74-123???'?iC'w's'S'M?;',;<'"a`!3?*^,..1'?'??:st lk??•??,y..y,,,,?f-.;?i a+??'?i'?;".'?- ',h?'.?•''?53?4''?S'-'•"i?+?'.?:,r':?5? Yr,
C .?ate : ? ? : 3 ? ta'rti ' +?'" v= ?Y. ?: 3??' ? ...:. ?r'? .-r?':.'.?.?'." .?, •ire ,??1??,??`,?
v.'.,`,ri_.a?bk ,i$w<. ii . ._ k•t, .titr..,:'p., .? i:'. .,,tek??;..5 ????'a'ej.r: rtd :; :•_v.?_ri.xts
¦k,
C it•
.fy
RESOLUTION
No, 74 123
WHEREAS, pursuant to the procedure established in Chapter IIA,
Housing, -of the Code of Ordinances, City of Clearwater, Florida, 1962,
relating to minimum housing standards, and the Southern Standard Housing
Code, the Building Official of the City of Clearwater has. caused to be inspected
the following described real property and the building situated thereon:
Lot 7, less the South 50 feet thereof for road right-of-way,
Block 2, W. F. Hughey's Subdivision, according to the plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, page 70, of the Public
Records of Pinellas County, Florida, also known as
1173..11731 Brownell Street, Clearwater, Florida.
The record title holder to said property appears to be
Wilma E. Ensign and Frank Eldridge, whose lawful
Attorney in Fact is Jack Kennedy, 1001 Uimerton Road,
Largo, Florida 33540, according to the Public Records
and the current tax roll of Pinellas County, Florida;
and
WHEREAS, based upon said inspection, the Building Official determined
that said property and the premises were uneafe, unsanitary, unfit for human'
habitation and do not properly comply with the requirements of Chapter IIA
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Clearwater, Florida, 1962, relating
to minimum housing standards and the Southern Standard Housing Code; and
WHEREAS, on March 27, 1974, written notice was furnished
setting forth deficiencies and violations and advising the Attorney in Fact that ti+
he had until July 27, 1974, to properly comply and correct said deficiencies
and violations; and
WHEREAS, an extension of time for compliance wa6 given because the
property was being sold; and
WHEREAS, the sale not being completed, routine inspection revealed
that the deficiencies and violations had not been corrected'and there had been }
vandalism and more deterioration of the, structure; and
esot,tl074 -123. 10-21-74 r
,1).t:i'S ?'' •i?: }•?3k`.1;-14',}x.
ki v7}a";V t:,"'+7 r!•'-.?/•Sj"?•.)ylf.`, `?.', r:J't ff rF ?..ta."?: '•*1. ' w }?il. •? .r. ';,ihlat t k- -7
l' f' yy..rt2 Kyi:'r'S?: ry,?g, pYJ.?'14e..j' µb1.:9 "?"~ - l ; r • ' a.
,??.,. ,. ,+??„, •a.?•?!Y?6? ?'?'??`'X'?i."?E'eay{?yR.'''?{Tl.?'?"'"'.rnT:: ?'.of ?.°i':''+"f?;'?"r'??"??_ d9C!i?;'F"-'?'?34!'+?`?'? 4"??•tt:"slkE?'.-(.? y`.r-{?•.y+y,
' :?iF;!9:?yt.'),?ry, ?.i .: r'i A'<'? r.l i ? •- '. -.{. s,S E" s. .: ',j '5. ?????,??.{`' '. ..? ?,,
+?'??dT°?':?a?k?????fJ?.vh?:; #:i4_,?. .¢,r_:: ?.."i'`..'i?S.?.:f?,'4.5 ,'~=iri4?:•if:?' '?` 4i.'•' •. ..x ?°' •:, ,?' ?^ - ..a". '?`? y,;.- ???
i
I
snce ;
r - L.}'dr- i°?is31,?7>?? ?'?'?" ??Y' .'N'.;i%..•:?? "' ; .. ? :`r'i?? ''-,-i";'?`v.3N; :?f:5.:'yrf. ?5t::;:-??i' F;i»-r.7;.. ??;,.•,_? t.:F
tY 1 ';?1. y,j, to ?%s,.' }-,m. .? `. li^ 3. 6?f? ?.ic ar ?.- • 1•
Fi? 1' .;1? 1. { „•e?';, ?`. ? ~ ?"r, l'`=F': ,'.. ?? x'.. i', ?rfy ..?1:.?1*.a ???y'.e.,...-s'n•'??' 3 L 7
SSyy '4.? .'l?s d;^? ? ,:?? 'y,ti.t „?'sr : ?,, ;:y?,?'',?A-, ?;..; ?<?,?' f?' 4r''? ?!•.:? -?i" ?ii?..i:
•Kr? S' ?t?,!(f}, (±'?t"y"^h;ti .LV.,,,,??Y?.:• ,?:'9'r.. 4?6 ;;s., :t;;d`s ''is.til}L 'v; i,R. ?...iy"fig ?'S,''? 'rpi^ r?&>
yy'??,, .?1; ?rry?`'s ,i j, '#,f•?'" 'Ao . ?i 'k .f' . ?i„ {c'!r ,, Y s `;: ?? ? rt. ; « a' , ? [f' ry• $i' , 1
? n t ` :3 T ?r'i '.!; .fir :,lg ''a s :•',x'..• ''.t nl••r.0. }}?; ??', j..; y-?'{';?#s?"-ir1
q?ttyy! 't "?.; ??" ?: .? ? E ^".. f :?? y A _ 'rL' }1i i. .T,?r.r• `£5??..} t
.C:y A?Xn t??i;y?, F.??a.'.?lti',?•?l?"?' . ix'?i:;rt;•}? ?? A pri, i. f,rri..f"iia?? ). ;i 5 .'?.?i•?. 3r,?.?,°?;
Y d7, i:i??-°q-?,v.??, "'? 1: .?G :'il C- : ¢, :?,•?r Jy i?.'', 'r ?y 1
fy • WHEREAS, said structure is a nuisance, is sub-standard and
constitutes a fire, safety and health hazard, and the required repairs exceed
}E{tin ,
4('1 .
fifty per cent of the physical value of the building in its present condition; and
:r
F<
WHEREAS, the Building Official of the City of Clearwater has
recommended to the City Commission that the building situated on the alcove
.;: described real property be demolished pursuant to Chapter 11A of the Code
of Ordinances of the City of Clearwater, Florida, 1962, and the Southern:
7 Standard Housing Cade; and
°r
Seri
WHEREAS, the City Commission scheduled a public hearing on said
matter for Monday, October 21, 1974, at 1:30 P. M. at Clearwater City Hall
Auditorium, had notice of said public hearing published once a week for at
;
f
.
' least two weeks, the first publication being at least ten days prior, and has
:U.
also had mailed a notice of the scheduled public hearing by certified mail,
n return receipt requested, to the occupant at the street address of the property
and the Attorney in Fact of the owners of the property addressed as indicated
e on the current tax roll of Pinellas County, Florida, said notice requiring all
r?.
1
persons interested to show cause why the ocev.pant or owner, or both, should not
comply with the order and decision of the Building Official;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA,
IN SESSION REGULARLY AND DULY ASSEMBLED, AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The City Co:nmiesion, after proper notice and public hearing,
t and having considered the evidence and testimony presented, finds that no
objections have been filed or presented or that the objections filed or presented
are deemed insufficient, further finds that the above described property
and the building situated thereon is unsafe, unsanitary, unfit for human
habitation and dangerous and detrimental to the health, safety, morals and
general welfare of the community, and does not properly comply with the
requirements of Chapter IIA of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Clearwater, Florida, 1962, relating to minimum housing standards and the
Southern Standard Housing Code.
r
A74-123
f
?S
10-21-74
?r?Tt?;, ??t"?11?"',?`.?%ja.: •''?7.1 `t?}?1F'ullr*?sAh 6?i, R"=}Y`"°''^?'.?j'.sC"?i?-i?'"'?;7 t''
r `•s
Z. Further, that the City Commission does hereby agree and concur
with and in the finding and determination of the Building Official of the City of
Clearwater, concerning said real property and the building thereon and the
occupant, if any, and/or the owners, or all of them, are ordered within
thirty (30) days after the passage and adoption of this said Resolution to repair,
alter or improve said premises and the building thereon or remove or demolish
said building in accordance with the determination of the. Building Official so
as to properly comply with Chapter 11A of the Code of Ordinances of the City
of Clearwater, Florida, 1962, relating to minimum housing standards, and the
Southern Standard Housing Code.
3. That a certified copy of this Resolution shall be immediately
furnished by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Attorney in Fact
mdthe owners of the property addressed as indicated on the current tax roll
of Pinellas County, Florida.
4. Further, that if said occupant and/or owners fail to properly comply
with this said Resolution within the said thirty (30) day period, the City
Commission shall cause the removal or demolition of said building and
shhlT 1 charge upon those benefitted and the property such special assessment
of the necessary costs incurred as determined by the City Commission and
shall provide that such assessment be a lien upon the real estate improved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 974.
•
Atte
C Clerk
-3-
? ? Re'eo#74 'l23
?i1" ,y •:Sk ,fl131' r'.`-1j :S.i'.f.. Hr•,1'n-0.''r ??-??- .}11'x' , t; "?
-'•`S.s`r?.,Y• }Y{ .1?' -.ELM ', •. 1 s t •
10-21-74
MIMS 11
? i
` r s