Loading...
02/03/1987 , ..~ -, ;:. .. '" .,',t',. ;"1':'" '... < t, . 1 " , ""/'- ,," : :',:,~,,)., :J,fk' :~~" '!!,~"l': 'f:,'" :'1,~~ " /",,~:~,""~'~-.' '-'.."'/., ',.,'<"'.;"- " , ,,', " , ....{ 'J:' .~- , t . ~ ' ..:r , ,:,1 ,rJ'" " . l, ' ,v. " .,,':~; ~.~~ ~!:~,~~p~.;~, .' r,':",' '.'" -, '''''''':,''''', "" t.' " " , , ' ~);'~:',,: ,', '.. 'f)i-" '. , ' ~":...., ',\ .j ',," , I', ~, " " ,,' ~ :' c 'j .',' '.',v.' ~";:,,, ~"t"l.;'":'; "~'';; . Minutes of the Planning & Zoning Board - February 3, 1987 Page -2- Motion was made by Mr. Schwob, seconded by Ms. Nash, to approved the above request with the condition that the use permit be procured within six months of the approval of the conditional use. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). 2. Lot 24 and Part Lot 23 G. L. Bidwell's Oakwood Sub. (613 North Ft. Harrison Avenue) Douglas Gifford, Trustee/ Chipman Harris CU 87-06 Request Vehicle Service; Outdoor Retail Sales, Displays and/or Storage CG (General Commercial) Zoned Mr. R. Chipman Harris, representative of applicant, appeared requesting approval of this conditional use. He further advised that at one time there had been a gas station at this location. He stated a gasoline island in front of the building would be removed to allow for parking. Mr. Harris stated that minor repairs such as battery changing are necessary at this location and that such minor work would be performed inside the building. He further requested that this service be allowed. Mr. Harris stated a dealer's license for this location has been approved by the State Department of Transportation. Mr. Harris advised he intends to keep the property in a neat and clean condition unlike previous occupants. Mr. Harris stated the intended use is similar to other uses in the area. The following persons appeared in opposition to the above request to give their comments: Mr. Tim Cronin, 13531 Rustic Pines Boulevard, Seminole, stated he is in the process of purchasing the property at 604 North Ft. Harrison located across the street from the subject property. He also stated the neighborhood is presently being developed with residences and professional businesses. He further stated a car lot would not be consistent with the surrounding uses. After questioning by Mr. Schwob, Mr. Cronin advised the property at 604 North Ft. Harrison is being remodelled as his residence. MS. Cynthia Heaton, 19933 - 103rd Terrace, SeDinole, stated she recently has signed a long-term lease for property on North Ft. Harrison, known as the "old Jack Tarr residence" and is in the process of renovating property for use as a large antique-type mall. Ms. Heaton stated the area should remain as historic as possible. Ms. Harvey advised that one letter in support was received from International Automotive of Pinellas County, Inc., who are property owners directly across the street. After questioning by Ms. Nixon, Ms. Harvey advised that International Automotive was recently denied approval of a conditional use for vehicle service. ''1 ",: 1 ,:.: ,';: ' ~~1 -"_":_* ..'I.' !.....,.";.;", .',: .:'; :<~ :.',>";;'(.::'!, ...'..;< , .'c'. " , .. . ";, '- ; .. ..' i 'I' , ,\ ' i," j: . ; ,. ~ . ' '! " ' ,',I, "",,:,.,":"' ',. '):' ",\!~", <j 1'(::1.{, -""'.:i''-: Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Board - February 3, 1987 Page -3- In rebuttal, Mr. Harris stated former uses were permitted in the Commercial General zoning district even though premises were unattractive. lie further stated his intended uses will be more attractive and should be acceptable. Ms. Harvey advised this request for conditional use is for vehicle service, outdoor retail sales, displays and storage in a General Commercial zoning district. She advised the proposed use of the property is for auto leasing, auto sales, and limousine service. She also advised the Board the governing sections of the Land Development Code are Sections 136.025(b) and (c)(22). Ms. Harvey stated the Traffic Engineer had no objection to the proposed use provided adequate parking is available on the property. Ms. Harvey advised the Planning Department recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1) That there be no vehicle service (repairs, body work, etc.) on the property; 2) That there be no parking in the right-of-way; 3) That the median located between front canopy support posts be removed; and, 4) That the use permit be obtained within six months of the approval of the conditional use. Ms. Harvey advised the Board that two parking spaces noted on the diagram will not be available if the median is not removed. . After questioning by Mr. Schwob, Mr. lIarris advised there will be one limousine in front of building and remainder of vehicles will be demonstrator automobiles. Mr. Harris felt this use will be more desirable than a gas station or tire store. After questioning by Mr. Green, Mr. Harris advised there are five parking spaces in the front of the building and two parking spaces in the rear which are for employees. After questioning by Ms. Nixon, Mr. Harris advised van conversions will be done in Pinellas Park. He further advised it was originally intended to have van leasing at subject property before it was realized more parking would actually be needed. He also advised that more automobiles for lease will also be stored in Pinellas Park. After questioning by Mr. allowing vehicle service approval. Johnson, Mr. his client Harris would be advised that agreeable to other than not conditions of . Ms. Harvey advised that clarification is needed from the applicant because the application stated the rear parking is for car detailing and Mr. Harris stated the rear parking is for employee parking. Ms. Harvey stated the property across the street was the recent subject of an application for vehicle service and was denied due to lack of available parking and noise that would be generated from the vehicle service use. She further advised that, regardless of prior uses in area, the Planning Department cannot recommend vehicle service as appropriate at the subject location when it recently denied vehicle service across the street. Ms. Harvey expressed concern that the subject property immediately backs up to residential uses and further recommended that, if the Board does grant the conditional use, no vehicle service be permitted at subject property. , "'1' ,..?::~ ;'(L~":/~:\;f~tt;;(:r:~jj.~tF;, :' .' .,' " < . ~ , I, .;,', ",.' ,',' _:,'~ .. _...._~.- . ..1.. '.'~.,...:I!:JI.;.~t';~~~.: :: .' ;'.'. " '.; '. \' ::':,~;~~{;:i:k, ,:., .., .' /:';f;;"![:l';'li'\~.i:: . " ," :.., . :..:,z', " , '; ::', '.. .:...., I,' ,f ~"i \' '. ~ 4'.. '! ':,t4~' ~' " ' .... .,', ',. . , , ' I J " '., " I I '\ ",I, ; ~. '.: "," ~ ,..\ '., "",'" "'" , ,_ .,,: ,,~.:" :- ".i~, '/.' I ';~' ." ':" 1';'.,. .. ,I; , , .".', G',.,'..'.:".',"',': .,: '.,'. '. ::' ,,1., "".f,",': \ \ ,'j "i''', . ", " ! '. '". ,,"'t,' , , " , ." ,. ,', ."'" ..J....'':O'" ,.. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Board - February 3, 1987 Page -4- Mr. Schwab stated that the property is zoned Commercial General and felt the proposed use would be reasonably compatible with the area if the four conditions were included in the approval. Motion was made by Mr. Schwob, seconded by Mr. Green, to approve the above conditional use subject to the following: 1) That there be no vehicle service (repairs, body work, etc.) on the property; 2) That there be no parking in the right-of-way; 3) That the median located between front canopy support posts be removed; and, 4) That the use permit be obtained wi thin six months of the approval of the conditional use. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). 3. Lots 4 to 7, Part Lots 10 and 11, and Lots 12 to 14, Blk. 12 Pine Crest Sub. (607-A Pennsylvania Avenue) Speros Frangedis/Art Kiskanyan CU 87-07 Request - Vehicle Service Zoned - IL (Limited Industrial) Mr. Speros Frangedis, applicant, appeared requesting approval of this conditional use. He advised there is adequate parking at the property and felt this is a good, clean operation. No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request. Ms. Harvey advised this request for conditional use is for vehicle service in the Limited Industrial zoning district. She further advised the request is specifically for transmission work and car repair on the property. She also advised the Board the governing sections of the Land Development Code are Sections 136.025(b) and (c)(27). Ms. Harvey stated the Traffic Engineer had no objection if sufficient parking is available on the property. Ms. Harvey advised the Board the parking requirement for vehicle service is: parking or storage space for all vehicles used directly in the conduct of the business, plus four spaces for each service bay, plus one space per two persons employed on the premises. Ms. Harvey also advised that if approval is granted, the Board must specifically authorize transmission work and engine repair. . Ms. Harvey stated a similar request was before this Board on June 17, 1986 and the Board granted approval of the vehicle service on a portion of the subject property. She stated several conditions were imposed on the applicant including proper posting of signs, policing of area by the owners to insure proper parking, and amendment of site plan to reflect the requested use. Ms. Harvey advised the proper signs have been installed and there appears to be no problems regarding traffic and/or parking. She further advised there was no adjustment made to the certified site plan as required and it appears there is a need for further adjustment of the site plan. .~ ;; ". 4....~ __....:__.-.-. ':",'.;;~;,::j~,:, 1,:.,t,~~~~;,:~3~~,ttf::~/."::'.~,:,:..,;,:,: .;, , . .. . :f:', "'4 ,;::::',~,j ;i. -: ,~f . , , ~.',: '::jF {~~~~,W~;;:~~J1:~'~:;.~i~)~.:i:}tE;~:\'f.:)~:;\~?~;;~~~f#ffX.i~:. , . , ~, , ::"l.... . , ..' "', , -, ;~...... " ! '. \ ' ;, ,',....; ,"., ::", Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Board - February 3, 1987 ..rt;-~'(F ..p,i, Page -5- Ms. Harvey advised the Planning Department recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1) That, prior to issuance of any Occupational License for vehicle service on the property, the site plan be amended to reflect uses on the property with the applicable parking calculations being shown thereon to reflect that Code requirements are being met or, if parking requirements are not met, variances to parking requirements be obtained; 2) That there be no work on vehicles on subject property after 7:00 PM; and, 3) That the use permit be obtained within six months of approval of the conditional use. Ms. Harvey advised the 7:00 PM limitation is recommended because of the close proximity of residential area. Ms. Harvey further advised it appears one of the requested uses is already in place and advised clarification from the applicant is needed in regard to the Occupational License. After questioning by Mr. Schwob, Mr. Frangedis advised he was not sure why a revised site plan should be a condition of approval. Ms. Harvey advised Mr. Frangedis that the certified site plan on file with the City identifies the subject property for use as warehousing and the parking calculations on that site plan were based on a warehousing use. She further advised that since the use is changing to a use other than warehousing it is necessary to have the site plan revised and recertified by the City to reflect the intended uses. Mr. Frangedis stated he felt a revised site plan was unnecessary and questioned that a revised site plan was necessary when he has enough parking. Ms. Harvey advised a new site plan will be required and issuance of any Occupational License will be withheld until a revised site plan, indicating new parking calculations based on vehicle space used, is submitted. She explained to Mr. Frangedis it is the Planning Department's responsibility to keep the site plan up to dat~ based on how the property is used and a revised site plan is the only basis for monitoring sufficient parking on the total site for the uses proposed. After Mr. Frangedis stated he felt operation of his business was being unnecessarily delayed, Ms. Nixon explained the uses had changed and, though a revised site plan must be submitted for City monitoring, it doesn't mean he cannot make use of the property as intended. Motion was made by Mr. Green, seconded by Ms. Nixon, to approve the above conditional use subject to the following: 1) That, prior to issuance of any Occupational License for vehicle service on the property, the site plan be amended to reflect uses on the property with the applicable parking calculations being shown thereon to reflect that Code requirements are being met or, if parking requirements are not met, variances to parking requirements be obtained; 2) That the specific uses on premises are transmission work and engine repair; 3) That there be no work on vehicles on subject property after 7:00 PM; and, 4) That the use permit be obtained within six months of approval of the conditional use. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). . ., '. .,. ','~"'!'''' '~ I ,,' , ,.'P,' j,!' , (,' . 21.'",," , , , ' . , , , " ,;"';::~>~?;'ar;t;~,':;t;i~~ :~.":! ~:';:"~':~:"~';l~.~f.,',,~ II "." :..' I' ",. ",t" , , . ) ~.." . . i~' ;,' I." :r ',) I; , . ~ .,!, t. I _II . I I. , , ;"' ,[I, , ,: 1-; , 'I , ,~' - I,"", "'~ , i' ), . qi': -;""\. I,' . ',.' \', )~ ; - <& Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Board - February 3, 1987 Page -6- 4. Part Lot 1 Forest Hills Estates Unit 5 (1522 Lakeview Road) Reconstructive Associates (Dr. Thomas Schwab, Partner)/ Barbara Laidlaw CU 87-08 Request Zoned Noncommercial Parking RM-28 (Multiple-Family Residential "Twenty-Eight") Ms. Barbara Laidlaw, representative of applicant, appeared requesting approval of this conditional use. Ms. Laidlaw stated the applicant has purchased the subject property to extend the existing parking area. She further stated the parking lot would not be used in the evenings or on weekends. She also stated the landscaping and upkeep of the grounds are excellent and felt the building is a credit to the neighborhood. Ms. Laidlaw advised the applicant has met with representatives of Kalmia Condominiums who are in agreement with applicant's proposal. She also advised it is applicant's intention to remain good neighbors and keep in contact with Kalmia as plans progress. e"n . to <ii' In support of the above application, Mr. Joe Barto, 1524 Lakeview Road, stated he is speaking on behalf of the majority of residents of Kalmia Building No. 7, the building adjacent to the subject property. He advised the residents have a good relationship with applicant. After questioning by Mr. Schwob, Mr. Barto advised he is president of the Kalmia Building No. 7 Association. In opposition to the above application, Mr. John W. Sanford, 1524 Lakeview Road, stated he lives at the south end of Building No.7. He further stated that when he purchased in Kalmia he was informed the subject property was owned by Kalmia. He felt the subject property is Kalmia property and if the application is approved it will cause property values to go down. He also felt there may be drainage problems if a parking lot is constructed. Mr. Johnson expressed concern that the Kalmia's private drive will open into the parking lot. In rebuttal, Ms. Laidlaw stated the applicant intends to maintain the property in an attractive manner and doesn't feel it will cause neighbors'" property values to decrease. She further stated applicant"'s grounds are watched by police. She also stated it is not feasible for applicant to have a gravel or grass parking lot due to the nature of orthopedic patients. . Ms. Harvey stated this request for conditional use is for noncommercial parking in an RM-28 zoning district. She further advised that property immediately to the north of the subject property is Kalmia Condominiums, property immediately to the east is the Orthopedic Surgery Center, and to the left of the subject property is a gas service station fronting on Highland Avenue. Ms. Harvey advised the Board the governing sections of the Land Development Code are Sections 136.025(b) and (c)(19). She further advised the ,,>1 ~, " ,.,~ '.' '1\ '., ";'., .I' " ",'~?~i:~~:~:.;i~~~'?{:'~~~~:~\.~~j:~;~'~lt;:,;:r .:,','::: ,,:i;;,~,::}/~i:S~;'/';~r~<J,+~~~;:f~;~~f:~~;{~~; ',' . -"- , . . ,"' ' ~ '\":~ .' ~~'.;. ..", :".", ,,':,". ; 'j' ~.. ',~, ,:. ,'; '. I" , " '! " :"'",' : , ,~J ' , , !', , :~~ttiid(i:,l:,;':';:(}:,i.':::': I : ,: , ':'i' ~;t r~: ;~~A};;'~'~!:tt., i,',: (','), . " i' " 1,,' . ,! f....:r(,('\.J"~d,t\)~...tA'.\~i;,.I"-;1 I. ' i1ll' '\>., f 11,l \1 ..\;\)~l }. .f",;" '. !.{~ loll" ,~,~~,r "'ili.",. Ie"')', < l' ~ 'tg/~:~~{~:;i;:~;~:'-\;\\':>': ,';''':> ",> " ,~, '.:J;ir. ~~n::"'~t,l~t'I: I h\/~'~t', ~'j' I' " ~ L', ',"''., '],!.\;~""L~'" q .~, i (, ,'.~ , ..~, \ :', '" , .' ~ 1""1. l. ,i ,,:' ' " , i;::>;': " .1'.''\\, ~~'....... .,.' I Tl,.".,'.'" " I ,.:' .' ',' '.."' I' f, " , I " ,; , , '.1' ",1'", .'" ..'.. ," ~' t,' , ,I ~ ~;~~t:;_Of the Planning and Zoning Board - February 3, 1987 Traffic Engineer noted that Kalmia Apartments are immediately adjacent and currently have a parking problem. She also advised the Code Administrator noted that the parking plan included in the application does not meet the requirements of parking lot layout as required in the Code. Ms. Harvey advised that the subject property is currently vacant and would in no way reduce any parking that is currently available to Kalmia Condominiums. Ms. Harvey noted that the parking plan appears to indicate area proposed to be used for parking lot is owned by Kalmia Condominiums and requested clarification from the applicant if there will be an easement between Kalmia Condomi niums and the applicant. Ms. Harvey advised the Board tha t, if approval is grant ed, the Board should specifically authorize there being the access from the east and west sides of the property zoned RM-28. Ms. Harvey further advised the Planning Department recommended approval subject to the following: 1) That the parking lot layout, in regards to distance from lot lines and spacing of parking spaces, be revised to meet Code requirements; 2) That an opaque fence be constructed along the north property line of the subject property line to buffer the parking lot from adjacent residential building; and, 3) That the use permit be obtained within six months of approval of the conditional use. . Ms. Laidlaw advised that the original plan did indicate some spaces on Kalmia property but applicant intends to have another plan drawn to indicate correct spacing and maximize available space. After questioning by Ms. Nixon, Ms. Harvey advised the Board could table this item until such time as a revised site plan was submitted. Ms. Harvey further advised it is the Board's responsibility to consider whether it is appropriate to have a parking lot adjacent to a residential use and in a zoning district. She also advised the design of the lot may be governed by any conditions this Board may want such as any type of buffering, whether landscaping, fencing or both, between the parking lot and the building immediately adjacent to the lot. Ms. Harvey stated these conditions would be taken into account for issuance of permits and when the design of the lot is finalized. Ms. Nixon stated she would like to see both opaque fencing and landscaping as a buffer. Mr. Schwob stated he was impressed that most of the residents of Building 'No. 7 were in favor of the parking lot, though he also understood Mr. Sanford's concern. He further stated he felt that both fencing and landscaping be provided. . Motion was made by Mr. Schwob. seconded by Mr. Green, to approve the above conditional use with access from the east and west side of the property zoned RM-28 subject to the following conditions: 1) That the parking lot layout, in regards to distance from lot lines and spacing of parking spaces, be re~ised to meet Code requirements; 2) That an opaque fence be constructed and landscaping installed along the north property line of the subject property line to buffer the parking lot from adj acent residential building; and, 3) That the use permit be obtained within six months of approval of the conditional use. l-iotion carried (4 to 1) with Mr. Johnson voting "nay.'. :(l:;;,~'> ~ ~{~:~:~: ::~~" :,; ~, .. "'I, ,,' ,I', "'~ ' "'1".', /,:, '.,', >:,~ 'j " " J, ~. . J: I' ,I:' I"" -,', '~J: ; i. " :, '. /'J. , ,\,1 ',I, , I., . :', " . " .'.' .'~, ,{ .' '~~i'f~(,' I I ~~.~~~ ", Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Board - February 3, 1987 Page -8- 5. Lots 72 to 77 Clearwater Beach Park (458 Mandalay Avenue) Alexander & Mary Der~ech/Henry & Estelle Cruise (Beach Bar and Lounge) CU 87-09 Request 4-COP (On Premise Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages) Zoned - CB (Beach Commercial) Mr. Henry Cruise, applicant, appeared requesting approval of this conditional use application. Mr. Cruise ad~ised he took over restaurant that was next door to his premises and was instructed by the State that he would need a connecting door to serve alcoholic beverages. No persons appeared in support of or in opposition to the above request. Ms. Harvey advised this request for conditional use is for on premdse consumption of alcoholic beverages in the Beach Commercial zoning district. She further advised the applicant has applied to the State for a 4-COP license and is proposing expansion of the eKisting Beach Bar. She also advised the Board the governing sections of the Land Development Code are Sections 13&.025(b) and (c)(l). Ms. Har~ey stated the Traffic Engineer had no objection if sufficient parking is available and the Police Department saw no reason to deny license to applicant. Ms. Harvey also stated expansion of the Beach Bar would not necessitate additional parking. Ms. Harvey advised the Planning Department recommended approval of the above request with the condition that the use permit be procured within six months of approval of the conditional use. Ms. Harvey requested clarification from the applicant concerning the expanded area; specifically, the application and drawing indicated the expanded use involved Lots 72 to 77. Ms. Harvey stated if Lots 72 to 77 were not all involved the Board should specify what area is approved for expansion. After questioning by Ms. Harvey, Mr. Cruise advised the proposed expansion involves approximately 50 foot additional frontage. Ms. Harvey advised the Board that, if approval is granted, approval should be only for restaurant area immediately north of the Beach Bar and the Planning Department will define the specific legal description. Motion was made by Mr. Green, seconded by Mr. Schwob, to approve the above request for the restaurant area immediately north of the Beach Bar with the condition that the use permit be procured within six months of approval of the conditional use. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). . ;;';:~;:{V:",:> :,:~ ~ ~' ,": :: 'f>'. .i.~'.'"" '-:" '; ,- . .~ . r, ,..' ..,. 'I. ..-...- ,,_:. - .. ~ ':';'" ";. : L , lit, ~ > ',;tY,' .,'1"" 'j,':~~~f~~,~~: ":':: ,I ',' I .', " "' I' '.~ ' , !' :: . ., I. ',_ " , .. t' , ,,', " ' " .'~ "'.! , I, I' ~;, '., .;' . - . ,." > " . (. ~ ~~ '",,<. ,'" ,~" ,:1;''',''''.' ""',, '.. !-..;'.~' 'f '.. "\. ...., , " ;,) t ~ ~~." .'~,I' ,'",''' ",' ',' ,~.. " I. , , , "7";/"':"'( .1,' .'A.J ,$'J",I",;" ',~I.,'"",.: \ ',f . I', ,\. : 'f,i'l!j' '7 IV Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Board - February 3. 1987 Page -10- Ms. Harvey advised this request is for annexation and RS-8 (Single-Family Residential "Eight") zoning. She also advised there is an existing single family home on the property and City sewer is available. Ms. Harvey further advised Public Works requested that the abutting right-of-way of Kentucky Avenue be included in the annexation. Ms. Harvey stated Public Works also noted that~ though not a condition of annexation, the property owner be on notice that at such time that Landmark Drive (Bayview Avenue) is extended to Gulf to Bay an additional ten feet of right-of-way will be required. Ms. Harvey also stated that staff recommended approval of the annexation and RS-8 zoning. Motion was made by Ms. Nixon~ seconded by Mr. Schwab. to approve the above anneKation and RS-8 (Single-Fa11lily Residential "Eight") zoning, with approval to include the abutting right-of-way of Kentucky Avenue. Motion carried unanimously (5 ~o C). 3. Lots 159, 160 and 1& 1 Clearwater Manor Sub. Located on the south side of South Lagoon Circle~ east of Belcher Road) (Cardo, Buck~ Seelig/City) A 87-4 Request - Annexation & Zoning, RS-8 (Single-Family Residential"Eight") 'rhe above properties are located on the south side of South Lagoon Circle, east of Belcher Road. Ms. Harvey advised this request is for annexation and RS-8 (Single-Family Residential "Eight") zoning on three lots governed under prior Agreements to AnneK. Ms. Harvey also advised the three lots are currently developed with single family residences. She further advised that City sewer is available and the properties are contiguous and eligible to be annexed. Ms. Harvey stated Public Works requested the abutting right-of-way of South Lagoon Circle be included in the anneKation. Ms. Harvey explained to the Board there is the possibility of creating an enclave and the City may not be able to annex all three lots at this time; however, the review by this Board need not affect its recommendation to City Commission. She further explained the City will annex the property it is able to and not annex any property that will create an enclave. Ms. Harvey advised staff recommended approval of the annexation and RS-8 zoning of the above properties. Motion was made by Mr. SCllWOb. seconded by Mr. Green. to approve the above anneKation and RS-8 (Single-Family Residential "Eight") zoning, with approval to include the abutting right-of-way of South Lagoon Circle. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). . ">~\i~{:~~(./:;'~' ',; ". ~ "rt; A , ", ~' , 1,' "<1'"'''' ',. <':).J:~:~/II'~I;'''''~' . ~ ~"!."!t:n"'~~l~~ t: . '1"'" ",,' "',.:, ':" 1"'-;;1;"';1 _, '" , ,~~ ;~' " ~;~r?ei-! "'It. o '/'1 /f.~I,)r~'.' . Y:,'- , .' f. I: ~ ,1' .,~ <~ i. 'i ,,', :', \ ~ ,<, ~ ~ ~,'" '-.." '-" .': ; j, ~:, ~'f.'-' (f:~' f :" ~ >" "f..'. it ,. , .... 4~ .. \ ..,^'; ,'./:'. r:\'. , , " ;', ,.,'. .. i.~'1 .' 'I'" ~ '. \','.. t ~ ' , " 7, , ~'f' - ' '.' :-; .~; '; "'i"' :, ' ,I I' ' i' - '.;' . ,',. ',', :c-...l\~iiJ}~'l!,it;i~;,ii~~:";,,:;/:; ':![~l Minutes off the Planning and Zoning Board - February 3, 1987 Page -12- Ms. Harvey advised this reques t is for annexation and OL (Limited Off ice) zoning and requires a Land Use Plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Residential/Office. She also ad\rised this property is governed by a prior Agreement to Annex and City water and sewer are available to the property. She further advised that this Board and the City COlll11\ission recently approved property immediately on the west to a Residential/Office category and Limited Office zoning. Ms. Harvey stated Public Works requested that the abutting right-of-way of Sunset Point Road be included in the annexation. She ad\rised that staff recolll11\ended the approval of the annexation and Limited Office zoning. Motion was made by Mr. Green, seconded by Ms. Nixon, to approve the annexation and OL (Limited Office) zoning and Land Use Plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Residential/Office, with approval including the abutting right- of-way of Sunset Point Road. Motion carried unanimously (5 to 0). (E) Chairman's Items A V After questioning by Chairman Jonnson, ordi nance is still before the courts control portable signs. Mr. Galbraitn the City. Mr. Galbraith stated the portable sign and until that time the City cannot further stated the case looks good for (F) Director's Items Ms. Harvey introduced Mr. Jeffrey Pruitt, Senior Planner, Long Range Planning Division, to the Board. Sne ad\rised the Board that Mr. Pruitt will be attending the Planning and Zoning Meetings as his schedule allows so he can become familiar with Planning and Zoning procedures. Ms. Harvey stated she will tnen be able to have Mr. Pruitt assist her in conducting hearings for conditional uses, annexations, zonings and Land Use Plan amendments. Ms. Harvey advised the Board tnat a Motion to Dismiss on tne Dock of the Bay appeal was denied, though property has changed hands. She further advised the hearing is scheduled for March 27, 1987. After questioning by Ms. Nixon, Mr. Galbraith stated this appeal is concerning CU 86-83, which was a request for a 4-COP license. Mr. Johnson stated he was advised that Dock of the Bay has been sold again. Meeting adjourned at 3:40 PM. . Pau a Harvey Planning Director , ;;:;; :"-,;: , I: ..', .. :~:~~~\i~~:)~i:J:t!1':~ >:.(~'h~}",;. :,' , , ... , " .-,. ..-" .,. '."." .~._---"---"..._..".,_...__.. . '.. " .............=' ," 1(:' I"" , ~.'~ :-;r:'f1;;';: " Yi?i1't' , : I ~:.n~",! ?'l':'" ,('t.., :~~ 1-' :Il , :' ':1 't' ~l\' ~ ' ~ ::: '\' ,\:,'~ ~ ,> , -,.:~~ 'I ;.,"" , \:~ ~IIoJt{~ ',:,~FI);,:-: ?:-~!W)"'f~fi;l1I~ .;; \ ~ ~ !'>' I.... .Y j ~ \,' .. ~:,f~!:"~l1\f" ",),) ,I ',~' ",\"~,,,,,:Jj'l: 'It,>, , 'I, '. '!:';- ..-".. "', , ' -- -.--.., _.~.. .1 "', .,:.. ":: 1\;1/1. '":"'l"..!)l~, {.'.' ,~, ,',I. ~ rl....,'1 . /' ~,;"""",Il',I"':~/'~j.i...rli:(~{:\~~,~f1~~'.~'t;lo( "/~+;",l~( ; .~.:.! 'r,~"I".',?J~\' ' ., ;:"1 '~>>\":.1~!\ ':,/";'1,; '\i:; ,f:7f'I~1 '~I~";\;:'" :'f',)...!'t ,~ .I~.Y/!"i-'1' -';;' ......,'-, '. l' ': ~! ",. -, ".