03/09/1988 (2)
K'
~, ":".". '
",
.',
.
"
r-
\ "
"
,~
/,
'f"'"
~___.,' ~_,-.w"""':-'jflrjll!!l'~--':"__..~~~kllMto.~....~~t2~~~l\'1t't!.tl~l\jj "'ll
~-
I
CASE RO.
,:~
l :--,
\ , ' !
........../
CASE RO.
CASE RO.
ClSE RO.
ClSE RO.
CASE RO.
ClSE 110.
ClSE RO.
ClSE RO.
ClSE NO.
CASE RO.
CASB NO.
CASB RO.
CASB NO.
c:::>..
V
CASB RO.
CASB BO.
CASB BO.
CASB RO.
CASB 10.
CASB BO.
CASB RO.
CASB 110.
CASB RO.
CASE RD.
CASB 110.
~>"'h
,r..';\.
'.'~~r~t-
., ,
,j,.....~
27-88
28-88
31-88
33-88
311-88
35-88
36-88
37-88
38-88
39-88
110-88
111-88
112-88
113-88
1111-88
115-88
116-88
111-88
118-88
119-88
50-88
51-88
52-88
53-88
54-88
George Routh (Occupational License)
Plas Tech Industries (Occupational License)
Reliable Lawn Service (Occupational License)
Jerry's Beach Service (Occupational License)
Jerry's Beach Service (Occupational License)
A. Linn Wyllie & Company (Occupational License)
A. Linn Wyllie & Company (Occupational License)
Meridian Mortgage & Investment (Occupational License)
Western Consolidated (Occupational License)
Mayer Company (Occupational License)
Marino Import & Export (Occupational License)
David Mayes Homes Inc. (Occupational License)
Gary Walkei (Occupational License)
Rolak Inc. (Occupational License)
George Allen (Occupational License)
Stephen Barasch (Occupational License)
Deborah Barasch (Occupational License)
Payne's Paradise Lawns (Occupational License)
Natural Design Landscaping (Occupational License)
Natural Design Landscaping (Occupational License)
Donald V. Rebholz (Occupational License)
Medical Administrative Co. (Occupational License)
Robert Wilder (Occupational License)
O. B. R. Incorporated (Occupational License)
Odell Blunt (Occupational License)
2.
3/9/88
. ~~. :
'.', '
"
'P
"'I' " ,.,' ,
"
r--
~,'
,',
, ,
t:;r,S~""'f"""'~"kC."~-i\"',-",-,__".JI'[iilI__.........~.
.~~t'1OrJ11~__~_ .._.____..'~tJ.,'1..'I'v~k1'~.I.~'fA""""'..I"1:""t....,..;.:J::.~t..~:,,~~#A."'!tt.\u.'.L~+>'tZ~~:!~::..]X:~~_____..:......____....o..~.~~~.~:1~~.tt,,'
r\
'~'
The Secretary to the Board asked that the above listed cases be withdrawn
as the violations have been corrected.
Mr. Ehrig moved
28, 31, 33, 34, 35,
51, 52, 53, & 54-88.
CASE BO. 7-88
CASE BO. 8-88
CASE NO. 12-88
to withdraw Case Nos. 88-87, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23,
36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48,
Motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
25 , 27,
49, 50,
Bayfone of Tampa/Pinellas County School Board
(Building Code) Cont. from 2/10/88
Joseph Simonelli (Building Code)
Cont. from 2/10/88
Mitsubishi (Land Development Code)
Cont. from 2/10/88
The Secretary to the Board stated Case Nos. 7, 8 & 12-88 have been requested
by the Inspectors to be continued to the meeting of April 13, 1988.
13,
Mr.
1988.
Ehrig moved to continue Case Nos. 7, 8 & 12-88 to the meeting of April
Motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
CASE HO..
13-88
E. C. Scott (Land Development Code)
Cont. from 2/10/88
~\
0'
Carol Cicero, Land Development Code Inspector, stated she inspected this
property as the result of a complaint received in the Code Administration Division
regarding a boat parked in a residential zone. City submitted composite exhibit
/11 four photographs of the property taken December 14, 1987 and February 4 &
29, 1988 and exhibit #2 - a copy of the Notice of Violation and applicable Code
section. Ms. Cicero stated she had contacted Mr. Scott's wife who stated the
boat would be moved. The Notice of Violation was mailed to the Scotts on December
28, 1987. Another complaint was received in the Code Administration Division
on February 1, 1988 stating the boat was still parked in the setback area at 1664
Jeffords Street.
Discussion ensued regarding a portion of the original Land Development Code
referring to a 60 day period of grand fathering after which all vehicles would
be required to comply with the Code.
Donald McFarland, Attorney representing E. C. Scott, objected to this portion
of the Code being admitted as an exhibit as it is not currently a part of the
Land Development Code.
Ms. Cicero stated she provided this copy of the original Land Development
Code to answer the question regarding grand fathering after the 60 day grace
period. She stated there is no grandfathering provided for in this section of
the Code. She stated the boat does not comply with Section 136.022(i) (2) (a),
which allows boats up to 20 feet to be parked in the required setback area from
a street right-of-way. When questioned whether the Code in effect prior to the
Land Development Code's adoption in October, 1985 regulated the size of boats
parked in setback areas, Ms. Cicero stated there were no restrictions.
.(0'\
"'.~"l
\;~
,r--,
,I '., ,
F
f. '","
I
17-
i
"
'\ ;
"~"!71-::to~~'~~"'~'A
______ ""...._ _...._.___~__.....-~-...,.....~t....-o::..,.,>-p>~H~...I~\;.'" ~'.;"'II,.>...,..~.....ilI_....",......"!;."H,"~~'t7.":'~:l'~~\~J':~~~l9..:lJ:'yt~.tf';'{'.'~h\.,j~I(Vftt''''''ff~~?~~~~1Jt<<:''''~~.l;\''A''Ut'~ .
',' "
, "
: ,.:
. t
Mr. McFarland submitted Defendant's exhibit #1 - a survey of the lot, exhibit
02 - a copy of Section 136.008 of the Land Development Code, and e>ehibit /13 -
a copy of Section 136.007 of the Land Development Code. Mr-. McFarland stated
Mr. Scott purchased the residence primarily because it had room to park his
tr-ailered boat. Prior to purchasing the property he checked the subdivision rules
regarding the parking of boats and trailers and found no prohibition. Mr. Scott
bought the property in September, 1975, when ther-e were no regulations in the
Code of the City of Clearwater regarding the parking of boats and trailers. Mr.
McFarland stated the boat that is curr-ently parked in the setback area was
purchased in 1983 and has been parked there continuously since that time. This
was prior to the adoption of the Land Development Code in October, 1985. Hr.
McFarland referred to Section 136.007(a) regarding nonconformities and stated
none of the listed criteria were contravened by Mr. Scott. Mr. McFarland also
referred to Section 136.008 regarding accessor-y uses. He stated the ordinance,
when it was adopted, was meant to be prospective not r-etroactive. Mr. McFarland
stated Mr. Scott's boat is moved approximately once a week on weekends and he
wants it parked in his driveway for convenience.
\
"
;
\
\.-",-",:
:1
1
The Assistant City Attorney stated the Code is clear on the size of boats
allowed to be parked in the required setback area. He stated nonconforming uses
do not apply to moving vehicles.
r-.
;', ."\
''-J
Discussion ensued regarding whether- this is a nonconforming use that was
grandfather-ed in when the Land Development Code was adopted.
Mr. Ehrig moved that concerning Case No. 13-88 regarding violation of Section
136.022(1){2) (a) of the Clearwater City Code on property having a legal
description or Lot 3, Block K, Oak Acres Addition, Unit 3, the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board
hearing held the 9th day of March, 1988, and based on the evidence, the Municipal
Code ~nforcement Board enters the following Findings or Fact, Conclusions or
La" , and Order.
The Findings or Fact are: after hearing testimony of Carol Cicero, Land
Development Inspector, and Donald McFarland, Attorney and Viewing the evidence,
exhibits submitted: City's exhibits /11 & 2 and Defendant's e>ehibits #1, 2, & 3,
it is evident that the use currently in existence, ie., the parking of a 30 foot
boat in the setback, is in compliance with the criteria for nonconforming uses
in the Land Development Code, Section 136.007, and was in existence prior to the
adoption of the Land Development Code.
Th.e Conelusions or Law are: E. C. Scott is not in violation of Section
136.022(i)(2)(a).
It is the Order of this Board that E. C. Scott is hereby declared to be in
compliance with Section 136.022(i)(2)(a) of the Code of the City of Clearwater,
and that the pending violation proceeding before the Board is dismissed. Motion
was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken: Mr. Morris, 1-1r. Ehrig, Mr. Aude
and Mr. Cardinal voted "aye". Mr. Elliott voted "nay". Mot:1on car-r1.ed.
Done and Orde~d this 9th day of March, 1988.
The meeting recessed from 2:30 - 2:35 p.m.
r:J:,
U
CEB
4.
:-"". .....-
:....--,..
. . . .
,:~'U::.:':..:,
..,',' ,':,,' '.'::1
, , '
'..'.. .
;/ '
!.
"
, ~.
r
':',
~.
. ..~_'NI'...______~v____.~_~_____~l;,,~~1;."\'Yf,,!.t"'~':':'(-""~"'~'.:"':'-l::'>'t.l.'.;.t~...";,:'~"~""';~t...::..i".:--....A:::..~.-5'r-"#"".Jl......",...~.\~JI''''~~~'t.f.:t~.'L~~~~tmt,
'1.~~~~~J<f5"'.;."'Y:ii;lnll~Mw.-.___"___,___ .- .
.
1
", .'1
CASE RO.
15-88
Kite Encounter/Thomas Oakley (Occupational License)
Cont. from 2/10/8&
.~
\....J
Keith Crawford, Traffic Engineer, reviewed some of the issues discussed at
the previous meeting. He stated he had prepared a chart showing the overlapping
uses and trip generation rates. City submitted exhibit #2, the above referenced
chart. Mr. C~awford stated it is possible that someone could be assigned a higher
impact fee even though they are in a lower use category. The municipal officials
who are responsible for enforcing the County ordinance have no leeway to adjust
fees. The only relief provided for in the ordinance is to obtain an independent
study by a p~ivate engineer to determine actual trip generations. Mr. Crawford
stated the rate is based on average trip generations, not individual use. If
a classification is listed in the ordinance, they are obligated to use it.
I
@
Sarah Ward, of the Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization, stated
the MPO drafted the ordinance and is responsible f'or monitoring enforcement.
Ms. Ward stated the rates for traffic impact fees are based on average trip
generations and the only relief provided for is the independent study referred
to by Mr. Crawford. Ms. Ward stated they do not have the discretion to create
new categories or to assign uses to other categories. Although there is no formal
appeal process, the ordinance, which is administered by 24 municipalities and
Pinellas County, provides for an administrative self-help committee which meets
on an as-needed basis to discuss issues of concern regarding enforcement of the
ordinance. Ms. Ward stated a pe~son objecting to their impact fee could submit
the objection to the committee for review; however, the decision would not be
binding. The only other appeal process would be to the courts. The ordinance
is scheduled for review shortly and there may be an appeal process incorporated
into it. When questioned regarding the independent study, Ms. Ward stated the
completed study would be submitted to the MPO for review. If they agree with
the engineer's recommendation, the rate would be lowered. This could then be
applied to the current situation only, to future situations also, or could be
completely ignored. The MPO would not be bound by the independent study
engineer's recommendation.
Thomas Oakley stated he has paid his occupational license fee for the past
two years. He stated if he could aCford to hire a p~ofessional engineer for an
independent study, he would do so. He would also have had an attorney
representing him at the Board hearing. He stated he would be amenable to going
to the self-help review committee if that is the only way to obtain relief.
Kei th Crawford stated the committee meets only on an as-called basis, but
it is usually every few months.
Discussion ensued regarding the traffic impact fees and the value which
accrues to the land owner rather than to the tenant of' the property.
When questioned regarding the willingness of his landlord to pay the traffic
impact fee, Mr. Oakley stated he had agreed with the landlord to take care of
all expenses when he sublet the property from Beach Taxi.
(~
:"")'
,(;:.:;
CEB
3/9/88
5.
',11
'F'"
'.' .
, ,
. '
/,.:.~
'F
,. '
\
1
..',.
t.c~.!r.\.""'~~~~~~~~__4_____"""<ff.JJ':'V"",_____,_,_'__"'~1"'~~"'l'1"'I":'.:!""""~"Jt:;'...~~.4"f,....::.';.t::.f:-.j"'.;,I.!ri....::...._P"....'i1o-J\"~~'Yt.\~~-:i.'J.....:t~,'!1,.~______.......__.___.......,.ul.......~oA""P~.,"~WTl"'"....u......."'~
1
,~
'-..../'
Mr. Cardinal moved that concerning Case No. 15-88 regarding violation of
Sections 11.01 and 11.02 of the Clearwater City Code on property located at
28 Papaya st., Clearwater, Fla., the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard
testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 9th day of
March, 1988, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board
enters the following Findtngs o~ Fact, Conclusions or Law, and Order.
The Findings or Fact are: after hearing testimony of Keith Crawford,
Traffic Engineer, Sarah Ward, Stu Williams, Occupational License Inspector, Don
Winner and Thomas Oakley and viewing the evidence, exhibits submitted: City's
exhibits f1:1 & 2, it is evident that Thomas Oakley d/b/a Kite Encounter is in
business at the above address without a current occupational license.
The Concluslo~ or Law are: Thomas Oakley d/b/a Kite Encounter is in
violation of Sections 71.01 and 71.02.
0",
, ,
It is the Order of this Board that Thomas Oakley d/b/a Kite Encounter shall
comply with Sections 71.01 and 71.02 of the Code of the City of Clearwater within
60 days. If Thomas Oakley d/b/a Kite Encounter does not comply within the time
specified, the Board may order him to pay a fine of $10.00 per day for each
day the violation continues to exist. If Thomas Oakley d/b/a Kite Encoutner does
not comply within the time specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the
fine may be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once
recorded shall constitute a lien against the land on which the violation exists
if the violator owns the land, and a lien against any other real or personal
property owned by the violator pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. Upon
complying, Thomas Oakley d/b/a Kite Encounter shall noti fy ~tu Williams, the
City Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance.
Should the violation recur, the Board has the authority to impose the fine at
that time without a subsequent hearing. Should a dispute arise concerning
compliance, either party may request a further hearing before the Board. MOtion
was duly seconded and upon the vote being taken: Mr. Morris, Mr. Elliott, and
Mr. Cardinal voted "aye". Mr. Aude and Ehrig voted "nay". Motion carried.
Done and Ordered this 9th day of March, 1988.
CASE 110.
18-8B
Consolidated Milinery Co. (Occupational License)
Stu Williams, Occupational License Inspector, stated this business, located
in Maas Brothers Department Store, 320 Cleveland St., is a leased operation.
The 1987/88 fee has not been paid and, according to the manager of Maas Brothers,
the Milinery Company is still leasing space in which to sell wigs and hats.
There was no representative of the alleged violator present at the hearing.
Mr. Elliott moved that concerning Case No. 18-88 regarding violation of Section
11.02 of the Clearwater City Code on property located at 320 Cleveland St.,
Clearwater, Fla., the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at
the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 9th day of March, 1988,
and based on the evidence, the MuniCipal Code Enforcement Board enters the
following Findings or Pact;, Conelusiona or Law, and Order.
<9
6.
t"; :;;,~r . .
~ 1 . .
.r~
l'
.r-
':
I
,.
, '
, "
, , .
'''tF~~-e-~~n..''iUn.ro'H..~fI<'''''i.....~_''-'_~T''_'''''--_'' ~.__.!"...,..1,:'tlil..W~~~':'\~t."1:~'::'f"7'<<"..~__...,~"",~~'V(tI'J}~''''1'i'''''''''A.''''''':'-~~.-__..__...-~~!:-<<;t;~1t."\\~~t
/~
''-..J
The Findings or Fact are:
Occupational License Inspector,
Consolidated Milinery Co. is in
occupational license.
after hearing testimony of
and viewing the evidence, it is
business without a current City
Stu Williams,
evident that
of Clearwater
The Conclusions or Law are: Consolidated Milinery Co. is in violation of
Section 71.02.
It is the Order of this Board that Consolidated Milinery Co. shall comply
with Section 71.02 of the Code of the City of Clearwater by April 15 , 1988.
If Consolidated Milinery Co. does not comply within the time specified, the Board
may order them to pay a fine of $10.00 per day for each day the violation
continues to exist. If Consolidated Milinery Co. does not comply within the time
specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in
the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute
a lien against the land on which the violation exists if the violator owns the
land, and a lien against any other real or personal property owned by the violator
pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. Upon complying, Consolidated Milinery
Co. shall notify Stu Williams, the City Official who shall inspect the property
and notify the Board of compliance. Should the violation recur, the Board has
the authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing.
Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further
hearing before the Board. Motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Done and Ordered this 9th day of March, 1988.
CASE RO.
21-88
University Forum Inc. (Occupational License)
CD
The alleged violator requested this case be continued to the meeting of April
13, 1988.
Mr. Cardinal moved to continue Case No. 21-88 to the meeting of April 13,
1988. Motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
CASE RO.
26-88
Tanner and Associates (Occupational License)
The Secretary to the Board stated there had been no service on the alleged
violator in this case.
Mr. Ehrig moved to continue Case No. 26-88 to the meeting of April 13,
1988. Motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
CASE RO.
30-88
Tony Miele Hauling Service (Occupational License)
Barbara Sexsmith, Occupational License Inspector, stated this is a home
occupation that previously had an occupational license but have not renewed their
license for 1987/88. Ms. Sexsmith stated she had spoken with the wife of the
alleged violator on the phone who stated MI'. Meile had not been able to get into
the Occupational License Office to renew the license.
There was no representative of the alleged violator present at the hearing.
6778
\ii.&
7.
3/9/88
..~;t- ::-:;":'-1:.'.--:,..
:
, ,
.", .
,"'.
"
p-
, ~' ':' :,:"."
. '. '.
9,
~:. .". ~. .
" ,
-" ~;:'
r
I
,."
. ,
......~~Q.~~'l.""''':~~~~~it'')''"'':TP~"mj.~"~~~~..,......ut;t~......______.,,...__...___,........__,__....1It~..J..c...;..'t'..,~':':'!:"~:::~";;::-::::;...."!;~......1;::'TtJ:...~c............._..__"...v.;..}<::"=L")':'.rn-t(~~_.....-_.
__.__.w.~t'::;r.."t....~~
n
\.....---'
Mr. Eh~ig moved that concerning Case No. 30-88 regarding violation of Section
71.02 of the Clearwater City Code on property having a legal description of
Lot 36, Block 3, Beckett Lake Estates, the Municipal Code gnforcement Board has
heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement Board hea~ing held the 9th day
of March, 1988, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board
enters the following Findings of' Fact. Conclusions of' [.aw. and Order.
','
"
",,I
,,'"
" ., ":<. ~
..,' ;,""'l
The Findings of' Fact are:
Occupational License Inspector,
Anthony Melle is doing business
Clearwater occupational license.
After hearing testimony of Barbara Sexsmith,
and Viewing the evidence, it is evident that
at the above address without a current City of
The Conclusions of' Lav are: Anthony Meile is in violation of Section
71.02.
@
It is the Order of this Board that Anthony' Meile d/b/a Tony Miele Hauling
Service shall comply with Section 71.02 of the Code of the City of Clearwater
by March 16, 1988. If Anthony Meile does not comply within the time specified,
the Board may order him to pay a fine of $10.00 per day for each day the
violation continues to exist. If Anthony Meile does not comply within the time
specified, a certified copy of the Order imposing the fine may be recorded in
the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and once recorded shall constitute
a lien against the land on which the violation exists if the violator owns the
land, and a lien against any other real or personal property owned by the violator
pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. Upon complying, Anthony Meile shall
notify ,Barbara Sexsmith, the City Official who shall inspect the property and
notify the Board of compliance. Should the violation recur, the Board has the
authority to impose the fine at that time without a subsequent hearing. Should
a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing
before the Board.
DoDe and Ordered this 9th day of March, 1988.
CASE RD.
32-88
Clearwater Auto Wholesale (Occupational License)
The Secretary to the Board stated there had been no service on the alleged
violator in this case.
Mr. Cardinal moved to continue Case No. 32-88 to the meeting of April 13,
1988. MOtion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
tJIIPIBISImD BUSDIBSS
Lot Clearing List 88-01-1
Case Ro.
8
Willie & Vadie Hannah (906 Marshall St.)
Af'f'idayit of' CoIIpliance
Case Ro.
9
Hubert & Carrie Jackson (904 Marshall St.)
Af'f'idaYit of' CoIIpliance
(r])
Mr. Ehrig moved to accept the
of Lot Clearing List 88-01-1.
unanimously.
Affidavits of Compliance in Case Nos. 8 & 9,
Motion was duly seconded and carried
, ','"
,I."
....
. ~ > >'.
,,','
"
,;
'. ",..,
L
"
i,
,I,'
......~ ,"
F
'I' .'
~
\-
'.~.~______~"l\n~~~~~~4.j;~~~'O.~~O:~~~~~~
Abandoned Property List 88-01-1
.:~
\..;.....J
Case Ro.
5
Willie & Vadie Hannah (906 Marshall St.)
Att'idavi.t or Compliance
Case Bos.
6 & 7
Hubert & Carrie Jackson (904 Marshall St.)
Att'idavi.t or Co.-pliance
Mr. Ehrig moved
&: 7 of Abandoned
unanimously.
to accept
Property List
the
88-01-1.
Af'fidavi ts of'
Motion
Compliance in Case
was duly seconded
Nos. 5, 6
and carri.ed
OTBBB DODD ACTIO.
Fine Status Report
The Fine Status Report was reviewed, and discussion ensued regarding filing
liens when the fine is still accruing.
The
General's opinion
of the lien.
Assistant City Attorney stated he
regarding whether the fine
would get
continues
a copy
to accrue
of' the Attorney
af'ter the filing
The consensus of the Board was, for the time being, liens not be filed in
cases where the fine is still accruing.
Discussion ensued regarding the cases the Board has directed foreclosure on.
/7:'.
V
office
of the
Motion
Mr. Ehrig moved tha t
requesting a status
Code Enforcement
was duly seconded
the Chairman
report regarding
Board, and the letter be
and ~led unanimously.
write a letter to
foreclosures
copied to
the City Attorney's
f'or the April meeting
the City Commission.
The consensus of' the Board
Clearing/Abandoned Property
agenda would be discussed.
was if' no violators are present
meeting on March 23rd at 5:00 p.m.,
for
the
the next Lot
work session
!lEV BUSDIESS - None.
kulur~
Mr. Elliott
24, 1988, 1988
unanimously..
moved
as
to approve
submitted.
the
Motion
minutes of
was
the
duly
meetings of
seconded
February 10 &
and carried
The meeting adjourned at 4:10 p.m.
QA1~k
I
Robert Aude, Chairman
,~
",.\
'(9
,-.
9.
3/9/88
-Pt .....,"I!'~'t......-
.'
',' " , t,. < .. f<J' ~ - ".~ .~ I .' ,! \ ',.:, , ,. " . !,~.,-
,,~""~'t }~r 'ANtn~~1tC'C!l15HrM~W"b'"~&1l.'f.'fiI~,.~,..~~~,;~74~.~~~-,. . ..._-L---;.;..__.:..._..:.-...............:._
MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
o
Meeting of March 9, 1988, 1:00 p.m.
Agenda
Action
~ ~",,_,_,,""~""""'''''''U'f'A...
PUBI.IC ImARIllGS
(At the time a case is heard and date set for compliance the Board shall at the same
time set the fee to be assessed in case of non-compliance.)
1. Lot Clearing List 88-03-1
1. None
2. Abandoned Property List 88-03-1
2. None
3. Case No. 88-87 15 S. Lincoln Associates 3. Withdrawn
( Life Safety)
Cont. r.ro. 7/B/87
CoIIplied prior
4. Case 10. 1-88 Bayfone of Tampa/ ~. Continued to 4/13/88
Pinellas Co. School Board
ED (Building Code)
. . ,-
. ,'.
Con~. rro. 2/10/88
To be continued
5. Case 10. 8-88 Joseph Simonelli 5. Continued to 4/13/88
(Building Code)
con~. t'roa 2110/88
6. Case 110. 12-88 Mitsubishi 6. Continued to 4/13/88
(Land Development)
cont. t'roa 2/10/88
7. Case 110. 13-8B E. C. Scott 7. Dismissed
(Land Development)
cont. t'rora 2110/88
8. Caa lIo. 15-88 Kite Encounter 8. Comply within 60 days
(Occupational License)
cont. rro. 2/10/88
9. Caa lIo. 17-88 Glenn White Associates 9. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
CoIIplied prIor
10. Caa Ro. 18-88 Consolidated Milinery Co. 10. Comply by 4/15/88
i\1{S (Occupational License)
CEBA 1 . 3/9/88
"
11. Case Ho. 19-88 Movie Makers 11. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
0 CoIIplied prior
12. Case Ho. 20-88 Tile by Cavanaugh 12. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
CoIIplied prior
13. Case Ho. 21-88 University Forum Inc. 13. Continued to 4/13/88
(Occupational License)
14. Case lio. 22-88 Lerner Woman 14. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
Complied prior
15. Case Ro. 23-88 Harlow Engel 15. Withdrawn
(Life Safety)
COIIPlied prior
16. Case Ro. 25-88 Computer Service Network 16. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
COJIPlled prior
17. Case Ro. 26-8B Tanner & Associates 17. Continued to 4/13/88
(Occupational License)
18. Case Ro. Zl-8B George Routh 18. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
@ Ccmplled prior
,'.
19. Case Ro. 28-88 Plas Tech Industries 19. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
COIIplied prior
20. Case Ro. 30-88 Tony Miele Hauling Service 20. Comply by 3/16/88
(Occupational License)
21. Case 10. 31-88 Reliable ~awn Service 21. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
22. CUe 10. 32-88 Clearwater Auto Wholesale 22. Continued to 4/13/88
(Occupational License)
23. Case Ro. 33-88 Jerry's Beach Service 23. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
eo.plied prior
24. Case 10. 3'-88 Jerry's Beach Service 211. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
Co~lled prior
25. Case 10. 35-88 A. Linn Wyllie & Company 25. Withdrawn
(Qccupational License)
;r)T~c Coaplied prior
".jt~f~
CEBA 2. 3/9/88
, '.
,~
~ " .
"',';~.........~ r t 11.'1 -..~"(l~. ~.. -~1lW"""1"'~~~t't.m.~.!Jt(!".:.~~\!:~"~,,,.u.."t~~~"':"'-;._.. . ~'.-.....~~
I
.I
26. Case RD. 36-88 A. ~inn Wyllie & Company 26. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
CoapU.ed prior
CO 27. Case RD. 31-88 Meridian Mortgage & Inv. 27. 'Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
Complied prior
28. Case Ro. 38-88 Western Consolidated/ 28. 'Withdrawn
St. George Square
(Occupational License)
Complied prior
29. Case Bo. 39-88 Mayer Company 29. Withdrawn
(Occupational ~icense)
Complied prior
30. Case Bo. JaO-88 Marino Import & Export 30. Withdrawn
(Occupational ~icense)
31. Case Bo. 111-88 David Mayes Homes Inc. 31. Withdrawn
(Occupational ~icense)
CoIIplled pr:lor
32. Case Bo. 112-88 Gary Walker 32. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
COIq)lled prior
33. Case Ro. 113-88 Rolak Inc. 33. Withdrawn
@ (Occupational License)
\ l :,~:
".".
CoJiplicd prior
34. Case Bo. 1111-88 George Allen 311. Withdl"awn
(Occupational License)
CoIIplied prior
35. Case 110. 115-8B Stephen Barasch 35. Withdr-awn
(Occupational License)
CoIIpl1ed prior
36. Case 110. 116-8B Deborah Barasch 36. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
C0IIP11ed prior
37. Case 110. 117-8B Payne's Paradise Lawns 31. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
CoIIp11ed prior
38. Case 110. 118-88 Natural Design Landscaping 3B. IHthdrawn
(Occupational License)
eo.plled prior
39. Case Ro. 119-88 Natural Design ~andscaping 39. 1-11 thdrawn
(Occupational License)
. ~'I''''\t eo.p1ied prior
'~}i~~~~
C&BA 3. 3/9/88
I:
"
...,...........
-,'
40. Case 110. 50-88 Donald V. Rebholz "0. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
@ CoIIplied prior
'j' ,'1'
41 . Case 110. 51-88 Medical Administrative Co. "1. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
CoIIplied pri.or
42. Case tlo. 52-88 Robert Wilder 42. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
CoIIIplied prior
43. Case tlo. 53-88 o. B. R. Incorporated "3. Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
COJII)lied pri.or
44. Case tlo. 511-88 Odell Blunt ..... Withdrawn
(Occupational License)
COIIIPlied prior
UIIl" J.d.lSmm BUSnmss
45. Lot Clearing List 88-01-1 115.
a. CUe 110. 8 Willie & Vadie Hannah a. Accepted
906 Marshall St.
It'rldavit ot CoIIpllance
€V b. Case 110. 9 Hubert & Carrie Jackson b. Accepted
'''':,1'',1,
~;.' ;'
904 Marshall St.
It't"idavit ot CoIIpliance
46. Abandoned Property List 88-01-1 116.
a. Caae 110. 5 Willie & Vadie Hannah a. Accepted
906 Marshall St.
It'fidavit ot CoIIp1iance
b. Caae Boa. 6&7 Hubert & Carrie Jackson b. Accepted
90~ Marshall St.
ltt'idavit or CoaIp11ance
OmBR BOARD .lCTIOR
47. Fine Status Report 117. Reviewed
48. tIEV BtJSnmss 48. None
49. ~U~~ - February 10 & 24, 1988 49. Approved as submitted
50. ADJOUBB 50. 4:10 p.m.
CEBA
4.
3/9/88