01/17/1975
.. ? ,?., ??t ? X1'1
? ? ? ? ? ... ? is J???".a
?' ? . ? ? ? , t'?,- ? f ;? ? ..t7r ri??i i?`lx'? $?f T,`'fi?T 'f4d 2?tr'?'
?l
tr. 4 fy t :}1 t, c 1?G N??T??????? }
' r t! r 1 i. rrtt 7 4e`• ..4, s•1?,S7si}?;?yt 4 ?.
y ?}I fiy?1?
- ? ? ? ? ?, t t, 1 ?'r tL T???ti ii'tt7tl?y l?i'?K?°.
' ' ? ? ? ? '. ? ? s rYt ` 7'i ? ,q r x .a t?,a?,?kr y.'.
?. I.} tt `+ t t !s y...rlrl s t.,,'t"r?%???. ?ih.{
.t , J n r ?.. r v}}r7 P?' 1St, ty
L ?? 'E
t: ? .S ? st t ri.t i??.,'(?r t?ir!'(>.?? F???`y?1"?rl.
., Y.. t i. S s l S ?.'H'1f. Iv' . ds3f :f. ?J"Y' '£?SIT ",
r I'' f t 4 r ?k 1? tl ? 1 ? ?
Jlt!{' 1 try 1.??f ?T ff f ? h f ,{)I y f Xi?tM..-?t'
yLj?{2' 111
. _ 1 ..J dj??{ai?+'4q#f?4 ???.,. 'k}t .??Cy^?i?5?{f y}A.+ ?4.
? ? , ? w>: fca rt 'A k P cf t?, J fv` SY .
'. ? ? - f ,? ? i ? . ? ? N x? ?yr#zt rttl +,liv yi. ??'#r1? rL''<r f? ti7t ,
.. ?r ,' ? _ ., r t 1, { .1 } ;yt 4 311?? y?,?ttd tvJ ? tt 'f ,F ? hf... M'}7 t-i?? _. lr 5i }?,
? t s 7 {jr `L1}0 ??? S,?TJg?.^?%1+fz#1,?2h hrr T 1 ?1't?r rr?rro 1 'r?C'?eft ? ??y
?.•r. _ ? ? ., 1 ?'td azy?d`? x4ir1 -r"?r4???k. ,?? ? it v1??.rrtYYS s ? 4}Ir,'??srvv?? ?y?,° ?v?,
t ;, a?u. si ? ¢? Sk?i^r. ct + r kt ti?:?" f } f t sP ?t? ?? r
.?? ? .?t } nK ?????} Mts.
r, y ? ? ? ? ? * r l.t S;I t .?t Y9F"dN ??,,; ?p?'?. r'?? kf??:'
r ? , ? 't.( ; Y.r l+ v' ??f ? i<,"?tf r;,r7 rs ? s.* v }Ytir1 n;?'y 3t ???b g y ?';t,?:Y??y.
1. 3 ? r F 1 t v J+ k ?l 1? .?Z,n ?t'r,r!"? ` ? ?, t i n???.? t ,r;? .; t
? . , 4 ar,r a? ?-,? 4 ? } r ;tetix'` ?' u. ??ytiy??" ?r
f`rj k? x i v r: ' ,{ v ??^? x Y f . a 4 1 I "vS s5
i .?r'r". t s r t? {! it ? tr n s y x ??f y} 3J h??T. T? F„rtp..
r ? ? ... 4 ?
,. ?' , rf } `t?i1t ?'yl'? ? t ?'v T?t1vr}`?XS;+thSC4k?:? ?? ?..
,'? r zs p;r ?` ' t?t,>
'. ? ? t
.tr1 ? ? ? ? y?? }?? I ;.?t? ur ?#??i 1'SazSlL,,yr'1'I E i i Jn ? ?. ?i II
,..
. ,o .,.
.. : , .
.... .. ..
V?
.. i b{ ?
'• ' i of ? .. ? ? t, r .. ?r}, "';'r' .
,; f't k ray •, tr ?.. ? !r ?r r??. o- .r .z r. ?.'r ?t ? _ ? .. ,.. `?
?? . tY ? S di a r£;? nr t i + ? t, t :^ t . J ? l c ; r r.. .. 1 `! Z ` F >.
?• \.t.t rv ' ?+s'^ b F'tit „t i.x: ?? `} x. `,, 1 1 .?- ? .. t} ft' ? .')tvfl ?:
r ?,r , ? , .. s???:?? ?'Y£dtM?R?I+*.YStsxtaSreeasa+lw?+r?wri?,wr;.r..w,?ws,..:...,.:.?.,...,:1?.:.?vr?
5 ' - ?? ? .
1 .;t 1 '4 J .'}?
'i;'
"'?', - CLa?IRw?'?c Ti.R'I?Tti7CtZC p?.iAPli?T C! ,Y
t '
t c a1 ?? Jams ? 975
J ?.. ,
???'' ? Present:
''
',} ?? Charl.®e Galloway, Jr . Chairman
?.
f' ? F?, Dsr?isi 1?rank
t : ;,?;:
? ? ?.. .
,t. ;,
{ i ';
j ? °,
??
?.;:?.
::
f °? ;}
?4,
?????.
.y.
Lewis Hamer
Joel R. Wolfea
B=ooks Carter
M. E. Palmer, Exec. Director
Paul ? ?,:.
Doug l ' ?:?,
Rose
Doto Min .
Leon H
Bob Tay
Pence P
Mr. & Mrs. J
?lyd
The Chaisman opened the meetin with a atateraent that the s ?? ,`' „r?J
4 Pertiw?, , t
inq today is for the purpose of discussion of a pzopoaead orditusn?' ,
,
, '
?
?
will, if passed on January 20, reduce the .density city-wide, Nith tAe???
exception of the downtown business district. Ee 88ked Mr. ??1??. ,?o ?'+'? ?r,.
revior the statement he made recently before the Plannitiq acid so??
Board of the City requesting the enlargement of the CBD. '' ?r'??,?
.
? ??:7:,
?L J
"
Mr. Wolfe responded by giving a review of the meeting he hed Kith ?.?t?C
,
a -, =:
:?,
?:??:
Sergwann prior to the Planning and ?ontng Board me?ating, ae Drell ???`'#,???', ,
.-';,???_
reasons for the prescribed doKritow-n taxing district, as shown in the -:? , :. ?.
Clearwater Downtown Development Board A:t. Mr. Wolfe displayed e?.rcaa
'
a?a a to show what is thou ht of as the downtown area, rescribed °
j'
P 4 P by 18!rr..,.-;
? r?,;
. ,:
-.:, ?.
Mr. Wolfe stated that the Board become concerned with the d®finition of , ?? :'???'-
_? the dotwritown area, and pointed to the variances as recognized by the
City Planning Departiaent and the Board. He added that the Board took ;
definite action on this issue at a recent meet;?ng and asked th® City
to include the 'entire area which is the taxing district of toes CDDB.
8urther, the Board asked that the statement of work, prepared by the
CAC includ® the entire area within the statement of work ao that all
o! the properties who contribute the tax levy by the Board be consider^
ed iti the proposed redevelopment study.
Mr. Wolfe ratatod that although the City planners think of the core ar®?
of the taxing district only, i.e. out to My?ctle Avenue, and have ex ? `-
ed thi• care area from the roll-back ordinance, the board thinks
CBD a• the district paying the tax levied by the Board. He adds
at thin time we are sitting on the threshold of having to provid
an expensive ®tudy required by the City, and that we are asking
of the ar®a of the taxing district be exempted.
1?_
The Chair?aan turned to Mr. Bergmann and asked him to expl,
recognized by the City as the CBD and what effect the pr
changes will have on the taxing district of the CHHD.
that the bulk of then entire downtown district is now zon
limits of 34 units eAeneity and height of 150 feet. The
limit density to a sap of ?8 unite and a height of 80 ;eet.
Mr. Bsrgam+nn explained why the planners exempted t:?e CAD sic
aer they did but recognized the Harr-Dunlop report, did ale
' ;.ti??.' area betwe0n My?ctle Avenuo and Greenwood se needing dev®lo
1985. During the discussion which followdd Mr. Frank asked
City secogasiso the 'eentir® taxing district at this time ae be
• enapted from the roll-back ordinance.
.... ,' ;
`; ,f.
.?
,?• '
:, ? ? ? L ;
9. ? tl' 4'f > .FA +
+ y t l` 4 [2 fr ??,? ?tl ?N 1i 7
ijEt t 3 ?t.?4 f ?y ..+?t? j i v+
t ?v t +''? 5??? ? t? F?'.? r ? .,. ? .,
u +
i?f ?71?1 t ?N n{kY y ?(4?i yy h ?y i { 1 y
?? is a 4x??Yl?3?? ??9??? i . z ? s ? .
n k, r ?
il5lky{ q?, Y} y ? ? '
t P .+?v ^{ ??r ryr i d f,? ttt?? o[k?r4? y !
? s ,????r?{tytr tryr.vi?>j?'f?? ? +x +tR; ? i
?? ??x?'au?'Y?if,kti,???v?e a? a ?+ ? tij a ny t r
?t?r ?w.?Y?'eY`4?}r rf LV?Ut ?.Sr v x v j ? t ? ? ,
i y1?A}` '?77?r"y ?'?? ? 1' S 1 i ?'1. d 3 i t i+ s t
^? hY? t,,{?y}_t??i?R?? yt?y J? jy t jry?i J ? i i j ? t
5 t aS'. q v"4`?ir1 ? J r iii ti + v'? Y l j
? ti {?hth? ? S t?I? ?L.4k? ? yt? V 1 Y `
c ? r apt ?, `ta ?.°?M ti \ Li?"i 5.a ti '.y .. .
a4a'?,t?fN' z?l?A?t lt'a. r 'Y. yJ a x ..
. ?.C?Ifi/i? C t'? ?'tv?ryryJJ? Jj ?5?u .AI
4?t ??R?z?e,l ?a'it'tA ??49t t t ? i ?
v ?.T y} } ?,x? `+r?i?'-xr'z ssw i? y???( ? 3
z x?l??'?lN?'??iyrry4 t?yf 4 E ? ? t v'
?,,tt Y 1t?????ti ?7} ??Pn'Nt i ?f; t t .t ?. T
t ??T.y1?'Rw,t?,( r.S2 r,?'n*4v?'y{?y?tl t jy?? y +
? ?4y??+???s??1?t,,????' yp??ilH??y,??'j(?i I ?.
i RyX{i+?d?jW>a ',I?, ;4*t{???e 4 ? .y,'? ?' +? ? t ? + ..
i 'x ? 1# ? is ?( t x ...
rr'?Ylt Ot?.t?t?) der x,:,;<
4+LM1.ttr??;v,?0.'?UtY ,- ,i? .r ? .a 1''. . }
? Yt 1 F3F?
i'
.t
i ?,K
d,
1
_?
? , :?
;,
?..,
i
l
.. ? }?
,o
? ? -. ^
s ?i C t ?? \r?+???? D?WI?7`iViN19 A??'i?p?? ??
' ?,? ? , ??? s? ai'?
p}., r
Y 1 ?? P14i 1 ~ ?
t ? :r ? d? ?? ? r t ?
` ' `? S cis ee i Ja?Y ? 1975
l k' 1
`?? r ?? Present:?
?,, ?'`?? ? ?<
?? ;? Charles Qalloway
Jr. Chairman
,
4
t . ,
;
? ???.??':?? ? ' Dartiain Frank
a ?r
r
' ,'?',?
f
,;^ ,
Y
?,? rt,
? r'h'S? j?!>'l?fa iY P ??e<
V Iii k?rh TS 4jp4
,,. ?:.
?, ?, a.
??'nf' ,?? ',
Iawis Romer
?? ?'''??`x? , ` ? Joe R. Wolfe
??? ` ? ' ?? ?{ Brooks Cart®r
`' ~? M. B. Palmer, Sytec. Director
? ; ?,
?,
?
.
t
,,?,
?..w
,;
,?'
'.. ?
?,?
?. ? ? ? +.
?.
' ;. ?:,
?!
;
? ,,: ;? ??
. ,
. ' ?
?t`?
.
,
:.
.
,?, ,
,
? t,
,
?
.
..
.:....
?? ,
y P
f
??
?
? ' ?
?
,
?'r?"
?..
?e
YM
S
7
t I f
? t t
?F ;
Paul Bergman ?? ? (? l?r ?
`Y
Douglas Roach ? ??' ° ??? ,
Rose Pl,ifer ?
'
;
'
,
, ?
?
' ??
?
1
Dom Minotti ? ;? ?
?
a
Leon Hammock ?.
? ? ?"
1
Bob '#a
lor ? ? s
???
°
?' ??
????
y
Peres Powell ,,
?
,
?
,
h
,
,
< <
,
?`
'`
Mr. & Mrs. J.Ar1os Ogg
V Y Yt
?
? {
?t v
:Y'?,
?
t ? ? ?'?Y y1?
?
?
?? The Chairman opened the meeting with a statet??ent that the special meet•• ?? ' ? a? : ??' '? '??,'?`
?
? .
?
?`
? ing today is for the purpose of discussion of a proposed ordinance whic:?. ' ? ?' ? '? ? }? " ? ` '?'
?
?
`?? wills if passed on January 20, reduce the
density city-wide
with the {„` ??;,?
;' ;
? ?? ??{
`
?l
? exception of .
,
the downtown business district. He asked Mr. Wolfe to
`?? ;?,} S
'' ? `"`? ? '
?
t't t ? t ? '
?'?
+
, 1.
??l T
? 1
revie? the statement he made recently before the Planning and zoning
Board of the City requesting the snlargemerft of the CBD.
Mr. Wolf® responded by giving a review of the meeting he had with Mx.
Bergmann prior to the Planning and Zoning Board meshing, ae well as the
xeesons for the prescribed downtown taxing district, as shown in the ?'''?'''
Clearwater Downtown Development Board Aot?. Mr. Wolfe displayed area
maps to show what is thought of as the downtowm area, prescribed by laa•.. -``-
Mr. Wolfe stated that the Hoard become concerned with the definition oS ,_,,..,
'-`????-??????
_? the downtown area, and pointed to the variances as recognized by the ??;_'??
:
City Planning Department and the Board. He added that the Board took ;,,
; ,
t
,
f
definite action on this issue at a recent meeting and asked the City .
,,,,,
??`SA?`=?'
to include the entire area which is the taxing district of the CpDB. ?'?:;;{?a,
Further, the Board asked that the statement of work, prepared by the ''`'?`??""`
?
CAC include the entire area within the statement of worlr ao that all
?:?;:,xr?;?,
?""'??
Y
?r
?'
of the properties who contribute the tax levy by the. Board be consider- ,.y
4?
i.
'',???????'
ed in the proposed redevelopment study. ;??;;,1.?.
Mr. Wolfe stated that although the City planners think of the core area „ Y,+PIr?iY
?? ???;?,,u.,?,
of a taxing district only i.e. out to Myrtle Avenue, and have exem x ?:?.;?'?
??,?-<
ed this cote area from the roll-back ordinance, the board thinks of t e ?
`???'.=;.`rr'
CBD as the district paying the tax levied by the Board. Me added that `"??????`'?`
at this time we are sitting on the threshold of having to provide for ?''?;,°'t
?
an expensive study required by the City. and that we are asking for all ;.:
?"?"`''?'*_
of the area of the taxing district be.exempted.
The Chairman turned to Mr. Bergmann au?d asked him to explain the areas r:;f?.,
?'?A
recognized by the City as the C8D and what effect the proposed ordinance ,
:?,..,,,,t..,r
?`?``???'??'`??
ahamgas will have on the taxing district of the CBBD. Mr. Bergmann adds: ???????°,=.????'?
???.
,
that the bulk of the entire downtown district is now zoned C4., with ,
???'«`?{?
limits of 34 units density an8 height of 150 feet. 9'he code change will. :-:.r,,„?;
1 t density to a cap of ?8 unite and a height of 80 feet. :.?: ?,?.???.r;
.?,; ?>??:>
Mr. Bergmann explained why the planners exempted the CAD area definition ?.?,?s.
??'?"?t`?`?''
as the .dad but reG
y ognized the Barr-Dunlop report. did also include the
t'"? area between M
rtle A
a
u
d G
d
di ???":?`?:.;;y?'?
?r?;r??J;,
y
ven
e
n
reenwoo
as nee
ng development aFter ???f?,?`'
1985, During the discussion which followed Mx. Frank asked that the F'''??u??`'a'
f'R?
City recognize the entire taxing district at this time as being ex? ?'?`??°`?
?
???r
?
empt®d #zom the roll-back ordinance ''
f
i
!?, s.
•: ,.
•
1 ? ?„
z;.'
?.
?,< <I
aI
I
t rp? }I ? Fl,l
I , ,1 k
, ?? r? J, ,, ? ? ? -
±,,
1 ., ,?
{: . ,
t'.I'?
., p ..
... ?M ? ? -
? S' ?
V-`? ????F p{ ?,f 7. I ?. ? ? ? ?, ?t
t .dipYa ?i , r
?t ??
,? r t t' r w ?- ? i
+ ;-? i
, 1 ? , ?
a s ,? .i
? F ? ,?> ? ? - .,
is
?.. ?'?
? 't ( I ? ? .
,p ,; ` i
9 f 7 i
S A f S
u 1+4 ? 9 ` ? ? +i ? 6 iF, ? - ? ? ? ... ?.. ? ??
i a f5 ,. s' ? r v? i
Il ? y ? ? f 1
?1 r, t,j ? r, r r ? : ?
, .,
? i ? ,, { j{, t4
1 1 1?.? n? + i i.r I "?'?. ??? d ? ..
?s I a l
r ti 41 I? ,t? ? ? S7. I? .{. ( ? '??M?, "??Sk?:i$ ? '7; ,y r
? ? ? a j: ? •-I ' <,Y
k
y'Ve ,. ?t
' 11 y Ir ?'R r +t ??? , F
A 'S r V
f ? J
w?w + .
1'f ?$ I+Y.. ? 1 1 1
4 r ?L, ,.;? Mz. s?x?mrt pointed out that at this time we are talking about expansion ' ' ;: ' ;";;;::
'?'°r '`? the City definition of the CBD, which has na effect on the application ''-`I?;' ???''?`
?,? ? ? ??
,? ? ' 1
' `' the PIt?1C ordinance. Mr. Wolfe urged expanding tho entire taxing dis• ?' , ?' h ,?'
,?' ?t, , tr ? to have it exenq?ted a roll-back ordinance. , Ir `,'?
.,
?? `? , ? Mr. Homer spoke of the pro Deed roll.-back ordinance because he had at- ? ? ' ?` '
r ` + ?,;, tended a treating of priwuarily, real estate people, who expressed, them- ? ??' ? ' ? '
selves as being against giving the downtown area any exemptions at all. '"? !
;: rt + ;? ?3-°°`` ?? ? He pointed out that the problemsot redevelopment are dif#erent than the ` ? ' , ?'
„ ? ?+„ r ? +, ,L ? ; ,?
4 ? ' ??, ? 'r , '??? probletws of d®valopment of unused property. Be added at the City level ? ?,_;? ?, - ;,??
?{ 'tf ??'?..? ?k:'? there is a gx®at amount of under?atanding of this problem. ° `' ??: ?, < ?,,, ,?`,?
a ,, ? ??, ,
, +°
? ', y3. ; ' ,,?,.; ? ,
;,a I? ? ' ?,; +At the Commission tweeting on Monday next, we should maks the point that ` ` ? >? ,> ?'
?"?, ??ti l p,',? the early redevelopment may very well fail outstEde of the presently ? 4` ? ,?'?I,,
f :. zeco nixed CSD i. - 4 ,"`` f? ,f ` ,?
?:'w??? 9 e in the axes east of Myrtle Avenue, and suggest ex
?: ? ? ti r, r?a sad..
?; pending to 4>reenwoad. r ? ? ? ? ??
5 1 ??Ff f L! tr k, t ? ..v ? ? . ?r t\ V V 4. ?
i??+{ `a `' i` ' ??? llz. Bergmann coutmented that he believed that his department could support ,? va ? ,'h?''?' {' ';?
j -< , ?,x{j?Mk Y ?• expansion og ,the CB1? to Greenwood Av®nue, but not to include the corridor ? ? ? ?+ ???? 5 K
+ ? M,?s?i pr a ? ? i I +1, ? ?? -,:
??':? "???a ?,, ?? :? along Cleveland out to Freduica. Me added, the azea netween Myrtle Abe, ? ? ???? ,F ??? ,??>?+ ;?`i
t t?4?y ti ftia -,, ? y ???y
?? ? , ;??'?? ?? ?,r, tl?'+ and (?Aeenwood should await the results o! the study which we axe about ??. ,, ?? ` ?' ; ? ? ;?"r,`},r '
iv' ? `?, ?,?, ;? 'r? ,,vt, ? :^ to undertake, which might well state that this area could be developed ?{ ? ? ? , ?,?°'r l ? u}y+{??? ? ;
? A
??? ????qr??,r ??4? r,+?????. into x®aidential area. '? ,p ,,?? ` , , ? ?,?, ?<;??
,i Sip t + { NN `f e1 ?V' I? tiI t ?(? Al Y Ys
?y r????l"MVa.`7??p?t?1!}'?+t?, , ' ' t? std'" )L K °a'? ?a??..
,,? t+ ? ? ?• Mx. Wolfe stated that he believes9 that before wo can go ahead and spend y ? ? r ? ^ ??? r? '
f?..1i'w`??^` ?r1 .?,y ?' a p`"Rht ? . , ? Pa x
?xa R???? x,,"? ? ?n? ?,,4" a lot of money for the proposed study that we have some assurance that ; ° I? ' „r ' ??" ?`'? '?
??tt yy., ? + ? ? + ter , , wt
'341 ?§s ?r ? 1?r 1? 3T ??'t ? n? ,.yY1} A, : ?t7? ??i ]
Ash, ; ,????i,Apar?,? when the study is finished the City will not deny us the right to xe? , { ° `?r a ?q; ??;? r???If
??? ????,"????'?r,???"?? ? develop along the lines of the consultants' recomunendations. ??` ` ' ' " '????' ?t `?,??'? t????? '
P
? 'Iy a ?? t? '?tyy y??k . 1 ? a ? renal a? 4 t '47a ? "tytf '+?a4 ?'????
?? '????,?????.? , ,, Mr• ?ergmatus compeeted--?he believes the City will indeed support the ?;'? ` , ,;yy>,? r?,` ???i=?, ;;?;???'??`
r ` ?????,, urban center concept ae thy have already agreed to exempt the CBD area ? ?; ?' ° ??` ? ?`;'p ? ????d??.,?I ??
? SxTh t r ?,?
??e!' i?p p ?`, ? A I J f? 4 1`? t1 S
'' ? ??;` fro?a the roll-back ordinance, adding that after the completion of the ., r'?? '?? ???? 4n;????`?'?? Y' ???,? ?????
+ ? ,.,. 1 r ???' „?y..?t?l?.?rs????, ,
-? ??? redevelopment study the City will use the report and the urban center ????? ?, ? ', ,??,,?.°?????????????; <;
d? 4 ? ri, , ti.} ? i .
,? concept as a tool to work with. ? ? 5? a n, 5}?' {? A ?°' ,
p ? dl ?+? , ? £ j y+ t4 I` I ? dt ? r??r1???, , I
1 y, ?? Ii?i1?1'll 4?( 1"
ti , ?r?,
The Chairman aunsaarired the discussion, pointing out the possible reasons " ? ?? ?' '
'??° ?; ? ? - !or the intones feelings being expressed by the people o! Clearwater at °` r , j, ' ? ?``'?a'",?,????'??a t ?
?' ? zs , ' s;W r ? ?u,? ?;, x,>C q, ?,
? ? ?'?? ?. ra ? .
r this tiwte against high density. tr f ? `,?' ? ?; ? ,? k ,??,s, ?- ?
,eta ; fY i.r-,?r?oy??4s????t,",
r , tdr . Frank offered a motion to approach the City at the next meeting to ; ? ?, p ? t ?? < <? ? ?,att?.u; r +? a??ax?a
,?? hold in obeya?3ce their decision to down zone the azea? un+tl after the ?, ? `?? ,' "?t`;???, ??x;w"?? ????`'? ? A
?.?- ° redeveloptaetat study is completed. Mx. Wolfe suggested that we.have ` `? ' ?"?? °?,{'!°:,s?! fl?'?, ? ?"?' `
?, , ?,,? ,? ? „,L ,
n(?? a good turnout of people to support this decision, if adopted by the ?`' I??` a ? ",?t?a?r??"??'????;r
F'+l + t' '1 ? ?\ 1?f14'I ?,P`Jp'Fy?,J t
board, at. ?e m®eting on Monday next. ` , _ , ?? ?,', ???? ;t-° , ? °?, ?
a.p,? ? + +?ti?? fl ? + ? z uu i
The Chairman stated, sincQ we do not have four members present today, ° f , ,M, ?c } `° '? I4 alt
we haven't a quorums however, we should have an expression from members °M`h? ` ? ?d4°?;?''y t,. ? ?14?
k? ?? ,? ? r;. ?,??, ?? rt .
present so as to poll thane who are absent prior to the Monday meeting ?? ? ?;? ? ,t? >?'}?'??"`?
.j of the City Cowaiseion. '`?;?' ;, ,??,????? , E
4 , ' ? st+? ? a ? t?1}Y??? +? - 5
a S
? t% } I
tP ?? ? P 4? F J t ?. f y r d ?,
In response to a question as to the present position of the statement of ? , , y????i,? r ' ?' `?????
,; work, mr. Bergmann stet®d that the City has consulted with the CAC who `" ???;??;+; , ? ' Yt?c????'? ?
is now reciting the statement, when it is completed, we then, together F }?'`?'+???` ? 7?f, ? ',
r ,
with the City utay go ahead with the selection of a consultant to do the ?'?????' ,; t ' , .
work. I ?? ?`???? " ?' : ?,, ?'r ?` , ?',
.. pc,,?? ?? .:,,?. .... ?? . t- . .
M. 8. Balmer
Executive Director
d 3. ? 1p ? - ...
?
yy F ? I
/'? 1
4s?? ?@6y y, ?
a ??'
? ,,,
r;:
h
?!
1
??1 r
_ - -
-
?a
.? - _ _
1 ? t??Y
' ttti+,)? ? ? 5 ? ° , ?+ f ?s r
Y r j ? ?ktk drNrn' n??? ?
,f ???? 7? hip+v?+?r7Lyy??.P ,? r?a Mfrs ? L'
.'?au?i'h'?z. ???T'lihw»?.a`'tz?`?;c'v,?ru?+?' s,y '?
i 1 f'1' . r?sl ;.? L 1 ?i ,
l.? 4h? '
Ai ?riilyd'.r?rsi?'Et'?T??awa?,ti .h'????;?',.+.
;: p ??k?a?;? ??',?- f tir4? -tI l? ylr,?
u t `?.
j, + ?r ?fi tin r ai ?,??a,?t jv ?t f.`i a? `p ?':
R ,, Id r (? r i
i+Y t
f ? ? ?)
•?? ?. i rt 11, r .? a
a