02/02/1988
;, .'., ..'
,
.!f.: '.~.
.........-.......--..... ... .
. .
P&Z
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
.).. J ~ I,,.
, I
DATE
'1 ,Jt!l/Y}~ r!) 711
I
{
I
.j
.i
1
t
.. t
I
,
" r
. i
,
1
!;
,
i
!
'f"
".:' f
'i
l'
,
.. .
. .!' .
,'..
iii
,,1..
~.
\."
a;:.::.
j~'..' ';;' i! " ,
, : . .. . ',' ': . ;., I ':1 ' ~. ..' , ' ., .' . . '. .
t\ .
AGENDA
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1988 - 1:30 PM
(::;'~:"\ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION
ITEM
ACTION
(A) Approval of minutes of January 19, 1988
CONDITIONAL USES:
ALL TESTIMONY IS GIVEN UNDER OATH. The Board follows the procedures outlined
be low:
..)~." .
1\___
"'" .
1. The Chairman reads from the Public Hearing Notice each item as it
is presented.
2. The Planning Director advises the Board of any pertinent background
information.
3. The applicant or his repre~entntive pcesents his case.
4. Persons who support the application speak.
5. The Planning Director presents any supporting written documents.
6. Persons who oppose the application speak.
7. The Planning Director presents any opposing written documents.
8. Persons supporting the application (other than applicant) may speak
rebut ta 1.
9. Persons opposing may speak in rebuttal.
10. The applicant has an opportullity for final rebuttal.
11. The Board makes a decision.
FLORIDA STATUTE 286.0105 STATES: ANY PERSON APPEALING A DECISION OF THIS BOARD
MUST HAVE A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS TO SUPPORT SUCH APPEAL.
B. Conditional Uses:
1. La t 3, B 1 k . 2 0 ,
Gould & Ewing's Sub., 2nd Add.
(635-B Cleveland Street)
Nicholas Hoban/Salvatore Bonagura
CU 88-10
RequeRt - 2-COP (On Premise Consumption
of Alcoholic Beverages)
Zoned - UC[C] (Urban Center [Core])
I
,
\
~.
P & Z Agenda
1
02/02/88
. . '. : . j . . I . '. .,.. . .:. ". . ". . .
'( ~
II
2.
Lot 13 and Part Lot 12,
Island Estates, Unit 2
(325 Island Way)
Island Escape Assoc./Milne Marine Canst.
CU 88-11
r.....
".
1;
Request - Marina (Construction of
Boat Docks)
Zoned - RM-20 (Multiple Family Residential
"Twenty") AND
AL/C (Aquatic Lands/Coastal)
ANNEXATION & ZONING & LANDS USE PLAN AMENDMENTS:
(1) Statement of case by applicant - 5 minutes
(2) Presentation by staEf - 5 minutes
(3) Comments from public in support/oppos ition:
individual - 3 minutes
spokesperson for group - 10 minutes
(4) Public Hearings are closed
( 5) ni scus Ii ion/ Ac t ton by Board
c. Annexation and Zoning:
J'~' '.
~\ ....
~~",..'
1.
Lots 2 through 9, Elk. H
Brooklawn Sub.
(Located on the west side or Lantana
Avenue between Idlewild and
Arbelia Streets)
(Rogero)
A 88-1
Request - Annexation and Zoning, RS-8
Single Family Residential "Eight"
D. Zoning Atlas Amendment:
1. M&B 33.071, Sec. 32-28S-16E
(Located on the west side at the
Northern Terminus of Soule Road)
(City of Clearwater)
Z 88-1
Zoning Atlas:
FROM: RS-2 (S i ng Ie Fami ly Re s ident ta 1 "Two ")
TO: aS/R (Open Space/Recreation)
.-
..
"
P & Z Agenda
2
02/02/88
,.':;r,\';,;,.>
. ~ *', l' ;; .
~< .
E. Land Use PLan and Zoning Atlas Amendment:
1.
M& B 22 .11 , Sec. 11-298-15 E
(Located on the east side of North
Highland Avenue, nor~h of the
Intersection of Overlea Street)
( UPARC)
LUP 88-1 Z 88-2
c'
Zoning
FROM:
TO:
Atlas:
CG (General Commercial)
RM-28 (Multiple Family Residential
"Twenty-Eightlt)
Land Use Plan:
FROM: Commercial/Tourist Facilities
TO: High DensLty Residential
F. Annexation, Zoning, and Land Use Plan Amendment:
1 . Lot s 1 & 2, Haas Sub. and a
Portion of Lot 3, Blackburn S~b.
(Located at the southwest corner of the
Intersection of Haas Avenue & U.S. Hwy. 19)
(Ridge Haven Assoc., Ltd.)
A 87-37 LUP 87-25
Request - Annexation and Zoning, CH
(Highway Commercial)
C"
"",.,.,:
Land Use Plan:
FROM: Medium Density Residential
TO: Comme rc ia l/Touris t F ac i Ii t Les
2 .
Portion of M&B 21.07, Sec. 16-29S-16E
(Located on the east side of
McMullen-Booth Road, south of
Bay Lane)
(Calva~y Open Bible Church)
A 87-45 LUP 87-31
Request - Annexation and Zoning~ P/SP
(Public/Semi-Public)
Land Use Plan:
FROM: Low Density Residential
TO: Public/Semi-Public
l' .'
-'
P & Z Agenda
3
02/02/88
f-,}'q'~;.' ; '>.'
"I'.
t~"',
t.
\
C'"
~",
,~t... ~~
,
"- .'
G.
To consider a request for amendment to the
Master Site Plan known as Beckett Lake Plaza
in the CPD (Commercial Planned Development)
Zoning District as required by Sec. 135.076
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Clearwater for the following described
property:
A tract of land lying within the southwest
1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 6,
Township 29 South, Range 16 East, and being
more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the west 1/4 corner of said
Section 6 as a point of reference; thence
o
N.89 50' 54"E., along the east/west half
section line, the same being the centerline
of State Road No. 588 (Sunset Point Road),
o
612.29 feet; thence N.Oa 09' 06"H., 50.00
feet to the north right-oE-way line of said
State Road for a point of beginning; thence
N.29o 25' 29"W., to the east right-of-way
line of Belcher Road, 103.25 feet; thence
N.34o 48' 24"E., along said right-of-way
1277.78 feet; thence s.580 46' 47"E., to the
west right-of-way line of Coachman Road,
94.66 feet; then s.OOo 22' 42"\-1., a10n8 said
right-of-way 1068.06 feet; thence S.37 03'
26"W., to the north right-oE-way line of
State Road No. 588 (Sunset Point Road),
o
25.11 feet; thence S.89 50' 54"w., along
said right-oE-way, 737.41 feet to the point
of beginning. Containing 12.2 acres more or
less.
H.
Chairman's Items
t.
Director's Itelns
J.
Board and Staff Comments
P & Z Agenda
4
02/02/88
, " ~
-!.I'
.e
MINUTES
PLANNING & ZONING BOARD
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1988 - 1:30 PM
{-'>
.
.
Members Present:
Chairman Johnson, Ms. Nixon, Messrs. Ferrell,
Green, Hamilton, Hogan, and Schwob
Also Present: M. A. Galbraith, Jr., City Attorney
A.
Due to noncompletion of minutes, motion was made
by Mr. Green, to continue approval of minutes of
Planning and Zoning Meeting of February 16,
unanimously (7 to 0).
by Mr. Hogan, seconded
January 19, 1988 to the
1988. Motion carried
Chairman Johnson outlined the procedures for conditional uses and advised that
anyone adversely affected by a decision oE the Planning and Zoning Board, with
regard to conditional uses, has two weeks from th is date in which to file an
appeal through the City Clerk's Office. Florirla Law requires any party
appealing a decision of this Board to have a record of the proceedings to
support the appeal.
B. Conditional Uses:
1. Lot 3, Blk. 20,
Gould & Ewing's Sub., 2nd Add.
(635-B Cleveland Street)
Nicholas Hoban/Salvatore Bonagura
eu 88-11
Reques t - 2-COP
(On Premise Consumption
of Alcoholic Beverages)
(Urban Center [Core])
('
.......~.
Zoned
- uc [ C]
Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This request is for on premlse consumption of
alcoholic beveragQs in the Urban Center [Core] zoning district; the specific
state license being applied for is a 2-COP license; the governing sections of
the Lund Development Code are Sections 136.02S(b) and (c)(l); there was
previously a restaurant at the subject location and a new restaurant is now
proposed; the Tra f f ic Engi nee r had no comme n t; and, the Po 1 ice Department saw
no reason to deny license to applicant. Ms. Rarvey advised this request is
being reviewed under the provisions of Ordinance 4470-87. Ms. Harvey advised
that staff recommended approval of the above request subject to the following:
1) That approval by the City Commission of a variance to the 500 foot
separation distance be obtained; and, 2) That the use permit be obtained
within six months.
Mr. Salvatore Bonagura, representative of applicant, stated he recently opened
the Daily Planet restaurant and would like to sell beer and wine. He stated he
has an extensive background in alcoholic beverage sales at various restaurants
in the area. He also advised he is a registered trainer with the TIPS Program
and visits various restaurants to teach bartenders and waitresses how to
responsibly dispense alcoholic beverages.
J
'"~.
After questioning by Mr. Schwab, Mr. Bonagura advised the hours of operation
are currently from 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM, Monday through Friday. He added he may
decide to open on Saturday in the future and remain open until 10:00 PM. He
also advised that two televisions provide the only entertainment on the
premises and the operation is similar to the operation of the previous owner.
P & Z Minutes
1
02/02/88
. _' . ': ~.' . '.' '. .' . '. ..". I' I !':'.., .' . . ," . ~ I . .'. . "" . . " t.
No persons appe.:lr~~d in support of or in opposition to the above request.
.......rl...,
, .
(
Motion was Inade by Mr. Schwab, seconded by Hr. Hamilton, to approve the above
request subject to the following: 1) That approval by the City Commission of a
variance to the 500 foot separation distance be obtained; and, 2) That the use
permit be obtained within six months. Motion carried unanimously (7 to 0).
2. Lot 13 and Part Lot 12,
Island Estates, Unit 2
(325 Is land \.]ay)
Island Escape Assoc./Milne Marine Const.
CU 88-12
Request - Marina (Construction of
Boa t Do c k s )
Zoned - RM-20 (Multiple Family Residential
"Twenty") AND
AL/C (Aquatic Lands/Coastal)
"
J
I,
.."'.....
Ms. Harvey advised as follows: This request 15 for a man.na; the zoning is
Aquatic Lands/Coastal and the adjacent upland property is zoned Multiple
Family Resident Lal "Twenty"; the governing sections of the Land Development
Code are Sections l36.02S(b) and (c)(lS); applicant proposed to construct four
boat sl ips tor the adjacent H)-unit condominium; the Traffic Engineer had no
comments; the Environmenta 1 Division had no objection; and, the Harbormaster
felt that navigation woulJ not be adversely affected. Ms. Harvey advised that
staff recommL~nded approval subject to the follO\.,ing: 1) Th.at the building
permit be procured within SlX months; and, 2) That there be no commercial
activity, launching facilities, or liveaboards at the above location.
Mr. Tom Hogan, employee of Millle Harine Construction and representative of
applicant, stated there will be no commercial use of the above request and the
docks are for the exclusLve use of the owners of the property owners, and
there will be no llveaboards at the subject location. After questioning by
Mr. Schwob, Mr. Hogan stated no dredging will be required and there will be no
fueling faei lities. After questioning by t1r. Hami lton, Hr. Hogan advised that
no variances will be required to complete construction of the docks and all
requirements of the City and the County have been met.
No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request.
Motion IWS made by Mr. Schwob, seconded by Mr. Hogan, to approve the above
request subject to the following: 1) That the building permit: be procured
within six: months; and, Z) That there be no commercial activlty, launching
facl.l it ies, or liveaboards at the above locat ion. Mot ion carried unanimous ly
(7 to 0).
.'-...
P & Z ~1inu tes
2
02/02/88
c. Annexation and Zoning:
1 .
Lots 2 through 9, B 1k. II
Brooklawn Sub.
(Located on the west side of Lantana
Avenue between 1d 1ewild [lnd
Arbe lia Stree ts )
( Rogero)
A 88-1
/,",""
(
Reques t - Annexat ion and Zon ing, RS-8
Single Fanr:.ly Residential "Eight"
Th e above prope rty is loc.at ed on the we s t side 0 f Lan tn na Avenue bet we en
Idlewild and Arbelia Streets.
Mr. Pruitt advised as follo"!s: This request is for annexation nnd RS-8 (Single
Family Residential "Eight") zoning; Lot 2 is the subject of .1n Agreement to
Annex; the property is presently vacant and is proposed to be developed with
single family residences; City water is available; Ci.ty sewer will need to be
ex:tended from Sunset Point Road to provide service; natural gas is not
avai lable; and, surrounding land uses nrc mostly vacant with scattered single
family residences. Mr. IJruitt advised staff recommended approval of the
annexation and RS-8 (Single Family Residential "Eight") zoning.
Ms. Patricia Muscarella, representative of applicant, advised that single
family residences are proposed for the above property.
/'
Notion was made by Mr. Hogan, seconded by Hr.. Green,
the annexation and HS--S (Single Family Residential
carried unanimously (7 to 0).
to recommend approval of
"Eight") zoning. Hotion
,
'"
D. Zoning Atlas Amendment:
1 . H&B 33.071, Sec. 32-28S-16E
(Located on the west side at the
Northern Terminus of Soule Road)
(City of Clearwater)
Z 88-1
Zoning
FROM:
TO:
Atlas:
RS-2 (Single Family Residential
OS/R (Open Space/Recreation)
"Two")
The above property u located on the west s ide at the northern terminus of
Soule Road.
t
.........,....
Mr. Pruitt advised as follows: This is a City-initiated request for zoning
atlas amendment from RS-2 (Single Family Residential "Two") to OS/R (Open
Spa ceRe ere a t ion); the sub j e c t pro per t y was ann e xed in 1 98 7 111 con j un c t ion
wi th the prope r ty to the sout h; the City purchas ed the above proper ty from
Stevens Designer Homes; and, it is now appropriate to amend the zoning to
conform with the Land Use Plan designation. Hr. Pruitt advised staff
recommended approval 0 f the zoning atlas amendment from RS-2 (Single Fami ly
Residential "Two") to OS/R (Open SpClce Recreation).
P & Z Minutes
3
02/02/88
Motion was made by Mr. Schwob, seconded by Hr. FerrelL,
of the zoning atlas amendment from RS-2 (Single Fami ly
OS/R (Open Space Recreation). Motion carried unanimously
to recolllmend approval
Re sid e n t i a 1 "Two" ) t 0
(7 to 0).
~'"
( ,
E.
Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas Amendment:
I. M&B 22.11, Sec. 11-29S'-15E
(Located on the east side of North
Highland Avenue, north ot the
Intersection of Overlca Street)
( UPARC)
LUP 88-1 Z 88-2
Zoning
FROM:
TO:
Atlas:
CG (General Commercial)
RM-28 (Nultiple Fami ly Residential
"Twen ty-Ei.gh t")
Land Use Plan:
FROM: Co mm e r cia 1/ To u r i s t Fa c il i tie s
TO : 11 i g h De n sit y Re sid e n t i a 1
The above property is located on the east side of North Highland Avenue, north
of the intersection of Overlea Street.
(
"(.,
Mr. Pruitt advised as tollows: This request is for d zoning atlas amendment
from CG (General Commercial) to RH-28 (Nultiple Family Residential "Twenty-
Eight") ano. a Land Use Plan amendment from Commercial/Tourist Facilities to
High Density Residential; the property is presently vacant and the request is
made to permit the development of an rtp.1rtment complex; previous site plan
approval expired in February, 1987, which approval was granted previous to
adoption of the Land Development Code; since the current Land Development Code
does not allow for residential uses on commerci;:llly zoned property, the
applicant needs to request the above changes; and, if appro"val is granted,
applicant will be required to submit a new site plan. Hr. Pruitt stated that
allowing the mix of residential and commercial uses 1S not considered
appropriate because the uses are generally not compatible. He also stated that
approving the request is precisely what the Land Development Code is trying to
prevent. He added that approval will also split commercial uses and create a
small zoning district and the adjacent residential uses are a low density
residential. Hr. Pruitt advised that for these reasons staff recommended
denial of the request for a zoning .::ttlas amendment from CG (General
Commercial) to RH-28 (Multiple Family Residential "Twenty-Eight") and a Land
Use Plan amendment from Comm(~rcial/Tourist Facilities to High Density
Residential.
i
~
....,.
Mr. Alex Plisko, architect and representative or applicant, advised applicant
is looking for a parcel to develop an apartment complex for independent
clients. He stated the property has been donated to UPARC with the condition
that apartments be developed on the property. He also stated the property is
divided by a drainage "creek" whi.ch cannot be filled in and \olhich makes it
difficult to develop a commercial usage on the property. He added the property
i s b u f t ere d E r om ad j ace n t res ide n t i a 1 use s by r ail r 0 a d t r a c k s . Aft e r
questioning by Mr. Ferrell, Mr. Pliska stated RM-28 zoning is requir.ed because
UPARC has received a grant through HUD for a 27-unit complex. He added 24
units will be built on the subject property and 3 units will be placed
elsewhere. After questioning by Mr. Johnson, Mr. Plisko stated the apartments
P & Z Minutes
4
02/02/88
"',, .'
After questioning by Mr.
apa r tmen ts is re gu 1.a t ed by
have small, independent
apartments.
Schwob,
HUD. He
living
Mr. Buckley advised the
added it is more important
faci lit ies rather than
S Lze of the
for cli(~nts to
sharing large
will be minimal in size, both buildings will he two stories hi.gh, the north
building will contain eight units Clnd the south building wilt contain sixteen
units.
;;,.,.,
(
In support of the above request, Mr. Thomas Buckley, Director of Residential
Services for UPARC, advised that there ar(~ sevel"al res idents of UPARC that are
now ready for independent living and UPARC proposed a complex where residents
can live. He added that UPARC can only accolnplish dcvelopm(:.~nt of the complex
th rough HUD fund i ng wh ich c nus ed the de lay 0 f no t me () t Lng the exp i rat ion of
the previous site plan appl"oval. He stated the above location is ideal because
it is near public transportation.
Xs. Harvey advised that staff is not opposed to independent li.ving facilities
but the pt-operty 1S not appropriatt~. She added that, under the old Land
Development Code, Genct-;d Commercial zoning allowed independent housing but
problems arose because of n~sidential housing withll1 comml~rcially zoned areas
and the City made a conscientious ~E[ort to stop such practlces. She disagreed
that the City should condone residenti.11 living in the middle of a business
district.
After questioning by 115. Nixon, Ms. Harv2Y stated the property does not meet
the criteria of minimum size for zoni.ng but the City Commission may approve
such a request if the Commission felt it was justified.
€~
~1 r . S c h wo b s tat e d he ;J. g r e e d wit h not mix i n g use s but f e 1 t t his is asp e cia 1
case and is different than an operation renting housing to the general public.
Mr. Johnson expressed concern about the size of the property and the number of
apartments proposed and he felt the property is not the ideal spot for an
apartment complex.
Xr. Hogan stated there seems to be no opposition and felt if the building
heights were kept down there would be no problem.
Hr. Hamilton stated there has been no opposition and felt it ~s better than
having such a place in a residential area.
Ms. Nixon expressed concern about setting a precedence based on an emotional
Issue.
Mr. Schwob felt serVIng a social need is not considered emotional.
In rebuttal, Mr. Pliska stated he understands the slte is very small. He added
UPARC wi 11 be requesting a varlance for parking because the clients cannot
have cars. He 31so staten UPARC will operate the complex for a long time and
the ownership will not change.
,,~
Motion was ffi3de by Mr. Hogan, seconded by Mr. Hamilton, to recommend approval
of the request for a zoning atlas amendment from CG (General Commercial) to
RM-28 (Multiple Farni ly Residential "Twenty-Eight") and a Land Use Plan
amendment from Commercial/Tourist Facilities to High Density Residential
subject to: 1) Building height be a maximum height of 25 feet; and 2) approval
P & Z Minutes
5
02/02/88
'~,
. . , . '. , '. . ': . ~ .' ". '. '. . . '. . . . ; .' . ,. . '. .) . of ~ . '.' .
of any necessary varlances. Ms. Harvey advised this BOl1nl I1<lS IlO
Ii m i. the i g h t 0 f b u i 1 din g 8 un 1 e s s the pro per t Y l S II P I a 11Ih~ d
development. Motion W.3.S withdrawn by Mr. Hogan.
illlt!tori ty lo
r t':1 i II I' 11 L i 11 I
('"-'
Motion was made by r-1r. Hogan, seconded by Nr. Hamilton, to r'~C()lllml!lld ;l(lprnv:il
of the request for a zoni.ng atlas amendment from CG (Gcner;ll C()Il\lIl(~rci.1l) to
RM-28 (Multiple Family R.esidential "Twenty-Eight") and .1 Land U:H! PLln ('"1)111
Commercial/Tourist Facilities to High Density Residcntial. Hotinf} c;Hril!d
unanimously (7 to 0).
F. Annexation, Zoning, and ~and Use Plan Amendment:
1. Lots I & 2, H.:las Sub. and a
Portion of Lot 3, Blackburn Sub.
(Located at the southwest corner of the
Intersection of H3<1S Avenue & U.S. Hwy. 19)
(Ridge Haven Assoc., Ltd.)
A 87-37 LUP 87-25
Request - Annex:ation and Zoning, CH
(Highway Commercial)
Land Use Plan:
FROM: Hedium Dens ity Resident ial
TO: CommercLal/Tourist Faci.lities
The above property l8 located at the sOllthwe~t corlll!r of till' intl~n1t.~ction of
Haas Avenue and U.S. Iiwy. 19.
(
\""
Mr. Pruitt advised as follows: This 1.8 a n~qlJe1lt for anl1t!X;ltion, ClI (Highway
Commercial) zoning, and a Land Use Plan aTUI.~l1dll\(lnt [loom H,~dillll\ Densi.ty
Residential to Commercial/Tourist Facilitie~l; tlw pr()pl~rty ill :1 porti.on of
what is presently developed as Ridg8 lIllV(!11 Tr;d}.'r P;trkj till! l"l~ql1est was
before thLS Board on December 15, 1987 and (i,!nial of the r(~qu(!st was
recommended by this Board by a vote of (6 to 0); and, l:h,~ applic;lllt has since
made changes to the applicati.on \"hi.eh consi.sL Ill: including adclitional
property, bringing t.he acreage up [rom .65 to <lPP,"o:<illlall.' ly 1.6 acres. Hr.
Pruitt advised the larger tract will allow Ill()n~ OppIHtllniLie:; for buffering
between commercial uses and the mobile ltoml~ park ,lIld wi,l1 ItlSO connect the
subject property to the existi.ng highway cOllunl'rci.ll :~()Il('d property to the
south rather thdn creating an isolated parcl~1.. 1\1' :Jdd'~I.1 th:IL, (or those mobile
homes that need to be relocated, r>ropl~r lllJt iCI~ tD I"I.'S i.dents must be given
along with the provisLon for reloc:1tion to cOlnpar;lhlc :;ites as required by
State law. Hr. Pruitt advised that st.:tff l'I!COllllllt~ndl'd ;tpprovnl. o[ the request
for annexation, ell (HighwclY Commercial) zoni.ng, ;1IId ;) Land Use Plan amendment
from }tedium Density Residential to CommL'rci:Il/Tollri~;t Fncititi.es.
Mr. Ed Armstrong, represcntativ(;! of ,Ipplic:lnt, i1dviNI~d the application has
been revised to suti..sEy previous cnl1c~~rn:'; t~xprt!s:ll.~d by the City. After
questioning by ~1r. Schwab, Hr. Armstrong Blatt!ll nothing will bl~ done with the
adjacent mobile home excl.~pt possibly to il11,t;lll. bUr[llring \~hich would be
considered at the ti..ll\(-~ of si.te pbn reVif!\". Ill' i.lrldl~d th;lt specific plans for
development and qUt:.!sti_ons cOl1cnrning traffic i,mpl:1ct: would be answered at time
of site plan review.
~"_.
Motion \~as !\lade by Hr. Schwab, S(~COl1d(!d hy Hr. Hllltli Itotl, to recommend approval
oft he r e q lie s t for a nil (> x a t ion ~ ell (IIi g h W.1 Y G () 1I111ll! r ci a 1) z 0 n i n g , and a La n d Us e
P &. Z Minutes
6
02/02/88
'. : ".' . '. ./ . . ",' ,.' .' ,.,. ". '. .' " .,'.' . .' " ' . .
PL1n amendtncnt from Hed iLl.n1 Dens ity Res idential
Fa c 1. li t 1.CR. Hot iOI1 C;l rr i.ed un an imous 1 y (7 to 0).
to
Commercial/Tourist
"""-.,...
(
2 .
Portion of M&B 21.07, Sec. l6-29S-16E
(Located on the east side of
Hd1ulLen-Dooth Ro ad, south of
Bay Lane)
(Calv.1ry Open Bib Ie Church)
A 87-45 LVP 87-31
Request - Annexation and Zoning, P/SP
(Public/Semi-Public)
Land Use Plan:
FROM: Low Density Residential
TO: Publi.c/Semi-Public
Th e above peoper ty is loc a ted on the ea s t side 0 f McMu lIen-Boo th Ro ad, south
o f Bay La n e .
Mr. Pruitt advised it is a requirement that the applicant or the applicant's
represen~ative be present at a public hearing, and he suggested this item be
continued to the next Planning and Zoning Board Meeting. He stated staff would
contact applicant and advise applicant his presence is required at the meeting
scheduled for February 16, 1988.
Mo t ion was made by Mr. Hogan, seconded by Hr. Schwab, to cant inue the above
request to the Planning and Zoning Board Meeting scheduled for February 16,
1988. Motion carried unanimously (7 to 0).
(
""'"
G.
To consider a request for amendment to the
Master Site Plan known as Beckett Lake Plaza
in the CPD (Commercial Planned Development)
Zoning District as required by Sec. 135.076
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Clearwater for the follo~ing described
property:
A tract of land lying within the southwest
1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 6,
Township 29 South, Range 16 East, and being
more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the west 1/4 corner of said
Section 6 as a point of reference; thence
o
N.89 50' 54I1E., along the east/west half
section line, the same being the centerline
of State Road No. 588 (Sunset Point Road),
61 2 . 2 9 fee t; the n c eN. 00 0 09' 0 6 "W., 50.00
feet to the north right-of-way line of said
State Road for a point of beginning; thence
N.290 25' 29I1W., to the east right-of-way
line of ~e1cher Road, 103.25 feet; thence
N.340 {+8' 24"E., along s aid right-of-way
1277.78 feet; thence 8.580 46' 47"E., to the
west right-of-way line of Coachman Road,
94.66 feet; then S.OOo 22' 42"W., along said
P & Z Minutes
7
02/02/88
~ - "': ,',
. a-:JI' ~\.r:" ~.' ". ;~\~i!: ~:\ '; "':~'" \ I r:.~;;! r;".,."- :-. "if...:
1;;'
, ..' .' . . . .:. ' ' . , . ",' . . . : . _' . ~ . , ,'~ ' .' ! ." " .' , .',.' '.. ... . " .'. '. ,. ~ i" . f . '. f" .
('C.
rig h l: - 0 f - way 1 0 6 B . 0 () [ " I ~ l i l 11 I . net' S. 1 7 ,) () 3 '
26"\.,1., to the north rigl1l:."OC'-W:lY lilli' \If
St:lte RO.lll No. SSH (Sunll!'l Point HIl;ld),
25.11 feet; thellc',l S.HI)!) 1)0' ';/1 "H. , .!long
S :1 i d rig h l: - 0 f - w ;. y, 7 3 1 .I, I r I' I' L l: () L:1 II ~ P () i n t
of beginning. ConLlilling I/..~ ;\Crl'~i Inu\"(' or
less.
The above property lS locatl!d 011 thl~ northe.1s t corner Sunset Point Road and
Belcher Rond.
Mr. Pruitt advisl~d :.lS follows: Thin r'!qui~st i.s for an amendment to the Haster
Site Plan for n(~ckett 1..1k,; Plaza; this is a Commer:cial Planned Development and
the revision consists primarily of rt~tails building:>; and this request had
been reviewed by th(~ Dt!vl~lortlH'l1t R,'!vi(~w Committc(~ and approved with
conditions, most of ';Jhich h;IVI~ b\"~11 Illl't. Mr. Pruitt st.:lted staff recommended
approval of the .1nll!l1dtll(~nt to th,' H:lst(!I- siu! Plelll subject to the following
conditions: 1) That the lO:l\ling duck ar(';! for the Skuggs bui.lding should be
screened \;Ji.th laJ1d~,c;Jping tn hurr,~r iL from the ri.ght-of-way and the
residentLal arl!:u,; 2) [h!tai 1.(~d ]:ll1d~;c:\ping pl:11l must be submitted prior to the
lssuance of.1 bllildi.ng p(~nnil sp,'cific,111.y addressing a landscaping buffer
mechani.sm for thl~ ~;ingl,"-f:lI11ily hlll1\"o; to thl~ east; 3) Ing("(~ss anti egress
easements ;lnd a to-fnol lit i 1. iLy (~;l:;I'm,'nt should be pt-ovided over the wate r
mains up to and incltlfling 1I\('l.l~r~; ;lIld hydr;ll1t:, and detector checks prior to the
issuance of i.l bllilding (H'rmilj ;ll1d 4) Th;)t the requisite initial building
permit be is!H1Cd within 'lix rrll)/lth~; [rolll t:1w date of certification of the final
sit e p 1 a n and .11 1 t" e q II i s i tl ~ c,' r t i r i c ;t t I' S 0 foe cup .:I 11 C Y be pro c u I~ e d wit hi nth r e e
years [rom J:lt(>. of c,:rt.irication of LIlt! final site plan.
"
.
I
{"""
Mr. Larry Ki.stLer, r:,~pt'(~s(~nt;ltivc of applicant, stated that the above
amendment will not C:ll1!W thl~ tra[fi.c pattern to be altered. He added the total
f 1 oar are <l 0 n s i. t (! w ill n ( ) t c h.1 n g e by n me z z ani neb e i n gad de d . Aft e r
questioning by Hr. Schwub, Xr. Kistler stated he has no problem with the four
conditions rec()mlll,.'ndl~d by st:l((.
,
,
!
Hotlon was m,ld\~ by Hr. Schwob, seconded by t"ll-. Ferrell, to recommend approval
oft h e a b 0 ve r C' q Uf ~ .{ t f3 U b j t ~ c t tot h e f 0 1 low i n g: 1) Th a t the loa din g doc k are a
for the SIUlggs bll i 1<1 ing ~;hould bl~ screened with landscaping to buffer it from
the right-O[-W:1Y ;\Ild t:h..~ residential areas; 2) Detailed landscaping plan must
be submitu~d pril)J" to I:h,.~ issuanc(~ of a building permit specifically
addressing :1 landscnping hufh'r- lIH~chani.srn for. the single-family homes to the
cast; 3) I.ngr,~~j:J :lI1d '~gn:ss l~a!H~ments and a 10-foot utility easement should be
provided nVI'r r:ht~ \vnLt~r mallHi up to and including meters and hydrants and
dl!tI:~ct()r el\l'cks prior to the issuance of a building permit; and 4) That the
requisil,' initial hllilding pt!rmit be i.ssued wi.thin six months from the date of
certification of lltl' ri.lwt !dte pl:Hl and all requisite certi.Eicates of
OCCIl(llllICY Iw pr()cl1(,~d within thrl~'~ y(~ars from date of certification of the
f1.nal ~;itl' pl.ln. HoLion c.lrri.l~d unanimollsly (7 to 0).
II. eh,l i rtll;ll\'~; 1 t l'Ill~j
\
"'-.
Hr. ,!tlhil:lOn 'jl:II.,.'.[ h,' l-t~Ct~iv(.tl lhll Hearing Officer's order on the Rose Leon
ctllldiLillJla\ II'll' rl~qlll\sl.. Hr. Galbraith st:tted he submitted a Motion for
CI.'lriri\~,1I i'ltl 1"!g,lrdillg tilt' nep.1r.1ti.on distance issue. Mr. Galbraith also
:ltnll'.! UI" lI".lring orfict'r r(~:'lp()ndt~d by order that there was no such thing as
n ~11I1 i'lll 1/11" O,'.!,'r Cl;lri ric.ltion but the I\r~.1ring Offic0.r did not agree that
till! ord,' I' lIl't'd.." c 1 il r" i f i,.d.
~
p ~ 'I. Hi IlII'\'!;
8
02/02/88
I
/"'" .
( "
I.
Mr. .]ohnson requested a list of the corresponding City Commission meeting
dates applicable to public hearing items before this Board for annexations:J
rezonings and Land Use Plan amendments.
I. Director's Items
Ms. Harvey advised that the pinellas Planning Council has been determined to
be unconstitutional but staff is unclear what action will take place at this
time. She added that a public hearing has been requested in order to receive
any and all public comment with the hopes of successfully drafting legislation
to construct a pinellas Planning Council that \"ill be constitutional a.nd
supported by the majority.
Ms. Harvey advised that an ordinance is being drafted that will designate this
Board as the tocal Planning Agency. She ,11so advised the Board's function
would not change but in accol"dance with the State Act the Local Planning
Agency designation must be in ordinance form. She added th!lt currently the
Planning Department and the pinellas Planning Council are designated as the
Local Planning Agency. She expressed concern that, until a decision regarding
the Pinellas Planning Council is reached, the City would b(~ in violati.on of
the State Act.
J. Board and Staff Comments
(... .
Mr. Schwab stated he understood that the City of Safety Harbor is being sued
because it will not allow a developer. to remove more trees at the property
loc ated at the intersect ion of: McMulle n Booth Road and En terprise Road. After
questioning by Mr. Schwab, Ms. Harvey advised D.E.R. and SWFMMD have
jurisdiction over the creek and any changes that would involve' the creek would
need to be approved by those agencies. She added at the time.:l request would
be put berore either of those agencies \"ould be the time for the City to
comme n t.
After questioning by Ms. Nixon, Ms. Harvey advised that the developer provides
for e;<:pansion of sewer lines and pays the fees for hookups. She added that
impact fees are paid by the developer and road fees are paid by the developer.
After further questioning by Ms. Nixon, Ms. Harvey advised that the property
located on the southwest corner of Sunset Point Road and Belcher Road is still
under county jurisdiction. She also advised the County Board of Adjustment
recently approved a special exception Eor mini storage on the property over
the objections of the City.
Meeting adjourned at 3:05 PM.
,() 1
"~~_-f~
Paula Harvey
Planning Director
i
\
....~. . -
P & Z Minutes
9
02/02/88
,..;. . .~
. . " . " '; ;<,.;: "I 'rt.; J~