The URL can be used to link to this page

08/15/1985 Ci-l-y Me-e.+i ~ Co m rv\ I S S f ~ h .! " , I - "",.., .' ~ . 'I .\ .;., , , I . . ".. '.: , " C". C -: f'J~ I ., ~ " ' .~\ ' , ' c . :~( , " : ' ~ .( ~ .:~ . , ',j ,'. . . . II .1 ,\ ' 1/ ~..; \ . ~ ; '. 'l ~ ; :1 ! . . : i.. ! . ~, '" ~ ',' . ,'\ ",:. :::':;I~:~: ,::<>,~~ ~......-\ I YINAL AGZlfDf. - eIn CO:tH$5!O:-l lEZTl~~G - Au,:;u::Jt 15, '9B5 (11:00 P. J.) .: ~ ~~ I. II. III. IV. V. -l Ple1~o or ~11e~i~~~~ Invocation Oath or O!'ficc ~ PoUec ~rf1ccl':J ~nt~oduction3 & A~ard3 ~ Citation~ ~crvicc ?in ~ward: VI. :Un1It.es nC np.~ull'lr ~lcet1nl) 0/1/ as, Special Meet.ing 7/29/BS, Bnd ~oa13 and Objoctlvon 6/S/35 VII. PI"QlSrratat!.ona i1tI.~roolaaattcoo - 5:00 p.a. II.' Citizen3 to be hoard ro ltem3 not on the A~~nda - 5:30 p.n. CITY '-TraMEl RHroRTS I I I I I 5ftca~ Rending OrdllVlno~u ~ 10. . ~002-n5 - Zonil1~ i\ tln:! hmenJrr,ent. !'rlM H~\ (Single-Family, DupleX-Apartment) Re~idontial District to RM-12 (Ouplex- Apartment) R03tdential Ui::Jtrint fer ~~n Q2.01, 3qc 7-29-16; located on tho W 3id~ of Old Coltch'TIan Pod o\lp.:l3ito the cntr.3ncc to Cnrpenter Field (Twln Lakc:! MCg Co - PH 5/16/85) 7-85-6 (LUP-B5-2D). ~OO3-.85 Land Unu PI.:m ^':lImdmcnt t'ro:n L~w Density R03ident1al to Hed1u~ Dun3ity ne,ldential property zonc~ in Ord. Q002-8S, LUP-85-2D (Z-8~-6). ~Ol'-85 -Annexing n PortLon of L~t 19t 1'10011a3 GroV03 SUb, S'.lh Sec 19-29-10; locnt~d on U~ S 3ido of Uur3cry Rd, ~ 'Ji' Belcher Rd Nrl'!,ht - PII 6/6/85) A-3S-t5 111012-85 - Zoning Atla:J A:nendoent to nS-75 (Single Family RC3idoncc) for proporty unncxcd in Ord. ~Otl-6S (A-OS- 15) . 1W13-e5 - Aone;d.ng Lots 7 and 8, South Binghamton Park Sub, See 3-29-15; locat6d ~t the H~ corner ot Chunan~o Ave and 5un~et Point Rd {Cal'r/Ila/)ol't" - PI! 6/5/35) I ,\-f1S-1Q. 11. 12. l3. 11: . .- 1;'1' '.',' :f:..~"",,: .. " .." ~ ..,' .'.. . .~... ~.. ~. (Dook 36) 355 ".: ~. . :. '0, I J I. W. O,.J. ~~OO2-85 lldoptod. t ,. "'r~. f4003-{\5 udo;JI;'~d. I~. t"r1, '_ijlt-R~ ~d'Jpt"d. t 3. Or.i. '~01:':,-S~ 'hl':l\lI.~J. 1'1. OrJ. ,ilO13-0!.i ;dout,od. ACEIIOJ'. a/15/:J; '." . ,~ ~.. .... ..... .,....... 2G. A~~d~~ln~ RU31 Pr~p~rty CO~t3 or D~~o11LiDn In Removing 3ub~t~nJ3rd Building - 703 Carlto~ St. (McCloud). A3~CS3t~K neal Property CooL5 or Do~olit~on In Ro~oYln3 Sub5Lnndard Bull~'~~ - 501 N. Cardon (nobln5on). A~~e531n~ R031 Property Co~t~ of ~emolltion tn 9cMoving Sub~tJn~ard 3~ildl~g - 1560 S. H~di3on ^v~. (no,u). 29. ~a30531ng Re~l Property COJt5 or Dcmolltl~n In aemoving 5ubolandard Buading - 1203 Railroad AVo. (rru~n,("r), 30. ^~3CJ51ng RU31 ~roparty CQ~t~ or D&mQ~ltlnn in Reroovlng Sun5tandard Building - 1215 nailro3d Avu. (Wa~hlnaton and Fragier). 31. .~~~c~:.-lng lIeal P:"oporLy C03to or De~~lltlon in Removing 5ub3landar~ I Building - 325 S ~ad13on Ave. (3trrtu~). ::),21, ~ . ...\ . , 213. nIl mum r.rrr llTOR1(CY .tn:13 3~. ^uthori~ln3 ~cttlc~~nt or littg~tlon _ Cro~l.lr v. ~pal.lJ a:-:d City. XIV ~tlSt Doodll nnd lta.araentn ~ B. 10 ft. 1oI.1tor maln IJ!l:)o;Tlcnt. and tnflr>::l"J lln:i ogrOJ5 oallnm!)n\. for r~ru:Jo oollootlcn I.ots 7. Ot 15. 16, ulo~k.i and Lot:! 1-14. Oleo\( 1/, Srookl wn Sub. I :3oe. 3-29- 1:- (:.. 'i. :"o~on) Crii'""i<<iiGKRRlfron!3"----.---. rv CONSFJlT AIJlOIDA Id~leory Board - Hot1float1oQ3 31j. COT.::Iunity R'.llatJon::J DO<lrl.l (1 mo:nbo") aot.1 "Le3 tiC:l 35. Pinel1a~ SunCo~3t Tran9it AuthDrity (1 ~e~bor) Notirlc3tlon 36. :lcar~Jtcr HQU5in~ ~ut.hority (2 roo~bor3) NotirIc.lt.ion .37. Beautificat10n Co~~Lttce <1 me~uIJr) Notific.'1tbn Ag:o~t:J 313. !ntereCVbrn~cntal ~~re~m2nt for SanJ Key Llroauurd Servica (~artno) - with Flr.el)<l3 COl,;nty frl'm '0-1-34 to 9-30-B6, $17/1,286.00 r,lUlbur3od by County '>' (9CXJI: 36) 357 2u. n~~~. '6~72 ~dopt~J. 2'/. llo::lo. 'B5-73 Ijdop'.od. ~3. llGJD. ~n~-7~ ndoptod. ~9. Pc~v. ~U5-'5 n1opto~. 30. R'.l'o. te5-76 auoptud. 31. ~Q~O. ~85-71 a~opted. nn. 3.~. AtJt,horhnrt. T.! 'I. 33, ^C~Dpt~1 ~a~nm~nt, !'J. ,'collpt!ld ".:1 ~l~b:nl.l. tod n:rr.ept, It C:J 36. 10, Actl:Jpte:l. AGf.NOA l!/11j/05 ~ ;"',.\., . '" 1",-t.. ",. ~ 1 1 't'f~~'.)'~ ....,\.,1.... , ..F'~)i.~.:! ~i:,~~.':,4 '".,.: . ,} ,:\l':::.'\.~',,""~""'~"'..."'I'.f-' ~< ,.,. Pit "", .of,,' 4 ~ " 'I . ~, . iii "I ~ 1\", .. '" ' " '. 'j . . J.;),.,L.)(.,.... ',". p' ! . ..~ ..) ., )I....,.....{"~,.."...I- -1;) .'~' j.t:'. ,,-'.. . 'I-'(ft...". :...'" ~:.::.... ~f ! ..... t ~~f;;t""~"'lI:Kbia~/"oli';.'''' --... , ~.~t.."'.... 1.)t~.~'!.:J ;~\\;.!;: ~ ),. ~-.~ . ~~ J;7-;, ~ 'It -n' .. <Ii "'\'{""~ illd.5 & Co:ltract:s :~'Y/L.~J' 0 \rj,~. ~~ t," , . ~~'.,i:" '. .' 39.. i"o:-;;urr.. (C':!t.t.r.ll .~I!rvtc(w/;~ot.or Pool) - ~~~~. , 1":.\ LLft Truc~ ~crvl::u:J, Clll,\I'',,'~t(!r, rL! .,,\~1;' .~21I,II17. 00 ~~rt", ~a, r'ire 1I?:1U anJ n::tlrH.!:I lr-lre} - .Snap-l'Lt.o 1'1-11~! 1I03e, Inc., Union City, PA, :,13,76~I.OO ",.i'", 111. ~lurk Drive Stor:: 'ic'./cr (Public \-IOI'~1/ ..'!,t~~ ~I,.r; -, En~.) - i'r;\wl CC)o:ltruct..ion, G tearwat.r.r, :~~;;: r't., $33,891. 50 i~l;:i' 112. Pro fr.3:l1ona 1 5er\'lM (~Qn~raet ^~Qnd,1l0nt Z;-OS'f' :~. E. 1l1'~t!C!!l 1..1. t1rary - ~Yl!rs, Pl1 :l\.:~', ~~'f. Ott. .'.r'chH~ctn, P.il., Clcarunt..nr, F'1. ~ tl.300.00 ' ~~. Cb.a:1F.O Ordf'lMl ~, .'t!f~(, 113, C:l 01 nn~ Fin1.1 - SU:Jur:11n 1905 Co:otrl\Ot.. ~' eruDile ~ol'k~), 1"1':1~1 Con3tr~etlon, Ctl!3rw~tor, Fl., 1-12,'35.5& ~3klng & n~J t{?-'f. 1) total of $63,533. III ,'~~~ Roodpt :. llorer-rnJ, .~ . llll. LOIli.l lJJC Pllln A;!lf!n;Jrno.:nt fl'fJm :'OoJ Ocn~tt.y . i .~ Ro~LJQnt..ial to PubtLu/nQ~t-publ1c ~nd ~-... n Zonli'l::; l\t1a:1 Ilmondr.:cnl. fro:n i1S-'/5 ~;t~~ (31ngle-~-3r.:llY 1lr::JLdonco) to IS? (In~tltuLio~~l Scml-PubllQ) tor w 55 ft. oC 1.01; 106 nnJ E. 10 rt. of \'ot lOll t flarbour Q3k:l '~:'Jb., Sco. 16-;l9-1lj {Critchley/Gon. tnl. Cu.) LUP-05-J2, Z-J5-1'I, 115. PetitLon tor Ilnnrxation nnd ::P (pnri<<I'-'Y nU~ln03J) nt~~rl~~ ZonJn~ for th~ S I~rtlon of ~\ll 33.09 and all of M&3 33.10, Snc. 5-29-16 (rrl~a) A-a5-28 J.~:;,t:~'-~..~....'1' ..} i_t ,'.... . t'~'l.l. t . . .' :.4,.) !:\~~'l ."1 ;~~ . -1-,'t,' '''-:jlH~1.,.j.':''1 I.~"~n ...., t'".,)-<i .,,~ ~..".c' I...t.'&~ . { ",. '..t", '~~'i';"'~~~. / .~t! f h....~~~~}-.,1..': ~.....O.! ~'" -' - '..('fli..\....:-'I!\~~.l . 4. . , .,. .II~~' " . I .I ."..., ~ ....~,/ '. .'J 4..!~,.-t.rp , . , . , ,I' " , '/~"l:' ~ .......--..". " '(or',. ~ ~ ~: J.:n.~;..,..!.Jf ~, . ;'.;' of' :if . \ J;..:',~ 'fj ',~' : .'" ,/~ \.,.. ,:,p.M , {(.r~,lj' t,l'! .; 'I 1:8. ottnm ~01f CITY K.UfIOSR RK?OI\'i~ (C~ticusd froM 8/1'85) CU3tcdlat 5crvlcn~ (Central Servic~9J - extend contract with Spectrum Building Scrvlaos, St. Poternburg, FL, from lO-l-U5 to ~-JO- 86. ~22~, 450.00 Travel Hnnagement SorvLcoa - ~^A ~orld~lI!de Travel Agenoy, St. P.:!t..lll"'!lUUI'!;, fL, frl'111l 611/65 to 9130/J6,'\~ 1 1/1, 3:l~, 00 Du~ldinb i'OI':Dit t't::o MJu'~t:ll!nt:l - ar~r"\'c attached BIlUtJ!rH~ Pl1mlt Fee Schod\lll~ o. 1nt. ilU3din& Ql'd. ~(l2'{-fl5. XVI. r:vt. ~G. rIG. So Ucit ud~ i t1t;lnal blt13 and r~"lc.w :=pr.\llr t CtJ t..l Oll:.!. 1I7. ll"(. h.t.lrdr!'l corotr9.cl;.. , 111;, Cc.ot.im:-ix. to IJ/5/:]5 'I " Munioipnl POllCD OfntJ~rs 5upple:::entary prll:J~nt, ~9. a. Ord. ~-O~'~65 pB~~O~ 1:lt ro.:al1Jne. f " :t>~";"\"":"~".~~" '.~:.:,~ ."~: 1 '\' ... <JU. 51. -0 52. 53. Sll. 5'3. 33nlLory 3~ucr Utility "alu~ (Public 'lir)rk~) - l1'3U r; ..! ~chl':i'JII'! (Or-dinnnoc) FiMl Hl,portt W. :~. :~(mt30'l:l'ry f. A~3ocl~t~~, n3~lo :om~unlontlon~ COfl~lJ) tanto - nn.c':lvo r,'port I1n1 3ccept conoluolon that 3n BOO ~!'z trunk~j radio 3y~te~ will b~~L n~rve the City, 300 mH~ Trunk~d H3dlo 3Y3tfZ _ Initiate 3tlJl):' to Impl(!:~ent Lllc ~y~tcm. .igrce:nont, \.,'l~h '~. K. :~ont&o:'l~r>' !. A~oncl(JtC3 for ten-ehBnncl trunkcd radio 3Y3tcm (C~ntral Scrvlec~) jl~2,S63.00 Conftr~atton of City Clerk AppolntMont _ Cynthia E. Coudu,}u Cl u:!.l"'./ato'" :lc1.ghtlar!l.;roj Hou!!! n~; ~crv I c.:c:\ T~r~ot ^rQ(J Exp~n~lon - Jpprovc cx?~n~io~ or CIlIIS rllr~ct;. 'It;lll;httorhood In :l. Grl.'ftn'rl~od :J.tlU ;\li,l!:ld oxh\tins ~'Jr'/1.CI! ;J ~rccrr.cnt.:J. 36, Ilth taar CDB~ Appllo~tion (Con~unlty Dovolo~cnt) 5'r. me,., Prl!:Iontnt.ioll (Pnr~:l ~ IhlC.) ~ :<1:'. Pal t".1ll"r, E):ct:utl VI'; lHrnctor of PlIlm II 0 rIH,!' Y:iGA rc rcqiJO~1 t. to O;lQrll te tempo/'.try iJ f~\1~' ~chool rccrcatS~n proRra~ PJ.nn.o & P!ut;:J . st]. (COntinued t~ 8/11(5) rtr.'.~n1:n~nt t'.l ~.l1c Fln~l Site Plan for Villop'c Jt CQ\lnt.rY3idc, Tract:! 115, 7~, 73 and 74/CountrY:Jldo, Sec':! 30/Jl~20-16; locatl!1 lit tho 1/10/ Inl:Jr:ll!ctlon of I):; 19 nnd Rntor~rioa Rd. (MultiPlo, Lnnu Co) PSp-a'-!J 59. nI!V~lid~lion of the rroli~lnory SllbdivJ~Jlon Plat Cor l.okey 5ubdi'llalotl, ~1&D 11. 01, Seo, 19-29-1G <t.okuy) :rJB-BII-23. 60. Proli:nlnnry Silu Pion for lno ~11dur ornC!! [lu1.lt.1in~, lot:! 1..6, 11, 12, tllY.. ~, 3~Y'ltcw City Sub,. and a portion of Vncated Alley, Sec. 16-29-16 (Jl1d~r f,orp.) P3P-~5-31 61. E'rol1::l1nnry 31tr: I'lan for McCol':nick E'ro~'lrt1C:J ~ Countryside Tract, a portion or :~r.B 3). C 4, ~O~. 32-28-16 {~cCormlctc Pl'opert.iQ~, lnc.) r.3p- !l5~32 62. Proli~ln~ry Su~dlvl~ion ?lnt for Studobnk~r':s 5\llJ., :<1(,1;' ~ 111.07 ar.d ltl.:}S, Soc. 10-29-16 (Studeb3kpr'::I, Acpucl1c rlnan~ial Corp.) 3UD-85-S (Book 36) 359 .. ' .. . ~. '~'~.'. '\: .. .. .;1 " ~. '.' \' '......:. .': n J I ,:jt::, l-',-d )I~~, , ~ ;'~r~.f.:t J(t...~ . tc..~'.1"~~~~~~~J::/".uJ: 1 '" . r'~'.' J,.. ~..;: . \, l, . 'l. ....... ~... . ~., ..;..~ 1 . . ~. f ...j.... ,.~~ , r '"'. _... .. t~_~""". ,". ~~. . r. ~ ~~ ~1. ~cceptod r~p~rt. 50. Urd. ,~O~~C~ pJ~~ed '~t reading. :);"!. D!roctO>:l :stllff to ImplcMmt; :stt,P:J. ~3. "Pr,rovod. ljll. Conr!r:no:1 artlolntr.:o'lt.. 55. Approyo1 a~pan91on ~n~ amQndrd ~crvlc~ aBrco~onL:s. ill)vlmtQc1 !IntI :J.ppr'>'I~,j "F"inhl ~tQt'!l~ant. of Com::ur:1ty Dcvolo~c'lt: abJnu~l \'(l!J nnd Prl)jt!ctU1 U~~ of rllmL,," and allLhp!'i:t:e1 :1u!l:!llo:>;i,c'on nC' tlPpUcllt.1.on; I Sr.. 51. "WPC'I)Y"I\ rtHjU~:J/;. :i~. j)~nl,r.'J. 59. ~pprovLd w1t.~ a~n~ltlon. S:J. Rijvlnwed an~ nuthl)rllcd R~C rQvle~ 1\ rLnai :I1lo plFlll <:nd f'lM1 :lot.1on by t.h\' Cil.y i~ar.1\;;er. :lU'ojr:ct \:0 (Jrmdltior.!J. tj'l lI~~'l'~',lcd 3nct ,111t~orl :!.\)(t no,; rll'/il!'~ i\ final :11 tc pJ,lll1 IUV! J'1nnt actton t.y 't:h~ i~~ty ;.\anagcr. :\ubjcct:. t:.o conrJ ill on~l. Approved ~Ubjeot to t:.he rln~l plat belnr, r~c?rded no later than 2-15-B6. '" ')~I foGE:lDA 011 ~/05 ,~. :. :'i"'~ ., .. . u3. PrGll~\n3ry SUbdl~l~lon PInt for Pr~mlor Placo, a portion or Lot 19, Plnolla3 Grovo:l 5ub" S:a of Sec. 1')-29-16 (';/rJ~llt, PrQ~tQr Sh~lter~, tnc.) 2UB-BS-7 ^grce~~nt to Annex for H&D'3 Q3.01 anj ~~.DO, Soc. 32-23-16 (Corn~r3tone COt:l::llW lttl!'l , rnc.) (I.,{I. 8S-19-2Ijt 0"" XVII Other Pend! na: lobt.torlS XVIII f~rbnl Roport:l 6:30 r.t'l. 1) 3tJtc~cnt or ca30 by cltl~o" :lpol~p.3p(!r:lvJ'\ - 5 \Illnutl~ ?) Com.1ll.'n tJ 1n :'llpport/ollPO:l H.1orl: lr.~lvldual - 3 Ainutoh ~poko::lpcr~on for ;~roup - '0 a1Dutf'_"I , ~ . :"','.' ~ ~1 . .. ': .j~; >,) . . ." "I:~ , . -F . ... ~ I ~ . .. ",' ( li3. '\'J;>royod. !.tll. Ccat\~U6d t'.> '3/ 1')/1\5. XVll. ~l 0'1". IVllr. f!~~~~tQr p,~~ ~~t1~ , !~.!.nsl - Of! hour, ~ hour, ~ hClIr, :JalurJn:i. 3u(ld:l1. r~Jor,)l h~lidaY:l ~ orr~Ptlvd O!21/SS. TcnL3LI701y 'pprovcd 3 rC~u~3t Crom C I.~J.:'W;I :'tJr DO\llltOlo/ll "3:J()Il:,r.~t1on t.{l clv!tt;! C!,(,lvnl:'rl1 3t., for [n'.-:rllation,ll St.r~o\; Foo!:.J'Iat, :;':fll".l:'nll~r ;:"1.n, 1~95. Soh&dvlC'tJ PubHe [t:)nr'!l1l\n ,n .:o:nn.t u:llor, ";.J'J:':;ll)n:.. oP;1C:ll tt~l\\ 5 -Q(.n\1\t.t: GO! (,,- :). PU.DLic lI&AlU!.'GS (Cont1nuN1 t'1'"'f>> 6/t/B5) ~x!l[l.n3lon ;lu,1 l:nproyo:'llont. or ~,ho Clnar-..ltt.llr ;~nrtn~! Sc1.r,nco Conter' ~ r-1n:1 thllt exp3n~lon .l~ n~c~39ary: d~ctaro propcrtl ~urplu~ - ~&D 13.07 3QC 8-29-15; located at 2~9 ',an,\',~l1l'd i'i111:la!5C, l:ibml i:::II.11t."~: prov1.rJo for ncrcrcndu~ StcctIon n. 15~ RC:Jdln3 Ord1n:lncc 11020-0:3 66. Land t1:w Plan A.nr:lJ'Jt~n"t fro:n :~cdlll:~ D.)n::lity fic:)l <.lent tal I." II t~h t.lI.ln:) tty n ~, 1 den ti al all,j Zon J. r.g .'It 1;;..9 Amond~l(>n t f1'o::1 ilX-16 (:':ej1um D(!M1ty Hult.I-fa~ il~' U~O) to RPD-la (Re~Ld~nt1.nt ?lanne~ DC\lelop:l'Icnt) for t,\&U'3 44.013. Ij4.02 :lnd ~u.D11 1C35 La~c and 1033 E, ~50' and C::'D.ch.';lan RLd;;e Cond" Plta!lC I !In:J It, and a F'lrlRt lla:'lt.ol" npD SitQ Plan for Gal tbrp. iUnge Apart::'lcnt,.::I (l':ult1.ple, Cal tore r;~ or Tampat Inc./C1ty) LUP-8~-23, Z-05-;, Psp..E5- 23 (Dook 3&) 31iO r'c but, t.::l1 hy oj) F11I:ll robutlal t.y Ilpjl11r.:Jnt./J'c:\pOlld~r,t (,;)1" r~pr,~:!er.ta~.l\lc) 5 'l:IIH.l~~II. xu. ';>5. ?oun<l 'lXpJWltnn. ')nJ l~l;lr'J\I(jincn\, neCo,llHEU'Yt d~'~Lll"od prJ)p!lrt.:r ~III'plu::l, anj u3tabli~h~d ~31c prIco of ~1.0~ lr nj)pr()'.'~d :it.. r'lfcr'c:'ld,l~lo t'.l3~od ':on ll\t ron:l1nl~. 6&. f,p~rri'led Illp'lI Pon~tt)' nC31oenti,,1 l.VP :U'l)-1& ;r:onln~, :tn.1 flnul lIIJ:!tOl" jCPII =11:.0 p13n s~nJcoL to ~on~1ttDn~. ^G~tmA al \5/85 " ~~"J~~'...!."'ti'c . ": . ~. ~v:: ,\., VI. Minutes of Regular Meeting 8/1/85, Special Meetin~ 7/29/85, and Goals and Objeotives 6/5/85 VII. Presentations VIII.Proelaaations - 5:00 p.s. IX. Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda - 5:30 p.a. ,,' .... .~<..~. FINAL AGENDA - CITY COMMISSION MEETING - ^ugust 15, 1985 (~:OO p.m.) WELCOME We ~re glad to hav~ you join us. Ir you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state your ~ and address. Persons speaking before the City Co:nmission on other than 'publio hearing items shall be limited to 3 minutes. No person shall speak more than once on the same subject unless granted permission .by the City Commission. I. Pledge or Allegiance II. Invocation III. Oath of Office - Police Ofriccr~ IV. Introductions & Awards - Citations V. Service Pin Awards " CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS X Second Reading Ordinance3 10. 11002-85 - Zoning Atlas Amendme.lt from RM (Single-Fa~ily, Duplex-Apartment) Residential District to RM-12 (Ouplex- Apartment) Resid~tial District for M&B 42.01, See 1-29-16; located on the W side of Old Coachman Rd opposite the entrance to Carpenter Field (Twin Lakes MCg Co - PH 5/16/85) Z-85-6 (LUP-85-20). 11. _003-8~ Land Use Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to M~dium Densi~y Residential property zoned in Ord. , 4602-85, LUP-85-20 (Z-85-6). 12. _011-85 -Annexing a Portion oC Lot 19, Pinellas Groves Sub, SW~ See 19-29-16j located on the S side of Nursery Rd, E of Belcher Rd (Wright - PH 6/6/85) A-85-15 13. _012-85 - Zoning Atlas Amendment to RS-75 (Single Family Residence) for property annexed in Ord. 4011-85 (A-85- 15) . 14. 4013-85 - Annexing Lots 7 and 8, South Binghamton Pat'k Sub, See 3-29-15; located at the NE corner of Chenango Ave and Sunset Point Rd (Carr/Roberts - PH 6/6/85) A-85-1It. 15. 40111-85 - Zoning Atlas Ame~dment to RM-8 (Single-Family, Duplex, Apartment) Cor property annexed in Ord. 4013-85 (A-85- 1~). 16. 4018-85 - Amending Chap. 72 Alcoholic Beverages, to clariCy ownership and change age to 21. 17. 4019-85 - Adopting Updated Historic Preservation Element or Comprehensive Plan. 18. 4029-85 - Amending See 72.05, Alcoholic Bevera~es, to place new establishment under 2APS Clnssiflcation, part of Lot 33, R. H. Padgett's Estates, Sec. 15-2q- 15i ,located at 1215 Clevel~d Street, Units H & J, Cleve13nd Plaza (Eckerd Drugs nIt) AB-85-24. "\\ ""> :) II 1 ' IAGENDA 8/15/85 . ,I ~ . i- \}c ~.~.).,":\ '." ~ ~ . .~~; 19. 4030-85 - Amending Sec 72.05, Alcoholic Beverages, to place new establishment under 2APS Classification, part or M&B 111-02, Sec. 6-29-16j located at 1864 U.S. 19 N., Sunset 19 Shopping Ctr. (Eokerd Drugs 0 1~9) AB-B5-25. 20. 4031-85 ~ Amending Sec 72.05, Alcoholic Beverages, to place new establishment under 2APS Classification, ~ 15' of Lot 26" together with Lots 27-31, Clw. Beach Park 1st Add., Sec. B-29-15; located at 467 Mandalay Avenue (Eckerd Dru~s " 250) AB-BS-26. . " XI First Reading Ordinances 21. 4033-85 - Retitling Chap. 95 to "Nuisances"; enactinc; present Sees. 95.01 thru '95.15 as Article I, Lot Clearing;, and Enacting new Artiole II, Public NUisances. . 22. 40311-85 - Amending Chap. 22 re Municipal Code Enforcement Board to clarify enforcement procedures and powers. 23. 11042-85 - Amending Sec 72.05, Alcoholic Beverages. to place new establishment under COPSRX Classification, M&B 33.021, Sec. 20-29-16; located at 1525 U. S. 19 S (The Old New Y~rk New York) AB-8S-28. XII ResolutiOns -" '! ': " \. 2~. Urging State LegiSlature to Consider M~ndatory Safety Belt Use Law for Florida 25. Authorizing City Attorney to Defend City in the case of Shadow West Apartments, Ltd., v. State of Florida, et al, Circuit Civil No. 85-11000-14. 26. Assessing Real Property Costs of Demolition in Removing Substandard BUilding - 703 Carlton St. '(McCloud). 27. Assessing Real Property Costs of Demolition in Removing Substandard BUilding - 507 N. Garden (Robinson). 28. Assessing Real Property Costs of Demolition in Removing Substandard BUilding - 1560 S. Madison Ave. (Raye). 29. Assessing Real Property Costs of Demolition in Removing Substandard Building - 1203 Railroad Ave. (Fruster). 30. Assessing Real Property Costs of Demolition in Removing Substandard Building - 1215 Railroad Ave. (Washington ::lnd Fl"agier). 31. Assessing Real Property Costs of Demolition in RemOVing Substandard Building - 325 S Madison Ave. (Street). ;,\ ,'.1 nIl OTHER '~ITI ATtORHEY ITEMS 32. Authorizing settlement of liti&ation - Crosby v. Sp~cta and City. XIV" Agreement:s. Deed:s and Easement:! 33. 10 ft. water main easement and ingress and egress easement for refuse collection Lots 7, 8, 15. 16, Block J ~nd Lots 1-14, 'Block ~, Brooklawn Sub.,'Sec. 3-29-15 (L. ~1. Loken) , ) 2 AGENDA 8/15/85 38. Intergovernmental Agreement for Sand Key Lifeguard S~rvice (Marine) - with Pinellas County from. 10-1-84 to 9-30-86, $174,286.00 reimbursed by County " CIn MANAGER REPORTS XV CONSENT AGENDA AdYisory Board - Notifications 34. Community Relations 90ard (1 member) Notification 35. Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (1 member) Notification 36. Clearwater Housing Authority (2 member8) Notification 37. Beautification Committee (1 member) Notification Agreesent:s Bids & Contract:s 39. Forklift (Central Services/Motor Pool) - PM Lift Truck Services, Clearwater, FL, ~2lt,417.00 40. Fire Hose and Fittin~s (Fire) - Snap-Tite Hose, Inc., Union City, PA, $13,769.00 41. Mark Dr! ve Storm S.ewer (Public Works/ Eng.) - Prawl Construction, Clearwater, FL, $33,891.50 42. Professional Service Contract Amendment N. E. Branch Library - Myers, Plisko, .Ott Architects, P.A., Clearwater, FL $1,300.00 Change Orders 43. CO 61 and Final - Subdrain1985 Contract (Public Works), Prawl Construction, Clearwater, FL, $-12,935.56 making a new total of $63,683.14 Receipt & Referral 44. Land Use Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Public/Semi-Public and a Zoning Atlas Amendment from RS-15 (Single-Family Residence) to ISP (Institutional Semi-Public) for Lot 106 and E.10 fto: of Lot 108, Harbour Oaks Sub., Sec. 16-29-15 (Critchley/Gen. Tel. Co.) LUP-85-32, Z-85-14. 45. Petition for Annexation and CP (Parkway Business) District Zoning for the S . portion of M&B 33.09 and all of MIB 33.10, Sec. 5-29-16 (Prida) A-85-28 '" '., \ '.", XVI OTHER ITEMS OK CITY MAHIGER REPORTS \ I 46'. (Continued tral 8/1185) Custodial Services (Central Services) - extend contract with. Spectrum Building Services, St. Petersburg, FL, from 10-1-85 to 9-30- 56, $224,450.00 47. Travel Management Services - AAA World-Wide Travel Agency, St. Petersburg, FL, from 8/1/85 to 9/30/86 ,48. Building Permit Fee Adjustments - approve attached Building Permit Fee Schedule a. 1st Reading Ord. 4027-85. . \ 3 AGENDA 8115/85 .' ;- ., . .".. "', \.~ . : ~ '. ~,.! , .~'~ " ~~. ~9. Municipal Police Officers Supplementary Pension Plan (Police) - repeal present plan and enact proposed plan a.' 1st Reading Ord. 4041-85 50. Sanitary Sewer Utility Rates (Public Works) - new rate schedule (Ordinance) 51. Final Report, W. M. Montgomery & Associates. Radio Communications Consultant - Receive report and accept conclusion that ~n 800 mHz trunked radio system will best serve the City. 52. 800 mHz Trunked Radio System - Initiate steps to implement the system. 53. Agreement with W. M. Montgomery & Associates for ten-channel trunked radio system (Central Services) $lQ2,583.00, 54. Confirmation of City Clerk Appointment - Cynthia E. Goudeau 55. Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services Target Area Expansion - approve expansion of CNHS Tar'get Neighborhood in N. Greenwood and amend existing service . agreemen ts . 56. 11th Year CDBG Application (Community ,Development) 57. YMCA Presentation (Parks & Rec.) - Mr. Pat Kerr, Executive Director of Palm Harbor YMCA re request to operate temporary'after school recreation program ,j' e'l Plans & Plats 58. (Continued tram 8/1/85) Amendment to the Final Site Plan for Village at Countryside, Tracts 45, 72, 73 and 74/Countryside, See's 30/31-28-16; located at the NW intersection of US 19 and Enterprise Rd. (MUltiple, Lane Co) PSP';"81-9 59. Revalidation of the Preliminary SUbdivision Plat for Lokey -~t'bdivision, M&B 11.01, Sec. 19-29-16 (Lokey) 3UB-84-23. 60. Preliminary Site Plan for the Wilder Office Building, Lots 1-6, 11, 12, Blk. 8, Bayview City SUb., and a po~tion of V3cated Alley, Sec. 16-29-16 (Wilder ~orp.) ?SP-85-31 61. Preliminary Site Plan for McCormick Properties - Coun.tryside Tract, a portion of M&B 33.04, Sec. 32-28-16 (McCormick Properties, Inc.) psP-85-32 62. Preliminary Subdivision Plat for Studebaker's Sub., M&B's 14.07 and 14.08, Sec. 18-29-16 (Studebaker's, Republic Financial Corp.) SU9-85-8 63. Preliminary Subdivision Plat for Premier Place, a portion of Lot 19, Pinellas Groves Sub., SW~ of Sec. 19-29-16 (Wright. Premier Shelters, Inc.) SUB-85-7 64. Agreement to Annex for M&B's 43.01 and 44.00, Sec. 32-28-16 (Cornerstone Communities, Inc.) ATA 85-19-241 XVII Other Pending Hatter3 ,,\ " .i '\ XVIII Verbal Report:! ',\ .i 4 AGSNDA 8/15/85 I ,I 6:30 P.M. 1) Statement of oa3e by citizen spokesperson - 5 minutes 2) Comments in support/opposition: individual - 3 minutes spokesperson for group - 10 minutes - Scheduled Publio Hearings 3) Commission questions, rebuttal by opposition 5 -ainutea 4) Final rebuttal by applicant/respondent (or representative) 5 minutes. nx PUBLIC HEARINGS 65. (Continued trom 8/1/85) Expansion and Improvement of the Clearwater Marine Science Center - Find that expansion is neces3ary; declare property surpl~9 - M&B 13.07 See 8-29-15; located at ~49 Windward Passage, Island Estates; provide for Referendum Election a. 1st Readin~ Ordinance 4028-85 66. Land Use Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential and Zoning Atlas Amendment from RM-16 (Medium Density Multi-Family Use) to RPD-18 (Residential Planned Development) for M&B's 44.013, 44.02 and 44.011 less Lake and less E. 250. and Coachman Ridge Condo Phase I and II, and a Final Master RPO Site Plan for Calibre Ridge Apartments (Multiple, Calibre Co of Tampa, Inc./City) LUP-85-23, Z-85-9, PSp-8S-23 61. Land Use Plan Amendment from Commercial/ Tourist Facilities to Medium Density Residential on ~ 400' of M&B 33.03, See 17-29-15 and Zoning Atlas Amendment from B (Business) to RM-16 (Medium Density Multi-Family Use) on M&B 33.03, See 17-29- 15 and H&B 22.01, Sec 20-29-15; located on the E side of Gulf Blvd immediately N of Sand Key Condo, Bayside Gardens IV. (American Design ~ Devel Corp/City) LUp-8S 25, Z-85-10 68. Zoning Atlas Amend from B (Business) to RM-28 (High Density Multi-Family Use) for ~&B ~3.a2, See 19-29-15; located on the,W side of Gulf Blvd. adjacent to and N of the Cabana Club Condo (American Design and Devel Corp/City) Z-85-11 69. Zoning Atlas Amendment from B (Business) to RM-16 (Medium Density Multi-Family Use) for M&B ~3.01 and Sand Key Condo South Beach 1501, See 19-29-15; located on the E side of Gulf Blvd. adjacent to and S of Sand Key Condo, Bayside Gardens II. (American Design & Devel Corp Multiple/ City) Z-85-12 ! j : i 'J xx Other CCJl'Wlli ~lon Action XXI Adjournment '-') 5 AGENDA 8115/85 :u. ,f';j - " .\ ORDINANCE NO. 4002-85 .: r.~ ~ . '< < . ';V..~: ,..:\' :t~:1~~ '/0"". ,.:.., .. ......'..;: '. ,"". .. . . ~/..: J~N Or-WINJ\NCB ,;HE~mI~'JG THE ZONING t\'fLi\S at' THE CITY OF CLE~RWATER, FLORIDA, 1985, AS hMENDBD, BY HECL)\SSl FY I NG AND ZONIJ.JG CERTAIN PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED HEREIN: PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF . ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONPLICT HEREWITH TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; PRO- VIDING FOR THE SEPARABILITY OF THE PROVISIONS HEREOf; PROVIDING FOR PROPER.NOTICE OF PRO- POSED ENACTMENTi AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTlVE DATE OF ~HIS ORDINANCE. NHEREi\S, on l-lay 16, 1985, the City Commis!'iion of the City of tlearwater, after proper public notice, held a public n~aring or: ce'rtain proposed changes. to the zoning atlas of the ci tj' of Clear~ater in accord~nce with procedure as established; and WHEREAS, certain oi the proposed ch~nges and amendrnentsto , . . I . , the zoning atlas were' approved by t~~ Ci~y Commission after its '. t' " evalIJ8t:ibn of all evidence presented'i.'at 'i:he" saie public hearing; and t'lHEREAS, ::he Local' Governr.tent Comprehens i 'Je P lann ing Act (LGCPA) requires that all development regulations and amendments .,' :. . . thereto related to an adopted comprehensive plan or element the=~of \ . be reviewed by tGe Local Planning Agency (LPA) for conformance wit~ :i ?lans adopted ;putsuant' to the LGCPI-\i and WHEREAS, the pinellas County Planning Council (PC?C) has been' des~gnat~d the Local Planning Agency for Pinellas Coun~y and ~he PCPC has. adopted guidelines with reference to each req~ired referral . process; and \vHEREAS, this Ordinance has been referred-to and considered bv t:h;; PCPC under said process; '\) NO~, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED 2Y THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following described ?rogerty in Clearwa~ar, Florida, is hereoy ciassifi~d and zoned ., }. ..- 4""11 . ... as nere~na::er ~~Q~cateQ, , ='Ino "Th~ Z'o'n;nc"~~i~s o~ ~h~ C1~V ..I... .... M_-.~l. ..L. 9<11"'._ --..I 1985 II , of Clearwater, Florida o~ as amended, 1S amencie6 :~ indicate tnat tact as .herein&~~er se~ '\\ out.: \ , .' " -1 _. .\ t, '. , c ~ ....' , .r'. .- . , . . ; . _' c '- .~..~' . ~. ~ ., . \ 1 , ( " (, <~ Zoned Rt,1- 1 2 Duplc:{-Ap~rtment Residentiul District From the NE Got"ncr of the 58 1/'4 of Section 7, Town- ship ~9 South, Rl\ng'2 16 E..1st, i-un thence N 89059' J611 W, ~long ~he East-Weat C0nter line of said Section, 1340.50 ieet for P.O.B.; thenc~ S 004Ut52J w, along the 40 Acr~' Line, 238.36 feet: thence N 89059 16" W, parallel ~o the East-West center line at said Section, 831.66 feet; thence N 0000'.14" E, 118.35 feet; thence ~ a9~59'l6" E, parallel to the East-West center line of said Section, 48.3), feet; tHence N 0~48'5;:" E, 120.0 f(;!et: thp.nce S U~~59' 16" E, along the Enst-West center 'line of s~id Sec~ion 7, Township 29 S0~th. Range 16 E3st. 785.0 feet to the P.O.B. AND F~om the NE corner'of the SE 1/~ of Section 7, Town- ship'29 South, RAnge 16 East, run thence N 89>;59'3.6" ~v, ~long the E3st-West center line of said Section, 2125.50 feet for the P.D.B:; thence continue N 89059' 1611 N, aloryg said East-West center line, 49.'99 feet; thence S 0000' 4 4 It \"1, 1 1 9 . 9 9 fee t:H the nee 5 8 9 0 59 1 1 6 II E t 4 8 ~ 3 1 fee t : thence N 0048'52" E,. 120.0 teet to the said East:-'tvest center line of said Section i, 'fownship 29 South, Range 16' C;:.lst and P.O.E. A~"D' A parcel 0 f land in the SE 1/4 of Sect.ion 7 t TOvJnsnip 29 Sout"n, Hi\nge 16 E;\st f furtiler described as follows: Begin at the NE corner of tne NW T/4 of the SE 1/4 of S~ction 7, 'L'ownship 29 South, 'Range 16 East, and run S 004H15J" \'1 nlonu t~"le 40 acre line, 238.36 feet to t:he P~O.B.; conti~ue S OQ46'5111 N along the 40 ac::e 11:1~, 434.70 teet; thence N 8905313111 ~v, 525.50 feet: ',:,hence N 0000'44" E, 4'33.26 feet; thence S 69059' 1611 E, 831.66 fe~t to the P.O.B. Section 2. The City of Clearwater does he!'eby certify -cnat t~e ~easures contained in this ordinance are consistent and in , confor~ance ~it~ t~e City's Comprehensiye Plan and i~clividual elements thereof adopted pursuant to the LGCPA and directs ,chat same be forwarded to the .Lpa for th~ir receipt and appropriate a<cion ~ , Section 3. All.ordinances or parts .of ordinances in conflict. herewith~are ~o ~ne extent of such conflict hereby repealed. Section 4. Should any part cr ?rovision of tnis ordinance be decla:::-ed by 3. cqur.t of compet.ent'jurisdiction to be in'la,lid, 'l ' the same sh~ll not affect the validity of the o!'dinance as a w~ole, or any pait ,~h0r~of. o~her tnan ~he part declared to be invalid. Sec-cion 5. ~otice of the proposed enac~men~ of this ordir.a~ceJ has been properly adver~ised in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with Sec<:ion j6o.0~1, Plqr.ida Statutes. -2- " . ~. :.;. . " 'I', " . .. \1 Section 6. The Planning Director is directed tb include ~nd set out and show upon the official zoning atlas of the ~~ty bf Clearwater tne foregoing am~ndments as hereinab6~~ set QIJt~ Section 7. Section 1 of this Orui~ance shall not uecome . '\ ~ . . ~ . '<;: effec~ive until the requisite autnorization has beenrec~ive~'> iro~ the Pinellas Coun~y PIRnning Council pursuant toi~s powers:' i c of Loc~l Planni~g Agency revi8w or Land Use Plan amendments, as. \ ...,':',:}: l, :. '~::';~~~ '~ ~:'.~ ; ~..:f. . ,. ~s .::lpplicable. ,t' ;,n' . . !:.~ .",:.': > ;,' c '.. '.' . ... ~~ PASSED ON FIRST READING Al:G'..1ct .1, 1985 .. l .~' \1 .1 '" , . PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING ,AND ADOPTED '. T" .' ,"": .' ~ . ~ ~ i: ~ .. .. ..06 ~S , ..' '" '. " .1 I' , ' , ,!. '!:' f/' Hayor-Commissioner i\ttest: i' H. :c '., ~.. "' > ) City Clerk ., ,,"; ......~.:: ~. ' ~~ . . \-". .". . ~L.. ., ,.f ./ +: ~ , ,,..:< ~;[:: . (, '\ . ~ ,{ ~~ i .: tc ~ ~ ' . . ,'.:.> '1 "\ 0\ " ,\ Il .\ ", .'. '.') , ~\ ,J i\ -3- ~->-".' ~, . .' ~R~ D"""" '" /.. v .' ~ ~\ '.1 ~ . '. t'Y'\ S. 0 I \ -:s . 0 "2- :1,:~~, C'" 1 'J ' ,. ;!~ ~ :.' .;! .!'; ''':0" ,~::-:o;"".'7-~~l1nnrnmllIl11111imllrnlInnnrnmmlll nnm~ ~T~ :~ = "-A 1--'-::' ~\. I " ;'1 = \ V\ rq.". S::;:, c_ , - ~\o. .: = ,~~,' ;1 == . " , '~011. :; __ ,". = I L' = . =' ",I tt "j. =. . ....... ='l'. . :1 . V' ,__ '\J .i3:M;.;:.:f? 07;~~ -~'-a :i! Ji' . . . '.. = ..' . 42'00'>('.. . '. . - .." 'J ., = . -. ," ._ . ': ..~''''','.= :,,'~;: L ?', f___ ..... . ='.(...,.,. __-31-01 '. = . , ";.,,, "'l~>,:.:<... = ... Lm'-"'1 . = "..,,, - " 1 .- - .---., 46 ~ " '--= ,.,,:~' r-t V' "'."" ,'.' i' ,I " - -~ . M. r _ ". : }~~-<""~1 ~2 :_.~.""' im&~11i11~lill1ll11111IlIlIlll\lIllIl\l\l1ll1ll11ll1ll~ :~} .... ~ r:-J ;:.;...' ',' . .' '.. :1": :......."'~,,, '." ',:- "~)" V''',', ".' . """:' ,":,~:.: ~ ~~4 I ~JL~ ::""'::':":" V'. .......:>,.. ." ,.d'i~.~~.'/L..;:~.! I /' 'j. ' .. " ~'. ..... " r '. . ' ": . . .:... " AP1.J' ., ....:,:~.. -> .:: ~ , ~ ~ ..'....'.. ....:;, . '.. ' ':.. . :" '":,,..' ".... 'B' :;'"...' , , . .::::>.>.~; ~ IJ" ~~ ' ',", .:: ~,:. '. .' "., ~~ "':,. ..:' L:.' ::"';'.::':'~' ". '. .;;.. ,'. ' ", ',",::"~ I 1 ' '.' . ., .. , , '. . .,. .. \ f.' L;,~ . (~.' _' ,.... .... -'_', ...;-.:,._!..:."t~i'i~. _..:i~_ ~j: ~Z.':]f!l : I .. "1~ :. a 13.0:;; f,'. '. "f4.03 . ~" i . . , ...... ," '~ ..:. ~ cL v cL Ll_ Q~ne=/Applicant:. r-W IN L~\<. ec; M FG,. Co LAND USE ' .. LO ,^r 0 121\J ~ l"Tl.( :tram: R-.:S'\J)6k.)\'( AL ircm: RM-8' M E 1) l U Nt D E' tv S (T'71 to~ RcS\)jtOT\f\L I to';~RM.\L PSO?~~7,( 0{ REZONiNG I 1 DESCR1?TlON: 2. SS'-6 Lu? BS-- 2.0 l PROPOSED.. LArlD lJSE PL.A1V ,AJ1IJEf\JDI'i1.1=lvT. ~ zai'JING t'v\ 'S. \3. 42.01 \ 2. ,q '3 A C-. Public Hea~ing Item Neffiber Planning and ,,' City _ Zoning Board l!-3o' t:5" C?":,wission 5-(b- 8~ To \.,';: s hip L 0, R::.. n gel 6 At 1 a 5 P'a g e F -' \ Y SCALf: 1" = .2 0 0 J See': i 0 i1 7 '0 Si:1g'le :=<1.:;111y :'- Dt'l:'llex " (l :'~~~:::..~=:.:-:: '.v B ~."-l.".3C:S _ ...J .. _ - V 1; - - "n ~ . :;:. '- ~ lw , I ~.\ , \) ~ ~,.. ',j f )1 /'I"~''';' '\n , . , , ' ORDINANCE NO. 4003-85 AN. anDr NANCI:: 02, THE CITY OF' Ct.El\Rt>;i\'f'ER, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2019, RELATING TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY .OF CLE^RWATE~; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES: PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT: kND PRO- VIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE.. "WBEREi,S, tne Loca 1 GOVC1:':1ffient Cnmprehensive Planning Act (LGCPA) requires t:hnt all development reguli\'t.ions nnd amendments ther~to related to an ndopted comorehJnsive plan or element thereof be reviewed by the Local Planning Agency (LPA) for conformance with plan~ adopted pursuant to the LGCPA; and WHEREAS, the Pincllas County Planning Council (PCPC) nas been designateu the Local Planning Agency for Pinellas County and the, pepc has adopted guidelines with reference to such required referral process: and WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been refer~ed to and considered by " . the PCPC under said process: NON, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY C01>lHISSION OF 'l'HE CITY, OF CLEARh1P.TER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the Local Gov~rnment Comprehensive Plann~ng Act, 1975, as amend~d, and pursuant ~o all' ~pplicable provisions of law, Section 1 of Ordinance No. 2019 ~5 . amended by placing the hereinafterdescribeo property in ~he land .. . .;( use category. as follows: PrODertv Land Use Catecorv From: Low Density Residen~ial .,) (L.U.P. 8S-20) From the NE corner of the SE 1/4 or Sec~ion 7, To',mship 29 South;' Range 16 East, run thence N 89059116~ W, al~ng the East-West center line of aid Section, 1340.50 feet for P.D.B.; thence S 00 48'52" \\', ~lon'g the 40 Acre Line, 238.36 feet; tnence N 89Q59' 16" .W, parallel to the East-West center line of said Section, ~31 .66 feet; thence 1'1 0::'00'4';11 E, ,1 ;8.35 feet: thence S 89.:159' 1611 E, parallel too the East,- West center lirie of said Section, 48.31 ~ feet;. thence N 0048'5211 E, 120.0 feet; trlence S &9=59' 16" 81 along the Ee,st- . West center li~e of said S~ction 7, Township 29 3outn, Range 16 East, 785.0 feet to the P.C.B. b.ND From tbe m~. corne r of th:: SE 1/4 (,1 i Section 7, l'o~'msnip .2 9 Sou~h, Rnnge .r3 East, run thence N 89059' 16" ~'l, along the East-West cen~~r line of sald S~ction, " To: t"ledium Dens! ty R.asid.::!~+:i~l '\~ -1- 1/ " , ' ~ ~'," , . ".':":' :,:,.>:.,p.~ :?:~~tl , -... '-;~ . 1\" o. ",'~ . ". 21~5.~U feet tor the P.O.B.i thence continue N S90~9' 16" \v, alonl] said East- West center line, 49.99 feet; thence 5 0 0 0 0 ' 4 4 II \'1, 1 1 Sl . 9 9 fee t ; the nee S e 9 0 59'16" E, 4R.31 fect; thence N 00481~211 E, 120.0 feet to tile .5aicl Eclst-t'1est cente,!, line of said Section 7, Townsnip 29 South, ~ange 16 East and P.O.B. AND A parcel of land in the SE 1/4 of Section 7, Township 29 South, Range 16 E~st, 'further described as follows~ Begin at the NE corner Ot ~he NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 7, Township 29 South, Range 16.East, and run S 0.048'5111 \'1 olona tlle 40 tlcre line, 238.36 feet to the P.O.B:; continue S 0048'5jll W along the 40 acre line~ 434.70 feet; thence t,i 89053'3P W, 825.58 feet; thence N 00.00'44" E, 433.28 feet; thence S 89059'16" E, 831.66 feet to the P.O.B. J . /:', /~ .'. , '.+ " /lJ Section 2. . The City of C,learwater does tlereby certify that " ( the measures contained in this ordinance are consistent and in d conformance ',-.lith the City,fs Comprehensive Plan andlndividual elements thereof adopted pursuant to tne LGCPA and directs that . (/ same be forwarded to the LPA for their receipt and a9propriate ( ~ction. Section 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict here\-Jith are to the extent of such conflict hereby repeale,d. ,d Section 4. Notice of the proposed enactment of ~nis ordinance .l has been progerly advertised in a newspaper of general'circula~ion in accordance with Section 166.041., Florida Statutes. Section 5. Section 1 of this Ordinance shall not become effective until the requisite authorization has been received .' , from the Pinellas County Planning Council pursuant to its payers . of Local P~~nning Agency review or Land Use Plan amendments, as ~s applicable. PASSED ON FIRST READING ~U('cst 1, 1ge5 . .) '} PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AtlO ."'.DOPTED "'\ ',\ Mayor-Commissioner AtteSt:: ."' City Cler;c ~ -4- -~~. '...-...". , f" 1~.03 ,', . ~"" f""\. t ~t'(~ I . I E"=T;i~;S: ." V" ~' , ~ ~~~ '. I ~~. .' : ~ ;,. h . Mac \"3 . ~ "'2... '~J : ....; '. ," d '" ;~~~ :,' , ': i~,77: '~,;",~:-'-~mmmmnmlllmnllnllnmIImmmlllmmn~:tr '1 :1 = M!=(7.." ~\' 1 l' ~l = ~\ 0--:' ': =~.~.' n = . ~ Q:i'. :~ = .~=. ' < ...-.... , ~t 1\" " 'V'_: V R M ":i8~O:~FrC/~\a;l; . . - . . "-\.' / . ...' _, I' ; ..'"":\:". ;:. ,". .':,'~ .. . '." : ~ :' ~.~': oJ'{ ..'. .. . .':, '.> ~ ;...! j, , = -.(,.... .-.2.J .. ..-...... .".c' ",' ...- . . .. ~_-3['OI = =. , !-A'" "1 ' = "". = . jJ ' '= ',' .,Io! =' 04 6 I J '. ;2..-:.. . .,: I'^' 1-1 tV' " =: .,,:!. . -f~~~--1 ~'z~ =., im'&~l1ill~illll"111II1ll1I1I1ll1\1\1I1Il1l1I1II II II II~ '; ; ~TlI.4 err 4~ ;J,. ..... "",',;,:,,"'.',,~',.,,"'.'.' ,"',',:' ",:"~:: 1"':,'.. '...'.......,'. . ..'.:,~':,:/?, ,~..':'...::..y..;..: '~,.','.' -':':'>::', ;':,:::";{\ : ~:4 I ~ V I ,,' 'c:._:~:.r~'~~:. .' . ". . ,,, " ,. ,.. . . I :. '. ' .... . '.. ,:':Ll2.09 APD ..':.'. ~ .' , ,.'" ~ "",' ,',',p: ,: :" " '.>,;:;;;) I I l--,' ,'; " ,', .", ',", ," .:; >.' >'9+ I,t " 42:'" ,:' ',.,',(>m ".,,' " '.,' ," " " 'mt::, ,';)J~~l . . ,,~----=. t: .. .". ',": [.....-.....~.....,......-_~.,~__""'""'".....~....~_.....~...__~......-...-..i 1 .: : ~...' i ~.,;-;;-- -.. " _' . ~ _ _ . . !"''':'''~'~'''''''. t'":., ..... ..c' r . >{ PROPOSED 1 PL,AiY .AI11~i'JOll;ri=lvT.~ RfZ01\ilNG 1 "\1 PRO?::BiY O::.sCRI?TtoN: 2. 65-6 I LU? ~5'"- 2..0 . , . ":7':) , I '.! :. a \~. 01 fl LAf\10 lJSE O~nerJAoclicant:' p . . . \WtN L~Ke~ MFG- Co L'AND USE . ... LO \Iv" 0 6 \\1 !: t"T '{ zrom: ~~S' 11:> 6 k.J\'[ A L.. . M ED \ U Nl D E' tv ~ CT'11 tO~ RcS\j)EUT\AL I ZONING =rcr.:i,: R M -9 M~~ 41.01 '''"I \ 2. ,q 3 A c- , I .. .0 cL r..l- 'to';~ R M. \'2... Planning and Ci~y _ \ P'.iblic: Hea:-ing Item ~L:mbe:- Zoning Board ~/-3o' 85" C~n:i:1ission r;i-IG- 8~ SCALf.:l'I:200" Sec:tic;1 7 Tc....';'.ship 'Lq R~nge t6 Atl?s P';:.ge F-\:1 " Si:-:g:e ?a:7l:!Y .-' D~:':1!e:': n >r'..::::.!=::-,:l\' 8 :"3:~::S5 V V'::'':::=':1': , , r r . , ~ .. .. ~ OHgINANCE NO. 4011-85 'l'a AN ORDINANCE' OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ANNEXING ^ POHTION OF LOT 19, ,PINELLAS GROVES SUBDIVISION IN THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, INTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID ADDITION ACCORDING TO THE'PRO- VISIONS OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF CLEARW~TER, FLORIDA, AND rHE LAWS OF FLORIDA; AFTER PROPER PUBLIC NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THEREON, ESTABLISHING.THE FIRE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR SAID PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINMNCE. \vHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida, received a sworn petition from Gerard R. Wright and Marion E. Wright, his,wife, requesting the City to annex a certain parcel of real es~ate described hereinafter, owned by them, into the corporate" limits of the City of Clearwater, Florida; and, WHEREAS, the City Commission, after due consideration of said request for annexation, at a regular meeting held on April 18, 1985, voted unanimously to accept said request and authorized the prbper officials to set up a pUblic hearing thereon for the determi~ation and eotablishing ot fire district classification and to prepa~e an, 'Ii ' ordinanc2 to a~nex said parcel of real estate into t~e co~porate limi~s of the City of Clearwater in accordance with the pr?visicns of Chapter 171, Florida Statutes; and \-lHEREAS, on June 6, 1985, t~e City Cornrnis s ion of' the Ci ~y of Clearwater, after proper public notice, held a public' hearing for the determination and establishment of fire dis~rict classification for said real propertYi and WHEREAS, Ene Local Government Comorehensive Plannina Ac~ ~ c ~ .r) . (LGCPA) requires that all development reg1llations and amendments c~ereto related to an adopted comprehensive plan or element ~hereof be reviewed b~' the Local Plan~in~: Agency (L?~) for conformance with pla~s adopted ?ursuantto the LGCPA;, and ~~HEREAS, ~he Pinellas County Planning Ccu~cil (PCPC) has neen designated the Local Planning Agency for Pinellas Ccunty and ~he FCPC has ~dop~ed guidelilles wi~h reference co 5UC~ requi~ed refe=ral pro':ess; gnd -i- P~EMIEIt fL If'-C pA..C1I!. >'oA - ,FJ.IJ';J7IW,9c.. fJ.../?r.I -r~ Jj E3- 61 Vfit\J ,/!J ~ M r 0/1 /VI-J~t. Tr/s.. ).p.d./'(. , , . ";.... ". . ~ ~.:. .' .,' \~HEREi\S, this Ordino.l1ce has been referred to and considered by the PCPC under sa~a process; NOW, TBEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: " Section 1. After its evaluation of all evidence presented at a proper public hearing, the City of Clearwater, acting by and through its City Commission, by t~e ~~thori~y and under the provis~ons of . 58ction 171.044, Florida St3tU~~S, hereby annexes into the corporate limits of the City of Clearwater, Florida, an9 redeEines the boundary ~I lines'()f said City 50 as ~o include the following d~scribed real property in Pinellas County, Florid~, and estaolishes fire district classification tnerefor: A parcel of land locnted in the SW 1/4 of S~ction 19, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, also being a portion of Lot 19 of the Plat of pinellas Groves, as recorded in Plat Book 1, page 55 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particul~rly described as follows: Commence at the SE corner of the Pla~ of Hulett Estates, as recorded in Plat Book 56, page 64, Public Records of said Pinellas County, being the P.O.B.; thence N 00031' 2511 E, along the \'lest boundary of said Lot 19, for 449.14 feet; thence S a9C05t2911 E for 105.00 feet; thence N 00~2914511 E for 185.01 ~eet to a point on the South right-of-way line of Nursery (a. 33 foot half right-of-w,3.Y); thence S 89009'04" E, along said South line, for 98.32 feet; trlence so 00 36140" W for 135.06 feet; tnence 5 89009'1611 E for 99.95 teet '-0 a ooint on the East boundary of said Lot i9, and along said boundary for the following 2 courses; thence 1) S 00<J39'29" W for 499.05 feet; thence 2) N 890081 1U" W for 301.80 feet tb the P.O.B. The above described property is hereby designated Fire District No.2. Section 2. The City of Clearwater does he~eby certify that the measures ccnt~ined in this ordinance are consistent Rnc in confor~ance with tne'City's Comprehensive Plan and individual eleclents thereof adopted pursuant to the LGCPA and dire.c~s that' same b8 forw~rded , ) to the LPA for their receipt and appropriate action. Sectic~ 3. The City CQmm~5sion hereby :or~ally and accordi~g to law, accepts ths dGdication of all easemcn~s, s~ree~s, parks, plazas, places, rights-of-way and other dedic~tions ~o t:1e public which have heretofore been ~ade by plat, dee6 0= user \li~hin :he , ) areas so anr,exed. '. }: .! -2- ~ ,- . . . :,: ", ....,..: ..f".. ~("ll"lG c '.00 . ': >./ ::, :..':!:.:~i~'~ SectiOll 4. The City Engin~er t the City Clerk and the Planning.: ....>:.<:j; . ' ",'"". . 'PH <", f":. Director nre directed to include c'\nd set out and ShOW upon the'. . , '. . '., 'r,t' official maps and records of the City of Clearwater the foregoing property and the fire district classification therefo~. > :f' ~ ".. ,.;~ . ,."c. Section 5. This orGinance and notice of the ?roposed enactment of same has been properly advertisf'3d in a ne\Jspaper of general , .' circulation in accordance with Section 166.041, Floiida Statutes, and Section 171.044, Florida Statutes. Section 6. This ordinance shall become effective immedintely I' ,. upon its passage and enrollment in the City of Clearwater Ordinance Book and a copy thereof being filed by the City Clerk for recording in the office of thee'.erk of tte Circuit Court of Pinellas County, " '" Plorida. In accordance with S2ction 17i.091, and 5ec~ion '171.044, Florida Statutes, a certified copy ~hall be ~iledwith the , J Department of State of th~ State of Florida. .. ' August], 1935 . PASSED ON FIRST READING :;', ~ '. , ,.' PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED ,,' " , '.: " " ,; Mayor-Cownissioner '., " , Attest: <,\ ,. City Clerk <, ., j: , '.) ,] {,. J, 1 . ORDIN1\NCE NO.. 40.1.2-85 ".' ';' . '?-:~"[f '.:":'"3" ':':""<~:'~\."lt , ; . . . ~',:.;:'~ . . i.a ". ,! " AN ORDINi..NCE Ar1EtlDING 'rUE ZONING Nl'LAS OP. THE crrry OF CLEhR\'ll\'rER, FLORIDi\, 1985, AS At-tENDED, BY ZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY RECENTLY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLIC~ HEREWITH TO THE EXTENT OP SUCH CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR THE SEPARABILITY OF,THE PROVISIONS HEREOF: PROVIDING FOR PROPER, NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT': AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. .. . ' 'e,'< WHEREAS, on June' 6, 1985, the City Commission of the City of , .> Clearwate~, after proper public notice, held a public hearing for the determination and ~stablishment of zoriing classifications for certain property annexed into the c{ty of Clearwater in accordance "with procedure as established; and \'lHEREAS, certain of the' amendments to the zoning atlas ffor establishing zoning for such newly annexed real property were approved by the Cit'l Commission after its evaluation of n11 evidence presented at the saia public hearing; and tVHEREAS, -che Local .Government Comprehensive Planning Act (LGCPA) requires that all development regulations and amendments thereto related to an adopted comprehensive plan or element thereof be reviewed by the Local Planning Agency (LPA) for conformance with plans adopted pursuant to LGCPA; and WHEREAS, the Pinellas County Planning Council (PCPC) has been designated the Local Planning .Agency for pinellas County and the PCPC has adopted guidelines with reference to such required referral process; and ,\ WHEREAS, this ordinance has been referred to and considered by the PCPC under said process; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY' THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY O~ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. .'~1 ~ The following descr1cea'property in Clearwater, Florida, is hereb~ classified and zoned as hereina~ter indicated, "') and liThe Zoning A:l3.s of the City of Clear.v.::lter, Flo'!'-ida of 1985", as amended, is amendea to indicate that' fac't as herainafter set out: ~,. i 0, Zoned RS-75 - Single Frtmily Residence District j\ pa.rce 1 0 Eland loea tcd in the 5~oJ' 1/4 of Section 19, Township' 29 Soutn, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, also bGing a portion of Lot 19 of the Plat of pinel IuS Grove~, as recorded in' Plat Book 1, page 55 of the Public Rocords of Pinellas County, Florida, being more' particularly described as follows: . Conunence at the SE corner of the Plat of Hulett Estates r as .recorded in Plat 'BOOK 56, page. 64, Public Reco~ds of said Pinellao County, being the P.Q.B.; thence N 00031'25" E,along tOt:! Nest boundary of sa'id Lot 19, tor 449. ~ 4 feet; thence S 89005' 2911 E for 105.00 feet; thence N OO'~29t45" E for 185.01 fe.et to a poipt on the South right-of-\V'ay line or Nursery . (a 3 3 f 0 0 t h ~1 f rig h t - 0 f - v',' a y); the n c e S 8 9 0 0 9 r 0 4" E, , along said South line, for 98.32 feet; thence S 000 36'40" W for 135.06 feet; thence S 89009'1611 E for 99.95 feet to a point on the East. boundary of'said Lot 19: and along said boundary for the following 2 courses; thence 1) S 00039'29" W for 499.05 feet; the nee 2) N 89 0 0 8' 1 0 11 W for 30 1. a 0 feet .t 0 the P.o. B . :', '. ,:^. ',:. " ::;:~.~~ , '" . . ',: "} .~:~ , f <~; ,j ,; , ,(;., ,- . . ~;t ",'., . hi II ".\\-:. '. ~ ~', ,"} i.) ;>.1; j Section 2. The City of Clearwater does hereby certify. that the measures contained in this ordinRn~c are 'con~istent and in conformance with the City's ccm9rehenstve Plan and individual elements thereof adopted pur5u~nt to the LGCPA and directs that same be forwarded to the LPA for ~heir receipt and appropriate action. Section 3. All srdinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are to the extent of such conflict here~y' rpeealed. Section 4. Should c.ny part or provision of. this ordin'ance be declared by a court of competent 'jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect th~ validity of: theordinan'ce as a t'lhole, or '; n '. any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid.' Section 5'. Notice of the proposed enactment I.: 0.. this ordinance has been properly advertised in n newspaper of generul circulation ., ., in accordancs with Section 166.041, Florida Statutes. Section 6. TH~ Planning Direc~or is directed to include and set out and'show u~on the off{bial <, zoning atlas of the Ci~y of Clearwater th~ foregoing'~mendment as hereinabove set out. Section 7. The provisions of this ordinunce shall ~ake effect. , irrmediately u90n its passage. PASSED ON FIRST READING August 1, 1985 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Attest: MRyor-Comrnissionar City Clerk -2- I I d -, m I 2. .....t . ' . ~l ; '<<:1: ::; - I .;; ~ 5.51 ~: c..a.5 oct. <g:;~ C. R. I I .!5 v II !. 20 "1 a: , I&J il- l~ '. . . . 'H :.. '/ A ~ ). ~ . ),. I . _ '.t'!l.T1 1"'3 1:50 _~ ~~0':-~~~~":""-'~40~~-:::::'--;-- _---!.._" _. _...4,. ~____ . a /\ , --' . . I - " PROPOSED..ANNEXATION ANoZONING t Owne;/App\~cant~G. R ~ M, E~'~R\G'r-\\ . .. proper~Y=A gr;--\ from: c- 2 c:. 0 \,) N.,..y A. Duplex PA~T L.a\' lq I _ ? \ tV ELL- p..<) G R.OVC) SW 1/4 ~ -G Ac..' TPJ:anning and _ Ci ty , Zoning Board 5-l,-/-8::> Commission 6-'6- It. Township 2.. q Range \ 6 Atlas Page j- t L[ , "Vacant ~ :. Request to : RS 75 Public Hearing Item Number [. ;-O'~'_~~~, Section \ q . 5 in g 1 e F am i 1 y' o 1-fulti-Family . ' B Business ,'j '.,> , '. ',./\ ~"'C~:>' :',i\/{.~~ , , " : :;);: > :.,' : ." .". ~t ,~ ORDINANCE NO. 4013-85 I\N ORDINANCE: Of THE CI'ry OF CLEi-\RWATEr<, FLORIDA, ANNEXING LOTS 7 AND B, SOU'rH. BINGHAMTON PI\RK SUBDIVISION, PHlELLAS COUN'ry, FLORIDA, ItJTO THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARY LINES OF 'rHE ,CITY TO INCLUDE SAID i\DDI'rrON ACCORDING TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CHARTER Of THE CITY OF CLEAR\'lATER, .,FLORIDA, AND THE LANS OF FLORIDA; AFTER PROPER PUBLIC NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING THEREON, ESTABLISHING THE FIRE DISTRICT CLASSI- FICATION FOR SAID PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT: AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. , . ". .f. " : ~.' .". ~J , ' ., 'I: , ' , .'. . i WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City or Clearwater, Florida, received a s\Vorn petition from cindi L. Carr and J. Randy Roberts ~equesting the City to annex a certain 9arcel of real estate described he~einufter, ,owned by them! into the corporate limits of the City ot Clearwater, Florida; und \ojHEREAS, the Ci ty Comrniss ion, ,a fter due cons idera tioD ot said reques~ for annexation, at a regular meeting held on April 18, 1985, voted unanimously to accept said ,request and au-:horized the proper officials to set up a public hearing thereon for the determination and estnbli$hing of fire district classification and to ?re~are an ordinance to annex said rarcel of real estate ~nto ~he co~porate limits of the City of Clearwater in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 171, Florida Sta~utes; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 1985, ~he City Commission of the City of Clearwater, aft.er proper public notice, held a,'public hearing for tne deter.mination and establishment 0: :ire district classification fo~ said real propertYi and , , i1HEREAS, -:he Local Governmenr. Com?renBnsiv= Plannins ~ct (LGCPA) requ~res tha~ all develooment regulations and amendments " . tnereto related. to an adopted comprehensive ulan or elemen: ~nereoi " . be reviewed by the Loc~l Planning Agency (L?A) for cor.rori:l.JDee vIi tn plans adopted pursuant to the LGCPAi ~nd . \j ~~HEREASr ~he P~nel1as CQunty 21annin~ Cou~cil (?CP~) ~as been designa~ed the Local Planning.~gericy tor Pinell~s County ana tne PCPC has (ldapt.ed guidelines '.-Jith reference to sue;) ',. re(!".J i r~c. refl~rrcd process; and IJ 1> /) I T 10AI,9-L .1L/~ H/JY :Bt:EN. 6ft/eN -1- , 011 Iftr;}ly. --TlI S'JJ..JI(.: f' :?~: ~ . . . the PCPC under said proccss~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: ci Sec~ion 1. After its evaluation of all evidence presented at a proper public nearing, the City. of c~earwater, acting 'by and through its City COffiITlission, by the autnority and under the provisions of . Seetin 171.044, Floridn Statutes, hereby annexes into the corporate (, limits of the City of Clearwater, Florida, and redefines the boundary lines of the City so i'3.S to include the following describeci real property in Pinellas County, Florida, and establishes fire district classification th~refor: Lots 7 and 8, South Binghamton Park, according to tne map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 12, page 81,of toe Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. The above described property 15 hereby designated Fire District No.2. Section 2. The City of Clearwater does hereby c~rtify that the ~I measures contain~d iD this ordinance are consistent a~d in conformance with che'City's Comprehensive Plan and individual elanents thereof ado9ted pursuant tt) tne LGCPA and directs that same be forwarded to the LPA for their receipt and appropriate action. Section 3. The City Commission hereDY for~ally a~a according co law, accepts the dedication of all easements, streets, parks, plazas, places, rights-af-way and other dedications to the public which have he~etcfore oeen made by plat, deed or. user within the areas so annexed. Section 4. The City Engineer, the City Cle~~ an6 the Planning Director are di=ectp.d to include c.nd set. OU~\ and shO\.,."\,lJpan the official maps and r~cords of tne City o~ Cle3r~3ter t~e fo~~going property and ths fire district classification ther2fc~. Section 5. This ordinance and notice of tbe 7ro~o5ea e::ac-:ment of same has been pr~perly advertised in a newspaper 'If general circulation in accordanc'Z! .....ith ,S8c-:.ion 166.0-111 ?lorid;:;, S':-atutes, and Section 171.044, FloridA St3t~tes. ~I -i- ~.. t, '1: 0, ~ 'y' ,1 ,; , ~1 c' . , ' ."':'.;" ~t': ~,' . . . ~,', :"\;'. ':::'::;'-::' ;'::,~i;:_'1:r,:Yf.::~'.;7~W~:~;~~{f~" ~ Section 6. 'rhis ordinance shall become effective imm.ediatel~i..,~'",;' ;,.::.~.::.:.,~~ . ' ~..'. ,~:".:'r '../:'c>': :u<:;~, :.~}.:~\:r~~ upon its passage and enrollment in the City of ClearwaterOrdinance{/ '....;,;..<;~[~ } ." : .,;. .;'.... .~:;" ..~.,;::.t>~;>l::Zti~1 Book and a copy thereof being ~ i l'ed by the Ci ty C~erk for recor,din'g :..';.'..::,i..),;::::.~~ ::o:::a ~f f ::e a::o:::n::e:: t:f S:~:i:~r~~~~ o:~~r:n:f s:::::~a: 7~~~::~" :::,I"'~ Florida Statutes, a certified c09Y 'snall be filecf.""ith the.' "";?~t)tI Department of State of the State of Florida;' , /.(~.~ ".' ~~~. PASSED ON FIRST READING AurJust ), J 985 . '! , ~. . . .j>O.. . ",",",: . I c ..~ . /~~~. . ~; I' PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED I .. '.'.,~. " , .'.~ ;:'~i ,:'/: '( <\} ,:'cl .'/ , .. ,.,' ,. , > -:::; " :,I~, Mayor-commissioner, ., " . )"~.,': Attest: . ;' .~;' "' ~\.. >.' . I,' , .'\..; ~ . ';'/ l ." t.:~ . ,> Ya , i J .",. " . '. Ci ty . Clerk " :)J- , ",5i~ . <:;'-j .,. , ~ ~.~.\~ " ")& .>:0. ,':'\~ .,.-~ , ,"~}; . """'~' ",'~ . " " '~J . :',f , .~ . :, 'i " " ;:. , .I': " . , ,! t. .) '1 '\,' , ' >,}'. .' . . " 0 . "\i. ., , '" ',I ~ f.> '} ',. . ....;. , . , '!, . ' . c,.f .}j " -,"",p"" ",', "l""'~ 2:2'~;~~, -...J C i. ..0"....:, O(~DIN^NCE NO. 4014-85 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, 1985, AS AMENDED, BY ZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY RECENTLY ANNEXED uno THE CI'rY Or Cr.EARWA'rER, AS DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING fOR RE~E^L OF ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR THE SEPARABILITY OF THE PROVISIONS HEREOf; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF' PROPOSED ENt1C'J~MEN'r; Al;O PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINhNCE. NHEREAS, on June 6, 1985, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, after proper public notice, he~d a public hearing for the det~rrnination and establishment of zoning classifications for certain proper~y annexed into the City of Clearwater in acco=dance 'l w1th procedure as establ1sned; and~ WHEREAS, cer~~in of the amendmen~s ~o the zoning a~las for est~bli5hi;1g zoning for such newly annexed. real 9roper-ty were approved b~r the City Commission after i~= evaluation of all evidence presented at the said public hearing; and -\ WHEREAS, the Local Government Cl)mprehensive, Planning Act [LGCPA) require~ that all dev8lop~ent res~la~icns a~damendments tnere-=o rela-:ed :0 an M.6.opt~d cornprehe!lSiv~' r'lan or element thereof '"I be r~viewed by tne Local Planning Agency (L?A) for co;;formance witn .u plans adopt~d ~ursuant to LGCPA; and WHEREAS, the Pinellas County Planning Council (PCPC) has been design~ted the Local Planning Agency for Pinellas ~oU;1ty and the PCPC has adopted g~idelines with referer.ce to such required refsrr3l process; and NHEREAS, this Ordinance has been referred to and consiaerea by the pepc under said process; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION 02 THE CITY OF CLEARt~TERf FLORIDA: ',) Section 1. The following described 9ro~ertY l.n Clear;.,Rter, Florida, is hereby classified ana zoneC: .... . - ~ ... as r.e~e1.~a:ter 1na1.Ca~eal and lIT~le'zoning Atlas of the City 0: Clearwa<:er"Florida of '1985", ""j as arne~ded, is ume~6ed to indicote that f?c~ as ne~einaf':er set out: :t';. ~':' '. :' -1- ~oned RM-8 - Single Family, Duplex, Apartment' Residential District '. ' " '~'." .' i<:,<.~:}~ . ",~~! Lots 7 and 8, South Binghamton Park, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 12, pays 81 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Section 2. The City of Clearwater does hereby certify that the measures contained in this ordinance are consLsten~ and in conform~nce with ~he Cityts Comprehensive Plan and individual elements thereof adopted.pursuant to the LGCPt-\ and directs that same be forwarded to the LPA for their receipt and appropriate action. Section 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are to the extent of such conflict hereby repealed. Section 4. Should any part or provision of this ordinance be declared by a court of com~etent jllrisd!ction to be invalid, ~he same shall not affect the validity of ~he ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 5. Notice of the proposed enactment of this ordinance nas been properly advertised in a newspager or general circulation ~n accordance with Section 166.041, Florida Statutes. Section 6. Tne Planning Director is directed to include and set out and show upon the official zoning atlas of the City of Clearw~ter the foregoing amendme~t as hereinabove ~et out. Section 7. The provisions of this ordinance shall tak~ effect immediately upo~ its passage. PASSED ON FIRST READING August 1. 1985 '\ PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READI~G AND ADOPTED ) l-1C'yor-Cor:unissioner .~ Attest: City Cleri< ;j . , -2- 1\ r- I I I I I I I , I I I I I I t I 1 I L ,1 :,___ Prop'c r-ty'- A 85'"- \ 4 LO '\5. 7 ~ 8 SOllYH 6, NG- H~M 'T 0 N PARK s " os e: Q E. E v A ---m', S~O' , I j ~ ~;)' ~ I ~9 I I r I I Ji I I I I 1'1' , I I 3E:RTL,.\NO NAY '~'i~~\1\ 'ZJ I I I ., .-.-1., ..~,l,,:.- 32. \1 .-... ,,'" .""', " . 'Ii . . J.... ". I~.. '.. " '~, o ( Z' 4 ..J ~ a: 4 Q., .... - ..."" .....~, '~:-:':."r ..~. L.A "v I \ 'i 1 '7~ ~ w > ~ . , I i C'a \...--... ; {.... )- - 1-' d cl I I t- , VI ' 7 I . ! I --' RO. Cl ! : VII . LU ' 1 ..J t o~ u' 14 PO' ~I , . .U o!l I I V .....~.....~' _~;;~~3~ ..........". .;r~_ .,. TURNKEY. .-_04: r . DE'vELOPP ....NT '::'.-..- .~"'? A~ c::;?- , ~1~2-_0~l~.....';:/'--~ ' I ' , I PROPOSED,.jl),)\l N EX~/j~TI 0 N ~""JZOr\Jfr"G O\.;n c r / i\ P P i'i can teA R R / ROB E: R \:S :-_--- i'cquest R-4 , to c.OV'N"\-r from to R M - 8 " ~. , _ -..: f I " I, . ~ - f - .. .. . . o . 2q A~ L Planning and - City I ?Ubl.i~~3ring Item :-\urnber .Zoning Board 5-(t{-fJS C?~mission r;-b-8- 1; - :::::r----r __ _1 '. -:.:::1 , See t ion"3 To h' n 5 hip 2 '( Ran gel S- A t 1 asP age C. 9 .. =. __ __ '::....:::0- _. _.____--...... . o Single Fomily' ^ Du?lex 0 >llllti-FJlaily B Business V Vacant - ...-. -.---. -~- ,..- ..... - - - .... ,.~: ,) ORDINANCE NO. 4018-85 . 't ....~...~.. ""J...~"'-~)'''~ : :,.r.' \_~~~;;:. ~ to ",-l'}~, "lb" .,.1",,... . ,::: :' ..", ;.:....\.t..:i; . ...., . . <.i.~' . ,.r . \,,' , I~' ), , AN ORDIN1\NCE OF 'rUE CI'fY OF Cl.Ei\RtoJATER, FLORID1-\, ^NENDING CHAPTER 72, ALCOHOLIC OEVER^GES, OF TrrLE VII, BUSINESSES AND nUSINESS REGULATIONS, OF THE . CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CLEARWATER, TO CLARIFY , USE OF. \-vORD 110WNERSlnpu; 'ro UPDATE LIST OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE DESIGNATIONS: TO PROVIDE THAT THE DRINKING AGE SHALL DE TWENTY-ONE, WITH CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS, 'IN l\CCORDANCE WITH 'J'BE FLORIDll S'rATU'I'ES; PROVIDING FOR '1'118 SEPi\RABI LPrV OF' 'J'HE PROVISIONS HEREOF' PROVIDING . , FOH 'NIB HEPEAL OF ORDINANCES OR PAR1J.'S OF ORDIHANCES' IN. CONFLIC'l' BERE\'l1 TH;' PROVIDING FOR NO'J'ICE OF '1'HE PROPOSED ENACTMENT: AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DNI'E.. FOR '1'HI5 ORDINANCE. . <:+ c. ,':c . .:' WHEREAS, the Legislature of ~he State of Florida raised the \ drinking age to twenty-one, with certain exceptions, effective July 1, 1985; and WHEREAS, the Code of Ordinances' of ~he city of Clearwater should be amended to. reflect the change in the Florida Statutes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMHISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: ;i' 'J Section 1.' That Subsection (e) of Section 72.01, Purpose, of Article I, Generally, of Chapter 72, Alcoholic Beve=ages ," of , Title VII, Businesses and Busine~s Regulations, of the Code of Ordinanc~s, City of Clearwat~r, is hereby ~mended to read as , ' , : ;:; follo\'ls: " (e) Alcoholic beverage zoning designations are approved. for a specific property and a specific applicant. Any change in the business ownership will require the filing of a new application which may be approved administratively by the city clerk if such establishment was approved by the city commission under guidelines contained in chapter 72 of the Code of Ordinances as of October 21, 1982. If city commission app~oval was granted prior to October 21, 1902, such new application must be sub- mitted to the city c?mmission for approval. .:) Section 2. That Section 72.03, Designations; license .clas~ifications, of Article I, Generally" of Chapter 72, Alcoholic Beverages, of Title VII, Businesses and Business Regulations; of " the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, is hereby amended ~o read as fol10\oJs: :\ f l<~ . -1- ;1 ..-' "r;{f:O;\{'l~ ~ I .. Sec. 72.03. Designntions: licGnse classifications. '~. << The following shall govern in establishing alcoholic beverage de~ignations within the city: , ' . ../; . ", , '. j.. +++--+APS+-BeeE--Paekn~9-s~*es ill fiH ill ,{.:3.}. ill f4+ ill {-S1- {, ill {-6+ .ill F;} J1l. {-S+ ill f9+ ,.' -f. '" " , lCOP: 13eer--Consumption on premises, package sales ./:~. 2APS: Beer and wine--Package sales >, .t 2COP: Beer and wine--Consumption on premises, package sales .. . .^ PS: Liguor--Packagc sales COP: Liquor--ConSllmption on premises; package sales .: i; COPSRX: Consumption on premises--Special restaurant .j -\ llC: Chartered, incorporated, sasial and golf clubs Warehouse District--Bowling alleys, tennis and racquetball clubs. , . Section 3. That Paragraph (5) of Subsection (b) of Section :-:":1'" , "' 72.08, Reversion of. alcoholic beverage designation, of Article IV, , :,~ Reversion ~rocedures, of Chapter 72, Alcqholic Beverages, of 'Title'VII, Businesses, and Business Regulations, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, is hereby amended to read as 1l follQ\lIS: l' (5) Conviction for selling, g~ving, serving or permitting to be served alcoholic beverages to persons under R~ReBeeR-~+9+.twenty-one '(21) years of age, except military personnel on active duty and exept persons born on or before June 30, 1966~ or permitting a person under ~ifleteeR-f+9+ twenty-one ,I ( 21) years of age, except military . personnel on active dutv and except persons born on or before June 30, 1966, to consume alcoholic beverages on such prop~rty. ,Section 4. should any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this ordinance be declared for any reason ~o be invalid, the same shall not af fect the validi ty of the ordinance a's a \'lhole, or any part.thereof other than the part to be declared to be invalid. . '\ ' -\, ~ection 5. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in. conflict ~~ I " < I herewith are ~o tile extent of such conflict hereby ~epealed. Section 6. Notice of the proposed enactment of this ordinance .\ 11a5 been properly advertised in a neVls9aper of general circulation in accordance with Section 166.041, Florida Stututes. '-'2- ' ,! ,< . ... ..,>t".;:":)'~;~~~~(::l~\., immedia t~l;r ." ~;'\'<, ::,?~~r~ . " .': " -- -:, ';:~,if~ .r, 'I".. :..:'.......1;-~ :.. ,.' :'~~?~~ ".,.ff: " ". <..;;~~ "::'/(~1 ";,~ '<~:.:~.'.'fy)~ ..-:->.~,~." .. ,~"", .,-.)1 ,,-:' ':::,:'.~~f~~ ': -,. ~t>:}l .. '.J J~J~\ ..;~\~Wj ,I' ~ :'~Jl~~)c~!~~ ,<'Xj~ " ,\>:'.;~~.J;~ ,\W~ ":.~l {t. .. , .. .' Secti9..!l 1~ upon its ud~ption. Thi8 ordinance shall become effective PASSED ON FIRST READING August' J, : 1985 PASSED ON. RE1\DING SECOND AND, FiNAL AND ADOP'l'ED ',' " u. . May,or-Commissioner ~ . . . Attest: :, :,- 'f City Clerk .i '\ ., .a ..<: I,t . i. " . .,: . ~ "; ',~ : :;':::\,jt; :'.:~~,~~ ..<}:(~ , ,,~::j{r~ :~}I! ':;;1~ ". ~ ~ . ~ r I . " ,< .1.1 " " .. ';0">" .: . .... '.~' ~ .f J" i ....' 'q:' t .\ ,. o ~ I' , .' ':" > \:1 ~ i '.' :'.> .j -'1-oi ":1 " \~ .... ',' . .. ',' 'I "\t. . " '. '2~!. ~:~~ ~.~ /F. . .d .; "',~. .. II ), , ," '1 ~. <, ";j" . } /", ..C j " ., ,,'" , ,!,\':. ~~ ,/ :c~ ,,"I .i "' .' ':') " -3- ,.. \\ 1,,' '". , ORDINANCE NO. 4019-85 AN aRDI NANCE OF THE CI'rY OF' CLEA'nWNl'ER, FLORIDA, COMPLYING WITH THE "LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPRE- HENSIVE PLf-\NNIHG AC'r OF 1975", AS I...MENDED; ADOPTING THE UPDATED HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT AS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORID~; ADOPTING THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT: PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THEE~FECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. . - :.~"'. - ,.:'/(~':"n~'(~~ -/-7 ' ._~ . , " ~ -< 'I WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater previously adopted Ordinance No. 1891, on March 1, 1979, adopting the Histoiic Preservation Elem~nt as part of the Comprehensive Plan for the entire City of Clea.rwater; and WHEREAS, 'an Evaluation and Appr3isal Report measuring the effectiveness of this element has been prepared and the Historic II Preservation Element has been updated; and -/ WHEREAS, this updated Element has been reviewed by the various .3.gencies regui !--eo to do so and each has recom....nended adoption thereof; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. The'updated historic oreservation element of the comprehensive plan as requi.r-ed by tl1e "Local Governr.1Ent Comprehensive Planning Act of 197511, nS amended, ~nd as set forth in the attacned exnibi~, ,described as: Composite Exhibit A. Documeitt entitled IIHis't:oric ,Preservation - Element - Revised ", consisting of a table of contents sheet and 50 pages, II ~s adopted in 'accordance with the IILoc~l Government Comprehensive Planning Act of 1975", as amended, for the entire City of Clearwater, ~'Florida . Section 2. The attached exhibit described as: Composite Exhibit A - DOCllment entitled ltHistoric Preservation Element - Revised", consisting of a ~able of contents sheet and 50 pages, is adopted as part forth in . t: 0.1. this orOlnance as if i t "'oJ as set 'J full herein. Section 3. For the purposes of this ordinance, the area encompassed by this ordinance shall be described as: ',\ ~\ ' -1- ,I .lj ..' .1 'l'lle entire Llrca within the present boundaries of the . -"l, Ci ty of Clearwater itS such boundaries are expanded "and rQdefined by future annexations, and the City of Clearwater service area wnich service area is further described as follows: Bounded on the West by the Gulf of Mexico, on the North by the centerline of Dunedin Pass; tnence Southeasterly to a point in St. Joseph's Sound apQroximutely 700 feet Southeast of Moonshine Island, excluding Moonshine Island; thence due East through St. Joseph's Sound and along Union Street to Keene Road; thence due Worth to County Road 34~ thence due East to the . Southerly extension of County Road 70; thence due North along County Road 70 to State Road 580; thence due East to U.S. Highway 19, e'xcluding the Dunedin Industrial Park; thence due North to Curlew Creek Road; tnence'due East to McMullen-Booth Road; thence dUe' South u.pproxima tely 5,400 feet to City-owned property; thence due East approximately 2,200 feet; thence due South approximately 2,200 reet to State Road 580i thence West and Southwest to McMullen-Booth Road; thence due South to the centerline of Alligator Creek; thence East along Alligator Creek and the southern shore of Alligator Lake and Arlie Drive to Cooper's Bayou and Upper Old Tampa Bay all the way to the Clearwater-Tampa City Limits ana Pinellas-Hillsborough County limits; thence due South to the Courtney Campbell Causeway: thence Westerly, Southwesterly and Southerly along the slloreline of Old Tampa Bay to Sellair Road extended; thence ~ue West on Bellair Road to the Seaboard Coast Line Rail=oad tracks: thence uue North to and along Ft. Harrison Avenue to D Street; thence due West approximately 150 feet; thence due North to B Street; thence due West to 4th Avenue; thence due North to A Street; tnence due East to Ft. Harrison Avenue; thence due North to Watkins Street; thence due West to Waters Street; thence due North approximately 700 feet; thence West to the Intracoastal Waterway; thence South--Southwest approximately 6,000 feet; thence due West to th~ Gulf of Mexico. Section 4. .~ll required and optional elements and parts of the Comprehensive Plan as required or allowed by the "Local Government Comprehensive Pl~nning Act of 1975", as amended, Which are set forth in tha attacned exhibit adopted herein, are hereby adopted as part of this ordinance. Section 5. All development undertaKen and all actions taken ~n regard to development orders, all land development regulations enacted or amended shall be consis~ent with this Plan and such updated element and part thereof in regard,{o the land covered by this updated element and portions of the Comprehensive Plan as hereby adopted shall be consistent with this Plan and each element and part thereof. '11 SectioIl 6. Notice of the proposed enactment o~ this ordinance has been progerly advertised in a newspaper of general circulation ..\) in aCGordance \"i th Section 166.041, Florida Statutes. Section 7. All public hearings and punlic participation required pursuant to Section 163.3181, Florida Stntutes, and Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, has preceded the consideration of this ordinance. -2- :" ' !" .' :"( . ;.\.",.~; ~>::;:~;~.\\t';~t;.t~~~\~1~K 1'h is ordinance is her~by .;ldooted' and sh'~ll' b~"< :,:.:.::,<:~:/'. ~':i~~~~ . .. . . " ',.. ' . -,' ,:\ ", '.\r,::.:~~?~ considered henc:eforth adopted for the purposes of .Section.' .':f ,', .:.':<:-:':':'~:~,,:::ii~ , . ~ . '. 163~3184 (7), Florida Statutes, and shall become effective':~ ~ . . . .. , . -. .t' , ~ ';.,'~' <:, "~ ~,~. I; . ., .~ ,'~ . .: ~~: Section B. im~ediately upon its passage. PASSED ON FIRST READING AU(1usl J ')985 M , ~ASSED ON, SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED 't "" .~. .r .,' ; , ,~ 1 . ., " Mayor':"'"Cornmi.ssioner 1 .' L ,~. 1 ~$ .' ~ ~" ' v . 1. , t ~. l' t I " I . t'.. !i ... ~ .' '\ . i' .' 't... . ~. .' 'In'" ~:;::: ' ",..: .. ~ ", ..... . ("j ~1<:\-: Attest:. i, City Clerk '.\ '.l \;. ,!" .! t'.' ,'. . "\ '. , .'~ ,.,:';'.":;i .', .:~:,;~':~;;' " ~:~.:'. :'?~ . . ' ~~ t /' 'l-,',{: "'I(: :, :': . .< ,.,' j' "\'. ':.' . ,,' '. ~~~:~' ,.> ' " , . ;'k:,' 'j: ' ..~:~;~~::,:.,.._~.:,... b ,~ )' ',.. ," . i\) "I") ;,,) . .1' ., .. .... " " , . , " :- .11 '., ,. ...."\ '!"l: '. 'I . .,1 t' . .; "\). . . :,1, , " . , ~'~~~':>'".~:,;(" :..: , .", : ~: . :~... -3- 11 < , .. ;'. ': ;~.~ '" , .'~ f : ~ '.. ^"'" :; . :- ~, \;":,,, '.. 'r I ;c i: f' f.t- .. .i ~. ~ :' -:- ' ."~..~': \. ......"^."c.,;"k.;.,..:f'.;;;~ . .:. \ "<'::"8'" ':'::>;':}~~:~ , .' "-::~.!t, . teL .. ';': ";':.~1~~ " I' .' .~ ;;:J . ", ~ :, <; . ,'" I OIH?IN^NCE NO. 4029-85 AN ORDiNANCE OF THE C1TY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, . i\1-lEnDJNG SEC'l'ION 72.05 OF' c't'It\P'I'EH 72, i\LCOIiOLIC BEVERI\G8S, OF 'rIm CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CLEARWATER, BY PLACING ^ NEW EST^BLISHMENT UNDER 2^PSCL^SSlFICATIO~, SAID ESTABLISHMENT BEING IN' 5 EC'l'ION 15, rl'o\'lNSHIP ~9 SOU'l'H, RANGE 15" EAST, PINELL^S COUNTY, FLORIDA; ,PROVIDING FOR PROPER C NOTICE.OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR frHE EFFEC'rIVE DA'l'E OF 'P1IIS ORDINANCE. ,. . ~.- .' :"-/' '0 -!.:.r ~. " ...... ." ., . ,",; . ". ""... ~ ".~' ><"7', '. ','I ./. . l <. ~ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF' 'rHE CITY OF CLEi\RNi\'l'EH", 1';'lLORID1\: Section 1. Sectiol1 72.05, of Chapter 7'2, Alcoholi.c Beverages, of the Code of Ordinnnces, City of Clearwater, is her~by amended to place a new establishment under 2APS Classificatiori as follow~~. 2APS- .Beer and Wine Package Sal~s Eckerd Drugs #4, 1215 Cleveland Str.eet, being Units Hand J, Cleveland Plaza, part . 'of Lot 33" R. H. Padgett's Estates, in Section 15, TO\mship 29 S(,)Uth, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida. Section 2. Notice of the proposed enactment of ~his'ordinance has been properly advertised in D newspaper o~ general circulation in accordance with Section 166.041, Florida Statutes. ;',) ~"ection 3. This crdinance si1all necome et::ectivE.! immediately. upon its passage. PASSED ON FIRST READING Au~\.tst 1, 1~~'= PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING.AND ADOPTEQ .. Attest: .Ma yor -C;:J>mmi 5 S i 0 ner ,I City Cler:k ',\ , \, .j . .' . ~ \'".i; .\ '~ :\ ,I :1 ..I. . \ ALOOUOLIC DEVERAGE D&SIGN^TION REQUEST SEE INSTRUCTIONS ESTABLISHMENT NAHE !. ADDRESS: APPLICANT' S I~AM8 AUD ADDRESS: 3c1::.crd nru~s ~:!l. '- r.c~:.nrd J!rtIGfi of Florida, Inc. 1215 Cleveland Street P . O. D 0:( 4 () r, 9' . Clebrwater, Fl. 33515 Glcnrwatcr, Fl. 33518 PHOIlE 813/446-6037 PHO~lE 813/397-7451 G\. \4- ( I l/l ,/-::; I 'i. LICENSE'"' TRANSFER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY - OWNER OR PROPERTI/MANAGER'S NAt1E & ADDR2SS: . , . ','. I ,.,. ," ,oJ L.. L:............:. ... ~ (,. ~ i,. ~ ~t:_i' First ThoL.\pso;t Joint Ven.ture YES ~o xx .- " - "-. /" \...... "'-;,(..~',~. c/o Consultants Realtv ~o~ IF YES, PRIOR OWNER: Clearwater, Florida 33517 BEVERAGE DESIGNAnOU REQUESTED ZAPS SEATING CAPACITY: FLoon AREA: PARKING SPACSS: nlA 1J.. 700 ,c;s IS ~STABLISHt{EnT LESS '!RAN 500' FROM: 1) SCHOOL ~,~O 2) CHURCH i:n 3) R'SSIDENTI/l.L AREA '110 4) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ESTABLISHl-lENT Publ ix I , H.:=l "''1'"1 r:: J f . T rm p ~ ' correct. , certify the above information to be true and C) hvu. /-""1 ~h-" . , AjJplicant 711'6/8'S Date Clerk's Office Use: Property Zoned (use) ~~ GC Atlas Page G-8 Sec-TW3hip-Range J.r::j ~ f..q -/5 ~~otarized statement (or a lease) -Building Permit AliA N lit I 'Seating Plan tIC required' ABF0F11.GD Rev. 6-'1-u;. , \ "\ I . .\ .,) ....\, (:. I 1 y,. :" I I I. I 1 ':1) I 6 , . I I ,..-1- ) m ~ I ~~[) ; L!J IX'~I' ~~ : 'IlL OTS ., <::, ',/ I I" 10 - 0 4J'f / : ~~ I '<" S T, 7 0 - '*7 I ~ - U' /~ ~~l"~ 3r ~i I'~ Y~A IF; " I R. H. " [..t-. 1 ~ ~ 0 I ~ 31 I JJ 33'! / .... M-l/ 3'8 I "'f.JI - 'r;)~ -i:t , u..t" RU '" L:..l I ~ . . 19 /8 ~ 7 5 ~ z ESTTeORD 4-11 .., 2012 )22 4 :3, 3247 :'0 9 -lIP .~, IcB3 , ~/I""~EVEL~~D.. , ' ~'. . <-i)ry1" ~l' ~~t'~\' Z.. 25 / : Jl( 7263 rr.:-!J.. Ie PAD G E II T S / I 7:, I r.~~"., s.r/Iq:Il.. '" '---..-----.L[7 I I I T IlYl *I RO\ :z I I I ~ I K ~ 9 6 G ~ < I-t I : EST. 4 - t I . -. j 1'1 j I I II \ ~8 3, J.J . . ~ I 3 4 ,._..__:::3."., ,w':....':.,. 3.2. f P ~ R K , 'CV I 1 I 9 I } I~ ~ I 8 : I -.' 10 I ~ PIE RC E \~. ~ PI/.R~~""""", , vi'I~'7~1 I~~;: 1K>1 (J~ \1\ I ~! 12 " \":)'. /jl, ,~\J. \ '] T ' '<' \ ~ / J .<... _. L\.J. '~i',? I C; I 0 ' ~ <(t 'J~' -~ ~ I(",@T . r 7 I, Y A ~ G!) 7 :\3.~~ 2 o D. L L \' r--.:-.-::::... 4- B:3 159 I' , c). ~ .---; . II,'!; ~ [ ,\ ,/'/..;.~ "-.~.-41'''' 6 ,~74 . 1- :v I . ~ ~~7/_~R_O\ ~1..11y ..... __l./ ,Do. 19: ~2 . ,~ . '., Ill./' ~Q;-,/ ~4~8...3.... ORD C'11r~'~'K ..:.~~~~r u 0 23 t;.. / 2964 ~ . . y 04.83/ F' R ANXLJ N. ~ s.,..... t r. ~ '- '- ~ U.T 4 \~c. ~.., -c. .. .... .,.t"7' .~. I';;~\, '0&,.... '\' '\' . ~A\_l .,) -.:...~ ~ ?..J- ,r;-1 \ 8 J~l!~ I r:rlt.(rJ--~ J~_ ~ ,BROW~'S..... I I It,ll "~ ~ L ~. Y L_'l ST. VE 24 "32- :3 9 f I . .. Co. p ~ 19 21 0' -.J C? US 20 4 ~41 I I s t BJ rl 2- GIE I I I 75. 5 T. IF P$ ~ 21t 4 I I 2~ I ( - ~ ~~~ I : I ;1 II , . :KOR6\' ';':~OV\ --. t I 1~'fJ2 .1 __ - t I orr I , ~ll 10 .0:' kf), I knll t, z 2fj~5 "'\ ~ CIl ,...' ".0::: <n 1::- 9 ~ s. ---;::-'~'f ..:g ~~ . .. S 1- u.J~~ ..J.G . --,..:..~---. -''C..~- -:i--- -u,t- x. 0) OG ~J 0 ~ ? ~ 8 rt\.~ ~~lO' · en 9 ..... '\ \ D!l '~.# ~ ~ :.. ~ A ' ^ r- T ~ V j,~- g DREW RJqGE PARK -J /2 ~ /I ~4 , M fa 0 R E (L 0 T : II - 5 0 F ~ P A { GET T:S) ! ; ST, .. W I' " :!: ~I -' ~ - t" IJJ nI ..J n ..J . \AJ 10 X .' :~ >- -f _ ... : ~ I- , 'iTi - w ;~ tV r , f . : It ,'W . ..... I '0 I .__ - :tt ~ I' A. J. ' ..L.- . G R. 0 V E . _~II 9 . ~l ~ ~ . , . 12-24 2~ j 31 : , 'n. : -r-- ~ ."" ~ , _=r : ; l~1 : ~ t 1 . : : Wi I I j ~ ,~: CI:) j U) D:: G , I '1.H. PAbGETTS 60 >.. 3 .,,/". 'r= ~ I 44 , <<" 1>-? l 1- I 1-<... -.(0. -' II d.l 1- . +-\,.\~' -I ~;..~ ~r~{)'G ~~.- ~ , '.' K' j I ~ : I 3'\{ M \ 1-Io~D::\ @ 0 1_ ""-/...--\ ~ \ \~ 960 -L U ~: 9 .--- \ ()~ \"::83 /1"'" ~ ~ \ 7 ,"'po" ~ / A 8 j . I BS:-Z ^ f1!:j n~ ~ ~ ~~O '5 <( o Z 4 <( > q '2., CD 25 I I I .... " . "01;' .:00;' . . li' ..:.~ '. . "", ~ '. l' '>~..i'J'~"'-;"'~:;'1""'iI"'~~ ." ":'.:: ". ':: ~;::~/'~: "g':':,' ;.',~}!{ '," ". ',"1'.':;:;:,~~ , . .~l,..... , . ~ . ~---. ORDINANCE NO. 4030-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 72.05 OF CHAPTER 72, ALCOOLIC BEVERAGES, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CLEARWATER, BY PLACING A NEW ESTABLISHMENT UNDER 2APS CLASSIFICATION, SAID ESTBLISHMENT BEING. IN SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 16 EAST, PINELL1\S COuNtry, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR PROPER" NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OP THIS ORDINANCE. ."}J'; , ., BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY CO~~ISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section '1. ,..~ection 72.05, of Cha.pter 72, Alcoholic Beverages, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, is hereby amended '! , " to place a new establishment under 2 APS Classification as follows: 2APS - Beer and Wine Package Sales Eckerd Drugs #149, 1864,U.S. 19 North, being part of M&B'41-02, in Sunset-19 Shopping Center, in Section 6, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida. ~; j Section 2. . Notice of the proposed enactment of this ordinance ., has been properly adverti~ed in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with Section 166.041; Florida Statutes. ,; Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage. PASSED ON FIRST READING August 1.. 192.5 'I '.' PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED . .. , . ~ " \I .\ ,l ... Mayor-Commissioner Attest: '1 City Clerk " ',1 ~+-\) I -.,j. .il '. , . :I', 0 .'. . :. ~.< ~.\Ir:~ri-~,~ ~ . :',"..-l ~ -; ....' ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE DesIGNATION REQUEST SEE INSTRUCTIONS $100 Application Pee ReoeiP~/~88~ AB- 8 - ~ . Initials , 1864 U.S. 19 l~. APPLICANT'S NAME' AND ADDRESS: Eckerd DrUGS of Florida, Inc. P.O. TIox 4689 . ESTABLISHMENT MAME & ADDRESS: Eckerd DrU3s ~149 Clearwater, Fl. 33515 PHONE 813/799-0910 PHO~E 813/397-7461 RtJl.<H (' 1M ~ YYl '1 i~ LICENSE TRANSFER: Glear#ater, Fl. 33518 Kif..! c,D LJ I-.()~ C~~~~t Cre.~ " ' J " LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY OWNER OR PROPERTYIHANAGER'S . NAME & ADDRESS: Publix.S~permark~ts, Inco P.O. BalK 407 YES ~o XX IF YES, PRIOR OWNER: Lakeland. Florida 33802 BEVERAGE DESIGNATION REQUESTED ? A ,,~ SEATING CAPACITY: ~:r,; A FLOOR AREA: 72' x 150'=10 300 . . PARKING SPAC::S: IS SStABLISHMENT LESS THAN 500' FROM: 1) SCHOOL ~lO l?nn 2) CHURCH tb 3) RESIDENTIAL AREA H 0 ~) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ESTAaLISHHENT Publ:i.L It Harri2.- M. Jones correct. , certify the above information to be true and ,j) Ie,;, /{1-1 .;fJ~ Applicant 1/ 7/,r.)f.') , Date 'IJ -Notarized statement (or a lea5eJ IBuilding Permit 'Seatin.; Plan N/A {,/ /4- I .If required ,; Rev. 6-11-tij ABFORM.GD 'i ",~ oG~ ~~~ ~~ ~, '(\~ A\~\).\\... 'f.. ~~~ I CR CG o s- ~88 · '0 . . 30 . - .. CG "00' 1I.f:, "4 J~. Jl4 8 A R R e: !.!.-.!!.Q.:- '" , , .~4. .~.. ~~~~... ..~ !'.. ~ ~.~r.. .'~ .. .;:. I ; . ~ '.., #~. .(. ." . ...... .,,", ....... ;. :~.. .... . - -;. ~ .. "',.. .. " ~.. "' :".~ (, . ~,,,l~ : . :.~.. ~~;;S~: i~. " :'~~... ~,.'j~':.~~. I.) .:,.~ -t. ,.. ...,...._,.;_,''-.,::,:' .:.:,' '-.' ~.; . ~'. ': '~l' ,'eo,. '.:'" ',;. ~: ..,...t.~. . , ,; ,. " ,,,! , , ~, } . , . , ,... ~ ... ~.....1. . o."").. _. . . .~ ..,., ow' . :' "':: ["'" :':~:.,,:~."C: ~ . O:-":S':' .....~\.G--:i. ~/ . , . I . '. .. '. . I'~.. <It'.. . ' .. .' .. .'" . . I . "'8 'I, 41-01.1._' - I . . ... , :: I' '. ': ..: I '. to' '" . f ," . I . - I . . . I : . .-. .:,,' .I+"~. .';, ' ":: ':'-:' I :: ...: i.....;;-I. ',: 1 .. + " : : 10 .: f:' _. '-"1 . ~ , ~" ~ 1 .. '. .." .1 "0 .' "'. ~', "I'. ."..: '~.I + . III . ... ~ .~.. f fI . : ; '::,( :" , '..' . , :.. I " : - .', t: . , ..I ~ . -I' 1" 'I 'j . I 1 . ,; I i I i .' I I ': "',1 I ,\ I_ I I. I I . ~.. .."... ." , : ~... . 4 . ,tt" "/.: :' .' r 4.:. c ..'.: : f.. . ,~..:~:'-....:; ;~' : . ...'II, . I . ,~ 3: , I',.. ~ .. o' .. .. ... . ; : ,-. ' , .' ~- ! II: ..... . , '. , , . . . ~ ; , ' .~ . . . 'a: , I 0:: 0 u I . " M 8 3 - 4\- 02 ~.' ~:.. 'J., SUNSET SHOPPING " '19 ". eNTER . ... " '. . ' M Eo 8 , 41'O~ M Eo 8' 41' 08 ,. ._~. -~ . ~. ~ M~B " 41-04 , . . ,. .t . . .. . . . . . . < o - " . . ": ":' Cf) ".,.;'. '" w .... . ~., ~ '. , a: o ..J I&. 'tl"l .:--....,.-r....:-~t...1- t_n._.~....~.,..... .'Y........\..._~~..;;i:.~ :~~./..'3~~~~:.~~~~~t;:~I..?: ......~ .>. u "0 .,_,~,t,..! it( .~~~~~fit r..<l'.::':'.."":i~ Wl'~';'" \t~ .'.I"'l'li!',r~':;,,\ .;..... ~::'t";>:.t~zr~~~~~... Vt :....J~."....t' ~ f't'.'1. ~!-~~.~-;i~~... at! '.r \.:.~.,..,..." "";:1=-;.~'), t=-;....~t~,,'t.,....~-~ iff.....~t.'i..,.'~'l.....: '..-.. "~.~r;J- .~...)' ~;.. ~..~:.... 1':- J' , I~., . { · '.>i.~--~ . -'~~t}11~~t~;;:~~::~~~-,:: - ".., ~:. ~ ~~. '~-.f"'~'; ,,~'t"'-><"""'~'l'"~. '~ .. ~-L~...,''-;' -t~~---:~."'~~V"Tl'....~.'.. ',1". ~.i ~.... t..,$.'. -..~: ':}....~_/,<J.':' '~.;~.,~' .~. ;:;"8~ r""~'~~~l~..ORD. .'~~'-b.."t . "..:1;~~"" ... ;o-_~~.... .to.::~'. ~ ~'l\~..:~~':.;. ..,~ ~'J....,:.o'h""""1'" .,.....tU.,~...~.~.~~."^~~l.'- .. It ',"~",..<'~..~>'"lc' ,_ ...,"'.,...t-....{~'3.a_~ol~.~~,.<~.. c t'.~ .I (~ '. ,-' ..- (It en :l .. .. ..: .. .. 100' 'i:to' ,~. . '.' .. :,'" '. .~ '. "' , 10 It) a: rn .. . ., -,.:. I .'.' ..! I '~ ':';1'" - . . . :'.. 1 . '.. en I; ,! I ,~ "" ':;) , I, -tfs- :'I ..._ _4. '. .. .. ~ < :<. :,.r:::)~ c.. D.~:' , -- ORDINANCE NO. 4031-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEhRWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 72.05 OF CHAPTER 72, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CLEARWATER, BY PLACING A 'NEW ESTABLISHME~T UNDER 2APS CLASSIFICATION, SAID ESTABLISHMENT BEING IN CLEARWATER BEACH PARK FIRST ADDITION, IN SECTION a, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: . 'I Section 1. Section 72.05, of Chapter 72, Alcoholic Bever,ages, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, is hereby amended to place a new establishment under 2APS Classification as follows: 2APS - Beer and Wine Package Sales Eckerd Drugs ~250, 467 Mandalay Avenue, being North 15 feet of Lot 26, and all of Lots 27 thru 31, Clearwater Beach Park 1st Addition, in Section 8, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, pinellas County, Florida. , ' I' section 2. Notice of the proposed enactment of this ordinance has been properly advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in ~ccordance with S~ction 166.041, Florida Statutes. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective i~~ediately upon its passage. PASSED ON FIRST READING August 1, 1985 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED, " \ " Mayor-Commissioner Attest: \ '~) ......\ ~.~ .,\. City Clerk , ".1 \ , ; 1 I J . _~4_ . ':, ~) ALCOnOLle BEVERAGE $100 Application Fee DESIGNATION REQUEST Receiptf1/)J J 33a-:G SEE INSTRUCTIONS AB- ..e 1:1- 2.tt' ' Initials ,)t:H( , ESTABLISHMENT NAME & ADDRESS: APPLICANT'S HAME AND ADDRESS: Eckerd Druns #250 467 l1andalav Avenue fo.:cl::erd .nTllr.~ n~ P.O. Box 46B9 r.1 n:r; rb , Tnt' Clearwater. FlaA r.lea~vaterJ FiR. 33518 33 llS PHONE 813/447-6429 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY PHO~'E 813/397-7461 N 15" tJ-I.. /-IU;. Z ~ ~SL "=hdz, f\ 1];' l-4/_.~~_~Z-2.B! 2t:t! ~O_ f 3/) l. Jlu:? Ch , . . LICENSE TRANSFER: CYa.h~ 1.$'1:= ' yeS . ~O xx Qdd -.I " OWNER OR PROPSltTYIMAHAGKR'S NAME & ADORESS: T~rk Eckerd Corporation , IF YESt PRIOR OWNER: P_O. P.n...... 4liR9 Clea~vater, Fl. 33518 BEVERAGE DESIGNATION REQUESTED _ ~ , A P ~ 'I SEATING CAPACITY: P ARDlfG SPACES: FLOOR AREA: N/A lOrOaO IS EST ABt..ISHt1ENT L.ESS THAN 500' FROM: 1) SCHOOL 36 2) CHURCH HO NO 3) RESIDENTIAL AREA NO 1n ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ESTABLISHl1ENT NO I, Harris M. Jones correct. I certify the above information to be true and :I 4~ .1m t;'r~___ AjJplicant ;711?}?5 , Date' Clerk's Office Use: Property Zoned (use) C G A tlas Page f':.. .- 3 Sec-Twship-Rangc 8 - .?::q -/,r;; -Notarized Statement I~I ;ILl , (or a lease) ~ -Building Penuit Ai /4 -, I · Sea tine; Plan /....} ( A f *Ir required Rev. 6-"-:.Ij ABFORM.GD '~\ \'. "'.. _r_._ r AL OAD, l!aa~ "-'7$ ~ ., (.) " ~-, ,. ... a'~.' I' - - -C-1 l,;n' [ ; an r- ST. r- -1~ .. '-- 1'.;' ~". ...~ 11 '. ': t . .. -c./<:; ORDINANCE NO. 4033-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, RE'I'rI'LING CHAPTER 95; AMENDING CHAPTER 95 BY PROVIDIN G FOR A R'rICLE I, LOT CLEARrNG, WI.nCH INCL UDES pnESEN1~ SECTION 95.01 'rHROUGH 95.15; ENAGrING ARTICLE II, PUBLIC N UJSAN CES, TO PROVIDE FOR DEFINrrIONS, PURPOSE, DUTY OF MAINTENANCE OF PRN ATE PROPERTY, NUISANCE CON DfrIONS, ENFORCEMENT AND I-IEARING PROCEDURES, POWERS OF 'I'HE BOARD, DUTmS OF 'rRE CITY MANAGER, PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TI-IE Crry COMMISSION, AND DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE Cl'rY COi\1l\inSSIONj REPEALING CHAPTER 94, N UISANCESj PROVIDING FOR THE SEPARABILITY OF THE PROVISIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF TIDS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the City Com mission of the City of Clearwater) Florida) is vested'with police power pursuant to Section 166.021, Florida Statutes; WHEREAS, the'.City Commission wishes to preserve a quality of life in the City of Clearwa.ter free of the types of nuisances described below; WHEREAS, those reasonable and l'easonably behaved citizens of the City of ..) ,) Clearwater are entitled to be free from such nuisances in the use, possession or ownership of their property; WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that preventing or terminating such nuisance conditions will aid in preserving the safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Clearwater; and WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida, during the 1985 Legislative Session, passed CS/HB 328 expa:-tding the permissible jurisdiction of code enforcement boards to include all code and ordinance violations that do not carry a criminal penalty; 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAfNED BY THE CITY COi\llVUSSION OF THE CITY OF CLEAR WATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. Chapter 95, Lot Clearing, of Title VilI, Public Health and Safety, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, be and the same is hereby . :-. ~ , amended, by retitling Chapter 95 to Chapter 95, Nuisances, ~ ~ Section 2. Chapter 95 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Clearwater, is hereby amended by providing for Chapter 95, Article I, Lot Cleoring, "\~ which shall include Section 95.01 through and including Section 95.15 of the present Code of O~dinances of the City of Clearwater. , Section 3. Chapter 95 of the Cod~ of Ordinances of the .City of Clearwater, is hereby amended by enacting Article II, Public Nuisances, to read as f01l0.NS: - 1 - ,I. . : ~~~ .\ ~~ ..... .t. . ~'"" ARTICLE II. PUBLIC NUISANCES Sec. 95.20. Dcrlnitions: The rollowin~ words and plll'llSes, when used in this article, shall have t.he mcanings res~ectively nscrlbed to them: "Bonrd" melln.<; the City of Clenrwntel' :\lunicipal Code Enforcement I30Hrd which 'Nt~ crcated by SCl.!tion 22.60 of the Code of Ordinanccs of the City 0C Clearwater. . "Person" includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint venture~1 partnerships, estates, trusts, business tt'usts, syndicates, flducinries, private ot' public corporations, nnd a.ll other gt'oups Qt' combinations. "Premisest! means the land and all structures and articles appurtenant or attnched thereto which at'e owned, leased, occupied or controlled by a person. "Nuisance" means t})at conduct defined in Section 823.05, Florida Statutes, that conduct '3pecified in this Article, any continuing condition or use of premises or of building exteriors or of land which causes substantial diminution of the value of property in the vicinity of said condi tion or use, or any continuing condition or use of premises or of buildIng exteriors or of land which unreasonably annoys, injures, or endangers the comfort, health, repose, privacy, or safety of the. public through offensive odors, noises, substances, smoke, ashes, soot, dust, gas fumes, chemicol diffusion, smog, disturbance nnd vibrations of earth, aift or structures, emanations, Hght, sights, entry on adjoining property by persons or vehicles, or other unreasonable intrusions upon the free use and com fortable enjoyment of the pr:<'perty of the ci tizens of Clearwater, Florida. . "'(ehicle!' shall mean any automobile, motorcycle, truck, motorized van, recreation vehicle, bicycle, or any other device which any person or property is or may be transported upon a highway, except devices used exclusively on sta tionary rails or tracks. . j, . ' Sec. 95.21. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to. protect the comfort, health, repose, safety and general welfare of the citizens who reside in the City of Clearwater, and to prevent the maintenance of nuisances affecting the public generally. It i~ hereby declared by the City Commission of the City of Clearwater that the creation or maintenance of a nuisance as defined herein shall constitute irreparable public injury. In order to accomplish the foregoing purpose, it is deemed necessary to establish a :nechanism of review and provide for remedies in order to abute a public nuisance by action of the Clearwater :\'Iunicipal Code Enforcem~nt Board or the City Com mission. I . \ "> Sec. 92.22. Duty of maintenance of private property. ~o person owning, leasing, operating, occu[)ying or having control of any premises within the City of Clearwater shall maintain, keep or permit any nuisance, as defined in Section 95.20 Rnd as further defined in Ssction 95.23, affecting the citizens of the City of Clearwater. Sec. 95.23. Nuisance Conditions. .\ fiJ:1ding of the existence of any of the following specific conditions and conduct is hereby declar.ed to constitute a public nuisance as that term is used in Section 95.22: ! (a) A condition or use that causes a substantial diminution of property value of property in the vicinity of the condition or use. (b) Conduct similar to that described in Section 823.05, Florida Statutes, has occurr~d or is occurring. - 2 - ,:1 ,\ ...' .:. .;~1", . , I ,.',.0.: . .'. (c) t\ co ndi II on 01' use thn t un rcnsonnblJ' I nt rudcs upon the (r(l(' ll5eJ privltcy nnd comfortnble enjoyment of the pl'opcrty of the citizens of the City of Clenrwntcl'. The \lse or con'di tion mny bc considored un 1Illl'CI1S0nnble intrllsi()f\ upon the free u..;c nnd comfortublc ~njoyrncnt of property when one or more of the following condi lion~ nre found to exist: {O The !'epl'nted illtru~ion upon property udjoining or surrounding the llse or condition identified in the complaint of odors, gases, $nlo;.:e, fishes, soot. dust, fumes, chemical diffusion, smog, or othel' purticlcs or gases. . (:!). The ['epcatcd intrusion upon property of disturbances of earth or air, inqluding, but not limited to, vibration", explosionti, light, nnd loud, rUlIcous nnd unnecessary noise, find the repeated, tlT1!.1uthorized intrusion of adjoining pl'operty by r. patrons or U5ers of tll(' premises which unreasonably disturbs or interferes with the pence, comfort, privacy, nnd repose of owners or possessors of reol property in the enjoyment nnd the use of their property. (3) The repented, unauthorized intrusion upon property of persons or vehicles which adversely disturb the privllcy, comfort, peace, I'epose, fll1d use of owners or possessors of property adjoining' . the premises where the pel'~ons or vehicles complained of origi nat es. (4) The repeated attraction to the prem ises where the use or condi tion co:nplained of is maintained of persons who, through , frequent raucous or disorderly conduct, or through repealed disturbances of the peace, or through violation of any law of the state, county or city, adversely affect ordinarily reasonable nnd reasonably behaved persons in the enjoyment and use of their property, (d) Buildings which are abandoned, boarded up, partially destroyed, II 'or left for unreasonably long periods of time in a state of partial construction; provided that any unfinished building or structure which has been in the course of construction three years or more, and where thc appearance and other condi tions of said unfinished building or structure substantially detracts from the appearance of the immediate neighborhood or reduces the value of property in the immediate neighborhood or is a nuisance, shall be deemed and presumed to have been left for an unreasonably long period of time in the sense of this subsection. (e) Any attractive nuisance dangerous to children in the form of abandoned or broken equipment, hazardous pools, excavations, or neglected machinery. ' .n (f) Any other condition or use that consti tutes a nuisance to the public, generally, as that term is defined in Section 92.20, which is continually or repeatedly maintained, the abatement of which would be in the best interest of the health~ safety and welfure of the citizens of the City of Clearwater. Sec. 95.24. Enforcement and hearing procedures. .rhis Article may be enforced in accordance with the procedures established by Section 22.64 and Section 22.69 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Clearwater. The BOMd shall follow the procedul'es set forth in Section 22.65 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Clearwater. The procedures for establishing liens, forcclosuI'C of liens and providing fOl' appeals set forth in Sections 22.67 and 22.68 of the Code of Ordiryances of the City of Clearwater shall be fully npplicable to a finding of violation of the Article by the Board. , This Article may also he enforced by the City ComrnissiLln in ,1 ilccor'dance with the procedures established by Section 95~2G through and including Section 95.3~ of this 1\ I'ticle, ! . - 3 - Sec. 95.27. Proceedings before the City Commission. Upon submission of the City Manager's report to the City Commission, the City Manager shall schedule a public hearing before the City Com mission and shall provide actual notice of said heuring to the person owning, leasing, operating, occupying or having control of the premises whel'e the alleged nuisance exists. The notice requirement may be satisfied either by mailing or delivering written notice to said person. , !. ~, . .:. . ; ......:d.::~ Sec. 95.25. Powers of the Doard. In hcm'ing 'nllegcd violations of this Article, the Board shall have the powers set forth in Section 22.66 of the Code of Ordinances of the CIty of Clearwater. Upon n determinntlon of the Board that reasonable cause. exists to believe that u nuisance exists OS defined in Section 95.20 and . 95.23, the Board shall find a violation of this 'Article and shall set forth the steps necessary to abate thc subject nuisance. A fine for each day the violation continues past thl') compliance dnte may beset purusant to Scction 22.67 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Clearwater. Sec. 95.26. Duties of the City Manager. If a condi.tion is determ incd to be a nuisance under Sections 95.20 nnd 95.23 of this Article by the City Manager, or his designee, he may seek enforcement of this Articb by bringing the matter before the City Commission. The City Manager may initiate such action by providing to the City Commission a report containing information showing the existence of a nuisance and the City Manager's application of the criteria set forth in Section 95.23 hcrein to the pnrticular facts of the use or condi tion which is the basis of the report and u brie[ statement of the City Manager's recom mendntion for City Com mission netion. ... Sec. 95.28. Duties of the City Commission. At the public hearing, the City Commission shall determine whether a nuisance exists by applying the defini tion of nuisance provided in Section 95.20 and the standards contained in Section 95.23. Sec. 95~29. Powers of the City Com mission. Upon a determination by the City Commission under Section 95.28 that the use, activity or condition which forms the basis of the'City Manager's report constitutes a nuisance under thi~ Article, the City Com mission shall proceed as follows: (a) . The City Commission may consider an agreement with the offending person requiring the person to tnke certain measures to abate'the ., nuisWlce, The agreement shall include the measures to be taken by the person nod the time period within which such measure must be completed. (b) If an agreement cannot be reached or un agreement is not follOWed, the City Commission may, by resolution, request the State Attorney or the State Attorney General to seek judicial relief for abatement of the nuisance pursuant to the provisions of Section 60.05, F loride Statutes. . i " \ (c) 'I'he City Com mission may direct the City Attorney to seek judicial relief for abatement of the nuisance. , ,\ Sec. 95.30. Additional remedies. 'I Nothjng contained in this Article shall in any way r~strict the right to revoke) suspend Ol' deny an occuputionallicense as provided in Chapter 71 of the Clearwater Code of Ordinnnces. The t'cmedies provided in this Article for the abatem ent of nuisances are in nddi tion to any other remedies provided in the Cleu['water Code of Ordinances. -.} - , "' 1 , , " . . .. ,. >:~;?~"?"'r,;i,,t;;~~~ c. i-.J' ':"i .' .,' ~:~; :..' , . ~.~ ~ Section 4. Chapte.r 94, Nuisances, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of . Clearwater Is hereby repeilled. A 11 ordinances or parts of ordinances In .connIet 1 herewith are to tho extent of such confHct hereby repealed. " Section 5. Shoulduny'part or provision of this .ordinance be declared by a court1of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordinance us a whole, or any part thereof, other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 6. Notice of the proposed enactment of this ordinance has been properly advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with Section 166.041, Florida Statutes. , , Section 7., The provisions of this ordinance shall take effect immediately. upon its passage. (/ ,/ PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED Mayor-Ca,m missioner Attest: ' " ,I City Clerk " J, .i ., , ~ t~) '. . ") " . - 5 - .,. J. " . ,~"..<.~..,,":~} c:...... . . , . -II OROIN ANCE NO. 4034-85 AN OHDINANCE OF THE Crry OF CLEARWATEIl., FLORIDA, AMENDING AHTICLE V, MUNICIPAL CODB ENPOHCEMENT BOARD, OF CHAPTER 22, APPOINTIVE BOARDS AND ) COMMITTeES, OF TITLE It, ADl\llNIS1'RATJON OF THE CODE OF ORDINAN CES, crry OF CIJEAR WA'rEU, TO PROVIDE THA'r THE BOARD SllAIJL CONDuer HEARlNGS RELATING TO ENFORCEMBNT OF CODES AND ORDINANCES WHICH HAVE NO CRIMINAL PENALTY WI-mItE A PENDING OR REPEA'l'ED VIOLATION CONTIN UES 'l'0 EXIST; CLARU' YIN G ENFORCEMEN'f PROCEDURES AND POWERS OF THE BOARD; PROVIDING FINE, Fon REPE'I'ffION OF SA;VIE VIOLNrl0N BY SAME VIOLATOR; PHOVIDIN G THA T THE BOA RD 1\1A Y A UI'OlUZE FORECLOS URE ON LIENS AFTER SIX MONTHS; PROVIDING THAT NO LillN MA Y DE FOHECLOSED ON HOMESTEAD PROPERTY; LIMl'I'ING APPEAL 1'0 APPELLATE REVIEW OF RECORD CREATED BEFORE BOARD; PROVIDrNG FOR THE SEPARAI3ILn'Y OF 'fHE PROVISIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH TO THE EXTENT OF SUCH CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. ..' .,1" WHEREAS, tlle legislature of the State of FloridaJ during the. 1985 Legislative Session, passed legislatiort CS/HB 328 .which made several changes to the general statutes governing Code Enforcement Boards; and WHEREASJ it is necessary to revise current sections of the Code of Ordinances to take into consideration such revisions; \ . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED.BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. That Section 22.61, Function, appointment and term of office, of Article V, Municipal Co~e Enforcem ent Board, of Chapter 22, A[)pointive Doards and Committees, of 1'itle II, AdministrationJ of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, be and the same is hereby amended to read at; follows: Sec. 22.61. Function, 8[)pointment and term of office. (a) The Clearwater Code Enforcement Board shall have the purpose of conducting hearings relating to the enforcement of teehrtieal codes and ordinances. which have no criminal penalty, in force in Clearwater, where . a pending- or repeated violation continues to exist, including but not limited to occupational license, fire, building, zoning and sign codes. . 'I ",\ , '1 Section 2. That Section 22.64, Enforcement procedure, of Article V, Municipal Code Enr'orcement Board,"of Chapter 22, Appointive Boards and '1 Com mittees, of Title 11, Administration, of the Cl?de of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, be and the se.rne is hereby amended to rcad as follows: Sec. 22.64. Enforcement procedure. Except whel'e the inspector charged with enforcing a particular teehrTieaf- code or ordinance identified herein hns reason to believe that a code violation presents a serious threat to the pUblic heal th, safety and welfare, the code enforcement procedure under this article shall be as follows: .I t (1) It sholl be the duty of the code inspector to initillte enforcement proceedings with respect to each teeJ1htcttt code or ol'dinance. - -1- ., . 'l Scetion :l. Thnt Section 22.6G, Powers of the code enforcement bOnl'd, of Article V, i\iunicipol Code Enforcement Botll'd, of Chaptel' 22, Appointive Boards Hnd Committees, of Title II, Administl'alion, of the Co~e of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, be nnd the same is hereby nmended to rcad'ns follows: Sec. 22.66. Powel's of the code cnfol'ccment boord. The Clearwnter Code Enforcement Goard sholl have the power to: (5) Issue..'! ordel's following a heuring, which orders shall have the force of low nnd which orders sholl set forth the steps necessary to be accomplished in order to bring fl violation into eomplitUlce with the tecflmeal- code 01' ordinance that Jms been violated. Section 4. That Section 22.67, Fine, lien and forec]osUI'e, of Article V, Municipal Code Enforcement l3oilI'd, of Chapter 22, Appointive Boards and Committees, of Title 11, Administration, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, be und the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 22.67. Fine, lien and foreclosure. .~: .~ (a) Upon being notified by the code inspector that the order issued pursuant to section 22.66 of the Clearwater Code of Ordinances has not been complied with within the time established in such order or, upon findinff that the same violation has been repeated by the same violator, the code enforcement board may order the violator to pay a fine to the city not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) per day that the violation continues past the compliance date established in its order. (b) A certified copy of an order imposing the fine provided for herein may be recorded in the public records of the county, and thereafter such order shall constitute a lien against the land on which the violation exists or if the violator does not own the land, upon any other real or personal property owned by the violator, and may be enforced in the same manner as a court judgment by the sheriffs of this state, including levy against the personal property, but shall not be deemed otherwise to be a judgment of a court except for enforcement purposes. (c) Gne'yee.r Six months from the filing of any such lien which remains unpaid, the enforcement board may authorize the city ,attorney to forecl~e on such lien in the manner provided by statute for the foreclosure of other m unicipalliens. ~ 0 Ii en created pursuant to the provisions of this chapter may be foreclosed on real property which is a homestead under Article X. Section 4 of the State Constitution. Section 5. That Section 22.68, Appeal, O)~ Article V, Municipal Code Enforcement Board, of Chapter 22, Appointive Boards and Committe~J of Title II, Administration, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, be and tJ1e same is hereby am ended to read as follows: \\ \ Sec. 22.68. AppeFll. , , Any aggrieved party, including the local governing body, may appeal a final administrative order of the Clearwater Code Enforcement Board in the circuit court of any county. Such an~appeal shall not be a henrin~ de novo. but shall be limited to appellate review of the record created before the enforcement board. The appeal provided for herein shall be filed wi thin thirty (30) days of the execution of the order to be appealed. , ',,) . ~ - 2 - " I " \", . .:\,,::.;:~(~Jj'!"7~;Wf~~ , . T;,it;" .. .. ,I Section 6. Should any part or provision of this ordinance bc declared by a' court of compctent juri~dlction to be. invalid, the some shall not afCect the validity of the ordinance ~ n wholc, or any part thereof, other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 7. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in ~onf1ict herewith are to the extent of such conflict hereby repealed. . Section 8. Notice of the proposed enactment of this ordinance has been properly advertised in n newspaper of general circulation in accordance with Section ." 166.041, Florida Statutes. Section 9. The provisions of this ordinance shall take effect immediately , ' upon its passage. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED , L I\layor-Com missioner Attest: " , .c ./ City Clerk !' .' ,. , . I i ~ .' , , \ . , " 1 . .\ ' 'i ;,' " ,. ',\ : , \ J ':\\ ' ':1 . , r.:.' ~i " '~ .1 - 3 - ~ . .~. "e .1 .... ----~ . . :-', ~.P,: : ..:.' :~;-'d\ ;.~~::V:~'<\i~q'~~"'i1ri CU<'. i/' 5' - .':: .}';'<'~::;1{~ , \- 2'" .^.,' . 3'" . . . ".. . . ..' . '..-1; ., . . /'~ OHDINJ\NCE NO. 4042-85 :' ~.I:;> >- .~ :). ~. ,. .:> AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATERi FLORIDA, AMENDING SECTION 72.05 OF CHAPTER 72, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, 'OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CLEARNA'fER, BY PLACING A NEW ESTABLISHMENT UN~ER e ',1 COPSRX CLASSIFICATION, SAID ES'rADLISHMENT BEING IN SECTION 20~ TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGEe 16 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA:' PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OP THIS ORDINANCE. . "f ~ 'I , ( , ~. . .. '. . ,-. ,~". \~t ,..; -,t, . ~ ~.:.~ , ., BE IT'ORDAINED' BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF 'l'HE CI'l'Y OF CLEAm'lNrER, FLORID!\: (/ I. " Sect.ion 1. Section' 72.05, of Chapter 72, Alcoholic Beverages, of the Code of Ordinances, City of.Clear~ater( is hereby amended to place a new establishment under COPSRX Classification'as " follows: 'I COPSRX Consumption on Premises--Special "Restauran t , 'j 'rhe old Ne.,... York New York., 1525 U. s. 19 South, being part of M&B 33-021' in Section 20( To~nship 29 South, Range 16 Ba~t, Pinellas c6unty, Florida. .. ; , . .,' Section 2. Notice of the proposed enactment of this ordinance. has been properly advertised in a ~ewspaper of general circul~tion' t', ~. in. accordance with Section 166.041, Florida Statutes. '1 ,":1 , ,~. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective immediately ~pon its passage. PASSED ON FIRST READING . PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED " , Mayor-Commissione:o: .Attest: . ,\ '\1 " Acting City Clerk ') I ,'.. " , ,: ~ ;..'(~~ ; '. .<.: ",;:1' 01- ... .-.. I 1\ ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE DESIGNATION REQUEST SEE INSTRUCTIONS $100 ^PP1~~ation ~e neCeiPtOf.:--~J!0~ AB- ~6 -:-:516. ' 1"1 t1'als () . ' APPLICANT'S NAHg AND ADDRESS: ESIABkISHMEHT NAME & ADDRESS: 'l'hp Old Nnw York Hew YOJ.'K: Krejci Restaurants, Inc. 1 S2 5 u. s. 19 S. Clearwater, Fl. J))46 11)2 7 u. S, 19 S. PHONE (81)) 539-7441 , Clearwat~, Fl. J3546 PHONE (81)) 5J9-7441 . ~ .su a:d4.rM J'kt/ ( 'YYl :; B "3 3- c>;& I ) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY OWNER on PROPERTY/HANAGER'S NAME & ADDRESS: Lee W. & Gail M. Krejci LICENSE TRANSFER: YES NO X 2703 S~~ony ct. E. Clearwater, Fl. 3J~19 IF YES, 'PRIOR OWNeR: , Stella of Clearwater, Inc. BEVERAGE DESIGNATION REQUESTED4-coP-SRX " 250 FLOOR AREA: 8000 Sq. Ft. PARKING SPACES: 289 SEATING CAPACITY: IS ESTABLISHMENT LESS THAN 500' FROM: 1) SCHOOL no 2) 'CHURCH no 3) RSSIDENTIAL AREA no ~) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE ESTABLISgHENT yes I , Lee W. correct. Krejci I certify I:-0'~ Appl c the above information to be true and 7/31/85 Date Clerk's Office Use: ., Property Zoned (use) C- S c . A tlas Page ..::J'- i 5 Sec~T""5hip-nange 2LJ....;zct -16- *Notarized Statement (or a lease) .Building Permit N/A I .\ .Seating Plan Police '(If required) Building Inspection Rev. 6-26-B5 '. '\) I t I t I IYr)- I ... 41,09 I .. I .... 0 r ... ~. tit ; I . " ., . 141' MEB 44.0" IQ .., a:: .; M~8 ~~,02 . rn Me, B 44,03 'N, OR. 2 a:: o <t@ r 0 . I ~ 1.lJ \16 , ~, ,,4 ", E, 1/4 ZON ING PAGES. I': r 1m . I I I leG l ~ f I I M f. 8 : 33'0~ I I ). ~ I.. l I.I'JI/~ Hr:. to ~~. .. I~: ..~ ~~ ao 1'1.., II" SIC.,).' Mas 4"1'04 J . ()o J~ I I I , , I I' o v CII . o? ::l . I r:, J Ie, "\ .. . MoB 32.04 R'M H~ CO ~~ r.-" Oc,~ " ~~ r -'- I I 1 I 1 I I t r,;- -' - --- f - ), ' 1, =-_ -1 lr--=-----=-- -=), Ii . ~\\ If ',\\.. 1....- ,. ~~ II , ( I , c ...:..-..:: r~: , I I "l;: M E.9 J'2-0<1 -R ,0' cj > .J al 1. I ',: ,: . ,'I '" "., ',' ::. M&B I: :: 33 - 0 21 l . I , . 'I 1111 r.. I I I I I. ~I I I I /, I I I f -J- _._-- I I I M~ 8 r 33,03 I I I C'S C a:: w f- ~ :J: a:: q w ...J U ~ '" '" ~ I I ~B' :: I = I ss.- 4-' .- .. '" .. .. .. 2"" I' r----' . I :1 aJ r ~I a . lMS8 I 33'0,61 I !,' ..,. ....,"""'" ..___...-.01- -' .'-1 o:=.;:..I~ .10.' \I M5B 3;5.02 v MoB ~:3' ()7 MoB ..' 40 Joe,,!; LEGEND: 0 ZONE o SUB. OR CON'DO. CLASS. o ANN RES 0 L UTI 0 N No. 85 - 1 0 , . .. t' .. ~ 'I , ~>' . ....~ ,",1 . . '~f 't '. ' ~ ',"p . .". .~, '; :;' ':; "::","::\,~'::16 ==' ;..}:. ,:". c:..... r) ^ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, ENDORSING A MANDATORY SAFETY BELT USE LAW FOR FLORIDA AND URGING THE STATE LEGISLATURE TO CONSIDER SI\t-1E AT ITS NEX'r SESSION. ':.,r , ~ . -rt , . ::, :;.:. . ," co. ,< " .J WHER&ill~ the Florid~ Coalition for Auto Safety Now is a non- profit organization working to oducate the public about the effective~ , ness of safety belts as D life saving device in automobile accidents~ . ~ and I' is WHEREAS, it is es~imated that safety belt use can decrease deaths and incapacitating injuries by fifty per cent; and .\ r WHEREAS, States who have a mandatory use law, such as the State of New York, have a~ready demonstrated a reduction in deaths and injuries; NO\-v,.. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, IN SESSION DULY AND REGULARLY ASSEMBLED, AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the City Co~nission urges the Florida State Legislature ,) to consider passage of a,rnandatory safety belt use law for:Florida at its next session, 2. That a copy of this Resolution be transmitted to tne Pinellas County Legislative ,Delegation requesting their consideration of this legislation. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of August, A.D. 1985. \0 . <) ., 'I Mayor-Commissioner " Attest: " ') " ") Acting City Clerk. , \\ ., 1:\ H . . .' ;' , . , " '1. .1' ",:." .~'. .": . -\ i.~)'<': ::"D.~.\1r'~;;:'::/:J~~t:~ . 2'J'y~-:'t' . . ~.; ""~ I':' ;.:: . . .) t'~ . RES 0 L U T 1,0 N No . 85 - 1 \ . A RESOLUTION AlPI'HORIZING THE CITY NPTORNEY TO DEPEND 'THE CITY.OF CLEARWATER iN THE' CASE. OF'SHADOW WEST APARTMENTS, LTD. V. STATE.OF FLORIDA, DEPAR~MENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL, CIRCUIT CIVIL NO. 85-11000-14. \'l/HEREAS, the City of Clearwater has been made a party defendant. HI ClIl act-iora to quiet t'it:le \1Ji1ich is the subject mntter of the cnse of Sh~dow West Apartments, Ltd., v. State of Florida, Department of 'rransoorta ticn I et a 1, Cireui t Civil' No. 85-11000 -14 ; ,- , NOW, THEREFORE~ 'SE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, IN SESSIN DULY AND REGULARLY ASSEMBLED, AS POLLm\fS : '. , I I. That the City Attotney is hereby aut~orized to take any and all steps necessary to defend the City of CleRrwater in the case of Shado\\" West Apartments, LtG. v. State of Florida, D'e!;lart.ment of Transportation; City of Clearwat~r, Florida; and Vision Cable t of Pinellas, Inc., Circuit Civil No. 85-11000-14. 2. 'l'hat this Resolutio'n 'shall become effective immediately 'J upon its ~assage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of August, A.D. 1985. Attest: Ma~or-Commissioner '1\ .~ .I.J " :)' . ,A7ting City Clerk I) 'l'his is an action to quiet title in that. the Plaintiff alleges an eRsemcnt granted to the City termina tcd in 1982,' and reverted buck to the grantor. " '\\ ;'''\ ,II II ;, -'I :\ , ,{ , ''''.-''' ... 'Ii. j .", ~ ... '.;:.~ t~.' Z'6'.";: (lgSOLtJ'l'ION No. B 5 - j\ RESOLU'l'ION ASSESSING REi\L PHOPEA.rry THE COSTS OF DEMOLITION IN THE, AMOUNT OF $675.00 INCURRED IN REMOVING SUBSTANDARD BUILDING. , WHEREAS, 1?1IrSuilnt to Chapter 138 of the Code of Ordinances, ci ty of Cletu"wa ter, Clnd the standard HOIJsing, Code, the Building Official determined that certain real property hereinafter described and the building situated thereon were unsafe, unsanitary, unfit for human habitation and dangerous and detrimental' to the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community and do not properly comply with the req~irements of said Code; and I WHEREAS, the owner of said real property wished to dispense with formal notice and hearing J;lrior to the'structure being demolished and has executed a Waiver of Not,ice and Hearing requesting , r' . t.he City to ddmolish such structure utilizing its normal procedure; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has caused the demolition of said building, and the cost of such work should now be assessed R5 a lien on behalf of the City of Clearwater against said' property; NOv-J, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY 'l'HE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, \ IN SESSION DULY AND REGULARLY ASSEMBLED, AS ' FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to Chapter 138 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, and p~cperly executed Waiver of Notice and Hearing, the o\'mer of the real propsrty described as: Lot 16, Block ~, C. E. Jackson's Subdivision, according to the map,or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 2, page 96 of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Plorida, of which Pinellas ~ . County WAS formerly a partl also known as 703 Carlton Avenu~, Cleawater, Florida. The record title holder to said property appears to be Henry i'lcCloI1r1 and Mamie L. M9Cloud, his wife, 1309 Roosevel t Hvcnue, Clearwatc':r, Florida, according to the Public Records and the current tax roll of Pinellas County, Florida; !laving voluntarily requested the City of Cleawater to demolish \ said building, and the City of Clearwater, having now completed said 'dork I docs hereby' Clssess find chargE: n lien on behalf of the -1- ,. If c '> ' ". +'~'~J'" ...;. ,,'~lo'~~(".t i.T':'A~:,.11~ " :~'. ':'Y,;:. i.:~~~'> :":.A,,:,:;\~~~~',\t~;;~~tl .' ' , ';"':.:/}~ City of Clcan.,rater, against said described real property for the' . < ,:\":;':r < ~.~ r nccessQry cost incurred as fQll~ws: Terra'E~cavating,Inc.-~Demol~tiqn Cost ~ '.. r: .T .': .', . ') ,~ , ~~, :, '$675.00 " .. . ~ \.~:.:' .", ~{: " , '. ~ " . ~. As soon as practicable a certificate of inoebtedness ~gainst tne described renl pro[?erty for the amount'of the assessment shalL , . . :: ~:\.~. .. :>/ '" ..' be prepared, which certificate shall constitute and be a p~ior' lie~ to all other liens except the lien for taxes. Said certificate; .... ::'l: \oJhen iSE3ued shall oe payable ,to bearer in not, exceeding ten (10) " II equal annual installments with intereest at a rate not greater. than eight per cent (8%) per annum payable annually. Il~ . 3 . .'1 The City Clerk is hereby directed to prepare a Notice of . ~'~~i , ., Lien in the amount of the assessment a9~inst said'property and t6 file the same in the Office of the Circuit Court oE pinellas co . . ,. ., Cou~ty, Florida. .,; 4 . This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon ! ," I its adoption. :,." PASSED AND ADOPTED this ~______day of August, A.D. 1985. , , i :1 , { i - ;. I) , ."-' .1 ~ ~... . ., ,; t; . c . ~ 1 Mayor-Commissioner Attest: " +f' . ~., , ) Acting City Clerk I ../ I . ., ',) ".,\1 . ., . \ i,' .':'2- \ ' 1 ' '\ ,; / ~. '<. .q' 'l " I. ., 'f>C:~ : :~;:~::~~.~: . ~::...jY;/~~~~ .~ '2"7 <.~ ... -......... ,,1 RES 0 L UTI 0 N No. 85 - J .~'1--' . , ( ') A RESOLUTION ASSESSING REAL PROPBRTY THE COSTS OF DEMOLITION IN 'THE AMOUNT OF $1,400.00 INCURRED IN REMOVING SUBSTANDARD BUILDING. I. WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 138 of the Cod~ of Ordinances, City of Cle~r~ater, und the Standard Housing Code, the Building Official determined that certain real property hereinafter described Llnci the building 5i tU.:1. ted thereo'n Here unsafe , unsanitary, unf it tor human habitation and dangerous and detrimental to the health, safety, morals and the, general welfare of the community and do not properly comply with the requirements oi said Code; and WHEREAS, the owner of ~aidreal pro~erty wished to dispense '( with formal notice nnd hearing prior to the structure being demolizhed and has executed a Waiver of Notice and Hearing requesting the City to demolish such structure utilizing ~ts normal procedure~ and \ WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has caused thedemolition of 'I said building, and the cost of such work should now be assessed as a lien on.behalf of the City of Clearwater against said property; NON, THEREFORE, BElT RESOLVED BY THE CITY CO~.lISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, IN SESSION DULY AND REGULARLY ASSEMBLED, AS FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to Chapter 138 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, and properly executed Waiver of Notice and Hearing, the owner of the'! real property described as: North 1/2 of Lot 15, Block 2, Hart's Addition to Clearwater Harbor, according' to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, page 94 of the Public Records of Hillsborougn County, Florida, of which pinellas County was formerly a' part~ also known as 507 N. Garden Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. " The,record title holder to said property appears to be Harold Robinson, 1970 Soule Road, Clearwater, Florida, according to the PUblic Records and the current tax roll of pinellas County, Florida; , having voluntarily requested the City of Clearwater to demolish said building; and the City of Clearwater, having now completed ,1 ,) -,1- .f, . ",' '. . , \' , .......:. ,\ · ,,:"i!t~.:;"~, :~~:(~~ I, . " , , " , , said work, does hereby assess and charge a lien on behalf of the. .;. '."": City of. Clearwater, against said desc~ibed real property for the " ,." , . " necessary cost incurred as follows: Sonny Glasbrenner, Inc.--Demolition Cost . $1 ',400.00 2, As soon as practicable a certificate of'indebtedness against the described real property for the amou~t of the asses~~ ment shall be prep'ared, which c~rtificate shall constitute and . be a prior lien to all. other liens exce9t the lien for taxes. '" Said certificae, \Jhen issued shall be payable to bearer in not ~xceeding ten (10) equal annualinstallrnents with'jnter~st at a rate not greater than eight per cent (8%) per annum payable o " annually. ;1 3,. The ci ty Clerk is hereby directed to prepare a Notice of Lien in the amount of the assessment against said property and to file the same in the Office of the Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida. " 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon i't's adoption. " . PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of' August, A.D. 1985. Mayor-Commissioner 'i Attest: ''. Acting City Clerk " " it '1/ , .0...,\ '! ,-2- "c".\. , '::.~. ,~~~."t:J:~)!.~::.~~ . 'c' ':8' .:,'.'.';. . ," . :. \ I .~: :,.... . . _:. :J' :'~ ,,_9 ....~. RES 0 L UTI 0 N No. 85 - 1 ?\- ,j'l' ,A RESOL0TION A~SESSING REAL PROPERTY THE COSTS OF DE~lo"LI'l'I.oN IN rrHE AMOUNT'OF $1,075.00 INCURRED IN REMOVING,SUBS'fANDARD BUILDING. r.." . ., c.'.. ,\ ~ . c.,. ,', , . H :.! t~HE~El\S, pursuant' to Chnpter 138 of the Code of" Ordinances, , , \ ' Cit{ oftl~~rw~t~r; an~ the Stahdatd Housing Code, the Building .. :;. I . ',' . . . . official d~terlnined'~h~~'certain i~al :prop~~t~ ~~reinafter ~ . . " .... . .. : ' oescr ibec1 alid th~:" builc1i'ng si t'UAt ted ,tilereo'n iwere 'unsafe, unsanitary, unfit for hUInan habitrt"tion Clnd dangerolJs ':arid detrimental to the health, safety, motals, and the gen8ral welfar~'of the community and do not broperly comply'~ith.the requirements of said Code; u" +, and WHEREAS,' tte owner'of said real property wished to di~pens~ I \-lith formed. notj.c~' and h'eari.nc; px;ior to the structure being ~e~oii~hed ~n~'h~~ :~xe~tite6 a W~i~~r of ~otice and Hearing'requesting ., c, .,. I ,. ~ . the City' t.o demo] ish' such. strpcture utilizing its normal procedure; '. ; ~ and' ; j. , , :\1HER.l~~S , 'the Ci 1~~i.' :of C:Le'ar\)'atE:Y, ha5 cause.d th~ demolition of said ~u~lding, ~nd t~e'c9s~ of ~p~~ work should. now b~ assessed as a lien on behal f of" the City of Clearwater ctgainst said property; NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COr-U.lISSION OF THE CI'lIY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, IN SESSION DULY AND REGULARLY ASSEMBLED, AS ,:: FOLLOWS: " ... 1. Pursu~nt to Chap~er 1~B of the Code of Ordinances, City of ~learwatert and pro~erl~ execu~~d ~aivetof'~otice and Hearing~ , , . . 't'he owner of: the real ?rop,:arty oeser ibedas : '.' . . . ~ " ~.. . Lot 3 and North 40 f~et of Lot 4, Block 0; Catclin~Teriace,Subdivision, according to the map or 91~t thereof as recorded {nPlat '~ Book 12,pa~~ 15'~f the Public Records of, . Pinell~s County, Floridaj ~lso known as 1~60 s. MadisonA~enu~, ClearwRter, Floilda~ 'rhe r0cord title holder to said propert,y appear~~' to be Maud~, W. ,Raye,S08 V{rginia Avenue, , Clearwater, Florida, according to the Public Records and the curr~nt tax roll of Pinellas Count~, Florida; , , ' having y'olllnti'3.rily requested the City of Clearwater to demoiish sdid build~ng, and the City of Clearwater, havin~ now. completed if -1,- "I ... ',' ',,",' ", "":X?;~; II .';' said work, d08S hereby nSBess and charge a lien on behalf of the: City of Clearwater, aga1nst said described real property for the necessary cost incurred as follows: . , Terra ,Exca'Jating lIne. --Demoli tion Cost " . $ 1 , 075 . 0 0 ,,' ' 2. As soon as practicable a certificate of indebtedness. , ~., against the described real property ~or tile amount of the assessment shall be prepared, ~hich certificate shall constitute and be a prior lien to all other liens except the lien for taxes. Said certificate, when issued shall bepayble to bearer in not exceeding Ii ten (10) equal annual installments with interest at a rate not greater than eight per cent (8%) per annum' payable annually. 3. ., The City Clerk is ~ereby directed to prepare a Notice of Lien in the amount of the assessment against said'property and to file the same in the Office of th~ Circuit Court of Pinellas County,. PIor ida. 4. This Resolution shall become effective in~ediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND AboPTE~ this day of August, A.O: 1985. Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Acting City Clerk ;'1 .~) "j . ,~ "'\\ -2- J ~...t: ;~ .~. \ o 'II ':'~'. <',:: <~ . ~.~~l_:;'~?:~i;' /s'~'~:'f~; ,2- "i-l':;" . '. " . ~ t ." " .:.'.~ R B SOL UTI 0 N No. 8 5 - . , .:.'-~, . ,^ :)' A RESOLUTION ASSESSING REAL PROPERTY THE COSTS . , Oi" DEMOLI'rION IN THE AMOUNT' OF $1, 050 ~ 00 INCURRED. IN REMOVING SUBSTANDARD BUILDING. : :,~. " . I I . ~", WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 138 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, and the Stand~rd H045ing Code, the Buil~ing Official determined that certain real property hereinafter described ," , .. , ' .' , : ',:,~ and the building situated thereon were unsafe, unsanitary, unfit ,', for human habitation and dangerous and detrimental to the health, " safety, morals and the general welfare of the community and do not properly comply with the requirements of said Code; and WHEREAS, the owner of said real property wished to dispense with formal notice and hearing prior to the structure being demolished and has 'executed a Waiver of Notice and Hearing requesting the City to demolish s~ch structure utilizing its normal procedure; and WHEREAS, the City of cleGrwater h~s caused the d~molition of , , ~</. . ..... ..: said building, and the cost of such work should now be assessed as a lien on behalf of the City of Clearwater against ~aid property; , " . , ,. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, IN SESSION DULY AND REGULARLY ASSEMBLED, AS FOLLOWS: > ' '\ 1. pumuant to Chapter 138 of the Code of Ordinandes, City of Clearwate~, and,properly executed Waiver of Notide and Hearing, the owner of the real property described as: Lot 5, Block 8, Palm Park SUbdivision, .accordin~ to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 4, page 86 of the Public. Record~ of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas Cbunty was formerly a part; alsq known as 1203 Railroad Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. , \) The record title holder to ~aid property appears to be Marian M. Pruster, 1203 Railrond Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, according to the Public Hecords and the cu:rrent .tax roll of pinellas C9unty, Florida; having voluntarily requested the City of Clearwa~er to demolish said building, and the City of Clearwater, naving"now completed -1- l . ,I I.~ ~ ," ;.-. . ~,. , . ",' , " '~ "". '.' . ".:. (~/;:~;:~?;.~'? ?:q?,?;~~ . ..-.:.. /~ }f~~~ .. ," ~. , .. cO .I'~', .~. :',. ~t:~ ," said work, does hereby assess and charge a lien on behalf of ~h~ City of Clearwater, against said described real property for. the . '~.?I " necessary' cost incurred as follows: , t.r. . ~.\.~ . ,,' ".\' ~. .... Terra Excavating, Inc..--Demolition Cost $1,050.00 '~'r > .~' .:1,. 2" As soon as prac:ticable...a certificate of indebtedness against the described real property for the amouht of the 'assessment shall be prepared, which certificate shall constitute and be a prior lien to all qther liens except the lien for taxes. Said '.' f " " .. certificate, when issued shall be payable to bearer in not exceeding ten (10) equal annual installments with interest at a rate not " greater than eight per cent (8%) per annum payable annually. 3. The City Clerk is hereby-directed to prepare a Notice of Lien in the amount of the assessment against said property and to file the same in the Office of the Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida. ' 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon '" its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of August, A.D. 1985. 'j > . ~ Mayor-Commissioner Attest: .1 Acting City Clerk ..~ . ., \ , \ .\ t .\\ I. , ,\ " "\ :.l '. .r -2- ':r , " ", .'.r.: '[,1:' '~."':(>~:}l~t .... _.~...... 50. n E SOL UTI 0 N No. 8S - 1 ~ A RESOLUTION ASSESSING REAL PROPERTY THE COSTS OF DEMOLITION IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,550.00 INCURRED IN REMOVING SUBSTANDARD BUILDING. WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 133 of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater and the StandardI3uilding Code, the Building Of~icial determined that certain ,~eal property hereinafter described and the building situated thereon were unsafe, unsanitary, unfit for human habitation and uangerous and detrimental to the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community and did '. I not properly comply with the requirements of said Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 103.4 (-a) (5), as amended, of the Standard Building Code, the Building Official found that an emergency existed which, in his opinion, involved imminent danger to human life and healt~, and ordered the demolition of said :r building; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has caused the demolition of said building, and the cost of such work should now be assessed as a lien on behalf of the City of Clearwate~ against said property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, IN SESSION DULY AND REGULARLY ASSEMBLED, AS " FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to Chapter 138, Code of Ordinances, City of ') Clearwater, and Section 103.4 (a) (5), as amended, of the Standard Building Code, the Building Official having found that'an emergency existed and 'hayingordered the demolition of the building situated on the following described pro~erty: Lots 1" 1 0, 11 ",nd 12, Block B, Palm Park Subdivision, according to the map or plat thereof as recordedin Plat Book 4, page 86 of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was formerly a part; also known as'1215 Railroad Avenue, Clearwater, Florid",. , I .'1 The record title holder to said property appears to be Earl Washington and Helen Fragier, Heirs, 1215 Railroad Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, according to the Public Records and~the current tax roll of Pinellas County, Florida. \, . and the Cit.y of Clearwater, having now completed sRid work, does hereby assess and charge a lien on behalf of the City of Clearwater, , , ., , -1- , '.: .'~ . '" "'. '.; .t. .,;~,,, ~.\.H'~::~,:.~~~ . . ~ ,.~,;,.,~..~~,~~, . ' , ., . ...~ "-; " c ~ ";.': ~ ~ against snid described real 9roperty for the necessary cost .~. /;' ..j' incurred as follows: Terra Excavating, Inc.--Demolition Cost $1,550.00 , " .... 2. As soon as practicable a certificate of indebtedness ag~inst the described real property for the amount of the assessment :' shall be prepared, "'Jhich certificate snaIl constitute and be a prior lien to all other liens except the lien for taxes. Said cer~ificate, .. when issued shall be p~yable to bearer in not exceeding ten (10) equ~l annual i~stallments with interest nt a rate not greater than eight per cent (8%) per annum payable annually. 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to prepare a Notice of , Lien 1n the amount of the assessment against said .property and to file the same in the Office of the Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida. 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of August, A.D. 1985. Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Acting City Clerk " '\J' "'\ .:'.\ \ , -2- . . RES 0 L UTI 0 N' No. 85 - 11 A RESOLUTION ASSESSING REAL PROPERTY THE COSTS OF DEMOLITION IN TH~ AMOUNT OF $850.00 INCURRED IN REMOVING SUBSTANDARD BUILDING. WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 133 of the Code' of Ordinances, City of clearwater' and the Standard Building Code, the Building Official determined that certain real property hereinafter described and the building situated thereon were llnsafe, unsanitary, unfit for human hhbitation and dangerous and detrimental to the 'health, " safety, murals and the general welfare of. the community and did not properly comply with the requirements of said Code; and WHEREAS, pursuaht to Section 103.4 ta) (5), as amended, of ,; the Standard Building Code, the Building Official fOllnd that an emergency existed which, in his opinion, involved imminent danger to human life and health, and ordered the demolition of said building; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater has caused the.demolition of said building, and tile cost of such work should "now be assessed as a lien on behalf of the City of CleartoJater against said prope'rty; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED ~Y THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, IN SESSION DULY AND REGULARLY ASSEMBLED, AS FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to Chapter 133, Code of ordinances, City of Clearwater, and Section 103.4 (a) (5), as amended, of the Standard Building Code, the Building Official having found that an emergency \t:~xisted and having ordere,d the demolition of the building situated on the following described ~Foperty: i South 75 feet of Lot 13, of Revised Map of R. H. Padgett's Subdivision, according to .the,map or 91at thereof as recorded in Plat Book 4, page 32 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; also known as 325 S. Madison Avenue, Clearwater, Florida. The record title nolder to said proper.ty appears to be Conious Street, S.R. 5, Box 271, Radiant, Virginia 22732, according to the Public Records and the current tax roll of Pinellas County, Florida; .and the City of Clearwater, having now completed said work, does heroby assess and charge a lien on behalf of the ~ity of Clearwater, -1- U:: ::., r.: :c..-:..::~ ?'I", " " '.' : " .. :: l'!>::' ~:: l::': \)~'i::':':;~~~\?\~>>~ against said described real property for the necessary cost incurred as follows: " " . ~ . , ! . ~ .".. II . ~ '.1 .' .. ,J, , -f ~. . , .' ~ , Sonny Glasbrenner, Inc.--Demolition Cost $850.00", ' .r,.'-: ,', 2, As soon uS practicable a certificate of indebtedness again~t tile described real property for the amount of the assessment sh~ll be prepared,"~hich certificate ~~all constitu€e and be a prior I'ien to alL,other liens except the lien for taxes., Said certificate, .wnen issued shall be pnyable to bearer in not exceeding ten (10) ~qual annual installments with interest at a rate not greate~ than " ' " " ," t . eight per ~ent (8%) per annum payable annually. 3. The City Clerk is h~reby'directed to rrepare a Notice of Lien in the amount of the assessment against said property and ~o file the same in the Office of the Circuit Court of Pinellas " ~ ~ " i County, Florida. 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately ,upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of August, A.D. 1985. Mayor-Commissioner Attest: Acting City,Clerk " " .,) " ;, . ,;~ 'l '. I " ' "1 :j -2- '1 ,\ > ,.'. ...- ............. . ' ".,":: ",:'~i ,:'L,' (':~.:~;:X;:,:i\:~~q~ . :3" ,,?,:. '. ','~~ ." ~,.:,.~L, ,', ,.", . L'; I) I' , M EM 0 RA N DUM ,\ . " SUBJEC'r: DATE: Honorable Mayor wnd Members of the City Commission ,PrankX. Kowalski, Acting City Attorney An thony L. Shoenlaker,' Ci ty ManClger; Dan Deignan, ~ Finance Director; Bob Ellis ~ Risk Management' ... .'.. I'~"J(/' Crosby v. Spada and City of Clearwater. . \ '- August 7, 1985 .t :-~ I '.t '::li TO: FROt-l : COPIES: " .~ :! . ~" " . " :, , , Thds action arises from a motor vehicle accident in which a police officer collided with a motor vehirile driven by Mr: David Crosby. ' The police officer was driving an unmarked vehicle, while involved in a high speed pursuit. ' The officer ,lost contiol of his vehicle and collided with a vehicle driven by Mr. David Crosby. ~Mr. Crosby was not involved in the chase and there is no evidence of negligence on his part. Mr. ,Crosby suffered permanent injuries as a, result of the collision. The City has negotiated a settlement of this suit whereby both, the City and the driver of the vehicle which wa~ being' pursued by the police officer would each contribute. ' ,1 The City would pay $10,000 in satisfaction of a full release .for all its liability in the case. This settlement is recommended by the City Attorney's office and by Gallag~er Bassett, our claims adjuster. It is recommended that the city Commission approve the proposed settlement and authorize the appropriate officers to execute same. FXK:br " , 'J.' '\ 'Ij ',; , ',\ , ~,) " 'M,:\ . -,j '~1 i , ' '~ I ':[ RELEASE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned DAVID CROSBY, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten-Thousand ($ID,ODD) Dollars, in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby release, acquit and forever discharge the City of Clearwater, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation, . ! its servants, agents, employees, heirs, successors and assigns, including Clearwater Police Sgt. Sam Garrett, of and from any and all claims, demands, damages, actions, expenses, loss of service and causes of action, arising or growing out of any matter or thing from the beginning of time down to the date of these presents, and more particularly and from any and all claims, demands, damages, actions, expenses, loss of service and cause of . action arising or growing out of any matter or thing from the beginning of time down to the date of these presents, and more " particularly of and from any and all claims, demands, damages, . actions, expenses, loss of service and causes of action, arising out oE the motor vehicle accident occurring on August 10, 1983, near the intersection of Bayshore Boulevard and Bay Lane, Clearwater, Florida, involving, David Crosby, Sgt. Sam Garrett, " and Nicholas Spada. And for said c~nsideration the undersigned DAVID CROSBY agrees to direct his attorney, Irene B. Sullivan, Esq., to forever withdraw tr.e pending claim against the City of Clearwater, said claim being filed in the Circuit Court of pinellas County on November 13, 1984, Case No. 84-14201-12. Further, DAVID CROSBY agrees never to file another claim what- soever against the City or Sgt. Sam Garrett regarding the above-described incident. It is understood that this release constitutes the compromise of a doubtful and disputed claim and that payment is not to be construed as an admission of liability on the part of said, releasees, by whom liability is expressly denied. V' ,', ~: ' " . '~ " , :' ,.\' , ;'." ,,::, ,:: ::. }~~, -c.. --- , .' " .,' -2- The City agrees that in consideration of his share of the settlement and in re~ognition of his cooperation in resolving this case, Nicholas Spada shall not be held liable or subject to " any claim arising from the $10,000 sh~re of the settlement paid to David Crosby by the 'City The undersigned further declares and represents that no promise, inducement, or agreement not herein expressed has been made to the undersigned, and that this release contains the entire agreement between the part~es hereto, and that the terms of this release are contractual and not a mere recital. I further state that I have read the foregoing release and l' . l , , know the contents thereof, and I sign the same as my free qct. WITNESS my hand this day of , 1985. WITNESS: On behalf of David Crosby , " , ' Irene H. Sullivan, Esq. P.O. Drawer 1441 St. Pet e r s burg ,. F lor i d a 3 3 73 1 David Crosby " On behalf of the City pf .Clearwater r~ 'L I' i /" ., 1 , ( _ .: . ._ ~ ~ Jho'. '\ . lit ' (", \ ", I ,\ , 'j , ". \ r-_,.~,.i[( ',' .. '1, t~~>. _n~ '. . Robert G. walker, Jr. \,~ Assistant City Attorney police Legal Advisor "') ,'j ", . . \'\ " " \ '. " 1. C ~. " (, I ( , .. , , -EASEMENT 3 ' 3. FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) cosh in hand paid to them , the receipt of which is hereby acknowl- .edged, and the bene!i ts to be der i vod therefrom, L. M. Loken dOes hereby grant and convey to the CI1Y OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, an easement over, under and across the following described land, lying and being situate in the County of Pinellns, State of Florida, to wit: A Ten (10') foal waler main casemenl lying 5' each side of all waLer mains ~p lo and including all hydrants and meters, but excluding any waler mains that may lie under buildings or with- in five (5) feel of buildings, AND an ingress and egress easement for refuse and garbage collections and Cily of Clearwater service and utility vehicles, all lying wilhin the following described lract= Lots 7, 8, 15, 16, Block IIJ", and Lots 1-14, Block "Nil, .BROOKLAHN SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Plat Book 13, page 39t Public Records of Pinellas CountYt Florida. Along with vacated road right of way of Id1ewild Drive as recorded in O.R. Book 2243, page 544 Public Records of Pinellas CountYt Florida. ' !j III " Tbis easement being for utilities installation and maintenance. The CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, shall have the right to enter upon the above described premises and to construct, fnstal1 and maintain thereon any utility lines and to inspect and alter such utility lines from time to time. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party haS set his hand_ and sea~ this 29th day of July - , 1985 Signed, sealed and delivered in t presence ~: ;1 ~,r;, 0~SEAL) 't:) (SEAL) _ STATE OF FLORIDA 1 ) COUNTY OF PlNELLAS ) . '\ Before me personally appeared to me well known and known to md to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknOWledged before me that ~~ executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. ~ss my hand and official seal this , 198.:r ~9 day o:f My Commission Expires: HO.ih-~'~ ~U~L'C ~IAi~ Or H.G~IO'\ 1M CCIIJIIl'.iSIOi'l i::<mi.S JAI~ 23 1980- llCNt\D J~ GENEi'.AL iNS. UNDur.WRI~ '. ~ ARBEL IA 51. " 9 '2 10 ~) /I 3 II ",.: ./ >- <t ~ :I: 19 :r: 12 13 N IN. T. 5,) w > <::( 14 : ~i~n{jH~;Hi~H ~~~~~~H~~mm ~~?~~~\~;):~~t :t/,>:)~(~' ~gr~~j~{?~\ mpj~}~?:}: ~Hm~m:/@Hf mmJ~~~~?He~ l~~~~~~~B~;~~i~I~~~~~u~g~~~~~~~ "..'.,....:.lVAC.K:JC:Eih......... '.' ~~~=~ :~:~=~:~O:1{;: ii 43:~54;f ~~~ ~~ ~~~::: 'l~[l~!ill!~!':il~ll)mj~ !1111!!I~~!II:~ : I~l III I!!! B~ ~i ~ Iii! lll~ I! l!l I!: ~ ~ !il ~ 1m! ll~ 1111!iiiilllliiililiil~i:lllllllllillllli mmm~~~~mmm~~ m~~~;mi'~m~mm~ :~:~:~~ ~: ~ :;;3::::~:~; ~:~: :~ ;~:~~~~~ ;~:;~:~ ;~: ~~~:~ 9'> ,. z w w a:: ~ a:: w > w U) ~ z ~ \ Note: ThIs Is no' a survey. '.f) ;) : !!!!l! I!!! ~ II~ mil!! ~ II!!! 1111 ~~ 1~li 1!!1 II: :!~l ill!j Ii m i ~ i ~ I ~!i l~ llllllll! l!~ I: ~ !!I~ll: M.J.8, C8/14/85 '\ WOODLAWN TERRACE . " d .~ ~. ':"\~':~'%l -'.-.(1 . ~." ':'/;~~tf. ; .'.:/~f~\ . ~ .~_>J:~r i . .: ~~~0~";'" !';.1 :.~~':~..~ , <\i ;:~\~\;.. , ,':':~ltSi"1 . ''';''i1l ".;,:~~ :.,AJ.~ ~ '~:. :L;~~~ .:<:;;~i .;!..t~{M : :~ ~ ::t:<;f '~,)8 .-'H,~ . ..:~.~}~t . .~.{f ".'c:/~i~ ;;'.;":.~:~ . :;';';'I~' .:',.;':\~ ':.<:)5~~i ".,.{~ ..:. "':"3 : f( :.~}~ ,:.,~ ..,:'::.~~ . .0.." :';:~~f,t~ ..,. .... .<"11 . .'~,7,,:\ , "';'~'Il ~ ::.~~~;~) . 'z?;i,' . .~;:;:.~ . I~~1 ': ;:;:i~ . ,,'..~~;.k . :::j~~ .':: .Yj c ~ . ~~l'rl ~'L;:;; .:~<t~ . '/l,f:r . :.:,~:~~ :~ d ., ' ."I.e ':..~~:~ . ,/~~~ .,- , '. c.'.:h i{:~ ::..-:.:} ,-;.;0. :/:~ . > . ~:" 'J.!fi ,}.r.', . j':"'i+ ~r;.;t '. ;,~}; :::;;~ . ....:~~ ~',;~i , ";~ """d' '\~~~ ;. 'l~~'~~ '..':;;~~4~1~ , ; -; ..:i-': ..,' /.1I,rb~2i~ . ~ I ',' ~IOTIFICi\TIO:~S . --II . ,..,'~...: ,,] ~> , ~ ..l-I'\ 'ff .....'.1 ~~"='}i.!'~~-.ci .. ,". ~'1, "..':. (~.r,~ /~:,'~ :r, '. ~.ib~?':t~~ '!i C JI(~ /' ":' " ::" ':'~'3'~?1~;~~~~~! ~ ' I I ",:",'.f"rj , ~ <' ~ >.. ~.. ~ f- Y" ,"{\ . . : ~. : ;~~;.l:ili . ... if....... Agenda 11 .' ';,- ) ~t '~."'~T{~~ . " ~.:. 'F~.\I""~'~ :'. ~. >>,/'}}~~~ . , . ""';<i,'~ . ". ." '" <';.' ;..~{::)~~ ~ , \. +T""....' . .. ~.J..:.. :.: ".;';fi ", ",-':"';'.::Jf. :.i,it. ;. " ~.f.~:43ZB3 : 13 CHAIRP8RSO:l (3): Lois :1artin .:\3:ETDtG DATES; .As Called. (4/yr~.> PLACE: Co:nrnission Chambers' . APPTS. ~8EDZD: 1 DA'rE APPTS.TO Be: i-1ADB: ASAP . : ~ /.' i Ttt2 FOLLO~,n:1G i\O.HSORY SOARD tH:.\OSri3 HAVE 't2:Ri-tS ~'lHIC:1 EXPIRE I:l JU:U:':. 1985, A:ro :JOil R8Q!JIRE'<,,~:~ EI'rHEa RE-APPOI:1T:.t8~rr FOR .\ :~Z~~ 'rERr-t OR REPLAC::::1g:.\T t3'i 1\ ~18'.~ APPOHl'r8Z. .' " ... "\:'<is f' . ::.~.:;;.:~, f :'1111 ingness :.~1';:,:~1 'fo Serve ' . > ... ':'.~;;. \;:~ . :T\. ~tJ .... .1/. Na~e-~ddress-Phone Date of Original Appointment Att;en::tance Record 1\ 1. Patricia Ne~ell 3lJO Gulf al vd. Belleair Shore 33535 a~595-5427 ~-5S6-3514 (County Representive) (Real Estate Sales) 1985 Resigned, 6/25/85 .', . '.."l:. '.! . :," ..' c ;~ " .. ~'h-'-'l:" ...u.~. . . ~ ":.)~ TilE ~OLLO'.4I:m ~IA:'ISS A RE arU:~G SUe:.1ITTE;D FOR CO~SIDSR!\ TIml TO FILL THE: I\BOV E ' V ACANCIE:SI:..tc. '; .:..:':.',~,;,",~,'.',,\ ~~e-Address-Phone Submitted By Co~ments-nelated Experience~ .' . . L. ~ '\: .:,~; :. ..' .~:~:~;c . ',.' ~: . . :.:':~~;:;~ . ." ," - .~o~F:d"i. " ..~ ;~'>,r '. '.' . ::;'::1" . .' ....J~"i ';..:;.:Y '! . . 1. ~o ~ames Available at this' Time .~) , I .\ . IJ' . ,~. :.<<}:; '. ~ ~ ~ '.1 . . ::';'1: . . ~<: " <.<;.:;. . ' ~ . I . .l~ . , I c ~. > d' .~. c .,{ " :, ~ I :',~ . ~~ '}: ;:} ',i , . '. . " .' "'; ';1 . . " " ." II 'Ii .,. , ~rune-Addre3s-Phone Date or' Original Appointment .".. ' ~.....:;~ .? " .....' ~:~~ ~.{t::~t:.,;.:'.).'~.~tb~t~l~~~:T1~~t\ eLI(~02. .....,',": "3SJ7:}"t FOR CO:--lmSSIO;~ :-tC:2:TItW AUGUST 15-1 11)85 HOTIFICATIOUS Age~~a (J JOAllD: Pinella.s Suncoast. Transit Authority ~lZ:.J9ERS:' '10 TE:ll>l: 3 years CHhIR?€RSQtl (5 l: APPOl:irl~D 3Y: City Commi:Jsion M~~TI:1Q DATr;S: n:1A:~CIAL .DISCLOSURE: Required PL.AC~: '. . . . l ,..,~ RE3lD~:'lCY nEQUInE:'fE~T: City Resideri t APPTS. NEeDED,: 1 ....,..;:.... ".:'>'::';;,~ SPBCIA!.. QUALIFICATIONS: . DAtE APPTS'.TO l3E: t1ADE:: 9/5/05,.: . .' . " ::;,,:.,:,~ . f,".. . , ~.,. ~.' I' ~.' ': ;.:~~~ THi1: :OLLO~~I:W ADVISORY 30,\RD H::::H~RS H(WE 'rC:R:~S '.mIen ~XPln~ It1 SEPTE::1m;m,: 19B5 AND':~O'.~ ,.' REQUI n:; SI'fHC:R nE-APPOI:'T.1Et~T FOR A ~eH TERi.! OR RE:PLACE:~IEI1T a Y 1\ :'l~vl'APPOI~:'TeE. " ..,. . . .. J\ttendance Record i/1l11ngnes3 To Serve 1. Donald 3. ~illinrns '445 Court Street. Clearwater. FL 33516 '.~_IPl3-1158S Yes . "".' ,,' THE ~OLLOHING NAr.tSs ARe 3EWG 3UBMtTTED FOR CONSIDERATIO:-l TO FILL THe: ABOVE: VACANCIES: ~ame-Addre3s-Phone Submitted Oy Comments-Related'Expe:ience, Etc. 1. " 2. '.. , . 0 ' -:' ~ ., ..... . :';j"J . .. . .c.," . ,:/' . ~~. .I~:,.....;,~ .' ." ~- ~]~~ '.~ ; :'\>i~: . ,~.:.: ::~;~\{: ,.', '"';':":;i~ ., ~~.. ',.'..:.(:;.~ . " 'I, , .: ~;~ . . :'c'c~ ,J , ',.. >~~~; l \' '. . L c' :.~ ~:.~{; . .' ~ s' ~ ," .' . .) ',: . 'I[ !. . :~ .~, .. " II ~ ; """1.' . , \ '.' " . , . . . \.:. ' " ~ I' j ','l '\ .~. ~ ;.1". ;, T~ '1 '\) 1: \ , '. . " ",: , I :1 .' :.~l '," '. ,:.. .?~ ., . ~ ' "., , . . . . "..~ ~ . ' ;~. ... ~ .' ,.' . '.': ~""../, . ,- ":("~I';<"l,n"\<:Ir" i~ \<ii.i''I~lI . '" .: '. r .': :\'~' ~ ;:~;;'::',;;~)~ ~;:-r::?;~t,h~ : . g.b.'."'....<<.. . . A~.nda ~"',i;~~~ .. '. '. '::.'/'1,' ....... ';- , .,., ';,:~~ c ... _,_. .... ......- .. eLK -,3 li'IJR CO:;lHIS3IO~1 :.I:;:~TDlG AUGUST 15 , 1935 ~IOTIl'.IC^rIO,'l3 nOARD: Clearwater Housing Authority TER'1: 4 'lears APPot~T3D 31: ~Ayor, Approved by City' pomm. FI~A~CIAL DISCLOSUR3: Required RESID~~CY REQUIREM3NT: City of Clearwater SPECIAL QUALU'ICATIO:1S: One Member must be a Public Housing Resident (efr~ctive 10/1/84) Tm::: FOLLO',H~'G ADVISORY 30ARD ;.18:-t3BR.t) H.WE Tii:R:13 ',mICn i::XPIRE Dt SEPTE:H3Etl, 1985, ^~D i'lQl..l R3QUliE ~I'r!mR RS-APPot:n(.1"::::~T ron A :IE',{ 18m-l on RE:PLAC8:-lE~1T BY. A i'~:'1 APpor:1TZZ. ..J1~i.lJERS : 5 C[IAI RPI::RSO:-' (S): Robt. Levison' :1e~TIaG DAT3S: 4 th Thursday PLACE: Sarbee To~ers APPTS..NE8DED: 2 OAT3 APPTS.TO 3S MAD~: . 9/5/85 . " '. '." .,....'." . ~ ,.c~ , ' ...""t '. ','}) :1 aile-Address-Phone - D.::lte of I) r' i.~ i rial Appointment Attendance Record '..1111111.;neS5 To Serve 1. Rick ilall 1941 Sever Drive Clearwater, Fl 33516 H-447-4195 W-446-5915 1980 4 AbsenclJs out of 13 Mtgs. Yes 2. Robert H. Leviso~ 1613 N. Osceola AVSr.U9 Clearwater, FL 33515 ~41-1132 1969 7 Absences out of 13 l1tgs. Yes f(' T:1~ FOLLo:nHG :IA11';:S ARE ElSING SU3:-tITTZD :;OOR COt~SrJ)3ilATIO~1 TO rILL T!i8 ABOVZ V ACA~ICI~S: t I . ~a~e-Address-Phone Submitted 3y Comments-Related Z:<perience, Etc. 1. ~rs. Ellen Blidsoe 916 :.Iormandy Rd. Clearwater, FL 33516 446-0275 self Retired G;xec. Hospital !louse :{eeper. (Resume attached)' ; , ;, ~. , 2. 1elen B. Theofilis 400 Island ~ay ~612 Clearwatsr, FL 33515 445-13311 . self Ret. Spec. asst. to Director, .' .~ Dept. Housin,3 &: Urban Development' .:~' (Resume attached) 1." . \. , i 3. .Josetlh P. 1I9uddyll Verdi 518 :lichards Av. Clear~ater, FL 33515 ~-443-1263 ~-461-58S5 self Realtor - Member of Society o~, Injependent A;>praisers. .' (Resume attached) .... -, .' .TO 'J ) : ~. ., " ',\ ., 'I , \ ~:, :f: ~ . f~.. " .r c>'> . \~~ j .' ..':;:;~: . " .,;.c.,':: .~:,>;:'.',~_ ~<r~.:~~S :. "':'.,~<Y:;~ ,. I':: ../. OF CLE.t\R'Vr'\TER C I T Y APPLlCAnOR FOR ADVISORY BOAllDS . Name IB.-L ~dso e. - We.. fJ. . H~me Ad~r... Wi; do i1 (111 ()! "j- d Lj Mice Ad.dre.. C-{, e.o R.. It) (fJ f-.1 A-- ( Cf!Q. 03,-7:6 Telep~one 7"1j 6- 0'7... 7 !/,... Telephone I'~. ~, ,~ (J 3: " =\ ~ rn. v-( :::0 (i, " j U\ {11' I ' ? CD <' 1m ~ m . ~ '. ", .~\ How long a Occuoation resident of the /~~ City of Clearwater? Iv b ~ Employer Field of Education ~l~alt~ ~ r Othe~ Work Experience 'Rlltr-R'S.Um · 'Pe~.se:>/I/N e...L L(Q~Qtf! M eN( ./ Other Interests Board Service (current and past) Board Preference Cnote list on reverse) ~ IJ>cI, <tort ml e~/t-l- aN i{(JJ r.-_....9."q1J 91. Cl (' (l R. (f/O 1 f R. , flCJlUS t .v q Q r11j1(!)T>-e lLil ~:~ q f/ J~ Q fI.-'7 J ~ . I , · \. ~ ~LUi /2.i./J (filA.. 1-1 M U/1 . G uil-z -' - 4 Add itional Comments .J - 6~{4'~ s tgned <3// - /!?::;:Y . Date PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: City Clerk's Office P.O. Box 1t71t8 Cleal"'watet" FL '1'351 ~ ) 'f c . ~.: . . 'f: \;' :~. '.: .~'~:~~~~ , 7,' , . ,", C I T Y OF CLEr\.R'VATER ,.OST 0,.,.11:': 1I0X .crAil CI.EARWATER. Fl.OftlOA 33!518 .., RECE1VEO : APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP ON CITY OF CLEARWATER ADVISORY BOARDSAAY 1 \983 Address: , ) ,.., /} /' .I' ., -1i-e~.J j:) --=I-IL:.~./f,t..b"~~J ,:1, . tf 'loo ~jr:-etf!-I-A {.G~ (tl=-C~/.Q) (must be WlthinOfitv Ilmiul Home Phone: i:~ CLER.t' '1tf~ - 1.;.3 c/ Nllmll: Occupation: ,- OfffCf:l Phone: .-- OHlca Address: - If retired, plea::o 3c\liSolJ fermer cCc:Jp.:I~lon(~): .1,uJ~,-, ~, I ' -f.1 ~J ~ CU?1"-. I. ~~:S~nt of Clearvr.JtJr 7 ...,..,.u. '-" u{.czd1~ " Plea~e Indicate the particular Board(sl irk you are Interested: ,.. (!n 1 . 11 oLt. -r .)L.~'(J2t:1!'(A.-' _ -L4.L.-7J . (1.. ,'-U,,'~I · ~. r:[?,'-U/N ~:-ti.i-r.Le-I~""'-yl..()--r-t.- d . J If appointed to ~rCity of Clear~ater board, r agree to make a sincere errore to maintain satisfactory attendance at all meetings . L ' ~-' , I.; f' I' / ') L, LJ ~fJ ,~-[It.. &..v Signed l I~} ()-1--V.{ .)- cl I y J 3 J Da te 'Please return this form to City Clerkls Office I ~ " 111~orIL/S 1,,\, ~O~T O""ICI 1I011' "'7"'. '.r ~ . ".J ., ,...... " ,. ~ ~ ~~ .... . - .... C I T Y o F - ' ..' ... ...,\., ..,;:.:..,~ ;;,:.?~~.:,;.:.:~~.;:~:...t'.::.:~f:n$l c. L BAR tV ...0\. T E . R '. .. .,: .. r .: . :"<~:,lp . . , I .~~ ,:," .--' .~- CLEARWATER. FLORIOA 33St8 ~\!Ct.\'1,f~.:'~,' .JAU .a. '. . . J:IX{. ~: 13 UJ2 D f 11 B-te-o J Home Phone' J/lf '3 - I::}, 6 3 . Addreu. ~7<f- RICH/H20 ~ fhfl. ,(!L$~t975YL 6..-.'"3,36- / ~ - (must be within City limits) . --, . Occupation: PEjjLro!J. '.IN51J!?O R Jl.r JfJ:?tJc:rori... . I I CHico Addm.1: /:J 0 I - :p ~t3 tJ Jr. Ci Et!jie.tt/IJ CJ3R.. .. . I APPl.lCATION FOR MEMBERSHIP ON CITY OF CLEARWATER ADVISORY BOAROS_ Name: O~flco Phone: ':f b 1- .!J-;P(.s- -5"?J>j,-".: PL./h '3J-/J........ If retired, plea~ advi~ former oCCllP<Jtion(sl: How long a resident of Clear\vater 7 1"3 Y et4ll~ ~1embmhip in other organizations: VFW tY/JLU CAI..,I} PoPA VA VI Ln\hJ.L IktJ~ Jl:10Qsr=- I I ( I - 'sUCfcN OF- 1Npp.PMP54r;qPfMls~ CGftrf~lG() 'BJJ..s/})~ ~cJAlS5.LOI2S - Field of EduCltion: J' f\11k1Oi. IJ !1;501GfJS AO!1;#JSmAf/()Js frJ.1/2tU:r1AJ&. ( iff Please indicne the panicular Boardts) In 'Nhich you are Interested: fM}.hJtI1(i +2 DJ./JA/(i (!;.OAfU) - B-v Of!. fl-DJ~S~lJ64Il o:t!iPPprH - 2.cAtnJr; CU1}t2lJ/CW:/l~ t4 t1S liJ ~ Av~fi'7 ----~---~----~------ If appoinced co a City of Clearwater board, ! agree to make a sincere effort to maintain satisfactory attendance at all ~eetings 1/J~Si~~ · Please return this form to City IY/r?,/J(~ / Dace Clerk's Office V~ J~ r:>i ',.. \, ,i .r' .1 .., ,.'. ," ~ ,",::" ~r!"".~,""~:,",.;:.,,t~';ml'lIt':t~l:1r"', ~' ~;1M;f . > . .OJ' '~~.;I~-..~. .t". ""-t', ~'i,.~ ~~ . . '.".:; ',..;'" ,,( ?~'~';,l ;":"'l '. ',' -.,....:::.;., ,:::.~ 'i>(.;:-:::;;~f:~;ff~ . . ,'" ".... . .~! Asenda n "f":~7i?*~ " .., h .'5: !!~~::;~~!1~: :~ : ~~:~~~n~~::::~~ln ,.':'l,:.:i;iJ " ". 'l::' . .I,~:{f. THZ FOLLO',~I:lG ADVISOR Y BOARD ~18:1i3SRS HAVE: TE:R:.13 ~'lHICH EXPIRE nt SE:P.T~;1'3g'n, 1985,' MtD ao',{. ::/; R3Q:JIRE caTHER ilE-APPOI:tT:1El~T FOR A. ~EA 'fER:1 OR REPLACE:13~1T BY A. N'::il APPOIUTEE. . <;:;; Date of'.;.....: Original 'Attendance, f/li1lin,;ness ,:' :,U Appointr:lent Record' !To Serve "'. , C L/(- Y, ~OR CO~~tS310~ ~~8rI~G AUGUST 15. 1983 ~lOTn'ICA'tImlS BOARD: Beautification Committ~e rZR:,t: 3 years APPOINT30 3Y: City Co~missio~ . FI~A~CIAL DISCLOSURE: Hot Re~uired RE3ID?:NCY nSQUlflE:-ISNr: CUy of Clearwater S?3CIAL QU^LIFICATIO~S: Jane aa'tle-Address'::Phone 1. i<athryn Peat , 961 Harbor Island Clearwater, fL 33515 It47-7522 J Absencea out of 12 :1tzs. . Yes 1992 r, , . THE ?OLLmn:m :~A~-r~S A~~ 9Er~G 5UB:lITTZD FOR COaSrDE:RATIOi'I TO :<'ILL THE A30VE V ACA~~CIES: ~a'tle~Address-Phone :3ubmi t ted a~ self Co~nents-Related Experience. Etc. . 1. :Hlliam C." Reed, Jr. . 365 S. Gulfvle;.J 9lvd. 0-10G Clearwater, FL 33515 446-0445 Retired Realtor of 27 years. Partner in Real Estate Company . (Resume Attached) , 2. Lou Aldrioh 1949 Byram Drive: Clearwater, FL 33515 H-447-20g3. 0-461-9313 self Exec. Asst. - Downtown Dev. Od.' (Resu~e Attached) - \ . -p , ~ ''';';.: d c ;r~~ Agriculture Inspecto'!,,' Fla. Dept. .' '.\ of AgriCUlture ,",'.' (Resume AttaChed) 3. Lisa A. Lanza 2043 San Marino aay S. Clearwater, FL 33575 H-446-6994 0-447-6573 ~'j self Ii ,e,;;. . ":-~' c ". .... . ',,'\' ."i< .' ., . ,:. , ~ ~ ,', '.,1 . , ' . .,~ ':\ .,\1 t . ~ ~ : ' , . . ~l. ", " . , ,~ ~) ,. '. :\\ < ';1' ':.' {. ;<','+ ',' .:. J....... .\ '. .' ':~~ -t.,., c ~-; ~ :11 ). ..,/ , ...;. ~ '; ,.,~ C IT Y OF ...w:R EC E L\"'ED C LEA R'W ATE R OCT 18 1984 APPLICATION FOR ADVISOny BOAnos ~:a"'lc W IA..,(,A/If C.. 7lA:'%D, f<< !1oMe A:idrc'Ss.&s :1.. 6U,lA,~,,,f!'tJtIgflIlOff1ce Addrens '. 6- /tJi, CIe:~ i3stut 33)"/r "'a.lp.o!1one 4-1-6- b4/s- CITY CLERK - TQlophon~ - 110'" 10nl'. :) .......i~~D:1.. "..#' "l,~ A cj~\"'~'fwr.l~:t;~~;ter'? /f Y~?I~$" "rinl i (\ r F,ciuco t!on AU -/ '1 s-o /~iJ/ #,1 /tA11a.{ ITV Occupation ~..,€',..ro Emploj'~r - Cth~r Work Exp~rlence If retirec1, former occupation ~~ ~1'~ /N ~,&ir~ la.~ Comm'.\n 1 ty Ac t. i vi ties (..1 TV ~~,~ ~?4I1u 11Ee. e"",.,~"PI ..:5c1&1~e J)~., ~ YArA ~ Other tntorE':'lts k~. 6TAfC / 'vA-tTn,Ift.. ;Gr.-~77J(: A-sS'~fl1:r , Boar':1 Servic~ (current and ,past) Heard Pre fp.rence (notf' ~! t tuct'C!d lis t) -- 1 ?~PI#l. i ~/I//AJ4. 2 &) ~ ~I ; A' p4;',f(. - 81,,~ /;r:,.PJ' 3 /If;. ,,, ~4fI S 'I &#Uil1t11-17A1 tn.... n R :l '1 'H'JllAU Arl d it i 0:;.' 1 J2u I~ /9# Ci;~ t p. .\ Please see attached list for Boards that require Financial Disclosure. PLEA:;;:: i1r.:':':J~!~ r:lTS FORI-l TO: ~lty ~lerk's Office P.O. nox Il7llU Clp.arw?tAr FL 33~18 " . I . \\ C IT Y ~ '.'~. ?", ,;C " '~':-~:>;~~~t:i'~ ...., '. ~'i(J ". .,l' . " '" OF C L E :\ R \\: t\ T [ R APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS Name LOU ALDRICH HOllle Address 1949 Byram Dri ve orrice Address600 Cleveland st"Sutte 1100 Clearwater, Fl 33515 Clearwater, FL 33515 Telephone 447-2098 Telephonp. 461-9318 How lonp'; 'il resident or the City or Cleart,a ter? 13 y~ars l I I I J If Fielj or Education B.A. Degree Business Administration/ Management (graduate 12/85) A.S. Degree Interior Design & Space Planning, Real Estate License, Art education (Perspective drawing/Arch. drawing) OccupatIon Executive Assistant to Executive Director of D.D.B. Emploj'~r Downto~n Dpv~lnpmpnt Rnitl"'d Cth~r Hork Experience Construction & Development Project Coordinator. Real Estate Development & Management, ~eal Estate Sales, Designer for Developer Model Centers, Public Relations Community ActivitiesChamber of Cdmmerce Deautification Committee, Downtown Symposium Committee member. Streetscape Committee member, Christmas Parade Committee, White Christma : Downtown Comm1ttee. Bayfront Proposal Commlttee, U.C.A. member : Other tnterests Beautjfication & Functional Use of Plants. Historical Preservation, Physical Fitness Activities, Public Relations for Downtown Promotion Boar1 Serv1c~ (current and past) None' Beard Preference (not~ ~ttachec list) Beautification Committ~e 2 Park & Recreation Board 3 Historical Committee " 4 member of all three of these Advisory Boards S"'/'I-YS- C:ltl? Plea38 :see attached l1:rt (or Board3 that require Financial ~j:sclo5Ure. PLRAS~ R~7JR~ r~lS ~O~M TO: RECEIVED CI~Y Clftr~'s Office ? .0. !:lox 11711 e Clp.3rw~tp.r F~ 3:~18 MAY 14 1985 CITY CLERK '\\ . , 'I .\ . ".' I ~ 'I,"c " . ~ . \ , ",. ' , . , ,) : .;.~ ~ .. ." ';":::~'."':;~;:,':':::7.~!Yi~ C I T Y . . .J , RECEIVE.D- CLEAR\V.A.TER. . ~:::;: OF .,\ , :;, ~{ : t ) , JUtt 1 H 1.98S : <: I~ .' Name Lis A APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY BOARDS A - L . PI N Z A- (.~n(? H r-: R l \1 : .':~ ."'i\ rpPOI-IT(')~ .~ 11'Y C ' Home Add re ss ~ -. Orrice Address d.DLJ~ S~tJ t1ft(2./No Lv'! S C.LEF\ Rw I\TGI2 rLf\ 3.35"75 I 7elephone L/lllo - b ? ') Lf ,;1.;;1/ ~)(~rJ ~e 'S.,..' SIlI~ I()~ e LfAfC WAne, 'FL,A ':;-==jS16__ Telephone '-/4 '1- '8 S"" 7 :3 I I How long. a. res1d2nt of the Ci ty of Cleat"":;! ter'? . " Occupa tion A-G, reI c.. u ... TU R. G- rN SPec. T7)~ Employer FL.D,2.IDA b€Pr. of AGetC.UL TlJR.6 9 uP I1-fC. .s ( Field of Education -Other Work'Experience 8,5. DlEGl2rEJE- IN 5vfcf2.VIC;(lre.~ iJf'Af?G 0ftl:DEAI ('fENTbf2.. Vo. A.6 '1-eAC.\1~re.~. F/rz.llG;e4t..D HIr>DLt3 Stl~~ !/oP... II c..u L. ru,e 6" If retired, former occupation .. /, Community Activities PIZE5 I 'P e NT': V A L. (;tJc. I " PFl (<l{ NoN6 ouJ rJlJ/2.S A 55 ('Ie..., A" I 0 rJ i' c.." A- LI '\ t D tV Q po /fS5 OC I t1 rID rJ IlotfEo(.),JG<<'S . Other Interests Board Service (current and past). Board Preference (note ~ttachgd list) (., /l'3/8' 6 / ia te Please see attached list ror ,Boards that require Financial Dbclosure. ~} .. PLF.ASE i1F.7J!l!~ r:~IS ?"O:U.! TO: City Clerk's Office P.O. SOX lnae Clp.arw~ter FL 33518 ') .\ 'I \, ..\ .7 :1 ., 01 ../ 'I ;1 /1 'MEMORANDUM TO: (fIR--\ The City Com mission of the City of Clearwater, SUBJECT: Agen~a No. '; Meotrng Oate:s/15/B5 .J- ~""'_.'-' intergovernmental Agreement - S~nd Key P~rk Lifegunrd Service AECOM MENDATION: C! Approve an agreement whereby the City of Clenrwater will provide lifeguard service to Pincllos County at Sand Key Park at county' expense from October I, 1984 to September 30, 1986. [;] And that the opproprlale offlclols be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: In the agreement d~ted November 20, 1973, whereunder the' City of Clearwater conveyed property to PinelLas County for the devc'lopment' of Sand Key Park, the city o.grced to provide lifeguard service to the park at a cost to be negotiated. The attached agreement provides for the city to supply lifeguard service in accordance with th~ current staffing, hours of operation and scheduling concepts for Clearwater Bench. The cost to Pinellas County will be $10,910.00 for initial purchase of necessary equipment, $79,696.00 for services during fiscal year 19B4-85 and $8J,680~OO during ~iscal year 1985-86. These amounts represent the actual estimated costs to the city for supplying such services. !I Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submit ted by: Advertised: DAffected Costs' $174.286 3JAttachments: . . Parties Funding Source: L Lifeguard .JJtol..~~~ Date: Notified ' o Capital Improve- services Poper: of Meeting ment Budget agreement City Manager o Operating Budget CiNat Required aNat Required }{Xl Other Pim'llas\ Originating Deportment: Ctv. reimbursment Date a Sequentiol Marine Appropriatjan Code Reference '0 Non e II ", "'\,\ .........:.::]i~ , . INTERGOVE~~tENTAL AGREEMENT 'I " BETWEEN PINELLAS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMHISS tONERS AND THE CITY OF .CLEARl~ATER, FLORIDA THIS AGREEMENT is hereby made and entered into this day of 1985, by and between the PINELLAS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY, and the CITY OF CLEARWATER, hereinafter. referred to as the CITY. WITNESSETH . tVHEREAS, the County has acquired real property, known as Sand Key Park, for the purpose of providing public recreation and hereinafter referred to as the PARK; and lVHEREAS, the COUNTY has constructed a number of capital improvements within the I PARK; and tVRERtAS, for the purposes of this agreement, the BEACH is defined as that portion of. the PARK extending from the sand wall westward to buoy line, including the . safe bathing area and the lifeguard room inside the bathhouse; and h~EREAS, the CITY is willing to provide beach lifeguard services at the BEACH for the health, safety, and welfare of the general public; NOW, THE~FORE, in consideration of the mutual obligations, agreements and undertakings contained herein, the parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. The'term of this Agreement shall be from October 1, 1984, to September. 30, 1985, and shall be renewable for a te~ 9f 1 year to run from October 1, 1985, to September 30, 1986, subject to'fisca1 funding by the Board of 'of County Commissioners. This agreement shall teroinate in the event the Board of County Commissioners'does not appropriate sufficient funds for administration of this contract. This agreement shall be 'automatically I. renewable for subsequent terms oLJ. year subj ect to, fiscal funding and the , provisions of Paragraph 16. Prior to May 1, of each succeeding year, the CITY will advise the COlrnTY of the anticipated costs of providing lifeguard services for the subsequent year. " ~. ; 0':' \ f I I , l I " " I . : .:, , , ,c, . ~ \. >"~l1 2. The CITY agrees to provide beach lifeguard service and through its T. >~ lifeguards advise users of the beach when they arn in violation of the beach rules and regulations, as set forth 1n Exhibit A. The CITY further agrees to notify the appropriate COUNTY official when users of the beach continue to violate beach rules and regul~tions after being warned by beach lifeguards. 3. In addition t.o the services provided in Paragraph 2. above, the CITY, through its beach lifeguards agrees to work in conjunction with other t. go~ernmental agencies concerning other distress situations that may occur on the beach when CITY's beach lifeguards are aware of such situations. The CITY further agrees to provide first aid to Park visitors for minor burns, stings, and abrasions. '{ -' 4. The CITY will have authority to designate certain beach areas for either active or passive recreational activities as long as these areas meet with the approval of the Park Supervisor. ~,\ 5. The CITY will provide beach lifeguard services 365 days a yea~ in accordance with the ~ur.rent staffing, hours of operation (9:QO a.rn.-5:00 p.m.) and scheduling concepts for Clearwater Beach, which will include but not. be " limited to: a. One year-round leadman beachguard to supervise daily operational activities. b. Seasonal beach lifeguards: Winter (Dececber, January, February) - a minimum of one beach lifeguards. " Sp~ing (~~rch, April, May) - a minimum of four beach lifeguards. Summer (June, July, August) - a minimum of seven beach lifeguards. Fall (September, October, November) - a minimum of four beach lifeguards. c. The performance of the services provided for above is subject to existing .weather conditions. The CITY's Water Safety Supervisor may halt such , \ service when, in his judgment, wea~her conditions are such to make the work of t~e beach lifeguards hazardous and the beach unsafe for public use. Likewise, the performance of services provided for above is subject to limitations as may be caused by the availabilities of qualified personnel. However, the City will r.lake every effort to keep authorized positions manned by making timely ~equest to the City's Personne~ Department for ql\alified replacement when ~ositions beco~e vacant by resignation or othe~Jise. '1 6. Beachguards employed by the CITY must poss~ss at least a current valid.. '. ~. ,. ::::.:::~~ . . .:"".:' , , , , , .....,.... .,..,.,..,r.~ . -.". ,.,," .:.'>"'~ '..1 ....~ L " 1~' . '.. :c;; :',C~:{f:.:-;~ ". ~ ::~:':'~:~ ':~':ifj ,\merican Red Cross Advanced Lifesaver's certificate or the YMCA, equivalent and be qualifi~d according to the City of Clearwater's personnel regulations.. 7. The CITY will provide all existing written documentation that. is not confidentia:' I by statute to the COUNTY that would enable the COUNTY to defen~ any action relating to injury and property damages or to prosecute criminal ,violations that may have occurred on the beach. 8. The COUNTY agrees to pay the CITY initial implementation costs in an amount I not' to exceed $10 t 910.00 for those capital items as listed in Exhibit B. ., a. The COUNTY agrees to pay the CITY for lifeguard services, expenses and equipment in the amount of $79,696.00 for the period of October 1, 1984, to September 3q, 1985. Payments for this period will be made upon execution of this Agreement. b. The COUNTY further agrees to pay the CITY for lif~guard services, expenses and equipment in the amount of $83,680.00 for the period October 1, 1985, through September 30, 1986. Payment~ for this period will be made on a quarterly basiR. The first paymenE'for $20~920.00 . ( . shall be made on December 31, 1985. Each subsequent quarterly payment ,) will be made upon receipt of a quarterly invoice. ., , , ') -j" " '1 .' , "',\ ') : 'Ie . . I ~ :":' ~;;~: ;'\~~1 II 9. The COUNTY shall provide a telephone for emergency purposes and a secured interior spnce for storage of lifeguard equip~ent and personal items. 10. No amendments to this agreement will be permitted exce~t at the mutual agreement of the parties; provided~ however, that arbitrary changes must first be approved by the County Parks Director. " 11. It is mutually agreed that the CITY will have authority over the daily implementation of the beach lifeguard service at the Beach; however, authority. for all otber operational matters will rest solely with the Park Supervisor. h 12. The CITY is presently protected by a partial-self-insurance program augmented by umbrella insurance coverage. The CITY is authorized by law to undertake such a self-insurance program. The parties understand that the CITY will continue to procure insurance coverage or provide for self-insurance. 13. The CITY and COUNTY agree that to ~he extent provided cy law, each will be responsible for the actions and omissions of its agents, officers, and employees. This in no way shall be deemed to waive or modify in whole or in pare any sovereign immunity defense, insurance. or right of contribution, nor shall it create any new or additional obligation or liability. 14. The CITY shall make no permanent alterations or additions to existing facilities provided by the COUNTY without written consent of the COUNTY, and that any approved alterations or additions will become the property of the COUNTY upon termination of this Agreement. 15. The duties and o~ligations of the CITY under this Agreement shall not be assigned. 16. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon the giving of ninety (90) days advance written notice to the other party. Provided, ~ howev~r, that the termination of this Agreement shall not release the COUNTY of any obligations and/or responsibilities that may have occurred and/or accrued prior to the te~ination of this Agreement. .\~ . > I _I I ! 1 I ;, 0'.( ,i 'l .' :;' / '\T:'~;~'(;;F;4f~ , , ',':' <'::3~] ,'::')~:~~ ..<,,~-., , ~.. >~ . ~,~ ,.:~. " .:,:. ( 17. In the event of termination of the contract pursuant to -Paragraph 10, or at the expiration of the contract term, the, CITY.sha11 return to the'" COUNTY the capital items acquired during the term of this Agreement and paid for by the COUNTY. , 18. Upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement, the City will ,. .',.. f' , . .', bill the COUNTY for any unpaid services or charges as provided, for by . '0' ,", this Agreement. The CITY will, upon receipt of payment referred to , . '" above, do those things necessary to meet its obligations under the (, provisions of paragraph 17 above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be properly executed and attested to by their respective authorized officials, all I on the day. and year first above written. ATTEST: Pinellas County, a,political subdivision of the State of f1, I, KARLEEN F.' DE BLAKER Florida, by and through its " , Clerk Board of County Commissioners By: ,By: Deputy Clerk Chairman ATTEST: CITY OF CLEARWAtER, FLORIDA City Clerk " APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor-Commissioner '\ ,) City Attorney City Manager :1 '\) County Attorney .,';oj ,/ , : -:\" " ,j "I '" .~. - , ' ," . q' ""i j' ,,,, ".'1H~~~~)l ':':1 :"i' ':'''~?:.::':i?n::?~';~'~J~itt~ :', '; ",,:: "': :,::.":',~~,;~~ .. .... . I .l.~j.r~~?j "', ,,'" ,,', ~<"'~~ .... '. .. '." . ;"i2'~;~:J~1 " o 0 .'~ 0 . "<~{1 . ' ~. + '. ' ":' :; I:. . ::';:, ..~ : : . :~. '. 'n., ~. ~i . , : ~ .. , " !, ': , .' , , .. ~ ... ol.' _,' . :~I, 0 . EXHIBIT - A .; .' , BEACH RULES AND REGULATIONS .. I ~ !;; " , , _~ o. ~.t. .{'"". ,J " " ' ',. ::.:'! 1. Obey lifeguard instructions. /~" oJ, 2. Swim within buoys. on. ;, 3. Prohibited swimming near the jetty. " " 4. Place trash in containers. '" '. ' c~i: 5. All drugs, alcoholic beverages, surfboards, skimmers~ fiFes, grills, glass containers, and $ets are prohibited. " .'/. > . .~"' . .' 0/ ." ..'" ~, < .. :.: ;~.:: 0 .' .r .' .... 6. Surf, fishing is prohibited. ~ .;. . I . :~ ..~, " " . ~ .: . .. , '.: ',' ;:'1' 7. Rough play is prohibited. ~l "', 8. Vehicles (cars, bicycles, mopeds, etc.) are prohibited.' , ."- ..(:: , ...,l i.'~' :,'! .0 :~!" ::.> , . :.!; , .: .:fr~~i' ,:.'<~ :...'~ ~~ 9. Public soliciting, promoting surveys or sales are prohibited. 10. Nudity and indecent exposure are prohibited. , 11. . Boats must operate outside buoys. " : ",: ~.: . ~p 12. Launching of boats or boards from the beach ,is prohibited. .'". ~ '.. .t. :./i. 13. Frisbee and ball playing are restricted to s'pecified areas.' ';II . '.\, ~l') , " , ,;), '.. :"1;0- :-~! " I , , ~ j. :'.1 ~i ;.i." 'j , >, . . ., ,,' " d ':'/' " !'. . 0>..1 l .' . 0 . .! .L~~' ',. :J. j"\\ " . ~:I ~ . : i.. "+" '" " l~; : ~ ~ l) , ~ " ,..~.I,! ,', . ~ 't.: ~:~.~;~~ ;: ~ I i ~ " q' ",," 'l~''''''''~''u~,''.I:~' "" /;\....tf;r. ;1"". "'~:{.,"h..~r<.\'l .; .'.~ ...'.,.^ ,,-T, ;,,\,~.., ~-::l:..;:~:.... , . '. .., .,." ,t.;l' .; ".~<'<'.,." ".1J"""'~~r~m ,. ~. , c'~ ;' ".l:> \ . I., "J' Ei., S,,"....l: .N "j , . ~ .1'" . '. , . , ~. I ,T> '+, H. ". '. .',. '" ,I'" .d.,. ,'. tl.,.,,~;1 '. >", ~ /,,", ". > \ ;'< '.. ~~'~.~:; !:~~.,~, ,'.>.:. ,1 ::\<::t~t . .' . '. . ., '. '\'~":f~ '. :. <.':);,/'~"'S,;i{{1 p. ...... '.' .,.....~ ,,' !"'/~~j![~ . > . C .:".~ ~>:...:S..~ ..." '. ,. I' \ " " EXHIBIT B :J ;. .., '~:', "', QUANTITY' " ITEM DESCRIPTION ;>. 4 6 Lifeguard'Towers Portable'VHF'Radios .. \' ,),.' '/:,,1 .. , u. 'i' :':".J ~... ..t...., :";. '. ~ 2 Rescue Boards ,; . ./ .4 Ladders , .,. "'.( '. 4 oj Umbrellas . ~. '.. ;- ;"': .... 4 '" First Aid Kits.. ,~ ,", :,;. . l~ '.' , .. }iJ 4. . .Rescue Tubes' . :~~ ~ " 4. Pair Bino'culars ., . : ~ ,.'" ~ ' . T~' . . . . :: ~ 1 "..' ,"'- ~ .!. "',/ ," if..,c J.:-' ,:, . ~ ~. . . ~. ''; . t: ~ -F;q \,' }, ~, ~,"' " F:."~, ". :.t;;~.'::::,;. ~~~*~'~:::'.~T ~ " .,~ ~~;: ", /, :.~j~:~~~': ',:. ~ >.1. " ,6 Buoy' Markin~s'.'" '. \:., ., ,C\c. c ': " " ,. ',) , . ~, "... . ~. c, " ,I' ,', ~", , ~ "to., ,', ' . ';, \ J :~. '.::.. .'. ' . , .,.;,i;J~ :;.... '.c4.' : /'j~l "c ~ c.;..: ': ::;.~ ", .; " ,~!{r':' \'.:' ' ~.' ." , ;-. 'c i :.,;- ;. < ~. " .~~~':..' ,. '. , 3' >,' , " '. ,;'. " " ~: ': '. ~ . ~.) . ,i' .'. I' " .....1. . " .\.'.:' :, ."" .,. 'I ',\ " ~:. 'I. ' "\, ' . , " , ~ ~;~ '", /. c ' ,... " T ~l " " ': <'1:, t., . ,.'.,>. .. (':':.:' '\) :, .. '.'1. " ",tc , ~,. \;.;~;::3 , + < ~ ~ ..<:~<:} . ,'1, ~~!f .;,\1 ~T\I c ...~ ~( ":,:':,~ ": ~,:1 ., '. "<".~i~ ,...} .J .A;'\t.~ "'l ....'..1; . '1." ;/.~~1 ,':".:<) . ,. c ~ ~':' ~"'~ . ..: ,':':::; .':,':~~;:,;~;~L~ .; ,~. ' '.~ ..!~ :', , ( ~' '~'.. .' " ). .\ . . .:f ." .. ":\) .'. " .> .' ., .1 "',1 '~ L ~ ,'J.,::' '. If: 4\.' ~~: . ''l~'' ~:~ '. . ,'. Jf .;'..:,. :\ 'J , , .... --,.- . . .~ . ''',~'..:,:-:~~t';.,~,.~:~~.~~r:.?l~~{{ . ncr ,','".. . ~..' .~ . .,.' .:.:"~~ . . '. : .4 T MEMORANDUM TO: G5~;).J The City Com mission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: Agenda No. Meeting Date: 9/15/85 ., Forklift . R E CO M MEN OAT ION: Award a contract to purchase one (1) new forklift fran ., PM tift Truck Services, Cleal:W.:lter for a total arrount of $24, 417 . 00 which was the lowes~ most res!)Onsive,and responsible bin submitted in accordance with our specifications. Sf And t hot the approprla1e' offi clals be au thorized to execute sa me. BACKGROUND: Bids were solicited for the purpose of procuring one (1) new 6000 lb. forklift to be used by our Sanitation Dspartrrent at variOl,lS locations. The three (3) . l~r bids cUd not rreet City specifica,tions necessary for "over the road travel". The r-btor PCXJl staff has evaluated this bid and recarrrends award to PM Lift Truck Services and the Purchasing Officer concurs. This is a replacerrent for vehicle 2080.43 and the funds are currently available in the present budget. Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: ~ ' ...~. ./~;.s, 't"' :~4 ~. ~.~. ';-~ Advertised: Dote: 7/12/85 7/19/85 Poper: . The Advertiser Cl Not Required o Affected Parties Notified of Meeting . Not Required Costs: 4, 7. .Attachments: ' FundIng Source: . Capital Improve- Bid Tabulation I ment Budget 80-85 C1 Operating Budget CJ Other . \ ,; Submitted by: City Manager Originating Deportment: Date ~ Sequential. , Motor Pool Reference Appro prlation Code 315-1-4209-641/590 ,0 None '" '"'1\ ., , 1.0 to 'M r.-.I "j::::-~ o h% lIJ III .... U < <( CD. 'J It 0 ... III !:! m 'k. 0 Z :> i: 0( +I ... ~ ::I U') .rf III CO ~ ~ I Cl t CO {i. lIJ ., m ::J III 0'\ Z .~ 0 +I in ~ III i .j.J ::lE 4-1 0 .rf U H > l-I . ,t ~ ~J ., U III e 0 LI. ~ o c 0 0 ; Ul e .e- \0 i,e: c: , .. . 1IJ 0 ..-l ~ tfl In it u 6 ::lE ~ Z lIJ c: ..... ::lE W ~ _+I ~ .-l G .0 J rg - zc: OJ ..... < ~ ~ 811 ... D: U d:: & o . tn > c: . . .rf Ul < ~ ..:I ~a ~o( ~ g I.ll c: o ..... -J < ~ U m ~ 0< u ,'C: 10. ~ 't,~j~ ~ .,'0 r - -"'"- ~ :J: U i " II U II.. " Q ~ 0 :ol:iD c: lI. o - Ii I , " : I I " I -Dg~ 8~~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 m..u . . . ~ ~..~ ~ ~ +I f'o i r-i .j..... ~ q< ~ '0:1' ~ ~.~ .. .. .. ~ ~ ~ N N N 0 (I; (I)- (?)- M it: . ~ 'j g Ul ~H 0 E 0 II) ~8~ 0 0 ~ . . ...... lt1 r-i o:r .- ...... 'd' ~i~ l.fl Id: ~ l.fl 0 'S , .. - .. \0 r- ~ ~ I ...... 0 (1;. (J), M g ~ .-l ~ II) ~ 0 Ul 0 ) 8 ~ 0 0 f . . Ltl 0 l.fl .. 0'1 - M en 0 rn r- I'd'; ~ r- N ! .. - .. 7 ~ ~ f'o .-l 0 <r.. tf)- CT\ - - ...-l I'll ..... ~~ Ul B 0 ~ .sa 0 0 e.-i~ 0 . . 0 r- III , H~ .. ~ , .-l ...-l B '2 4.1 \n ~~i I.t'I - .. .. ~ r-I enrol ...... N co ~S8 N (J)- 0'\ ih' tfl , 11J ,. ~ i +I III 4-1 0 B \0 . III .j ~ 0 '0 ~ . . N N ~ .. 0'\ 0 C\ i M ...... M r- ..... .. .. r- N co I o4J to I f1. N ~ N M (/)0 (J). \0 .ti .rf ...-l ] ~ .-l 0 III U ~ 0 .>11 0 l/) . ~t 0 B ~ M . I .. to 0: ~I ..... i \0 H . ~ r-11 \0 0 o 0 l'"'- I I ~i ~ C\ ......e N 1 ~H8 (J)- -,!ll.. N 0 i - :z; I - (J)- \0 j ,. . l:' . 'y I 1~ ~ - = ~ z . c E = .. - 0 - .. .. :J ...... - ;: z .. 0 'C:! ~: " 0< ."11 "0' :.w - \.< ;; C .. !~ 1 .. .to z :g1 ci ~ JD.. lIJ 10-' . )0 ~ iii · Z 't 0= O' . It :l: E 10-. ~ Z &LQ 0 1!. o-l & u - lIJ II: . t:J .. 2 ,~ tJ .. ~ ..-l ~ ~ ~ t: j ~ S d:l .~ ~ {i - ..4 - . (1)0 t::o o . r- ~~. ~(J)- o..~ .BO 11 .~ ~o. ~~ mE 1~ .:x:~ a Q Z III :r '.:I. o iii It II <. ~'/ ;; II i z B .~ ij ~ ID I Q III C .C: ; 0( . ...... ~ ',: '. ~.1 ~ .. ~ ~ ~ l/) ~ III l-l z 0 tS ;: 0( OJ .0. .-i i: ~ u. w. Il, ..... III 5l I- III W ~ ~. g I- 0 Z ~. III W 0 ;3: c .. << ~ << - ii w .:: w z .J. it,' 0', -J . , w Q: " "} :1 ,. . :'..:::>:'. .'::~'.::~;:{1:!:!*1 ,.A~...'''r ~.,.~.~? , ,. Agenda No. Meeting Date: 8/15/85 . . .^ MEMORANDUM TO: f'P-1 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SU8JECT: . , Fire Hose and Fittings R E COM MEN 0 AT ION ~ Award a contract to purchase various lengths of 5" hose with fittings fran Snap-Tite Hose Inc., .for a total price of $13,769.00 under tenns and conditions of Pine lIas Cbunty COOP Bids 9-84 and 33-84, as authorized by Article II, Section 42.23 (4), Cooe of Ordinances. jiJ And thc1 the appropriate officials be authorIzed to execute some. SAC KG R 0 UNO: This purchase represents annual requireJmnts for 5" fire hose and fittings. Prices were established by Cooperative Bid developed by the Pine1las County . Fire Chief's Association and issued by the City of. Clearwater Purchasing Oivision. Hose and fittings must be delivered nnd invoice processed' for payrrent not later than 9/13/85. The 1984/85 Fire Departnent Operating Budget includes sufficient funds .for this purchase. The third quarter budget arrendrrent will reflect a reorientation of equipnent purchases to permit funding fran withi..., approved Fire Deparbrent equiprrent rronies. :. ~ ": J"; Commission Disposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Revised/CondItional 2. Continued to Follow-up Action: .,) dot... Submitte~ by: Advertised: o Affected Costs;S13,769.00 ClAttachments: ..~.}........ ~'..~,.; . 00' e ~ . '. PartIes Funding Source: , Notified t . Capito I Improve- City Manager Paper: of Meeting ment Budget IWNot Required . Not Required W Operating Budget " CJ Other Date aSequentia! Referen ce I Orl~inotlnQ Deportmen t: Fire Depa.rtlrent Appropriation Code 010-1-1240-640/522 . None ""\ \ I 'r (ff:, , ' 'l', ' ,~', -. -, . . -. ~-"_. ~- -.- ._,..,~ .~"-"";--""-:-~/~:;'~'~'~::'~~~~'t I " ,'..' -,~ ': ,'~,' ';, ",.', ::..:~',5 MEMO~ANDUM.T?: pW....1 . The City CommissIon of the Clt'y SUBJECT: , Agenda No. Meeting Date: 08/15/85 of Clearwater Murk Drive (Slorm Sewer from Murk Drive to Linn Lake) 85-17 RECOMMENDATION: Award the contract for Mark Driva (Storm Sewer f'rom Mark Dr. t Linn Lake) to Prawl Construction for the sum of $33,891.50 ' which is the lowest responsive and responsible bid received in accordance with lhe plans and specifications. Ii] And that the approprIate officials be authorized to "execu1e some. BACKGROUND: This Department has received numerous drainage complaints" fro m the res ide n t s 0 f 5 l r m ci'n sHe i g h t s 1 s tAd d i t ion at Mar k Dr i v e and Lots 9, 10, 55 and 56. The proposed Storm Improvement Project is designed to relieve localized flooding conditions which has caused extensive damage to Public and Private Property. Funds for this project, will be transferred from eIP Code 315-1-2465. Unspecified Drainage, to the CIP Code for Mork Drive Storm Drainage, 315-1-2470 and are sufficient to finance the project. ~ ' The Public Works Director concurs in this recommendation. *315-1-2470-637/541 Commission Disposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2, Continued to Fallow-up Action: d..,~ Submit1 ed by: ~ JJI-. (~.(,:;j;t- . Advertised: Date: 07/09/85 07/17/85 Peper: Clearwater Sun C Not Required CJ Affected Parties Noti fi ed of Meeting Costs: $33 .891.50 FundIng Source: o Capitol Improve- ment Bud get D Operating Budget o Other ~Attochments: Tabulation of Bids City Manager . GJ Not Required Date aSequentiol Reference Originating Departmen i,) , I Public Works/Engineering tvt. . o None Appropriation Code .315-1-2470-637/541 "'\\ lI"I tC 0'\ ... lI"I ...... 6.J III ::l eo ::l <: W I- 0( o o E...o loJ > H c::: Q :.G c::: c: ~ o ... z: 1II 0 C c::: al ~ ... c::: o ~ a l1J j: U) < :z 5 c::: ~ ~ ... U) - t~ h.l :::- ~ 1-1 al c::: :J 0 II) ~ c::: ~ z o III III ~ ~ o u )- J- U 11. o 0( C III 1;: lr 0 UI -I CD lo. ~ ri UI "" ::E ... '" c ~ z c: 0( ~ -J a: u o c: ~ :: ::E ; W II: ..l '" al ~ ,', 0( U a: I.. o 0 z )- 0'" J: U ~ ,~: 'j o I- ..-. l1J ~ < ...:l Z Z I-t , - e ::l C ... f''''' .0 S ~ ::l :l. - uc... < . Q.t..~ l-i"1:l 6.J .1"'1 Q.t l1Ill'\ ~ 4.1 l-i l""\ 0. ~ U 11l eo...... C .~ c::: ::I ~ 0.-.. l-i C U~Q)~l1l U ;. 0 a -0 0.1"'1 U QJ Q) '-' '-' s... .1"'1 11l Q: ::l ..... E N III -I""'I~..-'!f QJ,..., r.:J ~ J,.I QJ (1l . E '-'I.%.. (./ ..:.: . C ~ u ~ eoo :l .CU-:t'-' ...::.... ~ =< . ............. o .... ~ .-l o e III "0 l""\ t/'):l QJ c-s... w.1"'I :l l-i c- o 11l c::: ~ C 11l.1"'I~ ...... 1';l.1"'I C l-i 1-I"Cl"O .c QJ "0 ::l ~ 1-ot/') ...... 1';1 >. -1Il'C"O~ I';l (1l C QJ 3 ..... "C III C. "CI ~ ;:l ~ C. l'J ;:l.-ltnl'tlO o U ,.. c::: c eo 3 11l ..-1 C 11l '"' ~ _.1"'1 '"' 0 11l :.tll<..... k u = o U ~ Q .... < J::l ~ co "0 o :i:: N '" co l'tlO 'II) .:t (1l eo l-i c :l '1"'1 J,.I .c U III :l ."" ,.. c ~ '"' U)J:: Q.I "t:l 11l l'tl...... ~.c CD::! .c 0 = "0 ::lQ\C Q.I tf) (J W. 1-0::: ~ o 0'\ 11l ....... ..... 0."':: ..... = . >. ..-1 .1"'1 >< H 0 ~ Q.I . 0 c:::en .MQ) I';l ...... .a...J 0 Q) .~.!:I U 11"'\ QJ l'tl ::lLrl......O'~ '"' ..-1..-1 ~ ... .....~ ::J 1I)11l~ t/') C III (1l >> o Ill...... k C U co C Ill.,.l ~.u ~~ .,.l...... eu.uC::l ::l 0 U l'tl III en ,.....-1 tn := (I)...... Co e ..... = . e..-I c:: 0 >< ::l ,..:J 0 '"' . ,..J UI-I(.j .~ 00 0.0 Q) 0 .u c:: ..... 0 ::2 .',..(.""'M u>o3:.u ... U... tn 11l ::l X '" ......00 10.0 ~ o 11'1 :l = LrI00C 11l 0..... 0 0.. ...... +f"'t ...-1 'C ILl . J..I p.,Q) to.u ''''; cu . C "C ,..... c.,..:J ::I l1l'..-I >. .. ,&.)"OHO Ill' 0 N ill e.o~'. .u :l rJ QJ kI-lQJ.w/../ k c:: U OQJ.....Q)C 'u 0. e 0 >. .~ Q) U a H (1l U :l Q. l'tl "t:I C .w .1"'1...... ClJ ...-1 ..... ,::.. c..... EI"J Q)\I..l :l .c C c::: ...-1 .....0.0 'tl <:lIll-i-oO <HO:': = tn r.::: ..:t: QJ . ~ N.-4...... l'tl ~ . ..lj ~ Q) ~ ~>: ~tnr' ~ ,..:J tn Cl 0 'H ~ VlO= g~ .:t LrI 0 ~ ..-1 ...... LrI N .:t ~I en ...... o l'J <:..-1 l-i ClJ .u l'tl ::<:: c::s .........c:"L Vl l""\ l""\ . E : . .. %.0 .~ \.< . ~"1:l ~ &: jij . >< 8 ~ C,) % o a: u. ~...--.. (C III U I.. :f C flo\:al o - o M . ..:t co ,.... .-I ..:t <I} ...... to. 1-< Q) .u I'll 3 '"' l'J Q) ~ "C c::: C o ~ '"' Q) e ...... ::l o o M LrI . (./ C 1-4 ,; 1-0 o ~ (J rn l-< J,.I C o U ILl 't:l C l'J en Q ..... t:Q o Z 0'\ 00 ~ M ...:l ~ III 00 C ..-1 l-i 0. en c:: o Q. ~ H o en Q"o ...... en ::l o r-- ...0 ...... (./ c:: H ~ . o U 1-< J,.I ~ o u Ul o '"' c:c ..-1 ...... ...... Q) ,... C'Il co I'll H 'c o ..... . to 0'\ lI"I .... ..::t (/to M ..::t VI C"1 M ...:: ~ ~ o 0.0 l-< l'J ,..J .:.. ~ . (1l ;. < .t= .u 00 ...... .-I I ..::t \J;;l r-- \0 . u' t:: 1-1 "0 ,... III :3 p., u o o .... -:t 0'\ .:t ..::t (/to l"'l ~ l"'l M ,..J ~ 0.0 l-i ::) .c Ul 1-0 Q) .u Q) ll< .~ o .:t o ...... ;,).:t >: o ~ . o ll< u C 1-1 o u ..., C I'll ...-1 .... ::l ...-1 ~ ...... ::) l'J p" o LrI . .-I 0'\ ex: ,M M (h ...0 ..::t LrI M ,..J .=- - -lz".. ..::t ~ ...... l'J ...0 Q. M E l""\ l'J . H ...:: to. ~ 1-< QJ .u I'll 3 k I'll QJ ...... U .:.. ~ QJ :> ..-1 'k Q Ul .~ .u ,., ::) U N l""\ N N C o .,..4 .u U :l tl III c:: a U ..... 3 l'J '"' p" o N to ..... ...0 ...0 ..::t (/) ,..J to. .. ell Q. E I'll H ~:' ...... (./ 1-< .,.l u 3 QJ ...-1 :.> .u QJ ""'l IN ..::t ..::t V'\ . ~ l-i o U 0.0 C W "0 t:: l'J k .u III t:: o U Q) .u o o ...... ~ a o ~ M '" l"'l 11"\ (/) o 00 \0 M M ...0 Q"o l""\ o ...... l""\ >: o c:c . o . p., "0 ~ QJ J:' o U 0'\ ..... N 11"'\ . u C 1-1 ~l ;. "0 a o ~ 'g l'tl I'll bll c:: .~ ~ l'J ~ o ...... . ...0 .... ...... Q 1-4 ~ o ~ 0'\ 1""1 (/)0 LrI r-- lI"I M l""\ ,.J ~ V'\ ...0 LrI M M '" QJ .u I'll ;l l-i III Q) .-I U ,..:J ~ .. ~ '"' III 1 ll< Ul III .. <:: N .. .u .,..l :l tf.l ...... QJ t:: '004 p., ~ . .w tn :3: QJ '"' Q '" ..c ...... N .. 11) N :< o ~ . o . p.. u =1 HI ~':.i C .,.l .u III > . III (./ >: w 1 1 ~I. I-l . o U co C .P>l ::- rn l:l.. .u III l\'I o U C :::J U) .u l'J C. ~ l\'I Q ". . ' ';':::~!'.;-::.~:?~~;J.~ " u:(, . . \.'j . ~ .:~:; :,:? ;1' " 'Jet ", J, " , I' o o . 11'1 M 0'\ .. ..:t M (/). en ~ al 5 orl .f..I rn ~ Ul ~ J.i Cl.I Cl.I s:: 'r-! b.D l:: ~ a II' D Z to! :I: :1:, { U I a:, I . ..' ; . ~ f' : 'I ~ ,~ B <! ! )- ... U! "J ')- l:ll 'I T I I I I o Iol a (Cc < ~, 0( " ...0 O..::t ~Lr1 = M o Q) M ...-1 > J,.I.~ Uk....:l :l t:l lz..o l-i .u CIl ~ 0...-1 k C::.u QJ o k J..I c.., :l I'll U ) ...... '"' ;J N III III M QJ kN ...... p., IN ,U :r 11 o lI'\ . I J I i I I .... 0'\ co '.. M l""\ <I)< 'C ..-of 1II ~ o ~ i j l-~ )~ i ~ c z w ~ =t o U w n: i I . '" ~~.. " ,,' UJ > - 0: o ltJ a:: > 0 <{ ..... ifJ a: w w a: z t- u W .-J W (f) -< cr l&J C) :s:: :J: a: LLJ u > UJ '! .". ,31" . . ------ --~---- r~ ,'"'" ,......=: ( DRUID ROAD \ \ , \ >- t- t- lLJ CD c:: l:: ~ \1j' Z <t ..J q, ~ ~ -...J :ot: ti q: ::E II iJ 55 54 ..... --..J , , \ \ , \ \\ LOTUS PAT H .' ::'( .;. , ',~ " . ,\ . . . ~....... . . [ 1---- ,.-.- y 5 T. /7, [" -, -'- .../,,/' ",'" /'~ ...~ ~-----..._...._------~ . I ", ....=. ..~r c.:'-I ';i . "~1 > '. ':1: , " ~ ", .... ,', "" .......... J E F FOR D S . \ ~ '" "".. -., -...... -~ ~...."'--... 1: 10- , .,"t.' .'::'~ , . .~ , I .,~ .,' .:) "'I . ~ 'I,:tl .~~ :'i,:. .:,1 ::,,1; c:~' J ....ti >. ...)~~: .dJIiI....".~_'..,..4--.-L r~...... ... I n-.boII~"" "'"' 1" .".,.~riJ1[r:r '111 ~ t~ 1 L - .1 " . , ... .. i ' :1 . , , . .~ .....;, 'I .....-- ".' +......::.:..., ~:.,~-..::,{i~.~ 'I. . - '~..: ...... 4-~ ' MEMORANDUM TO: fv])-'Y The City Commission of the City of Clearwater Agenda No. Meeting Dote: 8-15-85 S U BJ ECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONTRACT AMENDMENT - N .E. BRANCH LIBRARY RECOM MENDATION: Approve the contract amendment with Myers, Pliska, Ott Architects, P.A., to perform professional services associated with the renovation and expansion of the N.E. Branch Library. ' :Q And that the' approprlato officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUN 0: Commission approved the Architectural contract with Myers, Plisko, ott I, Architects, P.A. at their meeting on March 7, 1985. The present contract requires the architect to prepare necessary plans, specifications, and bid documents to cover this $150,000 project; to monitor construction to insure compliance with cheir plans and specifica- tions; and to oversee the projects completion. Their fixed fee amounted to 8.4% of the available budget or $12,600.00. During the developmental planning, the Architect has been instructed to make the following changes to his' plan: 1) Add a meeting room. 2) Eliminate all existing support columns in the center core area, and resupport the roof with four new columns so as to eliminate visual obstructions currently existing in the library. The Architect has requested a $1,300.00 increase in his fee to ~over the costs associated with this change in scope of the project ($800.00 for a structural engineering consultant, and $500.00 for increased architectural services) - See attached letter. These charges appear to be reasonable a~d supportable. The available balance in this project is sufficient to provide. funds for this contract. Commission Disposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Cr.lntlnued to Follow-up Action: drit. Date: Pop~r: o Affected Parties Notified of Meeting Costs: Sl. 100 Funding Source: CJ Capital Improve- ment Budget CJ Operating Budget ~ Other CDBG Appropriation Code , R' - , -9402 KKAttachments: Submitted by: IJ....~ City Manager Advertised: 1. Con trac.t 2. Letter, Req'ues t: Dote a Sequential Reference ~Not Required fkNot Required . . Orlg inotlng Departmen t!}I)O ,;....:. '- , PLANNING & URBAN DEVELQPMENT o None ;s - .: ~:': .\~ '..:,::}.'; 0' . , ,. .' ,,' '~'r' '.'"'' '(' "'....f...;4f1 ;," '" "i?I':;';h;~~~ .',::?~~ , . _: ~\l . .' "":.-",,~ ~ : :.' .'.. ;~':~'~t , ~:~ ';:, , . ~~~i, ,<.:.,,)~ ,~ . August 2, '1985 " Mr. Don Ja5s Office of Community Development P. o. Sox 4748 Clearwater, Florida 33518 Re: North Greenwood Branch Library Dear Don: At our meeting on June 24, 1985, Linda Mielke changed our scope of work .to include the following: , ":" . !~" Add a meeting room. " El~minate all the existing 'support columns in the center storage core. Re-support the roof with four new columns so that no visual obstructions exist in center of library. We are requesting a $1,300.00 increase in our fee because of the additional costs created by this change in scope. The increase can be broken down as follows: ,', =\ >-::":\ ~ I, - ". : :~!" 1) $800.00 for structural engineering consultant. This is for engineering new support systems for center core and additional structure for meeting room. ".::UI ,. , .,.. ~ ',\ 2) $500.00 for architectural services. This is' for architectural design. for meeting rooM and detailing alternates for deleting meeting room and center core if over budget. Don, if any other information is required~ please contact~ me. If not, please process this for approval at your earliest convenience. .' '> '.,'. t', ,~ APJ/'sl -~ Si/?;lY,/(); \ / !Y+ ~0/1 '() 'Alex rf?-iSkO, Jr. / "0 \ , 4 __. - M,Y ERS, PLISK 0, OTT ARCHITECTS, P.A. AlA \ ~" 800 DREW STREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 335 U5.. 481-0030 442-7200 l' If d , "'.. . ; .,~ " >, ""'i":;~\'i . ".;' ',:.' '~."\::j,::;'+J~~( ':<;)~ ,._ c,::"", '. >:~~r . > -~ ;~';? . '. " ,~~; .: c ~ l '. ~t.~ . ',"1 : .~.,'~ > "I' ., . ,." , ,,:I."{:j. , ~ '. ~ : ~. ~l THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS . AlA Document 8151 . .Abbreviated Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect For Construction Projects of Limited Scope 1978 EDITION THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEG"'L CONSEQUENCES; CONSULT/l.TlON WITH AN AHORNEY IS ENCOUMGfD WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFlCA.TlON AGREEMENT made as of the Eighteenth Hundred and Eighty-Five day of Febru~ry in the year of Nineteen BETWEEN the Owner: City of Clearwater Clearwater, Florida and the Architect: Myers, Pliska, Ott A~chitects, P.A. BOO Drew Street Clearwater, Florida 33515 For the following Project: (Include derJited descriplion 01 Projec:l/ocaUon ~nrJ scopt,) Addit~)ns and alterations to the North Greenwood BranchLibrary located 1 at 1250 Palmetto, Clearwater, Florida. The scope of services includes a new building entrance area with handicapped accessible toilets, new heating and cooling system, opening center core area for general library use, new lighting, renovating existing toilets and work area and general renovation of interior ,of main library area. ,The Owner and the Architect agree as set forth below. . ... CoPYrilhl "74, ~ 1'J7lI by The Aml:riun IMlIlul1: ot A,chlh:CIJ_ lns NI:'ii yo.... A'rtnue, N,W,. W~~inJ\on. D,C. xa:6. ~rodoalOl\ 01 the ~11:,i.J hl:,ein 0' wb$"'nli./ qUQ"'11oo 0/ il$ provbiom wi lhoo.I I P'=,miuioo Q# !he AlA Yiol'la !he CDpyrl"'l 1._ of !he Unlled SI.1l'~ .nd will ~ wbjl:d to lrpl p~IlOl\. " AlA DOCUMENT 11S1 . ABBREVIATED OWNER.AIlCt1/TECT AGIlEeMENT . JUNE 19111 EDITION . AII..- lD un . THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 17.15 NEW YOIU: AV(NUE. N.W" WASHINClON. D,C. 2(txl6 ....... 8151.1978 1, --------- ...,--........ ......._.._-~ -----.. .~. ............-_____ _. __..... .....__~....___....__.....It.... ._..... _ T~_... _..- '. ( Terms and Conditions of Agreement Between Owner and Architect ARTICLE 1 ARCHITECT'S SERVICES AND RESrONSIBILlTlES 1 he Architect's Oasic Services are as described unw der the four Phases identified below and in Article 10, and unless otherwise provided in Article 10, include normal structural, mechanical and electri- cal engineering services. 1.1 DE5ICN PHASE 1.1.1 The Architect shall review with the Owner alterna- tive approaches to design and construction of the Project. 1.1.2 Based on the mutually accepled program and Proj~ ect budget requirements, the Architect shall prepare, for approval by Ihe Owner, Design Documents consisting of drawings and olner documents appropriate for Ihe Proj- eCI. and shall submit to Ihe Owner a Statement of Proba- ble Construction Cost. 1.2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE 1.2.1 Based on the approved Design Documents, the Ar- chilect shall prepare, for approval by the Owner, Con- struclion Documenls consisling of Drawings and Specifi- calion~ selling forth in detail the requirements for the construction of the Project and shall advise the Owner of any adjustments to previous Stalements of Probable Conslruction Cost 1.2.2 The Architect shall assiSI the Owner in connection with the Owne.r's responsibility for filing documenb re- quired for the approval of governmenlal authorities hav- ing jurisdictioh over the Project. 1.3 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATION PHASE 1.3.1 Unless provided in Arlicle 10, the Archilecl, fol- lowing the Owner's approval of the Construction Docu- ments and o( the most recent Stalement o( Probable Con- slruction Cost, shall assist Ihe Owner in obtaining bids or negotiated proposals and in awarding contracts for con- struction. 1.4 CONSTRUCTION PHASE-AOMINI5TMTlON Of THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 1.4.1 The Construction Phase will commence with the awaid o( the Contract for Construction and willlerminate when final payment 10 Ihe Contraclor is due, or in the absence of a final Certificate for Payment or of such due date, sixty days after the Dale of Substantial Complelion o( the Work, whichever occurs fj~t. 1.4.2 Unless olherwise provided in this Agreemerll ilnd incurporaled in the Contract Documents, Ihe Archilect shall provide adminislration of the Contract for Construc- lion as sel (orlh below and in Ihe edition of AlA Docu. ment AlOl, General Conditions of Ihe Contract (or Con- struction, currenl as of Ihe dale of this AsreemenL 1.4.3 The Architect shall be a representative of the Owner during the Construction Phase. Instructions to the Contractor shall be forwarded through the Architect. 1.4.4 The Architect shall visit Ihe sil~ ill Intervals appro~ priate to Ihe slage of construction or as otherwise agr.e?d by Ihe Architect in writing to become generally far1llhar with Ihe progress and quality of the Work and to deter- mine in gener..1 H the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Conlract Documenls. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or conlinuous on-sile inspeclions 10 check the quality or quantity of the Work. On Ihe basis of such on-site observations as an architect, the Archilect shall keep Ihe Owner in(ormed of Ihe progress and quality of Ihe Work, and shall endeavor 10 guard Ihe Owner against de(ects and deficiencies in the Work of the Contractor. 1.4.5 The Architect shall not have control or charge of and shall nol be responsible for constrL1clion means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safely precautions and programs in connection with the Work, (or Ihe acls or omissions of the Contractor, Sub~ contraclors or any other persons performing any of the Work, or for Ihe failure of any of them 10 carry out the Work in accordance wilh Ihe ContractDocumenls. 1.4.6 The Archilect shall at all limes have access to the Work wherever it is in preparalion and progress. 1.4.7 The Architect shall determine the amounts owing to the Contractor based on obserVations at the site and on evaluations of the ContraClor's Applications for Payw ment, and shall issue Certificates (or Payment in such amounts. " 1.4.8 The Issuance of a Certificate for Payment shall conw slilule a represenlation by Ihe Architect to the Owner, based on Ihe Archilect's observalions at the site as pro- vided in Subparagraph 1.4.4 and on the data comprising Ihe Contraclor's Applicalion (or Payment, that, 10 the best of the Architect's knowledge, information and belief, the Work has progressed to the point indicated; the quality of lhe Work is in accordance with Ihe Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of Ihe Work for conformance with the Contract Documents upon Substantial Comple- lion, 10 the results of any subsequentteslS requjred by or performed under Ihe Conlracl Documents, to minN deviations (rom the Contract Documents correctable prior to complelion, and 10 any specific qualificalions slated in Ihe Cerlificale for Paymenl); and Ihat the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount certified. However, the issuance of a Certificate (or Payment shall not be a repre- sentation that Ihe Architect has made any examination to ascertain how and for what purpose the Contractor has- used the moneys paid on account of the Contract Sum. . 1.4.9 The Architect shall be the inlerpreler of the re- quirements of the Contracl Documents and the judge of the performance thereunder by both the Owner and Contractor, and shall render written d~dsions on all claims, dispules and olher mailers in queslion between , Ihe Owner and the Conlractor. In the capacity of inter- preler and judge, Ihe Architect shall endeavor to secure faithful performance by both the Owner and the Con- tractor, shall nor show partiality 10 either, and shall not be A'A DOCUMENT ttSl . AIIBI![VIATED OWNER.ARCHlTECT AGREEMENT . JUNE 19711 [OIllON . AIA8 o 19111 · THE MlUJCAN INSTlTUJ( Of ARCHITEClS, 171S NEW yon: AVENUE, NW., WASHINGJPN. D,C. :ax" .~~~!.- 8151-1978 2 . , , -. .". ~. . .. .... " \l i , ... .. ..._ ..~_.______ _T~ .._...... _._. ~ _____...__~__ ..._ ... _T . ' liable fOI Ihc Icsull of any inlerpletation or decision rendered in good faith in such capacity. 1.4.10 The Architect shall have authority 10 reject Work which does nol conform 10 Ihe Conlracl Documents, ilnd will h~ve authority to require spedal inspection or testinG of the Work whenever, in Ihe Architect's leasonable opin- ion, U is necessary Of advisable fOI Inc implf,Clcn'allon of the intent of the Gontlact Documents. 1.4.11 The Archilect shall review and approve or lake other approprlilfe action upon Ihe Contractor's submillo1ls such as Shop Drawings, Product Data ilnd Samples, but only for conformance with Ihe design concept of the Work and with the information given in the Conlract Documents. Such action shall be taken with reasonable promplness so as 10 cause no delay. The Architect's ap- proval of a spedfic item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component. 1.4.12 The Archilecl shall prepare Change Orders far the Owne(s approval and execution, and shall have authority 10 order minor chanses in Ihe Walk not involving an adjustment in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contl~ct Time. 104.13 The Architect shall c.:lnduct inspections to deter- mine the Dales 01 Substantial Completion ilnd final com- pletion, and shall issue a final Certificate lor Payment. 1.4.14 The extenl of the duties, responsibililies and Iimita- IrOns or authority of lhe Alchi,p-ct as 'he Owner's repre- sentative during construclion shall not be modified or ex. lended without wrillen consent of the Owner, the Con~ IIaCIOI and Ihe AlchilecL 1.5 ~DOlTlONAl SERYICES 1.5.1 Additional Services shall be provided if authorized or confirmed in writing by the Owner or if included in Arlide 10, and they shall be paid (or by the Owner as provided in this Agreement. 1.5.2 If the Owner and the Archilect agree that more extensive representation at the site than is desClibed in Paraglaph 1.4 shall be plovided, such dddilional project representatian shall be provided and paid for as set lorth in Article 10. 1.6 TIME 1.6.1 The Archilect shall perform services as expediti- ously as is consistent ,with professional skill and care and' the orderly progress of the Work. ARTICLE 2 THE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES The following services and responsibilities, and any others so indicated in Article 10, shall be un- der!aken by the Owner. 2.1 The Owner shall provide full information intluding a program, which shall set forth the Owner's design objectives, constraints and criteria. 2.2 The Owner shall furnish '~\Iegal description and a certified land 5urvey of rhe sire and rhe services of soil engineers or other consullants when such services are deemed necessary by the Architect. 2.3 The Owner shall furnish structural, mechanical, c~erniQI and other laboratory tests, inspections and re- (- ports as required by law or the Contract Documents. 2.4 The Owner ~hall furnish all legal, accounling and insurance counseling services as may be necessary at any lime for the Project, including such audiling services as the Owner may require 10 verify the Contractor's Applica- tions (or Payment or to ascertaIn how or {or what pur. Jlo~ef,1 the Contractor uses the moneys paid by the Owner. 2.5 The services, information, surveys and reports re- quired by Paragraphs 2.2 through 2.4 inclusive shall be fumished Ul Ihe Owner's expense, and the Architect shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness thereof. 2.6 If the Owner observes 01 otherwise becomes aware of any fault or defect in Ihc Project or nonconformance wilh the Contract Documents, prompt written notice ,hereof shall be given by the Owner 10 the Architect 2.7 The Owner shall furnish required inlormation and shall render approvals and decisions as expeditiously as necessary for the orderly progress of the Architect's serv- ices and of the Work. { ARTICLE 3 CONSTRUCTION COST 3.1 DEfiNITION 3.1.1 The Construction Cost shall be the total cost or estimated cost 10 the Owner of all elements of Ihe Project designed or specified by the Architect. 3.1.2 The Construction Cost shall include at current mar. ket rates, including a reasonable allowance (or overhead and profit, the cost of labor and materials furnished by the Owner and any equipment which has been designed, specffied, selected Or specially provided (01 by the Archi- lect 3.1.3 Construction Cost does not include the compensa- tion of the A;chitecl and the Architect's consultants, the cost o( Ihe land, righlS.of.way, or other coslS which are the responsibility of the Owner as provided in Article 2- 3.2 RESPONSIBtllTY fOR CONSTRUCTION COST 3.2.1 It is recognized that neither the Architect nor the Owner has control over the cosf of labor, materials or equipment, over the COnlraclor's methods of determining bid prices, Or oyer competitive bidding, market or nego- tiating conditions. Accordingly, the Architect cannot and does not warrant or represent Inat bid5 or negotiated prices will not vary lram any Statement Of Probable Con- struction Cost Or other cost estimate or evaluation pre- pared by the Architect. 3.2.2 No fixed limit of Construction Cost shall be estah- lished as .1 condition of this Agreement by the furnishing, proposal or eSlablishment of a Project budget, unless such . lixed limit has been agreed upon in writillg and signed by t the parties hereto. If such a fixed limit has been estab- lished, tile Architect shall be permitted to include con- tingencies for design, bidding and price escalation, to de- . lermine what materials, equipment" component systems Jnd fype~ of construclion are to be included in the Con- Iract Documents, to make reasonable adjustments in the scope of the Project and to include in the Contract Doc- 'umenls Alternate Bids to adjust the Construction Cost to the fixed Iimil Any such fixed limit shall be increased in 3 8151-1978 "Ill. DOCUMfNT .151 . ABa//LVlAlLO OWNeR.ArCHIJfCl ACIlHMlNT . IUNE 1974 lomoN . "SA- ~ 1m · Tlil AMlltlCAN INSTITUTE Of AROUTECTS, 11)5 NEW 'rOJU: AVWUE, N,W.. WAS.HINCilON, D,C. 2r:Ol' ,./ -..... ~<- ...... _......- - . .... - ...... - - . .>..........--..... ~ - "---' ~f,. Ihe amount of any increase in Ihe Conlracl Sum occurring after execution of the ConHacl for Construction. 3.2.3 Anv Project budgel Or fixed limit 01 ConWuclfon CO\t shall be adjusted to rellect Jny change in the general level of prices in Ihe construclion induslry between the dille or submi~5ion of the Conslruction Documents to Ihe Owner and the date on which propos.,is are soughl. 3.2.4 If a fixed limit of Conslruction Cost (adjusled ilS provided in Subparagraph 3.2.3) is exceeded by Ihe row- esl bona ride bid or negolialed proposal, Ihe Owner shall (1) give wrillcn approval.ol dn incre.lSe in such fixed limit, (2) aulhorize rebidding or renegotiating of Ihe Project within a rea!.Onablc time, (3) if the Project is abandoned, terminate in accordance with Paragraph 7.2, or (4) coop- erate in revising the Project scope and quality as required to reduce Ihe Conslruclion Cost. In Ihe case of (4), pro- vided a fixed limit of Construction CO~1 has been estab- lished as a condition or this Agreement, the Architect, without additional charge, shall modify the Drawings and Specifications as necessary to comply with Ihe fixed limit. The providing of such service shall be the limit of the Architect's responsibility arising from the establishment of such fixed limit, and having done so, the ArchileCI shall be entitled to compensation for all sefVices performed, in accordance with this Agreement, whether or not the Con- struclion Phase is commenced. ARTICLE 4 PAYMENTS TO THE ARCHITEa 4.1 An initial payment as set forlh in Paragraph 9.1 is Ihe minimum payment under this Agreement 4.2, Subsequent payments for Basic Services shall be made monthly and shall be in proportion to services per- formed wilhin ,each Phase. 4.3 When compemation is based on a percentage of Construction Cost, and any portions of the Project are deleled or olherwise not constructed, compensation for 50uch portions of the Project shall be payable 10 the extent services are performed on such portions, in accordance wilh Ihe schedule set forth in Subparagraph 9.2.2, based on (1) Ihe rawest bona fide bid or negoliated proposal; or (2) if no such bid or proposal is received, Ine mosl recent Statement of Probable Construction Cost. 4.4 Reimbursable Expenses include actual expendilures made by the Archilect in the inlerest of Ihe Project for: ., expense of transportalion and living expenses in connection wilh out-of-tuwn travel, aUlhorized by the Owner, .2 long distance communications, .3 fees paid for securing approval of authorities hav- ing jurisdiction over the Project, .4 reproductions, .5 postage and handling of Drawings and Specifica- tions, .6 renderings and models requested by the Owner, .7 expense of overtime work requiring higher lhan regul;u rates, if authorized by the Owner, .8 expense of any additional insurance coverage or . limits, in.;:luding professional liability insurance, requesled by the Owner in excess of Ihat normally carried by Ihe Architecl and the Architect's con- sultants. 4.5 Payments on account of the Archllecl's Addilional Services and for Reimbursable Expenses as defined In Paragraph 4.4 shall be m.1de monthly upon presenlation of the Architect's slatement of services rendered or ex- penses incurred. 4.6 No deductiOns shall be made from the Architect's compensalion on accounl of sums wilhheld from pay- ments to contractors. 4.7 If Ihe Project is suspended Or abandoned in whole or in part for morc Ihan lhree months, the Architect shall be compensated for all services performed prior 10 receipt of wr;nen notice from the Owner of such suspension or abandonment, together.with Reimbursable Expenses then due and all Terminalion Expenses as delined in Paragraph 7.4. If the Project is resumed after being suspended (Of mOre Ihan Ihree months, the Archilect's compensation shall be equitably adjusted. . ':: . ",'-/0), ."" {: ARTICLE 5 OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS 5.' Drawings and Specifications as instruments of selV- ice are and shall remain the property of the Architect whether the Project for which they are made is executed or not. The Owner shall be permitted 10 relain copies, in- cluding reproducible copies, oC Drawings and Specifica- tions for informalion and reference in connection with lhe Owner's use and occupancy of Ihe Project. The Draw- ings and Specifications shall not be used by the Owner on other projects, for additions to this Project, or for com- pletion of this Project by others provided the Architect is not in.default under this Agreement, except by agreement in writing and with appropriate compensation to the Archilecl. 5.2 Submission or distribution to meet official regula- tory requiremenls or for olher purposes in connection with the Project is not to be construed as publication in derogation of the Architecl's rights. ARTICLE 6 ARBITRATION 6.1 AI/ claims, disputes and olher matters in question between the parties to this Agreement, arisiQg out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach thmeof, shall he decided by,arbitration in accordance wilh the Construc- tion Industry Arbitralion Rules of the American Arbitra- lion Association then obtaining unless the parties mutu- al/y agree otherwise. No arbilration, arising Qut of Or re- - lating to this Agreement, shall include, by consolidation, joinder or in any other manner, any addilional person not a party 10 this Agreement except by wriuen consent conlaining a specific reference to Ihis Agreement and signed by the Archilect, the Owner, and any other person sought to be joined. Any cons,enl to arbilration involving an addilional person or person~\ shall not constitute con- sent to arbitration of any dispute not described therein. This Agreement to arbitrate and any agreement 10 arbi- trate with an addilional person Or persons duly consented to by the parties to this Agreement shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbilralion law. ... AlA OOCUM[l1l n51 . AIIIIR[\fIATED O\\INE!t.AIlCIUHCJ ACII:[[MENr . JUNE 1978 [DillON . AlAe 01971 · THE ,o\MElJCNlINSTJTUTr Of AIlO1nECTS. 1735 NEW '(ORIC AVENUE. H,W., WA5HING"tOH. O,c. xxx:4 - 8151-1978 4 1\ I' T ~ ~.;. ~ ".'~>,<;"::~:~~~~:'~~~J : ~.,:. <,',~: ::)f: ':';;:;:{ '. ,r' ~ .. ~;. t ,.2 In no event shall the demand (or arbitration be made after the date when Institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute or other mailer in question would be barred by Ihe applicablc statute o( limllations, 6.3 The award rendered by the arbitrators shall be final and judgment may be enlered upon it in accordance with' applicable law In any court having jurisdiction thereof. .2 10 pt'rccnt If termInation uccurs during the Con- struLlion Documents Phase, or ' .3 5 percent If termination occurs during any subse- quent phasc. ARTICLE 8 MISCELlANEOUS PROVISIONS 8.1 This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the principal place of business of the Architect. 8.2 As between the parties to this Agreement: as to all acts or failures to act by either party to this Agreement, any applicable statute of limilations shall commence to run and any alleged cause of action shall be deemed to have accrued in any and all events not later than the relevant Dale of Substantial Completion of the Work, and' as to any acts or failures to act occurring afler the relevant Dale of Substantial CompletionJ not latil,r Jhan the date of issuance of the final Certificate for paymlml! 8.3 Thl!: Owner and the Architect, .fespectivelYJ bind themselvesJ their partnersJ successors,' ~ssigns and legal representatives to the olher party to this Agreern~nt and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal representa- tives of such party with respect 10 all covenants, of this' AgreemenL Neither the Owner nor the Architect shall assign, sublet or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the written consent of Ihe olher. 8.4 This Agreement represents the entire and inte- grated agreemenl belWeen the Owner and the Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements/ either written or oral, This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both Owner and ArchitecL . ARTICLE 7 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 7.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with its terms through 'no fault of the party initiating the termination. 7.2 This Agree~ent may be terminated by the Owner upon at least seven days' writlen nolice to the Architect in the event that Ihe Project is permanenlly abandoned. 7.3 In the event of terminalion not the fault of the Architect, Ihe Architect shall be compensated for all services performed to termination dale, together with Re- imbursable Expenses then due and all Termination ex- penses as defined in Paragraph 7.4. ' 7.4 Termination Expenses include expenses directly al~ tributable to termination for which the Architect is not otherwise compensaled, plus an amount computed as ~ percenlage of the total compensation earned 10 the time of lermination, as follows: .1 20 percent if termination,occurs during the Design Phue, or " H ~ ".\ 'j \\ " . .. 5 8151-1978 AlA OOC\JMENT 1151 . All8J!EVlATEO OWNU.ARCHITECT ACIlEtMENT . JUNE \9711 EDITION . AlA- il:l1m1 · THE AMUUCAN INS"lI11JTE Of IIRCHITECTS, 1735 NEW you. AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. ~ ",.. 4 ._ -..._.__ "":"'t ._-,~. -.- ~ _._ ._______..._ _L' _.~T ....._ ."___. . ..--.......-- -....-...--.-.--..--.- ~.. .. , ) ,r 'j , . . . . " d_,.'.' ". . " , , 10.. ~:4" ~. tJ'oI':W,/,A1:1 :;" ":': ",'\:'<i,:1~~ . .:~ ~~ . 1 . ~... 1-,,", . '\ ( ARTICLE 9 BASIS OF COMPENSA nON The Owner shall compensate the Architect (or the Services provided, in accordance wilh Article 4, Payments to the Architect, .md the other Terms and Condilions o( this Agreement, as (ollows: 9.1 AN INITIAL PAYMENT OF Zero dollars ($ 0 shall be made upon execution of this Agreement ;and credited to the Owner's account as follows: 9.2 BASIC COMPENSATION 9.2.1 FOR BASIC SERVICES, as described in Paragraphs 1.1 through 1.4 or identified as such in Article 10, Basic Com- pensation shall be computed as follows: 1N.,r lnul' buls 01 com~nWlOll. t~l..dln, riiHl ~ounu. mutllplr:f 0' ~rc~nl~,rs, Utd turnlJly 'hUrl IQ whIch pNllCJlu mtlhodJ 01 com- pMUlJOIl ..,plr. II nr<<s.wy.) ~ Fixed Fee - Twelve Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($12,600.00) ,I 9.2.2 Where compensation is based on a Stipulated Sum or Pcrc~ntage of Conslruction Cost, payments for Basic Ser- vices shall be made as provided in Subparagraph 4.2 so that Basic Compensation for each Phase shall equal the following percenlages of the total Compensation payable: " "nduct. Ulr ~iliOoll" phour. ... 'PP'''Pllu.,) Design Phase: ConstrLlction Documents Phase: Bidding or Negotiation phase: Construction Phase: percent. (300/o) percent (500/0) percent ( 5%) percent 0.5%) ... 9.3 FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES provided under Paragraph 1.5 or identified as such in Article 10, compensation shall be computed as follows: ' llIffr: tfUr,' bul. at cQJIlPrnJ.Ulon. Indudin, WI!S ~dlfN mu/liples 01 Oitf'Ct 'f(JotmtJ Upe-tur lor PtinclfWS. comuluno ~ tmplarff'. IdffI- lity sp<<Jrlc rypcs af con~ulllnll in N'id~ 10. II F~ujrcd,) Architect's services:1 $45.00 per hour Consultant's services: At our direct cost. PPf~!n~:h~ ~~d~a u~~~cf5uOnmThj~'ifeement shall bear interest from the date payment is due . at the rate entered below, or in the absence thereof, at the legal rate prevailing at the principal place of busi. ness of the Architect. 9.4 (Ikn lfUCrl IJ'I'f (JU oIln't'~ ",tftllJpoll.) " ":', lUau)' t~ Ind Itq1Ji,r:mtnU u(K/ft th. frdt,.J Trulh In ltnd,", .Act. limilu SI,'r IJld loeD corWftII!' crt'dil "..... UId OlhN ,uuIIr(GIU II tM o..~J ~ Alchl.l!Ct's plillcityJ plun 01 bll1inrlJ. lhr IOCII/on 01 Iht ",ojrd UKJ r:1J_h.,r: ~ Nfrct Ihr "Didl!)' 01 Ihis p,o.lsion. Specific - ItpI Mlvtu should bt abullled with ,rspr:a ID dtl~lion, modIliQtlon, or orht( If!qui.rmtlltl wdJ II w,IIIM dilC/ow,n or w.I".NJ 9.5 The Owner and the Architect agree in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of this Agreement [hat: 9.5.1 IF THE SCOPE of the Project or of the Architect's Services is chanl!led materially, the amounts of compensation stu.1I be equitably adjusted. . 9.5.2 IF THE SERVICES covered by this Agreement have not been completed within Fourteen- of the date hereof, through no fault of the Architect, the amounts of compensation, rates forth herein shal,l be equitably adjusted. ' (14 ) months and multiples set . ... AlA OOCUMfHT IlS1 . AMlltVIATEO OWNER.ARCHITECT AGRHMENT . JUNE 1971 [DITION · ^,A- o 1971 . T!if AMUICAH INSTITUTE Of AJOilTECTS, 17JS NEW 'fORJr:; AVENUE. N.w., WASHINGTON, D,C. 2I:XU .....- D151-1978 , _.-.--~"- --, I'....~-~- ___.-T~--~".""-7 ~-:....,..-- --- ...- .~ ...,......___ .......__.. ~..__.._~H- l) - ~ - --...--...,.. .. 'r . I - . . " ,.' 11 . :':'~'::':;:',.:, ":::>;'~~!~t~:\~:~~ff~(t~{~1~1 .' ','..., }~"i:-'~ . ~~ "0:. ~ : ,~.,::;~~; ;~::)(~~ . , p...\ . ' ..'. v'~ . 1 " ~ ': '".' ::."::':~l~1 . '.' . ,., ,.81 ,t : 1 ~ ' , \ ':.\:r>.;:r~ 1 ' "',\.(d .. .,': :"':.:'.:;:;~~ J" ' .', J~.:...t~ .' . . :).;'../~11 ",.;. y'. I . "L: . ~.' I...;:~~I=~ :," "''I\' " . ". ,.,~:~.-t I . ' (' ARTICLE 10 OTHER CONDITIONS OR SERVICES I,' , , (Describe any services not included above which are to be performed by the Archllect or Owner. Stille, wh~thcr ser. vices to be provided by I,he ArchllecJ ilrc BilSic Services or Additional Services;) '. ~., , . . . . , ./ ..!. Hi ., , .1 .! .. I, ,"'.' :....t t ' .. . . . . ~ 41 < + . .. . .~. .. " d . n " , I I,. ~ ): .' -' T~is Agreement entered i(lto as of the day and year first written above.' OWNER' ,~ Cit'y Clearwater , ARCHITECf . Myers"-y .Plisk~ Ott Architects I P .A.. RO~D{ew/~re~t c{~arwater, 'FL .33515 '/ --if /i Y .....Pi ,/) I~. '7' ~ \/1 "t.f~~ _,~ .- /11. a\1ex pliska, Jr. /I ':,) Anthon . 7'. B151~1971 ABBIl.EVlATED OWNER.AlCHITECT ACR[EMtNT . JUNE 1m EDlnON . ,\JAe INSll1lJTE Of AROilucrs.1115 NEW VORK ^~UE, N.W.,WASHINGTON, D.C. 2lXm ...... 'r ... +\, 1/ ... _.__ _ ~~..... _ ~_ _.,._....._...,.... .._':"' ___..,_"Il______ ----:-.....-.- - --. ----;--,----..--.-- ------.. ~ ----..--. , .,- T;i II . ... . .,:; '.'A " " \<'~' , ~. .,l?~ . <.'. ~ ',/~ :;~ . .f; '., c""i.:1: " ,,(~' : (oj",.1 ....,:... . . ~ ,. " I.'" . ~ :;"'>:.' t';'!' ~:J h~.J~~~~l'~~";J~:~~.);r;\ . '. .'. ;"',' ',,':' f,j,~7i~~{::ot~~. " '''r~ . ~ .....:.:~~~41;-~~~ , ',;,..:;' :[fi?~& ~> L. . .~. :l j\:th~~ ,." '~., ',::,' '::~\\~ " ',,' ",l:,'1-& ' .:. ;<~;;;~~fR ',; :':;'.l\~ ~' .:/i~j " ... ....~'t:~ft '~';'fn"~ ">.\Wi . ';::;~~.i~ ;: .... :;:J ~, J ,', '. , " :1 .., This Agreement above. e'ntered :into as of the ,! day.and,year first, ,writf.'en, " By i' ./ CITY ,. , ~ ~ I Attest: d' , . , , L . . ',';' ,:r O\v. t..J-t~~ City Cler.k 'J ~ ~ ,..,J --- __ T ,:y ~:' . dl~ .~ . . .. ..1-~.~ " ..,..,',> '.<.". <" 't.. / . :...~ ~~'~ !+'.- ," '1\ ,j' & correctness: . ~ . .>~:;- ", . ....:" \ <- ~. .i .;.. . ";~! ': 'It; , , . ;"" ~I; -: :',,:::: ~'1 i ,~ '.>h . .l'.."j' , " ':\. . . ;"~ . J ~. .~::~ .;; " ,I.;;r " ~l , , '; i'1 " ,'/ ", ," , l.'.'. . '. ,. '1 ~ ~:. .. ~' ,. CI " ...L _.-.., ......-.... ........~_'"'t._r._ _ __ __. ..._~ :, ! I' .. ;) "..1 ,', .' ~J, .1: , 1:""". , t f " .~ . ....., .'..I,I:;P- .' .' "zr"':' .' ;~~ ..~:';'>>l)-;.J: :3 . ,.,.,..\" . . ,.'. . o. .( . . , ~,.'.' ') , Agenda No. M EM 0 RAN 0 U M TO: puJ.... r:;;L-/ Meeting Date: 8/15/85. The City Commission of the City of Clearwater S U BJ ECT: Change Order No. 1 nnd Final to the Subdrain - 1985 Contract' (B5-lA) R ECOM MEN DATION: Approve Change OL.der No. 1 and Final to the 1985 Subdrllin Contract . r~ducing the contract in the amount of $12,935.56. ~ And thet the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROU N D: This Change Order adjusts the contract amounts to the actual quantities used in the con- struction of this project. The contractor is Prowl Construction of Clearwater, Florida. The Public Works Director concurs in this recommendntion. ./ 315-1-2242-637/541 Commission Disposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued to Follow-up Action: dclt' m Not Required &I Not Required Costs :-$12.935.56 Funding Source: o Capitol Improve- ment Budget. tJ Operating Budget o Other GSlAUachments: Change Order ') Submitted by: ;U..~ Advertised: Date: D Affected Parties Notified of Meeting City M onager Paper: Dote 8 Sequential Reference Originating Departmen t: Public Works L)cMV Ap propriation Co'de * CJ None , l . \\ .. PRO.JECT: SUBDRAIN 1985 CONTRACT PROJECT NUMBER 85-1A ,i I; : ".I:..~,":~'~~':'1-.:.-t "t"~iJ~,;,.~...q.~J;~-m II, ',' "",;<(""" ',: ."~::":\'~~~Y~'0~;~ ,",:>':"n4 . '.. .. 'I'- ::.:~~g . ~: ;', (f ....;.1 ,,'; ,:""::~~ '''j .;::~~} . .. ~ ..<\ ..~~~ ~ ,;: COYl RACT CIIX:Gl:: OIUJEt\ Nl ~;JLH: 1 and FINAL D:\'L'!~ ; Aug. 1. 1911S , CONTRACTOR: PRAWL CONSTRUCTION 2232 Curtis Drive No. Clearwater. Florida 33546 DATE OF CONTRACT March 7, 1985 ", ' . tT~ . ~ ,'. "c". SCOPE OF CHANGE: THIS CHANGE" onDER ACCEPTS REVISIONS TO THE CONTRACT ..:~; , . SEE ATTACHED OVERAGE AND UNDERAGE ITEMIZED SHEET ,;';' . ;I ,II )' J , " . ,. ";: , .1 i ,{; ;'c' . \' " " I " 1~. <~. . +._~ Original Contract $ 76,618.70 ACCEPTED BY: .$uJ~ afi/cg-r.eUC'17tJ/'I" ':., By: ~QLv/'(SEALL- " '. .,::, STA TE~lENT OF CONTRACT AMOUNT Final Change Order No. 1 -12.935.56 $ 631683.14 WITNE/JS : 1 ., , UJ,tU (?M~-' ~;,e ~Lz:::<~ :2 "Recomrn;yd:-d by.: tJd~-- - ~ ~~ ,:r . ., ~ . ...~ ..T'.. " Final Contract Amount " .' c....{ ~ir , '. , '. Mayor-Commissioner ATTEST City Attorney (Approved as to Form & Correctness '\) City Clerk , l .~ Date: CITY OF CLEARWATER, in PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA Anthony L. Shoemaker, City Manager -~ , , " ~~{::. . '. r': " .', , . . :'~: , .j TOTALS '.I 1~ 622. 94 . 14,?5B.50 :- ,'I','~ '!t,. " "'1'::: . ,. . " :1;' . ..!, ~ . d .,~ . .;:1,' " '>. .' ~<.I"'cl .... '-t J'~r+~~:t~~~n.~rf~"~~'~~ m .,. ...... -...:.- ~..- -.~ ;.:~;Q;!;lj~~!1~;(1~~ ':~H r : IJ:I U r R r CE S I) V~ P .AGE . 'r'"u'jO( MGE\'Y: ~'~ir . , .. .' ,1.".....~..:tl.;1j.~:.~ ---- -:,- --; ;~~;;: -:: -:,;~~:.- ::~;.;.:: - ----- --.., - - -::: ::- - .':: ~ : - -: - - - -- - ;:: ~:- -: - -----::: ::--.- --. --------.~' :-~;~~\:~ 2 :ClEMmUTS1.00 EACH @ 150.00 == 150.00 ":'J,~,~.;.l , I., ,.: ::":":;hii,~ 5,62e.00 ...)~ . '. '.: :,,:i . ." <\' 5 2" ..,.; i,l , ':',.;0.50 'j:' .:r 63.00 . 'I'" . .:I':~ " ,. " . , I " , ~ , '. 11 r.M ~1I).: :H:-i~ ~~SCP.IF'TIGN ~ ~J'~'}l T 4 :CURB 804. 00 L".f. 9 7. 1'0 = 5 :8- LIMEROCK EASE . 120. 70 S. Y . @ 4.20 = 506.94 6 : P AfrHALT PtNt:MEtH 1, 1!;'3. 00 S. Y,. @ 4.50 = 7 :1- ri:i'HALT f'APJHIIG LOT REPLACE- :l1E1H :1/6- LII1EROCK 8~SE 7.00 S. Y. . 0 9.00 = . . . 8 :CG~lCRETE DRIVE, REPLACEMENT :~/G-X6-. 10/10 ~.W.F. . . 772.00 S. F . @ 2.50 = 1,930.00 . . , h .,' ,t 9 :$00 . . 6,816.00 S.F. g 0.25 - 1,704.00, ) ~. .' .: CG~ITf'JlC T TO iAL COST !', ({iOD) iOiAL O'/~r~GE 76,618.70 ,1,622.94 i .I~ II ',. " (SlJ'3TRtlCn TOTAL utWERAGE ' '78,241.64 " 14:558.50 ~ ~ c" +. . ---------- --- ' . .. . I.~ . 1/ iO ~AL PA'(AE'tE .63: 583.14 ..'..r::~ ---------------------------~---------------------~----~---~------------------------------------------~~---_.._-_.._---.~ " , ,. ~.'" ., T .; . 'j,; . -;'J .'.,... , ' I liCf:E3Y CERTlfY TP;: ;.e;Jvr.:. M::ASU?~hSNTS ~R.E EIJE MID CGRFS,C T AND ntE i.~JRJ{ HAS ::~EN f'EPfQL~::O HI P.~CGR[.t.t~~CE !:HTHTHE PLANS AND Sf'ECI- . F!CATIGNS MiD iN It ~nSFACTORY MAm:ER. " . ;'r,pun DUE ~:QW &3, '382.14 . ........ . > '. r..~: . '"f:" T ~..: .:.:.. . ,: :~J- . .r.t . ..; .~~ . . -'It;; '. ~ ': '1\ .....:'H ~ :~:: . I :~. " , 1,.\ J.." , . ;~ ; ~IJ~ : - + " ': ~ ~.. V' .. ~, . ~f:.' ;..... LESS PREVo F'hYi<:::NTS' S8,gS7.19 ~ '.:. (- ~ . ~ ._-----~---~-------------~-----------~----------_. ~~ }> ,..... I ~ .. . f.: ~ILLIAM c. BAKER, CITY ENGINEER ESTIr.A TE' - 5 AliQ!.~n PAY;,St.E 4,725.95'. I ~ \ ,) " ~ .~:-; ...h'\ . .',' .' .~ }., . " I" II' . _... .~.... ~..~ ~ r....~...--... _ -:'" _...- _... OT" ~.. ~... ...c. '" .'~.'. - l) , .r'. ).' , " . '. ..... ., . ...~ ~'. . .;.. . ~ : . .. . C I .. . ~ ..c . ,;, . . , . . , ~ ~ .; . " ,,) . ... . . ~ .., . , i. L I I . , ,\ > . \ ' '.' . '. .....~ t, I, . , :< ' .. ..\ ~ ., . ~' '. ;~k .1ll If~ . i' , J .~,; ~,C ;' ~ ,..T. , i" . \ . f . C . . '. '>~ , .' ,'.r: JI >,' . .'-" /~~] . " \ " " <T ~ '.,\,y, ...,.):;.::?>::.~if ... --~.,. ,.... 4_~-"" .: ,':'.;-,' .,-: '" -,.~.:~::.:.,,~~...:.;~~t~ , 4- 4-' ": :'<",~' .'C . " .., ~,~~ . < .1:>< Agenda No. ' M E M 0 RAN 0 U M T 0 ~ frJ D /1 Meeting Date 8-15-85 'The City Commission of the City of Clear-water SUBJECT: , Land Use Plnn Amendment from Low Density Residential to Public/Semi-public and a Zoning Atlas Amendment from RS-75 (Single Family Residence) to rsp (Institutional Semi-Public) for Lot 106 and E. 10 Ft. of Lot 108, Harbour Oaks Subdivision, Sec. 16-29S-15E (Critchley/Gan.Tel.Co.) LUP 85-32, Z:"':'"85-!:1. RECOMMENDATION: City Commission receive this retlUest and refer it to the proper departments. [] And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located on the south side of Lotus Path west of South Ft. Harrison Avenue. The site contains .24 acres M.O.L. The Land Use Plan classification is Low Density 'Residential with a zoning designatipn of nS-75 (Sirtgle-Family Residence). The request is to amend the Land Use Plan to Public/Semi-Public and the Zoning Atlas to ISP (Institutional Semi-Public) to permit the construction of a digital remote switching unit by Gener.al Telephone Company., The subject property is presently vacant. Commission Disposition: .J 1. Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued to Follow-up Action: dar, Submitted by: Costs: N/ A Funding Source: o Capital Improve:- ment Budget Cl Operating Budget o Other I:ElADttochments: rawlog Application Advert ised: City Manager Paper: o Affected 'Parties ' Notified of MeetIng Date: .... ! &J Not Required [iJ Not Required Dote a Sequential Reference Orlglnotlrl9 Deportment: PLANNING o None Appropriation Code " "'1'J 'f " '.t~=tttJ ~J~d.~l ,~IJ~;t113J~3J L--'.~'~-'. -LLLU- I ~; . . '- '. . c.': · ,,' .-...; '.. : , "'. 'w A"Y ,. .'.. . J AS"" IN E I . J" -~.. . '" ',~'~_::~': --1-- -1'-- -- - --.- :JJ~ t'I::: ,--~--""'- I 1 '-' \' . t . .'. t ':. . .. I, . . . J.' .... " f.-- ....- II 9 .. .' ,~ . ::4 ,.. .- -"v ' .. . , , - . ~ ' , :r.. I ~ :....~B. ~2A 5~ 14....B 46 .4~. 42. 40/~38 ~6 _3~4 . z~--- b "',' ',/1. .~1. "':'.;', t ~, ,I r-iJJ . :-'., _ 0 -~_.:1.- .- 'I'.. r... .rll,"l/'ldr, .~ l'" J' .. ~:o :-..: - ~ Ift.~ , 8 5~', 8 3 ~ I p./ I 7,9 " 77 "~ i~' 7 '3 ~ "7 1'- G 9 6 ; ~ Q B .r. ~~' -~ r=- ~.l . , I,. ~ I' ',' ~ :r 5 II. ~~ ~. ~ , ,~~ '",:,:""~' ~ ~../ .:';:::: :,~ ,';' [ " . .,... '". GC; J ',~' :..,-':', '1'. ,,:' >,:." .~ IHi' ~. -'82. r~o 78 \ -76: ~~~: ....72. 70 G8, . t.' , It '". I I , ~ '~ ' ,~.' f -,l.J : l.J', ',: -:--2 rfl 'f>, .,;~ f, 1 'IJ~~ .,; . (_I j t" ",' I I' : 21 B 12\1. 11 ~ \1'7 II ~ '~'3 I. I.~~ 10]' 105 103 f 0 "I I. ,'. r ., .1 -.s t:. 1 .: ~,t . to ,.' . -. . ':', ,." WAY .tl'H'" ., ~7 :1:., Q.I,Q I PH VU .\ 65,12'7. '. r-~~ . PH lllC e 7..71 . I I CENT~~ ~~ PH ll' CON Die ;, ~,/ 79'105 <!!WRD 65 - 12.: 2777 &,82 : o MAGNOLIA I I · 'i- ~l L " I~;:.,.. I :>c V 1 ~ .....,0 v . V I: ~ w' T' ~~~ · . "- '.---....:- '- --~, ~ . PATH , , 'I I'~".I 112 110 '08 t06 I" J . ..t j; J I , .J II ~~~b ~ ~t\;.-r\C) ~ ...." 16 8 '\.. I \5 t .' , \ 9 21 ~ .' .. . - " ' .- . - - . . .' It r . . , . " t22 8 22. A 120 liB "6 114 IrIJ \ .~ . '" .:1' ,- ~ ~--" ~.\ ~, I ~ ~- -- ~.@t---\ l- i V5 ,/ ~ v"'.....rf"t t;.. ,~,~ LOT us ,. ~ I.. I . . :) t \LI 2 III > I > . <. <( ~ 6 7 en ..---. - ME8 . . w 12.02 ME.a > 4 M68 011: '12.03 IZ.Ql ..- M~B Q. ~/ ,,- 12.04 5 ~dil~1 MEB I~ - B \ \ t I \ \ \22 ~D\\:FFORO~ ~ '\ mun2 'T 1:\\ \MI Jl, LjU \ \ 1---1_ I~ ~r ,~, .- L ... I" ,3.8 6 8 ~ . .. .. --. ~,-- m q- I en . J ~ c'~~RD\. ~' c 10 .....[ _\ \ \ 31S0) ~_ f?ROPOSED" LAND USE PLAN . AMENDMENT ,~~ REZONING, Q~~er/Applicant:' C (.<.1 -rCH lJ E '( GE.N, TE.L, Co. ZONING frem: R5 75 to ~'>:rS P PROPERTY 0 ESCRIPT10N : LOT /D lr:, ~ E. 10/ of LoT /og HAR...L3oufC. Olt-K-S Su8 LAND USE., -fr~m':.LDW DENSITY RES,b. ~~ ;_' Po 81./c:. /sEl-1' -p~J. Public Hearing Item Number Planning and ,Zoning Board - City Commission SCALf.:l~~:2.0o' Section If.o Township ;tqs Range /SE Al:las P-age ' H-Io '.. Sing'Ie family~ A Duplex CJ ~fulti-Family 8 Business V Vacant .!' :'., '. ":'.: f:I;~~~; ',~ '5~; ~", +:t~ . ",' (, " '1 o D -..... ... \ n ..c:::> I ,; .... .. II I 0 C '. .. II , Keer:e Rd. e .... I ~ 0 J.... // In ~ ;;a ;;a ~ ~ (/, . .. Her;:ules Ave. C) / n I 0 C C .. ... I ... ... I z .. . C :I: .. I .. <;I- I 0 .. =" . :T ~ ... I ... . ~ '< r ... ~ a. I II .... ~ < ~ Q u. S. 19 ~\ .. .... ::2 t11 :-- o(l Rd. t11 ... ?Jr: .. . ... - - - - - -. - - - !' ;;a . ... ... .......- . .. . .. , ,. ~ . . 1>-;; . .>>," P . '::~ DATE (,/6/65 NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER(S) ADDRESS Jos~ph E. Critchley PHONE 224-4261 REP RE SENTA TIVE (I F ANY) General Telephone Co. of Flo~ida Robcr~ A. Kcrst~cn ADDRESS 610 Morgan St.. Tampa. FL 33601 PHONE 224-4281 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (SUBJECT OF REQUEST) The Wes t ,5 feet of Lot 106. Harbour Dilks Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 65, Records of Plnellas County, Florida and the East 10 Feet of Lot 108. Harb~l~ 0nks Suh. Division . ..... GEJ'IERAL LOCATION 80 feet \.[os t of South Fort "Uarr i son on the South 5 ide of Lotus Pa th ACREAGE -- --. - PRESENT ZONING DISTRICT RS-75 . .. REQUESTED ZONING DISTRlCT I SP Note: A separate application is required if the zoning district is proposed to :be changed. PRESE:.'fT CLEARWATER COMPREHENSIVE LAL'lD USE PLAN CLASSIFICATION J low Density Residential . REQUESTED CLEAR1'lATER CO~tPREHENSIVE LAND_.USE PLAN CLASSIFr"CATIm~: ":".... Publ ic/Semi-Public REASON FOR REQUEST To allow the placement of a Digital Remote Switching unit in a concrete block type building (361 x 281) ultimate.(361 x 42') . PI)lELLo\.S COyNTY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLk'1 CLASS IFICATION Urban low Density Residential IS THE REQUESTED L~'lD - USE CATEGORY IN CONFORMANCE l'fITH THE PINELLAS COUNTY LJ...'lD USE PUu.'l CLASSIFICATION? YES NO X loIUST AN .-1.NENDNENT TO THE PINELLAS COUNTY CO~lPREHE~SIVE Lfu'lD USE PL~~ BE .4..PPROVED BY THE PI}lELL:\,S cour..n PLANNING COUNCIL? YES X ' ~O )io~e: County Land Use Plan amendments require the approval or ~he Pinellas County P;anning ~oun~il if tne ~roposed.l~nd use ~o~ ~he ~--per-'i- 'il QuestIon I~ n^~ r"n~'~~Q~P ~.-~ -~- - .. -.. 1"'........... '-...... . -."tI - - '---- --...- ......~,I... ~..~; COwLey Land Use Plan and the land area is equal ~o or exceeds the acreage threshold for the intended use as established in Section IV 0 f the "Pinellas Coun ty Planning Council Rules Concerning the Administration of the Count)~~ide Co~prehensive . Land Use ?lanlt unless other..,ise excepted under Seci:ion III (5). C-Elo"6R"" Tft...iE plf&.cr:. a~-fr:....r, 01= r~.t..). '1'/. ;~f /l~J::) (-51 g n a t u r e ) , ~ ~ c ~e \.ie h'e d b r : rl_.-L ;-l_.r<>J II d ... , ..' t I' I I ! ,- ~' . c' ,;) '.j .. .'. ..... .'... . :....~..:...~;w~.'>;<~"~i . , APPLICATION rOR C~~GE OF ~ONING orS7RICT ./ OA~ B/6/8S ~At~ 9f, ~~?f~~F~- g~;~'~i) ,,~ j~~~~~E:~.C"~~~I~~}.~~i. :.; ~= ,;... .'. . . .',.t...... . .~~..\ .~..:. ~ t ~~ r... \.':~ ....it. ~ . .. Ift'~ ~ '., I '.;'.' It., ... J. '" . ADD1U!~$' .;; ~. It':'~!: ~.'~ ~ ;,~ ....!t:t ;.;i..,-! ~ r.'~ '., t I'" .' ,', ~"PfiONE " 22't"'tio1~ .~. ~ ~ .r ~ r ~ ... ~.~ . _ ...._.., .. ...... ......~ t-fl...,....,.,......f ... F;__ . ~ c .: . .,., . ,......'"r ..".... ".., . . '.' It General Telephone Co. of Florida AUTHORIZED REP~SENTATln (IF ANY) ADQR,ESS 610 Horgan Street, Tampa, FL 33601 PHONE 224-4281 LEGAL DESCRlPTIPW OF PROPER'I'Y (SUBJECT qF REQUEST) The Wes t c:;~ feet - of Lot 106, Harbour Oaks Subdivision as recorded in Plat B~okl't Page 65, , . i ..' Records of P~n:_l1a.s ,~~~n~Yt ~lori~~_"; and the ~ast 10 Feet ,of Lo~~~O~.\ 7.:, '. "; ~ ~a~hou.r _.O~k~ ~~~b. Dj.;ri:s~?~; - T .l:- :: -:. - - - ~. : ;; GEolEaAl. LOCATION_ {- 80 feet West'of South Fort Harrison on the South side of Lotus Path AC RE-~GE ?Rl:3ENT ZONI~G QISTRICT REQIJES-r=n ZONL'tG D!SnICT RS-75 ISP CITY COMP~~~~_IVE LAND USE CAr:aGORY Low Dens i ty Res idential COLJ"NTY CG~tpRE:::~Si:'I: L.A.'lD USE C.-\!1:GORY Urban Low Density Residential REASON' FOR.REQ,UEST ' To allow the placement o.f a Digital Remote Switching unit in a con~rete block type building (361 x 28') ultimate (361 x 421) IS T:-:E ~QUESTED ZONI}{G DIS7RICT IN CONFOFl\f.)"NCE WITIi r:-G cti:Aa~'1AT:R Ca~1P~HENSIV.:::; I..A4'fD USE ?L~N? YES NO x No~e: IE ~~e reques~ed :one change is no~ consis~en~ wich ~e C5.cy's Land Use Plan, c11e applica.:l'C '....il1 be 't'ecuirec. :0 file a. cor-.:-espond.i.n.g application ~o am.end. tb.,e ia..,d use plCl.;.'"1.. IS THE REQlESTED ZONING D!STRICT !~ CON::OR.\t.1..NC= ~'iIr:-[ 7:~= ? !~j=!.L-\S CCt;~;-r! cm.(p~~\(S IV: L..~ND USE ?L.A_'f? YES ,. ~O . x !.. r 57 ASY OTHER ~=RT!~ENT IX:OX)1ATION SiJ3~UT-r=D fh.::~.€ -'L n:;L,;PH.o...&_ '\\ "" . N L-f") ~t" A...... . ."'J:= FL._~;~"\", ~.- ~..' '-,,;)t'i ~,.J "7'?> ~.. u"" 0..: ~ (' ~ ("1..I.':'?"..-:"':::" ~ . ""T';o-, ~.. .:..r '.:. ~;'JI",D ~ I r... ,1_ . GE-t.:61:U.L TE"L-cPNc.Jk- CJMMIoJ'I 0':::' FL..~. .~ J;r;; 4~ ~._. ~ I r."\\// . //':.~ ~ / ~ , p~/~ /~';Vv I /........Pv~ '. ... .. f""::, "n'!--u-"') \,"'" -.:::t...c:.... ...- ~e \- :. e t.w e:i 9J y : d~L- 41_~.~ I , I cr ~..H 'Yo' . ,.' :,', 111~~ .....~..::,~.,~'::;'~::~~q , 4-S- ", -, ::~~,;:' , " . -- .....--,.. Agenda No. MEMORANDUM TO: plJ]) - ~ Meeting Date8-15-85 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater .. '" < SUBJECT: Petition for Annexation and CP (Parkway Business) District Zoning for the South port.ion of M&B 33.09 and All of M&B 33-10 I Sec. 5-29S-16E (Pz'ida) Annex 85-28. RECOMMENDATION: City Commission receive this petition and refer it to the proper departments. IJ And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located on the northeast corner of a private drive known as Coachman Plaza Drive and S.R. 590. The parcel contains .69 acre M.O.L. The City Land Use Plan classification is Commercial/Tourist Facilities with a Residential/Office/Retail designation on the County Land Use Plan. The request is for CP (Parkway Business) zoning with the annexation. r There is presently a fruit stand on the property which will be removed prior to development. ' Commission Disposition: 1. 'Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued to dl%te Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Costs: N/A Funding Sou ree: o Capita I Improve- ment Budget o Operating Budget o Other Drawing Petition 'I Advertised: Dote: o Affected Parties Notl fl ed of Meeting aJ Not Required fDAttachments: ~ \ City Manager Poper: fa Not Req~ired 00 te 8 Sequentic I Reference Orlglnatl~g '~Departmen t: PLANNING o None Appropriation Code \' , " ",) I! .. i.. ". , ,; I ,. j '4 J ~ , " ~ ", '. ". .- - ) . . , . , . . . ~ . .~_:; l '. ... .. : ~~. 01 MEB 330.02 '.. "':', . -'II_L __ __L--L- ~, . T c: R RAe E ~ c;L .'_' r:;':) A R S 601 s:5 ,&4. , . ttW'~ .37 3 tS . .. . RS60 , . . ,;' , . 1" .-- ....J.. .....- ..... _'_ I r M.~ B "J3' 03 I -. ," . ." . . " ~ ~~A ~G~.~. '" .,: '" ()'J. ........;.'\v '.' o ~t:--\:~---\': ......""..t..~~....~:-::;:..~.. "l..~l;;'~:' ;-h- ~~~.i.:f..~,~.. _ .,.;:1'"',~~ ~ ... ..'" . t " ~ . .. '10 .n:.h~ , . " .0; '0: ,.. '.~ p . .. (tl i , ~ ,... I :..:. , ,. '. ...' " ':: '.., ":, '... ,':. '.-. -, c:., , .~,'~ ': . ' ~'1 ,,~ "i ", ' ~. ~ I .:J: '.l.~'\ ~ .' ,;' ~-.i,: ~,t"; .-: I . 0.. , ~." ...:',q . <l"" ~:. J ....~..; ':- . ..;tc.. >- ~ _0: ~ k .-,,- ..,. . ':_" ...' '~f" . ';F "I'" :-:" '. : . '.. c. _' '. ~. . . .., .... .' ..,::1. ..... .' " 0<<( I .i: 4' " . I' ' . .- f- '.~ -. f, J . I I ,'. --: ~+. .' . .....'1- .... '... .'. .. , . . , I~'. , . , .' , ':.L . '4 .0 .t : . , .,i ~ .. '. :-.. ~ ,- '- tea' : 'l?O: , ,/. - ~ :. -, .1 - S....I}4 ~el;. EI; :", 11I,...1/" ~ - 100' lOa' f I .. t . . . ~ .. :.. . '.. . . " 7 8 :: '~r . -. _e. .. .' . --.-....' .S'.R. ~90 " ~ ;-.:,,: __:..: ' , .... . ~:/'~':~',~~:; ~-; '...: . :; ~ .'1;;* ';'" ~;.:~ :::- ."... '_- ~'~4" :_.;:'~... .'1-. 'I- . . . ',-,-~. ~ _ U A "MftB' " 22.01. 20 ~... ..' '.. In C ~ ~OB4 .., n ,,; --. ~ I- -L:J o u .. .. 1110' . l' . ~ .. L, ~ , . ...I:" -- PROPOSED..ANNEXATION AHOZONING i At.J",ex.. 85~ 28 \ Owner/Applicant "\0,","-1' t Ea...~'Z,:::o.~l:!.':\o-\ ?RIDA C P - I (COIJ,.",,..,,) -...-.....-. Property , Yo~"'O...s l"':'ll!> ~'3. 09. ....o,JO ""'\,, \,. o 'f 1-'\.", 'P.> '3 '3 - '0 . "q A c-a.q :;;'cquest from to CP --.J., I Public Hearing ltem ^umber . , Planning' and Zoning Board Citv COIilmis~'ion . Y) . Singl~ Family A. Duplex o f.~ul'ti-Family B Business V Va-can't I I i t 1 Section 5 Tm.;nshi.p ;4'lS Range lb€: Atlas Page D.. \~. - - --' - ._".~ ..-- _......~____ .__0 __.- _. __ - ., '\, -. - -..--..~ . --- .-.. --~ +..-- ~ - ....p . ... .'.. .. . :>:~;j _ _ __..._ -..,.A c.................~...;.;;. ....... .. ."" .... ... .. . ui .PH ,p:. ~ U? l:: ... ~ 5t 'S .n .() r$='Q ~h Is i 1 I, I --... ., ... rr; . u . "tI > ... DO IIQA't 1 I I. , ~ll1n:l.lOH " / , 0 I I ~ ~ , , ......... :.. .. DO , o .. , ... ... ::l l.:I "'" I>: " .. -- ... ::l U [J r::;] o I>: <I) .." p: ... UJ "tI 5 ... ... :- co ... u . "tI c.: .., -- ::l ... t:;) 'Q .. c. Q . O^'f Ill\V1 o .Il^" PUllttj!lH \ \ I I .; IV) I " I .. l.!:i I ... <I) .. ... :;, o U :.,. ~ .\ , . I t1 ! ...., ~- . .&.~~ , '.' '1' ,:'~'''''11~t1. <, . :.- : .~~:~ .,:t,':' " ,0 PtllflOl1 FOH ANUI.XA.TIOlt " ~'"'I-. e-; - 2e ~...(1'. k M \\9"3\1 "00;-1- City Co mm i s s ion City of Clearwater P . O. 0 0 x 4 7 4 8' Clearwater. Florida ,,' COin 111 i s s i un c r s : We, the U II d t! r S I !J n e r1, lJ c i rl 9 a 1 J 0 W rl C t' S u f the II E: S c d bed n: rl 1 p '" u per t y ; 'caotilJuous lo'the present tH\un(iarics of the r.' ty of C1Cilr.tl.1tt'r, iUP' 51tuatC'd in an unincorporated drca of Pillcl10lS COllnty. F1orirla. ria h~rp.hy rCllues't thJt said property be Jnne)u~d into the corporate 1 imils of the Cit. of Clr.arwater, Florida. " He herC!by further request that said pr'operty I.)(! lOlled and classified under the Zoning Ordinance of the City of C1Cclrwl1lcr, dS set forth on the following page. 'I Attached hereto is a current survey of the described prope~ty. together with a certificate of title from a title company or a licensed attorney setttng forth the names of all persons, firms or corporations oNning any interest in the described property. The undersigned have been advised of. understand and in. cOrlstderativn pf ann~xation, utility services, and other aood and valuable considcration do her~by agree and convenant as follows: , ' ., 1. all continuous property under the ownership of the petitioner(s) is included in this petition for annexation; 2. all structures and improvements which are erected upon said property subse~uent to the date of this petition for annc~- ation shall comply with all applicable City of Clearwater regulations and ordinances as set forth in the City Code of Ordinances; 3. to convey such recreation land, recreation facilities and upen spJce lJnd d~dicJtion dnd/or fees in the dmount and r.'ldnner pres.cribed by Ordinance lias. 3128-83 and 3129-8~; dnd " , 4. when any substandard ahutting street or utilities olrc ~uhsequently up9rarlcd by the City to meet City Standards, said improvement will be done on an assessment basis. c u n S 1st e n t wit h C i t Y P rue c d U '.I! ~ the ref 0 r . We. the undersigned hereby certify that we have read dnd e~Jmlned al I of the statements and allegations in the foregoing Petition including attachments and nftcr being duly sworn, depose and say thdt such statement are correct, complete and true and voluntarily made with full knowledge thereof. . ') . ... (h~,- (? 2~~ John' C. prida "~~/-LJ?J: E1~ za~~~~ . B" h' ~A~ 1LL.2fL .r~ -'Ellza~tf1- J: '.Vi:' oa "as' "Trustee - th; s I.t_day 0 f ._..--9~ ___1985 , \ \ , STATE OF FLORIDA CUUNTY OF PI"ELLAS ) ) ~ub\c~ibed Jnd sworn to before me fly Coru:nission r.xpir'/cs: A;_,,-,_~ __t2___I.RL~___ UOl,tr{~~ ,cr~~y F~SLI: ~~~Tt c~ rt~rtti r' :,..~~:!!C~ ~I.;. Hi!. !.Bt~ ::~::~ I~q~ G[~t~~l I~S. U~O. I I 'J 11 ) I 1 ~:! I ~ , 1 " .i , " l 1- ~ ..... u: r:.... ~ . ;. o :1 I I ,I t-: ~ . .. ~ ~ 1Il , , ., '! ; -:; t...: . - - J ~; ~ ," ~ i ~ :i , ':\ : ;1 ;, :' ',- c ':3 .' , .. ~i.:.., "_'-r'."':.~l; ~~~"""."'T"::-..I'~~~:~~-.::t:'/~~' " C' . q '. .. :l.,~" "::.,(~~ll ~ ..~. .... ""'\'::g~~ 4J 4J C '~.~T" ::';~ 1Il.c: 0 . ':"'';~' ::I ~ U ..:,.,~~ . . .)~ "" .... ........... '.: ,(: ... v. .., .: '~ t:'U (,I In 1'~ .e ~ :j '-' : >i. UC::H ...,:'.\ "'d X . H . ~~~:{ Il.lIl.lI'""tH " II) ..r4 '..;'. . 0 1-0 U I:: . ',~' n. 0 I~ 0 o ~.rt ...00.... Po.... U U Q,) (J t~ rJ;tI1 .t:r.11:: 4J ;:] 'rt ,... 0"C:1l.l 4-( IV c:: 't:J ,,-I CIS c: II'II'""t ~ -'.-1 Q., ,,-I "'0 'UClS~1l.l Gcut-J.... ;.JJ.oco. OI'd='GJ U OU 'ljU>< tlO I:: QJ s::: CIS 11'I. .,-1 I'""t cO cu s::: r-i 11'I' a QJ...-t.1"'i co..l: Q,) ~ ...-tf.JS:::J.4 0. .. 'I"'i 11)' "t1c.....c: >- c::: t-J +-Jcu 0 3C:~tf) Ol"J+-Jtf) u...... cu c..tH...... III OJ:: ~(J>;j ~Ul ......~-: Q.l 1:: c: c: "0 0 r3 ..-f C:..-4...-t ~rtI~o. -JU 11I IUCJ .t:: ~" II) III ......., ~ ~ 9.5'lj 00 s: U"'t:ll'J r-f \ 1U-1 fl3QJ..l: >..c: III (J 0: t-l ,..-4 > ).i \'r-i.I"'i' 0..'::::.0 III' a."" c: c:: ns.1"'i ~ Cl.l ~Ul"::: Q) fl) IU .t: ~ .1 \-0 ~C:IIlp.. OJ",~ o~ 0 ~1IlQ,)U ...t ..-4 III ::::lU'l=O :ri: "0 C) 0 ~ '.-1 ...UG.l?= "0_ 1Il4.lCU toJOCUC C:::C:~:J ~ r::O &:: 11)..-4 U ~'1"'4 r.: l:.J '11 ':)c:.:.:.:: eoww :;t..-I .....'-0'-' 1::1Il00 c:l~l-. ..-4... t: r.. C"':J 0 - ..-1 c:Jc:O..... ~ ........= r:s ~ lIlJ.o :... rj &.J "lj ..... ;... IT. I:: ....: ..... 11 t) .'" c: -J r::. 'M ooE: )0,.;'" ::4"'0 toJ n. 'JU ~ ... CU 3 eJ 100 c:J o.::u.:: uiJr::..... c -c , . .. ~: I. . << i/ r: r. l~ rJ C :3 ."..-4 o f'_ ,-' U ro l:.I I) III 1/'.-1"'4 r: ::) ~ ..... .... . -4 'lj 111 V I: '11 to: t'J ~ .,..,1 ...J ~., n. l) ~ rtl (X .,-1 tJ ~~ " ~ o u o f.J 'd ILl ... .... :::i 0" CIJ ~ CLI .c r-t I""t .~ ~ .~ C.- . :Iti ':'.' ,. . ~ ", ,,' '. I , >>~~r...(;~~.~~~~~cU ~ . '."': .. "'i+."'~iA::'-4"...r;~::~.;~rr;'.X"~~l"':.~.~~:;~:..:;:~~,~~~.:w.::-.t~~~""::.:-{..):;"o()i;:,{".~~~(.~~'fi~~:T .1' i)" .. ....~ ..............~.." .....i.. ..~).,..:..: "".., "~J:'"."!r .....?'<::~~;~~~..~..).~~.'r.,"* ........"',.re....:: ....... "'+ r~.....~..IS.I...^..:.................~ ,..~...,.........~.,.. .....".I(..y~"t ...:) .... ....,).t'; '. ..."'''*.... ... v~b......~~ .,' 1tl;:~:~! 2}.t\~:,.*;t::t~:~;'~ ?)~~'~~~~~:J :i~' '~':::J'; ?~:~,::;~::~ ~~:: -;~~>~:~~~}~~;' ~::::~,.~~~ :~'::: :,:; ,~~~~ .?~:~~1::~?:~~:~~~~'~':~ -::. ~::.,~..:~:.:# :':'~~ {:p ;~;~i.~::7f.~::~~~~...; .', r .. -- -.......-. '. . .jc I: r: roo ... ..... '1"'4 Q) n. f.J f.) III d l1.\ U ~ III..... j:; ~':I 4-1 ~ ..-1 CJ '"CS VI .. t-I ::: tn UQnl ....:...... U r.... ~ ~ i: nJ U ..... r-t 0.. J:1. I'll CIJ ..c: t-J 'd CJ 1..0 .., t: III .r-1 ~ 'f I: :1 o I.J ~ ::=: c: ro r-t p,. QJ 11'I :;::) '0 c:: CIS o-J ~ .') ", f: o .... ~ i.J ~... iU :::.. w ;.: .-4 .... e.l ~~ CJ C U CoS: ,'. ., ".:: CJ .... r.;c..ru ... - 11J .:J I' - ,IS . VI j r. <1 , V\ :r-'; -3 .1) .", f" t"" ':) .(l ~ '.- ~ ~ if' rll cu > .~ In c:: QJ ..c: CIJ 1-0 Po ~ o u ,j .. ~ '1 J -:"'- c! ,... ~ '~ d") rl jI ") \" VI ~ 11'I >.. ......-1 cDCl) .., t:: ro."" .~~ ",0 'QJ U ......u ucu ~4 .~ 0 0 a. 1- Q) -J "" ';!~ ~ ':::1: f..Jro '.-I'~ )::0.. f..J4) C::III e.l :J f.J U)'d 'rl !: tnc:s c::...... o Ull.I VI III . ... ":'J , . .., 1fI III '.. .W .., lit III 111 1lI 111 ~ QJ ... III Io.e 'lJ Ii 'lJ Fl 'lJ 'lJ 'U "tI III 'lJ '" ~ '" -.. '" -. .- ..,~ o c::-c c:: 1Ill1> ..-1 ~ t: co 1:0 .1"'4~ s: 0::: NO ..... ".... CUf3 "'U lIl'r-1 rJ ...... ::Jc.. ere. c:Jn .... .-t N ,., ''\:. ~ ~ ....J r:J UJ ~ IJ 1-1 I) ...... :::::: ~ 01: r( -t: n. '"- no c:: cac:s .c: .,~ - ...... ......t ~ '-4 << . - ."7-' =...... .. ,RECOMMENDAT10N: Exercise option to extend agenda item 7/19/84, with Spectrum Duilding Services, f~om 10/1/85 to 9/30/86 at no change in price, terms or other conditions. ~: >.t."'r\ ':".~~:.~~.':;:' ";t,\?~ ... ,._-~;.-----:,: ,: Agenda No. MEMORANDUM TO: C.$-j MeettngOate:8/1,S/85 The City Commission of the' City of Clear.water " S U 8 J E C T: Custodial se1.Vices 18 And .that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same.' BACKGROUN 0: On July 19, 1984, the City Carmission approved award of a contract for custodial services to Spectrum Building Services. The contract expires 9/30/95 and Spectrum desires to extend the contract until 9/30/86 at no change in pricing, tenns or other OJnditions. The basic contract provides for such extension, if nn.rl:ually . agreeable, and the Central Services Director .recatITEl1ds that the extension be accapted. Purchasing Officer concurs. Funds for this contract are included in the City Manager's Recommended 85/86 Budget. Appropriation Ccx1es: 565-1-6540-303/590 ($159,450.0Q) 010-1-1145-303/521 ($ 65,000.00). At the last Commission Meeting (8/1/85), the Commission requested the square foot cost for custodial services for the following locations: City Hall c: Annex = Library = $1.35 per sq. ft./year .81 per sq. ft. /yenr .82 per sq. ft. /year (The above inforr.1ation tms obtained by t-'r. Floyd Carter, Central Services Director). \ Continued from 8/1/85. Commission Disposition:' Follow-up Action: FY 85/86 Budget o Affected Costs: $224 ,450.00 .Attachments: Parties FundIng Source: Notified C] CapitCJI lmprove- Agenda Item of Meeting ment Budget 7/19/84 . Operating Budget .Not Required CJ Other Submitted by: Advertised: .i..4..'1 "'"'~~ Dare: CIty Manager Pope r~ .Not Required Date aSequenticl Reference Originating Department: Central Services Appropriation Code See AOOve CJ None' i"-" I, , '\.~ , .- -... ~.dsICS , .. Age ndo No. Meeting Date: 'I 7-19-84 MEtvlQRANDUM TO: .CS~s-- The- City Commission of the City-of Clearwater SUBJECT: CUstodial Services R E COM MEN 0 A Tl 0 N : Award a contract to purchase custodial SeM.ces fran Spectrum. Building Services Inc., St. Petersburg, Fl. during the period 8-1-84 to 9-30-85 for a total price of $ 218, 530 which is the lowest responsive and resp:msible bid subni. tted in accordar:ce with the specifications. El And that the approprlote officials be authorlzed to e):,ecut~ same. SAC KG R 0 UNO: A careful review and analysis of custcdial services for the City shows that significant savings can l::e obtained by the use of comrercia1 custodial services for the major buildings. To achieve this end, an invitation for bid for contractual custodial serlices for the City Hall, City Hall Annex, Main Library, Police Main Station, Police Sub-Station, Utility and t-btor Pool bUildings was sent to prospective bidders. Camercial service will ccmrence upon contract award according to the following s~hedule: 1. Utilities Building; 2. t-btor Pcol: 3. Mai:n Library Building; 4., City Hall. The Police Main Station, Police Sub-Station and City Hall Annex are currently under contract Which expires 9-30-84. These buildings will be included .in the new contract at that tirre. ~n1strative and p:rsonnel changes that will occur as the result of the use of comrercial custodial services by the Ci ty are as follows: a. Personnel requirerrents for the City OJstcdi~l Service will be reduced from 16.0 Fulltime Equivalencies (PrE) to 2.5 FTE by October 1. 1984. b. The 2.5 FI'E will be COIt"{Xlsed of one (1) part-time supervisor and four (4) part-tirTe custo:lians woo will perform custodial services for the Purchasing, Ccmrercial Service, ~ter Shop, Gas and Water, Beach Library, N.E. Libt:'ary, . '!Wig Library, and WFC buildings. All of these buildings receive less than' - fulltirre, daily custcdial service, and cornrercial services appear to not i:e cost advantageous. c. The CUstcdial Oi vision will becorre a part of the Building & r-1aintenance Oi vision for administration of b::Jth personnel and operations. Bids received were evaluated by the staff. The results of that evaluation along '.-;ith their r~commendation are attached. Funds for coses incurred under this contract after 9/30/84 are included in the Recommended 1984/85 budget. ** Code - 565-6540-303 $146,896 010-1145-303 - Sil.634 Commission Disposition: Fal \aw-up Action', " Sl.'bmitted by: Advertised: 6-12-84 00 t e :6-15-84 Pop~r: Clear,..ra ter Sun CJ Not Required Costs: S?l q S30 FundIng Source: (J Capital Improve- ment Budget !21 Operating 8udget CJ Other DAttachments: Bid Analysis. ?gs. 1 ar.d 2, w/Exhi.bits I & II . ~ . D Affected Parties - Notified of Mee tlng City Manager . \. 16I Nor Required Date ~Sequential Reference Originating Oepor tmen t: Central Services Appropriation Code ** ' o N or.e .;, ~, . ! .- :' ;,\......:.~::>;:\~ . ,. :.: , ',.. . ~.~ .\ Bid Analvsis - Cus~odial Se'rvices The procuremen~ of a service such as cus~odial services is essentially ~he purchase of labor. The bidding for such contracts is basically the offering of ~his labor at a se~ fee. The key to ~he purchase of this labor is ~he de- ~ailed definition of the work ~o be accomplished. The City's specifications for ~he purchase of custodial services are extremely detailed and are sufIi- cient Cor the calculation of the number of man hours needed to accomplish the tasks / frequencies specified. Over the pasl: ten years the City has developed detailed and comprehensive task/frequency time requirements for' custodial se'rvices to those facilities maintained by the Central Services Department. The time standards applied are those used and developed by the Federal General Services Administration. This set of standards sets time requirements for the lowest level of task required such as, dusting of individual pieces on a desk. Current, computer- ized systems use much grosser standards. These standards were developed by the Department of the Navy and are based upon the vast experience of the GSA and use square foot/-.1se to determin,e labor requirements. The man hour or labor requirement es~irnated by the City to accomplish the service being contracted is 34,346 hours. (See Exhibit I). ' The number of man. hours bid by Spectrum Building Services, Inc. is 32,077 nours. The number of ma.n hours bid by T ri-Angle Maintenance Service, rnc. is 21,307 hours. (The gross labor rate for Spectrum was given in ~heir bid.~, The gross labor rate for T ri-Angle was calculated, based on the minimum' wage.. See Exhibit II). . The 32,077 hours bid by Spectrum is reasonable and is based upon the Navy system of square footage. ., The 21,307 hours bid by Tri-Angle is not reasonable and totally insufIicient to perform the services required by the City. All four (4) references provided by Tri-Angle were contacted. ,Of these [our (4) references, two (2) were spoken with directly and two ,(2) had staff personnel re spond to our que rie s. The !:wo (2.) references interviewed directly indicated dissatisfaction with the service they were receiving. This dissatisf3:"tion is of long standing and at least one (1) of them is pursuing replacement bc T ri-Angle. The basic prob- lem exp'ressed by these two (2) was the lack of personnel. The level of charges ,by T ri-Angle to the two (2) businesses are approximate to those bid by T ri- Angle for our City Hall Annex Building and Main Library Building. - 1 - , ''\) .. ."'--" ~ I ~i " , '':,.\ ;l}l .' :,>~:\'; . .:0'" + '>;:~':.,:~5. '" c'~~!f ... . '~:" ;\\ \ ~, :.,;,~~ ". ~:~2? ':":,,~i~ ~ .~.::; " ~ '" ': ;i~~ . ~'.:;~ ( ".', ,.:; cll":" ,;, C . ".,,'..'tr .::' ',:'~.,;(~~ . ,:: .:;;>~~ ~ ~.;; , .';.\U . } > ~r; -/ . > '" "., .'. ......, ,._(.,,,,,N.->1',;'-H,'.::t.'i!~r::-,",,~'l ':~..I. . ,"..-. ~.. .' '~"'I-:~ ~ ~;''1'.' 1;j.'jcJ. '':''1J';;"~U~~:;~ f~.?,r;t,' . . .. .'. '.:"\)':~",(":i{i~;'(j'~,!~~ ',',' >,' """""';'~ . ',~ .' . <"'#If . : :/,'~i.',': 1.1. . ~ " " >il)- . ',~:;~: . ~. ) .... --... i, The two (2) references thaI: would not, could not, and/or did not resp'ond to'us di,tectly (even aCter a ,meeting was set: up) were neutra.l in their comments by , staff members. I I . . I , ! I Our review of the bids received Cor commercial custodial service's shows that the low bidder cannot perform the services required by the City, and contact with current cUstomers oI the low bidder shows 'that Tri-Angle habitually [ails t:o provide the labor nece~sary t:o give a.greed upon services. . I, ' Centra.l Services Department: reconunends that Spectrum be awarded the con.. tract Cor cormnerdal custodial services. . ~ ,,' " , t ,} tt, .n .' ! ",: . ~ ~ . '\ " "1 ) ., " . ':\~~ ..', ", ,.:,} "\t,.::T :/:: ~~.' ',' , . , :. f ") ':1 " .:.' . f . , . '1 ., '~'':1. .."':., , . , "',,5 . ~l~ .1 : , ! ,', , .. ',," " 2 '. .~ .' . .~ t:J : :~'!l II ., , " , " '.i. ~t: '. .' : .~~ . .1 . H~ < , . . . ; ~.: . '. .... '. ;::y~? l, r~', L (~.. ,p:' , ,,o..! .4" ',,;" ..,,- . > . ~.' " .'.........c~,\..,.':\\-.tir..f\~.)~1~~~MJ~~=1'ir,. ': ." "";'''' :'7"';\;'.;:.;']!}t;i~~:~e , , , '.,' ,,, ,,,,J)~ . ,\' . '1;" ;-.~;... JlJ ':~.. ~' , . 1" ~. . ~rJ. ~<.... ,. ,,' :'-:'; :~:,; , , \')?'~;~~\:Jj " "," " .,"J,t"~ .< ," ":";;;(;;;~.f1 '" . '" '".-.. ,'" ~ .... .,'..;,...~;}i::ljil " :, '~:;,I: ',' :':1 , ': ''''''j , ..:.' (' .J .... . .1 '. . . 'I' EXHm IT I , . B 1d ~ . City Hall" Annex . Library 'I Police _ M 'Police - 5 U tilil:ie s Motor Pool City Estimate, 4,032, 6,~4:8' 7, 922 9,617 2, 194 2,592 1. 941 34,346 : ,': , , T ri-An!tle 2, 119 hr s. 4,955 hrs. 4,749 hrs. 5; 811 hrs. 1,123 hrs. 1,26S"hrs. 1.285 hrs. 21,307 hrs. ;I) Spectrum 3,763 hrs. 5,667 hrs. 7,393 hrs. 8,975 hr s. 2,048 hrs. 2, 419 hr s . 1,812 hrs. 32,077 hrs. 11 c, ','I ,:\ . ' . . .. I C ~: <: 'I Base bid .Initial 113,608.03 24.489.76 138,097.79 212,500 6,030 218,530' '.;r,}.~ , ,I --...:1 .' . >'," '.1 ,1 ~. ," )' . ".: II " " " , ~ . ~ ., -. '.~ ~ " " ' .,i r , ~ "",' ,",. : , ,} , tit ';'f ,,-1 .j ,\ \ ',j, ,J. : 'j ',j, ~~\ ,', . .:' ". . ,'1 , .' " ~, :[ . ' >.\ " .~) ~ " ~ ' c' , I ~. ~ c ~".: .' , ij. , .' t, ~ . \"'1 11 " .t~. i- ~ > ~ '!. :) " ! . > {~ . .... , :j\ .' , ,.,.;/ ; . ': ;I....; :~.~ ~ -----.... , . ,": " . , ~ I " :," I"'. . ,e., .' _,,' I . ':":'(<~! .~?~~ , ':,~t' . -. ~ ~ . T,/ T ~~ ..:.~~:; "'::,: /;{~ .. . :~'p~ :: /, .::~ A~ r"fJ f:')'i:~~ ... ~' .:~~~. " " v. I,' : :;~,: .. ,,\ EXHIBIT n . "."~~,;;,,,t;~~\C\~;~~~~~;:;\~i' .:r >, t ~.,)' 1'\' "~r-: , ". 'Y";:':::~:t\ ' '.. ',', >:,::t;:~:~ '~, ,>~...~-,.~.~>:.... ~ ~ " ,1/ . ;?, 0/; ~ '7-}, ~ I .' ..'"...:~ "". ."'\'Yi;j~ fJ: :,' :'~~:c?~~~~ . ':":.;::<~1 T I :;~~(; . .:. ':~~~~:\ )'~i ., ..1l_C " , < . . II 'j , ' I. ... . . .,'t Calcula.tion of T ri-An'tle Cost/Hour Minimum Wage" SO,cial Security (6.070/0) Workers Compo (4.82'0) Liabilil:y Ins. (Z~ 08%) Unemployment Compo (4.5%) Overhead - Training, Matis. (4.3%) Subtotal $3.35,,/ .203345 . 16147 .06968 . 15075 . 14405 $4.079295 .453255 $4.532550 . 79986 · $ 5. 332.4.1 I) Supervision (10%) Subtotal Profit (lsllfo) , i To ta.l . . , } .1 , t: . i ;' ~I., . 'r '. , " . ) .,", ;' ; .. , 'j . \ .. '.'~. .:' " , . .~~ .'~ .\ " ,.1,', " .., . ..... ~ , C' '.' . , , ~'" 'I ~~~.. ." i. :' " '\ . " I :.,. ,."\ \\ , .1 ,". " .\ " "\> n .: " " ..' \\ ~?" , ..~ / --- -......--------------- - -- --- ---- ..--------.....--.--- -- . --.-....-- ..........-----------~---- ...- *R E V 1 SED 4-; Agenda No. Meetl ng Date: 8/15/85 MElVl0RANDUM TO: C(Y)-~ The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: Travel Managerrent Services . R E CO M MEN OAT ION: Award a contract to purchase travel management services fran AAA Horld-Wide Travel Agency, St. Petersburg, FL effective 8/1/85 to 9/30/86, with the option to extend the contract by mutual'agreern::mt for additional twelve (12) rronth periodn, as authorized under Article II, Section 42.23(5), Code of Ordinances. II ro And that the oppropria1e officials be authorized to execute same. SAC K G R 0 UNO: Sealed, carpeti ti ve proposals to provide travel managerrent services to the City, were solicited (Atch.l) fran twelve (12) full service travel agencies with experience and capability to handle co:rp:>rate travel accounts. Three (3) pro- posals were received, i. e. Keppie Travel Inc. (the agency presently servicing the City I S account), AAA World-Wide Travel Agency (this agency presently services Pinellas County, City of St. Petersburg and City of Largo) I and Cedars Travel Inc. A team of City staff, chaired by the Assistant to the City Manager, was appointed to evaluate the written proposa:!.s an~ oral presentations received from each agency. Each agency was evaluated using rele~tant criteria. rmd rating scale (Atch 2.) The evaluation team was unan.i.m::lus in its recamendation that AAA be awarded a contract. AAA has previously derronstrated breadth of experience and capability to service governrrental entities l:oth srraller and larger than Clearwater. tvbreover, the team was rrost favorably im- pressed with the depth, scope and responsiveness of the 'AM written proposal and oral presentation as evidenced in the ratings assigned by individual team rrembers. The Purd1asing Officer has reviewed the results and concurs with team recornrendation. I' \1 * Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: i, Submitted by: Cos1s: * Funding Source: o Capitol Improve- ment Budget . Operating Budget o Other Advert ised: 00 t e: 4/5/85 4/12/85 Paper: Pine lIas Review o Not Required o Affected Parties Notified of Me etlng .Attachments: 1. RFP 56-85 dated 3/26/85 2. Proposal Evaluation Horksh(et 3. 8/1/85 Letter :4. 7/3/85 Letter '... City Manager . Not Required Date 8Sequential Referen ce Originating Department: lI.dministration o None Approprlotion Code * . ~ < ....; ....-.., C I T Y OF C, LEA R W ATE R PUR01ASIN3 DIVISION ,"CST O.....'CI; 1I0X 0&7.11 ,; CL.EARWATER. FL.-ORIDA 33!S'8 Issue Date: March 26, 1985 " StJB.JECr: Request for Proposal No. 56-85' Travel Managerrent Services PRE-SID m'iFERENCE: OR City of Clearwater Purchasing Division P.O. Eox 4748 Clearwater I FL 33518 i) MAIL BIDS TO: .\ City of C1eanrat~r' Purchasing Division 711 ~.a.ple St. Clearwater. Fr.; 33515 DE!..:I\lER BIDS 'IO: BIDS MUst BE RECEIVED ~ay 2, 1985 - 2:00 PM \" , f $ '. "EqUQ! Employment and Affirmative Action Emcloyer" (RFP No. 56-85 Travel r.lanaaerrent Services. DErAILED SPECIFICA.TICNS AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS I. GENERAL: A. The City of Clearwater (hereinafter referred to as the City) is seeking prop:>sals fran qualified, full service accredited travel agencies to ServJ..ce its travel managerrent needs. B. The purpose of this Request for Proposal is to obtain travel rranagerrsnt services for the' City of Clea.rwa.ter by a:>ntracting with ene travel agency which will provide, at a minimum, those services outlined l:elow. . C. The travel agency selected will te required to agree to provide sr:ecified services for a three year period, subject to that agency I s continued successful ~fonnance as detennined by semi- annual perforrrance evaluations. The City reserves the right to tenninate the agreerent at the end of each annual period by giving thirty (30) days prior written notice. D. The City intends to use the services of the contracting agency or agencies for as much City travel business as possible; however, the City reserves the right to obtain travel services from other sourceS, when extraordinaI:y circumstances dictate. E. The City's annual travel budget approxirrates $50,000.00 ( \; F. Only profOsals fran full-service, JXJ:C authorized agencies ,affiliated with at least one rrajor airline will t:e considered for evaluation and award. Preference will l:::e given to agencies with proven ~r- ience in either corporate or governrrent travel arrangerrents, rreeting 'the minimum service requirerrents outlined in Section II l:elow. G. Proposals must be signed and received no later than 2:00 p.m., r-lay 2. .'}'985. ProfOsals must be enclosed in a sealed envelope plainly rrarked PROPOSAL FOR '!RAVEL ~ SERVICES and addressed/nailed to: , Purchasing Officer Ci ty of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33518 or hand delivered to: 711 Maple street, Clearwater, FL 33515. H. Proposals rrust include all infonration required h.erein in order to te evaluated aad considered for award. Prop::lsals that are not resp:msive to RFP requirements may l:::e rejected. t~ .-. i. , . 1. Although we provide a general fornat or criteria to use in our final evaluation, we will not limit your imagination or creativeness in preparing a proposal that you feel will accomplish our goals and expectations. JI..gencies nay. at their discretion. subni t nnll tip1e pro[..osals which provide various alternatives for evaluation. -1- A. At a mini.rnl.m, the scopa of services required of the selected agency shall consist 'of the following: (l) Scheduling, 1:ooking and ticketing of air and ground trans- portation which rreets the require.rrents of the traveler and at the' rrost economical cost to the City. It (RFP No. 56-85 ) II. SOJPE OF SERVICES: (2) (obnitoring fares on a scheduled basis, reissuing tickets where rates have decreased. (3) Scheduling and arranging lcxiging aCCCllll~tions which rreet the requirerrents of the traveler and at the rrost econcrnical cost to the City, using governrrent or agency negotiated corporate rates or other special 'rates. (4) Providing rronthly rranagerrent reports to the City including infonration an savings, airlines utilized, sales per airline, destination by airline, why lowest fare was not used, and other travel experience data that will permit improved rranagerrent 'and planning of City travel expenditures. . '(5) Providing rre.nagement consultation to the City on ramifications of deregulation, a:>rTputer technology and other aspects of travel management and planning, including assistance in negotiating vol\.lIT'e rates with hotels and car rental corrpani.es. '.' (6) Providing training assistance to City staff to facilitat.e travel planning and rranagerrent, including special bulletins and newsletters wi th helpful travel tips and a fare hotline. (7) t-1aking car rental reservations, using governrrent or agency negotiated corporate or goverrurent rates that provide the lowest cost to the City. (8) I:elivering tickets to designated locations' in the City and rraking errergency ticket delivel:Y when required. (9) Establishing and irrplerrenting procedures to continually . rronitor the quality of travel services perfoJ:11Ed including identifying, rep:lrting and correcting deficiencies. j" 'J (10) )i"Pro~~ding ,liu.f.f.j,cent..o>st.a.f,f.ing, ap9., f~9il~ti~s ,~q ,ap,s~~\.Pf9~~ . , , SE:mce. . , So' i' 'J..d:5itio,pal services desired include: -\,' (1) ISSuing travelers checks at no service cost. (2) Providing assistanCe for foreign travelers, including visas, passports I health require.'rents, currency exchar.ge rate infor- nation, international airfare pricing, etc. (3) Providing incentives for the City IS prorrpt payrrent of invoices issued by the travel agency. (4) Arranging and neintaining access to national consortium systems" that provide hotel rates lower than coq:orate rates, discounts on first night stay and accE:.3s to IlblockedlL hotel rocrns. -2- (RFP No. 56-85 I I i (5) Providing 24 hour lost baggage assistance, including claims assistance and reimburserrent if bags are not located. (6) Arranging and maintaining airport leek boxes for ticket deli very, I. if applicable. . (7) Providing national 24 hour toll free telephone service. (8) Providing travel discounts to en;>loyees and family nant:ers not traveling on official City business. (9) Coordinating convention/conference planning to include all travel, lcdging, etc. arrangarents for conference( convention attendees and their families. (10) Arranging charter flights for group travel., (11) Providing free insUrance, e.g. travel, accident, etc., coverage. Sp;clfy types, coverage li.mi. ts, options, etc., and attach sarrple p:>licy. III. FORM ;'.NI) o:NTENI' OF THE PROPC>&>L: A. General: At the m.ini.rrn.In, the proposal must include: ,. (1) A description of the types of services the agency proposes to provide and the approach the agency will take to inplenent the system and ensure efficient operation and cost. A time fraIre, rrethod of billing/accounting, fonus and additional special services prof:Clsed should be included. (2) Evidence of the agency l s ATe authorization and its expertise and experience. A list of references (narres, addresses and telephone nurrbers of at . least three (3) firms) for which similar services are now l:eing' {:erforrred; professional affil- iations with major airlines, hotels, etc.; and a narrative , description of the major tYl;'€S of arrangerrents rrade by the . > , , , . . agencyshould.Ce. inclu:led. ,., .. . '\ . '1111""~~~'lc".,~.~.,t~., (3) A detailed profile of the agency. The number of enployees, the crest recent financial statenent, the number of years in business, the agency's h::rre office location or principal . \ place of b&iness, branch office locations, resunes of key rrenagerrent staff and those staff to be assigned to service the City account, computer capabilities, other system capabilities and any other ill~trative inforrration should 'De included. . \ , 1 ",\ (4) A clear staterrent with examples as to hew the agency I s services will result in cost curtai.l1ient or cost reduction in the City's total travel e>:pendi tures. (5) A description of costs, if any, that the city will te e.xpected to pay I for any of the proposed services, and the rrethod of pricing to be used. -3- (RFP No. 56-85 B. Scecific: , r-bre specific information relative to the following must also t:e " inclt.Xl.ed in the proposal: (a). ReservationslTicketing (1) I:escribe the airline or any other Computer reservation systems your agency utilizes. Include advantages your system(s) has over those of your carpeti tion. Be specific. (2) D:> you have a Urate sp;cialist" on your staff? What ,exactly > does the Ilrate specialistlt do? If not, why not? . (3) Will your agency guarantee the lcwest air fare at tirre of ticket issuance or pay the difference? If yes, explain the methods used to validate lowest air fare and the au::li ting procedures you have instituted to back up your fare guarantee. (4) For air fare adjustrrents (e.g., if prices go down after issuance of ticket) will you reissue at no charge? If not, why not? ,> (5) Is your agency capable and willing to service all City locations? If not, what locations do you proflOSe to service? Cescribe hCM delivery of tickets to each of the locations is to be handled. . Would there l:e daily delivery and would the schedule be flexible? How would arergency ticket deli very be handled? Would you deliver to traveler I 5 residence? (6) Would your agency deslgnate a person who would handle errerg- ency needs after working hours? Would you provide national toll free teleph::lDe service twenty-four hours per day, 365 days per year"? (7) Would your agency provide special rates for such things as hotels, motels, airport parking, car rentals, etc.? If yes; please describe in detail and l:e inclusive of any other special rates or diCX)unts related to travel (see attadment 1 to 'ce sul:mitted with proposal) . (b). ~aQelrent Rep:lrts (Subnit samples with your proposal: ) (1) Cefine the types of travel volurre and savings reports which your agency could generate and subnit on a m:nthly basis for each designated location. '\\ (2) Could you provide docure.ntation why lowest fare was not accept- able to too traveler? If not, why not? (3) Could you shCffl' nomal fare and any saVings resulting fran fare specials, alternate routings, 'etc.? If not, why not'? (4) Could you pr~vide reports by traveler nane on flights that would qualify for discount coup::ms, accumulated miles flown. etc? If not, why not? ' -4- (RFP No.. 56-85 ) (c) . Billina/Account:i,ng,: 1. Please indicate if your agency can provide the following information at the time of billing: - traveler narre - City depart:Iient . - City account number or depa.rt.rrent expense ccx:1e - route of the trip, Le., round trip or one way, include three- letter station designators - date of travel - an invoice number aI:1d date issued - air line ticket nurrber - if traveler refused least expensive air or lodying reservations - abili ty to separate personal charges frem a cc:mbined business- personal trip . I, 2. Define any advantages to the City if we elected to use a credit card prOJram (e.g., Arrerican. Express, Diner's Club, etc.). for payrrent of airline tickets only and any other benefits we derive fran a credit card program. What controls are available to prevent abuses? Will travel agency assume liability if abuses occur? (d) '. Non-City employees travelinq on official City business: Haw would you handle non-City errployees authorized to travel at City a~se on official City business, but whose'travel may originate either here or outside of this area, say Washington, D.C., California, etc.? For El$.snple, persons brought in to interview for City positions, consultants, etc. (e). Soecial Services: 1. ~t sp:cific ,t:erscnal services can your agency offer, e.g. access to airp::>rt VIP loungp.s, while traveler is enroute or at destination? 2. D::€s your agency publish sr;:ecial bulletins or newsletters on a regu1;:rr basis which contain helpful travel tips'? If so, incllrle sarrple~ 3. Cescrite the assistance, if any, you pro'\{ide for international travelers relative to visas, passports, health re:JUirerrents, currency exchange rates, location of l'om;rican embassies - and consulates. time zones, etc. '\ 4. Cescribe procedures for' processing claims for lost or stolen tickets, including baggage. s. HCM would you ccordinate group travel to take advantage of special fares, e.g., various professional societies where several s'taff rreml:ers are going to the sarre rreeting'? I' " " ,; 6. List any additional sp:cial servJ.ces which would be furnished by your finn to the City. Include any unique business features. or discounts your agency offers '.vhich you feel are different fran your competition. -5- , . {RFP No. 56-85 7. D=scribe procedures for naintaining personal and confider?tial infonration on frequent travelers. (f). Orientation/Implerrentation: 1., Is your agency willing to organize initial and ongoing orientation seminars at City locations so as to ensure a clear, . Imltual understanding of your travel services and to effect a srrooth i.n;>lesrentation of a travel program? ' 2. When could your agency begin providing services if your pro- p.jsal is accepted by the City? ~, 3. Will you need to hire rrore people? How rrany? (g). AaenCY's Quality Control: 1. r:efine procedures your agency will use to continually rronitor the quality of travel services. This would inclooe an inspection system covering all services to be perfonred and shall include a nethod for identifying and correcting deficiencies; such actions shall be expected to be a part of any managenent report. (h). Proprietary Infornation or Trade Secrets: 1. If any of the' infornation requested under Section III above is considered to be proprietary or a trade secret belonging to the proposer I that information should 1::e labeled and filed with the proposal form in a separate envelope appropriately designated. IV. EVALUATlOO AND SELEcrICN: '\1 (A). Proposals will be reviewed by a City Proposal Evaluation and Selection Coomittee which will use the following criteria as a guide: The travel agency's ability to reduce the City. 5 '~veraJ.I direct travel related costs and indirect administrative costs. The quality and range ot services the agency profX'ses to provide. . , The agency. 5 overall experience, expertise I stabili ty and financial responsibility. The experience and qualifications of the staff that will be assigned to service the City account. Th; agency.s cannitrrent and ability to provide service in an expedient and efficient manner. Facilities (corrputerized infomation systems, access to in- dustry facilities, quality and range of rranagerrent reports, etc.) that will be used in servicing, the City account. -6- '. , .. > 1~.~:.~:<~: .. . ',:r .:.~~:t ,I (RFP No. 56-85 " " ..,',.11.... : ~5 ~: " , .' j'.":: ':I (B). The City nay re:ruire an oral presentation of the. proposals . including an interview with key personnel. . ' (C) . In determining the successful' agency, the City Prop'sal Evaluation and Selection Carmittee nay visit the offices of any respondent to inspect facilities, revi~ established operating prOcedures and rreet personnel. ' ..' ;.~ 1: ,. ;'J .. .' . . }.... . ~(: ~:'.' !:~ ~.' . l~:: " ;'1/':,:. ~\~.~.: . [,t~;: : ~\:::. l~~ ~i,." , '.~ I: ' :~;.~.:' ~~ ?~';' ';.' ,.~I . ~ ' (D). The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to negotiate with any respondi.ng agency considered qualified or to rrake an award without further discussions. Notification of award to the selected agency will take place wi thin approximately 120 days after the due date set for receipt of proposals. ' ' . :. ,.~.~ , H "\ .' ,~, F' -1,' .. :....~,r <' , , ~ , '..' .. ~... ~.~ r;:; ...../q. . . .'. T'> ;~~~ '.. .; ;:;-,.' ~~; '. .::, i:':.~~~ui;. ,<, ~. ~ '. ~, .'.> "." ",I . \ .! : i'.'. ~:~ , "', .': . , <,' -;.,. ~ ~, " ';':< '. '~'~'~~"~ . ~. ' " . : ,{, ,I I ~', ", ,H)i " . ',\ .' . ~", ,J! . ~, -:; .,e '\ :! ,', 'I '....) , " " " " '\.t...~, 1\ -7- ;1 ' (RFP No. 56-85 a. Enter rates or discounts available fran rrajor hotel chains through your agency (See Section III - B (a) (7) as of proposed due date) : Narre Smqle Rate D:)Uble Rate or Discount fran standard Rates An"ericana Best Westem Fai.rnont Hotels Four Seasons Hilton Holiday Inn HOiJard Johnsons Hyatt Inter-Continental 11 Marriott Quality Inns Rarrada !lms Stouffer Hotels Travel Lodge Western International * oth.:ll" - List b. Enter Discounts fran standard car rental rates available through your agency (see section III - B(a) (7) as of pro~sal due date) : Hertz Avis . \ National Budget *other \ *.Enter Florida State Contract rates if different fran others. ~" :; r SUEMIT '!HIS FORM WI'IH YOUR PROrosAL . ) 'r ~ ~ . AttachrrEnt 1. -8- . r (RFP No. 56-85 Request For Proposal' , Proposal Response Form (RFP No. 56-85 ) 1. The undersigned hereby pro,poses to furnish travel rranag~.nt services under the ter:ms and conditions indicated in the RFP, for Travel M3.nagerrent Services for the City of Clea.n.rater. 2. Infonration requested by RFP is 'attached, including rate/discount sheet identified in RFP as Attachrent 1. It, " 3. In sutmi. tting this proposal J it is agreed that it may not be wi th:::irawn for I 120 days and it is understooj that the City reserves the right to waive infornalities and to reject any and all proposals, including proposals or m::clifications received" the tirre and date set for receipt of proposals. , ~ter 4. Attached hereto and made a part of this proposal is all the info.J:lTld.tion required by or req:uested in the prop:>sal except (exceptions identified , by' separate attachrrent). 5. The travel agency represented herein is a (sole proprietorship, corporation, licensed to do business in City/COunty of partnership) . Florida. The undersigned, has complied with the City of Clearwater Cccupational License Ordinance and all other local, state, and federal laws which may be applicable. 6. The undersigned, by affixing his signature to the Proposal response form, agrees to the following: "I certify that this proposal is made without previous understanding, agreerrent, or connection with any person, firm, or coq:oration rreki.ng a proposal for the sane items and is in all resI:€cts fair, without outside controlt COllusion, fraud, or otherwise illegal actionlt. BUSINESS NJ>..ME S'IREET ADDRESS CI'IY t STATEJ ZIP CODE PRINTED/!'YPED NJ!.ME OF AU'IIDR!ZED REPRESENI'ATIVE TITLE/fCSITION OF AlfIHORIZED REl?RESEN'T'..ATIVE .~) SIGNATURE OF AtJ'IH)RIZED REPRESENTATIVE , DATE SUENITI'ED TELEPIDl:>IE NO. . y~ -9- J I ' I ~ , ,< , . . CI'li' OF L1..EAI\\I/A'l'ER CENrnAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT TRAVEL MANAGEMENT SERVICES EVALUATIQ'J WORKSHEE.T . . "f Travel Agency - Evaluator - rn.ITERIA 'I I. Abili ty to Reduce Direct Ravel Related and Indirect Administrative Costs - (40 points) 1. Direct Travel Related Costs - a. Guranteed lowest airfares b. Nonitor airfares and reticket for 10\1er airfares c. Financial incentives (refunds, etc.) d., Access to discounted fares and' rates e. Expert, assistance in' negotiating special rates for hotels/rnotels, car rentals, etc. 4 4 4 4 4 4 f. Insurance included at no charge 2. Indirect Ac5rninistrati ve Costs a. Timely ticket delivery b. Single p:>int for travel scheduling, reservations and ticketing c. Electronic billing capabilities d. Frequency and quality of m3I1agerrent reports e. Travel management consultation/training f. National 24 hour toll free 'eIlergency telephone service 2 '3 '. 2 2 2 ,\ 2 3 g. Arranging travel for non-ci ty errployees on official City business II., SCQP=' and Quality of Services - (15 p:Jints) L Scop: and quality of minimum s~rvices required 2. Scope and quality of s~cial services 3. QuaE ty control procedures 5 5 5 ",', III. OVerall Exp2rience, Expertise, Stability and Financial Responsibility - (IS points) 1. ,1Nurnt€r of years in business 2. a. Dq:erience in servicing large co:urercial/ coq:orate accOunts, b. ExT~rience in 'servicing Cities of oo~parable size I " , . . J o. .. . 3. Current financial status/stability 4. E>.p::;!cicnc...-e and expertise of topmanagenent 3 4 " ; j DI. Experience and Qualifications of Staff Assigned to Service City Account - (S points) 5 , V. Agency's Cannibrent and Ability to Provide service in an Expedient and Efficient Manner - (15 };X)ints) 1. Staffing pattern and levels pro};X)sed 2 2. Service acCess (noml business, hours and after 2 nomel business hdurs) IJ 3. Client list/references 1 4. Creativity and innovati'/eness in business approach 3 . (ability to respond to in~ust.ry changes resulting from deregulation) S. Resources corrmi tted to improved systems and service 2 " 6. CUrrent or proposed locations of offices servicing 2 City account 7. Ticket delivery (frequency and point of delive,ry) 1 8. Renore ti,cketing 1 9. Jdr:p::>rt lock b::lxes' 1 \l VI. Facilities (computerized infornatipn systems, acCess to industry facilities, quality and range of rranagerrent rer:orts, etc.) that will 1:>e used in servicing the City account - (10 points) L Number and adequacy of reservations systems used 5 2. In-house cOITy?uter systems 5 " RECAP Criteria ' ) I II ' \\ III D1 V VI Total \ Weiqhted Total 'I j; ~ !: fi\Th'WfYlld-W~ 'O::f)I * TRAVEL AGENCY .tz ST. PETERSBURG MOTOR CLUB CLUB HEADQUARTERS 1211 FIRST AVE. N./P. O.BOX t3368 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORtDA 33733 PHONE 813/823-1211 ,. i r ! 1 TELEX: 523Q06 EmlJ CABLE: AAASTPETE 1..':"'- 'I' _ .-7!iI.-~. T .............~ T .Ll.......-y ~-- -_..--~ .io...-~ ..} August 1 ~ 1985 Ms. Jackie Sulek Purchasing Department City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Cl earwater, FL 335.18 'I J RE: Travel Management Services. RFP 56-85 . . Dear Jacki e: With reference to our telephone conversation yesterday and our letter of July 3, 1985 regarding AAA benefits for City of Clearwater employees and family members, we would like to clarify the following: '11 All of the AAA benefits listed on page one of our letter will be provided and are available for all City of Clearwater employees and family members traveling on official busines~. 2. All of the AAA benefits listed on page one will be providedifor all City of Clearwater employees and family members and are available for these official travelers and family members when booking personal trips.'~ ' "i 1. .. 3. The AAA benefits listed on page one will be provided and are available to all other City of Clearwater employees and family members, for personal travel, with the exception of: * Exclusive discounted airport parking of $2.50 per day at Thrifty Rent-A-Car. Free Passport Photos. * \, continued '"'\j ,..7",_ AAA Building 2170 Rainbow Dr. e ledrwilti:r. FL 3357S ~r'm Harbor Branch 314Q U. 5.19 N. Clearwater, FL 33575 Seminoh:: Building 9200 Seminole Blvd. Seminole, FL 33541 , ,~'.:~: '., .~~\ Page ~ Jack;~ Sulek 8/1/85 An airline ticket or cruise/to~r must be purchased for personal travel from AAA to obtain the' benefits listed. City of Clear\'1ater 'employees,and family members would not'be entitl'ed't~ these beriefit~ if persohal travel was~purchased .from another travel' agency. , .. I Please advise me'if you or Mr; Petersen ~ould like m~ to be present at the Council meeting to respond to any question5when your recommendation is presented. ;, Sicy:ncerelY~ /i ,01 .::.-r2 '. (1 ) "" ,/, l~ . I ,,;,., /l / . .,!...\.CtL((.. ,......:,. '" ~., . / Vivian E. Perry, Director Business Travel Department J ,. J. VEP: deb . ; cc: Finley B: Myers, J~. 'I . . ...... .' "," t. . " '\ . " '. " '':\) .J " i. \ () ':-II \i:, Iv r. :11 . . ,'I . . '15?n\)t~/M/~-Pt/tae .\Qj/' ~- TRAVEL AGEUCY b ST. PETERSBURG MOTOR CLUB ~- . ....---- ,.. CLUB HEADQUARTERS 1211 FIRST AVE. N. I P. O. BOX 13365 . ST. PETERSBURG, flORIDA 33733 . , PHONE 813/823.1211 THEX: 52340e ~"(~STr\ . . -<-=:.- CABLE; AAASTPETE ,. July 3, 1985 Mr. Donald Petersen Purchas; n9 Off; cer " City of Clean...ater . P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33518 'RE: Travel Management Services RFP 56-85 Dear Mr. Petersen: I) Thank you for your letter of June 19, 1985. In response to your inquiry we would like to clarify the following: 'i GZ)_AAA Benefits for City of Clearwater Officials, Frequent Travelers and Executiv~ Secretaries Include: * No Fee Traveler's Checks, choice of American Express or C it i corp. * Free Passport Photos. * International Driver's License at member cost. * Purchase of Savings for mernbers items at members cost. These items include but are not limited to, discounted luggage, auto travel items, and discounted attraction tickets. Assistance in the issuance of passports and visas. 'i<' Auto Travel information including Triptiks, t~aps an"dl Tour Books. * * Di scounted Limo Ti cket s. . * Exclusive discounted airport parking of $2.50 per day at Thrifty Rent-A-Car. ~ All of the above benefits are contained in our proposal of May 1, 1985. continued f.AA OI,llI\Jin\l ~1 70 n,,;"huw Dr, Ct. '1I\".wr, f l 33~ 15 Sl'NlulOle [lqnch 'Jooa SL'n,nnl(, Olyd. ~(',,,,"al,,, r L 33542 1'.11''1 HJ,hul a'auch 3144 U.S. 19 N Cl"al...~l"', Fl 33515 BrurlCh ollices in all t.~ilnl B,olht'u Slo.es in PinpllJI COU'11V / Page 2 r'lr. PetQrsen July' 3. 1985 .j @-Limitat i ~ t AAA would provide a~l of these benefits without placing a limit for the number of requests provided the requests are reasonable and unusually 1 arge number of Inaps. tour books, and tri pt i ks are not requi red. ;1 1. Advise an AAA dedicated business travel counselor the day, approximate time, location and service required. " AAA will advise the manaoer of that location to enable us to expedite your requests. 2. 3. Pr~sent official identification as an employee of the City of~Clearwater to the receptionist who will th~n direct you to the proper person to process your request. p , @- AAA Benefits for City of Clearwater Employees and Families lnclude: .J * A special discounted pilot program will be offered to City of C1 earwater employees \'/ai vi n9 the entrance fee for ne..., t'1aster memberships in the St. Petersburg 11otor Club. A savings of 58.00 per Master membership would be provided. One month in 1986 \'lOuld be selected and each employee joining as a t~aster member during the specified month would save the $8.00 entrance fee. Enclosed is a membership kit which details all of the benefits of a St. Petersburg Motor Club membership. * Special discounted vacation offerings will be offered at member' savings or at b~low the regular rate on a quart~rly basis to City employees and faif,il i es. AAA w~ul d produce brochures and' flyers at no cost to the City of Clearwater to promote the offerings working in concert with the Personnel/Human Resource D!:p ar tllle nt. . (f) - L imitution - - Ilone "cont; nued . . . , : "\,oiJ f ., ". . . . I. t> ~\' f,'"' I, ..< : ~ I -, i ,,~~ . , <' ,>;'{l~ 'Page 3 r~r. Pelersen Juiy 3, 1985 Procedure ,.. @..Booki ng procedure and deposit deadli nes wi ".. be detail ed wi th each vacation 9ffering. " I, ',\ If you need ~ny additional clarification,pleai~ contact me at 823-1211, ext. 2275~ We sincerelyw~nt your busin~ss and look forward to a favorable communication from you'. ,~ ' .Sincerely, " ) . -'~ rf.~ Di r,ec"tor , Depart,ment ", '1 Vi vi an E Perry, _ Bus i ness Travel . , ...... VEP:deb -.,1 E,ne 1 osure cc: Finley B. :~yers't Jr. I,' ". " ...;: , . .j. .1 ,) .,. 'I . " - . .'1 '~ '. ., \, ".F; " 111 f''''\ . !I .! ;l .. . .' . ~ ., . ~..<-. .... "'.._ '~'-.~T..~~ . Jo~i""-."""'~'r.' \, --. - '(. Agenda No. Meeting Date: Au ust 15 MEMORANDUM TO: :E'LD--I The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMIT FEE ADJUSTMENTS RE'COM MENDATION~ Approve the attached Building Permit Fee Schedule and conduct first rcnding. liJ And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUN D: The proposed Building Inspection Department budget for FY 85/86 is $909,745. The approval of the proposed Land Development Code would ~educo this de- partment's budget by approximately $90,000. The two Zoning Enforcement Officers and the Sign Inspector will be assigned to the Planning Department under the Land Development Code. The Building Inspection Department's total proposed budget would then be $819,745. Revenues for the current fiscal year are anticipated to be $530,000. If economic conditions remain con- stant the present revenue projections would cause a deficit of $2891745. in the coming fiscal year. ' The attached proposed fee schedule would generate an additional: I ~ (1) $24,948. in single family resident construction; (2) 36,480. in multi-family construction; (3) 5?,632. in commercial construction; (4) 107,088. in plan examination fees; (5) 68,597. in other permits or a total of $289,745. Adoption of this proposed fee schedule would make the Building Inspection Department self-supporting during the fiscal year 1985/1986. .'. \, Commission Dispo~itjon: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: o Affected Parties Notified of Meeting .Attachments: Present .Ordinance Proposed'Ordinanc City Manager Paper: Costs: N/A Funding Source:; o Capital Improve- ment Budget o Operating Budget o Other Dote: o Not Required Ea:Not Required Date a Sequential Reference Originating Departmen t: Building Inspection o None \, Appropr,latjan Code . \\ ; ":;'~ .' ~ J; ~ ........ .' BUILDING AND ZONING REGULATIONS ~ 133.07 ( , Sec. 133.04. SuppIcmentnry nlles nnd rcgulntlons. (a) The city enlpncer is hert.!by authorized to promulgate rules and regulations not in connict with this chapter for the purposes of providing for standards. plan specifications,. practical resolving of conflicting provisions, and providing for the application and supplemen. tation of the provisions of the Standard Buildi ng Code. The rules and regulat;ons promulgated ht!reunder by the city engineer shall have the Same force and effect nnd shall be enforced the same as the provisions of such code. (h) [f the provisions of the Standard Building' Code arc not adequate to completely prescribe the manner of construction or the design or construction procedure of any structure whatsoever, the struct'lre design or procedure shall be made or accomplished according to specific rules, regulations, plans or specifications therefor, set out by the city engineer under _. the authority conveyed upon him under subsection (a). (Code 1962, B 7.3, 7-4) c Sec. 133.05. Fire district. All property located .....ithin the corporate limits of the city shall be within the fire district; provided, however. that propert)' desib"'llated for use as single.family or duplex dwellings in the zoning codes of the city shall be outside the fire district. All property subsequently annexed to the city shall automatically be within the fire district; provided, however, that all such annexed property which is zoned for .single.family or duplex uses shall be outside the fire . district. Within this section, the term "lire district" shall mean all property and uses located within the corporate limits of the city as presently shown on maps located in) the city ~ngineer's office, including property and uses added by annexation. Property located within the corporate limits and de\'oted to a single-family or duplex use shall not be included in the tire district. (Code 1962, S 9.8; Ord. No. 3114, B 1,2, 7-7.83) Cross reference-Fire prevention and protection, Ch. 93. (' Sec. 133.07. Permit fees and miscellaneous charges. (a) In the case of reviews, inspections an::! similar activities associated with building and related codes not requiring a combination permit, the following schedule of fees shall control: "r , ) Sec. 133.06. Minimum floor elevation. . (a) The minimum floor elevation for buildings constructed after February 3, 1975, in the city shall be either one foot above the crOWn of the pavement abutting the building site. or in the event of unusual building conditions or a major development, as directed by the city engineer. (b) The building director is hereby designated requirement. (Code 1962, ~ 7-11) , ,Cross reference-Flood protection, Ch. 142. ~I and authorized to cnforce this ,. 1\ Description of Seruice Pee or Charge \.. Building pennit fee estimate. . . . . . . . . . . . .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25.00 Consult3tion or special service fee (multifamilj' and commc~cial only) . . . . . . . . . .. 50.00 Supp.No. 13 J209 .,'\\ " , \ "" .' ~>~'.:'~\~ ~ ~', . ~: ~ : , ,.'l 'l ", j BUILDING AND ZONING REGULATIONS ~ 133.07:,,', 'I il'~. " ." ,\ ":'.' I~ ."j i' I Description of S cnJiCf! Fee or Charge $501.00-$25,000.00:'. . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . .. ,25.00 Rcinspection (red lng): Building.. . II... . . . . . .. ill II II ill . ill ... . .. . . . . . . .. . .. .. .. . II ..... . . . .. .. .. . . .. .. . . ". ~ . . . .. .. < 10,,00 Electrical .... t . .. ... .. .' I .. .. ... .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. ill . . II .. .. .. .. ,j, , .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . ill ill . '. . .. .. . .. .. 10.00 , Plumbing ........... Ii- . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . .. .. . II .. II- . .. .. .. II .. .. .. . Ii- .. .. .. III III . . . . . .. .. . .. . .. . 10..00 1+-iechnnic:nl . . '. . .. . ... . . . .. . , . .. . . .. .. .. II Ii- .. , .. , .. II .. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. oil ill .. ill II II .. .. .. . . .. .. . .... 10...00 Electricnl permit: Single.family nnd duplex (per living unit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1lultifa.mily and commercial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plumbing permit: Single.family and duplex (per living unit) . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . Multifamily and commercial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'i, Mechanical permit: 10.00 50.00 10.00 50.00 ( \ . Single.family and duplex (per living unit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Multifamily and commercial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . Work commencing prior to issuance of..a permit will be assessed a triple fce. All permit fees not listed above will be based on building valuation. Valuation shall ' be based upon the most recent values published by the Southern Building Code Congress International, Inc. Where such values are not published for a given use ~r type of construe. tion, a copy of the duly executed contract may be required at the discretion of the building official. 10.00 50.00 (b) In the case of any new building or structure. or any addition or alteration to a new building or structure. the fee for a combination permit shall be ~nsed on the value of the completed structure or on the subcontractor disciplines involved, or, in the case of alterations, the cost of such alterations. The 'dollar amount of such fee shall be as follows: Value of Building or Structure S'500.00 and under $501.00 to $25,000,00 (Computed depending on which of the four (4) disciplines listed herein are involved.) Building Permit Fee '\ $10.00 Building permit: $25.00 Electrical permit: $25.00 Plumbing permit: $25.00 Mechanical permit: $25.00 $4.00 per $1,000.00 of value or fraction there- of. Plus plan check fee. i' $1,000.00 per first $250,000.00 plusl$3.00 per I $1.000.00 of value or fraction thereof. Plus plan check fee. ;) Ii (", $25,001.00 to 5250,000.00 $250,001.00 to $500,000,00 I "-- Supp. No. 13 1211 ,~ { ~~: Description of Service Fce or Charge $1,750.00 per first $500,000.00 plus $2.00 per $1,000.00 of value or fraction thereof. Plus plnn check fee; $2,250.00 per first $750,000.00 plus $1.00 per $1,000.00 of value or frnction thereof. Plus plan check fee. m Where no fe~ is staled in the llbove table, the same shall not be interpmted as an J intention to waive nny requirement for a permit. that may be stated elsewhere in the Code of the city. CLEAH\VATER CODE ~ 133,07 c'" $500,001.00 to $750,000.00 .. (- '. I, Over $750,000.00 1) (2) Prior to slarling any electrical, plumbing, mechanical, roofing or other subcontractor work permitted as part of a combination permit, the contractor or subcontractor engaged to do the wnrk shall file with the building inspection department on a form provided for that purpose by lhe department, a form showing the name of the contractor or firm doing the work, the contractor's certification number, the contrac- tor's Clearwater occupational license number or occupational license registration number, the number of the combination permit, the address where the work is t~ be done, and any other related information required by the building inspection depart- ment. Failure to Iile such form shall be just cause for refusal of inspection services by the building inspection department. (3) Demolition permits shall be issued at the fee set forth in the above table. However, no fee shall be required where a demolition is ordered by the city or where the building or structure has been declared a hazard to public health, safety or welfnre by the building director. (Code 1962, ~ 7.5; Ord. No. 3052, ~ 1,4-21-83; Ord. No, 3222, ~ 2, 10.6-83) c- Sec. 133.071. Definitions. "Combination permit" shall mean n permit for construction, including any or all of the privileges, conditions and restrictions of n building permit, electrical permit, plumbing per. mit, mechanical permit and any other type of permit covering work for which proper approval has been granted by the city and for which proper fees have been paid. <Ord. No. 3222, 9 3, 10-6.83) See. 133.08. Development impact lees. (a) For all new buildings and structures, the applicant shaH at t.he time the building permit is issued pay n development impact fee as foHows: (1) New residential structures: Single-family, apartment, condominium or mobile home, per uni~, two hUl.'I,dred and fifty doJla.rs ($250.00)~ (2) New commercial structures: Two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) for each two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of floor area or fraction thereof. . \ . , \:..1 , ) ,-, ' Supp. NQ. 13 1212 ,. -.... " ORDINANCE NO. 4027-85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 133, BUILDING CODE, OF TITLE XI, BUILDING AND ZONING REGULATIONS1 OF THE CODE OF " ORDINANCES, CITY OF CLEARWATEU, BY REPEALING SEGrrON 133.07, PERMIT FEES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES, AND ENAGrING A NEW SECTION 133.07, PERMIT FEES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES, TO SET FORTH NEW SCHEDULE OF SUCH FEES AND CHARGES; AMENDING THE DEFINITION FOR COMBINATION PERMIT; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE CODE IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR THE SEPARABILITY OF THE PROVISIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act (LGCPA) requires that all development t'egulations and amendments thereto related to an adopted comprehensive plan or element thereof be reviewed by the Local Planning Agency (LPA) for conformance with plans adopted pursuant to the LGCPA; and .WHEREAS, the PineHas County Planning Council (PCPC) has been designated the Local Planning Agency for Pinellas County and the P CPC has adopted guidelines with reference to each required referral process; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been referred to and conside~ed by the PCP C under said process; and WHEREAS, study of building permit and building permit related revenues demonstrates that the fees the City of Clearwater presently charge do not cover current costs; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to bring such charges into line with current !;lractice in order that such charges reflect more accurately current costs; NOWt THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY CO MMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEAR WATER, FLORIDA: Section 1. That present Se~tion 133.07, Permit Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, of Chapter 133, Building Code, of Title XI, Building and Zoning Regulations, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, be and the same is hereby repealed. Section 2. That new Section 133.07, Permit Fees and Miscellaneous , I Charges, of Chapter 133, Building Code, of Title XI, Building and Zoning Regulations, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, be and the same is hereby enacted to reud as follows: ~ .- Sec. 133.07. Permit fees and miscellaneous charges. (a) In the case of reviews, inspections and similar activi ties associated with building and related codes not requiring a combination permit, the following schedule of fees shall control: " . ': - 1 - ~ .; .:.: .". ~.,::?;; . .. ~~ ~~ Description of Service Building Permit Fee Estimate Consultation or Special Service Fee, per hour Plans Examination Fee, 50% of Permit Fee Plan Amendment (Change), per hour Mobile Office, Construction Trailer~ Sales Trailer, etc. Building Permit (Tiedown ~ Site Placement) Electrical Permit Plumbing Permit Mechanical Permit " Fee or Charsrn $25.00 $50.00 MobUe Home Move-In . Building Permit ('I'iedown &. Site Placement) Electrical Permit Plumbing Permit Mechanical Permit $50.00. $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 " $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 " $2 5.00 $50.00 (I Tent Permit Demolition Permit Plus $.05 per square foot in excess of 1,000 square feet (No fee charged when demolition is ordered by City) House Move Application $5 0.00 $40.00 $40.00 House Move Permit Solar Heater Plus $5.00 per each panel in excess of ,two Fence Permit Plus $.05 per linear foot . $15.00 Swimming Pool Permit $80.00 $60.00 $25.00 Spa Permit Lawn Sprinkler Permit, if on City water Plus $.10 per sprinkler head Certificate of Occupancy (Fee,to be collected at permit issuance) Single-F amiy and Duplex Residence, per uni t Multi-Family and Commercial Reinspection (red tag) Building Electrical Plumbing Mechanical $10.00 $25.00 $25.00 $7.5.00 , $25.00 $25.00 . ~ :. ~ . + '. . Electrical Permit Residential, Hotel, Motel, per uni t Commercial, per unit $25.00 $50.00 Plumbing Permit Residential, Hotel, Motel, per unit Com mercial, per Wli t Mechanical Permit Residential, Hotel, Motel, per uni t Com mercial, per unit Work commencing prior to issuance of a permit will be assessed a triple fee. $25.00 $50.00 $25.00 $50.00 All permits not listed above will be based on building valuation. Valuation shall be based upon the most recent values published by the Southern Building Code Congress International, Inc. Where such values are not published for a given use or type of construction, a copy of the duly executed contract may be required at the discretion of the building official. -2- .... - , . (b) In cnse of any building or structure, or any addition or alteration to n building or structure, the fee for a combination permit shall be based on the value of the completed structure or on the subcontractor dlsciplln~ involved, or in the case of altemtions, the cost of such alterations. The dollar amount of such fee shall be os follows: Value of BuUdin/?: or Structure $500 and under $501 to $5,000 $5,001 to $15,000 $15,001 to $25,000 $25,001 to $250,000 Buildin~ Permit Fee $2 5.00 $5 O. 00 $75.00 $100.00 $5.00 per $1,000 of value or fraction thereof $250,001 to $500,000 $1,250.00 per first $250,000 of value plus $4.00 per $1,000 of value or fraction thereof ' $500,001 to $750,000 $2,250.00 per first $500,000 of value plus $3.00 per $1,000 of value or fraction thereof $750,001 and over $3,000.00 per first $750,000 of value plus $2.00 per $1,000 of value or fraction thereof (1) Where no fee is stated in the above table, the same shall not be interpreted as an intention to waive any requirement for a permit that may be stated elsewhere in the Code of the City of Clearwater. (2) Prior to starting any electrical, plumbing, mechanical, roofing or other subscontractor work permitted as part of a combination permit, the contractor or subcontractor engaged to do the work shall file with the Building Inspection Department on a form provided for that purpose by the Department, a form showing the name of the contractor or firm doing the work the contractor's certification number, the contractor's Clearwater occupational license number or occupational license registration number, the number of the combination permit, the address where the work is to be done, and any other related information required by the Building Inspection Department. F allure to file such form shall be just cause of refusal of inspection services by the Building'Inspection Department. (3) Demolition permits shall be issued at the fee set forth in the above table. However, no fee shall be required where a demolition is ordered by the City of Clearwater or where the building or structure has been declared a hazard to public health, safety 0';" welfare b~ the Building Director. Section 3. That Section 133.071, Definitions, of Chapter 133t Building I Code, of Title XI; Building and Zoning Regulations, of the Code of Ordinances, City of . '\ Clearwater, be and the same is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 133.071. Definitions. IICombination permit" shall mean a permit for construction; -ineittdiflg ,8HY 6f' all of tHe privileges, conditions and restrictions of abuilding permit, electrical permit, plumbing permit, and mechanical permit alia aflY 6t:her type of pet"mH eovemg work for which proper approval has been granted by the city and for which proper fees have been ;?aid. - 3 - ---. . \ :, .' ~. .: " ~"c ";, '~: ~ ~{.;{;~;~~j '.. T' Oft .. . 'i~. Section 4. The City of Clearwater does hereby certify that the measur~ contained in this o.rdlnance are consistent and in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and individual elements thereof adopted pursuant to the LGCPA and directs that same be forwarded to the LPA for their receipt and appropriate nction. Section 5. Should any part or provision of this ordinance be declar~d by a . court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not aCfect the validity of the ordinance as a. whole, or any part thereof other than the par,t declared to'be invalid. Section 6. Notice of the proposed enactment of this ordinance has been, properly advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with Section 166.041, Florida Statutes. Section 7. The provisions of this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage. " PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED " Mayor-Com missioner Attest: City Clerk '1\ ',I.') ,\ 1\ ,\ .'"\> \ - 4 - :\ " ~. ~. :I { I "';~' 4-9 MEfVl0RANDUM TO: The City Com mission SUBJECT: Agenda No. Meeting Dote: 8/15/85 --PD .-- I of the City of Clearwater MUNICIPAL POLICE OFFICERS SUPPLEMENTARY PENSION PLAN , RECOMMENDATION: Repeal the present Police Supplementary Pension Plan and enact the Proposed Police Supplementary Pension Plan. ! rii1 And that the.appropria1e officials be authorized 10 ex.ecute same. BACKGROUN 0: The present Police Supplementary Pension Plan has been in effect since 1959. Retirement benefits are ,determined based on salary, years of service, and mainly age. Under the present plan~ two (2) officers with equal salaries and years service, but of different ages, will not receive the same amount of benefits. The older officer would receive considerably more benefits at retir.ement than would the younger one. Under the Proponed Supplementary Pension Plan, which has been approved by the State of Florida and overwhelmingly by the affected police officers with a vote of 123 for the change to 4 against the change, two {2} officers with equal years service would receive an equal amount, regardless of ,salary and age. The trustees of the Police Supplementary Pension Plan and the affected officers feel the Proposed Plan is much more equitable. Neither plan is contributory by either the employee or the Ci~y. I ' Commission Disposition: Fol low -up t..ction: 1 Submitted by: .', .:'....... ~... :;':':':>I~.,..,..~:r- Costs. N/A Funding Source: O:)C a pile i r m provc- ment Budqet o Opera~ing Budget o Other }gA t tachments: } Proposed Ordinance ) Correspon- dence from State of Flor- ida t>tunicipal Retirement ", TJ;.ust Fund U None Advertised: OAffected Parties Notified of Mee1inq Dole: City Manager Poper; o Not Required ~Jt~ot Required Dote 8SequcnticI Re f eren ce Odgina t ing Oepar tmen t: Police Department Appro pric t ion Code \\ '\ " onmNANCE NO. 4041-8G AN ORlJINANCE OF TIlE Cn'YOF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, TO REPEAL A RTICLE V, POLICE PENSION! OF CHAPTER 26, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, OF TITLE II, ADMINLl)TRA'rION" OF CODE JOF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CLEARWATER, AND ENACT NEW A RTICI..E V. POLICE PENSION, TO PROVIDE Fon l\'lUNlcrrAL POLICE OFFICE US' PENSIOt\ PLAN IN ACCOltDANCE WITH CHAPTER 185, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR THE . T\10DlFICATION OF A POLICE OFFICEHS PENSION FUND; PHO\'IO[}lG THAT ALL f\10NEYS RECEIVED I3Y THE Crl'Y OF CLEAHWATER UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 185, FLOHIDA STATUTES, BE PAID INTO SAID FUN 0; CREA:l'ING A 130ARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE ADi\nNISTRATION OF SAID FUND; P ROVIDL'i G FOR MEANS OF CREDITIN G ACCU:\l ULA TED FUN DS TO THE ACCOUNTS OF IN DlVIDUAL POLICE OFFICERS; PROVIDING FOR DISBURSEMENTS AN D PA YMEN1' OF BENEFITS FRO~1 SAID FUND; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; , PROVIDING FOR THE SEPARABn..rry OF THE PROVISIONS HEREOF; PR0VIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENAGr:'I'iENT; AND PROVIDING FaIt THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE. . .,.:"::\~:?l~ ; , WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater has adopted Section 26.65 providing for the levy of 1 % tax on premiums for casualty insurance 11$ ,permitted by Chai?t~:- 185, Florida Statute5, which ordinance is currently in effect; and WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater is desirous of modifying certain pension benefits for police officers under the':\1unicipal Police Officerst Pension Trust Fund as ~rovided'for in Chapter 185, Florida Statutes! NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLOIUDA: / Section 1.' The purpose of this ordinance is to implement the provisions of Chapter 185, Florida Statutes, nnd to provide means whereby all sworn full-time police 'officers of the City of Clearwater, Florida, may receive benefits from the funds . provided for that purpose by Chapter 185, Florida Statutes. This ordinance shall be deemed to sup~lement any other pension plan of the City of Clearwater ill50far as benefits of police of,ficers are concerned; and nothing herein shall be construed in: any way to affect the operation of benefits of any other pension plan of the City of Clearwnter. ) Section 2. Article V t Police Pension, 'of Chapter 26, Employee Benefits, of "\) Title I~ Administration, of the Code of Ordinances, City or' Clearwater'is heretw , ,. \ repealed in its entirety and the following new~frticle V, Police Pension, is hereby enacted to read as [oilo.,','s: - 1 - )1 ;( ., , . d . J . ;. ""L : \ ,.:. ~ . , ,\H'l'ICLE V, POLICE PENSION Division 1. In GCl1crnl Sec. 26.65. Excise tax on cusunlty insurers. (a) In nddition to anv other lawful license or excise tax noW levied by the city, un excise or license tux is n!'iSeR"ied und imposed on every insurance compnny, corporation or other insurer now engaged ,in or carrying on, or who shulll1crcaflcr engage in or carryon, the business of cnsU!llty insuring w; shown by the records of the slate trcnsur'3r in his capacity of 1ilule insurance com missloncl', in the amount of one (i) per cent of the gross amount of receipts of premiums from policyholdel's on all premiums collected on cnsualty insurance policies covering property ,wi thin the corporate- limits of the city. f J' (b) The excise or license tux herein provided for shall be payable and collected in the manner provided for by F.S. eh. 185. (c) All moneys received by the city under the provisions of this section shall be paid immediately into its pension fund; provided, however, such moneys received hereunder shall be kept separate and apart from the other moneys of the pension fund, and the moneys received hareunder shull be used solely for the payment of am ounts to bacome due policemen and their dependents and to no other person under the provisions of law governing pensions within the city. .~ ,I .! Sec. 26.70. Defini tions. , Tl)e following words and phrases as used in this division shall have the following meanings, unless a different meaning is plainly required by the context: :raoard" shall mean the Board of Trustees of the ClearvJater Police 0 ffieers' Pension Trust Fund as provided for herein. "City" shall mean the City of Clearwater, Florida. 'Tolice Officer" shall mean all sworn members of the Police Department who are regularly employed by the City of Clearwater and shall be deemed Police Officers for the purpose of this ordinance. The words "Police Officer" shall sDecificall\' exclude ItPolice Recruitl1 and any other employee of the Pollee Department not employed full- time as a sworn law enforcement officer, or who is not a member of a pension plan authorized in accordance with F.S. eh. 185. 'I "Pension Trust Fund" shall mean the Clear'Nater Police Officers' Fund as provide for herein. rrparticipantlt shall mean every poltce officer of the City of . Clearwater eligible to have moneys credited to his or her share account and to receive benefits therefrom under this ordinance. I . 'Servicell shall mean all time served as n regularly appointed or employed police officer of the City of Clearwater for which regular compensation is paid by the City of Clearwater llnd all time during which a participant is on military leave in active military service and, subject to the application of F.S. 115 (1983). It shall include all leaves ,of absence with pay, but shall not include leaves of absence during which no regular compensation is paid by the City of Clearwater, except military service leave as herein provided. "Fiscal Yearl1 shnll mean that period from September 17th to the following September 16th, both dates inclusive., . \", "Net Creditlt shall mean the amount standing to the credit of a participant's share uc({ount as at the end of th~ preceding fiscal yeru'. .- 2 - '; , Sec.26.71. Entitlement; Allocation. (0) Each pl1rlicipont shull be enti tied to one shnre in the fund for cnch full ycar or service as a police officer of the city rendered before nnd/or ufter the pnssage of this ordinance os of September 17. Promptly after passage of this ordinance the number of full your's of servlcc rendered by euch participant sholl be determined nnd n record thereof shull be mode on the participant's service record nnd the participant shulI thereupon hove as many shares os full years rendered, and thereafter ench full fiscal year of service lIS defined in section 26.70 hereof sholl add one more share to the credi t of eocll participant. (b) The total moneys received, including interest eorned, any gifts and the credits forfeited by the participants, all of which constitute income to the fund during each fiscnl year, shell be allocated and the value of the respective participant's shares shall be determined as follows: .! (1) The board shall pay all costs and expenses of manllgement and operation for the fiscal year lost ended. (2) The board shall set aside as much of the income as it considers advisable as a reserve for expenses for the then current fiscal year. . , (3) .\fter deducting the moneys called for in paragraphs (1) and (2), the remaining moneys shall be allocated and credited to the s}1are accounts of the respective participants. The number of shares to which each and every participant is enti tled as at the close of each fiscal year shall be added together and the total number of shares thus determined shall be divided into the net amount of money available to be allocated and credited to the respective share accounts. The amount to be creditec' to the account of each participant will then be obtained by multIplying the value determined for one (1) share by the total number of shares to which each participant is entitled. As soon as the moneys are received, the value of each participant's share shall be calculated and credited to his share account. Such calculation shall be made and credits allocated to his share account one only in each fiscal year; and prorations shall not be made for a part of the year. Sec. 26.72. Board of trustees - created. There is hereby created a Board of Trustees of the Supplementary Police Officers' Retirement Fund. The Board of Trustees shall consist of the l\lavor-Commissioner and the Chief of Police of the City, two (2) reguiarly employed police officers of the City to be appointed by the City Commission upon the recommendation of a majority of the l'egularly employed police officers of the City, and one resident of the City, to be appointed by a majority of the trustees. The Mayor-Commissioner and Chief of Police, respectively, and upon a vacancy in the offices of iHayor- Com missioner or Chief of Police, their respective succeS)ors shall succeed to the posi tions of trustees. Each police officer member of the Board of Trustees shall serve for a period of two (2) years, unless he sooner leaves the employment of the City as a police officer, whereupon the legislative body of the City, upon a recommendation of a majority of the participant police, officers there, shall choose his successor. The resident members shall serve for a period of two (2) years. The two (2) police officers and the resident 'members may '\\ I, - 3 - ., }. ~~;'~l~:(~~~; . . . ~ . .' succeed themselves in office und shnll continue to serve until the Slleeessors ore duly nppointcd tmd quolified, The :\1oyor- Com missioner shall be the Chairman of tho J30nrd of Trustees. The board members sl\0.11 elect anyone (1) of its members os secretary of the board. The secretory sholl keep u complete minute book of the proceedings of the bonrd. '1'he trustees shnll not receive nny compensation us such. Sec. 26.73. Power and authority of Boord of TMJStccs. The Board of Trustees shall have power and authority us follows: To invest and reinvest the assets ofJhc pension fund in: (1) '1'ime or savings accounts of a notional bank, 0 state bank insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or a savings, building' and 10lln association insured by the F edoral Sa vings and Loan Insurance Corporation; (2) Obligations of the United States Treasury and agencies allied with or r,clatcd to the United States Treasury; (3) County bonds containing a pledge of the full faith and credit of the county involved, bonds of the State Development Commission, or of any other state agency, which he. ve been approved as to legal and fiscal sufficiency by the State Board of Adminstration; (4) . Obligations 01' any municipal authority issued pursuant to the laws of this state; provided, however, that for each of the five (5) years ne:o.'t preceding the date of investment the income of such authority available for fixed charges shall have been not less than one and one-half (1-1/2) tim es its average annual fixed charge requirements over the life of its obligations; (5) Com mon stocks, preferred stocks and bonds and other evidence of indebtedness issued or guaranteed by a corl?oration organized under the laws of the Urn ted States, any state, or organized territory of the United States or the District of Columbia or any corporation international in charter engaged in international business and trade, provided: ). ,";. ,i'( 1 a. .The corporation is listed on anyone or mot',e of the recognized national stock, exchanges; '1) b. All corporate bonds shall carry at least an AA rating as established either by Standard &: Poorls or l\1oodyls; '\ c. The BOEJ'd of Trustees shall not invest more than three (3) per cent of its assets in the common stock or capital stock of anyone issuing company nor shall, the aggreg,ate investment 6n anyone issuing company exceed one (1) per cent of the outstanding. capital stock of that company; nor shall the aggregate of its investments under this subsection at cost exceed fifty (50) per cent of the fund's assets. , I :1 II ThE-4rustees of this I?ension plan and all o"ther persons occupying a fiduciary position under this article in the administration of this article and in investing and reinvesting assets o(tl1e pension fund shall utilize and be governed by the prudent man rule., The ,1 - .t - , " .' Sec. 26.74. Death/disability benefits. If a participant shall die while employed by the City of Clearwater, his beneficiary or estate shall be entitled to the nccum ula tions standing to Ole credit of the deceased participant, irrespective of ,the age or yeurs of oradi ted service of the particIpant. Upon satisfactory proof to the Board of Trustees of total and permanent job-related disability which renders the affected participating member unable to perform the duties and functions of a ' police officer, a participant will be entitled to receive his ' outstandin:;t shares on the date of retirement. :'L) ~~ --,: ,:<";,.r~.;.~~ . '~; ,<."," '" '" , :h trustees in the performance of their duties arc authorized to seck, obtain nnd ~ngugc independent professional counsel nn<.1/or sccrctnrinl/clcricnl services and advice and to pay reasonable charges for the service. Sec. 26.75. Separation benefits. (a) If n pnrticipant shall separate from service for any reason wha.tsoever after ten (10) or more years under the plan, he shall be paid the entire amount to his net credit as of the last preceding fiscal year, reduced by three (3) per cent per year for each year that the employee is short of his normal retirement date. For the purposes of this plan, normal retirement shall mean twenty (20) years from date of hire as a police officer. (b) Settlement as provided in subsection (a) of this section shall be in full acquittal of all claims of a participant against the fund, and he shall thereupon cease to be a participant. . . ~. J' Sec. 26.76. Rights and benefits not subjact to legal process. The rights and benefits provided for herein are vested rights of participants in the fund, and shall not be subject to attachment, garnishment, execution or any other legal process. Sec. 26.77. Responsibility of the City. The City of Clearwater shall have no responsibility for the operation of the special fund except as specified herein and shall bear ' no expense in the operation of the special fund. Sec. 26.78. Statement of conflict with F.S. 185. If any provision of this ordinance or the plan hereby created shall conflict with the provisions of Chapter 185, Florida Statutes, such conflict shall be resolved in favor of the statutory provisions which are intended to control, and the conflicting provision of the ordinance shall be severed without affecting the purpose of this enactment. Section 3. Should any part or provision of this ordinance be declared by a ..,\ court of competent jurisdic,tion to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the ordina'1ce as a whole, or any part thereof, other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are to the extent of such conruct hereby repealed. - 5 - t'l J , .~ 'I'~', >t:l;:,n~:'~\:;~":;- /~:::..~;:~In~ . , :~.: ",& I,~ .J~~~:r ':'~~~~'.~~'~~k , "", _ ,~;1:" . ..,,\.;\~ , ".:'"c.;y. ;;,\2~t~ '. <,', ,~~:, :. ':~(i , .:<'~~ c, " - ~ \ . :~~~,::~< 'c, " _ ' ,~ 11-' Section 5. Notice of the proposed enactment of this ordinance has been' , , . propel'ly advertised In a newspnper of general circulation In accordance with Sectl~n.' 166.041, Floricla Statutes. Section 6. " The provisions of this ordinance shall take effect 'j' " September 17, 1985. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AN D FINAL READING AND ADOPTED n, .1 Mayor-Com missioner Attest: , i .' , ~ Acting City Clerk 1/ 'J ' " ' <:,t .l ' . . " , ,( . ',1 '\'. "\ , , .~, ;., ' "J , \1 " ' " .\ :j I " .. , ,'; , ' , " ;. :,.,) , ' CJ q " ! d,~ " \ .- ~ ". ,'\ - . .. .. , , . " "'" '" ;.' . '..' ">, iP:.n'.1l.""'H'i11,ll .":'ii?~1":i'T>'~~\'~ ....: .~~,~.~~ t)p " ,,7~f//YI;;;t~1'I STAT!: TR~ASUnER INSURANCE COMMISSIONER FIRE MARSHAL . ,.0~t:- '// 6- ~,...a6 : '</" ,',:":'N , ~ i ~.,/ ;". . H t'.::~.' , " :.:~ :::'~ :;" . ., '~., , '.\ ~ :~~ I?);r ' 1 U?" ,'eJ?-' ~.Iatt:,1lCn/ r ...htO'.bla-N,c& a?td JtcmJedQI- TUE CAPITOL TALLAHASSEE 31:101 , i > . ~. :' " ~ ;~,' '. . :..:~~.(- .- , :::7. ',> ',~ T :~~: , ' w ," . . , HI I.. ,~ .\- " July 26. 1985 ~ ~ ~ ,~ ..' \.' .....~. .,:. - do "J Chief Sid Klein Chief of Police 644 Pierce St. Clea~ater~ FL 33516 , . .' ,', ? ' Dear Chief Klein: .~\ , \ This is in response to your letter dated June 17. 1985. . . and 'the attached proposed ordinance. ,> .' . -. .\: The ordinance appears to be in compliance with state law and the suggestions 1 made earlier appear to have been incorporated into this latest proposal. ,I. Please furnish this office a signed and dated copy of the ordinance when passed. If this office can be of flJrther assistance or if you have any questions, please let me know. q ., '.:) " , Sincerely, /J/.ar:.:,~-- 4~ (~7X. }mrvinB. Clayton, Bureau Chief Municipal Police Officers' Retirement Trust Fund . .;, ,I " " HBC:pfs . ',..: " -,t , ," ~ -' ", '., .:1 ,. '" "\ ..... +I :~~ . ') " ! " " 1 ~ . ~11:: wK" ~f"~'r v)", ~N" .. ,/1 ;. s-o . MEMORANDUM TO: The City Commission SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer Utility Rates -p{jJ-'3 of the City of Clearwater r:Y:fJ t. <(- @ ~ Agenda' No. Meetfng Date: 8/1S/85 RECOM MENDATION: Approve a new sanitary sewer utility rate schedule and the attach~d ordinance implementing the revised sewer rates with a minimum monthly service charge based on water meter size and a flat rate of $1.25 per 100 cubic feet of water consumed ahove the minimum allowable consumption for each meter size for all llccounts. G1 And that the appraprlate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: Sanitary sewer fund revenues n,re not keeping pace with costs. A $201,000.00 net' loss occurred in the fund in FY 1984 and n $790,000.00 net loss isantici- pated for FY 1985. 'This condition stems from the fact that rates have not been changed since 1975 and the Consumer's Price Index (CPI) has risen 95.8' percent during the same period. Action to increase se~ler revenues is necessary to prevent any further deterioration in the financial condition of the sewer operating fund and to avoid any d~cay in the City's financial rating. The City's Engineering consultants, Briley, Wild and Associates, were consequently directed to prepare an analysis that ~ould d~ve1op a rate structure to: (1) raise 'sufficient revenues to cover Operating and Naintenance (0 and M) costs, provide for projected sewer system elP construction, and service the debt on the sewer portion of the Water and Sewer Bond issue; (2) meet the U. S. Enviro~mental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements; (3) he simple to administer; and (4) be easy for the public to understand. The resulting r.ewer rate analysis and report is attached. ' Commission Disposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued to Fallow-up Action: The sewer rate schedule best meeting the requirements was found to be a minimum monthly service charge based on the water meter size and a flat rate of $1.25 per 100 cubic feet of water above an allowable minimum for that meter size. 'A tabulation of the recommended rate structure is shown on page 28 of the attached Briley, Wild and Associates Engineering Report. This rate would not contain a cpr or a pass-through cost increase tied to the cost of waE~r. It would be acceptable to the EPA and would be simple to administer and easily understood by the users. It is recommended that the proposed sanitary sewer rate schedule and accompanying ordinance be adopted and be effective on passage. The Director of Public Works concurs in this recommend a t ion. dar,. Submitted by: Advertised: o Affected Costs: !XI A tta'chments: tLt....~~ Dete: Parties Funding Sou rce: BWA Report, Noti fi ed o Capital Improve- Ordinance, City Ma nager Po pc r: of Meeting ment Bud get Rate Comparisons CJ Not Required o Not ReqUired o Opero1ing Budget o Other Date a Sequential Originating Department: Appropriation Code Reference Public Works o None .. ORDINANCE NO. -85 ", AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AMENDING TITLE V, UTILITIES, OF TUE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF CLEARWATER, TO INCREASE 'filE SANITARY SEWER UTlLITY RATES; PROVIDING FOR,THE SEPARABILITY OF THE PROVlSIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH;' PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR THIS ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the current sanitary sewer utility rate has been effective since September 1, 1975; and l~IEREAS, inflation, as measured by the Consu~er Price Index, has increasai95.8% since September I, 1975; and WHEREAS, the current 1984 Water and Sewer nevenue Bond Ordinance requires that the City provide gross revenues in each fiscal year sufficient .to pay th~ cost of operation and maintenance of the sanitary utility systein, and that the City will provide an amount equal to or greater than 115% of the bond service .j requirement becoming due in each fiscal year on the outstanding 1984 bonds and on all outstanding additional bonds plus 100% of all reserve and other payments required to be made pursuant to the ordinance, such rates and other charges not being reduced so as to be insufficient to provide gross revenues for such purpose; and WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the State of Florida Department of Environmental Regulation require provisions for periodic revaluation of the sanitary sewer utility rate structure and annual notification to utility users of the rate structure; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COM}lISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATERJ FLORIDA: .. Section 1. That Subparagraph (3) of Subsection e, Rates, of Section 50.05, , '\1 Deposit, Fees, Service Charges and Rate Sch~dulcJ of Chapter 50i in General~ of Title V, Utilities, of the Code of Ordinances of the ~ity of Clearwater, Florida, is hereby r~pealed in its entirety and the following Subparagraph (3) is hereby ~nacted: 1\ (3) Sanitary sewer utility rates: '1 a. There is hereby ,establ ished a uniform schedule of rates and. charges for the use or availability of use for the sanitary sewer utility for both residential and nonresidential accounts. Utility rate shall be a monthly fee schedule consisting of a minimum lump-sum charge for an assigned volume of wat~r associated with each meter ,size plus a charge of $1.25 per 100 cubic feet for water consumed above the assigned volume. Size of Ne tel' . \ Honthly Charge Allowance U nd e I' 1 Inch $ 5.00 400 cu.ft. or less 1 Inch 11.25 900 cu. ft.' or less 1-1/2 Inch 167,150 13,400 cu.ft. or less '2 Inch 388.75' 31,100 cu. ft. or less 3 Inch or 2-2 Inch Hanifold 600.00 48,000 cu. f t. or le'ss 4 Inch 1,155.00 92,400 cu.ft. or less 6 Inch 2,966.25 ,,237,300 cu.ft. or less 8 Inch 5,000.00 400JOOO cu. ft. or less -1- b. Service outside of the municipal limits. Accounts outside of the corporate limits of the City shall be subject to a surcharge equal to twenty-five (25) per cent of the monthly_ sanitary sewer utility charges as set forth in subsection a. above. c. The sanitary sewer utility rate schedule shall be ~eviewed by-the City Commission as a part of the annual fiscal budget preparation to ensure that adequate reVenues are generated to pay the costs of operation) maintenance and outstanding bond $ervice requirements. d. The Utilities Department will notify each user annually of the above sanitary utility rate schedul~. e. The sewer service charges herein provided shall not apply to sprinkler irrigation systems separately metered or deduct meters. f. Basis where water is unmctered. Premises which have a source of water other than city water system) the spent or used water from which goes into th~ city sanitary sewer systemst shall pay a charge according to the schedule provided in this sectiont bused upon an estimate of the aniount of water going into the sanitary sewer system. tn the event of a disagreement as to the amount of such water reaching the sanitary sewer system. thent a metering device-or devices shall be installed to determine that amount. Section 2. Should any section) paragraph. sentence or word of this ordinance be declared for any reason to be invalid) the same shall not affect the validity of ~he ordinance as a whole) or any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 3. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are to the extent of such conflict hereby repealed. Section 4. Notice of the proposed enactment of-this ordinance has been properly advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with Section 166.041) Florida Statutes. Section S. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage. PASSED ON FIRST READING " PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING ,AND ADOPTED "Vf Mayor-Commissioner Attest: City Clerk -~ , - t.... . ! 1 I . \- . In o \&.~ 0.-:1 ~o,<,..~~ a:: 0 . <0' \tlCO c. ~\Q V. o u tt'I co c;r. ... ~ ... 0: c:.. <: <: w ~ <: ..:: c H 0:: S to. ..:I <: 0:: ~ %. W U >- Q :;) ~ 11) I.:J ~ < a:: a:; I.:J ~ W l/) ...... .c:: \IJ ~ 3: c:: l>.l l- < ~ c: is -1 l.J tJ. o ~ .... tJ 'J l1'l N o In 0\ r- .., ..0 . ..-( 0\ .... .... .... 00.... r- In '" r- \Q 0 .... Il:l C> a:; S n .... r.: t7' o o -0 r.l .... 0" \r)' ON o o .... 't ..... tt'ltt'I .nr- o 0 000 000 .... 0 .... ..... ..-( ..... iI'I ..... ED \Ll lf1 ID o C) .... ..... c: 41 ~ W III + + + o CJ 0 o III 0 o III 0 ,., J:l ,., ..... ..... In Itl In r- N '" ~ .... .... cJ> ~ 'q' t- ~ ~ ~ M 1f'l VI U'l In N N N .... W III ..::: 0::1Il o 1>.0:: W W> E-O < 0::0:: W ~ ;J: .... .... .... III ID IG C'O'O> 00'::1 o 0 :> 00::1 ... .... .... ............... N r- ::I ED .... 17> . .... .... ... III '" 0" .,. o 0 o 0' o 0 .... ..-( ....., Vl N m N U)o III :;) ..:I ~ c.. t.:lWI III I-< << l:!:lC: Q\ r- In N In .D 111 rl ~ ....c ..... N cJ> w CI 0:: :5 U :t: :;) Z .... Z .... Z .... .... 10 10 0' CI o :) ~ 0 :::l III 0 C ..... ... 1"1 M 0:: o "" 0..00 1Il r- 0 ... ~ In tI)- ;.- ,... :z. g r-I U >0 III .r; II .. c: JJ ... o c.. ). CI Z III U ., .. ... III l-- t.J .... 0. E III (- III Q. E (2 =- = o 0 ~ .... In If' .... ... o .-I N .0 o .... co .... <: ...... :z. \D' N .., N . to ~ .... '" N c;J> o M to .... ID r- o r- 0' 0 o 0 o 0 .... .... ..... ..... o 0 In ..0 o o o Q) Do III lJ ID ... .... l\J JJ .;. r:I :J: l\J 111 .... IC o .c ~ 0 N ,., C) .... ..0 N -+ . c. CI IC Ul U I.' 10 III .cO :J o ~ 00 Ul "'to ~j- g ~ 1Il N M ... .' .... .... ..-( > .-I III 10 d 0 ItI 0> CI 0' 0' ..0 o 0 00 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0.... 0' .... .... .... I ..-( ..... ..... .....0 ..... a.....1Il00 CO ..0 NO CD ..-( ..-( 0 .-l .-l o ~ :. :.:: :. .-I .... III 10 tl' tl' o 0 o 0 JJ o 0 III . .... N ,., .... ,IJ ,IJ ., III :: ~.,: ,IJ CI r-I .... ~ o Vl NO'" .... cr> .... ('oj t- . ,.,. lID M "IQ" ...... o 1Il .... '" ~ III ~ CI N III ,~ :t: C 'tI 0 C JJ III l: .... III ~ '0 ;.: III III ... .J r~ III ... llJ >0 llJ Z '8 o :l III .... o c w III JJ o III tr) ... III III CI U l: CI ,. J.J "" lfl 0\ . 0'> l1'l M ..0 o' o o ..-( ..... r- ID .u ID .... .... .n 0\ 0> .... ..... r""'I ~ r-t 1Il1tl1ll1D 0' D' CI 0' o 0 0 0 o 000 o 0 0 0 .... .... .... ...., ...... ..... ...... ...... o.D 1Il 0 0 cr> to a- 111 : :: : .: o .... .... .... III D' D' C ~ 0 ..-(,0 .u ,IJ .... 0 ., 1:1 ......t ............. .c lI'l .... .... : = o 0 ,., ~ o on OJ' .... . N lI'l .... ~ ..-( >- .;.I C :) o lJ .c 0" :J o w .8 .... ... '.. - .0 Q N~ .-l Z M ~ CD 'q' ..0 M .... ... ... IV .u ~ ~ o to s:: o o o o .... ..... o o N ::-.. ,IJ r. :.-~ :J ... 0 C U :) o III U IV ... ;.: IC .... t:; o III tl. To ....0 .... ~N III . 0.... .... NN N lI'l (I) 'tl ..... IUlI'\ .I.J 1tI \,j ...lll ::l > .00 1ll.-4 .uAJ ......lJ1 'tJ llJ ...Z -t: . c.1-) E>o 8.0 fJ lI'\ 1fI ~ ....1'1 ..., ... Q 0. NN ~ o o III 0 o III 0 o ~ 0 .... IQ ... ...... ..... ..-(... ~ N U'I CD . ... l.. llJ ). IV .f III NO .... + -- + III III IC .a .:r' lll.u III III Ill.... .0.... 1Il 0 .... to N ~ o.D.... 0 N .... g '. :11 " ~..-4 ....-!. III 10 ID D' 0' 0' 00 0 00 0 00 0 .-I.... .... ............ ...... 1.tl.... III r- In '" .... NN r: .: o.D .... III . W l.. III Ql E .u 0 III ~ ;J III ....... :;I ~ III U .1 _. IV III w ~8..E U.... ....;:1 .ac. :;I uc o 1-0 III O..-t ~w flI ....0. ...e ....0 .co \\ N . .-l 1:1 01 o ~4J 0 lIIl:I 0 ..-( .... '.PU M llJ 0> .... ltI ,t:;. lJ .... :) CD ~ = Ul cr> cr> 0\.... .... "1' 1Il , o.D flI III JJ 11l.... ::l E ..-( ... 0,.... III >0 lll.u O>~ L.I U c:: .c.... L!,O .. , III l..o 0.0 E.... III r-tl ... ~~ "".c lIJ'C' 4J~ 1tI,IJ ... GI ;J... /II '0 ... lll......... III :>', :;I III QJ C tJI .u .... 0 llJ::I ~ . l' t"', C ::-.. .u l: :-I o U Itl ~ o III ID ... Itl 1Il llJ 4J .u >00 .u.... c....u ::12 f.< 8u a .c llJ ... JJ ";1-0'" ....00 OP-Z .... ... tr) .r;. u III W f.- a z >- .... j.;' ~ o U III tJI C m l.. o .-1 -- N -- .I ~. f .,' ,..] .:: t5 ~ 0:1 .t::;: ..1 u, c.. :..: ;'1 Za.,J 11) 1..0 0:1: ...... Z,..] Ood; lI)t,:lo: .... W c::.of-o <Ood; n.O~ :-. . 0\0 W Gll II'l C) Co ~ ,..] ... c: c.. < >- !-o Z o C u II) < .J oJ W Z ... a. ;::;~ -Cj ~ >- C ;:J f-o 11) w f-o <; c: c: w ~ W I1l ...... c: w ~ ~ 0: 00: t.,W ::- wO f-o <0: o:W f-o '" ;J: talwj enf-o 4< roo: 0: W f-o <: ;J: ~ W oJ U s... o >- f-o .... U 1I'i' . '"~ . I \0 ~ "" "" . \0 CJ} w t,:l 0: ::: U 0: W ;J: W III ..... ~ btI o 0 o 0 o 0 ~ ..... ......,- r"l .... r"l \:l .... III D' + III N . I .,. CJ} """".. 1IlU111'l NNr"l ~ o . o ..... vr 00. ..,. r"l ... . 001"- M 004 r- N m ~ ... ... N N 0 U1 o "" 01 M .... 004 III D' Co- d'" o U III o - t" o ... ... 0 , 1110 o 0'0 N .aJ . 0 r- III ... 0.... M 0 .... + ....... ......0 o 0 01 ..,. ... ... o r"l M M "" .. U"l U"l N N on .... -;;~:r: III [1. lJl (II 004 D' 000 ego 0 000 ll.I 0 Q 0 000,1: .-l ~ ~ "'~ ~ ' , 1:0(1)01"- M \0 N 00l1'lr- . ~ C1I . . 01- 0"1 ... 11"""'4 ...-4.... . CJ} CJ} Ch m w en ~ o II) ~ ::l ,..]. : Co Do mco\O ... \0 N r"'l .-l CJ} .-I P""'I-t...... C III III 10 D' D'D'O' 11.1 'CJ 0: ~ U :I: ;:J :!: ... z ... :::: Nl1'lN C>OC> C1I m C1I N..,.N "" 0: E ',\ MM..c,. "'Or- ,., ... ,., '" tf> ... Cl... ....Ill ~....o s:::~w .... ~ ~ III :>O_'OIIlO !:;: o:-l ~D. :::: w 11I'0 0 0- I-ll.I CO: <1% H D. U ~ '" 0: i: < ... ~ u u .... .... e III D' cr = \0 C- . .-I o o ~ ~ o III III . M 004 .. .... .... o.D on 0 C) m 0 r- r"'l .. >. .., C 0' ~ w o ~ u .c III II ~ 10 GJ C .... ... ... M ell '0 ... ll. ll.I C C ... .. ::l D. II) 0 = N "" N .-l co 0 0 tf1 0 U1 . .... r"l .-l .... .... .... o " o """ Nom .... 0 M . ort 01 0 .... ... -I III t)> o o o .-.l , N ..... M III ... D'll.I > 00 o 0... . lo:l lJ'lD' .aJ ll.IO 10 III 0 .... : ]~ o ...... o II'l U1 WIt 0 "0 ("'l.I . ... C) II'l 0004 ... M ... ll.I .. III J: N H WIt H "" IJ'I IJ'I lJ'l II'l N N N N ... II D' o o o ... .... o I' ... III C- O C 0 o C 0 000 ... ... .... ,......, ,... 0 ... N It'I M . ... ... ... M ... ., III tl' D' -I : :. : o r- . .-l o m an 0 .-l N .-l ....... III III III D' tl' 0' o 0 0 0"00 o III C C ..... . ..., .., N ..., : = o C 0 lJ'l ...l1'lCN . . III \0 IO'J '" .lI: ... Ill, e. II Cl ... ... III C .... C. III 0' ... ~ .8 ... 104 0. III en ::c ... C >0 Ie o ... E C. ell ~ ... .... 'D III III ... f-o II) 0 I' + + '\'- m :" \0 .... 000 0 ao I/'l ,., <or on .. co 0 0 ..,. N .... M ..... r-l If\ \0 m m ... ... ... "'" CDONNN . r- 0 0 C ... ... M ... Ill... O'll.I > 00 o OM . III MD' ll.I 0 .u 1Il0 III III 0 .-1 .c.... .., ...... 00 1"-01 IV ;. IV .8 ;. fO.8~ III .... .., >- .. 0 C lI'l ::I . .. 0 "'" \OM co II) U M II ~ IV o ll. lI'l "" Il'I N M o U"l ... II: co o c C M , o CI'l ... II III > 1Il III " 0-.8>>> o III .8 .8 .8 o III III Cl o &I ... .. >0 >< >- ci-~~~~ o =' =' =' ."000 ... I/} U U U : : III ~ 111 I"- .. .... 10 0' o o o ... ' III I> 104 C II 1.1 0'11I 111 II , Ill. ell .... , III ......... II ... .. ell 10 .. ;I III : , II .... >- III .... a:> Cl- C "'l ~ ~ 0 M I/} U 1.1 ... II II .. .. III III , =- >. >- .. .. C C ::I ;::l o 0 U U .... : III ... . .... Gi .., III ;I 1Il .. ell Cl- ,Jj III III III .... C .... ,I: l! ~ U '0 ...... III III l%l ll.I III l%l Lo ., ... .... ll. .... II III III W 1Il ,I: ... .... ~ J.J ... l\) ~ ::I ~ '0 llJ 0 llJ III QJ II) l%l :I: .. ... o Co .... .... ~ CJ - Co ......10' <or U \0 o N .r- ........ .... + "'"' ..10 III 01 ... 10.10 o "'0 NM . \D ,I: U 10 II m 0' Lo ::I .c III 1.1 II .. III t:l. J..I II) V1 M )( o If\ C ('oj . \D N 0 o M 0 M ... . rl .... N .... III C .0 ... ..... ... N ..,. "'" ..,. ..,. -- N N N N N o 0 000 .... .... .... .... "'"' o ... + .... "II 110' M 10.10 C 0'0 <D r- r-l 0 . . IO'J N N ~ .. 10 III ... .... .., 10.1 .. .. 1\I III M .... .., .., o o . ... III .... ... N M o I/'l o N o \0 r-l '1 III > .s III >- .. C' =' o u III OJ > > .8 ,g III 10 >- >0 ~ ~ C C ::I ~ 0-0 U U III ll.I OJ > > > .s .s .8 10 III III >0 >0 >- .. .. .... C C C =' =' =' 000 U U U ... II .. ., ) >0 .. C ~ o u ... ... ... Lo 1.1 I) II t.l 1Il II .. .. ... ..... .. III III III 10 III )))';1.:- >. >0 >, >- >. .. ~ .... .... .. C C C C C ::l ;:l ::I ::I ::l o 0 0 0 0 U U U U U :0 C III ~ III M II .c II u ... 10 0 II! ,I: ro en III ,I: III U ... III 0 .c GJ .c u l%l en 10 VI III ~ l%l U o a:. C C o 0 .. .... tl' [) C C .... .... '0 '0 '0 '0 1Il III n: n: ... .... 10 II! ..... .... llJ ,l%l III ,)&. u o l:l: C C. III III ... ... '0 '0 C C M ... II ... ~ ~ III III 104 f-o 000 ..,. .... ort 000 ..... .... .... ..,. ..,. .. N N N . . . o C 0 ... .-4 ... III '0 o ~ o U ... III At IV IV III > > > .s .8 .8 10 III III >- >- >- .. .. .. c c c ~ ;:l ::l 000 U U U 1Il III 1Il > > > .8 .8 .8 III III III >0 >. >- .aJ .. .aJ C C C =' ::I ::l 000 U U U Lo 1.1 ... III II 1lI ;t , :I< III III II 1I\ III III ......" ... ... W II 1Il II ..... ..... .... III '" 10 ;II :- , >, >0 >- ~ .. .. C C C ::l ~ ::l o 0 0 tJ U U >- .. .... u " .... .c o .. o C II 0- ... C ... e c III III 1Il ..J en ~ l1'l m '0...... IIII1'l 4J III ... ... QJ ::I > .c 0 "'.... ....11I ......Ul '0 III . .-4% .... . Q,t-) 6>. U,Q ... .... ........ lOG tJI C\ _ 11I0 ..,.0 f'oC ... U, N .aJIII ... 0 ::l . u.... ,en- ... III U D' ... mill ...", ....co ..,. l<.... ..... :::'8- ~ u.... CD o . 00 .... en- . ... II .... Il )' , . .....r III IV III II 10.18. U ... ....::1 .cg. ::l uc o ...Ill 0,"", ..,... III :::~ ....0 .DU Cll.o C. -0. E'" III Eoolll 1.0 oil III ,I: ... 11'0 ....11 10.. ;I 1.1 Nil Cl> lIlc ....0 tJU III ... IV E o ~ III ::l U. ... o 10.1 II 0' 104 III ,I: U 104 ;:l III IUIIl .... Ill.... ::l E ... .... c..... a:>. IV.. CO.... "'U III ,1:10.1 U 0 ...11I III '0 .... .... ::1C OC.. 11I::1 l:l: 0 '\ ... - N III W S :z. II ,. .~--: MEMORANDUM TO: The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: . . - Agenda No. Meetl ng Date: 8/15/85 crv;- -$ Final Report, W. M. Montgomery & Associates - Rudio Communications Consultant RECOM MENDAT\ON~ The City Commission receive the report of W.M.Montgomery & Associates and accept the conclusion of the report that an 800 mHz trunked radio system will best serve the City. I5lf And that the appropriate officials be authorized' to execute same. BACKGROU NO: On June 21,,1984, the City Commission approved the City Manager's recommen- dation to direct the staff to proceed with a study of the total radio commu- nications of the City. On January 10, 1985, the City Commission approved an agreement with W.M.Montgomery & Associates to perform the study. A copy of the Final Report, RADIO/DATA COMMUNICATIONS EVALUATION & RECOMMENDATIONS is attached for your review. The final report has been reviewed by staff from Police, Fire, Utilities, Public Works and Central Services. The conclusion of this staff committee was that there appears to be no acceptable alternative to the recommendation for an 800 mHz trunked radio system. We have met with St. Petersburg and Pinellas County who are in the process of implementing plans for the installation of their own 800 mHz trunked radio systems and agreed that should the City install such a system that it will be compatible with theirs and that where facilities can be shared, they will be. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 1. Existing radio equipment is performing about as well as can be expected. The municipal radio shop and police radio maintenance contractor arc both giving the City good value for the money. 2. New radios operating on existing channels won't carry any more traffic than present equipment can carry. 3. Complaints are not hardware related at all. The needs are for enough independent talking paths between fleets and dispatchers to carry the traffic, for better coverage and for communications free from inter- ference. The.p:obability of new channel assignments for the City on the current Ut~l~ty, Local Government and Police frequencies is zero. Of the two alternatives available to the City: 1) channel splitting, 2) 800 mHz band; channel splitting is not recom- mended f~r,a number of reasons, the major reasons being expense, low power, l~m~ted product selection, brand incompatibility, and no major manufacturer has announced plans to offer this product line. The 800 mHz band offers the long range solution to current radio system problems. This is true for four very strong reasons: 1) All channels are clear channels now. 2) Tr~nking can be applied only in the 800 mHz band per FCC Rules. 3} MaJor manufacturers have significant experience in this field. 4) The 800 mHz trunking system will benefit all departments. Construction of the proposed trunking system cannot be completed prior to 1988 and the need is immediate. There will have to be an interim step. Th7 800 mHz system will be initially set up as a conventional or non-trunk~ng system. We have only d ~hort period of time (3 years) to set up the trunking system. The recommended budget is $4,144,500. 4. 5. 6 . 7. 8. Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised; o Affected Parties Notified of Me etlng Paper: Costs: Funding Source: o Capital Improve- ment Budget o Operating Budget o Other IIIAttochments: Report ... ,..... Date: .: ., '1.....,. .I~ ..":T.J.....:.j.;;- City Manager Date a Sequentia I Reference . Not Requi red . Not Required Originating Department: Administration Appro priatjon Code o None ~ ~ .' " TABLE OF CONTENTS " :: :'.. ;'~; F/~~,:<~\~ , "'''~f' , . .'.'~' . ;:~ ,Cover Letter Executive Summary '" .'11i iv EVALUATION Introduction System Personalities Police Radio Fire Radio Pub~ic Service Radio' Utilities Radio Data Processing Vision Cable Maintenance Quality of Maintenance Cost of Maintenance FCC Radio License Status Traffic Loading and Interference 1-1 1-'1 1-2 1-2 1-3 1-4 , '1-4 1~5 1-5 1~5 1-5 1-6 1-7 1-9 " ANALYSIS Introduction 'I New Communication Opportun;ties - Radio Need For New and Additfonal Radio Channels Availability of New Radio Channels 800 mHz Band New Communication Opportunities - Wireline Telephone Company Copper Wire Cable Coaxial Cable Fiber Optic Cable Vision Cable Company r-licrowave Trunking What is Trunking Trunkecl System Spectrum Efficiency Channel Loading History of Radio Trunking Trunked System Architecture FCC Requirements foe Trunked Radio Systems Generalized System Requirements Compatibility A Look Forward \ 2-1 2-2 2\-2 2-3 2-5 2-6 2-6 2-7 2-8 2~8 2-9 2-11 2-11 2-11 , 2-12 2-14 2-17 2-19 2-20 2-22 2-27 2-27 II \' i "\ , , , \\ 'j 'I . ",' ........ .' .... <;';';;;";;:'~:~f~ ..~ . , ~ >:" ,>~~ c . ~. !' I:':'~ .,' ,: .j . " . j'~ System Integrity : 2-28, , . System Failure " 2~2B Control Circuit Failure 2-29. Voice Security' 2-30 Radie? "Coverage '2-33 MUltiple Stations 2-34 Mobile Rel~y Operation /, 2-35 Receiver Voting 2-36 Simulcasting 2-38 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES 3-1 Introduction 3-1 Squeaky Wheel Designs 3-2 New Channels 3-6 . The Long View 3-7 n' Goals and Objectives 3-8 Recommendations. 3-10. Candidate Station Sites, Towe,i.rs, and Buildings 3-11 Main Station Facilities 3-13 Control Circuits 3-14 Possibility for Sharing with Pinellas County 3-15 Recommended Budget 3~17 Timing 3-21 I System Migration 3-22 . 1) '1 ,( '. :j" I) 1,/. . t.~ I ' . ii .~ . '.. I ., \\ ' " " '~ 1 ' 'il ,1 . , . ):~~ .'f....... ......, . ,-' , )~, r:,: '.j ,.,( .' v ,. T \:. , .1 I ,( t;- . ~ ~; ", . c.~ ./~~ " . ,',' " :," :'~:", :;"'':>?,,::~:~~ , ( " . ~\\' ,:.c.>.> ,'j, )' . . . ' w. M. Montgomery & Associat.es . 3618 Rainbow Drive · Minnetonka. Minnesota 55345 · Telephone (612) 473-6985 June 28, 1985 Commander Lynn smith Communications Division Police Department 644 Pierce street Clearwater, Florida 33516 ,\ Dear Ccmmander smith: Attached are six copies for your distribution :of our Final Report for the Communication Evaluation Project for the City ,of Clearwater. Recommendations are based on data gathered during the course of the work including a program of measurements for equipment performance, traffic loading, and interference. I will be in C!earwateron'July 10 to meet with you and other members of the project committee to discuss our task methodology and conclusions. 'I } . Very truly, yours, tf; ftf. /#,rkf~ W .~1. Hontgomery I .. j. ! ,: '\\ ... ", ',j Communications Systems. Planning & Engineering " " ':\ ". EXECUTIVE SUMMARY W.M. Montgomery & Associates has been engaged by the City of Clearwater to evaluate performance and make recommendations for improvement of various municipal communication systems. This report is the final product of the project. It includes some material first presented in the mid term report as a convehience 'jto the reader to eliminate a need to constantly refer to earlier , comments which form a foundation for conclusions and recommenda- tions detailed in this report. .G_en..~.;:~~_ !!'?:i:n.tenan~e 9f r.;idi9 ,?,q':1.i.E!1:'~nt;... is,_9~' A thorough pro- gram of performance measurements on fixed station equipment and randomly selected police hand-held radios was executed over a two week period in March and April, 1985. Results of these measurements were recounted in detail in the Midterm Report. The.rneasurement program can be summarized by saying various stations could be fine tuned for maximum performance but no new maintenance procedure would make a ..s.i.gnificant improvement -In- r.ange, voice quality'; or'-1:ree"dom "from Interference compa-red to pres'ent o"pera'tion. No 'difference -was' observed' in'" r"adIci' 'perfor"- mance"between police equipment maintained by the outside contrac- tor and other radio equipment ~aintained by City employees. Eacn of the radio networks was monitored for radio traffic and unwanted co-channel signals. A counting devlce was use~ which totaled number of times the station receiver picked up a signal, elapsed time all signals were present, and total elapsed time of the monitoring event. TheP~blic .Servi~e station handled almost 2 ,.000. 9~1~~ .p~r day. The Utilities, Depar,tment repeater handfed an incredible 3,300 transmissions per day for t~e two day moni- toring period.-:Since both netwoiks. are essentially eight hour per day operations, it is clear both channels~are seriously overloaded. Police channels are not nearly so busy because traffic is spread across four channels. The monitoi recorded .?55 ~nterference hits on police Channel 3 in 48 hours. Opportunities for new radio channels are investigated in radio services not presently licensed to the City, inter service , sharing of frequencies assigned to radio services for which the city has no direct eligibility, new channels available only for use with amplitude compandored single side band radios, and the 800 mHz band using both'conventional and trunked radio technol- ogy. The author concludes an 800.mHz trunked,\radio systF.'fiI would best serve the City.' '" '\ iv ,:,", . ,", Particular ,attention is given to. how the' Clli might cooE.erate w:lt;,!L Pinellas ~9J.tn.ty -!n~.i oi_l!~_.~o!1~tructioii- or .a. ~;Cf?_~~'~esYS~~fl)' t:6 serveootnthe new county raclo sfys-Eeni:":r(<?~L~n..J;.he. pl9-Jlp,i,ng . st'ag~eaOQl:]re-f:orulHfecr 'munfcipal--fadlc:i-' system' recommended in this report _, -.._~-,._. ....- ....- - ;' ........ '- ,__' . "." . . : Th~ consultant concludes!trunked radio system architecture would ser~~he City into. the .tnaEilTn.!te--fift1ire;--'T6Eal-iifUrrrC:ipa.r'~ 't"nvestment-Iil""trunJe-ed raaio wneiC'ffiigra:tton tothe'J new system is qomplete, including joint CitY/County purchase' of_a'shared micro- waVe system,' -1*8'- estImated -tcioe-iii"-the--$4""'-ml11.ron range: ...... _.-":,-,,. ~ - ... ... ---....-.. ..- - ~. . ,,' Y~1 " <~~ , ,~~ ">?:: : ~ . 1; ~:~ ~ ~ ',!-I, h' .. ;.l.;.: : ....' I ( 'I ,.l' - . , ,\ ~. ' . 1 -, : , , ',i' ~ ,.- I, . '\. . ':'}''', :l , . , I :( ", " () ,I \ ' \ " . ( ; , \, "J ,v )' , '. J~~Y .', I.: , :: 'f .' 'c', '.' , '~ :....1 '-:1. '. " .1.:. .:+ ... ~ >:1"' ~I'j ~ " ,: :. ~ ~ ,~ I e. ,f . \1 ;, .I~ .\ , :~'~l' ". " ,,' ,..' , - ',' '. l" '" ., ~. :1 ~" , . .: ~ '" . .1' \:1 :\' ,. ~~~.'. ~ .'. ,. " " " JI ,(, ;. e, ,. :~: : I ' .; ,i. h :i" ) J. ~ j, . ~: ":' ,'{' ~t. , .; -j-:~/, # .. ~ .. .~c. '(s' ". fi :~'J\ ~.,. . . ~ '1 .L:><" ~: ~: ,( j' .{. 1'" :! ," :~ :.. ~:.. ~~ <.. J\'.' j,:" ',.:.: :. '" , ' , 'I 11.::; ,,: ~ i' i. " :1 ' :1, l 1j :t.~ " '~ " ., I:' d 'f, ,I( ,.,. ~ ," ',' \' .' . ~ ~ ,f . , ,~. ~ . . .,. , .' ., ',.:,c.J ~ . , " , , >, . ,1 " .. , .,'t'.:' ,l " .j. :. -I .' " '. ':' ,; '.]:. ' . ,'~.< '" : ~ . . . t:~ \., '. ' " ~.~.}' ~ ....... ',."i' ...?. .<i.', ..c. lJ. i" ~1;, I; ".,.:',< ~ " . \< :. .., "e " ' ~. . in .t :'. ,', . . ~. ,f. ~ c " ." jl>' .i: If., " - :j', t:".,.'" , ' .,1 ,', ' '., ic' " !J> ',' " ',') , , . J ',' . ~~j ~ ::'f1i .' , ,:' l .,.., 'e L . i~}' i: ". : .~ ! '... ;, : :-::.') .,.:, " I.' .j., 'r ~~\i: .,;~", .1., ,. .c !, . f .'1 :i . .C :' i: Ii , t~, ..' ,~ ";." , c.~ up" .;' .: I., ~t L" ~ . '.~~ "...~ " .','J --- .: '~'''''' "S:~~ 'e' 2,' . . : .c' ,"','. ",:' e' " O'~~~ ~. ; .. .', . ;. . '. ,. .....j! . :t~ .~. c '. ,. . . >.. . ' . . ~. l::': \J)', ~ .e.' . . ~. , :, . , . ' + ,.1. .,i ~. , " '.', ., ., ;' :i? .,' , ". I , ~ \; ~ " ~ , " ~/ . .~ ' .. ~ I' ~~ .."c,o .". ,:~ '. .\ ~i ,. . .. ..~ , .'~" ,;{ :\ . ',' " . . ~ ) I: D " . '. :' , e .\ ", ~ ~ " , . . r' ~ .':.: ~.t;..r~ . l' ~\.l '~'" ",' ")~r '. '-'" " ;. ..! . 'L , " )', EVALUATION , INTRODUCTION l i J W.M. Montgomery & Associ~tes has been engaged by the City of Clearwater to evaluate performance and make recommendations for improvement of various municipal communication systems. This' report is the final product of the project. It includes some material first presented: in the mid term report as a convenience to the reader to eliminate a need t'o constantly refer to earlier comments which form a foundatlon for conclusions and recommenda- tions detailed in this report. r The Communications Syste$ Evaluation Project detailed in the W.M. Montgomery & IAssociates proposal of September 24, 1984 i I, enumerates nine tasks to I be accomplished to develop recommenda-i tions and a budget to upgrade communication system performance: 1. Establish a communications system data base. 2. Measure and analyze radio equipment performance. ;\ '/ 3. Evaluate radio maintenance. 4. Measure radio traffic. " S. Survey radio coverage. 6. Evaluate interference between Clearwater radio systems and those of neighboring jur~sdictions. 7. Evaluate data communication requirements. 'S. Establish upgraded radio system performance standards. " I I 9. Develop an estimated cost and associated municipal benefit for each recommendation. '\ A menu of choices is presented in this report together with trade-offs represented by the various opportunities to improve radio and data communications. It will become apparent there is no ~cor.r.e~__s..g~f improyem~~t;.~':.o ~s,~'yre ~~~;:, .~a.tr~fac"; - ~.ion ~~_t;.h!L~xc).-9.?ion of alterD~,~~__j..mR~.9\r~Jl\~_n..t~_ _wl?~~h_ ~.ig_ht otherWlse be made. Rather, the choices to be made relate to 'j relatTve- wei-g"l'iCing of benefits. versus ,cost, operational flexibi,l- '\ ity, and required maintenance support. '. ,', 1-1 , ...,F~i " n . . SYSTEM PERSONALITIES The ~dio system for each department of the 'City has been pl_~nne<[t. CO~!t~(~.~-Kll~J}-Q~W~_~'E5_e@t:~e._as.-a...s.t.and=-..alpne sy,s tern. There ~s '~~~~~~orr~lity between equipment, coverage, or ancenna towers. There is bare minimum communication capability between. the Clearwater police and fire radio systems at the street level. public safety officers can't communication by radio with members of the utilities or Public Service Departments. Although all municipal radio users require communications over approxi- mately the same geographical area (Utilities Department service area extends north to the Pascoe County line), each department has historically pursued its own interests without considering how its own improvements might be shared with other users in the ~ity. This is not to suggest one department should share its air tim~ with another, but radio towers, standby power systems, and interdepartmental communicatTOi1--pIannfii9' ,ati9~_c~6bratiflft~-o'n can' aria- 'shoulo"'o'e snar eo to-he"ver-y6-rfe r s'-'mittual beneflt'~- "- i ! ' ! j, \ '. I ~ _....~- i.Q1J.5;,g_.Bg9j,g 1-2 Principal characteristics, of the Clearwater police radio system are: 1. No single station site adequately serves the entire area with a signal intense enough to assure primary communica- tions with hand-held radios. Dividing the system into four networks has not only split radio traffic among four independently operated channels but , also has permitted the City to locate network repeaters more advantageously than would otherwise be possible. However,. ~fl is ..placeroe!'lt' ._scheme has ~~en camp romi s~Q.J;.h.!9~g)!_._ t roubl~- s.9.~ _ c_Q.n t.fQ1-_.s_~~<:!:!~ !:.:_.le~ed f rom the ,~~}e~~?~~ comp~.l}i:~ A.ndl-__.p_f__c.9.l,.l.J:.S_~.l__!19 slr"Lqle staITon ~s sltuated where lt affords dependable city-wide poTICe-C6mrnurircaCIO'ns~-- . ___._ __________-.....__.._____ .__ ....__- T . 2. ~dio coverage is valued in terms of two-way communication with hand-held radios. ..,.- ,", '---."--' "\1 Office~s evaluate -the radio system in terms of radio cover- age when inside their cars, and secondarily, when inside buildings. This is a severe test because signal attenuation .\ is high to a hand-held radio antenna when inside the ~etal automobile. ""\:, "l l:to'i- . ; .....~. .... " " " 3. The b~~~:t5te~ .is_~ld (!~lJl_~nd use technolo'gy now out of date." -.~..- -....... -..,- .- .. .-.. . Equipment has been well maintained but good maintenance can not improve generic performance of the system. In particu- lar, the old two tone signal comparators do a poor job of selecting the best available signal from hand-held radios when compared to presently available equipment. (The role of signal comparators and receiver voting is reviewed in the next chapter.) Further, ~~~y. po~ulation_has nearly doubled since the present system was planned plac~ng demanas-on-~he ..~Y~J: em.'_ n~~ r:::'-~Qnt:efflBn'{.~d.J?Y ,.J:~~~~~i ig.i~n~,-~y.~~~~.eS]:~~_~ r .. 4. Co-channel interference from Orange County Sheriff and Orlando Police Departments is destructive to Clearwater police communications. Unwanted co-channel signals appear as desired on-frequency signals to the various police receivers since the only dis- tingUishing feature between them is the squelch tone and text of the messages. ..E.~h day the Communications Cent,!3r . .s.uper.v.is,o.r._dis9.qle.~ ...o"-~_ 9f...J!l9";:~- ~,~J;~i.v_e'~h~i_~~s i,n ~h~, _Cle~r- wat~:: p_gl_i..QLr.a.9.io ~y,~.~em_ ~_.~9_lLc;:e hiI:1-t:er~f.er~.q2.e_,.~rom Orlan,,; d..Q E-n.q_Qr.an.9-e-c.au.n~. The superv lSO r lS trYlng to do the impossible by making the system deaf enough so that outside interference is not heard while leaving enough receivers in service that local officers can communicate effectively. rJ..rlLB sg,109 The Fire Department radio system is a single channel, single station UHF system. The department cannot communicate by radio with its neighbors and, if the single mobile relay station were to fail, could not communicate between trucks in the mobile relay mode or between field units and dispatcher. pj~c~ on~y one radio channel is available, radio traffic associated.with a 'w'orking -{fie -preemE..ts other"tacHo t~a-ft{~_~.~._rtt1JS ,occ;;:~~i.ol1ally . geneta t:esaCfITt.i.c..ul t SIFUa]:;J..Q.I:l_ oec~us.e _~Ppu~,. fou;',:","f i.~ths of all ra'afo--tra-f't"l-c on a day to day basis relates to emergency medical services and not fire protection.. The Fire Department is in a unique position regarding its radio system which is not of its own choosing. A. n_e~~L nQ,I;:.t.h--f'p.~.mty 150 mH?__f..i..z:e.-a.nd ambulance radio ~ystem J1a.!?_ .be~n._p.uJ_chas~d, is--now', being__ins_talled, and \<1111 oe st~ff.ed ,and operated at -co'un'ty ~'e~_,l pense. Tne goaI~:rs-tO~6nsolldate all fire and medical communi- caE1~ns in the northern half of the county. There is sub~tan-~ tial inducement to the Clearwater Fire Department to join~ne . '\ 1-3 (I county radio net because the City would be relieved of 'a signifi- cant expense to carry its own fire radio and ambulance communica- tion system. If the Clearwater Fire Department joins,the county fire/ambu- lance net, it would mean a complete change of radio equipment for the department paid by the county. On the other hand, the county net is not yet fully operational, so municipal fire offi- cials are unable to evaluate how well it works. Since the City would account for half of all communications carried on the net, fire officials are understandably reluctant to" abandon their existing radio system in favor o~ an unknown quantity. The wait- and-see stance being taken by Chief Davidson is probably the best choice for now. 4~~en__~ouqQ_;ime, City officia~s will be able to make a decision based on soli:<L~experience' 'of oth"er- n-orth ~cy tire d~ts. --It a:"-crecis~ion is maife-to--j"o1n the-o-:--- ~oun~y-T1Te;amblUlance radio system, network managers will then be better able to assume the considerable job of digesting Clear- water fire communications. .'>: . ;'::~ ".", .... " 'F~Qllg_~gX2i~~_BgglQ The Public Service radio system is a single channel, single station uaF system. Like the Fire Department and utilities radio systems, if the single station fails, the' entire radio sys~em also fails. Co-channel interference is not a problem although a few foreign signals were received during the moni- toring period. The main station is located at the Fire Department training tower on Belcher Road. The station is very busy but the depart- ment see~s to cone with the traffic load. On the other hand, managers of this~departrnent recognlze the channel has reached' maximum utilization and are reluctant to add additional radios to the network. In fact, department managers would like to spli~ existing radio operations into several channels divided along functional lines. .1Jsj,li.tl~B_.EgQiQ The Utilities radio system is a single channel, single station VHF system. If the mobile relay station on Belcher Road fails, all communications would fail between the dispatcher and trucks and between trucks themselves.. ~p~~~~~~m is grossly over- loaded. ~ Not only ii:;, ai r-t:...i.m..e_,Slt a premium"';' "there-ar e per tods durlng mo~~-a-s.i-n9~~7-=~colrht'not. handle"'*:he--, tt a~er Et-1 t notJ.OL-t1;-e-_..th.(o~_t:..li.!!.9....o~ff~t ()~he-1fta.d-eqttate raCiio system. Co-channel ~nterference 1S not -a: '-problem .because -;\ I ,---";~-- I ' 1-4 ') '! . ..J c . . : .~~ Il the unimpressive station 'antenna isn't high enough to pick up unwanted signals. Of course, the antenna isn't high enough to properly serve the Utilities Department, either. Cst s_.f.r.Q.G ~.fHi.in.9 All data b~.tween..building.s..~is.. carried on leas,ed telephone com- pany "Trnes. The highest speed circuit is 9.6,QO,.J:taud, the highest speeawh'rc-tr can be carried on a voice grade circuit. lIi"g.he~, speed is des i r ap.l.Lf.O_Ls_ele.ct"ed_ci.~ui.ts. ,_pa l;',t;:.i c.u.lar.l:t._ wi t.h th e p'ofice-"f.orwnom short r~~p.9.rr.s.!!_tjdn!L.ts-1mEQ_rt~nt_. The City"now pays"$lJ;3.0'7~er' year for a data 'circuit between the computer at City Hall Annex and the Police Department. A higher speed line would cost even more. William McCall 'and Douglas Barnes, both of the Data Processing Department, report poor response by the .! el eph~ort~ _company t,Q _mYJ'ti c i p-aJ..._~g u ~:I~mi!K~s__fo,r. new-=-aat:-~..cl r=- cli~tts.~an.g.eaj.n_~-9Jj.lli.-qQd IDjllnJ:enance of_~xj,.~~~ng....lin~s. Their dreary tale of generic difficulty with telephone company relations for data services was echoed by Eugene Webb, Telecom- munications Manager, City of St. Petersburg, in an interview in his office on April 26. These problems contrast with the opin- ion of all three men on telephone company relations for tele- phone service which is reported to be good. v" C b' _.1~J..Qn__.s_..!r~ The Vision Cable system in northern Pinellas County is organized into three sub systems. Each sub system looks :ike a wheel with spokes (cable distribution lines) 'radiating from a hub ("head endn) from which all signals are distributed. Head end sites are located at Highway 19 and Alderman Road, 2350 East Drew Street which is also the principal head end site and general office location, and 7901 North 66th Street, Pine11as Park. The head end sites are connected together with non redundant micro- wave. Point-to-point communication on the Institutional cable always passes through at 1eas~ one head end site. HAINTENANCE ~sli~~_9~_BEiD~~DED~g General maintenance of radio equipment is good. A thorough pro- gram of performance measurements was executed over a'two week period in March and April, 1985, during which time fixed sta- tions for all City departments were measured for ~ransmitter -I 1-5' i ',:, ," II " power output, transmitter carrier frequency error, reflected power from the antenna, transmitter voice modulation, transmit- ter squelch tone modulation, receiver sensitivity, and receiver desensitization. Results of these measurements were recounted in detail in the Midterm Report. The measurement program can be summarized by saying various stations could be fine tuned for maximum perfor~ance but no new maintenance procedure would make a significant difference in range, voice quality, or freedom from interference as perceived by users on the street. I' No difference was observed in radio performance between police equipment maintained by the outside contractor'and other radio equipment maintained by City employees. No significant impro~e- ,ment would be made in system operation or system integrity for any department through a one for one replacement of new radios fat" old. ~7_~~cogniz_e t:hat none of ~~e_r.::c1io.~~~~1S P~_;'~f1I:,IP ~o current mU~lc~pa1 requrrements, but:tni~.sfior~ll'ls not a ma~n- ~ .~~nd,aiJ:i.9-e=-.ero9lem and cannot be ~edied.EJ.._~if?j?l:Y_ buying new ra os. ---, I ) I l I \ \ I ~gs~_~~_Ms~n~~DEDg~ I I i I 1 i \ ( , - _._--~ .I I Cost of contract maintenance is easy to identify - it is stated in the maintenance contract. Prices paid by the City for main- tenance of police radio equipment (the only equipment listed on the contract for' the year beginning October 1, 1984) are repre- sentative of prices paid by other users for contract maintenance of similar equipment. Total value of the Clearwater contract is 'about $~~,OOO ~er yeaf. The City is paying monthlj rnaint~nance on 20~-hand-held police radios. The police radio inventory shows 225 hand-held radios of which 37 are marked "storage" and another 4 !'[larked nout of service", giving one to believe 184 " hand-held Dolice radios are in active service. .. , ,- Cost of radio maintenance executed by City personnel is not well docum~nted. We know total budge~ of the department for salar- ies, replacement parts, test equipment, and a sinking fund for replacement radios is about ~;~..~OOO this year. ~o.je know cost for maintenance shown in the municipal-oudge~ slightly less on a per unit basis than for contract maintenance. This cost .is actually an estimate which, together with contributions to the sinking fund for new radios and technician's~salaries equals the annual r~oio shop budget. n~_be~~e~e~h~_d~~~sion of cost b~- tween ...!1!?- .In_t~n4.lJ..c.e._AQ4 _ d~pr eC.lat.lon ~s ou t 0 f Ba-l ance: '-"ma.tnt::~- , rran-ce is too hiah and de- reC.laf:lon .1S-too lo1r;-\..te--bei-revecegre- (3:-1 on 15 too low ecause we don e triTe tbe--O:1:y .t?ur-cnasea exjs.t;._i.n..9-..eq..u.i.pmen tat o-C..i..c...es as low as shQ.'d.D......O~he clep r ec ia t ion ~ - . . ------- -. ~~.. schedule. In fact, we bel.leve some of these pr.lces ar~ too low hy--a--,ta:ctor of 2 or more for existing equipment and as much as a 1-6 ',\ '/ factor of 3 if replacement cost is considered. We believe ,cost ~ c.f ".mg.J.,Qt_en.al).c..e~_over stated because, ~~_l?est;, ,_~!L_<;j1,n~_~eaJ::n,.- "- only 72.Q,.man _ho~,rs wer-e-sp~!T_;:=<!rr~~tJ'ft"e-nance. )_ast. ye~~ ,out of about.4,0.00 .a.vail.ab):"e'. maiLliq~,t:s ~:t!.e,t~!3en th~. twQ. _te.~hnicians. If au I ~uspiciQns.. are ..t:ruel- ,~Q.s_t,..9( in.':":P9~~e _nl~~pJ:_~n~r!9.e' is s ignif i... ,C~z:1t~y . ~ ~;:;s__t:halL.C9.f1~.%.ac;,)JJ?intenance. This would remain "crue'- even when allowance is made for the more intensive use police radios receive (contract maintained) compared to utility, public service, and fire department radios maintained in-house. i \ Some thought has been given by Central Services management to expand in-house radio maintenance activity and add basic tele- phone installation and maintenance' (but not maintenance for the switch) I and maintenance fot computer peripherals (but not the main computer). Two more persons with technical skills would be required to implement such an expansion together with signifi- cantly improved bench test equipment and facilities. New space for an expanded maintenance shop would be required, too. Of course, management of the expanded maintenance function would take on a new dimension which doesntt exist now - the present maintenance function pretty much runs itself. Impr~ qqst acco.unt.ing..shoulq..be instituted, to conclusively :ad~t_ermine if money could be saved 'through a full .ser_vice."do~it-yourself main- tenanqe 'app~oach. A side benefit of improved records would be'a correct inven~ory of equipment and history of maintenance cost by brand name and model. Well' documented maintenance histories are essential to life cycle cost accounting. This cost ~istor.y is also a powerful tool when shopping for replacement equipment. Th~;:~ Js-1.i,ttie-doubt- in J:Jl~ writer I s mind that, money can be p~ Y~Sl,~!ld_ _US,e..L~xp_e_~ie!1,cEL~ rou(i~t:-_.~o-oear:ontne_p r oeli): e-m~ry t , process if the City wants to assume the burden of managing this -fu-ncti6n. ~---------._, --. --..__...-.~'..-. ~ -- .\ --_. _..--- FCC RADIO LICENSE STATUS I, The City of Clearwater exercises radio operating authority una~r nine FCC radio licenses which are related to this report. Ell~A~~~__ri~~_~ggiQ_~gL2ig~ '\ This license covers the fire radio station at FO #1 plus 50 , mobile and hand-h~ld radios. City inventory' lists 67 mobil~ and hand-held radios charged to the fire department, 17 more than are authorized by the FCC. ~JJ~.,J:JS:~D.~~J which expires December 31, 1985, should be up~~d~~art of tne'renewa~~2~q~~s~ to reflect the larger number of radIOS-:-..---- _...,-.- __0- 01 ,I . - ....-.---.... -----~----..~,--,-----._ - --- \~ 1-7 .....\ , , c .' ~,. EnS~J~&~__~91j~g_Bg~jQ_~g~2ls~ This license covers police repeaters on Channels #1, #2, 14, and #5 at the Bank of Clearwater Building, plus 3n intersystem base station at this address on 155,370 kHz. Only a Channel #2 repea- ter is actually in service here. Th~ license expires January 5, 1987. E~~21~~__iQll~g_B~~lQ_~g~2j~~ This license covers the police repeater on Channel #3 at the Del Oro water tank on McMullen Booth, Road. The license is correct in all details and expires January'S, 1987. KN1E~~~~__2Qli~g_BsgjQ_~~~yj~g This license covers the new Channel #3 repeater at the Country- side fire station. Ground elevation at the site shown on the license is 39' msl but actual ground elevation is about 98' msl. Authorized height of the antenna is 171' agl although the 18t antenna is mounted on a tower only 135' high for total height of 153' agl. This license expires May 16, 1989. EtllJ~~~__~Qlj~~_BggjQ_~~~yj~~ This license covers 200 mobile and hand-held radios used bv the .. police on UHF channels plus another 25 units authorized to oper~ ate on the statewide police emergency channel, 154,950 kHz. The police show 225 hand-held radios on their inventory, 25 more units than authorized by the FCC. However, of th~ 225 serial numbers listed on the police radio inventory, only 184 are shown in active service; 37 of the remaining "radios are marked "stor- age" and another 4 mark~d "out of service". The license expires January 5, 1987. E~~ll~Ql~__1Q~gl_~QygIDIDgD~_~ggjQ_~~X21~~ This license authorizes a base station at the police Depart~ent on the county emergency government coordination frequency 154,100 kHz. The license. ~xpires November 5, 1986. "\ Or) KB12AA~__1Q~El_g9gg~DID~Dt_BBQig_~g~~i~g \ This license is used by Public Service for the repeatei at ,the. Fire Department training tower on Belcher Road. The license 1-8 ;' .. ',\\ ~. ,': . , L~.. authorizes 125 mobile/hand-held radios compared to 232 shown on the inventory list. Geographic coordinates shown on the license place the station on the east side of Young Street between Belle- air Road and Bayview Drive although the station address is cor- rectly shown on the license as 1776 Belcher Road. This license' expires November 2, 1986. E1L~~~~__~~ill~lg~ This license is used by the utilities Department for the repea- ter at the Fire Department training tower on Belcher Road. The license authorizes 150 mobile/hand~held radios. The inventory list used for cost allocation by Central Services shows only 85 mabile/hand-held radios but the Utilities Department dispatcher believes the department is operating 136 radios on the street. This license carries the same error in geographic coordinates as shown on the Public Service license. The license expires July 22, 1986. EHHE~~~~_~~D_MHZ KNEK858 is a new license issued to the City which has not been exercised yet. ~a-new-license authorizes three channels for co~v~_tional (not t~u,nked), ,.r~~.!gopefatI~n-in:~:Jh~ public safety c~te9ory- oE th'e -n-ew 800 mHz band for- aco"tal of 150 mobile plus 21) nana-ne"Icfra:aTos;---Thereate -70'.channels available for licen- slng-fri'- the--fn the ,. 800 mHz band in the public safety category for either trunked or conventional syst~rns, none of which are presently in'service in the Clearwater area although Pinellas County 1}M__a licens_~ 9.n 20 of' tn'e-"channe1.-s-'for a trunked racio sy"stemi,,- ana. Elie:-:Cl.ty., af._St:';'.: 'Pete-i"sEiJ rif-li"as --a---l ieens e fa r another 20 channel trunked radio 5~is-t:em:"-' .------ --.. '-----.,-- '-" '. . - -.- ---. -----...~... TRAFFIC LOADING AND INTERFERENCE Each of the radio networks was monitored for radio traffic and unwanted co-channel signals. A counting device :~as used which totaled the number of times each station receiver picked up a signal, elapsed time all signals were present, and total elapsed time of the monitoring event. Additionally, the squelch code signature of each signal was accumulated. Once each four hours the monitor printed these accumulated totals. Samples of tallies for Public S~rvice and Utilities radio channels are shown in Figure 1. Samples of tallies for the Fire channel and Police Channel ~3 are shown in Figure 2. 'I 1-9' ,~ ) i .) , l The monitor print-out for the pUblic Seryice channel of Figure 1 'shows totals for the two day period ending 0900 hours on Thurs- day, March 21. Elapsed time, shown at the bottom of the tape, is 48:17 which means the monitor had operated 48 hours, 17 min- utes since the counters were last reset. The left hand column of numbers beginning at the ,top with "CON 8" and ending at the bottom with "67.0~ represent the'various monitor inputs which are tabulated. The monitor will accumulate totals from eight, sets of external contacts identi~ied on the tape as CON 1 through CON 8. None of these were used so the totals for Hours, Minutes, and Hits is zero for each CON input. Subsequent num- bers in the left column,~eginning with "97.4" and ending with "67.0" represent the complete set of Electronic Industry Associaw tion squelch tone frequencies used by various radio systems throughout the country. The Clearwater PUblic Service station uses tone 127.3 Hz. Inspection of the line on the tape for this squelch tone (marked in pink) shows the station was busy 2:36 hours during the 48:17 hour period and counted 3,906 calls, almost 2,000 calls per day. other stations which are ipentified only by their squelch tone signatures are tallied, too. Only ,a nforeign" station using tone 114.8 Hz accumulated any time so the other hits ma~,be ignored. Happily, the station using tone 114.8 Hz was ~nly heard for 4 minut~s during the 48 hour per~od, not enough to represent a threat to the local channel. If the local antenna were highei" as might be the case 'if coverage .of the station were enhanced, this foreign station might be heard more often. The right hand tape of Figure 1 is taken from the Utiliti~s repeater station. As b~fore, the section of tape shows accumu-, lated totals after 48 hours of monitoring. In this case, the monitoring covered the period from 0900 hours Tuesday, April 2 to 0900 hours Thursday, April 4. This station uses squelch tone 127.3 Hz, too (marked in"pink). Look at the totals~ The sta- tion was used 3:39 hours for a total of 6,633 messages. Since this network is essentially a business hours operation, the station was busy 23% of the time averaged across each 8 hour day. The author visited the dispatch room during one afternoon - a relatively quiet time for radio activity. Even then, the dispatcher could not participate with the author in a useful conversation because of interruptions by radio and telephone. The Utilities channel is picking up a little more interference . than the Public Service channel. A foreign station using squelch tone 167.9 was heard for 6 minutes during the monitoring period and another station using squelch tone,l07.2 Hz was1heard for one minute. We are, told that more interference was heard before the ~tation was moved to 'its present location and antenna height reduc~d. Other stations on the frequency are operated by the ~ , \ " . \ 1-10 ", .1 . . I' \ '~.:- ~ < . .'~ .~ 'I' .: .~. :.: : ,I , ~ c ' EYblj~_~~~~i~~_B~~j~ JJ.tJ,l.i.t.ua_..B.a,gj.2 F'RE(i! HR 't1N A HITS I F j;'E I) HR r'lN A HI 7::, -~-----------~----- I ------------------- 'f CCIN S 13e 013 :41 ae130 I CON .... eo l~H) ,f. 0~) ~HJ .;. CON 7 al3 013 * B0se CON ... eo ~) (~ i: 00(uj , ( CON 6 013 ee i4l aees t CON Ij Bl) (q) ,~ 1) ~3 ~j L) CON 5 013 a.e * 013013 CON 5 IDe ~o .. ttLj00 CON 4 ae as * 13eee CON 4 00 tIe tl 0~CH3 CON 3 ae 013 * eeae CON - 00 00 .. 00C1€1 .;. CON a Be 8e * eeao CO~1 2 00 (n) ~ (10(:l~~1 CON 1 ee 108 * Beae C(lN 1 00 ~~~ :.. D (nj i) 97.4 ee 1313 * eel313 ';<:,4 €n) ~j~, ':' e ~J .:'! 'I .,:. 241. g ~H3 ee :f: 130GB \:.4: ,;: tt ~:1 ~ - ~,,) (+ ~., .. I..... .... .~ .. a33.6 00 013 * 1313GB ~-:~ -:. 136 ~) ~:' ., (,. ~) .j ~, i) ~.. . . a25. - 00 013 ~ aee13 -:. ':'1::' - 0e tt~J .., \oj ).~, .) ~ t ....M,..... , I 213. 1 813 013 ~ 0eee ""''' .:. 1 ~30 ~r~ ... ~)0.J~ .:~_. . alta.7 00 1313 * 1300\0) ::'16. - ee .oe: ,f '\3 ~3 ~j ~:~ I a03.5 130 ee * 131300 i:.Cc:: I 5 00 60 to ~'6~:~1 192.3 00 ee * 0003 11?~r~' (t~ ~(1 ~ \j~; : 1 186.2 013 00 :it 0013 ll::::.2 00 ~:t (1 ~ ~) (~ ;:. ';' 179.9 013 ~e * C3e24 oil ~r~ " 00 e~J ~ (,~:;: J. .L ~ .' . :" 173.8 00 00 * ee23 .....- - Olj ~itj '~ ~j('33 .I. f.:. . ':' 167.9 eo 0'3 ~ 01013 .. .11-_ ,~ GO \jE. * ~)!:~ ..L. t:. t' , , 1.62.2 00 01.3 * 0017 1 E.2 .2 60 6~j t: 0~ 1 ~:. 156.7 1313 ee, * 01013 le-~.. - (113 013 ... ' I.J~.).:, .' 151.4 130 eo '~ 13004 .. _ 01 . (; () ~j I.'J ~ (~(I ~:.;:, .. ;:i .. I .... 146.2 01.3 CJe * 1.3131.34 14::.2 (h~ ~J ~ .. .:t:.:;: : 141.3 aCJ ~4 '* 13114 1 ..; : - ~jl-?, ~)(l r. ~j.j (T:' . 136.5 ee 130 :ti 130'37 1 -. - .!t€t ~: IJ .f: ~'i31.;...I -- .::..:..:, '131. 8 Be 1313 * t31()~~ 1 .... ,- ~)€. ~t ':1 .. ~3.: ;.::.:. -~~~.: .127 1:3 132 36 * 39136 12:.3 ((3 41? . +-- ,t': -: ~ ~.;. 123.0 00 ~8 * 81316 1::3,,) eo (\~, . I:; I: .: : 118.8 ~l) l30 :4E ~H313 4 1 1;: t ::. (1e ..-~ }.-~ - - ~ .. 11: -. ~ ;''' II- ~ r'" 114.8 ee €1I) * 01303 1 1 w: , ~: OJ ~.~J . c' ~:~ ~. (- 11 e. 9 eo CJG :4E 013133 11,:' . '~ Co' ;:\ ~~ ~~ ~ t'. . . - ~1 t1-..': ..1 ee * 813132 .' - 107.2 Be U:~.;: (1,z, ~l . o :.3 .; ~ ',' 103.5 013 013 :ii 813136 16::r~ tt ::1 L~1i~ " :''' .,... ~ ~.. lL.....U 130 eo :+: 813130 .. - . ... l(1i~,~~ :::1~3 ~~~ ~? . :...~ ~.:.' ~. .,,~~ .94.8 GO 130 :;E l300G ........ ~- (t;.) ~~~ - . - .. :r ~ .. .:. . ~~~ ;: ....~ ;.. '\ 91.5 1)0 013 * 00136 .:, II =- I': 6 -. i"';. ~ . .. .. . :41 0~301O - . .' _) ':.~~} f: ....~ I:- 013 013 C' .:' ~~ - .' .~ I"':. -+ .., ~.:r. ..,) ,., '. ..,'1 .. .......~.... ~ 85.2 00 013 iIE e0~30 . .. . ~... ---, .... ~) ~:' ~~6 .. ... .. .. .:- :' ~ ~ " ~: ~.. .: '.) sa.s €Ie ee * 00136 .... - ~Z,(~ :-: ~':"1 .. .:: ~z~ : : . - - ... 013 e13 * 81300 4 _ I' ._' "'1,~ ( - . - D~) .'>.. / .' . ~1 t..~ " .. . . ... .. ..... . 77.B 00 De * GlJ00 , , . ~ . ~0 . . + . I.' . . , Be :+: 13000 .I . , ... -. ':". ... ~ -. 74.4 e~3 . - ~:1~) ;.: - - .. .. 9 eo eo * 0006 <....1" _ ~: t=.,~ t- .... ~_. I '." 71. ",:". O~, .:' LZ. ~ (1 ~l .:. .:' 67.0 00 00 :+t eH300 . . .' '.. \) [~ ~~ c~ - - -II> . " I:J :'.''': ~ ELAPSED T I t1E 0048: 17 - I""... ~ L ~ ~ .:. ~ : -.. ...- ~..-.:.;: : .:+,..) ~ (' :. Figure 1 Traffic load for Public Service and Utilities radio channels. 1-11 " \ Ii ,. Cities of Sebring and New Smyrna Beach plus Peoples Gas System. Figure 2 displays monitor tapes for the fire radio system and police Channel #3. Both recordings were made at the satellite receiver site at Fire Station ~6 on Countryside Road. Because of the way the fire and police radio ~ystems work, these recor- dings only display time occupied by field units talking among themselves or to the dispatcher. Dispatcher talk-out traffic cannot be recorded at the Countryside site. It is reasonable to double traffic counts shown on the tape based on the argument that for every transmission from a field unit to the dispatcher there was a corresponding transmission from the dispatcher to a field unit which wasn It reco rded. . i The fire radio system was not especially busy during the monitor- ing period. Only 914 messages occupying 24 minutes of air time . were recorded during a 44 hour period ending Saturday, April 20 (1828 messages occupying 48 minutes air time, estimated total). About 80% of routine fire communications relate to dispatch and coordination of ambulances. Of cou;rse, the ambulances also communicate with hospitals on various medical channels not part of the fire department radio system. Un~~s~~h~re. ~~_~ wo~king "'~ire in the City, one channel can hanql_e. J:h,e j,ol;> nicely:--If'a 'rire shou'J.-d--be-' very-oTg7TOcar-Ya'dl'0' communications associated . with the fire would fully occupy the channel and crowd other traffic. The limitation of a shared channel for both fire/ambu- 1 anc e d i's;?a'tc_h a.h9--fTI:e~91:'9.lJ.!}_ct:-:;~C;>:!l1.l1lqT},:.i:~'~~ 16f1~cfano-e-t6!er a tea ~~-!.L)'JL_no,t__a _s,iJ~,.J~la tl_oI')..._o[\e,-,!.'>'oJ.~.~d._ c.~_o~s.~-=-~..9~f__a.. -~t.1:Y,~~f'-:~?70_0 0 pOP91a~~. If fire/ambulance communications are not picked up oy the county and remain a municipal responsibility, some atten- tion should be given to accommodating traffic sur~es on this network. The police tape of Figure 2 was printed after 48 hOllrs (actually 47:53 hours) of activity on Channel #3 ending May 2. police Channel #3, used for east side dispatch, was chosen as a matter of convenience. We could just as well have monitored Channel #1, west side dispatch. Clearwater traffic, marked in pink ' again, amounted to 1:54 hours on this channel. Since we can assume this is only half the traffic, actual air time is esti- mated to be 3:48 hours, or about 7.9% of available air time. Previous studies by the author and others have shown the typical busy hour in a 24 hour period on a police channel accounts for 10% of the day's traffic. Using this criteria, the channel would be busy 11 minutes of the busy hour or about 18% of the time. This traffic load is not a problem provided the channel remains available. But this is not the case. Whenever a prior- ity event takes place on the east side of town, this traffic is shunted to another channel to make this channel available for the priority traffic. Usually, the priority traffic occupies 1-12 ,( '\\ p' ..' :1 , ,:.:: >:':'::::'~:~t . > : I:.:{~ p <",;., J ~ , r.1.r.e-Bs.Qj.Q FREQ HR MN ~ HI~$ Eglj~~-~b~nn~l_JJ :? ~) \) (1I~1 .ii 7 013 '30 " ,:, lJ iJ (11) j; 5 l;U~ ~H) ~ 4 O~3' (H) '11; 3 oe 8~ t: 2 00 00 . 1 O~~ 00 'ti 06 ~)0 .~ Jjl} (iQ :f. .J I;) ..:.... ;f. lJ l~ ~:' ~:1 f. ~ ': ~_HJ :t I} [1 ~:~: 't ClIJ 80 61;:\ Oi) e.) !=": E' .~ H ~ ~'1N ~ .1-H i ':' ----------------..-- , 1'.\-1"'1 I CO"1 CON CON 'CON CCIN CON CON o;7.J. ::.11,,:. .:. "':'.., ..: ..... '.~'" .. .,.. .~ :.~ ~ ....-.....'. S 1 ;:' . ~ ;:113,7 20:Z,:. 1'~2,,:3 11:''': .:. ~...." '_" t :w. ! 7?, '? 1 73 , ::. 1 .:.: ':" ':. '..... , ..- 1 ..... .-' ::.~.;:. ~ S€.. 7 151,.1 i4~...: l.l!.3 . 4-:':': r: .L .-' '. . '. . -: t .: .L ...t.. , '.. 1... - - -, . .a.._ ..... la~~o €, sJ (! I) (1(.1(l~J c+ e l:1 €I lj (h?, L? lj r.:u) (~ 1:3 ~j (u) sJ l5 t;, ~) l!i L3 ~:; ~j o (h)B (;~(i(' ~) lj ~J 13 i3 ~: (I ~t - -------------.--- C J:' t.: :: LJ 13 C r ~,! i l) ~ C:: N :::' .:'0 (;(I:",j ~r rj8 c!: ~J .; (~~) C' i:: t; -: e e celt'; .... ~'(1 C C j.; ~ €: (. - ,,: l:' C. ~.~ oi . .;. ~j 1: ;;;. -: .,(11: 2-:: + - 't41:. :::~.: (1~) co 2 1 :~, I" (1I~1 \? (1 2;:-:; t ~ ~~~ ~Je ~:-l :: (~~ ('l~ ~~ \~n,) ~ 0(1 t. Qj,J(uj \jl3 << ljQvL3 lJ:3 :.. ~~~jQ (li~ ,f, .:' (\ e lZi C-~ 'fi 6lj(~O .~ eel::hj ? ~Hj lj 6 t. C1l;e~t ~ (hj lJ lj ;. O;Jl;3~\ ~'.;: 'to: ~ lj It' :j. ~, (I ? ~, fuj (\ ~lJ 06 ~J3 JL3 -: 0 Cl301 't: ~J~j~~) · 01J(1(~ . .j l~h:, : ,.. Q~Zq 7- t? ~ .: 0 ~ ~:; ~~ ~ .:. ;:,.) (. ~ :t. 0(1':::: 0~' 1:)(, 'io: 60'71 'z'~. ..: (1;3.j3 ~~j ~ ~3~1~. ~:':3 ."" \)Oi::3 ,; I~ ';.: l:.B 38 2.4 ~ 0514 ~ ~.. <: . . . .. "- . -..: ':. . I. !-7,~: ~l~-..~ (4"4~ e~3 ~ 1 : ~ ,.:. ~~ ~ (1 {1 ~):l e(, ~)(1 .j(1 -r: '41.~ i~"-~' :. - .. .. . (~~' .._!~~~ .;: ~1~ 2 7 ~:.(~ ~~(~ -T: ..j~;~2 (1 0 . .:11:1 .~ (i I:' ;: 7 130 60* (i(\lj8 ~: (1 t' (! '+: lJ '3 ~,:; I?,:} l3e ?: ~~:~)~ 6 ~, .:! ~j "-t= :. ~ ~ ~ ~ t ". (i 1:1 :: (l .;: .J th~ i etoj ~~1 ~ C:~~~, C1 ~~ L~ i~t :~ ~\ ~~ ~: 2 f~::5~ " .... - ~ :.::"" " .' :.-: '3(,.q -it i) :3 ::; 0 :::,..; 11';":.2- :w:..3 '~'1 e-~... ~: ~1 .:' 1) ~ "~'}) .t.: ;, ~'! ,.." ::. __., tiIII .:.. ( ~ ~ :::- :: ..:~~: \: l .~ '.;; .: '4;~ ~ ~j (~ ;) : ~ -: .~ . .. .. . - . - - . . - - I.. : .; 7 ..~ .:~ ~ :. .. t... 0,,:~ ~.:~ ~ ,- - - , ~ .~ ..~ ~ : : ~ I : . .. :. . ... . . . 1 1 J:~ .: ,_~ ~ ~~ . ~ ~ '=1 [1 2. :: ::: (1 0 (; ~ =:.' \.+ ~.+;..,,: t6-~:: :~)"7,:: :Ii .-,:~,;, ~ . 'P. _ . .. (1(' ':'~1 D i;' t' LZl 66 ~j,3 CtC! ~JO , - . . . .. , . ~.:.1 ~_~ .j L~ . ,-.. ~':; .. . t; 0C:0~J f: u~)::t::; '!: + .:., '.. '. . :~I:'";' , .. - :. ."..~ (~ ~:~ l:~ 2 ".. -. i.3 ~: . ,) ..).: .: +: ~, ~j ;.:. .) ~ €l(~ 1.) ~5 ~: 0 .. - : .~.:: ,: f.. ~_~ .;~! . .. .. " ." .: ~..:: '.". . le~.0 G0 ~~ ~ Q~U~ S4t: 6u ~~ ~ B~0~ 1 :", .. .~, I~ ~ ~~ ~: .,: ~~ 0 ~:; ~) .:. ~ ~ . . . ". ':. ':. :e:-- ~-' ;.". .' ':':: >:: ~? .:' ~.: 9> S2.,S -. - t . . I -- t.... . . ~jCl ':1 (1 ~nj . . . -- ~ .:1 ~ l~~ ~..! ~; :.1 i~" "':.." ..-.. l~. ...: ~.) ::: ..} "11 ':.. "'" ~..:,~ ........ (i (; :.: :.) t1 ~:... .......~ .. .,--- .":- :~ \"'. . .. . . C'" _. ~:~ (1 .. ~:' ~. .:: .; ;: - ~~ ~J ~ ~p~: C' ~, ~_~ ~: ~:1 t,; :.: _ 1 .. ,\ t:l tt .:' \.~~ > r 1.,;,1 ~: '_~ ~.: (~ 6 .. , 4" .. t~ ~~. -:.~ .) . (. ~." _. ... L;.".~_;.~.: . ... ~..'...: -- :- . ., ~ L ~ :. . ~. . ~ . - . - ~~~~ B6 ~~ . ~~~~ 7 : . ::- r~ :~ :..~ :.~~ "-r (: ~J .:~ ~ 67,e 00 ~0 ~ DOGe ~L~PSE:' r:ME ~~~~ , ~_ ..:u:~ . _ -, .:..) (,~ ~1 j..... - - - - .. - . :._~~.: ..}...~ ~: ~:~ .:" ~:... ~ ~:: ~:, .,:<>; ~:-. 'I . -: . '. , '. .:. c~ ...: I':~ ,) :o:~ ':' . - .. .. :.. ,-'" : :. - -: uE .:~).: -; 57 '1 '\, Figure 2 Traffic load for the fire channel and police Channel #3 . " '\\ 1-13 \ \~ " .. ~ . 'l little air time but the rationale for inconveniencing almost every officer on the st~eet through this proc~dure is to make th~ __channel instantly _~v~AJ,able for__. p;,AC?"~ i ty t~,~f~J~.!._.._ The p r9c eaure-ma"!\e-s-tlre-oes t ,~_~EOQt'_s.L1;.l:!a tJ..9!1.~..._ ..If,_t.hj!_~ t occu?'scUrJ.ngaou~~_ _hQu.c.,_J:~.i-s.r.u.p.t.i,on. ,in_!' no.rm.al,~_ .9.9.m1Jl~!1j._- c-aticin'~rt's'-'51lliScari'EJ.al. The department needs a sp.ecial e.v.ents , cnanner-WTCb-cJ. ty wtd~_ c.overa--ge tQ ~~commodate the~e events. ..__ __---. .. r ~ Much has been made of interference to/the Clearwater police radio system from co-channel stations at Orlando. This inter- ference has been recorded on the tape. Eight minutes of inter- ference amounting to 355 hits were recorded in two days. This recording, which actually extended another day beyond the tape shown in Figure 2, only picked up another 23 hits on the third day amounting to less than a minute. How then, if recorded inter ference J? ,l.i,ttle__ more than.. noth irig~'at all','" can--rE- be such a p~~.ol:emt_,~he answer ls-'found in the.nature of th~, J~terfer- ence. . - -.,., -, ~ ...-.-.. . O~casionally, propagation between Orlando and Clearwater is such that clear and 'complE:te--dis'paccb-es' are'"rece-[ved- 'e~~:i@.~qr"la~do. When-- crrrs 'na~fpe.ns ,'the'-Ct.earw'd.t"e-r'officer canno~ al\yays be' sure the"dippat.ch-ls te'ally' co-channel itlt'e'rfereric'eand not ~ legiti- mate--.!"ocal-'di'"sliat"ch; '''-Text. of "the 'message or spoken address is n1:lc"-always' "Ein-6ligh 'to' comfort the Clearwat::er officer that the dispatch can be ignored. When this "ducting" as it is called occ~rs, the interference is strong and typically lasts for tens of minutes 0 r--nlaybe-"a"fi' "tio.u i-." More often, the Orlando signal is too--weak-for useful communications but is still detectable. The satellite receiver system feed~ the strongest interfering signal to the repeater transmitter and broadcasts the noise throughout Cl earwa ter . If the ~!lt~r ~ ~ r ~n.g . 9 J...9n~! 09C;.t.!-J_a_te5..; b.a.c.k ..and-forth across the squelch tnreshold "of:",_a__C~~arwate~ r.ec.eJ.vec,.. ,the -local fr~nsml"Eter is turn-ed-"o'nan<foff with :i ra'tcheting_no.ise.., ',.:hich is--w-o"f'Se-than- sOl"i"tl-'interfe.rence. ".. -The .fact that 355 hits """E::re rec6raeawnnon-:ry---6-rnrnu1:es'--~!'a'psed tirr.e on the clock indicates the interference recorded on the tape is of this latter type. The poli,G.e_.9,t~patcher--has_Q.,9.. ,defense except to di-?a~le~,he, rece~ver pic~iDg~p-th~~nte~~rence. . This is ~hy,we said earl rer"'-:!=!.i,~t:- _~thE:-disE@1:.9h~H:... j.~___~,t:yrr~g'-"Eo' b-a-lance m.~~A~,q_ the,. sYS't"~~m de~f enou..9.h to avoid interferenc'e'wh-ne' ni::iEJ.ge.~.~,r:aj:iJ:lg . ,\ 1;._9. Q..JI!.CLl'lY. 10 c a 1 compl a in t s aD 0 U t -pocrr- 'cove'r-ag e -' be ca u s.~. .1:q c;..a 1 receiver-s are tu rned off. -r)--------- ,-' - ._"~- .--- ----- Below is a transcription of the dispatcher's log for March 8, 1985 concerning dispatcher action to 'maintain local communica- tions in the face of interference. References on the loa to "bleedover" is either cross talk on the telephone lines 6r inter- modulation interference. References to a repeater "sticking" means the interference was strong enough to keep the Clearwater 1-14 " /. repeater the only received repeater log that l'.im,g 2:02 AM 2:20 AM 4:35 AM 7:20 AN 7:20 A~t 3:00 P~l 3:10 PH 3:28 pro} 3:33 PH 4:37 PH 5:00 PN 5:00 P~l 5:00 PH 5:08 PH 5:12 PM d .. . ,';-/:~'~ ..... :: :>}r] , , on the air but not strong enough to be readable. Since thing that lets the repeater turn off is the absence of signal, the dispatchers identify this problem as a sticking on the air. One would guess from reading the the dispatcher lost the contest on March 8. .f-'.Q~.l.em Disabled police building receiver on, Channel 3; outside interference. Disabled high schqol receiver on Channel 3; Channell bleeding into Channel 3. Disabled Curlew receiver on Channel 4; outsid~ interference. Disabled fire station receiver on Channel 4: outside agency I I Disabled Del Oro receiver on Channel 4; agency. outside Disabled high school receiver on Channel 2; sticking. ' Disabled police building receiver on Channel 3; . sticking. Disabled the high school receiver on Channel 3; loud static. Disabled the Del Oro receiver on Channell; sticking. Disabled Horizon House receiver on Channel 3; sticking. Disabled police building and High School receivers on Channel 3; turned on Disabl~? Del Ora rec~iver on Channell; stickir.g. Disabled police building receiver on Channel 3~ bleedover. Disabled the DelOra receiver an 'Channel'l; turned on. ' L Disabled the high schaal receiver on Channel 3; stick ing . 1-15 ,1 . ') .. 5:34 PM Disabled tbe Del Oro receiver on Chan'nel 1; sticking. 5 : 5 a ' PM' Channel 3 . all turned on. ,\ .. I 1" " .\) ! ,..' ,~ : .. " ;' " " " ... " ,/ ,) ,( '\":-: .' . r."~' ,; '. . 'i. . , ~ " "~ II ... '. " '" ., , ~ .'~: >, ',' ", .. '.f r '. ":J ,,' ;, , , " . ". -: ~.", "I~ ,'.' ..\ . '~'~~;;< .. " " '1. ~\ r . 'f) ".} \\ ':\) \ '.\, ~~\ ',1 " " , ',} 't. i 1~16: "1 .. '", . .~'\ ,', >, :1 "r "I; 1'1 '.I " I~. ' ... ,.l. ~. "/ p.: fi,'~:'.:: .r , /.. fj ,,' .. ,. , , j> , "/. . ~n1.; ~> .. }c . .~..( ',' :, II' '\ ," , .I,'" ", . .," <:[' , " '.' ~. .. ",<. '.< , ':.:.)' , " .i,', ".' ~ ~'. . .,~- , ,):(" ., ,- ..:~ ~, ;.<~ ", ,:\, ". :,\' I :. "'," -.") ';: . Or ~ t-"i' i". ,.. " ' .. , .. );: > .~. " .' " . , '.' n~\. .' ',' !. . "J . q' ), ' , , d :'1 ,I ,,/":', c~J' '" '> I.' .: it- ~'J ^' ~:".~ .:~ I .' " ..," ,C'o -Of} I, ,> I, >",C: . . ~ ~ " '.t" .., :J ," " ~ . ,; .''1', Z .' .- . .\.... , , , '0" , ,",'~; ". " .' i ,'1 ", ;<\: > . ~. . \: " :".. " :, . ~'.'; " , !. .. ' ','.; ~ ,t . "'./.0. . ,"'" -\ " '.J, :. ,(' . .~. ',';..~ : J 1~ - ,--.( ,~, ~: ~" 'w,:':'l.l:: . , . . .~ &&t ~,:"....:~ , , , , . Ie' . ',' ,~;, . ',)." . l'~. : "( .~.: ~ ~~. .' :: .-/' ?" ,'. .; : ~. r,.f. I. " . " , ,; ~ ~ : f " .J C',:' I'. "' ~.". ':i' ' "e . ""(' ';'. ',I:' " ,c.>, 1 . ; ~ ~ '/ ..' 'I, 'p 'I I:~ . '. i} ') <,'!' 1;, '" :':~~'.j'~~~r~~; :') , " , " /:: ',.'1' r ~."t , ': ~\ 'r ~' ." " :<:'. .~ " " :.< . ~i.' ,;1, ~ . " , " . .:\ , .. " '" .. " ,,\ 'J!' ,\ , ~' 't\: : :"\ '..' "':'0) , '.,,' " ' . " .... .,' '" 'I it '. :,.: I " "1 .'1 '.> '" .. ,[.!~~ : ,;;,::, .';~;:i'< '~.: ::,,:':;: :;;;;:(~:{{~ ,., , . .; -: .1 "I; ANALYSIS .Inj;.I.Q.Qy~.tj,Qn There are two important observations to be made concerning equip- ment and traffic measurements itemized in Chapter 1 of this report. 1. Existing radio equipment is performing about as well as can be-expf!cted"~" F"r~quency-and-'severit~y of service events is cons!itentiWlth-similar equipment in other cities. The muni- ~AE~J..__~~e~"o s~.?_P ~,l],d ,p.c?l.ic::_~ rad~<;l maintenance contracto r- ar-e-- . -.~ o bo~h" g lVl.ng -:-tn~ ~l t,Y good value for the money. 2. New.JadiCULQper~ ting on...!.xi~t;in<3._<;.hanl1f!J._s~"Q.o~L~~~_r~a.ny more traffic ~han-present equipment can carry. ----. .- From these observations one can conclude that replacing existing radios with new radios will not improve system operation. New radios operating on the same frequencies won't offer better coverage, won't be more reliable, and won't eliminate interference. One must be careful to read these conclusions accurately. _~~_ did flo.L S ~y_s,y!; ~ ~IJ! .. QQ e ~ q .t.1.9 U _~" ao",.~_~bJL inm..t;QY e.d ~___d r ama t i call y i~rJ~..ve_d.~ We did say thato ~imply'"_ r!3P~~9iDg ...2;l.I;L,n~_9J.p~~_~Jth .new radios OnthE!~fame Trequencies ,won't fix reported problems. .- - Existing radios, viewed from a hardware persFective, are doing , wha t, they should do. You are no t entitled to expect mor e. per- fa rmanee specifications '."are ne~rly.. the same for new radios as . ~for"oE'ne-ia-d"fos-tbey 'wc5131Ci replace. To the user on the stree't, a replacement-'ra'dio would be a di"sappointrnent. While the old police repeater stations have a rather expensive vacuum tube in the transmitter which is replaced by transistors in new equip- ment, the net perf2rJnan~e of. ,r_eQ*.?5:~m~n;. police repeaters, as seen by officeii-~ri the street, would be the same. All but one of -tnepo1ice 'i:ep'ea'ters are now 14 yeGlrs old and roay become a ,maintenance problem in the next few years but nobody in the Police Department is complaining about cost of maintenance or availability of replacement parts. In fact their complaints "~ren't hardware r.elated at all. Neither are the complaints from adminIs'e:rator"s' fo"r" tO'e U-tfTit'le.s' and Public Service departments. No, these people need something else. They neeSlHel\9ugh indepen- dent talk in9 paths between fleets and dispatch-e.rs to-'car ry'the traff i~ - -They--need-'bet't-eY-.c'ove'ra"ge-;-Aria-t'hey -nee-a- communica- tions'''tree from interJe-r-ence. 'rhis chapter explores opportun- ities t6.."g,~[}~~E-at:e" iequ,CieaI"mprovernents t:-c serve Clearwat~r for the next 20 yea:rs-.' .--.--,--.---,-- _OU" --" , \ 2-1 ~ We will explore the opportunity for new radio channels, where to find'them, and how to use them. We will explore ways to control new radio facilities and at the same time enhance communications for the Data ,processing Department. We will explore how a new' communications system can be made tolerant"of equipment failures and how communication channels can be changed from time to time without changing radio hardware. Our report will lead inexora- bly to radio trunking which offers the best combination of bene- fits versus cost for all departments. " NEW COMMUNICATION OPPORTUNITIES '- RADIO ~g~g_Eg~_~~~_sD9_hgg~~~~Dsl_Bg9lQ_~DsnD~1~ All of the municipal departments using two way radio want new ~ and/or additional radio channels. Each department manager wants new or expanded capability to be compatible with existing radios so department members can switch between new/additional channels and exist~ng channels as communication requirements dictate. In addition to these generalized requirements, each manager has his own list of wants and needs. . *The police want ,additional channels to carry special event traffic which now disrupts routine communications on the four-regularly assigned channels. The pollee want diff~rent radio channels than now assigned to escape crippling inter- ference received from the Orlando PD and Orange County Sheriff. *Utilities Department wants at least one more channel to. relieve congestion on the existing channel. If possible, at least two new channels would be implemented so in time of emergency such as a gas leak, regular communication can be ,carried on remaining channels. \ ' . \ *public Service wants at least two mor~1 channels to relieve congestion and split communication along operational lines. *The Fire Department wants a fire ground channel for on-scene communications in addition to ~he existing dispatch channel. Present traffic loading on the existing single channel does not indicate any problem with channel congestion but, like the fire protection business itself, radio ~raffic follows a typical fire department pattern of long periods of nothing punctuated with short periods of frantic activity. The corn- muniFation system has to accommodate these surges in radio traffic. However, pending outcome of the county~s effort 1 .~ 2-2 " . ,) to reconfigure fire and ambulance communications, the depart- ment has suspended planning for its own communication facili- ties. AYsi19gil~~~_9i_Bg~_i~g~g_~bgDngl~ There are some basic facts of life about new channel assignments for Clearwater which are so overwhelming that these facts define the boundaries of available opportunities. These facts are: 1. Ch~nnel assignments in the 150 mHz range of the Power Radio servIce, wnere"th-e -r'ad'i:o--system-f"crr-the Utilities Department is licensed, have been available since the end of World War II. All channel assignments in the area have been occupied for years. - '"No vacant VHF Power Radio Servlc'e-channer'ls- available- to -expaiiclthe Clearwafe'f-UtIlities radio system. 2. F~equeEg~_~__~__the_1?O mH~_~~nge, where the Public Service Department is:licensea; .have been available for assignment since th7 1950'~. ~ll_~h~__;r~gu~n~~~~.~~,the ~~ca~ Govern- ment Rad~o Serv~ce have oeen'ass~gned 1n the Clearwater area forye-ars. __u_______,,__ 3. F~u.encies_ in-the_4.6.U_I.I!.Hz ..~.?!Jl.3~, wnere the police depart- ment is licensed, have been available for assignment since the 1960's. There are only 20 police frequencies in the'460 mHz range, all of whi~h.a~a.used .in_~h~ local area. '. .. - --.-- - "---._~- ... +- .~ 4. Effective May, 1985, the FCC authorized splitting some exis- ting 150 mHz 6hannel assignments into fragments for a.new type of amplitude modulated AM radio call~d Amp~it~ge Compan~ .dored Single Si~~~~nd r~9io~ACS~. The FCCfs action came aft~t-'se~iE:rar-years of hearings and developmental work by the FCC and industry. ACSB radios are not compatible with FM radios. There are two public safety systerns using ACSB radios known to the writer: Maryland Department of Natural Resources operates a small system for DNR police; Toronto PO operates about 20 mobile radios to communicate with process servers. The Largo PD operated two mobile radios and a station on a trial basis from May to August, ,1983. 'j, , We believe ACSB will grow slowly in the public safety market for at least five reasons: or) a) ACSB r~diQs_a~~_expens~v~_ because of technical require- mehcs which are part-and parcel of ACSB circuitry. List price for a basic one channel 25 watt 150 mHz ACSB trunk mount mobile radio with tone squelch is about the same ($2500) as list price for a 150 mHz top-of-the- 2-3 I{ ~\ '1 . ~ ~'.: line multi channel 100 watt FM radio. (Top power available for ACSB radio is presently 25 watts.) b) Product line of the two manufacturers now selling ACSB radios is limited.' No hand held radios are available now but are expected to be offered in 1986. ACSB radios are available only i~ the 150 mHz band. The narrow selection of'models is likely to continue for a few years, minimum. c) ACSB is incompatible with FM radio which means a ACSB radio cannot communicate. with a FM radio. d) ACSB radios may be incompatible between brands. There is no FCC or industry standard'for pilot carrier fre- quency which is necessary to operate the automatic, frequency control (APe) circuit in the ACSB receiver. APe is essential to keep ACSB receivers on frequency to avoid severe distortion. e) None of the major radio manufacturers have announced plans to offer an ACSB product. ' Captain Douglas Day, Largo Police Department, writing in the January, 1984 issue of the APCO Bulletin concerning his test of ACSB equipment said, "I went into an area that I call the 'black hole'. It is an area in dmmtown Clearwater, Florida covering 11. approximately one half square mile. The area has a very high number of VHF and UHF transmitters located on several tall buil- dines. It is a communications 'No man's land' due to severe and continuous intermodulation interference. This area was selected for the 'acid test'. ' The intermod was so severe that every mobile and p6rtable radio that I have field tested fail~d to reject the interference. The ACSB also failed. In this area, I was able to receive and understand test messages through ~he interference with VHF-Fl.t and UHF-FH equipment, Howevet', the interference blocked reception of the test wessages on the ACSB equipment." .;) Robert Snyder, Standard Oil Company (Indiana)" writing in the June, 1982 issue of Business Action Radio of his experience with ACSB equipment under a developmental license from the FCC, reports ACSB works as well as FM radio. In a June, 1985 inter- view with Snyder, now retired from Standard Oil, Mr. Snyder opined ACSB radio will find increasing favor with industrial organizations because of severe channel congestion in the indus- trial radio services in metropolitan areas. "And it works as well as FM radio". 2-4 , I .1 I.') .1. "." . ~: " " .e.Q.Q_m1iz_~sD.d ,f' ,. >'--. .' Large system users have recently found communication capability available in the new 800 mHz band substantially more attractive than any choice previously available for, four very st.rong reasons: ~ " 1. The 800 mHz spectrum is virgin territory. All channels are clear channels now. Later, when the band fills with new users, each, licensee will receive at least minimum protec- tion from co-channel interference through protections writ- ten.into the FCC Rules which do not apply to other frequen- cies. 2. Trunking technology can be applied ~D12 in the 800 mHz band per FCC Rules. ~~unkinq, described below, is the mos~~~~r- ful communication concept ever-aeveIoped in the industry. .. ---'---- -- 3. Major manufacturers have a significant body of experience in both building 800 mHz equipment and implementing 800 mHz radio systems for the commercial market place. Public safety users are comfortable with their long time relation- ships with these vendors who now offer a broad product line of 800 mHz equipment from which to choose. " , 4. Ho'{in..s.. municipal radio conununications \:.9,__8.00. .mE..z-,. .esp'ecial)Y -n trunR.Trig_-~s-usecr;-rs-=-"t1fefTfsc-'oFiportunity in the history ~of"the l_~~strLf~.t" l'arg-e- u'se-rs:J::Jke, Cle~~~~~.r.'t:cC~l)s-ta'll a liJ.DgTff-,adJ.o olal1., .t-6-Ijenefrt~.11 departments.. An 800 mHz t"runKed- radro" systemhof1:ers "a-s many exclusive talking paths as functional and operationaJ. requirements indicatei yet, communication can be easily carried across department lines when, required. It should.also be noted that an 800 mHz trunke~~~~Qi9., system is -mre'.comoa~j,bl.e with what Isnow calle~.an:ventional" ra'di6.'-'--- -equipment- opera ting in'r:ne-'.I~rO_rnHL<Lr,:..A.50=-41.0_.rnH~.Ji~q9E ~-eve-n PH ...cortVen t::.lur1crl" _.{_c;1ifios.... '.--r;some 800 mHz trunk ed equ ipment is compa-- tib-l.e >-wi to -800 mE z conventional radios.) This means that if Clearwater implemented an 800 mHz' trunked radio system, those who remained behind on existing channels could not talk directly to others equipped with trunked radios. While there is a way around this problem, the interface between new and old is best viewed as a patch to be set up by push button action at the dis- patch console when required and .knocked down when not required. , \ '\\ .\ . \\ 2-5 , I - j NEW COr-u'\UNICA'l'ION ,OPPORTUNITIES - WIRE LINE Five new opportunities are examined in this report to supplement or replace dedicated wireline circuits leased from the telephone company (GTEr. These opportunities are: copper wire cable, fiber optic cable, coaxial cable, Vision TV cable, and micro- wave. Microwave isn't wire line communications, of course, but it works as if it were a combination of all the cable technolo- gies rolled into one, so we have included a brief introduction to microwave here. The discussion begins with a short review, of 'circuits leased from GTE which are candidates for replacement by, .' {, municipally owned circuits.' , II Xgl~~b9n~_~QID2sn~ All communication between city buildings for telephone and data is now carried on wire lines leased from GTE. All radio control circuits are leased fro~ GTE, too. \ Basic cost for a dedicated circuit of voice grade quality not connected to the switched telephone network (data or radio con- trol) is $23.48 per month if both ends of the circuit are served from the same telephone company central office. If both ends of the circuit are in Clearwater but not served bv the same central office, and the serving offices have contiguou; boundaries, add $4.20 per month to the basic charge. If both central offices are in Clearwater but do not have contiguous boundaries, add $26.10 per month to the basic charge. These charges do not include cost of installation which is extra. ' The CitY.J,as..A_(g.v.9r,~p:!..e. .Q.I,1;t,IL.1s,ase. .Late on a 600 pair under- 9 raunc cable rt,lDn.in.g...b..e.tw.een--th.e-t.e.lephon.e _ camp,ariy - central o~ce-on Cleveland (~he b'~lding ~~-the-rni~IQ~~ye tower on ~he_J_oofL ang~ th~L.E_o.l.ic.e.....D.epa.~t-ment-bu-ildin9, 6.(4, Ple?c'e ---- Street. Not all !?airs in this cal;>le ~';:~.J!se~~La.t_...t,hj.~s,.~Xrr.e: tnere is no adoitional charge for using new pairs up to En~ capacity of the cable. The City uses another 400 pair under- ground cable leased from the telephone company on a per circuit basis which runs between the City Hall Annex and the Police Department. Not all wire pairs are used in this cable but each new pair used as a dedicated circuit (data or radio control) costs $23.48 per month since both ends of the cable are served from the same central office. The City leases a special data circuit together with a standby circuit between the Annex and police buildinR. This circuit is "conditioned" by the telephone company for s~eciai data handling requirements. Each line'costs $554.46/month for a total of 2-6 ; :1 , }. '" '!~ ., . $13,307. 04/year. .For.. ..reasons best eXp'~a~~e.9 ,by. _t..he~, .t:~~faP,hon_e company, t.he data circuit bet.ween these buildings is routed throllgn~-'Atl'ane-a;-G"e6i:gra~~--l:t'-a-ppea"rs--tne--City-may b'e. able to achieve the 'same 'level' of, - sei"v ice offered by this special 'circuIt b~i repl];c_~,rfg_-:o_n:e of --ttiese 'Tines 'with" a "circuit:- in t.he 400 pair cable already running 'between the Annex and PD. Ordi- nar ilY', s'ucn- a.truncondj;t-ionea-Tj:n-e~'\.ioul'd --nce-oe'-a" candida te for -this--appl-icat;.ton-bu t-i t--is--wo.r,th-a-.tr-y-because--che- cab-l-e-...is -1 ess than a mile long. Short cables do not exhibit the transmission probl-ems-of'l"onger lines and therefore can sometimes be substi- tuted as-is for specially conditioned data circuits. "Short" in this context means less than one,mile of wire. It is probable a modem supplier would be willing to 'loan the Data processing' Departmentl a pair of high speed modems for trial with the under- ground cable on the proposition the City would buy the modems if the trial were successful. W~-PelJeve erospe~~~fq,~.~~~~~~ are ~9.Q~~- Savings generated by oiscontrnuing-lease of one of these, special data 1 ines wou.J.~--12.-a.y .-feu. ~hp mOde.ms-..in--e.ne.,.year. If this trial is successful, we would look at duplicating! the success with another local line using a different route between the two buildings, perhaps using the route no~. followed by Traffic Engineering Department cable. Two local loops using different routing between the Annex and PO would be as secure and the' special circuits routed thorough Atlanta. The City leases a number of circuits from the telephon'e company to operate the police radio system. Present lease cost amounts to about $lO,lOO/year. ~~~~g~_~j~~_~s9l~ The City already has a substantial municipally owned cop~er wire cable plant installed to operate traffic signals. Some of the cable is buried in ducts leased from GTE years ago at what now looks like give-away rates. Some of the cable is installed over head on telephone or electric utility poles. All of the exis- ting cable plant was installed by and serves the Traffic Engi- . q neering Department. None of the cables are more than 24 pair. These small cables do not have enough wire pairs to make a contribution to municipal communications but some routes could be replaced or supplemented with larger cable to accommodate data, telephone, and radio control. Wire can be pulled into existing ducts o~ installed overhead on existing poles for about $IO/foot including cost of, cable in the 50-100 pai'r size. ,Since maintenance cost on these cables is little more than repairing breaks (falling trees, excavations), total communication cost for the life of the cable is not much more than cost of installa- tion and right-of-way. Communica~ion service is limited to voice ,grade circuits. Data speeds typically cannot exceed 9600 2-7 " c, baud on these circuits if cable length exceeds one mile. Exis- ting radio control circuits are not candidates for replacement by City owned cable because not enough radio circuits run be- tween any two locations to make construction of ne~ routes or extension of existing municipal cable feasible. The City owns an underground cable between the Police Building and Fire Station #1 where enough circuits exist to have made cost of installing this short cable worthwhile. ~.Q.9~j.,g.l_~.s.Q.l,g Coaxial cable can be installed for about the same cost as copper cable. Unlike copper cable which consists of a bundle of indivi- dual circuits, coaxial cable is a wid~ band path much like fiber optic cable. High s~eed data c~~ ~~ansmitt~~on-~oaxial cable. Terminal equipment for coaxial cable can be a signifi- c:~~ e~~~_Eepen~~g~E!?l},. the kind~ ~Lsi9nals caEEled ory _the cable. An amplffier must be installea 1n '.en'eca"bTe every 1500 't'O-SOOO feet to overcome inherent attenuation in the cable. A ' , municipally owned coaxial cable system would operate just like the Vision Cable system (but less extensive and therefore easier to maintain) except the'City would be responsible for its instal- lation and maintenance. riQgI_Q~~iS_~gQl~ thP_e C.QP'~!..C::. 5:~~l~_. .~s. .~,~e.9__w_h7.~~, .many ci rcu i ts traverse _ th~. _7arne p.at~,__wi}e_r.~_. ~.l e~.~r ieal trans 1 efl t5," a r~._ a., problem on copper \0:1 r e, or where protection from wire taps and eavesdropping may be- nere.aea; --srnce-Tign"tls--transmTfteo' ciif 'tr'ies-e "cabl es ra therthan electrical signals, fi~.~_r__Q.fL~ic .cables. are. impervious to electri- cal s_u~~ges, do !19..t,~aqj,.c;t~L_a~9 cannot_l;>e tap!:,ed without kI1;ow- 1 eQg_e._~~ _the s'upe.:vis ing agency. The developmental stage of f ibe r op i: lC- 'co-rtlmuffH:a e ion' i's' now his to ry and many compan i es serve the ma~ket. Cost of glass cable is approximately $0.60 per fiber meter., Two fibers are required for two way communi- cation. A two fiber cable of significant length would be rather unusual because it is.much cheaper to buy more cable capacity than initially n~eded than install additional capacity at a later ,time or repair breaks in individual'~ibers. Basic termi- nal equipment for one T-l circuit (24 digital voice channels) costs about $12,000 ~lws installation. Basic terminal equipment for 96 channels (4 T-l circuits) woulcl run in the $35,000 range per end, plus installation. Data may be transmitted on these basic circuits up to 56 kb/s, or 1.544 mb/s for the entire T-l line. \ \ 2-8 '1,\ IJ~) II I: ',1 < ~: >.... ~ ,; I) The Ci.ty_of.. st: t.,. P.ete!.sbu.t:.g_bought_a_fiber optic cable installa- tion f~om AT&T last year with 12 fibers in the 6ible fo~. ~ link betwe~n fity Hall and the Police D~part~~nt:-'. a_distance o;_.~qg~t one mile. . 'Cos\:' - of' the--proj"ect-w-as, $237 ,000 inclua1ng excava- tion, new. undetg rotind ~uc.t wotR",-'-aild' o'as ic "te:rmina'X-'equipment t Y~~~~D_~~~1~_~~ID~2D~ " Vis~~n_~~bl~ Company has installed an "institutional" cable in Clea~wat:er fo-r--u:s-~~~'s :.t.lie:..1:Le-y w-r:$j1eL~ffllart. 0 f i t:s franchise ag-i:(ienienE~----Tfie--Tnstitutional cable is TdeiiEIcaI"Iti--aIT 'respects to t:!ie"TV cable except for routihg' and kind of signals carried on the cable. We understand the franchise agreement requires y~on to offer certain services free of chatge to the City. Among' these free services are: 1. Access to the cable at City Hall, City Hall Annex, Engineer- ing, and- public'W'orks -with up to 10 cable drops at each ' address. 2. Cost of,..n.ead end equipment up to $50,000 to implement munici- pal communications.. ' . -- " " - ~. --...- ~ - . d 3. Teleconferencing 'capability. (which is interpreted by Vision to mean two way video pictures with accompanying voipe) 4. Maintenance of the basic institutional cable system not including any terminal equipment and perhaps not some head end equipment. ' Not .included on the list of free municipal entitlements is: 1. Cable access at the Police Building, any fire station, or any two way ~adio site, even if passed by the institutional cable. . 2. Terminal equipment at any location to implem&nt communica- cions on the cable. 3. Maintenance on any City purchased equipment. . Vision Cable personnel were interviewed on two different occa- 'sions'aoout now tnelnstl.t\fEional-cabTe network might be used for ~ata circuits as well as selected radio control circuits. Particular attention was given to anticipated reliability of potential circuits. We also inquired as to redundancy and back- up features which would assure communi~ation during periods of electronic or primary power failure. Initial response to these inquires is: --'.- .' .. -----," 2-9 :1 , ..~ \\ 1. Only 6 mHz of spectrum (E~OU~ 48 voice channels) remains aval1atsle -fcrr- 'new-"two way circuits 'out of an original 80 mHz bandwidth. -----..--.. 2. Cable,amplifiers are not redundant so failure of an ampli- fier would interrupt service to all points on that distribu- tion leg o~ the cable. However, system performance is moni- tored 24 hours per day and matntenance service is available 24 hours per day. A system-wide failure, though unlikely, would swamp maintenance personnel. All electronics in the system ~ave battery or generator back- up for continued operation during time of commercial power failure. Headend equipment can be operated for two days using standby power with on-site fuel. Cable amplifiers will operate 2-3 hours on battery back-up. The company has a few portable generators which can be connected in place of battery back-up for cable amplifiers for extended power outages but a widespread power outage would prcbably exceed company capability to maintain operation beyond 2-3 hours. (The City Data Processing Department has DQ stand~y power source except a UPS system which permits an orderly shut down if the power outage is expected to last more than about 30 mintites.) . 3. I j \ I I 4. Hardware reouired to connect data terminals oc radio cir- cuits to the cable would be a City expense. The first $50,000 of head end equipment offer~d to the City free of cost in the 1980 proposal may not be forthcoming, depending upon a decision expected August 27. The ~up to 10 cable drops" at a single addresS-mentioned in the 1980 proposal as being furnished at Vision Cable expense on the institutional network are for television only and do not include cost of modems for data or voice. 5. In event of widespread failure of the cable system, Vision's fir -?~..P..!..~9S~_~.- .w..Qul.o, b.e..._to__ce,s t_9 r~._,s ervice to. it '.5. } 5~~OJJ.0-':-TV' subscribers. --- yis~~_n_~?-.1?~~.. !'I1~n.agement has declined to offer any suggestio_os on ho~. Vis.ion 'Gabie~ mlgM..:.p1ay" lit' "r'ole ~in'- mun'icipal comm"unTcatlons. If municipally maintained equipment r~lated to the cable' system needs to be installed in an unattended Vision Cable building, municipal maintenance personnel would not be permitted ,unescor- ted entry, "even the police department". The question;of whether municipal employes and/or municipal communication system contractors would be permitted to maintain ,equipment connected to the institutional cable remains unanswered. . \ , "'j 2-10 , " " r " ) j' ,t " '\ /. Notwithstanding this dismal introduction to the potential role Vision Cable might play in an upgraded municipal communication system, we would not wr i te them 0 ff. 'When planning prog r~~ts~!S.. _ beyond the conc.~t stage we suggest Vision -C'a~'~~Jnah~9-.~q\'eQ..t be - re.v,!. s-~ te?" -t.~' .~cris~~_~'s ,_~p~~.J;rc ~oltif1i~1:ill ic'~t-~~n__.p~J;li~ .1.E_r. .s~~~. r~.i, c . 'purposes. Pernaps the .company has capabIlIty (and responsibili- ties?) Beyond that ~olunteered during OUI conferences. ~j~.IQ~.s'yg Microwave is a bulk point-to-point communica~iop ~edium offering 's'uE~:ricrr qtrcrlity-cil:cuiti-;----re:--!-'s-oe'sf"-usecf to carry a large ntim- ber ofcT"rciiIE"s":""'t)"e'E'weena-few .locations because cost is strongly dependent upon the number of stations in a system. The number of voice and data circuits carried on the system has only a second order effect on cost. "A~~crQW9v~~yst~~,consisting ~f few _ y_oice/data circuits or short distances between!drops may. com- pare urifav'oracl~rln' cost' 'w!'E}i other transmission media. Cost of a redi.uia'anl: "m"ic:row'ave s:Y-sfcenf-t'o-~c'Orfhe~t--tnEf- Anne;(;-1'orice Buil- ding, and City Hall would, for example, probably cost $250~000 to install plus $12,000 per year to maintain on a contract basis. An underground 100 pair cable system connecting these three buildings using existing ducts would cost less to install, would last longer, and cost virtually nothing to maintain. On the other hand, the same microwa~e system of three stations stretched out over 30 miles would probably also cost $250,000. It would be a bargain compared to buried cable. TRUNKI!-:G Nbs~_1~_~1~D~iD9 '~7-~nk~?9 is the automatic sharing of a small number of communica- t 1.00 .-p-at:h.!:r:-rTi'-(lr'1..k s) altl-Cng _ a :.:.taTg.-e:=t.l1Jt!)oe r ofu:s eL:::i . Thl:: .e[ f rrc-.:-- tiveness of trunking is predicated on-:'" '. .-. -'-"- a) percentage of time a user requires the communication ~ink is small. '. .----- -..." b) p~obabili~y _~hat many users will require a trunk at the ~~roe instant is exceedjngly small. Trunking has been used in the telephone industry since before the turn of the century. An example of telephone trunking can be found in the City of Clearwater m~nicipal telephone system. .'-.---..... - .. ~ .,.--+ ....---- - ~--~_... ..------ ~" ----- 2-11 t \") II I' ;,.,- .( , . The number of simultaneous conversations which can be carrled on the system is significantly less than the number of pairs of telephones, and the number of "outside" lines available to the municipal telephone system is far smaller than the number of telephones. Cost is the driving force which limits size of the telephone central switch to no larger than necessary to carry typical traffi~ loads. S~ity of ~a~sp-e.ct..J:.um i~ the dt:WD.9-(.orce which-B..rgmoteL. radio trunking. There is not enough spectrum and therefore not enough radro-channels to offer every applicant for radio license all the channels he needs. However, if the applicant will use trunking technology, users of trunkjE3 s~stem:;_q!l!!_J1?,y'e,,_~iscE.~te talking channels even thol.!.'lh sharing a central radio plant. .. Th'i:-s--rs'-t:r\re--:rm3'E-as'the-teIephoneuse-i .-c'a'fi- nave'-a,- conver sacian with another while sharing a common telephone plant with all users. Trunked radio systems are new to the industry for two reasons: l} Only recently has it been possible to manufacture logic and control circuitry to manage a trunked radio system which is small enough to be conveniently incorporated into mobile and hand-held radios. 2) Radio spectrum has been available only since 1976 which has a channel organization designed to optimize trunking technology. And, one might add, without spectrum to use ~~k~~g, manufac- turers had no incentive to laL:nch what has turnea out to be ,a ~c:.~~.!ve_ devel~p'm!Enta_~ p rag ram ~~o.. impAeI!lE?_l}t. .r~_~.i_~..,tEEE.k ing .cR!t:- c ep ~s . --- X~YD~gg_Ey~t~ID_~~~~~~LYID_E~ii~i~Dgy~ The presumptive objective of the introduction of trunked system c'oii~t5-r:.(_to-Tn-cr'ea'se'-si?ect.rUl11:-'lis'~g~ ~~~J!JSP~Hfcy. -. ""'5'pect'nitn efflciency" has been ae~liieo as the ratio of-the actual number of users assigned to a defined portion of the spectrum to some unspecified theoretical maximum number of users that could be assigned to that portion of the spectrum, holding the level or quality of service constant, within a defined area. Since the theoretical maximum number of users that could be assigned in a given area, and a quantifiable measure of "level or quality of service" is not available, the term "spectrum efficiency" is not very precisely defined. However, it does have a useful meaning in a relative non quantifiable way. Intuitively we feel that techniques which permit more users to fit into a fixed " 2-12 I ~~'i '-' [' . " .c h .,>" . 1\ amount of spectrum or conversely, that permit a fixed number of users to be accommodated in a smaller portion of the spectrum, without impeding their communication effectiveness, improve "spectrum efficiency". From this concept springs the corollary that unused air time is an indication of spectrum usage inefficiency. This iaea is b.~sed ~20.?. ~he~ r_~_gu~.~t6ry J?rinc!~le _thC!~~~~~.~~_ meet.~~~.~n~um e!!~QIIs_fi~~_~q~~~nts Ji~_!1 rig_ht ..1:.~_~~_er~~e~A$. 'p,~iY_ile9..~. to use air tJ.me. - a___.~ _, This concept might have validity if all users of the spectrum have the same requirements and make the same contribution to the pUblic's interest, convenience, and necessity. If that is not the case, then the idea of unused spectrum and therefore the, term "spectrum efficiency" may have little meaning. The possi- bility exists that the worth of unused spectrum, simply by being available, may be greater than the worth of spectrum fully occu- pied by l~ss essential services. . As an ~xample, the worth of the "hot line" between the White House and Kremlin is not measured by the number of messages transmitted. Its worth lies in its guaranteed, instant availa- bility when needed for "t;he g'opd-,of the coinmunity"at large. KeepiAg in mind the above cautions regarding the general applica- bility of the term "spectrum efficiency", several analyses of the possible contributions of trunking techniques to "spectrum efficiency" are available. These studies, derived from tele- phone experience, show that tr~!}~;.;t"g.te"chniques can be expected ~o significantly. reduce.-the..probabJ.lity of delay in a system of a fixed number of trunked channels. - - --.:..,. ... Figure 3 shows the probability of delays that have been calcula- ted for various number of trunked channels under various conci- ' tions of loading. A single channel system is included to illus- trate a boundary condition. For example, a 'fQur channel system with each channel loaded to 40% would represent an overall prOba- bility of delay of 40% to any user if the system were operated in the conventional mode. (See dashed line. Each channel has the same probability of delay as a single channel system.) The chart shows this delay probability would be teduced to 9% if those same four channels, each 40% loaded, were connected in a ~runked system. A 16 channel system, with all channels loaded 40%, would provide each user with a 0.1% probability of delay if operated in a trunked mode. Appl~cation of these generalized conclusions to a specific mobile radio service presents certain difficulties. The calcu- lations from which Figure 3 is derived assume a telephone type 2-13 - environment wherein a large number of randomly selected callers are attempting to communicate with a large number of receivers over a limited number of channels. This analysis does not exact- ly fit'the City of Clearwater situation. Here, generally a single caller (dispatcher) must communicate with a large number of simultaneous recipients (mobile units) or one (or more) of the field units must communicate with the dispatcher. Since the number of system users on one part of the system (dis- patchers) is relatively small compared to the number of users at the other part {field units), the basic mathematical formula- tions used to develop Figure 3 should not be applied too liter- ally. Just how much more traffic can be carried on a system by trunking the channels cannot be determined from Figure 3. Pub- lic safety providers, in particular, must have near absolute assurance th~~ the system will support the level of service required to satisfy their public safety mission under peak load conditions. Since radio trunking is new to public safety ser- vices, we must look to the commercial market where radio trun- king has been used on a large scale for the past seven years and to the FCC which has given particular attention to the special communication requirements of local governments. ~bBDD~1_1QB9jD9 Mr. F.A. Giorgi, General Electric Company, wrote a report in 1981 titled "Nearly Instant Access" in which he describes a mea- surement program conducted by his company on stations installed at the Sears Tower, Chicago. Five conventional stations servi~g 303 field units distributed among 53 commercial firms were'mea- sured for activity and waiting time because of channel busy con- dition. A five channel trunked system' serving 318 field units distributed among 61 commercial customers was si~ilarly mea- sured. A total of 3,831 radio conversations were recorded over a 9.3 hour period, of which 2,103 were on the conventional sta- tions and 1,728 on the trunked system. Mean length 'of conversa- tions on the trunked system was 30.6 seconds and 28.0 seconds on the ,conventional stations. Blocking time on the trunked systew (all channels busy which means the next user had to wait for access) was 1.3% of the time even thouoh each channel in the svs- tern was active about 32% of the time. JOn the non trunkeq (con: ventional) systerr~ where each channel was active approximately 35% of the time, the potential blocking rate was 35%. This high level of activity should be compared to the Utilities radio chan- nel, the busiest channel in the City of Clearwater system, where we measured a busy rate of only 23%. One might speculate on how many channels a City of Clearwater trunking system should have to make potential waiting time insignificantly small. It has already been suggested that telephone traffic models are not a 2-14 'I \ .,~\ PROBABILITY Q,F DELAY IN MULTICHANNEL TRUNKED SYSTEMS 100: 80: 60% 40: > 20% ~ :::> ~ w a: 10% ct ~ 8% ..J . . w Z 6% .' ~ Z ''\ <( 4% J: (.) ..J ..J <{ to- 2% .'. ct :t ..... > ..... 1% - ...J - ,8% ~ <( ~ ' .6% 0 0:: 0- .4% .F II 2Q; . ... 1~ Figure 3 . Ie 0,2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 COMMUNICATIONS LOAD FACTOR " 2-15 11 very good fit in a two way radio environment. How many radio channels are enough? The FCC has, for all practical purposes, answered the question about how many channels are enough. The governing figure is not level~of serviqe, waiting time, or applicant desire. The gover- ning factor is number of mobile and portable radios to be . served. Basically, the FCC requires an applicant to load a trunked radio system to 100 radios per channel. A general idea of the power of trunking can be gained by'fmaking a few comparisons between a trunked City of Clearwater radio sys- tem and equipment now in place. The City operates with 6 chan- nels now, or 7 channels if the fire department is counted: four for police, one each for Utilities and Public Service, and one" channel for the fire department. The City owns about 600 radios of all kinds. Channel usage on the 7 existing conventional chan- nels averaged over 24 hours varies from 23% for Utilities to about 2% on the fire channel. The public Service and utilities channels are extremely busy during normal working hours but virtually idle nights and week ends. The police channels are busiest evenings and week ends with unpredictable surges at any time during emergencies. The fire channel is practically somno- lent until an alarm is received and then is very busy for a few hours before going back to sleep. ~ The City has taken the first step to relieve congestion on the Public Service and Utilities channels by applying for three new 800 mHz conventional radio channels which have been granted. Will this be enough? Not likely. How will the police radio problem be solved? How about a new fire ground channel?, Presuming the police can solve their radio problem~ through some process yet undisclosed, the municipal radio inventory in ten years might look like this: police mobile police hand-held fire mobile/hand-held public service mabile/hand-held utilities mobile/hand-held administration/miscellaneous 75 225 100 200 200 _SQ 900 radios Ignoring for a minute where the police will find new channels to solve their problems, look at the channel loadina. System growth will amount to about 100 radios for each ~f the three ,. .," newly licensed 800 mHz chann'els but the reso~rce won't be evenly distributed. Public Service and Utilities get it all. Worse 2-16 IJ , 1 o yet, the City Commission will still have to pay a substantial price to somehow fix the police radio system. , Utilities and PUblic Service users with new 800 mHz radios won't be able to talk with "old" users, from their departments except on a cross patch basis which puts all the traffic from either channel on both channels. Both Utilities and Public Service radio channels; new and old, will probably continue to be virtu- ally vacant nights and weekends when the police are busiest. I Communication across departmental lines, won't,be any better than it is now. Traffic surges on the various channels will continue to be a problem. In fact, three new 800 mHz channels won't stem the complaints. The police need better communications now. The police also need, a new special events channel and would split some other special- ized operations from the dispatch channels if they could. The Utilities and Public Service Departments will solve their traf- fic loading problems at the ,expense of isolating their' own sub fleets from each other. Communication between either department and police won't be any better after the new channels are added than before. This is a situation made to order for a single municipal trunked radio system which can include as many independent talking paths between field units and dispatchers as needed; where users can talk across fleet lines when required; and where all depart- ments can share in the benefits of a single radio system. If the application of trunking technology is so obvious, why, one should ask, isn't it already widely us~d by other cities? Hi~tg~Y_Qt_Bsgjg_I~YD~iD9 The Federal Communications Commission established basic require- ments for trunked radio systems and proposed new spectrum to the land mobile community to implement trunking technology in 1970 in Docket 18262. The FCC granted the first license for a trunked radio system in 1976. Nearly,'al1 early grants were ~ade to entrepreneurs for Specialized Mobile Radio Systems (SMRS), a commercial trunking concept which was established in Docket 18262. These newly permitted entrepreneurs now sell radio service to businesses for dispatch type traffic and since 1982, a mobile telephone type of service. A subscriber can operate a few radios on a SMRS as if he were the only user because other" unrelated subscribers are not heard. Each subscriber has essen- tially a private radio system. The SMRS business has boomed with an annual growth rate of 60% for the past three years. There are now more than 600 SMRS on the air serving tens of 2-17 n ~ , I, " ~~. > <. thousands of mobile radios. The trunked radio business has been driven by SMRS. Associated public Safety Communications Officers, Inc. (APCO) published results of a study in 1979 to identify and develop specific operational capabilities which should be incorporated into a trunked,radio system for law enforcement agencies. APCO is an organization of communication administrators, engineers, and technicians who are employed by all levels of government. APCO has been the FCC designated frequency coordinator for the Police and Local Government Radio Services for many years. Their members represent the sin~le' largest repository of communi- cation skills in the nation for state and local government requirements. As will be seen, most of the capabilities for a law enforcement communication system established by APCO apply equally well to all municipal communications. APCO used a panel of senior communication system administrators from state and. local governments to assist in what came to be. called APCO Project l6A. Among those who played a key role in this project was Philip Byrd, then Chief, Florida Division of Communications Engineering. Most of the trunking architecture recommended in this report can be found in the APCO Project l6A report together with some of the descriptive material for trunking systems found in the predecessor APeO report for Project 16. The section above titled "Trunking System Spectrum Efficiency" is a para- phrase from the APeo Project 16 report. Three years after the first SMRS license was granted, when APCO published the Project 16A report, governmental use of radio trunking was minuscule. One can, speculate why this was true. Some delay can be blamed on the enormous investment local governments have in conventional radio equipment which is not compatible with trunking. Some of the reticence of local oovernment officials may be a natural reluctance to try new fechnology. And, some delay can be attributed to the slow procurement process of budgets, public hearings, and bidding which typifies all large projects of government. The FCC must carry some of the blame, too. Original rules for a trunked radio system described a rigid construction and implementation schedule for the ~gIDP1~tgg radio system. Not only did the FCC demand rapid implementation of the system by the licensee, he was further required to prove he had the system loaded with users on a preset timetable. The penalty for not meeting FCC growth standards was and is loss of license for lightly loaded channels. The penalty applied to all licensees, commercial and government alike. (Some,SMRS licenses have been rescinded for this reason.) It was ,a schedule few units of government could hope to meet. The scene is beginning to change. .~ 2-18 ...,\ ',", ',. ,"1: Radio equjpment is now coming to market which is specifically designed to meet both APCO Project l6A criteria as well as other operational requirements of the government market place. The FCC has changed its rules relating to governmental applicants, for t~unked radio systems to permit slow growth and has set aside 70 channels for trunked public safety radio systems which are not to be ~hared with commercial users. The City of Miami will be on the air this summer with a trunked radio system. Pinellas County has a license for a 20 channel trunked radio system with first purchase of equipment expected in 19B5. St. Petersburg is planning a 20 channel trunked radio system and is already licensed. Tampa and Hillsborough County haven.t moved yet but it is only a matter ,of timer both governments will' probably want 20 channels, each. It won't be long before all of the trunked channels will be assigned in the Clearwater/st. pgtersburg/Tampa metropolitan area and that ~ill be the end of that. In the meantime, it is first come first served. The FCC will not re~ssign the same trunkep channels within 70 miles of each other. . I~~D~~9_~2~~gID_b~SD~tg~~y~g Architecture of a trunked radio system is completely different from what is now called a conventional radio system. Trunked radio systems use many channels in a single system, no one of which is dedicated to a particular user group. A conventional radio system may use many channels but they are always dedicated to designated user sroups (utilities, public service, police, etc.). Trunked radios use an addressing technique to identify radios. Each radio has a unique address plus usually a fleet address and subfleet address. Whereas conventional radio sys- tems are organized by channels, trunked systems are organized by fleets. A fleet is defined as a group of radio users with a common fun6tional responsibility ~ho, under normal circum- stances, only coordinate actions among th~mselves. A subfleet is a subset of a given fleet whose normal communications do not require interface ~7ith other subsets of the fleet. Typically, the majority of an individual.s communications would be with other members of his own subfleet. Communications within a subfleet s2~~sL to be on an exclusively dedicated channel. However, conversation is actually assigned to any available frequency within the trunked system. It is digital addressing which permits communication with other designated (addressed) units. By assigning fleet and subfleet addresses to radios in addition to their individual addresses, communication is possible among all members of that fleet or subfleet. Units not in the group are not parties to the,commun- ications. Addresses can be assigned organizationally or func- "\ 2-19 tionally or both, thereby permitting organizational or function- al privacy, i.e., police department members only, utility depart- ment members only, etc. Similarly, addresses can be assigned to patrol divisions, detectives, water department, gas distribu- tion, and so forth. It is possible to have empty subfleets to which units may be assigned on an ad hoc basis to isolate traf- fic associated with a special event from routine traffic within the gr.oup. Addressing individual units by fleet and subfleet permits agen- cies within the community to utilize a common communications system while still maintaining operational independence and integrity. By careful design of the system's signaling concept, many specialized features are possible such as automatic status reporting, priority of access to a channel when the system is fully busy, flexible command and control organization, system privacy, and other needed features often impractical 1n conven- tional networks_ f~~_BggYiLgIDgD~E_iQx_1XYDt29_~E9j9_$~~Sgm~ The Federal Communications Commission has established ground rules for 800 mHz radio, including trunked radio systems, which are different than requirements for any other part of the" spectrum. Salient requirements for 800 mHz systems are: 1. Any' number of 800 mHz channels may be trunked but an appli- cant who requests more than five channels IDY~~ trunk without ~tXQD9 justification in favor of conventional assignment. The City now has a license for three 800 mHz conventional channels as a stop gap measure to relieve the pressure on Utilities and Public Service. (Implementation of these channels has been suspended pending outcome of this study.) If this foothold at 800 mHz ever grew to five channels, the City would have to re-co the entire conventional system to add trunking capability at enormous expense. And, the FCC has historically rejected cost as 'a reason for not following its rules. 2. Trunked radio channels are granted on an exclusive basis. Clear channels initially licensed to the applicant wilI~be removed from the list of channels available to subsequent applicants. If the applicant keeps on his construction timetable, the FCC will hold these exclusive assignments for the applicant for the entire construction term. 2-20 "~\ . I , I 3. Units of government may have up to 5 years from date of license (10 'years in v~ry special circumstances) to fully implement their trunked radio plans. The FCC will reserve clear BOO mBz channels for a Clearwater trunked radio system provided justification can be made for: (a) number ,of channels applied for; (b) extended time to fUlly construct and load the system. Acceptable reasons for granting extended time are: the system will serve more than 200 units; the applicant is a local government agency required by law to follow multi year cycle to plan, approve, fund, and construct; or system 'will be part of an area wide program which requires more than a year to plan, approve, fund, and construct. , . . "J ;i<. 4. The FCC expects a trunked system to be loaded to 100 radios per channel with total number of authorized channels rounded upwards to the next whole number. Suppose the City counted 901 units in its trunked radio inventory after completing its implementation plans inclu- ding mobiles, portables, and control stations. The City would be secure in its hold on 10 exclusive radio channels. If, after the implementation, period had passed, the City did not meet the loading criteria, the FCC would reclaim enough channels to bring loading to 100 units per remaining chan- nelh (rounded upwards to the next whole number of channels). 5. There is no maximum number of mobile and hand-held radios which may be added to a trunked system. An applicant may operate more than 100 units per channel. 6. Annual implementation reports must be submitted to the FCC and applicant's frequency advisory' committee. The FCC is keeping licensees "on a short string" to inhibit warehousing of frequencies. 7,. A conventional channel with fewer than 70 units assigned will be reassigned to other users in the sa~e area,) At least 70 units must be operated on a conventional channel to retain exclusivity. If this loading is not m~t in three years from date of license, the FCC will assign the channel to another applicant in the same area, ~Y~n_snQ~gb clear channels are still av~ilable. '~ 2-21 . . , " . . T ; > ~gng~Bllz~g_BY~~~ID_Bggyj~~IDgn~~ The APCD.Project 16A Report lists 36 system requirements which a local, government trunked radio sy~tem should meet. Some require- ments relate to systems much larger than Clearwater will ever need while other requirements are basic to most trunked systems designed to meet the special needs 'of government communications. Below are listed selected requirements from the APCD Project 16A list which we believe are essential for a City of Cle,arwater sys- tem. 1. Radio channels assigned to the system should be automatical- ly selected in accordance with their availability such that' all system users will have access to all assigned voice chan- nels in accordance with the established priority protocol. 2. Hardware should be capable of supporting not less than 10 dispatch locations for a 10 channel system. 3. The signaling language should permit each system to assign no less than 4,000 discrete mobile addresses and 100 dis- crete dispatch position addresses, regardless of system size. " 4. All dispatch positions and mobile units should be capable of being assigned group address designators thatwill permit communications between individual dispatch positions, groups of dis~atch position~, individual mobile units, groups of mobile units, or combinations thereof. All units operating within the sam~ group will receive both sides of all communi- cations (except digital information) addressed to or from .that group. 5. Dispatch locations mayor may not be co-located. All signa- ling between dispatch locations, the system controller, and base stations, should be compatible with voice grade common carrier land line or microwave standards. 6. When one or more voice channels in the system is not in use, any system user should automatically have access to a voice channel within 0.5 seconds after momentarily activating a microphone switch (or other request for channel device) . The system must automatically compensate for any signaling attempts lost due to simultaneous attempts to access the system~ Should a voice channel not be available, the caller should be placed in a queue and given an indication t~at his request has been received and queued. He should be no~ified automatically when he has been assigned a valid channel. " The system should continue to request an available .channel automatically until channel assignment has been established. \ .'\ 2-22 I '/ ::'.'.~ :~1 7. Anytime that a unit is out of contact with the signaling system, an indication should be presented at the unit. 8. The system, should incorpo~ate five levels of priority. Assignment of these levels of priority will be made at the system control center. Structure of the signaling language should be such to assure aCcess to the signaling system in accordance with the level of priority involved. . Access to the system should be only at the expense, of the lowest level or priority necessary, i.e., a priority level 2 call on a fully busy system will preempt the system from a priority level 5 user if there are any on the system. If not, then priority level 4 or 3, in order. Such, preemption should be indicated to the affected user. 9. All units in the' system should have 6apability of seizing access to the system via an instantaneous emergency switch. Activation of this switch will permit access to a dispatch position within 0.5 seconds. This level of precedence is intended for use only in those instances where im~ediate communications Is necessary to preserve safety or life. I 10. Activation of the second precedence level or below should establish communication with some or all dispatch locations as determined by the procuring or using agency involved. Activation of precedetlce levels' should remain in effect until a dispatch position takes those actions necessary to re-establish regular operation of the system. This prece- dence level is intended for those units in the system requir- ing immedi'ate access to a communication channel in the' per- formance of the mission of their agency, i.e. fire apparatus en route or other operationa~ need established by the system users. This precedence level should be established by acti- vating an appropriate control at the dispatch and/or mobile unit. It should assure access to a channel in all instances except when a priority 1 signal takes precedence. 11. Command priority: this level of precedence should be avail- able to designated command or supervisory personnel. Use of this precedence may incorporate system privacy if so estab- lished in the system controller. .Group addresses or mobile units assigned this level of precedence may require such priority access as a normal procedure at the discretion of the procuring or using agency_ 12. Operational priority: the system should be capable of provi- ding a level of precedence to public safety functions which will preempt routine activities in the event of a fully busy system. The distinction of these classes of ser.vice shall be established in the system controller via the system ~en- , , 2-23 '\ , ': :.: ~ ... .:' 'I tral control. The system shall maintain sufficient channels for each ~ser to provide for pre-established operational requirements. 13. Routine: the lowest level of precedence. 14. The system controller should incorporate those features" needed to permit the switching of discrete units and/or groups of units. It should assign channels ;n accordance with priorities and group assignment procedures established by the system user. . 15. It should be possible to reassign the priority levels of address groups and to change group designators by direct access (via keyboard or similar means) to the logic of the system controller. 16. In the event of failure of a portion of a voice channel (either a transmitter or receiver or any portion of their related equipment), the system controller should detect such failure and give indication of the ~efective channel at the system control center. The controlle~ should not select a defective channel nor designate it fo~ use, but should. continue to assign traffic to the remaining operating ,channels. , , 17. Should any portion of the RF link of the signaling system become defective, signaling should automatically shift to another channel(s) while concurrently shifting other system components in accordance with a predetermined protocol. Indication should be provided at the system control center of such failures. ' 18. provisions should be wade for bypassing the system control- ler in event of its failure. This 'will permit designated dispat~h locations to have direct access to predetermined RF channels for operation in the conventional mode. Failure of the signaling system should cause an indication in all mobile units and all dispatch positions. It must be possi- ble to then switch all elements of the system to a conven- tional mode of operation within one minute. 19. The system should be capable of displaying the discrete address or group address of any unit with which. a dispatch position is in communication at that dispatch position. 20. Each dispatch position and mobile unit in the system should be capable of'changing its group address to no less than six other pre-established group addresses. Each user of the system should be able to select a mode of operation that 2-24 ..~ ,) permits broadcast to all of a selected number of groups as may be assigned to satisfy operational needs. Certain units should be capable of broadcasting to all units in the sys- tem. This last capability should be incorporated within the system design but may be implemented in only selected units at the discretion of the procuring agency. . , 21. A sub system controller should be available at each dispatch location capable of permitting reprogramming of addressing protocol of those group and discrete addresses, that may be assigned to that agency or dispatch location. For example, a dispatch location assigned' to a fire agency should have the capability of altering the addressing protocol of the group and discrete addresses of the units'assigned to ,that agency. 22. Provisions should be made in the system design concept to incorporate a minimum of six automatic status reports. These status reports should be sent automatically in digital burst format by a mobile unit through activating an appropriate switch on the mobile unit control head. I 23. provisions should be made to incorporate automatic interroga- tion of the status of individual units from dispatch posi- tions. Such queries should be indicated in the mobile unit. Status replies to status reque&ts should be displayed at th9 interrogating dispatch positions together with the discrete address of the unit involved. The implementation of this capability should be determined by the specification of the individual system being procured. The system should be capable of interface with a computer aided dispatch system. Depending upon requirements of , the CAD system involved, the interface may be either direct or through buffering equipment. Such interface requirement and the appropriate data output needs should be specified in the individual system procurement documentation. 24. \, 25. The system should be capable of incorporating or interfacing with mobile digital terminal systems. The specific opera- , tion of this interface should be a function of the type and number of the terminals involved as specified by the indivi- dual system procurement. The system must be capable of operating in the conventional mode in the event of failure of the system controller. In the event of such failure, an indication should be pr10vided to all users of~the system to alert them to revert to a pre- determined system of conventional operation. In this event, dispatch locations will be assigned previously designated channels. 26. -\\ 2-25 "I ., :.W' 27. Trunked mobile radios should have capability to communicate ,:\ with existing conventional radios operated in the 800 mHz band'by the agency. 28. Interface with conventional systems noi operating in the 800 mHz band should be through designated base dispatch loca- tions. . The APeo Project 16A lists ten operational requirements for the system controller hardware and human interface with system management which are important. Two of these requirements are worth repeating here because they are particularly appropriate to a trunked radio system for Clearwater. 1. The system control center should contain facilities and equipment to monitor and record all message traffic passing over the system as well as the signaling channel, including: *number of transactions by user *system element failures including time of failure and time of restoration of service *percentage of system up time *equipment status change , . 2. The system center should provide a keyboard or equivalent type of-operator positions at which the followi~g control protocols may be imp~~mentecl or altered: *change priority level assignments by group and discrete address . *add to, change, or remove designated groups and discrete addresses from the,list of automatic priority assignments interchange address groups within the machine'logic so that users of one address 'group can be automatically included with or excluded from other address groups *allocate discrete addresses to dispatch locations or reduce the number of authorized dispatch positions ' *prohibit designated discrete addresses from having access to the system I *assign higher or lower level automatic priority assignments to discrete address units (supervisory personnel) *~lter the configuration of selected address groups. This is to establish designated,~ddress groups with appropri- ately assigned discrete address numbers for special pur- pose or temporary'functions. 2-26 , l"\\ , I .) :. ":'!'~ 'or' \. .Il .c.QmJ;lRj;j.J;ljJ.jj;~ If Clearwater were to implement a trunked radio system to enjoy benefits which no other system configuration can offer, what should become of existing radio equipment? Almost none of the existing equipment is new, very little is less than three years old, most radios have been in service for 6-10 years, and the oldest existing equipment (police fixed stations) have operated 24 hours per day for 15 years. Suppose for sake of argument that half of existing equipment is too good to retire. If the City installed a 10 channel trunked radio system, what should happen to the "good" half of existing equipment. Answer: keep it and use it in conjunction with the new trunked radio system. A new trunked system can be configured to provide talking paths between new subfleets of trunked radio users and old radio users. Intersystem communication will work ,best if old users can be organized into fleets which pretty much stand by them- selves so as not to burden the flexibility of the trunked system with old system architecture. Over time, as old radios are retired, they would be replaced with 800 mHz trunked radios. After say, 7 years, the radio system would have mi'grated to 800 mHz without loss in residual value of existing equipment. b_~99~_l9~~s$~ l ~ \ \ . TherE is little doubt the police should move communications to a new trunked system as soon as possible to escape debilitating interference on existing channels. Coincident with the move, the department could expand the number of independent talking paths between field units and dispatchers, .institute dynamic regrouping of subfleets for special events, and enjoy the secur- ity of automatic unit identification with every transmission. Old PD radios should be retired and ngood" hand-held radios modified to operate on the pUblic Service channel. The police will want to retain basic operating capability at UaF into the indefinite future for coordination with neighboring jurisdic- tions. ! Public Service should jump at,.\ the opportunity to move to 800 mHz, too. Oldest and most tr~ubJesome radios should bE replaced with new trunked radios. High volume users 'should move to 800 mHz together with those. who sometimes need to talk to utilities units or the police dispatcher. Hand-held radios inherited from the police should be deployed to key persons for ,improv'ed work efficiency. Utilities Department administrators will find relief from channel congestion at 800 mHz~ Communications may be split 2-27 1: ') 1[, ..~~I~?~ , ... ~ ,,'c along functional lines. Improved coverage from the ~runked radio system will enhance communications in the north county area. Both Public Service and Utilities administrators will need to give close attention to organization and flow of their newly , found communications capability. Existing radio channels ar~ so busy that they 'throttle traffic during busy times of the day. When this bottleneck is removed, existing dispatch capability will be woefully inadequate. On the other hand, with a trunked radio system there is no requirement to run all communications through a single point. Communi~ations can be reorganized to pro~ide direct contact between sub 'fleets and their own offices, giving each sub fleet its own, independent talking path. SYSTEN INTEGRITY . ~ i B~J;~gm_.Es.j,J..!J.rg Communication system integrity, reliability, dependability, or whatever description to uninterrupted communications is assigned to this requirement, must be beyond doubt. The public safety communication system must continue in operation regardless of weatheI, power failure, equipment malfunction, or other trouble. Citizens are entitled to expect help from their public safety providers when help is not available from anyone else. This re- sponsibility, which is imputed to everyone in the public safety services, means these services must be largely self sustaining in any emergency scenario. People and equipment must have enough surge capability to discharge their responsibilities under working conditions which would be impossible for anyone else. Many of these trying circumstances can be anticipated and plans made now for ccping with weather, equipment failure, and work overload. All radio equipment will fail sometime in its life. Most esuip- ment will fail more than once, almost always at the most inoppor- tune time. Since equipment failure is probable, it is incumbent upon the planner to design a system which cannot be crashed by a single failure nor 'is prone to domino style catastrophe. Consi- der station failure. What woule happen now to Utilities, Public Service, or Fire if the main repeater for any of these depart- ments were to fail? These departments would lose all radio COffi- munications. There is nothing the dispatchers for any of these systems can do if the station falls as these systems are present- ly constituted. There is no standby station for any of them. , City radio shop personnel could probably get ~ny department back , ' . \ 2-28 , \) , I ..~ II on the air in the same day by repairing the failure or patching together something from inventory which would work. Would you be satisfied if you were the one who called for help during the time the system was out of service? Because the police operate on four channels, the department isn't entirely ,off the air if a stations fails,l but, except for channel #3, there is no standby equipment. A general power failure would crash every radio station in the City except the fire s~ation and single police station installed at the PD where standby generators are available. This should be corrected. A trunked radio system has inherent reliability in the nature of trunking architecture. Since individual stations of a trunked radio system are not related to specific talking channels, and any station may be used on any talking channel, station failure is not a catastrophe. In fact, 'the stations must be alarmed so the system manager knows a failure has occurred. Of course, if a station fails, the remaining stations must carry the traffic and users may find there are short periods when all remaining stations are busy. This kind of soft failure is what engineers like to call "graceful degradation". It goes without saying that a trunked installation is always furnished with standby ~lectric power and the facility operated over redundant control circuits. A trunked radio system can be made as "bullet proof" as any system can be. And the beauty of the architecture is that a single, secure raqio plant serves all users equally well. For the first time every municipal department and every employee and public safety officer can enjoy the benefits of excellent coverage and super reliable station facilities for the price of buying only one such system. ~QD~X91_~ixg~j~_EEil~~~ The police have experienced interruptions to radio control cir- cuits in recent years weich extend several hours and mo=e on circuits leased from the telephone company. Loss occurs when the telephone company Switches to standby facilities for reasons unrelated to trouble with oelice radio control circuits. When the telephone company makes this switch, the police dispatcher loses capability to turn on the various transmitters located away from 644 Pierce Street. Modern radio station equipment would eliminate this hardware dependent problem and make exis- ting leased wire line circuits transparent to radio operations. The police report trouble with cross talk on telephone lines. Indeed, during our test procedures in March and April we heard WFLA loud and clear on a radio circuit for a period of hours - 'l 2-29 ~ I' '", l , I then the cross talk.stopped and the line returned to normal operation~ The City radio technician reports other instances of noise and high attenuation on radio circuits which comes and goes. Control circuits for municipal radio channels need to be at least as reliable as the equipment itself. New radio equip- ment of every kind would also be adversely affected by cross talk on telephone company lines. Radio trunking can support the cost of secure control circuits. Since many circuits terminate at the station site, bulk circuit techniques are viable choices whether it be copper wire cable, coaxial cable, or microwave. It 'is, possible, even probable, that the City can install and maintain its own radio control circuits for a trunked radio system at less cost than they can be leased, and be assur~d of greater reliability from these circuits than has been offered by the telephone company in the past. When conventional stations are ~istributed throughout the ~ city as is now the case in Clearwater (and characteristic of most cities), these bulk control circuit techniques are not applicable. Individual control circuits leased from the tele- phone company become the default option. 'However, unlike leased circuits which have a low first cost and significant recurring cost, municipally provided circuits are likely to have"a high first cost and small continuing cost. Notwithstanding the front end load of cost for self provided control circuits for a trunked radio system, long term cost to the City of self provi- , oed circuits would almost surely be a winner. And, with appro- priate planning in the design stage of a new system, addition~l circuits added at a later date would have a low first cost, too. VOICE SECU8ITY " It is no secret that most public safety communications are no secret. The proliferation of inexpenEive receivers solo to the general public through radio and hobby stor~s has made them a common consumer item. Some models of these receivers include scan capability to monitor many channels. As these receivers have become popular, ~olice agencies have shown increasi~g interest in protecting their radio traffic from eavesdroppers. Scramblers have been generally available to public safety'agen- cies for about a dozen years but have become sophisticated only in the last six years. Almost all scrambler products sold to police agencies are directed to r~al time protection of radio traffic. That is, scrambling technique, complexity, and expense are directed towards listeners who simply want to eavesdrop and don't have substantial resources to develop code breaking equip- ment. Six basic encryption techniques are used in most scram- I, " '2-30 4 , bIers sold to police agencies. Sometimes tw~ or more of these techniques are combined in a single scrambler. 1. Speech inversion is the oldest and probably the least compli- q, cated scrambling technique. Inverted speech sounds like single sideband Citizen Band radio when received on an old 23 channel ,Citizen Band radio. Others have compared the sound of inverted speech to listening to Donald Duck on a bad day. Inverted speech has an easily discernible syllabic content and is technically easy to decode. This scrambling technique is not seen much anymore because it is so simple. Encoder/decoder is priced in,the $200-$400 range. 2. Band splitting is a method of slicing the audio band into two or more pieces using filters and then recombining the , pieces in an unusual order for transmission. Band splitting is seldom used alone and is difficult to do well. 3. Sometimes noise or one or more tones is superimposed on the speech to mask the voice. Tone masking, as the process is called, is seldom used alone because it is not scrambling but it can be used to disguise syllabic content of a mes- sage. When tone masking is filtered from a signal at the receiving end of the circuit, the process also n=rases" some of the recovered voice'which erodes quality of recovered speech. . ' Code switchir.g can be u~ed to sequentially change encryption details of any of the above schemes or switch betw~en scram- blino schemes. Code switchinc is not a sctamblina method in itself but it makes decoding more difficult on a continuing basis. Encoder/decoders are priced in th~ ~600-$l200 range. 4 . 5. Time domain scrambling uses delay lines to chop transmitted speech into small segments which can be further scra~bled and rearranged. It can be;compared to a bucket brigade in which the order of buckets is chanoed in mid~stream and then restored to the original sequence at the receiving end of the circuit. Time domain scrambling employed with other techniques is about as complicated as\cornmercial analog scrambling is expected to become in the public safety radio service in the next few years. Encoder/decoders are priced in the $1500-$2500 range. Equipment is sometimes bulky. The scrambler for a hand-held radio is about the size of the radio itself although one manufacturer builds a time domain scrambler into an oversized microphone. , 'I The last scrambling technique to be noted here is digital speech transmission. The FCC approved a methocl of digiti- zing speech in 1979 for use by police agencies. Digital 1, " '\ 6. ~\\ 2-31 , I , I , il ,< speech is a completely different method of scrambling than heretofore permitted. Actually, the speaker's voice is not transmitted at all but is used to generate a stream of bi- nary numbers at the sending end of the radio link which is used to manufacture a human voice at the receiVing end of the link. There are an astronomical n~mber of ways that a stream of numbers can be arranged. If the voice can be translated 'into a stream of numbers and the numbers arranged on an excruciatingly complicated basis known only to the parties in the conversation, the message becomes extremely secure. While any encryption scheme conceived by the mind of man can surely be decoded'by. the 'mind of man, we are here only concerned with real time decoding by a person who does not have the resources of a nation behind him. As a practical matter for police applications, digitized speech which has been encoded in a sophisticated cryp~ographic fashion is secure, period. Only. one manufacturer, Motorola, has developed digital speech ,for two-way radio applications which has E'CC type acceptance. Motorola calls their pToduct Digital Voice Privacy. Sometimes it is called simply DVP. A DVP equipped radio is no larger than the same model without DVP capability. DVP has some limitations. DVP cannot be added in the field to a radio already manufactured. DVP, as do all sophisticated scram- bling systems, reduces radio range somewhat when used in the , scramble mode. Range is unaffected whe~ used in the'clear voice mode. DVP requires a "code inserter" to program DVP radios ir. the system. Codes may b~ changed as often as desired. There is no wav an individual officer can know what DVP code is , being used (or~needs to know) so not only is the transmission se- cure but information leaks concernino the code itself are minimi- zed. If the radio is lost or stolen; the code memory is erased either when the battery runs down or when the code module is re- waved from the radio as an interloper might do trying to discov- er the algorithm. Curiously, in addition to extremely secure encryption, the,intercepted signal does not sound like a scrarr.- bled signal to pi~ue onets interest, but sounds like squelch noise on an idle channel. DVP adds about $1600 to the price of a mobile or hand-held radio and S26pO to the price of,a base station not including certain availabI~ console options. The code inserter which is used to program each radio costs about S1800. One code inserter is re- quired for the system. Because only Mctorola offers digitized speech radio equipment, net practical cost to the buye~ may be higher than cited here because the company might elect to offer a smaller, discount on the basic radio than would otherwise be offered since, in this case, "they own the. only store iri"town". 2-32 ;, : . ."., :.; , :', I . Whether scrambling equipment is worth its cost is a judgment call which varies between police agencies. Opinion is no less divided among police officials who endorse scrambling about how much voice security should'be purchased - at least for "ordi- nary" police work. About the only thing we are certain is that whether to scramble or not to scramble is not an engineering decision. Cost for voice scrambling is not included in budget ~ figures of Chapter 3. RADIO COVERAGE Public safety radio communication systems are called upon to de- liver reliable contact undeI more difficult, circumstances than any other radio service. These systems are expected to always deliver "loud and clear" messages at the location of the event even when the field unit is shielded by a building or terrain. The complete system must have enough performance capability to accept radios which are nct operating at full specifications and still deliver readable communications at all locations of inter- est. How much extra performance 'should be included in a radio system to accommodate variations in propagation, equipment degra- dation and unusual shadowing isa contest between system cost_ and system performance. If solid contact with ~and-held radios or pocket pagers is used as the minimum performance standard, the test of performance is even more severe than' for mobile radios. When evaluating system coverage for hand-held radios, a rule of thumb is to allow 10-15 db margin for communication with a hand- held radio in an open area compared with signal required to com- municate with a car at the same location. Th~s extra margir. is required to overcome the poor antenna on the hand-held, radio to- gether with weak transmitter and shielding of the user's body. It requires an increase in transmitter power of lOx to increase signal strength at a point by 10 db and ia transmitter power in- crease of 32x to increase signal strength 15 db. Additionally, the hand-held radio user may be inside a building or automobile which further shields the user from the central station. Atten- uation of 25 db is common, in a modest commercial building or car comEared to signal level outside the shield. If the 10-15 db mar9in "for poor hand-held radio performance is added to margin for "inside" communication of 25 db, the 35-40 db margin re- quires a transmitter 3,200x to 10,OOOx stronger than required to communicate with the central station from a mobile radio in an open area at the same location. 'Since these enormous increases in transmitter power are not available to the system designer, ' the net result is that communication range with hand-held iadios is less than with mobile radios. J 2-33 I I \ > \, \ . , , 00.'1..0 : '. " None of the Clearwater radio stations servei its users,~ith coverage desired by each of the departments. Five strategies are available to improve system coverage.' Sometimes two or more 'of these strategies are combined within a system. They are: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Multiple stations Mobile relay operation Receiver voting Transmitter steering Simulcasting ~ The first three strategies are used in Clearwater. Transmitter steering is the terea between two 'or more stations. Probably the most frequently stated requirement is to improve communications with hand-held radios. This is true because hand-held radios not only hav.e low power transmitters but they are further handicapped by low performance antennas. Since "there is no practical solution to the short range of hand-held radios, the system designer works around the problem by artifi- cially reducing necessary coverage for these users. Talk-out coverage is iroprove9 through use of multirea between two or more stations. Probably the most frequently st~ted requirement is to improve -~ommunications with hand-held radios. This is true because hand-held radios not only have low power transmitters but they are further handicapped by low performance antennas. Since there is no practical solution to the short range of hand-held radios, the system designer works around the problem by artifi- cially reducing necessary1coverage for these users. Talk-out coverage is improved through use of multiple stations and/or simUlcasting. Necessary talk-back range is reduced by placing satellite receivers at strategic locations throughout the area of 'ir.terest., ~~l~lPl~_~t~tlQDs I I. The intensity of radio coverage, can be increased within a de- fined ~eograp~jcal area by using multiple station sites. Each station of a wulti station system is then required only to pro- vide service to a limited area close to the antenna where sianal level is high. The strong signal can be used to overcome diffi- cult coverage problems. Multiple stations with overlapping sig- nals ~an only be used one at a time or require diverse frequency assignfuents to avoid mutual interference. If wide area coverage is needed for 'individual broadcasts on the same channel, multi- ple stations must be linked together in a special way for simul- c~sting. The polic~ now use diverse frequency assignments with four channels, dividing their system into east/west dispatch, .. \\ 'I . \) 2-34 ... ~ , I I' " I" r , MQ~jlg_Egls~_g~g~s~j9n Each of the main stations used by POlice, Fire, Public Service, and Utilities normally operate as a mobile relay (repeater) sta- tion. That is, the stations automatically rebroadcast signals received from field units. Repeater operation enables field units to communicate between each ~ther over greater distances than would be possible on a direct basis. This is true because the powerful fixed station 1S served by a high antenna at a site chosen to optimize illumination of the desired coverage area whereas lower powered mobile and hand-held units are necessarily equipped with modest antennas and must operate from randomly chosen locations. Only one station can be enabled in the repeat mode on a channel at a time or the system defaults to simulcast operation. Mobile relay operatio~ places special constraints on the system planner which do not exist when simple base stations are used. Unlike a base station which alternately transmits and receives . as the radio conversation ebbs and flows, the mobile relay sta- tion must simultaneously do both. This means the strong ~ignal of the repeater transmitter must be excluded from the receiver of the repeater if the distant and weak signal from the field unit is to be heard. Two techniques are used to do this. First, the transmitter and receiver dfthe repeater are assigned differ- ent frequencies so the transmi~ted signal appears as an unwanted sisnal to the receiver. Second, the receiver is complE:tel~l isola- ted froru any hint of signal from th~ transmitter. In most situa- tions, receiver circuitry is not capable of rejecting the over- whelming signal of the local trans~itter without adaitional iso- lation external to receiver circuitry, regardless of whether the transmitted signal appears unwanted to the receiver or not~ If the repeater receiver is not completely isolated from the adja- cent transmitter, the'strong signal and/or broadband noise from the transmitter will desensitize the 'receiver. .' information, and "all other traffic" channels. None of the other City departments enjoy the luxury of more than one radio channel to implement a multiple station strategy. ;' TwO g~neral attacks are made on transmitter/receiver isolation for a repeater station to guarantee success: th& transmitter and receiver are protected fro~ each other by filters (cavities) ana sometimes they are also connected to separate antennas. The penalty for not maintaining required isolation is desensitiza- tion of the repeater receiver. Indeed, special care must be exercised to avoid unwanted coupling between all tr~nsmitters .' and receivers at a site to avoid both transmitter in~ermodula- ticn and receiver desensitization. Special weasurements were 2-35 i' l' made at each transmitter site of' the existing system for'recei- ver desensitization. We are pleased to report, Clearwater does not have a problem with desensitization among its own radios but some desensitization was measured from off-site signals. i,g,g~jYst'_Y.Q.t.iDS When a service area cannot be served from a single fixed station site, satellite receivers with voting can be used to make talk- back range extend beyond the limits of any single station in the system. Receivers can be'installed throughout the geographic area of interest so that a field unit could always be expected to be within range of at least one of the receivers. Consider two geographically separated receivers, each of which' has an 80% chance of teceiving a solid signal from a given field unit. Probability of receiving a solid signal from the combina- tion rises to 96%. If three receivers are used, each of which has an 80% chance of receiving a solid signal from a given field unit, the combined probability increases to 99% for good recep- ti.on. , I I Design of a satellite receiver system is not as simple as instal- ling several receivers and routing received signal from each' site to,the di~patcher. Quality of a given received signal will not be the same at all satellite receiver sites. If all signals were routed to the dispatcher, the best signal would be masked by poorer signals from other sites. Quite clearly, some method is needed to choose the best signal among all the sites and inhibit poorer signals from being heard. Solution to simultaneously receiving both good and poor signals at the dispatch console is to feed all receiver outputs to a ' "signal comparatorn which- selects only the best signal, discar- ding all others. The comparison process, called voting, is ccn- tinuous, and switching between receivers is fast enough to be f undetected by the ear. Thereforer the dispatcher hears only the best signal available from all sites (regardless of number) with the active site changing in mid-message if the best receiver location chances durir.o the messaae. ~ ... .. I I l' I \ I i I i I' If field unit-to-field unit communication is the problem rather than field u~it-to-dispatcher, a satellite receiver system will also impcove communications in a repeater system. Comparator output can be used to feed the repeater transmitter for rebroad- cast of the best signal from all satellite sites. In this in- stance each field unit, and the dispatcher, hear the transmit- ting unit just as if they were located at the most favorable receiving sit~ in the system, regardless of their actual loca- tion. I i 2-36 .1 'i since ,the comparator knows which receiver has been voted, this intelligence can be used to select the desired transmitter for rebroadcast in a multi station repeater system. If two or more geographically separated transmitters are installed on the same channel, one could say that if Receivers #1-3 are voted, for example, the rebroadcast should occur on Transmitter "A" because other mobiles of interest to the conversation are more likely t~ be in the service area of Transmitter "An than somewhere else. The process of automatic transmitter selection based on an algo- rithm of voted receiver sites is called transmitter steering. Clearwater radio systems do not use transmitter steering. Since the signal comparator doesn't have ears and cannot hear what we hear, an artificial method is used to evaluate signal quality. The Police Department, now the only department using receiver voting, uses two technologies to acco~plish this. Chan- nels 11-3 use a now obsolete technology which groups signal strength into one of three categories as measured at each recei- ver site. Only signal strength is measured and not signal qual- ity. Using this method, a strong but poor: quality signal is given a more favorable rating than a weaker but "clean" signal. Police channel ~4 uses a different technology which is now em- braced by the major radio. suppliers. The new, technology splits the incoming signal from each receiver site between two paths through the comparator. In one path the signal from each satel- lite receiver is processed to convert it to a voltage related to signal quality. These voltages derived from the various satel- lite receiver sites are compared. The site having the'best sig- nal at the comparator, as interpreted through comparison of derived voltages, inCluding degradation added by connecting tele- phone lines, is "voted" and its audio from the other path through the comparator used to feed the mobile relay station and connected 'dispatch console. a) perceive from this discussion that two factors weigh in signal comparator performance: 'rhe obsolete '\'technology used on police. channels #1-3 disregards signal quality in favor of raw signal strength. , One can heavily b) Frequency response of the telephone line ~nd relative audio level presented to the comparator uSlng the new technology on police channel #4 is important if the comparator is to consistently make the best choice among the various received signals. Wireline circuit~ which vary from one day to the next in frequency response and attenuation make it impossible for the maintenance technician to optimize sy~tem performance. 2-37 !\ . , \ , )'\ '....~' ',ri . ", 1 ~",: .sJ.m.!Jl,gg~j;jDg ~he concept 'of simulcasting is so powerful that it demands atten- tion from every sponsor of a wide area radio system. If the' ideal radio system is one wherein the dispatcher can simultane- ously talk to any and every field unit throughout a geographical area which ext~nds well beyond coverage of a single station, we .. have defined simulcasting. It is the system planner's Nirvana. It can be a system engineer's nightmare. The whole technical problem with simulcasting is found in the coverage overlap areas between two or more transmitters. When two or more signals of similar strength ~re received by a field unit, the signals mix .in the receiver~o create new signals. If the received signals differ in carrier frequency, ,or amplitude or phase of the modulation, the listener hears a distorted sig- nal. Unhappily, rather small differences in any of these param- eters generate unacceptably large distortion products. There are two schemes available to the system engineer to minimize distortion in the overlap areas: (a) eliminate or at least minimize the size of the overlap areas; (b) make certain that; signals transmitted from the several sites are identical in ' carrier frequency, modulation amplitude, and phase. , , Minimizing overlap areas is inconsistent with intense signal coverage over flat land. Therefore, in Clearwater's case, it is required that overlap areas receive signals from serving sites which are equal in frequency, modulation amplitude, and phase. Keeping overlapping signals equal requires Olympic ~fforts to condition and maintain transmitter control circuits to be ~~sst- lY equal. As a practical matter, transmitters in a simulcast system must be connected together with microwave under control of the simulcasting agency. There is no instance known to us where leased wire lines have successfully been used to ,connect transmitters in a simulcast system. 2-38 \ , ,I': tl I,' .~ I + ' \~.~ .: } .' I' "I ;i.;-o, ;' .. i~.j.l (, : .;'. :~, ,;.: ~ '.( , I ;1 \/ ,'. :..\~;: ";: ~.:~;.\:if;*~t'';.::ftt1.''f\~~)~~~ll'_ " ' . " .} ~'~'o."'" ,~.~""'" I" '?'/l\"~~~1 . . ... . ',,' :', ~,:':P;(;;;B:t}!~f~ , ~ . ." "" <, > ".' " .. '~r'.2t ;:;' m,:,;;.~;&j;,~~i " \' I) . ~ '. ,\ " ",',. 'c.,I.' '.' , .'0'; .,I~ :li.' ,( ", ,","" . , 0: . "'.1. n. ,.j ,,' .~ I j .' ~ ,';\ ' Mi ,'oft' ',j !( '-:', ,"I " ,,;;" , \ .j' j " ~ : , 1"/ ':,il . /'-' I ':~ .( c ~ .: ,', ", ',\ c' "\ l\ , " '"j,.-,-i, ' " '2' . ~ ~ " ',' ,0:..... " , ., ." . ' , " -,,"'.,":';';', ~ ,,: , . , ~?I' "c ~ > " \,I, , . .' ," 'c . ". . c , , " ,'I, , , . . . ". . ..~ Y.IJ ,:.. . ' , ,;..... '-, .. I &n"" " "0 F " . , . , ii, ' \, ." '" . C " '" . " ".. ' .. ',. ~, . . u~ ~ :::~.~: 1 ~' . I: ".c ;'~J,~<,: , ,. " " ' ":'. ". d , . ~ ( , f ~ ~ ' .'-:j"' , ; !l -{. .., 'II ',1 .( ..,~...., ;', :~:::~?J~;'~ ~ l i \ ~ ",' " ,\ ',' ' ':\ ' , "I '.\ . " '/ I" <' ,~'~ : '~'l\ ' '. " 'I;) '. ,~'l ;" ''\ ,\ ill , " :. ..! \' '\ , \ " .!n.!:J:.Q.QjJg1:1..QD Chapters l,'and.2 detail our evaluation and analysis of communi- cation problems experienced by the City; this chapter treats available solutions. Before investigating candidate solutions one should ask how much treatment each problem requires" before it can be considered to be resolved. Is just reducing interfer- ence to the police system good "enough if the price is right? Is it good enough to add additional channels to Public Service and Utilities radio systems? Should this improvement program ~ttend only to current problems and leave long range planning for" another day? Should a seven figure sum be spent now to build a trunked radio system to improve communications for all depart- ments into the next century? It is our opinion the best value will be found in a thoughtful, well developed communications improvement program which can be molded as requirements change over the years. We believe atten- tion should be focused on system architecture rather than partic- ular enhancements, no matter how well individual enhaqcements may be conceived. This view necessarily requires a new way to evaluate municipal communications which has direct impact on not only how much money is spent on improvements but when it is spent. The price for long term low cost communications may very well require substantial expense now. Alternately, relatively small cost now may fix immediate trouble but require continued fixes which 'becom~ discouragin~ly expensive over time. I t i Our view may not be shared. Perhaps reducing, if not resolving, current communication uroblems is all the\exuense that should be incurred now. Some problems, after all, tend to go away if treated with benign neglect. Consistent with our promise to offer a menu of solutions, we have divided suggestions into two broad categories: " ':' .... ....\.... IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES '\) 1. Quick fixes which treat current problems in the most exVedi- tious manner. We call these remedie~ Squeaky Wheel Designs. 2. Goals and objectives developed from our observati6ns and experience plus re~arks made to us by users during the course of the study. ' Objectives listed in this report identify bench marks of accomplishment within the framework of communications system goals recomrnen~ed to you. Goals and objectives are introduced on page 3-7 under the title, "The Long View". . . \\ 3-1 I . ' , ~. '. . ,". . ". :'t: " ~gygs~~_~b~~l_~g~~gDS Installation of radios on the three conventional 800 mHz chan- nels recently licensed,to the City would be the fast track ap- proach to solving PUblic Service and Utilities Department chan- nel crowding problems using proven technology. Approval has been received from both the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)' and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to erect an antenna tower in the back yard of the Water Pollution Control (WPC) facility near Highway 580 and McMullen Booth Roads. Authorized height of tip of the antenna is 250' above the ground. Cost of this improvement might be: (1) / 240' guyed tower (plus length of antenna would equal authorized total height), rated for Zone B wind loading, painted aviation orange and white with obstruction lights, delivered and installed. $24,000. (3) BOO mHz conventional repeaters for outdoor installation, 70 watts, includes antennas and coaxial cable, installed. Each $18,500. 55,500 (3) 800 mHz control stations, simple remote control unit, microphone, antenna, coaxial cable, installed. Each $5,000 . 15,000 CIaO) 800 mHz 10 watt dash 'mount two channel mobile radio, installed. Each $1,450 , 145,000 or (100) 800 mHz 35 watt rear mount three channel mobile radio, installed. Each $1,900 (10 t) p.rofessicnal en'] inee r iog se rv ices. 190,000 20,000 For a cost estimated in the $260,000 - $305,000 range the Public Service and Utilities Departments could vut three conventional 800 mHz stations on the air and transfer a combined total of 100 vehicles to t.Of: new channels. This \oJould go a lant.; way to re- duce channel crowding problems on exi~ting radio channe!b. This price does not include a building to house the stations, rather they would be mounted outuoors IH:e the existing police rauios at the Del Oro water tower on McMullen Sooth Road. Price doe& not include a standby ~e~erator to keep the stations operating during commercial power failures. Price does not. include satel- lite receivers to enhance cor.HT,unication with hand-held radios. Faill1re of any of these stations would fail all communications on the affected channel. Control stations Eor the Annex and Utilities Buildings included in the above prices have'~ccess to two of the three channels, 3-2 ..\\ \ \ " taken one at a time. Simple remote control consoles are pre- sumed which are not built into existing dispatch desks or con- nected to existing equipment in any way. Lower cost mobiles cited above are configured for und~r-dash mounting, have 10 watt transmitters and are available with only two channel capability. Higher priced mobiles are configured for rear mounting, have 35 watt transmitters, and can access all three 800 mHz channels. Users of either mobile model can talk to each other across chan- nel boundaries (if the radio has the other channel installed) but can not talk to users on existing channels. Above' prices reflect no change in existing equipment or system configuration. Communication would not be possible between existing radios and new radios except through manual r~lay by the dispatcher. If'an aoo mHz conventional system is implemented as outlined, above, the City will have to expand the system within five years to 196 units for another $140,000 - $180,000 (1985 prices) to maintain exclusive occupancy of the three conventional channels. This is because ~the FCC requires each exclusively assigned con- ventional channel to be loaded to 70 units within the license term but will accept 80~ loading on the last channel. Penalty for not meeting FCC minimum channel loading criteria is to lo~e ~xclusive occupancy of the "lightly" loaded channel(s). There- fore, minimum loading for a three channel conventional 800 mHz radio system to maintain exclusive occupancy is 70+70+(70xO.8)= 196 radios. One can see that 100 radios would not insure exclu- sive occupancy on even the second channel - 126 radios wo~lcl be required to do that. Cost of an equivalent three channel 150 mEz ACSB radio syste~ would be about the same as the 800 roRz s1ste~ quoted above ~~ing the higher priced mobiles. As before, communication would not be possible between old radios and new ra~ios except through manual relay by the dispatcher. There is no minimum chanriel loading criteria for ACSB channels to maintain exclusive c~anl:ol occupancy (or any guarantee the channel will b~ assi~necl to Clearwater on an exclusive basis regardl~ss of number of units serveci) . How the police radio interference problew wight b~ solved re- lates to bow the Public Service and Utilities Departments raciie problems are solved. The police will have to'change frequencies to escape interference from Orlando. If the police system is moved tp 800 mHz using conventional radio equipment, the police radio count will be added to the Public Service and Utilities De~artments radio count to determine the total number of chan- nels to which the City is eligible. It would seem to be no problem to justify five exclusive channels, that would only be (70x4)+(70xO.8~=336 radios, minimum. However, this would trig- ger a new consideration: an application for five 800 mHz chan- 3-3 nels (or more) X~~jL~~ the licensee to implement a trunked radio system without ~~X9Dg justification for not doing so. Alternately, four or fewer conventional channels could be used in an 800 mHz radio system without any need to show why trunking is not used. If four 800 mHz channels are placed on the air, the FCC would take no cognizance of separation between depart- ments by channel. If three additional channels is' the right number for Public Service and Utilities, then the PO would have only one channel to use. If one channel isn't enough for police operations, then the City would reach the five channel trigger, for trunked operation. We don't think the City would have a ghost of a chance to justify a cpnventional 800 mHz radio system using four channels for police (they have four channels now) plus three more channels for Public Service and Utilities. Nei- ther do we think the City would have any business instituting a 7 channel 800 mHz radio system without using trunking. Rules notwithstanding, it' would be nonsense. Given that the PO must change frequencies to escape Orlando interference, the PD ID~a~ either move ope~ations to 800 mHz or use ACSB radios on the newly available ISO rnHz channels restric- ted to ACSB use. Suppose the police el~ct to use ACSB radios. ACSB products are only now coming out of the developmental stage and, as ~as mentioned earlier, there is no large ACSB public safety svstero in se,vice anywhere in the nation known to us. But somebody has to be first" Why ~ot ClearwDter7 The"FCC is actively promoting narrow channel technology to the point where informal gossip is being passed about at the FCC that licensees may someday be forced to ab~ndon current modulation tachniques in favo~ of ACSS or som&thing like it on VB? and UHF frequen- cies.. . \ '.!j"'~~ ,.;... .; j 1J Pr~sent manJfactur~rs of ACSB radios have virtually no sy~te~ engineer-iny capability and have never been in the l.;!'tJt: s~~tl;!h~ business. Neither companv currentlv s~llino ACSB radios makes voting equiL)Il,E:nt to employ satel1it~ recE:iv~rs. However, there appears to be no reason why voting apparatus used in FM syst~w~ couldn't be added to ~CSB stations in the field. 6o~ic cost for a police ACSB radio system using existing station sites and antenn~s would be: II (4) Repeater stations i~~tal1ed at present antenna locations, 25 watts, each $9,000. $36,000 'I (5) Satellite receiver sites, each with one receiver on each of four ACSB PD channel~, in~talled. 92,500 (4) Comparators for voting syst~w, includes console interface to existing PD consoles. 41,000 3-4 "" , I I '1 (75) Mobile radio, 25 watts, complete, each $2,500 . ~I.'.:;' 187,500 (200) Portable radio with carry case, antenna, and battery charger. Each $1,400. Professional engineering services 280,000 _'s.Q.L.Q.Q.Q $742,000 These costs presume existing wire line control circuits leased from the telephone company will continue in service. Mobile radios are quoted because we believe the police will never solve their coverage problem with a 100% hand-held radio system, re- gardless of what kind of radio system ~s employed and regardless of what frequencies are used. There are too many propagation penalties carried by low powered hand-held radios with their attendant poor antennas to be overcome by any reasonabl~ cost we think the City Commission would assume. Suggested prices for a police ACSB system shown above are about as much educated guess work as not. Since there never has been such a system built, the~commercial value ofithe system is hard to estimate. An ACSB radio manufacturer might want to use the system a$ a showcase for his products and offer radios at cost ' (plus his own system engineering expense) in return for permis- sion to use Cl~arwater as a demonstration system. On the pther hand, these ~ame manufacturers might decide, much as they would like a showcaze, that their corporate size doesn't permit philan- thropy on a massive scale. Prices shown are our best e$tiroate of cost on a one for one replacement of exi5ting police radio }lardware with 150 mHz ACSB radios dispatched from exi~ting con- soles plus addition of mobile rrtdios in cars. So now what? Rock bottom cost to implement three 800 mHz.con- ventional channels for Public Service and Utilities plus a vir- tually experimental ACSB system for the police would cost a mil- lion dollars. Bv the ti~e the SOD mHz channels were load&~ to maintain thei~ eiclusive use by Clearwater, new investment wou16 be in the neighborhood of $1.2 million. It could be fairly said that implementing any combination of the above suggestions would , meet basic objectiv&s of each department. Public Service and utiliti~s would have their extra channels. Police would be shut or Orlando interference. But is this patchwork worth $1.2 mil- l ion? The answer depends upon \>/ha t othe-r cho ices are avail21 b1 E!. There aren't many. , '1 3-5 ,. . .; " l:1g~~L.c.bsDD.e.l.s New radio channels to expand communications capability and/or escape interference on existing channels can corne from four areas: (1) new ACSB technology on 150 mHz frequencies; (2) new radio services not presently licensed to the City; (3) inter service shartng; and (4) 800 mHz band using either conventional or trunked channels. ACSB opportunities have 'already been aiscussed. It is our opin- ion that the City should move cautiously with ACSB radio. Pro-~ duct development is not mature.. It is possibl~ that new brands of ACSB radios will not be compatible with equipment now being 'sold; there are no industry or FCC standards for compatibility. The opportunity is open for new vendors to make ACSB equipment which cannot communicate with ACSB equipment now on the market. The City could expand its current radio system architecture by adding a new channel in each of the Forestry Conservation and Highway Maintenance Radio Services. Although UHF frequencies allocated to these services are shared among all public safety services and all are occupied in the Clearwater area, there may be an opportunity to license a vnp channel. The vaF frequencies assigned to each of these services are not shared with other public safety services and are not heavily populated. We think it possible that Clearwater could obtain one channel in each rad 10 serv ice. Tl1 e 1\existing Publ ic Serv ice channel ClO\V car r i es the traffic which would be appropriate to both t~e Highway Main- tenance and Forestry Conservation radio services. Highway Maint- enance Radio Service frequencies can be used for any communica- tions relating to the design, construction, operation, or ~ain- tenance of streets. Forestry Conservation Radio Se,vic~ frequen- cies can be used for any communications relating to trees, parks, and "conservation". Two new VEF stations could be placed on the air with 100 mobile units, total, for about $200,000 tb S250,000 ,including antenna tower. For this pric& the stations would iJe p.xpos€:'L1 to tIn: weather like the, police repeaters at the Del Oro water tank. Price does not include satellite receivers or standby power for the main stations. Failure of &jth~r sta- tion would crash that channel for all users, VeIlicle.s with radios on either of these channels could not talk to existing Public Service units except by manual relay through the dis- patcher. Neither the Highway Maintenance nor Forestry Conservatioll Radio Services is appropriate to Utilities Department or Police radio traffic. Implementing the option to apply for a license in either of these radio services would not help the Utilities or Police Department. ' \ "" 3-6 , , ',:~, " About three years ago, the PCC amended its Rules to permit an applicant to look for frequencies out of his home radio service, a licensing process called inter service, sharing. The only ,requirement to make application for a channel in a foreign radio service is the need to show there are no channels available for assignment in the applicant's home service. It would be, easy to establish that ,no new frequencies are available in the VHF/UHF bands in both the Local Government and Police Radio Services in the metro area. Having established this, the City would be free to shop through other radio servipes for unused frequencies. Public Service, now licensed in the Local Government Radio Ser- vice, one of the public safety seryices, is entitled to sort through all the other public safety services for new frequen- cies: Police, Fire, Highway Maintenance, and Forestry Conserva- tion. We already know their are no frequencies available in the Police Radio Service or the police woulu move today. Fire Radio is out because these channels are all assigned to fire depart- ments in the area. Highway maintenance and Forestry Conserva- tion Radio Services are legitimate possibilities but the City is,. directly eligible ,in these services as cited above. Utilities, now licensed in the Power Radio Service which is one of the in- dustrial radio service~, can comb through all the other indus- trial services for a vacant channel in the Clearwater area.i If an idle channel can be found, the City is entitled to apply for it through that service's frequency coordinator. Candidate radio services which can be investigated are Business (terrible, users are already piled on top of eacn other on every fr~quen- cy); 5i'~cial Industrial (tightly coordinated for years by the Specia] Industrial Radio Servic~ Association - not a prayer here), Forest Products/Petroleum (not good hunting - the'petro- leum coordinator is particularly loath to share fr~quencies) I and Motion Picture and Relay Press (very few channels available and all occupied). In short, inter service sharing as a source for new channels apppars to be without hope for the City. THE LONG VIEt-! '1 The City has installed radio equipment in the past to solve each problem a& it arose. Each improvement ~as planned, ~aid for, anu operated as a stand-alone project. This is not an efficient way to manage communication resources but it is the only way each tIepartm~nt t acting on its own, CeHt justify anu afford 'the i~provement. The current improvement program to move ~art of the Public Service and Utilities radio systems to 000 mHz (which was interrupted by this study) is a case in point. The program as envisioned by radio shop versonnel and departni~nt administra- tors addiesses the most pressing radio problems of these depart- 3-7 .." .' . :L :.\ ," '" 'C . , ments - traffic loading. The program offers the lowest cost approach to the City - buy just enough to satisfy pressing ,requirements of departments footing the bill. ~Qgl~_gnQ_Q~j~~~i~g~ We propose the'City would be served best to organize the improve- ment program through a series of goals and objectives. We de- fine a goal as a long range target which describes a desired re- sult in general terms. We define an objective as a short range, quantifiable target 'which can' be a.chievedwithin the scope of a single project. Theref0re, a goal is realized through achieve- ment of several objective~ over a period of time. t Long ,range goals for the improvement program a'nc1 related objec- tives should include: 1. Enough ind~pendent communication paths in the radio system to accommodate ~nique requirements of each user group. a) At least as many independent talking paths lor Public Service and Utilities as there are major'department divisions. . b) Seven independent police talking patb~. c) Two inde~endent fire talking ~aths. , d} At least on~ talking path for Utilities/Public Service and one talking path for Police/Fire which is normally not used and therefore available for special e"ent~. e} ,Capabili.ty during a special event for any radio e(~uip- ped person to talk with any other' radio equipped person in the City, regar.dlest: of hc::rllp. radio channE:l assign- ment. 2. Traffic handling capacity to ~ccomroodat~ all users ~e9iring radio COll1oILml.cctions.' a) , . t~ot file, re thaJ1 l~ of. attE:'m\'Jt~. to access a radio channel def ea ted on the first t r~/ becaus e the sys terr' i ~ ,busy. Capab 11 it",j:' 0 f any enle rC;E'ncy S l; r.v 1e e prov id~r 1:0 gain im~e~iate acces~ to his di~~utcher regardless of busy staius of th~ system. Automatic ID of field units displayed at the dispatch local:ion for administrators 'wanting this feature. b) ,,. "\ c) 3-8 .~,~ ,I .... . "',' .~~~. 3. Radio coverage to reasonably assure intelligible two way conversation on the first try at any location in the City while using a hand-held radio. a) Assured coverage in Clearwater for hand-held radios at 95% of the locations at least 95% of the time. b) Assured coverage for mobile radios at 95% of the loca- tions at least 95% of the time between Ulmertan Road and the Pascoe County line. 4. Freedom from interference. a) Fewer than 1% of messages receive disruptive int~rfer- ence. 5. Capability to add mobile or hand-held data terminals as user groups see their individual requirements. a) / I Capability for police to search relevant data banks from the street at the municipal, state, and national level. b) Capability for all data terminal users to recall and display graphics such as maps and line clrawings from municipal computer files. 6. Distributed risk of failure to minimize probability of any department suffering a catastrophic loss of co~munications. a) No single lo~s will destroy all radio communications for any departmentl including loss of antenna towe~. b) Capability to overate normally in thR fac~ of an exten- ded pow~r failure. I, c) COMrlon fail u reE> such as base s ta t: ion 0 r con t r01 1 ine do not disrupt con'It'unications for any de1:artnlent. 7. Capital investl11ent in i'l. single fixed radio plant which serves all users well. >\ a) Satellite receivers serve all user5, not just ~oiice ana fire. b) Shared antenna towers, radio buildings, and ~tar.dby ~enerators serve all depQrtments equally well. c) Shared City/County facilities without cowpromising independence of either body. '\ ....\ 3-9 ....."' Whi1~ the above list of goals and objectives represent an amal- gam of user and this consultant's view of a modern communica- tions system for Clearwater, the reader may have a different view. It,is important that municipal administrators agree on a common list and then assign priorities to the various objec- tives. 1 I \, !, Assuming for a'moment that above goals are:acceptable, what prob- lems should' be addressed now and what improvements should be made? ~; Police. Two problems are at the root of police radio trouble: coverage ano interference. Coverage trouble rests almost entirely upon 100% depend~nce on hand-held radios and their ineffective antennas. If primary police communications were carried over radios perman~ntly installed in cruisers with roof top antennas, the crux of the coverage proble~ would instantly disappear. Interference can ,only be eliminated by moving the system to new channels. Public Service/Utilitie:s. Both of these departITlents suffer from , the same problem: trying to fit two quarts of communica- tions in a one,quart bottle. Additional channel assignments must be found to resolve this problem. .-Data Processing. Data traffic can be expected to increase~hich will requir~ higher speed circuits to avoid irksome delays, especially between the Annex and Police Building. ' The ideal communication system will in~lude a ITlethod to parallel data communications on improved radio control links. RECOl-ll.] ElmA-I'I Ct'.JS The 800 mEz band is the only resource available to the City which holds solutions to all of the radio problems cited in tbis report. Trunking technology offers the only way to improve and expand radio communications for all departments through invest- ment in a single radio plant. The City is eligible for a trunked radio sY5tem license for as many channels as ultimate size of '~he system will justify. Rules of the tcc prohibit other appli- cants within 70 miles of the City from! operating on trunked r~- 'r) dio channels licensed to Clearwater. (It should be noted ag~in that these rules also would prohibit Clearwater from building a trunke:d radie system if other applications were granted first for available channels in the area.) These Rules further limit transmitter power and antenna height for co~channel licensees (and therefore potential sources of interference) who are more 3-10 'I '''''J :", ;" ,} than 70 miles distant from Clearwater according to coverage requirements for their own service areas. We recommend the City proceed without delay to implement a trunked radio-system of 10 channels, looking coward the day within seven years or so when at least 901 trunked radios will be on'the air. We recommend the trunked radio system use two antenna towers which are widely separated to regulate against loss of commun- ications through a site catastrophe. We recommend two main station sites be installed which are con- trolled via circuits operating independently of each other. We recommend design of station buildings and towers to the high- est industrial standards to enhance survival in a hurricane and operation in its aftermath. We recommend the City coordinate its radio plans with the County to share radio sites and facilities where appropriate f.or the mutual benefit of both governments. ~sD9j9st~_~~stjQD_~j~g~~_1Q~g~~~_gng_~yjlgins~ Good station sites are characterized by easily recognized features: a) Site security. . b) Easy, all-weather access for equipment maintenance. c) Central location to minimize distance between station and farthest point in the service area. d) Proximity to existing electric service. e) No zoning or FAA restrictions on antenna tower. Two sites are attractive for 800 mHz antennas: Arcturas Avenue near the High School at a point just south of an existing radio tower, ahd the WPC site northeast of Highway 580 and McMullen 0 Booth Road. The City already has received per~ission from the FCC and FAA for a 250' antenna at the WPC facility and could probably g~t permission for a 300' tower there if system design indicates the higher tower should be built. The Arcturas Avenue site is only a mile south of Clearwater Executive Airport and would therefor receive special FAA scrutiny. The existing tow3r is 160' high, not high enough to provide needed coverage for a 800 mHz radio system. Our reading of FAA rules indicates the agency would apPfove a tower at least 200' high and might ap- 3-11 \ prove a tower 250' high. This height, in combination with its central location, would offer the same coverage as the WPC site throughout the area of interest except in the extreme northern reaches' of the County. The Arcturas Avenue and WPC sites are 5.5 miles apart for good site isolation. This is about all the physical separation that can be realized without placing the stations too f~r away from the locus of municipal activity. If the Arcturas Avenue and WPC sites were used, what construc- tion would be requi:ed to serve the trunked radio system? Could these sites also serve antennas now on a temporary tower at Fire Station #4 on Belcher Road. To answer tpe second question first, yes. Either or both sites could serve all the equipment now "temporarily" installed at FD 14. Radio towers are designed to one of three wind loading criteria, identified in order of increasing strength as Electronic Indus- tries Association (EIA) Zone A, Zone B, and Zone C designs. Zone C wind loading is the most severe design standard for the commercial market place. A Zone C tower not more than 300' high is designed to withstand wind loading of SO pounds per square foot (psf) of exposed surface including customer specified antennas. (Taller Zone C towers must withstand even greater wind loads.) This corresponds to the survival rating of most radio antennas. While hurricane winds can generate pressures greater than 50 psf, one has to ask how much strength is 1/ enough? Zone C tower design standards coupled with two sites 5.5 miles apart would seem to offer a reasonable compromise between extravagant cost and reliable operation under adverse weather conditions. A 230' self supporting tower for the Arcturas Avenue site designed for Zone C wind loading, antennas for a 10 channel trunked radio system, two VHF or UHF ant~nnas, and two 6' microwave antennas would run about $75,000, instal- led. A 300' guyed tower of similar loading for the WPC site would cost about $60,000 installed. Each of these sites will need an equipment building. Pre-fab buildings are available'from several suppliers which are speci- ally built to accowmodate electronic equipment. In fact, the recent explosion of cellular radiotelephone construction has generated a boom in pre-fab buildings peculiar to radio installa- tions. Building cost runs in the $120 range per square foot of floor area including lights, internal wiring, heat, and ~ir con- ditioning. Shipping expense, always done by flat bed trailer truck, runs in the $2.00 - $2.25 range per mile from ,factory to tower site. A completely outfitted pre-fab lOlx201 building, delivered, installed with surrounding chain link fence, and '\ connected to electric service, would run in the $28,000 range. A standby diesel gene~ator sized to operate a 10 channel trunked system, tower lights, and two conventional VHF or UHF stations, " a~ 3-12 installed with on-site fuel for one week continuous operation would cost about $18,000 at each location. Total cost to implement two candidate antenna sites cited above which are suitable for a 10 channel trunked radio system plus two additional conventional VHF or uaF channels, and supported by a diesel generator, not including site acquisition cost would be about: . Arcturas Avenue building, tower, generator, installed. $121,000 106,000 WPC building, tower, generator, installed. There may be an opportunity to avoid spending anything for the WPC site as a result of a timely telephone call. The City has been contacted by Gary Hess, President, Bay Area Communications, owner of radio station WVTY and others, who would like to negotiate lease of a tower site at WPC for his broadcast station in exchange for paying the City's cost to build its own tower at the same site. I This consultant talked by telephone on June 6 with Mr. Hess at the request of Central Services Director Floyd Carter who had been approached by Mr. Hess regarding a tower site on City property. Mr. Hess advised he must move the WVTY tower to comply, 'as we understand it, with zoning restrictions at the present site. Ee would like to pay for the proposed City tower at WPC in exchange for permission to erect his own broadcast station tower nearby. He offered to pay for any special shiel- ding the City radio building might require to avoid interference from the broadcast station and perhaps pay rent on the site as well. We e~chanced concerns about mutual interference which either station might cause the other. Mr. Hess offere~ to pay for whatever fix might be required to protect Clearwater sta- tions at the site. The telephone conversation closed with his offer to pay rent for the site in addition to paying construc- tion cost for the City's tower. We speculated the City might prefer to forgo rent for some period of years if Bay Area Com- ,munications also paid for the City's radio building a~ wpc. Mg~n_~~~ti9P~f~~ilj~jg~ , ,. If there is a disadvantage to a trunked radio system, it will be found in the expense schedule of main station facilities. It is the nature of trunking technology that a system must employ many channels .(else why trunk them?) and many, if not all, must be in- stalled at the same time. This expense schedule is not a prob- 'I 3-13 ~, ~ ;, ~ lem for new radio users who don't have an existing radio invest- ment to protect, but it presents a serious problem for users who have a substantial investment in conventional radio equipment as Clearwater does. These users are faced with a larger first cost than can often be justified through correction of instant prob- lems just to implement the basic trunked plant. Once the trunked radio plant is installed, additional users with exclusive tal- king paths between field and dispatcher can be added for only the cost of mobile and hand-held radios. This was never possi- ble with conventional technology when idle channels were avail- able to serve additional requirements, and now is impossible for the City because vaF or UHF channels are unavailable at any price. ' ~ There are two schools of thought on how a large trunked radio system should be built. The first school holds that a minimum facility should be initially installed and then expanded as traffic warrants. This procedure has the advantage of deferring capital investment in fixed plant until absolutely required. The second school advises immediate installation of the complete fixed station plant to assure compatibility between all equip- ment. This belief carries added value if the user. requires the vendor to demonstrate satisfactory operation 'of the complete system before final payment is made on what would otherwise be a skeleton system. And not incidentally, it guarantees compatibil- ity between stationp and controller even though the manufacturer may claim futur~ circuitry will be plug compatible with current production. A fully redundant two site 10 channel trunked radio system would consist of 10 stations at each of two sites. Fixed station cost for each site would be about $314,000 installed plus the tower, building, and generator mentioned earlier. To this must be added an estimated $42,000 for a system manager terminal and . spare module kit. This price does not include satellite ,recei- vers or control circuits. Satellite receiver assemblies, each equipped to operate on all 10 channels, would each cost about $42,000 installed, not including antenna tower or control cir- cuits. Horizon House (or other downtown site), Del Oro water tower, Highway 19A/Klosterrnan Road County tower, and County Jail tower are candidate satellite receiver sites. Only the Highway 19A/Klosterman Road County tower is not already used by the City. ~Qn~~9lh~~~9~jt~ Control circuits to connect various dispatchers and satellite receivers to the main station sites can be derived from any combination of wire line circuits leased from the telephone 3-14 "\\ , ' , . company, municipally owned wire line or coaxial cable circuits, Vision Cable, or microwave channels. Since these circuits can be combined in all possible combinations, it follows the City would choose the lOwest cost combination consistent with system integrity. At this writing only the cost of circuits leased from the telephone company is known. .Leased lines may n~t be probably are not - the least cost circuits for this, appllcation, although they will have the lowest first cost. A meaningful economic analysis can't be made for control circuits until cost and availability of all potential vendo,rs are known. Notwith- standing/ the number of control circuits required to operate a 10 channel trunking system can be ~stimated. a} Each satellite receiver site requires 10 circuits to the c~n- tral comparators, one for each channel of the system. If there are four satellite receiver sites plus one of the main station sites which will act as a satellite receiver site for the other main station site, a total of 50 receiver cir- cuits will be required. , . Each dispatch location reouires a circuit to the main sta- tion site for each independent talking path (including sub- fleets created for special events}. The ,following number of circuits could be assumed for planning purposes: police-a; fire-3; utilities-6; public service-a; administration-l; and future-4. This example would require 26 circuits from vari- , cus dispatch locations to the main sites with 4 additional circuits available for future expansion. b) "1 , , It quickly becomes apparent that the number of circuits required to serve a multi fleet trunked radio system with satellite recei- vers is a matter to be reckoned with. Lease payments to the telephone company for wire line circuits could easily reach $25,000 per year. On the other hand, the substantial number of circuits running between any combination of points makes it possible to consider control"options which aren't economically viable for only a few parallel circuits. Since the County is planning a trunked radio system with double the number of chan- nels recommended here for Clearwat~r, it is worthwhile to consi- der how requirements for both gOVErnments could be s~rvecl simul- taneously at a savings to each. , ~9~sj9jljs~_i9.x._~ns~iD9_~j~p_Fjnffills~_~~gD~~ Pinellas County is licensed for a 20 c~ann~l trunked radio sys- tem. Installation sites are not firm at this writing but system details which are mentioned most freoue~tlv include: .. . "'\~I ,\ , 3-15 .1 ,. a) Main station site at the County antenna tower near Highway 19A and Klosterman Road. b) Main 'station site at the court house in\Clearwater. I c) Satellite receiver site at the Safety Harbor fire station, 3095 McMullen Booth Road. d) Satellite receiver site at the County jail~ e) Sites connected together by a new County microwave system. If the County proceeds to build ~heir trunked radio system along general lines suggested above, the County could save a six, fig- ure sum in capital investment by joining with Clearwater to build and operate some common radio and microwave sites. If the City proqeeds to build a trunked radio system along general lines suggested in this report, the City could save' a similar~ sum in capital investment by joining with the County to build and operate some common radio and microwave sites. Here is how the City and County, each with its own independent trunked radio system, might share a common microwave system and some common radio sites. a) Northern term1nus of the County microwave system is planned to be the sheriff's radio tower near Highway 19A and Kloster- man Road. This tower would be outfitted with 800 mHz anten- nas by the County as part of their trunked radio system. The City could share this site and antenna for its own satel- lite receivers at no cost to the County in either invest~ent or system performance. Sharing would save the City ten5 of thousands of dollars otherwise requir~d for an equivalent antenna tower and building. b) The County microwave relay site proposed for the ~afety Har- bor fire station on MCMullen Booth Road will requ1re a new tower at County expense. This relay point could just aE well be at the proposed Clearwater WPC site. If the City shares this site with the County, it wilJ cost the City nothing and will save the County tens of thousands of dol- lars over cost of a County microwave relay station at the Safety Harbor fire station. d} Microwave routing betw:en the Clearwater WPC site and court house could pass the proposed Clearwater Del Oro water tower and Arcturas Avenue sites at no cost ~o the County and great advantage to the city. ~ 3-16 q '~l , . I' Sharing would permit the City to connect satellite receivers to the County 800 mHz antenna at the County Jail and control them over the microwave system at no cost to the County and great advantage to the City. . City wireline connections to the microwave system, and there- by to the Cityrs trunked radio system, could be made between the police'Building/Otilities.Building/City Ball Annex and downtown terminal of the microwave system at less cost than by making connection at any other point in the system. A joint City/County trunked radio',venture is a win/win situa- tion. Sharing microwave and'site facilities permits each party to realize substantial savings,in capital investment compared to cost of going it'alone, while still enjoying independent radio communications. The shared microwave system with routing through the WPC, Del Oro, and Arcturas Avenue sites makes a loop config- uration possible with inherent security against catastrophic site failure for both parties not available in the'ribbon style microwave system'now planned by the County. d) e) . - If City and County administrators believe,this sharing progr~m has strong advantages as we do, the locat~on of the downtown 'microwave terminal should be assessed again. Locating the termi- nal at the court house is an obvious choice because this will be a County dispatch location. Unhappily, the court house' is not an especi9l1y tall building to support a radio antenna. Horizon House or Bank of Clearwater are much better radio sites.' Heicht of the downtown location is particularly important to the County because they propose to use it as a principal radio antenna site, not just a satellite receiver site as the City would do. The County might want to look at locating the downtown antenna on either the Bank of Clearwater or Horizon, House and control the equipment via new underground cable installed in existing City owned or leased ducts. Ducts are available between the corner of Fort Harrison and Court street, and eith~r the Bank of Clearwater or Horizon House except for the blOCK on Fort Harri- son between Pierce Street and Cleveland. B~S~mm&D9gg_]~gg~~ j ':) Cost of an 800 mHz trunked radio system is composed of five major parts: 1. Site facilities including real estate, building, tower, and standby power.' 2. Fixed station equipment, including satellite receivers. 3-17 ~ , \ Site Facilities: We recommend the City and County share site facilities, each bearing 100% of the cost for the principal occupant of the site as follows: Paid by County: Highway 19A/Klosterman Ro~d County Jail Downtown Clearwater ~ \ I I ( ! " , , . . .. ' ~ ~ q 3. Control circuits. 4. Dispatch consoles. 5. Mobile and hand-held radios. Paid by City: WPC Del Oro water tower Arcturas Avenue Cost to the City for site facilities standby power is estimated to be: WPC: 10'x20' building, chain link fence, 300' guyed tower, standby generator. (Will De less if negotiated with Bay Area Communi- cations to erect a broadcas~ antenna here.) building, tower, and $106,000 Del Oro water tower: 10'xlO' building, no fence, short antenna mast on water tank, standby battery/charger. Arcturas Avenue: lO'x20' building, 'chain link fence, 230' self supporting tower, standby generator. $22,000 121,000 Cost to the City for fixed station equipment is estima~ed to be: WPC: 10 trunked stations, system controller, antennas, and coaxial cable, installed.' 314,000 "t, Arcturas Avenue:: 10 trunked stations, ,system controller, antennas and coaxial cable, installed., Highway 19A/Klosterman Road Satellite Receivers: 10 receivers connected to sheriff's antenna. , \ DelOra Satellite Receivers: 10 receivers connected to City antenna, coaxial cable and multicoup1er. 314,000 42,000 ~ 47,000 ~11 3-18 '~ ,[ , . ". ., 0 'l~ I . County Jail Satellite Receivers: 10 receivers connected to sheriff's antenna. 42,000 Downtown Clearwater Satellite Receivers: 10 receivers connected to County antenna. 42,000 We recommend the' City arid County share cost of the microwave sys- tem where each party pays 100% of the cost of RF equipment and antennas at locations ~lhere each party pays for site facilities. Where the party does not pay for site facilities, the party would pay only for modems serving circuits of that partY"if , , a~. ' Cost to the City for control circuits'is estimated to be: WPC: Microwave station plus modems serving the City radio system. DelOra: Microwave station including only modems serving the City radio system. Arcturas Avenue: Microwave station including only modems serving the City Radio system. J ' ' County Jail: Modems for City radio system. Downtown Clearwater: Modems for City radio system. Highway 19A/Klosterman Road: Modems for City radio system. 'I 151,000 56,000 151,000, 10,000 10,000 10,000 Present dispatch consoles used by all departments are incompati- ble with control circuitry required to control a trunked radio system: they will have to be replaced. No attention has been given in this project to aetails of how dispatch functions might be reorganized to take advantage of new radio fleets which are possible with a trunked radio system. Price estimates include console control capability to operate existing Public Service, Utilities, and Fire channels where appropriate, plus Police chan- '\ nels used for coordination wi th neighbor ing j ur isd ictions. Price also includes dispatcher capability to patch users together be- tween existing and new radio channels wherr required. Number of dispatch positions and auxiliari ~ccess points to the radio sys- tem will affect cost, of cours~. Therefore, prices shown here should be used only to make general estimates of final cost. (6) Police dispatch consoles (1) Police information console (2) Fire dispatch console {l} Police dispatch ,supervisor console 'I 3-19 '\ "'c' II -, , . < -,j"' . ~:.. ~ ". ':~ .' . :.~> ..J "",J; (2) Utilities dispatch console (2) Utilities auxiliary dispatch points (1) Public Service dispatch console (3) Public Service auxiliary dispatch points Total estimated plant cost: $710,000 $2,148,000 Suggested start-up quantities of mobile and hand-held radios are: Police: '~ (75) Mobile radio, capable of operating in 15 subfleets, 2 systems, fleet call, alarm, auto IO, 35 watts, installed @ $2,500. (200) Hand-held radio, capable of operating in 15 subfleets, fleet call, alarm, auto lO, carry case, battery charger, @ $2,500 Public Service: 187,500 500,000 (90) Mobile radio, capable of operating in 7 subfleets, 2 systems, fleet call, auto IO,_lS watts, installed @ $1,800 Utilities: 162,000 (90) Mobile radio, capable of operating in 7 subfleets, 2 systems, fleet call, auto IO, 15 watts, i~stalled @ 1,800 162,000 Administration: (20) Full duplex, telephone interconnect, 15 subfleets, fleet call, 8 systems, 20 watts, installed @ $3,000 60,000 Professional fee: Detailed system planning, specifications, bid rev iew, construction overs ight, and, proof of performance tests. c'. __J..2~.I..Q.Q.Q TOTAL $3,344,500 Size of the start-up 800 mHz fleet shown above is 455 radios. It will cost about another $800,000 (1985 prices) to bring the fleet up to 901 radios to justify the 10 channel trunked radio " 3-20 '" 'l I # ,Ii"' ,'.,' '."~'l"'-~;I~~; , .. system upon which this proposal is based and required by the FCC to retain a license for a 10 channel trunked radio system. Con- sidering the rate at which present radios are reaching retire- ment age together with modest expansion of the radio fleet in coming years, the City will migrate to this goal in the natural course of events. ," :rjm.ins .' Planning, procurement, and construction of the recommended trunked radio system will be the l.argest communication proj ect ever undertaken by the City. One might speculate on, how fast this project could be implemented. l1gn.tD l' 2 b~.tlt~jj;y 5 City approves project. Engineer hired for; detailed system design and specification work. System design submitted by Engineer for. City approval City approves system design. Begin drafting specifications and request ~or proposals. RFP published to candidate vendors. 6 9 10 12 13 25.. Bidder's conference. Proposals received. Contract awarded. System trials begin. '1 28 Proof of Performance tests complete. City accepts system and places it into regular service. . with prpmpt response by the Commission to this report it will be 1988 before the,trunked system will be in regular service. Can this wait be tolerated? We don't think so. If not, then what can be done to ~ccelerate the schedule? What if the City moves promptly but the County 'is slow to construct their part of the microwave system? ' 'j > >\ " .,,\ , 3-21 \, '. ~~~ssm_Hlg~~~~QD Construction of the proposed trunking system will take every bit as long as postulated ,above. The only way to speed the schedule is to omic, or at least significantly change, task requirements. There are no short cuts to the planning and design phase of the work and probably no short cut for time allotted to the City for various reviews and approvals. Indeed, hurrying parts of the project will make planning and coordination more difficult since there will be an extended period of time when some users will be depending on a new system not fully constructed. The WPC or Arcturas Aver.ue site~could be built relatively quick- ly as a stand-alone facility. Satellite receivers could be installed at the Del Oro water tower and Bank of Clearwater or Horizon Bouse and controlled on a temporary basis via leased t~lephone lines. Limited subfleet control capability could be achieved by new 800 mHz users if control stations were substitu- ted for full service dispatch consoles on a temporary basis. We have given particular attention to how an accelerated con- struction schedule could be fashioned. It is not a black or white situation. Consider these trade-offs: ~ 1. No equipment can be manufactured until the vendor knows which frequencies are assigned to the City by the pec. Frequencies won't be assigned until the FCC ects on the license application, typically three months fro~ date of filing with the Commission. 2. Ba~ic system design and construction schedule must be dis- closed to the FCC and antenna tower details approved by the FAA as part of th~ license application process. This means the City (and the Engineer) has some work to do before a radio license application can be submitted. 3. The City has no assurance presently licensed 800 mHz frequen- cies would be included in the grant for a trunked radio sys- tem. If equipment were ordered to operate on presently li- censed channels, it could mean new equipment might have to be modified at City expense to operate within the trunked system when that license is granted. 4. Control listem architecture is currently incompatible be- tween major manufacturers of equipment. Purchase of a few radios now will lock the City into a single source of supply with the big purchase yet to come. 5. No hand-held radio is available 'for trunked operation which. includes capability to operate on more than one conventional 3-22 ," ~ 1 · . . .. <<'. . < ' t ',.,~ "' . .... ~ I} channel. While the police could buy mobile radios with multichannel capability for both conventional and trunked operation, the limit of one channel for new hand-held radios would require a dramatic change in police communications. Perhaps this problem could be softened by running the existing system in parallel with the new system until work on the new system is complete. " . 6. Special engineering and special modifications made to exis- ting police consoles to run a hybrid UHF/aOO mHz radio sys- tem will increase cost of the ~ornpleted project. 7. Operating an admittedly half built 800 mHz radio system may further exacerbate complaints from police about their safety and ~ut a hex on new equipment that will take years to fade away. 8. Construction estimates for both cost and time are related to the County construction schedule because a shared'microwave system is proposed here to control the radio sites for both units of government. We think 'it unlikely that any department will be on the air with any part of a 800 mHz trunked system, ,however crude and tempor- ary, in less than one year unless the city is prepared to pay a significant penalty in equipment and labor to bridge the migra- tion to upgraded communications. There will be a periodoof months while the trunked radio system is being installed that various dispatchers may need t6 operate under adverse conditions. The difficulty will come in three areas: 1. Change in console equipment which the contractor must make to accommodate trunking control apparatus. 2. Dispatch room remodeling which the City may choose to make as part of the upgrade project. 3. Split fleet operation where some field units have old radios and some have new radios. ") : vie can almost be assured of interruptions to both dispatchers and contractors where new console equipment is installed in the same area as existing consoles. Obviously, both new and old con- soles cannot occupy the 'same space. A squeeze can be expected in this situation to the discomfort 9f both parties. If dispatch operations are to be relocated fo~ any department in the next few years, it would be an enormou~ advantage to everyone to co- ordinate this change with construction of the new system. 3-23 " ) ; \ ,. , '.', '~, " ,," "''':>'nJ~ . ,.' "': : >' ;~'; ~.~;{~~ ',. ..... Installation of new consoles away from existing dispatch loca- tions can only be appreci,ted by dispatchers who have lived, " through a change as big as contemplated here,' It will be possi- ble to maintain uninterrupted communications for all departments under all circumstances' but, if new work has to be done under foot of dispatch personnel, it will take vety careful coordina- tion to mainta~n everyone's equilibrium, The ideal installation schedule would see the entire trunked plant installed, tested', and placed on the air before the first mobile units are deployed.. In this manner, consoles can be tem- porarily wired for simulcasting on both new and old frequencies. By simulcasting, dispatchers won't'need to keep an hour by hour log of who is operating on what channel, When installation is complete for fleets of mobiles, the consoles can be quickly rewired for the permanent' system configuration, . .\. ",\ , \ ',\ , '\) .! n~\ . 'I \ , 3-24 ,( ... \. , ! , , . , . .... ...-A. , . . '.~I . ..... ___. ~''''~_'+~'''L__''''_:. S-2. 'I 8/15/85 Agenda No. Meeting Date: C rrJ- MEMORANDUM TO: The City Commission of the City of Cleo'rwater SUBJECT: 800 mliz Trunked Radio System RECOM M EN DATION: The staff be directed to initiate the necessary preliminary steps to implement the BOO mHz trunked radio system. I2l And that the appropriate officials be,' authorized to execute some. BACKGROUN D: Preliminary steps would include: 1. Retaining the consultant to perform the required engineering services. 2. Application to the FCC for the ten 800 mHz channels. 3. Application to the FAA for location of antenna towers. 4. Seek the lowest cost source of capital funds for construction and capital equipment of the radio system. The anticipated construction period for a trurtked system is such that an interim step is necessary to meet immediate needs of the Police and Utility departments. This immediate need can be met by initial use of the assigned 800 mHz channels as a conventional radio system with the current system. This interim step will require the purchase of equipment that can be, for the most part, utilized in the final trunked system. Some of the equipment will not be required in the final system or is excess to the final system, i.e. control stations at a cost of approximately $90,000, and mobile radios at approximately $100,000. Space in the current police dispatch is such that it will be virtually im- possible for all of the new consoles to be installed while the old system is still being used. Adding to the second floor of the Police building is esti- mated to cost $300,000. The total estimated cost for the 800 mHz trunked radio system is $4,641,000. A breakdown of this cost is attached. Funding for the preliminary steps listed above is in CIP 315-1-,4208 which was originally proposed as an initial step to enhance the Public Service radio network. Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: ~~{'~ Advertised: D Affected Parties Notl fi ed of Meeting . Not Required . Not Required Costs, Funding Source: o Capitol Improve- mEmt Budget o Operating Budget o Other .Attachments: Estimated Costs Reports Date: City Manager Paper: Dote 6 Sequential Reference Originating Deportment: Approprlatjon Code '" o None Administration , 1 \, .' . ,: ,>. '~; "~~i~:';~~f;~:I~;":#~~:f:~~.\~ , .q ;,'~"\~~ . . :; ~.c: C~\ , :, .':'::.i{{ .,;..,: ;": ~ ~{ ,I ,I ~ .. . ;, .,' ,i " " . ~.'. ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION & CAPITAL COST :,' INTERIM' FINAL TOTAL' PHASE PLJ'l..NT COSTS SITE $106,000 $143,000 $ 2 4 9 " 0 0 0 " FIXED EQUIP. 246,000 555,"000 801,000 MICROWAVE -0- 388,000 388,000 ; j CONSOLES 90,.000 709,900 799,000 \, , .' RADIOS \ 642,600 1,316.,400 1,959,000 J FEES ":'0- 145,000 .145,000 I Ii DISPATCH FACILITY -0- 300,000 300,000 ' 'J TOTALS $1,084,600' $3,556;400 $4,641..000. ,. ,< " 'I , ! "(< . d ,I I , . f ,0 'I " .' / :/ 'I' ," " " ~I\I ., :\. . 'j I) , '. -, . v~ ',,' ,.' .\ . 1\ .\ ' ! " " , , .', ,I ,J I I -I I \ L , !. I ~.} ..',' ", cj'C '/ REQUIREMENT FOR REPLACEMENT OF POLICE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM ..."",~:". < ~" . , In 1971 the Police Department's radio system was upgraded through the purchase of what was then state of the art radio equipment. This included portable radios, transmitters, receivers and related tower equipment~ In 1976, additional radio equipment was added for the consolida- tion of police dispatching for the Cities of Clearwater, Largo and ,Dunedin. The dispatch responsibilities from the Clearwater Com- munications Center was relinquished for Largo in october 1977 and for Dunedin in December of 1978. Significant radio problems were first experienced in 1979 and have continued at an accelerated pace to date. Although the system has been we11mctintained, deterioration has evolved for a number of reasons. First, we have seen a significant addition o~ high-rise buildings within the City, the increase of commercial businesses operating on similar radio frequencies, interference from other police agencies operating on similar frequencies, overall growth of our City boundaries and ~he age of the current radio system. ,The police radio system operates 'twenty-four hours each day and must be totally dependable to ensure officers' safety and maintain the quality of service provided to the citizens of Clearwater. At the request of the Police Department, in March of 1984, the Florida Division of Communications completed an in-depth survey of the police radio system. The results of that evaluation stated that the police communications system was, at that time, three years past a total breakdown which could result in the total loss of police communications. This information was provided to the City Commission at that time of the Police Department's budget presenta- tion in 1984. That report ultimately resulted in the Commission decision to retain an outside consultant to complete a total evalua- tion process of the City;s ~ntire radio system. The final report prepared by the selected radio consultant, W. M. Montgomery and Associates, is included as an a~dendum to this agenda item. As' stated in the attached fi~al report provided by Mr. Ward Montgomery, the police radio system has been well cared for by our contract and in-house maintenance personnel throughout the years; however, a point has now been reached where no measures will suc- cessfully improve the system to provide adequate coverage required, and most importantly, there are no technical solutions to ~liminate the primary source of interference which is generated by o~er- riding frequencies from the Orlando Police Department and the Orange County Sheriff's Office. In addition to age deterioration of the major components of the entire system, the police portable radios currently in use have far exceeded their life expectancy. j, Staff recommendations totally concur with that of the\radio consul- tant to proceed with the overall, phased replacement of the radio system. If this recommendation is approved, it will take many months, and in recognition that the problems with the police radio -1- " \ ,\ -. - system are extremely critical, the following recommendations are offered as a "quick fixl' which will provide 'some temporary relief to the current system. One of the proposed solutions is to proceed with a phased upgrading to the,800 ~e9ahertz (mHz) frequency range with trunking capability and the immediate installation of mobile radics in all operational police vehicles. Installation of mobile radios on the 800 mHz' frequency range will immediately and significantly increase trans- mission power and will allow us to operate on a dual system with our current UHF band portable radios. The mobile radios to be installed in.,the police vehicles will have the capability to con- vert to a trunking system. At the time the total trunking system is completed, it will provide us with the 'present non-existent capacity for a City-wide communications system, and only, the police portable radios will need to be replaced. The temporary solution to reduce the greatest majority of existing problems now being experienced by the police radio system, will require the purchase of new control stations for the 800 mHz system 'at each radio console in the communications center. However, the proposed,trunking system which will be the overall solution for the entire radi? system, will not be able to operate on our current equipment nor will it be possible to simply convert to the'~roposed trunking system, In short, ,the phased solution, both short and long-range, will require purchase and installation of control con- soles for the proposed trunking system, separate from our current system, which will require a new location for the communications center. In its simplest terms, the new system must be built and tested before the ole system can be turned/off. " , Logical placement for a new Center capable of handling all of the 800 mHz system would be immediately adjacent to the existing Communications Center.l This would require completion of the second floor of the Police Headquarters Building at an estimated cost of ' $300"OOO~OO. This would also provide some very badly needed relief in terms of offi~e space now required for the Police Department which has exhausted all available space within its existing Head- quarters Building. ' '/ ,; -2- " II .\". ,.::, - . II. ,1 r Communications Requirements - Utilities Department I. .. Problem The current Utility radio system is extremely overloaded'and inefficient. This was verified in depth by the recent com- munications study done by the City Consultant, Ward Montgomery. Our Utility system operates on a single frequency and currently has approximately 136 units operating daily. Communication load gets as high as 6600 transmissions per day. This is far in excess of the capability of one frequency and one net control station. Our efforts initially were to justify a second fre- quency with which to break out the Sanitation system into a separate net. We outlined these requirements' and requested an 800 mHz channel. ' It was because of our needs and the needs of others in the City that the consultant was hired and the total system analyzed. > b .'. .' .., .,f' :: Discussion As was pointed out in the Montgomery Study, our frequencies are tremendously overloaded and the traffic much too voluminous for a single net control op~rator (dispatcher).,. This situaticin exists at the current operating levels of the Utilities D~part- ment and does not take into consideration the expansion require- ments imposed upon us by the Gas Bond Issue and the additional area coverage needed to expand natural gas distribution across northern Pinellas County. We now have customers as far north as Tarpon Springs. ,With actlve gas lines being installed well to ou~ north, we have existing emergency communication require- ments to cover that area, not only for operations, but also for citizen health and safety. As customers' are acquired and area coverage expanded according to our current plans and bond issue requirements, we will be compelled to add additional mobile units. This will"compound the problem since the current system cannot support operations now and certainly cannot support future growth. Given that fact, as outlined in the Montgomery Study, the Utilities Department has a definite need for a more efficient system. We could operate with two channels, pro- vided the second channel had antenna heights and repeater sta- tions adequate to cover the northern half of Pinellas County. However, this would not solve the City-wide requirements for the same coverage. \Ve agree with Mr. Montgomery that trunking is the best solution for us all. We respectfully request to be included in the City's plans for the new system and want to start out initially with our gas and water system units on the new communications net. This will be a total of 2 base, 87 mobile and 10 portable radios operating on the new frequency. we can get by with Sanitation remaining on a separate net on the current frequency with its own net control until their current radios begin to wear out. This will give the City time to plan and budget for the expanded trunking system. We wIll shift radios, now operating on our frequency in Gas and Water, to Sanitation. This will complete the installation of radios in all units leaving the remaining sets as replacements and backup. We would then plan for Sanitation to be integrated into our trunking system as funds become available and present equipment wears out. - 1 - , ) : I i' , \ , ' " '. ..: ."';:1.1;**\ , ,','~i!J 11. Discussion (contd.) The new trunking system will provide the necessary area and safety coverage for our service units and will permit us to grow into the system systematically. We would propose to put Utilities Department Gas and Water units on the trunking system immediately upon its implementation and phase in other Utilities uni ts at a l~ter time as funds permi t. t"le would continue to operate a dispatch/net control station in the utilities Building tied ip with the central control station to be operated by the Police Department. This would give us the necessary,capability we require and would also provide, an alternate communication center in the event of natural disaster. , \ III. Conclusions . I A. It is our belief that the Montgomery Study demonstr1tes clearly a need for a new City-wide communication system which affords'trunking. We also feel that the Utilities Department, because of its wide area communications require- ment, number of operating units and volume of traffic, should be'included as one of the initial elements to be placed in the new co~unication system. . , I B. The sanitation system can be operated on the present Utilities frequency until existing equipment wears out and, at that time, be 'integrated into the new City-wide trunking system. This integration should be appro~imately three to ~our years in the future. IV. Recommendation A. Recommend that the C~ty establish an'SOO mHz trunking communications system. , B. Recommend that the Utilities Department become one of the initial operating elements made a part of the new City trunking system and that funds be made available to provide us with the necessary radios and equipment to meet that schedule. " '. . I :" \ ' :\ r ~,\ ''\) - 2 -, .' ',t F ,\ ,\, ,\ '/ I:~>~:., ~:..','~;~';~f ',~ ~ '. ,.::. " , , ,,. , , ~:' '. ~ ,,' . ~. C I T Y OF CLEARWATER POST OI"I"ICE POX 4'48 CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33!318 PUBLIC SERVICE NETI~ORK KRL-244 "PRODLENS RELATED TO OVERCROWDING" The Public Service Radio Network handles the radio traffic for four (4) departments with nine (9) of their divisions representeB. The co~ertlge is for Public Works Department's, Public Service Division and Engineering Division; all of the Traffic Engineering Departmentts Divisions; Central Services Department's Buildin~ & Maintenance and the City Motor Pool Divisions; and four Divi- sions for the Parks Department, The Network is licensed with F.C.C, for 125 unitstand, at present, has 159 units in opera- tion. The Departments have a dire need for further expansion, but the Network is unable to handle any more traffic. With such a crowded Network, many of our units have difficulty in even signing on the air. Traffic Engineering has had to resort to C.B. hand held ,and voice actuated head sets for cable work, as they were unable to, get on the air when needed, Public Service, also, has had to supplement with C.B, head sets~ Because of their extremely limited range, they are very unsatisfac tory. During the day. many units have to wait in line for air time, delaying their work schedules. This) also, presents discipline problems) in relat~on to logging work locations and length of time on job sites.' Under emergency conditions, all traffic) must clear except the most urgent calls pertainig to the emer- gency (wind storms) h~avy rains, street damage)' p~wer failures, etc.), The Public Service Radio Network in a single channel, single station U.H.F, Systeml and if the single station fails, the entire system is off the air. Also, our range is limited and with our expanding boundries, it is difficult to communicate with any units at the city's perimeters and with our units at our Hillsborough County Sludge Farm. Public Service has requested two (2) more channels to relieve congestion and split comm~nciations along operational lines, I 'J ,~ ') ./{J, /, . ..'C2-; -.!5.2CLr:::.A-i~' () '~\ 'I 07/12/85 \\ liE qual Employment and Affirmative Action Employer" " \ \. .1 \' / -.-... .. '), or- . 5"3,,' I ~ MEMORANDUM TO: cS/3 The City Commission of the City of Cleo'rwater SUBJECT: Agenda No. Meeting Date: 8/15 85 Agreement With w. M. Montgomery ~ Associates RECOM MENDATION: Approve the agreement with W.M.Montgomery & Associates for implementation of the ten channel trunked radio system for a fee not to exceed $125,000 plus expenses. . And thot the appropriate officio Is be authorized to execute some, BACKGROU N D: This agreement will provide the engineering services tion of the ten channel trunked radio system. These formed over a period of time 'estimated to exceed two the following services: 1. Prepare detailed system design requirements. 2. Draft detailed technical specifications from system operational requirements. 3. Establish general contract performance requirements as a section of the bid documentation; Conduct a pre-bid conference. Evaluate all the bids. Provide engineering oversight to equipment installation. Witness proof of performance tests by t~e contractor. required by implementa- services will be per- years and provides for 4 . 5. 6. 7. The available balance in this project is sufficient to provide funds for this contract. The scope of this project will be modified at the third quarter budget review. Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: .,' .'1_ .d/~ ~ ~~~.Y~ Advertised: \ City Manager Dote: Paper: ' o Affected Parties Notified of Meeting . Not Required . Not Required Cost s : ~ 1 q.2 ~~).-:.!lU.. Funding Source: . Capital lmprove- ment Budget CJ Operating Budget o Other .Attachments: Contract Agenda Item 12/6/84 Date a Sequentla I Reference Originating Department: Central Services Approprlatjon Code 15-1-4208-000000- ONone 'I , ", p " ,','. ",';': ~;": '.,'" ;I"1;;~i;f\1't\l. ; ... .."."",::f';~\;;;;~* .. , " , ,. '-"'J ; ,::L~;,~ .:"''':;:::'\1~ '" . ":, ~ .~ >":;;::;. ',':': ::.;::: ,. ,'i~ . . '.' .~\' CITY CF Clf.ftH'\.ATl.:a, FLO~ 1DA . ~ ' ~ ~ "J\~,} , .'.,;" :.':~',~f~ Central Services Depart/rent , , Con t r OlC t No. 2 ,I . . r .\ )!' t' >'. .~. + :~;.:;'b' Date ." .~~ < ~i~ nus x:RE.EM:NT t rra.de and entered into by and bet\Yecn the" CITY Cf' "'." :." . ::. . . '~., ;: CLf..PR\\'A 1B{ , FlCH. f UA, a m.micipal corporation, by its City Vilnager 'hereinafter ,> ' " ~: , called the rlClTY" and ';o,.ard Won tgone r y oX Associ a tes , Radio COmmunication , Consu J tan t s, here inaf ter ca I led the "CD'1SULT.'V~T. II A. The City 'viana~er of the City of Clearwater, Florida is authorized and . ", .< empo\~red by provisions of the City Charter to execute contracts for professional services. .,' , . " B. The City desires the design, procurerrent, installation and test of a ten channel trunked radio system wi th associated microwave control for al I . ..' ~. . ..~. .' , . :~; ...;. : '. ~I municipal c~nnunications. ~,;i~: . :} C. , The City desires to contract with the COnsultant for this design, procurement, installation and test on such terrr5 and conditions as hereinafter follow: SECTIO"l 1 - ~SULT.ANT'S SERVICES .AND RESfU\lSIBILITIES .: , " 'II The Consultant, under the general supervis'ion of the central Services Director of the Ci ty of Clearwater, I sha J I provide rad io cOHlrun icat ions COIlSU It ing serv ices for the pro iect a,ccord ing to Ci ty di reet ion and standards. ") , TheConsuhant's services shaJI include, but not be limited to: :,\ 'I A. PHASe f 1 - I~PlENENTA:r(Q\l 1. Prepare'l detai led sys tern des ign requ i rerrents, prepare suomi t tal s to the Federal Aviat ion i\dmin i s trat ion 5eekjn~ " approvaJ for construct ion of antenna to~\?rs ....,bieh wit I be , \ 'I II \\ "~ ,~ ,ji I, , " " , " ..,..', ,..' >""''''''''':-d~ ".' .... ,....,..,.'.. ::'..~T~?~.o:"...~;;,~ '. '.' . '<":'?:~:;1~ . ", .. ....:1~ .)~~ ,'. . c: . ~:' ~ . '1 ~ t . . ,: ~ "'- , .' :.', >;.~~ required, ,and prepare uppJications t,o the Federal CcnlTl.ullcatiorls CO'nnission for radio' nccnses to ilTplerrent' the design, System design requ i renun t s Wt II be ' based on System operationaJ requirerrunts wi II be car e fu ! ! y 1 1 , I I I I 1 , I 1 I ' l ,recornrendat ions : for irrproverren t O13.de in PHASE 1 of the 2. project. ()raft detai led technical speci f ieat ions. frans lated into langua~e vJ\ich aecurat,ely and corrp.l~teJy, descr i bes hardware perforrrnnce leve 1 5 bes t SU i ted to the .' proposed systl::!m to graphically ,I, illustrate sys tem con fi'~ur at ion. J. Establ1sh general contract performance requirerrents. Bid docu'rrentat ion, wi (I ine Jude contract termS \..nich have been deve loped and tes ted in fmre than 150 comrufl icat ion system procurerrents. The COl11) Iete Inv i tat ion to Bid wi J1 be prepare'd in book form ready for distribution to potentiaJ bidders. ^ list of suppliers will be furnished .., " , with the submittal. 4. Conduct pre~bjd conference. A pre-bid conference wilt be chaired by Consultant at which tim':: potential bidders fmy COlOTent upon techinical , " 'requ i rerrents of the sped f icat ions t rece i ve a ~u ided tour through all sites of the, WJrk t and be wi tness to all comrents concerning the project. 5. Evaluate bids, ':,\ 2 t' .t,,\-;. " , , ,I ': f i , :;, ":'. ',~", :".~:~;7';":\;:?~~:,~~ , "".)"~ ..,..?J . ,,',' '. .ct I ~ .:.~. . .c' .~~ :} ; .,-; '.\ f Each bid wi J J be rev iCM:!d for equ lprrent I j s t, COfrp J lance with specifications, and experience ot rroposed sub- ,1 contractors. A lormal '\iTitcen recomrcndation for bid award wi II befJ,prepared. Iii"''''' 6. Provide enr,ineer:ing oversight to equiprrent instaJlation. 7, Wi tness proof of per forrmnce tests. The contractor wi II be required to dem:mstrate corrpllance IIi wi th per forrmnce . spec if icat ions before sys tem acceptance , '{ by City. Consultant's \\Ork will include personally wi tness ing all per formance rreasurerrcnts. Upon successfu I . cone Ills ion of the test program and our approval of I contrac,tor \\oOrkrmnship, Consultant will deliver a letter to Ci ty recomrend ing acceptance of the pro ject and final ',> ,\ payrren t to the contrftctor. SEer 10-( I I PERlCO a= SERV ICE , A. The COnsultant shall perform basic and additional services as expeditiously as is cons is tent wi th profess ional sId 11 and care and the order I y progress of the \\.Ork. Upon request of the City, the Consultant shall submit for'the City's approval a schedule of the perforrrance of the Consultant's services, \\Oich shall be adjusted as required for the City's review and <ilpproval of submi ss ions and for approval of authori ties hay ing jur i sd ict io~pver the project. This schedule, when approved by the City, shall not, except for ',I reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Consultant. B. Design procur~nent, installation and test [or the ten channel trunked radio , \ system is estimated to require lTOre than t'MJ years to corrplete. , , ' , , SECT ICN III ~ ~SULTANT' 5 ADD IT laJAL SERV ICES " , " "\1 A.The following services cause the Consultant extra expense' and 'When 3 " II \ , J L ~ ~". R..~:\. ~~:~~;;\:\f:~~~31r . ".,' '-'1" '~'.hl..i.rH"-t.1 ".,' . .~. ~';. :,/~~ ;'~ ;'?~\~1 ,I.: '.' ~;f$~ . .'. .l .....:.~r. '. :~>:;. ,.~t{~ .1...... . '.'. uuthor.ized in writing by contract ChurH~c order ,they shall be paid for by the City uS "udditior~i\l \\'ork" ~nd not included in the codpensation fo~, bnse scrv ices. .... "" 1. Consultation concernin~' replacclrcnt of any \\Ork dulJlagcd by fire or other causes durinR construction and furnishing professional services as rray be , i ,I , ! required in connection with the replacerrent of such \l,\)rk. 2. Providing coordination of IMJrl< perforrred by separate contrilctors or . . . . '1 by the Ci ty I s 0\1.11 forces. .1 . 3. Prov id ing serv ices af ter issuance to the City of the' final r.ertificate for 'payrrents, or in the absence of a final certificate for payrrent, ITOre than ninety(90) days after the date of. substantial cor'1lletion of the work. 4. i Prepar ing 1\:; serve or serv ing as an expert wi tness in connect ion \vi th ~J any public hearing, arbitration hearil1~ I)r JegaJ proceeding. 5. Pray id ing any other serv ices not otherwise inc Juded in thi 5 agreerrnn t . :..'1 '>' I or not custO!'rnrily furnished in accordance with gencrdJJy accepted Consultant \ pract ices. .', , SECnO'l I V - RE I.H~lRS~LE EXPENSES A. Reirnbursable expenses are in uddition to the cOHpensation for basic and ....\ additional services and include actual expenditures made by the COnsultant and associates in the interest of. the project for the expenses listed in '\ the following subparagraphs. :,. 1. Expense of the tr anspor tat i on beyond a 100 mi Ie rad ius of the Ci t y of, Clearwater in connect i on wi th the pro ject; living expenses in connect ion \vi th said out -of -tov.n trave Ii long distance comnmicationsi autl) rental in connection with the project. .' 2. Expense of reproduct ions I pas tage and hand I ing of dr awin~s , .,\ " specifications and other docunents. 4 .\ " L I. ! " ." o. " , .. . '. < ....:::;'(':"";.'~!i . ".:: '. :i.\ .'~ i \ >'. . Y.h :. = ~~t . . <:". t 3. l~l<pense of data processing and photoRraphic production techniques .. when used in connection with additional services. 4. If authorized in advance 'by the City, expense of oVerti,,~ v.ork requiring higher than regular rates. 5. Expense of any add it iona I insurance covera~e' or I imi t5; inc ludin~ profess iona J Ii ab i J i ty insurance, reques ted by the Ci ty . in excess of that norma II Y car r i ed by the Con su It an t and'l as s oei a tes . SECTla~ V - CITYIS RESPQ~SIBILIT[ES A. The central Services Director shall provide the following: 1. Information as to its requir~rents for the project. 2. Exami na t ion 0 f docurren t s submi tted by the Consu I t an t and render decisions pertaining thereto pronptly, to avoid any unreasonable delay in the progress of the COnsultant's work. 3. Legal, auditing and insurance counseling services as may be required. 4. T~e City shall designate, \\hen necessary, a represer:atative autho'rized to act in the City's behalf with respect to the project. 5. The City shall be respansible for the printing and binding the final report, advert is ing for bids, and for the ~ssuance of the contract docurrents to the bidders and contractors. 6. [f the Ci ty observes or otherwise becO'res aware of any tau It or defect in the project or nonconformance with the contract docurrent, prompt WT'itten notice thereof shall be given by the City to the Consultant. .1' SECT Ia\! V I - <x::NSUL T A~T '5 ta::OJNTl NG RE.a:tIDS 'I Recording of the Consultant's direct personnel payroll, and reirrbursable expenses pertaining to this. project and records of accounts between the City and ',\ Consultant shall be kept on a generally recognized accounting bas.is and shall be 5 .'\) ... 1 ., . . /~ 'f' .\ uvai lo1bll~ to the .City or its authurizeu representative lor audit during nnrrrol ')usincss hours. SECrlO\ VII - Ttlt\\INATICN OF ?(Hl3.B\ENT The Ci ty and Consu I tunt hereby a~~ree to the (u t t performance of the covenants contained herein, except that ei the.r p~rty rmy upon seven days I " ....Titten notice terminate this agreerrent should the other party fail to substantially perform in accordance with its terms through no fault af the party , initiatinc the termination. A. This a~recm:~nt rruy,be terminated by the Ci ty upon at .Ieast seven days I II written notice to the Consultant in the event that the project is perrranen t I y abandoned. B. In the event o[ termil1clt ion not the fau It of the Cansu ltant I the Consultant shall be cOll1'ensated for all. services perforrred to termination date, together with reilrbursable expenses then due and all termination expenses as defined in para~raph Vll,'C. C. Termination expenses include expenses directly 'attributable to termination for which the Consultant is not otherwise corrpensated. SEer IO'i V I II - O\NERSH I P Cf' lXX11vENTS Drawings and speci ficat ions refnain the property of the Ci ty~ : SECT 10'4 (X - ffi'\ERAL ~S (DERAT ICNS A. Un less ot!1erwise speci f ied I this agreerrent shall be governed by the laws of the State of florida. ',) B.. The City and the Consuitant waive all ri,;hts a~ainst each'other and a~ainst the contractors I agents and elT'91oyees ,of the other for darna~es covered by ,,\ any proper ty insu,rance during cons t ruct ion. The Ci ty and the Consu I t ant ~ach shall require appropriate similar waIvers from their contractors"and 'j Y1 agents. -'\) 6 .,' . . C ;n ~I"" ....~., '~~"-;~'.;.. ,....~'.'.c~~ 1';t~Yf.r*~t~~~~ .' '. .'. ...~....:.;;i~:}~\;$;;~ . . ~ . c... 1 .: .:. {." / . .;~;.c~ .' , c :., 'I~, ," ", . , C. The Consu I tan l sha II be respons i b Ie for the conp Icteness and accuracy of the construction docurrents, prepared und cOlTf)iled under his oblip,ation for this project dnd shall correct, at his expense, all errors and 'omissions 'j ~herein ~lich rmy be disclosed during the review of the construction documP.nts. Correction of engineering errors disclo~ed during construction of the project shall be accon'plished by the Consultant. The cost shall be borne by the Consu ltant. D. During the course of contract, the Consultant agrees to carry a policy of public liability insurance of limits of not less than $500,000 for any n~rrber of persons in anyone accident. This'policy of a true copy of certificate of said policy, shall be filed with the. City Clerk prior to execution of this contract. E. During the course of this contract, the c,onsultant agrees to carry a Consultant's professional liability policy in the sum of not less than $100,000, which policy or a trUe copy of certificate of said policy shall be filed with the City Clerk prior to execution of this contract. F. ' Cf.1HlfICATi: ~ INSUHA\ICE I. The Consu Itant shall furnish' the City's Purchasing Officer sat isfactory proof of insurance coverage ns described herein before wi th an , insurance corrpany sat is factory and acceptab Ie to the Ci ty. To be acceptab Ie to the City, each insurance certificate rrust contain a clause substantially ,as fo Ilo\\{s : a. "Should any of. the above described policies be cancelled or '~ II undergo mater i al change befor~ the expi rat ion date, the issu ing insurance '! 'I corrpany will mail within ten (10) days written notice to the City. The interests of the City shall be included under such' polici'es (except ""brkers' ) () 7 ", 1.,\ ", ., '"..II .' ~. '~'.)~I'f .>;,,,( /.\;~ ~>;,~ J~ ..-4,l'~it~ .~ ':. "<!; ,,~:~,~r:'~<',J~ . >.- <.;,.. ...~:,' '.::',:~~r~ .' .<~~;~~ . '.""i' . ;.:~"'.l' ., .. , CCH1Jensation and Professional Linbility) .:IS an auditll)nal insured for all losses ar is ing ~ut of this a~reCHunt ," G. liJLO 11.At~\JU:S~ POl.t:E.\E.NT 1. The Consultant agrees to indcfmlfy ilnd hold hurrnless the City, Its agents and el\'lJ loyees, fron; or agains t all loss or e)(p~nse (inc Iud ing cos t5 "and attorneys I fees) by reason of I iabi Ii ty irrposcd by law upon the Ci ty for damages because of bodily injury, including death, at any ti:re resulting therefrom, sustained by an y pc r son or pe r sons or on acco'un t of damage to property, . inc Iud iog ,loss of usc thereto f \I.-hethcr caused by the Con~u I tan t or efrp loyecs . H. Tl1e Consultant is and shall' be an independent contractor and. not an agp.nt of the City, hereunder. MY provision in this contract that may appear to gi,ve the City the ,right to direct the Consult?~t as to the dctai Is of ,doinr, the 'MJrk or to exe'rci se a rreasure of con t ro lover the \\-\Jr!< rreaos that the Consu I tan t the associates, successors, assigns, and lep,al representut ives of such other . t f II coven"nts of thi'lS 1'0.' . h th C th part y 10 respec 0 a '" a~reclT~n t . I"e 1 t er e i ty nor e shall follow the wishes of the City as to the results of the \\Qrk only, "-hieh shall corrply .vith all applicable laws and ordinances. SECTIQ'l X - SLO:ESSCRS A~D ASS IG"lS The City and the Consultant each binds himself, his associates, successors; assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to this agrecfrent and'to Consultant shall assi~nt or transfer his interest in this a~re~rrent without the 'Written consent of the other. In no event shall any contractual relation be ;:) created betViCen any third party and the City. i This contract shall be in lull for.ce and effect only \\hen it has been \ i approved by the City Ccnmission of the City of Clearwater, Flori(ja, and ....hen executed by the duly authorized City officials~ , 'I 8 ~ \) . 'L: '. .'~ , . " , . :l~~ written instrurTCnt signed by both the City and Consultant. .' -'./ :' , . . .'."':;:".;:.77?'f~ . < .~,~-.:;: .:rt~ '," ':"; '''>1' , . j' " , .1 \ , 'SECfI~ XI - EXTENT ~ .AffiEf.\ENTS This ap.recfrent represents the cnt ire ilnd inte~rated agrecrrent bet~en the (, Ci ty and the Consu ltan t and!' supersedes all pr i or ncgot i at ions, represcntat ions or agreerrents, ei ther wr i tten or oral,' This agreerrent may be amnded only by SECT IO'J XII - BAS I S R:R a:tvPENSATI~ 'I A. fiN) IC a:rvPE.\lSATI~ 1. For professional services as described in Section 1, basiC cOfTlJen s at ion s ha II be corrpu t,ed as fo II ows : a. PHASe. ll: A fee not to exceed $l25 ,000 I paY,ab Ie as invoiced. Invoices wi II ref leet actual t1lm incurred each bi II ing pe~ iod plus expenses. B. COVPENSAT 1~ fUt ADD IT ICNAL SERV ICES 1:1 1. For additional services of the Consultant as described in SECTIQ\l III ~ and,. any other serv ices inc luded i,\. SECTIO\l as part of additional services, corrpensation shall be cOlTputed as follows: I, ' a. ~ard .v'bnt~orrery and Associates Ipr incipal' s 'titre at the rate of siICty-five dollars ($65) per hour. C. The City a~d the COnsultant agree in accordance with the ter~ and conditions of this agreerrent that: 1. If the scope of the project or of the Consultant service is changed materi~lly, the amount of cOfTlJensation shall be equitably adjusted. D. All requests for payrrents shall be submitted to the Central: Services Director for review and approval and /lUst be accOfTlJanied by a detai led: invoice and execu ted c I aim agains t the Ci ty of Clearwater. '1\, . \ -,\ ,j p ",\ 9 '/ / \. .. .: , ' L," '...~~ . ',r ~ <,' .... .:. il I' ",j r H .~tT.~\',\~'~~:'-:-:;~'~~r~/t)\"~~',:'~t1f"~f ,,1-.., :.~>. ....,t-.:.:.,\.il.i:r.'F~t:~~f'~\}:~;"~"'..:I...t.\..L.., .' ..' ',~,.~"'?:\,!r'{!W~:2jt, . . "~ . ...''', . >t.Si~~ ' ..' ,I' :>. ....i'::~:: " , ~!W , '::,' ,.:/;:,<:';:~i . ,_ , , ' . .L.<~ . ,~;," >:;~,'it~ . . ., - .,' l'/? . I . I' .~,~;.~ agreelrcnt to' be. .~~: . \ .~. , . 'I " " . .> IN \....1 T~t:.SS the par tics hereto have caused. th i s 'I\HI:HB..."1: t cxccu ted' the day and year f hs t \I.T 1 t ten above. CITY a: ClP..PR\"ATER, FU){lDA CUJNTE.~ tG'JED : I i , , .'. "";j . : ...... " ."1 . ".:','.:-1 : ....;1 { .'_ :. :,f,~: :/ ., ., '-"1. ,j l .."..~:.r ~ , I J .Vhyor~ommissioner ....;} :.(.: Ci t y.\13nager' . ~. :.:: :::~;: ~ N>I~~OVED as to form and cor rectness . . ...... '.. :" ..,.,c::'::)~ . :( .: . ~ :;,.. ,1 . -: .,; " .' :,..: ~ . .:.<:>;~ "neST: . . <.:. .;.. ~':'r: .';:fi1j . . . . '1:;,1 " I) .', ..', ,-'''; ',::, :.;~<~~. .' ':/,;..t.. " Ci ty At torney :::::;)?f~: City Clerk :{. '. . .," '.'.< .oll >: .<:~:~~} '. . . . :",;-.::: <J.:NSULT,a..'lT: I\.'ard ,Vonqareryand AssoCiates "1. .,' I' ."';;jj L . "', . :-~'" WITNESS as to COnsultants '. ..:. I, \\ilrd ,VOll t:~orre r y,' P.E-. .' ,~ ' \~.:<' " ", ~ . ~,I " '. '\ .\ .\ , ~) . ..... I ::',:.ct " " .:, ~. ., . I' II:.; .; " :~ "' j . i! . i . \ , ".' 10 ,', :~':.~. - . \ ....,1 ;, / " ';. /< . , ," ',.. .,' :t. '" .~. .': " I ~ .~:~~~~ . '.p ~"". ';" ;;' ~<'. :":.":.:\:;~~\~~: '.;.' . . Agenda No. 7':;- M EM 0 RA N DUM TO: 1'])-1 Meeting Date: lZ/6/84 The City Commission of the City of Clearwc.ter S U 8 J E CT: City-Wide Radio Communications Study Consultant Selection RECOMMENDATION: Approve ilie selection of a Radio Communications Consultant firm as recommended by a Ma.nagement Radio CornrnWlications Consultant Selection Committee, and authorize the City Manager to negotiate a contract for this consulting work. ill And thai the appropriate officials be authorized to execu'e same. BACKGROUN D: The City Commission in its June 21, 1984 meeting approved the City Manager1s recommendation directing the staff to proceed with a study oE !:he ,total radio conununications requirements of the City, to be performed by an outside consulting firm. From the State of Florida's conununications group we obtained a well researched list of radio conununications consultants within the U. S. We sent requests far proposals to over 100 of these consultants. We received 28 proposals which were aU reviewed by the Selection Committel!:. These were ranked by the Selection Committee and the top 12 were sent requests for technical proposals. These were reviewed by the Selection Committee and the "short listtr was reduced to four (4) firms for oral presentations. A Management Radio Consultant Selection Committee of Bob Davidson, Fire Chief; Jim O'Neil , Police Dept.; Floyd Carter, Central Services Director; Bill Baker, AS!:It. Public Works Director; Cecil Henderson, Utilities Director; Aleta Cozart, Assista.nt to the City Manager; Don Petersen, Purchasing Officer; Bill McCall, Data Processing Manager; Joe McEwen, Radio Technician; heard a presentation by each of the four (4) firms regarding this project. Based on their reView of the technical proposals and the presentations, the Selection Conuni... tee has unanimously recommended the firms be selected in the following order: Estimated Studv Cost $24,000 + Expenses l(t $28, 314 + Expenses $55, 120 + Expenses $62,400 + Expenses " . 1. W. M. Montgomery & Associates 2. Gmnic om, Inc. 3. Sachs/Freeman Associates, Inc. 4. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc. (for 3 of 8 tasks) In accordance with the State of Florida' s Competitive Negotiation Act, the consultants have been selected based on their qualifications and experience. After selection and ranking, negotiations regarding fees and actual job des.cription are to be completed. A contract will then be prepared and submitted to the City ConunissiOl'l. for. approval. * W. M. Montgomery Bot Associates 300 engineering hours @ $65 6 round trip airfare @ $400 20 days, per diem @ $60 20 days, auto rental @ $45 $19,500. 2,400. 1,200. 900. $24,000. Total *The cost of this study will be determined upon Commission approval of a contract. Funding for this study is not included in the 1984/85 Budget. but will be provided by an amendment to the Radio Division of the Garage Fund. ,. - -...... CommiSSion Disposition: ,2-t..-u.-.-'" r.....~_./ SubmiHed ~by: Advertised: J..4.., ~~~ Do t e: City M aoager P Q per: Follow-up Action: /JL. :,.;/ /': '. ~ """'~. -- - ...'- ..p Affected Costs: * Parties Fundi ng Source: Notified 0 Capital Improve- of Meettng ment Budget ~ Operating Budget o Not Required 0 at her ,_. ,I - y OAttachments: o Not Required Date 5 Sequential Reference Originating Department: Ap pro priation Code Police None, Commi$~ion Oisposltion: 1. Apprand al Recommllndlld/R....ise<i/Candltlonal 2. Continued to Follow-up Action: 1 . . '.',' .\ '::..<~:~~;1fg '0' ,:1\ '. . ,I .. .~\: MEMORANDUM TO: C:f,'1-3 The City Commission of th'e City of Clearwater SUBJECT: ....genda No. MeetIng Date: 6/21/84 CITY WIDE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS STUDY RECOM MENDATION~ Direct the staff to proceed with a study of the total radio communications requirements (Jf the City to be performed by an outside consulting firm. C And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUN D: Prior to proceeding with the bond issue to finance improvements to the Police Department communications system as dlscvssed at the Budget Decision Package Worksession, it is recommended that all the radio communication needs of the City be reviewed by an outside consultant. Such a study could encompass a long term plan os well as immediate requirements for Police, Public Works, Central Services and Utilities, and would suggest technological advances that would benefit the City. Costs and' funding for a c:>ntract will be identified when the contract is submitted for" Commission approval. ./ C:.Jr.. Date: CJ Affected PartIes Notified of Me ellnq C] Nor Requited Costs; 'l:l/A CJAttachmenfs: Funding Source: CJ Capital 'Improve- ment Budqet J:I Operating 8udget CJ Other Submitted by: Advertised: City Manager P~~.r" o Not R.qulrad I OriQinatinq Oepartmen t;. Oate aSeQuential Reference Administration Appropriation Code CJ None "1 SCf- MErvlORANDUM TO: The City Com mission SUBJECT: Agenda No.' Meetl ng Date: 8-15-85 cm~5 of the City of Clearwater Confirmation of City Clerk Appointment. . RECOM MENDATION: GonHrm the appointment of Cynthin E. Goudeau as City Clerk, eff cct Ivc S And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUN D: Lucille Hil1iams, City Clerk, retired on August 2, 1985. The City Manager has named Cynthia E. Goudellu to fill this vacancy. Section 4.01 of the City Charter requires the Commission to confirm the appointment made by the City Manager. ~ts. Goudeau has been a City employee and a member of the City Clerk I s staff since November 1978, and has been Assistant City Clerk since September 1982. She has a Haster' s D2gree in Management and was awarded the design<1tion of Certified Nunicipal Clerk in May of this year. ,. I " Commission Oi sposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by~ Advertised: Costs: OAttachments: Funding Source: o Capitol Improve- ment Budget D OperatiNg Budget o Other . ./ ., '(.... .:.,.:.:.., to'\,; .....;;:- Dete: o Affected Parties Notified of Meeting l51Not Required City Manager Paper: " .f1(NOf Required Date 8 Sequential Reference OrIginating Deportmen t: Appro prlollon Cod e Administration m' None .'\\ nAnd that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUN D: ,. '. " I wh ',.~. - -... ... '.. ..~j~ .. ,--. , s-.s- MEMORANDUM TO: fUl)....;L The City Commission of the City of Clearwater Agenda No. Meeting Dote: 8-15-85 SUB J ECT: CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES TARGET AREA EXPANSION RECOM MENDATION: city Commission approve the proposed expansion of the CNHS Target Neighborhood in North Greenwood, Dnd amend existing service agreements accordingly. city Commission approved the current boundary of the CNHS Program with their approval of the CNHS Home Purchase Financing Fund on September 1,1983. It is now proposed to extend their North Boundary from Palmetto Street to Stevenson's creek so as to include that portion of the North Greenwood Target Neighborhood currently being served by the 'city's Community Development Block Grant Pr~gram. This expansion will provide additional services that will assist the City in its efforts to revitalize this neighborhood. tommi ssion Disposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued to Follow-up Action: dale Submitted by: Advertised: . If It....... -;:....,.____ c"..::~lt__II',.:......I- Oore: Paper: [2] Affected Parties No ti tied of Me e ting Costs: N /'A Funding Source: o CapItal Improve- ment' Budget o Operating Budget o Other CBJAttachments: 1. Target Neighbor- hood Description IIExhibit All City Manager Dote aSequentiol Reference Ci1 Not Required Cl Nor Required Orlg i na tin g De p art men t :Jh),\r~',~,", Appropriation Code II pLANNHJr. ~ URBAN DRVRT,OPMRN'T' o None ,\ '., ')- II All that certain neighborhood within the City of Clearwater, Florida, bounded and described as follows: ; '< : ~ ! I_ 'r.'.'~, ~ ;~,'.~ ~~~~:f" ,".....~;~~\~"\",~.f~1;,.t"*~~~ " , '".. '.' ". 'c" !::'~-"\;'::;'~%~:fl . .' >, .\~~Ji; c ~" . :,. t .... ,~.> ' " ij EXHIBIT IIAI' i ~ . ~ ~ . ~ . . ~" , . " ~ I .:...... ,:c; ~:; , :.~rl .r ;.. Beginning at the intersection of N. Hyrtle Avenue with 'the SCL Railroad Right-of-way, thence southwardly along N. Hyrtle Avenue to Lakeview Road;. thence westwardly along LakeviewRoad to South Fort Harrison Avenue: thence southwardly along South Fort. Harrison Avenue to Belleair Road; thence eastwardly along Belleair Road.to Missouri Avenue; thence northwardly along Missouri Avenue to Pierce Street;thence eastwardly along Pierce Street to Fredrica street; thence northwardly along Fredrica Street to Drew street; thence west.wardly along Drew street to Betty Lane; thence northwardly along Betty . Lane to ,Stevenson IS C~eek; thence westwardly along stevenson's Creek to ~he BeL Railroad Right-of-way; thence southerly along said Right-of-way to its intersection with.N. Myrtle Avenue, . the place of beginning., " ~~ .'. ~& ~~~ ~:' ',' . .! ". '.. J( ., .\.. . ~\.t . ' :\ .r : . "~I. Il i '.I~~ ',) . ... -\'\ , i . \ "'1 '~\ '1 ,\ j, . I ,I I' 5"6 MEMORANDUM TO: CD,-! Th.e City Commission of the City of Clearwater Agenda No. MeetIng Dote: 8-15-85 SUB J E CT: 11TH YEhR Cm.1MUNIT~ DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION RECOM MENDAT10N~ City commission review and approve the "Pinal Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds:, and authorize submissio of the 11TH YEAR COMHUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION. (Si;l And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUN 0: The City will receive $845,000 this October from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. It is anticipated that this amount will be supplemented by $150,000 in program income (repayment and sales of loans) bringing the total estimated budget for the program year of 1986 to $995,000. The City Commission reviewed the "Proposed Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" at a Public Hearing on July 18, 1985, and after obtaining citizen input directed the Staff to adjust the "Statement" by increasing the budget for Housing Rehabilitation Activities while reducing the budget for Public Works and Recreational Activities. The Commission also identified three Public Service Activities to be funded during FY'86. The tlFinal Statement" has been amended accordingly. Commission Disposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued to Follow-up Action: dgr~ 1 "....,.._ J.A...... Q.j1~ . City Manager Paper: OAffected PartIes Notified of Meeting Costs: N/A Funding Source: Cl Capital Improve- 1) ment Budget o Operating 8udget a Other >>SaAHachments: Submitted by: Advertised: Cate: "Final Statement" 2) Three Year Plan Dote 8SeQuentiClI Reference }CINar Required xlID Not Re.Quire.d Originating Oepartmen !~' )'1;.............. .- PLANNING & URBAN DEVELOPMEN Appropriation Code o None ./ ',. '"~.'~' :.~~.;:{~\ , . I';..... ......Y: , ~ ....~ -' , . .. FINAL STATENENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES' AND PROJ~CTED USE OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDS PROGRAM YEAR 1985-86 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES Develop liVing persons livable communities by providing decent housing and suitable environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally. for of low- and moderate-income. .j .( Conserve, upgrade and expand the existing housing stock, especially that available to low- and moderate-income persons. 'I Provide for a varie~y of housing types and locations within economic reach of low- and moderate-income persons and families~ Address the housing needs of low- to moderate-income elderly, female-headed households, large-family households and other special nP.'eds. handicapped, groups .with ') ., Provide emergency or interim housing to low- and moderate-income persons and ~amilies without shelter. Minimize involuntary displacement due to CDBG activities or, when displace- ment is unavoidable, mitigate its adverse affects on low- and moderate- income households. I Provide improved neighborhood environments, moderate-income areas to include protecting and man~made environments in all aspects~ especially in low- and enhancing the natural and Provide a full-range.pf public utilities, ~acilities and infrastructure of appropriate ,quality l to meet the particular needs of low- and moderate- income residents. Provide a full-range of human services as necessary to meet the needs of low- and mOderate-income persons, the elderly and handicapped. Eliminate ,blighting conditions health, safety, and welfare and all conditions detrimental of community residents. to the ::. .' Continued . ... "'i 1 _ ___.. _.... c ...~._.__~.__ __ ........___. _.~... _ _ .--... .... ..... -:-- -- .;0--.--- .... ~~ .. :---,...._~~--=--c_.7-~-- ~.. ~. 1(' . , ,I ~ ~"...' '-Q aJ"~ .' ~ FEOERAL ASSISTANCE L~ .. .....'-'''-1:" J '1AT'[ &. H.,)W~" CAHr5 "'"""''" >>"I'\J. N/A CA. t10Pf I. TYPf, ~ T"CH CIEHTI- CY 0 I'GT'CI. or HtDfT ~ c:om. . ~TI PlER .. DArt 1tJ!I~ 0 J1EJl. )'- _d ., ./fIG'T1 TO_ ~ r_ N~ (/J... .,. ~,..cA n;::.N l\.JVO Ioo'U) _'4 ~.. I2J APf'U:,.l. new ,.85 8 19 In "A 1'1. ,. tMJ 1..-. ~ . Lf{l.A.L APPI.~/REoP\t~ , ~ CEHTV'C.Uo. ~.ER alN) .. ~ "'-"'- City of Clearwater 59-6000-239 b ~_I..nr City G::r.;&n1E[lt . Co s.-~p 0 l!Ioo P. O. B:J?: 4748 PR0- &. ..-...u!\VI ~ GAUl clOy Clear..o.te.I." .. C'Lanr pinellas l~ Flor-.i.d:1 .. .tJ> Coc:dL 33518 0--. l:nJ.tJ AUTJu:D 1\ Ccr1bd PInon rN- [)::rul.d U. Jass b.. 1TTt.E . T~/'MJ (8131 462-6881 ~ty t::evelcprent ~ :! 1. lTT\.E OF ~S ~ l\.>M ~ f'i CII ..... tna 'II ~ ............,. c-..-.,..A.o-I d ..,. L TYPE OF ~ IJIEi::I>'V(T ! ~ Comunity ~velcprent Block Gr:'ant Program - This is t!-e - ------ - ~-- fUth year fntit1ement: ~pUcatial ard involws p<qmed furrlJn;J ~ ---- ~ -- fot"' Ptblic \-brks & Facilities, Public service, lElubilitat.i.cn ~ --~ ktivities, Cede Enforce:rent, S~ial ktivities by SUb- . 1-0oo --- z-~~[fJ J ""=ipients am Ge.=a1 Mninistrative costs. · t. AA!.A CF PAMer:a.H'JoCT (1)..-,,!i{~ ~&l>O:L ;<e.I4 _J 10. ~TED HL."IoI9D'I ". TYPE ~ J..SSlSr IH:ti. OF~~ ~- - ~ Cle3n\l3ter It ..._ .- ".... - lill c-u. __-II :x ,:it. PfloPOSc-O R./NOING h3 ~E~ OcSTl'lICTS OF: 14. TYPE OF APPuCA Tl:::IN - c:-.- . ...... -...... 1845 0Cf). 00 . .. APf>UCANT , b. P'ROJ€CT ....- 'O----QII.. .. ....... ,.... __ h- ~ " Fi;DEFl.IJ., f:L Al"f>1..lCJ.HT .00 9 9 17. TY'Pf: QI< 0U0PQ /,., Ii. .. /.., -----' ___ ~l e. STATE .00 I~ PAO.Ec;J STAAT II. Pl1O.ECT ~~ CAn: t:vV. n:w -~ 1 r _ ....... ~ ~~ If. t.OCAL .00 "..c.. I ,,85 10 1 12 ~ ~ c:pv. CIIJ . 011-ER .00 'il:"" 01. re t)JE TO r.., "9'.!Q _"'11 ! Tertii Is 84S,COJ. .co FEl:I€?.Al. ~ ~ t. 85 11 F'EOC'W. ...c;r;.cy 10 ~ RI:QI.JEST 4!D ~ FF:E<W. CiFUHT oemFC\TlC;Pi NL:USER ,. ... Cf'\ClA."lZ,A. r~ tJI'IlT (II' APF~LAm I b. AOIolIN: ST/V. Tio'E cc;.o."l' ACl (IF Jl;JOo'(N) U. S. ter..a.."i:zrent of H.U.D. F::b>-rt A. Lyle NIA c.~ 21. ~qltS ACCED 325 ~~ Hi3.Irs Street :n..._ ~Hc Ja~\a;cnvi11e, Florida 32202 6~ Tct~ tonl d. r.". ~ an:~. .. YES. THIS NOncE Of' IN rEtil'PRu..?P'..JCAT~'~..lCArO'i WAS w.:::E ""'}.l~LE TO tHE STAre 011""'- ., t"4 ~:.:nI~ ~ CACE.R lZl1Z ~ FOR REvl!W ON: 0- A.I"PI.JC,IJ(T ... ~ arcl ~ _ 00c:.r.w1t f>u OA~ g aRlVlES bM<I CUr ~ tor ltJe ~ b::<:y gt_ ~ .rd C"W ~ 'I ..1'J1.A,~ oril ~ -'th ~ .r~ ~"QJ1 b. NO. ~ IS HOT CO'o'E1m) BY E.O. 1231'2 0 ~ 'h~.~ CIA PR:lGJV,J.( HAS '-Or BaN sa..ECtEO BY ST"~ FO\~, 0 ~~~ .. 1'YPEO ~ AHO nn.E b. SICI'<A Tl..*U; Mth:ny L. ShcenuY..er "\~ =~. sa;N'T A 1'N'E Ci tv M3..'1aCJer 2(. APP\JCA. r.., --.Jlo ~ ~ fEO€FU.L. J.PP..A.A TlCt/ ~o.~ H\IIoI\l.(R I x. F"E~ ~ !CATlOH . TJc.:lH REa:......aJ "11 v. ICrC)t; T.vaEN . ZIt ~ r_ _di ~ XI. 1__'" ~ g~ S7ARTN:; o &. ....W,:'lOElJ zv .tCTION OA n;-- 11 DATE " o II.. REJI:<:TED ... 1=ED€R.Al. 1 ,J;IO :I,. COHlM::r FOR AOOlTOU.l. ~ J~ r_~'" Mn o c. Rf:T1.~NEO FOR l10fi tNu- o.JwI ":~ ~ E.'ONG J~ .t.>>Dl ""Em b. W>f"\X.I.HT .DO DATE " a Ii REnJRNa) FOA ~ STATE .DO n ~AOOED ~~ E.O. \2:172 sveUISSJON ~ 8Y~TO c1 l.OCAl... . J)fJ I Z STAre o. DEFERRED .. cn-t€ R .DO at W\T)1Ofl..I. W1>l l, TOTAL. I .co o Y.. 0 No I>cSM ~1..c:o&-al az PA~ EDfllC)H CS NOr lJS,'8l..! . ... "'\, 5T Al'IOA.RO fOI'lU ,~, P"GE , (Rn, 4-&11 ~ ~ ONI c..n.. "-Ilri 4Z4--Itt:J , , Ie ,. '. ,I . ~ p. . .":r.t~~;. I. . . \\ \.) CODE ENFORCEMENT $ 30,000 $ I 5,000 the Economic businesses $ 85,500 SPECIAL ACTIVITIES BY SUBRECIPIENTS 1) Reimbursement of CNHS for administering Developm~nt Loan Program for qualifying wi thin' the "Enterpri se Zone" ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES 1) Provide essential budget and program monitoring to insure compliance with contract~al obligations and program requirements 2) Fair Housing Counseling, and a housing Location Program for low and moderate income families through. the Community Service Foundation CONTINGENCIES '$ 450 BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM BUDGET SUMMARY PUBLIC WORKS AND FACILITIES PUBLIC SERVICES . REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL ACTIVITIES BY SUBRECIPIENTS GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS CONTINGENCIES $ 159,500 126,750 587,800 30,000 , 5,000 85,500 450 $ 995,000 Total BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDING RESOURCES ENTITLEMENT AMOUNT ESTIMATED PROGRAM INCOME $ 845,000 150,000 $ 995,000 Description Total I of Use of Community Block Grant Funds Program Year 1'985 Development ,\ PUBLIC WORKS AND FACILITIES .,) , . 1) Paving, Drai11age and Sewer improvements - Woodlawn St. , (S. Ft.' Harrison Ave. to RR Tracks): Palm B1 uff (N. Greenwood to N. Missouri Ave.); and N. Missouri Ave. (Palm Bluff to Palmetto) 2) Paving of Belmont Park and the Northeast Branch Library Parking Lots. . 3) Recreational Improvements - Ross Norton Park; Martin Luther King/Holt Complex; and Wood Valley Park . .4) Sidewalk "Streetscapen improvements along' Cleveland .St. . 5) St~vensonls Creek Basin Study (N. Betty Lane to RR Tracks) 3 _..._~, --.-. -.....--... ...-:-~-~-----:- ...,..,.~....-~, .._-. ~ ...... ,",' ~-. ...."'-_.... -----....------... .. .1 .. PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS 1) '. North Greenwood Neighborhood Target Area: a) Paving, Drainage and San.i tary Sewer improve- ments - Pennsylvania AVenue. . b) Develop plans and obtain permits to dredge Stevensons Creek Basin. 2) East Clearwater Neighborhood Target Area: , a) Drainage improvements - Dovewood & Applewood 3) Other Areas: a) Grant to "Latchkey" to purchase and construct one modular unit at a Clearwater' school site. b) 'Grant to Clearwater Housing Authority to purchase furnishings for the reception area of. the Robert H. Levison Senior Center. .i r l ?UBLIC WORKS AND FACILITIES $ 159,500 PUBLIC SERVICES $ 126,750. '1) Establish the "Greenwood Neighborhood patrollt - a police substation on N. Greenwood Avenue. 2) Supplemental Grant to Erwin's All American Youth Club for operational expenses. 3} Grant to "Community Pridelt to establish and operate a Daycare Center in South Greenwood for 20 children. ", REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES $ 587,800 * , Citywide Housing Rehabilitation for owner-occupied uni ts . Targeted Area Housing Programs * a) Rehabilitation of owner-occupied units b) Demolition and clearance of dilapidated units c) Relocation of occupants of dilapidated housing Qualifing Target Areas are identified on attached maps Reimbursement of Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. (CNHS) for administering housing rehab- ilitation programs in their neighborhood Financial assistance to Religious Community services for rehabilitation of their housing facilities (Emergency Housing & Spouse ~buse) (Renovation of Public/Private Facilities , a) Ross Norton Park Community Center ." b) Northeas t Branch Library c) Police Substation - N. Greenwood AVenue 'p) Girls Club pacili ties - Condon Gardens'" , 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 2 .J t., ." J ,( .'I Assessment of Relationship of Community , Development Block Grant Funds to Local Objectives and Broad National Objectives Program Year 1984-8~ The principal objective of Clearwater's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program in this program year was "to develop livable urban communities by providing decent housing and a sui~able living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income". Ninety-six percent of all CDBG Funds budgeted and/or expended during this period were directed to attaining thi.s objective which is also the primary objective of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 as amended. . I( . , . , :, ' " Several local sub-objectives contributed to the attainment of this objective, and a listing of these, along with an assessment of the relationship of the use of CDBG Funds to these sub-objectives and the broad National Objective of the cnBG Program follows: 1) To conserve, upgrade and expand the housing stock, especially for low-and moderate-income persons; address the housing needs of low-to moderate-income elderly, handicapped, female headed households, large family households and other groups with special needs: I' During this program year expenditures have continued. to assist low-and moderate-income homeowners to rehabilitate their homes through low interest (6%) and no interest~loans.. Funds were expended to operate a new Rental Rehabilitation Demonstration Program to assist investors in rehabilitating substandard units for use in the Section 8 Program administered by the Clearwater Housing Authority. The cost.of administering these loans and the integral "Code Enforcement" effort was budgeted against this housing activity. ., Efforts to expand the housing stock for low- and moderate- income families included fair housing counseling and a housing location program. While these activities do not increase the absolute supply of housing,' they do increase the number of units that are effectively available to low- and moderate-income families. Assistance to unemployed home-seekers in finding work has been an indirect mean%. of providing additional housing. 2) To provide emergency or interim housing to low- and moderate-income pe~sons and families without shelter: 'Funds were provided to a non-profit organization to rehabilitate mobile homes used as emergency shelter for families; and to assist in the ,rehabilitation of a . . c\\ fac~l1ty to shelter\ abused spouces. 3) To minimize involuntary displacement due to CDBG activities or, when displacement is unavoidable, mitigate its adverse effects on low- and moderate-income households: '\\ . ... 5 I' " 6) Grant to "Latchkey" to purchase and construct one modular uni t at a Clearwater School site; and to rebuild' 'and expand their daycare facilities in Condon Gardens PUBLIC SERVICES '( 1) Scholarship assistance for "Latchkey" day-care services. at Condon Gardens REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES II 1) Citywide Housing Rehabilitation for owner-occupied units 2) Rehabilitation of rental housing nnits within the "Enter- prise Zone tI .! 3) Financial ,assistance to Religious Community Services for rehabilitation of their housing facilities (Emergency Housing and the Spouse Abuse Shelter) 4) Targeted Area Housing Programs: a) Rehabilitation of owner-occupied units b) Demolition and clearance of dilapidated units c) Relocation of occupants of dilapidated housing d) Special campaigns to spruce-up neighborhoods and improve housing units 5) Reimbursement of Clearwater-Heighborhood Housing Services Inc. (CNHS) for administration of the housing rehabilitation programs in their neighborhoods 6) Condon Gardens renovations - Girls Club 7) Grant/Loan ,to the Clearwater Housing Authority for 'renovations in the Robert H. Levison Center for a senior center, and a fire sprinkling system CODE ENFORCE~ffiNT SPECIAL ACTIVITIES BY SUBRECIPIENTS 1) Loans to businesses within the IIEnterprise Zonen to expand employment opportunities and to provide services to the residents of this low-and moderate-income area ' 2) Loans to businesses within the "Enterprise Zonen to eliminate blight and encourage reinvestment in this area .3) Reimbursement of Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. for administering the Economic Development Program 4) Grant to the Downtown Community Redevelopment Agency to develop and implement a redevelopment strategy ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES 1) Provided essential budget and program monitoring to insure contractual obligations and program requirements 2) Fair Housing Counseling; Housing Location Program for low-and moderate-income familie~, and employment assistance to unemployed home seekers through the .Community Service Foundation I '" . .... 4 ,1 '"\:- ....-.,... ..._.~-+ . ... OR.....__ __.. '._-r ....__...---. _ . ., NORTH/SOUTH CREEm-100D ~mIGHBORHOOD TARGET AREAS! E~TERPRISE ZO~ES ~ORTH GREE~n.J'OOD ! DOt~lTm1N CORE AREA .. SOUTH GREE~-100D ~Elr.HBORHOOD TARGET AREAl EXPA'ffiED ~1HS ARE.~ '") ! , '[ . ~ 7 l~ .. " :.'::~~;~~i , , Financial assistance was provided to a lower-income elderly person whose home had to be demolished as a result of fire, termite, and other damages. 4), To provide improved neighborhood environments, especially. in low-and moderate-income areas to include protecting and enhancing the natural and.man-made environments in all aspects; to provide a full range of public utilities, facilities and infrastructure of approprate quality to meet the particular needs of low-and moderate-income residents: Improvements in qualifying Neighborhood Target Areas included street paving, drainage and sewer improvements, paving of parking lots, recreational improvements, sidewalk construction, expanded daycare facilities, renovation of the Condon Gardens "Girs Club", and renovations in the Robert H. Levison Center for a Senior Center and a fire sprinkling system. . 5) To provide a full-range of human services as necessary to meet the needs of low-and Moderate-income persons, the elderly and handicapped: AJ J 1 Scholarship assistance was provided to the expanded "Latchkey" day-care center in Condon Gardens. 6) To expand economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate-income persons: Low interest ,loans were made eo qualifying businesses within the "Enterprise Zone" to stabilize exist~ng jobs, create new employment opportunities, and to add or expand necessary neighborhood services. Four percent (4%) of all CnBG funds budgeted and/or expended during this period were directed to attaining the secondary objective, "aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight". , " A local sub-objective assisted in t.he attainment of this objective, and it, along with an assessment of the ~elationship of the use of COBG funds to this sub-objective and to the broad National Objective follows: 1) To eliminate blighting conditions and all conditions detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the ~ . residents of low- and moderate-income areas; a low \ interest loan program administered by Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc., assisted several non-bankable homeowners to rehabilitate their homes - thereby eliminating a blighting condition in this low- and moderate-i~c~~~~~ighborhood. '\\ '.j .~ Eight percent (8%) of all COBG funds budgeted and/or expended during this period were directed to the cost of administering the cnBG Program - to provide essential budget and pr~gr~ ' monitoring, to insure compliance with contractual obl~gat~ons anq Erograrn requirements, and to provi~e Fair ~ousing co~seling and related services through the Commun~ty Serv~ce Foundat~on. " 6 ~ ~ { 41 ,,' ,.:':, :'f:>C\?1?:r~1 c < ...~!~ .:'/: .,. ~ 1, .' '~~ . ~:.~:' '. .~t . ? ;:/~. : 1 ~ ~'I ." .', '" .~J . '. . PLAN TO MINIMIZE DISPLACEMENT CLEARWATER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM .. Tne basic policy of the Clearwater community Development Block Grant (COBG) Program is to not displace persons. This policy is'effected by carrying out activities that do not require displacement or that m~nimize displace- ment. '. A Local Relocation Program makes relocation payments available to low- and moderate-income residents of Target Areas occupying units which are not feasible to rehabilitate. These payments help make it possible for persons wishing to remain in a Target Area to avoid displacement. When mUlti-family rehabilitation is undertaken, every effort will be made to avoid displacement. Units will be rehabilitated on a staggered schedule so that tenants may remain while work is in progress or, if necessary, owners will be required to provide temporary rental assistance. Also,' it will be a requirement that rents remain affordable to low- and moderate- income tenants after .rehabilitation is complete. II. Local Citizen Advisory Committees composed primarily of Target Agrea residents will monitor for movement of Target Area residents to ensure that ,indirect displacement does not occur unintentionally. i ,- . t .j ~.r,) .. JI ;' -\ .. ~ ..t ,~ \. . .. 9 "_..---...- .~____ .r_ ,....__..-._,---.~ ._~_......- -~,., - -.....-...----- -. .. i " !I q ,if " .1:' , . I~ EAST CLEAIWATER ~EIGHBORHOOD TARGET AREA " ,c ." .6 '.\ ,. .1 '/~ ./ :\ - ... .... ). ~"41--~-nt21k3~~~~j:~ ~~;r' r ~ :. · Ii. 't fI'''";. - , " .....~ ~ t ~ :. ( t:u:;:iit: . ~ X.. I"\:i" ..;"':":.':: ~ ,. . . UL-'t ~I J ;J ..._ (41-..e.."" ~ ... I ~ - ::::..:.....:.....,.... ....1 ~ .... , .... ~~r;.: ,1'. . I.." \ \.; ~.: ~ 1:'.1. . 1'268.04 ~'~fi n--D f1f~'f7:!< :-1 CJ J~ ':::!:j~ ~,,:-2~' ti/. i ~~ .~U. ~ LJ:....-J ' l~gJ '-#X) .Ll -.:';::;-wJ ; ~ ~ ..t.. -.;-~:t , 'b~"n:~.\""'O~O~; ~' :.::.~.., :""( .c.. ''}f- "Y [ r7t. : .:t.~...........~ -,~ ~r~"""" ?...s...VU"".. lL-.-J l P......mG.- 't-..:; '1 ~'l ~ r. ...o:llr. c;w=-v 'II . ~~ : ::: r::i'..' ~-.: 268 03 ' ..... c; :...~ .r~r--...r.!':. . ~ t J ~~ U _~____________u___~u__.~._u.l"t . ~~__.,.~ ----------1Ir---:----- N~:] t[, ~~-..&~ ,1; . . G ~ E=_:~~l r .. El ....--...-:::0 I ~ .'T" ~ f j~~i 5 ~ ~: }T~ ~ ~..~.~.:-=-' '" " ... Ii ;:: :--:.t ; : 'r-;:;.. i5 ,;,::;:;::::J f :! I; ::. :::: :!Ie r'......., . . ~~ ;. I ~ ;:.~~:~ I cC=~.J:j I J.l--JUo-' ~ ..... .....:.. _. ~ '-- z.- ...-.. . ......,: ~ , -0-, 1 t .' d \) - - . - { J ';'} " -- \ \ ; i ' ., \ . \ ,'. .\ . ... 'I " \ , '8 " '. "e\ ~ ,'.'___..-"..........,..... .....__..--.._....__.___ h .T__.._....._.__.-..._._........ ......_ ...._..,.___... .... ._~ 'CI' . , I J f, '1-: .:~ CE.RTIFICATIONS Th~ grantee certifies thot: (8) 1\ possesses legal authority to make 8 grant submission and to execute a community dcvclopmcn~ and housing program; (b) Its governing body has duly adopted or passed 8S an official act a resolution, motion or sim ilar action authorizing the person identified as the official representative or the grantee to submit the final statement and all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person Identified as the official represent a. tive or the grantee to 8ct In connection with the submission of the final statement and to provide such additional informa.tion as may be required; 'I (c) Prior to submission of its final statement to HUD, the grantee has: (I) met the citizen participation requirements. or S 570.30I(aX2) and has provided citizens with: · .' 1 (A) the estimate of the amount of CDBa funds proposed to be used lor activities that w~l benefit persons of low and mooerate income; and (8) its plan for minimizing displacement of persons as a result of activities assisted with CD8G funds and to assist persons actually displaced as a result of such aetivities; (2) prepared its final statement of community rlevelopment objectives and projected use of funds in accordance with S 570.30I{aX3) and made the final statement available to the public; (d) The grant will be conducted and administered in compliance with: (1) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-352j 42 D.S.C. S2000d et seq.)j and (2) Title Vln of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Pub. L. 90-284; 42 V.S.C. 53601 et seq.); (e) It will affirmatively further fair housing; (n It has de.ve1oped its final statement of projected use of fuoos so as to give maximum . feasible priority to activities whieh benefit low and moderate i~ome families or aid in the prevention or elimination or slums or blightj (the- final statement of prajected use of funds may also include aetivities which the grantee certifies' are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immedia.te threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other rmancial resources are not available); except that the aggregate use of CDBa funds received under section 106 of the Act and, if applicable, under section 108 of the Act, duJoIng the three program year(s) (a period specified by the grantee consisting of I, 2, or ,3 program years, e.g., 1984 &: 1985), shall , \ .\ . - Office of Bloek Grant 'Assistance' - December 1984 ,I __.~_.T ~ -__.._.._,_.___.+~....,__......~__-~.........._---.--- . _ ~C- .:-:-:-:- ~.::-..- -: . :::-:-'-:::: ...:..._- :......-=-~._.~~ -.:.:= =.. ~ ~q _~"_ '"-:.-~: : ~ ..-: ~ -.: '.~: r-R~_ _.... .~ -~. : ---- . . <; , . ,(.' ":.'. :'r:~.~:.:~~ . .: ~ ~ 'I' ,'iL. " .~'. ,. ,... PLAN TO ASSIST DISPLACEES CLEARWAT~R COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM ,) )' In. the event that displacement occurs, benefits will be paid and assistance given to all displacees without regard to race, color, religion, age, sex, or source of income. oisplacees may include individuals, families, businesses, or nonprofit organizations. No displacement will occur unless suitable and affordable standard replacement units are available. Should direct displacement occur: (1) If the Uniform Act applies ,Uniform Act requirements will be met. (2) If the Uniform Act does not apply, written' guidelines designed specifically for the situation in which displacement occurs will be followed. These guidelines will'] provide funds for moving expenses and for relocation counseling and assistance services for residential relocations in order to assist displacees in relocating to safe, adequate, and affordable housing and to understand the types of assistance that are available to them. Also, the Clearwater Housi~q Authority will give priority to ,qualifying displacees for Section 8 certi- ficates and pUblic housing units. !, ,. I'. Benefits for any n~nresidential displacements will be provided as prescribed by the Uniform Act. "', -, :: ~ J .' " ,) "',\\ 'j ,\ .\ I ~ . ~ 10 ,j " R,___-...,..~-: ~ ..-- -......-----:,-.-..... ....._--...-...-. . ...-~_... . . if .] ~, ~-~~ . ' ',' :~J .\ \ t 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I' 0 I I I I I 1,0 1 I t 0 0 f 111'1 DJ COO 0 00 .. 0 00 .. .. 00 .. 0'1 Il'1 I I 1 1 I 10 I I I Il'1 ..... I IIl'1 r-f .-f Il'1 M ,.., ...-f (I)- .-f N p: r-:: fiJ >t ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ \0 I I I I I I I I 0 0 I I I IIl'I I DJ 0 :::100 0 000 .. "0 0 0 0 0 t:> C"I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 0 Il'1 I I I I I 0 .-f r-I ..... p:; ~ ~ ~ ~ " E-1 .. . en ...-f 0 00 0 0 ..... 0 00 0 tJ \0 0 00 0 an I .. , I 1 .. I . J I .. .- I I .. I I ca 0 rr'\OO 0 l.tlOO C). 00 0 0 000 ::: 0'1 I \0 I J I .-fl I , I MO I I N I I ~. r-l r-l ...-f.-f Cl <no: 0 I p::; Pol; 'i " 8 :z ~ t:l ::.:: tJ 0 H CQ 8 :z O~I' t.:I:E:C:O tIlPolC"l o Or-! ~H 1 Ot::4ll'l I O:;:>co n.~0'I Qr-f ~ rn, +J. 8 a x H d 1lI QJ :z e .-fk o $.l ::> OJ JJ.QJ '\ '0 +JO ~ :> e+J ~'O '\j Il-I 0 O~ t JU s:: s::: +J 0 $.l tJ.QJ lU 1tI .-flll CJ ~ +JCJ It.I s:: ...{ ., e 4J o Q s::: rn Itl 0:: H>. r-fa ~ ...{ +J Itl e ~ QJ 00 ::J cn+J ~ l.I-I ...{ E-i r-1.-f = .... 0 ...{ 1lI a+' ~ QJ Ul ........+J U :> e t: Ul ~g' O'lltl .~ rl ~ am aQ),....j 'tJ1tI 0 ,.::: ~ 1tI.... .0-1 ~ .-I .oP-. .. 'M +' ~ J.../ 0::.::; ~OIt1 cn::S QJ. +lUl H 1tI QJ.Q 4Jenr:: .-l 'r-! 0 () ~ 1I1 tal.lS H p:; 4J 'tJ a Q) .-l Ul U +J IV . Q) r-llJ1 l1>tI1Q) Itl 0 s:: s:: s:: s:: ..c: tJl ~ C1J4J e QJ :;:: tIl a.ro 0 QJ 03- +Jalll 'r-! s:: QJ4J4J Itl e C tI) .j.J E .-iltl ::s -..{ ItS ~QJ :> ItS lU ..:! o ItS Cl l-l QJ 'Or-f H:~ .Q e 04J.Q Ul tJ Z 0 :> ItS '0 - s::: QJ H r.n 4J s::: 0 :z 0 mQ s:: l...polS r-I CIJ :> Ul ~r::l . Ul s:: 't1 0 ~ H 0 .,..jQ) Itl 1lI o+'e Q) lt1 IV a,,..., Ul p. ...... .j.J..c: r.n I-l I-l I-lS::H.o:> ,...j eltS+' ~ " r.n e +J- l-I +J -r-! QJ e"a.QJ ~~ tn IV Itl 0 0 H ~tn ' " ltJ ::s s:: s:: eSQJ...-/ :::s :> >. ro .j.J p:; Itl a :::...:11:: ,...j QJ >. H QJ ::s (J '0 0 o +J a .-f ~ U) ~ >.0 Q) 0 t!I lt1 :>a 0 Q I-l.r-! QJ 'r; en ~ Ul III Hr-f CflS::+J 0 - ~J.../OQ)>'Q 04+J ~ Ul 0 +J J...I 3- roru +J.r-l III QJI-I:>J.../~ s:: e s:: I-l s:: QJ ,QJ lJ1 a+J~ Ul +I ~ 0.,:( +J t:: 0 Hl110 \l.4 Cl E-i QJ oM en+J ..S::: CVJ.../O QJ +J ItlQJe aQJ ::so +J 0 ~ I-l e 0.. s:: s:: 0 Slt14-1 ::I s:: Ul H.r-l ::s OJ Ul aOQJ .r-! ~ QJ '0 QJ Q.r-j QJ:E; Ul s:: QJ ~ J.../O~ +I .r-l- k er-l CJ H :> tll aern+' :> bl+J QJ e J.../roQJ::tu~ s:: Ul 1-1 lt1 ~ U 0 s:: JU QJ-r-! U OQJCH:> CIJ ItI s:: :::s 0 QJ ru >. ItI Cl.l :> I'":l ~ ES l-l ...{ :> H :::s ES l-l ..c:'r-! :::s ..:: > o.IUCUlS:: . e 0:1'0 ~O 0 0. .c llIOl-lH A.4J.J,JO 0 QJ Ul .r-! Z 1lI ;::lro e p:: ze Ul 0lJ.../1tI+J :z:e ..c::U4J ~~ QJ .. :> 'r-! :> ~+JS:: · H 1lI 0.. 0 H 'ri lt1 0..:: Ul Hll-ItJl r-l (4 :>llI':::;:E;rnll-l 0 llIUJlt1-0H Z '0 ~ as s:: 'tl o -r-!.-l 0, e .r-l C'I 4JO H 1lI CI.I-l ~, ~ O.-f -r-! H +I 0 Or-l riM::: H UlIUItII l!.I ~a.. kk't10 k o IU ..\J ltl 1-1 U O((J~ ltl Ul s::.,-i QJ s:: 4-l e Q.l tJ 0 QJ'ri a 0 (J) :?: ~ tJ Haa :?:~aQ).olll r-! ItI -rl a 4-l H 0 ::J H s:: 1H:>..\J04-l '. ~ ~ 0 :::s Q:?:~~ a 0 -rl 4J ..\J 4J ltJ a.. IU ItI 4-l +J 'rl r-i -r; tn 0-""-"" , 1lI.r-j 1-1 lU .--l 1lI.r-j 1I11tlQJItl l:: 1-I:>;::lm+JCOQJI-I . +lSlJ1+J+l 0 1lI..\J ..\J ...--l..c: 11$ QJ..\J l:::>:::S:> 0 0.. Q .--l r-l ~ C'I 1lI S::OQJOIUC) :?: l-I,rrI CIl O"l '0 ~ ::: klUiGOO'O .~ o >.a:l k 0 e nj Ol OlUl-Io,Ura ~1lI s:: ao~'O t:J QJ o..C U a oW r-l .. Ul .~ ~ r-l a a Ul k m',-i H u H 0 .,-i 0 o.,-i l-l X<UIUQJ ItI QJ t]I s:: e IU IU '" ItI C ..\J <U.r-l r-l ..\J H .cu CJ :> ::: Ul en .cuwe:::c::~ aJ > C C....-I a..1tJ~ JUC1 1lI J::.o '0 0., C I-l +l 1lI ra ..\J1lI 1-1 llI'~ QJ ru QJ H :>0 0.0 r:o ;::l~ r.., 1-1;::':: tJ, a:>o..a..~ 0 llItJ ~u ::> 0 0 lV JU ..\J p.. (J) z c::; t:ll U1 I . I " II, , '~ , ,:: ~~.::.:: ~:, principally benefit per!;ons or low and moderate income in II manner that ensures that not lcss than 51 percent or such funds arc us~d for activities that benefit such persons during such periodj (g) It has d~vcloped 8 community development plan, tor the period specified In paragraph (f) above, that identifies community development and housing needs and spC'Cifics both short and long-term community development objectives that have been developed in accordance with the primary objective and requirements of the Act; {h) It is following a current housing assista~ce plan which h11S been approved by HUD pursuant to S 570.306; (1) It will not attempt to recover any capital costs or public improvements assisted in whole or in part with funds Jh-ovided under section 106 of the Act or with amounts resulting from a guarantee under section 108 of the Act by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements, unless: (1) funds received under section 106 of the Act are used tti' pay the proportion or such fee or assessment that rela.tes to the capital costs of such public improvements that are financed from revenue sources other than under .Title 1 the Act; or (2) for purposes of assessing any amount against properties o'nlled and occupied by persons of moderate income, the grantee certifies to the Secretary that it lacks suffieient funds received under section 106 of the Act to comply with the requirements of subparagraph (1); and . (j) It wnl comply with the other provisions of the Act and with 'other applicable laws. . ;\ ~j ~.,.) '/ B~~~~5e~fl~~~ck Crant Assistance . .. , , .. \\ _...-. "'._..~_~~~ r~".._9! > ._::".:::~::':':.[,--:::~:~--~~:-':-:::':=---".~ .~-:~-: ~.~:F:",__.~ :___. r....__-_.. - . - - -,.-- . ._~..- "'",:",.- . - .. - - ..,. i >1 ! _ ..".w~ ... . '-\\ . i . Ul o z o ~ Ji:.l o !i1 Ul ::J o !i1 8 () !a t-:l o e::: ~ Ul ~ H 8 H :> H 8 U ,c::: 8 :z ~ ~ P4 o H Ul :> ~ Cl U H ::: o z o u j:1l oW t:: +3 OJ 't::l'1ll "0:>' a ;::: III 0'1 0 +J t%: III ,... 4-1 ~Illlll >t (1j 0 CJ .c .w ~ .a 'M oW -.-1.;.J ..c::> c: fJl H 0'1 k c: ::J OJ'M 4l0..-l eltJ+JIllO'l.c IS ItIZ .w o +J ~ rei 0..-1 U~l-Ika~ llln11111U t::ISOJ+J Ul ~1ll.....1tJQ)0J O.....U~C1Ul .wo, HItJUl t::1S~ltIaOJ ~on 0 <1I.1tl t:: a r-i IS OM Cl"OIUCJ en t:: III O::J 111l11kOJ+'..o .c: n1.c 4-'0.. .we~ Ot:: IUO O.....~Ok4.l +lIllO+JC1 :> .w 0 "0 = Q) Q) t:: OJ )./ a. 'tl1l10'O:::OC-i:J t::<Ut:: ac: ~Ul ::It::IUOrolU 0 N Itt<UUl~+J!I1l-l1-l Ornr,nt%: ClJIll Q) H 0..-1 ~ U t4 ~ Ul tn u) l-l - 0 c: .r-! O'l a,..... .......... tno..-l I-! t::l-flU:>,OJlUt:::>Oi .,.j Q)...-{ 0 :>''';'M r-i 1-1 :>+'OJ::1ll0lnOl1l .....caQ)'dc:J:>+J OUllUC1OJ/UOQJt:: :> = t::,:( l-l c: ::: c: !iI Q).,.j o,.j p:; ~ ~ t:: .,..j ..c:. .w .,.j ::: Ul Q) rn :n QJ t:: on rn ::J a:I trl t:: 'n :>, 4-4 .,.j r-l. /U ::J tJ1 k o ~ " , Ul ~ "H 8 H ~ H 8 U JCX; rei QJ s:: e OIU 0 +' tl Ul C trl s:: 'n t:: 0 I .,..j .,..j Q) ~.IJ .w o td Itl .j.J tn k 'M .,-i Q) S::r-l 'tl O.Q 0 EO EO\ t:: IS r-l ro .r-! Itlld Cr-i 1-1::1 ItlOJ 0\ +J I en 0.0 ::: c: k rei 0,::1 a, l-l r-l 0 +J U tt:l s:: l-l CO 00'1 ItJO ~C ..-1 '+J .a IS Ul Q)+J Itt::l Ci.,-i Ul k 0 'd :;: +J 0"1:::: ::I' ~ 0 .QQ)Q)kk o e o...,-i .....s::Q) ltl rdltJl-lt::~ .r-l 'M'M 0 +J r-l ::J.,.j ro c: 0. 01 +J c: <uE<UltliO rnOkUUl tnU OU] Ul QJ e,....ft::l-lUlrtl Z 0..-1 PI;::I ll-I H l-l 0 8 p.. ::: z o u II 'j ") .. \\ ~ H 8 ~ f:-t Ul H :z H ;:: a ,:::; '.~\l 0 00 00 0 00 CO 0 0 0 f' I 00 00 00 0 00 00 0 0 0 I I I I 0 l""I 0 U"'I ' 00 CO 0 00 I I I I 0 (Xl 00000 COO .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. ..00000 .. c-. I I t I I l""I 00 U"'I N, 00 0000 0 0 I I I I 0. t-4 l- N .-I N NO N III ..., .1 N '. e 000 00 a 0 00 00 a 00000 0 0 Coo I tn 00 0 0 co c. coca 00 e Coo a CD 00 0'\ 0. COO 00' CNO\O 0 \0 .. I I ... ... I .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. I .. OJ coo O\Ln r- U1 l""I 0. O~ 0 tnf"'-COf'l'lO 0 0\ lfl I I, ,..; OJ N M ..:r NO N r- ''''; I M r-I <n- o:r (I co ... . 00 00 0 co 00 00 00 0 00 0 0 0 co 00 '00 0 0 00 U'\ 0 0 00 0 om 0 0 U'\ I .., .. .. I .. I I I .. .. .. .. .. .. I I .. .. co ONLt') \0 0 ..., 0 00 0 0 00 0 tn\DOOO \0 C'\ 'o:r r-i I I I I '1:1' NCO N r- I 'l""I M r-I ~ N - : 1) \ '. '. .! 1 '0 0 " 0 ~ J:: Q) In \1) ,:: ~ 104 C'!Q) 0 Q) ~ ~ . s:: tI) .ri - ''0 Q) Q) .r-! ::I '0 .w. ~ '~ .w tJ .r:: en.Q III .CU ItI 4.l , s:: ..-r ./J ::I ~ ..-r )..j .r-! 0 0 Q) r-i ::I o 01 ,.u !-I tJ 0 .u 0 .c::Q) ::I en 0 't:lC QJ Pl s:: Ul rn tJ .r-4 .c o 0 tIl~ 'QJ CU '0::1 tJ r::: +J 0'0 ltICU ~ ltI l-f s:: s:: 0 0 'r-4 ::I ~s:: ..c: ltI bl .ri tOOl I ble ~ OJ 0 tJ Q) tJ tI) 1-1 Ulc;'O r-iU !-It/) I r-f jJ s:: Q) .w..-I ltl 01 ~ ;J ::I :>1 = IU 0'0 a .ri r.n s:: 0-41:: 0.. ItI ,..; ~ ..-1 .,-1 s:: :3: cpf..l .,..f ~ 'rl l-f ro 0 a r-i ..j) I'l1 0 :;:100 III QJ 0 1-1 Q) ..-1" !'j .!:tH ::J 'Orn ..c::q.-r = +J E tJ +JtnH '0 0 r::: Q) +J cu ;>, ItI QJ <<I ..-1 s:: 0 tI1QJ'Ottl - tI: rei..... tIl Q) QJ Pl<.-I r:-. ",;''''''.'H -\J./JQ)Q)UlUlttl +J HQ) '1-/ X Eo!c:4 .r-! fJl 'M IU .u tJ 111 4J s:: ' Q) k "0 'r-! .w o..-r nf .c 'OZc:4 Q) .0::1 a C '0 Itl.r-!.r-! C QJ :> QJ U) o ,..; s:: Il-f.w 0 0 ::I k !'dO 0 ::I .r-! '0 :> .w Q) '0 < .v CI O.r-f III .r-f s:: +J O'OCI) rei .c:::r: ....... 04.r-! I-I',..j e: 1-1 1-1 I'l1 ~, ~tJE r-f 0 I'tI ..c: 0 u Q) .w '0 ru OeQJ r-I Q) IU QJ '0 3 . ::J Q.)ltlOc >,...-1 or-! H 1-10 I >, I-I).,CU IV...... ltS,rn..-I :> 0 +J 0 J./i tz.I :> ~ ..-1 Q) tJ .w. o ~ ItS o .w '.-1 oM"'; \ 0 0 C 0 /tl 0 ~ ~IOH~ .0 s::.o Q 1-1 s:: 'M rn 01 ro ..-1 bl ro. 1-1 s:: Q) ~ QJ t:.I 0= 0' .c::q.-rlVQ) Q) .c: QJ ::I o Q) ...... e:;:::l ros::t:.Io.oU~...-i 0 >,(1) 0 .wu .c l)lQ)r-i = ~ tJl.,.j ro U 'H .r-f E '0 Q) U ~ Q) .:.JklUQ) .w .r-f H U Q) 1-1.0 HtJOq.-rrn41HS::>'(IJ- ~ O~'tl C'j1tl'3:H Q.lt.!) '0 t1)('j) iU 0\.0 0 ::I +J 0 +) l-l tfJ ,cs:: H....-l1-I H Z .r: CIl 0.-1 ~E.c o I Q) 0 ltI >. CJ...-I ~ ~ ::l en (J ::J = ~ (Ij 1-1 0 .s:;:.\Jd.lM ~ III HHum:::::>\..i-C OJ EAJO 'tIQ)Q) lH 'O.:.J::lCllQ.l -~ C4 Q.I r:: +-I ...-1 ItI , ::I . ~ 0 QJ 1'0 H oo..-{.w OHO~ Ul 0 ' s:: ItS s:: rt:J )..l H (II ~ z s:: (:J .-lHOl .usus::: tV OO~Q)>, ril +-IUl tn t1l~HttlOPl.oQ.l Q.I ~ .a::: :>, Q) 0 ::2: ~+J H +J s::: a 0 ItS a. 0 """,..,.., 0 I U c.J 0 ttl Q} l1.l s:: U k ~ s:: X OM E-i Q.l s:: 'M .f"i Q)::I..c:: U H .:.J U ~ k'tl....-l U ....-l.r-! ltI ttlQJl1.lmdlC: H Udl ttl Ul q.-r.-( 0 )..j ..-1 .,..{ l:: t:: t':l 0el=:0l c: .o.c:: :>-t 4Jt:Q.I,cu ::I :::0- s:: E ::l ::J 0 tJ (J O'~ .r:: .-l ~ 0 0 0 ..:: ltI lUfO.w...... Ul III 1-1 ~........-t ~ r::: H roQ.l 0 o 0 .a.a U.r-! ~..-{ (/] et: Eo! III p.~ AJ +l''''' H .r-{ "0 t!) 1-1 ra Q) E-i 4-1:>::: :I::r::ro ..c::::3C:(JItj+J'~ ,Ill Z tn~1-I CIlH~Q) U1J..r= ccuaOH () eno o s::: 4-l tJl P-I lU ttl a.. ro :> kJ Itj ril (Ij .r-! 0 'tI UlItI 'ri~OU"O .< OM \..i Q) U1;ri IU 0 orl ~ ~ +1 III Eo! C .p., ttl P. Q) .-l en It1 t.!:l Q) ..-1: r-i tnl:l4'O lU~ QJIHm S::CIlH z Q.l 'n 't:I Ul 4-JQJ ril .c s::: J.l ..-r S en E .rl 111 ttl ~ r:::z 0 ..Q 0..0 ~ .w IU r::: >,. fI: .,.., tJ ~~.j.JO.-ftdrtl.c ~.,.j :J ~~OO +J::l~::I' nj \..i 10 Q.l mOl H ..4 co ..-f.-f H U H I ~ .M ..-f .r-I )..l s:: Ill""; H tf.l := tz:l ~ '0 .-l CIl r-i - r::: ~ J;::"O.c::+J':::Q.l.t:' E-i ~ +) >, ....... +J 4-1 Q) 0 lU U 0 CJ Q).-! nj ro N r-l 'M tn~lllrtl ~l1l0 ~ ttl O.w 'd ......r-f m -4..l.r! Q.l Z OJ +) ~ m +J+JrtI cu .,-i -o.c:: w ~ O..-I.:.J CIl Oo,.j N '.-.1 CU .r-f U1 Q) ,.Q r-l tJ ItS 4-1 .c:: CIl tJ 1-1 0 III Om:> H u OU) tIl rdU....-lt/)~ ....-I H O.n s:: .\J +) I'd 0 0 ~ n:1 .\J rl tIJ.r! Q} ~ r-l QJ :> ~ s:: O.c .r-! ....-I .o.o~I-I.oH H r::: 0 ::J.r-! Q) .c: e ~ :> 1-1 Sol In.-l.o Z tJ kO'tl '" ;; 0 s:: u o +J CU ::I'r! 0 rtI 0 H ltI k ~ s:: tl' III ll) QJ III 0 0'" 0 0 0 ~ 1-1 s:: 0 1-1 r::: +Jcn H H ;::::ro+)(I)~4-l.j.J4-l m r::: l:l4 ::I 1-1 ~ Cl p:: ~ s::: z e", ~ ~ ll: ..4.l O<UQ ll) ..-1 ::l H o III IS} ~ ..-f 0 lU Q) I M III Uo:::;:: .c:: ~ ~ III Ul ~ W W ;I: ~ U 8 U~ Cl IU . .f .u ::l ~ 0 o t:.l . 0 tl4 U ~ . ~ r Agenda No. M E M 0 RAN 0 U M TO: f If-I Meeting Date: 8/15/85 The City Com mission of the City of Cleo-rwater SUB J E C T: Yt-1C/\ P resen ta tion RECOM MENDAT10N: !Iear presentation to be made by Mr. Pat Kerr, Executive Director of the Palm lIarbor YMCA, relative to the YMC/\'s request to operate a temporary after school !ecreation program at the new soccer/football lield complex being constructed on McMullen Booth Road: and provide direction to staff rolative to this request. ~ And that the approprtate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKG ROU NO: The Palm Harbor Branch of Suncoast Family YMCAs has previously conducted an afLer school recreation program for children at Curlew creek Elementary School. However, due to tile fact that the school will be on double sessions this fall, Mr. Kerr is looking for a temporary location upon which to conduct a program until a permanent site could be secured. Since a permanent site is expected to be secured by the first of the year, Mr. Kerr's tem- porary request will run for a three month period, from October through December. In preliminary discussions with Parks & Recreation staff, the original site considered was Country Hollow Park on curlew Road. Mr. Kerr submitted a proposal for the use of this property which included tile placement of a double wide mobile office for indoor activities and protection from inclement weather. At staff's request, Mr. Knrr also visited several of the residences immediately abutting the park to determine if there would be any objections toward the temporary program. Subsequent to these visits, three letters of objection have been received from adjacent property owners. Since learning of the oppositiont staff met again with Mr. Kerr to investigate alternative sites that might be appropriate. Since the YMCA program will be of a temporary nature, and with a desire to avoid objections from nearby residents, .Mr. Kerr has changed the proposal in favor of requesting the use of the new soccer field property located on McMullen Booth Road. These fields have recently been.sprigged with grass and to avoid damage to the sprigs, no activities'will be scheduled on the site until midfall. However, children attending the Y program will have sufficient room for activities on the site by using the grass parking lot area and a small grassed area at the far north end. Temporary sanitary facilities will be located on site and drinking water will be provided by containers. The only utility hookup needed will'be power and the cost of same will be borne by the YMCA. Commission Disposition: Fal tow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: :fi3 Affected Costs: N/A OOAf'tachments: ;J..iL., ~l(Jo"..oj:;;- '. Date: Parties Funding Source: YMCA Proposal Notified o Capita\ \mprove- City Manager I Po per: of Meeting ment Budget o Operating Budget o Not Requlre.d CJ Not Required o Other Dote e.Sequentiol Originating Deportment: Appropriatjon Code Parks & Recrea ticn ~eference o None . II .i '. .' ._ ,. i,' .. lJ PALM HARBOR FAMILY, YMCA 1021 . 12th Street, P.O. Box 146, Palm'limbor, Florida 33563 · (813) 785.2884 Sorving the Communities 01: Palm Harbor, Dunedin, Countryside, Oldsmar and Salely Harbor . I , J . f ; ,July 31, l~\85 I' A Blanch 01 lho Suncoasl Family YMCAs Nr. J{p,lIn \oJ i 1 sun Diroct6r of Recreil~ion Recreation Divlsiun Office 10 Missouri Avenue S Clearwater, FL 33515 fi ,! Thilnk you very much for your to \me during the rf~cent weeks ip helping to locate a suitable site for fhe Curlew Creek Elementary School Before and After School Progral'l~. At t ached is Ollr proposal for t- /1(.: use of t-.hese fac il it ies. The YNCA underst.iJnds t.h..ll' t hI.;? usuge 'r l!ques'h:!d is only a t.emporary use until DecI"mber 1985. At r.hat. t.lme, we hope to be utilizing the SWFWMD Canal Park property. Ream, the approvul of our usage of this property is vital. We have pursued other possibilities (churches, scihools, and other city property). We are in n~ed . of this approval ,if any progrum .is going t~ be offered. I look ferwa rd to 111('('1' inq w l t- h t hl~ Cotntn iss ionr.~r.s and you at your earliest convenience to present these issues. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully yours, ! \ -. ,", \. <.f ...i/{ ( Pa tr ick'\-<1. Kerr '., . '"" ... f I ExecutLve Dlrector Palm Harbor FamilY YMCA P\'lK ; d1.tn <j cc :; Clearwater Hayer City Manager City ~ummiisioners JlOffieO\vners t: ~ 2 Enclosures y .JA C~"F\CERS: Tammy Locascio, Chairman. Terry Simrw'ns, Vice Chairman. Slephen Ashley, Treasurer, Marsha Polin, Sacralaty A(l,'MINISTRATIVE STAFF; P..lrit:k W. Kerr, Joint E>' .Ive Director. Roger p, Jacobs, PlClgram Director. 8elsy Wa::htlar, Program Oh....ctor . ~'u Tucker, Adplinlsui:lt1ve Asslslan' "~ Ex/end Your Influe~. ond 11'''110[( ;\\., -, ;",>>,...I.a,. (1r U . I.lgn !!r III~ 'Of Cash, Socurltles, Insurance or Property . ..........f__.,. t .~, k.... .-. . . ~ ~. :/::. h :<~~ .:...,' . :l :):' t~4 " .... . . < , PALM HARBOR'FAMILY YMC'A 1021 . 12th Street, P,O. Box 146, Palm Harbor, Florida 33563 · (813) 785.2884 Serving tho Communities of: Palm Harbor, Dunedfn, Countryside, Oldsmar and Safety Harbor . ~-'.. ~.~ PROPOSAL A Branch 01 tho Suncoasl Fomlly YMCAs The Palm Harbor Branch of SuncouS r. Ft:im ily' YNCAs hus hadiln Af t.er School, . Program for children at Curlew Creek Elementary School and four other schools within its service area for several yanrs. These progr~ms are to meet the needs of working parents Hnd single parents whc) nced ~ft8r ,school quality child care and recreational services. Some of the issues are: 1 . The Curlew Creek Elemed'ta ry School w ill b(~ on sp.l i t s(~ss Lons housinghtwo elementary ~chools. The morning session will host the current Curlew Creek student body which services prudominately Clearwater residents. The afternoon will house the new Cypress Wood studen~ body. 2. State school regulations prohibit usage of school property wh ile school is in session by ot.her agenc ias or organizat.ions. ,\ 3. Th~ YNCA is currently neqotiating with SWFWMD officials for 12~ acres to locate a future branch at the CDnnl Park property. This site is located at the intersection uf McMullen-Buoth and Curlew Roads just east of th~ outf~ll canal along Curlew Road. Cur rent.ly, t.he land is owned by S\"I'fo'WND and lr:?used t.o t.he c i t.y of Oldsmar. . 4. The current negotiations with SWFWMD would not be completed until the direction is given from the SWFWMD Basin Board August 20, therefore eliminating the possibility of use of the Canal Park Property for YMCA programs until January.l986. . 5. School officials, parents, PTA and the school advisory com~i- ttees have been in constant contact with YMCA staff to locate a plac~ to operate a before/after scho~l recreation program. ,REOUES'l' , . J YMCA is approaching the ci~y of Clearwater for usage of untry Hollow Park locat~d ~.long Curlew Road approximatuly Lle,~est of Curlew Creek Ele~ent~ry School. its l. -:! , .'he. YMCA would utili.ze this prup12rty to uper<.lte L.I r~c:reat.i.on program ~o service approximately 120 youth in need of before/after schOOl ca~e from 7:30am to 6:00pm due to split sessions. OFFICER' i LOCast:IO, Chairrn, 1 'JlI C' A ,nPM.....I~T~\A 1 II.' = STAFF; PoJ..!m:k W. . .. j If' J'b'\. 'DIrector. p.. , 'Kar, Mmmlt ' . 'y SImmons, VIce Chalrrnan . Stephen Ashley, Treasurer. Marsha Polin, Socrelary I Execlll" -,,)(. Rogm P. Jacobs, Program Dlrlx:lor'. Betsy Wachtlor, Program . nt, . F \lrtPlc1 YOIJr tnf!I'.,r-~r~:. ;.rtl\ t"H,'....t. ~.' elll ...:w...,,;,....,.,. ...; .t\..,., ...'...... ...~, r:~, ""! ~ .'.~ ....j1 ""!~~ ~.., . .... , , ! ,,-- r '/ ~.: ':~: ,:,.'. ,. . ;"7 l\iJprox ima tely ~ of thes(~ you t.hs ar.C:! Clenrwa t.C:!r rGsidents. Further, since no restroom facilities or indoor ,reas are 'available at. Coun tcy Hollow Parl{, t.he YMCA is al so n1!qu~s ting the loca t.i\)n ' of a 25'x 50' mobile office at this site (see attaCP9d site plan) near the parkin:.} 10 t on Bra t t.le Lr\nl~. Noting the time required to make changes, we are r.equesting usage of this property from August 23 through Decemb~: 1985. . . Qpon the request of cj.ty staff, YMCA staff visited B homes and spoke to 4 persoMs whose property ~djoins or is immediatelY . adjacent to the city park property. Individuals contacted were very tnterested in helping to weet the needs of these children. One individual was adamantly ag~inst any typ~ of services, but the remainder. were open to thp. idea and saw the nC:!ed. We have forward~d to these property owners a copy of this proposal and letter. j, Again, the YMCA request is only.a temporary request, as we forsee being in the Canal Park property in January 1986. " , The YHCA is willing to repair and replace any damage to the park during use of this facility and would return the property to its original condition. He would be responsible for absorbing all costs for these repairs and improvements. The YMCA would be Charging a fee in accordance with its state charter as a non-profit organization. The fees would offset all costs to offer this program., . \ The YHCA will meet. all st.andard liability, t'equirements as requested by the city 'insurance carri~r. The YMCA will, at its expense, landscape and make presentable the the mobile office space to cause its appearance to 'be an asset to the community. The YMCA wil.l st.aff t.his program wi th qual if 'led YHCA person.nel . The YMCA wi~l be responsible'to obtaining all permits and hOOKUpS for water, sewer, and utilities per city ~lilding and zoning codes. \] The YMCA will v;tate this area by December 31, 1985 and have the repairs to turf and landscaping completed by January 30, 1986. ') The YMCA is aware of resident.' s co'ncer.ns t.ha t. curr~n tly exist of improper; use of the panko We will make all attempts during our hours of operation to keep surveillance and assure park security. I . "J , 'i ' "\\ ,.., . ~...,...._~.._.J,. ~I ....... .'".' ~ " ) " ... .".. u ,. .: I' . +", .' ...., .:.',\ " .'.. '. (., .....,:.;:+,:.: :~'A;':I,;l.'}'~":H~7,;~ '. .... .' >.";;":?Ji . t.: .',:l. . .. .' ./;~:~ .","',.~.. , ',:":.>)~i . :. ..>{.~)+... I) .' ~. --'''''~ ,'/ , ,- " I JI i' LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES .VISITED' II Residents contacted Friday, July 26, l~ti5 ,., :2~ I~;, <c~ .., Hr. and Hrs. Cummings 2723 Br.a t. t,le Lam~ " Hr. and Hr.s. Hester 2742 Bra~.tle Lane Nr.,and Mrs. Johnson 3445 Nor t.h Ridge j Hr. and Mrs. Vllgil 3451 Nor. t,h R.tdge 785-5084 . 784-5704 784-0899 784~7744 " . .,\ '. c" " . . I ii! c:' ~ l' I ..t- . \ '.' . " .f' :i . ;.' . " ,1 J" ' ., . I " , \ "\) \. \' "'\\ t ., ~... ..~ .:. '/. .:- f ~ ..,. , -: ."......' ..' .. e, >0 ~ ....._ . ." . "" .........L.~.._....T . It ., " .~ ) . . , . ". ~ ., '~43 .~ 42 " , <11 ,~ 40 , . <J:JG5 64 ",GJ 132 .,. ., ;. '" .. :~ ~ J" '" -~ --.. ~ , URLEW ,. MOO 32 OJ CIT'\' aWNED PROP, O.K. e.6"!l- ~o(, 42 .1,,(57 4\ J ~ ~"/ Proposed Trailer Location ~ / 40 J","5 39 .J.O :I J./S~ 38 126 ~. ,4.J I?~ J.,f.;r..,t -..... !.l. ,..: ,. I ~, .t I,..... .' ,{~, l ~ ' . " } 5-~1;: \' '. --i 1t1 - .-.. n ,I ___. ._ . ,..~: .~OF75[~OhO~f:~~1 76 77 I:. jl] ,. J ~~~.-~"~If_~:~ ~: rJ~r9_b't"~f"~t ~~J !:II/AT 1 U:' "LAUE ~ ~- -- ~~.. H'- r!Z :~. -- .~~. ~ '~74 ,7.3 .., 12. " -J 'j t_ ~q~.. t. 68 ...." ,~'J 1'1 <:) y '\ ~. . ...U." ~~~- 6 ~}~~ ~ :5" ~ ::. ;:~~ ~ ~ .....~ to" ,,~ t ~ .." 1:. .!- 'L--. ~t. __t.L " rASdA DRIVE ~ , \\ o~l~~;~~~- ~ ~5 ~ 5~1~" li1~~d ~~: ~~;I)'-I;-~'!j':""B J~"'~"l~}':'~)J"~':~:~ t.. '" lr, t. ' T '. .... t. '4 ~ ..~__,.. ~_._,_ ':'t....._ t~. " o fl lj) ... 1 ! I l M813 31'O;~ &0 , ~75 .... -W<f/ - ;;.':.1'53 \,} \ ~ ~ 60 .1.61 3: f\I .... " .:) >U l)"C; <[ ~~ ~;9 a: ,,~ <<.l. .w.:'J N .f"'/'~ ~ '14 ~ "', c '" , \ w > a: a Ge w H/O ~ --~ T ~ t'!t u . (J ,... ,~ s.n. SaG . - - - .!4u "0 ,HJ1.J \ \ IU ~ 9 I 20 It \ \'1 ..- , j"':;i"-1 -'77...r " '. .';.,,1' <. 21 11- ml ~.Y~~~ 'I C:~ 1901 18 (jJ QQ ,.. <.0 " .... '.. .' .. DR I V E . f ,.. 17 Ul " .He 7 "v 16 Hili w > I 5 Il:;' ~-- > 0 14 33 c. lJ 0 17 .3. AD . . \~ Ml:.HLJN WAY :.4,- ~ . ~\ 3ti:! 17:' , " j..{ ':' ~ :,"'J '/ I 2.2.., t <!1 I 20 . 1'1 ' \. . - P. P' ,.. . '~ R.( ~ '\tI -i 39 '-.I, if -~ y},~ '" ,.)61 "" . '\I Wt1()D ..\~. -"""'- ( ~'. ~ - 60;: ~:"l9 t~~.. _>.)~i . :"'J ~o !dT~ -dIe '. '1 . . i\ (t> - ll!:';~: -~~~."" ~ ',(,0 47 2.4 "- ,:."1') ._~_ .. 025 "':> ~JM ~J .,. co '? t, -4 I .,) , .It..,;O I rr 5U .'.i, -t / I 51 j H". [L Cl ~/S 2.3 '.u ~,..- ~4 w > )i~~ n: 25 a ~4S' .' C!6 .J</:S I U $;'';'~ 26 j-J,$p :2: 2.9 ..J :J./,$f'- a:: w 30 :;, -"" '7! T 31 ~t' 32 "...:.$' 33 JJ"Y 34 ~..~~? '. 35 " TRACT A W III ~ W a. ll. o U a::: UJ :t o a. 4 o cr o ...l u. 52 26 ..}. "': l t .l , .....,.;\ ~ '"" ~ t . '...' .. ..!. :i ,'....~..'J..._. .: .....1..:.. .i ....:~ ~ ~::'~~:::':.~:""~ J~._u_~. ",~~,.-,,-,______ PALM HARBOR' FAMILY YMCA 1021 . 12th Street, P.O. Box 146, Palm Harbor, Flor1da 33563 · (813) 785.288~ Serving tho Communltlos of: Palm Harbor, Dunodln. Countrysido, Ofdsmar and Safoty H8rbor THIS IS A COPY OF LETTER SENT TO A Elrsnch ollho :mcoasl Family YUCAa PHOPER'ry m<lNERS LISTED ON ENCLOSURE On Friday, July 26, 1985 I attempted to visit all property owners adjacQnt to Country Hollow Park. I was able to speak with four residents of eight houses I callud upon. The Curlew Creek El~lentary School is going on split sessions und services t.wo student bodi.es. In previous years, the YMCA hilS op~rated an after school program t.o serve these yout.hs dt the school sit.e. HOWl;!Ver, schoOl regulations prohibit us~ of schaal property by outside agencies during schoOl hours. Therefore, after much review of other sites, the YMCA has submitted a proposal for temporary use of the CO,untry' Ha1'low Park from September t.o December 1985. I Please note that the YMCA wi.ll need to locate a mobile office unit that will be landscaped and appear similar to the model units se~n in many areas of the county. The YMCA will also return the park t.o it.s original ~tate at completion of use. The purpose of a classroom office is for inclimate weather and restroom facilities for the programs. We understand that curr~ntly you may have some concerns regardlng existing park usage. Our st.aff,' while on duty, will take all measures to assure proper usage of this area.' I would be available to speak with you and have included my card wit.h phone numb~rs which you cun reach me. If you have ~ny concerns, ideas, or questions please let me know and I will work with you to solve your needs. I hope the YNCA can rely on your support. .for this temporary use. Respect.fully, ','IM - f\ 11 \ Patri. Exect OFFICERS: Tam" AD' , r :llr, 'l.il. d. Kerr ..ve Dirl.:!ctc LCC~CIO, ChaumiJll . T TAFF: P,lInl."1t. Yo' (I... mmens, VtCO en,urman. Slopnell Astlley, TftlilSUIlH. Marslla Polin, Secretary eCullY& Oireclor ' Ro(;11r P. Jacoos, ProgrJUl Dlroctor. Betsy W~hller, Program ...,;, ., . . _' 0_. ,..-_. Agenda No. MeetIng Date .5"8 8-15-85 MEMORANDUM TO: pu])-/ The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: ' Amendment to the Pinal Site Plnn for Village at Countryside, Tracts 45, 72, 73 & 74/Countryside, See's 30 & 31-28S-16E (Multiple, Lane Company) PSP 81-9. RECOMMENDATION: City Commission approve the site plan revision for Village at Countryside to allow the following maximum floor areas: retail-commercial-165 ,000 square feet, commercial-recreation-l1,700 square feet, office-71,690 square feet subject to the following uonditions: 1. Tree removal and landscaping details be submitted to and approved by The Environmental Manager prior to issuance of any additional bUilding permits. 2. All required sidewalks for any new construction be installed prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy. 3. All certificates of occupancy be procured by May 3, 1986 in accordance with the City Commission approval on November 3, 1983. [] And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located at. the northwest intersection of U.S. 19 and Enterprise Road and is developed with retall stores, offices, restaurants; and a health complex. The 30.9 acre site is classified CommerCial/Tourist Facilities on the Land Use Plan and zoned CP (Parkway Business). The original site plan approved on September 20, 1979 proposed 100,000 square feet of retail-commercial floor area and 156,000 square feet of office floor area. The project has been the subject of a binding letter of interpretation issued by the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Several amendments to the site plan have been approved over the years, with the concurrence of DCA, resulting in a current floor area allocation of 165,000 square feet for retail-commercial, 11;700 square feet for commercial-recreation and 70;100 square feet for office. The developer has requested that 1,590 square feet of additional floor area for office development be allowed in order to construct the last building of the Village Office Complex portion of the site. As required by the Planning Department, the developer has obtained a letter from DCA which states that City approval of the additlonal office floor area would not exceed the amounts approved in the 1983 binding letter which now gover~s the project area. This item was continued froln tl1e Ci ty Commission meeting of August 1, 1985 as a result of a tie vote 01 2 to 2 on a motion to approve. Commission Disposition: ,. Approved as Recommended/Rev;sed/Conditional 2. Continued to dar<< Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: Costs: ~/A tSJAttochments: Funding Source: o Capitol Improve- Drawing ment 8udget Letter o Operating Budget o Other Date: o Aff ect ed Parties Notified '." of Meeting City Manage r Poper: t!J Not Required [;s] Not Required Originating Depcr tmen t: Dote aseQuentiol1 Reference . PLA~NI~G Appropriation Code o None 1. 4~' 011 /' M &,e .t., :> ':~". ... & 8 ';-3 -.a..;;...":'T~. ~ "~~EC 31, 2B.:6 . 4:, ... p . j i I I ',- , , . ~~...,. '" . " '" . . - ... ", . ' ..,:, -... ~ '. ....,~:........ .. ., 1", I " . ", ..~-:-. '. # ~ . ~,....,-:. .. "',.... ...... .' o~ =1; " . .. - L , I . ,. --..... " - ; i4 . . I ~. ...: J. ~, . '~ 'f. - ~ '. ~ . ; .' . ' .., ~ . ...; t :"".-f . .- , ~..: :.... -- "-. '. ...... - , ' . oF:! UJr.! . . .......- . '\ ~ :j ':,", .:.~ ... ......- . - .-....,--- > ~ . In ~h 15 -- - ... Q .... a: u 'Pl! I I I I~ I \ n !..... ..... . 1.1 ." I> ... on <: - ~ .. 'D , -.:l J:: ... l>: .. :I 0 ... :z: - I' ..: ~ u I ~ ~ I ...; ! ..., > ... cD , t >.. '" , cD I . 0 , ~ I I . .... I ... I. ;:, 0 l:I , ;1 ;il :. ;^~ 't-tn:':;H .. /7 trl 't:l I Q ;; I .... ~ u ... 'Vd I :. j:l Q . .. 0 I ., nc::-r -:J ~ .... a: .. I u no \ Q . ;A'tf ;I~I!1. .. .....- I' 1 0: o - c: => "" .,' , "--~ 'I. '_ 'I < . '." > ~ .... . .;4 -..... ~ IlOB OR.... HAM G"v~mor ( . ~ . \. .' ) I' ,. ", 11 "l' . 4 ~ L I i: l. I" l' ~.l' 1'.. L.""\ ( 0... IJ 'l.....-t-" 1'....1" 1'-""\ 0 ' . .c.. , .L"'\... {_ 1'" .t~ 1 ~ 1 1: C0M11UNITY Al~AIRS DIVISION OF~f.:O'CA1!k'i:.~'<6~~~22~i~r;r~~~ MANAGEMENT t4 ....., 'I..J, ,:.- Q"~ q,. : . Ii: ~ ~ ~ .:~.. i ~ I:~ tJ: .. '. . ~ oLow.." .... ." . . . . .' JOHN M. ~ROVE SecJT':~ July 2, 1985 Mr. Dennis Kirby The Lane Company 2501 Enterprise Road Clearwater, Florida 33575 Dear l>1r. Ki rby: Re: BLID-883-046i Village at Countryside I am writing in reference to your letter of June 25, 1985, on the above referenced development. As you explained in your letter, the Lane Company is requesting a greater amount of office space development than is allowed by the zoning code for' the Ci~y of Clearwater, with city staff approval. However, as ~ under-" stand it, the total amount will not exceed the 81,000 square feet of office space as established in your 1983 binding letter (BLID- 883-046). Therefore, the Department finds your request is' consi- stent with the square footage amounts established in the previous binding letter, therefore not affecting the finding of BLID-8a3-046 that the project is not subject to the review requirements of Chapter 380, Florida statutes. . Based on the representations made in ihe June 25 letter, the Department hereby ~onfirms that the propcsed modification to the zoniny requirements does not deviate from the determination of the 1983 binding letter. If you have any questions about this matter, please call me. Sincerely, ~ cRJ''''f:'<V/'' Edward Lehman Planner II " -.- -- -..--. . .. ~ iD ~~~O\Y1~rrr:' ~ ..JUl 5 19ffi :" I .1 ." - - FL.IJ.;!j::. :: --. - .. - D::r.....~T.. '..1 -- -.....- . , WEL/welb cc: Ms. Sheila Benz ~ Ms. Chris Papandreas BUREAU OF LAND AND \\'ATER MA..~AGEMENT ~571 EXECL -rIVE CD:TER CIRCLE. EAST . TALL\H.."'.5SEE. R..ORJDA ~':~ (9:4) 455.4925 - ~ 32301.3244 - - --. - - --.. ------- ..- , ....-.. - . . ., .. _... . ~-~-..- - . ~ - . .- ,--- - . h... ......... -....~ --:;..-::--. :- ~~ .. .'".: .-. < " . I ,I !;;-r. Agenda No. MEMORANDUM TO: PVD~q MeetlngOafe8-15-85 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: Revalidation of the Preliminary Subdivision Plat for Lokey Subdivision, M&B 11.01, Sec. 19-298-16E (Lokey) SUB 84-23. RECOM.MENDATION: City Commission approve the revalidation of the preliminary subdivision plat for LOkey Subdivision subject the following condition: The final plat be recorded no later than September 15, 1985. [] And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located at the northwest intersection of U.S. 19 and Tropic Hills Drive. The site contains 7.17 acres M.O.L. The Land Use Plan classification is Commercial/Tourist Facilities with a CG zoning designation on the proposed Lot 2 fronting on U.S. 19. Lot 1 is classified Residential/Office on the Land Use Plan with a zoning designation of PS (Professional Services) and will be developed with some Off-street parking for the auto dealership located on Lot 2. The City Commission approved the final site plan and preliminary sub- division plat for Lokey Motors on December 20, 1984 subject to the condi- tion that the final plat be recorded by June 20, 1985. The property owner is requesting an extension to the date for recording the final plat. The papers have been submitted to staff for processing and recording the final plat. Commission Disposition: 1. Approyed as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued to Follow-up Action: dot. fZlNot Required c:l Not Required Costs: NI A Funding Source: o Capital Improve- ment Budget CJ Operating Budget o Other [J Attachments: Drawing Submitted by; Advertised: Do t e: o Affected Parties Not; fi ed of MeetIng City Manager Poper: Date a Sequential Reference Originating Department: PLANNING AppropriatIon Code '1\ . \ o None (i " L~~ ~~~l:M=id- / , --H~ 15 w > cf It) It) a: en C :l' z: '" ~ TROPIC OR, , I M flE 1-5 I 1 t.J G , C , > I '", <1 '''' .....- I'" t:'- I I , " I '" M E8 \-"\ , . 0" I 01 . U? ::l' 1: &I C ;) I. J.... =: ::lI D D .. .. ME8 ... 2-1 2 - <- . I I I I I I I I D I... ,,, I I I . I a: In It') It'! I t&- O ~4-" I _llQ l- X. C) CG a: ~ .. .. D ... MoLB "\ S, W. V4 · S ~C. .to PL\II'.1/4 I , , I , \ I I I I t I I I I , I I I I I l , I , I I I , , I I I I I I I 1 I I I , :::' OCl -, ::1 .., I . I :1 I , I , I t I! el ~I ~I 01 a:: t ~~'E J~~ 1 I j . '"t<- _._or, 'J ~ . ~lj . ,. *REVISED / f) P [l), (:.)(/ Agenda No. M EM 0 RA N DUM TO: Meeting Dote 8-15-85 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: Preliminary Site Plan for the Wilder Office Building, Lots 1-6, lit 12t Blk. 8, Bayview City Sub., and a Portion of Vacated AlleYt Sec. 16-29S-16E (Wilder Corp.) PSP 85-31. RECOMMENDATION: City Commission review the preliminary site plan for the Wilder Office Building and authorize RDC review of a final site plan with final action by the City Manager subject to the considerations noted below. II And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located on the east side of Bayview Boulevard north of Gulf-to-Bay BouleVard. The site contains 1.18 acres M.Q.L. The Land Use Plan classification is Commercial/Tourist Facilities with a zoning designation of CG (General Business). Plans are to construct a six-story office building containing a total of 29,742 square feet of floor area. Access will be from Bayview Boulevard. Preliminary staff review notes the following considerations which must be addressed with the submission of a final site plan: 1) a location map must be provided, 2) zoning on the site and surrounding properties must be shown, 3) building height must be shown in feet~ 4) two loading spaces are required on the site, *anu 4) proper precautions be taken to protect the specimen trees located on the property. "( I Commission Disposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued to Follow-up Action: dor. Submi Hed by: Advertised: o Affected Parties Noti fi ed of Meeting Costs: :J/A Funding Source: o Copi to i Improve- ment Budget o Operating Budget o Other Drawing Application RJAttochments: Dote: ~ity Manager Poper: &l Not Required aJNor Required Dote aSequential Referenc e OriginatIng Departmen t: PLANNING o None Appropriation Code J .'- ~ .. . . 0) " - \"9:ey - -" J '3) I a ;;~~;2:~1' ~, ~ -::-:-..';'2R-:"::':;J~r-=.-~1"!~~ ~:::.,.,..' c~ . I : I -I M['822-21 I--:-"-':ri 1_ " · " :-:'..J I t.l S B . I....: I: 22-0;?J (~W2~"'::" r 122-14 I ,..(f.82Z'36 OJ ,= .~~p...:{ M6822.07, ".C~ J ~ --- - --:- -=-- --::- ~ - ~ -.- -. E-:-: _L-,':'ti7~"";" ~ '~'r: ~ : . . ::- -. -::::. ::,! I: ; " 'J 0 '.f:' :... t..'W~J ~ V. 9 ,1:"<39\22-13 :22.15 22.20 22-2.2 22-2Gl~~ ~i. ~ . 1.1& 5 ""! ! . . --. - ~-' I 22.06 ~ 8:'ifi s- --i_ '7"5-~ ~'-1'--.f-. -L~2'39 gl . u " . .-'- _ ~ . -- ....) L -- \ 2' 22 ~ I I :!I ~ ~ __ .7~t.. I' t:",:: lJMf.8 1,22. .61 19 ~2-,3 -.u-r.~~'1,~f" 22-38' ~'40 ;' Ii . .....,.... .S'J! 22..05 '09 %2 It I . . . .~....=-~. .~- -J' -. - ---- . I ,. ;;. .. ,~I, I . I ... ';,:.. .. ;.:... -..--:..-.:,.. ~ ----.d' - . - : ~f-~\ !\f!~: -~. ,;,.;..-.~...~q2~ r zi." 22- 122. '22-1 ~." '. ~';!A~K'~ 22:1. !.I~j,J 1:17 fa ,24 j29 1301 ).C(.822-41 '1 " 04 I 22.11 . I I I ...... '- -.14J' """MlJ t '-.-;-:-:;-~ f ~- - 401.~ c:.-- -I -...--.-- ----------- - - R__ '-. ----- :.~~r~r~ 'f~"'~I~--=-=r' · \...... , ~ J € I : ~ ' ........~ ~ I "l ~. , ~ , I' . ' , I I J I _ 1/ .,1 - . -. - l' -.... -~_..l-. I " L' ~_,. - - ~~ ~ 23'01 F .... '~~D" - 'r--J ~ 8.S - OR~~ I II '...~ 3869 <l. C. , 3056". 3.85 .J 50 :'83 , t""-'-:- :~; ~-T-FIE~!.R' r' '0 IT r ... . I .' ~ ~ I a . l~ l L! "'75 ...~ t f ~.q ~:~:~~ : Ris-1;::-';::'~l ~III2 :":<i'f: ~~_. " , ;, I r .. -4 J - 0 ., 6 123 i3 I~ I ! ; N ! IS' :--, -- . ! ~, , ~ -[8 I' 'iw II- : I '-I II 14 -. - -'- i 1 ~ ~.. P* ~. - ... a::a i.:::::I L~ ,.c:.n._ .-~---......r : I ,-::"~~';.~. I~ rO > AVE. . 1'<<;: _._.-.-'~_.~ . --~q'--_.,-- [T ~ I -'1'""-- R. I. . ~D .; ~~ I ' ; !' ! ~ : ;: ill I 10 ~~ f J , v., ) 1 . .co ~ t! I' ,::~37; '.1 .:'5 II I I 3 I 91,'--- II ,~ ,::]y ~ Ol. j . 'I 'I 'I I' I ; :. . ... · -. . OJ- I L- I' : I , 1 - ~ - 'r..:. ',~' -::,,-- --:'.~. 0 _--=.--t'6 '.t.;J~.r .;c.os.nl-~_~--.:w,_-.....~_ . ~ i I:':;' ~- I ~I ~ lR'Sn MAJOR'S MANOR I!: , 11. \ '-' ~ . t~ ti~ I - 1 ~ ~ (). J "3 .. .~';? II 0 'S'..,.,~ 16 n - a <4 i .~J.\.,; . 11,/) ,~.,. ~ I or ... .". _ _. J ': . 1 .': l!..~l- ~.....!....~:...' _ M&8 ':>1 ~~,) ..... ..-- ~ ..-::) c: ......... ..:.... ~..........-......~.~......~__ .I3iiIII.... . __~-:-:....~ _ r/AC:~TEO .... f i:-:7~:.->~~..!...,7-f0' .... 1f3'. ~VE 23-02 I h.... ' ..,.',.......'>.}. . . I ).,:::;?>;'::.:h:~~~b{.:~~~ .~':'~,~ . ~f:1~gt/~~~~.,r~ 1--'11 :-'~.i ~6 I ? ~ ! 2M3f..o83 k \/;.t;.":<i- ~ > ~'l ',,1 ,,'. .~ s \:. ,.( ..~ J.~, _>--' '------ _ _ , .... " '." _ ~ !: . ',. .oct . _ _ _ __ ~ ~ f::i ~ _ _,.r Q. . 8 I\Y ~~ _ _ '. '." 'I~ "OJ 14.07 . ~ ... TRAJLE R S. R. 60 I -r- A. SM ITH"S I rs 25-57 /1 ! / .' , / . (SMI'!li:: '.. 7'RACT- A. . ' ------- ",,' .., ..... . .' CR, 3892 ~.4-8~ ro - - r- ~ -:. . . - .....-" ... . 1..LJ t- ~h Is I I I I = tIl "'::I to: () ~ .., > ... I = I >- os , = I , 0 I ... I . ... I ... , ::I , u -rJh': ~lltn:l~~H ..; ...; ,'/ I'" = .., , 0 ; / ... I .. :. , ~ .. , ... U \ .. ......... . Q^,!! pll1:t1j! Hi \ \ .; , VI , . .... ... I in .. I :1 ): c I ~ u I .. I::. I ;n~.(w i - .., '" :t II ... .. ::l U tI .., ... .. .c ... .. o Z D C::l .., '" '-PH ll:.lll:l:i i Q .. 0. o I I I a I , ~; " ~ '~\ ~ 4" '> . \\ --. .C", ':~ ,; r P LIe AT] 0 I~ FOR SIT E P L fdl "P PRO \' A L ~~_R'_"'---"""-"'._~_r _._~__~,_._......,____,...... ...~..._.....__.__ .1 11 TLE OF SITE PLAN: SITE PLAN FOR Ifl-lildcr Orfice Building" 1" = 20' GEUERAL LOCATI ON OF SITE: Corner of Gulf-to-Bay Blvd and Bayvicw Bouleva.rd NA~'E OF 'PROPERTY OWNER( S): Mr. Maurice F. Wildor ADDRESS: 3040 Gulf to Bay Blvd. Ste 10t__Cloarwater 33519PHONE: (813) 799-2111 REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY): Mr. Thomas L. Herrell ADDRESS: 3040 Gulf to Bay Blvd, Ste 101, CleRrwater, F1 33519 (813) 799~2111 IJAME OF PERSON ~HO PREPARED SITE PLAN: SIR. Rch!1tl.nn, PIE. ADURESS: Suite 12 3274.5. Samoran Blvd, Orlando 32822 PHONE: (305) 273-8)73 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSON WHO PP.EPARED SITE PLAN (CHECK APPLICABLE DNE(S): " ( ) LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT ( ) LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT (Xl LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LAND USE PLAN CLASSIFICATlmJ: Professional Office Z 0 N HI G : CO PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDIKG (6 Stories) THE PROPOSED PROPERTY USE IS: ~) A PERMITTED USE ( ) A SPECIAL EXCEPTIOU USE IDENTIFY ANY VARIANCES WHICH WILL BE'RE-QUESTED: Parkin!>; SDaces will be a possible request clue to t~e location of some large Oak Trees located in the oroDosed parking lots. C;-~" '.. ~ r=-. ~ ...... :-" r- :-;;:;:t ~ I" , ~ ,~ \' . .~. ,. \. I ,~, I 5\ · --I" - -',' r....J ....'f .~...,-~-.a....,; '., Jl.'." ~ ....'"' j " : \ ~ .....! 'I . J I ' . .. . .;..: i..-/ .f:.~ 1 ~~::~ COMMUUITY IMPACT STATEMENT CRITERIA APPRAISED LAHD VALUE: 114,700.00 AND DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS: RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE IMPACT FEE CRITERIA PARKLAND DEDICATION HAS BEEN GIVEN: NO PARKLAND FEE HAS BEEN PAID: NO 700.000.00 PI t r,I~'.'IMr. DEPARTMENT YES YES DATE DATE ASSESSED JUST VALUE: MW MOST RECENT,SAlES PRICE: 144'.700.00 180,nnn on AS OF (DATE) 3/83 / . ABOVE IS COR~"'P)A:TE AJlD~um. tit ,? - ~""~,@%4!g~ SIGUATUREn ,/ . '~~ ' 7' - '-;;+-' ~<r t:., - . - I ATTEST THAT THE INFORMATION PRESENTED PROPERTY OWNER/AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE DATE 7A.o/ Y5' / / . -'I -------------------------------OFFICE USE OULY------------------------------__ PREL IH WARY PLAU REC I D BY: APPLIC-ATIOtl FEE: RECEIPT & REFERRAL ACTIbu: FINAL PLAN RECiO BY: R.O.C. ACTION: , CI TY MGR./CITYI\CTIOU: C E Ii T 1 F 1 C A T1 0 U / R E C E R T 1 F rcATl U N 0 U : 'OATE CASE DATE: DATE DATE DATE - . . July 7, 1983 \ ... ~ ASSESS:'Ii-:."-n OF O?E~j SPACE/RECREATION IHPACT (:~C\l non-rcsilt'1ntiaf-~~'vni.~pr.'.(.!~\t~f'Tli"crc or mora) (TO BE GOHPJ.E'rED ilY THE !):.vELOPER) -. DATE: August 1, 1985 PROJECT ?-lAME: THE ',.,rn.DER 2Ull.Dnm LOCATION: 3qoo Gulf to Bay B,?ulevllrd, _ Clea.rwa. tar, Fl 2~519 ~A- " 46 + NET !.AND AREA: ..543 sq It... ----------- .. PARCEL GROSS LAND AREA: 51 .500 sq ft :t HOST RECEHT SALE PRICE OR CONTI\ACT: ~ . .180-,000.00 (VERIFICATION REQUIP.ED) ------ . -- ------ JUST VALU\:: ACCORDING TO CURRENT YEAR'S ASSESSMENT: ~__.J.11J.Z9Q~9Q...... ..' (VF.P_IFlCATIOU REQUJ liED.) '!ALUE PER SQUAH.E FOOT: ~ .35 (SALE PRICE OR ASSESSED VALUI::, \.,rUICIIJ::VER IS GREAT~, DIVIDED BY GROSS ll~m l~EA) I ATTEST'THAT THE INFOIU1ATION PRESENTED ABOVE IS CORRECT, COHPLETE,. AND ~~A#~ ?~ ~ ;;;~ ~ ~kOPERTI Ow"NERIAUT!lORIZED REPaESENTATIVE SIGlIA~E: iJr~~::~. . D1PACT FEE CALCULATIONS (FOR OFFICE USE OloILY)- I OPEN SPACE ASSESSHENT Parcel Net Land Area Open Space Factor Open Space Assessment x. x. .040--- Sf I SF - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -.- - - RECOMl.IBIDATIONS LAND DOLLARS TIMING OF PAYMENT I OPEN SPACE FEE . SF J. . . . . ., II RECREATION FACILITY LAND FEE. n/.^.. SF $ N/P-. U/A III. RECREATION FACILITY FEE . . . . . $ 'MIA N/A . .. ~ TOTALS SF &. \ Ream Wilson Director, Parks and Recreatioc N~te: All fQes payable to "City of Clearwater". ~eu SC3ca nnd Re~reat1on Facility I~nd fees should be submitted to the Parks anc Recrea~ion Depart~ent, City Hall Annex, 10 South.~ssour~ Avenue. Recreation Facility fees should be sucmitted to the Building Department at the sarue address. 1-10-84 - FOR.;'l i!04 n"-; c. __ . - ........... ~--..... 01- 6/' MEMORANDUM TO: pUj)//j The City Commission of the City of Clearwater Agenda No. MeetIng Datlil-15-85 SUBJECT: Preliminary Site Plan for McCormick Properties - Countryside Tract, a Portion of M&D 33.04, Sec. 32-28S-16E (McCormick Properties, Inc.) PSP 85-32. RECOMMENDATION: City Commission review the preliminary site plan for McCormick Properties- Countryside Tract and authorize RDC review of a final site plan with final action by the City Mannger subject to the considerations noted below. [] And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located on the nortb side of Koger Center Drive east of U.S. 19. The site contains 12.38 acres M.O.L. including a 1.5 acre pond which is zoned AL (Aquatic Lands). The Land Use Plan classification is Residential IOffi~e with a zoning designation of PS (Professional Services). Plans are to construct two three-story office buildings on the site containing a total of 152.000 square feet of floor area. Access will be from Koger Center Drive. . 'J Preliminary staff review notes the following considerations which must be addressed with the submission of a final site plan: 1) a community impact statement must qe submitted. 2) a preliminary plat must be submitted with the final site plan, 3) building height must be shown in feet, 4) if a variance is required for the building height, it must be approved by the Board of Adjustment and Appeal on Zoning prior to submission of the final site plan, 5) two loading spaces are required on the site. Comm ission Disposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued to dQtr Follow-up Action: 'J Dote: CJ Affected Parties Notified of Meetlnq QJ Not Required Costs: N/A Fundi ng Sou ree: o Capitol Improve- ment Budget o Operating Budget o Other itJAttachments: Drawing Application Submitted by: Advertised: CIty Manager Paper: fi] Nor Required Date 8 Sequential Reference Originating Department: PLANNING Ap pro priation Code o None 'Y, . ~ I. .. .J'l -. THIRD AV !OUTH o ID I~ .. 'I w 520 THIRD AV ~dUTt.. 4:f1 J I I I I I I 1 , 1 I I I , -- ------ I I I I 55 18 ~ ~ ..", .. ID I JZ CD ,...: ID N' ~ . .~, ,\" ;. AV SOUTH 32 Lot$ 2.12 Blk 16 CHAUTAUQUA UNITS SECA IImntTfIlmnntlmn Voc: SOUTH 513 ~._' '",or ~(~'"i..;..~.....""""",,",. . ..~~_....,...".._..)I" '~~~~''':-:='~):; .......t.... u.... ....~;.~",. v..~it l'fO~Q ~~~",,<3 CP 14-..\9 PS . l ....... ~ ", lorh Av So . ifi:'.vP e ~. a~~;ZONE CLASS: CHANGE cofto"".o. . b ANN EXA TION PAGE 8-15 12':1 ...!. ~.... .. . IJ'" C. '0: .211.16 '500 ~EC, '.Z9.J6 NOTE: FOR MARGINAL ZONING ':ONSULT ABUTTING PAGES- LEGEND: o SUB. OR :;= ORD 3814 1-10-85 , 1": ~" , .~ (. I I I. I I I l ~ ar .J i III :z o 1) , :.. - ./ ( \ . I ~ .f".. f APPlICATIOU FOR SITE PLldJ I.PPROVAL TITLE OF SITE PLAN: Proposed Office Complex GE~ERAL LOCATION OF SITE: 1/2 mile north of Sunset Point Road & East of U.S. 19 tJMIE OF PROPERTY OWNER( 5): McConnick Properties. Inc. ADDRESS: 4830 W. Kennedy Blvd.. SuitQ....5.~.O. Tampa.FL3360~HONE: 813-873-4100 REPRESEIHATIVE (IF ANY): Ed Fanner. King Engineering Associates, Inc. ADDRESS: 3250 U.S. 19 No., Suite 105, Clearwater, FL 33575 Architects Diversified, lnc.1 IJAME OF PERSON WHO PREPARED SITE PLAN: King Engineering Associates, Inc. ADI: 4902 Eisenhower Blvd., Suite 150, Tampa, FL 886-1296 ADURESS: KEA: 3250 U.S. 19 No., #105, Clearwater, FL PHONE: 785-2556 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIOtJS OF PERSON WHO pnEPARED SITE PLAN (CHECK APPLICABLE ONE(S): ,/ IONING: (X) LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT (AD!) ( ) LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAHDSCAPE ARCHITECT ( X) L 1 C ENS E U PRO F E S 5 ION A L UJ G I H E E R (K EA ) LAND USE PLAN CLASSIFICATION: RO-ResidentialOffice PS PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Professional Office Complex THE PROPOSED PROPERTY USE IS: (X X) APE R M I T TED USE ( ) A SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE IDENTIFY ANY VARIANCES WHICH WILL BE REQUESTED: Height Variance to 40-feet COMMUNITY IMPACT STATEMENT CRITERIA APPRAISED LAND VALUE: N/A AND DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS: N/A RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE IMPACT FEE CRITERIA P ARKLAtW DEDICATION HAS BEEN G I V E ~J : NO YES X DATE - PARKLAND FEE HAS BEEN PAID: NO YES X DATE ASSESSED JUST VALUE: N/A AND N/A N/A MOST RECENT SALES PRICE: AS OF (DATE) . .. - I ATTEST THAT THE INFORMATION PRESENTED ABOVE IS CORRECT, COHPLET~JAND TRUE. '\ ". ~.r-~~~/!J'" PROPERTY OWNER/AUTHORIZED REPRESEtHATIVE SIGUATUR:r---fu<p--j:~L' ~ \ -" __...-...- \ R- Ba rr.y. Behr.J e.. ..../ . Manager, Florida Development McCormick Properties, Inc. " . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -, - - - - - - - - - - -' - - - 0 F F ICE USE 0 N L Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATE Augus t 5, 1985 ',\ PRELIHIUARY PLAU REC'O BY.: "1 APPLI~ATION FEE: RECEIPT & REFERRAL ACiIUt:: FINAL PLAN RECiO BY: R.D.C. ACTION: CITY MGR./CITY ACTIO~: CERTIFICATION/RECERTIFICATIUN O~: DATE CASE DATE DATE DATE DATE July 7, 1983 be. Agenda No. ME MORA N 0 U M TO: pu]) _{ ~ Meeting Date 8-15-85 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: Preliminary Subdivision Plat,for Studebaker's Subdivision. M&B's 14.07 and 14.08, Sec. lS-29S-16E (Studebaker's, R~public Financial Corp.) SUB 85-8. RECOMMENDATION: City Commission approve the preliminary subdivision plat for Studebaker's Subdivision subject to the following condition: The final plat be recorded no later than February 15. 1986. [] And that tbe appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located on the north side of Gulf-to-Day Boulevard west of u.S. 19. The site contains 3.73 acres M.Q.L. The Land use Plan classification is Commercial/Tourist Facilities with a ~oning designation of CG (General Business). Plans are to subdivide the property into two lots. Lot 1 is proposed to be developed with a bank/office building. Lot 2 is developed with a restaurant/lounge. The Resource Development Committee on July 111 1985 recommended approval of the preliminary plat. I, The Planning and Zoning Board on July 30. 1985 recommended by a vote of 7 to 0 to approve the preliminary plat. Commission Disposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Re1Jised/Conditional 2. Continued to dcr~ Follow-up Action: City Manager Dote: !=Japer: o Affected Parties Noti fi ed of Meeting al Not Required Costs: N/A Funding Source: o Capital Improve- ment Budget o Operating Budget o Other RJAttachments: Submitted by: Advertised: Drawing &I Not Required Dote a Sequential Reference OriginatIng Departmen t; PLANNING Appropriation Code o None '\, -I #j' . tlL ..l\ f I .) /' 1<1 \ n ! ~-.u "g ... .. .c ... I- o :r. . .." r;;:. :k CJ - .: :;, u -- ... ... <=> ... d. J o 6! _'.S .:n ~---------------- ~ ui 'PlI I> .. VI C ... ~ ... . ~-h la , ~ I .. I "" I I 0 I ... I I ... I ... :;, I. ~ , ..; '~^I;' t/1"/ ..;: tlja n: -; ." .,., tt: C I 0 It 'g D~. I .... u .. I ;. Q . "0 Q I .. a= ... ... I U Q. \ ';lAY ;t~1!1: ... .. I 1 .. '..... .. .; VI ... .. =' 0 u '-':) ", 03 Agenda No. M EM 0 RAN 0 U M TO: fA.-J [) - ( 3 Meeting Dote 8-15-85 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: Preliminary Subdivision Plnt for Premier Place, a Portion of Lot 19, Pinellns Groves Sub., SW 1/4 of Sec. 19-29S-16E (Wright, Premier Shelters, Inc.) SUB 85-7. RECOMMENDATION: City Commission approve the preliminary subdivision plat for Premier Place subject to the following conditions: 1. Right-of-way be dedicated to provide a 40 foot half rlght-of-way for Nursery Road; 2. A private easement be obtained from the property owner to the. south for drainage outfall; 3. The final plat be recorded no later than February 15, 1986. [} And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located on the south side of, Nursery Road east of Belcher Road. The site contains 3.65 acres M.O.L. The Land Use Plan classification is Low Density Residential with a zoning designation of RS-75 (Single Family Residence). Plans arc: to subdivide the property into nine single family lots. The Resource Development Co~nittee on June 27, 1985 recommended approval of the preliminary subdivision plat. The Plannlng and Zoning Board is scheduled to review the preliminary plat on August 13. 1985. The Board's recommendation will be given to the City Commission on August 15, 1985. Commission Oisposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued to d<lf. Fo\ low-up Action: Dafe: o Affected Parties Notified of Meeting t:i:l Not Required Costs: N I A EJ Attachments: Fundtng Source:. Drawing o Capital Improve- ment Budget CJ Operating Budget' o Other Submitted by: Advertised: City ManoQer Pa pe r: EJ Not Required Date a Sequential Reference Orig inotlng Departmen t: PLANNING Appro priotion Code o None .1 ~I \ I ~ <', ~~:I~ / ; \ .-J .~ I .% .: ... "> \J ... '..., Ii I ~ , , ~I .....~ 12 - 1"3 C. R, II ~ ,-- ._._~ 'f I .. .. ~ .. . 1\ ., I, · ' I I '.t "'-" \ " "1;%Q I ~ ~ "''?"\ ~.~ U : ~.-:. ' 'i 1:,\"\ I~/~-c.;*-~I 'j ~"O-.l j t' J..~J g I......~? . l-~~-~~~~ ~O' ! I '="' .. ~0 '1 =J " J ! ~I'\~ ~ k ='7 -' .., 'C ~ ': 1_ ::I \~,L\. :,.. . .~ i \ "'T-=-.'....';""'-"'-,.~..2 ,; ?~_,L~j _ _:_ r :' ') 3 :~f~~l ;~_~, 'H:.v~~:. .".----T.- -. f . --- -- ----- \ 'I I ...:' I 1 . ..:. c. '\-'\ '! .'. I I ~ ~. I . " r--1L---f-'--r- ~, \ I t ,/ '. \ 23; I . . . . _. - __-'- , .. I 'J '\ , . \ ',\ , .., D: J: .. - .. :;i u " o . \) a --'" o .... ..: ,J c:r .., .... ,0: VI 61 . S 'n CJ o 'PH 1l:::Z,,) i u VI t: o - t: ::> ,\.} .r: .-:pI! ~ u III C .... ... ~ "1 a: l:J ,\ ~ "'OJ > .... I II> , >- . J .., II> / . 0 I u ( , ... / .... I ::I I t,;l .Q^": so::qn:ll :JH ... ..; // !II a: I 0 ~ .,.., .. :.- Q I ~ .. \ .... U \ ~ ' ~^'r '-- \) u (1. lu I- ...., -. . ~J~ l~ I I I I .-/ {'4- . .-..---.... M EM 0 RA N 0 U M TO: '\)\,.,\'D -L5 ~~:~l~~ ~~te8-15-85 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: Agreement to Annex for M~B'S 43.01 and 44.00, Sec. 32-28S-16E (Cornerstone Communlties, Inc.) ATA 85-19-241. RECOMMENDATION: Ci ty Commissi.on approve the It t. tached Agreerncn t. to Annex wi th Cornerstone Communities, Incorporated. ~ And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. _i-- BACKGROUND: The property is located on the north side of Union Street east of Soule Road. The property is vacant and contains 60.94 acres M.O.L. The property is not pr~sently contiguous to the City limits and is unable to be annexed. The Land Use Plan classification is Low Density ResidentiaL. The property owner proposes to subdivide the property into 96 singl~ family lots, each lot cOlltaining approximately .37 acre. The owner is entering into the attached agreement with the City in order to receive City water and sewer service which is available in this area. As a part of the agreement in satisfaction of the open space/recreation requirements, the owner is proposing to dedicate at the time of annexation a 3.1B acre park and to construct tennis courts in the park area. The arrangement is acceptable to the Parks and Recreation Director. The Resource Development Committee on August 8, 1985 recommended approval of a preliminary plat for the project area entitled Elysium. The plat is to be made a part of the agreement and referenced as Exhibit C. Commission Disposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Reyised/Conditional 2. Continued to Follow-up Action: ddr~ Submit1ed by: . .' ._.,IT '"""'-- i,;,J.....,...~'"'...,v~- Advertised: o Affected Parties Notified of Meetlnq {] Not Required Costs: NI A Funding Source: o Capital Improve- ment Budget o Operating Budget o Other Drawing Agreement fLJAttachments: Date: City Manager Paper: fI'J Not Required Dote a Sequential Reference OriginatIng Departmen t: PLANNING o None Appropriation Code '\~ . I II \\ -. " . . U' ,. L .1- e" 11 :1" 115 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~: ~: ~_p__~_t;_t5; _ ,_ .. .. I . ~ .. . : .. .. .. .. i ; . ~. ." . tv.:.: ..' 1..'" ~~'7:t ~ . .; " ... " J , , ,:., ... D. .. - == - - - " o :. o y .. ... .. E; t:: = e == ~ ,S - - .. - .-It _ I JI;'mnnrrnn:~f1l1nmIJ - - - t: - E' :1: ,PO o. , . "'1: ,:",.. i~ .. 1;1: '.. o. .. - == ::::I - . .' j I~. ',' i' .. .. , - ... .' .. ..It ell ti: t .. t . ... r.' ~ .' " . .. . " .1 , /, ---II ~ - ._~ I:: j ~, _,Ie == :2 = :01 = f%1 = !~ = -, , :: I,: t ,= ,- - /- ,- 1= - I~ I~~ -- ").Ao ..::!:: . "- ~tt: ~ E 8; n l> ~~ ='0 -. - - =\1\ :: 0 == C - = r - =(11 - - - - - - - - ~ 3 ...~ .... . .- "'.t.. , ' '- '- - . . .. ~,;; .. . ' , .. . . , " t' " 'f \ .' ". = - - ." " .. 3 'd I . .' - - - 3 :3 3 == ::::::l , - ,..t }.t . ~; .. . ;. ~,..- .. 't' .. . ' 4...; Ii. .. ;;':~\~~:~~: " . , ~ ) '.'.. I ~.. .. ..... , . I ~...~ .... ... "';. n . IllllJ UIIIIIIII J IIII UI f 1IIIIIIIIIIlllIIU IllllJUllllJIllJ :1 . . . . .., .. .. . . -j .. .. .. .. :-: .. .. .. .. . ~ .. .. ! ! .. .. :., . .. ;;. z-+ ..I: ,:,.. =.. It .. .. .. .. a ... ~--,,--,-,:,~~~-....,-.I-. . L ~ '~\ a = . _ ~. - ._L. __ ~ '. -.... .---- .. .... . . - .. .-~. - "":"'" .. -.. " 'I i ~ . \c,.;.- ... ~ ,_. .. - ... ... U/ 0 ~ ... .J ~ ~ U III lIi :z g <=> '" W1 I> .; Ul 0: ,.. ~ .... D . r.f>o .., > ... , ... ~ >- , .. lID I . C] , Q ... I . I ... - 0 I. :J I l.:l ....~^'! t -ll\:lJ;H ... ..j ,'/ In ..; a:: v. ":2 I 0 ;; .., I .; 'lIH il~;;:l - I II .. . Q \ :. Q 0 I ... ~ II n \ ... . r:>. U \ I ~ '>"'- <J . ill"'!! il:>(1:1. I ':l a:: I d \ ~ e.-........... .., ... . .. "" ~ a:: ... ... J: 0 ... Z ... ..: :J u D' = to: VI o 'il"'\, J:~tli!iH \ \ . I ~~ 1 ..; ... I \1'1 .. I ~ g I a U I~ , illU~", r - >- .. .. '" .. ~ "01 .~) " . ''1\ ~ ~,. 'I , " ;: ...-. 'I A G R E E MEN T THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 1985, by and between the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, q municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Cityll, and CORNERSTONE COMMUNITIES, INC., a Florida corporation , hereinafter referred to as "Owner"; , WIT N E SSE T H: \vHEREAS, the Owner now owns the fol1ow~ng described real property, located outside the municipal boundaries of the City of Clearwater but within the City of Clearwater service area: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof and ,( I" I WHEREAS, the Owner desires to connect to the City sewer and/or water main and is agreeable to signing an Agreement with the City for municipal sewer and/or water service~; and WHEREAS, the City is agreeable to furnishing said services upon certain conditions and considerations; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. The city does hereby agree to provide sewer and/or,water services, subject to the terms of this Agreement, and to permit the OWner to connect to its sanitary sewer and/or water main at the OWner's expense. The City shall not be liable for any damage resulting from any unavoidable cessation of service caused by Act of God, necessary maintenance work, or any cause beyond the control of the City. 2. In consideration of the covenants contained in Paragraph 1; '. immediately above on the part of the City, the OWner agrees: (a) to pay the appropriate annexation fee when this Agreement is submitted for processing; (b) to pay normal sewer and/or water connection charges; and monthly sewer service and/or ~a~eE ~h.:=,-r.ge.~ ~o\,.the City on the same basis as sewer service and/or water users 'outside the municipal boun9~E~es_?E~.~~~rg:?j~a~ set out in the Code of Ord~~~n~~s of the ~~~Y of Clearwater~ Florida; .- , (c~ that all recreation land, recreatioh facilities4and open space land dedication and/or fees will be due upon annexation in all .. , amount and manner as prescribed in Ordinance Nos. 31,28-83 and 3129-83. ~n particular, the owner shall ei ther: ' (1) paYI the required recreation facilities fee when this is c 'I. ~~; l' r the only fee required by Ordin~ncc No. 3128-83 at the time this Agreement is submitted for processing, or (2) place in escrow such deed transferring title to land and/or promissory note made payable to the City of Clearwater as required by Ordinance Nos. 3128-83 and 3129-83, such deed and/or promissory note, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit "Oil (IF applicable) to be conveyed and/or paid prior to the second ordinance reading I effectuating the annexation of the SUbject property; (Owner may in lieu of said recreation facilities fee, agree to construct two (2) tennis courts to City spe~ifications if approved by the City commission). (d) that at such time as it becomes possible for the City to annex said real property, this Agreement will constitute an application to annex at that time, and the City will have the right, I upon sixty (60) days' written notice of the property owner, to initiate action to annex the property to the city; (e) that' it is to the mutual benefit of the OWner and the City, in recognition of the eventual incorporation of the property within the City, to: (1) have the preliminary site plat reviewed and accepted by the City in advance of obtaining any requisite permit from Pinellas County. Acceptance of such plan shall precede the execution of this Agreement by the City and any construction on this property subsequent to annexation shall comply with the Fire District requirements as set forth in Chapter Three (3), Standard Building Code, as duly adopted by the City of Clearwater; (-2) have the water and sewer system designed to City standards, and the City will be entitled to review the water and sewer construction plans. (3) have each home builder go to the City to obtain a water and sewer letter, 'but City shall not require review of builders' architectural/structural plans. (4) not entitle the City to review the plat or storm drainage/street paving subdivision construction plans or the landscape architecture plans for the project. OWner agrees that the plat and subdivision construction plans \~i~l be in substantial conformance to the City approved preliminary site plat entitled Elysium ~nd as prepared by 'Appenzeller, Boyd & Zarra, Inc. and dated August 8, 1985, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C". OWner and City agree that storm drainage/street paving subdivision construction plans will be designed/engineered in accordance with Pinellas county standards, and will be approved by Pine lIas Councy. OWner and City agree that storm drainage/street paving subdivision improvements will be installed/constructed with Pinellas County inspections. (5) If pump station is required to be oversized to serve an area greater than Owner's 60 acre project, .then Owner will receive credit from City for such incremental additional cost. (6) have the p~rformance bond and maintenance bond run to Pincllas County. .. -..... .. . -... .' '~1 +: '.<:~~~8'~ , ,'I" I, (7) have no additional review fces payable to city of Clearwater while under the jurisdiction of Pinellas County. (f) all property proposed to be subdivided or otherwise' 'differentiated from the origina~ parcel described in this Agreement shall b~ treated as a single parcel for the purposes of the subsequent annexation procedure, individual ownership notwithstanding; (g) that the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon its successors and assigns, and the City shall record this document; (h) that the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be a ,. commitment and obligation which shall not only bind the present owner of said described real property, but shall be a covenant which shall run with the land and shall bind and be enforceable against all subsequent owners of said described real property whether or not it is mentioned in the Deed to,said owners; and (i) if the Owner or its successors, or assigns, or any subsequent owner, shall default in the performance of the terms and provisions of this Agreement, and the City shall institute legal proceedings to enforce the terms and provisions hereof, the Owner, its successors and assigns, covenant and agree to pay all costs of such proceedings including the payment of a reasonable attorney's fee in connection therewith. 3. All notices to be furnished hereunder shall be furnished to the City of Clearwater, to the City Manager, P. O. Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida, 33518. ,'. I., ~ ~~: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Countersigned: By Mayor~'Commis sioner City Manager Approved as to form and Correctness: . Attest: City Attorney City Clerk OWNER: Witnesses as to Owner: By " I c' c', ~.,. 1, : 'Jr' v-: ,~ [ ,. 'r.,l:':', ' ~ ;: 'J:'I"~;;'F.l'f\; , ';"';'.(:~';V'~.~%~" . ..;;t~t:~ . '. ;.~. ',~:8 STA~EOF FLORIDA /,: " , c':" COUNTY OF PINELLAS , '... . ) .,': . , " ~ , ' Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19 ,. ~ . .: day of. "'. : ~ ~ . \. My Commission Expires: .' ,Notary ,) 4',1 fI' ./' . !c ,'? " .', " I' .( " : . ~ " . I ~ . " 'J ,. ., .\ , ) c' .1 " " '. '\j . I ,. . , '"\j "( , 'II ') 6s- ,...~: - Agenda No. Meeting Dote 8/15/85 I I iV1EMORANDUM TO: C(f)--) The City Commission of the City of C~earwater SUBJECT: Public Hearing Cor the Expansion and Improvement of the Clearwater Marine Sclt.:!nce Center. HECOMMENDAT-rON ~ A. City Commission approve a finding that tbe expansion and improvement of ' the Clearwater Marine Science Center at its present location is necessary for the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Clearwa.ter. B. City Commission declare that M & B 13.07, Sec. 8-29S-15E known as the tlold Islanu Esta.tes Wa.stewa.ter Treat.ment Plant" site be declared surplus to tbe needs of the City of Clearwater. C. City Commission established the selling price of M & B 13.07 if the sale is approved by the voters at referendum. ~ And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGRO NO: The Clearwa~er Marine Science Center is proposing to expand and improve its existing facility on property now leased from the City and on three adjacent properties fronting on Windward Passage recently purchased by the MSC. On May 2, 1985, the City Commission endorsed the proposal for expansioo and in June, 1985 ~pproved Resolution No. 85-43 by which the City guaranteed loans not to exceed $1,000,000 for the acquisition of the three adjacent properties. The City Charter requires that due to the bay front location of M & B 13.07, no use other than open space or public utilities can be made of the property unless the City Commission finds that it is necessary for tbe public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Clearwater to do so. Once this finding is made, the development could proceed. However, an e:'l:isting Ii reverter" clause put on the property by the 'State of Florida must also be lifted in order for the MSC to.develop the property as planned. Steps are being taken to request removal of the It reverter" clause only on II & B 13,07 by the St~te. Since the MSC has requested to purchase this property from the City, the Cit.y Commission has directed that a condition of removal of the "reverter" will be approval by the vote~s at referendum of the sale of the property. Likewise, the sale of the property if approved at referendum will be conditioned upon removal of the "revertertl. Prior to taking the question of sale of the property to referendum, the City Commission must declare the property surplus to the needs of tbe City of Clearwater. It is also recommended that the City Commission establish a selling price of the property required by Charter to be "fair market 'Vulue". A state:nent must be provided by the Traffic Engineer that sale of the property will not materially affect the City Parking system. The tentative scheduled date of the referendum is October 1, 1985. The first $10,000 cost of the referendum is to be paid by the Marine Science Center. It is recommended that this cost be paid to the City at this time to cover the initLal costs which will be incurred in organizing and setting t.he referendum. Because of information recently received that the Stat.e cabinet will not act. ou the question of the reverter. it will require that the question of reverter removal be considered by the State legi~lation next year. The local delegation will nor; act without the referendum to be held in October as previously planned rather th"" the March ele~tion. Commission Dispcsition: 1. Apcro\ll!d in Recommendecl Re\lil.ed/~nditiOIl4I 2.. Contil"lued to Fel tow -Up Aerlen: - 'j /J.~t,. Submit ted by: Advertised: G:lAffeeted Costs: ~ I ~ [JA1taehments: Parties Funding Source: Agenda Item t .. .,{ '- Oote:7!26!85 5/2/85 ._ .J... ".... ..I '-"10' Notified o Capital Improve- Popertl of Meeting ment Sudget Ordinance City Manager W.SUD o Ocercting Sudc;et No. 4028-B5 a Nor Required o Nol Required o Other Originating Deportment: Date 5S€CUentioll ADMINSTRA'rION Re~erence ':'opropricticn Cece o None \ OJ ~ C. " -- . - - I " r' -, 4":' 'I .', 0 - I ; .~ J ... ~ ~ ~ ~.'""" " ,. ~.~.; -;-! I~g _~~ 1.CJ. _~.2.:..~ ~. _ _ ;\.111~: i'.,lj 0 I ~ t\ i'J iJ U ~/l -J~ () : .1- h G C i t Y Co nl rn j s s i 0 i1 of the C i t Y' 0 'f C J ear \v a 'I a r SUBJECT: Expansion of the Marine Science Center. HECO!JYENDA'f ION: ~.City Commission endorse the proposal fo~ expansion of the Marine SCience Center and detcrr!line the project is a public purpose with reasonable expectation that ~uch purpose will be substantially and. ~r[ectivcly acco~plishcd. ' k.. B. Ci ty Commission approve a pledge of credi t (e;uarantee) ot ....\. \..:. ,r $1,000,000 on th~ Iirst mortgage for the Mar~ne Science Center '/r..." expanslon aDd au thorize the Ma.yor and Ci ty Manager to execute the ~c~~ ~uarantee documents sUbject to review and approval by the City ~v fitiorney and the City's independent bond counsel. C. City Co~~ission direct the City Clerk to set a voter referendum to determine if the City should sell the p~operty M&B 13.07, Sec. 8-29S-15E, known as the old Island Estates Wastewater Treatment Pla.nt site, subject to removal by the State of Florida of the' . "reverter" clause On the property, with the first $10,000 cost of bolding the referendum to be borne by the Marine Science Center. D. City Commission authorize the Marine Science Center 00 behalf of the City to seek re:noval by the State of Florida of the "reverterrr clause on M&B 13.07, Sec. 8-29S-15E. [J And that tbe appropriate offici?-ls be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: '.J ~ The Clearwater Marine Science Center is presently leasin~ from the City of Cle~r~ater the oropertv formerl~ utilizea as the Island ~states nastewater Trea t:Jent Plant-. . Tn 1~75, the <..:i ty Commission made a determination that tbe property was no longer necessary for its intended use and approved a lease to the Marine Science Center. With tbe exception of reta~ning the marina slips around the property, the City bas no plans for future use of the upland. Plans bave ~een prooosed by tbe-Marine Science Center for exoansion of its present use of the property which include the following: 1) Purchase of 3 . abutting parcels on Windward Passage, 2) Purchase of the C1ty owned oro- perty now leased to' the' Marine Science Center, 3) improvernen~ and eX~1nsiou of the existing building to contain display tanks, research facilities, classrooms~. librarY1.a~ditoriurn an~ adrn~nistrative offices, 4) construction of Dew parK1ng fac~ 1~1es~_' In order to obtain a first mortgage to purchase the 3 abutting properties the ~arine Science Center is reouesting the City Co~~issioo guarantee ' $1.000,000 't.o'n'ard the first mortgage. The attacbed memorandum to tbe City Commission from the City Manager (with a correction of "1/2 of the purchase price" to "$1,000,000") details tbe risk to the C~ty of the guaran- tee. The City may sell the property now leased by the Marine Science Center only if the voters approve at referendum such sale. An existing "reverter" clause put on tne property by the State of Florida must also be lifted. If the State of Florida approves lifting the "reverter" and if the voters approve at referendum the sale of the C1ty owned nroperty, the Ci'ty Co~~ission may declare the property surplus to the C1ty'S needs ana solicit bids to ourcbase the proper~y Ior the development of an expanded Marine Science tenter. In aaditioD, the City would rezone the publically onoed land to CG (Commercial). Once a construction loan for the Marine Science Center expansion is secured, the City would lose any responsibility for the project. A re~lerter io title to tbe Ci ty ;;ould be placed unon the entire expanded project area to beco~e effective if the Yarioe Science Center ceases t~ be p'rilparisly.an educatiooadlrandl "non-profit" entity. hIn ac;idition11. if the " Mar10e Clence Center e au ts upon its mortgage, t e C1t~ wi . bave the first ootion to acquire the mortgage aDd ~egain title to the entire project prope rty. S ta f f reco;n.rnends the 2. bove l~en t i Oiled gua ra n tees be included 10 the agr~~rneots for sale of the property. Commission Disposition: _ 1. A~::ro~ed ~s nt:;Qrnni~llded/::ieyi~/c.::.nditional z. C.:m::nued to Folic..... -u P ~c1 ion: C~lr Submit t ed by: Acvedised: . Costs: ~/A Funding Source: '0 Co Poi t a I lli'l pro.." e- ment Sud.:;et DOper c ting Sucget OCt her 0Af fachments: C j t Y ..~ a nor; e r DOle:4!29/85 _ 5/1/85 ,-.:;;er: ner.lO 4/29/85 Proposed Financi al Plan o ~; 0 I r:: ~ ~ 'J i ( eO .-. ~~.. '.~~JI Cr;;:,-,,:~'nl1 .._ _.,....._~o........... r.....l ..-- . - <II _, ....... I . . _ ~ :: ~ ~ G:'" ~ ~j~':::1 t: ---- , .' . \ .. . I, : : '.;, '. ':. ,;,,'~S ORDIN^NCE NO. 4028-05 AN ORDINANCE OF '{litE CITY OF CLEARt'JATER, FLORIDA, PROVIDING THNl' A CER'rAIN TIMCT OF MUNICIPAL REl\L PROPERTY SHALL BE DEVELOPED AND MAINTAINED OTHER THAN IN OPEN SPACE AND PUBLIC UTILITY, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE CLEARWATER MARINE SCIENCE CENTER, AND DECLARING THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT IS NECESSARY IN THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF CLEARWATER; PROVIDING THAT SUCH CERTAIN MUNICIPAL REAL PROPERTY BE SOLD TO THE CLEARWATER MARINE SCIENCE CENTER FOR A SPECIFIED SUM, WHICH MAY BE LESS THAN THE FAIR ~~RKET VALUE, AND PRO- VIDING FOR A REVERTER CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A REFERENDUM ELECTION; PROVIDING FOR PROPER NOTICE OF PROPOSEDENACTMENTi PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF THE ELECTIONi AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE AFTER APPROVAL AT REFERENDUM. WHEREAS, the Clearwater Marine Science Center has approached the City of Clearwater witll plans for a proposed expansion of its facilities on Island Estates; and WHEREAS, the City of Cl~arwater, after proper public hearings and open discussion, h~s determined that the proposed expansion of the Clea~water Marine Science Center facility would be in the best interest of the citizens of Clearwater and represents a pro ject \'Jhich the City of Cleanla ter \V'ishes to encQur3.ge; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF 'l'RE CITY OF CLEARh"J.\TER', FLORIDA: Section 1. That pursuant to Section 2.01 (d}(5) of the Cha~ter of the City of Clearwater that the proposed development of the real property on Island Estntes, known colloquially as Island Estates \~astewuter Treatment Plant, more particularly described as follows: Commence at the SW corner of Lot 5, Block C, Island'Estates of Clearwater, Unit 5, as recorded in Plat Book 51, page 34 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence northwesterly 6U teet along said Lot line to P.O.B.; thence southwesterlv 207.5 ieet; thence northwesterly 482 feet~ thence northeasterly 207.5 feet; thence southeasterly 482 feet along the southerly line of said Subdivisiom to the P.O. B., ") for the proposed eX9ar.sicn of the Clearwater Marine Science Center faci,li ties, which cons'Ci 'Cutes a development and maintenance of the said real ptoperty other than in opa~ space or public utility, constitutes a developmen~ Which is, necessary in the interest of the public health, safety and '"elfare of the I citizens of CleanV'ater. -1- ~',A '.';. '1: , ;"jl. Section 2. A. That the municipal real property, colloquial~y I) known as Isl.J.n~ Estates \vC\stewater Treatment Plant, and more particularly described in Section 1 above, which has been declared . surplus and no lO,ngar needed for public use .as provided for in Section 2.01 of the Charter of tne city of Clearwater, shall be sold to the Clearv:lter Harine Science Center for the SUIi1 of $ , payable at closing, which may be less than the fair market value of the property. B. That the conveyance. to the Clearwater Marine Science , Center shall contain a reverter clause prcividing that if the Clearwater Marine Science Center does not devote the property to use as an expanded Ma~ine Science~enter facility, or if at any time in the future ceases to do so, the property shall automaticall~ revert to the City of Clearwater. Section 3. A. A referendum election for the purpose of approving the finding of the City Commission as contained in " Section 2 A above, and approving the conve~ance to the Clearwater Marine Science Center under the terms as outlined in Section 2 B 'I above, shall be held at a special municipal election to be \ conducted on Tuesday, October '1, 1985. B. The questions to appear on the referendum ballot, shall be :, as follows: i. Do you approve of the finding or the City Commission of the City of Clearwater i~ a duly advertised .public hearing that the development ,of the following described real property as propd~ed by the Clearwater Marine Science Center is necessary in the interest of the public health, \ \ safety and welfare of the citizens of Clearwater, "1 so that the property may be developed and rnaintai~ed , \ ", other thaA in open space and public utilities: H, if Commence C1 t the SW corner of Lot 5, '.' Block C, Island ~states of ClenrwaterJ ' Unit 5, as recordedin Plat Book 51, page 34 of the public'Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence northwesterly 60 feet along said,~Lot line to P.O.B.; thence southwesterly 207.5 feet; thence north- westerly 482 feet; thence northeasterly 207.5 feet; 'thence southeasterly 482 feet along the southerly line of said subdivision to the'P.O.B.; also known as Island Estates Wastewater Treatment Plant? -2- '. . .' ,~ '.~ '" .. .):~~f ii. Should the City of Clearwater, through the .1 . actions of its duly elected officials be' empowered to sell the following described real property to the Clearwater Murine science Center for the sum of $ , which may be less than the fa~r market value of the property, provided that the Clearwater Marine Science Center ~ust devote the property solely to the expansio:.1 of the Clearwater Marine Science Center facility, or if it fails to.do so, the property shall revert to the City of Cle3rw~ter, subject to any liens. or encurn- brances thereon: 1/ Commence at the s~'V corner of Lot 5, Block C, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 5, as recorded in Plat Book 51, page 34 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence northwesterly 60 feet:along said Lot line to P.O.B.; thence southwesterly 207.5 feet; thence north- westerju 492 feetj thence northeasterly 207.5 feet; thence southeasterly 482 feet along the southerly' line of said Subdivision to the P.O.B.; also' known as Island Estates Wastewater Treatment ~la~t? . . . C . The electronic voting system sholl be so arranged that the voter may vote "Yes" or IINo" with respect t 1 i +- . o eaCl que~_J.on. Section 4. Notice of the proposed enactment of this ordinance has been properly advertised in a newspaper or generol circulation in accordance with Section 166.041, Florida Statutes. Section 5. if a majo.:r;ity of the votes cast at suc:\ election i'n respect to sLlch questions shall be "Yes", such questions shall .be approved. 1 Section 6. Electronic system ballots shall be used in t~e election for absentee voters and sllall be in substantially the form provided in Sec~ion 3 above. ", Section 7. This ordinance sho3,11 be 1?ublishedin full at least " 'one time by the .City Clerk as part of the notice 6f such referendum :.: . election, which notice shall be headed "Notice of Municipal Referendum j' ) Election". Notice of the ref~rendurn election shall be published ,. in a ~aily newspaper in general circulation in t~e City in ~he manner provided in Section 100.342, Florida Statutes~! -3- .:.5. ::', ~ " C' I' ,:'.; :"';'~"I',::'."."\'~~'~':::f,~~;~ " ,... ,.",t . " " '"fw~' .< .:- "~~. , ~"'.c<',~~ . " 't;c . ',. ~ e . .<.,.' > . . Section 8. This ordinance shall become' effective immediately, " upon . its f il1al passage; hO\oJever I the conveyance and use of' ~he . " , .,: ;, ,:r: o.;';-/{ real property described herein are.contingent upon an.affirmative vote of the majority of the electors voting in a ieferendu~'on' the issue, and filing 'with the Secretary of State. .. . Y,. ~.... " ,:. .'~' . ~" ":- ;: ;, , PASSED ON FIRST READING :? ..' '; .. '1.+ ~ .j ~ '1 .PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL' READING AND ADOPTED " . .. ,/ Hayor-Commissioner lj Attest: '. . r. t ':\. : r! : ,'>'\1 , \ '[ City Clerk '."' ,. ,,,,; " ,.' J >/.~\;'\,.f.i.,~. :! " . ! 0, .' . Ii':' , . 1\ . \ . \ .i . \ .j', : . .; ~ . '<, j . ~ ~ , ) , .t. ... . ~.. I ,[ -4- , . ''\\ 'J " I " ~ . J \ ~~ \. '1 ., \.... ", .' .\ , ~ .'" ::;"~;:::l,-:;r ,:;0 ,:' ':;::U:;::ri;~ '" '. .:1.:.,....: NOTICE OF MUNICIPAL REFERENDUM ELECTION CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA To Be Ueld on Tuesday, October 1, 1985, as Provided by Ordinance No. 4028-85 of the city of Clearwater : i Notice is hereby' given that a municipal referendum election will be held in the City of Clearwater, Florida, on Tuesday, October 1,' 1985, to determine whether the property known as the Island Estates' , " Wastewater Treatment Plant shall be developed <and maintained other : ~ than in open space and public utilities by use in the Clearwater Marine Science Centef expansion'of its facilities in~'accordance wi ':h the finding of the City Comrnissi'on, and \<"he.ther such real 'property may be sold to the Clearwater Marine Scienc~ Center for , ' I such exp~nsion, shall be approved by a majority of the votes .'11 cast in che referendum electiori by the qualified electors 1n the I City of Clearwater. A~ required by Ordinance No. 4028-85, this notice is given by publishing the foregoing Ordinance No. 4028-85 in full as follows: , . '\ . ! "\\ ;, '''\ . j .I \ .\ :1 \"1 .,....._-.... Agenda No. Meetlng Dote MEMORANDU.M TO: puj) -3 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater 8-15;"85 SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential and a Zoning Atla.s Amendment Crom RM-16 (Medium Density tlulti-Family Use) to RPD -18 (Residential Planned Development) for M&B's 44.013, 44.02 and 44.011 less Lake and lass E. 250 Feet, and Coachman Ridge Condo Phase I & II, and a Final Master RPO Site Plan for Calibre Ridge Apartments (Multiple, Calibre Co. of Tampa, lnc./City) LUP 85-22, Z-85-9, PSP 85-23. RECOMMENDATION: - - - A. City Commission approve the Land Use Plan amendment to High Density Residential and the Zoning Atlas amendment to RPD-18 on the SUbject property; and direct the City Attorney to include this in an ordinance. B. City Commission approve the linal master RPD site plan for Calibre Ridge subject to the following conditions: 1. Final design 01 the storm drainage/retention system be approved by Public Works; 2. A 15 foot drainage and utility easement for the off-site drainage pipes and a drainage easement around the lake be provided; 3. All recreation impact fees be paid prior to certificat.ion o! the finnl site plan; aDd 4. The requisite initial building permit(s) be procured no later than February 15, 1986 and all requisite certificate(s) of occupancy be procured within two (2) years from the date of issuance of the initial bUilding permit. : [} And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located north 01 Stag Run Boulevard.and west of U.S. 19 abutting the Florida Power Right-Of-way. The site is partially developed with the Coachman Ridge Condominium Phase I and II and contains 12.85 acres M.O.L. The internal lake known as Lake Gloria and presently zoned AL (Aquatic Lands) is not proposed to be rezoned. Presently three condominium bUildings exist on the site containing a total of 24 units. Plans are to construct seven more buildings with a total of 183 units. At completion, the project would consist of ten buildings with 207 apartment units at a net density of 18 units per acre. The existing condominium units are proposed to be purChased and made a part of the apartment development. The subject property was a part of the property under a prior agreement to ' annex between the BlaCkburn's and the City. The property was recently annexed with an RM-16 zoning designation. The plans for a 207 unit reSidential development on the site had been in existence since the development of the existing buildings on the site. The new developer is desirous of completin~ the originally planned 207 unit development. In order to do so, a ~and Use Plan amendment ls necessary to permit the development whi.ch calculates to 18 units per net acre. The RPD-18 zoning would limit the development to no more than 207\ units. The Resource Development Committee on July 30, 1985 recommended approval of the final site plan. I The Planning and Zoning Board on JUly 30, 1985 recommended by a vote of 6 to 1 to approve the Land Use Plan amendment to High Density Residential, the Zoning Atlas amendment to RPD-13 and the final master RPD site plan for Calibre Ridge. Commission Disposition: ,. Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued 10 dor. Foi low-up Act ion: \ . Submitted by: Advertised: &J Affected Costs: '\ ! -\ Parties Funding Source: . \. Date: 7/19/85 Notified o Capital lmprove- .City Manager PaplJr: of Mee 1 ing ment 6 udg et Clw.Sun o Operating Budget o NOf Required o Nor Required o Other ~Attochments: Petitions Date eSequentiol Reference Originotinq Depar tmen t: ApprocriaHon Code 1 I 0 None PLA~~I:\G I 1 "1 .. ... : . 1 L-lr--' I I r~~" T~[]~. y:. ~mllllfllllllll tlllllrrnnlllllllllTTmrnfrmrrnllllnTIT(j'j r - , I I I . . .. ,. o ~ WI \ :I, t . .... ,~ lfl W . ,.'::.: '. ) <r " ..J "- ~~~, .. ,".""", t ~., z.. .... . <; r ~ ~ -..:' ::E ~ .,."..1 Xl!.., r t'.'t'U ' I" . z.. <l . 0 I .. ~. u '. ~ o:.,v~:,~.~r. . ,'. ~.. ~ ~o ., : . -j ~~J " o'! "'..~: . ~ ;j ...,...-J . h.........ft 'f'"j, .~ -.. 1_ ~:' 'I ~~ t :. j'::" :'~.I,' :.:'oe;\ :. ....' ,~ ... ~ 1-2..-- , , , ' . . " t I t t r WI n . I ,,;1 ...: . \! 'l . - . \ . . \~~'~l JJ l-- - . - I ....-..-..: -I U I ...:: I :: I ~-, w . g I .r ~-~ , -....-..,. , ... ' :i I , t \ ' ~ ~ u~ t ( < F ,--0 , I I . <:.. : I .. ! ',' , .'..- ':~ :'..~.~ f..:' :.~':.. ..............:.._Z.... . -....:,. :.......~., .,/. ~..:....:..:.. :.-. .:..._...~. . .-.., -. LAND Cn~.~___~ _.-~~ CIT..Y .INITIA TED ~ -.--- ..PRd~DOSED USE PLAN, AiV1ENOMENT ...~ . REZ01\JIN'G Q' 'ne r M P -C'~-v 0 ---~1--10N . "l. ~ S - 9 .... . UL-rl LE. PROl""_..11 :'~,",nr-I . '-uP ~5-2.3 " -- - M q ~ 's Lt 4 - 0 13 I 44 - 0 r 2. J LAND USE Z 0 N 1 N G 4l( -0\\ t LESS LA~E:) 44-0' LE:S S - MEDIUM oe:,..,s - lA\<E'J LESS E 250 FT. ::rom: RES, D€'t.,)~ tAl- :;:~cU:;,: RM-16 <:oA":"~ MAl\.\ R\ DGE: C.O NO 0 \-1\ G A OE).J S J .V . n -r P t-\ II. . t.o ~ ~EStDEN"'r'\ A.L t.o.; R?O- \B I'" t-I .L. ~ \-=3 ~ '3 '3 Ai.... t?::. .. . . ~la~ning and 7 "'2.0 ~8 ,. _Cl,~ ty_ . 0_ It- -8 r- .' CC n'ea~,~.g .Ite~ .~1..:~b;'r Lon,ng Board -;;1 _ ~c..."'_s,'ono." J ... ! Section 6 Township 2.q Range \6 .~.'i:l~s ?~ge 0-15 ,,_-.. -:-.~. _..'_ .... ~.... -:--. _ ~.III". .......i~.,. __'-~: ~.._~ . ,,~R .r ~., , , , I I "~-1 fJ. I~ ~~ " - .. 0 cii. ..c ... k :J 0 .. Z .... .. L: :;. ~ ,'/ - .... o ... rJ U ~ 6t "S "11 ..; III ..j a: '"I'll ;';1;':I:i III Q I ... Co . , . on ... on t I t I t I I I t 'IM~ "'/1:/ I 0- 1 I ~ ~ \ , .....- . ,'~~ ...'....._ _. ill ~ ' c' .' ; ~.. t ~h l~ i I I > ; I ',. '"" > .... ... >. .. ... . t> ... . ... .... ::I l:l " ... U'l '2 ;a .... C \I ~ .. .... u "!:l a: ',\ ~ .",/ '1\ T',<.~ July 5, 1985 'ro: Clearwater City Offi.cials CleatWater City Hall Clearwater, FL FIn-1: ltcIreaNners of coachman Ridge COndos. 2550 Stag Run Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33575 Dear City Representatives: , . . In reference, to the. notice of public hearing listed here belOw: we are requesting you to represent our best interest by voting in favor of the prolX'sed zone change to RPD and the LUP change to High Oe.nsi ty Residential. )' :JOT!C~ 0~ PUOLIC :JShitt~t~ C~:'C1ISSIO:~ ~'Ic::nIH":; ROO'.I, elf'f HhLLt Cla;".'.mter, F'lori:1n TUe3day, July 30, 1985 at 1: 30 p.::!. .. Pl:1nllin~ and Zonln'~ !lo3rd AND thursday, ^~t 15, 1985 nt 6:30 p.m. - Clp.ar~atc~ City eO~~isJlon To consider re~uest for a~en1ment to the Comprehensive Land U~e Plan :.and the Zoning Atla:s of t~le City or Clearw.1ter: J 1) ZO:Ir: - From RM-16 (Multl-F~mily U~n Distrlct) to RPO (n~31dcntint Pl~nncd nevel~pmcnt) - Fro~ ~ndiu~ Density Rcaldentint to :H~'l Density Hesid~nt hI L:JP J :1 ~ A's 44.013, :PI.1J12, 411.011 lC3S Lakc, Q4.01 less Lalcc t 1033 E: 251J F't, t;oacltm'Jn ltid:;e Condo p~t I !& II, .:iec 6-29-16 loci\teu :1 of ~::ta3 Run Hlvd, ~oJ of U.i 19 (C~llbro ~ld3c/Clty) ~ 65-9 LUP 95-22 We feel it is in everyones best interest to c:arplete the requested changes as quickly as };Ossible so that the project can finally be ~leted and the city tax rolls will benefit as well. Thank you in advance for your pra11pt attention, action, and repre~tation. Sincerely, COachrran Ridge Condo Hc::rreotmers , ') cc: Mayor - Kathleen Kelly. City Manager - Anthony Shoemaker , City Carmission - Rita Garvey, Jarres Berfield, tee Regulski, Don winner Planning Director - Paula Harvey ~ ~ ;;r> Jt./r1.' '1. /'{cU{/~.-~/ 13 !d~ tt-juC ([, ~:;L h , -;f4~#C, / ~'\....~il1ui: .6/3 Park- c. -M1<!.1'L';- f)"I,' I- 6:A1 fA.. ~: ~W ~~.J~ J ~"\.J\.' ~~. ( \, 'Z&J;:' /-6<Jitr;:-( Tt-...C ~ /.~ L 'f! Q ~. 11 ___ lIN'L~ *111 LLX e..e~ .'.. (: ~(~ ~ I,. q..~.' I ' , J ( /) J I. ' ( )' 1- t I 1..2. ..:1- rJ'laUIIJ f.._ >, !JJ.I cc..../ i{ SCI - .' I..l. { There are only 12 CMner residences in the Cocahm3n Condos. All the other units are unsold. All 'are in favor of the zone change. Only 9 are local full time residents. 'l11eir signatur~s are here.. I - ~u~-a;i!II<II\r;Q"'tWI_B"~~~-'~_.~~_'._I_""~.!'D"""n_-?---- _. t~ L r----.l ~,,~~.~~~~...~~"Wi.~~~~.'~'~~~~R~-:- .,~,.---:~,,~~.,...~:.~,...,..,,~.~, _ f"c':::~~"" ~~.... _._-.' ..J....'.....f! .: ~ .,. :\ I ..\\ ... .. ~;.! .,;1 .).~ ,./ July 5,' 1985 1'0: Cleat'Water City Officia.ls Clearwater City Hall Clearwater, FL . , . , FKM: Hareowners of Coachman Ridge Condos. 2550 Stag Run Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33575 Dear City Representatives: .., ~. In reference to the notice of public pearing listed here bela,.J: we are requesting you to represent our best interest by voting in favor of the proposed zone change to RPD and the WP change to High Density Residential. :IOTICS ~? PUOLIC :.ISAiH:I:I C"):,!:.II53IO:I :'IC:ZT!1l'J ROO'I, CI ry H^LL, Clc,'\r',mter, Florl:Jn Tue:sday, July 30, 1985 at 1: 30 p.::!. - P1::1nnln3 and Zonin~ ~o:ird AND ThW':lday, AlJ.gU3t 1S, 1985 at G: 30 p.m. - Clear...atcr City C:>'Tl'ni:U{Oil To co~slder re~uest for a~cnj~ent to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan ~nd the Zon1ng Atlas of t~e City of Clearwnter: 1) ZO:li:; - From 01.'-16 (~iultl-f"=1.;nUy Use District) to RPD (n~~idcntint Pl~nncj Devet~pmcnt) LUP - Fro~ ~~dium Dennity Renldcntinl to ilioJ'1. Density Re~ldcntlal :1 ~ A's 44.013, QQ.012, 4Q.011 le3s Lake. q~.Ol less Lake, less E 250 F't, Coaa:l~'Jn JUd'Je Condo P!l I & II I .~ec 6-29-16 located ~J or ~H:1~ nun 81 vel, l.~ or U., 19 (C31ibre ~ld1Q/City) Z 05-~ LUP 95-22 We feel it is in everyones best interest to carplete the requested changes as quickly as possible so that the project can finally be ccrnpleted and the city tax rolls will benefit as well. . ' Thank you in advance for your prompt attention, action, and' representation. Sincerely, Coachman Ridge Condo Hcxrec:Mners cc: Mayor - Kathleen Kelly City Manager - Anthony Shoe:rrakcr City Ccmn:ission - Rita Garvey, Jarres Berfield, Lee Regulski, Don \'linner Planning Director - Paula Harvey f<.m.~{~- ~ :'1'- z;:;~~ ~ 3;~ ~/~}; :>\~I\ ~h/1!.~. . ~~ -f~If'- oJ 3~1 ~~~ c::... ~~ ,--)J /A- L~C J t-<~,~,(.~- ," ~ \\ " -7 / ~ I l There are only 12 a,.mer residences in the coachm3n Condos. All the other units are unsold. All are in favor of the zone change. Only 9 are local full tiJre residents. Their signatures are here. ., ,. '~~..." ..'. ~ ., :IOT.tCS 01 PUBLIC HSAiH!1G C8:-tHS3IO:l ~.l~:n r:l::: R':X)"I, CI rY BALL I Cle:1r',mter, F'lorUn Tuc3day, July 3D, 1985 at 1:30 p.~. - Planning and Zonin~ 1o~rd AND Thur3day, Augunt 15,' 19B5 nt 6:30 p.m. - Clear.../ilt.er City COlllli:JsiOi1 " To consider request for amund~ent to the Comprehensive Land U3e Plan and the Zoning Atlas of the City of Clearwnter: " 1) ZO~E - FrOM nM-1G (Multi-Family Use DlstrLct) to RPD (Residential Planned Devela~ncnt) LUP - From Mcdiu~ Density Residential to nigh Densit~ nesidontial ~ & B's 44.013, 44.0121 44.011 less Lake, 44.01 less La ke, l03S E 250 F t, Coachman n id,3e Condo Plt I ~ II " See 6-29-16 located N of Stn~ Run Blvd, W of,U3 19 (Calibre Ridge/City) Z 85-9 LUP 95-22 ~2(A) ZO~E - From B (Business) to RM-16 (11ulti-Fa~ily Use Dintrict) ~&B 33.03 See 17-29-15 & M~D 22.01 See 20-29-15 LU? - rrom CTF (Coll~ercial/Tourist Facilitic~) to ~cJiu~ Density Reside~tial Portion It&B 33.03 See 17-29-15 Located on E side Gulf 31vd, 5 oT toll-booth' Z 55-10 LUP 33-25 (B) ZO~S - rrom a (nusiness) to n~-28 (~ulti-F~~ily Use District) M~B Q3.02 See 19-29-15 located on ~ side Gulf 9lvd, ~ of Cabana Club Condo Z85-11 (C) Z.Jne - FrorJ D (BlJsine:is) to P.:.1-16 (~-1ulti-r-a~ily Use Distri~t) H~a Q3.01 ~ Sand Key Condo South 3each 1501, See 19-29-15 located on B side Gulf Olvd, S of Sand hdY Condo, oayside Gardens lI'Z 85-12 .. .. "2 - A,B & C - (A:neric~m Desin;n & Develop:nent Cor:J/City) Flo~ida Statute 236.0105 states: ~ny ap~licant appeatinJ a jecision of this board m~st have a verbatim record of t~e proceedin3s to support such an appeal. ,\ Citizens may ap?ear to be heard or file Hritten notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to a?propriate Public Hearin5. II ./ '\.1 /'\l Paula Harvey, Plannin8 Director ? 0 Box Q7~5, Clearwater, rL 33518 Lucille ~illiams, City Cler~ , , ftpplic::u1t or represent~tive MUST BE PRF.SEtrr to addl"'ess the r~1uestelj ai.lend~ent at BOTH Public ilearin13. YOO ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY . WInIIH 200 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. Those City La~d Use Plan A~e~i~ent~ suhj~ct to nrpro'l~l hy t~~ ?in~11a~ Plaonin3 C~u~cil ~ill be forw3rded to the PPC for ?u~lic Henrio3 su~sequent to ,Public Hearin:;; a:1d action by the City COll:nission. ADV: 7/13/85 "\ c::.~.ca. __""\:"" ~ o....~_~~ . . <::::'__-:::.a.- ~~ ~~............,-,,--t0"- "--.......... ~~..,~0 ~,~,--- , " , . ~-.....-~ (':~,'='-~~ ' ~ '-"'-'-\::... ~~'U..-"""-_-S ~,,~,~___ .', ~ ~.~ ~'-~~_:,~'-~\. ~:~ ~~~~~&-~.t:C..... ~~& '~ .;.....~ ~~ ~~ ~"'''!;''-'~:~::':'-;''-~_\'''__' ~ c--'--~ ~~_"-"""'''''....:...~.', "" ~ ~ ~.' ,--~I..~--~.....~-....--~ ~ -'-~...........~...........; /' ,. ';.- Ii , ,I b7 II Agenda No. . ME MORA N DUM TO: fJY;' 7 Meeting Date 8-15-85 The Ci.ty Commission 'of t,he City of Clearwater SUBJECT: Land Use Plan Amendment from Commercln.l/'l'ourist Facilities to Modium Density Residential on N. 400 Ft. of M&B 33.03, Sec. 17-29S-15E nnd a Zoning Atlas Amendment from B (Business) to RM-IG (Medium Density Multi-Family Use) on M&B 33.03, Sec. 17-29S-t5E and M&B 22.01, Sec. 20-29S-15E (American Design & Devel. Corp./Clty) LUP 85-25, Z-85-10. RECOMMENDATION: Ci ty Commission continue this i tern to l t.s meeting of S~pt.ember 5, 1985. [] And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located on the enst side of Gulf Boulevard immediately north of Sand Key Condo, Bayside Gardens IV. The site is vacant and contains 8.64 ncres M.O.L. The Land Use Plan classification is Medium Density over the southern 6.34 acres. The northern 2.3 acres is classified Com~ercial/Tourist Facilities and proposed to be amended to Medium Density Residential. The zoning over the entire parcel is B (Business), on older zoning.designation which remains on the property as a result of a Court Order issued for Case No. rS-4765-7, United States Steel Corporation vs. City of Clearwater. The order found City Ordinance No. 1749 .to be invalid for the purpose of rezoning those properties on Sand Key owned by the U.S. Steel Corporation. Legal counsel and staff feel that sufficient opportunity and time have passed to allow development to occur on the property under the B (Business) zoning category. It is recommended that ,the City Commission proceed to rezone th~ subject property and to amend the Land Use Plan to Medium Density Residential for the proposed RM-16 zoning. The Planning and Zoning Board continued this item at its meeting on July 30, 1985. Co",mi~<;ion Disposition: ,. Approved as R ecommended/Revised/C,nditional 2. Continued to Follow -up Action: d"r~ ~Submjtted by: Costs: Nt t\ Funding Source: D Capital Improve- ment Budget o OperlJting Budget o Other ~Attachments: Drawing Advertised: Dote: 7/19/85 City Manager ?o~er: Clw. Sun ) liJ Affected Parties Notified of Me etint; , CJ Not Required CJ Not Required Dote a Sequential Reference Originating Depcrtmen t: PLANNING o None Ap pro priation Cod e ~ I ~ ... I ~ ~.I . tltl~' 4! Mt."" ..: .~, lUM'Ma 01' UICY ~".Ll H.....U..H U LIMt, .lutH ltllr -fO I. CI"Ur,IO IU""r, I UH or '~lIprll". IU"1~lI 0' 'lOr It t I AI III W.U ,~ ,rtlla~ ~ ,':TO!ln CH.-utl" CI ,.," \l.UOC1U. Tlllt fo..t IMUllau. ALL' LAlla I; rwrt" rI.r Lrlll 0' I ,..'uUrL fO fHI: UIC OISUlfcr 0' '0 'T" I"" O{""!D II. ne". "'~L4~. __. -.... ~ -... ' t."..~. ~ . ~." _ . ..!.. I ,~ I.~ . ~-r F 28 ~ ..~....~---~..,-, -- - .. /I e ,.) . , . I , . (, . , , '- ':":i ... o ..Q .... . .... ". ': : . o J: ~ NoTe:: R E''' e-R."\ eD gA<.~ To 'B 'f'FR c..ocJt2T oRDER. [, , [' .... (1J .' L r.... ......... - .... ~ CITY INITtA TED - '_'H_ 'PROPOSED PL.AN . AIVlENDMENT )a1fl . REZ01\J/NG LAlYO USE O....n. e :" z 8;- 10 LU P CO S- - 2. ,. N 400' Mc;:.e, "3~-03 2.3D A<- FRO?==~iY o S.5CRIF710N : AJv1EI<\c:..AN D~C;\G.-~ € t)\:V LAND USE tJ 4.00' :-0..... o~ '-1 ..~ .... (..OMMcR'-\~c... /l"r; M E:.DI "M 'D ~ -..J .., ;: 0; R E""$ , Co E tJTt 0.. C- r~,:;~~ ~-}j",.."" Co tlV LVP ONLY ZONING .":'_........ 'B ...... ........8uSt HESS pt;b 1 ic r.ea. :"l.ng Item :\~r.'loer Z 0 ,.., { PoJ G- [\ItCi, e 3 3~o3 SEe.. 17-'2..'1- IS" M~ B 2.2.-o( ';cC'.- '2o~2c:r- IS' \cTA L B, 61.; Ac... ~- . ~ C : .!.a~;1~ne anG7_30_85 ~r. 8- 15'. B 5' ~c~~ng ~card Caw~ S510n ~o.:~RM-\6 'I Sec:ic:117 f.2." TO.....oshi? ~,q Range l S- .~.:l3.s ?a.!;e 1-1 ~ I. - 3. , : II ... . aI~ ~l~ I I I C I , ~; .............. :0. . I ~ '~\ . ;./ . , " , \) ,1 '. ~. 6&> 'J Agenda No. Meetl ng Dote 8-15-85 /(.., MEMORANDUM TO: pJP / The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: Zoning Atla.s Amendment from I3 (l3usiness) to RM-28 (High Density Multi- Family Use) for M&B 43.02, Sec. 19-29S-15E (American Design and Devel. Corp./City) Z-85-11. RECOMMENDATION: Ci ty Commission continue this item to its mee.t.lng of September 5, 1985. [] And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located on the west side of Gulf Boulevard adjacent to and north o'f the Cabana Cl ub Condomini urn. The, "si te is vacant and contains 7.57 acres M.Q.L. The Land Use Plan classification is High Density Residential with a zoning designation of B (Business)J an older zoning deSignation which remains on the property as a result of a Court Order issued for Case No. 78-4765-7, United States Steel Corporation vs. City of Clearwater. The order found City Ordinance No. 1749 to be invalid for the purpose of rezoning those properties on Sand Key owned by the U.S. Steel Corporation. Legal counsel and staff feel that sufficient opportunity and time have passed to allow development to occur on the SUbject property und~r the B (Business) zoning category. It is recommended that the City Commi.ssion proceed to rezone this property. The Planning and Zoning Board continued this item at its meeting on July 30t 1985. Commic:o;ion Disposition: 1. Approved as Recommended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued to Follow-up Action: dttl.. Submitted by: , Advertised: EZl Affected Costs: N/~ G:l A tta chm ents: Date: Parties Funding Source: 7/19/85 Notified o Capitol Improve- Drawing City Manager Poper: of Meeting ment Bud g et Clw.Sun Cl Operating Budget Cl Not Required o Not Required o Other Date 6 Sequential Originating Departmen t: Appropriation Code '\) Reference PLANNING o None " L .~"..c . j .~. I ~-- ~.~ CITY INITIATED. v . . PROP.OSEP _ R~,~?ONJNG l\l~ n,\ - C .l..J...!.--a::,..' - .-" 02 J: ~ \0 ....,. 0 '^ .::... t) I- - \.1J <( => (I). 0 U) c.oNDO IJ111[111111111111111111111111111 X NOT€': RE\I€C2l' cD 6~~ "'\0 13 P R . Cou oRnE.R ",rao 43.02 "N - 0- 00 to Cu 0>- NUJ ~ Do O~ U) o o .. N .J .J < ~ < w V" t f - - - - - - - - - - .." t C M D U I * ~ ~ ~iRM28::' ~-:. S If ~ (;A~~ ~J- ~ " ... UJ ~ \4 Cl. MlB' .q~'02 v Mt6 o u -- ~ Q,I ~' 48' I;:~. ~. -... .: ~ ~: -...,."'...,r- .....--- -- - .2- ~5-1' Cwne:- AM E: R' <:: A. N 0 E:S l C. N ~ Oe:V <:. 0 R P Rec.uesi: rrom ,B (8US\t-.l~SS) Prooert.v 6 ~ MftB 4'3.0"2.. 7657 At:- P lal!ning and 7- '5 o. a 5' I - C~ ty . a - 15~ 9.5" Zon~ng Board _ Commls S 10n . . . ... Sect ion \ q TO'..;nship 2..'? Range IS A'tlas Page j ~ \< 3 ~~~~~:M-..' ~~~....-~--. ~~.....~~~~~ - to RM-2.8 Hearing Ite)j1 NUI:1be. <#<_-::'..~~ ,. " . ~l~ 1$ , bC(' ^ Agenda No. M EM 0 RA N 0 U M TO: fu [) - f.o Meeting Dote a-15-ij5 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: Zoning Atlas Amendment from B (Business) to RM-16 (Medium Density Multi-Family Use) for M&B 43.01 and Sand Kev Condo South Beach 1501, Sec. 19-29S~15E (American Design & Devel. Corp.,"Multiple/City) Z-85-12. RECOMMENDATION: City Commisston continue this it.em to its meeting of September 5, 1985. [] And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located on the east side of Gulf Boulevard adjacent to and south of Sand Key Condo, Buyside Gardens II. The site is partially developed with one condominium containing 64 units. The Land Use Plan classification is Medium Density Residential with a zoning designation of B (Business). an older zoning deSignation which remains on the property as a result of a Court Order issued for Case No. 78-4765-7, United Stat.es Steel Corporation vs. City of Clearwater. The order found City Ordinance No. 1749 to b~ invalid for the purpose of rezoning those properties on Sand Key owned by the U.S. Steel Corporation. Legal counsel and staff feel that'sufficient opportunity and time have passed to allow development to occur over the entire subject property under the B (Business) zoning category. It is recommended that the City Commission proceed to .rezone this proper ty. The Planning and Zoning Board continued this item at its meeting on July 30. 1985. <' Commic:<;ion Disposition: 1. Approved as A ecomntended/Revised/Conditional 2. Continued to Fo,low-up Action: a<il~ Submitted by: Advertised: Date~ 7/17/85 F'aper: Clw. Sun CJ Not Required o Not Required Costs: t;11 ,\ Funding Source: o Capitol Improve- ment Budget o Operating Budget o Other City Manager Ea Affected Parties Notl fi ed of Meeting G:J Attach m ents: Drawing Dote 8 Sequential Reference Originating Deportment: PLANNING o None Appropriation Code / , . .... - ::>> c.:. , , ~ ! -1 ~._--= -::---~--~ 'I , :< 0 to- Ww ~'Q~\ I.C ... 'e:> 0::: ':4" , ' 1 .... I Dc..owV "1e/q' ;! I' ZuO l/lcn- '101 '" <:f . 1 I fRmIV12 :' t I - .. .~ z. z " 0 uJ I") U 0 ~~j :z:t.:I ( . , . '. c -'-' 1 ~ Vi t1)>- l .:a '. . . Lv~DCJ il glfnlllHJllIIT 1~~9 nn = ...711 ~ * ~. ~R 16 I', c:::__ _ : J: >- u uJ <' ::':0 W OlD 02 J: 20 I- <( U ::J Ul . fA (;) o 01 N (Xl -;- 0 '<t"Ltl -lD o .. -," I 1 * 1--' NorE RE VEQ't'~ tit B A(..~ 10 i 'I 13 1'€'K r.ov joR Dt:~ I I .' I ' _.-:1... !' '..--___ _ I . . 1= 0- oJ = 0 0 ~ =Z1t) ; = 0- oil! =u......ot .., = ~ to ... = >- CD . . = w - =~J:"" = I- = O::::l t, =zO =<(Ul =Ul - - .,' Q \.) .... .. " ~ .. c ..J - -, ..~ . . " v fA! I,lll! "~'02 iRM .. ... , '" " ~ .. n " ;. \I - ~ --.-:.. -... _ r-"I..__. ~:':,;._ -: - .- Owner Property MSS 43.01'~ SANP K€V coNDo souTH 6 EA c. '"" J 5' 0 1 '3.\8 A~ Hearing Item Nwnber . li~~~~~n~o:~~7- 30. - S5 I c~-"!;~~; ion B-I!;-65": '" Section \C\ Township 2<J Range IS Atlas Page j Et \:::.'3 __~....:r;o:=-..,. ..______..........-- .:....:'- _ :"""""!:;..-:.---- ~~....~...--.;: ..... .... -~ -- ... - - -~... - ...--- ,- ..--~ .... ......-- - ..---- z s; -~) 2.- - -..;..". -"--- . ---- Request from to R.M.16 , , ~ l:r:; ;i ., - .. ::l U \: . ~f j' ~" . ." - '" .<= oJ .. ~ ::.. D t::=' ..; iii o <:> "" ,.. 'W - 6t '5 '/1 ''P1i ~".l~;>:t Q I I I c> I ~ " p , II '" . ":l > ... <rl >.. "l m , 0 ... , ~ ... :I t.:l ..: . '1'1 't1 OJ: 'tl ~ .. c:.. ... ., ... III oJ ... ~ n u ~1~ la . GAl:' ~~C1 I J ~/