ?aae 3GG;. =ss : . / go 2A ? r IV pro i ecaone 13 - S 3 S 0C% y-3 me_Aniicnle .'C-07 : anCT d rSSi G'cnr Oi t. , C,*--- Oi C' °_ r'r7aG=?? OCC;:naL?Cn A mac? cver -.4=1d o? =duca'tior_: V ? `? ?? ' LJGI LtCI,?1L4L?1 ? ,? ? l 1 i? re ?? "°_^ ?arer acc•Pa.?..cr_ le 1 ` ca. Chun-,L t? ?s.CC :vi t a s : L'ILOIu,,, 6t EI e-c-t( c7 L4 ?_Y111 C3Z_ 411 ?.? t '?,?LVC c?L?c CU-0o; ,??u to e?_T•-? 1 tom- t mss' ?.(,?.?? ??1? itt??5l,.i =' ?'?l1r?E . Oter?Trzerests;? IC (U-Lb • 259 $O2r'; Sar'r? C2 was } ?qZ ?rrs --encs: j? rh l 1 4 ? ? ?' . ? C( . }? ? 12z . WUtlctt_I f0a-) ?o s t r ' OY t'-aL Y AZUi S,,1t CGL(E cL {. ??. ?iJutL tL Imo. ?7 t ?dd? Liaxial Ca?enzs ! _•= Signed: Date : V 1 Doe t ,1 l - 1 Cf '? F7Y i` #' P? ease see attached list zar Bozos that recui=a a-'= -? _ T_,z_IS FCR, TO : C-t-r C1_er.`:' s Depa` =en,: DISC ?05'1sr°. P?A.S? RETL3?N • • P.O. Box 4748 C1ea--jater, FL 34618 C4 sr War_ B:er?e.:ce [Lt?3.t'1 CL ?W.. W j-t.5 ? t? lj?-t? ZLU. L L ?Y1 D Y O a 1 u'?'Y-f I` c i S? t L c+" ??5 :.?Tt? ? r Gl ti ?ctlc.:lirrt? `ti?.Ce.Y?r??r + car ftj '.I 0 CITY OF CLc.ARWATER Applicati.an far Advisor-, Boards (must be Clearwater resident) Name ! l , 1 Q 'o .Ci e' Home Addrass: Office Address: I coo M f3 L C ?l 4- 1 F C L.,. W, -3 C L fit! . F 1 . 3 y-,? !? ! 5? Telenhone ?L - O ex 0 1 Telenhone ? ! - t ` How Long a resident of the Ci`y of Clearwater? ;?t' Q / C ag' M • f Occupation 11? fJ S Employer O 5 n) T 14c/i G Field of Education: Other Work Exnezience: &-R z v s E' zA r- 0 Cl a s s V o n ?? v-? G 2 5 e LL LA 0Sp J j (?-S A V f /j U \1 y _ 1 If retired, former occupation k? G 1 a r i y`c %j- 5 r o R E' '7t . Community Activites : L- n 62 d2:5 .5 C 65 M M i 5 s f r _R -4-10 l I?tl - L. i N C Other Interests: a 4?' ` S D 1 5 U 5 r A) 5' 'E.5 Board Se--vice (current and past) Board Preference: D r:7-5VC /V/ 0 0 f5 11204 777' 74 All 77 ?. ('-?45- b O A) A ?a RRO 3 Additional Comments : R A) E7 E -1, Z AZ- P t 0 4e • e N ow ; i Signed-. Date : ell D ase see attached list for Boards that require Financial FF sal sh e f i PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO : City Clerk's Dea_ art.nent ; Clearwater, XL 34618 JAN 13 1992 • ,F 1, CITY CLMiY, L7???', 0 V / a es- . I a 4'7 8z f i ? ??'E?-Zczr s. .0 ' 0/11 7 l r' .tom ? r v ?L ?y r r t? 0