04/10/1986=f:, 'l.i' +'???ry'r`??A'"!'PJ1?`;??r,? yy"=1`i:'r};t,5\ ?t ?r..?'}S{.?!? .r.• s,)o •r•• :s: '?r:,,'t3•s'?L??a'•'??
?t+j .{?''S :'?^r °;?•iF
a'""
v
\•s?r.
i "
'?'
'
?
y`
f 1
? 3';4j,J
t?
r
. •}? [ ?,tr ?yf ?ttlr - 1.?rt .-, _
?`
??
?
"
r
? f
j
;
: ` •:
.
t
k.
1
1 ,
+:1 .
?-
^
v
.=?
t
;, ?:3^
1
. ? i
k?i?'???rti %. rti,s," r?tii? ,,:i • e; • ': ''?:i,"4 -- ?e.?,E i"?i ? .. ,. , ? .n ,
?".
•
.
+-.?.>i yy 2'f?,1? 1l?,
?'
fF . ? ^i S ..}?
? _'?'
M.i •.`'F' wt
.? -
?
?'?
'?'
n>
4
?
•
'j
'
';
?
?
r
..•(? S?•1`'i":4?'
?'j? i '?s .ti *:?ra K??' '?
'.1'':
,r r -s
?" .L
?
=
`
;
E
•+ ?i'
f
?'
'•, ?
w
• ,
>t`etr w4, t' r'1' iw jr
?y4
ry"'r:
- .n'k.fi
'
* +
r
•r
r
'
S
r
?
`
e
?
Y^;t ..
,
?
..,
a _ t
??. ??,
: -
?1 ?
S',
.•."`y
;.
t ??, (?. t?',.?',.?K-.,;. .: ?
3 s r?r";ri j
''' ,5
Jje: ?Fi
i
"
`
• a
l
,. i:.?ti
?
r
r• f.,
?
?,
l.,?it
k.?•`.. +.a ?
?
? '"'r'
?
`
?
'?
'?
'
'
`
,
,
.
i
?''ri:
??`r
'r
???
i
'
: ':sir,
i ?'""^+
l
"
}
:y
:''? t'l. .
-"
•. d?
fe
i'
1?
SS
.
.9?-
i r
??'
?y?f
4
?s
?
?
_:
C
•:`
:
? ?
+
'
; s
,
?
.
?
?,,
,
r'CE
?,
•;?(?,
{ll''. ?5",•'S
?
>M•S.; i'y:l;'?- r?
'r. •. t.
?
y
"? ?
4
,>,
?,
,
; ?
F Fr
?
:t
^... :, F
'`
r'
' t e ?.ri. ?'
+ -t
.'=`yr
'
.t
ti
e
,?
.
,?
. E
.
r
?
?
'
fit.
''r
,
? ?'L l.•:
` ?(?
•
'
•
'
?
F??
?
`, t,
,
L T ?
:v
1 I ern .'i` ?4
>
'
V?iµ
'
?
y
ri .rv ;r.+,`;:,:,4 .1;'z ,`. r ' ; ' -psi t;:?;°:"•.'y,?'T 34•+ s
tl rrr .- • 1.'.' ,:k.Y I1? I-i 'alai
M1' Y A.L'?::t"••?:as..._--S-w.Y.+a:.+s+11•hrSL'in.:.a:?E1,.a.1?'s.sa>u..a.^+wnt><M rfay.tv.[n:crta.rsrw:.ww:.•...:...::."?''''"'i
0
ACTION AGENDA - DEVELOP14 NT CODE ADJU3THENT BOARD MEETING - April 10, 1986
ITEM - (request for time extension) A. Smith ITEM - Granted 60 day time
Howard for a variance of 1.30% to permit 76.30% extension to 5/26/86
impermeable lot coverage, at 350 Hamden Dr,
Columbia Sub #3, Lots 10 & 10A, zoned CTF-28 (high
density oommeraial-tourist).
ITEM - (continued from 3/27/86) Orange Blossom ITEM - Granted
Developers (Mildred Taylor) for a variance of 31
ft to erect a pole sign 1i ft from property line,
at 1421 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd, Boulevard Heights, Blk
C, Lot 5 and J of vacated street adjoining, zoned
CG (general commercial).
1. Phillip Lott, Sr for'variances 1) of 12 ft to
modify an existing structure with a front yard
setback of 13 ft and 2) of 5 ft in height to
modify an existing structure, at 1340 Friend Ave,
Cleveland Grove Sub, Block 7, Lots 20, 21 and part
of Lot 19, zoned RS-8 (single family residential.
"eight").
2. John Sobieraj for variances 1) of 4.75 ft to
construct a garage addition 20.25 ft from street
ROW, 2) of 13.60 ft to construct a pool enclosure
16.40 ft from street ROW, and 3) of 7.6 ft to
construct a pool 22.4 ft from street ROW, at 2061
Butternut Circle W, Charter Oaks Sub, Lot 66,
zoned R3-8 (single family residential "eight").
3. Mark Davis for a variance of 8 parking spaces,
at 1330 S Belcher Rd, Oak Grove Estates, Lots 1
and 2, zoned OL (limited office).
1. 1) Dented
2) DWI ad
2. 1) & 2) Denied
3) Denied
3. Granted w/ conditions
4. University High Equity Real Estate Fund II, 4. Contfmied to 4/24/86
Ltd. for variances 1) of 12.67% open space to
provide 12.33% open space and 2) of 20 ft to
construct a building 30 ft from rear property
line, at 2612 U.S. 19 N, Sea 30-28-16, M&B 31.04,
zoned CC (commercial center).
5. Hugh Grant Realty and Bldrs, Inc. for
variances 1) of 2 ft in fence height to erect 6 ft
fence in structural setback area, 2) of 3 ft
buffer to provide no buffer, 3) of landscaping
requirement, 4) of requirement to provide opening
or gate to allow access outside, and 5) of from 7
ft, 6 inches to 8 ft 8 inches to allow 2 pool
enclosures 22 ft 6 inches and 21 ft 4 inches from
property line abutting S.R. 590A, at 2437 and 2441
Old Coach Trail, Coachman Ridge Tract A-1, Lots 96
and 97, zoned RS-6' (single family residential
5. 1) Granted
2), 3), 4) Denied
5) Granted
?';? `[????q,J•• ?'.§?(?r-k ti's"- ?L r. .:s: r, lr?. ?'E .. rl,"
S 1 '+6
rays. „1 2 a .r• ?• i': ? ae.rs s E 1 .,` ` `s.. >..±??: r :r •
1'i`,
rs1 ..s?$4`'Y ?' ?.4 ?i:;. ,r??t..r? f „t. ? j;s.?:F'?"?r...r•- ?1^: t.t.. '.; `•. ..'t <=?' ?
I.,,sF'j•?•i'gr ?%.i• 't?`k•' ?"k. j'[+11 'i; }.:,;ti
°iy. tfr. qqJ ?:i .'V /. _'r .: l.;?},?'R,•< S?,4L tt?Y???,
r:SS il??:j,n; ?, ^c'r'ia•,°., is:'r. "., `=+L"•; ?I?CfGiS.?fA@q'; •1
?{'1r'a?'?TV ??u : .rs?'•,e '?` S;,•Y,??.'r?l,f':T`'?1C
a? i<' ,;n 'ia. ... 1:',t 4.. ,<< ?. •l+}! any ?i?+??? a Z,
•yX. n'ii of S? r,l" x1.?i'?'•r, _ l.v,,ia lei S?.
6. Countryside Village Ltd (Sound Management of
St. Petersburg) (Jamaica Jacks) for. variances 1)
to permit one additional, X.D. (wall sign), 2) of
22 aq ft to permit 2 wall signs with a total of-70
fad` aq ft, 3) of 3 ft to permit 2 pole signs with a
total height of 27 ft each, and 4) of 702 sq ft to
permit property I.D. signs (2 permitted) with a
total of 1086 sq ft, at 2561 Countryside Blvd,
Countryside Village Square, Lots 5 and 8, Sea
30-28-16, zoned CC (commercial venter).
7. Equitel (Holiday Inn Gulfview S) for variances
1) of 145.2 sq ft for sign with 197.2 sq ft and 2)
of 5 ft to permit pole sign 25 ft high, at 521 S
Qulfview Blvd, sea 17-29-15, M&B 22.02, zoned
CR-28, (resort commercial "twenty-eight").
8. Equitel (Holiday Inn) for variances 1) of 375
sq ft to permit pole sign with 487 aq ft, 2) of
18.!) ft to permit a pole sign 38.9 ft high and 3)
of .5 ft to permit a pole sign zero ft from
property line, at 400 U.S. 19 S, Sea 18-29-16, M&B
14.11, zoned CH (highway commercial).
5
weaR.rrri?-'--' ---
6. 1) arsittod
2) Granted w/ conditions
3) & 4) Granted w/
conditions
7. Denied
8. 1)'Denied
2) Denied
3) Denied
.. J
',{+?.,??? '?i'r??:,f' iro .-i' F vl it"-: Z?'S:•i , +1 j 1?t' ..
i "`y'`''a"tiS""i?: ?? "?r+ r-?, X13; pia. .'`J • - , t:E1 •'?}_'.
_f r ?Ti ,. Sk 1'r' .+. ?'t_ ,rte. .:: ?i'.': -'[.' '•S` ' i. ''i., 'J;-' '-r•s ,t' t r<. :S`:'• rl_.?:,.
??,=y? b? ?,?e?? ? j ,+s .;rs.?r ??!a ?:.J,3,4:;',,, " • ;1'/:. e #,..`: . 1,•", ti,? `:L;....4 '"•' :? w? ,;•p yiE,...
1., ?; ;?1,: J? 'r.":,:, 14:x..:;• •..? .:??`?i?',° ?'`' '''?' ` i.."`
j A I1 N ? ?? ,nF' .+.t ?.y, % %? r,i ?;.: F. ,1+s%A .-^r .;r.r- r, nµ., i;a "'. sti•-?
t >,r a'??srr.a ?:':?` iy . _1i .?}l I?nIQr i.? - FS,...L'- ''?' ;?'? `??',: ? _.,--.. _- ?.? ,';i':.- •`i1?T # v ? .
Ti.
1.2
?((t;l?'.,J' ° ,??+e}biiNJ? .??? • :,ref,.
?yy `. tip .•? y •?,ti +F?•'.?r? y
34Y'T?ti'?••S•?ilr..•.. t,F. kq...?s4}tWl°" ;. F.,..; .t??
?'r.'r `^•?:tr;` Ps-? ?iiltjl`+'t`t ?•1,.1'F'' lsi'?:_:'t irl{'li,•
?.t1•y' ? ~'a' ?? ?`?""*.1.:.+^'A??,3' ? f y??'t`?ti'i?"??ty'1 r,?.
;yT': it 4: 'ti• ,,.-...?» tip .:;' ;• tE.:r?' y?`ft r.
,tit '' .I,• '.?,•. .' 4'2'?Y?,y. 3 / ;
DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD
April 10, 1986
Members present:
Michael R. Dallmann, Chairman
Mary Lou Dobbs, Vice Chairman
Alex Plisko
Otto P. {cans
Kemper Merriam
Also present:
Andy Onufer, Building Official
'John Richter, Planning Official
M.A.'Galbraith Jr., City Attorney
Susan Stephenson, Deputy City Clerk
.The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 1:00 p.m. in
the Commission Moeting Room in City Hall. He outlined the procedures
and advised that anyone adversely affected by any decision of the
Development Code.Adjustment Board may appeal the decision to an Appeal
Hearing Officer within two (2) weeks. He noted that Florida law
requires any applicant appealing a decision of this Board to have
a verbatim reoord of the proceedings to support the appeal.
In order to provide oontinuity,, the items wiu be listed in
sgeaft order a>ltbouo not necessarily discussed in that order.
ITEM - (request for time extension) A. Smith Howard for
a variance of 1.30% to permit 76.30% impermeable lot
coverage, at 350 Hamden Dr, Columbia Sub #k3, Lots 10 & 10A,
zoned CTF-28 (high density commercial-tourist).
The applicant requested a time extension by letter stating that,
due to illneas, there was a delay in obtaining the building permit.
Hr. Gans moved to grant a time azteoaion of 60 dams to May
26, .1986. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
ITEM - (continued from 3/27/86) Orange Blossom Developers
(Mildred Taylor) for a variance of 31 ft to erect a pole
sign 1" ft from property line, at 1421 Gulf-to-Bay Blvd,
Boulevard Heights, Blk C, Lot 5 and J of vacated street
adjoining, zoned CG (general commercial).
Dennis Reynolds, representing the applicant, stated that, without '
:.`the varianoe they would infringe on the parking area and the Traffic
'.'•.''' Engineering Department preferred they not do that. They wi11 take
.: ?..,t:; ,down.; tha other' ," sign. No letters from, neighbors stating they had
/07
?k V `; •tl'=i i??L ?'°y."y.? rf'". t..?(. 4/10/86 . ` .
? typ5r?r i•?Y,y:`y`J• ^L t;;', ?(.; y+ ?'° ? r
_ 4ugit31`. .1.6k. rM...?Y_?1 °.1 .1?:?'?....x it.. ..v.. .. •7S°.L .L
'x ?-;t ,i„1. t ..,;?: ai>p' :;?` ` ?.r? mil;. ..i?. ??.?4,- sa,?; ?r '?,• ? .. 1.,•,;, .
y?o ?tN t..?l.'".`','!-t• .7••y.}1. ,"- t '1 •, }'S`?i:` 7'???!..; '_t..,?-!. :•p •:+: ;i•.,. -- ?tr.+
?r.'1:.;'f.a?Y ',[?:'1. _ ?i.• .1!{'*- `ri'';f,''alf ,`;', ?l,-.S'r.,?.._%'. .?, `'i e'?' •d' 'F.: ":y:
?•t p>ti. ?! 'h ? ' • '? -? _.y •X. .•:: ?•S'!'La '•.};.; S'•'i?..i€, +Itl , r, ...t .; 4.F•?IF +,-t !i S` .?'° :i"'"tea
3R+.y.?? "T ?? ? 't i5?3'?r: *?•'•.? {, ,'?f : r p. ::1 R ?}?, :R;• ? ,•i. !.r.a': -?';;'?a f;; Sr'' 2• 0."'' 1,
}?'ti:ti.. •e?i :{?:7'•S'??lica]'''.:...h.??.':?.?r'?.'r ?:..?'i•C:.:'F?1::3?,?'!a o ? c???'u.';'-i::?e?'L^.:.:f._1`r..•.?1._ ;.!? ... .?.x-_i?:
3
ON
Tit(
Yi•!"Stt.? «.M1...Jj ?.'? , ? ?1.. ?.,k1`,'.t4}'«?.f, n. 'jFr (.
i
? ht ,,1 4t
`°
l V `?''`'; !{•S Y "?''u'. r'..- .., ?, :{,• ;l' :T w Z Sri ??"b,?C??1 '''s, ;s °" ? ',
,'plSi k { r 1 i o s., , ?i,TY nx• X ' ; r: r?' '` ` '.: r '•rh?;" nro-.•,,.? r ? ?•?. t?f !? C
ti },t ?? j,?°s53:i'N:t f', ii ;off T.}?{:. ,? r r.?;. ?i.'?.•};rif r?kn}y.?ry.';???,?r='?.
s ?5 s= ?., i..?.l1?k;?..+ .t. {.i t?,.-'? rs•.,r '.?.? +t '•??..'r.?c. s' t",F?. r,? S.r'.. ?j??i:.J;,
,??. ,a , r,i,t ., . ; . •' ' i?, '' .. ' t. , ?" . ° ? ?- •.' - ._ 'C,' .i : `?. i.,,' t,?ti,j`?r?'?f;s.`:! r
kt?y? { : ;':?'•?'.?)_ ' ;Sl;, ?5f,`t-' r' !-r`y.. ,??w :: ,,L:.: + - ••rf. (j ; ri.?. ter. +.r. ,rs ? ? `?• Si
`i: r lie:., it ' "'; w,.? ... .. :, ?,? Y?t?t ^g•.ti )?j`r'
?',{.?j;?.Ai!•-j.:::y??'.,{', ,.? .`•:,?'. "?-ti-.? ,` '••`. .. i .,tikJ xF y.s):''irft5='Tit•'fY!f°r."`x
4?7s?. "ir5"t^-: +' ?••'?. .' . , a.«..e ,_:tt^' '.S, ' `".. ?r.trR ti,41?,r1.-/i? i(ii?????,•i?
Y r i .' ff , .'T:' 7 !. ,f
44
.' '4' .`i•:pi 4;t?r.' ;,, ,, .5. . y'.r wA,+,¦'•.,'tfY?`i?-;.'My,',i
rv ?
no objection were submitted.
r Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, which
clearly shows that the requirements of Section 137.012, City Code,
have been met and that the strict application of the Development Code
would result in an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant as the
result of unique conditions not caused by the applicant, Mr. {Sans
moved to gent the variance as requested subject to the condition
that the sign permit be obtained within six (6) months of this date.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Request
Xmwtrd.
IT@M #1 - Phillip Lott, Sr for variances 1) of 12 ft to
modify an existing structure with a front yard setback of
13 ft and 2) of 5 ft in height to modify an existing
structure, at 1340 Friend Ave, Cleveland Grove Sub, Block
7, Lots 20, 21 and part of Lot 19, zoned RS-8 (single family
residential "night").
The Planning Official stated the request is for two variances
to modify an existing structure which is nonconforming.
Mark Ryozek, representing the owner, stated the existing
residence is approximately 30-35 years old. They plan to renovate
this structure and build an addition. The existing structure does
not meet the setback requirements and they wish to add bay windows
and a canopy to break up the long boxy look of the proposed building.
They want to align the garage with the front of the existing
building. The houses on either side extend further into the setback
than the proposed canopy addition. They intend to add the second
floor on top of the existing roof with the first floor having a
ceiling height of approximately 7 ft 4 inches and, therefore, require
a height variance. The balconies proposed are for aesthetic reasons.
Phillip Lott stated the house has been in his family for
approximately 30 years and for that reason they do not wish to raze
it. It is larger than the houses in the surrounding area. The
addition has been designed to allow his children more privacy.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, which
clearly shows that the requirements of Section 137.012, City Code,
have been met and that the strict application of the Development Code
wcuid result in an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant as the
result of unique conditions not caused by the applicant, Mrs. Dobbs
moved to gent the variances as requested subject to the condition
that the building permit be obtained within six (6) months of this
date: The motion was duly seconded.
'2. 4/10/86
h ? ? ;}lf,?R.?y,',?k$.jj}]..3)?y ?.rd A, li ti, ?'' .l •'S _Y. `4,. '.f '1 _ `. . ? ? ,
?l•?T".1 V ? \i????' l .ii`+'ft ?• ] ?.? ? F '1 v _ ``:1 .. ? ?1..'. . I i'• _ - ,.1. F; t?
????i<'?i?"ar';? ?? `• Fes'' :Y,r4r <'.(; ? ''°.?I"Y'. ? ?`r ?'i: , :''' ,,ti • 'r•'?``??'.?
t s., .t. .ITS.=:,.i.?r:y'. .. ?•1" t+: :i'?, •Y ;; ? `t•r} .:
?YK%`t••(5t?!` r `'S •:f¢r ??° "t''i.. ,a. :R.'3?:. ?'1'?'.i'?K` Ai ?il? ti fu
;z?4 E . •r }': r` Ir. Y?L': : I?,,'r ,`..e, f+ l?'.: • ? ?• •r,, !,!?'.+':.1 {4 f?,*R?,: ?y?A
,,,};l iMI:Y-i rse 't, r:. •r E. •{:'st-'?i'.:'?{'•??.. +5.1:. .i?`+v' `•.?'??+
.,?}!i?{ri•r-II?.?,r .!'a.+'r :jEi,?hh{ ?'11.11,d.S`+:' "a'„i "h,.'in ''?['. .r 'L. .{?° °' n ;'•iw`a.yr 'i.
ryt '"r?>1-?1` •?„? •?: ?tiP, :?sf,'.??•yF:'•r_ ';i.:` ?-.f .? r?• r %.. ti, - ?}' -•-'?1,°t
't`,,• v.i?y
'lt 41 r- y i' •f; ' 1•' „'i •Y" :i a..., _ I'+' •Y-r> "4 r
?IEY ':?;f
rte',?IFA?''t?r,ry
'r?E ? / !. i? 4'??'r -;r;;\??'Y .3?'? •. ;,; s ' 1, rr l .'ti r ''? ' ' . - ' e ? i ? / r n 1 ? 4
,_ ?t?,'?7?'?:.;t ' %t, :??: i,: `, ??? +? ', - ..._?..•,?' t<. i'•?r:IFlj'?Itfr•-,`'a'
4'}?{r, ,'{ lLi ?{,?,,i`?: .v?,? .ii" ` I'tp'' ,1?'?' . t. ,, ?'?t'.' Il?'. •?4r.?r ,?
YY-_-_•y,I SSI ?fIIRavh ??y.S.{r'?',?'t•i'v?Vf?• :1 '' '?'?1 q•A?S,r
•?`dS,}?p$ , r ' y,' ';':•' .• ,. - , . - .E+'.+. eF?' 4r; ?If4?1 ? ,C?
r i?'J?y'I.F,?.,,y r7i ' ,r.f•M r ?+ ? ?yo A
• ?"'?;j'?-? `?;''1 1,?,??•y41,';.'r.'ki?'? .,?.'!,,??., 1. ;;>, .. '?,, s-try. ;;?`r ?(An??a
'JriflaTfr,Nnr.?..w-ar.r.?,lnw,.,.xw-?,.._........ u. ?,..?..?u•..x.. M•ti?^.i .l'., .. .., -1
IdQ k
• r'
Discussion ensued as to whether the height variance was necessary
and whether it would be better to separate the two variances and vote
on them independently. Mr,. Merriam xithdrwr his second.
la
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, which
clearly shows that the requirements of Section 137.012, City Code,
have been met and that the strict application of the Development Code
would result in an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant as the
result of unique conditions not caused by the applicant, Mrs. Dobbs
moved to grant variance #1 as requested subject to the condition
that the building permit be obtained within six (6) months of this
date. The motion was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken,
Mrs. Dobbs voted "Aye;" Messrs. Plisko, (cans, Merriam, and Dallmann
voted "Nay." Motion railed. Request denied.
The Building Official questioned whether the existing foundation
would support a second story. He also was of the opinion that if
portions of the outer walls were being removed it would be necessary
to remove the existing roof which would allow them to lessen the
height of the second floor.
Because the applicant has failed to demonstrate a necessity for
the variance as requested, Mr. Plisko moved that variance #2 be
denied. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Request denied.
ITEM #2 - John Sobieraj for variances 1) of 4.75 ft to
construct a garage addition 20.25 ft from street ROW, 2)
of 13.60 ft to construct a pool enclosure 16.40 ft from
street ROW, and 3) of 7.6 ft to construct a pool 22.4 ft
from street ROW, at 2061 Butternut Circle W, Charter Oaks
Sub, Lot 66, zoned RS-8 (single family residential
"eight").
The Planning Official stated the request is for three variances
to enlarge an existing two-car garage and to add a pool with an
enclosure. He pointed out that an amendment to the Code is pending
which will allow pools and enclosures to have the same setback as
the house rather than the additional five ft as is now in the Code.
John Sobieraj stated the three variances are for the south side
of his property. A similar pool variance was granted to another area
resident recently. The garage addition is to allow them to expand
the house into the existing portion of the garage. He rented the
house for one year and then purchased it. There are only two bedrooms
and he wishes to add a third bedroom.
One letter of objection was submitted for the record.
a
30 4/10/86:
' +5'y;+i.l t'! ir,5 r.t;• CZr.t'i
!?y? 'j?!}Y}?„r1??,i''y;,e%r?tj«;;,'!?,'y! :E'• :'S1. ,. .. .•r{3,? ,.,••
.,'?',-, } +' H^C'1 . "+? •: v'E, rr•;,-: r,'A, :-. I; t',' _ F }' 's'r;. AIr-[.t
4elr. 3?yy?n,?.,,y is .yls: .}-.:' ,,s ,..?. :'3 •e- i` .1 ., r.•,
1 .l• dr}. ?+! ;, ^,r ill I-' T _ 'i,` t'. ,1 ,c,' `•y .,, le:', <' _r:.r_
:T,} {'?'°. 1?..?.,,t'+s1,..,`r ?..;d.,r?S.E?';.?i,i ','t,, ,i?F ?-_a,:? •'r i , •?•':r r: .1'T/;`.?!';tl:
dw ! • v.f. fv N, r a' :; f"..i : r • a' ..t .`''' ' 1} r h.
11 "• r ". .P,-?, .i ,`•f 3'ie?r. {_ •:`?. 'l r1v.P->': `?'. :y tif^!'. 'ri•..t °: .'? , . : _ '>,`bF - ,:i ?F ?r`r "tt•,,,
?? ???. tcl '7?,: •.is=?ii{" w?v?ti. .,,rT, =1 .,t. -, .. i"§':' _'r-. ;;:i?r.. 'J:,l., -. +r,i? .r,:yy l??r
LS 01111"t 'E 's-•w•F• l' 11 't` •IJLf+.ti y-rt;"'•
E ?ty L?'•,?x fr }«jt .ra? rlr?l i "??ke". Yy::+ ;.tir 'y •.w... :e ,-?.. .eft rn,.•. .. °., A.>` 4 1# ??••d° ?f•} Y i ?j
y { Lt,., ,?'[.l•` # Y1r,=?.., i' '?1:; ,r"'• µY`, i` rr j?„4''4''.. ''1 J..t
,.?.F/,ai2?.1>,it ti s'} y? •'l r,• .t• „?._ y?iz'-v i '?` 'E z: •: :'.?.. ;,t. /i?.'? }' 4.`?<?iY? ? !.r'? :4,- i?
Z T! li* •a\i:?:.L° y ";?s??t ?'r >,i i •? "l,++yt II . ?...:,`.. E^? , F •f s.. ;"': .K "h}?;?,S;e'>f; :1 .F ? ?'}•?,f,. .i r
t ? ? ct Y ?? ? tr ?. Yi#? r• .. ? ?,,;,,,; ? :. •? t :. i; "?•, I? v ,. i. ,?*t«
)3xy'.i.•-'1r t, :1':: .r?..,;. ?.•+?.;.?.. r 'Ir f' ,'I. • " .rj f.'+ly .'ii `{.. ,.
??'? F'lh. ..?{S. t '11 ' i w:?,l'si ?? t".°j? i.>`•,i ?';s'?' ; A'n`y' (? .!Y:.'- "r.` .`°.'.,;.,,,, ? y ' ' . -?it:` ?,. ? y$t tt?? kQ t? +y; r 3' O
yftF???;, tx,l,+t'?,,?{?•',,'?;.ry>r.!>'• °':'?^ ?'`;i? i+ ?'1?;+ - '•?`,,.i' -.?:' -,`t. « '. t, •' ';tl.;? . ? ??'.ir"°7' ``'i?lo"q:Sf ?::'
t rt?sA 1k4,??.r{'<ii?i,^^' Y5, ?s, ?;.>.•E+; rt YAK ?'',tr'? `^h.. ? ? ."t.+. I ' - ?y' ,•}' 'r ?':..? ? -l; t,? ?1.. 1 f•,'. Ia+.'?'
. A "3 }. , r
?V ,
>t'. V r; 1.1; .,'e _ tL ..3,3 • ;•?!1. St': '''?' bA J•LY ??`'A,."rt'.
-'y`,yV? , ., C.<' >nt `'"'??? . - - is ?`ir :r ;5??ii •?y
?{y?1`??i•'I•Q,.' 11.:+.? .?. ?' •. i! ? > n t?,'i ???'; ti '•' ? • r . , \ ^!' If
"fir ?. (}}
Tl•1?~`;`FI rYx F:?/.?. "i(s(.' :.?,.,5 ,:^ ..l• ''t '??r ??' ? +?T.? ' . .'A •^ "G.1a 'S w
'Jrl "r. .1 .:?.•r: ?.. y A. .y. ,s. _.`,:A' r '?L71
h?`j.1i'•??lA.^a ?,'y+;'•,f^,'#:_ :k? ."f, ?` .`„'i .• .1• t'. ??, r:; .? 'y?i? r.1?F:f;t/?1Y?A???' 6
4+"1•}3 'i4f ??ff 4??+•.' r"??t?? ?r.•: '? f . ? ?. '•F 'f1M .?' ' ?; .?1?1,?
'!? ;fit: .?F%? :A.'• .1 ? r?• -, I,
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, which
clearly shows that the requirements of Section 137.012, City Code,
have been met and that the strict application of the Development Code
would result in an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant as the
result of unique conditions not caused by the applicant, Mr. Plisko
moved to grant variance #3 as requested subject to the condition
that the building permit be obtained within six (6) months of this
date. The motion was duly seconded.
Discussion ensued as to whether the applicant was trying to
overbuild his property. Upon the vote being taken, Messrs. Gans and
Plisko voted "Aye;" Mrs. Dobbs and Messrs. Merriam and Dallmann voted
"Nay." Motion failed. Request denied.
Because the applicant has failed to demonstrate a necessity for
the variance as requested, Mr. Plisko moved that variances 01 and
#2 be denied. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously. Requests danied.
ITEM 13 - Mark Davis for a variance of 8 parking spaces,
at 1330 S Belcher Rd, Oak Grove Estates, Lots 1 and 2, zoned
OL (limited office).
The Planning Official stated the applicant proposes to enlarge
his' office building which increases his parking requirements. The
Code requires he have 22 spaces and he proposes to provide 14 thereby
requiring a variance of 8 spaces.
Petev Marich, representing the applicant, stated they have
requested the parking variance in order to save some trees. The
applicant is an oral implant surgeon and, therefore, does not have
the traffic that would be generated by a regular dental practice.
His property abuts a residential area and they feel by leaving the
trees it would preserve the character of the neighborhood.
Mme` s,?;y?'',?i•\,sti{. . ",?.• '. .. - " .'
fs,? y,?:?:??31s•51.:"rs??{`S?%?f;•??if:M.l.' ., • ?. ? r. ., ? ,,?F.
0 ?, F???.. ..€. .FS•
?F ?+i '? Y ?y 'tom .?`•? ? :lam 1... ', yA.6 .'?. E?? f 7". .Sr r " '?1
?°:r"'"3':l?L'?E.??1: +}•i;c?>rr 1 :y;? ''i•.?;',e?,':,s .•J.'°" .r`'?r? "I'? "1: ?J. ;r•::.'r••??: L.•r?? ,;.?.t. .t..?'?.i•?'.
tsr S ?i. LL.r ,r.• 5;'.i;? e:a?•rg', ,'y;?.'s. _ ?:E_':.- t?.' '' ?S?' ..._. .['.:?'.-' ? a .l
.r.K1'^;????>33:• yS F•Y?'<,?i;h' 'F,•t ?r X?Y.,j .r.., i'?•, i. L,1'. ,? ?,:, ?i,': ". ..i:''fi
f a?e,9?U. .:r ,?Yr ??f.?? i'V 7•K ,i•1; ?.?>: ill?tr il'•, .f' .F /.'. •! }, t,
?? 1, ?? i,;x •.. ,z'P'f<,1?i?i' r;"?. F•. 15 elf-''.'.i ?YSr .w.s :7•? •i•.: `?'',A,. L'ae ?,,. ,?'?•:
,f r•t ?y%? x?, ../I.M .,r6a=- "err`: ,•>!F??' :l'.`i. °?krF ?-F,.'rr'J?4',:'•;?' ,?v... '•l,- _r'A"S'?,S• •i1' i•I.?`l ;
`".4`i'L` ?S`:.•Fa ti?` ..f,,;•`'?t.. ?; ...:f t•'t' .i1. [`?.• Ys'>','}Lr ,?,•. ?• .. :1 1Y•+t'''..,-
S_1« ,'M,`f. :^+ ] ,'l\,. >`Er ?Wf .?._5_+.._!`_.._ ?i' ?_"• .;•,`!I' .• ra. ., t,,??.... •?T ?' , .. ?I. '. . :`.'P'__-r _Y''r5
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, which
clearly shows that the requirements of Section 137.012, City Code,
have been met and that the strict application of the Development Code
would result in an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant as the
result of unique conditions not caused by the applicant, Mr. Plisko
moved to grant the variance as requested subject to the condition
that a barrier be put at the north end of the parking lot and the
building permit be obtained within six (6) months of this date. The
motion was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken, Mrs. Dobbs
and Messrs. Plisko, Gans, and Merriam voted "Aye;" Mr. Dallmann voted
"Nay." Motion carried. Request granted.
'7t4"':^','" !kj ' ! S!' ? '1)f a,`•1'1 b 'T '?i• •} 'r ;,r;;•=-?.?e,.ti-? .. -?Y '^:.t s xyn, )Y' y
'' rxmi }r?r "G , t+t .?`' I 1'">..-:jS,..,. i,...f )ti^r •. .•a ;e}. 1 }
)f t_u. .N?,?, ;'Y' k? 1j %,,5. r ,?, ,{f1, •:.F:;..; :ts.. •' _ ., ? ? 3;• ?. ', 1 '`t=.
R f? K;.r .s yl 'g' $
1 =?• } f•{f t ''???:; ' r a.x.- ;4+ ref,
?:•lT k!'?,9 kJ 3?'?+?•Li'K ? y{. 71•[• ^?L7-t"}'.?3?„? • 't ;?w. ?-' t. ?;'?._ ?3 t
et t?s•_??}r.",.7!'i=Fi •?,r3Pry?i!`r'15:i C? ?..f ''?14.: =,•t'.k•.;s%"`r:,'.,•,•'',''?•1 t, .P=1 ',x k'?P `f?.',•qi? }_+l•4 *,rjy45.Y;1.f.'yl :`'^aK
r t?gt}•?..?? :.. ,Fvf?'..:,?s1•A,'.'*?:Y.i ^n4r, ??,' s: i.;Ki? "`•.-L.' S.'?.•I*' ?i'? -:??:??.?2k1l.•??yz??,?{?:,:.
j?x.lU.?( ?,}eil.:`vv `',.e : ?sT};?ry!• ,%.tlY .,'4:. qty' ?,s sT.,7' E :t .}. r ?R"«?,s
r;•t('• ?Lh"r?'i>£?'j•.?, i?.:'}t.[.}'•i', '.'j_ ?., ?,',•, - L•'.:r`; :is.+?w.• '.?S%• t'?: "'t+.',?Irr ?FSr, Si ?}sc xl
f ? ?»?r I??y?l??i ? t. ••al Yn?a„sv.. •i:, :?.' '?'> ... - .?;; ;, .a::i ?ls t.?yi l?
.. , 9 ?; ' ?.?? 7. ''1? ?t,a$a`i+'• t ?r '. • '.S?' r.l' 'r ., }: k.'.. • n , •, _~ s "?S
•Re.??''? ?'c?}.?l?ary . .? ?h??Yy" ' i,J'???+`.}c. e' -"s?t:.?? ?j?.aS'. . S .,.{+' ' ,r• , , ?.. ?1 !,? .,.r • '?? ,
? w 'A.i k[, `? f?.?r.?• ,1 ;t 4,''. .. '-,, .fr `'V i ../ ,FI?7, h:•c. ,s s?di .
• f t? 4"C) °fjyiYP?+?„?E"i?yL,i i E'' ?s?t'S! .• '1=•?. _ ,S . ?' r ? I ?It ? ?s.}.. ,?+,x ••j '" jP, ?.
? a « ?t SS j.< ytl,'.=I?y? e' 1''r -• •I;: t?? t . 1?•, '? ' f.i i?+ ' jl '. c lKkfi??M I h, y? l
'isti, ?° ?+ .? '}?%t ,4?r t?.:1°+?"?'? .-'Ffl,-y:.'- ? .'' - „ . .?. ?t Eik',;'•'S;ti? '?'s•,l;sRi?`
R' ?' • '!: r? '+?-k;'?'"?',1; J€A'%,I.f;rkz iT ft?.'? 3' i <.•,I?•'i'1' t 'a•,Sl ?f•. ! L!? V, t
?A}?'. (? }Se??4??• k ?z '..? . E?..?, , ??tfz?::i?' tl?l .,:'(, _ :•.T: . ?. ? sr x . ?, ..3 •', •. r 4? =:GS'.=;
,?}{ ??`'rYl•,y'fs;4?'?".!"t?r?(.yk;? PC??.L.J ?,S'{(;t? ?x?'iit ? •'y,,` °' •??' , , `'t'• t •' .. _ ?.,?,;I'. ,Yi7`,'}'?
?? h` yy .?':I .1 3'?1??. Jj? B.w .Y, f ;?is •.l',? , ,.,?, p ,1? •? ,? +'
.?..?'?«};;Y•K?p;:?7???? '?'r_?•,?:71j''.?'??,`ryYi,?•k?i?i zP;?1?%: '? s• ??1, ,•t. - , • ^?? 'k' ,
} ITEM #j4 - University High Equity Real Estate Lund II, Ltd.
for variances 1) of 12.67% open space to provide 12.33%
open space and 2) of 20 ft to construct a building 30 ft
from rear property line, at 2612 U.S. 19 H, Sec 30-28-16,
M&B 31.04, zoned CC (commercial center).
The above request has been ooatinued to the meeting of April
240 1986 at the request of the applicant.
ITEM #5 - Hugh Grant Realty and Bldrs, Inc. for variances
1) of 2 ft in fence height to erect 6 ft fence in structural
setback area, 2) of 3 ft buffer to provide no buffer, 3)
of landscaping requirement, 4) of requirement to provide
opening or gate to allow access outside, and 5) of from
7 ft 6 inches to 8 ft 8 inches to allow 2 pool enclosures
22 ft 6 inches and 21 ft 4 inches from property line
abutting S.R. 590A, at 2437 and 2441 Old Coach Trail,
Coachman Ridge Tract A-1, Lots 96 and 97, zoned RS-6 (single
family residential "six").
The Planning Official stated the request is to extend an existing
fence and to install two swimming pool enclosures. They wish to have "
a 6 ft fence on the property line with no access gate for
maintenance. Similar requests have been made in the area with one
permit being granted in error and another variance for a similar fence
on Lot 106 being denied.
Hugh Grant stated the property was annexed into the City but „
prior to that the County had granted the variances for the enclosures.
The fence is a continuation of fences that are located on either side
of the subject property. There are also pools and enclosures on the
adjacent properties. He desires to have the 6 ft fence because of
the heavy traffic on the road, to out down on the noise.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, which
clearly shows that the requirements of Section 137.012, City Code,
have been met and that the strict application of the Development Code
would result in. an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant as the
result of unique conditions not caused by the applicant, Mrs. Dobbs
moved to grant variance !1 as requested subject to the condition
that the building permit be obtained within two (2) weeks of this
date. The motion was duly seconded.
Considerable discussion ensued with regard to whether there was
a hardship and whether it was necessary for the fence to be on the
property line rather than set back 3 ft.
4/10/86
Yhi
[fY?}.:'??F!''S..jft?r_"f;.,'rl- I ?1 ..
i
?
'
t
•`
?
? f I•
A
'
?
l
`.i t.
tl
.
?'? .,lil"
Jry`la,:-tir1 :
f ?
i •f.
(. 4. •sT',i#ed"l
? ,T'
?
?'17?"? tij;x _ . r:,'D'
3
•
-? ?ali? - y...j;.` . '?..r:
'
'
'
, ?'It,?jf„ . `•? ?', '_4
?
'
[-
,
; ,
.
1,Y ! .? ?.Yi. ,?r,C,r•4"'.
,f? % i}?: ,Tr
?' ?'i4?•7':l;t,
?°1(?rl',
.,1,
??
? =
.
s.
,ty.,,?,,,f:
..a. ;.},j,.t
_ !.j' .
r?-'
??;t'' .•
"?':
?` ?.i?i"r
' e,i
,'1' r 1?• h..', '.. rI,'
'!. '.?' •.t? "} , /tt•tt •
T '`, y.:.. i?lt, ?' ?.S ?:'r:??,,3'•'i
' +p
i;'if
1.
`?f'
?
•''' ,!.!'
` ,.
•
. ?F
'
?
,
•
,
?
.Tl,? t."M7L y!i'l?' ?
tt
?%
3 ,
=
.
:s?:
.?''•
?'•'r?'',?t,.s.r?i 4: .
•''`.• E
I
i'•
.it
i, ),'
,
.sy
, -
r
.
-r i•. ,
'
t
'
' . .'{,y.,.f S'S}
x?
,'
r
?o 71?y: }t
}
d. I}i`
i ,
:}'e _`?_? L._.,e ?_ -_
?
,,
f
r
_ _ ?!
t
t' _
i
___ _ ., R"..•. -?.'P?Xiv _?
9k1 1'. 1 -,""lcL7 .?._[Y'JF••, - :-+' "G:. .fir . -j+r, •-?': •y g, ?r t? r.'S ;tJ?, tV'
's.' r 1? •;. .'f';,:+t j ?'t;! 1'H.??::r° I'+i'<:.;i+.. 7"a`,.,r ?t?4ar?S} .?' F?'?+r.r i? ? •?`.. ?}
? e?Sih????f '?4 ?; :. ;., . !' ;S`.•^, .,, ., (• i ?. :F: "; :5? - !'' '>~.v4,', :',. .1 1.7 R' 4-?iJrli ? "'.Y S
' F'yrt1.'C• : yr .?•,'„ , ?•: .? °. t' .e : is'' - +• ? •1+s i.
y?tg`;? { x+ ry F •r1 •-• ,e':?? .•'i..`r '.: -. f' .r: •4??"+ .?....:Sr"' c?'1..t?•?? ? ?t
7K (?• ?d.?.?Cr°.,?s•ws+:.y :.°,,:^l. r. '?jr ???. -r ...;'?+'`^ +. :i?:°•i?J.?•E' ; `='!F,. ,,,ty. rS? ?•.•^4*Vh.'ti,?(;', £rSr, '??I(. ??'
?'?S;µ?99?di.?'?'????1???i ir.')l, ..,`p• •,.?: `t+ ?'I ., ra°• .fi•,yT :i'+?d.. C:.p?y?:.v1J??i'.'f;.Si?''?+':r!'ij .if.
r5T7n r! ', t'. •l,t, ?. .4 + `+ ?l..; 11 }?,t ?. ??.
."1''fl,w •I•f'.Nx< i<•,'£'??••t`r, •l(??'l is i.,'?:?• f•°. .•.?' ' , ` ''t !'e ?• r+????33?? :'?lT? •? ..
44
E!°°: ?, '1.?'%:''l..;''. ,f'i': 1 a` . '.t ??,? , '?1'? . • • +S' 9. , 6 y!i t??!', .}ra?
.St¢f?1} ?S,„5,?,•1?r?'?.?`k rf?s ? i'•`' ? ? ' ': .•'t . . .. ? .' ' ' i•' "}S'ku i.l''t4?'? ? .
'??j?i7?;r`;°•<?1?r <'t.'is,, .3". ?a',•'°`?'.9'.t'{?,; .. d '• .- :'•.b .??.:ui`t,?
vrc ....... .....,s. ?.c
Upon the vote being taken, Mrs. Dobbs and Messrs. Plisko, {tans,
Merriam, and Dallmann voted "Nay;" Motion railed. Request
denied.
Because the applicant has failed to demonstrate a necessity for
the variance as requested, Mr. Plisko moved that variances #2, #3,
and #4 be denied. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously. Requests denied.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, which
clearly shows that the requirements of Section 137.012, City Code,
have been met and that the strict application of the Development Code
would result in an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant as the
result or unique conditions not caused by the applicant, Mr. Plisko
moved to grant variance #5 as requested subject to the condition
that the building permit be obtained within six (6) months of this
date. The motion was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken,
Mrs. Dobbs and Messrs. Plisko, {cans, and Merriam voted "Aye;" Mr.
Dallmann voted "Nay." Motion carried. Request granted.
The applicant requested the Board reconsider allowing him to
have the 6 ft fence set bank 3 ft with an access gate and
landscaping.
Mr. Gans moved to reconsider variance #1. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
+ Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, which
clearly shows that the requirements of Section 137.012, City Code,
have been met and that the strict application of the Development Code
would result in an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant as the
result of unique conditions not caused by the applicant, Mr. Gans
moved to grant variance #1 subject to the condition that it be set
back 3 ft from the property, that there be an access gate, and that
the building permit be obtained within two (2) a mths of this date.
The motion was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken, Messrs.
Plisko, Gans, and Merriam voted "Aye;" Mrs. Dobbs and Mr. Dallmann
voted "Nay." Motion carried. Request granted.
ITEM #6 - Countryside Village Ltd (Sound Management of St.
Petersburg) (Jawaica Jack's) for variances 1) to permit
one additional I.D. (mall sign), 2) of 22 sq ft to permit
2 wall signs with a total of 70 sq ft, 3) of 3 ft to permit
2 pole signs with a total height of 27 ft each, and 4) of
702 sq ft to permit property I.D. signs (2 permitted) with
a total of 1086 sq ft, at 2561 Countryside Blvd, Countryside
Village Square, Lots 5 and 8, Sea 30-28-16, zoned CC
(commercial center).
(, h'.?f t?yS'r•ri-t?'li:'.\j?fzS3 a?'}???. ?i.t i f..'` "' .. 1
{,9`?t?+ '??? ?.f(??¢fitF}' :i: .'f •,. 'li. °??;?'' ;1,.::.Er??, .s '.:i'
•_ ? ??' `.f}"''.?t:1 J,S „f'rt`•:!S '.? fTa? °r?. `rf.S't; ti:,J'?' 7r`;f , r.
.4S ,rRT'i.l'?•:?S•irV S.. y,y v,+"(••f:i•.', ?,l'?+ :'' .SS•.i',.. _ r,, •Z...Y?'. r'?'r
.syyx•+?''A,• `•jl.•?•: :l,r .\. -r.t• '>,'<h,. •. t' '•.i 'f. .r. ,.' ? 4.''??,`5 .r2
N a ?-
'?.; + r A '"..!' •z ???•,: •i:y?'fs}? :3y,?+. .';?i;',fc" '.r.t! :s.. r... - ''•r?+t
a..,-?-r3_??S?f ..?,,,.:• L?Jt,'-,i..r 54 yy{? va::a-?I?F..i.,r-A
oz
LSa pC F" ;s-r J f y? +i ?'-' ''. i 7w • r' ...., y{S Fri J?tw .}y .tr l.r? nr' t ,w `+ >
?T/? ri 4 •'i?"k !(ri'1. .wM S•''_ i, ?`1 .r/.. ; .y. )."%? tZ??•""+15. T 1r,. ,
?,,NN`?1YetJ ?;txpbi?t '• r?"-ter ?, Psi rM.r;.`.Ff,.t'.sYs';?+L1Yt. 1
?'a d F?Crri"r? S?'i'cJ fi•;' vic?;? [.'r,.?' ? ai.• ,?.. . ,?:./ •.;?'::,:. f N;eti. •., q x•'r i ?•
?. ,'!y L:.M? l'lE"'} ii 3 th w =?'', i?' qAw'. .) i?.' i r '!. ?. .,.?? .C l ?e•. ?' ?[':
k "??'';7'?i???.??sr' `.?f..?€SCw?7[¢^??: ?,::'ti. '? "+,.?4yY• _ ,u. ?'#` ; r iUt. ;? `?: i,?s?,?Ry wr ?y,
<??J \??1?•?'.''J'?., "S..'•ir 1';T.._4',?.'+,"'i,?r,'.e.. ^.X'.' .a%? •...,ti.,? •: 9: ..d ,`i. . y?i.l ik'?{•,r'
?r''r. ?' 7•. {1., ?;-t, •r?'?e ? '•, J4'?, ?r. r?...;F..:l:.',,•?.w+^ 11`111.,, ., i,,?={.'', IaYT'yyy... ,?y..77
,SP •t.,.7.' .tE?'?I•a2•:'i': •,?;. •?;' - .V :.?. i . ,4`. :u.t •T` y?F,i.?l? 1r31!?? ) ,
s? ';•`^it s.'ri`tt?r ,?•, '. /.r '.: '..;?,.. ??• S, :•f?'; ?5?..' .x;.: ,j /, kJ??,.?s +'4. ?
uLi'?+s3 'y??t?7w;1, ',.5 :•''. .7 ', '.;? 'i' :' `. -' 1`?. P ''Vi'i ?. i/,. ? ? +r?'.J?`'
°?r: I,f_;'Eii ?rF'f-t: r •7' .'.4 '; rri. it !' E .'., - -i', '(, a r '.1 y.,r1'4j w7
4j {
?` .,} J1 = ^ , r}• , l' syrf •, r• •S n ,r,l?? i r •'??{yry
r^5 ,t ;Y.?j',r ?;r, ..,,' ,r'S .?'?. ',?', .'4 . •' - :, icr?-}??. ?.1k, h•?h7
i`•,'_ :?(?;' P,, i, Jet.. '`,-.,. `? ;Yr .5 S•.° ?.•O.w i.p j!'!
??""' •"`_ __ _ __. ' . • • • ' -: -. '._•1wt1N.[M.r?..1-W M+?+i`+1KrxJrrr Je•rn.?,7X?i\IY9 ..
/r3
The Planning Official stated the request is to allow two business
identification signs and to permit alterations to two property
identification signs.
Michael Johnson, representing the applicant, stated Jamaica
Jack's has no on-street frontage. If the business was located on
the street they would have no problem with one business identification
sign. They are not considered a major tenant in this shopping
center.'' ire addition to a second business identification ,sign, it
is neesssary to alter the two pylon signs to replace the sign of the
old 'tenant with the sign for Jamaica Jack's. This entails replacing
a 3 ft by 10 ft plastic face on the two business identification pylon
signs. One of the provisions of Jamaica Jack's lease is that their
name be on the pylon sign. There was some discussion as to whether
they had requested a variance large enough for the type of business'
identification sign they propose and he stated, if the variance was
granted, he would design the signs to fit within the variance.
One letter of objection was submitted for the reoord.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, which
clearly shows that the requirements of Section 137.012, City Code,
have been met and that the strict application of the Development Code
would result in an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant as the
result of unique conditions not caused by the applicant, because the
building has two entrances, both of whioh are on an inside walkway,
Mrs. Dobbs moved to grant variance #1 as requested subject to the
condition that the sign permit be obtained within six (6) months of
this date. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Request granted.
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, which
clearly shows that the requirements of Section 137.012, City Code,
have been met and that the strict applications of the Development Code
would result in an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant as the
result of unique conditions not caused by the applicant, because of
the location of the business on an inner walkway, Mrs. Dobbs moved
to SmAt variance !2 as requested with the understanding 70 sq ft
is the total for both business identification signs and subject to
the condition that the sign permit be obtained within six (6) months
of.this date. The motion was duly seconded and upon the vote being
taken, 'Mrs. Dobbs and Messrs. Plisko and Merriam voted "Aye;" Messrs.
Gann and Dallmann voted "Nay." Motion carried. Request granted.
1'x?,s?^i?'V ?il'f'?;' y`yJ `,ISf•;: ?' y•-',' ''•'11 '4 _ ; - +I
{? T='1:'Ir,r. .Ys-y`:is: <i`4 Yc5 ,f=a ::
1iJ '? ir;?'?;??.??- J'1S4 ''y?. .-Y.! F;i?'. '?`?'``.s,,- `E' • ii ., .•i,
,? /?rFflxr}i;p{rJ ?'??xi +,iK. :`,?='S '.r- ..'Y ;-,j•. "'.t•_ S'.:, i !4 p .
?i,Si.f' L ri3 ;a,?• »?ii l:i7„s ';Y,.,'K.' .r ;. .'i're.. •' !1: ° 'I? IDIv6L,
C"'K?%'•.%rl"l. y.'l.`.k, '.ir. .4i _ .`ST4i .'7 ': 7...
,7 11^
rii•i.`,?irr•rS''
s? :t. k• ,f..' ti'?1J. i.`1? ,'.r .r `SNr. ).. '?'r? A . : •?'-`•,?i''?}4'?:e•.?+.'. ••t. ,= •.:`h'.S -? ..`' .: ? •., , ,;: ;' 1'r-t.1•- ..4 • _ r?, . x • 'ii •ti ,r>.
:Sir:ki.J :?}w j.,.}J:;yy'}.?{}Y J,N.r y 1 wYs`x•,.r:. „r.', t'- ti
e + r • .4Y?.'hit; i....f„L.i 'r': w. J.' ?i-'t-'r ' a`-?•;::''•i i-_.'.'.•. . L.i`'•`Y.:'?
... ?? F L:ltf t;.}':!"x ., s ? ._ ,';'•' #ifs" =: : fS^-•'y'' a :,,'a, _ ?^ ;l X:41
k
'? ^i syrf r ;•;;,}i,t,;, S.. 1{''.' ,it' i:'
.
!i3 d?d:l?`.i ''; 11:i•Y
r
?
°
'
• 'rvr* ' , - ; 1 pp e F
; `'r'
r
t F v? t
"'' r"?;1 S
"
`
A,
.J.1?? S r?4?•
? y
` `??, C. ?S,, :ae
' ;
? '
, ' ;' .,'.
}. r ^' S: t
???fff A
•i
a
?e
'
r 6"
.,
}
.
t. '
•. z, r'`i ry_r 4 ??i
1` ti
'':
?
.h'
,
,
.
i .
.,
ss ,
:..,•
t r S •-f t °
r 1?.
V f-
+?i.if. :. T
°?F"i .Y':^i+
??-' 53.1 !.NM\ fl?
N
`
• ,
?.,i_ ?F v.? p
, q??'1?.i .'
S
f'•'
•
7s -y.
'r°?" S
J
J
=
.
v
r71i?'s ,'.y,F '{
??*? 1
i rep ?1: 'L ?.'{?? +,.:•?%.
{sr;
w, .E'+ta]S,;•' ?"?..
t.si?`:•=?•:t•
?
?
t?.
?
'
a;?sy??
?'v":? ti
,
.
.? .
t''"?.Fi i?• .a,l?',vr 44'?tysi
{.
I•LJ
.'n?"'
-?
'?
"t? '-
r ',"
`
'
4
.1
:
??
j7y
a
S,t
.
F
S1•?'11
i
d1
?:
4;
`
"
'
6
Y ,,k
?,
?
,
: .. -f . .t
,,,,
': •i-
? ?{
;4
1
.
"
i?
;
. _
.I .lt.r .
t.
r+
?rJ •
r?
?y'^?, Y3'
+.Oa?
?
??,?{Y
' ?? :f::
`?r??: `?4 :-0; ?rJ' ,'!'?
;;?l,' ::S??k?'
?,',.'
'? ,
...,
""',""^•
.4. ,I ?4' ?l?
??
'"
'l! .b ?''rt'?
?
f
.
y
¢
?? -,.. S
{'^ ,? Mt
`.P.
?urawrwrr w.aw.Y.aJL.!hJ:d.laM-:l..na. J'fy,,,y,?,9+[L{siG::'1Y.ti7,7r
Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, which
clearly shows that the requirements of Section 137.012, City Code,
have been met and that the strict application of the Development Code
would result in an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant as the
result of unique conditions not caused by the applicant, Mr. Gans
moved to gmnt variances #3 and $4 as requested subject to the
conditions that it be only until October 13, 1992 and the sign
permit be obtained within six (6) months of this date. The motion
was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken, Mrs. Dobbs and
Messrs. Plisko, Gans, and Dallmann voted ??Aye;" Mr. Merriam voted
"Hay." Motion carried. Request granted.
ITEM 07 - Equitol (Holiday Inn Gulfview S) for variances
1) of 141.2 sq ft for sign with 197.2 sq ft and 2) of 5
ft to permit pole sign 25 ft high, at 521 S Gulfview Blvd,
Sea 17-29-15, M&B 22.02, zoned CH-28, (resort commercial
"twenty-eight").
The Planning Official stated the request is for two variances
regarding a property identification sign. The size of signs allowed
pertains to the size of the property and the zoning district.
Frank Jesweak stated he feels their sign is only 120 sq ft not
the 197.2 sq ft as stated in their application. He feels the
remaining portion is a pole cover and not a sign. The new sign is
smaller and lower than the current sign,
Darryl Saylor, manager of the Holiday Inn, stated they require
a large sign in order to attract business. The Holiday Inn Surfside
can afford to have a smaller sign because they are in direct line
of the traffic flow.
?«J`r,!?
Because the applicant has failed to demonstrate a necessity for
the variance as requested, Mr. Gans moved that such appeal be
dwied. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Request daded.
ITEM #8 - Equitel (Holiday Inn) for variances 1) of 375
sq ft to permit pole sign with 487 sq ft, 2)' of 18.9 ft
to permit a pole sign 38.9 ft high and 3) of 5 ft to permit
a pole sign zero ft from property line, at 400 U.S. 19 3,
Sea 18-29-16, MOB 14.01, zoned CH (highway commercial).
The Planning Official stated this request is for three variances
for a property Identification sign for the Holiday Inn on U.S. 19.
Frank Jesweak, representing the applicant, stated they need a
sign of this height because of the U.S. 19 overpass in this area.
The.sign will not interfere with anyone and they plan to use the same
.base and• steel that eX13t5 for the present sign to erect the new
They need to be assured.they have adequate visibility from .
19.
8 4/10/86
'
s Cr. '" :.r •r,
kar
st6•FL'.r:L,;j'=s., ??r `s"' .I.' '?t'• ;- ,' +s•` t.
. 'T-`1}
}:
1. 1'f;F "? r .'
?.
}
a '
'
.' •
•
?°
^
"
"
? ?
''
•
'
',:, ;•i'1i
_ ':i? YE,
'
,?
"?
rwr'
te
'
e•
•
'
J
.
.iiF
j
, ,
. i
r
,7 F
`:
? a J
sl..
i=F .+{L/?jr;
y. 11w ..7.. t
:f
.] °
.s
:
, :a
t
F"? 1
r
C
,yj,.ril`?•r'6 "`'?i'',r !)i?"a,'.-rT i????7{L'?l`.t'?H ?i•:s?;!..i,q`",ir `+y•+,-i•-ie P`z?'tra` ??%?7?`?F rR?-4?ml,
JfS :`: ?fxik.Di Y.y >.- • ?' { r.,w. ?r; y., ?.,r i T r L b
>'Y? ': rJ" rl f, ?. ?1?%,•k, xl lT:I:...E,. lr;tl? ry(11 ' F5 <r i:`:+? (pj.3r- J1 ...,r7' :} a, c y' at't•?. S ,?.•.?{ . y' Tr
5.[ 6' •,'v. _ .l r v-r' F' ... '::.. ?' , h.<t ?l'..?.: s ?;o ?. e• Y 11 4 f 1` {'.. ' {
?s.Jg•??a,s,,'ti 4Yyi 5 ";.'+••.•?;;.;'; i`a?P".+'•'-1r>:?•?Y.st,:; eti?.?. <1+? ?•
t,r#!,{„',`!f iy'?rc s'V.1:ir'''?' '?'•` .i .. ..'," - i ?•F?*.f ?.???;?.:,1 ]•? r
f`q,`,.::.i51 •'ff JYG •. ,"'?y.? '' '•.. f s •`f • `.?: ? i iYf si?.'yF^"/•'e'
;ti`?,?'?•'? j.+.-JS'.^%''..l'•r; .:?'l? `=':.f ; "??M.r.,.: i , .••??>? .1'' aP, ia` `?a..'y, r ?'''.:}?
,?.#'`; ±r,?ii -zr.. •! •'+: `. ,?' :;'?'{,f It r,s ?:
i;;' J.. .+! '.i : ,
° r;; '' 1
{1 y ' • :
L
??t?
? `r
. ,
`..i
` j
<5 S;i. )?. c!
? Srt^
. ? ..
?.iu?i;,::•3'? ,di
a +
i
.
;
f
•lf',i?;?f`• ..
.
d
?p 3ti ..?"r?.
???
,
••
1• .
i .
]
' ?f, .i
l?
:
.. ?.F k?;il:i??• S 1
'
.
(
{
'_
,'1
?.JP i!`•,.i`1,;Xa :iS 3..
}.
'
'
t i
.
:sj r •?
y
•• F ?. r
!•? ", `f !
? ?
?
?
?
-?ir?sl,.r•
liffj?
,•?4;w???y+'??: •'?,`(E?J
ii?,j;?i
-; %z
r
:
`
T
'.I
??++
'
?
?' .
"
::'
'
1 ;,r
?D.>„t-.
.f J' .. ??????:,.
}
r' ?Y
?
'
i
f?
`
?
l, r
?.
j
?
;i
.:.
tIf i
:?•i; ?
• . .
"? ,
;
'?.
j
?
' .
L ?. :
i,Z' ;: 3?L.;'?•N?1 'f'.. .. i?,', :f?• ;
.
?'} F::
, J;
.
.P . p
., 5• k
\
•.'
}
y
.
J1
?i•?l•:,r?.^•: •e'.e, ,?\`' .r, `•f li?
C
.`itri ., J ?
`
..y.'` ?"'r,Y?`
,
....rwra?rli?'s'•'""S""`.?`_.• -r?Yi.1.wry:?W1^ ?i?.?.w?1rw..a+uwrr,?..?h1.Y.I?`.;.r]a.rdn?x?a..ti.?..,w.L,a+•i.4?J1s7A+.raAdn?•trour?.:anrfatYar
xr; Based upon the information furnished by the applicant, which
clearly shows that the requirements of Sestion 137.012, City Code,
have been met and that the strict application of the Development Code
would result in an unnecessary hardship upon the applicant as the
result of unique conditions not caused by the applicant, Mr. Gans
moved to grant variances #1 and #2 as requested subject to the
condition that the time limit be until Oatober 13, 1942 and the
sign permit be obtained within six (6) months of this date. The
motion was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken, Mrs. Dobbs
and Mr. Gans voted "Aye;" M:rssrs. Plisko, Merriam, and Dallmann voted
"Nay." Motion fai.].ed. Requests denied.
Mr. Merriam moved to reconsider the request. The motion was
duly seconded. Upon the vote being taken, Messrs. Gans and Dailmann
voted "Aye;" Mrs. Dobbs and Messrs. Plisko and Merriam voted "Nay."
Motion to reconsider piled. Variances #1 and #2 denied.
Discussion followed regarding what reconsidering a decision
meant.
Mr. Merriam moved to reconsider the requests. The motion was
duly seconded and upon the vote being taken, Mrs. Dobbs and Messrs,
Gans, Merriam, and Dallmann voted "Aye;" Mr. Plisko voted "Nay."
Motion carried.
Because the applicant has failed to demonstrate a necessity for
the variance as requested, Mr. Gans moved that variance #2 be
denied. The motion was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken,
Messrs. Plisko, Gans, and Dallmann voted "Aye;" Mrs. Dobbs and
Mr. Merriam voted "Nay." Motion carried. Request denied.
Discussion ensued as to the necessity for the sign to be that
high and if it is wise to grant variances for a sign that does not
meet Code when that sign would have to be removed in 1992. There
was also discussion as to whether these items should be considered
individually.
Because the applicant has failed to demonstrate a necessity for
the variance as requested, Mrs. Dobbs moved that variance #1 be
dadied. The motion was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken,
Mrs. Dobbs and Messrs. Plisko and Dallmann voted "Aye;" Messrs. Gans,
and Merriam voted "Nay." Motion carried. Request denied.
Because the applicant has failed to demonstrate a necessity for
the variance as requested, Mr. Plisko moved that variance #3 be
denied. The motion wan duly seconded and upon the vote being taken,
tars. Dobbs and Measra. Plisko, Gans, and Dallmann voted "Aye;" Mr.
Merriam voted "Nay," Motion carried. Request dod od.
99
4/10/86
's S•yi "r?.-?f :'?.-`'?:iji:+•r..• '. i'4 '„, r? 'r. ... , Y.
?'/i?IJ"', ??`?Y i??•': `:. ?,n '•' j2?.. "ei :y Yl"? 'Fi rR ) ti, 'i!?.L-•'..
S1 «`11TP??J '7 :t' `i '?.??ai'a?'?:, ?'?:;j,: .i•'p.. .` ?: - 'rF..:l. t. ''.,.v
?a ? >?r.1 ^t?? ?,.r%a. .a. `i 'Ir.'r•r.h ?: r' ,,;t:?ii,' 'r: `• °!. 'f .2',Y ?.;..
y..d N vf,.,Y,+? {!a[?}} .s•t.:y r.' f" t'i i i= t '¢'
.f•%j`t.•t ;l:b.d, *` .•aj ,i.+ : '.?:": r.,. .. - .. ?l r' ",3• ..i u'•.
;• ss Fsi. !.}..,'ri"?r',;' :!f?. 'J )Y1' Yr,' `irl=fi7r. ?. psi+''• .R.° ? -
,,k «fi ?}Yf.? J,i' i.;,isi. i ?`':>::.:: rY..? .. ?' '' i?.r^, ! },?.?Zi•,d?ti•arla?,t, ;,.?«}?t t?f?',,jt{J}?:i 4
F,.•h ?IPU.?f r,
?i??vjjss'7r•,)?i?ri,.v',, •rs?, {T?'.t?f. ? 1. ,. :?A, , •+w=±:?.,ti?f7??Yi ?;-p ?`+.u: ?•,' r- Y0.i ?, '?. y r:i. i 3i l? a a ' r ? ? ti?
,)?f?.fi''i`??;•'SrlS F,:F ??Pf.l!Y fi'?'?''!)?'f. ?' 1 ' {??TM???Y.'?4?•`!? `i1'r?1???1 ??E•lf }Y'?????4„?f .?F
.'i3' ?`' L••l :??ii• .•tY s ;t.: - k .,.?'.?.'pY:-.s:?+".:, `•?!(' r . 5,.1• J:isbf ?i+ 'r•fi(•
'4,';??i'? ??;?,'" 'e , f t . „°'+1"'f"•r.l Ia F'?? , • • , e `rr ,'Y ?h.F?r"SiJ ?, r`. ,' ',"?+?a4 t i"
,Y?S'• i 'SF'.' r+l.n: :'?:f.r?,Y'4r,•`}?t r•a `,' ?•?; .:5. •., t Sti'r' ' •'w' T'iea K':l? '=3?1j?fi=.,
?'f.rs?,?'?+.'.Y;?i{; „ri h-}'s. :?..'t'?rf,r'.`;,?`? '3?'•' i4?L.'`"::'???`'. ??•':''?+f:-r'.?;jY. '..i ?''?"'i;}.51.11,,,
_ _ a '? - _ __ -_iV•1..1.rri?YY+.r.rb Jd{W KYRrRf>•Y.?3A:IQSiii?.{u"fb?FY.11YtrMM?M.Wr
/i
MINUTES
Mr. Merriam moved to approve the minutes of March 27r 1986, in
accordance with copies submitted to each Board member in writing.
Motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
t
Discussion ensued regarding conflict of interest and whether
a Board member may participate in discussion if he has a conflict.
The City Attorney stated he felt it would be open to criticism if ;
there was a conflict and the Board member participated in the
discussion.
Due to conflicts with vacation schedules and meeting dates, it
was the consensus of the Board to cancel the August 14, 1986 meeting.
Discussion ensued on streamlining the motions and including
reasons for approval and denial. The City Attorney stated he would
rework the motions to make them easier to use.
The Planning Official reported on several items that he was asked
to check into. Regarding the Neudeok property, he determined a
variance for parking was not necessary because under the new Code,
he has the required number of parking spaces. Regarding the 6 ft
fence on the Ann Keller property, the fence parallels the Coastal
Aft Construction Control Line per the permit that was pulled and if
constructed as shown, it conforms to the Code. He had not had an
opportunity to check on Julies Care. He was certain the Artemis
Restaurant had more signs than allowed and would check further into
that matter.
Mr. Cans requested the Planning Official check into the
waterbikes which Jim Gray is operating with no safety devices.
The meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m.
I I v-' I/
Chairman
Attest.-r' `
puty: City - C r
''•";-.`; _? '•'.•. ; ,.{; it . f. ;r..
?' rte, P} ?S• , Nl r: .? . ? r ? ??/ l F`? ? 1 , ? ? ? ? ? ..
?txj, ?,Y}E;-:f 'rte ;' , • , r', S . ?. i ? .. '. ?.
4/10/66
?° `?r yr-•' f :k+f?:'r` ?`h 'i5-^ai. v"` ,t 1. ,Y='y ;E..
f Y4 ?, t?.. ;,?•s,^?,J K++. ?' f,a`.: 5.,. ?E:j;' ?'. ?;,. ?.*:' •?.1. .•t1• iR".??.' r( s is ? i??' ';ti'S t`'.`•;?l.'1 ri??.
y,} ?z.4ie?; "?. w`C !t•-?Ir :.'r ?t':; {'rr i'.: .;,.' ,.i w.t.. ?Y+'•t ?.,.°• a?. :;i: i. ':i'?. =• ?:?'... ,i? ?.??. .f•; f;•?'.•?. y3a
?^"1x '? 7?'i ? ?`?'?.?,^.,..?jy?{ir';i.1 rk;?".-;?•` ?'`x'_sf,r ;s'j' ?,?,.; ` r,. ;?.{ [.?? ..1 r ??
} .J ?3!'t' ys'1' l t f?'3";? ? :, '?,.tn ;. .,,<,'?'. Vr , i_. ','•.:=;i.'!; +, _}' t .,?? :,?'•: r. A' r. i
t•?.?J?} )yY' Y?•?'!?,, ?, 4•L3??I??i??????a:'L?•' c??6=7. I'.`,'.?'??? '? y}r "?.. :'1' ,•'?'t?. il.: `.i ?+,^..?i• ????YSY r,??i ??l.,a 'S?r.
'? ???i??c.? ??y?4rf .,? } ?'F?'?.A ". 7+a i+!•ycj: Y•?`x.,4?;?1;3 .5. r2?... 3'.•.. ?'?,'_ _ _ ;- 'i+?': Y.i. ,Y,?i??}
{'2r•_ r s?.t?q .T:dt.xt.f- _ •? .!1: ti,.. .;?? '? .)"...r.l^-".'-;.:;?.rs.ia