08/14/1980
~
e
.,
,"
,
, I
.,
.,
"I
\ \.
Having held a duly constituted public hearing and since,
based on the material submitted by the applicant, good cause
has been shown, Mr. Regulski moved to grant the request with
the provision that the building permit be obtained within si~
(6) months of this date. Mr. Gans seconded the motion which
carried unanimously.
Item #2 - Otha Hansford for a variance to erect a 6 ft
fence in building setback area abutting CR 102 on Lot
17, Block B, Northwood Estates Tract F, located at 2887
Deer Run S and zoned RS 60 (single family).
The Building Official reported the applicant appeared
before the Board on 2/14/80 and was granted a setback variance
for the house but not for the fence height.
The Planning Official reported the closest 6 ft fence on
the north side of CR 102 is approximately 700 ft east of this
site. A condition of subdivision approval on the south side
of CR 102 was that the developer provide a post and rail fence
with continuous ligustrum planting. A proposed change to the
zoning code would permit a fence up to 4 ft.in height in areas
such as this.
Joseph Cottle, Building Cont~actor representing the ap-
plicant, stated a wooden fence is needed because there is a
pool and the family needs privacy and protection from intru-
ders. The double frontage lot creates the need for a variance.
In response to a question, he stated there are no new condi-
tions present since the previous hearing, but at that time
they were much more interested in obtaining the variance for
construction of the house and didn't push the request for the
fence.. It was their feeling the fence would be no problem
at a future date since 6 ft fences do exist in the area.
No one spoke in opposi~ion.
Having held a duly constituted public hearing and since,
based on the material submitted by the applicant, there are
practical difficulties 9r u~necessary hardships in complying
with the code, Mr. Gans moved to grant the request subject to
said fence being set back not less than three feet from the
property line with an access gate for maintenance purposes and
the finished side facing out, and a planting plan being sub-
mitted for approval by the Building and Planning Departments,
with the pr9vision that the building permit be obtained within
six (6) months : from this date. .Mr. Regulslci seconded the
motion. . .
. Discussion ensued concerning the proposed code change
permitting 4 ft fences, and the opinion was expressed that
',~ .
.C'b.;: ,.:;;; ~ ,:;~/:::.:.:,>... : \;.,
'\I~~~~:~~\ "~>~~""I~ +:' .' ~:'. t. .'
't.i~~t~ 'r:' r:.~ ; ~ ':.~:: /. ;..~~. { i.. "~ . .'~ ";.
.~t(~.~ij. '~t"","~i,,:"', 'p I .
'U
,;! ,r II, . I
. . .'.. I. , . , ~.
,....,::.:,.,:..,';.:\}::. ,Ur..'., :':,' ".,
8/14/80
" '. 2.
I' '.
" ; '; !~.. .'~,.~~/:, '::'~~~~:'~~~./:;, J
. . . >', . ~ ~!.,". c I ;."~' .
:..\\~ .
.,.... .
/.. .,.
~}i" ....LI~...
L ~ i., ,
c.,
. I~
lc'.
, .
','
,
~'. : .....l .", ':..;~ ,.~ .: '
,
. ),i . l-*t. T.~ -.~. . .....: -. "i. ., \
,; .C l
l\o'.