04/30/1986
~
Present:
13
PUBLIC HEARING
April 30, 1986
1: 30 p. m.
Diane Tremor, Hearing Officer
A1ll1o present:
John Richter, Planning Official
Susan Stephenson, Deputy City Clerk
Issue:
&ppe1laDt
John Schultz for a variance of 13 parking spaces, at
409 Mandalay Ave, Barbour Morrow Sub, Blk A, Lot 15
and part of Lot 35, zoned CB (beach commeroial).
Appearanoes:
Case .0. 86-0808
Margot Pequinot, attorney, representing appellant
Miles Lance, Assistant City Attorney, representing City of Clearwater
bb1blts subld.tted:
0 Exhibit 11
Exhibit 112
Exhibit 113
Exhibit 114
Exhibit IS
Exhibit (16
Exhibit IJ7
~
Tape of Development Code Adjustment Board hearing of
2/13/86
Variance applioation
Excerpt from Development Code Adjustment Board minutes
of 2/13/86
Excerpt from Board of Adjustment and Appeal on Zoning
minutes of 5/24/84
Excerpt from Board of Adjustment and Appeal on Zoning
minutes of 1/3185
Copy of Card from Building Department used for
inspection purposes
Portion of building plans against which building permit
was issued and which indicates various approvals by
the City inoluding a note that the use was for retail
and duplex
John Richter stated the request is for a variance of 13 parking spaces
as there are only 4 spaoes available and the use requires 17. The property
is zoned Beach-Commercial which permits retail and restaurant uses among
others. It is developed with a two story building containing retail space'
on the first floor and residential use on the second floor. There are
11 parking spaoes available through a joint use agreement with the
:)
1 .
4/30/86
':~)~t~,~~~(~~~~~~~~~~1~\0~~~
, \
. ~
, ~~~~Jl.~ ~SdllX,t;~;~;\~-S'\~i: .;~. .~:~.\~~~::~~~;~: ~:~:f ~..;{( ~/~~7 ~~\'r :!:; ~'.~~: :'. ~~~}~~; ~::.::~~;~~ ~~,~~:~~~~' ',: ~.: ~ :: ~y ~:-::-.,. ~'I~I ~ ~ .~:I: ~.\'~I ~;~ ~::.~{~:~ ~-r;:,::/'t' ~ ;::\. ~:,.?L:~~~~~t~:~~.~j~~~~J~:~11~~~r ..~~ ~~~ ~
~t' '%~/"~~f1""'~~~r.'~~:-~: :~\ r ~ .~..: 1~,f,./~\C't-~"L~~~t 7'.... ., ~.~ ~". t;...:,,,...~ -, "':'~L~'I~.~f'r--oI,.......-- '""''1'"., .....T ~ .1"1".0.< ....~;:..."1. I.,;,';" {~ ..~ tu.-.---~.~. ..,,~.-. ~}~:...._..}_,t ~)... :.~: .--}'"'-~~t~..li;'; ~1I,:drl~~~\' "
~:r.Jr~;:"~'\~~'~':':i\r~~L,.;"~~'~~'u...'-":~lt'~"'~~:~.r:':";~';~!i:~;.~\":~',..:f~:.l ~:~. ~:\ ....l~~:~:'2~.>~'..~ ,:.I.{+ ~+,"H:~,'+' .>~',r ~Td'.~J""/~. :t,,~..~. ~:.","~' I~ +":'t+';~:..l:~</J,-!'I;".~'J~~'",)~~mt:;~':[""l..}:1I~2
~'r~)1.""" ft.:,:.~.J~"t .."."\1', ....,L,' ";,~ . .~ ~ .'..r........ ..... a' J' . I, ~ . '.r .,' .', ~.I~, i' ., ~/.""-\,'~ 1'\; .(\.-, J~r'.:)i......T,,---:--, rf~r.\
'.,", <,. <:=~.'< ,', ~:~:"" ,~, >',^, ,: ','," .,1,1 ,',..,,' 1">',:''''' ': < ,';, " ~~'" . . ";,''',''. '.:.' , ~.".:,..; <' :'>:::~;~: :~':i}.:~'dl:;.
... .
. ,. .
'@
INVOICE
John Schultz v. city of Clearwater
(DOAR Case No. 96-0908)
TIME
DATE SERVICE (in hours) AMOUNT
1996
3-17 Initial Order .5 $l5.00
4-10 Notice of hearing .5 $l5.00
4-29 Preparation for hearinq .5 $15.00
4-30 Travel time 1.0 $30.00
4-30 Hearing time 1.5 $45.00
6-12, Research, preparation
6-l3 and and completion of Final
6-16 Order 10.0 $300.00
0 TOTALS l4 $420.00
",...~~ '. ~ >-(. ,,~,.. -.. ~ '...... ~ l: -to' .. __~ --..... - . , . ... ......"'.,
'. ~\4"","'lrc...-..l-'l""".i-~-'=-1":I""""'!'~]'.l,:;~ ".-...+.....Jt..~......"'t. 1o,""i~ ...~;;.'.,.>'I..'1~f~J~,J ~,:..~.~~.."'1.r.,*-:- '~~"},J"".r"'~""'~~r'''''''~''''5fl}:'' ~9.l....,....r
...-''t~'f,~i''.+-.'~-....~L.....;k.'\':t...~.....L.'~ ,..l-'-_.. ,..1'" "'I, . .~. I .,~~.....-t'~'.'........l"...'"," '"+~<)-pt.p.H:' ..".~P .....~~
~.:..-1.~~;..~lf',~ r'J,.,..,.-';;..-'"_:t"..\:,.~ ~-i-' ~)~~-})j~....:,~-\\," ~,", t ...:.......,. .~~:' '~b,. . .:. :-" ''< 1 g ~.~, . :.,....~~t. ~i~ ~:'l.~....t",,. /-1: ~.,,~........~"'~..\;~l.:~~ ' .,."'. ~l
\.....~r:. .'" 1. "'~ :1}:~'~ J.'~~~ 1jC~... ""t'I~'.:t'I7t.f"1'~, ~~~..~...~-;-~~~ ;~\""+ ~"<1?~.----.........+c ~-:-,,,._J,;,,-;.,,-c (',~.;....to+.\~;..rj: ?l~~~~~::;t ~':;:;~J.:':;'~ j:',,~~ ~
\".. T{, ;..~~,.;~+.!..:r~~..l~JIt.:. ~t,r-! ,.~~:.:':l~1 ;;:f~:~~:'Xt:~.~~~!~\~&~;~:iik~~~ ~~).~~~~~,J:r<:J.~~:~~~ :'~:;(~: ,":.;' ~ i:t. /.:~;:: ~:;).(,.,~~ ~.~,~~,:: ~:~ ~~.~ ~j.t: ~ 1 .r?1 k':/: ';j~~ f~ 1:~'-'; ~~::'i;~!~:~~:":'~~f .
. ',: '.::::'.-:\~!:"\',: ::'~: ,~tW~' ,~. ""?" " ': .:, :~\:~ :-/',:" ": . :: ":.{.-:, ":.! y '," . :;.;'~::-;:':"'~'~:"::,:,,"!.,, I .:.; :,?:.., I . "; ",': .';:' . ',;~".:,::;-,,:,~,. ,.~::>:~~' '" ';.;~Y'':'~~fi~';;~i,1.~t;;,~.,,-:~<,.
".
....~......__.Hr~ ~, -io.~' . ~ . . '-
. ., 4' ~..... ~ '"'' ~ .... r
. '". '" ~ , ',I. '. ,',. '" '\~''+;'..~ ....1 :--~. .~...- l:'"~i ,.~~ ~~?"-J/,j
~~ l~,. -r '."'~ . I,' 1 . .,J.~ \ ~..~ ~,~ ~,~" jt~;. .../~1}1.'~.,~ :".G.:/, hi'}f iJ:'j~i(
~ . ~ ,.. h..... . ,'.... ~ ..__, . .'. " ',c ',q.-'~" . ~ ,.INi:~' .j, <"':>l>.1
. + . ~ u,,_ . ~. .~ \" ~-.... <....";...'~ '-t'f. W-l'tHIT~I- j,,~ .... ;J'-f...l~....
. ~ .,. .' 1 ,. I ~ l.'~'~ ~'l.."r".~'Jf if . oC.f~.f:fd- l' i(:f: I~
',.., . '. J :.' .... " . J, \:/) , ~;~'~~"</~': ~.~y '~~~~:.:-'."..~t\ :'~)A~~~
. . 't ',)4' ~ ~. .\., \. ~,,~: ':X(~,("'~;"'.l.,r:.t:..r
. ,~ ,..'A ;~~,::'"T:l#;."~~'
tl ' l
District utilized for restaurants or retail sales are permitted a
50% reduction in the.required number of parking spaces. Thus,
petitioner's use of his property as a fast-food carry out
restaurant, without utilizing the courtyard,as a seating area for
patrons, would require less than ten parking spaces in addition
to the two spaces required for the second floor duplex. By prior
agreement with the owner of the adjoining property, petitioner
currently has four parking spaces.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
In this proceeding, petitioner seeks approval for a
variance from the parking space requirements for a fast-food,
carry-out restaurant on Clearwater Beach. The Code requires 10
parking spaces for such a business, along with two more for the
upstairs apartments. Petitioner already has four parking spaces
available, so the total variance required under the Code is 8
parking spaces. Petitioner presently holdS a variance for 17
parking spaces if he desires to utilize his property as a retail
establishment. This' variance was granted prior to the effective
date of the new Land Development Code, which now only requires
retail sales businesses to provide 6 parking spaces per l,OOO
square feet of gross floor area (Section l36.022) reduced by 50%
for the Beach Commercial District.
Because the previously granted variance'was conditioned
on retail sales use of the property, and because the Code's
parking requirements vary with the nature of the use to which the
property is put, a new approval is required for a parking space
variance for" a different use. However, the variance required is
not with regard to use. The use to which petitioner desires to
devote his property is a permitted use for that property under
the Land Development Code; to wit: a restaurant. Such use is
authorized "by right" under the Land Development Code, and
requires no variance or other form of approval from the Board.
The only variance required is with regard to the number of
parking spaces necessary for a carry-out, fast food restaurant.
/
4
'I,
'.
G>
Q~',
y+'..
"
~
~
""/" t'
....;~::. .;....}'""-.'...:~
... '..