04/11/1974
.~-
,. .. '. '. '." l;
> ~ J' \.:- '" J;" . :'.~,..:" r
.:",.,' .'~ .: .:\
o
u
. , I
," ;",
'. ~v.+
" .
~.,...."""'''''''''''_-U''''''-''''''''~~.__'''_~'4'..._L..io.~~..~J-.oIIl.~'''_ .......-.............. ~.I.\f_1 ,c#-~'J-.~_~h .,. ~ ,..~~...
T'. ". ,..L> ,.~.".'
'__~...., ..~ l ~_ ',-1 .............1,
L(7~
approval of neighbors, and presented some written and signed
approvals. The City Clerk read the list of 7 names and also
reported receipt of another communication stating that they had
no objection to the request. Ms. Dolores Jendrynski spoke in
opposition, particularly stressing that the pool would be too close
to the street. She also stated that some of those who had signed
approval had indicated a change of mind and presented a letter of
objection from Katherine Nugent. Clyde Reed and Roger Magee also
spoke in opposition. Mr. Johns spoke again and stated that the
pool was a semi-portable type and would be enclosed. He also stated
that it would be fenced to prevent noise and hazards. Upon consid-
eration of the appeal of William R. Johns from the decision of the
Building Official concerning a 5 ft. setback from the east lot line
to install a swimming pool on Lot 4, Block D, Bonair Hill Sub-
division, property being located at 1555 Lavern Street and zoned
RS-50 (Single Family), it appearing, after this duly cons~ituted
public hearing, that there are not such practical difficulties or
unnecessary hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter
of the provisions of the zoning ordinance as it affects such prop-
erty as would justify a variance of such provisions, and that the
same cannot be varied in harmony with the general purposes and
intent of the zoning ordinance, Mr. Carter moved that such appeal
be denied. Mr. Nichols seconded the motion, which carried
unanimoUSly.
Mr. Blanton, Building Director, stated that on March 22, 1973, this
Board granted a special exception for a non-commprcial.pa~king'lot
to Mr. Charles Brammer on behalf of the Clearwater-Largo-Dunedin
Board of Realtors, Inc., for Lots 15 and 16 and the East 20 feet of
Lot 14, Block 2, Brookwood Terrace SUbdivision, which property is
located on Lady Mary Drive. He further stated that the approval
and granting of the special exception carried a provision that the
right to obtain a building permit in accordance therewith would
cease six months after said date. He said that in June, 1973,
which was within the six monbh limitation periOd, a permit had been
obtained to demolish and remove a building on the subject property
but no building permit had been obtained within the six month
limitation period for the construction of the parking lot, He
requested that the Board give him instructions as to the procedure
that should be followed in the matter.
Mr. Guy Kennedy, Assistant City Attorney, told the Board that the
applicant, M~. Brammer or his successor in title, had within the
six month l~nitation period applied for and obtained a permit to
remove an existing structurD from the subject premises and that
perhaps the Board would want to consider this as a show of
diligence on behalf of the applicant and owner.
Mr. Albert Rogers and Ms. Mary Howe. member'and chaivman
respectively of the Building Committee. Board of ~ealtors,
explained the actions and efforts by the Board of Realtors to
promptly follow through with the matter and explained some of ~he
difficulties encountered by the Board of Realtors regarding the matter.
't?' , '.
;M(,i\;;'~~~);:")'i:.L;}\ ',~ ..
2.
4-11-74
L .~' ... ..'";S....,:...;.\l-'rP.'t..~'.>v". ...~'t~",.".~"''''''~:''+'':l.'It"~-t.'~~: ..~ _.