Loading...
09/10/1973 ".,,;~: ,.,;,:.~ H&,~~~;,.~~~?:S""t~~..~r:~~:'~,!~~"f\t,l~~,:,,~~~~~~~;,~;~~~1fr.~:r~~~\Y~", t -. '~_:~~,:.:....: I ..:~~:..:..~... .~...... ........., .' ~ ..~\.... ....-.i"'.....~Qro .....,.J,..;:....~ .:..... ......t....oI Li....W.j--'Oo;.;'\eA :;.' U~,a.Wv". ,~'.....~.". .\00",-:4' . :...-~..:.\ :;';';U'Wj~~"""'~"':L. '-.." ..I.....!-....,l~~.~. ..~.,i'.'1~l..I..L........w..:..:...<<21.u;.:.~~....~~r.:c,.. . ' .". J ,,'. tf, ,', , ~ . < CIlY COMMISSION MEerING Sc.ptombtl.r 10. 1973 The City Commlsaion of tho City of Cloar\:ato.r mot in special uesnion at tho City lIall. llonuclY, Soptomuol" 1 0, 1913, at 1: 30th m.. wi th tho followinG mombors pl"osont: ,,!\,- "~ ""t_ ' , :::t d,' ;~( "j ,~, , f , 'I i ;':,: I ~ ""'. '~ :-- j- 1 t ill l:vurott Hour,en "'Donald S. Hilhamll Richard U. Wachtlor Rick lIall 11clyor "Commi ssionor Commissioner' Commissionor Commissioner Auean t: Joseph Carwiso Alao present wore: lJuana Zusay Herbert l-t. ilrown Paul l30rgmann Jack 1'1011 c Frank Daniels Commissioner Assistant City ;'Iana"er city Attorney Planning Director' Chicf Plannor' Police Chief *Coll\missione.r ',iilliarns arriveu uurinlJ tho consideration of Item Ill. loning Amendments. The Mayor called the rneet:in~ to oriJer and announcod tha. t the purpose of this special meeting was a consideration of various rel.oning requests and other proposed amendments to the zoning laws. The invocation WclS given uy Chief Daniels. The :1ayol" presented the Employee of the :10nth Awa.rd to E1inot' Hawkins. Administration Division. Police IJapartment. , A Public Hearing on Lot :-lowing Ra$olution fl73-115 - Tho City Attorney referrad to Resolution d"l3-1l5. which had bean passed and adopted on AUBust 27. 1973. and requested the City Inspector to report on the current condition of tho lots l."ecantly inspected. The Inspector repol"ted that the lots remaining to be cleared repl"Gsented a menace to public health, safety and welfare. Thera were no Objections. COIlunissioner I'lachtler moved tha.t Reso- lution fl73-l15, passed on August 27. 1913, be confirmed and made effective as . to all persons and parcels listed thereon, 'except for those whose lots have been verified as being cleared and those who have paid the City for the Clearing. and that the proper City officials and Employees be directe.d to proceed in accordance with la\v t:o sce that the lots at'c clearcd. :'Iotion' was seconded by Commisl:doner Hall and carried unanimoUSly. A Public Hearing on Proposed Amendments to the City Z.oning Laws and Haps - 1. Change from RH-54A (high density mult:i-family) to KS-50 (single family) tho following prope~ty: North lu5 ft. of East 170 ft. of West 200 ft. of Southwest Quart!;;r (S~'l 1/4) of Horthwes1: Quarter (Nt! 1/4). Section 11-29-15. - UiPao10 'fhe Assistant City Hanagcr read tha rccoJiII'l\enuation of the Planning and Zoning Board for HH-12 ('duplex-apartment) 2:onin~ in lieu of i~S-50 (single family) zoning, and explained that this request and other requests t:o be pre- sentod at this ffioetinr, were staff initiat:ed and staff sponsored actions to modify zoning inconsistEmt with that of the surrounding areas. Commissioner Hall questioned the desirability of approving a leso l"estr>ictive zoning than the category (RS-50 ) cited in the pUblic hearing advertisoment. Commissioner \~illiams exprossed a preference for the requested RS-50 zoning. FOllowing further discussion. Commissioner Hall moved to cOn1:inue the. public hearing for this item to the meeting of October 1st, at 1: 30 P.i1., with appropriate rea.dve1'>tisement stating the lW-12 (duplex-apartment) zoning recollllllended. :10tion was sccondeJ. by Commissioner ~"'achtler and carried unanimously. 2. Change from R:1-12 (duplox-apt) and RH-16 (medium donsi ty multi-family) to RPD (residontial planned development) the fOllowing property: East 100 ft. Lot: 9 and West 1/2 Lot: 10. less East 90 ft. of West 140 ft. of South'190 ft. and lose North 90 ft. of South 280 ft. of West 140 ft. and less East 25 ft. of South 295 ft., Pincllas Groves. SE l/l~, Section 19-29-16. - Bowler & Koou. Inc. The Assistant Cit:y i"tanager reported that the Planning and Zoning BOard had' agreed to a continuanco' of this item to September 18th; a date of October 1st was recommended by the Assist:ant City Manager as the appropriate date fOr Com-, mission consideration of this i'tem. Commilisioncr i1achtler moved to continue " con,sidera tion of this roquest for rczoning to the Conuaission meoting date of ,October> l'st . at 1: 30 P.I-1. Hotion was seconded by Conunissionor Hall and carried ,unanil!lo~Bly . ..' "'. .... .,'". : " , .;,.',: .! .' "'.:::::~,j>{;:;ii~ . ,',,' , , : ~ L . " < . ' ,,\ ; " . . ... 1 . . , , .', ',' :\.... .' h,~, .. ""'~''''''''t.'f~.l<l<ib..<l~' "1'1 ~\'t;;l('J)t1!'r' ""~''''~N>''~~1~' ~l.~~".+~t.:: r.;..t"1..1l:-~ .J .wf,.~rf'r ;.i.~~;~.". ~~~~1~l\ -;':~,,{..,'~ t l;\~,;~~* ....~ ~"~.'Y';'t:'\:r 'i fj .~ .:('I.r:)'l!~ ",. ~ ! . ..i<:1,!"" . .t~i'1 ,:., \ ~ ~ ;', I::! 'l,t~::,~.:~L:L.~~~_~~~':";:>~'L:~~';':~"~;:"~\>>~~~~~:~;~L~I~~1i~~~~~ni~" ;.,',.,'/'., ",'V:' ." .~,. , ..2- CITY COHMISSION, MEETING Septomber 10, 1973 3. Change from R:1-S4A (high dens! ty multi-family) to ISP (institutional 'somi-public) Lots 9, 19 and 20, E. A. Marshall's Sub. - Sunsot Baptist Church. ' Tho Assistant City i1anagor' I'oported the Planning ana Zoning Board recom- mondation for approval of the ISP (institutional semi-public) zoning requested. Thoro were no objections. Commissioner Williams moved that the application foI' ISP (institutional semi-public) 7.oning be approved as recommended by 'the Planning and Zoning Beard and that the City Atto~ney be inst~ucted to include this is an amendment to the Zoning OI'dinance to be b~ought back to this Commission for app~oval as soon as possible. Motion was seconded by Commis- sioner l~ll and carried unanimously. 4. Chango from P 'publio) and RH-S4A 'high density multi-family) to ISP (institutional somi-public) Lots 19~ to 208 inol., Morningside Estates Unit 1, - Trinity Baptist Chu~ch. The Assistant City Manager reported the Planning and Zoning Board's recom~ mendation for denial of the change requested OSP - institutional semi-public). and read the Uoard!s I'ecommendation for PS 'prOfessional services) zoning subjoct to a covenant prohibiting residential use, restricting building height to 2-story construction, requiring paI'king areas and beautification to conioI'm to requirements o~ PS zoning and signs to conform to professional use I'equire- ments of the Sign Ordinance. The Board's reoommondation was described as compatible with the zoning of the surI'ounding area. The prope~ty owner's representative, Rev. William Kline, stated that the Church was now in the ~rocess of selling this property and supported the PS zoning recommended. Commiss1oner Williams commented on the potential of zoning this property ISP if the pI'operty should be sold to another church organization and moved to continue consideI'ation of this request, with appropriate readvortisement, to the Commission meeting date of OctobeI' 1st, at 1:30 P.M. Motion was seconded by CommissioneI' Hall and carried unanimously. Items #5 and U6 were considered jointly at this time as I'elated matters. 5. Change Lots 371 to 386 incl. and Lots 396 to 423 incl., Horningside Estates, Unit 4, from CTF 'commercial-tourist) to RS-7S 'single , family). - City. 6. Change Lots 3&9 to 370 incl., MOI'ningside Estates, Unit 4 from RM-12 (duplex-apt) to RS-75 (single family>. - City. The Assistant City Manager reported the Planning and Zoning Board recom~ mendation for' RS-75 (single family) zoning as compatible with the p~esent use of the properties under consideratfon. Commissioner Hall moved that the appli- cations of the City for RS-75 zoning be approved as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board and that the City Attorney be instructed to include these in amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to be brought back to this Commission foI' approval as soon as possible. The motion was seconded by commissionaI' .Wachtler and caI'ried unanimously. Items #1, #8, #9, #10 and #11 were considered jointly at this time as prope~ties now in public use foI' which P (public) zoning is appropriate. 1. Change Lots 179 to 187 incl. and Lots 272 to 280 incl., Del Oro GI'oves Sub. from RS-50 'single family) to P ~public). - City. a. Change from RPD (residential planned development) to P (public) the following described property: Begin 730 ft. North of Southeast corner of Northwest Quarter tNW 1/4) of Northwest Quarter 'NW l/~), Section 16-2Y-16 thence run North 95 ft., west 669 ft.. South 495 ft., Bast 469 ft., North 400 ft., East 200 ft. to P.O.B., less Chesapeake Villas Sub. - City. 9. Change Block 15, Woodvalley Unit No. 2 from RS.50 (single family) to P (public). - City. 10. Change from RPD (residential planned development) to P (public) the fOllowing described prop~r~y: Hegin 2482 ft. North of South- west cornel' of Southeast Quarter 'SE 1/4) of Southwest Quarter (SW 1/~) Seat.i.onM...29-l6 thence run North no ft., Southeastet>ly 1637 ft. along South line of S.C.L. I'ailI'oad, Southerly 148, ft.. Southwesterly along curve 220 ft., NOI'thwestcr1y 4~1 ft., West 198 ftc, Southwest 182 ft.. Southwesterly 74 ft., Northwesterly 600 ft. M.O.L. to p.o.e. - City. ',~', I :. ~ V~;');'::\(;":,,, .. . tt" '.'.:' ,", ..~. '.J .. t I '(- '.' ;n~J~i~\~:.:::~~~;i~}\> ~~,~, '" /, ',' ~," ',',' ;';,: , ',:.' , ~ 'i \h",.,).~~s:>'Y.;'J'l;- ....~ ,1. ~ !" i- ~." 'I \.".":I.~N', ""~ " t...." , , <"', , "I", " -"r'r~tu"1.vt~"'r'",,~'+( I .:. ~ ,,'. ,,' "I.t~ ' '" ~ i wl;h~.~J~{,;i,;~:,: ~:':::':" ; ;'~~ !', /'.,:; '.': ':: \;' ;' " ~ , ' ~.~ti-t iJ .;.....~~o., I'~ t." ~ :. ~ L, r. .. . "., ' . ..,r.~~~n~"~~:tJ:\:t~'":i~.~..~:l.'~J .'~.! .~. ". ;,: . '~l~. :~\>: '; '" .' u1f~'~"'~:"!.'<('i1i''''''-~'j:+' '," ~~.I':""J"" "~.. i't ~"l..'\,. ~.It '0 l ." ..... ..... , ,~ , .... " , ' , ~) l , t ' ", ~ ....,..l........ .! I ~ . . ....."...... ,.....I....."..U......~.........".,~....v,........;...~..~:"--~....,~~'I"'-:'1..1........tl , ".' " " , f 'Po . . I . . ~ " . T I' . ,', '. ,'.'. " .' I , . -J- CITY CmlaIGSIOii ;'U:r::'.l'I;IG Septembor' 10, 1!J7 3 11. East Billf of 1I0r'thoaat Ql..1ar'tla~ 'tU': l/l~) of !/ol'thwcst QUilr'tOr' (NYJ 1/4), Section l-2\J-l'!i, loas Valcncitl P<1r'k Unita 1 and 4 to be chanr,ou from RPD 'rosiden.tial planned developmont) to P (public), - City 'l'ho Assistant City :1ana[tGr identified tho proporty locations specifiod in thoue ~GqUGstB and ~oportod tho Plt.lnning and ~onin~ uoard recolllmendation for P (pu1.>lic) r'olooning. Commissioner' v/illiams moved that the applications of the City for' P zoning be approved as rocoJiunandod by tho Planning and ~oninc UoarJ and that the City Attornoy 1.>0 instructed to include these in amendments to tho Zoninu Ot'dinancc to be brought back to this Commission fot' approval as soon as possible, 12. Channa Lots 3, 4 anJ 5 and vacated streot, Cloarwator Industrial Park fr'om :1L (light rnanufacturin~) to P (public). - City Tho City Attorney roported that Ovtnor'S of propor'ty in the Clearwater Indus- trial Park objected to the proposGtl rezoning of Lots J, 4 and 5. Commenting on the purpose for which this property had be on purchased, the :layoI' stated his opposition to rezoning property planned for industrial purposes in ordcr to create a ball park. He concurred with argUllIents presented in the petition of o bj ec tion and sta te,d that he bel ieved tha t the City no w had enough park land for recreational USIl. Commissioner lIall emphasized the need to stimulate job opportunitios and to promotG the growth cycle potential roprGsented by this properoty. CommissionsI' i'lachtlor moved for withdrawal of this request. :1otion was seconded by Commissioner ./illiarns and carried unanimously. A Public Hearinn on Establishment of a ~~ew Use District - UC (urban center). The Assistant City l1anager reported the Planning and Zoning Board recommenda tion for approval of the proposod Article XXIV, ~ a now use district cla.ssification to bo known as UC. 'urban center') , subject to amendment of Section 24.03 (A) from ~40 gross acres to 20 gr'oss acres and revision of the last 2 sentences of Section 24.04 to read as follows: "Declared now Urban ContG.rs shall have a minimum act'eage of 40 gross acres fot' phased final plan approval. Declared redevelopment Url>an Centers shall have a minimum acreage of 20 gro~s acres for final plan approval.t1 Referring to Planning and Zoning Uoar'd memorandum of Augu~t 10th, the Planning Director described the major features of the recommendations made toward the establishment of this new district, pointing out the principal differences be- tween the requirements for redevelopment urban center's 'a.nd new urban center zones. Commissioner \~illiams discussed var'ious aspects of high density ~oning and Com- missioner Hall questioned the degree of density indicated for the proposed urban centers, 5ta ting that higher densi ty may be necessary to promote true UI'ban centor development. The Planning Director noted that restrictions in density in other areas of the City would be necessary to compensate for the recom:nended urban center density i~ maintaining a reasonable total population level. ~Ir. /.1. E. Palmer, Executive Director, and i'lr. Charoles Galloway, Jr., Vice-Chairman, of the Downtown UevolopmGnt Uoard spoke in favor of the proposed urban center classification and commented on the long rangG benefits to ve anticipated from this action in moating the competition from outlyin~ areas. dr. Charles d. Finton, Clearwater' resident, concurred in urban c~nter zoning for the downtown area but disagreed with its potential use in outlying areas of the City. He noted that such looning could prove an invGstrncnt vlindfall to some developers in specific locations. After further discussion of various aspocts of tho proposed zoning classification, Commissioner \1achtler moved for establishment of the UC (urban center) classification as recommended. :10tion was sE:.condod by COll1>nis- sioneI' Hall. Commissioner \'lilliams moved for amendment to condition final approval of this classification on the results of a city wido referendum, noting that the prospoctive change would affect the Gntir>c City. The motion for amendment was seconded by Commissioner Wachtler for purposGs of discussion. Commissioner Hall indicatcJ his interest in postponement in orde.r to study the total impact of the proposal, and moved to continue consideration of the proposal for a now use district CUC - urban center) to the Commission meetine date of September 24th, at 1:30 p.a. ;'Iotion was seconded by Co.nmissioner' \~achtlGr anl.l carI'ied unanimously. A Public lIearin[t on Proposed Amendments to the City Zoning Laws: 1, Amend Sections 5.01, 6.01, g.ll. 7.01, 8.01, 9.01, 10.Ul, 11.01 and 12.01 pertaining to use district classifications by deleting the second paragraph thereof and substituting a provision providing for more flexible application of 4 acre minimum area requirement. j~~~~~iv1ii"i"".i;~<.'" . ll,;"'i;~li,/"./ ., ," I . I. " ;v:i~:;~.\C~~~~~~;I~I:;/\'\~~~'_ .::::" ...:.\. , i. l ';'" . ~'._ ;.,if;'''.'f)~ !.':_"~",'" "'",'" " .' ' , , ,. Y.""'b..h"'..l.'.f."; . ~.., t... . 'If':JI~~-:!r:\.'I.'/:~ ."~f ,1:-1.10<' ...~.', . _ I.....'. .. f " . . r . , ~. I.~~JB~~J(J?;~J-i~(;.:j/ '.,;.:\;:>.~,~ :' .'. . ~;t.~~1~~.~-:~!::~.,..t.v.;~\' ..;\~r~{\r~.!.l"':~' ~~..ll".l~' i'~.', ':: ',:, , " , . . , , I : .;".' '; ,';.,' '.1. 'l ,'.' ," ( :, 'r ~.- ~l' t~; i './ " ',', : ;,,~, , ' ,~. ...~..,~.i. . fl' . . '",' f:" ..~c ',,"'" ...:.:.,.;........':'".-...."":'..".~" '.....l'~,...~.......~;;.~..'..~~'>-:f , ,,' . ~'fl::. ~!'f.f:~~,r.~rp!'1'*"~~!~-:?,-"1'"""R~7;t~rrm-:" \'i~t~c~t7;~'~~',"~~;1t'flij..,*~n~1,~(~~'~~1II"" ': ..~.\.;..t.l'~71".." ',':1' .:. ,t--"!.-1 .. . \' > 11,1~. ."f It~.,l, ..;.,..... ,- I ~.~:~.',r~~1 <..'o(PI:};.../I"~:f .;'. :",~ . ~ ~t. 't;~~if:~' '~~,~"~f >i:.~~ii"~\;{~,~, ..,', .I~ (::, ~~..~~).~\l~tJ.i~~:-:"~~,.~n~~Y.~~\~il,i1~~:'~L.t ~~. '" nl'''!.l ' ~""""""'>6~~~_ . \M ...... . '; '. ,; ,,'t ,'P{,~;lf1~\Ut;, ., ,'::,: :':"~,':;;';':4;~'JW;S;~~ . .' "';!"/,J',.;,~..Jlt't~ ,.' ;'; .... :}"[:;~':G~! " \ ' I . ~ ~ . 2. _1._ CITY CO:111!SSI\.)N l'lCC'1'IlIG September 10, 1~1J , Amond Scotion 9.U2 pot'taininH, to pormitted USCG undor Uuplox,:,Apart- mont RODi'dontial Diot1"ict by adding to (,1) tho 'wo1"ds "except thoso lots platted prior to data of this ort.1inanoQ - pOl" :l:one standardstl and adding to (2) tho words "par zone standard II . " 3. Amend Section 13.02 pert.lininu to pormi tted uses and ntruotures under lliUh Density ilulti-fa'mily Usa District, (1) by dcletinu "lloarding llouses, Lodging housos, motels and hotels" and add thase to Section 13.03, Spacial I:xcoption, .as (1). Also dclGte (4) froln Section 13.02 and add as (2) to Section 13. U3 r.lnu renumber aG required., Amenu Section 20.02 pcrtaininc to pCl"mitteu uses and structures under Professional Services District, by deleting (1), '2) and (6) and plo1cing (5) (b) as amenued as (3) (b). Amen:.! Section 20.03, Special Exceptions, by addinr. thereto (1), (.2) and (I)), deleted frollL Section 20.02 and renumber both Sections. ' 4. 5. Amend Saction 22. 02 pertainin~~ to permitted uses, Parkway Business District, by deletinB multi-family dwellings and town hOUSGS and adding thorn to Section 22.03, area and dimension regulations, and renumber as nocessary. 6. Amend Section 23.05 pertaining to area a.nd dimension reculations, General Business District, (3)(c)(1)(a) by res~ating setbacks. for clarification. 7. Amend Section 25.04 pertaining to prohibitad uses, COlrunercial Services j)istric~, by adding (13) to prohibit separate structures for apart- ment use only. 8. providins Article 29, Section 29 - to es:tablish an AL-Aquatic Land Zoning District Classification including Intent, Application, Permitted Uses, Special Exceptions, Prohibited Uses, Riparian Riehts, etc. ~. Amend Section 34.07 il€:.rtaining to ?('occr1urc for amending ZoninB Ordi- nance, Administration anj Enforcement, to provide a procedure for proccsGin~ and raview with reference to the comprehensive plan, request for zoning for annexation, und requ~st for rezoning. 10. Amend Scction 34.08 pertaining to nonconforming uses, Administration and EnforccUltlnt, by addinH to (3) (a) rel:1ting to discontinuance of non-conforming uses in a rene\.,tal arG.;J. as declared by Commission. Also. amend (1.\) to cl1anne thtl 65% shown to 50'6. The Planning Director explained the pur:>osa of each of the proposed amend- ments. The City Attorney stated that pa!'agraph (8) of the proposed Section 34.U7, (Item J19, above) Procedure for Amending Zoning Ordinance, nowapt>licd to annex- ation and zoning act~ons as well as rezon~ng requests where previously only rezoning items \o/o.re limited by this provision. ill'S. Karlc;.cn F. JeBlaker, Clcar- wa tel" resident, concurl'Qd with the procedural matters contained in the proposed section but objected to paragraph (6) with respect to 'the wording IIthree-fourths (3/4) of the S,i_ty...Commission presentll. Statinn t~at the Hording of this para- graph reflected a feature of the State law, the C~ty Attorney expressed the opinion that deletion of the word "presentll t%uld not be permissible. In further discussion of this paragraph (6), Commissioner ~'Jilliams stated that he. would favor application of this provision to annexation and zoning actions in addition to the rezoning category specified. Commissionort'Jilliams moved for a?proval of the zoning amendments proposed for Items ill, i12, #3, 1/5, /J6, if?, 118 and 1110 above, as recommended, and that the City Attorney be instructed to incorporate those amendments in the Zoning Ordinance to be brought back to this COJJul1ission for approval as soon as possible. aotion was seco:1dcd by Conunissioner Hall and carried unanimOUSly. Commissioner Williams moved to continue consideration of Items #4 and #9 above to the Commission meeting date of October 8th, at l:JO P.J1. Notion was seconded by Commissioner Hall and carried unanimously. Effect of the Law on Commission Voting - At the request of the Mayor and for the record, the City Attorney stated that the law requires a member of a public board to disolose the nature of the personal interest which may cause him to abstain from voting. North Osoeola Zoning Study - .' .". I' " . ' ,.' < , . ~,l '1.:1 ,; . \ ), ~ j : ", . " "" '\ , ' , ~. ; : :'.1 '~,f. , " .,. I , ., . }:,~:~1:'~ :'. ',,:, i;' ~""'~'.~~-'..''''':'b~'''':, '., ~.'O-~""'''--;.'~''''''''j,~...y't , ".. ':"'-.......~.- ......~~~.Ii~trf'..... . (.' . '. '.,,-,;,:, \/. ::~.~~\~(....:;t " ""l'.\~".,..~,...~~ , ',~':::':'~-:i,':/\{:~\;1i.ci*;. '. ",,,:, ''''''{\'''i.';{l\~~-r,: , :..' ':':;:,;;}:)S;j\;~;Ny~;:, I..,' .' '1 't;'''- ." ...'...~,~.... ~ I " -5- CITY COilllIsSroN MEE1'Ii'lG Soptomber la, 1973 . At the roquest of tho Assistant City Manager the Planning Director re- viewed.the purpose of tho Horth Osceola Zoning Study. The City's Chief Planner outlinod rnsultB of thn study showing maps and ovoI"lays appropriate to the various catogories of zoning development, density and. traffic flow. and sum- marized the various al te~nativos open ,to tho cl ty in promoting redevelopment of 'this aroa. Tho Planning' Director continueu the discussion of coastal. . dovolopment by describing the potential in tho East Clearwater area. Commis- sioner h'illiams ,suggested tho dosirabili ty of permitting the public to' better understand the character of the various environmentally ondangered areas of tho City by expanding appropriato road networks. FOllowing furthor disoussion on the time involved in accomplishing area rozoning and the noed for appropriate public hearing on various proposals, Commissioner Williams moved that a public hearing bo soheduled for these matters at tho speoial Commission meetinlX of . Octobor 22nd, at 1:30 P.H. I-lotion was seconded by Commissioner Hall and carried unanimouslY. " " " i " ,J , - Other Commission Action. Anticipated Additional Coats of flight :1e~tings. The Mayor 'summarized the results or a study prepared conoerning the additional' cost impact ofprospectivQ evening Ineetinns, noting that'sp6cial compensation' for overtimo work would add significantly to total payroll costs. Property Utilization Under Approved Zoning. - Commissioner lIall commonted on the dosit"ability of t'eqUl.rl.nU the use of, undeveloped property under approved zoning within a specified time limit~ Property not used within the time limit would be placed in a special category without zoning authorization. Co~nissioner 1~11 indicated that such a time limitation would help to avoid the problems of spoculation in property tha.t has not been developed. The City Attorney suggested that removal of specific zoning authorization probably would be considered illegal City action. Minutes - Commissioner Williams, moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of July 16, 1973, and tho special meeting of July lY. 1973, be approved as recorded and as submitted in written summation by the Clerk to each Commis- sioner. Hotion was seconded by Commissionor Hall and carried unanimously. Commissioner Hilliams questioned the City's plans fat' a City AUditorium. The Mayor stated that a report would be furnished on this in the near future. Commissioner Williams BugBGsted. acquisition of usable but unused citrus grove areas for :-. the purpose of continuing procluctivi ty and maintaining attractive open space within the City. The Hayor r~quested the Assistant City i1anager to report on the, poten~ial acreage involved and to furnish appropriate recommendations. That'e being no further business. the meeting adjourned at 5:30 P.H. . Attest: ' '/, ". tjt:;t:~;':::.:' 'p' .':.' ' ; '. . . ' " ' ' . ~~ti"'~.t.'. '~'o:.~ ~ . ).~ ',"' '., ' ; '~\'>;.'1yt:~.:,~>~;.;: },,;,\:,/,'~',,~,~/; C<~". '~':,,; '" ',/ "," , .',' .''':, ' . ~~rp-~t.t~r\},,,,;!;r':';~l:~'~f'~'..~.....I:.f'~:'.\'l'.<",~ .~. ',,/. ~ .) f.~~ ~~10.~1:.K\i~<~4:::'~I~'~':T~:~>'''\~/:}~>~:;:~'''':-::>~ ,:"~l",'" ". ' I'~ '" '~.,' ~ tll.;7t.:(tq;:I~\.J~~~'\ ).r'~'f'~ '~'.:.!.~ , I ~ .., u ~ ;',;{ ;. " :.' \ , . ., "'?~~~~~~i(il>~~ '~81~:'':?-'}:;>jl;;(';:~.::,::i :~; ";':', . ,::! :,~:/,:. : ;"..' ';,"', '~, .. ", 0" ~, ',: ,,' 'tt:l.~.,...j."~h )~...:..t "('?-(f)J~ .{' 'f' ."t, "". r' + .... '.~ ~ ,. ~ .. .~~t:1~~~~)~~"f\1,~."t~'~'~"', ~'t,~ 1 :'~'tl'",.,~ ,~~~.~ \' ~;-,:i"':;,:~;: ~ ~. ~ \, ',:, \~~;~,~;-h\~~\~.:...f:I.'~ttJ4;-':,;~~'i,,~~~,[.\,' : ,~~\ I'~ \1 ':'. ;f.p ,', ~) .l, -:', 1 I '~" ',:: ,T /., J, '1 ~~.;~p;-.q:f!h;,./,~d 3"~'\';,;,' lI;'~:I,(..L;f::l\'~I>t';',"'i,~' II' ,: , .' v,; Ii" , " ',' , ",' l I " " I, . / "~ , , , J. ., <'. , , .: . '1.',1 "." " . '..,"",)\;,;,':}i:}}'l(;!~ \ , ' ',-, . ...... ,', , , I.. \ " ...../ " I', ~ .' , ,\;. ,r ,I 1-;.1~t-:-:,oi~:~T:.;-:';,)j -:J ,:~.1 ~~~~,:,Y \. . ' .:~~"".'-;''''''''''' .: , '~::'~F,>:;:~:h:: > ">' , ~ .~.' ,- . ~ -', ,..' I" r 'f ' ~ t r~: " ',' " '. ' ,~ "~ " ~ , . ; ~ ," " ' " , ~ . t' .", I ~ " I. ~ ... Septomber 7. 1973,' " .,> " . ~ I . " :q: 0', . , Honora.ble Mayor' and City of' Clearwater ,'Clearlilc1 ter t FloI'ida ~t ~ . ".,., ) ,.; Members of City Commission .,t. . ..; ,,1- ~ . T . ..;", ,'j " ~. ' . \ ~. Gontlemen: '.' ...... '. O.':'.c ., . ,:1., . ,,:,' ':':/i:~,' The Ci~y Commission will meet in Special Session on Monday, SpptembQr 10, 1973 at 1: 30 P,:f:l:. in the City Hall Commission Chambers foI' the purpose of conducting a public hearing on zoning ordinance amendments, and to consider such otheI': ' ,business as may be pI'esented. . , , " '" ,~ '. .. \ ~ ' Sincerely, ' " .j' '" . :" I. " , . , .! ~ " '. 181 H.' Everett Hougen Acting City Manager " c: ,.'\ ,I . :. ~- . , ; '" . , , -------------------------------~---------------------------~--~---------------+ ,.' T:.' . + " ,I :" ..... ....".' " ">>" !' '<. ", ~ . ", ;' ~ . , I ,J \,' , ,j :'i ,i. I. . . >, .'. , , " " .'" i " .' , ' , I ,. ~'\ I . 1 , . .J.. ,) , '. .\. . '>.1 ) ,,' '1-\.; I ~,~ :. ':~~: '/:..;'.' >. ,{ . ',:1 " .," . ...: , ' , 4 < ~. " ) ~ . , , " '" , . ,