10/02/1990 (2)
'fF~ ~
ACTION AGENDA
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1990 . 1:30 PM
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCA TION
mM
ACTION
A.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. September 4, 1990
2. September 18, 1990
Continued to 10/16/90
Continued to 10/16/90
CONDITIONAL USES. ANNEXATION, ZONING, lAND USE PLAN AMENDMENTS. LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENTS. AND LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REVIEW:
THE BOARD FOllOWS THE PROCEDURES OUTLINED BELOW. ALL TESTIMONY FOR
CONDITIONAL USE REOUESTS IS GIVEN UNDER OATH.
1. The Chairperson reads from the Public Hearing NotIce each Item as it Is presented.
2. The start report and pertinent background inlormation are presented. - 5 mInutes maxImum.
3. Staff presenls any supporting written documents.
4. Staff presents any opposing written documents.
5. The applicant or hIs representative presents his case. . 5 mInutes maxImum.
6. Persons who support the applicatIon speak. 3 mInutes maximum for oach Individual;
or spokesporson for group. 10 mlnutos maxImum.
7. Persons who oppose the application speak. 3 mlnutos maximum for oach Individual; or
spokasporson for group. 10 minutes maxImum.
8. Persons supporting the application lother than applicant! may speak in rebuttal - 3 mlnutos
maximum.
9. Persons opposing may speak in rebuttal - 3 mInutes maximum.
10. The applicant has an opportunity for final rebuttal - 5 mlnutos maximum.
11. Public Hearings are closed.
12. Discussion by the Board.
13. The Board makes a decision.
FLORIDA STATUTE 286,0105 STATES: ANY PERSON APPEALING A DECISION OF THIS BOARD
MUST HAVE A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS TO SUPPORT SUCH APPEAL.
B. REOUESTS FOR EXTENSION, DEFERRED
AND CONTINUED ITEMS:
1.
Lots 48.52 and 98, Lloyd White Skinner
Sub., 201 S. Gulfvlew Blvd., Stanislaw
and Kazlrnicra Budzinski
(Srltt's Bcachslde Cafel
CU 90-63
DENIED
Request. To permIt on premise
consumption of beer and
wine
Zoned. CR-28 !Resort CommercIal)
RECEIVED
OCT 2 1 1991
CITY CLERK
P & Z AGENDA
October 2, 1990
1',
'c '
~,
C. CONDITIONAL USES:
1.
Lots 4-8, Gibson's Clearwater Heights
Sub., 1180 Cleveland St.
The CommunIty Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Clearwater IS.T.E.P.P.S.
Organlzatlonl
CU 90-64
Request. To permit 11 Level III group
care and 21 child day care
Zoned - UC(EI (Eastern Corridor
Subdistrict of the Urban
Center DistrIct)
D. ANNEXATION, ZONING, LAND USE PLAN
AMENDMENT, LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE TEXT AMENDMENT, AND LOCAL
PLANNING AGENCY REVIEW:
1.
M&B 34.26, Sec. 01-29-15, localed on lhe
enst side of Calumel Sl. npprmdmately
1600 feet west of Hercules Ave. (Johnson)
A 90-11. LUP 90-15
Request - Annexation nnd Zoning IL
(Limited Industrial)
LAND USE PLAN:
FROM: Unclassi tied
TO: Induslrial
P & Z AGENDA
Approved subject to tho following
conditions:
1. Prior to occupancy, alllocsl and state
building, flro, health ond sofcty rcguloUoM
to he compiled with;
2. Vehiculur aCCess ond egress be limited to
only the existing wcst curb cut along
Clevchmd Street; the easterly curb cut to
be removed and 0 five foot wide landscape
buffer strip sholl be provided olong
Cleveland Street for the enUre width of the
property, such landscape strip shall
include shrubs ond trees in accordance
. with City Code exterior buffering
requiremcnts; also, the aspholt shall be
removed in the right-or-way and replaced
with ncccs.'mry sidewalk, sod and curbing
parallel with Cleveland Street in
accordance with City Standards;
3. The parking area be provided sufficient
night lighting nnd designed in such a
manner not to adversely affect
surrounding public Dnd private propertYi
4. The parking area to b'e properly striped
delineating parking spaces nnd movement
nnd incorporate necessary huffer and
interior lundc;cnping pursuant to Section
136.023 of the Code;
S. An on-site outdoor piny area be provided
nnd so designed to ensure user safety.
APPROVED
2
October 2, 1990
,.
t :. .
2.
Lot 1 Rnd part of Lot 2, Blk B-1.
Maryland Sub.. located on the east side of
S. Greenwood Avo. approximately 175 feet
soulh of Turner St.
(Jaquier Investments Inc.)
Z 90-07, LUP 90-16
CONTINUED
h
LAND USE PLAN:
FROM: High Density Residential
TO: , Residential/Office
P & Z AGENDA
3
October 2, 1990
ZONING ATLAS:
FROM: RM-28 (Multi-family
Residential
TO: OL (Limited Office)
E. Chairman's Items
F. Director's lIems
G. Board & Staff Commenla
"
'--
'I
.":'~...
, .. . ,.," ~ ~ ' ,f'.,. ,','. ~, " " , .'
ITEM
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. September 4, 1990
2. September 18. 1 990
ACTION
1, '
AGENDA
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING
TUESDA V, OCTOBER 2, 1990 . 1 :30 PM
'Y?""~
.,
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION
CONDITIONAL USES, ANNEX:ATION, ZONING, LAND USE PLAN AIVIENDMENTS, lAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENTS, AND LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REVIEW:
THE BOARD FOlLOVJS THE PROCEDURES OUTLINED BELOW. ALL TESTIMONY FOR
CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTS IS GIVEN UNDER OATH.
{~...
1. The Chairperson reads from the Public Hearing Notice each item as it is presented.
2. The staff report and pertinent background information are presented. - 5 minutes maximum.
3. Staff presents any supporting written documents.
4. Staff presents any opposing written documents.
5. The applicant or his representative presents his case. - 5 minutes maximum.
6. Persons who support the application speak - 3 minutes maximum for each individual;
or spokesperson for group - 10 minutes maximum.
7. Persons who oppose the application speak - 3 minutes maximum for each individual; or
spokesperson for group 4 10 minutes maximum.
8. Persons supporting the application (other than applicant) may speak in rebuttal - 3 minutes
rnaxirnulll.
9. Persons opposing may speak in rebuttal - 3 minutes maximum.
10. The applicant has an opportunity for final rebuttal - 5 minutes moxhnum.
11. Public Hearings are closed.
12. Discussio n by the Board.
13. The Board makes a decision.
FLORIDA STATUTE 286.0105 STATES: ANY PERSON APPEALING A DECISION OF THIS BOARD
MUST HAVE A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS TO SUPPORT SUCH APPEAL.
B. REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION, DEFERRED
AND CONTlN UED ITEMS:
1.
Lots 48.52 and 98, Lloyd White Skinner
Sub., 201 S. Gulfview Blvd., Stanislaw
and Ka2imiera Budzinski
(Britt's Beachside Cafe)
CU 90-63
...
,
Request - To permit on premise
consumption of beer and
wine
Zoned - CR-28 (Resort Commercial)
l
\:"i. J.~' j ~
P & Z AGENDA
October 2, 1990
2.
Lot 1 and part of Lot 2, Blk B-1, Maryland
Sub., located on the east side of S.
Greenwood Ave. approximately 175 feet
south of Turner St.
(Jaquier Investments Inc.)
Z 90-07, LUP 90-1 6
" .:"', :, ",
...
,j'
tl.,',. .
. ..
.".
" .
C. CONDITIONAL USES:
1.
Lots 4-8, Gibson's Clearwater Heights
Sub., 1180 Cleveland St.
The Community Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Clearwater (S.T.E.P.P.S.
Organization)
CU 90-64
c'
Request - To permit 1) Level III group
care and 2) child day care
Zoned - UC(E) (Eastern Corridor
Subdistrict of the Urban
Center District)
D. ANNEXATION, ZONING, LAND USE PLAN
AMENDMENT, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
TEXT AMENDMENT, AND LOCAL PLANNING
AGENCY REVIEW:
1. M&B 34.26, Sec. 01-29-15, located on
the east side of Calumet St.
approximately 1600 feet west of Hercules
Ave. (Johnson)
A 90-11, LUP 90-15
Request - Annexation and Zoning IL
(Limited Industrial)
Co.,;;,..
.on ".,
". ,"'~ ":,]i
~!,.' ".
LAND USE PLAN:
FROM: Unclassified
TO: Industrial
LAND USE PLAN:
FROM: High Density Residential
TO: Residential/Office
ZONING ATLAS:
FROM: RM-28 (Multi-family
Residential
TO: OL (limited Office)
E. Chairman's Items
F. Director's Items
c~>
G.
Board & Staff Comments
P & Z AGENDA
2
October 2, 1990
l\lINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1990
f'''''',
(
Members Present:
Chairman Johnson, Ms. Nixon, Messrs. Mazur (arrived 1:34), Schwob, Perrell,
Hamilton and Gans
Also Present:
James M. Polatty, Director of Planning and Development
Scott Shuford, Planning Manager
Chairperson Johnson outlined the procedures for conditional uses and advised that anyone adversely affected by
a decision of the Planning and Zoning Board, with regard to conditional uses, has two weeks from this date in
which to file an appeal through the City Clerk's Office. Florida Law requires any party appealing a decision of
this Board to have a record of the proceedings to support the appeal.
ITEMS ARE LISTED IN AGENDA ORDER THOUGH NOT NECESSARILY DISCUSSED
IN TllA T ORDER.
A. APPROVAL OF MlNUTES
Motion was made by Mr. Hamilton, and seconded by Ms. Nixon, to continue the approval of the September 4
and 18, 1990 minutes to the October 16, 1990 meeting. Motion carried unanimously (6-0).
B. REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION, DEFERRED
AND CONTINUED ITEMS:
1.
Lots 48-52 and 98, Lloyd White Skinner Sub., 201 S. Gulfview Blvd., Stanislaw and Kazirniera
Budzinski (Britt's Beachside Cafe)
CD 90-63
l
,
"..
Request - To permit on premise consumption of beer and wine
Zoned - CR-28 (Resort Commercial)
Mr. Shuford gave the background of the case and submitted, in writing, the staff recommendation. Mr.
Shuford further stated it appeared from Britt's site plan that they had a legitimate number of parking spaces,
but after the permit had been issued, Traffic Engineering found that 4 spaces located along 1st Street could not
be considered grandfathered. He stated those spaces had been created after a certain date and could not be
counted which had necessitated Britt's corning in to get the variance.
!,
~.
Elizabeth R. Mannion, 1230 S_ Myrtle A venue, applicant's representative, stated Britt's is at present
operating as a restaurant and is seeking a beer and wine permit. She stated Britt's is not large enough to
qualify for a 4-COP-SRX license, which is basically for restaurants, so they must apply for the 2-COP license,
which is appropriate for their size, but requires them to have the parking requirements of a bar, with the same
percentage of sales of food to alcohol--51 %--.as the 4-COP-SRX license. Ms. Mannion stated Britt's is caught
in between the State and City Code requirements for a restaurant and a bar and this is causing a hardship for
them. She stated under the 2-COP license they are required to have 54 parking spaces and will need a 23
space variance if they are granted the Conditional Use permit. If the request for outdoor eating is denied, she
stated they will need a 17 space variance. Ms. Mannion discussed at length the history of Britt's as a
restaurant and why they did not think parking would be a problem when they moved across the street and
converted 6 units of a motel into their present restaurant. She stated they had tulked with City staff before
entering into a lease and before remodeling. Ms. Mannion further stated it was not unlil Dritt's had received
their occupational license and the City came oul for inspection that the Traffic Departmenl in their research
discovered 8 parking spaces were actually in the City's right-of-way. With regard to Keith Crawford's
comments to the parking being notoriously deficient, she stated he had told her he was thinking of their old site
when he wrote his recommendation, but he left the remarks stunding because he remembered they had come in
for the variance of 2 parking spaces with regard to the problem with 1st Avenue. She further stated Mr.
P & Z MINUTES
October 2, 1990
(2) Acceptable ingress to and egress from the site shall be provided in a manner and locati<>n 'Which
ensures optimum vehicle maneuverability and vehicular and pedestrian safety. The number of
ingress and egress drives shall be the minimul1l necessary to provide reasonable access to the si te.
to''''.'.
Crawford did not have any strong objections to their application and did not foresee any parking problems as
there was a large parking lot across the street. However, she slated Mr. Crawford had applied tbe Code
literally to protect the City from bars who might find themselves in the same position. Ms. Mannion restated
the hardship they are under and said Britt's: 1) would he willing to keep food sales beyond the 51 %
requirement up to 70 %; 2) would supply an audit each month to the City to confirm food sales; 3) 'Would
keep the kitchen open until the closing time of 11:00 p.m.; 4) would not advertise beer or wine outside the
premises; and 5) would stipulate to any kind of occupational license the City would request. If any condition
was violated the City could pull their license and close them within 24 hours notice. Ms. Mannion stated all
adjacent property owners, except the landlord across the street, had signed statements in support of this pennit
and she also presented petitions signed by 1200 customers in support.
James Mayes, 1429 Lime Street, applicant, in replying to questions from the Board slated that: 1) they have
a different landlord, but the management and the food operation are the same as they have had the past four
years; 2) they are not asking for package sales of beer and wine, because it is not a bar and tbey are only
concerned with consumption on premises to accompany food; 3) prior to signing the lease he talked with City
officials, and was told it was zoned for an SRX and not for beer and wine. but he was not aware there was a
difference in parking requirements; 4) they had gone from 2400 sq. ft. to 2000 sq. ft. and from 126 seats to
84 seats when they reopened; 5) they have not eliminated any parking spaces, nor have they added any seats in
the restaurant, but they have moved some seating from the inside to the outside; 6) they are not advertising
beer or wine for sale now, but are giving away three free beers per customer per day; 7) the Flanning and
Development Department had asked him to request everything they were proposing at one time and come
before all the boards; 8) originally they were planning to request the beer and wine pennit and then eventually
request outdoor seating; 9) if they were not requesting outdoor seating, they would not be as deficient in
parking spaces. He presented a site plan and showed where they propose to eliminate 2 parking spaces for
outdoor seating. Mr. Mayes stated they would not need to increase the seating to obtain the 2.COP license,
they are only deficient in that the City d.oes not have a 2-COP-SRX license.
No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request.
c..
Mr. Polatty stated what Britt's is really asking for is the creation of a new alcoholic beverage license called a
2-COP-SRX and that they would have to present that argument for the parking variance before the
Development Code Adjustment Board. Mr. Shuford stated he had just finished bilking with Keith Crawford on
the telephone to clear up his comments on the application and that Mr. Crawford told him he did n()t have any
violent objections, that his written comments had been directed to their prior location. but he felt fairly strongly
that the parking requirements should be met.
Discussion ensued with the Board members expressing concerns including the shortage of required parking
spaces and the setting of a precedent for other hotel/motel conversions to seek beer and wine variances.
Motion was made by Mr. Gans, and seconded by Mr. MlUUr, to deny the above request because it does not
meet the Standards of Approval of the Land Development Code of ~137.011(d) and specifically it does not
meet the conditional use standards ~136.025(2)(3)(6) and (7), which state as follows:
(3) Noise generated from the use shall not unreasonably diminish the use, enjoyment or value of
surrounding properties.
(6) Sufficient area shall he afforded for parking in accord with ~ 136.022 of this chapter.
(7) The use shall be reasonably compatible with surrounding uses as measured by building setbacks,
open spaces, hours of operation, building and site appearance, architectural design and other
factors which may be determined appropriate 10 assess the compatibility of uses.
Motion carried unanimously (7 to 0).
(
.........
P & Z MINUTES
2
October 2, 1990
Zoned - UC(E) (Eastern Corridor Subdistrict of the Urban Center District)
C. CONDITIONAL USES:
1. Lots 4-8, Gibson's Clearwater Heights Sub., 1180 Cleveland St.
The Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Clearwater (S.T.E.P.P.S. Organization)
CU 90-64
,..,.oL..
r
Request - To permit 1) Level III group care and 2) child day care
Mr. Shuford gave the background of the case and submitted, in writing, the staff recommendation.
Jerry D. Sternstein, Economic Development Director for the City of Clearwater, 455 S. Alternate 19,
#165, Palm Harbor, representative of the applicant, stated the City advertised this property in the newspaper
several months ago after electing to put the property to some use pending future development plans. They had
received one bona fide response from Joyce Frohlich of the S.T.E.P.P.S. organization. He stated this had been
presented at the Community Development Agency board meetings and that Ms. Frohlich was there to answer
any questions.
Joyce Frohlich, 3108 Thomas Road, applicant, responded to questions from the Board and stated that: 1)
S.T.E.P.P.S. is a non-profit Christian social service organization, which she founded in 1986, in Palm Harbor,
and which has been located in the 1100 Building on Cleveland for the past three years; 2) she considers it is an
outreach of her church--Countryside Christian Center; 3) the majority of the funding comes from private
sources, but that three foundations also contribute on a monthly basis; 4) they do not charge their clients for
any services, but do have a fee of $25.00 for counselor training seminars, which can be waived if necessary; 5)
they employ 2 counselors, besides herself, and a part-time secretary and have 10 volunteers; 6) they provide
counselling and child birth classes at the pregnancy center and distribute clothes and furniture donated to them;
7) they have serviced 7000 clients over 4-1/2 years, many of whom came in for pregnancy tests only; and 8)
they are listed in the phone book, but most of their advertising is done by word of mouth.
(
'f",...
In response to questions by the Board, Mr. Sternstein stated: 1) they understand the 5 conditions required by
the staff and have no problem with them; 2) the City had talked with the Downtown Clearwater Association
and they were informed of what was being done; 3) this was not a controversial issue as was Isaiah's Inn,
which had been brought up by the Board. Mr. Sternstein further stated he did not think renting to
S.T.E.P.P.S. would be harmful to the City, but that leaving the building empty could be harmful.
No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request.
Discussion ensued with the Board members expressing concerns about: 1) this being a poor location for
housing 13 people for six to eight months; 2) the heavy traffic impact on Highway 60 in the downtown area; 3)
the lack of support or opposition by citizens of the community; 4) the cost of repairs in bringing the building to
code; and 5) safety regulations.
Motion was made by Mr. Schwob, and seconded by Mr. Mazur, to approve the above request subject to the
following conditions: 1) Prior to occupancy, all local and state building, fire, health and safety regulations to be
complied with; 2) Vehicular access and egress be limited to only tbe existing west curb cut along Cleveland
Street; the easterly curb cut to be removed and a five foot wide landscape buffer strip shall be provided along
Cleveland Street for the entire width of the property, such landscape strip shall include shrubs and trees in
accordance with City Code exterior buffering requirements; also, the asphalt shall be removed in the right-ofr
way and replaced with necessary sidewalk, sod and curbing parallel with Cleveland Street in accordance with
City Standards; 3) The parking area be provided sufficient night lighting and designed in such a manner not to
adversely affect surrounding public and private property; 4) The parking area to be properly striped delineating
parking spaces and movement and incorporate necessary buffer and interior landscaping pursuant to Section
136.023 of the Code; and 5) An on-site outdoor play area be provided and so designed to ensure user safety.
Motion carried by a vote of 4 - 3, with Messrs. Ferrell, Johnson and Hamilton voting "nay" because of the
location.
\
,~.
P & Z MINUTES
3
October 2, 1990
ZONING ATLAS:
FROM: RM-28 (Multi-family Residential
TO: OL (Limited Office)
D. ANNEXATION, ZONING, LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
TEXT AMENDMENT, AND LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY REVIEW:
("
l,
1.
M&B 34.26, Sec. 01-29-15, located on the east side of Culumet St. approximately 1600 feet west
of Hercules Ave. (Johnson)
A 90-11, LUP 90-15
Request -Annexation and Zoning IL (Limited Industrial)
LAND USE PLAN:
FROM: Unclassified
TO: Industrial
Mr. Shuford gave the background of the case and submitted, in writing, the staff recommendation.
Michael Lloveras, 29228 U.S. 19, representative of applicant, stated the applicant, Instrument Transformers,
had been very successful and the owner, William Johnson, had increased the number of his employees and
woald like to use the property for overflow parking. He stated Mr. Johnson's employees are now parking on
this land in a dirt manner and that they have a site plan in the current certification process in the City to put in
a paved parking lot and a retention pond. He further stated there was no requirement for them to request
annexation, but the City staff had requested they do so. Mr. Lloveras stated the existulg site plan had been
reviewed by the City, that it was in the process, and that they would meet all the codes.
No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request.
There being no discussion by the Board, a motion was made by Mr. Schwab, and seconded by Mr. Ferrell~ to
approve tbe above request. Motion carried unanimously (7 to 0).
<<...,-
}I> ":1
*~~~\.~:;~ I
2.
Lot 1 and part of Lot 2, Blk B-1, Maryland Sub., located on the east side of S. Greenwood Ave.
approximately 175 feet south of Turner St.
(Jaquier Investments Inc.)
Z 90-07, LUP 90-16
LAND USE PLAN:
FROM: High Density Residential
TO: Residential/Office
The applicant was not present.
In discussion the Board was reassured by staff that the applicant had been properly notified to be present at the
meeting.
Motion was made by Mr. Schwob, and seconded by Mr. Hamilton, to continue the above request to a future
meeting in view of the fact the applicant was not present. Motion carried unanimously (7 to 0).
E_ Chairman's Items
l
Mr. Johnson announced that the FPZA will have a conventi<?n at Daytonna Beach on November 28, 1990.
P &. Z MINUTES
4
October 2, 1990
Ms. Nixon stated she was most offended by Jerry Sternstein's condescending attitude with the Board and felt
the City Manager should be notified, to which the Board concuned.
F. Director's Items
,f
.
Mr. Johnson inquired about Windward Passage on IsllU1d Estates and Mr. Slt\lford advised him the variance as
a requirement for the Conditional Use permit on the pllm which had been approved by the Board had been
turned down by DCAB and was in the process of being appellled. He stIlted if tlte appeal were successful, the
applicant would build to the plan that was approved by the board. Mr. Sh\lford further stated that DCAB has a
defensible position and it will most likely be \lpheld.
Mr. Johnson also inquired of staff who was responsible for the removal of grass in front of commercial
buildings. Mr. Shuford stated he would research his question and report back to him at the next meeting.
G. Board & Staff Comments
Mr. Schwob stated he had reported two items directly to John Richter: 1) that a young woman would be
opening Mako's Plus on October 11, 1990 as Equator which would cause a lot of publicity, and 2) an
establishment they had trouble with before witlt a change of ownership, Grandstand at Enterprise and Belcher,
had a sign up stating it was under new ownership. Mr. Shuford advised the :Board with regard to the first item
that they have applied for a Conditional Use Permit and would be coming before the Board soon, and that he
would research the second item.
Mr. Ferrell asked what would be done about the outside seating at Britt's and Mr. Shuford stated they had been
waiting to hear the Board's decision and would follow up on it now. In further discussion the Board felt that
applicants should be put on notice by something besides the Code when applying for a building permit, perhaps
by signing an affidavit that stated whether they intended to ask for a beer and wine conditional use permit, so
they would know whether they could be approved before expending any money for construction. Mr. Shuford
suggested as an interim procedure the staff would compose a statement for tlte applicant to sign which would
say the permit was for the restaurant and not a conditional use permit for alcoholic beverage sales.
f'
,
\
The Board expressed strong concern over future small motel conversions and felt their decision on Britt's today
would establish a precedent, but that the ruling I110st likely would be appealed. Ms. Nixon suggested the Board
propose to the City Commission that when a motel wants to change its use to a restaurant, they be told they
can change it, but they cannot apply for a variance.
Mr. Mazur brought up the fact that Britt's was giving beer away to get around the parking variance and felt
this should be prohibited. Mr. Polatty suggested regulating the "serving" of beer as opposed to regulating the
"selling" of beer.
Mr. Mazur asked for an update on Pearlys and Mr. Shuford stated the Harbor Master had just informed him
that a waiver agreement for Pearlys would be going to the City Commission on October 18, 1990, and that he
did not believe a Conditional Use Permit would be required for that property_ Mr. Folatty stated the staff
would get a copy of the waiver agreement for the Board Members to review at their next meeting.
Ms. Nixon inquired about Andy's Auto and Mr. Shuford advised they would be coming before the Board with
a Conditional Use request. Ms. Nixon further inquired about Lokey's beside The Bank of Commerce on Gulf-
to-Bay, and Mr. Shuford advised they had not requested a Certificate of Occupancy yet and that he would
research it further and report to them at the next meeting. Ms. Nixon also asked the staff to look into the
storage of motorhomes at Belcher and Sunnydale.
Mr. Shuford advised the Board he would again provide them with the Code of Enforcement Activities List at
the next meeting. He requested the Board to take the item on Coastal Construction Control Line off the table
for their next meeting on October 16, 1990, as the City Commission hoped to take it up at their October 18,
1990 meeting, and that he would give them further information on it.
The meeting was adjourned at 3:45 p.m.
\...
P & Z MINUTES
5
October 2, 1990