05/31/1988
P&Z
..
.....- <
..." < .' >. ,.~. u . ><. '. <. - .., . ,. _.
PLANNING &. ZONING BOARD
DATE .S/:J,/I'~
1- JLO/ntJL 0 q II
. .....-----........
... .
",
,
r'
", ,d':"',
g
~..;;
/
,"
\~-"
I;.
AGENDA
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
TUESDAY, MAY 31, 1988 - 1:30 PM
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION
ITEM
ACTION
A.
1-
2.
Approval of minutes of May 3, 1988
Approval of minutes of May 17, 1988
CONDITIONAL USES:
ALL TESTIMONY IS GIVEN UNDER OATH. The Board follows the procedures outlined
below:
1. The Chairman r~ads from the Public Hearing No tice each item as it
is presented.
2. The Planning Director advises the Board of any pertinent background
information.
3. The applicant or his representative presents his case.
4. Persons who support the application speak.
5. The Planning Director presents any supporting ~~ritten documents.
6. Persons who oppose the application speak.
7. The Planning Director presents any opposing written documents.
8. Persons supportLng the application (other than applicant) may speak
rebut tal.
9. Persons opposing may speak in rebuttal.
10. The applicant has an opportunity for final rebuttal.
11. 'The Board makes a decision.
FLORIDA STATUTE 286.0105 STATES: ANY PERSON APPEALING A DECISION OF THIS BOARD
MUST HAVE A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS TO SUPPORT SUCH APPEAL.
B. Conditional Uses:
1. M&D 32.03, Sec. 30-28S-16E
(2506 Countryside Boulevard)
EKecutive Corp. of Clearwater, Inc.
(Grandstand Club, Inc.)/
Helen 1. Sa rver
err 88--40
Request - 4-COP-SRX (On Premise Consumption
of Alcoholic Beverages)
Zoned - RecPD (Recreational Planned Development)
P lie Z Agenda
1
05/31/88
.. ; .'.. . ' ~ ' " . .' .'.'. .' : . i . ' ,.' II' ',... '. I '. ' , . '.' l '. ".. ~'
2.
Lot 7, B1k. H, McVeigh Sub.
(803 South Missouri AVl'oue)
Me r h~ t-1. Ch am b t~ r la i n/ Da n i. \~ 1 Ho od
(Danny's Sh~ll Service)
CU 88..41
r'
Re <i II est - 2 -. A P S (p a c k age S <1 1 e S 0 f
Alcoholic nev~ragcs)
Zoned - CG (Gl'neral Commercia 1)
3 . L::> t 2 0 ~ Ma c D i. x 0 n I s Sub. 1 s t Ad d .
(1 1 28 Go u 1 d S t r e e t )
Leander Jones/Richard E. Whisscl
ClJ 88-42
Request - lndoor Storage and/or
Warebousing (Storage of
Hotor Home)
Zoned - CG (GI~11eral Comm(~rcial)
4.
Lo t 1 l Lo e hm ann I s PIa Z ;'l
(1730 U. S. Hwy. 19 S. -. Space 600)
Brandon Nu-\oJest Clwtr. ~ Ltd./
Frederick J. Barrett
(Nationwide Van Center)
CU 88-t~3
C.'
Request - Outdoor Retail Sales,
Displays and/or Storage
Zoned - CC (Commerci.al Center)
5.
(CONTINUED FROM 4/19/88, 5/3/88,
and 5/17/88)
!-l&B 13.09~ Sec. 18-29S--16E
(2472 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard)
Zelman & Associates/Douglas Zelman
CU 88-28
Zo n ed
2 .
- CG
Outdoor Retail Sales,
Displays and/or Storage
Vehicle Service
(General Commercial)
Re que s t - 1.
6 - Lo t 11, pi n e 1 13 S Gr ove s Sub.
(2470 Nursery Road)
Unitarian Universalist Church
of Clearwater, Inc.
CU 88,,44
Request - Child Day Care Center
Zoned - p/SP (Public/Semi-Public)
!
'-.r"
P & Z Agenda
2
05/31/88
.:'.:;I>I-;.":,:::..,-tV-:'I:.:~ .... ,,", .... (~.~,~.
t,";,.
, .'., 'I':, , :., '" ' '. '. . " "'~' : l .' ' .' " . . , . .... " .' '. . . . ...' , 'I
r~'
(
(1 )
(2 )
(3)
(4 )
(S)
ANNEXATION & ZONING & LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENTS:
Statement of case by applicant . 5 minutes
Presentation by staff - 5 minutes
Comments from public in support/opposition:
individual- 3 minutes
spokespe rson .for group , 10 minutes
Public Hearings are closed
Discussion/Action by Board
c. .Annexation and Zoning:
1.
('"
~.
2.
Lot 20) Clearwater Industrial Park
(Located at the southeast corner of
the intersection of Rercules Avenue
and Calumet Street)
(Square D Co.)
A 88-12
Request - Annexation and Zoning) IL
(Limited Industrial)
Lots 2 and 2A, Spring Lake Estates
(Located on the south side of S.R. 590)
east of Spring Lake Drive)
(\ve bs ter)
A 88-14
Request - Annexa tl.on and Zoning) RS..8
(Single-Family Residential "Eight")
D. Land Development Code Amendlllent &
Local Planning Agency Review
1. (Chapter 135) Section 135.151)
Add use limitations applicable to
outdoor electrical facilities and
Public Works projects in the
Limited Industrial district.
E. Chairman's Items
F. Di rector's Items
G. Board and Staff Comments
/
\,--"
P & Z Agenda
3
05/31/88
,;
I
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONLNG BOARD
TUESDAY, MAY 3 L, 1 988 - I: 30 P~1
I"'~O .
Chairman Johnson, Ms. Nixon, Nl'Hsrs. Grc(~n, IImni,lton,
!logan, and Schwob
Members Present:
Membe rs AbRen t:
Mr. FerreLL
A.
Motion was made by Hr. Hog<1n, seconded by Hr. Schwab,
minutes of the tolay 3, 1988 meeting and thL~ }loy 17,
written. Motion carried unanimously (6 to 0).
to Clp prove
19&8 meeting
Cha i rman John son Oll t lined thl~ pt-occ du res Eo r c and i. t iona 1 us es and adv ised tha t
anyone adversely affected by a decision of the Planning and Zoning Board, with
regard to condi.tiollal uses, has t\oJQ weeks from thi.H date in which to file an
appeal through the City Clerk's Office. Florida Law requires any party
appealing a decision of this Board to IlaVto~ a record or the proceedings to
support the appeal.
B. Condit iona 1 Uses:
1. MeSB 32.03, Sec. 30-28S-l6E
(2506 Countryside Boulevard)
Executive Corp. of Clearwclter, Inc.
(Grandstand Club, Inc.)/
Hell~n I. Sarver
CU 88-40
("
Request - 4-COP-SRX (On Premise Consumption
of Alcoholic Beverages)
Zoned - RecPD (Recreational Planned Development)
Ms. Harvey advised BR follows: This is a request Eor on premise consumption of
alcoholic beverages in the Recreational Planned Development zoning district;
the governing sections o( the Land Development Code are Sections 136.024 and
136.02S(b); the r~quest is specifically a change of business ownership oE the
exist.ing 4-COP-SRX State li.cense, whi.ch license requires 51% food s3les; the
Traffic Engineer had no. objection; and, the Police Department saw no reason to
deny license to applicant. Ms. Harvey advised that staff recommended approval
of the above request subject to the Occupational License being procured by the
new owners vithin SiK months.
Ms. Helen I. Sarver, applicant, stated she was not aWa1.'I~ City approval was
required fOT a chdnge of business ownership of an alcoholic beverage license.
After quest ioning by Mr. Schwab, Ms. Sarver advised the food sales is very
close to the 51% requirement and the State has given the operation one year to
increase food sales. She also advised that a formal dini.ng room has been
opened and banquet sales have been added to increase the percentage of food
sales.
No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request.
;'-.0
Motion was made by Mr. Schwob, seconded by Mr. Hamilton, to approved the above
request subject to the Occupational License being procured by the new owners
within six months. Motion carried unanimously (6 to 0).
P & Z Mi nu t €s
1
05/31/88
the
as
'. fiii"," \~
. ,;'." :.,,' ,,' ,'. ,. '. '. '.' . ,,', . .: .' . '. .',' ~ J ." '. " .'....:.. ' , . , . .
2 .
Lot 7, Blk. I~, McV.~igh Sub.
(803 South Missouri Avenue)
Merle N. Ch.:1[nbf~rla in/ Dani.I~1 lIood
(Danny's Shat! Service)
CU 88.-L~1
(-'
Reques t - 2.-A.PS (P.:Jckag(~ Sa les 0 (
Alcoholic Beverages)
Zoned - CG (Glme r3 1 Comme rc i a 1 )
Hs. Harvey advised <1S follows; ThiH 1S a request for package sales of
alcoholic beverages in the General Commercial zoning district; the specific
State license being applied for is a new 2-APS license; the governing sections
of the Land Development Code are SI~ctions 136.02L~ and 136.025(b); there is
presently a serviCe station at the subject location; the Traffic Engineer had
no objection; and, the Police Department saw no reason to deny license to
applicant. Ms. Harvey advised applicant wilL be required to obtain approval by
the City Commission of .'l variance to the separation requirement since the
operation is located within 14 feet oE a residential zone and is scheduled to
be heard by the City Commission on June 2, 1988. Hs. Harvey advised that staff
recommended approval of the :lbove request subj~ct to tlH~ following: 1) That
the license be pl"ocured wi.thin six months; and, 2) That.:'l variance to the
separation requirement be .approved by the City Commission.
.f"
(
J....~._
Mr. Daniel M. Hood, appl kant, stated he \.Jants a beer license. Ilt~ advised he
sold beer 7 or 8 ycacs ago, but allowed the license go back to the State
because of i.nadequate sr:lce and security. He also advised, since the time he
previollsly sold beer, t:he stati.on has heen improved and a small mini mart has
been added. He stated he now has securi.ty camer<lS ilnd .1 security system to
monitor the store and he wants to sell beer to keep pace with the cmnpetition.
Hr. Hood advised he. had no pr.oblems when he sold beer previous ly, such as
sel ling to minors.
After questi,oning by Board members, Mr. Hood advised as follows: He has been
in business for 12 yeacs; he personally supervises the operation and is there
every day; he originally asked for a beer license only; the only wine he will
sell will be wine coolers; and, he was able to do without a beer license for 5
or 6 years but he felt the situation is now different. Mr. Hood stated the
service station business has chang(~d. He also stated he has il better way to
handle sales of alcoholic beverages with the security cameras. He felt people
will shop wht~re it is convenient, and if it is convenient to get gas and
repairs at a place other than his that also sells alcoholic beverages he may
lose customers.
No persons appeared 10 support of or in oppo~ition to the above request.
~1r. Hogan expressed concern about selling gasoline and alcoholic beverages
from the same location.
Hotion was m.:.1de by Nr. Schwab, seconded by Mr. Hamilton, to approve the above
request subject to the following: 1) That the license be procured within six
months; and, 2) That 11 variance to the separation requirement be approved by
the City Commission. Notion carried (5 to 1) with Hr. Hogan voting nnay."
\,
'--.-'
P & Z Minutes
2
05/31/88
\ .'."
." ')i:!"~Z. J ;,.'., :iii" ~;'f~.~,j'
3 .
Lot 20; Hac nL XUI1' s Sub. Is t Add.
(1128 Gould Street)
Leander Jonc~l/Richard E. Whi.ssl.d
CU 88-42
(-
Request - Indoor Storage nnd/or
Warehousing (Storage of
Notor Home)
Zoned - CG (General Commerci.al.)
Ms.. Harvey advised as tallows. This LS ;j requeBt [or indoor ~torag('! and/or
warehousing in the Gcncr.:ll CommercLll zoning distri.ct; thl? governing sect.ions
of the Land Development Cl)de an~ S\'lctions l36.02S(b) .::]l1c\ (c)(l3), the specific
request LS to park a motor home i.n tl building~ fln.d, the Tr~lf[ ic Engineer
commented that t.he parking plan needs to bl~ reworked. Ms. Harv,~y advised that
staff recommended approval of the above request subject to the following:
1) That a parking plan bf-~ approved by the Traffic Enginel'lr prior to the
property being used for storage; and, 2) That the use permit be procured
within six months.
Mr. Richard E. \<1hi.ssel, repre~H~l1tatLve of applicant, stated appli.cant lives in
an area where a motor home cannot be vis ibly parked Clnd is therefore
requesting approval to store the motor hume insi.de a building. He stated
applicant proposes to store the motor home on the subject property when not in
use. Mr.. Whissel n~quested that he be i1llowed mon~ tilIle to obtain the permit
than the six months as recommended Rince he is not sure when applicant will
return to the nrca. After. questioning by Board members, Mr. Whissel advised as
follows: the motor home LS stored only during the \~inter; there will be one
motor home stored; the n~quest is not (or vehicle service; and, the building
Eor the motor home must be built.
11s. NixOll stated she would hav(~ no objl~cti,on to allowing one year to obtain
the permit and thought it was a good idea for a resident to consider enclosing
a motor home.
No persons appeared In support of or in opposition to the above request.
1-1otiOl1 was mnde by Hr. Hogan, seconded by }lr. Green, to approve the above
request subject to the following: 1) That;:} parking plan be approved by the
Traffic Engineer prior to the property being used [or storage; and, Z) That
the use p2rmit be procured within one year. Not ion carried unanimously
(6 to 0).
4. Lot 1, Loehmann's Plaza
(1730 u.s. Hwy. 19 s. - Space 600)
Brandon Nu-West Clwtr., Ltd./
Frederick J. Barrett
(Nationwide Van Center)
CD 88-43
Request - Outdoor Retail Sales,
Displays and/or Storage
Zoned - CC (CommercLal Center)
~.
Ms. Harvey advised as Eollows~ This is a request. for outdoor retail sales,
displays and/or storage in the Commercial Center zoning district; the
governing secti.ons oE the Land Development Code are Sections 136.025(b) and
P & Z Minutes
3
05/31/88
<.-' .',
".).
<I,
(c) (22) I the property 1S currently deve loped and tht;:~ appl iCHnt proposes a
custom van sales operation; and, the Traffic Engi.nc'~r commented that the p1:m
does not lend i.tself to car sales and vehicll~s cannot be d isplayetl on U. S.
H""y. 19. Ms. Harvey explained that the Traffic Engi.neer was speci.ELc.:l1ly
referring to vehicles not being parked i.n the right--of--w<lY on U. S. Ilwy. 19~
which is usually the grass area in ELont of property. Ms. Harvey advi.sed stafE
recommended approval of the above reques t subject to the following; 1) Th~lt
parking be in paved areas on 11'; and, 2.) TI1::1t the Oecupat iona 1 License be
procured within six months.
(h.
Mr. Frederick J. Barrett, representati.ve of applicant, stated his operation is
currently located in the construction area of u.s. Hwy. 19. He stated he noW'
has a ll~ase with Loehmann's Plaza for the subject property which he wi!.1 use
for custom built conversion vans. He a Iso st;lted he will not use the green
space on U.S. Hwy. 19 or in Loehmann's Plaza. lie advised his operation will be
a retail outlet only and there will be no service of vehicles. He felt there
will be an improvement in traffic since there will be no fast food service at
the location. He added he expects 10 to 15 persons to visit his operation
dai.ly. Hr. Barrett stated he plans to keep the property attractive and his
operation will be well \vithin the requirements for parking. After questioning
by Mr. Schwab, Mr. Barrett stated there will be a maximum of 20 vans at the
above location At one time. He added that his hours of operation wi 11 be 9:00
A.M to 9:00 PH Monday through Friday, [rom 9:00 AH to 6;00 PH on Saturday, and
from Noon to 5:00 PM on Sunday.
No persons appeared in support of or 1n opposition to the above request.
}lotion was made by Hr. Schwob, seconded by Hr. Hogan, to approve the above
request subject to the following: 1) That parking be in paved areas only; and,
2) That the Occupational License be procured within six months. Motion carried
unan~nously (6 to 0).
5. (CONTINUED FROM 4/19/88, 5/3/88,
and S/17188)
M&B 13.09, Sec. 18-29S-16E
(2472 Gulf-to-Bay Uoulevard)
Zelman & Associates/Douglas Zelman
CU 88-28
Reques t - 1.
Outdoor Retail Sales,
Displays and/or Storage
Vehic Ie Service
(General Commercial)
Zoned
2.
- CG
{
~
,-,-,'
Ms. Harvey advised as Eollows: This request is Eor two conditional uses for
outdoor retail sales, displays and/or storage, specifically vehicle sales, and
vehicle service in the General Commercial zoning district; the governing
sections of the Land Development Code are Sections 136.02S(b), (c)(22) and
(c) (27); the Traffic Engineer's preliminary comment was that he had no
objection if parking conforms to the current Code; a copy of a previous plan
was revi~wed by the City Commission on April 7, 1988 and one of the conditions
of approval was tha t a c ond i t iona 1 us e be approved by this Board; and, the
Commiss lon expressed concern regarding access from Shelley Street and also
suggested there by screening along Shelley street. Ms. Harvey advised that at
the p rev ious hear i ng he Id before th is Bo ard 011 the above sub j ec t, the Boa rd
expressed concern that access was from a residential street. She stated the
applicant advised the Traffic Engineer did not want access from Old Coachman
P & Z Minutes
4
05/31/88
'~:li';:;:';";J+.y', ":~~~.l" ,,:1., :~""".1 ~r,~:~' '..J"~>:'
. ~. . '. . ~
..' '. ' . . ". :: '. ' , ' , ' . ". .' ':.',.' , "., . " '" '. " '. . ,'; ~ . I,.,. J.'~ '/I " , " ..' ' '. . "", . .: .,': . r' "I " . . :
Road. She also stated that, after dtScl1s~;ion with th(~ TraUi.c Engineer, the
TraffLc Engi.neer felt access should be frl)m Shl~lley Stl-(~.!t: and suggested there
not be access from Old Coachman Road.
1""""
f,
Ms. Hat'vey advised that the plan has be(~n rt~V is~d to :lddce:-;s the conCI~I-I\S of
the City Commi.ss ion and this BO.1rJ ;IS follows: Ther'l ts now ()Illy one aCCI~SS
from Shelley Str(~ct; the carport for car washLng has been mnvcJ; no :1CC(~SS is
provided [rom Old CI).1chman Road; and, i.t appl!.:lrS thl~re is provision for
landscaping on Shelley Strei:lt. Hs. Harvey ex:pc(~ss(2d conCI~L-n about applicant
providing enough landscaping to buffer th~ OI)(~r8tion from the resiliences
across Shelley Street. She advised that any [(!T1cin.g located \"ithin the sl;~tback
call be no higher than 2 1/2 feet and thet-e is no height limit.qti.oll on
landscaping. Ms. Harvey advised that Rta(( recommended approval suhjt~ct to the
following: 1) l11at all vehicle serVlC8 be per[ornh~d indoors; 2) That all
storag(~ of parts be indoors; 3) That no !najlH ri~p(l i,r wad: bl~ done on vehicles
on site; 4) That th,~re bl~ ft~ncing ilnd landscaping along the north property
line to buff?.lr the nse from tht' r,:~sidenti.al :1r<..~:l, 5) Th.at any outside ltghting
provided on the sit(~ is to be ori.entl!d away fn)!]l r-r~sidenti<11 area; 6) Th.:lt
there be no outs i.de spl~akl~rs; ,1rld 7) That the Cl~ rt i. fi, cati~ of Occupancy [or the
use be obtained In accordance wi.th project c(ll11pleti,oT1 Rpecifi.ed in the site
plan.
Ms. Harvey advi.sed that two petitions of objl2ctlon submitted for previous
hearings on the above item have bel:'~n iIlclud~d with the application "IS well 3S
one letter of objl"!c ti.on r'~CI3 LveJ for th i,5 hearing on. the above rlc~quest h3S
been received.
Mr. Douglas Zelman, appl tcant, stii ted lll~ ILlS tciet! to comply with all the
comment~~ and requests made by the Comrntssion., the noarcl, and res i.dents. H(~
felt that by moving the carport to the south side of the property any car
washing would not be visi.blt~ from Shelley Stn~et. He stated he has no problems
with the conditions as :31?t forth_ I1r. Zelman di.d not fel~l fencing \.,:1::>
necessary. I-h~ advised thel-e t'l ,1 landscape buffer b,~tweell Shelley Street and
the subject property and only the end of three rows of parking would be
visible. ~1r. Zelman express(2d concern about the landscaping that ts required
since he W<Hlts visibility of at l{~f1st the ftrst two CI)WS of vehicles for sale.
He also felt that landscaping should be suffi.ci.ent. He requested that
landscaping be provided from his driveway on Shelley Street to the \.,est. He
also requested perlni~sion to apply for a temporary Certificate of Occupancy so
t hat wh i let her \~ i:3 con s t rue t i, 0 n he \., i 11 s t i 11 b e a b 1 e t 0 sell car s .
After questioning by Board mernbers, Nt:". Zelman advised 3S follows: The Oak
trees on the proper.ty wi 11 be mai.nta.i..ned; his fam ily has been in the car
business on and off since 1950, though applicant has not been involved in the
business; he is not looking for an (~xtremely high volumc of busi.ness; he hopes
to handle very late model us<-~d cars and poss ibly somt,~ exoti.c cars; the only
service to be performed wi.ll be washi.ng and \"axing or d~tailing of cars; and,
any servic~ on vehicles will be done at 8 dealership elsewhere,
I
\.......
I1s. Nixon (2xpressl.ld concern ahout the operation bei.ng directly across the
street from a residenti,ill use. She ft~lt that landscrJping that is higher than
shrubbery should be required. Mr. Zelman felt requiring 11 higher type of
landscaping is not feasible. Ms. Nixon advised she could not vote to approve
the request without sufficient landscaping. After questioning by Mr. Hogan,
Mr. Zelman stated he intended to use 24 to 30 inch hedging. After questioning
by Ms. Nixon, Ms. Harv~y advised that landscaping must provide a continuous
scn~en <lnd upon maturity th{~ landscaping must reach a minimum height or four
P & Z Minutes
5
05/31/88
feet. Ms. Nixon st.:lted Slll~ \"ou1.(1 llke to SI~0 ;\ 5 to 6 foot hedg~ as a butter.
Mr. Hogan suggested the easterly 25 feet of the north prop'lrLy li.ne bl~ opened
and the remaining portion of the subject property be buffered.
(""
;'
No persons appeared In support of or in opposition to the above request.
After questioning by Mr. Zelman, Ns.
temporary sales is to be submitted to
HarVI'!.j advi.sed that an
the Building Dep;l1:,tment.
nppllcation
for
Mr. Schwob also felt that landscaping should not
25 feet of the north property line but should
property line after the flrs t 25 feet.
bt~ n~quir.~d along the eastern
b(~ rl~quired along the north
Mr. H.ami lton advlsed he has conCt~rns about the only access
Street. He staten that most l)ther busincss(~s .,long Gulf to
their prlInary access 011 Shelli~y Street. He stated the
eKposure.
bl~ i ng on She lley
Bay do not have
:1pp 1 ic ant needs
Nr. Hogan felt that not requil~lng the buff,:;ring in the first 25 feet of the
north propl~rty may be a happy medium Lor all conci;rned.
Hs. Nixon stated she does not agn~c ~vith not requiring buffering in the first
25 feet of the north property line. She felt th(~ residt"~nts across Shelley
Street should not be infringed upon.
Mr. Ham i. 1 ton f e 1 t t his
owne r s hou ld be ;,1J, low,~d
should not be infringed
kind o( decision
to make use of his
upon.
i. s d i. f [ i C tl 1 t b e c ;\U set h e pro per t y
property but the residents' privacy
"
i
i
After questioning by
property owner's choice
Board mt?rnbecs, Hs. Harvey advisl~d that
to divide the property in this manner.
it
was
the
After questioning by Mr. 11ogan, Hr. Zelman stated he receives two tax notices,
one for the improved prop~rty and one for the unimproved property.
Nr. Schwab felt the applicant lS attempting to mel~t the Code requirements amI
it appears the only question is whether there is suffi.ci.ent landscaping. He
telt that requiring a l.<1ndscapc buffer after the easterly 25 feet of the north
property line will not interfere wi.th the proposed USl~ and will not infringe
upon the residential area across Shelley Street.
Motion was made by Hr. Schwab, seconded by Mr. Green, to approve the above
request :-iubject to the foll.owing: 1) That all vehicle service be performed
indoors; 2) That .111 storage ot parts he indo(:>rsj 3) That no lnajor repair work.
be done on vehicles on site; 4) That any outside lighting provided on the site
is to be () r i l~ n t e d a W ;j Y fr.o III res ide n t i .11 are a ; 5) Th a t the r e be no 0 u t sid e
speakers; 6) That the Cp.rt j,f iCHt(~ of: Occupancy for the lIse be obtained in
accordance wi.th project completion speci.fied 1.n the site plan; and 7) That
along the north proper-I:y line a landscape buffer be provided commencing 25
feet W(~st of the property li.ne ,It Old Coachman Road and that th(! landscape
buffer cOll1mc~nC(~ with a mini.mum height of 3 [ec~t. A roll. call was taken and the
motion carri.ed (4 to 2) with i11~ssrs. Gre\\n, Hamilton, Hogan, ilnd Schwob voting
"aye" and i1s. Nixon and Chairman .Johnson voting "nay."
P & Z Minutes
6
05/31/88
, '", , : I' ,', .. -' , ' ,.' . ," . : ' , 'I: " " ' ".' t ,: :' . '~" ,. .,', . . ' , " ' , .' .' .', . ,,' , .o':.
6 .
Lot 11, pinellas Groves Sub.
(2470 Nursery Road)
Unitarian Universalist Church
of Clt.'!arwater, Inc.
CU 88 -4/1
('~
Request - Child Day Care Center
Zoned - p/SP (Public/Semi-Public)
Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This is a request for a Child Day Care Center
in the Public/Semi-Public zoning district; the governing sections of the Land
Development Code are Sections 136.02S(b) and Cc)(B), the Traffic Engineer had
no comment; and the Buildi.ng Department commented that use will require an
occupa t Lona 1 1 ieens e and ins pec t ion for chi ld day care. Ms. Ha rvey advised
that staff recommended approval subject to the following: 1) That the
Occupational License be procured within six months.
}Is. Lynne Perrault, reprQsentati.ve of appli.cant, stated thl~ church is in the
process of studying the feasibility of having a day can~ center and before
H.R.S. will proceed further it is necessary the church obtain City approval of
such a use. She requested since no firm commitment has been made at this time
a period of one year be allowed to procure the Occupational License.
r
\.
,..."
~1s. Harvey explained that if the license is not procul'2d within the ti.me
l.imit, the applicant may request an (~xtension. She added the extension is
requested in writing before the expirati.on of the six months and the request
i.s submitted to the Board for consi.derA.tion. She stated the request for
extension is not an advertised public hearing. She advised if the time limit
expires it is necessary for the applicant to repeat the entire conditional use
process.
Ms. Harvey advised that one lettf:~r of objection was received.
A.fter questioning by Board members, Hs. Perrault advised as following: One
year should allow the church sufficient time to obtain the necessary permits;
the day care center will be a nonprofit operation; services will start with
1/2 days and eventually as the number of children increase services will be
extended to full days; the number of children will be small at the beginning
of the operati.on and could possibly increase to a maximum of about 60
children; and, the number of times chi.ldren will be outside will depend on the
number of children at the center.
No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request.
Ms. Nixon felt that child day care cel1ters next to residential areas are
i.nappropriate.
Motion was made by Mr. Schwob, seconded by Hr. Hamilton, to approve the above
r e que s t sub j e c t tot he f 0 11 0 win g: 1) Th a t the Oc cup a t ion alL ice n s e be pro cur e d
within one year. Moti.on carried (5 to 1) with Ms. Nixon voting "nay."
I
\
,
'..........
P 5. Z Minutes
7
05/31/88
;'.iJ,,:'; ~:iTok:
.' .... : I: . ',' .'..' . .... :' .::. I "', :.' ..,,", . '. .' " . . .'....~" ~ . '.. '. . .'
c. Annexation and Zoning:
1.
Lot 20, Clcllrw:tter Industrial Park
(Located ;Jt the southeast corl1el~ oE
the in t e r s e c t ion 0 f lie r c u 1 e s A v e n u e
and Calumet Street)
(Square D Co.)
A 88 -12
("--
Request - Annexation and Zoning, IL
(Limited Industrial)
The above property is located at the southeast corner of the i.ntersection of
Hercules Avenue and Calumet Street.
The applicant was not present.
Due to nonappearance of the applicant, motion was made Mr. Green, seconded by
}fr. Schwab, to continue the above request to th,~ Planning and Zoning Board
Meeting scheduled fo~ June 14, 1988. Motion carried unanimously (6 to 0).
2. Lots 2 and 2A, Spring Lake Estates
(Located on the south side of S.R. 590,
east of Spring Lake Drive)
(\~ebster)
A 88 -14
l
'\~".
Request - Annexation and Zoning, RS-8
(Single-Family Residl'lntial "Eight")
The above property i.s located on the south side of S.R. 590, east of Spring
Lake Drive.
Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This is a request for annexation and RS.'8
(Single-Family Residential "Eight") zoning; the property is presently vacant
and is proposed to be developed with a single family residence; City water is
not available but \....ater is provided by the County; natural gas is available;
and, City sewer is available. Ms. Harvey advised staff recommended approval of
the request for annexation and RS-8 (Single-Family Residential "Eight")
7.0nLng.
The applicant was not present.
Motion was made by Mr. Hamilton, seconded by Mr. Hogan, to recommend approval
of the above request for annexation and RS-8 (Single-Family Residential
"Eight") zoning. Motion carried unanimously (6 to 0).
(,-,
P & Z Hinutcs
8
05/31/88
". . " ." , ", " . . . if '.,',.. " , ' , '/ _ .' " '." , 'I ' . , .,., . .
D. Land Development Code Amendment &
Local Planning Agency Review
('"
1.
(Chapter 135, Section 135.151)
Add use limitations applicahle to
outdoor electrical facilities 3nd
Public Works projects in th~
Limited Industrial district.
Ms. Harvey advised the above proposed amendment was requested by the
Development Code Adjustment Board. She advised that th(~ am(~ndment was prompte(1
by a variance request to the Board to install screen1.ng around outdoor
electrical facilities. She also advised the Board felt such screening should
be required for such facilities in the l.imited Industrial zoning districts.
Ms. Harvey felt the proposed amendment is appropriate especially along a
right-or-way. Ms. Harvey advised staff rec01nmended approval of the amendment
to Chapter 135, Section 135.151 of the Land Development Code.
i
After questioning by Mr. Hamilton, Ms. Harv~y advised the reference to
alcoholic beverages in the proposed :3.me.ndrnent is the kind of nonsubstantive
change made to clean up references to alcoholic beverages throughout the Code.
She added the changes were necessary due to J1CW provisions regarding alcoholic
beverages.
Mo t i on was made by Mr. Cree n, s eco nd eel by Nr. Hoga n, to recommend approval of
the amendment to Chapter 135, Section 135.151 of the Land Development Code as
written. Motion carried unanimously (6 to 0).
\"';" .
F.
Director's Items
Ms. Ha rvey adv is ed
July 5, 1988 since
neither the Chairman
Zoning Board Meeting
to appoint an Acttng
there will be no Planning and Zoning Board Meeting on
there will be no quorum. Ns. Harvey advised that since
nor the Vice Chairman will be present at the Planning and
scheduLed for July 26, 1988 it is necessary for the Board
Chairman for that meeting.
Motion was made by Hr. Green, st~conded by Mr.
Schwab as Acting Chairman for the Planning and
for July 26, 1988. ~lotion carried (5 to 0) wi.th
Hogan, to appoint William S.
Zoning Board Meeting scheduled
Mr. Schwob abstaining.
G. Board and Staff Comments
After questioning by Mr. Schwob~ Ms. Harvey advised that exis ting alcoholic
beverage uses must come before this Board if there i.s an expansion of floor
area or expansion of seating.
Ms. Nixon stated that the property adjacent to Ilarbor Oaks where the Board
recently approved conditional use of a child day care center is now for Rale.
Meeting adjourned at 3:25 PM.
,i
I
..........',
Paule Harvey
Planning Director
P & Z 11inutes
9
05/31/88
(Ii :~":"": 1.;" "
t_ , ;:,