12/14/1988
':. . ~ .
" :.
,~' )
\
,
,
u) :
, ,
.' ',t
~ I ~ 'J ; < ~. ','~,
.!.,:":..::.:.:<:'
',' t ,lA"
. ,
.' .' '"r',' i ,A \ . '. ....,...
. ' 'l.o.',_>'" ...........) 'r}, I. .~........."rt
~
~
Utilities - Bob Perkins stated he was concer'ned about easements and provided the
following written comments.
1. The proposed meter location is approved as shown.
2. The water meter size must be shown on the final construction plans. Contact
the Utilities Engineer to coordinate meter sizing. Failure to do so will delay
permit processing at the Building Department.
3. An ingress and egress easement and a 10-foot utility easement over the water
mains up to and including meters and hydrants must be provided for the site and
adjacent properties prior to the issuance of a building permit.
4. The existing dumpster lOI:ation must be modified to comply with City codes.
The code requires that the dumpster be placed in a visually screened enclosure
with a 12-foot minimum clear opening to the front for access by Sanitation
trucks.
5. An agreement between Turner Professional Park and Fortune Savings Bank to
share the dumpster must be provided to the Utilities Director prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
Kurt Youngstrom commented that all of these requirements were in process and he
would provide Bob Perkins with the name of the person to contact regarding the
easement.
4~ Planning - Paula Harvey stated that this plat will require a variance to the
subdivision regulations that require all type! of platted property have direct
access to street right-of-way. There is an existing drainage and utility
easement on the property and Mr. Youngstrom advised that the O.R. number was
shown on the plat (bottom. left-hand corner).
A carry-over from the site plan review which would apply to the plat -- there
should be a cross parking agreement executed between the two properties. Mr.
Youngstrom stated this was in process.
The remaining portion of the metes and bounds just currently developed with
Fortune Savings Bank should also be included in the plat. Mr. Youngstrom agreed.
Parks and Recreation - Ream Hilson stated that this nonresidential project is
less than one acre and will not be required to pay any open space impact fees as
required by City ordinances.
MOTI ON
.. I
Paula Harvey moved to approve the variance to the requirement of th~ subdivision
regulations that require all platted property to have direct access to street
right-of-way.
Bob Maran seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
.f)
.' .',.',
, .
~'i:<S::b<.~i~\:.<>': :':';',:,:. :;". .'
2.
ORC 1/14/88
.1.
j . . .
!:;h;}.';i~~~i~~~
'. \t~:';';I)~~~\"'!:::~~~~r,'~
.~. ,~>., ~~~ 'I....~...i-~...<':t-..n~:~viol
~..'1(,. .... ~~. ';~"....' .....~t(...ul...,..j...~.:.!i
rif!1i.:;:{/ci,i~;;'t.~~
i~;,U;.~~~~*t c. ~...
.!.I....~~l\-;,{:.J"'-
f~.U:f..~.'" , ~\
1crl:rh);. .
'\~.l\'h""
~?~;~
.'
.... E.'
4
..,
. '.
.:):!!1,'~;'/:(: };
~ " .
,
. I
I
. '. +,
" '., :~:.... to :'I..:,,~..:~:"~:'t,,:.t~,'~~~~;i:;;~~~J:~'.:.~t~z:::/'
L"."
3.
"
ORe 1/14/88
.~
MOTION
Paula Harvey moved to approve the preliminary plat for Turner Professional Park
based upon a finding of this committee that .the plat conforms with the design
guidelines for plat approval sUbject to the following:
1. An ingress/egress easement and a lO-foot utility easement be provided
over the water mains up to and including meters and hydrants and they be provided
to this site and adjacent properties prior to recording the final plat.
2. A cross parking agreement be executed bet~een the property identified as
Turner Professional Park and the property developed with the Fortune Federal
Savings.
3. That the remaining portion of metes and bounds 32.06 which is developed
with Fortune Savings Bank be included in the plat as another lot.
4. That the final plat be recorded within six months of the date of
certification of the preliminary plat.
Bob Maran seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
2. BECKETT LAKE PLAZA, located at the northeast corner of
Sunset Point Road and Belcher Road
(j)
(Previous ORC Review: March 26, 1987)
MODIFICATION TO MASTER CPO SITE PLAN - APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS
Fire - Nick Lewis had no comments.
Public Works - Bob Maran had no comments.
Building - Vie Chodora had no comments.
Traffic - Don Meerians stated that on this plan the northerly access to Belcher
Road had been changed from the previously certified plan. Previously it was a
simple intersection but now is a complex intersection with five points of
conflict at one intersection. After discussion and reviewing the plans, it was
'agreed this would be returned to what had been submitted previoUSlY which would
create clear access.
Requested the words "compact spaces" be removed from the plans. The code does
not provide for compact spaces.
4Ip
"
:~'
~<.. .\. ';-: <. :0:': :::.
q."
~ " l
q,
. .,
~ .:.,
:: .' " ~':-"
.' "
. ': 'i c ~ \.'
.. ,I
"." .'
. .'.~. ,'~.
",\
,.
., :;~' . L
, .'
"\.:
,.. ~ , , ~, ,"
" ,.' .':: i.../\;:/:J';),~,: :.;': ;::;.:~:,:
I ,',
G
On the other certified plan, it was not specified what the width of the drive
was. The maximum in Clearwater is 30 feet. The present plan shows 35 feet. The
other plan did not have a dimension so it was assumed it was going to be 30 feet.
There should not be two lanes exiting on Belcher Road without a traffic signal
because any right-turning vehicle has to look through a left-turning vehicle to
see oncoming traffic which creates a sight problem. After discussion, it was
determined there would be just one lane to make the left turn or the right turn.
There was discussion on some minor adjustments internally, inclUding islands.
Utilities - Bob Perkins provided the following written comments.
1. The domestic water services must be tapped to the existing au water main
located along the west side of Old Coachman Road, not to the proposed fire line
a~ shown on the plans.
2. The proposed water meter sizes must be shown on the final construction plans.
Contact the Utilities Engineer to coordinate meter sizing. Failure to do so will
delay permit proceSSing at the Building Department.
3. A fire protection sprinkler system may be required by the Fire Department.
If so, a detector check with a bypass meter must be installed by the City at the
ownerts expense.
@
4. A Pinel1as County Health Department permit is required prior to the
installation of the water distribution system.
5. An ingress and egress easement and a 10Mfoot utility easement over the water
mains up to and including meters, detector checks and hydrants must be provided
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
6. The proposed dumpster locations are approved as shown.
7. The dumpsters must be in a visually screened enclosure. Provide a minimum
12-foot clear opening to the front for access by Sanitation trucks.
e. The trash compactor will be serviced by a company under permit by the City.
Contact the Sanitation Superintendent for approval of a refuse contractor and
coordinate the location of the trash compactor with the contractor.
9. Natural gas is available to this site.
Planning - Paula Harvey stated that this is defined as a major site plan
amendment which will require review at public hearing by the Planning and Zoning
Board and the City, Commission. It was requested that the loading dock area for
the Skaggs building have a landscape buffer to visually screen it from the right-
ofMway and from the residential area.
e
As a carry-over from the prior certified plan, a detailed landscaping plan must
be submitted prior to the issuance of the building permits, specifically
addressing landscaping buffer mechanisms to the single-family homes to the east.
Parks! Recreation.- Ream Wilson stated that fees have already been paid.
~~' . ,.' ~ '
4.
ORC 1/14/88
:.,
: ; ;:'-
,'. .. ",
f. .' ':.~. .~~.:i\'C:)\';:
. ; .' \ ' '. " ;.' c ~-:.~ < ~:I1
~, ~:,~ T;~;:',{.:~:.:.c~it\i,J,:~~'';J};~;''
1\ '." ''''''-'/,"'''''l',,(''':!!,.:l
t .c..... . . ';>...:);- ,oj.,' .~'j< l ....,..'IJi. ~'i
~~~l. ~i.a::;~~....\::t:J"-.o'\'i . ~~
,,;>oj "., cr.'
J\ \)t }, ~ fi1.~ ~
~:.l:';' ~t~+ t:1
~'(If1'J:~{,
......-/jyI,
..1\-\.t",J'
~1 ~\\ t .. .
,~~~jij
~.~~€~ .
'lo.,L
.'j.
, ,
'd'L.:At_'cl-'-.-;.'~...L~.!':otJ:;..'\....~~~.~tl;"'\ :.:... ''- .~~....' ~:. c~ . ',1 .~',
. ,,' '.: ~;.::l./' ',I
...1, .,' .r..
1 .:~. '/,', '~', ~:' : ':,,:' /,:"
~ ~.:,<~.~ ~~..,~ , ~'p .'.~"f~)~/~'i"'i~:~~~-.:~;~'.~\~..::i~t':~~'~~t~;.;};::~1~~" > ~ < i' q , '.'. ~~.~'
. ,li.
. .
I,
, " ,
. L ,I,
~
~
Discussion: Keith Appenzeller stated he had discussed with Paula Harvey an
amendment to the plan made since it was submitted which pertains to the square
footage. The building as submitted sho~s a sing'e, one-story building. The
developer intends to put a mezzanine level on a portion of the building to allow
for offices and employee lounges. They have a plan where they have amended the
site plan chart to shaw the 121,200 square feet of building area originally
proposed is still intended, including the mezzanine. The only thing that changes
is the site plan data chart and the words to show that a mezzanine level is
proposed.
"OnON
~ Harve~ moved to recommend approval of the amended final master site plan of
Beckett Lake Plaza based on a finding of this Committee that the plan conforms
~ith the design guidelines for site plan review subject to the following
,conditions:
~
~
1. The loading dock area for the Skaggs building should be screened with
landscaping to buffer it from the right~of-way and the residential areas.
2. Detailed landscaping plan must be submitted prior to the issuance of a
building permit specifically addressing a landscaping buffer mechanism for the
single-family homes to the east.
3. Dumpster should be visually screened with a 12-foot wide clear opening.
4. Ingress and egress easements and a IO-foot utility easement should be
provided over the water mains up to and including meters and hydrants and
detector checks prior to the issuance of a building permit.
5. The internal intersection at the driveway entrance from Belcher Road
should be redesigned as required by the Traffic Engineer.
6. The designation of compact spaces should be deleted from the site plan.
7. The maximum ~idth of the driveway entrance off Belcher Road should be 30
feet.
8. The islands should be adjusted at the drive-in bank facility as noted by
the Traffic Engineer.
9. The indication that additional right-of-\iay is being provided on Sunset
Point Road ~ould necessitate such right-of-way being given prior to the issuance
of the building permit.
10. That the requisite initial building permit be issued within six months
from date of certification and all requisite certificates of occupancy be
procured within three,years from date of issuance of certification of the final
plan.
The motion was seconded by Bob ~.
e
5.
ORe 1/14/88
.,
, .
~
Discussion: There was a discussion on number 9 of the motion. Concerning the
la-foot strip of right-of-way along Sunset Point Road, Mr. Appenzeller stated
that the County is widening this road and is going through a corridor study to
determine right-of-way requirements. The County is just starting into the
acquisition phase and he has discussed with the County the possibility of the
County acquiring this 10 foot of right-of-way. Mr. Appenzeller questioned
whether this had to be dedicated to the City with the County getting ready to buy
it. Presently. the County doesn't have any authority to ask for the right-of-way
because the Board of County Commissioners has only identified a 110-foot
corridor. However. they are probably going to need an additional 10 feet to make
this work. Mr. Appenzeller stated they have already set back so that the
bUildings would not be affected by the additional 10 feet once the County took
ft.
AMENDMENT TO MOTION
Paula Harvey moved to amend item 19 of the original motion for it to state that
the reference to the additional 10 feet of right-of-way on Sunset Point Road be
removed from the site plan.
The amendment to the motion was seconded by Bob~. The motion as amended
carried unanimously.
(Paula Harvey explained the requirement that all requisite certiffcates of
occupancy be procured within three years from date of issuance of certification
of the final plan.)
e
3. DISCUSSION ITEM (Requested by the City Commission to determine what
items and the type of review made of petitions for annexation prior
to pUblic hearing.)
At the Commission work session of January 4. 19B5. the Commission requested
information on the type of review that took place on properties annexing into the
City. They questioned whether anybody actually made an on-site visit to examine
the general condition of the property to be annexed before providing written
comments and whether the City was assuming responsibility or liability for
property in a poor condition. Paula Harvey felt the Commission was leaning
toward the concept that if properties were going to be annexed the City should
know the costs involved. General discussion followed. It was agreed that any
foreseen costs or potential liability situations should be included in the
comments returned to the Planning Department.
~ /4
.. ~
ue:e '-' ~
Elizabeth S. Haeseker. Chairman
._.
.. . ~ .
6.
DRC'1/14/88
. '.
. ;r":'~:~',1;:~::'~~);~~ \}~~:~;';';"~' .
/' .
,,<':'