08/14/1985
" ... . ., I' " ..... . . . ' . ". ~. . . ~ '. ~ .
",\
,.p---
; I' ' .... .
"
~t . ~ '
r-
t'"
,', .
_-----'"'"11
...____J"
., ,',
~
,.'
MUNICIPAL COD& ENFORC&M&NT BOARD
CD
Meeting of August 14, 1985, 2:00 p.m.
1geada
1.
Public Bearinss
(At the time a case is heard and date set
for compliance the Board shall at the same
time set the fee to be assessed in case of
non-compliance. )
a. 147-85 Texaco USA (Utility Code)
b. 150-85 Bass Shoes (License Code)
C~plied
c 153-85 Biltmore ~ivery (License Code)
d. 159-85 Hamrick Lumber Co. (Zoning
Code)
e. 160-85 Gary Hewetson (Building Code)
f. 161-85 Gene L. Austin (Building Code)
15?\
"-V
g. 162-85 Jim Sommers (Building Code)
h. 163-85 Jeralne Burt (Building Code)
i. 164-85 Madigan, McCane & Associates
(~icense Code) eo.plied
j. 165-85 Mr. Carrion (Shear, Carrion,
Brocklehurst & Wall) (~icense
Code) CC8plled
k. 166-85 Professional Resume and
Writing Service (~icense Code)
C~pllecl
1. 167-85 Peter Spatz (Building Code)
To be cOIlt1lllled
m. 168-85 Jeralne Burt (Building Code)
n. 173-85 Charles Robinson (Building
Code) Ellergency
2. Unf'1n1sbecl BusJ.nesa
a. 5-85
John Ford (License Code)
Affidavit of Compliance
Carlyn Pheil (License Code)
Request for ~ew Hearing
Affidavit of Non-Compliance
Affidavit of Compliance
Church of Scientology (Fire
Code)
Request for New Hearing
Affidavit of Non-Compliance
Norman Bie (Building Code)
Katharine Bie (Building Code)
East Cove, Inc. (Building
Code)
Affidavit of Compliance
b. 123-85
c. 132-85
~.""
,.. t,
. "...
'-
j
d. 134-85
135-85
136-85
ACTION
1.
Public Bearings
a. Comply by 8/28/85
b. Withdrawn
c. Continued to 9/11/85
d. Dismissed
e. Withdrawn
f. Remove water from pool by
8/16/85. Comply within 30
days.
g. Comply by 9/30/85
h. Comply within 60 days
i. Withdrawn
j. Withdrawn
k. Withdrawn
1. Continued to 9/11/85
m. Continued to 9/11/85
n. Comply by 8/26/85
2. Unf'in1sbed Business
a. Accepted
b. Accepted Affidavit; set
new hearing for 9/11/85
c. Accepted Affidavit; set
new hearing for 9/11/85
d. Accepted
I,
",..,"
i"f;'
F
:~
;.~~"""'"-----"
..~~rW"t'...
._~,~a.'S'.!.O:.~..t'!Ql!:r':-.)tA>".r't~.t.th.__.tff......,,~~~_....-..~etMt~~.
MUNICIPAL CODE 8NFORCEMENT BOARD
r-"
\ 'j
'''-.-/
August 14, 1985
Members present:
John Ehrig, Chairman (Arrived at 2:39 p.m.)
Robert Aude, Vice-Chairman
James Angelis
Robert Hostetler
Tim Amburgy
Adam Midura
Frank Morris
Also present:
Alan Zimmet, Assistant City Attorney
Cyndie Goudeau, Secretary for the Board
t-A
~)
The meeting was called to order by the Vice-Chairman at 2:07 p.m. in
the Commission Meeting Room in City Hall. He outlined the procedures and
adVised any aggrieved party may appeal a final administrative order of
the Municipal Code Enforcement Board to the Circuit Court of Pinellas
County. Any such apPeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of the
execution of the order to be appealed. He noted that Florida Statute
286.0105 requires any party appealing a decision of this Board to have
a verbatim record of the proceedings to support such an appeal.
PUBLIC BEARINGS
CASE NO. 1111-85
Texaco USA
(Utility Code)
Malcolm Blankenship, Supervisor in the Utilities Department, stated
the original Notice of Violation was issued on May 6, 1985, due to the
reduced pressure backf'low device failing all tests. The device was not
installed in an upright position as required by code and manufacturer and
both valves leaked. Mr. Blankenship stated another test of the backflow
device was conducted the morning of the hearing It is now installed
in an upright position; however, both check valves still leak.
When questioned why the water service was not discontinued, Mr.
Blankenship stated the water lines serve a car wash facility only and do
not pose a health hazard. No representative from Texaco was present at
the hearing.
~
...,
Mr. Amburgy moved that regarding Case No. 141-85 re: violation
of Section 52.38 of the Clearwater City Code on property having a legal
description as follows: S 210 ft. of N 260 ft. of E 250 ft. of NE~ of
NE& less road, Sec. 18-29-16, the Hunicipal Code Enforcement Board has
heard testimony at the Hunicipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the
14th day of August, 1985, and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board enters the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions or
Law, and Order.
........-~r:l !,~~;:~.f;':"~~:;':',;J,}';~:f';.;({~:"}~=*~1~1"~':\~~~:C!.;{..':i.:\:~::.'~Eo';\:'::" .
.' ~ " .
F
I ' ',. ..;
,.' ,
r-
"
Ii'
,.
:W~~~~~~A':~~:-ttJ'hlro_...___..._.._
_._........,;.........,\_.......~......."'__\.l.~"""'_.........._..______.....______.......
i
1
1
1
.
1
I
10
, j
1
I
:j
Q)
".~
V
The Findings of Fact are: Testi:nony of Malcolm Blankenship
indicates the reduced pressure backflow devise is leaking.
The Conclusions of Law are: Texaco USA is in violation of Sec.
52.38 of the Clearwater Code of Ordinances.
It is the Order of this Board that Tex:aco USA shall comply wit.h
Section 52.38 of the Code of the Cit.y of Clearwater by August 28, 1985.
If Texaco USA does not co~ply within the time specified, he shall pay a
fine of $25.00 per day for each day the violation continues to exist.
If Texaco USA does not comply within t.he time specified, a certified copy
of this Order, together with an Affidavit of ;-lon-Compliance, shall be
recorded in the public records of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court in and for Pinellas County, and once recorded shall constitute a
lien against real or personal propert.y owned by Texaco USA pursuant to
Chapter 82-37 Laws of Florida, 1982. Upon complying, Texaco USA shall
notify Malcolm Blankenship, the City Official who shall inspect. the
property and notify the Board of compliance. Should a dispute arise
concerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing before
the Board. The motion ws duly seconded and carried unanimously.
Done and Ordered this 14th day of August, 1985.
CASE NO. 150-85
Bass Shoes
(License Code)
The Assistant City Attorney requested the case be withdrawn as the
violation has been corrected. Mr. Hostetler moved to withdraw Case No.
150-85. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
CASE NO. 153-85
Bil tmore Livery
(License Code)
The Secretary reported ~r. Robert Osborne, owner of Biltmore Livery,
requested the case be continued as he has been called our of town on an
emergency. Mr. Hostetler moved to continue Case No. 153-85 to September
11, 1985. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
CASE NO. 159-85
Hamrick Lumber Co.
(Zoning Code)
Leo Menendez, Zoning Enforcement Officer, stat.ed in response to a
complaint on April 23, 1985, the property was inspect.ed and a Notice of
Violat.ion issued for storage of lumber and parking in an RS-50 zone. ~r.
Menendez stated that the violation covered three lots and that parking
is allowed in an RS-50 zone by special exception only.
The Cit.y submitted: Composit.e Exhibit No. 1 photographs of the
property taken by Andy Onufer of the Building Department on August 14,
1985; Exhibit No. 2 - two photographs of the property taken by Leo ~enendez
on May 7, 1985; Exhibit No.3 - an aerial photograph taken in 1968; Ex:hibit
No. 4 an aerial photograph taken in April, 197u; Exhibit No. 5 - an
aerial photograph taken in October, 1980; Exhibit. Ho. 6 an aerial
photograph taken in l1ay, 1984; Exhibit ~o. 7 a zoning map of the
surrounding area.
. "-..... -'- : ~ I'
~
",
[T::.
, . . . ,
" . ....
.'r' ,
, ,
r--.
~
,;
,I,
,~",~~v:;co~,...to.-.-L .~ ___.. '.'"
,,'
.--.-_.~~~V""I~~-r.::J""'t"!!YotIt'l_______________~
',....-----\
o
Richard Pierce, attorney for Hamrick Lumber CO., stated his
client has had continuous uninterrupted use of the property since before
its annexation in 1966. Mr. Pierce stated that because of this, the uses
of storage and parking were grand fathered in when the City annexed the
lots. Clarification was also made that there are four lots involved, two
are developed with residential homes, one is used for parking, and one
is used for storage of lumber. The Assistant City Attorney stated the
use of the two lots for parking and storage of lumber would be
grand fathered only if the County permitted the use at the time of
annexation.
Charles Hamrick, co-owner of the lumber company, stated he owns the
property with one brother and a sister.. in-law. He is President of the
company and a representative of the corporation. The property has been
in his family since 1946 and has been used for storage and parking
continuously since 19~7.
The defendant submitted: Exhibit No. 1 - a copy of the deed of the
property showing ownership, dated April, 1946.
When questioned whether the use was an authorized use under County
zoning, Mr. Hamrick did not have that knowledge.
C)
Mr. Amburgy moved that regarding Case No. 159-85 re: violation
of Section 131.042 and 131.043 of the Clearwater City Code on property
with a legal description as follows: M&B 43.10 and M&B 43.11, Sec. 29-15-
14, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board hearing held the 14th day of August, 1985,
and based on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters
the following Findi.ngs of' Fact, Concll181oDS of Law, and Order.
The Findings ot Fact are: Based on the testimony of Leo Menendez,
Zoning Snforcement Officer, and Mr. Hamrick and reViewing City's Exhibits
~os. 1-7 and Defendant's Exhibit No.1, the property in question has been
owned by the Hamricks since 1946 and has been in continuous use for parking
and storage for Hamrick Lumber. Certain photographs submitted as evidence
show no use at particular times; however, the testimony indicates it has
been used continuously since 1946 for use of aamricks.
The Conclus:lons of Lall are:
violation.
Hamrick Lumber Co. is not in
It is the Order of this Board that Hamrick L~~ber Company is hereby
declared to be in compliance with Sections 131.0~2 and 131.043 of the Code
of the City of Clearwater and that the pending violation proceeding before
the Board is dismissed. The motion was duly seconded. Upon the vote
being taken, Messrs. Amburgy, Aude, Morris and Hidura voted "Aye', Messrs.
Angelis and Hostetler voted "Nay'. Motion carried. Case dismissed
Done and Ordered this 14th day of August, 1985.
~
V
" '
~
,',r-
L"....
" d
r-
{,I
i. '
.~....,...~,-.....,.,..~--:.-...
___..,""',....,of;t-~'f...""'!.................._"__._....,.._ ___.'~~_. .______~. ~
..__~..._o\':-~"'..~
n
-'<3
CASE NO. 160-85
Gary Hewetson
(Building Code)
,
The Assistant City Attorney requested the case be withdrawn as the
violation has been corrected. Mr. Hostetler moved to withdraw Case No.
160-85. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
CASE NO. 161-85
Gene L. Austin
(Building Code)
Robert Chauncey, Redevelopment Inspector for the Building Department,
stated this violation was the result of a complaint received regarding
a vacant house with an aboveground pool wi thin the electrical setbacks.
Mr. Chauncey inspected the property on May 22, 1985, and found the
aboveground pool within the setback for electrical lines and a shed within
the rear and side setbacks. Mr. Chauncey stated he reinspected the
property the morning of the hearing and the same condition eKisted.
The City submitted:
of the property.
EKhibit No. 1 - composite of four photographs
o
Mr. Gene Austin, owner of record, stated he bought the house in 1972
with the shed already in place. Mr. Austin put in the aboveground pool
in 1982, not knowing he ngeded a permit. In November of 1983, he
quitclaimed the title to the house to the second mortgage holder. In April
of 1984 the first mortgage holder on the property foreclosed. Mr. Austin
was informed that the quitclaim deed was never recorded; and, therefore,
he was still the owner of record of the property. Because of the Notice
of Violation, Mr. Austin discovered the foreclosure had never been filed
and he is still the owner of record.
Mr. Chauncey stated the pool is full of water, easily accessible to
children and should be taken care of immediately.
Mr. Angelis moved that regarding Case 110. 161-85 re: violation
of Sections 133.01 (Standard Bui1ding Code, 1982 ed., spec. Sec. 106.1).
131.044 (5b), and 134.01 (HatioDa1 E1ectrica1 Code, 1981 ed., spec. Sec.
680-8) of the Clearwater City Code on property with a legal description
as follows: Lot 4, Ambleside 1st Addition Subdivision, the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code Enforcement
Board hearing held the 14th day of August, 1985, and based on the evidence,
the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters t.he following Findings of
Fact, Conclusions of Law. and Order.
The Findings ot' Fact are:
fact that the aboveground pool was
is wi thin the setback area against
to an electrical line.
Robert Chauncey has testified to the
installed without a permit, the shed
the fence, and the pool is too close
@""
';;..',<.
"~ ,':
The Conclusions of Law are: Mr. Austin is in violation of Sections
133.01 (Standard Building Code, 1982 ed., spec. Sec. 106.1), 131.044 (Sb),
and 134.01 (National Electrical Code, 1981 ed., spec. Sec. 680-8) of the
Clearwater City Code.
I"
r-,
r-
,\
if "
,I'
1.1,
~t!'>>'..f'ltl" 11 ill ~..._______... .__. ._--~--
.__ ....~.__ ,... ......_...___. _ ......-_..'4,~..rl....~
','
. '" '.'
, "
, "
o
@''''
'0' :
\.:, ,',
@"""
"!'"
. :- (....\~':.
~
It is the Order of this Board that Hr. Austin shall comply with
Sections 133.01 (Standard Building Code, 1982 ed., spec. Sec. 106.1),
131.044 (5b), and 134.01 (National Electrical Code, 1981 ed., spec. Sec.
680-8) of the Clearwater City Code by draining water from pool by August
16, 1985. and within 30 days comply with regard to placenent of the pool
and the shed. If Gene L. Austin does not comply within the time
specified, he shall pay a fine of $25.00 per day f'or each day the
violation continues to exist. If' Gene L. Austin does not comply within
the time specified, a certified copy of this Order, together with an
Affidavit of Non-Compliance, shall be recorded in the public records of
the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Pinellas County,
and once recorded shall constitute a lien against real or personal property
owned by Gene L. Austin pursuant to Chapter 82-37 Laws of Florida, 1982.
Upon complying, Gene L. Austin shall notify Robert Chauncey, the City
Official who shall inspect the property and notify the Board of
compliance. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance, either party
may request a further hearing bef'ore the Board. The IIQtion was duly
seconded and carr~ed unanimously.
DoDe and Ordered this 14th day of August, 1985.
CASE NO. 162-85
Jim Sommers
(Building Code)
Lori GOldston, R'3development Inspector for the Building Department,
stated that on June 5, 1985, because of a complaint received, she inspected
a fence installation at the address listed. She f'ound no fence permit
had been obtained and the ~ence was being installed with the finished side
f'acing in rather than facing the adjoining property as required by code.
She informed the owner of the property of the violationsj however, the
installation was completed in the same manner.
The City submitted: Exhibit No. 1 - fence permit; Composite Exhibit
No. 2 - two photographs of the property.
Mr. Midura lef't the meeting ~rom 4:54 to 4:55 p.m.
Jim Sommers, the fence installer, stated when the fence was installed
he thought the property was located in the City of Dunedin. He went to
Dunedin to get the fence permit and was informed the property was in the
City of Clearwater. At that time he made application at the BUilding
Department but began the installation the same day. The fence was
difficult to install because of an abutting chain-link fence on the
property next door.
Mr. Sommers submitted: Exhibit No. 1 - a copy of his fence
with the property owner; Exhibit No. 2 a letter signed
surrounding neighbors stating they do not object to the way the
installed.
contract
by nine
fence is
Mr. Aude moved that regarding Case Ho. 162-85 re: violation of
Section 131.205(d) of the Clearwater City Code on property having a legal
description as follows: Lot 13, Block 1, Sunse t Ridge, Uni t 1, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board hearing held the 14th day of August, 1985, and based
on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the following
Findings of Fact, ConClusions ot Law, and Order.
,,'
F
l' .'
F.
~
.'~~'--'"
_.~~""t'\I~ll'......
I
10
\ '
j \'
1
I
!
,
!
i
The r1Dd1ap or hat are: Testimony presented indicates a fence
has been installed on subjeot property with support posts and stringers
facing outward.
The CaDolWlloaa or Law are:
131.205 (d).
Mr. Sommers is in violation of Sec.
It is the Order of this Board that Jim Sommers shall comply with
Section 131.025(d) of the Code of the City of Clearwater by September 30,
1985. If Jim Sommers does not comply within the time specified, he shall
pay a fine of $25.00 per day for each day the violation continues to
exist. If Jim Sommers does not oomply within the time speCified, a
certified oopy of this Order, together with an Affidavit of Norl-Compliance,
shall be recorded in the public reoords of the Office of the Clerk of the
Circuit Court in and ~or Pinellas County, and once recorded shall
constitute a lien against real or personal property owned by Jim Sommers
pursuant to Chapter 82-37 Laws of Florida, 1982. Upon complying, Jim
Sommers shall notify Lori A. Goldatoa, the City Offioial who shall
inspect the property and notify the Board of compliance. Should a dispute
arise ooncerning compliance, either party may request a further hearing
before the Board. The aotloD was duly seoonded and oarrled
unanimously.
Doae aDd Ordered this 14th day of August, 1985.
(?)
\!i;J
The Code Enforcement Board recessed from 5:25 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
CUB m. 163-85
Jeralne Burt
(Building Code)
Tom Chaplinsky, Minimum Housing Inspector, stated the property was
inspected as a result of a cOlDplaint from the Fire Department in March,
1985. Mr. Chaplinsky inspected the property on March 19, 1985, and sent
a letter to Jeralne Burt on March 20, 1985, enclosing a list of necessary
repairs. Mr. Chaplinsky reinspected the dwelling at 2: 00 p.m. the day
of the hearing and stated the first eight items on the list have been
oompleted. The remaining violations exist.
The
enclosed
2a & b -
City submitted: Exhibit No.
in the letter sent to Jeralne
photographs of the property.
1 list of neoessary
Burt on March 20, 1985;
repairs
Exhibit
Jeralne Burt stated she had made numerous repairs to the property
and thought she had completed more than the eight items mentioned by Mr.
Chaplinsky. When questioned how muoh time would be required to complete
the repairs, she stated 60 days should be ample.
@""
. ,," ~ '
, ,
'"
Mr. Hostetler moved that regarding CaR 10. 163-85 re: violation
of Section 138.01 (StuMtlN Boua1D& c:ocse-Adoptecl, 1919 eel., epee. Seoa.
305.2, 305.3, 305.5. 305.6, 305.1 305.13, 305.1'. 305.16. 307.-, 301.5,
aDd 103.3) of the Clearwater City Code on property with a legal
desoription as follows: Blook 2, Lot 14, Rouse Subdivision. the Municipal
Code Enforoement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board hearing held the 14th day of August, 1985, and based
on the evidence, the MuniCipal Code Enforoement Board enters the fOllowing
Plqdi.., ot rut. Coaolualaaa or Law. and Order.
"-" ~ ,
, '
r-
l" .... .... .
.-.,:,
r--
I
j
'I,
, "
. i ~
!I$;",.m"~~____ _~_
~-~~.........-
_...__-...-........_~~,
()
The Findings of Fact are:
need repair.
Testimony heard shows the building does
The Conclusions of Law are: Ms.
138.01 (Standard Housing Code-Adopted,
305.6, 305.1 305.13, 305.14, 305.16,
City Code.
Burt is in violation of Section
1979 ed., spec. Secs. 305.2, 305.3,
301.5, and 103.3 of the Clearwater
I
,
j
It is the Order of this Board that Jeralne Burt shall comply with
Section 138.01 (Standard Housing Code-Adopted, 1979 ed., spec. Secs. 305.2,
305.3,305.5,305.6,305.7 305.13,305.14,305.16,307.4,301.5, and 103.3
of the Code of the City of Clearwater within 60 days. If Jeralne Burt
does not comply within the time specified, she shall pay a fine of .10.00
per day for each day the violation continues to exist. If Jeralne Burt
does not comply within the time specified, a certified copy of this Order,
together with an Affidavit of' Non-Compliance, shall be recorded in the
public records of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for
Pinellas Cou.nty, and once recorded shall constitute a lien against real
or personal property owned by Jeralne Burt pursuant to Chapter 82-31 Laws
of Florida, 1982. Upon complying, Jeralne Burt shall notify Thomas
Cbaplinsky, the City Official who shall inspect the property and notify
the Board of compliance. Should a dispute arise concerning compliance,
either party may request a further hearing before the Board. The motion
was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
"J
i
!
Done and Ordered this 14th day of August, 1985.
,Q
-0
CASE HO. 166-85
Madigan, McCane & Associates (License Code)
Mr. Carrion (Shear, Carrion, Brocklehurst
& 'wall) (License Code)
Prof'essional Resume and Writing Service
(License Code)
CASE HO. 164-85
CASE NO. 165-85
The Assistant City Attorney
violations have been corrected.
1611-85, 165-85, and 166-85.
unanimously.
requested these cases be withdrawn as the
Mr. Aude moved to wi thdraw Cases Ho.
Motion was duly seconded and carried
CASE NO. 161-85
Peter Spatz
(Building Code)
the
Ho.
The Building Department
meeting of September 11,
161-85. Motion was duly
has requested this case be continued until
1985. Mr. Hostetler moved to continue Case
seconded and carried unanimously.
CASE NO. 168-85
Jeralne Burt
(Building Code)
The Notice of Hearing for this case
Burt. Mr. Hostetler moved to continue
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
has
Case
not
Ho.
been received by Ms.
168-85. Motion was
@"L
, ,',".-
'", "\'
p-
I' '. ,,'
....,.
r-
J'"
.. 1-
,. \
~
'It
. < 'o'
,.----.-. .
".~~_~.r."Il:.......,.....W\.,~____.__.
.._____. ..... _ _ i ._u............___...--____,__......~_. .._,. .' ._ ...-...____.-. ,~~._..........__"......__..~__._"""t''bt.J,..;....._..............
CASE HO. 173-85
Charles Robinson
(Building Code)
~~
Tom Chaplinsky, Minimum Housing Inspector, stated this property has
been in violation since January, 1984. At that time the Board ordered
the rear of the building be demolished and repairs be made to the
remainder; the rear of the building has since been demolished. The
remaining violations still exist.
The City submitted: Exhibit :-lo. - Building Inspector's report;
Exhibit No.2 - copy of Board's order to 11r. Robinson, dated January 11,
1985; Exhibit No. 3 - copy of a letter to Mr. Robinson hand-delivered on
August 8, 1985, stating the dwelling is unsafe and unfit for human
habitation; Composite Exhibit No. 4 - two photographs of the property taken
on l"ebruary 19 and 21, 1985; Exhibit No. 5 - a picture of the property
in the Clearwater Times, dated August 10, 1985.
Mr. Chaplinsky stated the utilities have been turned off for several
weeks and, with no water, the plumbing system is inoperable. Mr. Robinson
has made no attempt to repair the property. Mr. Chaplinsky inspected the
property the morning of the hearing and the violations still exist.
Mr. Chaplinsky stated he had received a phone call from Mr. Robinson
stating he would vacate and demolish the property. Mr. Robinson was unable
to attend the hearing.
@""
~ '.".
'Q: "
Ed Bethel, Building Director, stated the Building Department
demolishes a building only if the occupants are in imminent danger; the
Buildlng Department is not using demolition in this case. Mr. Bethel
informed 111". Robinson of the danger and urged him to demolish the house
immediately.
Mr. Hostetler moved that regarding Case Ho. 173-65 re: violation
of Section 133.01 (Standard Building Code. 1982 ed.) and Sec. 133.02
(Allendment to Sec. 103. 4. "U~e Buildings" ot the Standard Bu1.1d1.ng
Code) of the Clearwater City Code on property with a legal description
as follows: Block B, ~ot 21 and 22, Belleair Highland SUbdivision, the
Municipal Code Enforcement Board has heard testimony at the Municipal Code
Enforcement Board hearing held the 14th day of August, 1985, and based
on the evidence, the Municipal Code Enforcement Board enters the fOlloWing
Findings ot Pact. Conclusions ot Law, and Order.
The Findings ot Pact are: Testimony given by the City shows that
Mr. Robinson and his family are living in a residence that is an emergency
situation and a danger to their safety, health, and welfare.
The Conclusions ot Law are: Mr. Robinson is in violation of 133.01
(Standard BUilding Code, 1982 ed.) and Sec. 133.02 (Amendment to Sec.
103.4, "Unsafe Buildings" of the Standard Building Code) of the Clearwater
City Code.
~
@
It is the Order of this Board that Charles Robinson shall vacate
said premises and receive a demolition permit by August 26, 1985, and
COIIlply with Sections 133.01 (Standard Building Code. 1982 ed.) and Sec.
133.02 (Amendment to Sec. 103.4. "Unsate Buildings" ot the Standard
Building Code) ot tbe Clearwater City Code by August 26, 1985. If Charles
Robinson does not comply within the time specified, the City shall assist
August 14, 1985
- . .., '...~
-'~\l':'",,~\ ..~ '"
,-,,'
"p-
I.... ,
'..." ',"'
r.
~.
-'
./ '
'.~~ '~
1,4'
,I r
.~_.....~~1>1_._...
:D
in finding housing for Hr. Robinson
complying, Charles Robinson shall
Official who shall inspect
compliance. Should a dispute
may request
seconded and
and shall demolish the bUilding.
notify ThoIDas Chaplinsky, t.he City
t.he property and notify the Board of
arise concerning compliance, either party
a furt.her hearing before the Board. The motion was duly
carried unanimously.
Upon
Done and Ordered this 14th day of August, 1985.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
CASE HO.
5-85
John Ford
Mr. Aude moved to accept the Affidavit of Compliance in Case No.
5-85. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
CASE HO. 123-85
Carlyn Pheil
The Secretary for the
requested a new hearing as she
license for her aerobics class.
Board stated
does not
the violator, Carlyn Pheil, has
believe she needs an occupational
Ho.
Aude
Mr. Aude
123-85.
moved to
for September
unanimously.
moved to accept the Aft Idavit of ~on-Compliance in Case
Motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Hr.
accept the Affidavit of Compliance and set a new hearing
11, 1985. The motion was duly seconded and carried
e
CASE HO.
132-85
Church of Scientology
case.
No.
was
Church of Scientology is requesting a further hearing in this
Amburgy moved to accept the Affidavit of Non-Compliance in Case
132-85 and set another hearing for September 11, 1985. Tile IBOtioD
duly seconded and carried unanimously.
The
Mr.
CASE 110.
CASE eo.
CASE 110.
1311-85
135-85
136-85
Norman Bie
Katharine Bie
Eas t Cove, loa.
Mr. Morris moved
Ro. 134-85, 135-85.
carried unanimously.
to
and
accept
136-85.
the Affidavits
Tile IIOtion
of
was
Compliance in Cases
duly seconded and
CASE RO. 141-85
John Turner (Publix Profit Sharing, Inc.)
~1r. Morris moved to accept the Affidavit of Non-Compliance in Case
Ro. 1~1-85. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously.
CASE RO. 148-85
Norman Bie
~
\2r~::)
Mr. A. ude moved to accept
the Affidavit of Compliance in
seconded and carried unanimously.
both
Case
the Affidavit
Ro. 148-85.
of Non-Compliance
The IDOtlon was
and
duly
. August 14, 1965
"'~"~"'.._._ .!';:;7.....~.;lr.;r.....
, "