07/15/1985
:..
:J; " . 'H'~ ': ,..:..:;,c r;"'~' '. ;'_t'!/,)r1,;.'):~ (),'.. -:, ;'; ":::' ':.,:,::;'~,-:~,~~~.'-::~" ~'" : --::., , ;.~:,::':.;:', ::) : :',:: ;<>;;':;, i'~ ~;,;':~,;~~::i;i ::~:,~,)/A:,~;~j1J~fkW ~~
.,;'tili~ (i .'-..~,~ '..) - ~J '.. t.~ I'~Y (" 'r ,I. .' .~....,. . ., ~ ....... I,. _~t+>'....{-~.,_.., ~.....,.\.. .~-.,i-l"'''''''''-'''''''''''''''''''..';-'''''.' ~..~Jo.__. ~~""""",~'f~,"<f"n'."""".l~.""",,"~-~~.."'f..i~~l
.,...... ;-'-O..flcJ:'oe,..."'tlf,:-:'.......-1.~.~L..,.....:,:~~'--...;". ;.;~.:.;.:....r:.,;.~. ,:,+.. ." I..~ ~-~',; L "':'-~.'~--:*, " "" JI'.~" j". c' -I ':'.," ; . . :~',. .. ~:>. T..;.._ .+""-1~l-J.hY~ .~
~,'!! {..~1'!".I.tii_',.,l'\'" \,,"',N;:...:I,\\....,' ,'_ ,....,. ,~,. ."f':'''' ";", '. . .:.'c..,'".'.". '..' ....~'-I,.~.' ..- ,"..,~...Ir-.,,.,,~.....,'}~1~\~itj
""-'i.~-i..t..'I' '.-!.'-l~ '.:...;.;:~.,,~~...;:.? .;..i,......,..:.:t ...r;.:.;..~.1:..;,~~'.. .;;.:.~c,..~\' '; . '..::u.; -:: ~> .~.:<,~: "-1Lt.', ,',' . . . T .. ~ LH ".J I .,", '. ~ "::' ... ~j ., ::" :';.' J: '.... <. . i!:~;'~'" :~ ': I" \i( .....~ f!oj,~:,l~ ',,-;,\~. ;t.~>~1 .:.1.. v ~
~:t' t<. J":..f".....~...,.'~rr.,.: .!!". ,.....Jl!j" >' ."~~. ~ c L,.~L., ."'.. . ~ '.,.......-.. .<... .;F..,\:t~;..;,"';:r.-,_~-;...,....T ;"""....~T~..t-.....~-_ .po,.... ~~ 1................~~...,~....~"I;......:......\....~._;"Ci..U\~.A~ .....L~....;.....,;.;Zi~j...' j~~i~f~~L.(~~
, li~};i~1.1~t'~,:~~l:i{~:,I!!.~~(:r~:':'::(;,'.'~:.!.:~;'::i:;:~::,;:~.;::; :':':~ ,;' :>,~~;:"~ ;,::1,;/ . :<1...';' .'~ ';~:::,;; ~>:~~~\i: ....":;,'~~::;;,~..,' ::":':~' :'~': :; ," '<.. : ,','.\ ':' ,:/. /....;:;< :~:..'~ ,: " ':~. /:: \\W<.:1~~~~'..::'f~~:~;@~f
C>
Dunedin Pass Projeot Permitting Costs.
Pinellas County has proceeded with the permitting of the Dunedin
Pass Project. Estimated costs are expeoted to be $70,000. Because of
the obvious benefits to be gained by the opening of Dunedin Pass for local
interests and in the improvement of traffic conditions over Memorial
Causeway, staff reoommends reimbursement to the County for one-half of
the costs.
Water Rates (Ordinance 3999-65).
In December 1983 the Commission approved the development of a water
revenue bond issue which was to perform the following: replace
approximately 89 miles of old pipe and mains, provide a network analysis
of the entire system, connect dead end lines for a fully-circulating water
system, oreate a water construction crew and add a second story to the
existing Water Servioe building. The first step to the approval of the
new issue was the refunding of an existing water sewer revenue bond issue
completed 1n November 1984. Payment of debt service on the new bonds
will require a water rate increase. Revenues must be increased to pay
for essential operating expenses. In addition to the new water rates,
it is also recommended that the surcharge be changed from 25~ of the water
bill to 35~ for customers outside of the City limits.
o
Cecil Henderson, Utilities Director, was present to respond to
Commission questions. He noted that 75S of the Cityls revenue comes from
the under 1" water meters. There are 2 types of rates suggested: one
is a flat rate struoture and the other an inverted type rate struoture.
The inverted rate struoture encourages efficiency in water use because
of the higher cost per 100 oubic feet. It also has a lower minimum charge
and, because of this, rates to the consumer who normally uses a small
amount of water will not be as great with the flat rate. It is projected
that the average inorease would be $1.50 a month.
Disoussion ensued on using the consumer prioe index annuallY for
increases to the rate. Commission suggested that considerable advertising
and flyers go out to the public.
Proposed Settlement (Clearwater Beaoh
Gulf Court Apartments Litigation
Hotel, Inc.).
In April 1984 a revised final site plan and developmental rights for
Clearwater Beaoh Hotel were denied. Subsequent litigation occurred. The
owner's attorneys have approaohed the City regarding a proposed settlement
for the projeot and to avoid pending litigation. The owner proposes to
develop the property in conformance with a previOUS staff-approved site
plan subject to the following changes: 1) 20 units to be construoted on
the Gulf of Mexico; 2) ownership of property west of the seawall would
be given to the City; 3) the height of the bUilding would be 40' or 3
stories over parking; 4) the entrance to the parking under the building
would be eliminated from Baymont Street; and 5) Baymont would be landsaaped
and maintained by the owner subject to City approval.
e
Book 2
July 15, 1985
3::11
''"7..P~ '';''.-- '-; '~,'~'l'i'
)f{r!,~,(,~;i~~)}~~~if~~~~~;~;l~~~{~~;S(~:{~:-':;~-;/;~,j{j~7iA]i~"+~
. --------
.:'~.
""'WJl'.1i!'''.'i\r,jt,;~{1t~~:~~f@;7!H5f~~f~~tj:.~:;:.,:i:\.~:f'::'~:;~;>\(~<":'~; ri-'.':::;'::;~\i'L::::.t4~:.;.~i::iS:W~}~it~r.. .<'$
I' f.";I~~~~~~'l&ri~ifH'W~~.f\W;~';~~~~~!,';;~i~7i'0f;;f'(~:~~);;1;~~r;";';!;"H">:,,,;:';?f!~;~'f0~::m~~~t~{~~~~~;,:~.
. ,;~I I "..4.... .
"" ,
-'