12/13/1989 (2)
'.'
,,,'
':t~' "'. '" ,,' , ',. , ' .. . ~, ~. v~;~.. ):f,ll '<p'y..~.,~;Ii"AM\'~'(J~1J~g\1:':
., ",.;tlii~ ,','" . ~ ~ ' '. u ~. . ~~ ","'\lt~~c\' ~(Il(~~~..i?~." ._,:a''I~~)t''j:.."~,,th~,t'V', .,Jt~~fil",ilt~' li{i"~
:,r.~Y;i~""""iI j~~""N. .' ftl .. ..... . ... ,,,. ,:q......., ~ ... ~:'{':.\I~~!'''f'''''~'.'~\l.'"" ./lt' M~ ,t . ", ,>' . I~ . "I' . ~ .. . ..
, r"""'"'_>J.V,.!i_'....;..~...~.~.~~~1b~~~~J~..,."1]~-~oo~t~:"O.~.!~...~'-ir..\i\..fil~..'.""....._q.4.'"~. ...'. .~., > '...f "."-~. ..l"l"o.4.il..:"tllt..l..,..... _l.1".
"~I
o
MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
Meeting of December 13, 1989, 3:00 p,m.
.'~_H____
.~ ...... ..-_.~--_.__.~ -'----~
Agenda
Action
PUBLIC HEARINGS
(At the time a case is heard and date set for compliance the Board shall, at the same
time, set the fee to be assessed in case of non-compliance,)
Public Nuisance Clearing List 89-12-1
Case No. 1 Christine Keno Comply within 10 days
915 Engman St (12/26/89)
Case No. 2 Ester L, Gregory Comply within 10 days
709 Nicholson St (12/26/89)
Case No. 3 Enza V. Bi lello Comply within 10 days
1008 Magnolia Dr (12/26/89)
Case No. 4 Irene Graham Comply within 10 days
vacant lot about 1001 Engman St (12/26/89)
@ Case No. 5 James A. Cochran, Jr. Comply within 10 days
1342 S Michigan Ave (12/26/89)
Case No. 6 Stephanie Reberto/Jean Fowler Comply within 10 days
Lot 59, Eagle Estates Sub (12/26/89)
Case No. 7 Katherine Bie Comply within 10 days
M&B 24.03, Sec. 16-29-15 (12/26/89)
Case No. B Marc R./Colleen A, Green Comply within 10 days
112 Evelyn Ave (12/26/89)
Case No. 129-89 Mark Robinson Comply by 12/20/89
Beach area to W of Rockaway
(Building Code)
Case No. 130-89 Cheryl Toney Comply by 12/15/89
3336 Fox Hill Dr.
(Development Code)
Case No. 131-89 Jesse Montague d/b/a Comply by 12/20/89
Landship Electronics
1721 N. Ft, Harrison Ave.
(Development Code)
@
, "
MCEB 12/13/89
1
"l
"
G'
I' '.,'"
ocase No. 132-89 Paul B. Lokey d/b/a Comply by 12/13/89
Lokey Oldsmobile Inc.
2330 Gulf to Bay Blvd.
(Development Code)
Case No. 133-89 Michael Cohen, Director Withdrawn
d/b/a Clearwater Mitsubishi
405 U.S. 19 North
(Development Code)
Complied prior
UMFINISHED BUSINESS
Case No. 130-88 John Mavrogiannis Board directed filing of
d/b/a Auto Import Clinic lien
Inspector's status report
Case No. 148-87 Peter & Michael Gianfilippo Accepted affidavit
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 128-89 Henry Cruise d/b/a Accepted affidavit
Henry's Clubhouse
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-3-1-3 Eva Harris Accepted affidavit
Affidavit of Compliance
(DCase No. 89-4-1-2 John H. Ford Accepted affidavit
Affidavit of Compliance
Case ~o. 89-4-1-3 Joseph R./Nadine Klima Accepted affidavit
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-5-1-1 Mobil Oil Corporation Accepted affidavit
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-5-2-1 Lela Boykin Estate Accepted affidavit
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-7-2-2 James Liddell Accepted affidavit
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-7-2-3 Bruce F./Christine A. Chapin Accepted affidavit
Affidavit of C~mpliance
Case No. 89-7-2-4 Richard Leon Accepted affidavit
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-7-2-5 Tower International Inc. Accepted affidavit
Affidavit of Compliance
~case No. B9-7-2-7 Hosea Franklin/Annie B. Accepted affidavit
Richardson Est,
Affidavit of Compliance
MCEB 12/13/89
2
",
"
,(, ,
c..'
rr-
Ii,.""
~f ..
,,'
,
r-
'~-'
, ,_,' , ' ,', , ' , ";' i,... '... ' " ~"
',~~~l1~':Id,,'"'!!t'~J~~_____ '.. _:.-:.-__...._......"""'~'t.l"'~X,~4~~v:9P:1'ff,1t~~'r_~'\.'!'''"~~~;t't~'!$/1tI.;rt~f,~Wl'~W;6"..sr~1~le~.tlm~D<~'!$\r.'t~~{
, ,i
-,
o Case No. 89-8-2-1-
Case No. 89-8-2-2
Case No. 89-9-1-2
Case No. 89-9-1-G
Case No. 89-9-2-3
Case No. 89-9-2-5
Case No. 89-9-2-6
Case No. 89-10-1-1
@ Case No. 89-10-1-2
Case No. 89-10-1-3
Case No. 119-87
and
Case No. 147-87
Fine Status Report
USA Veterans Administration
Affidavit of Compliance
Accepted affidavit
Scott T, MacGregor
Affidavit of Compliance
Accepted affidavit
Robert O. Hall
Affidavit of Compliance
Accepted affidavit
~
Accepted affidavit
Lousiana Life Ins. Co. Inc.
Affidavit of Compliance
Hoke S. Russell
Affidavit of Compliance
Accepted affidavit
Tyrone Mason/Joseph L, Johnson
Affidavit of Compliance
Accepted affidavit
Neuhaus M, Baugesell
Affidavit of Compliance
Accepted affidavit
Da isy Will iams
Affidavit of Compliance
Accepted affidavit
Brian E. Cahill
Affidavit of Compliance
Accepted affidavit
Harold J. Hoblick, Jr.
Affidavit of Compliance
Accepted affidavit
Jeralne Burt
Partial release of
Liens
Approved partial release
OTHER BOARD ACTION
Review continued to
1/to/90 meeting
NEW BUSINESS
Approved as submitted
MINUTES - Meeting of November 8. 1989
ADJOURN
MCEB
;,
7:53 p.m,
12/13/89
3
.......,......
'p-
J' ,'~4'.
r-
'~
\..;~' "",',,~niU:" ,,' ," " ' , '
'.., .~~,r.'~:~f"~if,!;i;l,,,, , ~ ",""" ' '
. :.:.:.li:rf"~"~~HA1;;:'*-..>t.~Jj~'~~:.. ~:.:!:~ ...., I, 't'~" ~. ,'. ~'...' ,"'.:.:t t. ., ~ " ''''<<'''':-;-,. ~<f!' ..' ./(.,,' "( ~ . '.... .'
l ~ _4.1i~~:t~~~~Q."t1."It~2!:.~i1J:t;Y4VJtt.-n~~~f~~~~.r;t:.'1~~j!l~f!}lA "/:J';r,,1.!?J)J:\l':1,~~';:!o1~?{~tf1;';'~"{?;:~1t.':.~'t11'"~::~~~:~~}l.{<,-;>~;t'7J;ij>~ht.:~i;":tr~~'l~~t'\r.\nJif~Qt:~~Ifff,tf~'1litb~~~b\~
. . ~ ' . ,).. , .M..,." }..', ...r..._..... ... ..~, !!\..':.A"'I~/' ,.,~ ~~""d or. 1~,1' .t.~~"... ::""::-R; ,~!,:~~ "'1.;(:r~~t~~.&'1:\<~"1t11~f1~~~lt~'..
. ./ !
I~-t
PUB~IC NUISANCE CLEARING LIST 89-r&c2,
J~ -/:3 -'8:J
1"6-25 89
o
1., 915 Engman Street; Pa~ Park, Block C,
10/29/15/65718/003/0080. Owned by:
Street, East Orange, NJ 07018.
Nicholson's,
709 Nicholson Street;^Ira E. Addition, Block
parcel * 09/29/15/60102/001/0100. Owned by:
709 Nicholson.Street, Clearwater, FL 34615.
Lot 8; parcel *
Christine Keno, 18 Emerson
2.
1,
Ester L.
Lot 10;
Gregory,
3. 1008 Magnolia Drive; Rogers
15/29/15/76356/000/0171 Owned by:
Avenue, Garfield, NJ 07026.
Sub., s.
Enza V.
135' !.Jot 17;
Bilello, 308
parcel *
Midland
4. Vacant
North
Irene
1/2 Lot
Graham,
lot about 1001
1; Parcel 4/:
32a3 Forette
Engman Street, Palm Park Sub, Block
10/29/15/65718/004/0011, Owned by:
Lane, Lithonia, GA 30058.
0,
5.
Block 0,
Real Property Owned by:
Port Richey, FL 34668 and
Darners, 1342 S. Michigan
Lot 23;
James
1342 s. Michigan Avenue; Lakeview Heights,
parcel * 22/29/15/48978/004/0230.
A. Cochran, Jr., 6905 Graphic Drive,
Personal Property Owned by: Louis A.
Avenue, Clearwater, FL 34616
6. Entire lot of Eagle Estates Sub, Lot
20/28/16/2363B/000/0590. Owned by:
Fowler, 570 Sandy Hook Road, Palm Harbor,
parcel *
Stephanie Reberto/Jean
34683.
59;
FL
o
7. ROWand bluff area; M&B 24-03;
16/29/15/00000/240/0300. Owned by:
Road, Largo, FL 34641-2942.
Parcel *
Katherine Bie, 990 Donegan
B. Entire Yard, Gulf to Bay Acres, Block F, Lot
18/29/16/34560/006/0030, AKA 112 Evelyn Avenue.
R/Colleen A. Green, 112 Evelyn Avenue, Clearwater,
4303.
parcel 4/:
Owned by: Marc
34625-
3;
FL
r.
'-'.. -.
", '..,
.. ,'.
~
VEl
;"
"
;,
,p
..~..
<,",
";,,..,' ,: ,. " , ' " , ' , , ",'.'Y "" ',., ,,",,"' .\<{", ;"'\I4'~':r&lI~~~~".~i;~\'fii~11J<i-11'mjt\j'~~li!r;'"
" f:~f~~~~~~~~tt!~r~~~~~~~{r~f9..2~fB1~'::7{t~~~~~~~!~;~~~~~~~~~(i":l1:J~~~'~~~;~~~~~d~J!~~;f).~~~&~~~2~r~1t~~~rri~~.'J~tit~~~.l{
o
NUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
December 13, 1989
Members present:
Robert Aude, Chairman
William Murray, Vice-Chairman
James Angelis
Wi 11 i am Zi nzow
D. Wayne Wyatt
John McKinney
Absent:
Bruce Cardinal (excused)
Also present:
Rob Surette, Assistant City Attorney
Alan Zimmet, Attorney for the Board
Cynthia E. Goudeau, Secretary for the Board
In order to provide continuity for research. the items will be listed in agenda
order although not necessarily discussed in that order.
(')
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 3:05 p.m. in the Commission
Meeting Room in City Hall, He outlined the procedures and advised any aggrieved
party may appeal a final administrative order of the Municipal Code Enforcement
Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County. Any such appeal must be filed within
thirty (30) days of the execution of t~e order to be appealed. He noted that
Florida Statute 286,0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to
have a record of the proceedings to support such an appeal,
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public Nuisance ClearinQ list
Case No. 1
Christine Keno
915 Engman St
There was no one present to represent the alleged violator,
Vicki Neimiller, Code Inspector, stated the property was inspected September
8, 1989 and found to be in violation due to high vegetation. City submitted exhibit
A, a copy of the file of record including a photograph of the property taken
September 14, 1989. Ms. Neimi ller stated ownership was verified through, the
property appraiser's office, notice sent certified mail and the signed receipt was,
returned. She granted an extension until this morning at which time the property
was again inspected and the violation still exists,
S";
.s~' ,
, ,I.
MCEB
1
12/13/89
" ,..-
r
'1,' . ,"..
r-.
'~
.>
"
, "
. '}~\r?tj~~~(}~?'~:?~~';).s~f.;';;:':'\;:~;J''Oi'~l"ll''~=''__,,,,"",;;;.,~"l':; ':::::!'i;rt';(::i~:~ :~~'~~;~f:;~'~:'{ ~,j~,~"2:~::'''.!~':.:'~?t~i';/. ;s:1,~,>,,;~{;~~j~~t~~\~~?r~}~~';~?~~~? ~:!t;~:~1'r~j\~~~;~~5~r~~rf~rf:~~1r1!,~y.j1f~~~fZIJ#i~' ,
~
~g
Mr. Murray moved that concerning Case No, 1 of Public Nuisance Clearing List
89-12~1 regarding violation of Chapter 95 of Clearwater City Code on property
located at 915 Engman Street a/k/a Palm Park, Blk. C, Lot 8, t e Municipal Code
Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code nforcement Board
hearing held the 13th day of December, 1989, and based on t e evidence, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of act, Conclusions
of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vick Neimiller, City
Code Inspector, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: ity exhibit A, a
copy of the file of record, it is evident that there exists the excessive growth
or accumulation of weeds, undergrowth or other similar plant materials at the above
address.
The Conclusions of Law are: Christine Keno is in violation f Section 95.04.
1"""\
V
It is the Order of this Board that Christine Keno shall co ply with Section
95.04 of the Code of the City of Clearwater within 10 da s 12 26 8 , Upon failure
to comply within the time specified, the City Manager may authori e the entry upon
the property and such action as is necessary to remedy the co dition, without
further notice to Christine Keno. The City Commission may then a opt a Resolution
assessing against the property on which remedial action was take by the City the
actual cost incurred plus $150,00 administrative cost. Such cost shall constitute
a lien against the property until paid. A Notice of Lien, in such form as the City
Commission shall determine, may be recorded in the Public Records 0 Pinellas County
as other liens are recorded. If the owner takes remedial actio after the time
specified, the City Commission may assess the property the $150.00 administrative
cost. Such cost shall constitute a lien against the property u til paid, Upon
complying, Christine Keno shall notify Vicki Neimiller, the City 0 ficial who shall
inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should a dispute arise
concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing efore the Board.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Done and Ordered this 13th day of December, 1989.
Case No. 2
Ester L. Gregory
709 Nicholson St
No one was present to represent the alleged violator,
Vicki Neimiller, Code Inspector, stated she inspected the roperty October
6, 1989 and found the property to be overgrown with high vegetatio. Ownership of
the property was verified through the property appraiser's offic and notice was
sent certified mail which was returned undelivered. City submit ed ~xhibit A, a
copy of the file of record, including an affidavit of publicatio of a notice of
hearing advertised in the Pinellas County Review for four weeks. Ms. Neimiller
stated the property was reinspected this morning and the condition of the property
hasn't changed,
o
MCEB
2
12/13/89
r-
'I ": "
, ,
"
r~
~
. . ': ~
I'
" , ::~~\~lr;~~if~;itW{{(~8r:1~~~{i.~tm:'i&:!' :',':r.v_'''-'''''''.J''',~PJt'{':',(7:r,;q:~t.'~y':!''::t;:(~1: :';'< :',;;:r ~\':':'fi;:'r,;: :P'::~:" '1\:('~:i':r::-,:i}:::;;,::;:,,~:~:.:,::,:,::ir:i;?N~~S:1~~;~~~:f?Ei:;;f!!'~:?~~~~rij(lJt{~i*::i~,73~!i~),~t;:1! :
,
o
Mr. Murray moved that concerning Case No.2 of Public Nuisance Clearing List
89-12-1 regarding violation of Chapter 95 of the Clearwater City Code on property
located at 709 Nicholson St. a/kfa Nicholson's, Ira E. Addn., Blk. I, lot 10, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board hearing held the 13th day of December, 1989, and based on the
evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of
Fact, Conclusions of law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Neimiller, City
Code Inspector, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City exhibit A, a
copy of the file of record, it is evident that there exists the excessive growth
or accumulation of weeds, undergrowth or other similar plant materials at the above
address.
"
I
o
The Conclusions of law are: Ester L. Gregory is in violation of Section 95.04.
It is the Order of this Board that Ester L. Gregory shall comply with Section
95.04 of the Code of the City of Clearwater within 10 davs (12/26/89). Upon failure
to comply within the time specified, the City Manager may authorize the entry upon
the property and such action as is necessary to remedy the condit ion, without
further notice to Ester L, Gregory. The City Commission may then adopt a Resolution
assessing against the property on which remedial action was taken by the City the
actual cost incurred plus $150.00 administrative cost. Such cost shall constitute
a lien against the property until paid, A Notice of Lien, in such form as the City
Commission shall determine, may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County
as other liens are recorded. If the owner takes remedial action after the time
specified, the City Commission may assess the property the $150.00 administrative
cost. Such cost shall constitute a lien against the property until paid. Upon
complying, Ester L. Gregory shall notify Vicki Neimiller, the City Official who
shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should a dispute
arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the
Board, The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Done and Ordered this 13th day of December, 1989.
Enza V. Bilello
1008 Magnolia Or
Vicki Neimiller, Code Inspector, stated the property was inspected November
9, 1989 and found to be in violation due to debris in the form of old wood in the
rear yard. City submitted exhibit A, a copy of the f'i le of record including a
photograph showing the condition, She stated property ownership was verified
through the property appraiser's office, notice was sent certified mail and the
signed receipt was returned. The property was reinspected this morning and the
violation still exists.
Case No. 3
There was no one present to represent the alleged violator.
"
MCEB
3
12/13/89
'r-
r-
~
~' ..
,
j;
( , ,;~t~~~~~t~f'!:~~ii3;::!tl;~~:!~f~~~~;:- :"r;;.'";i"~':\,:c"."...~..-"",.".'t ....,i>: ;:::.f:~"l~;":V "!', }~,t~::;~;,;:;:~:;::':.' :~"{\~~i}:I':~'i;'::\ t:;,:~f:~~:~:~:7",::,~'~ ~~;:N;j~\i7.:~,::::"~:,;r'~~;:::~ i'!~~~~~~~~~~fg!~)~{T:r~~~:t!~~~\~~\~~)~~~~f;;01?:~~\~i~~;.:'
..,
;
"
~i
"~
~
~7
Mr. Murray moved that concerning Case No.3 of Public Nuisance Clearing list
89-12-1 regarding violation of Chapter 95 of the Clearwater City Code on property
located at 1008 Magnolia Dr. a/k/a Rogers Sub., S 1351 of lot 17, the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board
hearing held the 13th day of December, 1989, and based on the evidence, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions
of law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Neimiller, City
Code Inspector, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City exhibit A, a
copy of the file of record, it is evident that there exists an accumulation of
debris in the rear yard at the above address.
The Conclusions of law are: Enza V. Bilello is in violation of Section 95.04.
o
It is the Order of this Board that Enza V. Bilello shall comply with Section
95.04 of the Code of the City of Clearwater within 10 days (12/26/89). Upon failure
to comply within the time specified, the City Manager may authorize the entry upon
the property and such action as is necessary to remedy the condition, without
further notice to Enza V. Bilello. The City Commission may then adopt a Resolution
assessing against the property on which remedial action was taken by the City the
actual cost incurred plus $150,00 administrative cost. Such cost shall constitute
a lien against the property until paid. A Notice of lien, in such form as the City
Commission shall determine, may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County
as other liens are recorded. If the owner takes remedial action after the time
specified, the City Commission may assess the property the $150,00 administrative
cost. Such cost shall constitute a lien against the property until paid, Upon
complying, Enza V. Bilello shall notify Vicki Neimiller, the City Official who shall
inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should a dispute arise
concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the Board.
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Done and Ordered this 13th day of December, 1989.
.
, 'I
'\
I
"\
" '
" " ' '
Case No. 4
Irene Graham
vacant lot about 1001 Engman St
Vicki Neimiller, Code Inspector, stated the property was inspected September
8, 1989 and found to be in violation due to high vegetation. The property was
posted and a photograph taken September 14, 1989 showing the condition of the
property. Property ownership was verified through the property appraiser1s office
and notice was sent certified mail which was returned undelivered. City submitted
exhibit A, a copy of the file of record, including an affidavit of publication of
a notice of hearing advertised in the Pinellas County Review for four weeks, Ms.
Neimiller stated the property was reinspected this morning and the violation still
exists.
No one was present to represent the alleged violator.
()
MCEB
4
12/13/89
.M'.,',.,
" ,
, ' ,
r
r-~
, .'
~
,,'
"
; ,
, '..~f~;ffii~'?~?.~~r;;~tiA!~i::~iJj:~g,,:.~J,~~<,!!!~,,~"'_~_,_~~...-AO""" ,:_"",~,.,I ,~,~~~,'<;::::_t~'~'~ 'ij.'.:r ~.\';_~: ::J;;;;'; ? 'G',it~;',::~t,/:, V:;;!.;:(,~':':~(l(t;t~0)r",'J'::';~;j::::(y' :;;~i;1~?;~~!!1iy;/~rp;I:~i:;?:~;!;~~,jftt;,{:r:?!1~t,'
'~
J
,]
~
1
~
'i~~,
,,-
Mr. Murray moved that concerning Case No.4 of Public Nuisance Clearing List
89-12-1 regarding violation of Chapter 95 of the Clearwater City Code on property
located at about 1001 Engman St. a/k/a Palm Park Sub., Blk. D, N 1/2 of Lot 1, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board hearing held the 13th day of December, 1989, and based on the
evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of
Fact, Conclusions of Law. and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Neimiller, City
Code Inspector, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City exhibit A, a
copy of the file of record, it is evident that there exists the excessive growth
or accumulation of weeds, undergrowth or other similar plant materials at the above
address.
The Conclusions of Law are: Irene Graham is in violation of Section 95,04.
o
It is the Order of this Board that Irene Graham shall comply with Section
95.04 of the Code of the City of Clearwater within 10 days (12/26/89). Upon failure
to comply within the time specified, the City Manager may authorize the entry upon
the property and such action as is necessary to remedy the condit'ion, without
further notice to Irene Graham, The City Commission may then adopt a Resolution
assessing against the property on which remedial action was taken by the City the
actual cost incurred plus $150.00 administrative cost. Such cost shall constitute
a lien against the property until paid. A Notice of Lien, in such form as the City
Commission shall determine, may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County
as other liens are recorded. If the owner takes remedial action after the time
specified, the City Commission may assess the property the $150,00 administrative
cost, Such cost shall constitute a lien against the property until paid, Upon
complying, Irene Graham shall notify Vicki Neimiller, the City Official who shall
inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should a dispute arise
concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the Board,
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Done and Ordered this 13th day of December, 1989.
Case No. 5
James A, Cochran, Jr,
1342 S Michigan Ave
No one was present to represent the alleged violator.
Vicki Neimiller, Code Inspector, stated the property was first inspected
August 15, 1989 and found to be in violation due to debris in the fQrm of a yellow
Chevrolet truck with an expired tag and flat tires. The property was posted and
a photograph taken November 6, 1989, Ownership of real and personal property was
verified through the property appraiser's office and vehicle tag office
respectively. Notice was sent certified mail to the property owner and vehicle
owner and signed receipts were returned, City submitted composite exhibit A, a copy
of the file of record. Ms. Neimiller stated the property was reinspected this
morning and the violation still exists.
~
MCEB
5
12/13/89
.' , .. ~ ' : il", : J :, : ;' .,! ,\ ~ . " "
, . "",,'
~ , '\ '
'p-
, ":.'
,,: ,~vrt':,',l:"
, < .....\.i::' ~~;\";: ::~:'1 ~ '
. . ..J:!;"';;:).tc~v
~
~
". ,",
(,
~ < ~ . "'.. 'i~~ 0.' ,l. '-Ii <' r,J.\:~ '".',"::.,~;",:'4,:.<',';!','<1~,Jt:,"'; t,':< :~f,:"~,:~ ::\~.~l~:<~~_i~,,~r_~,~~,{~,~~f.;f,"'~,'?:"\~~;,.",~..~,:.';j,~,'1j,; ~t~,',}t.~, :~"':l,~,(,,'~7J,,...,f_',?';t_.~r~:,~~,,!,r.>'~~.r,~,', :,' H,;',~, _,"lh,:;'~,'~~,~,.~.",','~;,l,,\.~{f,::,';,I,..,,',.,!,l,.,~}l:~'~,;, ~',;','~:,tl"~ ~
' ,~r~:..~!1~~lft'~~~f.:~~!.~tt.~:;'~r.Y.J.~"'1;u"''''__--.uM'''''''''~_'.lt\~r.;,,;'j:''~~~f.')~~..t:~~'~' "':C<::q?:~~:,f:~'~,.'~,~ ~.'::~:'~:~.'/.' '. : '" :.' :- ~, .. '.:, :' ~,; '.., ,- '.~ _' .:' " ~:.' .' '-- ',~ .-" -~,_:_.: J:,~l" ~".:: - ~':, '.~ ,. ....' ~ ~'2,V .
,
I:
.J
l
:~
o
Mr. Murray moved that concerning Case No.5 of Public Nuisance Clearing List
89.12-1 regarding violation of Chapter 95 of the Clearwater City Code on property
located at 1342 Michigan Ave. a/k/a Lakeview Heights, Blk. 0, Lot 23, the Municipal
Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board
heari ng held the 13th day of December, 1989, and based on the evidence, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions
of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vicki Neimiller, City
Code Inspector, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City exhibit A, a
copy of the file of record, it is evident that debris in the form of an inoperative
Chevrolet truck with flat tires and expired tag is on the property.
The Conclusions of law are: James A. Cochran is in violation of Section 95.04.
;,
o
It is the Order of this Board that James A. Cochran shall comply with Section
95,04 of the Code of the City of Clearwater within 10 days (12/26/89), Upon failure
to comply within the time specified, the City Manager may authorize the entry upon
the property and such action as is necessary to remedy the condition, without
further notice to James A. Cochran. The City Commission may then adopt a Resolution
assessing against the property on which remedial action was taken by the City the
actual cost incurred plus $150.00 administrative cost. Such cost shall constitute
a lien against the property until paid, A Notice of Lien, in such form as the City
Commission shall determine, may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County
as other liens are recorded. If the owner takes remedial action after the time
specified, the City Commission may assess the property the $150.00 administrative
cost, Such cost shall constitute a lien against the property until paid. Upon
complying, James A. Cochran shall notify Vicki Neimillerr the City Official who
shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance, Should a dispute
arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the
Board. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Done and Ordered this 13th day of December, 1989.
Case No. 6
Stephanie RebertolJean Fowler
Lot 59, Eagle Estates Sub
Vern Packer, Code Inspector, stated he posted the property October 20, 1989
due to high vegetation, Property ownership was verified through the property
appraiser's office, notice sent certified mail and the signed receipt was returned.
City submitted composite exhibit A, a copy of the file of record including a
photograph showing the condition of the property. Mr, Packet' stated the property
was reinspected this morning, some cutting had been done but not enough for
compliance with the code.
There was no one present to represent the alleged violator.
<=>
MCEB
6
12/13/89
",F
r
I '
r-~
~
-. .'
i'
(,
, ' )ff!;}1,7~~;f?,t~'f;~f~:~g~,!,:j~!~:"n;';~r~~:':\.. "I~"'''''-...~,_....._._",,,,,,.,..~.f'''''-y.,,~';;'' .~"::\.,;<,?,:\,~,.~:,:,:~};,~",:::.:,,,:,:t",::-:r~(:1A);,,;'.'.~\T:\'i'~~;'~;;:':;:W'~:!?t:~T'}' :~~;~~1:'~r~1:':f~,Ej!~~~'\f~;\~g(':r.4~:.{~T~:';r{'~}jiJ,:~!il~1!~
'.
;', I,
1
.
'.
~
~1:?'
Mr. Murray moved that concerning Case No.6 of Public Nuisance Clearing List
89-12-1 regarding violation of Chapter 95 of the Clearwater City Code on property
located at about 2987 Eagle Trail a/k/a Eagle Estates Sub, Lot 59, the Municipal
Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board
hearing held the 13th day of December, 1989, and based on the evidence, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions
of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vern Packer, City Code
Inspector, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City exhibit A, a copy of
the file of record, it is evident that there exists the excessive growth or
accumulation of weeds, undergrowth or other similar plant materials at the above
address.
o
The Conclusions of Law are: Stephanie Reberto/Jean Fowler are in violation
of Section 95.04.
It is the Order of this Board that Stephanie Reberto/Jean Fowler shall comply
with Section 95.04 of the Code of the City of Clearwater within 10 days (12/26189).
Upon failure to comply within the time specified, the City Manager may authorize
the entry upon the property and such action as is necessary to remedy the condition,
without further notice to Stephanie"Reberto/Jean Fowler. The City Commission may
then adopt a Resolution assessing against the property on which remedial action was
taken by the City the actual cost incurred plus $150.00 administrative cost. Such
cost shall constitute a lien against the property until paid. A Notice of Lien,
in such form as the City Commission shall determine, may be recorded in the Public
Records of Pinellas County as other liens are recorded. If the owner takes remedial
action after the time specified, the City Commission may assess the property the
$150.00 administrative cost. Such cost shall constitute a lien against the property
unt il paid, Upon complying, Stephanie Reberto/Jean Fowler sha 11 notify Vern Packer,
the City Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance,
Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further
hearing before the Board, The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Done and Ordered this 13th day of December, 1989,
j'
\ '
~~
,I
, i
l
,
,
i
I
i
I
Case No. 7
Katherine Bie
M&B 24.03, Sec. 16-29-15
There was no one present to represent the alleged violator.
Vern Packer, Code Inspector, stated the property was inspected November 2,
1989 and posted due to high vegetation and needed edging along the sidewalk. He
stated this is an ongoing yearly problem, Property ownership was verified through
the property appraiser's office, notice sent certified mail and the signed receipt
was returned. City submitted composite exhibit A, a copy of the file of record
including a photograph showing the condition of the property. Mr. Packer stated
the property was reinspected this morning and the violation still exists.
~
......,
MCEB
7
12/13/89
"r'
,t.' ',. ,
j'
.F
~
, .,:.
" '~JS~~:i~:]t<~~~~~p::~;\,..~-..~_.......~-._._,_._,~...._>c"".",~~.r";,'~:';:'~5;'r:::?;;t:~~\~. ;';:{1::'!7' ~':1 ;~;:?:;i"~',i/;;'1?~;,~!;~1'!)~;~!?1tl,~:r:r:~~~~?l~j$~~~~0::~~~tfj~fl:~~S:?t~?~y;t?:1r
,'"
~
:1
~
I
, J
'I 0
1
, "
'-
.', <J
','( ,
o
o
t&,
Mr. Murray moved that concerning Case No.7 of Public Nuisance Clearing List
89-12-1 regarding violation of Chapter 95 of the Clearwater City Code on property
being the vacant land S of Pierce 100 Condo aka M&B 24.03, Sec. 16-29-15, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board hearing held the 13th day of December, 1989, and based on the
evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of
Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vern Packer, City Code
Inspector, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City exhibit A, a copy of
the fi le of record, it is evident that there exists the excessive growth or
accumulation of weeds, undergrowth or other similar plant materials at the above
address.
\
I.
I,
The Conclusions of Law are: Katherine Bie is in violation of Section 95.04.
It is the Order of this Board that Katherine Bie shall comply with Section
95.04 of the Code of the City of Clearwater within 10 davs (12/26/89). Upon fai lure
to comply within the time specified, the City Manager may authorize the entry upon
the property and such action as is necessary to remedy the condition, without
further notice to Katherine Bie. The City Commission may then adopt a Resolution
assessing against the property on which remedial action was taken by the City the
actual cost incurred plus $150.00 administrative cost. Such cost shall constitute
a lien against the property until paid. A Notice of Lien, in such form as the City
Commission shall determine, may be recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County
as other liens are recorded. If the owner takes remedial action after the time
specified, the City Commission may assess the property the $150.00 administrative
cost. Such cost shall constitute a lien against the property until paid. Upon
complying, Katherine Bie shall notify Vern Packer, the City Official who shall
inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should a dispute arise
concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the Board,
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Done and Ordered this 13th day of December, 1989.
Case No. 8
Marc R./Colleen A. Green
112 Eve lyn Ave
No one was present to represent the alleged violator.
Vern Packer, Code Inspector, stated the property was inspected September 12
and posted September 14, 1989 due to high vegetation. Notice was sent certified
mail and returned undelivered. He stated the notice of hearing was advertised for
four weeks. City submitted composite exhibit A, a copy of the file of record
including an affidavit of publication of the notice of hearing. Mr. Packer stated
the property was reinspected this afternoon and the violation still exists.
MCEB
8
12/13/89
;:_:A".~::::~:.~=~=~rf~~:~~~S(:'~i~4~:;~~:;~'>.
,r-,::,,'
, '
. '
r
(, '
T-'
~
" '
1" ,
. ' / '
" .",~~Y~1~tff1~[2?0:~~!k.";:1'IJJ~z~W,.,~,,~"""""'~_...;~t:""..if.~":t~:12'f:~;?:'~~ S~l.:'::::~(:';;?g,~:~.~~{t;~t;'tfJ\~~~~~.N?1~~'?~~~;:::;~~f;~~~~~~~;;:~'!i!i~fe~i:f~~~f:J!.r}.2!~(:}~r:~~~r{~~;:}fc~1,:~%i~~~~~~~;;
, .
.
-~, " ,
',. ,
, ..
~1
t
'I
1
1
1
I
i
'i
e
Mr. Murray moved that concerning Case No.8 of Public Nuisance Clearing List
89-12-1 regarding violation of Chapter 95 of the Clearwater City Code on property
located at 112 Evelyn Ave. aka Gulf to Bay Acres, Blk F, Lot 3, the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board has heard test imony at the Munici pa 1 Code Enforcement Board
hearing held the 13th day of December, 1989, and based on the evidence, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions
of law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Vern Packer, City Code
Inspector, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City exhibit A, a copy of
the file of record, it is evident there exists the excessive growth or accumulation
of weeds, undergrowth or other similar plant materials at the above address.
The Conclusions of Law are: Mark RICo lleen A Green are in violation of Section
95.04.
o
It is the Order of this Board that Mark RIColleen A Green shall comply with
Section 95.04 of the Code of the City of Clearwater within 10 days (12/26/89).
Upon failure to comply within the time specified, the City Manager may authorize
the entry upon the property and such action as is necessary to remedy the condition,
without further notice to Mark R/Colleen A Green. The City Commission may then
adopt a Resolution assessing against the property on which remedial action was taken
by the City the actual cost incurred plus $150.00 administrative cost. Such cost
shall constitute a lien against the property until paid. A Notice of Lien, in such
form as the City Commission shall determine, may be recorded in the Public Records
of Pinellas County as other liens are recorded. If the owner takes remedial action
after the time specified, the City Commission may assess the property the $150,00
administrative cost. Such cost shall constitute a lien against the property until
paid. Upon complying, Mark R. and Colleen A. Green shall notify Vern Packer, the
City Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance.
Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further
hearing before the Board. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Done and Ordered this 13th day of December, 1989.
Case No. 129-89
Mark Robinson
Beach area to W of Rockaway
(Building Code)
cont. from 11/8/89
No one was present to represent the alleged violator; however a letter was
received from Mr, Robinson requesting another continuance,
The Assistant City Attorney stated he opposes another continuance on this
case.
Mr. Angelis moved to deny the request for continuance. The motion was duly
seconded and carried unanimously.
o
MCEB
9
12/13/89
.~ '.,"';;:';' ..~.. .",:~.., ,"', , ,.,"':''':-(. ' .
i
I
i
G..' ..
"
, -.,
, ' '
" , .
F
r~ ,'."
'['.
~
; ,
I
(~
.
, ,!
, , I
o
o
:' ,
The Secretary to the Board stated notice was sent certified mail and the
signed receipt was returned. The Assistant City Attorney requested the Board take
notice that Mr, Robinson did receive proper notice of the hearing,
Tom Chaplinsky, Supervisor of Construction Inspectors, stated two shed type
buildings were relocated on the beach and tied together to appear as one structure.
City submitted exhibit A, a zoning atlas of the area in question and showing the
location of the structures. He stated the buildings are 98 feet from the lot on
the east side and more than 98 feet seaward of the coastal construction control
line. He stated at high tide, the water creates a pond landward of the buildings.
City submitted composite exhibit B, four photographs of the property and the
buildings, one of which shows the tidewater pond approximately four feet from the
buildings. Mr. Chaplinsky stated the pond sometimes appears under the buildings.
Mr. Chaplinsky stated Mr. Robinson is in violation due to the buildings being moved
without a permit and being located beyond the coastal construction control line.
In response to a question, Mr. Chaplinsky stated the business, which has been closed
for at least a year, previously operated at a different location. He stated Mr.
Robinson has acknowledged the violations.
In closing, the Assistant City Attorney stated no permit was issued for the
relocation of the buildings and the buildings are clearly seaward of the coastal
construction control line. He stated they could be hazardous to sunbathers.
Mr. Chaplinsky stated the buildings are not anchored and winds from the west
could cause the buildings to move or be destroyed.
Mr. Angelis moved that compliance be reached by moving the buildings by
December 20 or a fine of $50/day could be assessed. The motion was duly seconded,
Discussion ensued regarding the time needed to move the building and whether
the fine is sufficient as the situation is a potential hazard to others.
Mr. Angelis moved that concerning Case No. 129-89 regarding violation of
Sections 136.009(b) and 137.006(b) of the Clearwater City Code on property being
the beach area to W of 7 Rockaway St., the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has
heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 13th day
of December, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board
enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Tom Chaplinsky,
Supervisor of Construction Inspectors, and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted:
City exhibit A - a zoning map depicting the area in question and B - photographs
of the structure, it is evident that the buildings are in an area not permitted and
in violation of the Coastal Construction Control Line, and the buildings were placed
without a permit.
The Conclusions of law are: Mark F. Robinson is in violation of Sections
136.009(b) and 137.006(b).
')
I
I '. .,
'.:
:~
MCEB
12/13/89
10
F
r.,
I' ',', "',,
'F
1'. ~:
~
:'
" 'j
'j
J
I
r
,
, ,
~
~J.'
It is the Order of this Board that Mark Robinson shall comply with Sections
136.009(b) and 137.006(b) of the Code of the City of Clearwater by Oecember 20,
1989 in y'ernoving the bui lding(s). If Mark Robinson does not comply within the time
specified, the Board may order them to pay a fine of jl00.00 per day for each day
the violation continues to exist. If Mark F. Robinson does not comply within the
time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in
the Public Records of, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against
any real or personal property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida
Statutes. Upon complying, Mark Robinson shall notify Tom Chaplinsky, the City
Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should
the violation reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at that time
without a subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either
party may request a further hearing before the Board. The motion was duly seconded
and carried unanimously.
"10,
\,
Done and Ordered this 13th day of December, 1989.
o
Cheryl Toney
3336 Fox Hill Dr.
(Development Code)
Rick Rosa, Development Code Inspector, stated complaints from neighbors were
received September 13, 1989 regarding a lot of traffic at Mrs. Toney's house and
the possibility that she was operating a business from her home. He visited the
location on September 20th and spoke with Mrs. Toney. He stated the zoning is RS-
8 (Single Family Residential) which does not allow a home occupation either as a
permitted or conditional use. He stated he visited Mrs. Toney again October 20th
and saw a rack of about 100 bottles of fingernail polish in the dining/living area
of Mrs. Toney's home.
"
i'
I:
\
Case No. 130-89
i
Dr. Allen Atheras, a neighbor directly across the street from Mrs. Toney,
stated he has lived there three years. He stated he has documented license plate
numbers of cars parked at Mrs. Toney's and there have been five to seven different
cars on a busy day. He stated their activity occurs from 7:30 a.m. until 8-8:30
p.m., averaging six days a week including Saturdays and Sundays. This has been
going on since the latter part of 1988, stopped in March or April of 1989 and began
again in August of this year. He stated he does not have personal knowledge of a
business being operated, but there is too much traffic for a residential area.
Mrs. Marian Riley, next door neighbor to Mrs. Toney, stated she has lived
there since 1980. She stated on September 14, 1989 while taking license plate
numbers, she explained to a customer of Mrs. Toney's what she was doing, and the
customer said she would continue to have Mrs. Toney manicure her nails. Mrs. Riley
stated she has observed Mrs. Toney giving manicures to some of those whose license
numbers are 1i sted. She stated that Mrs, Toney, in August, admitted to doing
business in her home, Mrs. Riley stated she logged 172 cars at Mrs. Toney's
residence in 59 calendar days.
In response to a question, the Inspector stated the violation is inconsistent
use with the zoning of the property.
i',
o
MCEB
11
12/13/89
'" f '..
. '
0'
illt
o
o
,p
~
r
I, '
! .
Mrs. Toney submitted defendant I s exhibit A, a packet conta ining copies showing
that she is in the process of relocating her business to a shop.
The Board took notice of the Assistant City Attorney I s objection to the
exhibit and accepted it.
Mrs. Toney stated she was told by City employees that as long as she was not
charging for her service, she could do what she wanted in her home. She stated she
is in the process of opening a business in Safety Harbor and is handling her
customers at home at no charge until her bus iness can open. In response to a
question, she stated she does receive gifts of money from her customers. In
response to questions, Mrs. Toney stated she couldn1t go to work for someone e1se
in the area as they require a contract which would not allow her to open her own
business within five miles of the salon in a year1s time, She stated she has not
charged for the service out of her horne, but some of her clients have insisted on
paying.
Karen Hoeck, a client friend of Mrs. Toney, stated Mrs. Toney is very active
in church and it would not be uncommon for Mrs. Toney to have many visitors and
there are rarely other cars there when she visits, She said Mrs. Toney told her
she could not charge her as it would constitute a business.
Hilda Stewart stated she has known Cheryl Toney for quite a while and would
give her a gift onc~ in a while to cover for the supplies used.
Charles Toney, husband, stated they contacted the City before having people
come to the house and were told its not a business if they are not charging, He
stated some of the vehicles of which the license numbers were listed were
contractors for the house and one vehicle is Mrs. Toney's. In response to a
question regarding notification by the Inspector to Mrs. Toney to cease the
operation by November 17th, Mr. Toney stated they were told as long as Mrs, Toney
was not charging, she was not operating a business,
In closing, the Assistant City Attorney stated Mrs, Toney is generating
excessive traffic and endangering the neighbors.
Mr. Zinzow moved that Mrs. Toney comply with the City Code by December IS,
1989 or be subject to a fine of $25/day, The motion was duly seconded. Discussion
ensued regarding whether or not a stiffer fine should be assessed as Mrs, Toney
could take in as much as $75/day.
Mr. Zinzow moved that concerning Case No, 130-89 regarding violation of
Section 135.004(b) of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 3336 Fox Hill
Dr. a/k/a Countryside Tract 58, Lot 102, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has
heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 13th day
of December, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board
enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order,
MCEB
12
12/13/89
,,....' ,-, ,"',', '...~~~, :,'" "'I
~
, \
\
, ,',
I ~
r-
~
'17
r-
~'
'.:!_,
, "':"rtr~~t~~t~~~~Q'~~'\1Sff%~~;~~'1~~~:I":~~~~~"'1'W_"tt,..1~~~~;~",,~\~Yf/'f!t~1~~,.Y)g:;:;; :ii?:it::~:~;'?::~': :t"~~;:;~{(~:~!::'\?:~\ti::~~~:~;t~~:;9;~'~f::~ftl~\t.r#~~~~tf?~.x~~fl~{~~~~~~~~~f4~B~t~~t!~ ,:'
. ,'A'
"
:~
~
~1'
Mr. ~~urray moved that concerning Case No, 131-89 regarding violation of
Sections 135.004(b) and 134.009(4) of the Clearwater City Code on property located
at 1721 N. Ft. Harrison Ave, an/a Lesley's Sub" Lot 9, the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board
hearing held the 13th day of December, 1989, and based on the evidence, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions
of Law, and Order.
The Findings of Fact are: after hearing testimony of Rick Rosa, Development
Code Inspector, and Jesse Montague and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted:
City exhibit A, photographs of the property, it is evident that the business is
displaying items for sale outside inconsistent with the CN zoning and there is an
unregistered vehicle displayed outside.
The Conclusions of Law are: Jesse Montague is in violation of Sections
135.004(b) and 134,009(4).
!
o
It is the Order of this Board that Jesse Montague shall comply with Sections
135.004(b) and 134.009(4) of the Code of the City of Clearwater by December 20,
1989. If Jesse Montague does not comply within the time specified, the Board may
order them to pay a fine of $25.00 per day for each day the violation continues to
exist. If Jesse Montague does not comply within the time specified, a certified
copy of the Order imposi ng the fi ne may be recorded in the Public Records of,
Florida, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against any real or personal~
property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. Upon
complying, Jesse Montague shall notify Rick Rosa, the City Qfficial who shall
inspect the property and notify the Board of complianc(."'. Should the violation
reoccur, the Board has the authority to impose the f~n8 at that time without a
subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning cmnpliance, either party may
request a further hearing before the Board. The motion was duly seconded and
carried unanimously,
'~
Done and Ordered this 13th day of December, 1989,
Case No. 132-89
Paul 8, Lokey d/b/a
Lokey Oldsmobile Inc.
2330 Gulf to Bay Blvd,
(Development Code)
Mr, Robert Aude, Chairman, abstained from participation due to a conflict,
The Attorney for the Board stated a Motion to Dismiss was submitted by Mr.
McFarland, attorney representing the alleged violator.
Mr, McFarland stated the Affidavit of Violation is directed to Paul B. Lokey,
an individual whereas Lokey Oldsmobile, Inc. is a Florida corporation and Paul Lokey
is not Lokey Oldsmobile. He stated the City has attempted to identify objectionable
avenues to the sign code and questions who decides what is the purpose of a display.
He stated the notice mentions a hot air balloon an~ there is no hot air balloon at
Lokey. He stated there has been no violation, if ~!~r, for at least a month.
o
MCEB
14
12113/89
r
r
~'"
, ~ ~ '
. ,
"
I
" ,': ':~1\~J1i0!~\1!~101~'2X;~J:V:i"-:;~:~ii~r;'t";'~~"-__"'_"I~I1::'\'-TI>~)i;j~:;.;iJ;':'i':l:?;::'r.i'; '::'':':'::;(?~:,~' ~~1irc:":\~~?5':~'ff\i~;i~.:,r';t~:{?!;J:~i?\~:?~~~?~~1~ir~~;::~{~r~~;~~"
I
I
10
1
I
I
'/
j
o
c
r
The Assistant City Attorney stated that Paul B. Lokey is an officer of Lokey
Oldsmobile, Inc. He requested the affidavit be amended to show the violator as
Lokey Oldsmobile, Inc., showing no prejudice in amending the affidavit.
Mr. McFarland stated he was not prepared to defend the corporation.
Alan Zimmet, Attorney for the Board, expressed concern whether the alleged
violator was properly notified of the hearing, and Mr. McFarland stated the
corporation is aware. Discussion ensued regarding code changes and repeat
violators. Mr. Zimmet stated the validity of the code is not under the Board's
jurisdiction to address.
Discussion ensued regarding whether or not to continue the case to clearly
define who is cited and the correct description of the display. Consensus of the
Board was to proceed with the case.
Mr. Zinzow moved to deny the motion to dismiss. The motion was duly seconded
and carried unanimously.
Rick Rosa, Development Code Inspector, stated a large balloon, which is
prohibited by Code, was on display September 2 and November 18, 1989. He issued
a notice of violation each time, copies of which are submitted as City exhibits A
& B, In response to questions, he stated there have been several different
balloons, and the photograph taken November 20, 1989, submitted as City exhibit C,
accurately depicts the type of balloon as displayed September 2 and November 18,
1989.
Mr. McFarland questioned how the object in the picture is identified as a
balloon; agreed to the submission of the exhibit as a picture of Lokey Oldsmobile,
but does not agree that the object is a balloon.
In response to a question, it was stated a notice of violation was sent
September 7, 1989 to Paul B.Lokey and Donald McFarland. Mr. McFarland did admit
to having received the notice. In response to a question, he stated the notice
requested compliance by September 7, 1989,
In response to a question, Mr, Rosa stated a similar balloon or wind device
was observed on November 18th. He pulled into the lot and asked for the manager.
He wrote out the notice of violation in front of the manager and requested the
notice be initialed, but the manager refused and would not identify himself. He
stated the notice requested compliance by 5:00 p.m. that day. He visited the lot
again on November 20th at 10:00 a.m. and the same balloon was still in place. He
stated there have been no additional violations.
Mr. McFarland again questioned the lack of specific definitions in the Code
and the interpretation thereof,
MCEB
12/13/89
15
~
,,I.,>" ,;
.'. '
"p
I' ','
r-
,,' ,
Tl,,, .. "",,,
'.. . > ',/. .
I
" '\: ;i:~~l~l1~~il~~2:~J~~~~~~J:1i!"t'$~'~illl"-...~<c,,.~~:,~:~~],~t~iJ~gS~T:-;~~~:!;'~5:~~'?,?:(~;?1~"}~~t;)~~~::~:~:~;':;~~)i;~i:~.~f,f~1':f.1~~~~~1~~';t!.~l~~)~E~~f~?~}~~~f0f1(~~Y:f~{~~r71,~t}: ~
, f
\
"3
}
10
~
o
o
In response to questions, Gene Holm, General Manager of Lokey Oldsmobile,
Inc., stated 2339 Gulf to Bay is the mailing address and new car sales and 2330
Gulf to Bay is the used car sales address, He looked at the picture submitted into
evidence and stated the device in the picture was on the property. He stated the
device is cold air inflated. The device was given to them by a tent company in
compensation for a tent that fell down and damaged a car.
In response to questions, Mel Gage, President of Air Balloons Promotions,
stated by definition, a cold air inflatable is not the same as a balloon as it is
not inflated with air or gas lighter than air and it is porous, He stated the
inflatable device is not representative of the product displayed.
In response to a question, it was stated the purpose of the device is to draw
attention. It was stated it would roll/blow over if not tied down. The device was
supplied to Lokey Oldsmobile in lieu of $1,000 deductible for insurance on the
damaged vehicle, and revenue would be lost if prohibited to use the device for
display.
In response to questions, Mr. Holm stated an inflatable device was displayed
on September 2nd in the new car sales lot and on November 18th in the used car sales
lot. He stated he did receive a letter of warning regarding weekend inspection of
violations of the Land Development Code, Defendants submitted exhibit A, a copy
of the letter, Mr. Holm stated he was informed November 20th of the notice of
violation of November 18. In response to a question, he indicated he was appearing
as a representative of Lokey Oldsmobile, Inc,
The Assistant City Attorney requested the Board amend the affidavit to make
the violator Lokey Oldsmobile, Inc. He stated it is a technical motion without
prejudice to the corporation as Paul Lokey is President of the corporation.
Mr. Angelis moved to amend the affidavit to list Lokey Oldsmobile, Ine,
instead of Paul Lokey as the violator. The motion was duly seconded and carried
unanimously.
Discussion again ensued regarding definition of device and reason for display,
Discussion also ensued regarding inaccuracies on the citations issued in September
and November. It was also stated that both violations have ceased.
Mr, Angelis moved that concerning Case No. 132-89 regarding violation of
Section 134.009(5) of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 2330 Gulf to
Bay Blvd. a/k/a M8B 24.04, Sec. 18-29-16, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has
heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 13th day
of December, 1989, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board
enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
r'
MCEB
16
12/13/89
" \ ' :" ~, '."
,r
I: '. ,.
, "
.'
~
,',
','
.,'.. ';1
i"
, f:
'~
' '"
,;
:',,~,,>,', '," "C,' ,,;_~': ' , '!" ,,' ", " ' , ~,:, ,:..tf;~ '~' " "
':'~,,;,:~"~~~~J~~~f~~':\t1~~~\~'i\Jittt~(.
,: " ~...
0 Case No. 89-3-1-3 Eva Harris
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-4-1-2 John H. Ford
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-4-1-3 Joseph R./Nadine Klima
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-5-1-1 Mobil Oil Corporation
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-5-2-1 Lela Boykin Estate
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-7-2-2 James Liddell
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-7-2-3 Bruce F./Christine A. Chapin
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-7-2-4 Richard leon
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-7-2-5 Tower Intern~tional Inc.
Affidavit of Compliance
e Hosea Franklin/Annie B.
' ' Case No. 89-7-2-7
Richardson Est.
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-8-2-1 USA Veterans Administration
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-8-2-2 Scott T. MacGregor
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-9-1-2 Robert D. Hall
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-9-1-6 Lousiana Life Ins. Co. Inc.
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-9-2-3 Hoke S. Russell
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-9-2-5 Tyrone Mason/Joseph L. Johnson
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-9-2-6 Neuhaus M. Baugesell
Affidavit of Compliance
.
"
~1CEB 18 12/13/89
.. ,
'"
;..",,',,:':, ,', .. '- " ,", , , " ..,.. ;",*,-" '.. ~>!'f:;,+i1f '
'~.:lm~~~m~~~~'.\,~J~'^~,~';!~~~~~~1~~~~~I!'~~~~' ,,','
,~....,~~:~I~.e.,..._~,~:.c;"'1<_,"t.~~~"rl&j.W':I;}J!i.-v;;~...t;u~"{"::p:r/:JT~"'~...,,"'~.<('.......~_,. f~~".. ,0 I... , __ _ ~ .), }
0 Case No. 89-10-1-1 Da i sy Will iams
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-10-1-2 Brian E, Cahill
Affidavit of Compliance
Case No. 89-10-1-3 Harold J. Hoblick, Jr,
Affidavit of Compliance
Mr, Wyatt moved to accept the affidavits of compliance in Case Nos. 148-87,
128-89, 89-3-1-3, 89-4-1-2, 89-4-1-3, 89-5-1-1, 89-5-2-1, 89-7-2-2, 89-7-2-3,
'89-7-2-4, 89-7-2-5, 89-7-2-7, 89-8-2-1, 89-8-2-2, 89-9-1-2, 89-9-1-6,
89-9-2-5, 89-9-2-6, 89-10-1-1, 89-10-1-2 and 89-10-1-3. The motion
seconded and carried unanimously,
89-9-2-3,
was du ly
Case No. 119-87
and
Case No. 147-87
Jeralne Burt
Partial release of
Liens
Mr.
Case Nos.
Angel;s moved to
119-87 and 147-87.
approve the filing of the Partial Release of Liens in
The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
OTHER BOARD ACTION
Fine Statu~ Reoort
co
1990.
Revi~w of the Fine Status Report was continued to the meeting of January 10,
NEW BUSINESS - None.
MINUTES - Meeting of November 8, 1989.
Mr. Zinzow moved to approve the minutes of the meeting of November 8, 1989
as submitted. The mo~ion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 7:53 p.m.
Attest:
r::J/~c.
Chairman
n ~-Z, ~~_
~ry
o
MCEB
19
12/13/89
~r-
r
r--
i : 'l~~t:::rft~~'N";':~~lfs;~~t<:::~?:;'},:.;,rw.:(t'!~~':'f:'i,:';:~Y;:~5{X::~:'s:JtS;:':(!f:~:'?~~('t~?~ T~:~:;:~ ': " ,
4
~
;1
FORM 88 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
L^ST NAME-FIRST N.....MIi-MIOllU NAME NAME Or"OOIlRU, <:OUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY. OR COMMITTEE
Aude, Robert, J. Hunicipnl Code Enforcement Board
lilt: 1l0llRD, <:OUNClL <:OMMISSION. .....U'fHORIlY. OR COMMlrTEE ON
WIlH:H f SEI(VE IS II UN'" OF:
'XCIIY '("OUN1Y ,. a1HEK IO('Al A<OENCY
MIIILIN(; t\UOI(CSS
1719 Brentwood Drive
('OUNH
NAMU Of POll riCA!. ~URUIVISION:
'. 0" ,arwa ter ,
. ON WHICH vo,!: (X'(.'URREIJ
December 13, 1989
Pinellas
MY pusltlaN IS:
i' ElECTI VE
oX APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 88
\ t
This form is fOf use by any person serving :11 the county, cilr, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board.
council, cOnlmission, authority, or cClmmillee. II applies equally 10 members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented
with a '\ioting conflict uf inlerest under SectiulI 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although
t he use 0 f (his particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to us~ it in making the disclosure required by law.
Your responsibilirics under the law when faced with a mcasure in which you ha\'e a cooflicl of interest will vary greatly depending
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close allention to the instructions on this form
before completing the reverse side and filing t he form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
ELECTED OFFICERS:
~ person holding el~ctivc counl)', municipal, or other local publk of/icc MUST A BSTAI N fram \'oting on a measure which inures
~,his special rri\'ate gaill. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting 011 a measurc which inures to the special
~,Jn of a principal (olher than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
III eit hc:r case, YOII should disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating tll the as~embly lhe nature or your interest in the measure on
which you are abSlnining from voting; and
W ITI-lI N IS DAYS AFfER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording
the minutes of [he rneering, who should incorporate the form in the minutes,
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the
special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by wholll he is retained.
A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a mCllter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must
disclose the nature of the conflict before making any allempt to in f1uellce the decision by oral or written communication, whether
Inade by the officer or at his direclion.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEr"IPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH
THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN:
· You ~hould complete and file this form (before making any nltempl to influence rhe decision) with the person responsible for
recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporale 'rhe form in the minutes.
· A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other rnccnbe~s of the agency.
O,uThe rorm should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consider:llion of Ihe matter in which you have a connict of illterest.
11M\! .,. 111,11"
PACE 1
:,'::"); ,:;:',l,':;~'..~"~\~-:':\!'~'~;:"r,'/'.'},,:"~,:'r:"...:j.',/. ,: " .
I
;
,
I
1.
I'
!
LJ"
~, " . ~'
, ", ,':
"
t"
:---
...'
Jr-
I .,,';
',. ~,~ ~
'r-.--
1"
~
,~
I " ,
~
It'.,'
.. i ~
, ~~~~~'tIl~!I~''':'' . , "
~~~~!fJE1#~~~~;;......)~~~:~~~
_..-...t!V,,~,,",'~~~t1...r""''t.<''"~ .~,.'."'t.rt.r,.l:.:.~.~.t.;.~"'(~;l~.....~.J":':J.~:;,"~~~'nJ'~tb~lJ.m~;~!"1'1\t4.Y~}"'~'1.""",--_",,,
...._..~1\r..~.......'"';............,- .
". ..
!,;1.
,;ft
';'4..
'}~
':f,'.~,!I,.
w
:.~-1~
/:~
'I"
~\
~~j
l
IF YOU MAKE NO ~nEMPTTO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
I . \'ou should disclose orally the nature or your conflier in the measure before participating.
· You should complete the form anJ file it wilhin IS days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minute-
of rhe meer iug, who should incorporate the form in the l11inures. 0
, "
':!
. ,"
",,;. .
.' ' ,DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
;0~8?r /4/cG
I
"
I,
, hereby disclose that on
PE:t::. f ~
,19a-:
(a) A.Jneasure came or will ,~ome berore my:agency which (check one)
't "
---:-.inurcd (0 my -special private gain; or
/inurcd to th~ special gain of
UI(~( ~f,0;rltJf?It.G" /1Ic:;"
,.t'l.
'.'" \,
, by whom I am retained.
:J /I1rl 13(lIP41tfU:? 1?1 tVt'ta cJWA/ 9fCJC~ l/t/ pYJL[fll?n!5
fJr<a1fTar? Cf/II/Craa/ I CCC"/l/Cff/frO? F/,
to(t'Fo/ !t!/?f)7tJ81'tE JAlc2. It? II C?/8rT ~r
/1/!ttf!m? 1I1U/f-(/1c-Z7'3 1ff%t11f6!l (!ICTIC UVS/iWC'170/'/
C~mf7A1tfi; rocrtij(jUI/1/6 a'?;iCi::d ~tlICFS ;eC?ltTt:v To
1fTE7/l- 7/1G j ~~ rc(ftIC(r(PS~
, REC:r:IVED
o
i,
(b) The .Illeasure before nlY agency and the: nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
DEe 19 1989
" ,
"
/,.
CIT'f. CLEEK
)~
I\'
~ ' "', I'
':, ,
i
"
i i
!;
',j
/fg'7
...---.-
~;:;:;; ~L
-- w
Sigr.a rc
. > " f ~, '....
~~~ If
Date'Filed '
'i
!
l'
!,
':\1
'1'
<. ,';,
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FlORIDA STArUTES .HI2.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED
,:DISClOSU RECONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNiSHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:
IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUS'PENSION F~OMOFF1CE OR' EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN
SALARY, REPRIMAND, ORA CIV,ll PENA..LTY'NOT rO,"EXCEED S5,ooo.
1
.~
..
I
,'.,-....
,,: ~ .~." ." . "..',,,,, .
" 'I,
,',;"": ....
.. ..,.
~ ~"'.
t".,.
'.0 .~;..
...~. ',,'
'11\"1'
i!'- ,
,~ ..;:,,,,
;",.'
..W
. .. ~
/~