01/28/1975
,.,;."
:'
. !',
,':,
, ,
- ','0"
,.'0,;
G
CLEARWATER DOVIi~TCWN DEVELOPMENT BOARD
1975
~ting, January 28,
o
PRESENT:
Charles Galloway, Jr., Chairman
Donald Williams
Hugh Parker
Rogal' :Berryman
Leon Hammock
Joe R. Wolfe
Picot Floyd
M. E. Palmer, Exec. Dir.
The Chairman opened the meeting and asked Rev. Don Darton to
give the invocation. Following, Mr. Barton gave the Board Q run-
down on the present position of Oak Grove residential hotel.
Bob Taylor
John Ehri~
Paul Be:rgmann
Rev. Don Barton
Roy Henderson
Mike Reuther
The Chairman welcomed the two new members of the Board, Mr. Parker
and Mr. Berryman. He then welcomed the guests present.
The Chairman called for action on the minutes of the meetings of
December 17, and the special meeting of January 17. A motion was
made, seconded and passed to approve the minutes as written and
distributed.
.
The Chairman as1<ed the Executive Director to read a letter from ~fr.
Raymond Lee, Chairman of the election committee, which was done and
which nominated Mr.. Galloway to be Chairman and Mr. Darwin Frank to
be Vice-Chairman. Mr. Galloway asked ~~. Parker to take over the
election of officers. With no nominatic'Y1S .fl'cm the f'.oor, a motion
was made to have the secretary cast a unanimous vote for election of
the gentlemen cited. The motion was seconded and passed.
The new Chairman, Mr. Galloway, stated that he has spoken to Mr.
Hammock who has accepted the appointment of secretary-treasurer for
the ~oard. Mr. Hammock confirmed his appointment.
-
At this time Mr. Hammock reported on the financial condition of the
Board. His report in detail is attached to the minutes. Mr. Hammock
stated that because of the receipt of the funds now coming in, that
the bulk is kept in savings account. However, because this is in one
bank, he moved that a second savings be opellt::J at the first National
Bank of Clearwater, in addition to the one at the Bank of Clearwater.
He added that both banks did come to our rescue when loans were
needed some time back, he so moved. The motion was seconded and with
no discussion, passed.
A motion was made to accept the financial report, was seconded and
passed.
The Chairman stated that at this time, the Board must hire an executive
director for the year 1975. He added that there is no consideration
of money at this time, but an official hiring is in order. On motion
to rehire M. E. Palmer as executive director, seconded and passed,
our slate of officers is now completed.
- 1 -
; ~ ~':
',.:1.:
, '
,','
, ,>
..~.
" ,
,\,
. ,
\,
...-
MINUTES Jan. 28 - page 2 -CDDB
~
~
At the suggestion of the Chairman, Mr. Wolfe reported upon a piece of
legislation which has been filed for the next session of the Legis-
lature. The new legislation is intended to fill some loopholes in the
statutes involving the creation of new towns, etc., where special taxing
districts are desired outside of existing municipalities, to allo~']
developers to build roads, sewers, etc. by bond sales. He stated that
he doesn't see any conflict with existing special tax distric~s, includ-
ing ours. However, he will study the legislation further and advise us
should there be problems for us.
Mr. Wolfe was asked to report on the action of the Commission at the
last meeting with regard to the proposed ~8 ordinance. He responded
by reviewing the events and meetings held with Mr. Bergmann on the
subject. He stated that since Mr. Bergmann had not the time to properly
present a compromise proposition to the Planning and Zoning Board, that
the Commission received a recommendation to re-define the residential
density limits to a maximum 28 units, for the entire city with the
exception of the core area of the downtown tax district, i.e. the area
west of Myrtle Avenue, between Drew and Chestnut Streets.
The compromise spoken of was to include the area between Myrtle and
Greenwood within the so-called core of PRUC area, and thus be execmpted
from the density roll-back.
/!,,\
~
.
Mr. Wolfe referred to 'i.:he meeting of the City Commission on January 20,
at which time agents of the Board did ask the City to defer action on
the compromise area inclusion until s~ch time as the required redeveoop~
ment plan has been completed and adopted by the city. The Commission
didn't respond to this request, except to say that this ordinance, when
passed, is subject to revision, and that the Commission would always
listen to alterations when favorable results could occur.
.
~
Mr. Floyd, City Manager, commented that under existing laws, and spec-
ially with the powers of the Pinellas Planning Council, to enforce
their requirements, that it will be extremely difficult to change the
densities upward at any future date.
At this point the Chairman suggested that the matters expressed be
considered by the Land Use Committee, with ~ ~ecommendation to the
Loard after the,February 5 meeting of the Committee.
The Chairman referred to a letter from the Suncoast Chamber of Commerce,
which asked that we send a representative to attend.
The Chairman questioned if the Board should involve itself';in the effort,
and since one member of the Board, Mr. Parker, is on the st~ering com-
mittee, he. could as well advise us as our representative. He agreed
that there is no need for this Board to participate.
Mr~ Henderson was called upon to make his presentation. He responded
by bringing the Board up to date as to the progress with the new attrac-
tion to be known as a Marine attraction, on the site previously occu-
pied by the Soa-O-Rarna.
I)
',4.. "
., ........
, ". . ~ ,.
"
;
',,' .',Ii
;",'. "
\
, ,
t'" ;.~.) .
lIfI"'I~' .. . \
L':
" e:.:::..' ",'",
"I
, ,,; '..',,~ "..:"
.. '.',
',:,' '! j';,' ~' ; <
," t'
, .' .
, ,
, ' .
."- .
, ".,.,
,I" (.~, lJj,~-, " ',l,:-: .:", , : I: '
,'... j""
, ,':'
n ';"""~'::-<'\~~'!:':"\
q', ,
, "
'1.
": " '
, ",'
, . . ... I '~' , '. '. ,
'. ,. , ,
\,', ,'"',,
~",'"""-q
. '. .
~.~....--
. (, '
.
Minutes -Jan. 28 - pg. 3 - CnDB
Mike Reuther was called upon to speak on a company which h~ has recently
opened on the Beach to attract private firms to bring their conferences,
seminars, meetings, to Clearwater. He stated that they are wel~ supplied
with rooms for the. p,eople, but. <,the problem is we do not have a facility
to accommodate crowds up to 2,000 people, He stated, perhaps the new
Sheraton Hotel may have a large area for this purpose, but the location
is not of the best. He referred to his recent experience with ~ group
at Innesbrook, but it did not provide other places to go beyond playing
golf. He added that we must all realize that a facility such as is needed
to attract people here must be in the downtown area; further that the
facility should be a multi-purpose facility, i.e. for civic purposes as
well as private convention usage~ One use will assist the other to get
the most out of the facility.
The Chairman stated that he believes that the facility Mike made refer-
ence to will be considered by the City Commission some time within the
year 1975.
The Chairman stated that the 'statement of work' prepared by the CAC is
now complete and accepted by the City. The next step is to advertise
and invite consultants to offer their qualifications to a selection
committee, as prescribed in the statement, organize the group who will
work with the consultant regularly, and proceed with the study with full
participation of all interested citizens of the entire city.
The Chairman reviewed the discussions held with the City Manager as to
methods of payment, No decisions have been reached at this point, but
in view of the need to proceed with the plan, these considerations will
be put before the Board as soon as pos sib).?.
The next meeting will be on February 25.
~
~
I'J::\
~
l\. E. Palmer
Exeo. Director
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ * *
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Jan. 28, 1975
ED
Cash on hand January 1, 1975
Savings account $9,238.28
Checking account 5,852.27
Cash receipts in January
Cash available
Less: checks paid to date
Balance
Less accounts payable in January
Est. Cash on hand Jan 31, 1975
Savings account $17,238.28
Checking account 1,379.60
Total cash receipts (est) for 1975
Actual cash receipts to date
Balance cash receipts due
$15,090.55
5,913.86
2~,00tl-.4i
J.,109.40
19,895.01-
J., 277.13
18,611.88
.
$ 44,500.00
25,043.55
$ 19,456.45
.~ '
"':,': ,"
; ,\ ~
...'.... " ..
. ,:;~ ...., I 'I to, '
,',: /. ," t:'
f". <,
.'