Loading...
FLD2008-05013, 100 CORONADO DR - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 100 CORONADO DR CL ARW A TER BEACH RESORT & OT PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 276A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 05/02/2008 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner: Applicant: Representative: Address: October 21. 2008 FLD2008-050 13 (Related to DV A2008-0000 1 ) E 1 (Related to F 1 ) K & P Clearwater Estate, LLC Clearwater Beach Resort Hotel, LLC E. D. Armstrong ill, Esquire, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, RUlJpel & Burns, LP 100 Coronado Drive, 201. 215 and 219 S. Gulfview Blvd. CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: CURRENT ZONING: (1) Flexible Development approval to Terminate the Status of a Nonconformity for density (200 overnight accommodation units; where 137 overnight accommodation units are permitted today) within the Tourist District, under the provisions of Section 6-109.C; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 450-unit Overnight Accommodation use (through an increase of the permitted density of 250 overnight accommodation units from the density pool created pursuant to Beach by Design), with a lot area of 119,856 square feet (2.75 acres), a lot width of approximately 545 feet along Coronado Drive and 227 feet along proposed Second Street, a front (east along Coronado Drive) setback of zero feet (to building and pavement), a front (south along proposed Second Street) setback of 18.83 feet (to building), a front (west and north along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback of zero feet (to building), a building height of 150 feet (to roof deck) and either 463 valet-only parking spaces or 455 valet-only parking spaces with eight public parking spaces at 1.028 or 1.011 parking spaces per hotel room, respectively, as well as the allowance of a two-year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; (3) To reduce the required foundation landscaping along Coronado Drive and S. Gulfview Boulevard from five to zero feet (to building and pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (4) Vacation of a portion ofS. Gulfview Boulevard (former bridge landing). Tourist (T) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Resort Facilities High (RFH) USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Proposed Use: Vacant (temporary City public parking lot) Overnight accommodation use of a total of 450 rooms (163.6 rooms/acre on total site) and a maximum of 37,000 square feet (0.31 FAR on total site) of amenities accessory to the hotel at a height of 150 feet (to roof deck). Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 1 of 14 EXISTING SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: North: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District South: Tourist (T) District Pier 60 East: Tourist (T) District Overnight Accommodations (Aqualea/Hyatt - under construction) Vacant, Retail Sales and Overnight Accommodations Beach and Gulf of Mexico West: Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.75 acres is located directly south of Pier 60 between Coronado Drive and South Gulfview Boulevard, north of Second Street. The subject property is currently vacant, but used as a temporary City public parking lot. The properties were previously developed with various motels/hotels (Days Inn, Beach Towers Motel, Spyglass Motel and Golden Beach Motel) and numerous retail sales and restaurant uses. The overall property includes several vacated and dedicated rights-of-way (see next paragraph for description). On October 19, 2004, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved a Flexible Development application for the construction of a 350-unit hotel with associated amenities and 75 attached dwellings as a mixed-use development (FLD2004-02013). The City Council approved a companion Development Agreement on February 17,2005 (Case No. DV A2004-00001). These development approvals authorized the following: · Use of250 hotel rooms from the Beach by Design density pool; · Maximum building height of 150 feet; · Vacation of a portion of the right-of-way for Gulfview Boulevard between Coronado Drive and proposed Second Street; · Vacation ofthe First Street right-of-way between Coronado Drive and Gulfview Boulevard; · Dedication of right-of-way for proposed Second Street between Coronado Avenue and Gulfview Boulevard; and . Dedication of right-of-way for Coronado Drive between proposed Second Street and Gulfview Boulevard. On May 17,2005, the CDB approved a Flexible Development application amending the prior project to modifY the location of an elevated pedestrian walkway over South Gulfview Boulevard (FLD2004- 02013A). On March 16, 2006, City Council approved an amendment to this original Development Agreement (DV A2004-00001A), which dealt with issues associated with Beach Walk construction and the timing of the dedication of land for Relocated 151 Street (to be known as Second Street once constructed), as well as for the construction of Relocated 151 Street. Pier 60 and the public parking lot is to the north of this property and is zoned Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District. Properties to the east across Coronado Drive are zoned Tourist (T) District and are (or were) developed with overnight accommodation uses and retail sales and service uses. At least two of the properties are currently vacant, as the former overnight accommodation uses have been demolished, but presently contain temporary construction trailers for the Aqualea/Hyatt project. The Aqualea/Hyatt project, which is a 250-room hotel with 18 attached dwellings, is located to the south across proposed Second Street and is zoned Tourist (T) District. Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 2 of 14 Development Proposal: The proposal is to redevelop the site with a 450-unitlroom destination resort hotel, consisting of 250 traditional hotel units and 200 vacation/interval ownership (timeshare) units. The proposed resort will include amenities accessory to the hotel, including a restaurant, lounge, retail sales, pool, spa, ballroom and meeting space. The proposal changes the architectural style from the prior approved project to a tropical modem architecture, which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront property and complements the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design, and incorporates pedestrian access components to Beach Walk. The proposal eliminates the approved pedestrian bridge to Clearwater Beach, instead providing for the construction of a loggia and a palm court pedestrian area on the west side. The building mass consists of a four-story base, two 150-foot towers and a 95-foot tall connecting element that links the towers and base together. The building design incorporates a curved fayade on the north side where public meeting space, ballroom and spa softens and transitions the visual appearance moving east to west. On the north end, the curved mass of the base is reinforced by one of the two 150-foot towers (hotel tower). The towers incorporate a similar design where the towers are oriented on an east-west axis with the tower units angled to give occupants unimpeded views of the Gulf. Timeshare units are located in the southern tower. A 95-foot tall connecting element is aligned on a north-south axis and includes timeshare units, providing a transition between the vertical towers and the horizontal base. Smaller scale decorative trellises, awnings, louvered panels and translucent railings soften the mass of the building. On the west side of the building the mass of the base is carved back to create a curved public palm court. The palm court is a landscaped focal point for the hotel, located both on the subject property and within the S. Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way that will be a walkable part of Beach Walk. A covered loggia is located along the west side of the building on the subject property, providing pedestrian access to the resort hotel, the retail shops and restaurant. The palm court and covered loggia are slightly elevated providing a viewing platform toward the Gulf of Mexico for public use. The building is designed with the porte cochere and the lower lobby on the grade level. This lowest level provides building entrance areas on the east side, storage areas and 218 parking spaces. Level 1 is the main lobby level and includes hotel administrative offices, restaurant, bar, retail sales areas and a 10,500 square-foot grand ballroom. Level 2 provides an employee office area, 149 parking spaces and eight timeshare units. Level 3 provides a back of house area, a 5,000 square-foot junior ballroom, meeting rooms, 96 parking spaces and 17 timeshare units. The amenity Level 4 provides a 13,890 square-foot spa, 3,890 square-foot fitness center, 17 timeshare units, the main pool between the two towers and a small timeshare pool in the southwest portion of the amenity deck south of the timeshare tower. Levels 5 - 9 have 24 hotel rooms and 22 timeshare units per floor. Level 10 provides 24 hotel rooms and eight timeshare units, as well as providing access to the rooftop recreation deck on the top of the connector portion of the building between the two towers. Levels 11 - 14 provide 24 hotel rooms and eight timeshare units for each floor. The Penthouse Level 15 provides 10 hotel rooms and eight timeshare units. The proposed hotel consists of four rooftop levels - the amenity deck at 38.67 feet accessible to the guests; the spa roof (inaccessible to guests) on the north end of the hotel tower at a height of 48.17 feet; the third being the connector element between the two towers at a height of 95 feet that includes a recreation area for guests; and the fourth being the roofs of the hotel and timeshare towers having a height of a maximum of 150 feet to the flat roof deck (inaccessible to guests). That portion of the building exceeding 100 feet in height is separated from the AqualealHyatt building to the south by 140.67 feet, exceeding the Beach by Design minimum requirement of a 100-foot separation. The materials and color of the building will support the tropical modem architecture and its natural surroundings. The building will be painted sand dollar white, accented by honed gray granite stone veneer. The window mullions, railing caps, louvered panels and trellises will be arcadia silver. Balcony railings will be clear glass. The main pool area is located between the two towers in the west center of the building to minimize noise and visual distractions to the Aqualea/Hyatt resort hotel to the south. Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 3 of 14 With the height and location of the adjacent AqualealHyatt resort hotel and condominiums, the proposed hotel design is compatible with the surrounding uses. Parking for the hotel guests and employees is provided in a parking garage on three levels containing 463 valet-only parking spaces or 455 valet-only parking spaces with eight public parking spaces at 1.028 or 1.011 parking spaces per hotel room, respectively. The parking plan provides the two parking options, showing the eight public parking spaces should City Council decide to retain the spaces within this garage or to remove the eight public spaces and all parking in the garage would be private spaces. The Development Agreement provides an option for the eight public parking spaces to be eliminated from the parking garage for a payment in lieu of to be placed off-site. The two upper parking levels are accessed by a ramp located just inside the building on the south side of the building, which is accessed from Second Street. No guests or other public will access the parking garage; only valet employees will park and retrieve vehicles from the parking garage. The parking garage will include stacked or tandem spaces, where another car must be moved to get the stacked or tandem car out, and will employ the stacking of vehicles in drive aisles to create additional valet spaces when necessary, resulting in a total of 568 parking spaces in a worst case scenario (full occupancy and a large banquet). The site is designed with two driveways on Coronado Drive. The northern driveway will be an entrance only, providing access to the porte cochere for the valet service. A loading area is provided on the south side of the site off Second Street, providing three loading spaces and access to the compactor for solid waste trucks. Valet drivers will access the parking garage by a driveway provided off Second Street on the southwest portion of the site. The applicant is requesting a two-year development order due to market conditions. Section 4-407 specifies that an application for a building permit must be submitted within one year of the date the CDB approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval. The proposal includes the proposed vacation of the former pedestrian bridge landing at the northwest comer of the property. This right-of-way is no ionger necessary. Whiie action on this vacation request is solely a decision by the City Council, the request has been included with this application to show the relationship of the proposal to street rights-of-way and to include the land area into the overall site area for calculation purposes. Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation units per acre. Based on the 2.75 acres zoned Tourist District, a maximum of 137 overnight accommodation units are permissible under current regulations. The overall site was formerly developed with a total of 200 units, which was nonconforming to current regulations. The applicant is requesting Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to maintain the same number of overnight accommodation units in a conforming manner (see discussion below). Additionally, this site was originally granted 250 hotel rooms from the hotel density pool created by Beach by Design under Case Nos. FLD2004- 02013/DV A2004-00001. The overall density for this project is 163.6 overnight accommodation units/rooms per acre. Termination of Status of Non con formi tv: The development proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (200 overnight accommodation units; where 137 overnight accommodation units are permitted today). The nonconforming status of the prior hotel density has been determined to still be valid, even though all motels/hotels on the overall property have been demolished, due to the status of the approval of Case Nos. FLD2004-020 13/DV A2004-0000 1. An important factor in this case is the ability to retain an overnight accommodation use on the beach where many hotels/motels Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 4 of 14 have been lost to condominium (attached dwelling) construction. The criteria for Termination of Status of Nonconformity, as per Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code and outlined in the table below, including compliance with perimeter buffer requirements, the provision of required landscaping for off-street parking lots and bringing nonconforming signs, lighting and accessory uses/structures into compliance with the Code will be met with this development proposal. Consistent Inconsistent I. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-l202.D of the N/A Community Development Code shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established N/A in Section 3-l202.E of the Community Development Code. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory X use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to X satisfy the requirements of this section. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District. The temporary City public parking lot will be removed upon construction of this proposal. All proposed parking will be within a parking garage, where landscaping is not required. Any prior nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures/uses have already been removed with the demolition of the motels/hotels from the overall property. A Comprehensive Landscape Program has been submitted for this proposal, as the foundation landscaping requirement is not met and reductions are requested. Should the applicant desire attached or freestanding sign age in excess of minimum Code requirements, the Comprehensive Sign Program may be used for proposed signage. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to Section 2-701.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable LS.R. is 0.95. The overall proposed LS.R. is 0.92, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum lot area and width for overnight accommodation uses ranges between 10,000 - 20,000 square feet and 100 - 150 feet respectively. The subject property is 119,856 square feet (2.75 acres) in area and has approximately 545 feet of frontage along Coronado Drive and approximately 227 feet of frontage along proposed Second Street. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum front setback for overnight accommodations can range between zero - 15 feet, the minimum side setback can range between zero - 10 feet and the minimum rear setback can range between zero - 20 feet. This site encompasses an entire block of property, therefore only front setback requirements are applicable. The proposal includes a front (east along Coronado Drive) setback of zero feet (to building and pavement), a front (south along proposed Second Street) setback of 18.83 feet (to building) and a front (west and north along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback of zero feet (to building). There are no required setbacks for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project use. While the proposal has been advertised with setback reductions to zero feet along Coronado Drive on the east and along S. Gulfview Boulevard on the north and west, the building does not extend fully to the zero-foot setback for the entire street frontages. Along Coronado Drive, the structural fins for the two towers are located at a zero-foot setback. Actual floor area between these structural fins is located approximately five feet from the property line. Balconies for units between these structural fins for the Cormnunity Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 5 of 14 amenity Level 4 through Level 15 extend, however, to the property line. The fayade of the building north and south of these towers varies 6 - 16 feet in distance to the property line. At the porte cochere, the fayade of the lobby is approximately 46 feet from the property line, although pavement for the porte cochere is located at a zero-foot setback. Along the north side adjacent to S. Gulfview Boulevard, only the northwest comer of the building is located at the advertised zero-foot setback. The curved wall of the ballroom, junior ballroom/meeting room and spa terrace is located approximately six feet to the north property line. The building is located at a zero-foot setback along S. Gulfview Boulevard on the west side. Along the south side adjacent to Second Street, the building is located 18.83 feet from the property line, exceeding the required front setback of 15 feet. The previously approved project under FLD2004- 02013 also included setback reductions to zero feet along all frontage to the building. Setback reductions sought are a result of right-of-way dedications for street relocations, provision of a dedicated turn lane on Coronado Drive and incorporation of the project into Beach Walk. Landscaping improvements within the rights-of-way and on-site will reduce impacts due to the reduced setbacks. Along the west side, the travel lanes for S. Gulfview Boulevard curve away from the subject property, creating the large Beach Walk promenade area west of the subject property, such that the setback reduction will not be visually apparent. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable height for overnight accommodation uses is 100 feet. Beach by Design permits buildings up to a maximum of 150 feet through the use of bonus hotel units from the density pool, which this proposal has been previously awarded. The proposed hotel consists of two towers at a height of 150 feet (a hotel tower on the north side and a timeshare tower on the south side). A timeshare connector between the two towers, which also extends south of timeshare tower, has been designed at a height of95 feet. The amenity deck, which includes the two swimming pools, is at a height of 38.67 feet. The height of the roof of the spa on the north side of the hotel tower is 48.17 feet. That portion of the building exceeding 100 feet in height is separated from the Aqualea/Hyatt building to the south by 140.67 feet, exceeding the Beach by Design minimum requirement of a 100-foot separation. The proposed height of the lower and taller portions of the tower is consistent and compatible with the height of the Aqualea/Hyatt project. This site is located within the Beach Walk District of Beach by Design, which is the primary "beachfront" destination on Clearwater Beach. The applicant has submitted documentation indicating compliance with the Beach by Design criteria for no more than two buildings more than 100 feet in height within 500 feet of each other. The proposal also complies with the Code requirements under the definition of "Height, Building or Structure" for elevator and stair overruns and mechanical rooms, which are permitted to extend a maximum of 16 feet above the otherwise permitted height. The timeshare connector between the two towers is designed to provide a recreation area for guests. The definition of "Height, Building or Structure" permits structures permanently affixed to the roof that permit rooftop occupancy only if such structures are within the maximum allowable height of 100 feet. Since this timeshare connector is designed at a roof height of 95 feet and provides rooftop occupancy by guests, such structures can only be five feet in height. To ensure any such structures envisioned with this proposal or in the future after construction is completed, any approval of this application should be conditioned on such a structure height limitation. The design of this project creates a form and function that will be consistent with and enhance the character of this area. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum required parking is one parking space per unit, or 450 parking spaces. Parking for the hotel guests and employees is provided in an on-site parking garage on three levels containing either 463 valet- only parking spaces 1.028 parking spaces per unit/room) or 455 valet-only parking spaces (1.011 parking spaces per unit/room) with eight public parking spaces, which will be 100 percent valet parked. Full valet service will be provided so that guests and overnight visitors will not have to wait for spaces or circle the garage looking for a parking space, therefore allowing traffic to flow smoothly into the parking garage Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 6 of 14 off the public street. The 463 parking spaces will be provided on the various parking levels as follows: Grade Level - 218 spaces; Level 2 - 149 spaces; and Level 3 - 96 spaces. On the Grade Level, one option is to provide eight public parking spaces, located in the southwest comer of the parking garage. Depending on a decision by City Council, and set out in the Development Agreement, the public parking spaces could be eliminated from the parking garage under a payment in lieu of providing the spaces. Of the 463 parking spaces provided, 162 spaces are designed as stacked or tandem spaces where another car must be moved to get the stacked or tandem car out. The submitted Parking Study demonstrates that stacking of vehicles in drive aisles to create additional valet spaces when necessary will result in an additional 105 parking spaces for a total of 568 parking spaces in a worst case scenario (full occupancy and a large banquet). The submitted Parking Study also demonstrates that adequate parking will be available for guests, visitors and employees. The companion Development Agreement sets out a parking protocol in Exhibit M to ensure adequate parking is available and to minimize traffic backups at the porte cochere. The owner will also record a covenant (Development Agreement, Exhibit F) to implement a trip generation management program prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy to reduce trips to and from the site to ensure adequate on-site parking is available for guests and employees. The parking garage must comply with the Building Code and have a vertical clear height for all parking garage levels of not less than seven feet including the entrance and exit. This clear height includes any structural beams, fire sprinkler pipes and heads, electrical conduits and lighting, drainage pipes and any other building elements. The site is designed with two driveways on Coronado Drive. The northern driveway will be an entrance only, providing access to the porte cochere. The porte cochere drive will be one-way only travel (north to south), two lanes wide with a separate additional lane for buses and be serviced by valet only. Airport shuttles, taxis and limousines will use the drop-off area under the porte cochere on Coronado Drive. A total of 21 vehicles can be stacked within the porte cochere area. There is a valet exit from the grade level parking garage on the north side of the porte cochere, designed to minimize vehicular movement on the public streets. Instead of a turn lane the entire length of the project along Coronado Drive, the turn lane starts south of the drop-off area to provide access to Second Street for both this project and the AqualealHyatt project to the south. A landscape island with public sidewalk projects into the Coronado Drive right-of-way to the travel lanes, providing a turn lane into the porte cochere. A loading area is provided on the south side of the site off Second Street, providing three loading spaces and access to the compactor for solid waste trucks. This loading area is across Second Street from a similar loading area for the AqualealHyatt project on the south side of Second Street. Valet drivers will access the parking garage by a driveway provided off Second Street on the southwest portion of the site. The applicant will construct sidewalks of a width and material within the adjacent rights-of-way according to that specified by Beach Walk. The sidewalk along Second Street will be partially on the subject property and an access easement will need to be recorded for this sidewalk prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-201.D.l of the Community Development Code, all outside mechanical equipment must be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. The applicant is proposing mechanical equipment to be located within mechanical enclosures on top of the towers or on top of the flat roofs of the timeshare connector or spa, where the building parapets will screen views of such mechanical equipment. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Code with regard to screening of outdoor mechanical equipment. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, to minimize hazards at the driveway and street intersections on S. Gulfview Boulevard, Coronado Drive and Second Street, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. The proposed site and landscape design meet this requirement. Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 7 of 14 Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. The civil site plan for this proposal indicates that all on- site electric and communication lines for this new building will be placed underground in conformance with this Code requirement. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D of the Community Development Code, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this site. This proposal includes a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Coronado Drive and S. Gulfview Boulevard from five to zero feet (to building and pavement) through the Comprehensive Landscape Program. The foundation landscaping reductions occur at the structural fins on Coronado Drive and at the northwest comer of the building on S. Gulfview Boulevard. The reduction to the on-site foundation landscaping requirement is most evident along the west side of the proposed building and its loggia. However, Beach Walk promenade landscaping adjacent to the building will act as the foundation landscaping along this building edge. The site along the north, east and south otherwise complies with the five-foot wide foundation landscaping requirement. The applicant has worked with City Staff to ensure proposed landscaping and sidewalk improvements both within the City's rights-of-way and on-site work together with the landscape design for Beach Walk to ensure a seamless interface between this project and Beach Walk features reinforcing the pedestrian oriented beach community. Medjool date palms will be installed along Coronado Drive and to the west along S. Gulfview Boulevard, including the proposed palm court. Cabbage and Washington palms and other salt-tolerant landscaping will be planted within the rights-of-way and on-site. Landscaping assists with softening and reducing building massing to both pedestrians and motorists. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize hotel housekeeping staff to remove trash from units and transport the trash to the trash compactor located on the south side of the property. Trash trucks will back in from Second Street to access the compactor dumpster. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Signage: No freestanding or attached signage is proposed at this time for this overnight accommodation use. Freestanding signage in the Tourist District is restricted to a maximum height of four feet, or six feet through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Any approval of this application should include a condition allowing for freestanding signage, where such future freestanding signage must be a monument-style sign meeting Code requirements and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Additional Beach bv Design Guidelines: Section B.3 requires the floorplate of any building exceeding 45 feet in height to be limited to a maximum of25,000 square feet between 45 - 100 feet and a maximum of 10,000 square feet between 100 - 150 feet, but allows deviations to these floorplate requirements provided the mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum building envelop allowance above 45 feet. The largest floorplate between 45 - 100 feet is approximately 48,212 square feet and between 100 - 150 feet it is approximately 27,292 square feet. The applicant requests such deviations to the floorplate restrictions. The Design Guidelines provide that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelop located above 45 feet be occupied by a building. The applicant has calculated the overall building mass between 45 - 150 feet at 38.0 percent, approximately two-thirds of the maximum permissible. Section C.1 requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is approximately 96,110 square feet. The project's overall horizontal Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 8 of 14 plane dimensions are approximately 447 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard and 237 feet along the north side, while the vertical plane is approximately 158 - 159 feet from grade to the top of the tallest roof. None of these dimensions are equal. Modulation of the building massing also provides considerable dimensional variation. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. Although the base extends nearly the length of the property, it is highly articulated. Within 50 feet of the north and south ends of the building, the towers interface with the lower structure as they reach the ground. To the east, the center of the base has structural fins that extend up from the ground to support the building above the drop-off porte cochere and continue up to the roof of the timeshare connector. To the west, the base is carved back to create the public palm court. The north side is curved, creating a continuously curving fa<;ade and therefore, no plane is continuous for more than 30 feet. The two towers are oriented on an east-west axis, with the tower units angled for the occupants with balconies to view the gulf, creating a saw tooth edge on both sides of the towers. Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has calculated that the north elevation is at 65 percent, the east elevation at 68 percent, the south elevation at 60 percent and the west elevation at 71 percent. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-050l3 - Page 9 of 14 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use proposal with the standards as per Section Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 50 overnight accommodation units per 450 overnight X acre (maximum of 137 units) accommodation units (163.6 OVU/acre)l I.S.R. 0.95 0.92 X Lot Area 10,000 - 20,000 sf 119,856 square feet (2.75 X acres) Lot Width 100 - 150 feet2 545 feet along Coronado X Dr.; 227 feet along proposed 2nd St. Setbacks Front: Zero - 15 feef East (along Coronado Dr): X3 Zero feet (to building and pavement) South (along proposed 2nd St): 18.83 feet (to building) North and West (along South Gulfview Blvd): Zero feet (to building) Height 35 - 100 feef 150 feet (to roof deck) X3 Off-Street One space per room/unit (450 spaces Either 463 valet-only X3 Parking required)2 parking spaces (1.028 parking spaces per hotel room) Q! 455 valet-only parking spaces with eight public parking spaces (1.011 parking spaces per hotel room) Per Termination of Status of Nonconformity of 200 units/rooms and 250 units/rooms from the Beach by Design density pool Based on Overnight Accommodation use in the Tourist (T) District See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 10 of 14 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): I. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly Xl development and improvement of surrounding properties. Consistent Xl Inconsistent Xl 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed Xl development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use Xl category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street Xl parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: o Changes in horizontal building planes; o Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; o Variety in materials, colors and textures; o Distinctive fenestration patterns; o Building stepbacks; and o Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 11 of 14 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent l. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, Xl coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of Xl adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons Xl residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Xl 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the Xl immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including Xl visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. See analysis in Staff Report SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of June 5, 2008, and September 4,2008, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The 2.75 acres is located directly south of Pier 60 between Coronado Drive and South Gulfview Boulevard, north of Second Street; 2. On October 19,2004, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved a Flexible Development application for the construction of a 350-unit hotel with associated amenities and 75 attached dwellings as a mixed-use development (FLD2004-02013). The City Council approved a companion Development Agreement on February 17,2005 (Case No. DV A2004-00001); 3. On May 17,2005, the CDB approved a Flexible Development application amending the prior project to modify the location of an elevated pedestrian walkway over South Gulfview Boulevard (FLD2004-020 13A); 4. On March 16, 2006, City Council approved an amendment to this original Development Agreement (DV A2004-00001A), which dealt with issues associated with Beach Walk construction and the timing of the dedication of land for Relocated 1 sl Street (to be known as Second Street once constructed), as well as for the construction of Relocated 1 sl Street; 5. The properties were previously developed with various motels (Days Inn, Beach Towers Motel, Spyglass Motel and Golden Beach Motel) and numerous retail sales and restaurant uses. All of the buildings containing these uses have been demolished; 6. The subject property is currently vacant, but used as a temporary City public parking lot; 7. The nonconforming status of the prior 200-unit hotel density has been determined to still be valid, even though all of the motels/hotels have been demolished, due to the status of the approval of Case Nos. FLD2004-02013/DV A2004-00001; 8. The proposal is to redevelop the site with a 450-unit/room destination resort hotel, consisting of 250 traditional hotel units and 200 vacation/interval ownership (timeshare) units and including amenities accessory to the hotel of a restaurant, lounge, retail sales, pool, spa, ballroom and meeting space; Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 12 of 14 9. The proposal eliminates the approved pedestrian bridge to Clearwater Beach, instead providing for the construction of a loggia and a palm court pedestrian area on the west side; 10. The building mass consists of a four-story base, two l50-foot towers and a 95-foot tall connecting element that links the towers and base together; 11. The proposed hotel consists of four rooftop levels - one being the amenity deck at 38.67 feet; the spa on the north end of the hotel tower at a height of 48.17 feet; the third being the connector element between the two towers at a height of 95 feet; and the fourth being the hotel and timeshare towers having a height of a maximum of 150 feet to the flat roof deck; 12. That portion of the building exceeding 100 feet in height is separated from the Aqualea/Hyatt building to the south by 140.67 feet, exceeding the Beach by Design minimum requirement of a 100- foot separation; 13. Parking for the hotel guests and employees is provided in a parking garage on three levels containing 463 valet-only parking spaces or 455 valet-only parking spaces with eight public parking spaces at 1.028 or 1.011 parking spaces per hotel room, respectively, which will be 100 percent valet parked; 14. Of the 463 parking spaces provided, 162 spaces are designed as stacked or tandem spaces where another car must be moved to get the stacked or tandem car out; 15. This site was originally granted 250 hotel rooms from the hotel density pool created by Beach by Design under Case Nos. FLD2004-020 13/DV A2004-0000 1; 16. The proposal includes a front (east along Coronado Drive) setback of zero feet (to building and pavement), a front (south along proposed Second Street) setback of 18.83 feet (to building) and a front (west and north along South GulfView Boulevard) setback of zero feet (to building); 17. The application includes a request for deviations to the floorplate restrictions; 18. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Section 2-801.1 and Table 2- 803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design; and 5. The proposal is compatible with the adjacent land uses. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Flexible Development application to Terminate the Status of a Nonconformity for density (200 overnight accommodation units; where 137 overnight accommodation units are permitted today) within the Tourist District, under the provisions of Section 6-109.C; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 450-unit Overnight Accommodation use (through an increase of the permitted density of 250 overnight accommodation units from the density pool created pursuant to Beach by Design), with a lot area of 119,856 square feet (2.75 acres), a lot width of approximately 545 feet along Coronado Drive and 227 feet along proposed Second Street, a front (east along Coronado Drive) setback of zero feet (to building and pavement), a front (south along proposed Second Street) setback of 18.83 feet (to building), a front (west and north along South GulfView Boulevard) setback of zero feet (to building), a building height of 150 feet (to roof deck) and either 463 valet-only parking spaces or 455 valet-only parking spaces with eight public parking spaces at 1.028 or 1.011 parking spaces per hotel room, respectively, as well as the allowance of a two-year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; (3) To reduce the required foundation landscaping along Coronado Drive and S. GulfView Boulevard from five to zero feet (to building and pavement), as a Comprehensive Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 13 of 14 Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (4) Vacation of a portion of S. Gulfview Boulevard (former bridge landing), with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the approval of an amended Development Agreement with the City (Case DV A2008-00001); 2. That approval of this Flexible Development case is subject to the vacation of the pedestrian bridge landing right-of-way by the City prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations approved by the CDB; 4. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than October 21, 2010, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to Section 4-407; 5. That a Declaration of Unity of Title for Condominiums be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That any structures permanently affixed to the roof of the timeshare connector between the two towers or south of the timeshare tower that permit rooftop occupancy be only permitted if such structures are within the maximum allowable height of 100 feet above BFE (five feet above the designed 95-foot height of the roof of the timeshare connector); 7. That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Engineering Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 8. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the vertical clear height of all the parking garage levels be not less than 7 feet including entrance and exit (Florida Building Code 2004, Section 406.2.2); 9. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 10. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, an easement be recorded in the public records for the sidewalk along Second Street partially on the subject property; 11. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering, Traffic Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met; 12. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 13. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Wayne M Wells, AICP, Planner ill A IT ACHMENTS: o Location Map o Aerial Map o Zoning Map o Existing Surrounding Uses Map o Photographs of Site and Vicinity S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBlCoronado 0100 Clearwater Beach Resort & Hotel (I) - 10.21.08 CDB - WW\Coronado 0100 Staff Report -10.21.08 CDB.doc Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-05013 - Page 14 of 14 Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-562-45041 Email: wavne.wells(lV.myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE · Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; Reviewed building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). · Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director; Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). · Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Dept. of Planning and Development, Bradenton, FL June 1984 to March 1989 Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; Supervised six employees; Prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; Investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). · Planner I Alachua County Dept. of Planning and Development, Gainesville, FL June 1980 to June 1984 Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or pre development meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; Drafted ordinance revisions; General research. · Graduate Assistant University oj Florida Dept. oj Urban and Regional Planning, Gainesville, FL 1979 to 1981 Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; Coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. · Planning Technician Planning Division, City oJSt. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 ~ years; Worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section Owner: Site: PROJECT SITE Causeway ~ BAYSlDE LOCATION MAP K & P Clearwater Estates, LLC Case: 100 Coronado Drive Property Size(Acres): PIN: ! Atlas Page: DR :) FLD2008-050 13 D V A2008-0000 1 2.75 07/29/15/52380/000/0440 07/29/15/52380/000/0530 07/29/15/52380/000/0480 07/29/15/52380/000/0940 07/29/15/52380/000/0550 276A I I r 1 I , I I I E - 5~ ~ ~ ~ .l!! / ~ / ~f2~~ , / .,... .,... ..... ,... ...... ..... p <0 ~ - -- --- --- -~- 2 --- - -- --- - - - rosfR 3 ---------- 4 --- --- ~ - - - - ..., Q1 5 ~ - - - I.. ------- ~ - - - ~ ll, 6 ~ ------- (!) ---- CI) 7 --- ---- --- - -- 8 218 35 ---- --- - -- 9 --- 70 - -- --- 35 10 - -- --- - - - - - 11 "J 101 707 59 I , I I / / I 59 144 115 I 93 100 I / ,46 /47 190 ,91 /92 I 0 't ~ cq I I I I I , / Ie I 1 0 '- -L ~E~ S~07129h5 PARe L INFO - ~ - - '- -L .J02 59 105100 ~ 128 A 57.8 r -. -, _I_ I / I I , , / , '48 49 'so /51 ,- J. I / I -- I 201 52 ~ it Q o Q ~ o ~ o 98 I I 53 99 2O!X.pCTR /- _ _ _ - - - - -I I 100 I 215 54 I ,- -- 7 ENSl NS * - -8~WfD 892 56 I - - - 03 i- _ _ I --,---_ I 57 I 104 , 229 I o <0 FIRST ST o <0 60 0~ ~ 207 212 r- I L!!5 --1 217 ~~ 2 216 /228 ZONING MAP Owner: K & P Clearwater Estates, LLC . Case: Site: 100 Coronado Drive Property Size(Acres): PIN: Atlas Page: 3 224 -----+-- --- , FLD2008-050 13 D V A2008-0000 1 2.75 07/29/15/52380/000/0440 07/29/15/52380/000/0530 07/29/15/52380/000/0480 07/29/15/52380/000/0940 07/29/15/52380/000/0550 276A _ _1_ ---- 7 --- 8 - -- 9 - - - - _ _ ~o Beach - - 11 Owner: Site: ~ ;; J! ~ ~ ~ 2fe~lt)C> ... ... ,... ... I I Pier 60 I parking lot' I II r 1 , / 15~~ ~J Marina Beach '" co ~ 57.8 59 OIl'J '01 '" - - 100 - - a ~Vacant L INFO ..,. 'XI co ~rnight commodatio .... 128 2 Beach - -- 105100 - - 3 ~ - - ...., CQ ~ ~ - - it ~ CJ - CI) r -, -, _ I_ I / 1 1 I , 1 I '48 49 '50 151 ,- .!....!. , 1 -- , 1 201 52 I FIRST ST a co .,.. -, -, , , 1 1 I ~/ '" 4~5/961 1 97 I I a co 60 Vac~:f: ~Iot ~ ~ 207 Q 0 212 Q ~ R~ 0 vern~ ~ s~5 0 217 olB-llldda io~s ve!~ 2 ~ 216 C6 odaf ~ ~ - 50 98 I I 209,DCTR - - / , 215 1 99 53 1_ _ _ - --/ 54 I 100 ,- -- - - 218 - - 35 70 --- - - I- _ 03 OvernighT I - - - _ accomlJliOdati~fl~ I uMler construction --- EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP K & P Clearwater Estates, LLC FLD2008-050 13 D V A2008-0000 1 2.75 . Case: 100 Coronado Drive Property Size(Acres): PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0440 07/29/15/52380/000/0530 07/29/15/52380/000/0480 07/29/15/52380/000/0940 07/29/15/52380/000/0550 276A Atlas Page: Keith Zayac & Associates" Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning 70 I S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith@keithzayac.com September 15, 2008 Wayne Wells City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Street Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2008-05013 - - 100 CORONADO DR Dear Wayne: Please see the comments below in response to the above referenced project. 1. Engineering Landscape Comments: 1. The proposed Landscape Plan L-l as prepared by Fuster Design Associates, P.A. (dated 5/12/08) appears to provide for a heavily landscaped site that will be lushly planted. However, it does not match the theme, character and scale of the landscaping proposed in the Beach Walk Concept Plan or implemented as part of the Beach Walk Phases l, II, III & IV AUGUST 28, 2008: WHILE IT IS CLEAR THAT THE APPLICANT HAS REVISED THEIR PLANS (JULY 10,2008). THE PROPOSED PLANTS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WA YS STILL DO NOT MATCH THE BEACH WALK PLANT PALETTE. THE PALM/TREE SPACING AND LAYOUT APPEAR TO BE ACCEPTABLE, BUT THE TYPES OF PLANTS, PARTICULARLY THE UNDERSTORY PLANTINGS, MUST BE CHANGED TO MATCH THE BEACH WALK PLANS. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT (FUSTER DESIGN ASSOCIATES, P A) HAS BEEN SUPPLIED WITH THE BEACH WALK LANDSCAPE PLANS, SO THIS SHOULD NOT BE AN ISSUE. TO BE SP EC1FIC, THE PROPOSED P LANTINGS MUST JovfATCH THE EXISTING PLANT TYPES, SIZES, SPACING AND ARRANGEMENT THIS IS NOT NEGOTIABLE. THIS IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT WEST OF THE PROMENADE AND ALONG ALL OTHER RIGHT-OF-WAYS a. Plans have been revised per staff meeting on September 9, 2008. 2. It is imperative that all landscaping within the public right-oi-way meet and match the existing landscaping throughout the Beach Walk Project. While some of the proposed plants are the same, care must be taken to insure that all proposed plants would also be the same size as those planted as part of Beach Walk. In addition the plant spacing, mulch materials and irrigation components are just as important. Development of the Beach Walk plant palette and specifications was carefully crafted and coordinated between the consultant, the City's Engineering Department and the Parks and Recreation Department. Simply put, Engineering is responsible for placement of anything in the Beach Walk right-oi-way and Parks and Recreation is responsible for the maintenance of all plant materials and associated systems in this right-of way. Therefore, any final landscape, hardscape and irrigation plans, details and specifications must be reviewed and approved by both departments prior tofinal approvals and permitting. AUGUST 28,2008: THE FGUR MEDJGGL DATE PALMS PRGPGSED FGR EITHER SIDE GF THE TWO. CRGSSWALKS NEED TO. BE WASHINGTGN PALMS, LIKE EXIST CURRENTLY IN THIS LGCATIGN AND ALGNG THE REMAINDER GF SGUTH GULF VIEW, WITHIN THE BEACH WALK PRGJECT AREA. THERE ARE NO. MAGNGLIA TREES GN BEACH WALK THE PRGPGSED MAGNGLIA TREES ALGNG SDUTH GULF VIEW, DN THE NGRTH SIDE, WILL BE SHREDDED BY THE PREVAILING WINDS CDMING DFF THE GULF. WHILE SALT TOLERANT, THESE TREES WILL NGT DO. WELL IN THIS EXPDSED LDCATIDN. THE APPLICANT SHDULD CDNTINUE WITH THE WASHINGTDN PALMS, AT THE SAME SIZE AND SPACING ALREADY FDUND ALDNG THE REMAINDER GF SGUTH GULF VIEW, WITHIN THE BEACH WALK PRGJECT AREA. THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO. LIVE GAKS WITHIN THE RIGHT-DF-W AY GN CDRDNADo. THESE TREES ARE IN THE CITY RIGHT-DF- WAY, AND NEED TO BE CABBA GE PALMS, TO. il/IA TCH THDSE ALREAD Y PLANTED ALGNG CGRGNADG AS PART DF BEACH WALK PHASE 1. IN ADDITION, IT SHGULD BE NDTED THAT THERE IS NDT SUFFICIENT RDDM FDR LIVE DAKS DR ANY GTHER LARGE CANDPY TREES ALDNG THE EAST SIDE GF THIS SITE. a. Plans have been revised per staff meeting on September 9, 2008. 3. While this project can and should be unique, it must also fit in rather than stand out. There must be continuity within the right-oi-ways of the Beach Walk project area. This is particularly important on both Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive. The plans as submitted do not meet this requirement. AUGUST 28, 2008: o.T MET SEE RESPGNSE TO. Co.MMENT #2 ABGVE a. Plans have been revised per staff meeting on September 9, 2008. 4. Existing City owned improvements that this developer/owner proposes to remove, modify or replace shall be relocated to City owned locations approved by the City and at the developer/owners expense. AUGUST 28,2008: THE EXISTING PALMS, WEST GF THE P Ro.MENADE ARE AN INTEGRAL PART GF THE CITY GWNED IMPRGVEMENTS REFERENCED IN THIS No.TE THE PRGPGSED PLANS CALL FGR REUSING Fo.UR (4) MEDJGo.L DATE PALMS, THIRTY-GNE (31) CABBAGE PALMS AND TWENTY-TWO. (22) WASHINGTo.N PALMS WHILE THIS IS FEASIBLE IN THEGRY, THIS WILL BE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT AND Co.STLY TO. DO. WITH A PRGJECT GF THIS SIZE, DURATIGN AND LIMITED AMGUNT GF SUITABLE SPACE A V AILABLE, WE DO. No.T THINK THIS IS A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE. ALL o.F THESE PALMS ARE STILL IN THE ESTABLISHMENT P ERIGD, AND TO. MGVE THEM TWO. Mo.RE TIMES GVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS IS No.T ACCEPTABLE TO. THE CITY THEREFo.RE, CITY STAFF WILL IDENTIFY APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS FOR EACH PALM TO. BE RELo.CATED, o.UTSIDE GFTHE PRGJECT AREA, GNCITY PRGPERTY o.NCE THE APPLICANT HASPRGPERLY TRANSPLANTED AND STAKED THE PALMS TO. THEIR NEW LGCATIGNS, THE CITY WILL TAKE OVER RESPGNSIBILITY FGR THE CARE AND MAINTENA CE GF THESE P ALMS THE APPLICAI T WILL THEN IMPLEME T THE "APPRo.VED LANDSCAPE PLAN" pRIGR TO. CERTIFICATE GF o.CCUPANCY (CO.) AND FINAL APPRO. VAL o.F THE P RGJECT BY THE CITY; ANY RYISTING CITY o.WNED SITE LIGHTING SYSTEMS MUST BE PRo.PERLY DISCGNNECTED AND CAREFULLY REMo.VED Ai D STGRED BY THE APPLICANT GR HIS AGENTS A NEW LIGHTING SYSTEM MUST BE DESIGN/!'LJ, APPRGVED, PERMITTED AND INSTALLED PRIGR TO. Co. AND FINAL APPRGVAL GF THE PRGJECT BY THE CITY ANY FIXTURES THAT NEED TO. BE REPLACED, FGRANY RE4SGN, MUST BE REPLACED IN KIND BY THE APPLICANT; AND ANY SITE FURNISHINGS (BENCHES, TRASH RECEPTACLES, TREE GRATES, ETe) MUST BE PRGPERLY AND CAREFULLY REMo.VED AND STGRED BY THE APPLICANT GR HIS AGENTS THESE FURNISHINGS WILL THEN BE PRGPERLY REINSTALLED PRIGR TO. Co. AND FINAL APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT BY THE CITY ANY FURNISHINGS NOT REINSTALLED MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE CITY ANY FURNISHINGS THAT NEED TO BE REPLACED. FOR ANY REASON. WILL BE REPLACED IN KIND BY THE APPLICANT. a. Plans have been revised per staff meeting on September 9, 2008. 5. Revise sheet L-l, dated July 10, 2008, to depict a 1 O-foot wide sidewalk along Gulftiew Blvd (from promenade to Coronado). a. See revised plans. 6. Applicant and future successor's in title to the subject property shall be responsible fm the maintenance and operation of the Upper Court of Palms and associated water features that are located in public street right-of-way(s). A maintenance agreement or the development agreement shall be provided that makes the property owner and future heirs and assignees responsible for the maintenance of these features. a. Acknowledged 7. The sidewalk that transitions from this promenade around Gulfview Boulevard to Coronado Drive, on the north side of the proposed development is open to negotiation. AUGUST 26,2008. REVISE SHEET L-l, DATED JULY 10,2008, TO DEPICT A 10-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG GULFVIEW BLVD. (FROM PROMENADE TO CORONADO). a. See revised plans. 8. Who will be responsible for the water feature at the comer of Coronado Drive and Gulftiew Boulevard? An easementfor this area will be required AUGUST 26,2008: A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT OR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED THAT MAKES THE PROPERTY OWNER AND FUTURE HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THIS FEATURE. a. The water feature has been moved onto the project property. 9. Although the plans as submitted do not address the any irrigation and/or site lighting, it should be understood that the City would need to maintain control over these systems. Therefore, any modifications and/or additions will need to be reviewed and approved by the City before any final approvals will be issuedfor this project. In addition, any permits requiredfor modifications to these City's systems, within the right-of-ways, will be the responsibility of the owner/developer proposing said work. AUGUST 28,2008: THIS CONDITION WILL BE MORE COMPLETELY ADDRESSED DURlNG THE REQUIRED RIGHT -OF- WAY PERMITTING PROCESS a. Acknowledged 10. Although not referenced in the submitted plans, all irrigation and lighting systems must reviewed by the City departments responsible for their long-term maintenance. In an effort to assist in this effort, the City will gladly coordinate and share any Beach Walk plans, details and specifications. In addition, any City irrigation materials and components lists will be made available upon request. AUGUST 28,2008: THIS CONDITION WILL BE MORE COMPLETELY ADDRESSED DURING THE REQUIRED RlGHT -OF- WAY PERMITTING PROCESS a. Acknowledged 11. It is not clear how much of the area west of the proposed building will be impacted by this development. There needs to be a line labeled as "Limits of Work" on all plans. a. A limit of work line has been added to the site plan. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Applicant shall apply for and obtain approval from the City Council for the vacation of a portion of Gulfview Blvd. right-ofway shown as Parcel "A" on the site plan (Sheet C4). a. Acknowledged 2. Show on the plans that the new road surface for dedicated right hand tum lane will be extended easterly to fully include the areas of Coronado Drive proposed to be open cut to provide connections to the sanitary sewer manholes. (Coronado Drive as recently been resurfaced). a. Plans revised as requested 3. Show on the plan a double sweep clean out for the sanitary sewer lateral and include Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Detail #305, pg. 113 on the plans. a. Detail for double sweep added 4. The Fire Department Connection shall be located 25 to 50 feet from a Fire Hydrant Assembly. a. The FDC is located as required 5. The proposed use of the property includes a restaurant. Show a grease trap location on the plan. a. Grease trap will be shown on construction plans 4. Delete Brick Paver Driveway Index #1 13 on Sheet C7 and replace with Index # 116, Paving Header and Brick Paver Detail. a. Detail has been revised 7. Show all property lines and street right-ofway dimensions on the site plan and utility plan sheets C-4 and C-6 respectively. In particular, the right-aI-way width of Second Street has not been shown on the plan. (Previous condition that has not been completely met.) a. An overall site map will be added to construction plans for reference Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Applicant shall deed to the City of Clearwater a sidewalk easement for all public sidewalk that extends into the privately owned property, (8-foot sidewalk along Second Street extends approximately 3-feet into private property). a. Acknowledged 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. a. Acknowledged Land Resources: I. Contact Tim Kurtz, L.A., with the Public Works Department, 562-4737 to address the tree removal in the rights of way. a. Acknowledged Landscaping: 1. Comprehensive Landscape Program - Revisefor the following: b. Response to Criteria #1 - I find it curious that the justification given in essence is that this project takes credit for how the Beach Walk landscaping will appear. Unfortunately, it is THE CITY that has spent millions of dollars to transform this area and has constructed the improvements viewed today (even though the applicant is paying for a pro rata share of the improvements). There is no mention of THE CITY'S Beach Walk improvements, including landscaping, that has changed the character of this area. There is no mention that this project is going to remove all (or most) of the landscaping along the west side and then REPLACE IT, albeit enhancing what THE CITY has already planted. 8/28/08 & 5/27/08 - WW a. The existing landscaping was paid for by this project, and will be replaced and enhanced as shown on the landscape plans. 2. All landscaping within the rights-ol-way must comply with the requirements of Beach Walk See landscaping comments from Tim KUliz under General Engineering. a. Acknowledged 3. 8/28/08 & 5/27/08 - WW Section 3-1204.D requires vertical curbing to protect landscaped areas from vehicular encroachment. Sheet C7 provides a detail for a "straight curb" but the plans do not indicate where such curbing adjacent to landscaped areas is provided. Revise plans to indicate such curbing (include a note where such is provided "typ"). a. Curbing is shown and labeled on site plan. 4. Landscape Plan - Revise Plant List - a. Hibiscus Standard (HS) is spec'ed at 7-8' in height (Code requires minimum 8' height); a. Plans have been revised per staff meeting on September 9, 2008. b.Magnolia (MG) is spec'ed at 16-18' in height and 6" caliper (Code requires minimum 10' height and 2.5" caliper). Experience has indicated that the larger the tree the survival rate of the tree goes down. Recommend h'ees closer to the height and caliper the minimum Code requires; and a. Plans have been revised per staff meeting on September 9, 2008. c.Oak (QY) is spec'ed at 20-22' in height and 6" caliper (Code requires minimum 10' height and 2.5" caliper). Experience has indicated that the larger the tree the survival rate of the tree goes down. Recommend trees closer to the height and caliper the minimum Code requires. a. Plans have been revised per staff meeting on September 9, 2008. Parks and Recreation: l. 8/20/08 - Site Data Table has not been corrected properly. The number of previous and proposed units needs to specifically state what type of rooms they are (hotel/motel, vacation/inverval units, etc.). Impact Fees cannot be calculated without this information. a. Date table has been revised to reflect previous and proposed units as well as types of rooms. 5/23/08 - Site Data Table needs to be corrected to reflect the actual number of previous units on property, along with proposed number of new units. Needs to be specific with number of new hotel motel units as well as number of vacation/interval units. a. Data table has been corrected Open Space Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kater at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. a. Acknowledged 2. The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this project prior to issuance of building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727-562-4837 to calculate the assessment. a. Acknowledged Stormwater: 1. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Provide trench drains at the driveways adjoining Coronado Drive to catch all runoff and route to the proposed oil/grease separators. a. Trench drains added. 2. Show how proposed oil/grease separators are to be connected to the City's stormwater system. Mechanical plan was not providedfor review as response to comment stated. However, civil plan shall show this connectionfor review. a. Mechanical plans will show oil/grease separator connections. 3. The detail of oil/grease separator has been removed from the plan; however, response to comment stated that detail and specification has been enlarged for clarity. a. Details will be added to mechanical plans when submitted for construction plan approval. 4. Provide maintenance plan for the proposed storm sewer system and oil/grease separators. a. Will be provided upon building permit submittal. 5.Please show on grading plan the rim, and invert elevations for the proposed 2 curb inlets along with the proposed pipe inverts and slope that connected to these inlets. What kind of curb inlet is proposed in the City right-of way? Ring and cover detail shall be either City Index 203 or 204. Please provide an appropriate ring and cover detail for the proposed curb inlets. a. Rim, pavement and inverts are shown on the grading and drainage plans. Solid Waste: 1 . Please show (explain) height of door access to compactor a. Dimensions are shown on sheet A-14 ) 8-25-08 If seeking Green lodging certification" How will recycling be handled? a. Bins will be located at grade level service area. Traffic Engineering: 1. There shall be no structures other than landscaping and sidewalk on City right-ofway along Coronado Drive. a. Acknowledged 3. Although there are no proposed handicap parking spaces in the parking garage, the parking garage shall be designed to accommodate an accessible van which requires an 8'-2" clear vertical height. This includes entrance, route, parking stall and exit. Indicate this on the site plan. (Florida Accessibility Code Sections 11-4.I.2. (5)(b) and I1-4.6.5.) a. Clearance will be provided. See sheet A-02B for van accessible staff. 4. Traffic Operations is concerned that the number of proposed parking spaces is insufficient to provide for a resol1 hotel of 450 units including provisions for employee parking. To prevent impacts to City rights- of way and parking facilities, at a minimum on-site parking shall be providedfor hotel guests atfUll capacity plus for the peak number of employees including shift change. See Parking System comments below. a. See attached revised parking study 5. In the parking study, the unmarked parking spaces or overflow parking depicted on page (A-02, A-04 and A-OS) create access problems for the proposed garage. These unmarked parking spaces take up part of the 24-foot wide drive aisle, which is neededfor parked cars at 90 degrees to back out without difficulty. a. See attached parking study The above shall be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: I. Provide a civil site plan showing necessary lane markings and traffic signs along Coronado Drive per current MUTCD standards. a. Lane markings have been added to site plan. 2. The accessible ramps along Coronado Drive shall align with each other across both streets and driveways. Re-position the ramps to allow a vision-impaired person the ability to walk in a safe direction. a. Ramps have been revised to align with each other 3. Provide a note on the site plan: Objects in the sight triangle shall meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). a. This comment will not allow for the development of this project. The project like most others in the tourist district encroach into the site triangles with the building corners. General Note(s): a. Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Cell ificate of Occupancy (CO.). a. Acknowledged b. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. a. Acknowledged Parking System Comments: I. Provide justification included documentation of the three statements made in the Parking Study including a) "Only about 25% of the employees would require parking spaces", b) "only 60% of the occupied hotel rooms and time-share units are expected to require parking spaces" and c) half of the staff of the retail shops "would require a parking spot. " a. See attached parking study 2. According to the study, during a large banquet there would be 175 employees on duty. At 25%. there would only be 44 vehicles requiring parking. Based on the City's experience with pubic parking it is our belief that staff parking will become an issue for the City facilities. a. See attached parking study 3. With the lack of a full service mass transit system in this region of the country, assuming that 60% of occupied units would require a parking space seems low as well. a. See attached parking study The above shall be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: 1. 8/31/08 - WW Need to clear up discrepancies between civil and architectural plans for the following: A. Unclear as to current proposal. If there are to be 15 or 8 public spaces in the garage, than "a" below is still correct. If there will be no public spaces in the garage, then need to revise Note # 6 to "Overnight Accommodations". a. Eight public parking spaces will either be located off site or accommodated within the parking garage level as shown on sheet A- 02B. B. Based on decisions for "A" above, Note #9 needs to be revised to indicate, or not indicate, 15 or 8 public spaces. a. The note has been revised. 5/27/08 - WW Sheet C2 - Revise General Site Notes as follows: a. Note # 6 - Revise "Developed Use" to "Proposed Use" and revise "Overnight accommodations/Parking" to "Overnight Accommodations/Parking Garage and Lot"; and a. Note revised b. Note #9 - Need to reflect the required 15 parking spaces. a. Note has been revised to reflect public spaces in two senarios 2. 8/31/08 - WW Height dimensions provided. Please indicate in the "legend" that these are roll down doors and the color of such. a. 6/1/08 - WW Sheet A -14 - Provide height dimensions for building entrances to parking, loading and dumpster. Will there be any rolldown "doors"for the loading area and, more importantly, the dumpster area, to shield negative views from the public right-ofway? a. Overhead coiling doors will be painted to match wall color. Please refer to sheet A- 14. 3. 8/31/08 - WW Concur with Parking System comments regarding the Parking Study. 5/27/08- WW The Code sets out the minimum requirements for the number of parking spaces, which for this development is 450 spaces + 15 public spaces. While this is a minimum requirement, the development needs to provide needed parking for all its uses, including employees. Based on another Beach resort now not having enough parking (Sand pearl), especially for employees, provide documentation that the minimum parking will provide all NEEDED parking, such that there will be NO needfor off-site parking by guests or, more importantly, employees. Need to provide documentation regarding the maximum number of employees on any shift when the facilities are operating at 80 - 100% capacity. Additionally, based on the recently approved timeshare/interval ownership project at 430 S. Gulftiew Blvd, the staff report, based on the applicant's submittal, stated "Due to the nature of the proposed vacation/interval ownership units, coupled with a desire to ensure adequate parking is available for guests and their visitors within the garage, 178 spaces in excess of the minimum Code requirement have been provided. The applicant is providing this excess parking to deal with the seasonal congestion on the beach and the lack to-date of new public parking facilities, while ensuring that all parking demands of this project can be accommodated on-site." Based on this approved project, provide documentation regarding parking demand for the timeshare/interval ownership portion of this request to ensure adequate parking will be provided by this development. a. See revised parking study 4. 8/31/08 - WW I should have also questioned the need to have "spa" under the title. If the spa is to be considered accessory to the hotel, then the word "spa" should be removed. If it to be a primary use, then it may stay under the title. BUT, additional parking must be provided at a rate of 5 spaces/1, 000 sf Revise. 5/27/08 - rvw It is my understanding that the application is proposing a 450-unit overnight accommodation use. Unclear of what is meant at the top of Sheet A-OO as "Hotel, RESIDENCES, Spa". What residences? a. Please refer to cover sheet A-O 5. 8/31/08 - WW Sheet C4 now indicates this as an overhang. However, response says it is a "concrete eyebrow", but 1 cannot find on what floor this is provided (maybe Sheet A-06?; unclear where the concrete eyebrow is on Sheet A-14). Provide greater detail on the architecturalplans. 5/27/08 - WW Sheets C4, C5, Landscape Plan, A-02, A-03, A-04, A-OS, A-06, A-07, A-08 andA-09 - On the south side of the building there is a dashed line in the center of the building that usually indicates an overhang or other floor area above the ground floor. 1 do not find any such structure above the ground floor. Either remove from all affected plans or the architectural plans need to indicate what this structure is? a. Architectural plans have been coordinated with civil and landscape plans. 6. 8/31/08 - WW Need to resolve discrepancy so that the advertising can be correct. 5/27/08- WW Application, including Sheet C2, needs to be amended to include a request to permit a Parking Garage and Lot to provide 15 public parking spaces within the overnight accommodation parking garage (as provided by the Development Agreement). a. The plans have been revised to show eight public spaces under plan A, and zero spaces under plan B. 7. 8/31/08-WW Plans are still unclear. Stairs referred to are at the SE comer of the building (see Sheet A-02) and exit to proposed Second Street adjacent to the loading dock driveway. Where the sidewalkfrom this exit door connects with the sidewalk along proposed Second Street at a ramp, meaning there is no ramp on this egress sidewalk but one must step down. Determine if this is a required egress and, if such is a required egress, then revise ramping on this egress sidewalk where intersecting with the sidewalk ramp along proposed Second Street (all appropriate civil sheets). 5/27/08 - WW Sheets C4, C5, C6, Landscape Plan and A-02 -If stairs at the southeast comer of the building at the intersection of Coronado Drive and 2nd Street is a required means of egress, then the egress route must be handicap accessible. Location of the sidewalk is at a ramp along 2nd Street and is indicated as a step down situation. Revise. a. See sheet A-02B showing option for eight public spaces as agreed at DRC meeting. 8 8/31/08 - WW Need to resolve discrepancy and determine if any public parking will be within the garage. 5/27/08 - WW Sheet C2 - General Site Notes #9 - Need to reflect th~.l 5" public parking spaces required in this development. a. Revised per comment six 9. 8/31/08 - WW Plans indicate the trellises to be 105feet above BFE, which does not comply with regulations. Revise. 6/1/08 - WW Sheets A-08, A-09, A-I 0, A-II and A-I 3 - The roof of the connector between the two towers is being usedfor recreational purposes (ie: rooftop occupancy). The definition of "Height, building or structure" only permits structures permanently affixed to the roof accommodating rooftop occupancy when within the maximum allowable height. Since the maximum height of this connector cannot exceed 100 feet, the trellises over the recreation deck indicated on these sheets cannot exceed 100 feet in height, which as designed presently do exceed. Revise. There is no ability to ask to deviate this height restriction. a. See revised plans. 10 8/31/08 - WW a. Unclear with the operational aspects of "For special events, guests will be directed to enter off of 2nd Street so 52 additional cars can be stacked within the garage". Unclear of where this additional 52 stacking spaces will occur, as no drawings show such. Sounds like if the porte cochere is full, valet staff will direct guests to the garage entrance to be loaded/off-loaded within the garage. How will this work with handicapped individuals? a. See sheet A-02/ A-02B for grade level valet exit directly to porte cochere. b. Met. c & d. Staff still has concerns about the adequacy of parking for guests and employees, even based on the Parking Study. a. See attached parking study. 6/1/08 - WW Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - Revise for the following: a. Under (1), I do not find 180 feet of stacking along Second Sheet before the entrance to the garage. Also, since there is not such stacking, unclear of the statement in the second sentence "exiting the garage so as not to interfere with traffic flow on Coronado Drive. " Since parking on Level 200 is solely valet and the entrance/exit is on Second Street, need to discuss how the valet attendants will operate the parking (will they go around the block on S. Gulftiew Blvd to Coronado Drive to go into the drop-off area or will they exit to Second Street and then enter the ground level parking to travel to the ground level parking area to the drop-off area?); a. See attached revised parking study b Where will buses load/off-load? The drop-off area off Coronado Drive or within rights-of-way? a. Bus parking lane is closest to Coronado but is not within right of way. c. Under (2), demonstrate that adequate parking will be provided for guests and employees - see other Planning and Traffic Engineering comments regarding such statement in Sentence 3; and a. See revised parking study d. d. Under (3), see comments from Parking System under Traffic Engineering. a. See revised parking study II. The application indicates the request isfor 450 total overnight accommodation units; however, based on Sheets A- 04 - A-I 0, I count 200 vacation/interval ownership units and 251 hotel units. The discrepancy on the number of hotel units is on the penthouse level I count a total of I J hotel units, including the hospitality suite. a. See revised sheet A-lO I2.Sheet C5 - Section C-C - There are two Section C-C indicated on the plan. The sectional drawing is incorrect, as the sidewalk is not five feet in width (due to the tree well grating that can be walked upon) and there is not 11.12 feet ji'om the back of sidewalk to the property line. Revise. a. Section C-C is revised and shown at only one location rather than two. I3.Sheet C-4 - Provide a dimension from the south property line (proposed Second Street) to the building (General Site Note #7 on Sheet C-2 indicates 18.83 feet). a. Dimension added I4.It is my understanding that the public parking has been eliminated from the parking garage and is being dealt with differently off-site. As such, revise General Parking Note #9 on Sheet C-2 to reflect this, as well as providing a total number of parking spaces provided (463 spaces). a. See note nine 011 pave C2 I5.Elevation sheets - Plans appear to provide afive-foot high parapet on top of the roof of the ISO-foot tall towers Per the definition of "Height, Building or Structure" parapets cannot exceed 42-inches. Revise. a. See revised elevation drawings I6.Elevation sheets - Plans indicate aluminum trellises 13'-8" above the ISO-foot tall towers on Sheet A-II; no such dimension on Sheet A-13) and five-feet above the IOO-foot height for the connector portion of the building between the two ISO-foot towers. Unclear of the purpose of the trellises above the ISO-foot tall towers (providing shade for rooftop occupancy on the west side??) (please advise with as much detail as possible, including drawings as necessary). Unclear why a trellis is being provided above a mechanical room (?). Must comply with the definition of "Height, Building or Structure" for those above 150 feet. The trellises above the connector portion of the building appears to provide a shading mechanism for the rooftop occupancy being provided. Per the definition of "Height, Building or Structure" the trellises above the connector portion cannot exceed the maximum height of I 00 feet above BFE Revise. a. Trellises and wall extending above approved parapet height are there to screen mechanical equipment includmg cooling towers, air handlers, exhaust fans and stair pressurization equipment 17.Elevation sheets - Legend indicates # 1 and #2 to be painted. Need to indicate the proposed colors on the elevations (by name). Additionally, the colors of the other exterior building elements need to be identified. Provide color samples/swatches for all proposed colors. a. See revised legend on elevation drawings. I8.Will need to confirm with planning management as to appropriately handle the "valet" parking where spaces are stacked from an advertising standpoint (Exhibit B to application in request "d"). a. Acknowledged 19. Will need to confirm with Planning management as to advertising the widened sidewalk along Second Street that encroaches onto the subject property by three feet (Exhibit B to application in Request "f). a. Acknowledged 20. Sheet A-12 - There is an 8-foot tall projection above the roof indicated on the west side of the building. This 8- foot tall building feature is not indicated on the west (Sheet A-II) elevation, or at least not indicated at the same height. Unclear as to the discrepancy. Revise. a. See response to comment #16 above. 21. Sheet A-03 - Remove the paver and landscaping symbols (shading) from the retail area next to Coronado Drive (south side of drop-off porte cochere) next to the timeshare lobby and check in areas, since it will be interior floor area. Also remove the paver and landscaping symbols (shading) from the area on the north side of the porte cochere, since this will also be interior floor area. a. See revised sheet A-03 22. Sheet A-03 - There is a "blank" area (undefined) space surrounding the "ramp up". It appears that some or most of this area could be floor area devoted to some use, especially to the west of the ramp. Please define the intended use. a. See revised sheet A-03 showing drive aisle accessing vehicular ramp to 200 level. 23. Sheet A-03 - Remove the landscaping shadingfrom the landing area on the west side of the grand ballroom prefunction area NW of the restrooms. a. See rey;sed sh.eet A-03 24. Sheet A-03 - Include an internal door access from the gallery to the specialty retail to make it an accessory use, rather than a primary use. a. See revised sheet A-03 2S. Sheets A-04, A-OS, A-06, A-07, A-08, A-09 andA-IO - Unclear as to the meaning of the gray shading on the plans as to what it is indicating. Include shading as a "legend" with an explanation as to its meaning on each sheet. a. Shaded areas depict back of house service areas, elevators and stairs. See revised drawings. 26. Sheet A-06 - Confirm that the access for guests from the northern elevators to the pool is through the spa. It would seem that there should be some corridor to separate off this means of access from the spa (??). a. Access is through spa. Layout will not be completed until further into the construction plan design process. 27. Sheet A -II - Complete the connector portion of the building at the north and south towers, as portions of the building and/or details are missing. a. See revised sheet A-ll 28. Sheet A-13 - Based on the floor plans, there is only one level of louvers for the 200 level. The 300IMeeting Room level has timeshare units facing Coronado Drive. Revise these portions of the elevation. a. See revised sheet A-13 29. Sheet A-14 - Windows for the timeshare units in the lower (95' tall portion of the eastern portion of the building) do not correspond with that shown on Sheets A-06 and A-07. Revise. a. See revised sheet A-14 30. Sheets C4, CS and C6 - Unclear why the eight-foot wide sidewalk along Second Street drops to about five feet in width at the west property line (sidewalk appears to continue at the eight foot width on the Landscape Plan), Revise. a. Sidewalk has been expanded to eight foot wide at west property line. 31. Required egress stairs - Unclear how some of the proposed stairs are designed and/or function: a. Western stairwell in the hotel tower - Stairs start internally on the Lobby Level and go up. Lobby Level (-Sheet .A.-03) appears to the stairvlell to go to the Grade Level (Sheet A _ -02), but no stairwell shown. Stairs do not take guests to the outside to a public way; a. See revised sheet A-03 b. Eastern stairwell in the hotel tower - Stairs from Levels S and above are indicated to extend to the Amenity Level (Sheet A-06) with an unconnected "stair transfer", which is totally unclear. The tower stairwell does not connect to the open stairs on the 300 Level (Sheet A-OS); and a. See revised drawings c. Eastern stairwell in timeshare tower - Stairwells don't seem to connect between the 300 Level (Sheet A-OS) and the Amenity Level (Sheet A-06). a. See revised drawings The Request is worded as follows: (1) Flexible Development approval to Terminate the Status of a Nonconformityfor density (200 overnight accommodation units; where 137 overnight accommodation units are permitted today) within the Tourist District, under the provisions of Section 6-109. C; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 450-unit Overnight Accommodation use (through an increase of the permitted density of250 overnight accommodation units from the density pool created pursuant to Beach by Design), with a lot area of 119,856 square feet (2.75 acres), a lot width of approximately 545 feet along Coronado Drive and 227 feet along proposed Second Street, a front (east along Coronado Drive) setback of zero feet (to building and pavement), a front (south along proposed Second Street) setback of 18.83 feet (to building), a front (west and north along South Gulfview Boulevard) setback of zero feet (to building), a building height of 150 feet (to roof deck) and 463 parking spaces (1.029 spaces per room), a deviation to allow stacked parking and to allow a two-year time frame to subn1. it for a building pernl. it, as a Comprehensive 1 nfill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803 . C; (3) To reduce the required foundation landscaping along proposed Second Street and S. Gulfview Boulevardfromjive to zero feet (to building and pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202. G; and (4) Vacation of a portion ofS. Gulfview Boulevard (former bridge landing). (Related to Case No. DVA2008-00001). Need to revise Exhibit B to reflect the new wordingfor a Comprehensive 1nfill Redevelopment Project (C1 RP) request, since all standards in Table 2-803 for a C1 RP are listed as "n/a". As part oft his revision, the written material and responses to the criteria (General Applicability and C1 RP) need to compare the proposed land area, lot width, setbacks, height and parking to that normally requiredfor an overnight accommodation use (see Table 2-803) as to how the proposal is consistent with the surrounding properties and Beach by Design. See me if you have questions. a. Exhibit B has been revised to reflect above request. 33. Sheet 3113 - Plan indicates a "HIC Ramp Type CR20" south of the stairsfrom the Porte cohere to the sidewalk on S. Gulfview Blvd. Unclear of this note, since there isn't any HIC ramp shown. Revise removes. a. Plan has been revised 34. Sheet 3113 - Provide a dimension from the front property line to the pavement edge for the porte cochere directly south of the stairs and a dimension from the front property line to the pavement edge for the landscape area between the southern and middle driveways. This is for advertising purposes. a. The distance from the property line to the curb is zero. ~ Clearwater ~~ . Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORiGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN . CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 04/24/2007) ~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT~ .. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: c.t.~~ -g~rt.~ riO, !lJ.v J.-VC- MAILING ADDRESS: 315 S. 'Biscavne Blvd., 4th Floor,Miami, FL 3313~ PHONE NUMBER: (305)533-0001 FAX NUMBER: (305)513-5800 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: efordin@related group. com PROPERTY OWNER(S): K & P Clearwater Estate, LLC, a Florida limited Iiabilitv company List ALL owners on the deed One Tampa City Center, Suite 2505, Tampa, FL 33602 . AGENT NAME: E. D. ArmstronQ III, Esq. and Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 1368, Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 PHONE NUMBER: (727)451-1818 FAX NUMBER: (727)462-0365 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: eda@jpfirm.com 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the arch,itectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: ::ODMA IPCDOCS\DOCSC\I1II438591\ 1 Page 1 of 2 The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 3. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a .beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. See Exhibit "A" attached hereto. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART bF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL lWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this f 2. f'Jl,. day of May, A.D. 2008 to me and/or by E. D. Armstrong III, who is personally known to me. Signature property owner or representative E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire ~t,~ No~ pub , My commission expires: ~,-;'t;f':W:~ ayne . ears g!(Ji.\c:: Commission # 00449633 ~~~c;: Expires September 2, 2009 , ,P,jnt BonaodTroyFlln.lllIUItllCl,lIIO, IOl).U"'019 ::ODMA IPCDOCSIDOCSCWl438591\ 1 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" TO COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM APPLICATION TRG Clearwater Beach, LLC 100 Coronado Drive and 201, 215 and 219 South Gulfview Boulevard This application is submitted in conjunction with a development agreement application and an application for flexible development approval of a comprehensive infill redevelopment project to allow the redevelopment of this Clearwater Beach site with a 450-unit destination resort hotel. The project site is comprised of several parcels which make up an entire block located at the southerly exit of the roundabout, bounded on the east by Coronado, on the south by Second Street and on the north and west by South Gulfview. Due to its highly visible location, the proposed hotel will serve as a landmark to residents and tourists entering the south beach area. Written Submittal Requirements 1) Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. . The reason for this request is to provide relief from the foundation landscaping requirement along the westerly building fac;ade on South Gulfview Boulevard. Due to the project comprising an entire block of property, it has four building facades. The proposed landscape treatment exceeds the foundation landscaping requirement on three facades of the hotel. Sheet L2 shows the width of the foundation landscaping interrupted only by vehicular or pedestrian accesses. The applicant is unable to locate foundation landscaping within the property boundary along the westerly fac;ade because the proposed project is developed at a zero westerly lot line. As shown on the proposed plans, the west portion of the project includes a covered sidewalk on the subject Property and public gathering area (the "Palm Court") located on City property subject to an easement granted by the City pursuant to the terms of the proposed development agreement. The majority of the westerly landscaping treatment is within this Palm Court area as well as within the City's property. The westerly landscape design focuses on tall Medjool Date Palms lining South Gulfview and circling the "Palm Court" pedestrian entrance to the hotel. As shown on the proposed plans, abundant landscape treatment, including shrubs and groundcover in addition to the palms, is proposed on the City property in front of the westerly fac;ade of the hotel to enhance the newly-opened Beach Walk area. The proposed landscaping on the western fac;ade increases the existing BeachWalk landscaping and provides a lush, landscaped entrance to the city's BeachWalk. The project meets the Criteria (b) above, as the overall landscape treatment exceeds the minimum standards of the Code. As shown on the Foundation Planting plans included in the landscape plans, the number of proposed trees located within the property boundaries on the southerly, easterly and northerly facades of the hotel (119) greatly exceeds the number of trees that are required by Code (46). This was done in order to- incorporate into three building facades the total amount of foundation landscaping that is required for all four building facades. The northerly fac;ade which serves as the focal point for visitors entering from the roundabout will feature Medjool Date Palms on both sides of a water feature at the northeast corner of the hotel, with a Magnolia-lined sidewalk extending west into the Beach Walk. As the sidewalk extends south from the water feature along Coronado it is lined with oaks along the entire easterly fac;ade, with the exception of the Medjool Date Palms which will adorn the entrance drive. These trees are provided in addition to excess foundation landscaping and will give a lush green appearance to the site when viewed from the street, as well as providing a shaded sidewalk for pedestrians. Relief is also necessary because there is not a minimum of five-foot foundation landscape area continuously on the north, east and south sides of the property. These interruptions are necessary for the development of the property as a destination resort and will have significantly more landscaping as is required under the minimum landscape standards of the code. East Fac;ade: The drop-off area on the eastern side on the building, there is minimal foundation planting under the porte cochere. To counterbalance this, immediately on either side of the drop-off area, there is a 26-foot foundation planting. North Fac;ade: The foundation planting is interrupted by paved pedestrian walkways on the northern side. This walkway is incorporated into the city sidewalks and coordinate with the BeachWalk design. Further, the foundation planting is reduced in width as S. Gulfview Ave. turns to join BeachWalk. The applicant proposes increased plantings on the city ROW between sidewalk and the road to supplement this area. South Fac;ade: The garage entrance and exit interrupt the foundation planting. Where there is no interruption, the planting is 15'9" deep to counterbalance this interruption. 2 2) Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. The proposed landscape treatments and superior architectural design will enhance this highly visible location. The beautification of this site will have a favorable impact on the beach community and will be highly visible as to serve as a landmark to those entering the south beach area from the roundabout The tree-lined sidewalks and water features incorporated into the project will be inviting to pedestrians. The Palm Court entrance connects the hotel to the Beach Walk. The proposed landscape on the north and east facades incorporate pedestrian- friendly Beach Walk improvements into this project. These improvements encroach into the otherwise required foundation planting (see above). The encroachments provide greater pedestrian access to the property from the city right of way. The encroachments on the south fa9ade for the parking garage do not diminish the community character. 3) Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Although the plan does not meet the specific foundation landscaping requirement on the westerly facade, the overall level of quality of the landscape treatment proposed exceeds the Code minimum standards. In addition, the foundation landscaping on the northerly, easterly and southerly facades of the building exceed minimum standards. The beautification of the site through the proposed development's architectural design, lavish and inviting landscaping, tree-lined sidewalks and connection to and incorporation of the hotel to the Beach Walk will benefit the surrounding properties. The encroachments to the foundation planting do not minimize property values in the immediate vicinity. Rather, the increased plantings will beneficially impact the value of the properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. 3 4) Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The proposed landscape treatment is of a quality and character that is consistent with Beach by Design guidelines. South Gulfview is one of the City's major scenic corridors. Through the applicant's connection of the Beach Walk improvements to the site through the proposed landscape plans, South Gulfview is being accentuated and incorporated into the site. 8/11/20085:25 PM 49313.115456 #447517 v1 - TRG/Ex to Camp Lanscape REVISED 4 EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT K&P Clearwater Estate, LLC 100 Coronado Drive and 201, 215 and 219 South Gulfview Boulevard Section B. Description of Request Request The Applicant, K&P Clearwater Estate, LLC, proposes to redevelop the property with a proposed 450-unit destination resort hotel on Clearwater Beach. The subject property is the site of the previously approved Kiran Grand Hotel, located at 100 Coronado Drive and 201, 215 and 219 South Gulfview Boulevard. Specifically, the Applicant seeks flexible development approval of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, in accordance with the plans submitted with this application as follows: a. Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density of 200 overnight units as established by FLD2004-02013, where 137 overnight accommodation units (2.75 acres at 50 units/acre) are allowed by the current zoning (Tourist) and land use designation (RFH); b. Increase in density of 250 hotel rooms from the Beach by Design density pool, previously granted by FLD 2004-02013; c. Maximum building height of 150' (to roof deck) including three proposed towers, two with heights of 150'-0" to roof deck and one with height of 95'-0" to roof deck; d. Either 463 valet-only parking spaces or 455 valet-only parking spaces with 8 public parking spaces at 1.028 or 1.0111 parking spaces per hotel room respectively; e. A front (north) setback along South Gulfview of 6.0' to building, where 15' is required by Code; f. A front (south) setback along Second Street of 18.83-ft to building and 0' to pavement, where 15' is required by Code; g. A front (east) setback along Coronado of 0' to building and 0' to pavement where 15' is required by Code; h. A front (west) setback along South Gulfview of 0' to building and 0' to pavement, where 15' is required by Code; I. Flexibility to minimum standards for sight visibility triangles on Second Street; J. Reduce the required foundation landscaping along Coronado Drive and S. Gulfview Blvd. from 5-ft to O-ft (to building and pavement) as a Comprehensive Landscape Program; k. Approval of a two-year development order. History The property is the former site of several mid-sized hotels and retail shops, built in the 1970s, which served as the entry to South Clearwater Beach. On October 19, 2004, the Community Development Board approved the Kiran Grand, a hotel and condominium project, through (i) a termination of status of nonconformity for density, (ii) flexible development approval as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project of 350 overnight accommodation units and 75 attached dwelling units as a mixed use, including 250 hotel rooms from the Beach by Design density pool and (iii) approval of a Development Agreement (FLD2004-02013, FLD2004-2013A and DVA2004-00001). The approvals included a height increase to 150', deviations to allow stacked parking and relief from setback requirements. The City approved several minor revisions and granted extensions to the approved site plan/development order; however, changes in the real estate market and changes in ownership have caused the Applicant to modify the proposed use of the property to a proposed resort hotel consisting of 450 overnight accommodation units. Proposed Use The Applicant proposes to redevelop the site with a resort hotel consisting of 200 vacation/interval ownership units and 250 traditional hotel units. The proposed resort hotel will include amenities as outlined in Beach by Design, making it a destination resort for Clearwater Beach, including a pool, spa, ballroom and meeting space. The proposed Project reduces the size, bulk, mass and scale of the previously approved project on this site. It changes the architectural style to a tropical architecture and focuses on incorporating pedestrian access components to Beach Walk. The proposed Project eliminates the approved pedestrian bridge to Clearwater Beach and instead provides for an easement for pedestrian access on the west property line. The specifics of this request are included in the Development Agreement application that is included in this application. Changes to the previously approved site plan include: - Elimination of approved pedestrian bridge which connects project site to west side of S. Gulfview Boulevard and Clearwater Beach; - Granting of an easement by the city for the construction of a loggia and the "Palm Court" pedestrian area; 2 - Additional vacation of right of way by City for property located where the previously approved Pedestrian Bridge is currently proposed to be located; - Rather than a turn lane the entire length of the project, the turn lane begins south of the drop off area to provide access to Second Street for both the proposed Project and the Hyatt Aqualea and provide increased landscaping and pedestrian walk ways at entrance of City's Beach Walk. Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The property is bounded on the west by the City of Clearwater's public Beach Walk promenade, South Gultview Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico. North: The property to the north is South Gultview Blvd. and City-owned property, including the Pier 60 public parking lot. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the project, through extension of a 5'-wide shell finish concrete sidewalk along Gultview on the north side of the property and use of decorative pavers. Medjool Date Palms will be planted along Gultview on the west and cabbage palms and salt-tolerant landscaping will be added along Gultview to the north of the property. East: The Property is bounded on the east by relocated Coronado Drive and further east is an area of smaller hotels. It is anticipated that this area will also be undergoing renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. The height of the four-story base element relates the building to the lower context of the buildings to the east across Coronado Drive. South: The adjacent property to the south is occupied by the Hyatt Aqualea construction site. Upon completion, the Aqualea will be 150' in height (above BFE) and of similar scale as the proposed project. The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with the Design Guidelines set forth in Beach by Design for projects including approvals of bonus hotel density and increased building height. Please see the more detailed discussion of these criteria in response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria No. 6.b. in this exhibit. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3 The proposed project will enhance this area of the beach in a number of ways, including: (1) Superior architectural design, including a public "Palm Court" along the Beach Walk area of South Gulfview Boulevard, and lush landscaping which will visually enhance the neighborhood. (2) Incorporation of public sidewalks around the property and linkages to the neighboring Hyatt Aqualea and Beach Walk. (3) Construction which meets current building codes. (4) Provision of adequate parking for the entire project on site, plus the provision of 8 public access spaces under option B. The parking will have valet parking spaces and a loading area, in order to eliminate any traffic congestion at the site and eliminate potential off-site parking in public lots. The parking is designed to accommodate staff, guests, and overnight visitors, as well as provide adequate space for taxis and airport shuttles. Staging of shuttles and taxis will occur in the drop-off area on Coronado. (5) Beach Walk improvements incorporated into the site provide for a better pedestrian flow along South Gulfview and Coronado Drive than what currently exists. (6) The property value will significantly increase. (7) The guests of the proposed resort hotel will be potential clientele for nearby restaurants and retail businesses. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The construction of the Beach Walk improvements by the Applicant, including 5'_ wide shell finish concrete sidewalks around the property, will improve the pedestrian flow and safety along South Gulfview and Coronado. Traffic congestion will be minimized as described in Criteria 4 below. A turn lane will be constructed by the Applicant on the Coronado right-of-way extending south from the drop-off area to Second Street, for ease of entry to the parking garage, by guests and valets. A sidewalk shaded by trees will be installed along Coronado as shown on the proposed plans. With regard to health, safety and welfare, the proposed development and structure will comply as required with applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The Applicant has submitted a traffic study to review potential impacts created by construction of the project based on a methodology agreed upon by the City staff, which was prepared by Roy E. Chapman, P.E., Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 4 There are a number of ways in which the project has been designed to minimize traffic congestion: (1) The entrance to the parking garage will have 180 feet of stacking space along Second Street, enough for seven vehicles before entering the parking garage. This will allow adequate room for stacking of vehicles entering or exiting the garage so as not to interfere with traffic flow on Coronado. Additionally, vehicles can use the drop-off area in the front to pull off of the street and onto the property to avoid backups onto Coronado. (2) The site will contain 463 valet parking spaces where Code requires 450 non-valet spaces. Full valet service will be provided so that guests and overnight visitors will not have to wait for spaces or circle the garage looking for a parking space, therefore allowing traffic to flow smoothly into the parking garage off the public street. Due to seasonal congestion on the beach and the lack to date of new public parking facilities, the Applicant desires to insure that all parking demands of the project can be accommodated on site. (4) As shown on the proposed site plan, there is a loading/unloading area provided on the south side of the site. Delivery vehicles will be provided three spaces in the loading area that has access to Second Street. This should keep delivery vehicles from interfering with the traffic flow on Coronado Drive. Solid waste pick-up will also be accessed on Second Street. (5) Airport shuttles, taxis and limousines will use the drop-off area under the portico on Coronado Drive. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The property is located within the "Beach Walk District" of Clearwater Beach. The project will function as a northerly "bookend" to the "Beach Walk District." The project is also consistent with the community character of the "Beach Walk District" which Beach by Design describes as an area that necessitates the renovation and redevelopment of the existing structures in order to create the primary beachfront destination of Clearwater Beach. As to the immediate vicinity, to the west and the north, separating the site from the public parking and public beach, is the City's Beach Walk. The Applicant is incorporating the Beach Walk improvements into the property and providing improvements in the City right-of-way to the west and north of the property as envisioned by Beach by Design, including a shell finish concrete sidewalk, with Medjool palms along Gulfview to the west and cabbage palms and salt-tolerant plantings along Gulfview to the north. The Applicant proposes pedestrian access improvements to Beach Walk including a covered loggia that provides a seamless covered area from the Hyatt 5 Aqualea to the Pier 60 parking lot. This loggia and Palm Court area is proposed to replace the previously approved Pedestrian Bridge. The parcel to the south is occupied by the Hyatt Aqualea construction site with a proposed height of 150' (above BFE). The proposed project is of a superior architectural design to the previously existing buildings and incorporates Beach by Design guidelines therefore enhancing the surrounding properties. To the east are small-scaled overnight accommodation uses. The proposed improvements to the property include sidewalks around the building that connect to the Beach Walk and provide pedestrians seamless access north and south along Gulfview and Coronado. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal at this north entry to Beach Walk and South Clearwater Beach. The architectural style integrates a tropical modern design which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront property. Valet parking space, adequate loading/unloading spaces and sufficient stacking space at the main vehicular entrance of the property will keep vehicles off of Coronado which will enhance and encourage the flow of pedestrians from the beach to the site or other properties to the south. Access to the hotel on the Gulf front (westerly) side of the property will be pedestrian access only. The main pool area will be located in the middle of the property between the two towers and on the fourth floor level, such that noise or visual distraction will not be a factor to the resort hotel to the south. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The termination of status of nonconformity and allocation of 250 hotel rooms from the Beach by Design density pool were previously approved in association with FLD2004-02013 and FLD2004-02013A, which approved the development of 350 hotel rooms and 75 condominium units on the property and a pedestrian bridge from the project to the beach. The associated development agreement (as approved by DVA2004-00001) is currently in effect and the Applicant has simultaneously submitted a proposed amended and restated development agreement. 6 The proposed deviations from Code, which are discussed in detail below, are necessary and minimal and without which the project cannot be constructed at this location. The Applicant has designed the proposed redevelopment project to comply with Beach by Design guidelines to the fullest extent possible. The proposed redevelopment of this site into a resort use is highly visible from Beach Walk and is an integral part of the City's vision of Clearwater Beach as set forth in Beach by Design. Heiqht The request for 150' when 100' is allowed by Code is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design which provide that height may be increased to 150' if additional density is allocated to the development with bonus hotel units. There is a reasonable relationship between the height increase and the 250 additional resort hotel units based upon other cases recommended for approval by staff and actually approved by COB consistent with Beach by Design. There are 146 units located above 100', consisting of 106 traditional hotel rooms and 40 vacation/interval ownership units. Parkinq The Applicant has requested relief from Code parking requirements due to the fact that the parking serving the resort hotel will be full valet service. As such, the proposed plans incorporate 463 valet spaces. The 463 valet spaces provided are adequate to serve the 450-room resort hotel. Setbacks The previously approved project (FLD2004-2013) also included relief for building setbacks (0' to building along the east, south and west facades of the building). The relief sought from setbacks is required due to the dedication of rights-of-way for street relocations, provision of a dedicated turn lane from the drop-off area to Second Street and incorporation of the property into the Beach Walk. The proposed setback deviations will not be visually apparent as the property line will not be visible when landscaping and walkways are incorporated into the Beach Walk and promenade along relocated Coronado. Siqht Visibility Trianqles As to the applicant's request for flexibility with regard to sight visibility triangles on Second Street, the need for this relief is due to the location of the parking garage access via Second Street, which eliminates congestion on Coronado, an arterial. The applicant proposes to install safety measures (such as mirrors and signage) to insure adequate visibility for the safety of motorists and pedestrians entering and exiting the garage. 7 Direct Access to an Arterial The property is addressed from Coronado and South Gulfview and traditionally has had Coronado addresses. As such, the parcel is bounded on three sides by arterial roadways. The previously approved site plan (FLD2004-02013) allowed access to Coronado and South Gulfview. The proposed site plan provides for a hotel entrance and drop-off drive on the easterly side of the building on Coronado. Vehicles exiting this drop-off area will enter a right turn lane that extends to 2nd Street, where vehicles enter and exit the proposed parking garage. There is also a valet only exit to the drop-off area that does not access the public street, thereby reducing traffic from the garage. Two-Year Development Order The Applicant requests a two-year development order due to market conditions. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. Overnight accommodations are allowed in the "Tourist" zoning district. Primary uses in the "Resort Facilities High" land use category are "high density residential/overnight accommodation." The site is located in the Beach Walk District of Beach by Design which suggests resort development. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The improvement of the site will pave the way for future redevelopment and set an example for the style of quality architecture envisioned by Beach by Design. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. West: The property is bounded on the west by Beach Walk and the Gulf of Mexico. North: To the north is the Beach Walk entry and public parking. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the project. East: The adjacent property to the east is an area of smaller motels. It is anticipated that this waterfront area will also undergo renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. 8 South: The adjacent property to south is occupied by the Hyatt Aqualea construction site, which is 150' in height and of similar scale to the proposed project. The proposed project incorporates sidewalks that allow pedestrians to walk seamlessly between north and south from the Hyatt to Pier 60. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. The proposed use meets several of these criteria. Overnight accommodations are permitted by the "Resort Facilities High" land use category and in the "Tourist" zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard and flexible use. Redevelopment of Clearwater Beach is a significant economic contributor to the City. The property has not recently contributed to the economy as it has been closed to guests for the last few years. This proposed use is an economic contributor by increasing the number of tourists to Clearwater Beach and encouraging patronization of local businesses. The proposed project will generate new jobs in the City of Clearwater. The proposed use as overnight accommodations is characteristic of the neighborhood, specifically as the entrance to South Clearwater Beach. As previously discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding uses. 9 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. The proposed use is a use permitted in the Tourist zoning district without this approval. Surrounding properties are already developed or under development. Public property to the north is not impacted. The existing, approved project includes hotel and condominium use whereas the proposed project focuses only on tourist activities. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. The proposed project is designed to meet the requirements of Beach by Design in scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. The stepped massing of the project is derived from the massing requirements of Beach by Design. The project places active spaces internal to the project site to reduce noise transmission and visual distraction to adjacent properties. The location of the units on the site provides all units in the project with water views and provides easy access for all guests to the public beach and nearby businesses. This project furthers the City's beach revitalization objective of creating a "world class" address by punctuating the newly improved beachfront with a world class resort. The project's "modern tropical" architecture compliments the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. We provide the following information concerning the height, tower separation, design, scale and mass criteria: Beach bv Desiqn VII. B Heiqht and Tower Separation The project consists of three towers, two of which are 150' in height measured from FEMA to the top of the main roof deck. Per Beach by Design VII B: ".. . the height may be increased, however to one hundred fifty feet (150') if': . B.1. "Additional density is allocated to the development by ... bonus hotel units... " There are 250 bonus hotel rooms allocated to the site by FLD2004- 02013 and DVA2004-00001. . B.2 (a) "Portions of any structures which exceed one hundred feet (100') (in height) are spaced at least 100' apart." The nearest structure to the south (Hyatt 10 Aqualea) is separated from the 100' plus portion of the proposed building by approximately 140'. The two 150" towers internal to the project are separated from one another by 236'. See Exhibit "C-1" attached. . B.2. "Four structures which exceed 100' within 800'....do not occupy 40% of a north south vertical plane..." See Exhibit "C-2" attached. B. 3. "The floor plate of any portion of a building that exceeds forty-five feet in height is limited as follows: a) The largest floor plate between 45' and 100' exceeds 25,000 square feet and is approximately 48,212 square feet. b) The largest floor plate between 100' and 150' exceeds 10,000 square feet and is approximately 27,292 square feet. The Applicant requests deviations to this requirement as provided by Beach by Design. See below for discussion of mass and scale and an explanation of how the project provides a tiered effect thereby justifying such deviation. Beach bv Deskin VII C Desiqn, Scale and Mass of Buildinqs The building mass consists of a 4-story base, two 150' towers and a 95' tall connecting element that links the towers and base together. The building sits at the north end of the Beach Walk District. When approached from the north, the curved fa9ade of the public meeting space within the base softens the transition to the west along South Gulfview Boulevard or the east on Coronado Drive. Ample windows along the curving fa9ade foster the connection of the public with the building occupants. Lush landscaping and broad sidewalks appeal to human scale and encourage pedestrian circulation around the grand curve. The scale of the base element continues south to 2nd Street and relates the building to the lower context east of Coronado while enclosing all of the parking and service elements. The lush landscaping and shell stone sidewalks continue all around the building and interface seamlessly with the Beach by Design features reinforcing the pedestrian oriented beach community. At the north end, the curved mass is reinforced by one of two 150' towers providing monumental culmination to the approach appropriate for the urban scale. The towers are spaced nearly 240' apart and are both oriented on an east-west axis allowing the flow of space toward the water in both directions. The tower units are angled for the occupants with 3' to 6' balconies to view the gulf while not blocking visual access at an urban scale. The 95' tall connecting element is aligned on a north-south axis and provides a graceful transition between the vertical towers and horizontal base. Smaller scale decorative 11 trellises, awnings, louvered panels and translucent railing soften the mass of the building and make it visually accessible. The east-west axis established by the tower masses is reinforced by shaping the building in keeping with the Beach by Design guidelines to decrease the apparent scale of the structure. On the east side of the building this is apparent as rows of palm trees buffer the edge of the road as the vehicular drop off recedes into the property and accesses the lower lobby level. On the west facing the Gulf the mass of the base is carved back to create a public palm court that provides pedestrian access from the Beach by Design walkways to the covered loggia that brings people to the shops and restaurant within the base of the building. The palm court and covered loggia are slightly elevated and will provide a desirable viewing platform toward the Gulf of Mexico for public use. The loggia aligns with the covered walkway at the adjacent property to the south providing a consistent edge along the public space. The quantifiable aspects of the architectural vocabulary are as follows per Beach by Design: . Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet...will be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The grade level building footprint is approximately 96,110 square feet. The building dimensions vary considerably so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 447' wide along Gulfview Boulevard, 237' deep along the north side, and 158'-159' high from grade to the top of the two towers main roof deck; none of these dimensions are "equal" (or vary by less than 40% of the of the shorter two lengths). In addition to these overall dimensions, the building's modulated massing provides considerable dimensional variation. . No plane (or elevation) of the project "...continue(s) uninterrupted for greater than one hundred (100). Although the base extends nearly the length of the property, it is highly articulated. Within 50' of the north and south ends, the towers interface with the lower structure as they reach the ground. To the east the center of the base has structural fins that extend up from the ground to support the building above the drop off and continue up to trellises to the recreation deck on the roof of the connecting element. To the west, the base is carved back to create the public palm court. . At least sixty percent (60%) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. 12 All Qf the elevations are provided with large windows (including sliding glass doors and storefront) or architectural decoration including translucent railings, trellises and decorative louvered panels at the parking levels. The percentage of decoration on each of the exterior elevations is as follows, all exceeding the minimum requirement of 60%: . North elevation - 65% . East elevation - 68% . South elevation - 60% . West elevation - 71 % These percentages are noted on the architectural plans. . No more than sixty percent (60%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 42' will be occupied by a building. The overall building mass from 42' to 150' (above FEMA) calculates to 38.0% of the theoretical maximum allowed building envelope, which is less than the 60% maximum allowed. See Exhibit "C-3" attached. . The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The height and mass of the building are correlated to the parcel and adjacent public spaces as described above. . The guideline for mixed use is not applicable. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The proposed project has a less dense scale than that of the Hyatt Aqualea, which is under construction in the adjacent parcel. Further, it has significantly less mass and bulk than the previously proposed project on the same site. The architectural style and compliance with design guidelines will support the emerging character of the area as envisioned by Beach by Design. The project's "modern tropical architecture" compliments the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: · Changes in horizontal building planes; 13 . Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc; . Variety in materials, colors and textures; . Distinctive fenestration patterns; . Building stepbacks; and . Distinctive roofs forms. Many of these elements have been incorporated into the design as discussed in detail in response to Criteria 6.b. above. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Landscapinq The landscape plan is in accordance with design guidelines set forth in Beach by Design with special emphasis on selecting plant material that is native and salt- tolerant but provides visual interest. All four sides of the project are building facades as all front on public-rights-of-way. A comprehensive landscape application and program are proposed as part of this submittal which emphasizes uniformity with surrounding Beach by Design improvements and salt tolerant species. Gulfview Boulevard (West): Medjool Date Palms will be planted approximately 35' on center to provide height and scale to the building. The pedestrian scale will be further addressed through the use of salt-tolerant shrubs and dense groundcover along the sidewalk. A pedestrian connection will be made, from the lobby to the sidewalk, using specialty paving such as concrete pavers or colored concrete. Gulfview Boulevard (North): The north property line will be planted with clusters of Cabbage Palms and other salt-tolerant vegetation to create a landscape that will thrive on the site and will be coordinated with the Beach Walk improvements to provide a seamless feel between properties. Coronado Drive (East): Rows of oaks will be planted in order to provide a shaded pedestrian walkway along Coronado. Medjool Palms will be planted at the entrance to the building to provide height and scale to the building. Second Street (South): 14 The south property line will include the entrance driveway to the parking garage. The oak-shaded pedestrian walkway will be extended from Coronado around the southerly boundary of the site. Decorative pavers will be used at the entrances to the garage and through the drop-off area to direct vehicles to the entry. Crosswalks will be paved using the standard Clearwater Beach concrete pavers and a pedestrian connection will be made, from the lobby to the sidewalk. The driveways will have a heavy landscape buffer to shield the driveways as viewed from the Beach Walk on the west side of the property. The pedestrian path will continue along the south side of the building and connect to the service drive. Distances between BuildinQs The distances between buildings have been discussed in response to Beach by Design guidelines as set forth in Criteria 6.b. ******************** The following are additional criteria: Termination of Non-conforming Status The Applicant seeks termination of non-conforming status, as was previously approved, in accordance with Section 6-109 of the Code, to allow the density of 450 overnight accommodations on the site. Section 6-109 of the Code requires a level two approval to terminate status as a non- conforming use or structure with the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-1202(D). This requirement is not applicable as all off-street parking will be enclosed in the building. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. The Applicant agrees to accept a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with Code or be approved as part of a Comprehensive Sign Program. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. 15 The proposed landscaping either meets or exceeds Code requirements as discussed in Comprehensive Infill Criteria 6.e above. As stated above, the Applicant agrees to a condition of approval requiring signs to comply with Code or approval of a Comprehensive Sign Program. Granting of Hotel Density Pool units In connection with the Applicant's request for hotel density pool units, the following indicate how the Applicant meets Beach by Design requirements for such additional units. 1. A minimum of 200 hotel rooms. The project includes 250 traditional hotel rooms and 200 vacation/interval ownership units. 2. A full range of on and off-site amenities including full service restaurant, room service, concierge, valet parking, exercise club, boating, fishing, golf, at least 20,000 sq. ft. of meeting space, or comparable amenities. The project includes all valet-parking, a full-service restaurant, a poolside grill and bar, resort spa, guest exercise facility and 20,000 sq. ft. of meeting space. 3. Access to hotel rooms through lobbies and internal corridors. See architecture plans to see how only internal lobbies and corridors are used. 4. A national or international "flag". The Developer plans for an international "flag" to open the project as a destination resort. 5. Require legally enforceable covenants to implement trip generation management programs. A copy of this covenant is included in the development agreement and will be executed upon adoption of that agreement. 6. Require a legally enforceable mandatory evacuation closure plan. A copy of this covenant is included in the development agreement and will be executed upon adoption of that agreement. 7. No more than 25% of the rooms may have full kitchens. The proposed project does not include kitchens in any of the 250 hotel rooms. 16 8. The project must have exceptional architecture design and high quality finishes and furnishings. The proposed project is designed by a reputable architecture firm and presents fresh, different ideas in coastal architecture. 9. The site must front the Gulf of Mexico The site is immediately to the east of Beach Walk, fronting on the Gulf. Of the 450 rooms, 365 face the Gulf of Mexico and 85 (22 hotel and 63 vacationlinterval ownership) face the intercoastal waterway, so all have waterfront views. 10. The site must have a minimum land area of one acre. The site is 2.75 acres. 11. The resort is to be developed on the property which is currently improved with substandard, inefficient or obsolete improvements. The site currently includes closed and demolished properties. The prevIous collection of motels yielded 200 rooms and no amenities. 12. The development complies and is eligible to increase the height of structures up to 150 feet. The project proposal takes advantage of the opportunity to increase height to 150 feet. 13. The resort provides demonstrable benefits to the City such as opportunities for public off-street parking. The proposed project includes a public, pedestrian walkway at the front of the project, a "Palm Court" dedicated to the public as the northern entry to Beach Walk, and a signature building on a key piece of property on South Clearwater Beach. 9/30/2008 3:20 PM 49313.115456 #436494 v1 - TRG/Ex to Comp Infill 17 EXHIBIT 0 PARKING PROTOCOL The following parking protocol shall be implemented by the Developer in order to reduce the incidence of traffic backups at the entrance to the Project at Gulfview Boulevard (the "Gulfview Entrance"): 1. Adequate valets shall be employed to handle anticipated traffic volumes. Valets shall be provided as needed in the porte cochere area as well as on each parking level where valet '.. parking service is required to park the cars of hotel guests or the public. 2. Vehicles unable to access the parking garage because of unavailability of a parking elevator shall be parked in the porte cochere area of the Project (the "Porte Cochere") so long as space, and until elevator transport, is available. 3. The Gulfview Entrance shall be closed by Hotel personnel at any time that the vehicular traffic in the Porte Cochere prevents vehicles entering the area from Gulfview Boulevard without undue delay. 4. Vehic1es unable to use the Gulfview Entrance because of its closure will be given written instructions by Hotel personnel directing them to the street level parking entrance on Relocated First Street (the "Relocated First Street Entrance"). 5. Hotel event planners will take all steps reasonably necessary to encourage use of the parking accessed by the Relocated First Street Entrance for events likely to cause a traffic backup on Gulfview Boulevard. For example, (i) parties booking such events will be provided copies of written directions suitable for distribution advising guests to avoid the Gulfview Entrance and directing them to proceed directly to the Relocated First Street Entrance and (ii) prior to such events steps will be taken to maximize the number of spaces available in the street level parking area for use by guests attending the event., -.".. Heidi B. McCreo Chair, HillsDofOUgh TalmadgoG~"Jerry:rt Rice Vlce Chair. Pasco p"t"yC. Symons Sectctary;DeSoto Judith C.Whitellead Treasurer, Hernando Edward W. Chance Manatee Jonntfer E. Olo$$hoy HiIIsboroUgh Neil Comboe Polk TIJomas G. Dab"ey Sarasola Watson L Haynos II Pine lias Jan ..tD. Kovach HiIIstmroug/1 Todd Pressman Pi ne lias OavidL. Moore Executive Director Gone A. Heath Assistant Executlve< O~wctor William S.BHenky General Counsel SOtltllwest Florida tfl{;Uer jYIanagernent .DistTict .--'~;i~~~- 2379 Broi...1 :Street, Brookr;vilic, Florida 3'1GOt,j.(38D9 (352) '196-7211 or 1-800-423-147() (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TOO only 1-800-231-6103 WI. only) On tIle !nter@t at: WaterMatters.org Bartow Service-Office '170 Century 8{iuleVdUj Bartow. Florid;' 33S3o.-{70n (863) 534.1443 or 1-800492-7862 (FL only) SUNCOM 57;:6200 Lecanto $121vice Office Suite 226 3600 Wost .SGvcreiRn. Path Lecanto, Flnrida34461.g07Q f352} 527<S131 SUNCOM 661-3211 s...)(~sott1. Sefvice 'Office 6750 FruitviHe Road Sarasota, f1otida34240~9711. (941)377~3722 or 1.800-320-3503 (FLonIYJ SUNCOM >531~G900 Tampa Service Office ('501 Highway JOt North f;Hnpij, Fllxida 33H31.61t;9 18:1:3) 985-7481. or F800.836-0 79 7{FL 'only) SUNCOM 518~2010 January 24, 2006 Kitit Shah K & P Cleal\vater Estate, LLC 100 Coronado Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 Subject: Project Evaluation - Permit Not Required Project Name: 100 Coronado Inquiry Number: EX2900 County: Pinellas SeclTwp/Rge: 07/29S/t5E Latitude/Longitude: 21' 58'30.17", 82049' 42.80" Rule 40D-4.041, Florida Administrative Code (FAC.) Subsection 373.406(6), Florida Statutes (F.S_) Reference: Dear Mr. Shah: The District has reviewed tlie information you submitted for the prOject referenced above and has determined that an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) will not be required for the redevelopment of the above-referenced site, which constitutes a51 ,751 square foot decrease in vehicular use area and a 959 square foot decrease in total impervious area, as shown on the plans provided, The information received by the District will be kept in the Tampa Service Office to support the District's determination regarding your project. The District's determination that your project does notrequire an ERP is only applicable pursuant to the statutes and rules in effect at the time the information was submitted and may not be valid in the eventsubsequent changes occur in the applicable rules and statutes. Additionally, this notification does not mean that the District has determined that your project is permanently exempt from permitting requirements. Any subsequent change you make in the project's operation may necessitate further evaluation or penllitting by the District. Therefore, you are advised to contact the District before beginning the project and before beginning any activity which is not specifically described in your submittal. Your timely pursuit of this activity is encouraged to avoid any potential rule changes that could affect your request This letter constitutes notice of Final Agency Action of the project listed above. A request for hearing must.- (1) explain how the substantial interests of eaCh person requesting the hearing will be affected by the District's action, or proposed action, (2) state al! material facts disputed by the person requesting the hearing or stare that there are no disputed facts, and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter 28-106, F.AC. Copies of Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, FAC. are enclosed for your reference. A request for hearing must be filr"d with (received by) the Agency Clerk of the District at the DistriCt's Brooksville address Within 21 days of receipt of this notiCE. -\ '~ Permit No: EX 2900 Page 2 January 24, 2006 Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States maiL Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right you or such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573. FS., to settle an administrative dispute regarding the District's action in this matter is not available Enclosed is a "Noticing Packet" that provides information regarding the District Rule 400-1.1010, FAC., which addresses the notification of persons whose substantial interests may be affected by the District's action in this matter. The packet contains guidelines on how to provide notice of the District's action, and a notice that you may use. If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Richard M. Alt, P.E., at the Tampa Service Office, extension 2045. Please reference the Project Name and Inquiry Number in future communications concerning this project. Sincerely, (/J!L G2hza: Alba E. Mas, P.t., Director Tampa Regulation Department AEM:RMA:gjn Enclosures: Noticing packet (42.00-047) Section 28-106.201 and 28-106.301 FAC. Inquiry No.' EX 2900 Keith E. Zayac, P.E, RLA, Keith Zayac and Associates, Inc. cc: I#: 2004371859 BK: 13836 PG: 2479, 09/20/2004 at 01:41 PM, RECORDING 5 PAGES $44.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $280000.00 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC5 !5 /\ , , \ '\ :'_""':~ 11...... ;::. "....,..) Ie '\ ~~~~ ~ .~./ ,~-,-" "-. Prepared by and return to:/ c\ '~..../ M. Lisa Shasteen, Esq. ...-\.~..,-", ) 601 Cleveland Street, Sui~~9~O;~'" Clearwater, FL 33755 . \. '- ,/ . . ......:--."....' Property Appraiser Parcel Identification Nos.':''''.. /'" ~ '" J 07 -29-15-523 80-000".Q4~O' 07-29-15-52380-dOn~O~40 07-29-15-52380~Ooo~6480 \.. . " / 07-29-15-52380;~~D~b530 . I <''' 1,\ ....f . 07-29-15-52380-000-0550 '. \ ',.' , ;' "''''''' ,,",,/ I~')'. ~~ / /i", ....../ SPECIAL W.ARRANTY DEED '-. ','." . /":;~ l...) ANTOM;OS' MARKOPOULOS, a married man ("Markopoulos"), T.M. MEGAS, L.C., a Floricla)ihPted liability cOmpany ("Megas") and KOLOSSOS INNt INC., a Florida corporation (":({qtossp~") whose collective post office address is 1 01 Coronado Drive, pearwater, FL 33767, fitl~II~/County, Florida (collectively, "Grantor"), for and in consideration of the sum of FORTY /MILL)ON AND NOIlOO DOLLARS ($40,000,000.00) paid to Grantor and other good and /<'v.a1lplble consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, has /'-> "GJMNTED, SOLD and CONVEYED and does hereby GRANT,. SELL and CONVEY unto :"->-'f9&P CLEARWATER ESTATE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company. its successors '''''and/or assignS, whose primary address is 3105 W. WATERS AVENUE, SUITE 315, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33614, and whose Employer Identification Nunlber is 20-1594143 (collectively "Grantee"), in fee simple, those certain parcels of land owned by each Grantor, respectively, located in Pinellas County, Florida, as more particularly described in Exhibit A. attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, together with all improvements, itany, located on such . land (such land and improvements being collectively referred to as the "Property"). SAID PROPERTY is not the homestead of Markopoulos under the laws and ~onstitution of the State ofFlori~ in that neither the Grantor, nor any members orhis household reside on the Property, and Markopoulos resides at a single family residence Within Pinellas County, Florida. This conveyance is made and accepted subject to all matters (the "Permitted Exceptions") set forth in Schedule B of that Attorneys' Title Insui-ance Fund Inc., Owner's Title Insurance Policy issued in connection. with this instrument, which are incOlporated herein by reference. TO HA VB AND TO HOLD the Property, tog~er with all and singular the rights and . appurtenances pertaining thereto, subject to the Permitted Exceptions, unto Grantee and Graritee's heirs, successors and assigns forever. And each Grant~r hereby covenants with Grantee that, with respect to that portion of the Property conveyed by such Grantor, except as above noted, that at the time of the delivery of this Special Warranty Deed the Property was free from all encumbrances made by it and that it will warrant and defend the same against the lawful claims and demands of all persons claiming by, through or under it, but against none other. Page 1 of5 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 13836 PG 2480 - ...'-- .---------.-.--.- /\ , , '\. \ ,.....,M.. 1, .:.~'~) ,ri....... I f ' ,: (. ) ,.~\~ z; ;' ,_, \"J " , \ " J . BY ACCEPTAN9~~'0f TIllS DEED, GRANTEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT GRANTOR HAS NOT ~E;'DOES NOT MAKE AND SPECIFICALLY NEGATES AND DISCLAIMS ANY REPltESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES, PROMISES, COVENANTS, AGREEMENTS OR GuAltANTIEs OF ANY KIND OR CHARACTER WHATSOEVER, WHETHER EXPRESS.'oR IMPLIED, ORAL OR WRITIEN, PAST, PRESENT OR FUTURE, OF, AS TO, C9NC.~G OR WTfI:I RESPECT TO (A) THE VALUE, NATURE, QUALITY OR C0,NDL1ION OF THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE ,WATER, (:~0~;AND GEOLOGY, (B) THE INCOME TO BE DERIVED FROM THE PROPERTY,/I€~,JHE 'SUITABILITY OF THE PROPERTY FOR ANY AND ALL ACTMTIES \AND USES WHICH GRANTEE MAY CONDUCT THEREON, (D) THE . COMPLIANcSE:0F OR BY THE PROPERTY OR ITS OPERATION WITH ANY LAWS, RULES,/OitDiNANCES OR REGULATIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHPWTY" OR BODY, (E) THE HABITABILITY, MERCHANTABILITY, MAR.K:srtABILITY, PROFITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ~2pRqPERTY, (F) THE MANNER OR QUALITY OF THE CONSTRUCTION OR MA.~R)iLs, IF ANY, INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPERTY, (G) THE MANNER, ~~~JiY, STATE OF REPAIR OR LACK OF REPAIR OF THE PROPERTY, OR (H) ANY ...O.11lER MATTER WITH RESPECT TO'THE PROPERTY, AND SPECIFICALLY, THAT /~~TOR HAS NOT MADE, DOES NOT MAKE AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY ,,'-',l'lliPRESENTATIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE 'WITH ANY ENVIRONMENTAL z.""',~ROTECTION, POLLUTION OR LAND USE LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS, ORDERS """OR REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING THE DISPOSAL OR EXISTENCE, IN OR ON THE PROPERTY, OF ANY I:IAZARDOUS MATERIALS, EXCEPT THE WARRANTY OF TITLE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH HEREIN. GRANIEEFlJRT.tffiR ACKNOWLEDGES lHAT IT HAS HAD REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY, THAT IT IS SOLELY REL YlNG UPON ITS OWN INVESTIGATION OF TIlE PROPERTY AND IN NO WAY RELYING UPON ANY REPRESENTATION, STATEMENT, CONVERSATION, ACT, OR OMISSION OF SELLER OR OF ANY OF SELLER'S AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, OR REPRESENTATIVES WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY. AND, TO TIIE MAXIMUM EXlENT PERMITIED BY LAW, THE SALE OF TIlE PROPERTY IS MADE ON AN "AS IS" CONDmON AND BASIS WITH ALL FAULTS. set forth in the acknow.ledgment attached hereto to be effective r, 2004. Print name: ""'4(;7.0 hl'lt?{fOf'Oou;(" ~~~ Print iuune: . Vc; &' . !~ s Page 2 ofS , i PlNELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 13836 PG 2481 Ir~ \\ .........::. 1 L~........\ I'........ ~I !,. 1 ~ 1".,/) ,,......>..:...... -\.., I .... \..; ; \} ......./ / --' I! '. '. Antonios arkopoulos aIkIa Anthony Markopoulos, Its President T. , ,-." ~"A _,." P . t .' .,<~/;A.JtC~() ~/1/;I((.;I/t..(/(?( ~'ir)l/~, ~ ~ PriIl,t..rlwl'e;~"'~ '-JL~~M. / ," "\.;'t..../ . ( 1.,\} . . /......\.. '....J / t, ...~.... .... . rSXA1'B OF FLORIDA . ,~':".C0uNTY OF PINELLAS <. "-~..... :. (,::.~) ) v The foregoing instrument was acknowledged' before me this /7th. day of "".September, 2004 by Antonios Markopoulos, who i~~l~e~ . . ~~e: M;~j US) ~.l~ NOTARY PUBLIC M.Ilsa~ My commission expires: CcftlllllalodDDI6"" STATE OF FLORIDA !JlIb!I:NCN 19.*.6 COUNTY OF PINELLAS ,...:n~~... The foregoing instrriment was acknowledged before me this ~ day of . S~ptember, 2004 by Antonios Markopoulos,. aIkIa Anthony Markopoulos, President of Kolossos Inn, Inc., on bebalfofthe corpomtion, who is petsOnally ~L-1 ~.~ Pnnt name:_--L- _n_ ,. -t t'?t NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: . MlIIIcalladh_ S'~~ ComUdoft1DD16~ ~V.::~:.:ExpIm:NOY 19,20G6. '. . i o.tId1llu ...., -l1 OL\- Page 3 of5 PlNELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 13836 PG 2482 ,r, , \ \ '\ /""''':;:' 1, ':.- ~'- '') /,<1""" ........../ ! ,." ~ (~.'''./ (. .....,.................. '. SJ:ATE OF FLORIDA / (', ')',,/ COUNTY OF PINELLAS ..\ ",j ,/ . l' / ..........___"" l ..~/\ The Ioregoing ins~~t was acknowledged before me this L7.:!!! day of September, 2004 by Antonios Markopolilos, the sole Manager and Member ofT.M. Megas, L.C., on behalf of the company, who'Js--I?~~nally known to me. <,/ ~~t~ \'It...,...:.j' ~ ~ ~~,;J PrintllBIDl"_. _ ,: L/ <!, ~/'m"" /,,-;- "~.... )' NOTARY PUBLIC ( {" (' \'" . ~. \. ; ~ . .' ' /~;~~~:/ My commission expires: olbkaOsa~ / I I'>. ' i eomm\lSkln 19 2^,\JI: .. ,/,. 'v . . ~1:NoY I U\lU . i> . < . BClIlIlI4 -nwu , I'" ", . ,- .........u.. - ..... " ,/";"1-.. ,. .... ~~....- ....:~::~< v . / \'-../ [ {~ \ /~:>;:;:/ /....~~,::..~:::~... "" "'. v' /"..... ') ; "'-. ,,. .' ................./ I. Page 4 of5 , . v PlNELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 13836 PG 2483 Jr,( , , \ \ /-....."" \\ t;~:.""'-\..../ / r~ } \.... ..... 1..' ,...,........:......... ......i EXHIBIT "A" / '''- \..../ { \, \ f . ~ ....\\.., .......~/ ./ PARCEL I - (Grantor: An~IJ.i6i~arlcopoulos) 1 " '\ ! Lot 1, Block "A", cOLUMl1M;srnmIVISION, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 60, Public ReCords of ,R\!tel!l!S County, Florida, together with the vacated Southerly 1 foot orGulf View Boulevard adjacent to'saiu-tp'f 1, and the vacated westerly 1 foot of Coronado Drive adjacent to said Lot 1, said vacated portjo!;rS'.bb,in'g shown by Resolution filed November 27,1959, in O.R Book 757, Page 40, Public Records of.Pinbltai County, Florida, and also Lots 44, 45, 46, 47, 90, 91, 92; 93, 94, 95, 96, and . 97, TIIE LLOYD.:;.~SK1NNER SUBDMSION, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 13, Pages 12 81f(n3~-giiblic Records of Pine lias County, Florida, together with the vacated Westerly 1.86 feet ofCoron.~&J.?ri}/eadjacent to said Lot 93. !~ "~'N./ /'',0'', ........ " /,/....., ~ ... . PARC~~.~.'-((GTantor: Kolossos Inn, Inc.) " / ,.....\ ... Lots ~~~/4..9;"~O, 51, 52, and 98, The Lloyd-White-Skinner Subdivision, according to the map or plat th~re:Qf~,*orded in Plat Book 13, Page 12, Public Records ofPineUas County, Florida. ;; l. ., \. , ..... 1 , . I...... \.. ...., / , .......:.. ....".. /-PAACEL ill (Grantor: T.M Megns; L.C.) ..\'" "'!:"'.........f /~'~~~;55, North 40 feet of Lot 56, South 20 feet of Lot .101, all of Lot 102, and the North 30 feet of Lot 103; . ''-. "'"UOYD-WIllTE-SKINNER SUBDMSION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat '......Book 13, Pages 12 and 13, Public Records ofPinellas County, Florida. Lots 53,54,99,100 and the Northerly 30 feet of Lot 101, LLOvn-WIDTE-SKINNER SUBDMSION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 13, Pages 12 and 13, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Page 5 of5 , . 06JUO!~008 ~f;J9 FAX 3057893395 STEARNS WEAVER MILLER fll002/002 ARTICLES OJ' AMeNDMENT TO ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION . OF TRG CLEARWATER BEACH, LLC 1. The Articles of organization ofTRG Clearwater Beach. LLC, a Florida limited liability OOIIIp8J!y. were filed on October 31,2007 and assigned docwnent number L07000110699. . 2. This amondment is submitted to auncnd the following: ARneLl: J - ~AME The D8IDC ofthelimitcd Hability company is Clearwater Beach Resort Hotel, LLC. . IN W1TNBSS \VlWREOF, the undersigned bas exeeutcd these Atticles of "'''lendmcnt as of the ~ day of.June 2008. '.'1 ......, l>Vl C) r-I"" c;::) r- ("> C:lCI >~ e..- II ::I::rr! c::: :P-""i % - ]:> , r (/):,u I./) , CT\ rn...... m C"'o ;pa '"11"" :3: 0 r- c.!) "R a-.f z~ 0.., N ~.. 08(~(.Je008 Electronic Filing Cover Sheet ._-a._ .......- Note: Pteue priBt tills ... ad ...It IS. cover ..... Type the fax audit number (shown below) on the top Ind bottom ofal) peaes ofChc document. <<Oi080001463183>>> . . . . ... 1...........llllll H08OOCn483t83HlC+ Note: 00 NOT hit the REFRBSHIRELOAD buUon.on your ~~ERS Doing so will gencndc another (:OVer sheet. · '.--.. .. ...----.-- -- --'-- -..-. .--..... . - --.---- -- ---}G~T--6-7.008 To; EXAMINER D1vla1on of Corporatione Fax Number (850)617-6383 From; Account NCUlIe Account Number Phone Fax NW\tI:)er STEARNS WEAVER MILLER WEISSLER ALHADEF , SITTERSON, P.A. 120060000135 (305)789-3200 (305 )789-3395 - to..- LLC AMNDIREST ATE/CORRECT OR-M/MG RESIGN TAG CLEARWATER-BEACH, LLC o 1.U .> " - r m CJ o 1 OJ SUM '--j ,...., ~~ <r; => II""'; ~ r- '") c:s:> ~... ;:\l t- :::J:;rr"\ c= l-..-.i Z '" :t> t if':;:"} ~ rrr-< ~Tlo ):1:0 .- ..-.---t"'f---,.--.:::J: r:- fft HeJp.~ \f? --I !:?r'1 N M N ~~ .:.:. ~~ 0')0 ~ :.!-~-~ - . "" El~ic Filing Menu --- tc.- V) , ':(" l.!l :or: liJ S => 5~ ~ ljj Cl) ~ ....... U1 (.) UJ Q: Corporate Filing Menu https:lfefile.sunbiz.orgIscriptSlcfileovr.exc 6/612001 ... .~,.~.,.EXISTING PRQPi;RTY I OVER ~\(l:.rAl..l..--i, ! / 1.i:0".e- EXHIBIT "e" - page 1 Beach by Design Height B-2 Option 1: "500' Rule" B. Height Maximum height is prescribed by the respec- tive zoning districts in the community deve!- opment code unless otherwise restricted by Beach by Design. The height may be in- creased, however, to 150' if: 1. Additional density is allocated to the devel- opment either by transferred development rights or with bonus hotel units pursuant to the CRD designation; 2, Portions of any structure which exceed 100' are spaced at least 100' apart (with no more than two structures which exceed 100' within 500'; or four structures whIch exceed 100' within 800' so long as the elevations of all structures which exceed 100' when such structures are viewed from the east do not oc- cupy a total of 40% of a north south vertical plane which is parallel to the alignment of Coronado and North Mandalay of the building envelope above 100') o 25 100 SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD 50 ------ ~M'l'.^'_ ~.~'=..,. ,-foot:: ~ -~"".-~~:~q* - - ./ . .' BEACH BY DESIGN GARAGE" ~N1R"'."E.X AMENITY DECK 38'-8" TALL 237'-4." f- uJ uJ cr f- (/') o Z N POOL ~ OAOtM; <>xx TIMESHARE SUlLDING 95',0. TALL 534'.10' CORONADO DRIVE '~___W" '~wW'._"__' ,., -----, '_~~:;_:~\,>,:':':~::~:;';;~';;~:~.___'w_'_""'___________ __N CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL CLEARWATER. FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP ~. B y, C-1 ~~ EXHIBIT "e" - page 2 Beach by Design Height B-2 Option 2: "800' Rule" B. Height Maximum height is prescribed by the respective zoning districts in the community development code unless otherwise restricted by Beach by Design. The height may be increased. however, to 150' if: 1. Additional density is allocated to the development either by transferred develop- ment rights or with bonus hotel units pursuant to the CRD designation; 2. Portions of any structure which exceed 100' are spaced at least 100' apart (with no more than two structures which exceed 100' within 500'; or four structures which exceed 100' within 800' so long as the elevations of all structures which ex- ceed 1 AD' when such structures are viewed from the east do not occupy a total of 40% of a north south vertical plane which is parallel to the alignment of Coronado and North Mandalay of the building envelope above 1 DO') I I 1 1 ,I 1 'I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I, :::.,,:..::.. - -~';tl-.~l;; - - HO'-3" l- UJ w rr .... <fl a z '" ORNE 800'-0" 8(lST~ PROl?~TY OVER 100'-0" TAlL i I 1 1 I I I I I I I J. NOTE: 318'.10" lENGTH OF BU1LDlNGS EXTENDlNG ABOVE 100' IN HEIGHT" 39.9% OF 800' TOTAL " - ..-- N 25 o 50 100 '; t 81'-0" 81'-0" " CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL ~'" tY"" CLEARWATER, FLORIDA JJii'sr SEPTEMBER 15. 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP ~;t.E "iIo_l~ G Exhibit "e" - page 3 Beach by Design Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings Item C-4 4. No mOre than sixty percent {60%} of the theoretical maximum building envelope ID- eated above forty-two feet (42') will be occupied by a building. For the purpose of this standard, theoretical maximum building envelope is the maximum permitted building volume that could be theoretically occupied by a building and occupied by a building in- cludes any portion of the maximum possible building envelope that is not visible from a public street /" < , , " , ,/ '-../ MAXIMUM POSSIBLE VOLUME PROPOSED DESIGN VOLUME 42' -100': MAXIMUM: 6,804,850 CF VOLUME 100' - 150': MAXIMUM: 4,316.350 CF TOTAl: MAXIMUM: 11,121,200 CF PROPOSED: 2,807,740 CF PROPOSED: 1,420.100 CF PROPOSED: 4,227,840 CF RATIO: PROPOSED DESIGN IS 38.0% OF MAXIMUM Note: Calculation is based on proposed setbacks. ,/ 'I .) ,'/ ,/ ,'/' ,/ SUPERIMPOSED o 100 50 200 CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 15. 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP ~.A _.l~ G SKETCHofDESCRIPTXON SHEEr 1 OF 2 SHEErS PARCEL J A PARCEL OF LAND B8NG A PART OF GULf VIEW BOUlEVARD, AS DEPICTED ON THE PlAT OF COlUMBIA SUBOMSlON. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED IN. PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 60. OF THE PUBlIC RECORDS OF PtNEU.AS COUNTY. FLORIDA. B8NG MORE PARTlCUlARlY DESCRIBED AS FOlLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 44, OF UOYD-WHIlE-SKINNER SUBOMSION, ACCORDING TO THE PlAT THEREOF. AS RECORDED ON PlAT AOK 13, PAGE 12 AND 13. OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF PfNE1lAS COUNTY. FlORIDA; THENCE N9O'00'00"E. AlONG THE NORTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 44. A DISTANCE OF 3.82 FEET: THENCE N05"32'30"E AlONG THE EASTERL.Y RIGHT OF WAY UHE OF AFORESAID GULF VIEW BOUlEVARD. SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LYING 1.0 FEET WESTERLY OF THE WESTERLY BOlINOM\' OF LOT 1. BlOCK A. COlUMBIA SUBDMSlON. AS RECORDED IN PlAT BOOK 23, PAGE 60. OF THE PUBlJC RECORDS OF P1NEU.AS COUNlY. FLORIDA; A DISTANCE OF 0.88 FEET TO POINT OF A CURVE; THENCE NORTHfASTERLY AlONG SAID tASTERLY RIGHT -of-WAY OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD B8NG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 34.00. AN ARC OF 26.87 FEET. A CHORD OF 26.18 FEET. AND A CHORD BfAAING OF N28'11'29"E; THENCE N90"00'00"W. A DISTANCE OF 34.32 FEET: THENCE S48'31'37"W. A DISTANCE OF 1....15 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGlNNNC; THENCE S41'00'13"E, 17.95 FEET; THENCE S05"29'40"W. 20.00 FEET: THENCE NB....3Q.20"W. 6.00 FEET; THENCE N05'29'40"E, 0.58 FEET; THENCE N41'28'18"W A DISTANCE OF 16.55 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERUNE OF SAID GULf VIEW BOUlEVARD; THENCE N05"32'30"E. ALONG SAID CENTERUNE A DISTANCE OF 15.06 FEET; THENCE N48'31'37"E, A DISTANCE OF 7.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS: ...,6 SQUARE FEET (0.0096 ACRES). MORE OR lESS. LEGEND PLS PNIR5SIlIa IMl SlIllDIR LB IDII5fD IUSIlESS $J ~ ~ IIUIIM1IlIll POB __ CI' __ HOlES: 1. NO INSlRUIIENIS OF RB:ORD REFI.ECIlIIG fASEIIEIQS, RIGHT OF WIlY 1II)/M OIINERSHI' IIEIlE fUlNISHED 10 1IIS SlIMlOR EXaPr AS SHlMIt 2. 1HIS SlCETCH DOES NOT REflECT M DEJEIUNE OWNERSHIP. 3. USE OF 1tIS SlCETCH BY MMlNE OIlER 1tWI 1HOSE PREPMED FOR at. lIE 1lE RE-usERS SOl[ RISK RlOUT lWlIJ1Y 10 1lE SURVEYOR. .. lItE SlCETCH lIAS PREJWlED 1IItIOUf 1lE IlENEfIr OF " ctIlRENr TIllE COIIIII1IiIENT 111) IS SUBECr 10 fIISBIBIlS. RIGff\S-Of-Wo\Y 111) SIIUR MATlERS OF 1ITlE. 5. IIEIlIlM IMSED ON 1lE IIDRfIl ~ OF LOr .. AS IlfARIlG N9O'llO'OO"E (P). [PREPARED FOR: . TheRelaBtGraup ) DATE: 4/28/08 DRAWlNGf Checbd ., Drawn ., PARCEl.-J JAC JAC PnIject M0- field BoaIc . 8021 \ J SUNCOAST LAND SURYlYlNG. lac. 111 FOREST LAKES EIllUlEVARD CI.DSMAR. fLA. 34677 ~ ,.. "'--/ ___ - 1lll'OGlW'IIC - lXIIS1IIUC1IlII SJlIlEIlUT LB 4613 PHlIlE: (813) 854-1342 fAX: (813) ll55-68lIO 5lm'ElOR'S CfRlFlCAlE ......,...., -.. --..... - -..- -.. ~ CHIlE - .. -c.l-.... _.. _ __ _1Il_ ., .. R.lImIlIllllllOt ~ IMI SRIbIlIlS IIr a.Ior 11GI1-1. R.lImIl oOoNS.... ClIIE ...... .. .... mJID. R.lImIl StlIbES. "lID _ ~..,._ H -. ~ ~CI' ~ IJl:EIISfD -_.....~~4-~ J A. No.52J1J " SKETCH of DESCRXPTI:ON SHEET 2 ~ 2 SHEETS ~ {lO '" --- .....- ..... .- .- ,/ ,/ ./ ./ ./ / / / - / ,&"--' ,..-L----;# V/ l8 A "A 3~ L10 11."<P) -,- - - - - , .. Carner I I~ Lat 44 I ,!! I , Si I I I I LOT 44 I LOT 4S Ii:' I 11: i:' ,g Ii I:: I I I~ THE LLOm-WHfTE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION 1];1 /flAT IIOlIC: 13 IW;[ 12-13 I; I IllS , I I SW Carner J- - ~C!2. 1. Lat44 , - --__ I : FIRST A VENUE ~ RIGIfI' OF WIlY UIIE SCAlf : 1- = 30" ~ O' 15" 30" p .o.a. ~ IDT I Il.OCK ',,' COLUMBIA SUBDMSION FlAT IIOlIC: 23 IW;[ liO ... :. PARCEL :IS; 'v ~ ~ o <<I ~I a ~I....f ::> e:.18 ~l~; ~ lea: tul 0 ~Iii?: iLl i ~ (!) UNE IIfMING IJSfNlCE 11 541'''''18"[ 16.55" l2 ~~ 0.58" 1..3 SlI4"3O 6.00 16 N41'M'13 11.95' L7 N48'31 ":U- 14.15" La N9O'OO Cllnf 34.32" Ul NOS'32'3O"E 0.88" Ll0 N9O'OO OO"F 3.82' L17 N05'29' 4O"E 20.00" LIB S05"32 30" 15.06' 1I9 N48'31"37'T 7.42" I~ 1= I~~ I ~ lfI<<mt I="~ I \ J SUNCOAST lAND SURVEYING, Inc. 111 FOREST lAKES IIOUIiVARD CllDSMAR. FLA. 346n '---/ LB 4513 IIClIIIlMY - 1llI'OlIIM'IIt - CDISRICIIlIl STMEIIJT PHOIE: (813) 854-1342 FAIr: (813) lI55-68llO f::-:* lip I lDrcnm lip I PARCB..-J 1 J JAC JAC I I CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT AND HOTEL INDEX Of SHEETS: M)(J COVER A-Q I SITE PIAN A-Q2 GRADE lEVEL PIAN A-Q2B GRADE lEVEL PIAN OPTION B A-Q3 lOBBY lEVel PIAN A-Q4 200 lEVEL PIAN A-QS 300 LEVEL PIAN A-Q6 400 lEVEL PIAN A.07 S0D-900 TYPICAL PIAN A-Qa 1000 lEVEL PLAN A-Q9 1100-1400 TYPICAL PIAN A.IO PENTHOUSE lEVEL PIAN A.II WESTElEV A TION . COlOR A.II B WESTElEV A TION . B/W AI2 NORTH ElEVATION . COLOR A.]2B NORTH elEVATION. B/W A.13 EASTElEVATlON . COlOR A.I 3B EASTElEV A TION . B/W A.14 SOUTH ElEV A liON. COLOR A.14B SOUTH ELEVATION. B/W 100 CORONADO DRIVE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITI AL NOTE: CONCEPT RENDERINGS ARE fOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY AND 00 NOT REflECT STAff REVIEW COMMENTS. J CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL ._ ."'-'t FUSTER ~ NICHOlS ~ DimePI' ASSOcu,'1'18. P,A. BROSCH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 'm.a"'~."IMI",,,,.,, ---....-.... WURST ..,.~...~~*:... ----........ WOlfE SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP ..l';!,'il'!llV.l/h". ....n..__.....".& ~ _l-.ol....._lUr-l_ B I I SOUTH GUlFYtEW BOULEVARD (_.J-I--L J ), ..p~~~~ J OVER 'I [ t--I c-- '1:--1[----- . ,;1 .c 1-'----. -)\--,) .[_~._I_ '* ~r.' - 'I I -L,o.=-.c - - - - -oo\it...lioi1iioc:"..,,;; - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ CORONADO DRIVE ~r-s' EBN 8 ~~!.Er' ~,~,~.N r-----I o 15 30 60 CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL ---.- FUSTER ~ NICHOLS .z:. DSIIIOW....OCIA'l'U.P.4. BROSCH WURST CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ."'...........-...\,.... ::?;:j= WOlfE SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP ~I~rii~~ ~ B I COMTAl.-COIiITM:miON liNE !44 M ..~ . ----f - no i ~ -/ ~''l ~ a jM M M 1" la M [M M 'M ~~ ,.. ~.. ]" ~" ~" j" I" ffFu ~ ~ 'M ,~ ~u I~ E: · 11. IllI 11 93 . WI 101 03 107 (Ill 111 13 'I 11 10' 121 131 il3 t6 b . . - . . .~.. <- 218 PARKING SPACES EON CMSTALcONI1i'OOrlOrtUNE LEGEND Dl\I\ltllfIAlVf>E O SfJMC(AAEAIIlCl.UOINCST/IIRS. E!.EVATORSfJlDIIAClHlF'-tIOUSt ~a 'n II ~ .. . rrr-ur--~ '80 ~ ~ .~ J. /. 1" nlll 1'1 II In I!I:I ~ r-~- 115 1111 1111 ~.. 1'1 c : '" io .. .. '" '" .. '" 210 I'ir 212 o ~'~L~?~20~..EVEL PLAN CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL .m.~'_. FUSTER ~ NICHOLS ~IfAlllJOCU.TlI.P.A. BROSCH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA - -....- WURST ...==:...~... ____uu. WOLFE SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP _n_C-._Pl.III.. ~ ...,.IM>:.'R1III,'" --_...,.- I B I I -COASTAlCcittSiiNi:TIOMUNE LEGEND o.w~IDIrE/l11JR( D=~~: .~ 218 PARl<1NG SPACES <- 1115 llU I" 17.111' '" n to ,~ ;r.r----17~ 124 28 H I ~~ '" L / . i'M lee IMI 1'lO ~ :: ;" lllll 10 '" ~ "' -/ " ~ ~ j" " " "I" "t" " "~K " "~,. nrM ~'"' jm " ~ " " " "1. ~ " "~" ~ r f r r ". EON 0 ~c~?~20~~VEL PLAN CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL ctn.__.- FUSTER ~ NICHOLS ""..t!'::.,~ ... lIDl1iIl' A.DOCU.TD. P..l. BROSCH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ="_':."':''':: WURST ..,~{!;.. WOLFE SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP -....".....-........ ~ ....."lliI....'..... __1-.._- B I I C(i',.sTALcoNaTMmiONUNE -COIl8TMcoNin'iiiiTIONUNl! LEGEND DWATERftill1JIE o :~~~~.:r N'"'''' EON 8 ~~~'~:2;,~VEL PLAN CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL .....-.- FUSTER ~ NICHOLS .z:. DDroJf ...ocune, ..A.. BROSCH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA - -........ WURST "":~f-. -........--...... WOLFE SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP ....n..__.....'.. ~ -...-.....- B I , \ ! i UN" UN" UNIT UNIT '. .... .. 111 121 ';23 I- 121 ;v ;~ I- 131 133 ~- lU 1. " - - '$ 141 IG I" - ,~ 14~ '" 141 ,.. '* ,,---' .,----il ( '~ . . .' I~ I I ~ jZll I " ~ "ii 'il I~ I I ~QJ.artE___.' 149PAAl<IHGSPACeS '~t;O'~1e:~~.f.pO.+ . - ---IIZ-. . ._---. . " 1\17' 1'18 I LEGEND o WillTrRF[,\,1lJlI[ o ~~~ti~~~ii-?=si: """"" UNIT UNIT .' EBN 200 LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1'.20'.0' CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL _.- FUSTER ~ NICHOLS .z:. DIlIIGIt AISllCU'Ba...... BROSCH WURST CLEARWATER, FLORIDA .",..u..rt.......,...~,.... - ~...- WOlfE -~~~ __...__uu SEPTEMBER 15,2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP -..........-........ ~ _"__"'10ol_ B I I LEGEND o 19i1t~ffAWftl: \ \ DstIMCENlfAIMCl.lI!HNGSWIlS. ElMT0R5NlO9.lCll-or~HOOS{ '''''''''. I 'c. ! ; ;1 , 8 1- ~ .1 :12 '~ t ts ..." "'" UNIT UN" UNIT UNIT UN" UNIT : I: . TERRACE :- I .~~~~,llllT& ~~~-----l .. ~ ~ 1M n r t: ;-mr tl~:J ~ . : f.: J: : : J H . : 1: . " ~~ 96 PARI<1NG SPACES > ~ BAcK OF HOUSE :: ( i: . ~ UNIT UN" UH" UN" . . EBN 8 ~~~. I~.~~_;L PLAN CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL z: FUSTER ~ NICHOLS DUI1Df d80CUTU. p,j., BROSCH WURST CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ""..4....,........4"..'.'. ---...- WOLFE "'='':.'1:'" ----..... SEPTEMBER 15,2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP -........-....... ~ -J.;l'$':'IlVoU.... -..-----.....- B I B POOL DECK ~CONCIIm______ AMEMTV I LEGEND D-.m:RFfAl\IRf D ~(fM::E NO. l<<lLOlllG ~.u!5. ELMTORSA/fO MCK-(F~JfOOS[ ,..,.". TEllAACE EBN 0 ~c~;~~;,~ LEVEL PLAN CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL ........-..-..0 FUSTER ~ NICHOLS ""..c.",__ DaalGlfABaOClATD, P.A. BROSCH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA _ 1/00II'''_ WURST ..,=:C:=~... ----........ WOlfE SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP -.........-......,.. ~ ...,..f,ll'!MUf.... -..----- FOOOSERVICE ~ /;) <> ~ ~ ~ _ 0 ~ ElEVATED DECK II POOl SPA <>. ~D D D D D D~ . POOl DECK . SPA . 13,880SF. LANAI TEf'lRACE8 """'- lANA' U'IT . LANAI ""IT ""'" U'IT ""'" UNO lANA' UNO lANA, uNO . ""IT ""IT UNIT UNIT ""IT ....CONlE' SALCON B I t I Llt-gor 1---- ~1-TI' r """J '1'-1 I LEGEND o W;rUfEAT\IIll: DStIMCENlfA'llClIIOIIIGSlAlR'i, ~AND8'a-(lf-1IOlJSE \ W-l' iU-9' \ r tIt-g' I 1. 42' -11~ t 1~'-9' L 1 t ".," I 2'l'-J' L II 1 I II ~~~ 5" / <: 1 l r t ~ ~ UNIT 1_ UNIT UMT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT 1 UNIT a~'-o' at-~. EBN 8 ~~~,~7..~~O-900 PLAN CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL ---'- FUSTER ~ NICHOLS '"'''\~''''' UIlIGlfA81OClAftl,P.A. BROSCH CLEARWATER, FLORIOA _ l/OIII."_ WURST "'::::::m...-:.'I:'" ----......... WOlfE SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP _n...-._,.....,.. ~ ~.,s~_.'" ---...-- B I I LEGEND O'MTERfP,1IJI!( o ~=~~~~~:~~( \ i \ "- '--~ J / <</ RECREATION DE'" EON 0 ~~<~72;'~'OO PLAN CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL --- FUSTER ~ NICHOLS "'....~..".- "SlQ" ADOCU'JU. P,A. BROSCH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA - """...- WURST ....~.=.1::~... ----~ WOlfE SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP _n.......-......,.. ~ -,.151'.'01..... ---..-- B I II \ I LEGEND Dw.mAffAl\IIlt OSEIMCEN'O.lllCLIlMNGSWl'i. ElEV.\TOllSIoNDlIACK-[]f-IIOUS[ '...... I I EBN 0 ;c~~~'~o,:,.LAN LEVEL 1100-1400 CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL z::.. FUSTER ~ NICHOLS Da:lGIf 4DClCu.T.U. P.A. BROSCH WURST CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ".".....r.............\,.... _ 1fIMI'''_ WOlfE -'~~* ----........ SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP _nMC__ft...,.. ~ ----...-- ,I I t j '\ " i r,,~~'"'~__~lr~=~__~ _JL~~_~~_1~' RECREATION DeCK BELOW B I j 1,1 \ .' ~"-- I LEGEND DWAn:RrtA1\Illt O SERW2:Nl[I.IIIClUOI~B:;rAlllS. ELMTllllSNlOm_-OI'-HOOS[ ........ , \ / . / _/, EBN 8 ~~~;'~2~~SE LEVEL PLAN CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL ......--.- FUSTER ~ NICHOLS .z. n8JCNf AUOCU.'IIe. .... BROSCH WURST CLEARWATER, FLORIDA .........~.......,......"'< - -....- WOlFE ..~'S... ____uu. SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP --........-"'-..... ~ -""'_..._- B I o!1'l,WO~ '~i~10 oll~,'<I"'!. ol1":,W'!'. 'H~II~ '~l~ oR"~. Or.kf-\. olr.w"; 01l".\\1!\ on~Il" o!l'l~Ul" 'f'+1~8 01l'.',\'l'-\' oi!'\\~ r LEGEND QJ=~SIJll)Ml.TfHSHsrucco.f'NIll" [TIPHlWllltolOPt,1001AC1lYUClA1tl1. 0:*~~~al fI.lIlIQIOL'ft02ttWS'1'SlEIl1Ol ION, CDlRl'IC MIMMIIA 2Ill5. ~:t=.:'t ==~7:r~, COliPl.,""'MMlHaJ. [I]::W~~~, smE\l.1llXAISII,cor.If>I.YIfG'IlrIHMIJA .... Im!:FUtfNlo\C(Of~OItal.VATQlOlWlNlS; lIrsr-71X """'-'" 0lT -.. ""'" -.. I [] ~ ~ Ml:::ow:rBlf~ MClILlIlIIIIlilTll'llM.fNSH: f\.OOIQIOl\'Wll2COO'SlSml.1DIIlESIN, lXM'l'lllG 'MIH NW,!II)!. E!]~~~~~~' mucA1I>>l. F1BIlIC UWt 'Mlt N COlOR. E! ~~l~~:cwgR~ SIIlSIIlI\1t, @]lMRHfAIlClJtJl<<:OOOR.F'f-tPM/IFlNSli FHSllNOiES: tl.lllMllLllfUJOllOflOt.'l1IEIlrMSH;1'Pl; l/aISIJ\l.llll'.*MSlWIL 2)1'MfI':lIEN.IIMIlllOOllEOC-71SANODOI.1AR 3)'I1SIOIlClA$S:1'fICc.All*. 4} Sl'NIlf€l Gl.l& PI'G CNaM lIltH WAIlV ...,...... 5)lllA1SIWUllG:ClEARlOI'OlEDGV.sS. ')S1llll['lENttll:HJhIEOORllYGlWI1E. ITJ~'==~=r !Xl.I.1S'1$lD1,1OI1lES1l"cowP\.'llNCIIfIH -.... []~sm:~=~=2 MW.21lO5. [D~~~~~ RESI\ COIlI'I.'nMG'flIIIl NWo 2eOe. l/ltr:.,Vf.\o " --'i< 'b.~/~~ lOiiifiillT olfl.\\\>:\ 01l"l\\'iIC'. 'H~11{f:2 liWlLLG- oF"If!\ oll".~" 011".\'-\ olr.~ 011".11".'. 'f\~~ oll"l'll ~P" 0lf'll'l'!1l" .rW1-.~ " -~ .r+\~d- ~oll".'ffl o ~~~J.~,~~VATION CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL ---- FUSTER ~ NICHOLS .z:. D.IIOK Anocu.TU. P.A- BROSCH WURST CLEARWATER, FLORIDA "":,~~!4;:'''- _ \lIIOI..._ WOLFE --.--...... SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP -...--.....,.. ~ -';;fat'llW.l>- ---...-- B I .rUI\Ob '~t~\o "l~l~~ l/lJ~j~' l/lRn:l~<4 '~~~1\~2 .1~,\'-', .!l"4\lI!\, .!rJ.'l':'. .11"~. .r+l,~. .!l"'~2 .lI":il ~P" .!,~:W .ir.~. /IIECI\I\IIC'II.ENCl.OSlMf ~~I -~ "'- ~ ---ll "b J- J. J- ~ J- J- J- _.~-- J- , '--III --.:J ---~ -- ---~ -i ----- ----- .!1".~ lIl~rn.I,""'O -7= ;====== -lEWf., r I I I ~ trim -- LEGEND [!]:'!KI MlTFIIISl!STOO:O, PAINT 0PHl'NIIfClllOll.ll101ACIMlClATEll 0:*~~llOOIl~ mOlll'Ol:l'lt0200l.TS'mI!lI,1OlI; I!ESlt,COlII'\.1NlIIDl~_. o :t:~:Jr=Y~":Sa~, COII'I.'INl'MlllNIIA2IrIl5. [I]~~~~ S'ISmI,1OlIlESlN,.C1Ifl'l'lllC'MlHUIJ/o .... ~PfflCOlTIIGt(6OPENIlCllONn.tVATlONIllWlIICS: '161-7'" NOITH-651 ~---:.. -"""""", It ~f .~,- .!1"l,W'-l, diD_ .~'~\1I .k":,\~ ..... ~ ,~~,~l, ..... ./F"W'. .H~"/ll'C2 ..... .iF.,~. .!l"AlIO'" .1" J1-\ ..... .11"~ .!l".W-\ i .!I".~ ....--- .II":'<<~~' -- .~':lI':I!I' - r-' -- .!1'.1I"\- [l=::s.~':sr6i~ /ftD,lU/IlIl\.IlITOPIN..FIlI!lII: fU.QIOPOll'NElltCQl.TSYSIDl,7OlI:RESUj, COYPI.'I'tIlltml NMA 2t05. [] :=.::. = :&~~ ImTS'l'SlOl7OlREStl. COWPI.Y1NC'IIIM .... .... m ~r::.:~:: ==-~~ 2 ........ []~S~:.~ RESlII, COUPl'lNl1IDl NMA 28ClI5. I @~~IUII~~' .lI'PIJCI<'lDl.FMMlClNJIWlfTtlNCOI.OIt @]~'EOl'U~~== """'" ~a.'ERHfAllCOlJl<<;IlOOIl.PT-l""""fNSH. -""" 1)/t.IMUlfUlORCf'OL'\'IIERflIIISH:PI'G I.ICI5I3OIflCQI.Sl\UL 1) l'MIl"llOllMM IilllME OC-71 we llClUAA l)'o1SlONlIA5S:l'PG~ 4}SPNalElGUSS:PfIC~&\WIIIlWAAll ... ...... :~===D~S. CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL .z:. FUSTER ~ NICHOLS IlmGII' AJIIOCU'..... P.A. BROSCH WURST CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ..............................- - ........- WOlfE ..,=-....::::~~... ----...... SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP _.........._n...... ~ -"D1'M'lZMlO.. -..,-.....- b.. 1- "b I'- I'- I'- ..... I'- ~ - I'- I'- J- I'- J- I'- J- I'- J- 9jii ;Ii ;J=' ~ I ,,~ I T =. -= = =~'r+"~b .~:~.. - - ~ .~A~~ NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: I' 0 zO'.O' B I LEGEND Gl SllDOIHSNIlftG\TfMSltSTt.'tCtl,I'NNI ,-,-,,,,,,, [!]~~~riri~ nuoROPOl'ftI[R2 COO'Sl'ilDI, 7a 1IeSlH, COUI'I.'ltl(;WIIl1MW.l~ ~~~~~~1'1. lI'PUC:A'IION.feIClIlENWHI1tIllCWlll E1~~&t~~~~ ......... @]lM1lHOOCOl.JNGDOOR.I'I'.'PAlNJTNSH. fIlISII'oIOltS: 'lM.l/Wloll.lWFlUOllOPOl1\llRI'NSH:PPG UClIllI3lI__5I.YOL 1) PMfI': 8fK,IIMflllOClllE OC~1' SA/ClllOLlJIl, 3)WllMllASS:PflCCNlla\. 4)5PNIlIIO.Cl.Il5S:Pl'OClIlIlMllITHWAAl.l .., ...... S)GlASSIWIM:I:QDfl1Dl'ERmGlASS fi)SfllN[\o9I[[ll:IQIEDCRoIVllllAltn: 0PT-1PA/IIICllLOlI,IDOllACIMJ::lATEX. 0~~~OOIJtOR FUIDllllPOl1llDl2lXl1.TsmEII,1OX RfSlIl. COlI'l'l1lG 'llIIIl MlM 2<<llI. [J:='=,=~~ O>>.T smut, 7tlllUII, Cl:llIll.'lIlIl "MfH M/,M21O!i. m:t=~~=Yj~. C1IIl'l..'tICWiTHNMA2I06. []="~~~T 5YSI9l,7OIllE1N,tolI'I.MWllHNm. ..... [II ~uru~~ =: === 2 ""'-, [I]~-=~r:.:/fMIlE FIISIl: F\.l.IlIRlIf'OlWOl 2 COO smnI. 7lIl1: fIlSlN. COWtl'lNO 'tIIlH MW. 2tm. NOTt:PERroflAGtoroPt:hKlSCNEl.EVATIONOlIAIlI~ '/IEST-71' """ -.. ""-... --,. o~,\\{'" o~":,~ o!l"),~ .~,~'1-.14 4 ~ o~',WC\ olM,1i\'}. of.IV-]. o!l"~ or.!&'!. 0!!".1/IO\ 0!P'.\1-i on ~P" o!t'llcfll' 011'.\\\'\ ~--------, -nn rr-n rr-n rrT tl~~~L o~lW-o - - - - = =" ~lriY~~ o~l'l!f-o 7 8 ~~;..;o~o~VATION CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL --~ FUSTER ~ NICHOLS .'n~.' DZlIIQH~t'I8.P..L BROSCH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ------ WURST ..,=.:~Q:... ----..... WOlFE SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP -...-.-........ ~~ ....-NI~'1tv.l.!l'.. ---...-- '~'~O ol1"l,\'l-\, 'h~'~~ o!l"),1I'!\ 'lr~I~4 o 11":,',\,,:\ ,~\~~ o!!'.\V-I, 0!!'.\V-\ 0l1'.W-\ o!!".~\ o!r'.~ l/lW.~_~l orc"'cgl' 0!r.1\":1 B I .Ii"l,~ '~I~\g .d~I~~ .If').\r.:\ .1f'),1V-'. .lt~l"~~ .~lli'!'iT .R".IP-\. .r>.iP'-I .l1"~ .!l".~. .i1".~ .N!ll" .~'lII'-'W .!,,~ .!I'.','l& .11 l1'f-. LEGEND QJ=rSoWOflOl,TFNSIlmttO,PMIT [TI=~~':sr'iTl;: JflDIllIIMIJlI'ItilI.fN5H: FUIOIlllPOl.'llIElI1COOmtnl,7tmAESIIl, COlII'I.'IlNll'lll1H.......,ZIm. I ~~~rJ~~. ~TJ)N,fMlRlCI.N(NM/IIEWCOlOR, @)~~~=A= .....1L EDOYERllEAOCllUCDOOR.PI-1PA1N1'fllGi rtrllSlll101tS: I) IllMIIIl Fl.UOIIOPlll.VW1 rlllSfl: Pl'C UC8!iIJOMCMllo\Stml. 2)PMfr:llEKlMINliIDlW.OC-71SlHllIlOUN!. 3)WilOHQ..\S5:PPOCARl8Il.. :Im~GV$S;I'I'C:CMW.'IlITHWNlU 51~IlMJNC:Cl.tlI:1Ell't:ROlClASS. 8ISJllNf\SEER:lIlNED(;AArClW/fTt CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL ---~ FUSTER ~ NICHOLS .z:. UllOM UlJOCUTIIB, P,A. BROSCH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ''''~~~~''', - -....- WURST ____u.u. WOlfE SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP _....__...u... ~~ _1lIII1_"'__ 0I'HPAIlTClll.lII,'00IAClMJ;lAID:. !II~~~tootDII fl.IJOIlllPOl.'MR 2 COAl SYSlDl. 70S IlliIIl,COW\.'lII<<IIfJIlNIIAM. 0~~==\'~":S1l, COM'I.'IlNll'lll1HMW.'Hm. [TI~'~.=;~~~~ =~.1tlI1lEliIl,CtW'L'lJGvrrrll [D~~====2 ..."". IT] =",r:o~~T SYSIDl,1OX1lUlII.00MPI.YIfG'IIIllMW. .... [9]~-=S:.FttW~ llESlII.allI'\.'I1HOWllHINIA1I05. NOtE: flBlCENU,GEor 0f'{IfI/Qi ONQE\fiIDlIlRAWlNGS; !lEST -11" """'-'" ""-'" """" -.. () ~c~L~T.~,,~~EVATION B EXHIBIT "C" - page 1 Beach by Design Height B-2 Option 1: "500' Rule" "~"~~ OVER frY 1__][ ~_ }-if= _'1[____ I b- . H-- Ti,:L. r .j"T : ;~.._"'~~' B. Height Maximum height is prescribed by the respec- tive zoning districts in the community devel- opment code unless otherwise restricted by Beach by Design. The height may be in- creased, however. to 150' if: 1, Additional densny is allocated to the devel- opment either by transferred development rights or with bonus holel units pursuant to the CRD designation; 2. Portions of anv structure which exceed 100' are goac9d alleast 100' l1ma.rt (with no more than two structures which exceed 1 00' ~; or four structures which exceed 100' within 800' so long as the elevallons of all structures which exceed 100' when such structures are viewed from the east do not oc- cupy e total of 40% of a north south vertical plane which Is parallel to the alignment of Coronado and North Mandalay of Ihe building envelope above 100') " II 5304'.10' CORONADO DRNE ,.....N 25 50 100 CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP ~'"-''(''',''' .'-' '''1t...'l.,',.~ ~3KGSc;,j 'yV~W,S'; \'VC~Jf ~~ B EXHIBIT "C. - page 2 Beach by Design Height B-2 Option 2: "800' Rule" B. Height Maximum height is prescribed by the respective zoning districts in the community development code unless otherwise restricted by Beach by Design. The height may be increased., however, to 150' if: 1. Additional density is alloceted to the development either by trensferred develop- ment rights or wilh bonus hotel unils pursuant to the CRD designation; 2. Portions of any structure which exceed 100' are spaced at least 100' apart (with no more than two structures which exceed 100' within 500'; or four structures which exceed 100' within 800' so long as the elevetions of all structures which ex- ceed 100' when such structures are viewed from the east do not occupy a total of 40% of a north south vertical plane which is parallel to the alignment of Coronado and North Mandalay of the building envelope ebove 100') I I I I I 1 "I I I 1 I I I I I I I. I I I I I I ~ ~ ;.Lrr-r~- j---I f=~--~ :r-) [,~- }f-, . r~=r~d 'f' f"J.,~ ~~ OVER 190'[ 1m [ --] -=---) (._-~ ----'J L --,-,1 f-T ---'-] \ --]f J t .,.... ~, '.. ~'-':-J, . r- '~'?"~t 14a-8" ~ ~ I l---~--J "'... --.-,----:;tI.. CORONAOO ORIVE ""... NOTE: 318'-10" LENGTH OF BUILDINGS EXTENDING ABOVE 100' IN HEIGHT' 311.9% OF BOO'TOTAL /'-r"',\.. ;---HN o 25 50 100 I / 1./ B ~ NICI", 10, IS. BROSCH W()~ST WOlFE ...'xw.,,", -'- CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP Exhibit "C" - page 3 Beach by Design Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings Item C-4 4. No more than sixty percent (60%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope 10-- csted above forty-two feet (42') will be occupied by a building. For the purpose of this standard, theoretical maximum building envelope is the maximum permitted building volume that could be theoretically occupied by a building and occupied by a building in~ eludes any portion of the maximum possible building envelope that Is not visible from a public street. / f/ IITIlle....". JC.<xd.t/ rrnl .. i.;~-:I.~:: ::.::.t.. ::.....J //'f 1,1 I i /-::11 /1 J'->~."I". <, 1, I i j / )1'1 / // j <., ')1..;: ., / < II t>1//li )J:'1 1"'1/ ] l<~~ll~-~~.~'..,.~/JI/'.'li~/I/ . , '. ..1 / I / .. i './7 II / / "'" i 1 '11, /.//...-7 ~ ):~.. "......, --// ., ..- "'-, ",- MAXIMUM POSSIBLE VOLUME VOLUME 42' - 1 00', MAXIMUM: 6,804,850 CF VOLUME 100' - 150': MAXIMUM: 4,316,350 CF TOTAL: MAXIMUM: 11,121,200 CF PROPOSED: 2,807,740 CF PROPOSED: 1 ,420,1 00 CF PROPOSED: 4,227.840 CF RATIO: PROPOSED DESIGN IS 38.0% OF MAXIMUM Note: Calculation is based on proposed setbacks. ./ < '. " " " " ............ PROPOSED DESIGN CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL CLEARWATER, FLORIDA SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP ;."." I' . ..]'.!. i ~ i ~Ic./ !.,/ . ../ ./ .-?- ../ ./ ,/' /' ./ I' ~ I 1/ ./ ./ ./ ../ ''1 .) k/ /r''-~'X'r~ /_/ '''i-, ,./ o 50 ~ 100 200 B '" ...../' \ <><//.<> \\ " ' /\ '\ /,-/, \ /"~, \ "..>> \ \ -.... /, \ _",/, \ I ~.<~' ~ \ <:;. \,... o:~~~ >-> II ~ .It..... (TYP,,~I ...., '/' I -.; / / I '" ,,': ~.771~ ...~ /;/ t~ ... ~;::/ ~~' ~\I~ '\ ""T~H l>osr, ijAC" "/ / Sl~ ' XOP SlOEW"U< ;'~5'_____/ ':. ".'" '-. .1 \< -. . ~ , . . , , . Ci : \/ . ;Z 10 >:/,' 'o(COflAn-'CCt'lCllElt .~/ '" ~~~;C:~L~~ """j "'- .w.llST 'II.; AS ~[c(5S....n.lrn>.1 . . . . , . . . ., . , . . ." E~ ,3~ 11 . "1I~.~il.~1 tJ~ ~~ I ~g: ~: >-V> V>z ~8 "'5 o z ::l ,l-Q()l).':uNl::VEj1J) ... ..a.................. ..~,::7-:""~;:"~,:..... II t..... .ilIB.... ....11... lay;...." W .!Ill!.....!ll l:,.........,. \"J:;e.:::u:::s :jTACiq~J ..."...4!J // -b:Q'-'''lt ......~...".<l\I 4f."oltlill"4If ~.. 100 CORNADO DRIVE F.F.E. 14.00 LOBBY F.FE 4.00 GARAGE :;:N ~ANC~ i-El, iUr"::: D::: '-A;l_ Vl:.H!C1.ES SCJ;L..E.: :"'-"30' ~~~'T~lt "",o,NGlE(TrP.) ...lI!ilII..IlI... (2) ~.c. ~..",.. "'/l1I\!NCATm 0lJIj;./,' PER OTY Of' a!ARW~lt~ 'Ntlf:.,'OOl<roOr""lJU''''''' (T"".) ~:"~'~ \M1E~ I ~ rrPE~'CORlIptR(HY OF CLEAR"~l'!:~ "'DE~ JlOl ("'11'.) ~ ~.~ C1TY I;y; CU:.\RW~1Ul .. 'NDDe "o~ " FOOT ,..at. JI:)Q, " {rn>.J . . . . . . . . "-s~~u~~~~UKoOCX"OL(rn>'J ., . la'~~;\~9~ (lOS""C HV(loltHT (n'P,) L",u"FltSIJFI'~a'\Il1I< (1) HI" roJ:il:! 01' !_'". ,', "'". " w CORONADO DRIVE 60' RIGHT-Of-WAY - ASPHALT (P.B. 23. PC. 60) ,-",--.,.;:.,...,--- ~ CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL REVISIONS '""~ FlJS1'ER K NICKOLS .".....IT..._... I z: I [l~~r(;:< f.~~.:r.,-rr.~. P..' 8ROSCH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ''''.'''''C'''''''''''',,"C 110<'1....- WURST I WOLfE SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP ._....e...........'.Ln... .~.~ _'.......-...1.......- -......, I I I I'I L SITE PLAN C4 l 1 ~) = ~BEAC~-Bl-DESIGN~ CLEARWATER BEACH-RESORT & HOTEL - _________ 'f ~- CLEARWATER, FLORIDA sl \ --= '" SEPTEMBER-11-2008 PROPOSED BY TRGCLEARWATERBEACHLLC ~ ~ ~~~~~;LE;iN~~ i ~ 7J;;~~ /~/,.t~" :~~~'~ ---<^ .....~ ~ ~ " \ ' D t- @- W w II!: t- <f) D (S II w <f) --~...~ / - ---'- ___~".-_-o_____ . @--. '!!I' '= llf llOJ ~ ...... CD.uI'lAlltKnlllotL'lO.~"I;III:__ (J1CILD1ICID'lO"~"""" ,ir_...r,..,"_~~"" C)'" _ .:..... .~..- ... Tfi!EE& . PAU'16 .. @T- u: u U I'D I'll . " JI :::'=o.c. I :':.c;:-' If ~- .. =-~- 1'1 ::"'.....-....""0001' II ~~ ,. =:= . :::!:""_-- .~/I't.ClIMTMIt ~* " @--- ,': .' ...... ..... . . . .;;~: :S}',;L .' ~ @/ ~ CORONADO DRIVE iIIl -----, ~ -:ri5.~ . -, ___ o i..-J: ~ ~ k:' :?= ":::::, U ' lJi'J ~ ~ "" xPl l110111 1110111 1111 i~'!'!Y ~~. -.-.-- @l ~ j=::-- :.::: -= .-...:: ~.. - ....~ ..... ,- ......_~_.......- ClCIC" - ...... r.ta' "_ ...._.r.._ __ ~ ~ - ..... p.r 1_ ..._ """ =:~~"';;;:"1/'CtL "" .. =.-- .... ,.... ,- .....-.....- '----~ ~- .\~ or W - - ,., ... .'.,. "_1' .., ,., .., ,.. "..,. ".,. ..w ,.W Mt .. _...- .... ,_ N''''_ ~ . .... .... __ M."''''_ ~ .. .... .... 1_ ...._ ~ - ...~. p." ,- .-"".........- ~ 11 ..W ~.... ._ ...._......_ ~ - ..... .... ,- --,........ ~ .;:::-,..:. ..... ..... ,- .....- ~.. -.. ..... p.,.. -- :::.::;-.......- ~. .......... ...", ..."", 1_ "'''_.r.,._ ~ - .... ..... 1- ......_.,....,._ ~ :. - ::- :::.:-- .. . T:::-....:r- 1"." ...r __ __..........._ 'l1li "t=---=- ....1" W." ._~_ ~~~ f ~ ~ >=<1 '-=-') \~)T\"'-'J \7""' \\ 0 0 if ~ @l ~ ~ '- -/ '---" U'.t' U'~.I'W_ ...... :=..~...- .." --.......- .-.---- = =-=.=,::: Qf. .'.t<I' _"vi< .rH'..I",~'""'__ ~ @ '" ~~ --= ID '" ~ M "'" LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" FUSTER PaIGN ABSOCIATII. P.A. ~_tJIIIfl_..r-. ____..Lt.Li. _n.DHrs._"-_'Q ",..----""..-,-- S"111 OP TWO I ~ 7~ .~~ ~- +-", ::::::\!D ~ -@~::@ () () ~ 0 11" Z 1> ro D 1>c 0 Zz :::!D D z1> ~ {;\-f < ~5 m mZ 1> {;\ c r " -< m {)l E -{ {)l 0 D c m r (l) m -< G\ 1> Z ~ Y D () r m :t> ;0 ~ -I m ;0 <no OJ m...- ~~m m;o iii~ :t> m-i ;Om ::}l () .." ~r- I 00 "'~ o I )>;0 "lJ m Ep ::0 0 (J) "lJ 0 <n 0 m 0 III ;0 -< -i -I ::0 G) "T1 () Qo 0 ...- C ~ Z ::0 I 0 ~ ",)> I t-<l1 !ill I d ~::! -i 0 m fii~ ::0 III 3N IIJ1iU) ;-0 m -I fi II rpI ~ ~ ~> :r m 1,1i. trj /:iz ...- 1!~I ~ ~ ...- r 0 2 Ii SECOND STREET 51 ! ------------------- ~ ;t! ~ ~ :& ~ ~ ~ B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :;e !"" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I T:\2008-0020\Traffic Study.doc CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL TRAFFIC STUDY Submitted to: CITY OF CLEARWATER Prepared For: The Related Group 3155 Biscayne Boulevard, 4th Floor Miami, Florida 33132 Prepared Under the Supervision of: Roy E. Chapman, P .E. FL Certification No. 34438 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34655 (727) 849-7588 A.. .... .J ' .... .."" .'. -f,,\ b."'.... '{ .' :": :ft..." LI'4 '~-<..v _ Date: .' :C;M.:){3l..AJ8C7~ May 2, 2008 I _, S....ATE.. ('~ "2, rl rHr\0 . . '''(h~..\ ~ - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.0 3.0 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Clearwater Beach Resort & Hotel site is located south of the South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive intersection and west of Devon Street in the City of Clearwater. This traffic study has been prepared to document the potential impacts from this project on the adjacent roadway network. Currently there are 200 rooms of resort hotel at this location that will be replaced with 250 hotel rooms and 200 timeshare units. For the purpose of this traffic study, the new development will be reviewed as 450 rooms of resort hotel land use. The project is proposed for completion in the year 2010. A transportation methodology meeting was held between City transportation staff and the applicant on April 15, 2008, and was agreed upon at a subsequent meeting held on April 21, 2008; see copy of the meeting methodology statement and acceptance contained in the Appendix. As agreed upon at the methodology meeting, the study area and intersections to be analyzed include Coronado Drive at Gulfview Boulevard, Coronado Drive at Devon Street (Harnden Drive north intersection), Coronado Drive at Harnden Drive (south intersection), and Gulfview Boulevard at Harnden Drive. PROJECT ACCESS The access to the Clearwater Beach Resort & Hotel will come from driveways connecting to Coronado Drive and 2nd Street. Hotel guests will come to the main entrance on Coronado Drive where the valet service will take their cars to park them in the on-site garage. Figure 1 indicates the roadways surrounding the project and the proposed driveway access points. The northernmost driveway to Coronado Drive is located opposite Devon Street, which turns into Harnden Drive east of this intersection. Drives into the parking garage and delivery vehicle parking are provided from 2nd Street, a new road to be constructed on the south side of the project. The return of valet parked vehicles to the hotel guests would be provided by an internal access lane back to the Coronado Drive main hotel entrance. The applicant proposes that Coronado Drive along the frontage of the site be operated to provide a single lane southbound, a left turn lane, and two northbound through lanes. From the southerly project driveway to 2nd Street a southbound right turn lane would be provided. EXISITNG CONDITIONS Existing traffic counts were collected on Wednesday, April 23, 2008 and Thursday, April 24, 2008, by Florida Design Consultants, Inc. The intersections counted and type of traffic control are as follows: 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4.0 5.0 6.0 Coronado Drive at Gulfview Boulevard (signalized) Coronado Drive at Devon Street (unsignalized) Coronado Drive at Harnden Drive (unsignalized) Gulfview Boulevard at Harnden Drive (signalized) The traffic counts were taken from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. with subtotals taken every 15 minutes. The highest four consecutive IS-minute increments that were taken are the p.m. peak hour. The existing counts were adjusted to annual average volumes using information from the FDOT 2006 Peak Season Factor Category Report (PSFCR). A factor of 0.96 was applied to the intersection. Figure 2 indicates the existing annual average traffic volumes for the intersections counted for this traffic study. The Total Traffic Determination results are shown in Table 1. All of the intersections were analyzed using Highway Capacity Software (HCS+) (Version 5.21) computer program for existing conditions. Each intersection was found to operate at Level of Service C (LOS C) or better, see Table 2. A copy of the HCS+ printouts are included in the Appendix and copies are provided on CD. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC As agreed upon in the Traffic Study Methodology dated April 15, 2008, it was determined that a growth rate of 2.0 percent per year would be used in the analysis to increase from the existing volumes to the 2010 study year volumes. See Table 1 for the increase in background traffic to the year 2010. PROJECT TRAFFIC The trips to be generated by the proposed development have been estimated using information from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) informational report Trip Generation, 7th Edition, 2003. The trips from the current resort hotel will be subtracted from the proposed development to result in a net traffic increase. The number of existing, proposed, and net new trips that will be generated in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours are identified in Table 3. As indicated the existing development generates 77 trips in the a.m. peak hour and 224 trips in the p.m. peak hour. The proposed 450 resort hotel rooms, assuming 100 percent resort hotel occupancy, will generate 165 a.m. peak hour trips and 507 p.m. peak hour trips. The project will therefore generate 88 net new trips in the a.m. peak hour, while the p.m. peak hour will have 283 net new trips. Due to the type of development there will be no internally captured trips or pass-by trips to this site. DISTRIBUTION The distribution of the project trips was assumed as follows: 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7.0 8.0 To/From North 75% To/From South 25% It was assumed that hotel guests coming to the site will utilize valet parking, and access the site via a one-way (inbound) driveway on Coronado Drive across from Devon Street. The traffic will then exit back onto Coronado Drive south of Devon Street. Both drives will have full access to Coronado Drive. Employees and delivery vehicles would use the driveways on 2nd Street. The Total Traffic Determination Sheet shown in Table 1 identifies the existing traffic, the future background traffic, and traffic from the proposed development. The net new project traffic was added to future background traffic to determine the future total volumes. The net new p.m. peak hour trips for the proposed development (121 inbound and 161 outbound trips) has been assigned to the highway network beyond the project entrance drives. At the project entrances, including the Coronado Drive at Devon Street intersection, the total traffic was analyzed. Figure 3 identifies the p.m. peak hour background and project traffic in the 2010 build-out year. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS Intersection analysis has been completed using HCS+ (Version 5.21) to analyze the each of the intersections indicated in Figure 3. Results of the analysis are provided in Table 4 and copies of the printouts from the analysis are provided in the Appendix and on CD. All of the intersections were found to operate at an acceptable LOS C or better. The Coronado Drive at Devon Street intersection has been shown to operate at acceptable levels of service with the geometry proposed. CONCLUSION Based on the above review it is has been demonstrated that traffic from the proposed project would result in minimal disruption to traffic on the surrounding road network and that Coronado Drive would operate at acceptable levels of service if a single southbound lane is provided between the South Gulfview Boulevard intersection and Devon Street plus a southbound right turn lane between the south project access drive on Coronado Drive and 2nd Street. 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L ,I _m____~-- -'-" ,,- "-"-'\ " _'oM'40'I'~IS.~ ,,-,,- ._,,-,,-,,-,,-,,_._,,-,,_.~ " ,. -.,-..- ,. -..-" -..-,. -.. - ,. -" COASTAL cONsTRucT'IONLiNE' -" -" -" -.. -.. -., -" -..- -..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-.. -"-"-"-' ..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-., _"."'U-'-""'8.511 ,,_., -., 'CoAST'Al cONSTRUCTION l'iNE' -., -.. -" -, ---~~ ~ ~~ ~0 ~w & ~ OV~ '\ JYQ r- L- ,~ ~~ I a""'" ,....'- 'NU.~ ~~ . ' . . .' . . . . ~~ ~~~ '. vv \IV . . . . ~ Z) - ...;...; It-- - I It-- - 1\ / -.;.; ~ ~ Ij ~ \ I I ~, ~ ST, f-- - r- . '\. "- / / I I I I ~ "'-. --- /' ~ . I I . ---, ...-- "Il ~OF~R - I U Q r> ~ -l- : I I 0 ~ t ~ '\ D D a I . . . . ...... - · r; J:!: I \ W -- - -0 {l- I w , c::: I ~ ~ ~ I I ...... 00 Il {] . III . . . I 0: I I ~ Q Q ~ z I N STORAGE -0 *' ~ l]~ r> , ! I JtIF STORAGE I / . . --...;... I Q .. I I ~ I I ~ I r>/ I SERIIICe CORRlOOR . . - f COMPACTOR I fl ~ 1.4(" J ~~----.r--~n I I BACK OF I . . . ' I I HOUSE LUGGAGE I 11 ~ IRsJjsi+j I \ ~ I ~ / LOBBY ~ STORAGE -1 I 0 0 LOWER 0 I , LOBBY 0 I I f I -L ~~ I I '] I I LOBBY -~ I " -i- I . I . . . . V "- - - I I II ""'- ~ -~ - - STORAGE HOUSE Q L - .. .. Q 0 . . . 11\11 ;j ~~ . & ~.l.'\' ll'Ik"L:.i'J: . _ · .. .. .. # .. .. ..~.. .. . , ":'1 '>'I.; ~ "'- C:.L. 'Ir.S ~~. ~ l'f,,~ W~- <(~ rU''!'lS'' 't.~.If l1flj 'I . ':.1.... ~ '~w~ ~ I I I _ 5"~~ ~!i-~ . ~: w-.-..a - ~' . ~ 11!.}s> ~ . CORONADO DRIVE EBN o ~c~L~?~zo~~VEL PLAN --- 0 10 zo 40 V CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL Cl'VtL ~1.<""'UlUIOC _ l.l1IDllCAK FUSTER K~ "'C"T~cr""-~ tr --p~ BROSCH WURST CLEARWATER, FLORIDA J;E11'1ol Z;ATAC. 4SSOCIAn:S. INC. ................. ~..... WOlFE ,.,~~ti;?:- ........ ....... ... JiIIIIIIl. ...-..&. MAY 2,2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP - -. ..............-- J~ .................. --- D ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~..,. -.j co ..,.v> ..It 257 J. it 24, -.j 01 0 N ..,. 01 V> ~~O> L82 -0 .. 4 DEVON STREEr .JtL xx - Existing Annual Average Traffic 21 J. 1_ 5, it! OV>V> <0 V> DEVON STREET (') o ~ "%. ~ o ~ -z. {(\ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ LEGEND North (f) NaITo Scale e 2008 Florida Design Consulants, Inc. PLANlClEARWA.TER BEACH HOlEl-RESORTfTRANSPORTATIONI2OO8 PMPEAKVOLUMESAI. 4I29l2OO8 PM Peak Hour Volumes - 2008 CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL f~~~ z:.. FUSTER KN~~ -.. BROSCH WURST ClEARWA lER, flORIDA -:~::-- -----... WOlFE MAY 2. 2008 PROPOSED by lliERElAlEDGROlJP -.------- --..--..- ~ ---..-- o I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 01 0 N ~~ O>~ ~~ -1~ 268 -3 it 25, --l 01 N N ~ ~ .l>- 0> ~ CD L85 ~~ .l>-~ O>OlVJ -0 ~ ~ 0> -1~L ,4 DEVON STREEr SITE .l>- iti --l ~ VJ ~~ ~ .l>- VJ 0>0> 010 ~~ 80> 2ND STREET -1~ ~ -.::! ,\ DEVON STREET LEGEND xx - Background Traffic (xx) - Project Traffic North (f) NaITo Scale C 2008 Florida Design Consuftants. lnc PlANIClEARWA.TER BEACH HOTEl.-RESORTfTRANSPQRTAOONl2010 PMPEAKVOlUMESAI. 412912008 PM Peak Hour Volumes - 2010 CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL t~~~ ~ FUSTER Kg: --..... CLEARWA11:R, FlORlOA ...~=--- -----.. MAY 2, 2008 PROPOSED by l1iE RELA 11:0 GROUP - -.------ ------ .:=n:::; o ------------------- Table 1. Total Traffic Determination Sheet (P.M.) ~. Intersection Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Count I Percent I Left I Thru Right Left Thru I Riaht Left Thru Riaht Left Thru I Riaht Date Trucks Coronado Dr at Street Name Coronado Dr Gulfview Blvd Coronado Dr None Gulfview Blvd Count 0 503 181 0 0 0 7 523 0 268 0 25 4/23/08 0.3% 2008 Annual Avaeraqe 0 483 174 0 0 0 7 502 0 257 0 24 2010 Backaround 0 502 181 0 0 0 7 522 0 268 0 25 Project 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 121 0 0 0 0 2010 Traffic 0 593 181 0 0 0 7 643 0 268 0 25 Coronado Dr at Devon St Coronado Dr at Harnden Dr Gulfview Blvd at Harnden Dr Street Name Coronado Dr Devon St Coronado Dr Devon St Count 38 470 1 4 0 85 0 409 3 22 1 5 2008 Annual Avaeraae 36 451 1 4 0 82 0 393 3 21 1 5 2010 Backaround 38 469 0 4 0 85 0 408 3 0 0 0 Proiect 0 16 148 0 0 0 50 217 0 0 0 0 201 0 Traffic 38 485 148 4 0 85 50 625 3 0 0 0 4/23/08 0.3% Street Name Coronado Dr Harnden Dr Harnden Dr None Count 1 414 0 19 0 2 0 333 56 0 0 0 2008 Annual Avaeraae 1 397 0 18 0 2 0 320 54 0 0 0 2010 Backaround 1 413 0 19 0 2 0 332 56 0 0 0 Project 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 2010 Traffic 1 454 0 19 0 2 0 363 56 0 0 0 4/24/08 0.2% Street Name Harnden Dr Gulfview Blvd None Gulfview Blvd Count 379 0 35 0 174 353 0 0 0 25 156 0 2008 Annual Avaeraqe 364 0 34 0 167 339 0 0 0 24 150 0 2010 Backaround 378 0 35 0 174 352 0 0 0 25 156 0 Project 40 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 2010 Traffic 419 0 35 0 174 383 0 0 0 25 156 0 4/24/08 0.3% Source: FDC Date:4/30/08 T:\2008-0020\[Tables.xlslTot Traff - PM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 2. Existing Intersection Operation Intersection Siqnalized 2008 LOS Coronado Dr at Gulfview Blvd Yes B Coronado Dr at Devon St No C Coronado Dr at Harnden Dr No B Gilfview Blvd at Harnden Dr Yes B Date: 4/30/08 T:\2008-0020\[Tables.xls]Ex Int Op ------------------- Table 3. Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use ITE LUC Size Units Daily Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Resort Hotel (Occupied Rooms) 330 Existing 200 Room n/a 56 22 77 97 128 224 Proposed 450 Room n/a 119 46 165 218 289 507 Net Trips 63 25 88 121 161 283 Source: ITE Trip Generation, Seventh Edition, 2003 Date: 4/30/08 T:\2008-0020\[Tables.xls]Ex Int Op I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 4. Future Intersection Operation Intersection 2010 LOS Highest Approach Delay (SecNeh) Coronado Dr at Gultview Blvd B 18.0 Coronado Dr at Devon St B 12.8 Coronado Dr at 2nd St C 17.2 Coronado Dr at Harnden Dr B 14.1 Giltview Blvd at Harnden Dr B 26.6 Date: 4/30/08 T:\2008-0020\(Tables.xls]Ex Int Op I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ORIDA DESIGN CONSUlTANTS, INC, .~. - -~, Civil Engineering . Surveying . Transportation Planning & Engineering . Land Planning . Environmental Aprill5,2008 Mr. Himanshu Patni Traffic Operations City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Room 220 Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: Kir(n Grand Hotel Traffic Study Methodology Dear Mr. Patni: This letter is to summarize the methodology discussed in your office yesterday concerning a traffic study for the Kirin Grand HoteL As discussed in the meeting with you and Mr. Bennett Elbo and me, the study will review the impacts for the new trips to result from this project. The following methodology will be used to complete the study: 1. Proposed Development The project will consist of 250 hotel rooms (keys) and 200 timeshare units. The land use that previously occupied the project site was 200 hotel rooms. 2. Trip Generation Trips for the project will be estimated using the infonnation from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Informational Report Trip Generation, Seventh Edition, 2003. Trips for the proposed 250 hotel rooms and 200 timeshare units will be estimated using either the hotel 01 resort hotel 111 classification. The classification to be used will be determined by City of Clearwater staff by April 22, 2008. The trips from the previously occupied 200 hotel rooms will be subtracted from the proposed development to result in a net traftic increase to be studied. 3. Traffic Study Area The study area will include the intersections of Gulfview Boulevard at Coronado Drive, Gulfview Boulevard at HaAien Drive and both intersections of Coronado Drive at Haroen Drive. 3030 Starkey Boulevard. New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588. Fax: (727) 848-3648. (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Himanshu Patni April 15, 2008 Page 2 4. Background Growth The existing traffic volumes will be increased by 2% per year to a buildout in the year 2010. New traffic counts will be taken on a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. at the above listed intersections and will be converted to annual average operating conditions. The counts will p:<1f be taken after April 21, 2008. 5. Analysis Analysis will be completed using the HCS+ computer program for signalized and unsignalized intersections. The analysis will review the operation of intersections and links in the study area. The acceptable operating condition is Level of Service D. Both existing and future operating conditions will be analyzed. 6. Report A report indicating the study's findings will be prepared and submitted to the City of Clearwater. If the above procedure indicates an acceptable methodology for the proposed traffic study, please sign below indicating your agreement or provide comments indicating the procedure to be used. Sincerely, 1 0/ 1/ U~ ~Oy E. hapman, JfE~ Vice resident of Transportation The proposed methodology is acceptable to the City of Clearwater except as listed below: Ot/QI/ ~OOg 5e~ (f)~bJ rJ~ O(L I:k Joc~d . By: Date: ClaritIcation: c: Paul Bertels, City of Clearwater Bennett Elbo, City of Clearwater Eric F ordin, The Related Group E.D. Armstrong, III, Johnson, Pope, et al. File: 2008-0020-40.06 :pCIll K:\Kirin Grand Ho(~I\L~tt~rs\Pa(lliO I.doc 2006 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL I Category: 1500 PINELLAS COUNTYWIDE MOCF: 0.94 Week Dates SF PSCF ----~------------~-------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I 1 01/01/2006 - 01/07/2006 1. 06 1.12 2 01/08/2006 - 01/14/2006 1. 03 1. 09 3 01/15/2006 - 01/21/2006 1. 00 1. 06 4 01/22/2006 - 01/28/2006 0.99 1. 05 5 01/29/2006 - 02/04/2006 0.98 1. 04 I * 6 02/05/2006 - 02/11/2006 0.97 1. 03 * 7 02/12/2006 - 02/18/2006 0.96 1. 02 * 8 02/19/2006 - 02/25/2006 0.95 1. 01 * 9 02/26/2006 - 03/04/2006 0.94 1. 00 I *10 03/05/2006 - 03/11/2006 0.93 0.98 *11 03/12/2006 - 03/18/2006 0.92 0.97 *12 03/19/2006 - 03/25/2006 0.92 0.97 *13 03/26/2006 - 04/01/2006 0.93 0.98 *14 04/02/2006 - 04/08/2006 0.94 1. 00 I *15 04/09/2006 - 04/15/2006 0.94 1. 00 *16 04/16/2006 - 04/22/2006 0.95 1. 01 *17 04/23/2006 - 04/29/2006 0.96 1. 02 *18 04/30/2006 - 05/06/2006 0.97 1. 03 I 19 05/07/2006 - 05/13/2006 0.98 1. 04 20 05/14/2006 - OS/20/2006 0.99 1. 05 21 OS/21/2006 - OS/27/2006 1. 00 1. 06 22 OS/28/2006 - 06/03/2006 1. 00 1. 06 23 06/04/2006 - 06/10/2006 1. 00 1. 06 I 24 06/11/2006 - 06/17/2006 1. 01 1. 07 25 06/18/2006 - 06/24/2006 1. 01 1. 07 26 06/25/2006 - 07/01/2006 1. 01 1. 07 27 07/02/2006 - 07/08/2006 1. 01 1. 07 I 28 07/09/2006 - 07/15/2006 1. 02 1. 08 29 07/16/2006 - 07/22/2006 1. 02 1. 08 30 07/23/2006 - 07/29/2006 1. 02 1. 08 31 07/30/2006 - 08/05/2006 1. 02 1. 08 32 08/06/2006 - 08/12/2006 1. 02 1. 08 I 33 08/13/2006 - 08/19/2006 1. 02 1. 08 34 08/20/2006 - 08/26/2006 1. 03 1. 09 35 08/27 /2006 - 09/02/2006 1. 03 1. 09 36 09/03/2006 - 09/09/2006 1. 04 1. 10 37 09/10/2006 - 09/16/2006 1. 04 1. 10 I 38 09/17/2006 - 09/23/2006 1. 04 1.10 39 09/24/2006 - 09/30/2006 1. 03 1. 09 40 10/01/2006 - 10/07/2006 1. 03 1. 09 41 10/08/2006 - 10/14/2006 1. 03 1. 09 I 42 10/15/2006 - 10/21/2006 1. 02 1. 08 43 10/22/2006 - 10/28/2006 1. 04 1. 10 44 10/29/2006 - 11/04/2006 1. 05 1.11 45 11/05/2006 - 11/11/2006 1. 06 1. 12 46 11/12/2006 - 11/18/2006 1. 08 1. 14 I 47 11/19/2006 - 11/25/2006 1. 07 1. 13 48 11/26/2006 - 12/02/2006 1. 07 1. 13 49 12/03/2006 - 12/09/2006 1. 06 1. 12 50 12/10/2006 - 12/16/2006 1. 06 1. 12 I 51 12/17/2006 - 12/23/2006 1.04 1.10 52 12/24/2006 - 12/30/2006 1. 02 1. 08 53 12/31/2006 - 12/31/2006 1. 00 1. 06 * Peak Season I Page 1 of 2 I I I I I "'.l._....goo.t.I..:_..,__t:_~,~ 04/29/2008 09:18 "......,:r..e....,. 7275524755 ... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENG PAGE 01/02 FAX MESSAGE o FROM: 4/29/08 CORY MARTENS DATE: CITY OF CLEARWATER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SENDING LOCATION FAX NUM~ER: (727) 562-4755 OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: (727) 562-4747 TO: RYAN KIP? LOCATION: FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS FAX NUMBER: 727-848~3648 MESSAGE: Following are the signal timings you requested. These timings are what are running at this moment. They are subject to change as this is still an active construction zone and MOT area. NUMBER OF PAGES THIS MESSAGE (INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE): 2 I ~.J"""""'~'IIJ"""''':I~.:.'' ,.....,.~....,. 04/29/2008 09:18 7275524755 rr ENG PAGE 02/02 I' GULFVIEW BV. & HAMDEN DR. Phase 1 Gulfview Bv. EBLT I phase 2 Gulfview Bv WB Phase 4 Harnden Dr. NB Phase 6 Gulfview Bv. BB I Phase 8 HamdenDr. SB/SBLT Phases 4 & 8 are split phased. Phase 4 is a normally closed. driveway. I I I I I I I CORONADO DR. & GULFVIEW BV. I I I I I I I I CONTROLLER INTERVAL PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 4 PHASE 6 PHASE 8 INITIAL 5 10 5 10 5 PASSAGE 3 3 3 3 5 YELLOW 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 RED CLEARANCE 5.5 3.t) 5.0 3.8 7.0 MAXIMUM 1 20 40 40 40 40 WALK 7 7 FLASHING DON'T WALK /[3 /:3 MINIMVM R:ECALL X X MEMORY OFF X X X X X Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 6 Phase 8 Coronado Dr. SB Gulfview Bv. EB (left head) Coronado Dr. NB Gulfview Bv. EB (ctr. & rt. head) CONTROLLER INTERvAL PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 6 PHASE 8 INITIAL 20 10 20 10 PASSAGE 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 YELLOW 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 RED CLEARANCE 4.8 3.t) 4.8 3.8 MAXIMUM 1 55 55 55 55 WALK 7 FLASHING DON'T WALK /(; MINIMUM RECALL X X PED OMIT X X I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PM PEAK HOUR DATA PROJECT: Clearwater Beach Resot & Hotel PROJECT NO: 2008-0020 LOCATION: (N-S) Coronado Dr & (E-W) Gullview Blvd DATE: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 WEATHER CONDITIONS: Sunny LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIT: NB 2L NB 20 SB 2L SB 20 EB 2L EB 20 WB WB PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES ------------ ----------- .---------- _________ __________u __________ _____________ __.______.____ 4:00-4: 15 0 148 0 0 123 44 64 0 8 0 0 0 387 4: 15-4:30 4 115 0 0 112 41 55 0 10 0 0 0 337 4:30-4:45 1 132 0 0 128 43 71 0 4 0 0 0 379 4:45-5:00 2 128 0 0 140 53 78 0 3 0 0 0 404 1,507 5:00-5:15 1 129 0 0 100 56 60 0 2 0 0 0 348 1,468 5:15-5:30 1 107 0 0 105 59 62 0 5 0 0 0 339 1,470 5:30-5:45 1 104 0 0 118 56 68 0 3 0 0 0 350 1,441 5:45-6:00 1 101 0 0 108 49 89 0 1 0 0 0 349 1,386 ____________ _.__________ ____u__ ___U._hu huhh___ ___________ ___d___n__ 11 964 0 0 934 401 547 0 36 0 0 0 2,893 PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME ------------ ------------ ----------- u_________ ________nn n__n_n_nn_______h____ 4:00-4: 15 0 148 0 0 123 44 64 0 8 0 0 0 387 4: 15-4:30 4 115 0 0 112 41 55 0 10 0 0 0 337 4:30-4:45 1 132 0 0 128 43 71 0 4 0 0 0 379 4:45-5:00 2 128 0 0 140 53 78 0 3 0 0 0 404 _________h __n_______ ___.__n____ h_n____ unnun__ _____nn_n nun_________ 7 523 0 0 503 181 268 0 25 0 0 0 1,507 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 4:00 - 5:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0.93255 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 1,507 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 530 PHF NB 0.90 PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 684 PHF SB 0.89 PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 293 PHF EB 0.90 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 0 PHF WB #DIV/O! NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB L T R L T R L T R L T R 2008 Traffic Count 7 523 0 0 503 181 268 0 25 0 0 0 1,507 Annual AverageTraffic 7 502 0 0 483 174 257 0 24 0 0 0 1,447 PM Peak Hour Trucks = 0.3% Note: 2006 Annual Avg Factor = 0.96 Source: Foe Date: 4/24/2008 T:\2008-OO20\lTMC.x1s]Coronado at Harnden I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Trucks and Total Traffic Total T raffle Total T rattic Total Traffic Total Traffic SB SB SB SB EB EB EB EB NB NB NB NB WB WB WB WB Trucks Right Thru Left Trucks Right Thru Left Trucks Right Thru Left Trucks Right Thru Left 1 2 3 4 13 14 15 16 9 10 11 12 5 6 7 8 4-4:15 1600 0 44 123 0 0 8 0 64 1600 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 1615 1 41 112 0 1 10 0 55 1615 1 0 115 4 0 0 0 0 1630 0 43 128 0 0 4 0 71 1630 0 0 132 1 0 0 0 0 1645 0 53 140 0 0 3 0 78 1645 1 0 128 2 0 0 0 0 1700 0 56 100 0 0 2 0 60 1700 1 0 129 1 0 0 0 0 1715 1 59 105 0 0 5 0 62 1715 0 0 107 1 0 0 0 0 1730 0 56 118 0 0 3 0 68 1730 0 0 104 1 0 0 0 0 1745 0 49 108 0 0 1 0 89 1745 0 0 101 1 0 0 0 0 Pk Hr Traffic (4:00 to 5:00) 181 503 0 25 0 268 2 0 523 7 0 0 0 0 Leg Total 684 293 530 0 Percent Trucks by Approach 0.1% 0.3% 0.4% #DIV/O! Intersection % Trucks ::0 0.3% Signalized Intersection Coronado Dr t Free Flow Right J~! 20 M/Hr N ?OM/Hr Gultview Blvd .& T" if 20 M/Hr Source: Foe Date: 4/24/2008 T:\2008-0020\[TMC.x1sICoronado at Hamden Coronado Dr I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PM PEAK HOUR DATA PROJECT, Clearwater Beach Resot & Hotel PROJECT NO: 2008-0020 LOCATION: (N-S) Coronado Dr & (E-W) Devon 5t DATE: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 WEATHER CONDITIONS: Sunny LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIT: NB 2L NB 20 SB 2L SB 20 EB ~ EB nfa WB ~ WB nJa PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES -----.----- ------------ --------- _____n____ _______._. _________ ____________ _________ 4:00-4: 15 0 109 2 8 109 0 7 1 3 2 0 27 268 4: 15-4:30 0 91 0 13 114 0 5 0 0 0 0 21 244 4:30-4:45 0 119 0 7 116 0 1 0 1 0 0 16 260 4:45-5:00 0 90 1 10 131 1 9 0 1 2 0 21 266 1,038 5:00-5: 15 0 108 0 3 92 0 10 0 1 0 0 20 234 1,004 5:15-5:30 0 86 0 6 100 1 2 0 0 2 0 18 215 975 5:30-5:45 0 96 1 8 120 0 3 0 0 0 0 9 237 952 5:45-6:00 0 86 0 10 99 1 1 0 1 2 0 16 216 902 __________u ____.______ _______.___ ___.nun__ __________ _________ .___________ 0 785 4 65 881 3 38 0 148 1,940 PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME _____._____ ________n__ n__________ _n_________ ___n_______ n____._____n___________ 4:00-4:15 0 109 2 8 109 0 7 1 3 2 0 27 268 4: 15-4:30 0 91 0 13 114 0 5 0 0 0 0 21 244 4:30-4:45 0 119 0 7 116 0 1 0 1 0 0 16 260 4:45-5:00 0 90 1 10 131 1 9 0 1 2 0 21 266 ____________ ___.u_____ ._____._u. _.__.___u __________ _________ _______ 0 409 38 470 22 4 0 85 1,038 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 4:00 - 5:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0.96828 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 1,038 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 412 PHF NB 0.87 PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 509 PHF SB 0.90 PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 28 PHF EB 0.64 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 89 PHF WB 0.77 NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB L T R L T R L T R L T R 2008 Traffic Count 0 409 3 38 470 1 22 1 5 4 0 85 1,038 Annual AverageTraffic 0 393 3 36 451 1 21 1 5 4 0 82 996 PM Peak Hour Trucks ~ 0.3% Note: 2006 Annual Avg Factor = 0.96 Source: FOe Date: 4/24/2008 T:\2008-OO20\lTMCJds]Coronado at Harnden I I I I I Trucks and Total Traffic I 4-4:15 1600 1615 1630 1645 1700 1715 1730 1745 I I Pk Hr Traffic (4:00 to 5:00) 0 Leg Total Percent Trucks by Approach 0.0% I Intersection % Trucks = 0.3% Unsignalized Intersection I I I I I Source: Foe Date: 4/24/2008 T:\200B-0020\fTMC.JdslCoronado at Harnden I I I I I SB Trucks 1 o o o o o o o o Total Traffic SB SB SB Right Thru Left 2 3 4 o 109 8 o 114 13 o 116 7 1 131 10 o 92 3 1 100 6 o 120 8 1 99 10 1 470 509 38 t N EB Trucks 13 o o o o o o o o Total TraffIC EB EB EB Right Thru Left 14 15 16 3 1 7 o 0 5 1 0 1 1 0 9 1 0 10 o 0 2 o 0 3 1 0 1 o 5 28 22 0.0% 20M/Hr ~~ n/a M/Hr Devon St ~ Total Traffic Total Traffic NB NB NB NB WB WB WB WB Trucks Right Thru Left Trucks Right Thru Left 9 10 11 12 5 6 7 8 1600 1 2 109 0 0 27 0 2 1615 2 0 91 0 0 21 0 0 1630 0 0 119 0 0 16 0 0 1645 0 1 90 0 0 21 0 2 1700 0 0 108 0 0 20 0 0 1715 0 0 86 0 0 18 0 2 1730 0 1 96 0 0 9 0 0 1745 0 0 86 0 0 16 0 2 3 3 409 0 0 85 0 4 412 89 0.7% 0.0% Coronado Dr +- n/a M/Hr Devon St ir 20 MlHr Coronado Dr I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PM PEAK HOUR DATA PROJECT: Ctearwater Beach Resat & Hotel PROJECT NO: 2008-0020 LOCATION: (N-S) Harnden Dr & (E-W) Coronado Or DATE: Thursday, April 24, 2008 WEATHER CONDITIONS: Sunny LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIT: N6 1L N6 25 S6 1L S6 25 E6 2L E6 20 W6 W6 PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME N6 N6 N6 S6 S6 S6 E6 E6 E6 W6 W6 W6 TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES ---------- -------- --------. _______ __________ ________ ____________ _h___hU____ 4:00-4:15 96 15 0 0 4 0 1 0 95 0 0 0 211 4:15-4:30 65 13 0 0 6 1 0 0 110 0 0 0 195 4:30-4:45 102 14 0 0 4 0 0 0 95 0 0 0 215 4:45-5:00 70 14 0 0 5 1 0 0 114 0 0 0 204 825 5:00-5: 15 93 6 0 0 4 0 0 0 84 0 0 0 187 801 5:15-5:30 73 8 0 0 3 1 2 0 110 0 0 0 197 803 5:30-5:45 80 9 0 0 3 1 0 0 108 0 0 0 201 789 5:45-6:00 67 15 0 0 4 1 0 0 80 0 0 0 167 752 ._________._ _________ H________ ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ 646 94 0 0 33 5 3 0 796 0 0 0 1,577 PEAK HOUR TIME N6 N6 N6 S6 S6 S6 E6 E6 E6 W6 W6 W6 TOTAL PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME __._.______ __n__n___ .__.___u___ ___h______ ___u_______ _______n_ ______________ 4:00-4:15 96 15 0 0 4 0 1 0 95 0 0 0 211 4:15-4:30 65 13 0 0 6 1 0 0 110 0 0 0 195 4:30-4:45 102 14 0 0 4 0 0 0 95 0 0 0 215 4:45-5:00 70 14 0 0 5 1 0 0 114 0 0 0 204 ____.______ __n_______ _________ _._______n .__________._______________________ 333 56 0 0 19 2 0 414 0 0 0 825 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 4:00 - 5:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0.9593 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 825 PEAK HOUR VOLUME N6 389 PHF N6 0.84 PEAK HOUR VOLUME S6 21 PHF S6 0.75 PEAK HOUR VOLUME E6 415 PHF E6 0.91 PEAK HOUR VOLUME W6 0 PHFW6 #DIVjO! N6 N6 N6 S6 S6 S6 E6 E6 E6 W6 W6 W6 L T R L T R L T R L T R 2008 Traffic Count 333 56 0 0 19 2 1 0 414 0 0 0 825 Annual AverageTraffic 320 54 0 0 18 2 1 0 397 0 0 0 792 PM Peak Hour Trucks = 0.2% Note: 2006 Annual Avg Factor = 0.96 Source: FOG Date: 4/24/2008 T :\200B-0020\[TMC.xlslCoronado at Harnden I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Trucks and Total Traffic TotalTraffic Total Traffic Total TraffIC Total Traffic SB SB SB SB EB EB EB EB NB NB NB NB WB WB WB WB Trucks Right Thru Left Trucks Right Thru Left Trucks Right Thru Left Trucks Right Thru Left 1 2 3 4 13 14 15 16 9 10 11 12 5 6 7 8 4-4:15 1600 0 0 4 0 0 95 0 1 1600 0 0 15 96 0 0 0 0 1615 1 1 6 0 0 110 0 0 1615 1 0 13 65 0 0 0 0 1630 0 0 4 0 0 95 0 0 1630 0 0 14 102 0 0 0 0 1645 0 1 5 0 0 114 0 0 1645 0 0 14 70 0 0 0 0 1700 0 0 4 0 0 B4 0 0 1700 0 0 6 93 0 0 0 0 1715 0 1 3 0 0 110 0 2 1715 0 0 8 73 0 0 0 0 1730 0 1 3 0 0 108 0 0 1730 0 0 9 80 0 0 0 0 1745 0 1 4 0 0 80 0 0 1745 0 0 15 67 0 0 0 0 Pk Hr Traffic (4:00 to 5:00) Leg Total Percent Trucks by Approach 4.8% 2 21 19 o o 414 415 o o 56 333 0 389 o o o o 0.0% 0.3% #DIV/O! Intersection % Trucks == 0.2% Unsignalized Intersection Harnden Dr t 25M/Hr N ~ ~oM/Hr Coronado Dr ... -.,. --,. ; 25M/Hr Source: Foe Date: 4/24/2008 T:\2008...()(}20\JTMC.x1s!Coronado at Harnden Harnden Dr I I PM PEAK HOUR DATA I PROJECT: Clearwater Beach Resot & Hotel PROJECT NO: 2008-0020 LOCATION: (N-S) Harnden Dr & (E-W) Gulfview Blvd DATE: Thursday, April 24, 2008 WEATHER CONDmONS: Sunny I LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIT: I NB SB -a- EB -a- WB -a- NB SB 25 EB 20 WB 20 PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS I TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES --------------- ._______._ ___________ ________ ________ ________ _______n ____________ ____________ 4:00-4:15 0 0 0 82 0 11 8 45 0 0 42 95 283 4: 15-4:30 0 0 0 102 0 7 6 38 0 0 43 72 268 4:30-4:45 0 0 0 90 0 7 6 38 0 0 36 113 290 4:45-5:00 0 0 0 105 0 10 5 35 0 0 53 73 281 1,122 5:00-5: 15 0 0 0 87 0 2 7 38 0 0 33 76 243 1,082 5: 15-5:30 0 0 0 94 0 5 6 30 0 0 42 69 246 1,060 5:30-5:45 0 0 0 98 0 8 7 40 0 0 47 86 286 1,056 5:45-6:00 0 0 0 81 0 8 6 39 0 0 47 67 248 1,023 ---------- -------.- ----------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ----------- --------------- 0 0 0 739 0 58 51 303 0 0 343 651 2,145 PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME __________ ___________ ____________ _________n _________ _________ ____d____ ___n____h_ 4:00-4:15 0 0 0 82 0 11 8 45 0 0 42 95 283 4: 15-4:30 0 0 0 102 0 7 6 38 0 0 43 72 268 4:30-4:45 0 0 0 90 0 7 6 38 0 0 36 113 290 4:45-5:00 0 0 0 105 0 10 5 35 0 0 53 73 281 ------------ .-------- _________ _______ ________n .________ __________n___________________nnn_ 0 0 0 379 0 35 25 156 0 0 174 353 1,122 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 4:00 - 5:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0.96724 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 1,122 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 0 PHF NB #DIV/O! PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 414 PHF SB 0.90 PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 181 PHF EB 0.85 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 527 PHF WB 0.88 NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB L T R L T R L T R L T R 2008 Traffic Count 0 0 0 379 0 35 25 156 0 0 174 353 1,122 Annual AverageTraffic 0 0 0 364 0 34 24 150 0 0 167 339 1,077 PM Peak Hour Trucks = 0.3% Note: 2006 Annual Avg Factor = 0.96 I I I I I I I I Source: FOC Date: 4/24/2008 T :\2008-0020\jTMC.x1sJGuIMew at Harnden I I I I I I I I I I I Trucks and Total Traffic Total Traffic Total TraffIC Total Traffic Total Traffic SB SB SB SB EB EB EB EB NB NB NB NB WB WB WB WB Trucks Right Thru Left Trucks Right Thru Left Trucks Right Thru Left Trucks Right Thru Left 1 2 3 4 13 14 15 16 9 10 11 12 5 6 7 8 4-4:15 1600 0 11 0 82 0 0 45 8 1600 0 0 0 0 0 95 42 0 1615 0 7 0 102 0 0 38 6 1615 0 0 0 0 0 72 43 0 1630 0 7 0 90 0 0 38 6 1630 0 0 0 0 3 113 36 0 1645 0 10 0 105 0 0 35 5 1645 0 0 0 0 0 73 53 0 1700 0 2 0 87 0 0 38 7 1700 0 0 0 0 0 76 33 0 1715 0 5 0 94 0 0 30 6 1715 0 0 0 0 0 69 42 0 1730 0 8 0 98 0 0 40 7 1730 0 0 0 0 0 86 47 0 1745 0 8 0 81 0 0 39 6 1745 0 0 0 0 0 67 47 0 Pk Hr TraffIC (4:00 to 5:00) 0 35 0 379 0 0 156 25 0 0 0 0 3 353 174 0 Leg Total 414 181 0 527 Percent Trucks by Approach 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/O! 0.6% Intersection % Trucks = 0.3% I I I Signalized Intersection Harnden Dr I t 25M/Hr N +l I L-- 20M/Hr ?OM/Hr 11III I Gullview Blvd .. . Gullview Blvd I MlHr I Parking Lo (Roped Off) Source: Foe Date: 4/24/2008 T:\2008"()()20IJTMC.xislGuIMew at Harnden I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 3enerallnformation Site Information Analyst MRK Intersection Coronado at Devon Agency/Co. II.DC Jurisdiction Date Performed f1!29/2008 Analysis Year ')008 Analysis Time Period IPM Peak Project Description 2008-0020 East/West Street: Devon St INorth/South Street: Coronado Dr Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 393 3 36 451 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 413 3 37 474 1 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration LT TR LT TR Upstream Siqnal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 21 1 5 4 0 82 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 1 5 4 0 86 veh!h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Confiquration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LT LTR LTR II (veh/h) 0 37 90 28 C (m) (veh/h) 1098 1154 750 297 II/C 0.00 0.03 0.12 0.09 95% queue length 0.00 0.10 0.41 0.31 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 8.2 10.5 18.4 LOS A A B C I\pproach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.5 18.4 I\pproach LOS -- -- B C Copyright @ 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ ™ Version 5.21 Generated: 4/30/2008 2:19 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkipp\Local Settings\Temp\u2k123.tmp 4/30/2008 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information 5ite Information Analyst 'MRK Intersection I-farnden at Coronado Aqency/Co. !FOC Jurisdiction Date Performed 14/29/2008 Analysis Year ':>008 Analvsis Time Period IpM Peak Proiect Description 2008-0020 East/West Street: Harnden Dr North/South Street: Coronado Dr/Harnden Dr Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 lVehicle Volumes and Adiustments Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R lVolume (veh/h) 320 54 1 397 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 336 56 1 417 0 I'veh/h) Percent Heavv Vehicles 0 -- -- a -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 2 0 Confiquration TR LT T Upstream Sianal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Ivolume (veh/h) 18 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 18 0 2 I'veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Confiauration LR Delav, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 1 20 C (m) (veh/h) 1178 468 v/c 0.00 0.04 95% queue length 0.00 0.13 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.1 13.0 LOS A 8 Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 13.0 Approach LOS -- -- 8 Copyright @ 2005 University. of Florida. All Rights Reserved HCS+™ Version 5.21 Generated: 4/30/2008 2:21 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkipp\Local Settings\Temp\u2k12A.tmp 4/30/2008 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+ TM DETAilED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst MRK Intersection Coronado at Gulfview Agency or Co. FOC Area Type All other areas Date Performed 4/29/2008 Jurisdiction Time Period PM Peak Analysis Year 2008 Project 10 2008-0020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB 5B LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N1 1 1 0 2 2 1 Lane Group L R LT TR R Volume, V (vph) 257 24 7 502 483 174 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 '{J.95 0.95 '{J.95 0.95 '0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green, e Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 Gp Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G = 13.6 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 20. 1 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 7.3 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 8.3 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 0 Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cvcle Lenqth, C = 49.3 Lane Groul} Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 271 25 535 508 77 Lane Group Capacity, c 498 446 1393 1475 658 v/c Ratio, X 0.54 0.06 0.38 p.34 0.12 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.28 0.28 0.41 0.41 0.41 Uniform Delay, d1 15.2 13.1 10.3 10.1 9.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 13.2 10.4 10.2 9.2 file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkipp\Local Settings\Temp\s2k13C.tmp 4/30/2008 Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 I I Control Delay Lane Group LOS B B B B A Approach Delay 16.2 10.4 10.1 Approach LOS B B B Intersection Delay 11.5 Xc = 0.45 Intersection LOS B I I Copyright @ 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ ™ Version 5.21 Generated: 4/30/2008 2:22 PM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I file://C:\Documents and Settin2:s\rkinn\Local Settinp"s\Temn\s?k11Ctmn 4no/?oo~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Detailed Report Page lof2 HCS+ '" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst MRK Intersection Gulfview at Harnden Agency or Co. FOG Area Type All other areas Date Performed 4/29/2008 Jurisdiction Time Period PM Peak Analysis Year 2008 Project I D 2008-0020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Nl 0 2 1 1 1 0 Lane Group LT T R L LR Volume, V (vph) 24 150 167 339 364 34 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF KJ.95 0.95 p.95 KJ.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green, e Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 250 0 0 6 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 Gp Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G = 5.0 G = to.5 G= 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 25. 1 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 9 Y= 7.3 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 7 Y= 0 Y= 0 y= 0 Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 63.9 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delav, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 183 176 94 383 29 Lane Group Capacity, c 1112 312 265 709 634 v/c Ratio, X p.16 0.56 ').35 0.54 0.05 Total Green Ratio, g/C p.38 0.16 10.16 0.39 0.39 Uniform Delay, d1 13.0 ~4.6 123.7 15.0 12.0 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k P.11 0.16 10.11 0.14 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 2.4 0.8 0.8 0.0 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13;0 27.0 24.5 15.8 12.0 file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkipp\Local Settings\Temp\s2k14E.tmp 4/30/2008 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Detailed Report Page 2of2 Control Delay Lane Group LOS B C C B B Approach Delay 13.0 26.1 15.5 Approach LOS B C B Intersection Delay 18.3 Xc = 0.54 Intersection LOS B Copyright @ 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+™ Version 5.21 Generated: 4{30{2008 2:24 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkipp\Local Settings\Temp\s2k14E.tmp 4/30/2008 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information lAnalvst "ARK Intersection Coronado at Devon lAaencv/Co. DC Jurisdiction Date Performed 4/29/2008 Analysis Year 2010 lAnalysis Time Period PM Peak Proiect Description 2008-0020 East/West Street: Devon St INorth/South Street: Coronado Dr Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudv Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 50 625 3 38 485 148 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 52 657 3 40 510 155 veh/h) Percent Heavv Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- n Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR L TR Uostream Siqnal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R !Volume (veh/h) 4 0 85 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 4 0 89 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Confiauration LTR Delav, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR v (veh/h) 52 40 93 C (m) (veh/h) 934 938 557 vlc 0.06 0.04 0.17 95% queue length 0.18 0.13 0.60 Control Delay (slveh) 9.1 9.0 12.8 LOS A A B Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 12.8 IApproach LOS -- n B Copyright @ 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+™ Version 5.21 Generated: 4/30/2008 2:02 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkipp\Local Settings\Temp\u2kE2.tmp 4/30/2008 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst MRK Intersection Harnden at Coronado AQency/Co. FOC Jurisdiction Date Performed 4/29/2008 A.nalvsis Year ~010 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Proiect Description 2008-0020 East/West Street: Harnden Dr North/South Street: Coronado Dr/Harnden Dr Intersection Orientation: North-South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 363 56 1 454 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 382 58 1 477 0 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- n Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 2 0 Configuration.. . TR LT T Upstream Sianal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 19 2 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 20 0 2 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 1 22 C (m) (veh/h) 1131 418 v/c 0.00 0.05 95% queue length 0.00 0.17 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.2 14.1 LOS A B A.pproach Delay (s/veh) n -- 14.1 A.pproach LOS -- -- B Copyright @ 2005 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved HCS+™ Version 5.21 Generated: 4/30/2008 2:04 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkipp\Local Settings\Temp\u2kE9.tmp 4/30/2008 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information nalvst MRK Intersection Coronado at 2nd St \aencv/Co. FOC Uurisdiction ate Performed 4/29/2008 IAnalysis Year 2010 nalvsis Time Period PM Peak Proiect Description 2008-0020 East/West Street: 2nd St INorth/South Street: Coronado Dr Intersection Orientation: North-South IStudY Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adiustments Maior Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 15 461 537 164 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 15 485 0 0 565 172 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Siqnal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R lVolume (veh/h) 30 13 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 0 13 0 0 0 veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Confiquration LR DelaY, Queue LenQth, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (veh/h) 15 44 C (m) (veh/h) 878 340 v/c 0.02 0.13 95% queue length 0.05 0.44 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.2 17.2 LOS A C !Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 17.2 !Approach LOS -- -- C Copyright @ 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ ™ Version 5.21 Generated: 5/1/2008 7:12 AM file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkipp\Local Settings\Temp\u2k16.tmp 5/112008 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Detailed Report Page lof2 HCS+ TN DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst MRK Intersection Coronado at Gulfview Agency or Co. FOC Area Type All other areas Date Performed 4/29/2008 Jurisdiction Time Period PM Peak Analysis Year 2010 Project ID 2008-0020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Nt 1 1 0 2 1 1 Lane Group L R LT T R Volume, V (vph) 268 25 7 643 593 181 % Heavv Vehicles, %HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF KJ.95 0.95 KJ.95 0.95 KJ.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green, e Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 Gp PhasinQ EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G = 13.6 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 20. 1 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 7.3 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 8.3 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 0 Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 49.3 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delav, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 282 26 684 624 81 Lane Group Capacity, c 498 446 1394 775 658 v/c Ratio, X 0.57 0.06 0.49 0.81 0.12 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.28 kJ.28 0.41 0.41 kJ.41 Uniform Delay, d1 15.3 13.1 10.8 12.9 9.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.16 0.11 kJ.11 0.35 KJ.11 Incremental Delay,. d2 1.5 0.1 0.3 6.2 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.8 13.2 11.1 19.1 9.2 file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkipp\Local Settings\Temp\s2kFRtmp 4/30/2008 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Detailed Report Page 20f2 Control Delay Lane Group LOS B B B B A Approach Delay 16.5 11.1 18.0 Approach LOS B B B Intersection Delay 14.9 Xc = 0.71 Intersection LOS B Copyright @ 2005 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved HCS+ ™ Version 5.21 Generated: 4/30/2008 2:07 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkipp\Local Settings\Temp\s2kFB.tmp 4/30/2008 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+™ DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst MRK Intersection Gulfview at Harnden Agency or Co. FOG Area Type All other areas Date Performed 4/29/2008 Jurisdiction Time Period PM Peak Analysis Year 2010 Project 10 2008-0020 Volume and Timina Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, N1 0 2 1 1 1 0 Lane Group LT T R L LR Volume, V (vph) 25 156 174 383 419 35 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 KJ.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green, e Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 275 0 0 7 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, 3.2 3.2 3.2 Gp Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G = 5.0 G = 10.5 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 25. 1 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 G = 0.0 Y= 9 Y= 7.3 Y= 0 Y = 0 Y= 7 Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 0 Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cvcle Lenqth, C = 63.9 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delav, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB . LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 190 183 114 441 29 Lane Group Capacity, c 1105 312 265 709 634 v/c Ratio, X 0.17 kJ.59 0.43 KJ.62 0.05 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.38 kJ.16 0.16 '0.39 0.39 Uniform Delay, d1 13.0 124.7 ?4.0 15.6 12.0 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.18 0.11 0.21 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 2.9 1.1 1.7 0.0 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.1 27.6 25.1 17.3 12.0 file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkipp\Local Settings\Temp\s2k163.tmp 4/30/2008 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Detailed Report Page 20f2 Control Delay Lane Group LOS B C C B B Approach Delay 13.1 26.6 17.0 Approach LOS B C B Intersection Delay 19.2 Xc = 0.59 Intersection LOS B Copyright @ 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+ ™ Version 5.21 Generated: 4/30/2008 2:25 PM file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkipp\Local Settings\Temp\s2k163.tmp 4/30/2008 ~ iI: ~ !i2 ~ ;s ;Q e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c::i ~ (jjijI ------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL PARKING STUDY Submitted To: City of Clearwater Prepared For: The Related Group 315 Biscayne Boulevard, 4th Floor Miami, FL 33132 Prepared By: Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34655 Prepared Under the Supervision of: Roy E. Chapman, P.E. FL Certification No. 34438 Date: September 12, 2008 /(1: Y/1J! ~ ~ . f1~rt~ . 1"9 s/k8 tf' it "'lw -.. c.' ~ -;. 1:':., O~i~ .~~ -... 0..- , tl":- \0 :- ":";j~: ,', " K:IClearwater Beach Vacation OwnershiplReportslParking Study. doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.0 2.0 INTRODUCTION The Clearwater Beach Resort and Hotel is proposed for construction on the beach between South Gulfview Boulevard and Coronado Drive south of South Gulfview Boulevard and north of a new Second Street. The main vehicle access will come from a driveway located on Coronado Drive. All vehicles using the Resort and Hotel parking facilities will be parked by a valet service that will take vehicles from the Coronado Drive entrance to the parking structure access, which is located on Second Street. Three levels of parking will be provided within the structure. Trucks will make delivers to a loading area that will be provided on Second Street. The facility will contain 250 hotel rooms and 200 time-share units when completed. Based on City of Clearwater requirements, on-site parking should include one (1) space for each hotel or time-share unit. This would result in a need for 450 parking spaces. The City of Clearwater staff has questions concerning the number of parking spaces needed on site to handle the projected demand for parking related to the operation of the resort once it is constructed and placed into full operation. A meeting with City staff was held on June 10, 2008 to discuss the information to be considered for the parking study. A copy of the letter summarizing the proposed study parameters is provided in the appendix. This methodology was reviewed and approved by Wayne Wells, AICP of the City's Planning Department. This report will look first at the demand for parking by the resort's employees and guests and then at the supply to be provided within the garage. PARKING DEMAND The Clearwater Beach Resort and Hotel will have several components that will generate the need for parking vehicles. The facility will include 250 hotel rooms, 200 time-share units, 5,000 square feet o frestaurant, 12,000 square feet of a spa, a 2,000 square foot fitness center, retail shops, and 15,000 square feet of ballrooms and meeting rooms. The facility is being designed to encourage the interaction of the hotel and time share guests with the other amenities to be provided on site. A valet service will be provided to park vehicles in the garage on a 24-hour per day basis. The potential facility operator was contacted to determine the expected staffing through a normal day and for a full occupancy day including a large banquet. They provided staffing levels for the expected three shifts per day that will be used to service the hotel rooms, time share units, restaurants, spa, fitness center, banquet/conference facilities, and valet operation. These personnel will operate on three shifts as follows: Shift 1 from 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Shift 2 from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., and Shift 3 from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Under normal operations with approximately 80% occupancy in the hotel units and 100% of the time-share units being used, there would be 125 employees each for Shifts 1 and 2 and 25 employees for Shift 3. With full hotel occupancy and a large banquet occurring at the facility, the number of employees would increase to 175 each for Shifts 1 and 2 and 35 for Shift 3. Only about 25% of the employees would require parking spaces, since the majority will get to work using public transit or by being dropped off by car. The parking requirements for the hotel staff are summarized in Table 1. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3.0 During a Normal High Occupancy period the hotel is expected to be 80% occupied, which translates to 200 occupied rooms. During Full Occupancy 100% of the rooms (250) would be full. All 200- time share units were assumed to be filled for both the Normal High Occupancy and Full Occupancy conditions reviewed. Since the people staying in either the hotel or the time share units will use a high amount of air travel and then shuttle to reach the facility, only 60% of the occupied hotel rooms and time-share units are expected to require parking spaces. The retail shops are expected to be staffed by eight (8) people, half of whom would require a parking spot. The patrons for these shops are expected to come primarily from within the facility, with minor amounts coming in as pedestrian traffic from Gulfview Boulevard. The spa, fitness center, and restaurants will draw patrons primarily from the people staying at the facility, so no additional parking needs were identified for these operations. The conference and banquet facilities will draw many of their customers from people staying at the facility, but will also include many people driving to the hotel. During Normal High Occupancy it is expected that there could be a 360-person conference with half of the attendees staying at the facility and the other half arriving by personal vehicle. As indicated in Table 1, assuming 2 persons per Non-Guest vehicle results in a need for 90 parking spaces. It is expected that this would be a day meeting running from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. During a period of High Occupancy that also includes a large banquet with 600 guests, it is expected that one-third would stay at the facility, with the remaining arriving in personal vehicle using an occupancy rate of 2 people per vehicle. This would result in the need for 200 parking spaces during the peak periods of the banquet that would start at 6:00 p.m. and end at 10:00 p.m. An analysis has been conducted to determine the peak number of parking spaces required for each of these operating conditions throughout the day. Table 2 summarizes the parking demand for the Normal High Occupancy condition. As is indicated the parking demand ranges from a low of 246 vehicles to a high of 396 vehicles. The parking requirements for the Full Occupancy condition with a large banquet are shown by hour of the day in Table 3. As is indicated, parking needs range from a low of 279 vehicles to 514 vehicles. PARKING SUPPLY The Clearwater Beach Resort and Hotel will provide for parking within the building on the grade level, level 200, and level 300. All marked parking spaces will be at right angles to the driving aisle and will be 9'0" wide by 18'0" long. Because the facility will be operated as valet service only, there will not be a need to provide handicap parking spaces. There will be 463 marked spaces in the parking garage. Many of the spaces will be stacked to accommodate two or more vehicles. Figures A-02, A-04, and A-OS indicate the marked spaces to be provided. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I There was an original requirement for this project to provide some parking spaces within the garage for public use. Since the mixing of public parking vehicles with valet parking may present a conflict, the owner is pursuing discussions with the City to relocate the public spaces to another location. During high use periods at the hotel it will be possible to provide additional parking in unmarked locations within the parking levels. This entire additional valet parking operation would occur such that the main driving aisles would not be blocked. Figures A-02, A-04, and A-OS indicate the valet parking locations within the building. The spaces assume an 8' -0" wide by 20' -0" long space. This is longer than the marked spaces to allow maneuvering without moving an entire row of parked cars. The number of spaces provided within the building for the extra valet operation is 105. Table 4 below provides a summary of parking available in the Resort. As is indicated, there is ample room to park 568 vehicles on site. Table 4 - Parking Spaces Provided Grade Level 200 Level 300 Level Total Marked Spaces 218 149 96 463 Total 263 183 122 568 Valet Spaces 45 34 26 105 4.0 PARKING COMPARISON A comparison has been made to determine whether the parking demand can reasonably be met with the proposed spaces to be provided within the garage on site. During periods of Normal High Occupancy there is a demand for 396 parking spaces that can be met by the proposed marked spaces, which can accommodate 463 vehicles. During periods of High Occupancy and holding a large banquet at the facility there would be a need for 514 parking spaces. This would require use of all marked spaces and some of the extra valet parking spaces as indicated in Figures A-02, A-04, and A-OS. During periods of Full Occupancy, if there is not a large banquet taking place, there would be a need for 362 parking spaces. This demand could be met with only marked spaces. 5.0 CONCLUSION As this analysis has shown, the Clearwater Beach Resort and Hotel will have an adequate number of parking spaces on site to handle the projected demand. For most operating conditions, the marked spaces will prove more than adequate. For very heavy demand periods the number of marked spaces can be supplemented by additional parking within the garage. Several comments concerning this parking study were received from City of Clearwater staff. These are addressed in the Appendix. K:\Clearwater Beach Vacation Ownership\Reports\Parking Study. doc I - - ~~- ----::-::~--:;r - ~-- I, : )~/>--{ ! I I I I I I I I I I ,I I 'I I I I I CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL CIVIL f.'"I:-HRI.'G..l~:O;D'('~rf FUSTER ~ NICHOlS ~RCHIHCTt'RE-.rL..~"L"G ,-"" DESIGN ASSOCIATES, P.A. IB~OSCH WUILlr CLEARWATER, FLORIDA KEJTfll'" '." . '" ,;{"., ~ES, I~C ~.........(III'I."""" Y!.9J!.~ INC. ." '''' ~........ ~.... &.I.L..l. JOI E'.'- "~_'.' "."., '0 H'" JULY 14, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP 1~" " 'n'." " " ',.,1 7100 n .. Cou1. Xla-.&. n.. .10&3 "'......"d...e'o.. ,..... ~l "..._ ,. C-11'P'I4M I ArtNtoct\lr. & PitmlIg I i I I I I?! I I I I I I I I I I I ! i i ii' i i ii' i ii' i i i =-==r,_~~=i'-,_,_',_~- '='L'I~ :'~, IC~=l=t:~'~~ ,_'~~;,' -=~ '"-~-i: -=~f~. ; j--~~ -=::=-== ____ ___ _~ _ - 1__ - - -t- -~ - [ A- J - - .::: -:- -= - _, ~ - - L- A- - - - - - ,I -- 1 - -- '-- L/L., illII L 2 1 _ 4 6 I 6 0 _ 2 _ ~ 6' I 6 20~ 2 ~4 t'1o .v > 34 36 '! 36 - 40 ; & 16 16 ~ V. 'ill !j;2 54 56 'i8 ;0 12 L64 66 ~B7 70 . T1 "" I i I I y I -t-11 '--I I I y I I T i I 172m , I I ';!; I T I I I I 1 I ---~, 1 I c:) 1 I I I 1 1 I c:) I 1 1 f4 ~75 76 ~ \ \ ~ 0 E~]- ~: ::R {) nli IlL ; ~ 61 62 i \\ \- 1 'I -0 'I 79- sf i 72 : 73 Ii ~ - 63 1184 65 I \ n _~_ _ ___ __ ____ _. -I - _. ~ --- 1- .ANDSCP. 74 :75 .1 1 I I 218 ARKING SPACES I I I I 'I I 66 :87~1i81 \ 1 ST. 76 I 1 (+ 45 VALET) 1 I Y I 1 1 1 1 1 I I ;:. : 77 I I;:; I I I I I .0 ) 169 i190 91 I II 1\ II I:? II T I I I q ! T I I I illi 193 94 I I : ~ ~~{ :;,~~ 6 ::,0 M r ~ .. :. ~.:- '"- c' ri"- ,. ,. :r"- r" ,. If .. [~~".. ,. :'. '.. ,'. r '"- '" e J~': " !' ... - '; - :~- -:...--:=r' -. - ! i I q (j- ....~ LAJ' ^-J ERV'CECORR'OOl ~1[1 I I ~ ~~~: {/ :1 "CCOM-;';C-:;'O~-J / / / / IS 1 1 'STORAGE FaB ~&B I~~ ~l_ I C:::--=:J I - - J_= I I '" I 1 I I I. ~ -->,-.. .-17-?J I LOBBY ST'~DRY ST'~-BEV. ~ l- - - - -- - --( .' V S!o~GE I ~~g~ ~ill !-~ERVlCE- '--11-- -- - ~ - -~---- ~~-I .1 -/1- I " / 1 1 ~~ J_ ____ ~OQ~~ __ I __ ,,,,PAPER&l,O~THER '" l/ 1J~II';It.= ----- -- -I=--_~--/---'- --fQ- =RlFHIT-tiil I i ~~, t-- I _, 'l=rl=rFH- ~7 lJ8 ~ I / T- :1 -~OADING "" ~ BU 'K : I 1 1 I.. ... . 1 I; I I I LOBBY I S I 10 11 ~12 I ... . ..... Hil ~~""" + "~- - R F"'" , '^' I - --+ -. _ ~.J.=.~~{~~~~..- ~_ <-+- _ "'., ~L",,' ~-- - -~, - --;;-- '-;;-. }, J~~~", "~I r ~-F I: L../~!Ji~1!::_;~;.'~~:~~$);,: Q:: ~ : i --- 1 -~III -~GEG~'1 u~t- t--- Jr--=---=-=~._.7i49~'~;'~1~_"f':"":='=:";~"""f:~)-:~: ":::'I'~'-"':""""""':':';~i*.fii~t.4m~~ _~--n---J 'i ~__~ L I _ 1_ '1- . ~__-L-L__-LL-- I . _ I ~!}t~; ::e~@l}(~~q5-,"';;;;:::::::;::::::':::::::::::::"X '_::::::::::'::::::.,;~:::::::::::~;:;~~At%g~~,}::: .::&~)\ I _.1.- -LL_ .-! _--L- .J. -~ n ~ '--F~=t-'-':c-Fl:r---=4=-7--1--{Q:t 1\%0' ,----+6C--~-i=~++. ~_.____: 'c ~ ~ · I I 1 I I I I I I I I EBN () ~~L~~~20~0~VEL PLAN PARKING SUMMARY MARKED VALET TOTAL SPACES SPACES SPACES 218 45 263 149 34 183 96 26 122 463 105 568 i I GAl .~~~ :; 'I ENTF "",CE I' I ,I -'-r- -~ ! I --n I c.:1 I ---rr I - e--- - -+f I :1 I :1 -- + -I~ -- I : I '- r I ~ ) GRADE LEVEL 200 LEVEL 300 LEVEL TOTAL NOCi'4~'4g'E ~Ol(l. 58 COASTALCONSTRUCTION LINE ~ (- -~- - -.- - ~, l "~~ ~ .._,.~".O'~g'~\O..58 COASTAL CONSTRUCTION LINE ~- -- " ~" ~ ~ -i-- - --- ~ -+- -- / ~ --~y o 40 ----=-====-::--~--===---=~.r::::::::--.... , r= --~-_.~~( ~-~--_._~ ~-- A-02 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I Ii I I: 1 =m ' -.--L- "I 'T I' ____t,!~I!____ [ UNIT! L J; UN:lT ! :: I I -I-- - --II-- - +-----1 ---I _______ ____ : : 1 : I .11 : ODD I I tt-- I I I I II I I I I ..-----fIe I I I I -+ ~ ::::t--.: _ ;:----- ~ =_ ,\ -.c::; - III\I\I\I'JI ...J \ A"" l~~ ODD '" ~1f. ~ ~ ! i I ! l-rt ~~~ L~]/'7 ~ UNIT i UNITU [I:il- I ~~~~---~--~=v '~--s1L/- :- -:- ::1 ~;2:~ ~ . AUDIO-VISUAL I I I OPEN TO BELOW I I ~I I I STORAGE I ---r----r- · /41 13 14 ::: :::. - _~~ I , __ ' ~" , '" ,,,' rftj6ANOu:r:CRE I' I I _(~ I" I '" , OJ 0 61 'J "' I 1 - - t= I f-- - I - - - 1- -- - - -1- -I - -----!J - - -* f-- - -- - - ~ -- - I 25 : 126 I 144 ol6 48 150 ~ 54 56 51! 60 162 64 66 168 70 72 1- 27 128 FUNC110NFFaE I I L- . I I 1 1_ 1~29 ; 130 ~ _~OR: u_ _ ~ _ I I \ \ Q I I - -11- 1,"-0'1' -II ----: - -'T!9PARKING:ACET~ - -II - -II - p31 132 II 1110 I I , ~ (+ 34 VALET) \ c;) 1 II I I I f" ,,. HI, .'t>fl<i . ~ -- - - I '- I =' 731 74 I 183 B4 I 85 1 1'0' :'021 103 I 1'35 136 I I L _ :]S ~ ~ ~~+"" 75 76 -oil- _ _.~8'-0. 87"'_0 88"'0'_ 11'04 :'C5 106 __L __ 137 138 _. it ,Irs: s:1~1 jl-- I .. I s: "Iil- -~: 77 I ;89 90 I 91 ~ 1'07 'C, 109, 139 140 I 111..-'- I'II~ 'ffl--t-I I :1: i i 1:IE .\~ Sol U~ I I n;:.:' 78 : 79 I 192 93 I 94 jl'IO 111 112 I 141 142 I 143 I ..L "J( \\~ ~Cb .::;' t~ \I=--=' .c~~ T 80 1"5: 96 -r: 97 11"3 114~15 I 14-1 145 7 '46 I ' _~"' 'I .4 '''I '" I I OPEN TO BELOW IV -, 1181 82 98 I'r; 1100 1"6 117 '" 147 148 '49 I I r i~"""'-' 1 <::=11 I I I I i I I I I I I I J -,: , '":: ,;:. '::'':.' t :~:9 ~.- _Ir-__m- m___~___m+_m_~_______~mm~_______'-_____+__m,-_ F"" '" t=1s:IIIII I I I. L__.J__L__J I I I I I I I I I I. L__.J__L__J. I I, , X' : , , : UNIT: I I I I I -J~ I' , , , UNIT I~ I - --1- ~I \ MECH. I c. I I I I . 8 12 - - ,..-. iJPf '-.J 1/1 I 2 . 3 4 . 5 . 6 10 11 I 15 1\ 39 I I 16 I I 140 17 31 I. 33 35 ~t- - " i" · 3B I I 29 37 -'--~- 18 T -'- I" 1 I I 19 _I '- ~O~ I 21 25 26 ' I I 30 - " - 7- , -f--- ---- OPEN TO BELOW - I 22 I I "'. MECH I I I I I I I EBN 8 ~~~.~~2~_~L PLAN I I - \; -- ~- Wostin C1ei.l'Y'@.!grBeachResort& Hotel CIr!arwaIN. Fl July l-l, ;"oon Area, Unit and Parking Matrix I Floor Level GSFI Hotal Unitsl Fractional Unltsll Partdng Stansl 9fl!l.qtt.............. .......~.~,~~~ ......n....... ................... ............!Z.1{1 i~~;;;t:::::::::: :::::::j:~~~~ ::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::j :::::::::::jA~ ~o,,'-roL."'h"'h _..n..~,34~ __m_...____._ ...__.__.......__U _unhh"'__~ ~~.~~f:!'!!!'t:...n.n ......!95!.,.Z~~ ............... .......__.....u_1_~ .............__. 5ltlEl(~.;(___ _ SB,94!=1 :0'.: 12 .f~'tI..E.!,.':)r 50~ ~:.~ n ~~Jr~)'.:.::::::::::: :::::::~~;g:~ :::::::::::~~ ~~::~:~:~~:::::~:g Hit::::..::::: ::::::.n:~-~ :::::::::Jl :::-::::-:_:::::::':- 12lhrloor 28760:'.1 8 ~~l:~~~~"""'''' ::~~~~:~Z}~j ~::::::~:::-;~ ......m.......n: Plllilnuse 27.745 8 ISubtotals: 926.0621 2501 20011 4631 CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL c "ll. ~"';''''_~'''''';' '.A"~'C A.... FUSTER ~ NICHOLS ~.., ," ,U t ".~ _ P'.~"~''''' ,..-~ DESIGN ASSOCIATES. P .A. BROSCH CLEARWATER, FLORIDA '-'--.ln~ (16111 " .......... WURST "ItT[, 1."VI',( J. "~"<lt '^TI'. l'C WOLFE ~'l~~~1~~ <::~:~o: ,.,..."".........11-. EoollIio~. u.u. JULY 14,2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP noo n .,. ~ IiUaJIli. n. 3:114:1 "A5SOCIATES. INC. t~ 1_1"_ ru (111) ~Ma _11'lll'*1l I I B I I I I I I I I 'I I I I ,I I I I I I I ,I I I I , " I I I , " J I I I I;~i;- ~!I-I--t- i I' " UNIT ~NIT il I tN1T II !!, 1.:- : 1 -- ----- --+--:t- - TI -rr-- I 'l' I -"" i I , I i I , I i I , I i I , I i 17 19 I. II , 21 23 , I , , I I I , , ~ f- J 1.125 ~ 27 ~_ f--I ~_ ~3_ ~_ I+-_ I I , , 26-- 2-8-- 30-- I 32-- 34 j6-- I "~-'-~~~-u!' DDDk~'-l~:-/~- "~i ; i; -t-l1- i -~ ============ \. \"" ~ I (,../ /' UNIT I I UNIT II II U1'TI I I ", ilk / ' I I I, t -H I ' - -~:J ':-Jl:= r'~-' --!---- I-----j-I-~ -J---I--- I - 1--11--1 --::'. - _nO. --------- I '_". ~'.~/""-"--=---""'" ~ /<-: ./' .J \--. II ~ ,lIT- J ! ' ,-JJ I, , ! , , ,71 75 , PLANNER~~, I -+-- -t-----t- ---h - 4- -- BOABDROOM'A" L- . MT~I ----f-.-:---- --- i :NIT i 65 i 66 72 76 ' B~~~E~ RDOM 'C" i MTG. R OM A , =-U' '" I'\n!f1 .1 I I 7 I I I LAJ I 37 39 41 I 43 45 47 I 49 51 53 1 55 57 59 f 61 63 6"6-- I 6"9-- 73-- 77-- ~ I I I r--. --j-- 1-- 1--1--1 --1-- - +--!- I-- -1- -- -- -- s ;- 1-T r I I I I I I I I 7' I-- 38-- 40-- 42-- \44-- 46-- 49-- I sou ;2- ~-- 5"6-- 58-- W-- I 62-- 64-- 67-- 70-- 74-- 78-- BOARb RoAM -B" 1 I I I I I I I "- ~ 1 I I I M~~OM'B"_ -1- -"1 - -;:1-- I-- - -- t "I t- '1- .-+ -- 1------ I_- I I I , r-^..! ! 96 PARKING S~ACES I '-V (+ 26 VAUlT) , , ,81- i 82 , i 83 - 11-187 ! ! 85 I! 190 - -0----' - =--;- ,--" -.1 II8883l ' I c. , :::l !mPr ,~ I ' ------- --I : , I I I , , I ~ , 11 13 ~ _ 115 ------- - ~ , IIH-lI-------fIAA I - , .', . . ~ 1 , , ! I , , I --- n_ --- n_ .n 1 n_ n_ 16 18 20 i 22 24 I I I I I II I I I " , ------- , ~.-'~ rll t.:"~ =-:;~ !R'~ " Q! , ! ~J" ~ ~n~ ~::: !! Q! , -------- I----J"';.' ~ . u::....:=:..... ~ ~ ,^,,,,,,,,"~",,,"L n 179 , I ~ ~:_':I{ l_f~_ I j t::::: I I ! = ,-S" ~ ....... 5! "''''~co." 2 i8C! 1!84! 85 ------- ~ . -Her=.~- =- -\.ii~ 1/ III "1'"' i - - - - , !~ -,... . ~ I ~:~ .~I ::k I I I, IV~ I I I ----~- ~~ "If '" - ~fT~:_--- f--l-- -- I---~ --r- I 1 f.l.B I I 11NfT8tA I I l.\'IllT I I Uf,W I ~ ClFlOF ~ ' , II;EII ."'~':\I,""'" I~A"" I I I I I I I:a::dI RooII I I I I j i T--t---- I ~ - - , 88 : 89 , : ' : 91[ i 92 -: , , - 0-- - - - 93 f94 , I! 95 :96 - rr- - I I -1-1- 'b 1-----=-' t'HINA,"7 JUNIOR 7 ~ LASS BALL ROOM , & ILVER - 5.000 SF ! Y~~~F .7-~=~~=~----- I----J!trna arn+ I I ~ 'U " I LOBBY I I W ..L~ Ir~ " ,PRE- FUNCTION I I I , I r"~ ~ l:tlIIl . L______+__+nh_J . I I I _ ~::--==---=-I_--=---=- - ____ I- . 1 .-- -. L__m-+_n+_nmJ . i i i ~-T--i -- --r-l-- --r-"" -- --r I "IT I - I I "'" I I .,,,, , I i ~ ~~ ~,. :l~:t:~~ , , I +-~- i I i ! f,~, EBN 0 ~~~. ~~2~_~L PLAN CLEARWATER BEACH RESORT & HOTEL '''". ~"'''~Hvl'''; .l....~"".... FUSTER ~ NICHOLS ....""..,,,...-.......,.... ",'" BRO')CIHI DESIGN ASSOCIATES. P .A. WURST CLEARWATER, FLORIDA "'11TH ,,,VI\( .I.', '0' I"T" 1'1 ......,.~{f6I.I...~ ~\-l~ IN!: .", :~S .:::;'~':~'" ~___~,.....u.u JULY 14, 2008 PROPOSED by THE RELATED GROUP TlKlO :n . CoUrt. MlulJ. t'1- 3:U43 w...... I -"U~ ~O.. T..,..... UtIl) m-_ ru llGfl rft-1IlN __11'Iont1l B ------------------- Table 1. Clearwater Beach Resort and Hotel - Parking Demand Normal High Occupaney (800/0) Full Occupaney + Large Banauet Spaces per Parking Spaces per Parking Function Variable Number Person/Room Spaces Req'd Number Person/Room Spaces Req'd Hotel Staff - Shift 1 (7:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.) Persons 125 25% 31 175 25% 44 Hotel Staff - Shift 2 (3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.) Persons 125 25% 31 175 25% 44 Hotel Staff - Shift 3 (11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) Persons 25 25% 6 35 25% 9 Hotel Rooms Occupied Rooms 200 60% 120 250 60% 150 Time Share Units Occupied Units 200 60% 120 200 60% 120 Retail Shops Employees Persons 8 50% 4 8 50% 4 Conference/Banquet Attendees - Hotel Guests Persons 180 NA* 0 200 NA* 0 Conference/Banquet Attendees - Non-Guests Persons 180 2 90 400 2 200 Note: *Included in HoteljTime Share Amounts Date: 7/9/08 T: \2008-0020\Parking Study\[Parking .xls] Dema nd I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 2. Normal High Occupancy (BOo/a) - Time of Day Parking Needs Conferencel Total Hotel Staff Hotel Time Share Retail Banquet Parking Time Period Shift 1 Shift 2 Shift 3 Guests Guests Shops Non-Guest Needs 12 a.m. to 1 a.m. 6 120 120 246 la.m. to 2 a.m. 6 120 120 246 2 a.m. to 3 a.m. 6 120 120 246 3 a.m. to 4 a.m. 6 120 120 246 4 a.m. to 5 a.m. 6 120 120 246 5 a.m. to 6 a.m. 6 120 120 246 6 a.m to 7 a.m. 31 6 120 120 277 7 a.m. to 8 a.m. 31 6 120 120 75 352 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. 31 120 120 4 90 365 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. 31 120 120 4 90 365 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. 31 120 120 4 90 365 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. 31 120 120 4 90 365 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. 31 120 120 4 90 365 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. 31 120 120 4 90 365 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. 31 31 120 120 4 90 396 3 p.m. to 4 p.m. 31 31 120 120 4 90 396 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. 31 120 120 4 75 350 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. 31 120 120 4 275 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. 31 120 120 271 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. 31 120 120 271 8 p.m. to 9 p.m. 31 120 120 271 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. 31 120 120 271 10 p.m. to 11 p.m. 31 6 120 120 277 11 p.m. to 12 a.m. 31 6 120 120 277 Date: 7/9/08 T: \2008-0020\Parking Study\[Parking .xls ]Normal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 3. Full Occupancy + Large Banquet - Time of Day Parking Needs Conferencel Total Hotel Staff Hotel Time Share Retail Banquet Parking Time Period Shift 1 Shift 2 Shift 3 Guests Guests Shops Non-Guest Needs 12 a.m. to 1 a.m. 9 150 120 279 1a.m. to 2 a.m. 9 150 120 279 2 a.m. to 3 a.m. 9 150 120 279 3 a.m. to 4 a.m. 9 150 120 279 4 a.m. to 5 a.m. 9 150 120 279 5 a.m. to 6 a.m. 9 150 120 279 6 a.m to 7 a.m. 44 9 150 120 323 7 a.m. to 8 a.m. 44 9 150 120 323 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. 44 150 120 4 318 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. 44 150 120 4 318 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. 44 150 120 4 318 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. 44 150 120 4 318 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. 44 150 120 4 318 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. 44 150 120 4 318 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. 44 44 150 120 4 362 3 p.m. to 4 p.m. 44 44 150 120 4 362 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. 44 150 120 4 318 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. 44 150 120 4 100 418 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. 44 150 120 200 514 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. 44 150 120 200 514 8 p.m. to 9 p.m. 44 150 120 200 514 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. 44 150 120 200 514 10 p.m. to 11 p.m. 44 9 150 120 100 423 11 p.m. to 12 a.m. 44 9 150 120 323 Date: 7/9/08 T: \2008-0020\Parking Study\[Parking .xls ]Full I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Civil Engineering . Surveying . Transportation Planning & Engineering . Land Planning . Environmental June 11,2008 ORIGINAL RECEIVED Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle A venue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 jU~ '2. llUun JUN 11 2008 PLANNING D CITY OF EPARTMENr CLEARWATER RE: Clearwater Beach Resort & Hotel Parking Study Methodology Dear Mr. Wells: Thank you and the other City staff for meeting with us yesterday, June 10, 2008, to discuss the methodology to complete a parking study for the Clearwater Beach Resort & Hotel. The following identifies the items that will be discussed and evaluated in a study of the parking requirements for this property. Parking Demand - The first part of the study will review the expected operation of the facility to determine the number of people that will be on site during peak periods and to estimate the number of vehicles that will need to have parking spaces. This will be broken into two types of operation, first the normal, high-use periods and second with a major event such as a wedding or conference at the facility. A. The normal, high-use demand will review the number of employees to be on site during the peak periods. This will include employees for the hotel operation, retail spaces, restaurant, time-share operation, and valet operation. The operation of the retail uses will be examined to identifY the percentage of their traffic that comes from the hotel, walk by traffic, and other customers that would require parking spaces. The number of vehicles needed to be parked at the hotel for the employees and guests of the hotel and time-share units will be identified. B. Major event additional parking requirements will also be identified. This will include the number of additional staff needed to service a major event and the expected number of additional cars that will need to be parked to accommodate people attending the event that are not staying at the resort. Parking requirements for the additional people coming to the resort will be identified. Parking Supply - The number of parking spaces to be provided on site will be identified. As was discussed at the meeting, all spaces will be valet parked and valet service will be provided around the clock. As was discussed at the meeting, our preliminary count on marked parking spaces is 507. This includes the public spaces, which may be reduced to as few as 8 or eliminated based on other agreements to be reached with the City. Additional Overflow Parking within the garage will be identified. This will include parking at opportune spots and along the aisles within the garage that would be used in peak demand times. These may be used to increase parking availability during major events.' 3030 Starkey Boulevard. New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 . Fax: (727) 848-3648. (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP June 11, 2008 Page 2 Parking Demand I Supply Comparison - A comparison will be made between the needed parking spaces and the number to be provided on site. If a shortfall exists, remedies will be examined to provide sufficient spaces to meet the demand. Report - A report will be prepared and submitted to the City summarizing the study's findings. If the above methodology agrees with the discussions at yesterday's meeting, please indicate your concurrence by signing this letter below and return a copy to me. If there are additional items that need to be addressed, please indicate them in the space provided below. Sincerely, /t' Roy . Chapma , P .E. Vice President of Transportation The above described methodology is acceptable to the City of Clearwater staff. By: f1Jrv;t-.P- M. h1~ Date: 11}, '1 ) 0 l?i Additional Parking Study Needs: :pcm K:\Kirin Grand Hotel\Letters\wells.Ol.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Response to City of Clearwater comments on Parking Study By: Roy Chapman, P.E. Florida Design Consultants, Inc. Parking System Comments: 1. Provide justification including documentation of the three statements made in the Parking Study including: a) "Only about 25% of the employees would require parking spaces" , b) "only 60% of the occupied hotel rooms and time- share units are expected to require parking spaces" and c) half of the staff of the retail shops "would require a parking spot." The percentage of employees, occupied hotel rooms, and retail shop employees requiring a parking space was based on information obtained from the projected operators the proposed hotel and time-share units. Written documentation attesting to these rates was not available. This information was checked with another hotel operator, who also indicated that these were appropriate parking rates for a hotel on Clearwater Beach. 2. According to the study, during a large banquet there would be 175 employees on duty. At 25%, there would only be 44 vehicles requiring parking. Based on the City's experience with pubic parking it is our belief that staff parking will become an issue for the City facilities. There are several ways employees could access the Clearwater Beach Resort and Hotel property. These include being dropped off by personal vehicle, public transportation, and carpooling with another employee who parks at the facility. Due to these other options on travel to the site, it is believed that only 25% of the employees will require parking. 3. With the lack of a full service mass transit system in this region of the country, assuming that 60% of occupied units would require a parking space seems low as well. There are a number of ways guests will arrive at the facility. These include a shuttle operation from the airports operated by the hotel, taxi and limo service, charter bus operation, and personal vehicle. Only one of these modes of travel would require a parking space, the use of personal vehicle. A personal vehicle could carry in a family or small group of people that may take more than one hotel room. Therefore, the rate of 60% of the occupied rooms requiring a parking space is appropriate for the expected operation of this resort. Planning 2. Concur with Parking System comments regarding the Parking Study. The Code sets out the minimum requirements for the number of parking spaces, which for this development is 450 spaces + 15 public spaces. While this is a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I minimum requirement, the development needs to provide needed parking for all its uses, including employees. Based on another Beach resort now not having enough parking, especially for employees, provide documentation that the minimum parking will provide all NEEDED parking, such that there will be NO need for off-site parking by guests or, more importantly, employees. Need to provide documentation regarding the maximum number of employees on any shift when the facilities are operation at 80 - 100% capacity. Additionally, based on the recently approved timeshare/interval ownership project at 430 S. Gulfview Blvd., the staff report, based on the applicant's submittal, stated "Due to the nature of the proposed vacation/interval ownership units, coupled with a desire to ensure adequate parking is available for guests and their visitors within the garage, 178 spaces in excess of the minimum Code requirement have been provided. The applicant is providing this excess parking to deal with the seasonal congestion on the beach and the lack to-date of new public parking facilities, while ensuring that all parking demands of this project can be accommodated on-site." Based on this approved project, provide documentation regarding parking demand for the timeshare/interval ownership portion of this request to ensure adequate parking will be provided by this development. The City Code requires one parking space per room for hotels and treats timeshare units as hotel land use to determine parking needs. The 250 hotel rooms and 200 timeshare units require 450 parking spaces. The need for public spaces is being discussed separately with the City so that additional spaces in the parking garage will not be needed. The Clearwater Beach Resort and Hotel will have 463 marked spaces and will use valet service for all parked vehicles (assuming the negotiations are successful concerning the public spaces). Therefore, City Code requirements for parking will be met by the proposed parking scheme. At a meeting held with City staff on September 2, 2008, it was requested that the applicant review the parking needs during full occupancy of the facility. Table I, attached, reviews the parking requirements during full occupancy of the facility. This included 100% occupancy of the hotel rooms, 100% occupancy of the timeshare units, and the overlap of the two highest staff shifts. As is indicated, this resulted in the need for 362 parking spaces. As documented in the Parking Study, the Clearwater Beach Resort & Hotel will have 463 marked parking spaces and the potential for another 105 valet spaces in the aisles of the parking garage, resulting in the capacity to park 568 vehicles. Therefore, there would be an excess of 206 spaces available for overflow or unexpected parking. It is believed that the parking spaces to be provided should be adequate to serve the needs of the facility. Date: 9/9/08 T:\2008-0020\Parking Study Response\Response to comments on Parking Study.doc