05/26/1983
.~. ~ , /" .
'. (
.
,q ,
'j
"
" :,
r ." ~~"
. ....~_ ~ I
what speoial oonsiderations. if any, should be granted for this
property.
P\
.'2)
Oeorge Greer. attorney representing the applicant, stated the
applioant has owned the property tor 21 years and it is the only
undevelopl!td property on the beaob front. He explained the property
is severely lIIpaoted with setback requirements. and granting of tbe
varianoes will permit the use of approxll1atelr 22. ot the land.
R"-20 zoning permits three units on this site and that is what the
applicant desires to build.
John Haggitt. attorney representing the adjaoent property owner.
spoke in opposition stating that sinoe the property is not developed
it should be subjeot to all the new zoning regulations. He
partiou1arly objeoted to oonstruotion 3 ft. from his olient's property
l1ne at the height requested. He read four letters of objeotion and
submitted them tor the reoord.
Three oitizens who spoke in opposition stated the beaob rezoning
w11l never be effeotive it varianoes are granted and they expressed
the opinion the applicant should seek relief froll the State rather
ttum tbe City. Two letters of opposition were read into the record.
In response. George Greer stated all real estate is different. so
anything approved for this site would not bo preoedent-setting. The
hardships whioh must be shown pertain to the partioular zone wi thin
which the property is looated, not the general area. They are not
seeking to increase permitted denaity nor to vary the ooastal
construction control line.
The Chairman deolared a oonfliot of interest. as he is arohiteot
tor the projeot. and a Confliot Of Interest torm is attaohed for the
reoord. He stated the Engineering D~partaent was unable to determine
the flood plain at this location so he estimated that figure and
planned ftocordingly. based upon the applicant's wishe$.
Disoussion ensued oonoerning the size or the propo3ed units and
possible alternatives to the plan. The applioant stated he proposes
his unit to be approximately 2200 sq. ft. to .co~od.te a tUlily
of,five.
,~ (I)
Considerable disoussion ensued oonoerning whother the proVisions
o~ Seotion 131.020, Lots of Record. apply.
,Having held a duly oonstituted publio hearina and sinol. basld
on the aatlrial su~itted by tho applioant. there are praotiOal
dittioaltils or' wmeolsaarJ hardship in oOllplying with the soning
oode. Mr. DaUunn IIOved to ana' I U. TT' .1 with the proVision
that tbe, bUilding perait, be obtained within six (6) aontha or this
date.. Thl aot1on was duly.seoonded and carried unant.ously. Request
\',
.<
"
" . . .,,<'
'\\{:;,:.:';~\, ::', ';,,'.1 ';:"
.. .. . '\'''' . , I '\' " .. \,
i~~i?!~.:J~:~'< ~~.: :'~:)t (::;\ ' '::': i{~' '",( '.~
\'~i'1'l" "'.".J,. ,,1\ ; "I. , "rl'" "
~~Stt,:t:~!~~~;~[tj ~/~~~:~'r~;~\:'~';'~:~:}'~,~,{"',, ' :,;
r.tJ,\.\I'~''''''''f.'' "", ".,-., ,L,'<'" (.,.. ..
~.~a:t'{J'C1"R'r... -~'1 <.i'}) , . ~...."'.'.~> ,~!~lr;"T,.tp
2.
5/26/83
. . ~ I
"
"