01/17/1955??
?,r?+?th??'?di7 ,hdy*W"Li 7r1s Nn pp t? r,, ?:.,? t?f ,.'vl a „t'i 4[yy'?
ti? t?`N ? ? ? Mid.
???? r''r ., 1 . 7?z ti ' f a .. ..?
???? .?, ,:L.:. y:.a: .. .r.a.w1.4N.lw..Ji.1C}+.:in.kAN'-r.1M.,Yl::S.+.?'.l.fax.',P11't'li_Ge5)ir.u. w.. LL'.?-Yw:?'.E1.?tJ4tyrJ@''y i? ??
" i4a4 "1 a?'+l', 9"'"'.?.?`..+?,/;.wd,.ti.sr.:?.,.u...?,..,n ?.r, ..... ... ..... ....._.. .,. ...v?.,,..?,r.,:.?..?.v,.:,.1..,.,.. ..i?,:i..r.. ,., .i.2::s.a ...»...is?...Y?a.,...?.., I? SI ?: 3?'
4 7brlc:y.? .,,? ? ? ? taG"h ? . ?t?'.
1?r ? ? 7?PtM ^.?l X71 i' ? "?;
r ?,
? ? ? ? ? ?.
t? , .
h ?,??, ,?b?? ? i?{'
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
January 17, 1955
7 ? ?p,?n ? ? `?,,???
'17 .Y'y'? rs -
?:
ua?
.,,,
45 )?}M1W jig. ??'1
? .? i f
?, ,
..? L../?
.? ,? ??J
F
c1 1 ,
,?
?, r, :,?
,?
?? ;:
;,
A ? i
7 E,
?:
ij ::,° ,
t
,,,
t l' ,
a?
.,?
a , , ;; I
,?? ?, ?t.
> lit 7
f?,... ? . .:............ ..?
The City Commission of the City of Clearwater met in regular session at City
Hall, Monday, January 17, 1955, at 1:30 P.M. with the following members present:
Herbert M. Brown
Guy L. Kennedy
Jack Russell
W, E, Strang, Jr.
J, N. Bohannon
Mayor-Commissioner
Coarnissioner
Commissions r
Commissioner
Commissioner
Also present were:
F, C. Middleton •? ??--??--
Chas. M. Phillips, Jr.
G, T. McClamma
S, Lickton
City htana ger
City Attorney
Chief of Police
City En?neer
The Mayor called the meeting to order, The invocation was given by the
Reverend 0. H, Hudgins of Belmont Park Methodist Church, Clearwater. The Mayor
asked if there were any corrections to the minutes of the meetings of January 3rd
and January 10th, The Clerk re parted that Paragraph 2, Page 21g, in the meeting
of January 10th should be corrected to read;
"Mr, Ben Krentzman representing some Carlouel property owners,
reported that Mr, Leo Butler was applying" instead of "Mr. Ben
Krentzman, on behalf of Mr. Leo Nutler, reported that his client
was applyingn.
?''<'?? The City Manager stated that in the meeting of January 3rd in Paragraph 2, Page 207,
??:?.???;:;
`?`?°?
`? ?` concerning the Public Hearing on the Florida Power renuest the date shou ld be
'
>
:????? January 10th instead of January 17th. Commissioner Strang moved that th e minutes
-:
? of the regular meeting of Januar y 3rd and the special meeting of January 10th be
` approved as corrected in accorda nce with copies furnished each member in writing.
Motion was seconded by Commissio ner Kennedy and carried unanimously.
The City Manager xeported that seven bids had been received for the paving of
?.?,' Grove Street from San Remo to Hi ghland Avenue, The bids were read as fo llows:
k''! Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Item 2 Alt, Alt.
'
? Blackburn ?3,7?2.00 ?4, 2 .50 .?$ per ft, sq. yd. 1.50 per ft,
,r?,.
""
°'" W. L. Cobb 4,399.60 5,03$,60 1.10 .25 sq. yd, 1.25
'?^V?
? W. H. Armston 4,037.50 4,996.00 1.10 1 25
''???=y`\??'r 0. Harris 3 , 647.20 5 , 223.40 . $g 1.3 5
,
;
,
,
?='fir::>??.;? Davis ?c Sch, 3,723.60 4,320,00 .90 1.35
r
"4
Y
'^,a
a??,???-,,+`?
?;.. Hadley-Mich, 3 $0$. $0 4 320.00 0
9 .40
,
1.15
.
?"-'???'?'` Holcomb 3,976.40 4,445.00 1.00
.25
1.20
After tabulation, the City manager recommended accepting the low bid of X3,647,20
which would include the ?aodified curb from the Orville Harris Paving Contractors.
Commissioner Strang moved that the Orville Harris Paving Contractors be awarded
the contract for the pavement in Grove Street from San Remo to Highland Avenue
for the amount of X3,647.20. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Russell and
carried unanimously.
It was reported by the City Manager that seven bids had been received for
paving Grove Street from Duncan Avenue to Keystone Avenue. The bids were read as
follows
Alt. 1 Alt. 2
` Item 2
? Alt. Alt.
Blackburn ?3,7bz.50 ?4?2
7:50 .$
$ per ft, .40 sq. yd. 1.50 per ft,
W. L. Cobb 4,442.20 5,0$1.20 1.10 .25 1.25
W. H. Armston 4,037.50 4,996:00 1.10 1.25
0. Harris 3,647.20 5,223.40 .$9 1.35
Davis ?c Sch. 3,702.30 4,320.00 .90 1.35
Hadley-Mich, 3,$0.$0 4,320.00 .90 .40 1.15
Holcomb 3,97b.1,0 4,445,00 1.00 .25 1.20
After tabulation, the City j?anager recommended accepting the low bid of ?3,b47,20
which would include the modified curb from Orville Harris Paving Contractors.
Commissioner Strang moved that the Orville Harris Paving Contractors be awarded
the contract for the pavement in Grove Street from Duncan Avenue to Keystone
Avenue in accordance with the Mana;er's recommendation in the amount of X3,647,20.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Russell and carried unanimously.
Regarding the proposed storm sewer in Palmetto and Missouri Streets, the
City Manager explained the sewer would run vn Palmetto from the proposed new street
approximately 600 feet west of Missouri to Missouri Avenue, and another connection
would drain from the Baseball Stadium near the corner of Seminole and Missouri and
run north on Missouri to the 4$ inch line on Palm Bluff. The six bids received
were read as follows:
' W. H. Armston, Dunedin
E. I. Rutledge, Largo
Newton•Moore Constr., Bartow
Standfield Constr., Tampa
??: ' ,,. , ' ? ? E. H. Aolcomb, Clearwater
W, D, Owens Constr., Clearwater
:;
?'r r?
h?z5t
,11?
i,? ?f
M+'? µ? Pd .4 J T t }t .' F
F ?? k r r >'?, r}
t
Ftk'S?+?454?'Lt ? 1? ..
'rp`?????'?e'?N ??
'
Y?i _?.°.?.tr tr . ?. ? ? ?..
X7,443.50
g,zlo,oa
$, 641, 50
1o,47a,oo
$,46$,00
9,427.00
??
,r
? t ?,? ?,
,ff1?v4:
,f5 ? ;;?;:,;
'.
?' r
s.
1', 4 .
t ?,
>"`
?..
,:. t:?
', ,
,;
?.
,'.
'`' } ?? i,
,?,;7i ? .
,?:?? ? 7 7r,:•i .
5 ;?
•
s
4
'4
a :-
Y
.:
{'? ? { ?
a {aya"?+fi I '..
} 1 \ ,,
,1??„ jt`,..f'.,,:, ru L.,,.tik?x.C"?ro dM?o.. ?.s.. ,;.,. ., rw ...? ?.,.., . .. ..: ?? ? ,. .... _.. .. . .... ..........» of .?,. _. ., ...,_..... .,. .. ..,..._ ..... .. ... ._. ... ..,...1 scttiJ.r .,, ... ._.,..,.. _? im ....,L,?. _. ,,.<. ..... ,..,. ,... .. .,
Z 2 y'
-2-
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
January 17, 1955
,?
?. i ?
?:
ra;:?z;?s;.;; ;,
?? ? ?;,
:i?;'
-.;; .
?:?.
,.
'..
?';al:
:?,'?1, ., 'I
'I,
.,
;.a: ? ?,,,;y,;;.
After: tabulation, the City Manager recommended accepting the low bid of X7,443.50
from W. H. Armston Company. Commissioner Strang moved that the W. H. Armston
Com any be awarded the storm sewer for Palmetto and Missouri Streets for the sum
of7,443.50 and that the 45 day time limit be enforced. Motion was seconded by
Commissioner Kennedy and carried unanimously.
The City Manager read the following bids for two carloads of 6 inch pipe:
Rail Truck
McWane Cast Iron, Birmingham i.72 ./
Alabama Pipe Co., Anniston 1.75 1.77
Davis Meter Repair, Thomasville 1.75 1.77
American Cast Iron Pipe, Birmingham I.71 1.73
U. S. Pipe & Fdry, dirmin ham 1.6? 1.70
Jas. B. Clow, Birmingham not on standard form) 1.7k5 1.765
Cammissioner Strang moved that the bids be referred to the Purchasing Department
for tabulation and return to the next meeting. Motion was seconded by Commissioner
Russell and carried unanimously.
The City Manager reported receiving seven bids for supplying 4?" storm sewer
pipe to be used where Russell Street crosses the creek near the new Negro Swimming
Pool. The bids were read as follows:
Concrete Corrugated
Pinellas Industries, St. Petersburg I . t.
Pinellas Lumber, Clearwater 10.40
Sherman ?%orcrete, Tampa 10.40
Lakeland Cement, Lakeland 10.4.0
Universal Concrete, Tampa 10.4.0
Tri-State Culvert, Tampa 11.51
Armco, Clearwater 11.51
Commissioner Russell moved that the bids be tabulated and brought back to the next
meeting and that the Engineer bring back a satisfactory report for the Commission
. on the advisability of using concrete pipe in conjunction with corrugated pipe and
vice versa if the City has some corrugated pipe in that line now. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Strang and carried unanimously.
The three bids received for 175 palm trees for Mandalay Boulevard were read
by the City Manager as follows:
Wilcox Bros. Nursery, Largo
Indian Rocks Nurseries, Indian Rocks
j South Florida Nurseries, Clearwater
X4.75 ea.
10.00
4.?0
Commissioner Strang moved that the bids be referred for tabulation and returned to
the next meeting. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kennedy and carried
unanimously.
The City Manager reported that two bids had been received for one new
utility billing machine for the Gas and k?ater Department. The bids were read as
follows:
:??"?
?,
National Cash Register, St. Petersburg X4,200.00
Burroughs Corporation, Tampa 4,969.00
Commissioner Strang moved that the bids be referred to the City Manager for study
and a report at the next meeting. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Russell
and carried unanimously.
The Mayor announced the continuation of the Public Hearing on the paving of
Harvard Street between Duncan and Keystone Avenues. The City Engineer reported
that on the low bid received at the last meeting the cost would be approximately
X4.01 per front Foot and would include the modified curb. After discussion, the
Mayor reported that it appeared that there were still five people for the project
and eight against it. Having held a Public Nearing on the pavement in Harvard
Street and having heard sufficient valid objections, Commissioner Strang moved
that the project be cancelled. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kennedy and
carried unanimously.
Commissioner Strang moved that all of the bids on the pavement of Harvard
Street between Duncan and Keystone Avenues be rejected due to the fact that the
Public Hearing decided that the project would be cancelled. Motion was seconded
by Commissioner Russell and carried unanimously.
A Public Hearing was called on the request of Mr. J. E. Satterfield to permit
R-4 usage of the North 150 feet and to permit Business usage for the west 50 feet
r;;{{. of the south 100 feet of Tract A, Hillcrest Drive Re-Sub. The City Attorney read
? the request from Mr. Satterfield and also th? Zoning Board's recommendation that
?? the R-4 usage of the North I50 feet of Tract be approved but that Business usage
of the west 50 feet of the south 100 feet of Tract A be denied as the Zoning Board
did not consider the second request to be a zoning hardship case. Mr. J. E.
Satterfield addressed the Commission explaining his requests. Mrs. Robert Johnson
,
Mr. F. J. Truman, Mr. W. D. Pdatthews, Mrs. Joseph Staniszewski, Mr. R. W. Higgins,
Mrs. Louis Podboy, Mrs. Muriel Lewis, affected property owners, objected to the
request to permit R-!? usage of the north 150 feet.' Dr. Faye Russell objected to
;,
7
W
?Fy,r? ??,i.
"
A
.•
,,??,;;a;;;?,::Y ?,;,ti;, ,
{,? tit , ELI ??'
???,;?,?
?: ???':'
(?
.+, .
,?.rr
I:
? r ` `+y' ,
?.t.??' ?? ? ?Fti?+?, `
tti ??. r
nA?.:
•?
?I
i
f •
lei
k ,.._.-,m?s_..-?_,.__.___...,
!
J?? p
1 .t ?. ?? 1 ?`
>Na?l? ., t?t+?d S. ?,s,u f ?.. ? i, ?.nJ i.,.... ,. ..., .... .., ...?..,.. .._.....„.. .?. ? .. ... ... ? ..... ., .. ... ,... ,..?...4 u.J. i.....wl? ..., u,. ,.., ..J::""S? .,r?. E.?:..; t5.,? w.tu.»y
q t i
`?, ? , ? `? ?, l,, ?1,? f ? ?.
?d?'t?,r?a?s ?., ? ,tr TtiJ;, Ik f?lM12.?.
I ??,?;??„?;? ??; CITY COMMISSION MEETING ? ?a;?k???'„.
! Y ?.?? +?? . "?? ? y 7, 955 ? >! ,,????? •?
r;, ? , ? ° : Januar 1 1 , , ?,
f it V.) 7t ..:?? lY?.':
?I,. t 4 .. ', 1 . ,? 1
' `' both requests. Commissioner Kennedy moved that the Public Hearing on both requests ?? '''%
' ? 't r? be adjourned to 1°larch 7th so the Commission can get a clearer understanding from `? '
?!' {' ? the Zoning Board as to what its reasons were for its recommendation. Motion was
?'h!, ?;1 seconded by Commissioner Bohannon and carried unanimously Mr, Leland Drew, member .."
` `? ? of the Zoning $oard, being present explained the reason for the Zoning Board's
????. ,, ??.? - action was that the members considered a hardship existed when the value of a ?
?` ? piece of property is jeopardized by the Coning Act, itself.
?..
A Public Hearing was announced on the request of Mr. Wm. L. Morrie for a
3? root setback from the side lot line to build an addition to an existing garage
', ? building on Lot 3, Block 27, ???andalay. The Mayor inquired if there were any ? `.
' ? objections and there were none, Having held this Public Hearin; on the request of
Wm. L. Morrie fora 3? foot setback from the side line to build an addition to an
' existing garage on Lot 3, B].ock ?.7, Mandalay Subdivision, and having heard no ` `
,; .' ? objections Commissioner StranP moved that this he approved according to the
';?•':,.., Zoning hoard recommendation. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kennedy and j
carried unanimously.
The ???ayor called a Public Hearing on the request of Mr. l??arion Blackburn
to permit ???anufacturing usage of unplatted Block 9 Jones Sub. of Nicholsons J ?..
Subdivision, and Lots 10, 11, 12 and Lot A, Block ?, Property of E. H. Coachman, ?<„
presently zoned Business. The City Attorney read the request from Mr. A. D. ' `?' '
Finch, on behalf of Mr. Blackburn, and also read the Zoning, hoard's recommendation ? 'yt
,E r t?j? )r;
that the request be denied as the matter should be submitted for referendum action. ,-;r?,?,?ryi?r'?c ,
,:? Mr. Finch addressed the Commission explaining that the type of operation planned ,' '? ?,},????,
for the asphalt plant would have no odor or dust. He presented a letter from Mr. ? .aw,`r,? ,,,,. ?
;' ?? A. C. Wyllie indicatin; approval of the request. The City Attorney read a letter ??artz?``_.
` ?` of objection from Mrs, Ray E. Grant and a petition signed by one hundred six ?''„{' ?t"??K;.
? ` ? people who objected to the a,•ranting of the request. After some discussion, ?? ?`'3;?,?c?{.?,
'?` r?' ? ??'??? Commissioners Kennedy and Strang su?*?ested it might be possible for h1r. Blackburn ?`?ur?'?`= ?'?'
r? r ? :? ? ?, ? ,.,? 1, ??
to locate his plant on property which is being held for manufacturing purposes ??! '?
' ? ?`? near the City Airport. Mr, Finch withdrew the request pending a meeting of the ';?}???,?,? ??
Commissioners with Mr. Blackburn to consider other possible sites, .s?? ;:,;?
` Ida Tdae '`?"'?? r. ''
A Public Hearin) was called on the request of J. W. Lester, Jr., ?.1 ?.,,??
Lester and R. M. Thompson Construction Company to permit Manufacturing usage of t???? ?, =°..?i
Lots 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 4, Milton Park Subdivision, presently zoned R-4. M1??u? ?,{
t' The re uest was read b the Cit Attornez? who also read the Zoning Board's ,kh"?,,?t,? j
?? q Y Y ???
! ,? ,, recommendation that the request be denied until the owners of Lots 1, 2 and 3, .,;'????'???,4,.?'?
,t Block 4, are in agreement with anufacturing zoning in order to make an entire ???,?s}s???
atst ?1???+ ,?? ;?
block of "M" zone. Mr. E. B. Casler, Jr., addressed the Commission on behalf ,N,??« k,?r ; ;
?'? ;, `,- ` of R. M. Thompson Compan} and the petitioners, stating the lots would be used .? Q?fi?,??
far the storage o.f lumber only. Mr. Dan %atlin approved granting the petition if wAy??? '?',
?, the lots were used only for storage. Mr. J. H. Gibison, Reverend J. A. Self, ? ????;?'
` ?, , Mr. R. H. Beck, Mrs, J, A. Self, Mrs. I?9arie C. Brown, affected property owners, ?_{????,?????'?'
' :y ?:: protested the ?ranting of the request. A petition signed by twenty-four property ????{?1
' owners and three persons as Trustees for the Church of Gad was presented requesting r??xk`l?.°'?
s? ';? ? that the Commission deny the request. Commissioner Kennedy stated that it was his ?`????h`*ti?>`,
`' i't ? ? feeling that no change should be made in the zoning of this area until the owners r ??„?'?,??,..a
,` ,'? ,?' L' of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 4, and the owners of Lots 1, 2, 3 and l,., Block g, across '=??;Ek??'??+??,,
s ° ? : `? the street aUree to the proposed change. Commissioner Kennedy made the following ?` ?;; °' ?;
' { ? r;' motion "In view of the conversation that has been presented here, the protests, ?s
'•?74 ?<;} the recommendation of the Zoning.lnoard, I move that the request of J. W, Lester ?r t????; ?'
),? lf:?,?t µ ? ' V 1f '? ?r ? ti
,? x„?,, ,?r and R. M. Thompson Construction ompany be denied Motion was seconded by ?.?'-? , ?,
?;+,?;??t,QQ? ?,E, F ,,. Commissioner Bohannon and carried unanimously. ?h?,??? }?.
Fa ???f?7 ??4}41 !? t ;???' d?t ?y
!?' m 4 ? 5L : t': J}t lyt Y
i??Y"S„? ?y 9`j
?;?t?``??` , ?'??; .. A Public Hearing was announced on the request of Mr. Edwin W. Koch fora ,,?,?, ??.??
;??.'>f . ? ? , „?? I
r ? ' ` g , jt.,?s, t;J, ,
?? ?? ? ??? ?? ? setback line of 23 feet 6 inches from ?°?a nolia Street for Lot 15 Druid Acres _
??,??,Y,r ` .' The Cit Attorne read the re uest and the Zonin Boards recommendation that the ??
r ,'`
? ?1 .
g ' k?.rf'?r?+?l'?','??''? ????? petition be granted. The Mayor inquired if there were any ob jections from anyone ;n?,'+?,< "'??
5 t YY '`. ?, ? t, 1
??????'? Having held this Public Hearing and heard t ?? ??
?? ?t in the audience and there were none.
?k „*?' ,?zF?? , ? no valid ob 'ections Commissioner Russell moved that the re nest of Edwin W. Koch ¢'?? ! °
r for permission to erect a residence on Lot l5, Druid Acres Subdivision, with a Rt#??,?r ,?
!{??.,??,?;??4, setback line of 23 feet 6 inches from Magnolia Street, be granted according to ?.
?? ??""'t? '?''??'"`'? the Zonin Board's recommendation. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Strang ?a??_? ;?°`
?? ° '?,.;??,??' and carried unanimously. ,;?
??ir ; ?!
?''? ??'`?-' The City Attorney read on its third reading Ordinance 672 which would annex ,',??. p? ?:
'??'??"? acreage in what is to be Unit 1G, Skycrest Subdivision, and a portion of Unit 6, r???? r
. ?'.
?,', . ? k?? Oak Acres Subdivision. Commissioner Strang moved that Ordi Hance b72 be passed N?,., ? " ? ;
?,? ?, ?; ??a?, and adopted on its third and final reading. Motion was seconded by Commissioner ,fir ??'{„?'
i'''? ?,,.. ? ?x Russell and carried unanimously. ? ?.: s??;
The City Attorney presented a statement of 500.00 for his services in
connection with replatting Coachman Heights and a statement for X250.00 from Mr.
W, R. Kabrich, right-of-way agent, for the same project. Commissioner Russell
moved that the statement of the right-cf-way agent for X250.00 and the attorney
fees of X500.00 be paid. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Strang and carried
unanimously.
A plat of Betty Lane Heights Second Addition was presented by the City Attorney
for approval. He reported that he had secured an affidavit showing that there were
not ten registered voters in the area, a contract signed in accordance with
Ordinance 632 requirements, and a signed sewer agreement in which the developers
obligated themselves to pay for their pro rata share of the cost of increasing
the size of the pumping station not to exceed X2,500.00. It was pointed out that
the name of Overbrook Street should be changed to Overbrook Road, The Zoning
??`;;?;:
?;;;?
??r ? : , ;
r?w?, {;
t??, ?:? ;
;,?"?,,,' i
U
0
•
i
R f
S 1?8i4? ?tj,' ???,'??&?1?,11 71 1? ? .: ..
?yy? ? F 44 ,
,i { + !
..?aM??k'Ij1G?:5xfn.'4. ?<va?rV m.ttu:..4n.l?.t .. :t ..? .,. ., _,.?., ... ?. ...,. ,.. ..
.. ? ?. ?'
. ,..,..?.«I"..5.. ...,..,. .,i. uaFN.,«.+,?i.....ts>....+,R: ?"'.+.?.3:.t.?.'k?L'+1YwJ?'f41? ??'
[?
'1„. y„
..;c ?? ? kip'
? fi??????,? ;???' CITY COi?IMISSIO?I MEETING
?,?,?r; ? } ; Y January 17, 1955
,?a ,a Y ?t,
??.y k}''S? } f!???S?i 14 ???y".?.J
,4 ?'«?w ;? ?Sh ?? {??y ?N
,?,??b??,+F< <,;,;? Board recommended R-1 zoning for the entire subdivision. Commissioner Strang
f7}?4??'?s?,ilt'? ;;,tl moved the approval of the plat of Betty Lane Heights Second Addition, approval
?rY,, of the zoning as R-l, and the proper officials be authorized to execute the
?' ?t?`,,T F Y ? necessary papers and contract end sign the plat. Motion was seconded by
` ? ''' '' Commissioner Russell and carried unanimously,
? "' ?+ By consent, the City Attorney was irstructed to prepare a Resolution on
?' ? ?'"'"`?,,,:}r changing the name of Overbrook Street in Betty Lane Heights.
}? The City Attorney read on its first reading Ordinance 673 vrhich would declare
` the City's intention to annex acreage to be platted as Betty Lane Heights Second
`" Addition. Cornmisaioner Strang moved that Ordinance 673 be passed on its first
,? ? ? reading. i?iotion was seconded by Commissioner Bohannon and carried unanimously.
'`
Commissioner Strang moved that Ordinance 673 be considered on its second
'?'?' ???'?`" reading by title only by unanimous consent of the Commission. Motion was seconded
?;.
' by Commissioner kussell and carried unanimously. The City Attorney read Ordinance
??; 673 by title only. Commissioner Russel moved that Ordinance 673 be passed on
,`' second reading by title only. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Bohannon and
carried unanimously.
"> `' ?," Commissioner Strang moved that Ordinance 673 be considered on its third
?? i reading by unanimous consent, Motion was seconded by Commissioner Russell and
,1?'? :? carried unanimously. The City Attorney read Ordinance b73 in full. Commissioner
i ?? Russell moved that Ordinance 673 be passed and adopted on third and final reading.
???` •? Motion was seconded by Commissioner Bohannon and carried unanimously.
~??" ; I
M 1
?? AJ ?t, ; :,' ,?j The City attorney presented for its third and final reading Ordinance 671 which
'?' ?L4;'? ?" ?' ?'' would declare the City's intention to annex Sells Subdivision Unit 1. He reported
??? ?"t„?`,'v, { t - that Mr. Sells had signed a contract to put in the improvements in accordance
"y?` ??x r?j^ ''?1 with ordinance 632. Commissioners Kennedy and Bohannon reported that they had
_? ` ???; ? ? inspected the site of the proposed development and inquired of Mr, Sells what he
loll 4
'„???`° ?_ intended to do about the washouts and holes in Prescott Avenue. Mr. Sails replied
?Y 4'}
'"?°'`''' °""`f? " that he was putting in drainage tale along the street to take care of the water.
t ?` '<•`??' .'' The City Engineer said he would like to make a study of the area before making
;r;;;??t',??._,?°,;;',.;;,,;??? any recommendations on the dramaae, He said it would be necessary to have an
"'?i<'?t` ' easement for the storm sewer where it crosses one lor, to the lake, He suggested
;, ,
''`''?"' "?`???--?'???. that Mr. Sells ask Mr. Leo Butler to give him a layout of the sanitary sewers,
YEY'd$M F i?
n4?,,Y????4*? ?:? drainage layout and proposed plans for Prescott Avenue. The Mayor instructed the
?? ,i
,?:,????"? ??'"??'"<<- City Attorney to write a letter to Mr. Sells tellin; him just what engineering
4 z, ?rv e y,.'.
r,;?;?r,,?,, } ' data is needed,
,u ;.
<,? ?,? u ?j
In regard to the application of Mr. Leo Sutler to purchase five acres of
i??ts?„i ? t
`??# submerged land near Carlouel Subdivision from the I. I. Board, the City Engineer
',;ya
f i
?
' J pointed out the area on an aerial map and informed the Commission that it was
y,
.?:r
?.Y 'i it
?F"ntiI.,.'t"."'
' ?'x,'t?-?:-???•.?Y•?,?;:':?>:
outside the City limits and was in the County. Mr. Ben Krentzman was given
??? t?Y=?+? ???,-„'?`' permission to take the sketch of the property to the County Engineering Department
,
? before the matter was presented to the County Commission. The Mayor co?rimented
,,,
,,,.,„.,?
,
`°`?f?'? ?;? .?'t ?
4 that the County had discussed a proposed causeway from the mainland to that area
{X '? ''
? ,{
f
}
,yt ! ,t ,? y
' and suggested it might be well for the County to request the State to hold title
?
t
J
+??????:?? r?? i,f ., to this property as it might be needed for right-of-way.
By consent, the City
? ,?
i??`
?
,
'?
?
, .
Manager was instructed to notify the Director of Public works or the County
?
,
,
;
1
;~.
h.??????;,,?;?w,;?r.?;;;';,.? Commission that the City Commission agreed that it would be a good idea for the
?t,?R `??'F,?????? 5? State to retain title to the ro ert .
The sale of submerged land in Stevenson Creek adjacent to Lots 11?, LS and 16,
Avondale Subdivision, by the I, I. Board was discussed. The City Attorney pointed
out the sale was advertised for objections only. It was agreed that the bulkhead
line or seawall line for Stevenson Creek could be established later. Commissioner
Strang moved that the Commission offer no objection to the sale inasmuch as the
I. I. Board had already sold submerged lands on both sides of this property.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Russell and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney requested that Item $C, Request from Attorney Nodine on
behalf of his client for the City to take over the sewer pumping station at the
west end of Haven Street, be deferred and also that Item $D, Report regarding
Stevenson Heights Subdivision, be deferred to the next meeting.
The Mayor suggested that Item $E, City Clerk's report on t9ater Contract with
John Segelken of Pineridge Subdivision, be deferred to the next meeting and that
Mr. H. H. Baskin be notified that final action will be taken on the request at
that time.
The City Manager reported that he had received an oral request from Mr,
Guy McMullen asking that a service station at the corner of #590 and Urew Street
be connected to the City sewer system. Following a short discussion, it was
agreed by the Commissioners that the request should be denied.
?_.,?
????? Commissioner Russell re ortin for the Committee investi atin the re uest
.t?° P g g g
of Messrs. Edwin Cunningham and Glenn Liles for the Biltmore Construction Company
to build a restaurant in connection with the Shelby Plaza Motel, reported that in
their opinion the plan as proposed does not conform to the requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance and unless the plans could be altered to bring the restaurant
under the main roof, the Committee recormended that the request be denied. Mr.
Cunningham said that changing the plans would entail too much expense and he was
withdrawing his application,
,,
>.r t
???`
?'' ?
iG ? ' i i
'??'t lea i?•
.4"t; t} ?
f °t?p?{;tit 4apY ? ? ???.
x.-
... .. ., . ? ? Y
t ? ?
""
..
p
I
?', ?,
.,...
.. ?r.;
,:
r??r.?b e ?, ?41 J?4;'?,,sN cie T -s 1 ?:. .. ,...,. :., ? :? ?tl,` r Y
,..
i. '
? ,
t t ?? t ?t,?? ?d I'
?, t#,? It ?Sµ°? Ynti `?i 1 i.'Y ?. ? YS.'.? '. • . ,.',?. ?? ? .. ? .. .?.: ? ' ? +,.: .^_.,? ?. fd,? ? ri A??+ka?",,3 #+ ? ?l y rSS,?.u ??'4.Pm.r?W `? .f '..?,
4.tvv (rii t?' it G+ ?,?. ? ?" ? 7V .i v ., , r.ti,i.,v ?An ,? . ? ... • ..,r .. r,..a.k.+... F.L?l..._k?.?wa w. ?.a L,Y41lw`LS ' /'it!'1..N ?d?Yt(1. ???n,'
izrM?IM!?1?!???lw `. :. KR:#??.w?:?.rww.+.w.:.?,a;n#"«,A,?...."........ _, .d, d ..:. ,. ?....? ...., .? .., ... , ,. , .? ...... ?.... ? r .L?... ?.x. -. - .., ?r ?';'#:??::.?
J ?.,
3? ??'?
ti.
-5-
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
January 17, 1955
'? ?3
'?,f3 ???1•4? i??t ?, f
s ,
+'.4 t
?:
k ,,,
L+ ,,
,..
i
I '
. ,
?' `??
i
ar i , ?:,
,:
r.
A letter from Colonel H, ll. Woolley, President of Pinebrook and Palm Terrace
Civic Association, was read stating that they had been informed that some real
estate subdivisions just north of Pinebrook were applying for annexation to the
City and the Association felt that if those areas were annexed, the City should
require that the developers comply with all of the City standards for new sub-
divisions before being taken into the City. The City Manager said it was his
belief that Colonel Wooley was under a misapprehension as to what subdivision had
applied for annexation as no area in?mediately north of Pinebrook is being con-
sidered for annexation at this time. Commissioner Russell moved that the letter
be accepted and acknowledged by the Clerk. Motion was seconded by Commissioner
Strang and carried unanimously.
The City Nianager presented an application from Mr. Stuart Golding to erect
a billboard sign, 30 feet by 4 feet, nn top of the Small Boat Nfarina, After some
discussion, the application was referred to the Zoning Board for its recommendation.
??,
I®
:fV, ?,,, ???
? ,?, ? .
f :?r?-"i°)4f??t?itit:.
r4}"iRrti'?i?r
:? ra?? • ?.;.cS??;,t •.
i 1? I
'a4"?? ?
t
?. r . , ??
tp ? ?'?
?; 4 ' `''
y
(',,
. f?J 'a'.'.1 ??:?.?a.:'?
?1:
°,;?
#,?
?.
.?
?'?r:,';;,.,;;,. . .
t t
1 ? ? ) ? .
la?? ?.:
?,, y ? , ,
?, ??r.' ? ;'?
?{???s ,.;,? t
? ?,,;.
?,? ? ,, , '
,? ?
,. ,
. r.? i ;?.
.? 'F` v s
? , ? , . ?:
t<,?.
? .k 4?, ;.
Yj,?;;:,;rnt
,,,.,
:"
In regard to a Committee report on ttie South Shore Civic Association's
suggestion to purchase bayfront land between Turner and Rogers Streets, Commissioner
Strang requested that the matter be deferred to the next meeting as the Committee
had not had a conference on the matter yet.
The City 1°janager presented a Resolution requiring three property owners to
clean their lots of weeds and underbrush. Commissioner Strang moved the Resolution
be adopted, Motion was seconded by Conunissioner Russell and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney reported that the exchange of deeds with the Pinellas
County board of Instruction for the Negro Swimming Pool site, the cemetery site,
etc., had been accomplished.
In discussing the bids for the folding chairs for the new Baseball Stadium,
the City Manager recommended the U channel frame type chair at X2.96 each. Mr.
Bill Sult from the American Seating Company addressed the Commission requesting
that the City examine the quality of the chairs made by his company, pointing out
that they would withstand the weather conditions better and, had a lifetime guarantee.
After discussion, Mr. Sult was notified that the bids would be awarded at the next
meeting and he would be notified as to the date.
Mr. A. D, Finch addressed the Commission on behalf of Mr. David Brown,
developer of Edenville Subdivision, and asked if the Commission would give
tentative approval of the proposed subdivision so the work on the streets, sewers,
and water lines could begin. He was informed that it would be necessary to change
the size of the corner lots in the plat to an $0 foot width and that the plat
should be signed by all of the owners of the property. Mr. Finch said Mr. Brown
had signed the contract in accordance with Ordinance 63z and would comply with all
of the City's requirements. The jfayor commented that tentative approval would
be given now sub ject to the final approval of the plat. In discussing the sand
filter proposed for the subdivision, Commissioner Stran said that there should
be an agreement that every house constructed in the area would be provided with a
grease trap in order to make the sand filter operate properly and the Building
Inspector should be notified of this requirement. The City Engineer stated that
the use of the sand filter bed should be considered temporary and should be
permitted only until such time as sanitary sewers become available.
The Commission now adjourned as the City Commission and acting as Trustees
of the Pension Fund admitted Alex Elroy j??athis, laborer in the Parks Department,
to membership in the Pension Plan, subject to a waiver of any disability due to
hernia, on a motion by Commissioner Strang which was seconded by Commissioner
Russell and carried unanimously.
There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting
was adjourned at 6;x.0 P.M.
Attest:
ity Au ito? nd lerk
?? ?,
?'rN,`ty
????r?
F
f?i?3ti rn?
???yy ?
,' r
??:. ??
"? ?r?, .
?? ? `'i? ,
? ;;?'
M1f•tro?^#? :I
f-
??????`
a?.?yry,,? y.
1!t? `r.
?'Jr!,
f+.,
?ti=
?,
.?`?r i
`lY
;??
,?
c..#
t
?`
??
.'; ?? Y
I?F'}.
E` Gi ',
`?? ti
t
. f,;a`?
?. _. ,,?
4 !iv.
,p. i? ? irr# ?''??
? '
i s ? ?
? 7
. ? ?._ ? ? ? ? ? Y 11 ^F ..-ist.,.tEi.r?t?'ttE?tl.Lu?.?.?Eakv?ati ?'dmx,?tkmi+i?YYd,.»X a411?•J?YW
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
January 17, 1955
'ji Yrr ? F ? i.
Yn
`
'? r
. >' j
a1 a r r ''J ..
?f 4 1? '?
`i 'J
,
T?
15
u x
F ?ti* t?
,
,
22,, r i
4g
p E ?
a
Y 47
? i ?' 7 r ?
E '
?
..^d.,ir ? ir
3 .
u
1
i
,.
,
"C rt
?
'...
) .?
I
? ?
'
:
i ,, ,
? ?
? ''
f° ?:?
?
E
`?
?
+
e
.
+,E ;
i ,, i , ,;_
} -
;
?i
.,'?
?
{
1
r
r ? Y
„G
,{
4 ?;}
,.,?. ;,.;;t?.
Mayor Commissioner Herbert M. Brown
Commiasioners: Jack Russell, W. E. Strang, Jr.
Guy L. Kennedy, J. N. Bohannon
Gentlemen;
January 14, 1955
The City Commission will meet in Regular Session on Monday, January 17? 1955
in the City Hall Auditorium for the purpose of discussing the items listed on
the attached agenda. i?Ieetin; time will be 1:30 P.M.
FCM : s
Enclosure
Very truly yours,
/s/ F. C. Middleton
City Manager
REG?ULA?R
Agenda -City Commission Meeting of January 17, 1955
Cfty Ha11 Auditorium
1:30 P.M.
2 ? ? ? ?;?
?`
??????
;
?¢??,
.y
';
1?'?jii? _
?,??y,,,t,.t;,;
sr '
?b"??. y:,tii
e
( ?
? ?;t.
a
rt
rt( t
t
'
1
?.
?? ,.
?,.
4 ?'? '??
C
.-.. ,
?? ? :. . ,
,i
1. Invocation, Rev. 0. H. Hudgins, Belmont Fark Methodist Church.
? :r
-E? `? ;:'? ??;?}?a' ' '?? '? ? 2. Approvin, the minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 3, 1955 and the
o- ?.
?r °??, rr ? Special Meeting of January 10, 1955.
r ? -?
rt,
??A ?` 3. Opening of bids for:
?????,?r?:?>??:''??`? A. Paving of Grove St, from San Remo Ave, to Highland Ave.
?E@ t,, ,?, r<, ? ?.
'` ??' 't°` ? B. Paving Grove St. from liuncan Ave. to Keystone Drive.
j,?'?;'?; ?,?r.? ? C. Storm Sower in Palmetto St. between Greenwood Ave. and Missouri Ave.
`` ^? ?„ ` ?? ''? D. Two cars 6" Cast Iron, Mechanical Joint Pipe.
?, ???
'i'' ?? ? ' { ? ? E. Sixty feet 4$" concrete T & G Pipe.
i,?;? ' '? F. Cocos Plumosa Palm Trees for Mandala Blvd.
r it??ftik i $ , ?.
?yj" ?,???' ;? 4 G. Utility Billing Machine for G & W Department.
`"? ?'?' " ?'°' 4• Continuation of Public Hearing on Harvard Street Pavement.
';y ?'4??',,,,r?` ? t .; 5
, ?a?r ,,r,,` ? Awarding of bids for:
? ? , ,a; ?;1 z,,,.
" .,. h? ti? ,? ? A. Pavement in Harvard St.
? 'i;r???' ? f '? B. Steel Folding Chairs.
?,?+ „ 6. Public Hearings;
? r. ? ?E'' A. (1) Request of J. E, Satterfield to permit R-4 usage of the North 1541
ra, of Tract "A", Hillcrest Drive Re-Sub., an area presently zoned R-2.
`? 4?;r;?` ?? i ae'' , ?' (2) Request of J. E. Satterfield to permit "Business" usage of the West
,iy?,? .zy?,a
?,';';>?????::,+':??????" 50' of the South 100' of Tract "A" Hillcrest Drive Re-Sub., which area
r 44. :k? '?1?? ?yi 4
" ?`'' ? is presently zoned R-2.
??.?'`'??????;???¢3?a?"?' ' ?? ? B. Request of Wm. L. Murrie fora 3?' setback from the side lot line to
AM .?, iU, ak dY' ?? {m.
fir,°? {??° ? > build an addition to an existing garage building on Lot 3, Block 27,
`a ?z1,Ma;y"? ??? `, ? Mandalay Sub.
x,,?,??,,?as;?. ?;?., .,?,
?`y??,??rr'f?, ? ; C. Request of Alex D. Finch, ar. behalf of Marion Blackburn, to permit "M"
M`'',?y???'t ?' '?' (Manufacturing) usage of unpla.tted Block 9, Jores Sub. of Nicholsons
{'t?,?;r?t?wi, ? +- ? subdivision, and Lots 10, 11, 12 and Lot A in Block $, Property of
"??''`?????°' ',trt ?, E. H. Coachman, all of the described property being presently zoned as
#? ??'e a,? ? ..
'?a????"???°'' E'?., "Business.".
a, ??a,?aa??b?a:??= ??• ,t D. Request of J, W. Lester, Jr., Ida Mae Lester and R. M. Thompson
??;?n`?s??`??::.?:;? Constructs n C t er i "M" (Ma fact ri g) of o 11 12 13
??.,, .?;??.,.;;,?. o o. o p m t nu u n usage Lis ,
????+"?'?` r'????"=?x?'? and ].4, Block 4, Milton Fark Suh., presently zoned R-4. ?
`??"??r,??'?????Y°;?t`?t,'??r E. Request of Edwin W. Koch for permission to erect a residence on Lot 15,
?.? -????s?,,?r?±?????.• Druid Acres Sub. with a setback line of 23', 6" from Ma nolia St.
_?-?, `??'?a`?? This property is located at the northwest corner of Magnolia St. and
?c?'? h`> "??.?a?,'.,r? Willowbranch Ave.
.,j1,
?. ''•?? .v?, ???'?'' a.. ti •,?:
?1.?,?r,?:;r,,N?_?,+?,,.;,?? 7. Commi.ssion'S consideration of items from the City Attorney's Office:
?k?"`?'??`'??"??? ??? A. Ordinance ?b72, annexation of Skycrest Unit 10 and a portion of Unit 6,
? y'? q' ?`'??? Oak Acres Sub, on third and final reading.
` ;? B. Statements of Right of Way agent, and Attorney regarding replotting of
,:? ,: ?.,? ?;??? Coachman Heights.
,? ? ' ?????? C. Approval of plat of Betty Lane Heights Addition.
+ ~ `?' ? `???' D. Intents on to annex Salls Subdivision.
k.. ;'a?,
''? $. Commission's consideration of:
r '??°??
-`f A. Report from Engineering Dept. with reference to location of submerged
property in Clearwater Bay to be sold by I. I. Board,
?.???? B. Sale of Submerged Land by the Internal Improvement Board in Stevenson
,; Cresk adjacent to Lots 14, 15 and 16, Avondale Sub.
?,? ??? C. Request from Attorney Nodine on behalf of his client for the City to take
over the sewer pumping station at the west end of Haven Street.
D. Report regarding Stevenson Heights Subdivision.
E. City Clerk's report on Water Contract with John Segelken of Pineridge Sub.
,. F. Connection of service station at corner of #5$0 and Drew St, to City
sewer. (Guy McMullen).
G. Request of Biltmore Const. Co. to build within the Shelby Plaza Motel,
,`
1$5a n. Ft. Harrison Ave., a restaurant.
H. Letter from Harold D. Woolley, Colonel, USA Retired, with reference to
the annexation of certain sub-standard conditions in adjoining subdivisions.
I. Billboard sign on top of Small Boat Marina.
???,???' J. Letter from South Shore Civic Association. (Referred to Committee)
9. Lot Mowing Applications.
10. Utility Lnprovements.
f'?` ':?? - ll. Any item not on the agenda will be considered with the consent of the Commission.
'`?'?? ? Ad3ourrunent
?+'?`?? ? .• Commission acting as Trustees for the Pension Plan.
,..
f?? ?, xZ a a 1 % t
.5rf u a??r?ttJuyr? 'i i. ... . .
aF•???E?.YZ ,jj??r?af lT??t ?, !RY r .,
.
do '>?-??,,.5 k ?.
s Ce'.r,o- il>ai..5,6i?ainw?..aY'..°.eww........ . ?...,.. ?., x..' .s....,: .. .. .,... ..'........ ... .... ... ... .., ..... ..... .... ... ..... ....... ... ...,.....M..k.-.1..Y,.SaL.Stld`i9'r"?`Y!..:•rd
'r*`?.
I((?tNt ?'?'?!!3 t? 1 j..
(1 l51 A kh t ???'N11;
n> > s ` r ? ? ,?`t
t4:i ?.
1 ?' [ • 5
?s??it ?a ,t r?.
14 ??ssat°I
??
t ?i E; t ;
,Y,1r ;,'
r
?.
?I,
t. f;
?.
?;
R '?',!;
5,
e., ,?I{ 1 ? }?,4,
t`
?,,??
ry,;,
,c ,
j..
I i? ,
i x
`, S't ter ??;1`?.
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
January 17, 1955
Jan. 7, 1955
To: Mr. F. C. Middleton, City Manager
From: Mr. 0. H. Anderson, Secy. Zoning Board
Subject: J. E. Satterfield's Request
?-?. The Zoning Board recommends that we approve Item ?1 of the request which allows
{? the rezoning of the north 1501 to R-4. from R-2 and that we recommend denial of
'?"? Item ?{2 in rezoning the W-50' of the South 100' of the lot to be used far
business purposes; the reason being that we do not consider Item ?2 as a
zoning Hardship case.
Attached here to is letter of request.
Clearwater 'Coning Board
Clearwater, Florida.
Gentlemen:
;?
???'?>?'?`'"?? I have owned Tract A, Hillcrest Drive Resub, for more than ten years, It is
';;;`,'?:,' now zoned R-2, although it is bounded by R-y. on the West and Business on the
{??"'?'????' ` south. The property across Hillcrest Drive is zoned R-2.
;?:
a?`''f?t`?'':; I wish to request two changes:
'.,,; 1. To re-zone the North 1.50 feet to R-4. This for the reason that it has
`'t'='„?'?;?
' always been my intention to build an apartment house on the north of the lot;
?.?>.,.'?? ???d
'?''"`'' further, because the adjoining property in the same block is designated and
?? ?"?'??'?? ?x` improved as R-4. This makes a restriction of ray corner lot to a duplex
'?:..;``'°`.. unreasonable.
?y=?an?'?{?`:f?,'???"? 2. To re-zone the West 50' of the South 100' of the lot to whatever
';..;??„
#?h?,.?,?,,?,.?.?r,;;?,
?
? classification is necessary to allow me to put a storage building thereon.
r
K {
'
``` This is far my own use in a business I own, and the only activity would be
????:?„`}?"????'4?????'n?`°?
' ?I. filling and packing plastic bottles, and receiving and shipping light shipments
?4,' ?;F?'?'??`''"`?''` by truck common carrier. There would be no noise, odor or other objectionable
aspect. Trucks would call only two or three times a week, in the alley, which
'r:...,,.,`:??????`.??t??4
.
,
? is alread
y opened and used to serve business buildings facing (or backing up
?
,
,?,;ar?Lt?'" to) the alley on the other side
which side is zoned for business. It is also
" ? ;,??,
.v ( ,
my intention to build a residence or duplex on the Hillcrest Drive side
which
k
` ','? " J? K? ,
will effectively screen the building from that side. My property is perfectly
" J Y,'{ "}? suited to the purpose I have; it can be no detriment to surrounding property.
."?????T????'Y?;%'.1`:;? I have searched diligently for other property which will serve my purpose, at
$ ?''1 '
i
. ?, !
G" a price I can afford to pay, and have not found it.
5 tip,
r
s. Rr f ' C, r '.
^,?iJ;????,?fs,???
` I shall appreciate it if you will place this on your agenda for the meeting
5 '
??'??? r??,,iu ?? ? January 6th. I shall attend in order to give further explanations and answer
???tyA` t?w???1.:??.1?w?:
" fr=,y;""»:#?
?- ?' ?'.? any questions.
Sincerel
Y
,
`?s?
G
F+
'7 h^
????' s
/s/ J, E. Satterfield
,
r
?,
?
} JES, s
Jan. 7, 1955
To: Mr. F. C, Middleton, City Manager
From: Mr. 0. H. Anderson, Secy. Zoning Board
Subject: Request of William L. Morrie
The Zoning board recommends that we grant the request of Wm. L. Morrie to add
a utility room on the rear of garage:
Lot 3, Block 27, i?1andalay
provided he maintains the same building line.
Attached hereto is letter and sketch of proposed addition.
City of Clearwater
Clearwater, Fla.
City Zoning Commission
?? Gentlemen:
January 5, 1955
Jan. 6, 1955
' I would like permission under the hardship ruling to add a utility room on
the rear of my garage at 59 Acacia Street.
. The present garage is set hack 3 feet 6 inches from the property line.
I would like permission to add 10 feet with the same setback.
Yours truly,
/s/ Wm. L, Murri.e
5a, `v, 5 , Ldt 3, Blk. 27 ?
' 7:
`
'
Ma?nda].ay Sub.
,
tiw,?;
??`
? .? '
YJ l4
i 6 ( ? I
}'
?
x t
w
q
,5
? nw y , Y
r t
`?k
?1 ?
w.
i
t 1 ';sr; t J t? ?+??
? '..
. ...... ..r Y?.?.._ ,.....
h11 t:u, rxiH .; ?A:
??7r x C ?.
roro(j(j,, ih ?776..k p .. ?,
?AYi?. j? ????4?'?}f??f;?
%? ? 5 3:,
,'?rgrY?? ?'?
`? ? J r.r.yr,? a
t': 1{
;at,il ??,+tt;v?r',
_??., ,.?z,..
?Y. t ".
',u
i ? fl
,,
? .
?'` `}
-,
."? A
,?,:
r
?? ?.
;.;
,,r
...r:r?. SJ_ .
r
1 i?
? ft?A}? ?1 t.?lI??6 Y1Rj+Af ?{4i 1 ? {:n ?
?,
1
? ?? ? ? t 4??Zr.
?t ? ,
1 g?.d 7l
y ? ? R?, ..
?? i t
??ndrMrf.??,?«.rw .w",e,..n ..,'.
?'ff' 7f? di"iZ.N.k.fw ?I i' ? ... .. .. ?.r .. ... .. ...
?J'"e
UF
`
. .. ?... . .a . ... .... .._6 _.. < ..,. ?,. .. 'I.
.1. .' ?' l
? ? 1.
. f ? 1G h k4 r }., ', i.3 ?y ' r
I,. ,.,.,,w...w?..'?.ain'.e..w ?l..,1.w..Aaauw'rti.P.44TM;!}w?u.7,W11.«.dF.«-3: +.?.,?lln?La.1 ..?, a "}
f
, .{
,
?y r14
f.. ?A? .. J l .Yy
r+ r ?. '
ly,
?-?` 3 h?' ? ?'
k ilNL v
l
` 3?nnn? r nf
?'?
?? 5, *A r
F ?
1
P? 5'?? '!?
'??`
'
?
'?
..'.i? • ?'W
t?7?Y.
ny?a
K?s11 ,,
V
? ?;? ? n'?'?`
? ` ? "? ?
?Yi
CITY COMMISSION MEETING 4
.
v????4?'? ?':? ?-?
,
. ,?.? ?; ?, ?ay.'I January 17, 1955 "x??s?;
V 4 °? 44 hi f '? '
? ?? ? I
Jan 1
r ?}???`;°?'r`+,?`; `., To: Mr. F. C, Middleton, City Manager
`?,?,?'????? ? ??;?;;'? From: Mr. 0. fi, Anderson
Secy. Zoning Board
III i
tV. 'L
y?YYr V?N(
l(?y}'`""'''??? '''" ,
?I IT
property of E. H.
Subject: Re-Zoning Lots l0
12 and Lot A in Block $
ll
4
?
,
t?'?;???;,;I?? ,
,
,
Coachman, and Block 9, of Jones Sub.
,
,g .r r ??
?,?, ? ,{b,,s
' ? "' ?'? ?? ?"?
•
?
The Zoning Board is of the same opinion as it was on June !?, 1954, when this
,
',
"'' '' ?''"?` matter was presented
which is as follows:
,
} f 'M1,f
` : ?:?
t
That the request of Blackburn be denied, for the reason that it is a matter of
:, ,,
''
' `? re-zoning rather than hardship, and changes of this type should be handled by
4 ':°
? referendum, although the Board is of the opinion that this property should remain
,.
t t?,;?';?, business rather than be recommended for rezoning, or for referendum action as
?` ?' manufacturing,
' ?' Attached hereto is a copy of the request.
,,
?, ; ? x ,',
?
:? t+ '
' ,
?
.? .,;4,:.?, ?p.:
'
i
? ---..-..?---•-----.?- -----?..ter...-----ar-?..-•--•---r---.. r.r-r?-r -ter ?---•-..??-?
t
? ?t /
I
`
?`
?'?? ?`?
r ?i
? January 6, 1g5 5
?
:
`• Zoning Board
i.,?,;,;,?;;;rr41 '4?;,u;: City of Clearwater
?
, ? ? Clearwater, Florida
.
:a...,;;-.t. ,1.. ?,-;:
'??r,?J.;? ?? ??
srk?,`,:' ',''? >? Re: re-zoning Lots L0, 11, l2 and Lot "A" in Block $, property of E, H, Coachman,
,_t '' ?
?ti,,?, ?' and Block 9 of Jones Subdivision
i?iw t.c`t
°' Gentlemen:
?
=7 ,;?:
;?.',
?
?:
'
`; Mr, i?arion Blackburn is the owner of the following property, to-wit:
,,
,,
,
,.
?'r?: ,?
r
1
?
°, ? Unsubdivided Block 9 of JONES SUBDIVISION of NICi{OLSON'S ADDITION,
Y?????:?.;;;.?::?;:?x;?:.??????-??`:
} according to Plat Aook a e $2 of the ublic records of
?+, p g ? F
r
'?= ' t ':?,1 -` Hillsborough County, Florida, of which County, Pinellas was formerly a
?? f, -;l,: J ?` '`, part; AND LOTS 10
11, and 12 and Lot "A" in Block ?, according to
yy ? l
rs i ' ? '? h
I
4
?? ,
page 56
Plat of nPropertyt of E, H. Coachman", of record in Plat Book 6
~Rll us
?
?)
77
tl
+i '
1?
?`` ?? '?"???,r,?
4
? ,
,
in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida,
hi?
I
)
?
y151
??LL
1 f. JI,A ?YZ Li?S 5?•'1 I1n
?
?
?
`j??4
?
tYtth
? `
?,,
?? °?
? which is now zoned for business under the official zonin ordinance of the Cit of
g
;?,f,:
?
, ,r,
l? 5, ' °? ? Clearwater, Florida, however
due to the location of the property and the surround-
i?
`?rt?` 4?; ;; ,
ing neighborhood, particularly on the West, North and East sides, more or less, he
,
,`??r?')Iw?' ?
;. :..
;1 ?; ,>s?. ? I?
, hereby requests that the above described property be considered by you gentlemen,
?
.
????"`?`?'???? rk?,`?Y ?
?? { and after due consideration that the same be re-zoned to a manufacturing district,
1,
?`? ? which under our zoning ordinance will be a "M" zone.
F 4 t t ? ..
Sa ? rya Ei ?5 ,?? Yi y,?
?
?
;'
;?
-0?°
a
ryr', Respectfully Submitted
?.
,
,,,
.
?
,
.
?,a w °'
f /s? Alex D. Finch
` "`4f?'i `? y5
?? ??`?? ' ADF:r Attorney for Marion Blackburn
hj }
t1G? 14 I M? ?'
4
\f lLlt i?`.L??e k: tl?i?'. 4'?k,J??[?t..t'
S?v?r?(.?? sir •! , kt,'??44}It?f'??:),m, -.??-..--.r-.??-----r?-r??---?--r..-..----??--..-??.,--??-?--?---w----?---?w.??..?---I..--?--
? ? a r?1"x, t h Y'.rtie tK?)r.
y?r? ???:?i-?_; s,?????M.'r?:.
PETITION
We the following property owners of Clearwater do hereby petition the City
Commission of Clearwater, r'lorida, to deny the request of the Blackburn Paving
Company to change the zoning of property, lying; east of the Seaboard Railroad and
north of Dreg Street, from present classification to Manufacturing area.
Signed by one hundred six persons.
Jan. 7, 1955
To: i?r, F. C. Middleton, City 141anager
From: Mr, 0. H, Hnderson, Secy. Zoning Board
Subject; Request of J. W, Lester Jr.
The `Coning hoard recommends that the Board deny the request of J. W. Lester Jr.
and Ida Mae Lester, until lots 1, 2 and 3 property owners are in agreement with
"Mn zoning. This then would embody the entire block as "M" zoning.
Attached hereto is petition.
ZONING AND PLAA'NING BOARD OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA
IN RE THE MATTER OF
JOSEPH W. LESTER JR. )
IDA MAE LESTER
;. R. M. THOMPSON CONSTRUGTION CO. )
PETITION
This Petition is presented to the Zoning and Planning Board of Clearwater, '
Florida on behalf of R. M, THOMPSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and JOSEPH W. LESTER JR.
??.??';`?_. and IDA MAE LESTER all of whom are prop®rty owners in the City of Clearwater, Florida.
?:?s;:.
?; t
y$?aY. S't
Y. tia rj?J l? ?l S.?'
T?7 i Y
rI
i?J y??;li ? 1
i^??a}?? yY til
?,Yr{,r?a ?? r 1 .
(Continued)
?, {
?, ,;
! , ? .
? ti
II.,. f
f ?.
?:'
(?,
'? ' ? -'
? ...°'i? \',..,j F?'.
P
fr.?. .. $t :.. t .. .. ? ? .. '
'fF?v. ?1 i,?k p% rye,', q?"r??'?'.
v? 4,v
?;? x,??????{ ?jhr
?° ? ? gat ' ' ?''?
6 4 t,r i J ? ? } .??
;.{
,? ,
t
?? ,??
!i
?, :??
?,
r ?,_,?
1
^? ,
4,
7
.., ? 4
t
r
L
Y,
•? ,r ?;
??t; .y?
> rt ? .
?j w ? ?
f ? }? ?
??} A? { . ? .,..S fY.
J ,,.
i;?u?,?t.w,,, ,
;?::- ?a;??-
? t s
ry ,t
:5;fi ? f`S ? A';
t
? J?{? ,
,?;? ?
zx ?}? t
}>? a ? t,
S i ? ti
iS? }r :"t
?1 1 4 1 ,
y
1 ? ?? S? f r
? . A" _ T ?
',
4
". I
. x. rki.Y N. ilf?
J ??x`?
??
?;,?' ?r
?y?yy'{.
??I ±?W(?N'? ?.
CITY COMMISSION MEETING ???'*?. ,? '?
?. s;:?'
January 17, 1955 '?":?=?;a,F? '
(Continued)
This is an application for rezoning under the "hardship" provisions of the
Zoning Section of the City Code of Clearwater, Florida: Section III (1) and
Section XVII of Ordinance 627.
R, M. THOMPSON CONSTRUCTION CO., 712 Grand Central Avenue, Clearwater, owner
of Lot 11, Block 9 Milton 'ark Subdivision requests that the said lot be rezoned
from R 4 to M.
J. W. LESTER, JR. of 71$ Grand Central Hvenue, Clearwater, Florida, owner
of Lots 12 and 13 Block 4 Milton Park Subdivision requests that the said lots be
rezoned from R-4 to M.
IDA MAE LESTER of 71$ Grand Central Avenue, Clearwater, Florida owner of
Lots lIf Block 4 Milton Park Subdivision requests the rezoning of said lot from
R-4 to M.
R, M. THOMPSON Q?NSTkUCTION COMPANY owns, at present Lots $, 9, and 10, of
Block 4, Milton Park Subdivision, Clearwater, Florida as well as the lot set forth
above. Lots $, 9, and 10 are now zoned as M but further expansion of the
Company's operation is restricted due to the fact that the other company lot, and
the subject of this Petition, Lot 11, is in an R-4 Area. It is the understanding
of the Petitioners that Lot 11 was zoned as M up until ?lecember of 1952. It is
submitted that the market value of Lot 11 zoned as R-4 is depressed by virtue of
such zoning when the adjacent lot to the west is zoned as M and when lots to the
South West and Northwest are also zoned as M. In addition the company is restricted
in its expansion facilities by reason of the current zoning arrangement. It
should be noted that the company has occupied this section for several years, and
has operated business operations from this section prior to the zoning change of
December 1952.
JOSEPH W. AND IllA MAE LESTER join in this request to have the property owned
by them as set forth above changed from R-4 zoning to M.
The zoning Board is already aware of the zoning arrangement of these lots
as of December of 1952. The fact is apparent that the area zoned as M lies due
west of the Lester property and also due north with the exception, in the latter
instant, of one intervening lot also zoned as R-4 between the Lester property and
M area. The effect is that the Lester property altr?ough zoned a R-4 is virtually
surrounded by M zoned areas.
Although desirous of realizing a sale of the property it is almost impossible
to locate a buyer other than one interested in operations requiring M zoning.
This is particularly true when consideration is given to nearby lumber yards,
building supply houses, packing houses, and other manufacturing activities. The
additional fact that the main track of the Seaboard Railroad runs near and through
the above section makes the area desirable for business activities but undesirable
for residential and other activities permissable in R-?. area. The effect is that
the fair market value of the land is depressed under R-4 zoning conditions
although this same area had been zoned M until December 1952•
WHEREFORE your Petitioners R. M, THO?tiIPSON CO., JOSEPH W. LESTER, JR. and
IDA MAE LESTER join in this petition requesting that the properties awned by the
petitioners as set forth in the first part of this Petition be rezoned under the
'rhardship" provisions of Ordinance 627 from R-4 to M.
/s/ E. B. Casler, Jr.
CASLER & DOUGLAS
Attorneys for Petitioners
Davey McMullen Bldg.
Clearwater, Florida
-----r-------------------------•--------------------------------------r-----------
Jan. 7, 1955
To: Mr. F. C. Middleton, City Manager
From: Mr. 0. H. Anderson, Secry. Zoning Board
Subject: Request of Edwin w. Roch (Druid Acres Sub.)
The Zoning Board recommends that we grant the request fora 23'-6rr side street
set back line of Lot X15, Druid Acres.
Attached hereto is letter and request.
rrr..rrrrr rr rrrrrr rr••rr rrr rr-rrrr•rrr r?rr-rrrrrr•r..rrr•rr rrr r.rr rr rrrrr rrrrr rrrror
CLEARWATER ZONING BOARD
Clearwater, Fla.,
Dear Sirs;
Dec. 30, 1954
I am applying for a rezoning of lot ?15 Druid Acres, Clearwater, Florida
as a Hardship Cas@.
?;, ,'
?'?''...r" r
S;F"r?s ' ?? t `
?ix?? U t ? ? . ' F r
(Continued)
,t? il,
,; ,
???
i
,,
it ' ? ;t''
,,
???? a,,
Ili ? u
????','
??Y ,?:.
?qy???? d
?, m {?
,,?(?i;:", , `?
l'?M ?
H
_'?
a r".l t? t ??, wr'?r7,,i F" .r:-..?" s rti...
i I
s( '%
'a,,+i,?,r 1?y?ii ). ri???3 tF3r rrry? ?t ; 4yY4tw"d'k `f?s.Fl fit`, ?4 t?? ? ,. ? t. +ls`t' .. t S ? R ?
?:.1?J7LY i' A ?y ?kr L'tn'.s.'i.rou'.+wiwleLa.r...a,a+?:c:'?n:.??+.?,..a..,... .5._.t...,. .. ...,. ,. .. ..,.,..? ....................:?:u,:..t?sa.?... ....w, ._,.. .... ..,....,..,....?..,,.rw..e ?Mrtl..ii.....tt.i?+.,.?.li'?t1ro:MJYti:rli?.?i.:?cS(Su:.N?fG'iAtiwaffk's?aau?3.+ ??F i3.
w?
atf?. r .` !. ? { S. .?inF ?,
,?(ti Y+? r'y Ah?t i?`f l1 I 7 ? I?
`:?'?i 3S, a
?? ct E
t?,?ta?'sF,?,????,t 1? CITY COMMISSION MEETING a?????F `r
?? ???
?tif?a? ?` January 17, 1955 F? ????
,?? ?a ,?
tltt! ?,???.
1 ??!q'. rnfrt t ? Y'?9s. a?bia t}
i f y
??I,t????<??'??,!! ! (Continued) ? t ??r
?rc? ? a? + tiS;.
?.
, ? J ?.ti ? '?? ? r.: ?
' ? 4? ft.,f?l t? r?s?ri`r I?:?.?jit?tir lti r,.'.:
6 w ? .:?
a , ,,.10
?rY. r, r f
t""I7 tp
`E'r r'???`.
{ ? '?
F ?,: F ?,..ry , .?
? ?,?.
?::, . ? r.
r ?.:
,??. ? i
`, t
,! t f
?.
?,?,. ?? `
?. t;;j
t ?
t ..,. f
7: . ,r
! t ? ?' t
?;t
,, ,
?` Y
i?l1 f t?:
i???•i ?!
,? .
;t.r,?tt r
?,,? rt
rtl? d? "! }rt
' t?Y 9 t t ' 1
p .,
y ?. ti? l yti ? t?
?A;" ? 4
k?f??ik r { 1t !?'j;
??.???? »r • ? ?,v'?.
+S ?
??. '
?1,i?yT «F. rrt? ! r v
fit. ?ltt L?r} ?'' ? ?
?? k ?' ,
>?
t*
Lot #15 is a corner lot facing East on Willowbranch and South on Magnolia
which is a half of a street. My lot backs up against another lot which faces
Regent St. So actually there are just two lots on Magnolia making it a side
street.
Druid Acres Subdivision restrictions are Set Back 25' Side Lines 7' and Side
Streets 15'. Now since the City has taken the subdivision into the City. The
City restriction on the Side street is 25' as against 15' and 5' against 7' on
the side lines has me confused as to where to set my house.
My house plans have been worked out before the City had taken over and show
the seven foot side line set back and would have 23? feet on the side street or
a foot and one half Over the City restriction.
It is my sincere hope that the zoning board will go along with me and allow
me to build as originally planned.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Edwin W. Koch
900 S. Myrtle Ave.
----------------------'-------------------r-.r-w-----r--..---r--wr----------r---------
PINEBROOK AND PALM TERRACE CIVIC ASSOCIATION.
Clearwater, Fla,
Jan. 10, 1955
Memorandum to the City Commission, Clearwater, Fla.
(Care Mr. Middleton, City Manager.)
It has been called to our attention that the real estate subdivions just
north of this area in Clearwater are attempting to get city annexation and con-
veniences for their area that is substandard to city specifications.
The Pinebrook and Palm Terrace Civic Association which is adjacent to this
area feel that these new sub-divisions should be required to meet the city standards
before being permitted to enjoy or use the city facilities. The t?rpe of buildings
and streets in that new area are definatel}' below other new subdivisions in the
city and have a tendency to lower values in this area. If not corrected now, it
might eventually develop into a low standard or even slum district that would cause
the city and this area much trouble.
These new areas should definately be required to meet the standards for new
additions as laid down by city ordnance. This could be by assessment on property
or possibly by damages against the developer who apparently knew of these specifi-
cations and thought he could force the city to accept them as they now exist.
This organization approves the principles laid down in your ordnance for
admission of new real estate subdivisions. We object to lowering of standards
for above mentioned or any other area in Clearwater for admissions to the city.
We recommend that the City of Clearwater take steps to coordinate with the
county of a set of building standards for areas adjacent to the city that
eventually will be included in the city proper within the next decade or so.
This should eliminate a reoccurance of the present situation and make new
developers play honest.
/s/ Harold D. Woolley
Colonel, USP., Retired.
President,
Pinebrook and Palm Terrace Civic Assn,
RESOLUTION
,''
t'!-;"..
tr
fir, ? ? ? '
? {
+u?:, '?
riF tin
1 (?y') S: krt
j(„V lye Y `
?y } Fi1 x :1 = '
WHEREAS: it has been determined by the City Commission of the City of
Clearwater, Florida, that the property described below should be cleaned of weeds,
grass and/or underbrush, and that after ten (10) days notice and failure of the
owner thereof to do so, the City should clean such property and charge the costs
thereof against the respective property.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of Clearwater,
Florida, that the following described property, situate in said City, shall be
cleaned of weeds, grass and/or underbrush within ten (10) days after notice in
writing to the owners thereof to do so 'and that upon failure to comply with s aid
notice, the City shall perform such cleaning and charge the costs thereof against
the respective properties in accordance with Section 12$ of the Charter of the City
of Clearwater, as amended.
(Continued)
?y.r.
J
!
:.l ,},
?, i?.?:
1
'.
t
i
;.??,.,
r ?.
??.? ? ?;
_,,,,,.
r
?'
??
?J
?? i
a
,.
?.
,?
T5i.5 r '?7?' 'thy 'et -i"
N
,.
wY. 1 R e?.. Y tid,• r??(. ?..: ?'R.? t s,?r? TrS+.R?, ff?'1,??F??r'?1 h.. l:,(Fr? ?'?,,lT,
'?"? ??+ ? ,''???ilY ? .: 'a F Y r ? r ?? ? pJY ?, rkr r' :. :. ??' ? ? tr ;.: ?N? 1?? g r
?.¢+??a?aaiG.?"W'.1'LS,:: nun.. t ? .,rm.w.o.,`,t.+,...,»::.:.'?anedu?iids)t??nez?a+dru.eu?i?rn.n ??+?.?iwia.9W!etl.+?:,L ? A
IS?
,,
k??
x.
r,
A '?
.;
is
rv
??,,.
NAME
__...
Merle McVeigh Chamberlain
726 16th Ave. N, E.
St. Petersburg, Fla.
A & W Glads
P. 0. Box 270
City
Gulf Oil corp.
P. 0. Box 1166
Pittsburg, Penn.
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
January 17, 1955
(Conti nued?
DESC,?„ ? PTION
Lot 9, Block A
McVeigh
Lot 5, Block C
Unit ?, Skycrest
5b37-I
Begin in
Bay Blvd
bdry. of
parallel
of NWT 0
13-29-15
N line of Gulf to
50.02 W of E
SEA of NWT, run N
to E bdry of SEA
deg. and so forth.
COST
_..__
5,00.
1+.00
l+? 00
t.:1
?:,. ?
?,
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida,
this 17th day of January, A. D. 1955•
ATTEST:
/s/ H. G. Wingo
City Auditor and Clerk
/s/ Herbert M• Bro?n
Mayor-Commissioner
rrrw rr rrr rr rrr r r r r r rr r r r.? rr r r rr r r rr r.. r rr r r r r r r r rr r rr r -rrr rrrrir rrr rIw rrlr•rrrrrr rw rrt
Honorable City Commissioners
Clearwater, Florida
Gentlemen:
Jan, 10, 1955
As Trustees of the City of Clearwater Employees' Pension Fund, you are hereby
notified that Alex Elroy Mathis, a laborer in the Parks Department, has been duly
examined by a local physician and designated by him as a "First Class" risk.
The above employoe began his service with the City on Apr. 26, 1954• He is
under 45 yeaxs of age (born Dec, 4, 1935) and meets the requirements of our Civil
Service. It is hereby recommended by the Advisory Committee that he be accepted
into membership.
Very truly yours,
Advisory Comaittee of The Employees' Pension Fund
/s/ Paul Kane, Chairman
/s/ Helen Peters
/s/ Dick Nelson
rrrrrrrrwrr.rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrwrrrrrrrrr..rrrrrrrrrrr-rrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr?r?rrrr
ti; iE , ? ?, ?
?
t
?" ..
. .
..
Y}
1:M1
'
?
:r
Rat: ° t ? ?
? ? ? '
7r
J? }??'+ (+ Y z ° s ? ??
r ?
?
??''? s
tVY
+
P
"?"
? ?
u
?
Yj'?ll
?}1 ? ILr1 ? .,
Y?k?ytCF i?('
?
j
K'
RrSy u?JrHfY
1 '
?y
(
?
}
Y
S
, s
'f? r?? ?
? W ?'}? Y 3
?.
_ ?
'
t
?
? ; ?
.
( ? ? ?
'i ? fry ?" ` ? :
art?j,?????GY
^ t `
??
s
`? ? ??
r
`
?
r,
?
?q?„ ;
f,
?
{ i ? ?
?
r
?.,
.4+? 4?Y ? r4A., ? t i
j ?,(????'7 ??
¢T?R t ,. iR f. rr
f.4 Yl? '?¢p''n t,'s'' r Q7 ..? ,1(i`., ? ? ? ? «s.`k?;h;+t4
ttn7....
i?R4i-, .
?t?; ,
?; 9
??
`.
,?,7
'??'
}
?.
E_=*.
?;,'
?a' ,
? ,r?? ??
Yr ,
i ?"jr
?? ? ?
r; . '
??r'
?i
3A %%
v.:'1
t
?C'??S??ff F??dF'?i44?k niY,Jif P.?C? Aih t ?te t '..n".' .. - ? :'? ..
t f
? ?l 1?L??sJ; S. ?r>t?`i? "?Y.?r?w+°xenu,el`M.Y„,au,;d.C? ...,.'k?..,. +xX..?, v t?.:?.. , ...... ,,, ,,.,.m?au. ..ww,r.?,k.,;?; ?an:J? iv,+i.??dk..??.a.?.?ac::._Mrt.e.nw4?-.. ?.:, ,a>.,. .. +w_ ?ad+k'r;iCS:'..?'f?F
? ' t
?],L
??i??
^^
ggyy
??
' no
?
? ,?,
?
r ?
}
, .F .
?'
y q Q? y
R '
?r q?1ij? ' Y7h?{.
?
.
,, ?
? ?r ¢r?
/. ?,.4 ?I
1????
3 ? ' y ?,
.
'
1
' }'Y4 r?1'?,,tt ,'..r
??? x? ? ??d?t` tj
? ISgqT? SY ?{D,{{?iF4K4,
? ??QM1o r kaU?? ?? ak ?trt?r
tti t
.4U??i"?1'.hYl?t 7? [
,1 ?i,Yq•Y?9 r?,? ti 5j 1'?
?tr
§ ? ri?
?.t ?Y??r1" F'?? Y4 il,I ?.
s{?// '. ?
Ei li?it??'`?'Y?a?OYn tr 1
,} r
` ? ,'?? ? '? ? ?Y -4 r ?
f i; ,
?,i? r ?? ?,?,Y..
3?aa y
??? `?t??r':???.``?`?`
b???')' u ??1? '.
Y ? h 4 Tj
p• «?\Y 11
1b ?51? . .
`, s
t ;?,?????,. <'
?}???,? : ,
t?f ? rlk'47 ?` ?
t
,.?? „ 7 ,
"a ? t , ? r"?' Y ?' r ;?
.? 1y`7Y lk y
,.
?? ??
?}he ??> ??4?;? try' - .';
lYx ?Yy? ? 5 x _ 1..7 ??
e,.,
?:'LI?1'Ni.?I?H:??i "..I: ??{'-.l rl?l?)'1fi. ;..
oaniNANC? No. b7z
s. .
u?,????'t4??Y ??„
3`?;h'? `?l?`r;.
"/ 6°?.ir
.??,<,,x.. .
?, ```
? ?;?.;,.
`..
?;,,
?T. .
}:.
sY`
::,?
k?
,?
t;a ?,•
?.?.
,;
-h?
;,;
°;?' . '
`S a ?..,
?'??
s.
:;
???,
r ':.
F,.
?,??
?N
:w:.;
`^? a
}«
,,
,:.
„i
?.
{;
.;
F i'? fri,
?,,
4r .
?,
r
r,,.
:?
:L
Y,
':
i?
AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING ACREAGE IN WNAT IS TO BE UNIT X10,
5KICREST 5UBDIVISION BEING EAST OF NIMBUS AVEIIUE AND A
PORTION OF UNIT b OAK ACRES SUBDIVISION INTO THE CORPORATE
LIMITS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, AND REDEFINING
THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID SUBDIVISION
AND LOTS ACCORDING TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 171.04,
FLORIDA STATUTES; AND PROViDIH(3 FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida enacted
Ordinance No. 670 on December 6, 1954, which ordinance declared the ?ntention of
the said City to annex acreage in what is to be Unit X10 Skycrest Subdivision being
east of Nimbus Avenue and a portion of Unit 6 Oak Acres Subdivision into the corpor-
ate limits of the City of Clearwater, and
WHEREAS, said ordinance was published once a week for four consecutive weeks
in the Clearwater Sinn, a newspaper published in the City of Clearwater, Florida,
proof of which publication is hereto attached, and
ItiHEREAS, more than thirty days has expired since the enactment of Ordinance
No. 6?0, and no registered voter of the City of Clearwater, no owner of real estate
in the territory to be annexed, and no person whomsoever, has objected to?such
annexation or has applied to the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in
and for Pinellas County, Florida, setting forth any objection to said annexation,
and
WHEREAS, all of the provisions of Section 171.04, Florida Statutes, have bean
complied with.
NO?f, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMIdISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATSR,
FLORIDA:
s 'r .sir ,;;?.:;,'
? ? i .
R ?° ,'
t, ? ? i ?,?
,.
,?, ,
?!
?, ?,
?`
? 1
7 ' < <,
w,?, ,r i
?{ T A ??':
Section 1. The City of Clearwater, acting by and through its City Commission,
by the authority and under the provisions of Section 1']1.04, Florida Statutes,
hereby annexes into the corporate limits of the City of Clearwater, Florida, and
redefines the boundary lines of the said City so as to include therein the
following:
TRACT N0. ONE
All that part of TRACT "A" of a RE-SUB OF ALL OF CENTRAL PARK,
according to plat thereof recorded in plat book 16, page $5, in the
Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, in and for Pinellas County,
Florida, which lies easterly of the East boundary of Unit 9 of
SKYCREST SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat
book 30, page $0, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in
and for Pinellas County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT' the following described
tracts:
(1} Begin at the Northeast corner of the Northwest Quarter (NWT)
of the Northeast Quarter (NBA} of Section 13, Township 29 South,
Range 15 East, run South 0 deg. 24' 03" East 50.01 feet to South line
of Drew Street; thence North 69 deg. 25' 27" West 100 feet along South
line of Drew Street; thence South 0 deg. 24' 03" East 166 fast; thence
South $g deg. 25' 27" Bast parallel with Drew Street, 100 feet to
intersection with East line of said Northwest Quarter {NWT) of Northeast
Quarter (NE ); thence North 16b feet along said East line of the Northwest
Quarter (NW) of the Northeast Quarter (NEB) of Section 13, Township 29
South, Range 15 East to P.O.B.;
{2} Beginning at Northeast corner of Northwest Quarter {NWT) of
Northeast Quarter (NSA) of Section 13, Township 29 South, Range 15
East, run South 0 deg. 24, 03" East 50.01 feet to South line of Drew
Street; thence North $9 deg. 25' 27n West 100 feet along the South line
of Drew Street for P.O.B.; from said P.O.B. run North $9 deg. 25' 27"
West 327.54 feet; thence South 0 deg. 53' 34" West 366 feet; thence
South $9 deg. 25' 27r East 335.$0 feet; thence North 0 deg. 24' 03" West
366.05 feet to P.O.B.
and
TRACT NO_TWO
4
All that part of the Southwest Quarter (SW?) of the Northeast Quart®r
(NEB) of Section 13, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, which lies
easterly of the East Boundary of Unit 9 of SKYCREST SUBDIVISION,
according to the plat thereof recorded in plat book 30, page $0 in
c: the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, in and for Pinellas
County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACTS:
(1) All of Gunn's Addition according to the map or plat th??eof recorded
in plat book 11 page $$ in the office of the Clerk of Circuit Court,
in and for Pinellas G?ounty, Florida:
Fb'.r ?
a ?, ?'
a°
??i ??ii(' j? .+
M i`?...)?b ? . r i
???,??1'j}?+`, ?``s
? R d Y
?l?a$ n n
?Yf ???j ? i?r Y?,. -,. . .
d y 1ti$ 2 (r ?
? ?G?d a?'
Ides}},1'?Yi r??'
' i.,, ,.
?k.. . ?
?...:
a?r
??;
?,
? .? .
;
.
?,W,
'.
?? ?A?i??a,li?e?t ?
.
a?'???N4?1?
.r t?) r;? ?y?
?1
?i4 w
" rb??
d 1"^'t
Y`
x? ,«
F,
' ;
?
'
;
,
.,
?
?
{?r
?l y
'`'
f
` ?
?
..
5 f
?.
I
,
f.. ? ',.
l ? r
r
; J
f
( F,
?
, v1 vYiyyf
?
'
??'
iK I
1
'
F
1
•
r
dye F? ? ;'
74p
Cw
r,'?:
}'F;
',
c ?1 r `^y,; ?'. ? j'r 1a z. P yl. l.,?: fj U!?: t z ?, rw 1'?J ? i, a' M, _,w? ;?iNd zY?'? i{, iyaw?'. 'a,;h'?p e. ?,.?t.?
???AS.?7rid,'Pidi,??hsrskz'; .'r,. ?!?" f ?rw !,??w?+'r:'?Y?j°"?"a+yy.?Yt'm`cdA.ros?rv-?.iwl+%iiJw?+'A:"?.,"'.'I?ti?'?ii??? ? ??t 1?,f"t???°'
.? ????
?7
-2•
13) Begin in North boundary of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at a point 700.02
feet East along said boundary from its intersection with West
boundary of the Southwest G?uarter (SW?) of the Northeast Quarter {NE?j;
run thence North 0 deg. 39' 47" West, parallel to said West boundary
420 Feet; thence South $9 deg. 22' S3" East 112.13 feet; thence South
0 deg. 24' 03" East 420 feet to North line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard;
thence Vest along the North line of Gu1P-to-Bay Boulevard to p.o.b.;
(4) The West 146 feet of the East 472.2 feet of the South 67? feet of
the South?rest Quarter (SW?) of the Northeast Quarter (NE) of
Section 13, Township 29 South, Range 15 East.
ALSO TO BE ANNEXED
LOTS BUR (4) FIVE (5), SIX (b), Block A, LOTS FOUa (4), FIVE t5)
and SIX (b), lock B, and a portion of Duncan Avenue and Magnolia rive,
UNIT 6 OAR ACRES SUBDIVISION, according t.o the map or plat thereof ae
recorded in plat book 35, page 45 of the public records of Pinellas
County, Florida
Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon ita passage.
PASSED ON FIRST READING January 10, 155
PASSED ON SECOND K FADING January 10, 1955
PASSED ON THIRD AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED January 17, 1955
(2j Begin in Aorth boundary of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at a point 590.Q2
feet East along said bounder from its intersection with West
boundary of Southwest Quarter {SW?) of the Northeast Quarter (NE?)? run
thence North 0 deg. 39' ???" West parallel to said West boundary 15? feet;
thence East parallel to Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard 110 feet; thence South ?.
g deg. 39' 47" East 150 feet to Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard; thence West along
North line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard 110 feet to p.o.b.
Attest:
/s/ H. G. Wingo
City Auditor and Clerk
/s/ Herbert M. Brown
Mayor-Commissioner
,?.,.
1'5??;gyp, ?F,,R
a
t' 1?a ? ?
fj p ?h1 x
;tI'r Fcx ? ?, r,
:??? ??'
+ 3
yAj7 1 .. .. ..
1 l
V ?'
'
?, LN V.,
j 1 4
t
ah
S'
t
?
r
V
????N??tV
??p9
_.?t NI
iW'y?L? f ,.r
e id
z ?
'
?
t ?}
?
?
i
'
4 1
? .'
?
z
t
f 5
7
'tf?J i
{
yy 1
3 xxt ,%R
?
A
?
I ?
p
.
z N 1 ? (
?
6 1
z
? ? ..t t
?
?
ii", P
d
?Y t'k'?
x
3
3?
'
?
SA
I
'
?tiAS? / ?
t ?
? .°?r,r ?4 e1 '
ti1
?l
?
1
0?
f
?
!
.
.-
1
+ . 1
?y..
bl?? ?z:.?`r'"ffYt lz \?. t t 1 ?1 '' ( t
i L, i Ptff i ? . S V ??
?
?
?,???,''3i` 1?»k?gz?a i??•tl ? .1 1
??? ? ? r °1
1? ' 1 , Ylr, r? 1 d'
? ?
?? ?? ? ?? 1?6?'?'f`I?Sri ?. ?? .? ?1 ? i ?
?' °
f}
?? 1 ? 1?:, t ?
i 1 t 1??;. ?F???
?f r?il 1'?j
r
.?%?
F
?!
?Y;
?p,z?q ? r
Id¢?1 .'s k.f7 ? z 1.
? i i
z
Q
? , A r i£? Y1;? 1!'l , S,t4j?Y?r iF i <'Gj?F?V
r r.. rt,i" .. ? . ..
? '? ? t•..:..,.....t.a.?,n.. ?.ir.??.,. rr;:,?.o?..._?...? ?'??. ???w4? .?1???rr.'e'r'iA„.,
?.
1 ? .,. '?r•...
i
r- ,
<:4xrti ? i S:}?T`Aa`rT'+aF? ?7?8 ? ??"?? k? ?? z Ei7?1r?t ? ? "1 hlltl'?A
?i..S
E;y, ? ki....
q??41"?? PS;r?'t'yLxt4dAkliu.? .?-++:'..'?-u.a+s,.?sd'%W?ur..?SUkru^.+..v.'?.?.P?d4?d',t???YL2!.u`"Sitrat'?v.h..Y?ka,3lM?lcv.??ara,.u?.:.u.s nai..s.... :,?w,?:,?+a :i3?i:
ORDINANCE N0. 673 ,
AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE INTENTION OF THE CITY Ole
CLEARWATER TO ANNEX ACREAGE IN WHAT IS TO gE SECOND '
ADDITION TO BETTY LANE HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION INTO THB
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
UPON THE EXPIRATION OF THIRTY (301 DAYS FROM THE
PASSAGE OF THIS ORDINANCE ACCORDING TO THE PROVISIONS
OF SECTION 171.04, FLORIDA STATUTES, 1951; AND PRO-
VIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City of Clearwater, acting by and through its City Commission,
hereby declares its intention to annex into the corporate limits of the Citp o!
Clearwater, Florida the following described lands lying Conti uous to the terri-
torial limits of sad City, which lands contain less than ten ?10) registered
voters:
Beira a subdivision of the South B?$ feet of the Southeast Quarter
(sE?? of the Southeast Quarter (s?) of Section 3, Township 29 South,
Range 15 East lase that part in "Betty Lane }ieights" as recorded
in plat book 30, page g8, Pinellas County, Florida County Records;
also less the East 165.37 feet of the North 143 feet of said South
B56 feet, the same also including and being a replat of "First
Addition to Betty Lane Heights Subdivision" as recorded in plat book
33, page 8, Pinellas County, Florida County Records, and all being in
Section 3, Township 29 South, Range 15 East.
Section 2. The City of Clearwater, acting by and through its City Coamaisaion
intends to annex the foregoing lands according; to the provisions of Section 171.04
Florida Statut'ea, 1951, and to that end, the City Auditor and Clerk is rereby '
directed to publish this Ordinance in the Clearwater Sun, a newspaper published
in the City of Clearwater, once a week for four (4? consecutive weeks immediately
after the passage of this ordinance.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its
passage.
PASSED ON FIRST READING
PASSED ON SECOND READING
PASSED ON THIRD AND FINAL
READING AND AD(?PTED
Attest:
/s/ H. G. Wingo
City Auditor and Clerk
January 17, 1955
January 17, 1955
January 17, 1955
/s/ Herbert M. Brown
Mayor-Commissioner
,?1x?
j.,. _.
x,f„i
I,h?r?
?w°„a.
+?
?.,
F`'?? .
?.,
7t.
Y4 t.
+?s c^::
.,,? a, s
wt(S`?c<r:?lC f
_{; _., .
???'?`e?? ?`.??Svcl
r,.
??t ??t?y,
? r?;,'.
??????? ,
??
}?>
1
,31?;?'
fiJf 1? 't ki P '
?'?st+Pp??>. ?S+?i{ ti? ? Cgs
r,Y?' ?t ?a`S 1? ?d' +?7y ? +z ? ..?? t kt 4 u ?+.?'r,{??
? x {Pf??x?li?ri?y4??? r lb ? e t 4 + { ?, T.1 .. ?'?
?,,?iy?,rff?'r23 Ave r+i ? s F + ? ? ? ?, l+ ?1 ? I1+ fi M?yt
,Y' ?? f?'iS+1?Y tr ?i J'! + ?+ '.:?.. ??t ?? + id si ??,?+
Is
c
' ti 4?+ S?h??4tr+Cr "?i?fi? 4s?-tzf , ,??rrr* .. vta 't? t1?' ?e`? i n.a?.. .?p ?if'? rk,k'?T, ?????
' s ? ?`.. . ? ..,; t?tt ?t r` ?? `.cF``sY (?5'' ` ? ,? ?? M?'?r,'?`+.r S Yv?? i ? i ? , wr??'?" ^?s?CP 'i?"
,l''?M1J aLt?'?'c r 4?. ".3 ?, .; '" r t .'j r 9 &?`? ??'? ? t"'•";;: a'A?"i
I b, '???4 '( L 7t { ?{G g rt 7 6., A ?'r? r z ?. r 1 1t t ? k. r
?. r.o'' t ?'. ?l S.? A C "+Y {j`??; ,? et kY 'S'? txi?4 ?t $ 64 '?? t '??"tCF 7}r,?„4 S ? t a? r?FP?' 1? t 'h?.- ?.
Y??P' d ^" M? 1 ?` ? tet?' 's..?.J. `?t?t: i' '?° fl . ? w,u?n1ti.w:'?k..i'',.R ?..?1L.:'_??4?Js?? ?' i
a ? ? .
?r
AF I,?DAY,,,_,,IT
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF NINFsLLA8
;?ro?"??
Before ms, the undersigned authority, personally appeared ROBERT HIN30N,
who upon being by me duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. That he is a representative of the owner of acreage in what is to be '
known as BETTi LANE HEIGHTS ADDITION, and that he has personal knowledge as to the
occupancy of the land embraced in said acreage, and that said tract of land to be
annexed into the corporate limits of the City of C1eAr?;ater contains lase than
ten (10? registered voters.
2. That this affidavit is made in compliance with Section 171.01,"Florida
Statutes, 1951, and is made to induce the City of Clearwater to annex the fore-
going acreage into its corporate limits.
Further deponent sayeth not.
WITNESS my signature and official seal at Clearwater, in the County of Pinellas
and the State of ?'larida this lO?th day of January A. D, 1955•
/s/ Robert Hinson
SWORN TU AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 10th day of January, 1955•
/®/ Beryl F. Sydnor
Notary Public
.,. ,
I, .:
?,
,? ??' '
??,?
?' ,
?, . I, .
?A$' {?1 1
` ??'??i
r,i;,?i?yp
?., .??
ti?,,?;?.; ? ;>
't?? - t .
..?? ?'a, ?'i
f Mr.° .
9i??
?.:;?
}t,?,
;:,
,:'?
`,
.,
??
r, ,
;? ? t
}} r
?
? ? ..
"•?}?A ?
M1 ?
'
Y y
xy
??
???FFF '1,y ?},
P
.
:.
y
'
t
?? ..
t
? ?
? ?
f y
t
ggyy yy
F.v3p
i
?
N
.' r a I I ? 4 ? ..
F?1 ? ?1'{' ?
?
" ..
,
?? lryki t1 1??,r„?t? d .ie
p
? y 1
? ? ?
a
'
?
'
??` ??'
t'P?e t$ ? ?
?
?'`
"
S '. 1
7 r Y
1
.
?
??
t-y
?
4
??
',' r,.
?°
'
;J
-J F' a 4 ?'
.." ?
a ?
;$k?F
?`? . .
I t 3 I i,e.
u r
?
?
?i1?
t
{F t,tiY?' ??r'm 1??+? I
?
? ?sC??ji
hi:
?
?
fkr
, ?'' t
i ,
lt ??I ?? ?4 .
,
?
?u '? ?.
? "
?
?
,,
?
i iY"^y j Y
S f
yr ?. yr r 14 "t Y r
T
S
S
f?v V??14 nf?.7??4')q???'}'t ??Y"'?ay a t ?rf ??
?
'
ta ?
.h
d !
?? x ?}i ? ,? ^,? ,???? t
' "
?
??
??? t
,Y L4
.. t, `r? ?
s
1t
? +'
o , r
.??t ?
? t
,...3..??i?J???t j+a
, }?
?,,tr t 1?? yl T?y1
,,? ? f S r 1
+
y,
? . t?4
! .' 11 t
f, l
f
?
???
??
,
S
?i,?+•yS?,;?,
j4
Y?'??$VV'd?X??
?/.?
; ':?
l 1
tr?+?
r r
?
_ Y tf ?
,
, ,
_
p..??aL( rrt ?.Xyrh .?.r........+rc•I. .., ???.. ... ? ,?.,.;... ?r 4?YS?•'rt.Nr.'WV? .. 'v.NWh??Hi?YNt?.,,. ?._
� �g
�ITY COMMISSION MEETING
January 17, 1955
The City Commission of the City of Clearwater met in regular session at Citq
Hall, ?�'ionday, January 17, 1955, at 1:30 P.I�l. with the following members present:
Herbert bI. Brou�n
luy L. Kennedy
Jack Rus sell
W. E. Strang, Jr.
J. I�. Bohannon
Also present, were;
F. C. Middleton
Chas. M. Phillips, Jr.
G. T, iVlcGlamma
S. Li.ckton
Mayor-Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Cornmis sioner
City Manager
Citp Attnrney
Chief of Police
Gity Engi.neer
The Mayor called the meeting to order. The invocatio7 wus given by the
Reverend 0. H. Hudgins of Belmont Park Methodist Church, �learwater. The Mayor
asked if there were any corrections to the minutes of the meetings �f January 3rd
andTJanuary lOtk�. The Gl�rk reported that Paragraph 2, Page 219, in the meeting
of �anuary lOth should be corrected to read:
"Mr. Ben Krentzman representing some Carlouel progerby ownsrs,
reported that Mr. �eo Butler was applyingtt instead of 'iMr. Ben
Krentzman, on behalf of Mr. Leo But'_er, reported that his �lient
was applyingtt,
The City I�Ianager statsd that in the meeting of January 3rd in Paragraph 2, Page 207,
concerning the Public Hearing on the Florida Power request the date should be
January lOth instead oi January 1'Jth. Commissioner Strang moved that the minutes
of the regular meeting of January 3rd and the special meeting cf January lOth be
apgroved as corrected in accordance with copies fis nished each member in writing,
Motian was second.ed by Commissioner Kennedy and carried unanimously.
The City iKanager reported that seven bids had been received for the paving of
Grove Street from San Remo to Highland Avenue. The bids were read as fo].lows:
Alt. 1
Blackbt� r� �3, 7�2.00
w, L. Cobb ti�,399-60
W. H. Armston 4,n37.50
0. Harri s 3, 61�7. 20
Davis & Sch. 3,723.60
Hadley-Mich. 3,$0$.$0
Holcomb 3 , 976.1�0
Alt. 2 Item 2
�4,�27.50 .$� per ft.
5,03�.60 1.10
4,99b.00 1.10
5,223.40 .�9
4,320.00 .90
4,320.00 .90
4,445.0o I.00
Alt• 3
•40 sq, yd.
.z$ s9. ya.
.25
Alt • 4
1.50 per ft.
1.25
1,25
1•35
1.35
1.15
1.20
After tabulation, the City Marzager recommended accepting the low bid of �3,b1�7,20
which would include the modified curb from the Orville Harris Paving Contractors.
Commissioner Strang rnoved that the Orville xarris Paving:Contractors be awarded
the contract for the �;avement in Grove Street from San Remo to Highland Avenue
for the amount of �3,64�.20. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Russell and
carriea unanimously.
It was reported by the City Manager that seven bids nad be�n received for
paving Grove Street from Duncan Aventxe to Keystone Avez�ue. The bids were read as
follows:
Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Item 2 Alt• 3 Alt• 1�
Blackburn �3,']Sz.50 �4,�27.50 �$ per ft. .40 sq. yd. 1.50 per ft.
W. L. Cobb �.,4�.2.20 5,0$1.20 1.10 .25 1.25
W. H. Armston f�,037.50 4,996.00 1.10 1,25
0. Harr9.s 3,6¢7>20 5,223.4� •$9 1,
Davis & Sch. 3:7oz.30 y.,320.00 .90 1.35
Hadley-Mich. 3,$0$.$0 4,320.00 .90 .40 1.15
Holcomb 3,97b.�0 1�,4.45.00 1.00 .25 1.2p
After tabulation, the Cxty Nanager recommended accepting the low bid of �3,61�7.20
which would include the modiiied curb from Orville Harris Paving Contractors,
Commissionez� ��ran� moved that the Orville Harris Paving Contractors be awarded
the contrac� for the pavemen� in Grove Street from Buncan Avenue to Keystor�e
Rvenue in accordance with the Mana;er�s recommendation in the amount o� �3,647.2�i,
Motzon was secor.ded by Gommissioner Russell and carried unanimously.
Regarding the proposed starm sewer in Palmetto and Missouri Streets, the
City Manager exFlained the sewer would run on Palmetto from the proposed new street
apgroximately 600 feet west of Missouri to Missouri Avenue, and another connection
tivould drain from the Base�all Stadium near the corner of Seminolz and Missouri and
run north on Mis souri to the 4$ inch line on Palm Bluff. The .six bifls reeeived
were read as follc+ws:
W. H. Armston, Dunedin $?7,443.5�
E. I. Rutledge, Largo 9,210.00
Newton-Moore Gonstr., Bartow $,61�1.50
Standfield �onstr,, Tampa 10,470,00
E. H. Holcomb, Clearwater $,46$.QO
W. D. Owens Cons•tr., Clearwater 9,1�27.00
I
r2�
CITY C�[3SSIOI� MEETING
January 17, 1955
A�ter�tabulation, the City Manager recommended accepting the low bid of �'7,�.k3.50
from W. H. Armston �ompany. �ommissioner Strang moved that the W. H. Armston
Com any be awarded the storm sewer for Palmetto and Missouri Streets for. the sum
of �'7,Ja.1.�3.50 and that the 45 day time limit be enfarced. Motion wa's seconded by
Commissioner Kennedy and carried unanimously.
The City NIanager read the following bids f or two carloads of 6 inch pipe:
McVTane Cast Iron, Birmingham
Alabama Pipe Co., Anniston
Davis Meter Repair, Thomasville
American Cast Iron Pipe, Birmingham
U. S. Pipe 8c Fdry, Birmin ham
Jas. B. Clow, Birmingham �not on standard form)
Rail Truck
1.7z 1.75
1.75 ]..77
1.�5 1.77
1.71 1.73
1.6$ 1,70
1.71�5 1.765
� � �
Commissioner Strang moved that the bids be ref erred to the Purchasing DeFartment
for tabulation and return to the next meeting. AZotion was seconded by Commissioner
Russell and carried unanimouslv,
The City Manager reported receiving ssven bids for suPplying �.�" storm sewer
pipe to be used where Russell Street crosses the creek near the new Negro Swim,;.ting
Pool. The bids were read as follows:
Pinellas Industries, St. Petersburg
p:.nellas Lumber, Clearwater
Sherman �oncrete, Tampa
Lakeland Cement, Lakeland
Universal Concrete, Tampa
Tri-State Culvert, Tampa
Armco, Clearwater
Concrete Gor•ru�ated
�10.�.0 ft.
10. LrCI
10. �.0
10.40
10.40
11.5Z
11.51
Commissioner Russell mcaved th3 t the bids be tabulated and bro ught back to the next
meeting and that the Engineer brir_g back a satisfactory repqrt for the Commission
on the advisability of usina concrete pige in conjunction with corrugated pipe and
vice versa if the �ity has some corruoated pipe in that line now. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Strang and carried unanimously.
The three bids received for 175 palm trees for Mandalay Boulevard were read
by the City �'Ianager as folZo�as:
Wilcox Bros. Nursery, Largo $p4.�5 eae
Indian Rocks I�urseries, Inxiian Rocks 10.00
Sou�h Florida l�urs�ries, Clearwater l�. $0
Commissioner S�rang moved that thQ bids be referred for tabulation and retur�ed to
tne naxt meeting� Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kennedy and carried
unanimously.
The C�.ty Manager reported that two bids had been received for one r.ew
utility billing machine for the Gas and V�Tater Department. The bids were read as
follows:
National Cash Register, St. Petersburg �4,200.00
Burroughs Corporation, Tampa t�,95q.00
Commissioner Strang moved that the bids be referred to the City Manager for study
and a report at the next meeting. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Russell
and carried unanimously.
The Mayor announced the contir.uatinn of the Public Hearing on the paving of
Harvard Street between Duncan and Keystone Avenues. The City Engineer reported
that on the low bid received at the last meeting the cost would be approximately
�y..01 per front foot and wou ld include �he modified curb. After discussion, the
Mayor reported that it appeared that the re were still five people for the project
and eicht against it. Having held a Public �earing on the pavement in harvard
Street and havino heard sufi'icient valid objections, Corrmiissioner Strang moved
that th= project be cancelled. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Kennedy and
carried unanimously.
Gommissioner Strang moved that a11 of the bids on the pavement of Harvard
Street between Duncan and Keystone Avenues be rejected due to the fact that �he
Public Hearing decided that the project would be cancelled. Moti�n was seconded
by Commissioner Russell and carried unanimously.
A Public Hearing was ca.11ed on the request of i�r. J. E. Satterfield to permit
R-�1� usage of the North 150 feet and to permit Business usage for the west 50 feet
of the south lOn feet of Tract A, Hillcrest Drive Re-SuU. The City Attorney read
the regusst from Mr. S�tterfield and also th�e Zoning Boardts recommendation that
the R-y. usage of the North 1.50 feet of Tract be appraved but that Business usage
of the west 50 feet of the south 100 feet of Tract A be denied a.s the Zoning Board
did not consider the second request to be a zoning hardship case. Mr. J. E.
Satterfield addressed the Commission explaining his requests. Tdrs. Robert Johnson,
Mr. F. J. Troman, Mr. W. D. PTatthews, Mrs. Joseph Staniszewski,'Mr. R. W. Higgins,
Mrs. Louis Podboy, i�Irs. Muriel Lewis, affected properity owners, objected to the
request to permit R-4 usage of the north 150 feet. Dr. Faye Russell objected to
-3-
CITY COMMISSION MEETTNG
January 17, 1955
bobh requests. Commissioner Kenned,y moved that the Public Hearing on both requests
be a djourned to ljarch 7th so the Commission can get a clearer understanding from
the Zoning l�oard as to what its reasons were for i, s recorru-nendation. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Boh,annon and carried unanimously. Nir, Leland Drew, member
of the Zoning �oard, being present explained the reason f�r the Zoning Board's
action was that �he members considered a hardship ex.isted when the value of a
piece of property is jeopardized by the Loning Act, itself.
A Public Hearing was arnounced on the request of Mr. Wm. L, i+�iurrie for a
3� foot setback from tha side lot line to huild an addition to an existing garage
building nn Lot 3, Block 27, lylandalay. The Mayor inquired if there were any
objections and there were none. Having held this Public Hearin� on the request of
Wm. L. Murrie for a 3� fooi; setback from the side line to build an addition to an
existing garage on Lot 3, Block 27, Mandalay Subdivision, and havina heard no
objections Commissioner Strang moved that this be approved according to the
Zoning 1�oard recommendation. Motion was seconded by Commissioner KennBdy and
carried unanimously.
The l�iayor called a Public Hearin� on the request of Mr. l+larion Blackburn
to permit i�lanufacturing usa�e of unpla.tted Block 9, Jones Sub. of Nicholsons
Subdivision, and Lots 10, 11, 12 and L•�t A, B1ock $, Property oi E, H. �oachman,
presently zoned Business. The City Attorney read the request from Mr. P_. D.
Finch, on behalf of Mr. Blackturn, and also read the Zonin� �oard's recommendation
that the request be de nied as the matter should be submitted for referendum actien.
Mr. Finch addressed the Commission explaining that the type of operation planned
for the asphalt plant would have no odor or dust. He presented a letter from �r.
A. �. Wyllie indicating approval of the request. The City Attorney xea.d a letter
of objection from i'4rs. Ray E. Grant and a petition signed by one �hundred six
people who objected to the �rantin� of the request. After some discussian,
Commis�ioners Kennedy an d Strang suggested it might be posairle for Mr, Blackburn
to locate his plant on property which is beir_� held for manufacturing purposes
near the City Airport. Mr, Finch withdrew the requesL pending a meetinP of th�
Commisaioners with Mr. Blackburn to consider other possible sites.
A Public Hearing was called on the request of J. �,T. Lester, Jr., Ida l�iae
Lester and R. M. Thompson �onstruction �ompany to permit Manufacturing usage of
Lots 11, 12, 13 and 1�., Block 4., Milton Park Subdivision, presently zoned R-4.
The request was read by the Ci�y Attorney who also read the Zonino �oardis
recommendation that the request be denied until the ownzrs of Lots 1, 2 and 3,
Block 1�., are in a greement with 1"�anufacturing zoning �n order ta make an entire
block of �TMt� zone. Nir, E, B, Casler, Jr., addressed t•he Commission, on k�ehal.f
of R. M. Thompson �ompany an d the getitioners, stating the lots would be used
for the storage of lumber only. Mr. Dan Gatlin appro ved ,�ranting the petition if
the lots were used only for storage. Mr. J. H. Gibison, Reverend J. A. Self,
Mr. R. H. Beck, NIrs. J. A. Se1f, Mrs. i�rie C. Brown, affected property owners,
protested ths granting of the request. A petition si�ned by tWenty�-four property
owners and three persons as Trustees for the Chuz�ch of God was presented requesting
that the Commission deny the request. Commis'sioner iSennedy stated that it was his
feeling that no change should be made in the zoning of this area until the owners
of Lots l, 2 and 3, Block 1�, and the owners of Lots 1, 2, 3 and L,., Block 9, across
the street agree to the proposed change. Commissioner iiennedy made ti-ie following
motion 'fIn view of �the conversation that has been presented here, the protes�s,
the recorrunendatioa of the Zoning}�oard, I move tYr2t the request of J. W. Les�er
and R. M. Thompson �onstruction �ompany be denied". A'Io+ion was seconded by
Commissioner Bohannon and carried unanimously.
A Puolic Hearing wa� announce�i on t�he request oi Mr. Edwin W. Koch for a
setback ].ine of 23 feet 6 inches from 1°iagnolia Street for I�ot 15, Druid Acres.
The City Attorney read the request and the Zoning Board�s recomraendation that the
petition be grantad. The Mayor inquired if there were any objections from anyone
in the audience and there were none. Having held this Public Hearing and heard
no valid ob jections, Comnu.ssianer Russell mov�ed that the reques� oi Edwin W. Koch
ior permission to erect a residence on Lot 15, Druid. Acres Subdivision, with a
setback line of 23 feet 6 inches from Magnolia Street, be granted accordir_g io
the Zoning �oardts recommendation. Motian was seconded by Commissioner Strang
and carried unanirnously.
The City Attorney read on its third reading Ordinarzce b72 whieh would annex
acreage in what is to be Unit 10, 8kycrest Subdivision, and a portion of Unit 6,
Oak acres Subdivision. Gommissioner Strang moved that Ordirance 6�2 be passed
and adopted on its third and final reading. Motion was seconded by Comroissior_er
RussE11 and carried unanimously.
The City Attorney presented a statement of �500.00 for his services in
cennection �i�ith replatting C'oachman Heights and a statement for �2,50.00 from Mr.
W. R. Kabrich, right-of-v��ay agent, for the same project. Commissi.oner Russell
moved i;hat the statement of the right-of-t�ray agent for �250.00 and the attorney
fees of �50p.00 be paid. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Stran� and carried
unanimously.
A plat of Betty Lane Heights Second Addition v�as presented by the City Attorney
for a�proval. He reported that he had secure�. an affidavit showin� that there were
not ten registered voters in the area, a contract s:;gned in accordance with
Ordinance 632 requirements, and a sioned se�ver a�ree�nent in which the developers
obligated themselves to pay �or their pr� rata share nf the cost of increasing
the size of the pumping station not to exceed �2,500.Q0. It was poirted ou� th�t
the name oi Overbrook Street should be changed to Overbrook Road. The Zonir.g
��i
_�_
CITY GOMMISSION MEE�ING
January 17, 1955
Board recommended R-1 zonins f or the entire subdivision, Commissioner Strang
moved the approval of the plat of Betty Lane Heights Second Addition, approval
of the zon�.ng as R-]., and the proper officials be authorized to execute the
necessary papers and contract and szgn the plat. Motion. was seconded by
Commissioner Russell and carried unanimausly.
By consent, the City Attorney was ir.structed to prepare a Resolution on
chanoin� the name of Overbrook Street zn Bet�y Lane Hei�hts.
The City Attorney reaci on its first reading Ordinance 673 whiGh would declare
the City's intE;ntion to annex acreage to be platted as Betty Lane Hei�hts Second
Addit?on. Commissioner Strang moved that Ordinance 673 be passed on its first
reading. i�iotion H�as seconded by Commissioner Bohannon and carried urlanimousl}r.
Commissioner Strang moved that Ordinanae 673 be consider�d on its second
reading by title only by unanimous consent af the Commission. Motion was seconded
by C�mmissioner R�;ssell and carried unanimously. The City 4ttorney read Ordinance
673 by title only. �ommissioner Russell moved that Ordinar_ce 673 be passed on
second reading by title only. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Bohannc�n and
carried ur_animously.
Commissioner Strang moved that Ordinance 673 be considered on its third
reading by unanimous consent. iVotion was seconded by Commissioner Russell and
carried unanirnously, l'he City Attorney read Ordinance 6']3 in £ull. Commissioner
Iiussell m�ved t:�at Ordinance 673 be passed and adopted on third �.nd final reading.
Motion was seconded by Commissior.er Bohaimon and carried unanim�usly.
The City �tterney presented for its third and fina], reading Ordinan�:e 671 which
would declare the City's intention to annex Salls 8ubdivision Unit l. He reported
that Mr. Salls had signed a contract ta put in the imFrovements in accordance
witri �rdinance 632. Commissioners Kennedy and Bohannon reported that they had
inspected the site of the progosed development ar.d inquired of A'Ir. Salls what he
intenaed to cio about the washouts and holes in Prescott Avenue. Mr. Salls replied
that he was putting in drainage tile along the street to take care of the water.
The City Engineer said he would like to make a study of the area before making
anv recommendations on the draina;e. He said it �aould be necessary to have an
easement for the storm sewer where it crosses one lot to the lake. He su�;ested
that Mr. Salls ask T�lr. Leo Butler to give him a la.yout of the sani�ary s�wers,
drainage layout and proposed plans for Pz�escott Aver_ue. The Mayor instructed the
Ci.ty Attorne;= to write a letter to Mr. Salls tellin� him jus, what engineering
data is needed.
Tn regard to the application of Mr. Leo Butler to purchase �"ive acres of
submerged land near Carlouel Sub@ivision from the I. I. Board, the City Engineer
pointed out the area on an aerial map and in% rmed the Commi.ssion that it was
outside the City limits and was ir_ the County. Nir. Ben Kren�zman was oiven
perruissic�n to take the sketch of the property to the County Engir_eering Degartment
before the matter was presented to the County Commission. The Mayor co�rimented
that the County had discussed a proposed eauseway from the mainland to that area
and suggested it might be well for the Gounty to request the State to hold ti�le
to this property as it mi�ht be naeded for right-of-way. By consent, the City
tfanager was instructed to r.otify the Director of Public Works or the County
Commission that the City Commissio� agreed that it would be a good idea for the
State to retain title to the property,
The sale of submerged land in Stevenson Creek adjacent to Lots 14, 3.5 and 16,
Avondale Subdivision, by the I. I. Board was discussed. The City �lttorizep pointed
out the salr, was advertised for objections on1y. It was agreed that the bu].khead
lir.e r�r seawall line for Stevenson Creek could be established la�er. Commissioner
Strang moved that the Commission ofier no objection to the sale inasrnuch as the
I. I. Board had already sold submerged lands on both sides of this property.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Russpll an d carried unanimously.
The City Attorney requested that Item $C, Request from Atto.rney Nodine on
behalf of his client for the Cicy to take over thz sewer pumping stabion at the
west end of Haven Street, be deferred �nd also that Item $D, Report regarding
Stevenson Heig�ts Subdivision, be deferrad to the next meeting.
Tne NT2yor suggested that Ttem $E, �ity Clerk's report or�?+Iater Contract with
John Segelken of Pineri.dge Subdivisicn, be deferre�d to the next meeting and that
Nr. H, H. Baskin be notified tnat final action will be taken on the request at
that time.
The City Manager reported that he had received an oral request from Mr.
Guy McMull.er askin� that a service station at the corner oi #590 and Drew Street
be connected to the City sewer system. Follow ing a short discussion, it was
agreed bp the Commissioners that �he request should be denied,
Commissioner Russell regorting for the Committee investigating the request
of �Iessrs. Edwin Cunningham and Glenn Liles for the Biltmore Construct;ion Company
to bu�ld a restaurant in conneetion v�ith the Shelby Plaza Motel, reported that in
their opinion the plan as proposed does not conform ta the requirements of the
Zoning ordinance and urless the plans could be altered �� bring the restaurant
under the main roof, the Commit�ee reco.:�mended that the request be denied. Mr.
Cunningham said that changin� tlze plans wou ld entail too much expense and he was
wizhdrawing his application.
2 3 �.
-5-
CITY COMMISSION ME�TING
January 17, 1955
A letter from Colonel H. �J. Woolley, President of Pinebrook and Palm Terrace
Civic Assaciation, was read statin� that they had been informed that some real
estate subdivisions just north of Pinebrook were applying for annexation to the
City and the Association f elt that if those areas were annexed, the City should
require that the develo�ers comply v:ith all of the City standards for new sub-
divisions before being taken into the City. The City Pranager said it taas his
belief that Colonel VJoU1ey was under a misapprehension as to what subdivision had
applied for an�exation as no are� �.mmediately north of Piaebrook is being con-
sidered fcsr an3zexation at this time. Commissioner Russell moved that the letter
be accepted and acknowledged by the Clerk. Motion was seconded by Commissioner
Strang and carried unanimously.
The City Nianager presented an application from Mr, Stuart Golding Lo erect
a billboard sign, 30 feet by �. feet, on top of the Small $oa� NEarina. Pfter some
discussion, the application was referred to t.ie Zoning Baard for its recommendation.
In regard to a �ommittee report on the South Shore Civic Association1s
suggestion to purchase bayfront land be�ween Turner and Rog�rs Streets, Commissioner
Strang requested that the matter be dFferred to the next meetin� as the Committee
had no� had a conference on the matter yet.
The City 1�lanager presented a Resolution requirino three property owners to
clean their �ots of weeds and underbrush. Commissioner Strang moved fhe Resolution
be adonted. Motion was Geconded by Commissioner Russell and carried unar_imously,
The City Atterney reported that the exchanoe of deeds with the Pinellas
Gounty 1�oard of Instruction for the Negro Swirnming Pool site, the cemetery site,
etc., had been acccmplished.
In discussing the bids for the iol�ling enairs for the new Baseball Stadium,
the City Nianager recommended the U channel frame type chair at �2.96 each. Mr.
Bill Sult from the American Seating Gompany addressed the C�mmission requesting
that the Citp exaraine the quality of the chairs made by his compar.y, pointing out
that they would withstand the �eather cnnditYons better and had a liietime guarantee.
After discussi.on, Mr. Su1t was notified that the bids wouZd be awarded at the next
meeting and he w ould be notified as to th� date.
Mr. A. D, Finch addressed the Commission on behalf af Mr. David Brown,
developer of Edenville Subdivision, an�. asked if the C�mmission would give
tentative approval af the groposed subdivision so the v��k on the streets, sewers,
and wat2r lines could begin. He was informed that it w azld be necessary to change
the size of the corner lots in the plat to an $0 foo� width and that the plat
should be si�nEd by all of the owners of the prop�rt3�, b4r. Finch said Mr. Brown
had signed the contract in accordance with Ordinance 632 and would comply with ali
of the Cityts ren,uirements. The P�ay�r commented that tentative approval would
be gi.ven now sub ject to the final approval of the plat o In di scussing the sand.
filter proposed for ths subdivision, Commissioner 5tranj said that �,here should
be an aereement that every house constructed in the area would be provided with a
grease trap in order to make the sand filter operate �rogerly and the Buildi:ng
Inspector should be notified of this reauzrement. The Gity Engineer stated that
the use of the sand filter bed should be considered �em�orary and should be
permitted o�ily until such time as sanitary sewers become available.
The Commission now adjourned as the City Commission and acting as Trustees
of the Pension Fund adrnitted Alex Elroy ��athis, laborer in the Parks Department,
to membership in the Pension Plan, sut,ject to a waiver of any disability due to
hernia, on a motion by Commissioner Strang which was seconded by Commissioner
Russell and carried unanimously.
There being no further business to come before trie Commission, the meeting
was adjourned at 6:if0 P,M.
Attest•
`�� r��.
Gity Audito�nd Clerk
r�
iKayor-Commission r
;
,i
CITY CO.Nf�i7ISSI0N MEETING
January 17, 1955
Mayor Commissioner Herbert M. Brown
Commissianers: Jack Russell, W. E. Strang, Jr.
Guy L. Kennedy, J. N. Bohannon
Gentlemen:
danuary lt�� 1955
The City �ommission will meet in Regular Session on Monday, J�nuary 17a 1955
in the City Hall Auditorium £or the purpose of discussing the items listed on
the attached agenda. I�leeting time will 6e 1:30 P.NS,
FCM:s
Enclosure
Very truly pou•rs,
ls� F. C. M�ddleton
City Manager
REGULAR
Agenda - City Cp�ission Meeting of January 17, 1955
Cit}* Ha11 Auditorium
1:30 P.M.
� 3�
1. Invocation, Rev. 0. H. Hudgins, Belmont Park Methodist Church.
2. Approvin� �he minutes of the Regular Meeting �f January 3, 1955 and the
8pecial Meeting of January 10, 1955.
3. Opening of bids for:
A. Pavino of Grove St. from San i�erao Ave. to Hi�hland Ave.
B. Paving Gro�te St. from �uncan Ave. to Keystone Urive.
C. Storm Se4,�er in Palmetto St. betweeri Greenwood Ave, and Missouri Ave.
D. `I'�vo cars 6" Cast Iron, Mechanical Joint Pipe.
E. Sixty feet 1�$" concrete T& G Pipe.
F. Cocos Plumosa Palm Trees for Mandalay Blvd.
G. Ltility Billing Maahine for G& W Department.
4. Con�inuation of Public Hearing on Harvard Street Pavemant.
5. Awarding of bids for:
A. Pavement in Harvard St.
B, Steel Folding Chairs.
6. Public Hearings�
A. (1) Request of J. E, Satterfield `o permit R-4 usage of the North 150�
o.f Tract 14A1�, Hillcrest Drive Re-Sub. , an area pres�ently zoned R-2.
(2} Request of J. E. Satterfield to permit �tBusiness" usage of the West
5Q' of the South 100' of Tract ^A'� Hillcrest Drive Re-Sub,, which area
is presently zoned R 2.
B. Request o�' Wm. I,. P�iurrie .fpr a 3�� setback from the side lot line to
build an addition to an existing garage building on Lot 3, Block 27,
I�Iandalay Sub.
C. Reo,uest of Alex D. Finch, or. behalf of Marion Blackburn, to permit 'iMtt
(i�7anufacturing� usage of unpla.tted Block g, Jones Sub. of Niaholsons
Subdivzsion, az�d Lots 10, 11, 12 and Lot }1At+ in B1ock $, Property of
E. H, Coachman, all of the described property being presently zoned as
t'BuSin_ess, tt.
D. Request of J. W. Lest�r, Jr., Ida Mae Lester and R. M. Thompson
Construction Co, to permit '�Mtt (Manufacturin;) usage of Lots 11, Z21 13
and lL�., Block y., Milton Fark Sub., presently zoned R-L�.
E, Request of Edwir_ W'. Kach for permissian to erect a residence on Lot 1�,
Druid Acres Sub., with a setback line of 23�, 6T! frorn Magnolia St.
This property is located at the north�dest corner of Magnolia St. and
V�'illowbrar_ch Ave.
7. CommissionTs consideration of if,ems from the Cit3r Attorneyts Office:
A. Ordinance �672, annexation af Skycrest Unit 10 and a portion oi Unit- 6,
G3k Acres Sub, on third �,�nd fi,nal reading,
B. Statements of Right of W,�p agent and Attorn�y regarding replatting oF
GoaGhman Heights.
C. Approval of plat o£ Betty I,ane Heights Additi�n.
D. Inten.tion to annex Salls Subdivision.
$. Commzssionts consic�eratifln oft
A. Report f'rom Engineering Dept. with reference to location of submerged
B. Sal e ofySubmergedWLand by the InternalbImprovement�Board in Stevenson
Creek adjacent to Lots 11i., 15 and 16, kvon�ialp Sub.
C. Request from Attorney Nodine on behalf of his client for tne City tc�r take
over the sswer pumping station at• the west end of Haven Street.
D. Report regarding Stevenson Heights Subdiva.sion,
E. City Clerk's report on Ulater Contract with John Segelken of Pineridge Sub.
F. Connection of service station at corner of ��5$0 and Drew St. to City
sewer. (Guy McMullen).
G. Request of Biltmore Const. Co. to build within the Shel�y Plaza Matel,
1$50 Iv`. Ft. Harrison Ave., a restaurant.
H. Letter from Harold D. Woolley, Co].onel, USA Retired, with referenc� to
the annexation of certain sub-standard conditions in adjoinin� subdivisions.
I. Billboard sign on top of Small Boat Marina.
�. Letter fnom South Shore C�vic Association. (Referred to Gommittee)
9. Lot i�owzng Applications.
10. IItility Improvements.
11, Any item not on the agenda will be considered with the consent of the Commission.
Adjournment
Commission actxng as Trustees for ths Pension Plan.
CZTY COiKMISSION P�E11114
January 17, 1g;5
To: Mr. F. G, Micidleton, City Manager Jan. 7, 19�5
Fram: Mr. 0. H. Anderson, Sec�y. Zoning �oard
Subject: J. E. Satterfieldts Request
The Zoning Board recomrnends that we approve Item #1 of the request which allows
the rezoning of the north 150� to R-4 from R-2 and that we recommend denial of
Item �2 in rezaning the W-50T of the South 100� of the lot to be used £or
business purposes; the reason being tliat we do not consider Item �2 as a
zoning Hardship case.
AttaGhed here to is letter of request.
Glearwater Zonino Board
ClearY+ater, Florida.
Gentlemen:
January 5, 1955
I have owned Tract A, Hillcrest Drive Resub, for more than ten years. It is
now zoned R-2, although it is bounded by R-!� on �he West and Business on the
south. The property across Hillcrest Drive is zoned R-2.
I wish to request two char.ges:
L To re-zone the North 150 feet to R-l�., This for the reason that zt has
alwaya ��en my intention to build an apartment house on the north of the lot;
furthe� because the adjoining property in the same block is designated and
improved as ,�i-4. This makes a restrictior_ �f My corner iot to a duplex
unreasonable.
2. To re-zone the West 50t of the South 100� of the lot to whatever
classi£ication is necessary to allow me to pu� a storage building thereon,
This �.s for my own use in a businsss I own, and the only activit;� would be
` fillina and gacking plastic bottles, and receivin� and shiFping li�t shipments
by truck common carrier. There would be no noise, odor or other objecbienable
aspect. Trucks would call only two or three times a week, in the alley, whieh
is already opened and used to serve bu�iness buillings fac3.ng (or backing up
to) the alley an the other side, which side is zoned £or business. It is also
my intention to build a residence or duplex on the Hillcrest Drive side, which
will effectively screen the building from that side. l�y property is perfectly
suited to the purpose I have; it can be no detriment to surrounding progerty.
I have searched di.lioently for othex property which wi11 serve my purpose, at
a price I can afford to pay, and have not found it.
I shall appreciate it if you will plac� this on your agenda for the meeting
January 6th. I shall attend in order to give further expl.anations and an�wer
any questions.
JES:s
Sincerely,
/s/ J. E. 5atterfield
Jan. 7, 1955
To: Mr. F. C. Middleton, City Manager
From; Mr. 0. H. Anderson. SE�ty, Zoning �oard
Subjsct: Request of William'L. Murrie
The Zoning 1�oard recommends that we grant the request of Wm. L. Mwrrie to add
a utility room on the rear of �arage:
Lot 3, Blocl. 27, i�Iandalay
provided he mair_tains the same building line.
Attached hereto is letter and sketch of proposed addition.
CiL y of Clearwater
Clearwater, Fla.
City Zoning Commission
Gentlemzn:
Jan. 6, 1955
I would like permission under the hardship ruling to add a utility room on
the rear of my garage at 59 Acacia Street.
Tne present garaoe is se.t back 3 feet 6 inches from tha property lin.e,
I would like permissior. to add 1Q feet witlz the same setl�ack.
Lot 3, Blk. �'7,
Mandalay Sub.
Yaurs truly,
/s� Wm. L. Murrie
2,3�
CITY COMhiISSION MEETING
January 17, 1955
Jan. 7, 1955
To: Mr. F. D, n4iddleton, City Manager
From: Mr. 0. H, Anderson, Sec'y. Zoning Board
Subject: Re-Zoning Lots 10, 11, �? and Lot rrprr in Block $, groperty of E. H.
Coachman, and Block 9, of Jones Sub.
�
The Zoning Board is of the same opinion as it was on June !�, 1954, when this
matter was presented, which is as follows:
That the request of Blackburn be denied, for the reason that it is a matter of
re-zoning rather than hardship, and changes of this type should be handled b•p
referendum, although the Board is of' the opinion that this property should remain
business rather than be recommended for rezoning, t,= for referendum action as
manufacttiring.
A�tached hereto is � copy of the reo,uest.
Zonin; Board
City of C�earwater
Clear�vater, Floriela
January 6, 1955
Re: re-zoning Lots 10, 11, 12 and Lot T�AtT in Block $, property of E, H. �oachman,
and Block g of Jones Subdivision.
Gentlemen:
Mr. i�larion Blackburn is the owner of the following praperty, to-wit:
Unsubdivided Bloc:k 9 of JONES SUBDIVISION of NICHOi,SON'S ADDITION,
according to Plat Book 4, page �2, of the publ�.c records of
Hillsborough County, Florida, of which County, Pinellas was formerly a
part; AND LOTS 1G, 11, and 12 and Lot ��AT' in Block $, according to
Plat of "Propert}= of E. H. LoachmanTt, of record in P1at Book 6, page 50,
in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida,
which is now zoned for business under t he official zoning ardinance of the City of
Clearwater, Florida, however, due to t he location of the property and the surroun�-
ing neighborh�od, particularly on the West, North and East sides, more or less, he
Yiereby reques�s that the above �escribed property be consi�iered by you ,entlemen,
and after due consideratior that the 5ame he re-zoned to a manuf°acturing district,
which unc3er our zoning ordinance will be a"Mtt zone.
Respectfully Submitted
/s,! Alex D. Finch
ADF:r Attorney for Marion �lackburn
PETITION
We the followir_o property owners of Clearwater do hereby petition the City
Gommission of Clearwater, �'lorida, to deny the reql�est of the Blackburn Paving
Company to change the zoning of pm perty, lyin� east of the Seaboard Railroad and
north of Drew Street, from present classification to Manufactu��ing area.
Signed by one hundred s�x persons.
�7an. ?, 1955
To: iuIr. F. C. Middleton, Cl�y NIanager
From: I+�r. 0, H. xnderson, Secfy. Zoning $oard
Subjec�; Re�uest of J. �J� i;ester Jr�
The Zoning Board recommends that the Board deny the reauest of J. W. Lester Jr.
and Ida Nae Lester, until lots l, 2 and 3 property owners are in agreement with
tTM't zonir�g. This then would embody the entire block as 'TNI�� zoning.
Attached hereto is petition.
ZONING AND PLAfiNING B0.4RD OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA.
IN RE THE NIATT�R OF'
JOSEPH W. T,ESTER JR. )
IDA NlAE LESTER
R. M. TH�MPSON GONSTRUCTZON CJ. )
P E T T T I 0 N
This Petition is presented to the Zonirl� and Planning 13oard of Clearwater,
Florida on behalf of R. M. THOMPSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and JOSEPH W. LESTE�t JR.
and IDA I�lAE LESTER all of whom are property owners in the City of Clearwater, Florida,
(Continued)
CI'TY COMMISSION MEETING
January 17, 1955
( Contir.ued j
This is an application for rezoning urid.er the "hardship�� provisions of the
Zoning Section of the �ity Code nf Clearwater, rlorida; Section III (1) and
Section XVII of Ordinance 627.
R. M. THOMPSON CONSTRUCTTON CO., 712 Grand Cer.�tral Avenue, Clearwater, owner�
of Lot 11, Block 9 l�iilton park Subdivision requests that the said lot be rezoned
from R 4 to M.
J. W. LESTER, JR. of �l$ Grand t,entral t�venue, Glearwater, Florida, owner
of Lots 12 and 13 Block 4 Milton Park Subdivision requests that the said lots be
rezoned from R-1� to M.
IDA MAE LESTER of 71$ Grand Central Avenue, Clearwater, Florida owner of
Lots 1L� Block 4 i�Iilton Park Subdivision requests the rezoning of said lot from
R-4 to NI.
R. M. THOMPSO N� NSTRUCTION COMPANY owns, at present Lots $, 9, and 10, af
Block 1�, Milton Park Subdivision, Clearwater, Florida as well as the lot set forth
above. Lots $, 9, and l0 are now zoned as M but furth�r expansion of the
Company's operation is restricted due ta the fact that the other company lot, and
the subject of this Petition, Lot 11, is in an R-� Area. It is the understanding
of the Petitioners that Lot 11 was zoned as N up until �ecember of 1952. It is
submitted that the rnarket value of Lot ll zoned as R-!� is depressed by virtue oF
such zoning �vhen the adjacent lot to the west is zoned as M and when lots to the
South West and Northvrest are also zoned as vI. In addition the cempany is restricted
in its expansion facilities by reason of the current zoning arrangement. It
should be noted tYiat the company has occupied this section for several years, and
has operated busir.ess operations from tnis section prior to the zoning change of
December 1952.
JOSEPH L�7. AIvD IDA MAE LESTER join in triis request to have the propertp owned
by them as set forth above changed irom R-l� zonin� to M.
The zoning Board is already aware of the zoning arrangement of these lots
as of December of' 1952. The iact is apparent that the area zon�d as M lies due
west of the Lester property and also due north with the exception, in the latter
instant, of one intervening lot also zoned as R-!� between the Lester property and
I�4 area. The effect is that the Lester groperty although zoned a R-4 is virtually
surrounded by i�i zoned areas.
Although desirous of realizing a sale oi the property it is almost impossible
to locate a buper other than one intei•ested in opera�icns requiring M zoning.
This is particularly true wh�n consideration is �iven to nearby lumber yards,
building supply houses, packing houses, and o�ther manufacturing activities. The
additional iact th at the main track of the 5eaboard Railroad runs near and through
tlie above section makes the area desirabl8 for business activities but undesirable
for residential and oLher activities perruissable in R-i�. area. The effect is that
the fair market value of the land is depressed under R�4 zoning conditions
although this same area had been zoned �I until �ecember 195z.
�9HEREFQRE your Petitioners R. M. THOiy7PSON CO., JOSEPH W. LESTER, JR. and
IDA MAE rESTER jozn in �his petition requesting that the properties owned by the
petitioners as set forth in the first part of this Petition be rezoned undEr the
"hardship�t provisions of Ordinance 627 from R-4 to M.
�s� E. B. Casler, Jr.
CASLER & D�UGLAS
Attorneys for Petitioners
Davey McMullen B].dg.
Clear��ater, Florida
-----------------------------�__
T�: Mr. F. C� Middleton, City Manager Jan. 7, 1955
From: Mr. 0. H. Anderson, Sec}y, Zcning Board
Subject: Request of Edwin �. Koch (Druid Acres Sub.)
Tha Zoning Board recommends that we grant the request for a 23�-bn side street
set back line of Lot �{15, Druid Acres.
Attached hereto is letter and request.
CI�EARWATER ZQnING BO.�RD
Claarwater, Fla.,
Dear Sirs:
Dec. 30, 1954
I am applying for a rezoning of lot #15 Druid Acres, Clearwater, F1or�da
as a Hardship Case.
(Continued)
2 ,3 �
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
January 17, 1955
(Continued)
Lot #15 is a corner lot facing East on Willowbranch and South on Magnolia
which is a half of a street. My lot backs up against another lot which faces
Regent St. So actually there are just two lots an Magnolia m�kir,g i� a side
street.
Druid Acres Subdivision restrictions are Set Back 25' Side Lines �' and Side
Streets 15T. Now since the Cit y has taken the subdivision into the City. The
Ci�g restriction on the Side street is 25T as against 15' and 5� against 7' on
the side lines Y�as me cor.fused as to where to set my house.
My house plans have been worked out before th e City had taken over and show
the seven foot side line set back and would have 23� feet on the side street or
a foot and one half Over the City restriction.
It is my sincere hope that the zoning board will go a�ong with me and allow
me to build as originally planned.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Edwin W. Koch
90C S. Myrtle Av�.
PINEBROOK AND PALM TERRACE CIVIC AS;�CIATION.
ClearwatQr, Fla.
Jan. 10, 1955
Memorandum to the City Commission, Clearwater, Fla.
(Care Mr. Middleton, City Manager>)
It has been called to our attention thai, the real estate subdivions just
north of this area in Clearwater are attempting to get eity annexation and con-
venienaes for their area tl?at is substandard �o city specifications,
The Pinebrook and Palm Terrace Civic Association which is adjacent to this
area feel that these new sub-divisions should be required to meet the city standards
before bsing permitted to enjoy or use the city facilities. The type of buildings
and streets in that new area are definately below other new subdivisions in the
city and have a tendency to lower values in this area. If not corrected now, it
might eventually develop into a 1ow standard or even slum district that would cause
the city and this area much trouble.
These neiv areas should definatply be required to meet the standards for new
additions as laid down by city ordnance. This could be by assessment on property
or possibly by damages against the developer who apparently knew of these specifi-
cations and thought he co�ld force the city to accept them as they now exisb.
Tliis oi•ganization approves the principles laid down in your ordnance for
admission of new real estate subdivisions. We object to lowering of standards
for above mentioned or any other area in Clearwater for admissions to the city.
We recommend that the City of Clearwater tal:e steps to coordinate with the
caunty of a set of building standards for areas adjacent to the city that
eventually will be included in the city proper within the next decade or so.
This should eli�ainate a reoccurance of the present situation and make new
developers play honest.
/s/ Harold D. Wooll.ey
Colon2l, USA, Retired,
President,
Pinebrook and Pa1ra Terrace Civic Assn.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS: it has been determined by the City Commission of the City of
Clearwater, Florid2, that the property described below should be cleaned of weeds,
grass and/or underbrush, and that after ten (10) days notice and failure of the
owner thereof to do so, the City should clean such proper�y and charge the co�ts
thereof against the respective property,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVEI� by the City Comm3ssion of the City of Clearwater,
Florida, t;�at -the fallowing described pro�erty, situate in said City, shall be
cleaned of weedsf grass and/or underbrush within ten (10) days after notice in
writing to the owners thereof to �o so and that upon failure to comply with s aid
notice, the City shall perfo.r.m such cleaning and charge the costs thereof agains•t
the respective properties in accordance with Section Z2$ of the Charter of the City
Qf Clearwater, as amended.
(�ontinued)
_ �-
. _ _ _ ,�:_.
�j_
CITY COi�IMISSIflN MEETING
January 1�, 1953
(Continued)
NAME DESCRIPTION COST
Mer3.e McVeigh Ghamberlain Lot 9, Block A .5,00.
726 1$th Ave. N.Eo McVeigh
St. Petersburg, Fl�..
A& W Glads Lot 5, Block C �:.00
P. 0, Box 270 Unit 7, Skycrest
City
Gulf oil �orp. 5637-Z 13-29-15 4,00
P. 0. Box 1166 Begin in N line of Gulf to
Pittsburg, Penn. Bay B1vd. 50.02� W of E
bdry. of SE'� of NW�, run h�
parallel to E bdry of SE�
of IdUl� 0 deg. and so forth.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY :'HE City Commission of the City of Clearwater, Florida,
this 17th day of January, A. D. 1955.
ATTEST:
/s/ H. G. Wingo
City Auditor and Clerk
/s/ Herbert M. Brown
Mayor-Cornmissioner
Honorable Gity CoAunissioners ' Jan. 10, 1955
Clearwater, Florida
Gentlemen:
As Trustees of the City of Clearwater Employees� Pension Fund, you are hereby
notified '•hat Alex Elroy Mathis, a laborer in the Parks Department, has been duly
examir_ed by a local physician and designated by him as a"First Class" risk.
The above employee began his service with the City on Apr. 2b, 195k. Ae is
under �.5 years of age (born Dec. 4, 1935) and meets the requirements of our Civfl
�ervice. It is hereby recoumiended by the Advisory Committee that he be acce�ted
into membership.
Very truly yours,
Advisory Couaaittee of The Employess' Pension Fund
/s/ Paul Kane, Cilairman
�s� Helen Peters
/s/ Dick Nelson
2 3 �"
,
�
`'' -,��
�
.
ORDIIYANGE N0, b72
AI� QBDINANC� ANNEXIHG ACREAGE IN WHAT TS TO BE; UNIT �10,
SKYCREST SUBDIVISION BEING E�15T OF NIMBfTS AVEIVU� AND A
Pf}Afi2(ia� �F tR3IT 6 QAR ACRES SUBDIVISI�N I�1T0 THE CORFORATE
LIMrTS OI' THF CITY OF CI,Er1Rk�ATER,, T�'LORIt7A, ANA REDEFINING
7,'fiE BOUH�ARX I.IIu'ES OF THE CITY TO INCLUDE SAID SUBDIilI$IOI�
ANA LOTS ACCc�RDING TO THE PROYTSION'S �F SECTIOid 1�1.04,
FLORIT�A ST.ftTilTES; AND PROPIDING FOR THF EFFE�TIVE I?A'PEe
i�iHER�SAS, the City CQmmission of the Citp of Clearwater, Florida, enacted
Ordinance Pto. 670 on Decembar 6, i9�y., which ordinance declared the intention of
tk,ie said City �o annex acr�age in wha� is to be Uni� �10 Slcycrest Subdivisisn bein�
east of Nimbus Avenue and a portion of Una.t 6 Oak Acres Subdivision into the corgor-
ate limits of the City of Glearwater, and
WtiEREAS, said ordi.nanae was published once a vreek for four consecutive weeks
in the Clearwater Sun, a ne�vspaAer published in the City of CZearwater, Florida�
proof of whic� publication is here�o attached, and
T�+IH�RI�;AS, mo�e than. thii:ty days has expired sinc� the enactment of Ordir►ance
�io.. 570, and no registered voter of tY�e City of Clearwater, nA owner of real estato
in the territory to be annexed, and no person whamsoever, has objected to such
annexation or has app lied to the Circui� Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in
and for Pinellas County, Flarida, setting forth any objectiaa to s��d annexation,
�a
' VIH�REAS, all of the provisions oi Sec-tion 1']loOl�, Florida Statutes, have been
i complied with.
� N�1, THEREF�RE, I3E IT ORDAINED BY TflE CI�'Y C4�IMTSSIOh1 OH THE CITY OF' CLEkR[�dATER,
FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Gity o� Clearwater, acting by and through its Gity Commiss3on,
by the authority and under the prc visions of Section 1'%L 04, Florida statutes,
herebg annexes into the corporate limits of the City of Clearwater, Florida, and
redefines the bo�.ndary lines of the said City so as ta includ$ thereixi th�
following:
,
TRACT N0. ONE
All that part of TR�CT ttAn of a RE-SUB f7F ALL OF CLAiTRAL PARK,
according to plat thereof recorded in plat book lb, page $5, in th�
Office of the Clerk of the Ciacuit Gourt, in and for Piuellas County,
Florida, which lies easterly of the Ea�t boundary oi Uait 9 of
SKYCREST SUBDIYISION, according to the p1a.t thereoi reeorded in plat
book 30, page $0, in the Office of the Clerk ai the Circuit Court in
and for Pinellas County, Flora.da, LESS AND EXGEPT the following described
tracts:
(1)' Begin at the Northeast corner of th e Northwes� Quar'ter (NW�j
of the �tortheast Quar�er (sYE�) oi Section 13, Tov�nship 29 South,
Range 15 East, run South D deg 2�.� 03TM East 50.O1 feet to South line
of Drew Street; thence Atorth 89 deg. 25t 27tt West 100 feet aiong South
line oi' Drew Street; thence South 0 cleg. 21�t 03tt East 166 feet; thence
South $9 deg. 251 27" East paral,lel with Drew Street, lOQ .feet to
intersection with East line of said Northwest Quartes (Nt��� of Idortheast
Quarter (�JE�); thencs PIorth 166 feet along said East line of' the Narthvrest
Quarter (NW�) oi the 1�ortheast Quarter (P1E�) of 5ection 13, Township 29
South, Range 15 East to P.O.B.;
(2) Beginr�ing a� Northeast corner of PIorthwest Quar�er (fiW�) of
N�rtheast Quarter (AiE�) of Secti4n 13, Township 29 South, Range 15
�ast, run South 0 deg. 21�� 03" East 50.01 ieet to South line of Drek
Street; thence I3orth $q deg. 25° 2'j� West 100 feet along the South line
of Drew S�reet for P,OoB.; �'rom said P.O.B. run North $9 deg. 25r 27fv
Vlest 327,5t� feet; thence South 0 deg. 53+ 3t�+� y�Test 36b feet; thence
South $9 deg, 25` 27" Fast 335.$O feet; thence Alorth Q deg. 2t�.f 03+► Wes�
3b6.05 feet to P.O.B.
and
TRACT idQ. T��IO
All thai part of the Southwest �uarter {SV1�J oi the Northeast Quarter
(HE�) of Section 13, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, which liss
easterly of the �ast Boundary of Unit � of SKYCREST SUBDIVISION,
according to tbe plat thereof recorcied in plat book 30, page $O in
the Oafice of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, in and £or Pinellas
Cc�unty, E'lorida, LESS AND EXCEP`� THE FOLLOUJIhd� DESCRIBED TRACTS:
(lj All o� Gunnts Addition accoxding to the map or plat thereaf r�cor�ied
in plat book 11, page $$ in the office of the Clerk of Circuit Co'urt,
in and for Pinellas Coun�y, Florida:
� ��
_z�
(2} Begin i� North baundary of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard at a point �90.02
feet East along said boundar from its intersectioa with West
b6undary of Southwest Quarter (SiV�j of the Northeas'� Quarter (NE�); ruxi
thence rlorth 0 deg. 39+ l��TT ��est parallel to said West boundary 150 ieet;
thence East parallel to Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard 110 fee�G; thence South
9 deg• 39' 47" East 150 feet to Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard; thence tiVest along
Narth line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard 110 feet to p.o.b.
(3i Begin in Nor�h boundary of Gulf�to-Bay Boulevard a� a point 7C30.02
feet Eas't along said boundary from zts intersection with West
boundary of the Southwe st �uart er { SW� j of the Idortheast Gtzarter ( TJE� );
run thence North 0 deg. 3�► 1�7T, 6dest, parallel �o sazd Laest boundary
1�20 feet; thence South $q de�. 22' S3T► East 112.13 feet; thence South
0 deg, 21�� 03tt East �.20 feet to �torth line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulavard;
thence West along tk� North line of Gulf-to-Bay Boulavard to p.o.b.;
�4) The West 1l�6 feet of the East 4'j2.2 feet of the Sou�h 67L� feet of
the Southwest �uarter (SWw) of the Northeast Quarter (NE�j o�
Sec�ion �.3, rownship 29 8outh, Range 15 East.
ALSO TO BE ANNE�ED
LOTS Fi�UR (1�), FIVE (5), SIX (6), Block A, LOTS k'piTR (�.), F'IVE (5)�
and SIX (6), Block g, and a portion of Dizncan �venue and ��iagnolia Drive,
UNIT 6 OAK ACRES SUBDIVISIObT, acenrding t o the map or plat thereof as
recorded in plat book 35, page 45 of the �public records of Pinellas
County, Florida
Section 2. This Ordinance shall becorne efiective immediatel5� upon its passage.
P�1S5ED ON FIRST READI1dG January 10, 1A55
PASSED ON SECOND READIPJG January 10, 1955
PASS�D QN TAIRD AND FINAL
READING AND ADOPTED January 17, 1955
�s/ Aerbert M. $rown
Mapor-Com.mis si oner
Attes�:
/s/ H. G. Wingo
City Auditor and Clerk
a
�
�xDzrr�rrc� �o. 673
AN DRDINANCE �ECLPRING THr^, INTEI�TS�IV OF THE CITY OF
GLEtiRV�RTER TO ANNEIC ACRE�IG� IN WF1AT ZS TO B� SECOfi1D
ADDT`PTQN TO BETTY LANF HETGHTS SUBDIVISIOi� I�1T0 TfiE
CORPORATE LIbiITS OF THE CI�X OF GLEARVvATER, FLOdtIDA,
UPON THE EXPIiiATION OF THIRTY ( 30 ) DAYS FR01�'i THE
PASSAGE OF THIS ORDII�ARICE ACCORDiNG TQ THE PROUTSIONS
OF SEGTION 171.0�., FiORIDA S`rATUTES, 1951; AND FRO-
UIDING FOR �HE EFFEC�IVE DATE OF "_'HTS ORDTNt�NCE.
BE IT ORDAiNED BY THE CITY COti'iNIISSIOPJ OF TH� CITY �F CL�ARVJATER, FLORIDA:
Section l. The City of Cleaawater, acting by and through its City Commission,
hereby declares its intention to annex into the corporate limits of the City of
Glearwater, Flosidas the following described lands lyi.ng contiguous to the te�rri-
torial limits oi said City, which lands contain less than ten (10� registered
voterss
Bein� a subdivision of the South ��$ feet of the Southeast �ivarter
(SE� af the Southeast Quarter {SE ) of Section 3., Township 29 South,
Range 15 East less tha� part in "Bet�y Lane Heights�� as recorded
in plat book 30, page 9$, Pinellas Count3r, Florida County Records;
also less the East 165.37 feet of the North 1�.3 feet of said �fluth
$5$ ieet, the same also including and being a replat of rrFirs�
Additior, to Betty Lane Heights Su�division" as recor�ed in plat book
33, page $, Pinellas County, Florida County Records, and all being in
Section 3, Township 29 South, Range 15 �ast.
Section 2e The Civy of Clearwater, acting by and through its City Commission
intends ta annex the foregoing lands accordino to the provisions of Secti�n 17L 04
Florida S.atut'es, lg5i, and to that end, the City Auditor and Clerk is hereby
directEd to publish this Orcli.�aance ixz the Glearwater Sun, a newspaper published
in the City of Glearwater, ;;�ce a week for four (4) consecutive weeks immediately
after the passage of this ord.inance.
Section 3. This Ordinance sha11 beco�n� effective im.m.ediately �agon its
passage.
PASSED ON I'IiiST READZNG January 17, 1955
gASSED ON SEC9ND READIhG January 1%, 19�5
PASSED Oh THIRD AND FINAL
READTNG AIV`D AD�2'TED January l7, 1955
• /s/ Nerbert M. Brown
�Iayor-Commissioner
Attest:
/s/ H. G. VJingo
Citp kuditor and Clerk
AFF:LDAVZT
STA�E OF FL013IDA
COIINTY OF I'INELLAS
Before me= i;he undersi�ned authority, personally appeared R�BE�tT HINS�N,
who upon being b3 me duly sworn, deposes and says:
l, That he is a representative of the owner of acreage in vahat is ta be
:�nown as BETTY LAIdE HEIGHTS ADDITTON, and that he has personal knovaledge as to the
occupancy of the land embraced in said acreage, and that said tract o� land to be
annexed into the corporate l�mits o.f �he City o£ Clearc:ater contains less than
ten (1�j regi.stered voters.
2. That this affidavit is made in complzance tivith Section 171.01�, Florida
Statutes, 1951, and is made to indace the City of Clearwater to annex the fore-
going acreage into itG corporate limits.
Further deponent sayeth not,
WITNESS my sionature and official seal ab ;learwater, in the County of Pine�las
and the �tate oi N'lorida this lOth day of January A. D. 1955.
/s/ Iiobert Hinson
St�r"Gi�IG TU AND SUB�GItILED before me this lOth day of January, 1g55-
/s/ 'Berpl F. Sydnor
Notary Public