08/11/1983
~, " ~....
:.' . " "': ,~. ~. , '. '
.. ~~!,; .... ~~"~~f
. --t< ". .~. . . ..,' r c ..... . \' '';-"
. ~. ",
~ ..... ....... .! ':. :iI~' ~. ..t -.! .4"l\~ . _~ t : ;
~~iftf'" :;' .~~.~. :.~~~~~~~~.
", '. .':'~...~H>>i. :J>..'".......~. p" ...~~ .c:' c'. ~ ~;'",.w.:...:\..~. ", 't< :"~~';":""'" ~>';J".jIIl~. c .,,~.
~. .
., ,.-.~: ~~":r1;'~'~~.~H~~~",f'. "':'::>;
.\
.. \
:, JI. ,
"', .,
" .
.1.
.'
.. 'j
'~ 1
CTF-28 (high density oommeroial~touri9t).
@"
I" ,.,
,1;/~';~
Nanoy HoIntyre, repres~ntative, stated they wish to provide
oharter servioe primarily tord8uests of the Sheraton Sand Key. Her
brother is a sailing oaptain and has had ten years experienoe in the
oharter business. Their referenoes have been thoroughly oheoked by
tho Shera ton's genera I manager. She exp la ined the way the serv ioe
will operate and their finanoial arrangements with the Sheraton. She
reported there have never been any aooidents aB a result of their
operation. If required, they oould cnl1 upon other oharter oaptains
to assist from time to time. Upon oompletion of a oharter sail,
passengers would be landing at a point on the bay side. The manager
of the Sheraton probably would include information about this service
in a newsletter sent to other hotels in the area.
The Planning Offioial suggested the servioe be limited to guests
of the Sheraton only, if the applioation Is approved, in order to
eliminate any additional impaot on parking.
Philip Light. associate of the applicant, responded it would
be diffioult for them or the Sheraton to guarantee compliance with
this requirement. It would not be their intent to solicit business
from persons on the beaoh. No one spoke in opposition.
Having held a duly constituted public hearing and since, based
on the material submitted by the applicant, the proposed use is
oonsistent with the zoning code, Mrs. Dobbs moved to sraat the
,request with the provision Innovative Charters operate in acoordanoe
with conditions set by the Harbormaster in his memo of 7/25/83, and
with the ('UJother provision the use permit be obtained within six (6)
months of this date. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously. Request sraated.
ITEH 112 - Robert Horst for variances of 1) the coastal
construction oontrol line and, 2) height to construot a
house 46.3 ft seaward of the CCCL and 33 ft high at 1192
Mandalay Pt, Mandalay Point 1st Addn, Lot 25 & pt Lots 24
& 26, zoned RS-50 (Single family).
e
The Planning Offioial displayed a plot plan ot the area and
reported the property to the south of subject site received a variance
ot the Coastal Construotion Control Line from the State and a height
varianoe from this Board. At that time. there was no requirement for
that. owner to seek a varianoe of the CeCL. He noted this request
plaoes the struoture along the same line as the building to the
south. If the height varianoe Is granted, the varianoe required from
'the CCCL would be 59.55 ft. instead of 51.3 ft. in aooordanoe with
the formula 1n the oode. It the request is granted, he reoommends
the board make olear for the reoord the reasons tor granting.
8.
8/11/83
. ':.1 .
~i~;,tif\it{;/;'~:;i{(:";':"\:' ,'., ,', .' ';
~).r.yti'I~"oI(.l"'~/~;"""",~,~",,}c)1~if~"",Jo\ "~I:( ",,' ..~ ':~.' ,".~. " . '>: .\
...-)'(~:/~r~t~.i~i.<~..t:-'<~!"''';~J~\tJ ~~~?"xc:'i~:~!"tr;: > ,: ,:/ ,I .",.r!, <. :,;',
, ~r-'~"'~1'":;"...;n~I~.~;;rt'\""v,I"'....J'J'::,;,v"'')f~~ p.~ I'.., . . !. :',' 'J ' ",
i ~. ". " . ..,,~...~.t. .~~:'."'~'....~.".,c '\../:<.c,.c.~... '.1,.1\,
436
~.
~~. '
~.i..~~~1jt.."'~' . _. ." I
'If"';' .. '7f
';..r+:. ._...'~_:'.",: 1 A "II~_ \' . ..l>