04/04/1988
'" liif]
-. '
: ;. -."' '. " ~I. .
~ I . .' ',-;'"
v
," ""
""
t,' ("./.
,...'/?\.....
" .t::J1:."~~111,~,: ~I'
J..,
:-/' ., I .
, ,,' '
, ..
',' ':
..\' ~
~
',.,':' :"\'-: ", ,',,'
.' \ ~/ ..'" I .
":. \, ';" .~.'
. '...' ',' . ': ~l :'
, . ,>. ~ :."
',"', "
".J
''',' .
, ~ I " '
.... '
, J ,', ",'
" ,. ',,:',
"', .', .,
, "
, ,
, "
, '
, " ~! .
. ":','
, , 1'1'
, "21"""
...., , r
,.,' ::~ ,~:.:...:.:;. , "~,,:' .~..'
, '. ,,' "
,";,', '-
, '.. , I
I
, '
, ' ~,
,Page: 2
:'{
of the meeting of Ed Armstrong with City officials.
The question was brought up and discussed regarding whether the C.R.A. as an agency
does in fact want an Advisory Board or more specifical1Yt do they want the D.D.B. members
as an Advisory Board. Also, does the Board wish to continue the one mill tax levy as
presently structured or do away with completely or partially? Chairman Thompson suggested
that the Board hold a special meeting on the 18th of this month after Ed Armstrong has
had the opportunity to investigate these options with certain city people. Mr. Armstrong
will report back on the 18th to the Board on these issues and the Board will discuss and
decide which way to pursue. The question was called and the Board approved unanimously.
The next meeting will be April 18th at 5:30 P.M. for the purpose of discussion this issue
only.
The C.R.A. news was reported by Ed Armstrong regarding the free parking on the streets &
parking lots and that the C.R.A. would compensate the $7t500 to the city until the end
of the year. Chuck Finegan made a motion that the Board be in favor of this action for
free parking on Saturdays, Lillian Trickel seconded the motion and the Board all approved.
It was suggested by the Board that a letter be written to Keith Crawford, City of Clearwater
Traffic Engineer, to attend our next meeting to give opionio~and comments on Parking Study
Report.
Lillian Trickel wanted to have reiterated what Ed Armstrong was to obtain from his meetings
with the city to report back to the Board on the 18th. Chairman Thompson stated they were:
the ordinances that would need changed, current obligations of the D.D.B. ie.Bonding pledges,
T.I.F. pledges,elective Advisory Board vs. appointed Advisory Boardt what capacity the
D.D.B. would have with the C.R.A.and the possibi'lity of voting members on C.R.A. issues and
a general legal feedback. If any Board members have any further questions, etc., please
contact Ed Armstrong.
A property owner & ~~g~~a~a9~e~ statement and a motion for the Board to propose. He said
that "We (the Board) have resolved that the tax levied by this Board be repealed, that the
Board as it is presently consti'tuted, be di'ssolved, and that these reconmendations be
presented to the City of Clearwater Commission for their actionsll. Ed Armstrong replied
that the Board has stated that untl1 they feel comfortable with the re-structure of the
Board and the new ordinance, they wish to hold off on the repeal of the tax levy, but he
feels that this would be the ultimate goal. The motion did not have a second. A motion
was made to adjourn and the time was 6:50 P.M.
......
..,......
:::uu::: ,I:::,
!ill:!:!!! mIl!:!!!
..::::: ::. :::1::::::...::::::1::: ..
:::::::..:: ii::: :iii::: :::il::::::iii::.. .! i:
"',.....,' ..I,. II ... II "lln: "1'11'11"1.1'1'
!!1jiiiiEilii~!liin::Ei.::!i!i~:i :niii;~
Clearwater Downtown
Develooment Board
.~ ,..'
", .',
.,. ~,~. ~.
,. ., '.;.....~.' ~
."',
"'"