06/09/1988
~:i::I""
....
> ';.~''''
@
,.
:"
,,'
l'.!. "
'J
. ~.
. '
" ,
., '. ..,. ~ ,~ .
. ,';' \~;(:~~:~;,s
.. .' :'.~'
. .... ",.,' .:: -~~~::.~~~;~\t~!~:l;.~.\tS~.~~~1"f'"
. ~~; ",,:
~..oIIi-"''lI...",....._...........,.,.~.'t'':;'.:''''4 ~'..../...,.. ., ...
. >....... i <. '. ~ c r
3. Requested a 10-foot drainage and utility easement adjacent to Gulf-To-Bay
right-of-way be required prior to issuance of a building permit. (Bill Baker
advised that the City had been requiring a la-foot right-of-way for the DOT in
this neighborhood on the south side. The DOT curb will be 6 or 7 feet from the
property line and with a sidewalk there will be little room for anything else.
There was discussion on whether parking was allowed in a drainage and utility
easement. Although the City would Object to a structure on this area . parking
in a space that might some day be required for a utility was acceptable.)
Building - The owners were provided with a general information sheet.
Traffic - The only problem area was the loading space. After discussion of the
loading zone as shown on the plan. it was determined that since the parking
spaces by the loading area were the least desirable parking spaces on the lot.
customers could not enter the store from this area. Planning had no problem with
the shown loading zone and it would not present a problem to Sanitation. this
would be acceptable.
Utilities - Bob Perkins provided the following written comments:
1. The proposed water meter locations cannot be approved as shown. The City
will install the meters at the property line and make separate taps for each
meter.
2. An ingress and egre~s easement and a la-foot utility easement over water
mains up to and including meters must be provided prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
3. The proposed dumpster location is approved as shown on the plan.
4. The dumpster must be in a visually screened enclosure prior to the issuance
of a certificate of occupancy. Provide gates with a minimum 12-foot clear
opening to the front for access by sanitation trucks.
5. Natural gas is available to this site from an existing 411 main located along
the south side of Gu1f-To-Bay Boulevard. The location of the existing gas line
must be shown on the plan prior tu certification.
Bob Perkins stated that, if the City received the 10-foot drainage and utility
easement. the utility easement requested in the written comments would not be
required. Depending on where the hydrant goes, an easement up to and including
the hydrant would be required unless it is put in that easement also. If the 10-
foot drainage and utility easement is given, the meters can be put there.
Planning - No comments.
Parks and Recreation - Ream Wilson provided written comments as follows:
1. This nonresidential project will be required to satisfy the City's open space
assessment ordinance. The developer or his representative should complete the
top portion of the work sheet (given to owner) and return to the Parks and
Recreation Department. A copy of the most recent purchase contract and a copy of
the just value from the Pine11as County Property Appraiser's office should be
attached to the work sheet.
2. The open space assessment fee will be payable prior to City certification of
final site plan.
2.
ORe 6/09/88
. .
", ~. ...'."
tJ
~ ~,.: > .' :'
.
,
1\",
~uW~.;.:..:..:~~:!",~.:~~.;~,:,...(:,:~:.,,,:,:,~.. .~..~;<~~ ';,"':.t1I::'.~.'~,. :~.
~ "t '" . -i- ~ ~ ... .
L.'" .~+. ,., ~.. f. ,h ...~
p~.,.
.., .JI':"j .:<:..-;:. ".
~
W
Don Meerians stated that a problem would be encountered with Alan Mayberry,
Forestry Inspector. concerning the,island in the front not being S-foot. It was
noted that as accurate as one tries to be on the plan once you start putting in
the parking and dealing with trees and working around retention, etc. very often
conflict situations are encountered. It was agreed that before proceeding with
the paving this be coordinated closely with all departments. Before proceeding
with any required adjustments, this must be signed off by all affected
departments.
MOTION
Paula Harvey moved to recommend approval of the final site plan for Pier 1 Centre
based upon a finding of this Committee that the plan conforms with the design
guidelines for site plan review sUbject to the following:
1. One fire hydrant be located on site as required by the Fire Marshal.
2. Drainage be adjusted as required by the Public Works Department.
3. A IO-foot drainage and utility easement be provided along Gulf-la-Bay
Boulevard.
~
'<fiiI
4. Ingress/egress ea~ement and a IO-foot utility easement over water mains
up to and including meters and hydrant, if required by the Utilities Department,
be provided prior to the issuance of a building permit.
5. The dumpster be visually screened with a 12-foot wide clear opening.
6. Open space fees be paid prior to certification of the final site plan.
7. Final landscaping plan be coordinated with the City Forester and approved
prior to the issuance of any building permit.
8. Signs and fencing or walls will be sUbject to separate review and
permitting.
9. Requisite initial building permits be issued within six months from date
of certification of the final site plan and all certificates of occupancy be
issued within three years from the date of certification of the final plan.
Ream Wilson seconded the motion.
Discussion:
The owner questioned the requirement concerning the separate permit for signs and
walls. Paula Harvey explained this requirement.
The Motion passed unanimously.
.
-,
., ,
l~{;\rID';:,<:.,.';,,' . .,'"
, 3.
ORe 6/09/88
.' ,
,,'
\'. ,.........~
, "
'. ,t',. .
,"', , , ,'i"",/\;:}(;',:'
. .' ~ '\~ Ir I .. . . ~ .
. \. : r ,;.;"; ~ ~
" ..', "'i' '
.,c.'
......' .
'/1\
\ h,~
t
} L.
, .....,.
\ ~ '
" ,. .
.: ....,.
\~ IF' ,..' '. "e
'. j , ...
,
. '.. .. \ ~. ~.
;, '.; ;:~7;,~~;t,;
~; ,,~ "'J" t.,ir.)l'~".'il,"r
....~. ~"f~~tt~"'J~$'lir.~t:;i'~l'
'\':.:~:~:I~~~~\!r~,"- JI~~;;
~.! ,,~~,,'.,~. .~~t~I"'"
..", ""~ ;.' ' "'If", .'
'..' f......i"'i!~.;~ ~~JfN~.\ I
~~"j~y;~~.,\:J_~~'t ,...
;($.'. .)1. .~~~J.VI
~~~
~
"
1
;,
. ~/
i ~
,')
'. '.. '.." ~ ',,' ~ j"~. ,M .",
" :,'::t:i);i>
, =~';":'.__"I~)~~.~.:!..'..:~:,t. ~l~ .~~"'::':,.~I :;: L'':~ .'fI.' \'1.. .....~:...:~\' ~ :.:
,', P: '... ' .; ~::. J.: .;: ;'~4~7'I,:~\r~' i,;: ;1~;r:.~:J~
. >' + ~ ,; ~ "..;
; ~: . '.
2. CITY OF CLEARWATER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Slfin SHOP FACILITY,
located at the northwest corner of the intersection of
Myrtle Avenue and Hart Street
4'4<< '
'\~~} r;'
FINAL'SITE PLAN
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
E!r! - No comment.
r'
Public Works - Bill Baker complimented the engineer on the professionalism of the
proposed plan. Stated that sidewalks be on Hart Street and Myrtle Street.
Suggested this be included as part of the contract but the Public Works
Department would provide a code out of sidewalk funds for additional expense.
Don Meerians agreed.
Building - Vic Chodora provided standard building comments and stated that a
building permit must be obtained before starting construction.
Traffic - No comment.
Utilities - Bob Perkins provided the following written comments:
1. Proposed water meter sizes and locations must be shown on the final
construction plans.
2. The dumpster must be in a visually screened enclosure. Provide a minimum 12-
foot clear opening to the front for access by sanitation trucks.
3. Natural gas is available to the site.
~ Another area of concern was the planting of several trees over a gas main. Glen
Bahnick and Bob Perkins would work together to reposition the trees slightly so
that they are not right over the gas main.
Planning - No comment.
Parks! Recreation - Glen Bahnick had met with Mike Mulligan on the landscaping.
There ~as discussion concerning what the Commission meant by a "tree barrier."
It was determined that the trees and grass shown on the plan were acceptable and
easy to maintain.
MOn ON
Paula Harvey moved to approve the final site plan for the City of Clearwater
Traffic Engineering Sign Shop Facility based upon a finding of this Committee
that the plan conforms with the design guidelines for site plan review subject to
the following:
1. Sidewalks be provided in a continuous manner along Hart Street and
Myrtle ~venue.
enclosure (Corrected DRC 6/23/88)
2. The dumpster be in a visually screened encl03ed with a 12-foot wide
clear opening.
e
3. Trees be repositioned away from the gas main.
4. Signs, fencing or walls are SUbject to separate review and permitting.
4.
ORe 6/09/88
: ,
, d,
, .....
to,;;,:,: ~;.'~f'N~~~r~,~~~~~;.mt\'~"I", .~ _
~ .~: ~.'. ~<~...<~I,;:~.> j>:;) " ". ;'.::~~~!. :~,...:~I:XC ".....:~. ,~/. < ,d."....t:...~ ,..." \.
t ii-. ..___......_....
" . 1t~~,~'\V\~T;~,\'~~~~"':;'~'~~'~~~~~~~~~'~~~~"
",t..,: " ,.-.:;.,:\j;";','-' '.," "'..d."~' ,;;',' , I"~. :"':':"":'i:~\~:,,'.; ",', . .,'. ,'-,.'. ,.,'" ,..'... ",'
. "
"
~. '''~IioI'''''''''.''''''''A~~~''''''''ol,:o-.............i...._}!,.:':~ .:~ :...: ~ L ........~:...... "." ~ "_. . .
. '
,
~(;!t't1
":.t!~:
,(9) Lighting ,hall be pro.ided to illuminate any off-!treet parking or loading
!pace! to be ~'ed at night. If pro.ided. When lighting is provided. the lighting
shall be arranged and installed to deflect. shade and focus lights away from
adjacent properties. The height. type. 3pacing and degree of cutoff of a light
!tandard may be further regulated by the b~ilding director in relation to
!pecific !ite condition! or type3 of de.elopment.
~'.' 'Dumpster locations (Bob Perkins for Cecil Henderson)
, .
Page 1297 (2) Final site plan.. subpat~graph i.
be moved to Page 1296 (1) Preliminary site plan.
Requested that this subparagraph
Agreed.
Page 1295 (4) e. Provisions for refuse disposal, including container location
and access thereto. Requested to insert wording such as "including container
location with enclosures and access thereto."
e
There was discussion concerning eliminating "landscaping" and having everyone put
an enclosure around the dumpster. It was determined that it would be preferable
to have correct landscaping and examples of "appropriate structures" should be
drawn up -- From the service perspective it may be preferred to have a concrete
block wall or fencing but from an aesthetic point of view it is preferable to
have landscaping if it is done correctly. Bob Perkins questioned how he would
approve plans. Suggested examples of "appropriate screenin~ or enclosures" be
drawn up to be included in the City specifications -- one for structural (fence.
concrete blocks. gates) and one for the landscaping type (height. density. etc.)
Suggested adding "acceptability of screening" to (4) e. Bob Perkins to make the
revision as he would like to have it and bring it back to the Committee for
review.
Detector Checks (Bob Perkins for Cecil Henderson)
Paula Harvey stated that the Planni.lg Department was opposed to requiring
detector check locations to be shown on the site plan. It was agreed that this
should not be shown on the site plan.
(Paula Harvey left the meeting.)
5. Ingress/Egress (Added To Discussion Per Cecil Henderson1s Request)
Discussion of possible mp.thods of obtaining ingress/egress access for the City
without formal easement recordings. After discussion. it was suggested that Bob
Perkins inform Cecil Henderson of the Committeels concerns. Ask Cecil to draw up
the appropriate language in the appropriate section of the Code as to what he
wants ~- questioned if this should go in the Utility Code under solid waste.
Agreed that Cecil Henderson and Bill Shepard should be involved in discussion and
continued the matter.
,..
Sl
1~~1
Haeseker, Chairman .-<=-
The meeting adjourned at 10.
Elizabeth S.
6.
DRC 6/09/88
~ t
:,'}
. "~"YJ.,;iijf.t',
,y . . ",~:' ~
<", f ,~..:' .,'. ,~,
... ", ~
. .. .".
~~~~ff,j,~~li~~i
:""Ir.-il!rilJt"'.;" , '''' "?i~
t~~. (~~:.f .~.r. ~~: ....-.n
-;l' ~".;",.
"};:....\1,;;
;.
~