Loading...
03/05/1981.a'" 1 Y IL :1 . •: f.:' ?. ??i,".r:.t`.i - :?s' . 1 ,' S.r- 1'' :,f, ' S,' +?. ,lxr ,i r 1, X ': i::51?' •CFy- .?5 1 ° :11 > ,.r`.:. : r(' . S 'r;` LG%:•: ,'. - III 9'•' .1 ?. ?.: ttRt. aY??'i.' °?': ?i?J '>:' et? ?:1{• 1"'.- •"'?! lain ':f? 'i:.-a kk .1. i .l. .. °. 3'?..?' ,'1.' '? .! . ,,3, •.'r Q. •'t' .il {mot ) r . ?`.^ , _ ;T..' r 1 .'r •? .e,?+`„? ?,fa?' li? ' r t ^d 1?' „ .L •r?i ,x i rC•? 1 r t•! 'f- =3 i 4 "1 . .;jt i!' ?' i .. •, i a' i'r?? _ '.i:C? h 1`?r L Iv y ?; 1. `•x.SAF. ?;:. -'.r, .. .,i .I xr' h'i.' '.i j,t ?:4 .t b.4.,s . ar '4•- .r?r` .1'(. ?. 1 , , ,,. "., f' ..f. .?s I s. .''i. ? •t., .'1•,.^ w?,y'• ??f'. •!^ ".1 • / ?} J' ?t•, i,i Rq,.:.r .J. ?:?f `.?. r'?:?:3`i ilk 11 '.1.:: S .. `?f:•tr'j'a: "'" ,k.' i,; +`.'i':- "/f? •1;'> - ci.r '??`i• eY cr+!, t}'x-#' ' i' S':, 3' i 1.. ,? F.•? ''k •S .V? °?" ° cl'...,,-: + 1 .- , r 1 ?1 is-' ' ;i,: ?.. ,,,7'',t`.Ir' r, .Ae 5,1 t.\.. i '1 - - ''ti •s! _ r^. :}.. ?y,: i:+. . P' ; t' , '' t • S .. , x 1..,. . C,ry ?,•!'S ; ! , . IS, rr, „? ^ t"-f- '-Y" . l.L:p•w tb [1?' ';i T'T ~??• '.1 a '!, i` ' ' .i? E' .r:':, ?s ". L:f• ,1-? 'Ilif}G: •<''.• - .4, ??? c1?3v 5..?,1'C r;. i. r , 1. ,.1•, r'r. ".Y: .4 •' t 1 ,l'. - rl a',' f• .,y.. ', ??" 1 ? 'RS 'r ?'ii,lt; ,.. r t '?ti ? .:' !1` ?. .. ..-....Y..?r...?.?..arr..... .....,. ... ^ .- ...-..?.'-w. ._....?..?... `f ? •?r •:? '.,.?Li ° e s ,1 ?"p'{.SS?t.,. ??r '•?f ra 1• ?1i 1• LS'1•i Sr t' i. a ,'r, ?; yr, t }}'.i:,..}•`°i Meedl •.l err-<i'f r ,?',,: fii? ?.'r!? ; :`t ° 1 • .'v',.?,Cr`;?;':s?•i1i f•1'a i'?,t':'I f?? i , ?'•, Sid '°hl Iss ?? 5 ?' ' ' ' t1 = ? . ' ? .'1:1,'v.7isZA f ?• y? r i. .l FINAL AGENDA -CITY CO?ri11o5I0N MEETING - MARCH 5, 1981 5:00 m. r ? ?? p. ) 1. Pledge of Allegiance 1, Police Chief Klein ' 2. Invocation 2. Rev. Haimdat Sawh of the Church of the 3. installation of Mayor and Commissioners Reconciler. t 4. Introductions and Awards 3. Gifts presented to out-going Commis 5. Service Pin Awards sioners Moore & Stephan. Commissioners 6. Minutes of regular meeting 2/19/81 & Special Elect J.Calderbank,& K.Kelly, Commis- Meeting 2/25/81 sioner P.Hatchett & Mayor Lecher were 1 .' 7. Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda administered the oath of office. 4. Proclamations: CITY MANAGER REPORTS Mark Robinson Month-March 1982 • American Assoc, of University Women f 8. Selection of Board Delegate/Alternate Week of 3/15 - 3/22/81. ; 9. Preliminary Site Plan C.I.S. Ashley Oaks Sub. Citations of Appreciation: (Johnson & Zelman) M&B 22-4B, SWI of Sec.18-29-16 Rob't Aude-BAA - Signs a. Site Plan Isabelle Grenelle-Parks £, Rec. Board b. U.."rl. Harold House-BAA Zoning , 10. Clearwater Pass Bridge Toll Plaza Equipment Lease. J.Arlos Ogg-Historical Committee Automatic Toll Systems $22,630.00 5. (5) Service Pins were awarded ? 11. CDBG-Holt Ave.Drainage Outfall-N.Greenwood. KFM 6. Approved as submitted. Construction Co.,Inc. $323,858.50 7. No Citizens 8. Appointed Delegates & Alternates I { 12. Verbal Reports TBRPC K,Kelly J.Calderbank 13.'.Other Pending Matters PPC J.Calderbank P.Hatchett ? NIPO P.Hatchett R.Garvey , -_ _ -- CPTA R.Garvey K.Kelly f . 14. CONSENT AGENDA OEDPC Mayor R.Garvey f • SUNCOAST LEAGUE R. Garvey Agreements: MAYOR'S COUNCIL Mayor ; a. Cooperative Agreement with U.S.Geological ; Survey/Water Resources Probram 1980/81 9•a$b Approved w/Conditions b. Tampa Bay Intergovernmental Test Validation 10. Approved Revised Agreement` Project 11. Approved 12. a. (Haven. Hous a) Approved $1.00 per yr. Bids & Contracts Z yrs• c. Mobile CCTV Sewer Inspection System, CUES, Inc, b•Phillies Booster Trip-June 25-28,1981 } Orlando, FL $47,969 c.Phillies Dinner 3/18/81 °i d. Cathodic Protection System-Southern Cathodic d.Next ,agenda-item on extended terms fog Ma or and/or Commissioners. Protection,Danielsville, GA. $11,196.50 y e. Japanese Garden Siphon Modification Contract. e.P}iillies Parade - Sat.3/7/81. 4 Jack Laurance Contractor,Inc. $169,550.00 £•1170 Sedeeva-Not in Violation=at • present time. Change Orders: 9.1002 Eldorado-Complied with most `• f. Final C.O.-Downtown Outfall Storm Sewer,Phase City requirements. III -$9,760.0$ 3. Approved settlement stipulation-Life- g. C•0.#1 & Final-Drew St.Sanitary Sewers,East o time of Vacations - 62 Units. 4. Accepted as submitted. Old Coachman Rd. -$1,425.00 h. C.O.#1 & Final-Laurelwood Dr. Storm Drain -$39.19 5. Citizen input. 5a• Ord.#2268 Passed 1st reading as Leases: amended. i. Word Processing Equipment. $11,070.00 6. Denied request-Planning Dept. review ; Plans £r Plats area and make recommendations j. Major Plan Change for Phase II-Countryside/ 7. Continued to 3/19/81 Tracts 45,72,73 6 74(Pacific Cascade Corp) S Sec 30 $ 31-28-16 _ _ B. Continued to 3/19/81. ----------------- PUBLIC HEARINGS (7:30 .m.} 1S. (Cont'd) Proposed Amend.Chap 3A, Mobile Home Parks Code of Ord.providing clarification of definitions 6 revision of guidelines for mediation,arbitration & negotiation(Mobile Home Park Board) 1 . a. First Reading Ord.#2268-81 (cont'd 16. (Cont'd)LUP Amendment CTF-28 to RM-28 for Lot 28, ,• Sunset Point Replat S3-29-15(Key West Towers,Inc., Eid Haum) LUP 80-69. Z80-50 y, .i.. ' 17. Zoning Atlas Amend. Lots 6 thru 13 incl., Blk 6 ' CG to PS (. J. Booth Sub)(to be cont'd 3/19/81 skr "? 18. Zoning Ord. Text Changes. ) F •• 3 i _ a. Amend. Art = Sec 30.07olaterfront Property .?? • . setback} b. Amend Art YXV, Sec 35.09 $ 35.10, correcting typographical error and reference (to be cont'd to 3/19/81) , ? tom' ? ?.?_?:-•t_ . First Reading Ordinances :. 33: 92268-81 - Amend Code Relating to Mobile Home Parks 33• SEE ITEM 15a. ; to Clarity Rights to Organize, etc. 34. #2333-81 - Adopting Utilities Element of Comprehensi 34 . Ord.W2333-81 Passed 1st reading Plan 35:.#2334-81 -Adopting Energy Element of Comp" Plan. 35. Ord.02334•-81 Passed 1st reading r 36. #2335-81 - Amend.Chapt 131,Zoning,to Provide Travel 36. Ord.#2335-B1 Passed 1st reading Parks as Special Exception 37. #2336-81 - Vacating Alley in A.C.Turner's 2nd Add'n• 37. Ord,#2336-81 Passed 1st reading ' (First United Methodist Church, P.H. 2/5/81) 38.#2345-81 - Amend.Sec"72.05 of Code Relating to A1co- 38. Ord.#2345-81 Passed 1st reading s s holic Bev. to Place New Establishment tinder 2COP Classification (Lenny's Restaurant -App. 2/19/ 81) Resolutions: ITUI-R81-70 Defend City-)1.B. B. Corp. '.t• ; 39. Resolution 81- Establishing Fee to be charged f C 39. R81-19 Fees -Code of Ordinances. Adopted ?.' or learwater Code of Ord. both with binder and without binder. 40. Accepted 4 easements Sec 15-29-15 Ci Attorney Re its Second Reading Ordinances is 19•#2285-81 -Amend.Zoning Atlas of City(U.S.Home/City 9. Ord.#2285-81 Adopted `3t ' (P"H. 11/20/80) ? ) 20.#2287-81 -Amend.Ord.02019 to Change Land Use Desig- 61 i 0 20. Ord.#2287-81 Adopted . . ) nat on (LUP 8 - 21.#2298-81 -Annex.Lots 1 & 2,BXk 2, Sunset Knoll 21. Ord.#2298-81 Adopted (Upton P.H. 11/20/80) 22. #2299-81 -Zoning Property Annex.in-Ord.#229&8I 2. Ord.#2299-81 Adopted 23. #2300-81 -Annex.Lot 20,Solar Crest(Rhoades P.H.1/8/8 ) 23. Ord.#2300-81 Adopted 24.#23D1-81 -Zoning Property Annexed in Ord.#2300-81 q• Ord.#2301-81 Adapted " 25.#2313-81 -Amend.Ord.#2278 which Annex. Lot 9,blk A 5. Ord.#2313-81 Adopted Cleardun Sub"to correct description as to pt of ; Union St. annexed. 26.#2314-81 -Amend,Ord#2279 which Zoned Property in 6. Ord.#2314-81 Adopted I '• Cleardun Sub to correct description as to pt of ?' .::: Union St. Annexed. 27. #2322-81 -Vacating Pt of Alley SROW in Gould & Ewin 27. Ord."#2322-81 Adopted 1st Add'n (Frank - App. 2j19/81) 28.#2325-81 -Amend.Ord.#2019 to Change Land-Use Desig- 28. Ord.-#2325-81 Adopted r '"- nation (LUP 80-53) ' 29.#2326-81 -Amend.Ord.#2019 to Change Land Use Desig- 29. Ord.A2326-81 Adopted nation (LUP 80-55) 30. #2330-81 -Amend.Zoning Atlas of City(Helwig P.H 1/22J 81) 30.Ord.#2330-81 Adopted as Amended. 31,#2331-81 - Amend.Ord.#2019 to Change Land Use 31.Ord.#2331-81 Adopted as Amended. I Designation (LUP 80-701 32. #2332-81 -Amend•Chapt 42, Purchasingsof Code to 32. Ord.2332-81 Adopted Enumerate Instances Where Bidding may be Dispensed with. r" • ? .qq 1! •+:.d''?'`q?I?.Y.? . 't',.1? vr.J. r. v. ?:' r.'t,"•: i?r:. t`o: ??, Page 2 - - City Commission Meeting - March 5, 1981 (5:00 p.m.) FINAL AGENDA r J40. Acceptance of Deeds & Easements 41'" Other Commission Action 42.. Adjournment ? t . V Schmidt-Schivkowitsh 4 Easement '. , from Aerosonic Corp. ill sec 12-29-15. ti 41. Comm-Garvey-Lobby memo. City Atty reported on Sports Authority appointment-R.Tenney. Commission requested letter of resignation be sought. City Atty reported Tom Moore-counsel on Coopers Point Litigation. Comm.Calderbank-req.item for 3/19/81 Tax Increment Financing 52. 10:?Q?m. ' ?l tY ?S ;`r Iii ! j 1?i \ .?. .r . r 1 ! •. 44 ' .4: e.?......r..w+•.....-._RM n..?...wrl.wt/?IG?iW7. +i?aSiiP ? 1 4. % ' Agenda No, S" _1__7 MEMORANDUM TO Meeting Date:/5l81 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: SERVICE PIN AWARDS RECOMMENDATION: The following employees be presented with service pin awards for their length of service in the employment of the City of Clearwater. ? And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: FIVE YEARS William D. Cantlin Finance Department Charles F. Castanza Police Department Terrence Jennings Public Works Department TEN YEARS Gerald Bennett Utilities/Water Pollution Control FIFTEEN YEARS Gardner Smith Public Works/Public Service Zack Dudley, Jr. Utilities/Sanitation Commission Disposition: Fallow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: tgAffected Costs: -. N/A ?Attochments: ,f• ?:• . : . ..• Date. Parties Funding Source: } . Notified 0 Capital Improve- City Manager Paper: of Meeting ment Budget Bud et eratin ? O p ` ? f 5 ? Not Required 13 Not Required g p g ? Other • ? - D Originating Department: Date aSequen#ial Aduiit?istraCioii Appropriation Cade Reference I? None 4m Irv! ' ? r I V ? i < ' ! ? \ .. ., ,,.aa.,... '-• ... ? N 1 f•i',r.. •r.'? -s>s?.i .,ai'i. i,.''• 1? ??:.,,3??!''1i?;1' `.'?_ , ,, y , t ', s r ?. tf 7 • `r••?;. • ?';' , M f ,?tir•t, S.v. S'' ' 'r'v,`, . .?, ' r i' ? r .'••i ?'.t VS ''?.It??<?'?? F-, 1.{z?yl ??lr1`? 'ti ? Y •€.,•?, .•.,o, S;-,. ]•rj4F .ts_.t;R ?i?ity ?? E ? .. <: 'ra/a ' ``i4a. N? 1• Y ?=S F• i.S?t b' rs+. . ° • . _ ; ., 1, '' '"' tr=' ° s:: _` ?((`F '.1+.x?•'sii? ,?; axe p?? ($ ?, .??•? ° .. t ? , i ,; =^'';f ?,?'r. 'r,+•. ?ASi• ! ?•I,a? ?N<is l'1?? i r?]p ,{, •, r ..t• ' 1;, • t. •rY'`F?.• ,l_' Lf,•1 ,!„F?' ?,j.??y?i?;:! Ij '?-?„ ??„?i?'{f:t3? `L:r t, l tf.,rnr'•C,Af's?? ' S '' 1• • ?'~' p 7? i h r'l; I ° .?fr7. '€+s%r?• ,l?ix?r??"?'?;i' R??:G ?;: ??; rs? rwi? . •:•, .? ' ., ? I' . ?,?• ? , .. r•r7 #'i' ? ^.t.? ; f F•1`?T.. rF{i c " .}y+i?f ,?Y.,?.., C:,?F,?? . !e _. ? ,, }'`•1•`• ':1 i. y`:, .?Y'f??il ?;, ?'i'? '?f•:?; Div .(' ,? _ f' r.'. r•~j,: ,'3i ;'[/'i•1 i' ,€'?i??, rF ti 4???y''??rCrS!"NI,? g75S^lt ? - t • ? .! `'.' } f;< I? ? s; Ly°'?'t?r A.?? 6' b' ,.. ?. . ? ., I _ r , .. ° #:.?f;~. :•'? 41.' 't?''???'r'33?'yi?'fal ,.'?tNSY? ? ? !j A,F . .: ' r t,. .?' f ; !? t4y? ?VF ?;? 17?.e4f?i?l/ {?u?'}1 Fp??'i}1?R.!r ' t4,'yr r .i ' .. ' .. ? • .. : '"1' ,.. •? t }` hiy, ,?V•.,i ?f,pU Y •.? °? C?;'J(??'i"? ??;' i!qiq L"<?r 1 nAll ,,4 Fk. S •.?S 1 'lit 7*1 7ui .t'L ?,»r. ?.,• .? - r ,'_, '.ir,s''t 4?..r •. i? r?siF l?'Y,ffJJ( g • , ,',? ?f d r'S'.,? 1 •?.. •? f i?."?'i€?? ??T V+JE•i1'?'7w ' r ,'rt' ', ? ' ? e ., ,, o'ti•. Y '.. .'t_ s.f:!" r i. ? ?• ':' Y r`i?, ?SJii ?' S i ? :4 '..'r,1.. i...1P •.?.;:; `rs•l: ;j,yy!; y`'.!alt= 'r', F' .? .5 ,.• . 4: f'T•I '' ?:, x .t.T .. ,,fNalj?j?y:?ri.K"1. i•,f? ii?la'trpzf',?I Agenda No. t?'ili+tJat Meeting Date: 3/3/81 MEMORANDUM To The City Commission of the City of Clearwater 1 ..J 1 • t Y•ti.. :.t;?. .,v,r?`?Yr'-i+-H.ra t . • City Commission Minutes of Regular Meeting 2/19/81 Special Meeting 2/25/81 RECOMMENDATION' City Commission approve minutes as submitted by City Clerk. • ,f•' Vii': f:.,.;i.:,}?'r, i4t'• ? And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: Subject minutes were submitted to Commission with regular daily mail. • 7 '!fit. 't rt.•- ?'t; ,''!? " • tir a Y.. t. ,it•i fr 4'•' - Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: ?Affected Costs: ClAitachments: Parties Funding Source: Date: Notified ? Capital Improve- ?'' ;Jr.i.:,;•° paper: of Meeting ment Budget City Manager ? Operating Budget f. • r ;''tiJ'arL r. ' ?t f ? ? Ali t•??'- -j,'. E oC - Nat Required H1Nat Required ? Other Originating Department: Date BSequential City Clcrk's Office Appropriation Code Reference :,, . °S•.. None ' 'xx yi .. ? ' I ? ty ,' ! ?:' ? 1 1 ? ? a . ;,a.'4e ?.3 %, r. `, ?,"+ • S c, ':? ' + ' l ? ^,` e ' i..:i ;. it{: ,, ? r.Y7'i ?! .i• ;?'al;.`':;.' `?"; ? ?•yl? G ?., rr ,t t:• r 1 '1 ' s :,vk?IC 11t i ! ?'e ? ,.ylY ! t, ?` .'f 1.n K 1 12 40 R 40 rr"t ? . • '.I: ` . ?T?"'i)iw,ww.r ......... ... .... . -....r+-.nw..w,.wnw.r..?nw.w....,.awn....w.«vr..rwfwY]Iwn?wf9tM'l1t?Y?'A'?' Y9ltTJ?7?R?'4?1fe?.aTlww?Me?rewww+---'- - _ - 1` 'r ?i• •'i "•'?•,, . REVISED Agenda No. MEMORANDUM TO: Meeting Date: 3r/.5/81 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: SELECTION OF BOARD DELEGATE/ALTERNATE RECOMMENDATION: City Commission select those delegates and alternates enumerated below to serve on the boards listed in the background. ? And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: As requested the following list depicts those boards requiring an official delegate representing the City of Clearwater: BOARDS Name Delegate Alternate Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council Comm. Kelly Comm, Calderbank (2nd Monday - 9:30 a. m. ) Pinellas Planning Council Comm. Calderbank Comm. Hatchett (3rd Wednesday - 9:00 a. m. ) Metropolitan Planning Organization Comm. Hatchett Comm. Garvey (4th Wednesday - 2:00 p.m.) Central Pinellas Transit Authority Comm. Garvey Comm. Kelly (4th Wednesday - 9:30 a. m. ) Overall Economic Dev. Program Comm. Mayor LeCher Comm. Garvey (not scheduled on regular basis) Suncoast League of Municipalities Comm. Garvey ----- (2nd Saturday - 11:00 a. m. ) Mayor's Council Mayor LeCher Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: ?Affected Costs: NIA ®Attachments: Date: Parties Notified Funding Source: ? Capital Improve- City Manager Paper: of Meeting ment Budget of Boards ®Not Required El Not Required p Operating Budget era O Ot her Originating Deportment: Date aSequential Appropriation Code Reference Administration ? None I ? . 1 5 I i. •1 - r ? tit t ' , • t. .. ..' , ' ,..a?w.?M'iV;w.sf+.rwr.?.w..-............-w......wl?,.rr•r•..er•r'•S•:r. 'ISNT*7',. .«,?e..,.r,. !^,. ' ; ,? f ''?'e'S''?r; ;'''p" ' • ' ? ,t `?. fl rt..Ms.y.?.., ,.,..csrh+v.n+•rs•r+r•.rvs+.-t+r+?..rw....•..wr_.....-..-.?......._". _ _ _ , . !•7. , V , r js: i , • . r t'I .-.-? ?'. ,..!•' 'fit ., ?;.,'^ x s.°s,. jAgenda No. MEMORANDUM TO ' 'Meeting Date' 3?, -s? '• :,? E ; ,?'. 1. The City Commission of the City of Clearwater ' SUBJECT' Preliminary Site Plan for Ashley Oaks Condominiums (Johnson and Zelman) NI&B 22-4B, SIV4 of Sec. 18-29S-16F.. RECOMMENDATION: City Commission approve the preliminary site plan for t` .. ' Ashley Oaks Condominiums subject to the following conditions: 1. Dedication of water easement at slater mains from Druid Road to the fire hydrant as required by the Utilities Department 2. Building permit be issued within b months from the date of approval and pro- ject completed in 2 years. ' . ? And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: r " ,'•.:.. The property is located north of and abutting Druid Road, west of Happy Trails 'frailer Park and approximately 370 feet east of Belcher Road. The site is I. vacant and contains 3.51 acres A1.0.1,. I The zoning designation is 11<1-16 (P•iedium Density tiulti-Family Use) District. The Land Use Plan classification is P•ledium Density Residential. ?. Plans are to develop 50 residential condominium units on 3.22 net acres result- ing in a riot density of. 15,52 units per net acre. There will be 6 one'-story buildings and 3 tivo-story buildings on the site. • K 1 .1114 ;The Resource Development Committee at its meeting of February 12, 1971 .recommended approval of the preliminary site plan with the recommended condi-? tions and other conditions which have since been met. The developer has bee advised that the availability of sewer permits to the Bast Plant is limited and permits cannot be assured at this time as noted in recommended action on the Community Impact Statement. Commission Disposition: Submitted by: ?f ?•?r rl•rr? City Manager Date aSequentiai Reference Follow=-up Action: Advertised: ?Affected Dote: Parties Notified Paper: of Meeting CO Not Required 153 Not Required Originating Department: 11 1,11111 ill g VAttachments: --? I !)swing ? None Yy Costs: NIA Funding Source: Cl Capitol Improve- ment Budget ? Operating Budget ? Other Appropriation Code 40 E61 a 140 1 40 .t 1 r 'S r t • , 5 t ' I r. . s ".J. r(?!,t t,ir. ^h.. . f: .vY.? ..r.. -. F. ., ._._._ , ? ?.._ ..... .....r?_'LC `"!: L".°:?i ... _.... ... %.L'::J.e,ar ?,?...?? --• (0" Agenda No. ??- M E M Q RAN DU M TO : -t Meeting Date; 3-5-81 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater Community Impact Statement with Addendum for Ashley Oaks SUBJECT. Condominiums (Johnson and Zelman) M&B 22-4B, SWh o£ Sec. i RECOMMENDATION: City Commission approve the Community Impact Statement with Addendum for Ashley Oaks Condominiums,subject to acknowledgement by the applicant that no assu- rance can be provided as to the availability of sanitary sewer service and that development will proceed consistent with the City Manager's JJ.wited Administrative Moratoriums in the East Wastewater Treatment Plant, and as that Moratorium may be modified. I ? And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execuie some. BACKGROUND: The property is located north of and abutting Druid Road, west of Happy Trails 'f'railer Park and approximately 370 feet east of Belcher Road: The site is vacant and contains 3.51 acres M.O.L. The zoning designation is RM-16 (Medium Density Multi-Family Use) District. The Land Use Plan classification is Medium Density Residential. i i i Plans are to develop 50 residential condominium units on 3.22 net acres resulting in a net density of 15.52 units per net acre. There will be 6 one-story buildings and 3 two-story buildings on the site. The Resource Development Committee at its meeting of February 12, 1981 I recommended approval of the Community Impact Statement with revisions which were addressed in the Addendum. The developer has been advised that the availability of sewer permits to the East Plant is limited and permits cannot be assured at this time. f. I i 3 f I i Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: ?Affacted Costs:-.NIA [Attachments: ,r._. ltr.t,.---•? pate: Parties Notified Funding Source: ? Capital Improve- Drawing Paper: Paper: of Meeting of ment Budget Addendum O eratin Bud 13 et ? atANot Required }Not Required p g g p Other -' /° Originating Department: Data B Sequential Appropriation Code Reference Planning ? None 1 1 ? j. 1 i ! ,rl J 1 'W M s® : Ai, V Curler U. ? 1 ? MertArtle 3r. '•°? ? ' 1 hu 1 Y / • . , x.11. iao i 1 O late rice RI. C. A. 111 r 1 , . r u•>ti., st. 1 ????rlaAl 00 ri lrae Mcl1l !t. s.l. sll ` ? ; , ? f 3 . R <' ? ? • ? ? , ?'? at1 a? taaa ?e11111 e ,'? ? Dra,r ?t• ?• ? ' . ?? 7[ Clereload !t. F Court fr. Crl[-te-la tlyd. S. A. to - ? 1 anal / W . - ' y 51TE IlvdX ! r { • t •y f N Winery U. a t lelleair l4. f ?sas ren <w ow aei tsfa a? 1 1 tao acs ONO O MI6 R 10 r. Nt4 K a 40 all so-Om do. GI V. 1J• C. is-26.1m 041 F AL L TO AAY _BLVD. a. r. ur aat, a-ea-?a SR, i 0 'r ?? • - ' f MLA 22-s4 1 ; sae .' 22.3x! Mb a uE O ° ?, 11 plr' ;M68 22-1 s• 1 j C ! i14 ' mbe i f a +.I 3ju V ' ''? f aaa 22 4 7- a --? i 1 0- as ? Q • -- 2`6 ' 2MES 2 = 1 I Lj Li 1 - S 117 109 ' •, 1 14 Q 101 JAFFA PLACE 1 1 100 1 , 1 .3 I . i = ! j ?? x ? ,, l? .: .. ?}•I,.', L+ r.1', t'i't' a(S,,,F ?? ? .?.. °`•1';•'5.1+,• ! ;I',1;•/,r ''+•rl.tl.?`: 1'j• '' .. o 1 !.=•1. ..,,.+ ,1'.'?r 'r F., 1'•,41, , ..w+-1MrR`?71t4'L?%>•T:Ihr..-.. •.•-......._ .. ,_ '. t s •,. i .. :.41'j14'?. CG. -so-is _t $I. W, VA Sic. go it-is GULF 70 DAY DLYD. Wt. 40 a. V. W see. IA-21-11 ' MED 22-SA M&D m6+ 22-3A Mi t! - to ..22-5 M6E I'•, ?- ' ' OR D 1758 4.70 f it cc I I(( ! - - f ul j. LR- Ix E ! cc f ? M E D F- ZZ-aA 4L ' {. 07 vi I ' _ ? ssr• 22 S ? 4. ? CL m a: I UEE , Msa W • Li j I 22-6 ? rt- 22 !3 so al ' ws 1? d' 7 1 , r f f T Sry j ` . i .? '. ,nom ? . va:?'..i •il`'''TiC •?;^. f11 r `??.':•, aa-1:? :fix+ay}7,', y',:`.ti.' .4. . .' '`, a 11 • ... S' .. •F'k?'~V''•.w?; ;',!p ?•! '?y??'' k t•''1 `f°?yl'i'{j'`,'i?r?l'Y, s'f?•Y?::':!{,°?'.l ,,.•?..s' Curler U. . r 'I w NottksI1• Dr. ?'• a s f, aw • + c, ? t I 3 f • , L11. su r 1 C.R. 1 O [.q rise pd. IN U¦IM St, ?i • t I ?. st4 If SUMS" r92 tl.l. •t.b l. ?. 1*0 mass em dm an m .- jo .•. ...,..__?_.?? 0 a ` ? i , ` Clem 1.+? i ' I Court It. :.. Crlt•to-lily !lr/. l.0..i1 DTUI/ R/. + 1 TF ' ,? ? rl A ? ? u +? Rlr1. r 1 1 r 1 ?+ l f V 1 1 Run *TV I N ar I ? tollenlr R/, ' aals?lr? ??.:' ? ? ? tsar ? m 1 I ? e Ir11 L s , ' I, I'I 4 a y • ? 1, r?S':I.:AJi r'?.1`.. ???,• .i.?f .'.f.. y..^I{,v h:?3C?; _.?,rh ?. ? M1 .. .. .. f' .. .. ._ xNa ?..rTf^'?1rw+v:f'V!i',`,.?,...,.?tV.:•R'.'xMIRw.?v....w.......-`_•__-.-....... _...-.tea I 3 1 i I i i= f r s' i I I. ' c t I I i ' ^? I 1? f . i.. r`?Y •.• la . A ow r' • :5'' ,' , 99t?''R?rf?it!`?s?:?sricr?!suss..?r.'t?,r:??a,,+?..?+•r?r;.•?;aerw?rcv..?-1.,._N.v.,-,...,,....Y.-.....?.,.....x,,...??swe?',rx., .. , ?... :. ,_. Agenda No. Meeting Date: 7/5f81 MEMORANDUM TC The City Commission of the City of Clearwater i .. SUBJECT: ri)13? - 1101.'r AVr;iirl: DRAT%'A(:E: 01IT Ai,i. -- '1nR'rli r,itrr11V0nD . RECOMMENDATION: Tncreage the Project Budget to 5150,000 by re.111ocating the 5150,000 budgeted for acgaii.sition of the Drew Street Ri±;ht-or-Way, and award the contract for the construction of the Holt Avenue Drainas;e oti fall to 1: & \! Congtructinn Companv, Inc., ; for the sum of -121,959.50 which is the lowest resnonsive and rnmponstble bid received in accordance with the plans and specificnttons. M And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. " •' . ?; BACKGROUND: The 1ioLt Avenue DraLna;;e 0utfalL is the first nhnse n!' a program heiiii; ;. i designed to provirie relief from chronic Flooding experienced by residents of the i'lorth Greenwood Community, The Commission budgeted 1200,000 for this project as pert of, the 6th Year Community Development Block :rant Progran (1981) . This hnasl;et figssre w is set 'prior to the y development of final. engineerint, plans. Our engineers revised estinate at the time of hid ii ' was $4013,569.75. Concurrently with the development of the Holt Avenue Drain,ge plans, ? actions were initiated by n rrossn of developers to nurchase and rezone certain nroperti.es ' :. . along the Drew Street corridor between [Tnmpton Rond nnrl 'ic4ullen Rooth Rond. This s>,roup has obtainers suitable zoning from Pinellas Countv for development of this land, and they are i currently working their pronosal throsss:h the Ci.tv's annexation review process. It is anticipated that the developers wtll dedicate the Drew Street Right-of-Way at no cost to the City. The Public Works Director and Community Development Coordinator concur F•?,." ' in this recommendntLon. „ Commission Disposition: Follow--up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: ?Affected Costs:,4i i-i5g-sn ©Attachments: ' t Dat e' Parties Notified Funding Source: ? Capital Improve- Tabulation of 111 its City Manager Paper: of Meeting ment Budget i B d ? O r q Q Not Required U Not Required u ng get perat © Other c:rn1 ?`? - / Originating Department: .?V ?--.. Date aSequential Reference Cor.,c,isn 1 cy leye].osJmnnt Appropriation Code 115-?h 1 !-h'17-000000-- ? N one --how t- •1 J r fm e0 i 4` ?• -a .i k i L.4 -• ? 1 jj?'? 1 s 4 s • i' t? • ..k1 A sti 'r ?. ?y,?•, •R t, 1?. ' 4 Submitted by: Advertised: ?Affected Costs: NIA ®Attachments: City..MapagLreilf Date: Paper: Parties Notified of Meeling Funding Source: © Capital Improve- meet Budget ? Operating Budget Agreement ®Not Required FiNot Required ? Other 3, Ori inatin De artment: Date aSequential Reference g g p Administration Appropriation Code ? None ® i 4M l ado Iff 4W ? ? .l• ' ? r .. ,ate...,. ... '? . '' + : .V?.:L.it•M';rri„''?.?,..'?11+? `???:Y ?"i r .'?i?-1.k 'r?i•`"".u?r;' .. ?? 'ii' .', T+S• `£'^'c :•`: 1"'i?""•;^."lt?;,lte-hn?:`:S?`L^}1?1'tt'first?fr•y4?C;?r:.e34'?3?!fi?l;L'kSlff?NF+nr.1..r..........-?.•w.. w..r ? „' ' ', . REVISED • ? Agenda No. 7 MEMORANDUM TO: Meeting Date: 3s5/81 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: 1170 Sedeeva Street - Request for Certificate of Hardship RECOMMENDATION: IlDeny Dr. Bennett's request, and require that steps be taken to correct the zoning violation within seven days. j M And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. , BACKGROUND: Zoning violation originally discovered at the resident of ! Dr. Fenton J. Bennett, at 1170 Sedeeva Street on November 20, 1980, '. ' Travel trailer on residential lot, hooked up to sewer and electricity, and occupied by the owner's two sons. Owner was notified to abate violation, and later appealed to City Manager, requesting a Certificate of Hardship under Section 23-4 of the City Code of ; . r- Ordinances. Owner's request was to keep travel trailer as emergency : housing for his two sons until his new house was completed. The City Manager denied the request. L ' The staff does not believe the conditions described by Dr. Bennett to ' constitute an "extreme and undue hardship", as would be required by Section 23-•4 as a prerequisite for a Certificate of Hardship. } The owner, Dr. Fenton S. Bennett, has now requested to appeal the City Manager's decision to the City Commission. i' ' " Continued from 2/19/81. x " Commission Disposition: Follow--up Action: Y .y ` •F 1 l • ;;- Submitted by; Advertised; ® Affected Costs: N/A fiUAttachments: Gate: Parties Funding Source: s ;x .. !. , - - Notified ? Coplial Improve- Letters City Manager Paper: of Meeting ment Budget 1/8/81 :a•k Zf ?? 13Not Required C1 Not Required ? Operating Budget ? ather, 1/16/81 2/13/81 i E ?• 1 ca Originating Department: 2117/81 ! Date 81 Sequential Appropriation Code i Reference Building - - - - - N/A ? None T ?n I f 9 4W 4P 16 .i • ' 'r ?. 'i"=??•. .. .''.fit'``. . -,; .„ .., ... a ? I' Agenda No. f MEMORANDUM TO: Meeting Date:3 /05/8 1 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater i S U 13J ECT: WATER RESOURCES AGREEMENT WITH U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY i , i RECOMMENDATION: Approve the cooperative agreement with the United States Geological Survey for continuation of the Water Resources Program and the Urban Runoff Investigation Program for fiscal year 1980/81, i t f ® And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The City of Clearwater has been participating in a Cooperative Agreement with the U. S. Geological Survey for several years. The City pays a pro-rata share of the cost of performing a continuing survey of I hydrologic records through ground water stations and water quality stations. The City also participates in an urban runoff study which seeks to I establish pollutant levels in stormwater runoff and to evaluate potential controls, All of this information must be collected over a long period of i time, very precisely, to be effective, i t The agreement is recommended for approval by both Paul Rettig, Utilities Director and Max G. Battle, Public Yorks Director and City Engineer, ,W* Funding for ground water stations and quality water stations will come from Utility Code 420-1-2020-301 ($ 1,100 ) and funds for urban runoff study will come from Engineering Code 010-1-1321-301 ($7,000). Funds are budgeted in the Engineering Department Professional Services code to cover this cost. In_vestigati_on_ City of Clearwater Geological Survey- Hydrologic Records Ground Water Stations (FL-002) $ 650.00 $ 650.00 Quality Water Stations (FL-003) 450.00 450.00 Urban Runoff (FL-362) 7,000.00 7,000.00 Total $ 8,100.00 $ 8,100.00 I, ' i Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: k Submitted by: Advertised: ClAffected Costs: ®Attach ! %manta: P , ?7 'r ?..•,,,? arflies Funding Source: Agreement Dos M'`? e : Notified C3 Capital Improve- ` City Manager Papar: of Meeting ment Budget i ' Operating Budget ? • 1 a-'L(' rI E9 Not Required ®Not Required C] Other ? •'? Originating Department: ri Date B$equential public works Appropriation Code Reference 0 None 'y S 6? 19 l s G 1 ? % Agenda No. /. MEMORANDUM TO Meeting Date: 3-5-81 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: Tampa Day Intergovernmental Test Validation Project 1 , RECOMMENDATION: City Commission approve agreement between the City of Clearwater, St. Petersburg, Tampa, Largo, and counties of Hillsborough and Pinellas and the University of Florida Consultants, Dr. Meyer, Levine and Ironson, in the amount of $4,220. 00, And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: The use of validated examinations is required by the City's Personnel Ordinance and by the 3200 Uniform Guidelines for Selection Procedures. This means that tests must be proven to be job related and be real predictors of job performance. Test validation work is very complex and time consuming. The staff of the Personnel Department has been able to make very little progress in test validation without outside assistance and cooperation. During 1979 and 1980, the City received and administered an Intergovernmental Personnel Act Grant to fund a Tampa Say Intergovernmental Test Validation Project. This was a consortium project including the cities of Clearwater, St. Petersburg, Tampa, and the counties of Hillsborough and Pinellas. The purpose of the project was to develop valid employee selection tests and reduce costs by sharing work products and where appropriate developing common selection tests. The governments were assisted by Industrial/ Organizational Psychologists from the University of South Florida. This project has'been very successful resulting in new validated examinations for Police Officer, Firefighter, Clerk Typist I, Clerk Typist II, Equipment Operator series, Police and Fire promotional tests, Police. Chief Assessment Center, etc. By working on a cooperativ basis with the other governments and relying heavily on staff development, the City has been able to develop many more valid tests than it could not have done alone. A Federal Grant was applied for to continue the project for 1981. This Grant was not received due to cutbacks in the IPA Program. The local governments have agreed to continue the project on a scaled down basis using local funds. The City of Largo has asked to participate on a limited basis. During 1981, the project will focus on meeting the needs of each government as well as continue work on joint testa for the Account Clerk series, Water Pollution Control entry positions, supervisory jobs, and skilled trades jobs. The consultants will also continue The City's share on this project will be charged to Personnel Department Professional Services. Code and special project will be set up atinid-year. j I Commission Disposition: Follow--up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: ?Affected Costs: ©Attachments: ' Date. Parties Funding Source: Notified ? Capital Improve- Agreement City Manager Paper. of Meeting ment Budget r 2 ®Not Required ®Not Required ? Operating Budget ? Other A 7 f1 S F1, 4 Originating Department: Date Ek5equential Personnel Ap tion Cade propropriria Reference 1 2 ? No ne T to I? i i ' I i i i , E• I I I i k' i f ti! r. • • t Sa ? ' ' f1 , .;•t1^I ?'`4f S.?•! '. 11 i,. ?1. ??'.i•. S •f. ? ,.??yy?i?y 4rrvti t",:?r r tw,.r`•,,rx?.tar?.?u?.?„ y,,q„r ,? ? .. .. t' .'? ,. .. •• ea :?Si'.yr ?)+.?.???? ,r§.?t ?S, hi ?'?; '?'?;7?5-. !t. .t•?jt"y-'?tb?w••,Y+.. ?;sYx. ? ? ? ? • ? , a ' rl 5 f i. ` -5 36 (172, 869) 1120-1-1346-61107 µ•? '?? : fir. 1. MEMORANDUM TO: Meeting Date: The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: cathodic Protection System RECOMMENDATION Award a contract to purchase labor and materials to remove existing cathodic protection systems and install new systems on four (4) elevated water storage tanks from Southern Cathodic Protection, Danielsville, Georgia for $11,196.50 which is the lowest responsive and responsible bid in accordance with the specifications. tZ(And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: The Water Division requires contractual services to renLovc existing, non-functional cathodic protection systems from four- (4) elevated water storage tanks and to install now systems on each tank. The tanks were painted last year and cathodic protection is necessary to control corrosion and extend the useful life of the tanks. The existing systems are beyond economical repair. Sealed bids were solicited from four (4) companies spec- ializing in cathodic: protection. Bids were opened on February 12, 1981 and the results are attached. The low bid was reviewed by the Water Division Superintendent and found to be technically acceptable. He recommended award to the low bidder and the Purchasing Officer concurs. Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: Yes 0Affected CostskL.11)6. sn VAttochments: f ' ""`"" Date-12-23-80 Parties Funding Source: Bid [!,! ir s V 12-30-80 Notified ?ff Capital Improve- Tabulation City Manager paper: of Meeting ment Budget Cl earwater Sun d 0 O i B t - ?. D Nol Required vin Not Required ge u perat ng D Other ,.. Originating Department: Date aSequenfiiai Utilities Appropriation Code Reference 315-1-6105-636/53 p None k - i S t tl', . ?Yy I• t •' i.,vii . E;• tip, iI i?, Ii • '' '.? _ 'I. }` i",,??,r:•ofi i?o4F'`y'. !v ;_.??''' ?;}•'.`,I,'y`f,Jt' . •; ?.rr?reAl?Pt?MKa.w?tww+s?r.•.rw.ww.MS+wcw+wwrMw.•a.ws ta?t•trla•r-Y+aF?,w.snl+,ai'.'•r:M.•1?...nl?L,HMeil7Aty/?Te'?tSt.Yl1DYL? [, 4r; R? •++?•?+c?••nwwrw••-aw+ts JJJ ;^ l Agenda No. X?t its 4M . F A - nf{t S . k?4Y ,'r 7Cy...«. r`?i",tit`ryt^i 1'r,.ir .,1N',t'Y:. ?'' .. s '''•'" .. .. •i,.?R ..,.«r4..,.,.., .»••wx, n•tit`.',w:'3;!' ?T ?!: J"Si ?J.&?''.? ., . (..JjAgenda No. Meeting Date; 3/5/81 MEMORANDUM TO •The City Commission of the City of Clearwater . ., ; SUBJECT: JAPANESE GARDENS SIPHON MODIFICATION CONTRACT RECOMMENDATION: Award the Japanese Gardens Siphon Modification Contract to Jack Laurance Contractor, Inc., in the amount of $ 169,550, which is the lowest responsive and responsible bid received in accordance with the plans and specifications. ® And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. ' 5 BACKGROUND: The sanitary sewer siphon, located at Japanese Gardens Mobile Home Park, at the Bayfront, has become overloaded and, during rainy „ periods, has overflowed into Tampa Bay. The purpose of this contract is to replace the present siphon with i straight--through pipe which will eliminate the present overflow " i problems, i F The Public Works Director concurs in this recommendation, j ' ' c • i A * Code: 325-1-6204-637--535 Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: ? Affected Costs: _ 169, 550 ®Attachments: Date: 2/11/81 Parties Funding Source: Bid tabulation Notified ® Capital Improve- City Manager pa MO. Sun MO. of Meeting ment Budget 13Not Required ?Not Requi red C3 Operating Budget O i i p Other r g nating Depar tment: Date aSequential Public Works A ro riation Code ?p ? }. Reference ? None ? • e 4W ON 0 A, F ?a ?- ' 1. ?IYJ'^.KY'N"aiYRx'r.p+*teM'rlnYt?it"?ensMt??'rS??74YW1S[lll?i['??GJ7Y'SRI?.Kb7lal ?.,,?.w,....? ., , . • . Agenda No//,Y MEMORANDUM TO: Meeting Date. /5181 The City Commission of the City of Clearwater SUBJECT: FINAL CHANGE ORDER - DOWNTOWN OUTFALL STORM SEWER, PHASE III RECOMMENDATION: Approve Change Order # I and Final to Downtown Outfall Storm Sewer, Phase Ill contract, which decreases the amount by $ 9,760.08. IffAnd that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. BACKGROUND: This Change Order will approve adjustment of bid quantities to actual quantities required for construction of this project, Contractor: W. L. Cobb Construction Company Code 315-1-2420-637-541-079 * Reduce contract $ 9,760.08 Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: 0 Affected costs:. * an? ?rn <e w ?, • ,. . ...•?.= Date: Parties Funding Source: li d r ;, 1 _ Notified ? Capital Improve- City Manager Paper: of Meeting ment Budget ? O eratin Bud et F7 BNot Required M Not Required p g g ? Other i)-? V Originating Department: Date aSequential Public Works Appropriation Code Reference ? None 41 y ? y, i , -1 r y :i i • :?' '•!. .i '+ . ?? 'l'• r i 'fir'." ?! 1 1, ? wl ?? I ` 1 1 O)¦ L 0! t r }.`:}1aY44';Y'tYi/iL`,'?'?W'ri'w!1uR tL.r..•.°.3"i,lsllLf /.w.5't•?R"!5. 1"l./r, .ems. _l .. .t,. .gv« '.1e;41•.utY'YC•"`Z'11N1rt.'iR!y'il'.,•.'T{-.rll,?F'?r?'4?S?RS.'?illni^el'?tis0 r , I ' I •jyI , {f !j}II II ?. I I +4 , i iJ } t ' ly } ? 1 ? f. A ' • kr• w• ?? ff 41P 1K w FA[ 40 • 1 ` .. ?I ' !` r Pn• ,urn, yr __?-...?.?+•++w?.rr+rwr.r•. w.+'n•wn eM.inT ••,Irv•w •Y T., .1.4 ""11.7.'L' 'I? ?w!.!.'crF:I ? ??4 ?.. ? ? 4. °,•l,r ! 4 .w.?_.._-.? { : . Agenda No. / i Meeting Date: 3I5I81 MEMORANDUM T4 , The City Commission of the City of Clearwater f' SUBJECT: Change Order Number 1 and Final-Laurelwood Drive Storm Drain RECOMMENDATION: Approve Change Order Number 1 and Final for the Laurelwood Drive Storm Drain project which decreases the contract in I the amount of $ 39.19. ?. 4 [h And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. i' BACKGROUND: ' Thi Ch d ill ange Or s er w approve•adjustment of bid quantities to r actual quantities required for construction of this project. f The City Engineer concurs in this recommendation. t Contractor: Edco Construction Company, Inc. Reduce the contract amount -$ 39.19 " * Code 315-1-2428-637-541-080 V , Commission Disposition: Follow-up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: ? Affected Costs: -39.19 C'fAttachments; ? " Date: Parties Funding Source: Change order r?? `•?•-?'• ? Notified ® Capital Improve- City Manager Paper: of Meeting ment Budget Q Mot Required [BNot Required ? Operating Budget ©Oiher ? Originating Department: Date 8 Sequential Public Works ApoWopriation Code Reference ? None i . 1.7 Li 0 40 40 i .1 .1 •- ? • .' ??... I ? • ?? ? ., ?' - .? . z c..!' Et;?jT r??a?'l+;D?:'????r?•teF ':ri 'r"i; i.'S. ! t ,r•' r? C?r,..C. r:tt ;.;...r. ?„u:+;v.r 44/`cb.s n.re..r ?r .f?"t ??1.. ..,rc?, t,.:?;'r .!.:.???., rfi'i?trt. ?i' ?'??; ??{'. ?., i'f'''' i•'}+x'{i?..?.,r. y..-.r.1?'Z"?'S?'-':?n..?qw? l'yh. ?"' M ..ttb'SxS`;??. {fiCi?: ,? ' ., .''. is :;?''"• ' .? ? ?'M.????•w,???w.e?'c•y..N.K.+.i7s`S /rh",..:?flY 1f!xr?e?.v 'Iq+".. ;:*". ^;'!•..YT':•t,i 4•?' ..,..•.w.wi:????r;?i'?`,???'??Yk',.f'.'?-NM•a,r?.w..?..?...•....+....+....,»?.. { ? l t"") Agenda No Meeting Date: :-s-81 MEMORANDUM - -10: The City Commission of the City of Clearwater i SUBJECT. , i. . Wfjor Plan Change for Phase I1-Countryside/'T'racts 45,72,73 and 74 (Pacific Cascade Corporation) Tracts 45,72,73 and 74, Sec. 30 and 31-28-16E. RECOMMENDATION: City commission approve the major plan change for Phase II-Countryside/Tracts 45,72,73 and 74 with the following condition i 1. Subject to the conditions of the original plan approval dated September 20, ' 1979 and in accordance with the minor plan change approved AIay 14, 1980. And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. BACKGROUND: The property is located at the northwest intersection of U.S. 19 and Enterprise . ,'. T . Road. The site is developed with 93,000 square feet of retail/commercial space. The total acreage of the four tracts is 30.9 acres M.O.L. ; ' The zoning designation is CP (Parkway Business) District. The Land Use Plan i classification is Commercial/Tourist Facilities. Plans are to develop 75,000 square feet of office space in five buildings on the southwest portion of the site. The original plan called for five structures to be built during this phase with square footage of each building to be as follows: 7,800, 11,10o, 13,500, 16,800, and 25,800, for a total of 75,000 square feet. This revised plan calls for relocation of the five buildings and the square footage of each building; to he as follows: 53135, 5,135, 11,100, 160 132, and 37,498, for a total of 75,000 square feet. As per the original ; [. plan approval, the total site will be limited to 100,000 square feet of retail/ commercial space and lSc .000 square feet of office space. The ltesourcc Development Committee at its meeting; of February 12, 1981 recommended approval of the major plan revision. Commission Disposition: Follow--up Action: Submitted by: Advertised: ? Affected Costs: N/r1 1ri7Atta " chments: ' /' !',e: Parties oe1 Funding Source: 1 G,-• ?y`ra,.., .? s Draw i ng Notified tal Improve- •? ©Cap* POper: of Meeting meat Budget City Manager ? Operating Budget Mot Required Q7Nu1 Required kdL-*7-/q ? Other Originating Department: ' Date TkSequential Appropriation Code Reference Planning _ ? None i k `: I • m. 4th M 40 •. ? ,r'. ' ? ? .+ • Ifs ,:b ..'. • , , ?j :.• l,' lie ' ' ' .. _ •t A : ? 1. ' • iS' '.. • ? ? k ' .+..-.°?....._ ._..-w• wa..r .^we+-.y-S ?v,e?... --,.?.wr. .... ._?..__..-._ ..__ _ ' ...?_-..._..». _..»?. ?.?r.+w'.'yM'+Mw,.wWaN r.. , -.-. ?. ', . • _ ?? - ftttvtsta Apgnda NO. M E640 RA N D U M TO: Msettn Dots: ? p ? , The City Commission of the C i ty of Clearwater , ?. SUBJECT: proposed Amendment to Chapter 141)(Ordimance No. 1724). Mobile Hasa Park Board. of the Code id li f L $? '. or e nes of Ordinances providing for Clarification of Definitions and Revision of Gu , i Medlatios, Arbitration. and Negotiation (Mobile Home Park loard/City). l - RECOMMENDATION: cloy Camie.ian take the following actions: _?+ Fial Read1s*- aaaaIIdated staff recommendations as sat forth to ordinance Ho.?25147, t te t • A ?- • . •. ' • p s l., - + attached iimra v. in amendment of ordinance No.1724'; and ort to the Came loa concerning the effectiveness of Ordinssce No.172A d e [[[ r p 2. Direct staff to 'monitor an ¦s amended, following an evaluation period of some nine months. OAnd thol the aperoprlate aff1clsls be authorized I• esecute some. rring and City Commission directive of January B, MAC KO R OU N O:•Folloving the conclusion of public he o L98L. the ?Iobilo Hams Park Board held special settings n January 13 and January le. 1911 co consider the i proposod mmendmonts put forward by the Clearwater Mobile 4o-e ^+mers' Association and interested citizens ? actemdLng the meetings. The Board entertained each proposal separately with verbal input by Hr. Charles Glover and fr. Jahn Gregg reoresentint the association. ¢ach pproposal was Tither rejected or accepted by the Board and, where accepted, incorporated to Ordinance No.226d-B1. {{ = 1A number of the recommendations put forward by the Mobile Home firners' Association were accepted by the ' 7' changes Clarified ant ^rovided granter specificity in Lha R •MobtLe Home Park Board. The ma)ority of thest wording of the Ordinance and do not necessitate an its* by item explanation. One of the requested changes 'which proposed placing the burden of proof an a park owner to show that the expulsion of a park resident +was unrelated to any activities under the Ordinance, was deemed inepprppriate by the City Attorneys office and is not included to the attached Ordinance. The major issue that remains in dispute caltrasas the Legal + ity of and the Board's authority to hear and rule on dispute between owners and residents concerning rent The Associatiolt reposed that the Board have the authority to conduct unilaterally requested aaarinel- l designed to result is compulsory action in rental disputes. 7ho 30ard proposes a change tp thf OrdlAAnce • ! to allow the Board to hear remeal il:eprtes snd pubtl= tts +_:TC n4v ST Tito . The loard's lectston would ? not be binding on either party unlrss both parties consentad to writing to such binding arbitration. In i gsencf, the hard proposes to filar rentat disputes with its findings to be advisory only. In addition to the adoption of the above recommended changes to ordinance Yo.1724, staff renuasts direc- " tioc from the Cammission to monitor, 6VL1Uate and report back to the Commission on the effectiveness of ordinance .4o.1721 after an appropriate trial period. It is the staff opinion that even with the above I reposed "housekeeping" changes, Ordinance No.1724 exhibits Inherent weaknesses. The Mobile {lone Park Board bas worked conscientiously for two and one-half years to carry out the intent of the Ordinance, The Board should be commended for its effort In trying to bring mobile Kane park managament and residents together for btiateral negotiations on park rules and regulations, park maintenance and terms and condi- tions of park Eases. Oniortunatlly, the ¦ccomplishssmts of the Ordinance are Limited. Only six mobile hose parka IA tk+a City out of twenty-two have toraellr-orgsnized under the auspices of the Ordinance, Although residents of a few parks have appeared before the Board, most parks have not been heard. Thou ,. tar parks who have appeared have not utilized the proce4ures sat forth to the Ordinance by which the Board night issue advisory or binding recomssesdatiesa. The Board has not cosducced ¦ single public hearing om a compiaint registered by a mobil* hose resident, nor has the Board even boon ceded upon to mediate disputes. The hearing panel has never not to arbitrate an tspasse in :ollective negotiations; in fact, the city has not been apprised of a single park in which collective negotiations under the Ordinance have produced an agreement. The Mobile Home Park Board has never taken any formal action pursuant to the Ordinance to resolve a dispute arising from within a -oboe ' home park. I[ does not ¦ppear the,, harmony between park owner and resident has been promoted by the Ordinance. It is staff's belief that Ordinance Yo.1.I4 has created a situation which requires Board ¦eabers and 61ty staff to expend considerable tine and energy with Little or no public benefit and that Ordinance `Io.22e9-81, in particular the provision that allows the Board to hear rental disputes, has the potential to add to this exercise In futility. [It is further the opinion of staff that to provide for Additional, binding authority for the Board to me. . diate issues of rental, rates could be both illegal and ill-advised. It is the opinion of Counsel that ?aoa-voluntary binding arbitration of rental disputes would be unconstitutional under existint pravistons f law. The legal issue aside, it would he trui propristf for the City to involve itself in the area of g rent control without addressing the issue of Like requests in other areas traditionally le'- to the prLvat . market place such as with apartment rentals. F1naiLY and perhaps acct t+portrntlr, staff :aria rent controls would in, the long run work to defeat the very purpose ;hey would oe JoiLdned to serve, i. e. the l { ability of the ml home park resident to continue to reside in affordable housing. The imposition of t', tartzfsct4l rent constraints would jive impetus to the reuse of mobile home park landAfor other uses thus I'• S efosting the primary objectives of Ordinance No. 1724. +1 Gernrrtlsslan GrsDaslf,on: fattak-uD Action: S j r y + .: 3VOM11tea by: Advellleeo: pAttfclsd Catlt:- ?!?r,,^ CAITOt7M6101- Parties • Du et Notified Funding Source: O Caartal improve- Ordinance No. ' •' . Y Ctfy "*never "Pon I of Meeting monl'f)udoot 6e-e1 2 L_ . ffVl, all llefrlres La Cosrallng Q Bul et QNer>+sevlreel n Ordinance Na. l,•:3 - . i 4 t floes tputntfol r ? naling Gsparfn?ent: °aralihe* y e r r _Planning % APoroarict?Cole i , t. ... ?.., ??.....?.. C None • , ,. n. l •V ( .s•?!".KS??U"vm,Yn."++'nr.mY«•rv?.?aa.rrn xvt:•+MY!!,!s^17C`.y'a.'.:?':?•r•.:.}1 • '? -?*.SV;t.m...?.........«.. .-..•--.?. ..«.....w _ _ s Benda No. / (., •0 RA N D U ``?'r,1eeting Date; s-s-81 V?'TO: M Ef . t ' The Ci y' Commission of the City of ClearWater SUBJECT: I.and Use Plan Amendment from Loin Density Residential to high Density Residential j and Zoning Atlas Amendment from CTF-28 (high Density Multi--Family Use) District s for Lot 28, Sunset Point Replat, Sec, 3-29S-15G (Key Nest Towers, Inc.,-Eid, Ilaum) LUP 80-69, Z-85-50. RECOMMENDATION: is City Commission deny the requested Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas amendments and direct staff to review Plan and Zoning classifications for this property and that adjoining area classified RH-28 and C1F-28. ? And that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute some. ! . BACKGROUND: ' .? ' ?'•• The property is lccated north of and abutting Sunset Point Road, east of Edge- i water Drive, and west of the Seaboard Coast Line Railroad. The property j contains 0.72 acres I.I.O.L. and is undeveloped with the exception of foundations and underground electrical and plumbing work installed in 1971 them development was discontinued. The present owners wish to reinitiate development of the site at a high density, thus prompting the Land Use Plan change and correspondent Zoning Atlas amendmen . The Planning and Zoning Board • at its meeting of February 3, 1981 recommended by 1 r . a vote of 8-1 to deny the requested fligh Density Land Usc Plan and RNI-28 Zoning Atlas designations. The Board further recommended that the Planning Department review and prepare recommendation for change to the Zoning Atlas and the Land Use Plan for this property and that surrounding it now classified R?4-28 and ' C'I'F- 2 8. This item was continued from the City Commission meeting of I-ebrcrary 19, 1981 at the request of Counsel for the applicaltt. Commission Disposition: Follow--up Action: Submitted by. Advertised' lJAffected C t opts:_N/_11 13Attachments: ?, ?;'•? . date: 1/2.i/g1 Parties Funding Source: liraw in :, •' " Notified ? Capital Improve- h •,z ' • City Manager Poper:(:1 r.5riir of Meeting ment Budget ? Operating Budget ? Not Required Not Required j. ' _7,/ ? Other ' Originating Department: f Date Ei Sequential Appropriation Code 't Reference Phalli ?• - I•r_,_... Q None s lit W ....f. ?'. w ?w.l? 1 ?S 1 { A 'i. i I to ~ I i j ? SUM Ml? 1 • t j {k} 5 i e i ,y II " E I k :f • Y ? .? I } ' III - V , f s ? 9 ?E 4 s s s= s s s: r i i. j 4 t'. r • ? as 43 ? . 4t i t I A 'A to _ t 7 } ;? ! i I 3 ] 4 f0 r i E i ? d i ' . wi t3 ? i . REZONING i f I I ? WIIWWFk: L >E Y ' S k Paw Y KEPc.ar •? (.72 AcitEr ANAL hlli city 81 commission l-22-81 ,,; I t Atlas Page C•- a r 4m do s; ' f . z? I 1 i I r f+si peq flll? 5 w Wwwmm o1J¦ AAILt 5 ' f, h i if A e 19 40 U = 4m MR 40 ? 1 e r , ? ` ? ? .. E• . 't `?('` ? .{ ? 1, ? ? ?' t 1 T i I . . E j f t A'A + 1 s i t '` SEDEEVA ST 20 o Z 1 34 I 1A = g 1 x 3 g 11 ; e 72 53 y2 W 33 32 22 Q TO SUNNYDALE R. / a_ ¢? Is 20 cc'? a 67 2 I }. O V ` W rE Ii I ' •JIO 1 :1 }. V T12-78 F 2? raid ; '?+ s 1r * E t i 23 29 1 92 43 a 42 ' S E T PLA tA s R 2 tnZ ' C.R. _'32 ar/a ara, a __ E w 1 ?y All, I 1 1 s i? u Q Q ¦ 7 9 ..?f ' r , > I . 27 i JI r? 25 27 ! 1 33 34 10 I i RD A LA t ,` C C D "' w PROPOSED~' ! LAND USE PLAIN . AIWEs'1 D-111ENT . 0 REZQ11 ING Neer/Applicant : • r- `r PROPS TY DESCRIPTION . ? ? r o aror 2S, ?:? LAND USE Zo N l t`I! G S u rv s E r P R ? ..?J ; . Low oEkslrY RESIDENTIAL from: V?N T EPLAT? IQ 8.0unin rau+ril f'o&:CTF-28 t HIGM OENSIrv M .72 ACXE>i MO L to: (7A.1 • ?s.0 units aMr ar?1 tC ?M- 28 . rif ?,ocwrra.d M4V C?rv Or?wliL f+4r' "?i .' ° ' ?oblitriearing Ite'Ntumber'-Planning and . City Zoning Board Commission SCALL:1 "r 200?lfI Section 3 Township 2 9r Range !tTE Adis FRge C - 8 ? • ' _• = 10 a m Z f • 4 v L ? L am ' r t ? t ,• \ d f S .0 , L ' v ., r• J?,-? ?' #iF.. :4r., !i.. :? . ' y;e i i :' In. r* J w. a r?r ?+ I - I,; i ,`3#;- J-,;? t?? rM;E??'_n'. ,. ?• Y . . .'21.x;' .1 • t i. M' ' :,?` i? ' t: ;t' Ii '?I,: /'" . • if 't- 1,7 :%• , t•E:'d'tif¢l?Sr`'?D?3q?'r? at . . : ,u,. x ` .> i IF .? :E.. s r' rl, q. l.,r:. s.. . '{c. ;? i'T'?r, :?i'$ j(' 7 A" 't cr i 1, . . ;- ;:i :I', y ; ,:fir. ?'F'{:i,. rtr!F•4{ •r?' a '? y4.r} i.,,', :: ,..e,. ' ', X1.7. .i. .. .. •.i . . '.}. . • "r 'S;. C,•:'sZ•:w'7*es«s' tt 4?.§'111 ,a : ' . . ,{;'rr 1 'j ,j"?a`iC '•trr d `Ir,..?,. Ai!{ r' :f.. 1 . . y?,, .,! •;'I "' K , ., , ' s J 7 5,jy{,j ,'t{, ! g ' . :L ' ' • •? mo S - r ' Y,r. ry?1 ' . I rJ b'i71 r • ! `1Y. / : t •I''?'. {. : _ „ r , t'. ' P . . : ",Y f' :l, • y .? 3 :•r Y C .i?l , ? .: .'.r.. 1, . '. , ? t . k( ; t ?. " " , ` ' dt s r z t. f kQ,T +l "f:, ?T'I t ,? ! t `t s . •I'` F' 'ICI :1.• 1 ry' `i' ,ry G v .}? .,.11f. S I 't-.1^.l ;' '?? - 31 -.i: .f ;' 'r^ 3, ] ': - ! ?. ) ` 6 :?,.:? .sat _ .t :1 stF {..{t<, #s '1f• ?' I . + '.Yr: ' .t r J • i - tl,` `t:: , I,. Y{ d ^ ° } i, ' ;• .a- •r,.r. ,?. j;i,i a, _.i yS'. a .?SI Ew " u ', Y • i . 1 J 'J. ' s , -K . "'r. v j I kJ ','h•%,?, }r .;lJ' 4 :i' '4'x :,I?; ' ri. Pia1 •? . s I . n f•,•f ) .1 e' I?'h t `rill " ' \ ,,7,•a ..f .C 1 '.i*j? ,•l 'Iv. .'f 5,ri rr1•: •F, . •.4 i r 4. ,. I r .. i' ! ... •9• '4 l,r, 1 '`?'. . I. :i i" - i,;•. ;a; :r':5 ,.' r. .tr:'.' .ar',. I .,5- ;W" (A I 'I . l 3.' • i 4 [.Y V. S 1 .5 '1` ' '.s T , , f 111. • ' t "11S ,l .. ':"; s ;r- a " ' ?? b . :'`-'-e i +.fe. .=.t'',' .. .. -1' .. ', r7-', :,!•' 1 I .. 1 S•4 t •!i ..51" ^4 d,'oi ?..,?•?i"P"d'j-' vY,i xot ? ? ++,, 1j'" r 4 . • 1. ..•1. ,-S, t.,t v ;D' ',24 . 1 '' - ' ' f,,. 'j 'i, a ,t ^' .pl. :LT'•h} r "Y?;1 ,11';i 'yt' IIy. •.1, , ,f t . : 1 _ 's:; s', 2F+.s e•yf?•• ??. a, , - 'i', ` ` ",(I •f: '.t+ -.Z?; ,il ,,.',Yni', 't. r _7.1 F. 'b' I s e ;•s' 'tr, I. S'r3??''^:r. .i` " l .r. k i*,, i:..ji.,'. s.`E' ?' Nl" r,rCt 1 '?•cGi{;,1, . :t 6 ..1.. 'r1 - i '., . • ' I - ? `1 19 {?a ,r•?n .,.?p";Sr?i, r?:t,F .,,1:.•tt.,•r.. , °JT' 45 - •rh-i.'„'. f :',: F.t ' e,. '7 'j •E> ,-j 'f.. .i' `f. M;•t}N+a?''A+`. .f v?ti Tb„+•F.+A'' ?r, ,<. :`'` (. + r' , _ - 't'; ` ! fs'..I'"; ?, .5. ; i/f Kr?{iu ae°C .. ?yF . •'r .8'a•' - y_r" it,I;, .jtM711t-F :r ':?- {: 'i it :?",,1u,;' .r,; F'., I.y `?u ,.r •1'ir ik t •k . :`f,', y " .,. :f+. ,_. ?:,''J,: ;fc .5.. .11,i ,.? t?ry.R f7 -s+ .Y 3,,' •I'?lv' ,1'i?t`', :'(,'yr ¢ .i''..,.., r,i,`'.tf'' :z':- ;.i'h.,l 'i tdd,,. :d$';1:''rl i ".S'r T,f :f. a: 'Lt fig t, r. ! 1 •'t ,'-°"}'ri'r .'^ •r?'. ,. .1 . "f? .i'• ;tiA •'3 l.„ .a; •I #1,E y,ji.,^,t.;. . +ii .1r .:f,,`.:.?. .L'.. ,?.,". .fj:•. ?P'• '?. S.:Y-.i;t.. ; •;S}i?. ,f"-1?,._^?,,;t,t,a,S '.7". '.-1"f`_ ',?. •.it t I,. 1!' ' J? 'xw' ,??`I: s'`tY, :,r SG '• 1Fv,}_••t:'J . .r f', i. '.y ,r I,y, l"'i • ' :,. ' ' ,r` :.'`..' 'i f;.:,.. ''; `"5 ?tr' ?l. F.,.,' . r. r .1 9? .. ' t .r i`;, r' }3^;: ?"r t, It.- ,'3' ir`°L? ?? rti ?s' °,,; ELF y • ,,' I. •r.. `f <E?'t ••k<. 'x.: i`, .r5'I: T i - S': sir , ?,' 1.1: ''i•' ,.I+ ' - ..r _ ......-....,..,_..w_ , _ .- -- .. . ... ?Li$<?_..•,.. `.t... Fay-:: ?.:1:` 'r..-:", -r. ,~ }.r'.' r. t ?,:.{1 x , k. r. .,f. . - . t. - t,i t.t-• 4; y. t',a, , I , • r . i., _ i ' ....- s ' -45 '' - s-, is ..y', `.'.°}.y ; i r•. I ''`f l.t',-,-'-.;-:, _:?.?.l I /4 dm ADA - " ", ? ". __ ?_:",?''. L'.. I . % #0 OgICIAIA14 ? , - - 1,1 1-4? - -,.??,."- I.,. ,..,?,.,!?-,,",- " /I Ap /V o A A /V '' ?'?' . , ? - ?. -, -, '? i.r .,l ,.1. u , lry. I, ". ,-ft `.'?;;`.`!P ;i Y,., acv ,. t' .tr `., ili '' .',-..,,:6-"" ,t? .c.l!.'?. 'h k`;..?f ,,' 't ''•?.. i i',.'";fir ?. rF•., .1:" "y<,.,? .--'. " ,1. •Y3 j:! '''T;`i s .•t e1'v ;(,•,• # '! `v -i?)', .l,z ` fiF•r''S`t,I h,,:-{.?`st4:=?- 1< a`'?: c,,&'i". .. L ? , .", . -". /I , L '. ..l.. I . . . t I . 1 soon= .4, i.. .'' I'l .'i,t .... rNAD u Ow," P'?,'F ;"` ?, a:il?'. :' ,'I'xE'.1r1'1 f'?, ?' ,L: ,R, r„ t +.•. . F .* r-I ` 11.;• <.n h.". + a r d •t:' ?•. J),,( ; R':= T' ,. Y . ? ^ r ti •v1 i.. t ?'=`2:rf ? ,', ? f`Z{•.C'.i l::' ., hitr?'f.,... .,-, r ,.:ir ,Fr,4,rti,i d'-i' If ^ , 1. L .I }a,.t ,? ,.A ?C%. ?'*5; 1:?Y,-M... aq •, :.' .- bj. `',. ?',,°., •.1 ,?I,,.,rt ,I.,_i;t? , ii°i;^,C]` ,'s.''tif??r'i 'y Y`'.; 5,1';- .#;i? .e l: lV .f.' ,1 • `:r . r, :.1•..'^ ?', 7•?, i" 7, ' ? ""'2 ?''.il'-.%= . E.. :R: ;.6 "' I 'r. 13'lri ';6. r ' ''t. L I ,,l''' L j',''{l4j- ,I? I "t c .'. a i : r f tt s '? ,'4"', 'A :ti•" > 7 ' r'#, , ,? 11 J .,.• t' '' eiSE t ? ?' "V ,%,.,!??',.'A'?fl(nj -jLO t" '? " -1 r. }, { ? , 4., ., ,,7',,rV - t iff ; ' •,?I ,V r• -4 ^, <.. , ;I;tt`. i-: al.,. `?; c3; -,,', "4: ;}.S_ 1,1 I •.6'1,µN,+'} y'-, 1't"' °'rf', - .E (;,.' )' ji;.,r1 a'rt`'. ?' . -.:.. p s' .Y,. e2 t f F 1, t-' '»' S-> I, f at, ' I :v, :'c, ;':i,:°d;.I:k:. . .V . f•4 ..I. ``C +Rt''.I ''?'` ',i?;.' ,r;': Vii'.' i!' ;. 5 II' ' :'• V P },fir; , ygi T{'' ,- I , ,i I = .n -t' J :'f'i't; a?i, i I'. # , . , .. , . t;.. ; 1, ,?, , 1, , , "" r. Yip . O) 0] 4w 40