FLD2008-05012, 2855 GULF TO BAY BLVD - October 21, 2008
t
FLD2008-05012
2855 GULF TO BAY BLVD
BELLA TERRA ON THE BAY
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
ATLAS # 300B
ZONING: C
LAND USE: CG
RECEIVED: 05/01/2008
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
MAPS:
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC:
CDB:
CLWCoverSheet
CDB Meeting Date:
Case Number:
Agenda Item:
Owner! Applicant:
Representative:
Address:
('"", ;:
:", r\
Gq~I\'
~; ~ i'~ J\ L~
October 2 L 2008
FLD2008-050 12
D2
BVG Acquisition Inc.
Marc Mariano and Bryan Zarlenga, Tampa Bay Engineering Group Inc.
2855 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST:
Flexible Development approval for the redevelopment of the overall 31.12
acre-property zoned Commercial (C) District, Office (0) District and
proposed Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District (companion
rezoning Case No. REZ2008-07007) to permit a total of 229 attached
dwellings (Independent Living Units) (73 units existing to remain; 156
units proposed), a total of 40 nursing home beds (proposed) and a total of
170 beds of assisted living facility (94 beds existing to remain; 76 beds
proposed); (A) In the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 2.45 acres,
a lot width of 200 feet along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) and a total of
210 feet along Cross Blvd, a front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Blvd
of four feet (to existing sign) and 28 feet (to existing pavement), a front
(east) setback along Cross Blvd of one-foot (to existing pavement), a front
(north) setback along Cross Blvd of 25 feet (to proposed guardhouse), a
side (east) setback of five feet (to existing pavement), a side (west) setback
of two feet (to existing pavement), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to
existing pavement) and a building height of 81 feet (to roof deck of
existing assisted living facility building), as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project in the Commercial (C) District, under the
provisions of Section 2-704.C; (B) In the proposed Medium High Density
Residential (MHDR) District with a lot area of 28.33 acres, a lot width
along Sky Harbor Drive of282 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback
along Sky Harbor Drive from 25 to 21 feet (to existing building), a
reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to five feet (to existing
pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback at the southeast comer of
the adjacent nursing home parcel from 10 to five feet (to proposed
pavement), an increase to building height from 30 to 82 feet (to top of roof
of proposed building) and a reduction to the required number of parking
spaces from 583 to 426 parking spaces, as a Residential Infill Project
under the provisions of Section 2-304.G; and (C) Reductions to perimeter
buffers along Cross Blvd (east) from 10 feet to one-foot (to existing
pavement), along the east side from seven to five feet (to existing
pavement), along the west side from five to two feet (to existing
pavement), along the north side from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing
pavement) and at the southeast comer of the adjacent nursing home parcel
from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed pavement), as a Comprehensive
Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-l202.G.
Community Development Board - October 21,2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 1 of 1
CURRENT ZONING:
CURRENT FUTURE
LAND USE CATEGORY:
PROPERTY USE:
EXISTING
SURROUNDING
ZONING AND USES:
Commercial (C) District, Office (0) District and Medium Density
Residential (MDR) District (proposed to be rezoned to Medium High
Density Residential [MHDR] District under Case No. REZ2008-07007)
Commercial General (CG), Residential/Office General (R/OG) and
Residential Medium (RM)
Current Use: 229 Attached Dwellings (Independent Living Units) and a
94-bed Assisted Living Facility
Proposed Use: 229 Attached Dwellings (Independent Living Units) (73
units existing to remain; 156 units proposed), a total of 40
Nursing Home beds (proposed) and a total of 170 beds of
Assisted Living Facility (94 beds existing to remain; 76
beds proposed)
North: Commercial (C) District
Retail sales, restaurant and automobile service station uses
South: N/ A
Water (Tampa Bay)
East: Commercial (C) and Medium Density Residential (MDR)
Districts
Restaurant, detached dwelling and vacant land
West: Commercial (C), Medium High Density Residential (MHDR),
Institutional (1) and Mobile Home Park (MHP) Districts
Retail sales, nursing home, fire station and mobile home uses
UPDATE:
Due to an advertising error, the CDB continued this application from the September 16, 2008, to the
October 21,2008, CDB meeting.
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions:
The 31.12 total acres is generally located at 2855 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (south side of Gulf-to-Bay
Boulevard between Cross Boulevard [east] and Sky Harbor Drive [west]). The overall site has three
zoning districts, including 2.45 acres in the northeast comer of the site adjacent to Cross Boulevard
zoned Commercial (C) District, 0.34 acres in the northwest comer of the site adjacent to Sky Harbor
Drive zoned Office (0) District and the remaining 28.33-acres zoned Medium Density Residential
(MDR) District. The area that is zoned C District is currently developed with an eight-story, 94-bed
Assisted Living Facility (ALF) that will not be changed with this proposal. The area zoned 0 District is
currently vacant land and the balance of the site, currently zoned MDR District, is developed with 62
single-story, attached dwelling buildings with a varying number of units in each building (total of 229
units) that have existed since the mid-1960's. The site is heavily wooded.
On December 14,2001, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved Case No. FL 01-10-33, a
request to Terminate the Status of Nonconformity for the existing 94-bed ALF in the northeast comer of
the subject property. The owners had anticipated selling off the northeast 2.45 acres with this ALF to a
separate entity (which has not occurred).
The adjacent HarbourWood Nursing Home was originally part of the subject property and has the same
address as the subject property (2855 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard). On April 21, 1994, City Council
approved a Zoning Atlas Amendment (Case Number Z94-02) to Multiple-Family Residential "Sixteen"
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 2 of2
(RM-16) for this 2.71-acre area to increase the allowable density to permit the construction of a 120-bed
nursing facility at this site. On January 5, 1996, the final site plan for Bayview Nursing Pavilion was
approved which reflected the amended zoning district. Since then this facility functioned and operated
with the approved density. With the adoption of the Community Development Code in January 21, 1999,
the RM-16 zoning district was reclassified as the MDR District. The MDR District does not specifically
authorize nursing homes as an allowable use in the District. As a result, the Bayview Nursing Pavilion
became a nonconforming use. Intending to sell the nursing home to a separate entity, the owners
requested a rezoning of the 2.71-acre area from MDR District to MHDR District for the purpose of
having the nursing home as a conforming use (permitted in the MHDR District) under Case No. Z 01-05-
01. This was subsequently rezoned by City Council and later sold to a separate entity. Since this nursing
home (now the HarbourWood Nursing Home) does not front on a public road, the nursing home is
accessed by an access easement. There are also other easements that provide for utilities and drainage, as
well as for signage at the entrance on Sky Harbor Drive.
Those properties immediately adjacent to the north that are on the south side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard
are zoned C District and are developed with a restaurant and retail sales uses. The property immediately
west of the ALF building is zoned C District and is currently vacant. Properties to the north across Gulf-
to-Bay Boulevard are zoned C District and are developed with a variety of commercial uses, including
restaurants, retail sales, an automobile service station and vehicle sales. The property to the east across
Cross Boulevard is developed with a restaurant adjacent to Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (zoned C District).
The balance of the adjacent property to the east is zoned MDR District and is primarily vacant, but does
include three detached dwellings close to the water. Properties to the west are developed with retail sales
uses (Clearwater Mall; zoned C District), a City Fire Station (zoned Institutional (I) District) and a
mobile home park (zoned Mobile Home Park (MHP) District).
Development Proposal:
The proposal is to redevelop the site by replacing 44 of the existing 62 attached dwelling buildings with a
new, state-of-the-art building that will provide high quality adult living services to its residents. The
existing eight-story, 94-bed ALF building in the northeast comer of the site (zoned C District) will be
retained, as well as 18 of the existing attached dwelling buildings containing 73 units along the northern
and western portions of the site. These existing buildings to be retained as part of this development
proposal may be replaced in the future, but any future proposal will need to meet Codes in effect at that
future time. The proposal includes the construction of a new building that will have 138 attached
dwelling units, 76 ALF beds and 40 nursing home beds. The majoritY of the property is currently zoned
MDR District, which does not permit nursing home uses. In order to permit the inclusion of the 40
nursing home beds within the new building, the applicant is requesting to rezone the area from MDR
District to MHDR District, which permits nursing home uses (Case No. REZ2008-07007).
The development proposal includes a side setback reduction for that portion of the property requested to
be rezoned to MHDR District along the east property line from 10 feet to five feet (to existing pavement)
and on the west side at the southeast comer of the adjacent nursing home parcel from 10 to five feet (to
proposed pavement). The proposal also includes a height increase from 30 to 82 feet for the new building
and the construction of a total of nine duplex attached dwelling buildings along the southern portion of
the site closer to the water (six duplex buildings) and just south of the existing ALF building (three
duplex buildings). These duplex buildings will provide residents with the highest level of independent
living and will include garage parking.
The development proposal further includes the retention of the vehicular circulation pattern through the
private drives generally as they presently exist, the gating of the property with a manned entry gate south
of Cross Boulevard and the installation of gates on Cross Circle to the south of the HarbourW ood
Nursing Home and north of the drive that goes out to Sky Harbor Drive, as well as the relocation of
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-050 12 - Page 3 of 3
Loving Lane from south of the HarbourW ood Nursing Home, where it presently exists on the
HarbourWood Nursing Home property, to south of the HarbourWood Nursing Home property.
The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community
Development Code (CDe) is discussed below.
Density: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-701.1, the maximum residential density for properties with a
designation of Commercial General (CG) land use is 24 dwelling units per acre. Pursuant to CDC
Section 2-1001.1, the maximum residential density for properties with a future land use plan designation
of Residential/Office General (RIO G) is 15 dwelling units per acre. Finally, pursuant to CDC Section 2-
401.1, the maximum residential density for properties with a future land use plan designation of
Residential Medium (RM) is 15 dwelling units per acre. Based on the size of each land use area of the
site, a maximum of 487 dwelling units are possible on this overall site. When ALF and nursing home
beds are equated to dwelling units (70 units), coupled with the existing/proposed 229 attached dwellings,
a total of 299 dwelling units are proposed under this proposal, which is consistent with the Countywide
Future Land Use Plan with regard to the maximum allowable density.
Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to CDC Section 2-701.1, the maximum allowable I.S.R. in
the Commercial General (CG) category is 0.95. Pursuant to Section 2-1001.1 (Residential/Office
General [R/OG] category) and Section 2-401.1 (Residential Medium [RM] category) of the Community
Development Code, the maximum allowable I.S.R. in these two land use categories is 0.75. The overall
existing I.S.R. is 0.382, while the proposed I.S.R. is 0.431 (based on the overall land area with CG, R/OG
and RM land use categories), which is consistent with the Code provisions.
Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704 (C District), there is no minimum lot area
and width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project use. Comparatively, for those uses listed in
CDC Table 2-704, the minimum lot area ranges from a low of 3,500 square feet to as much as 40,000
square feet, while the minimum lot width ranges from a low of 30 feet to as much as 200 feet. That
portion of the subject property zoned C District is approximately 106,722 square feet (2.45 acres) in area
and has a lot width of 200 feet along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (north) and a total of 210 feet along Cross
Boulevard. The lot area and lot width for this portion of the proposal is consistent with these Code
provIsIOns.
Likewise, pursuant to CDC Table 2-404 (MHDR District), there is no minimum lot area or lot width for a
Residential Infill Project use. Comparatively, for uses listed in CDC Table 2-404, the minimum lot area
is generally 15,000 square feet, while the minimum lot width is generally 150 feet. For that portion of
the property proposed to be rezoned to MDR District, this is 28.33 acres in area with a lot width along
Sky Harbor Drive of 282 feet. The lot area and lot width for this portion of the proposal is consistent with
these Code provisions.
It should be noted that the selling off of the 2.7l-acre nursing home area did not trigger the requirement
to file a subdivision plat, as a subdivision is the division of a lot into three or more lots. However, should
there be a desire to sell off another portion of the property, a subdivision plat will be required to be filed
and approved by the City (such as the possibility of selling off the area containing the high-rise ALF
commercially-zoned portion of this site).
Minimum Setbacks: Due to the value of the proposed improvements, in accordance with CDC Section 3-
1401.B.3, the subject property must be brought into full compliance with the parking requirements of the
Code, which includes required setbacks. Pursuant to CDC Table 2-704 (C District), there are no required
setbacks for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project use. However, from a comparative
standpoint, for those uses in CDC Table 2-704, the minimum front setback ranges between 15 - 25 feet,
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 4 of 4
the minimum side setback ranges between 0 - 10 feet and the minimum rear setback ranges between 10-
20 feet. An ALF use is not listed in the C District, and although its status as a nonconforming use was
terminated through Case No. FL 01-10-33 in 2001, there are no comparative setbacks for an ALF in the C
District. The proposal includes a front (north) setback along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard of four feet (to
existing sign) and 28 feet (to existing pavement), a front (east) setback along Cross Boulevard of one-foot
(to existing pavement), a front (north) setback along Cross Boulevard of25 feet (to proposed guardhouse), a
side (east) setback of five feet (to existing pavement), a side (west) setback of two feet (to existing
pavement) and a side (north) setback of zero feet (to existing pavement). With the exception of the
proposed guardhouse, which has been designed to be set back 25 feet from the front property line at
Cross Boulevard, all setbacks are to existing improvements (sign or pavement). Along the eastern
property line, the site abuts an existing restaurant. The side setback to pavement within the Commercial
District along the east property line south of Cross Boulevard should follow the side setback the CDB
approves for the proposed MHDR District area (see discussion below).
Likewise, pursuant to CDC Table 2-404 for the proposed MHDR District, required setbacks for a
Residential Infill Project use are 10 - 25 feet front, 0 - 10 feet side, and 0 - 15 feet rear. The proposal
includes a reduction to the front (west) setback along Sky Harbor Drive from 25 to 21 feet (to existing
building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to five feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to
the side (west) setback at the southeast comer of the adjacent nursing home parcel from 10 to five feet (to
proposed pavement). The applicant is not proposing to redevelop the northern area at this time. The request
to reduce the front setback adjacent to Sky Harbor Drive to 21 feet recognizes the existing location of the
attached dwelling building. Adequate buffering exists at this location to this building to mitigate any
negative impacts.
Along the eastern property line, the site abuts an existing detached dwelling on primarily vacant property.
The existing pavement of the internal drive for this property is located five feet from the eastern property
line. The proposal includes the installation of a six-foot high decorative fence as well as the installation
of landscaping for buffering purposes within this existing five-foot wide area. The applicant is
requesting a reduction to the required side setback to the existing five feet along this eastern property
line. It should be noted that under the existing Medium Density Residential (MDR) District the side
setback is only five feet. The increase to the required side setback of 10 feet, and the resultant request to
reduce the side setback to five feet along this east side property line, is a result of the applicant's request
to rezone this portion of the property to MHDR District to permit the nursing home component. While
there exist established trees in close proximity to this eastern property line and pavement, it is Staffs
determination that the lO-foot setback along this eastern property line can be provided due to the
requirement to meet current Code requirements. Staff does acknowledge that the roadway has existed at
this location at the five-foot setback since the mid-1960's and has not caused any negative impacts to-
date (without the buffer landscaping proposed with this application). In order to provide the full10-foot
setback, the existing roadway and parking area on the west side of the roadway would need to be moved
westward five feet. While there will be impacts to existing trees on both the east and west side of this
roadway, these impacts are not severe enough to damage the adjacent existing trees. As such, Staff
cannot support the requested reduction to the side setback at this location along this eastern property line.
The proposal includes a reduction to the side (west) setback at the southeast comer of the adjacent nursing
home parcel from 10 to five feet (to proposed pavement) due to the proposed realignment of Loving Lane.
A six-foot high decorative fence and extensive landscaping is proposed adjacent to the HarbourWood
Nursing Home. Staff does not have an issue with the reduction to the side setback at this location.
In the future, the applicant intends to redevelop the existing ALF area, zoned C District, in the northeast
comer of the site and the northern and western portion of the site where existing attached dwellings are
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 5 of 5
presently being retained. These eXIstmg areas have structures close to property lines not meeting
required setbacks. Staff does not generally have a problem with not bringing some of these existing areas
into full compliance with required setbacks at this time, but expects full compliance in the future when
these areas are redeveloped.
Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-404, the allowable height for a Residential Infill
Project is 30 feet, but this height may be varied based on compliance with the Residential Infill Project
criteria.
The proposal includes a height increase from 30 to 82 feet. This site has substantial changes in existing
grades. The applicant has calculated the average contour level for this site at 12 feet. The proposed
building is primarily a four-story building. Due to slopes on this site, the east side of the building will
have a garden level, which will be five stories on this side of the building. A portion of the west side of
the building is designed with only three floors. The overall height of 82 feet is also measured to the
highest top of towers for the new building. From the average grade level, the building is 70.5 feet to the
top of the parapet roof. Some of the towers above the roof are for elevators, stairs and mechanical rooms
(which by Code may be a maximum of 16 feet above the flat roof), while others are purely decorative.
The adjacent HarbourWood Nursing Home is two stories in height and the commercial uses along Gulf-
to-Bay Boulevard are generally one-story in height. The detached dwelling to the east of the property is
one-story in height and the mobile homes to the west of this site are also one-story in height. The
adjacent fire station appears more as a two-story building due to the height necessary for the fire trucks.
As stated earlier, the existing ALF building on this site is a total of eight-stories, although it would be
viewed from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard as seven stories. The existing ALF building is 81 feet in height to
the flat roof deck. With the grade changes of the site, where the highest grades are. close to Gulf-to-Bay
Boulevard, coupled with the existing commercial buildings fronting on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard screening
views of the proposed building, the impact of this building will not appear as tall as it is advertised. The
location of the building is more toward the middle to southern portion of the site, further reducing the
height impacts from Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard. Staff finds the proposed new building compatible with the
surrounding uses and the heights of these adjacent uses.
Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Table 2-404, the minimum off-street parking required
for Residential Infill Projects is two spaces per dwelling unit, but the standard is a guideline that may be
varied based on the Residential Infill Project criteria of Section 2-404.F. The proposal includes a total of
229 attached dwelling units (independent living units) and a total of 116 new beds within the ALF and
nursing home. These ALF and nursing beds equate to 39 dwellings based on conversion ratio of three
beds equaling one dwelling unit. The 229 attached dwelling units and 39 equivalent dwelling units for
the ALF and nursing home beds total 268 units. At two spaces per dwelling unit, a total of 536 parking
spaces are required for the residentially zoned area. At a comparative parking ratio of one off-street
parking space for each two beds in the ALF in the C District (94 existing beds), there are an additional 47
off-street parking spaces required. For all uses on the subject property, there are a total of 583 required
off-street parking spaces.
The development proposal includes a reduction to the required number of off-street parking spaces from
583 to 426. The applicant has submitted a Parking Sufficiency Study that has analyzed the existing
conditions and the proposed development relating to parking demand. There are a total of 307 existing
parking spaces serving the existing 229 attached dwelling units and 94 ALF beds in the high-rise
structure at the northeast comer of the site. The proposal includes a total of 426 off-street parking spaces
to support all of the end-users of the site (existing to remain and new units). Based upon the existing
number of beds and dwelling units, as compared to the proposed number of beds and dwelling units, a
total of 505 off-street parking spaces would be required by current Code for the existing conditions,
versus a total of 583 off-street parking spaces for the proposed conditions. The Study indicates that the
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 6 of6
existing parking provided in close proximity to the existing uses of the site is 0.49 spaces per bed for the
existing ALF and 0.87 spaces per dwelling unit for the attached dwellings. With the proposal, the
proposed off-street parking for the existing ALF will remain at 0.49 spaces per bed, proposed off-street
parking for the attached dwellings to remain in the northern and western portions of the site not being
redeveloped will have 1.15 spaces per dwelling unit, proposed parking for the proposed nursing home
and ALF beds will have 0.50 spaces per bed and the new attached dwellings will have 1.52 spaces per
dwelling unit. The Study also analyzed parking needs for a similar senior living facility in Gainesville,
Florida, and based upon the Institute of Traffic Engineer's Parking Generation, 3rd Edition. The Study
concludes that these comparative analyses confirm that the parking provided under this proposal will
exceed the parking demands for residents, guests and facility staff. Planning Staff agrees with the
findings of the Parking Sufficiency Study.
The existing development fronts on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, Cross Boulevard and Sky Harbor Drive.
Cross Boulevard extends only 150 feet south of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and dead ends into this
development. Cross Boulevard provides access to the parking area north of the existing ALF building
and access to the Village Inn Restaurant at the southeast comer of this intersection. Cross Boulevard
otherwise continues southerly onto the subject property as a private drive (Cross Circle). Cross Circle
provides access to units around the perimeter of the property, including the HarbourWood Nursing
Home, and to Sky Harbor Drive. An interior drive (Loving Lane) bifurcates the property to the east and
south of the HarbourW ood Nursing Home. The proposal includes retaining the vehicular circulation
pattern through the private drives in their basic locations as they presently exist as well as gating the
property with a manned entry gate south of Cross Boulevard, and relocating Loving Lane from south of
the HarbourWood Nursing Home, where it presently exists on the HarbourWood Nursing Home
property, to south of the HarbourWood Nursing Home property. This relocation will convert the existing
Loving Lane on the south side of the HarbourWood Nursing Home into a dead end drive. The proposal
also includes the installation of gates on Cross Circle to the south of the HarbourW ood Nursing Home
and on Cross Circle north of the drive that goes out to Sky Harbor Drive. The installations of these gates
continue to provide access for the HarbourW ood Nursing Home from Sky Harbor Drive. However,
access from Cross Boulevard to the HarbourV/ood Nursing Home will be severed. As stated earlier, the
HarbourWood Nursing Home and Bayview Gardens developments share the same 2855 Gulf-to-Bay
Boulevard address. There do exist building permit issues due to both properties having the same address.
Either the address for the HarbourWood Nursing Home or the address for the subject property should be
changed to eliminate this confusion. However, changing the address for the HarbourWood Nursing
Home poses significant operational issues for the nursing home due to Medicare payment schedules and
regulations, as an address change means Medicare payments would be halted for approximately three
months. During this time the address is being approved and changed by Medicare, the nursing home
would need to float their operating cost by the nursing home, placing a significant burden on the
owners/management of the HarbourWood Nursing Home. This address issue continues to be unresolved.
Staff has recommended a condition of approval that this address issue be acceptably resolved prior to the
issuance of any permits for this project.
Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-201.D.1, all outside mechanical equipment must be
screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. The applicant is proposing
mechanical equipment to be located on the flat roof of the new building, where parapet roofs will screen
such mechanical equipment. The location of mechanical equipment for the nine new duplex units is not
indicated on the plans, but may be expected to be located on the ground. The mechanical equipment for
these duplex units must be screened from view in accordance with Code requirements and should be
included as a condition of approval. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with
the Code with regard to screening of outdoor mechanical equipment.
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 7 of?
Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the driveway
intersection with Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will
obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight
visibility triangles. The proposed site and landscape design meets this requirement.
Utilities: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-911, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all
utilities, including individual distribution lines, shall be installed underground unless such
undergrounding is not practicable. The civil site plan for this proposal indicates that all on-site electric
and communication lines for the new building will be placed underground in conformance with this Code
requirement. Existing overhead utilities for the buildings along the north and west sides being retained
will remain overhead until these areas are redeveloped.
Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-l202.D.l, this site is required a 15-foot wide landscape buffer
along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, a lO-foot wide landscape buffer along both Cross Boulevard and Sky
Harbor Drive, a 10-foot wide buffer (or seven-foot wide with a decorative fence/wall) adjacent to
nonresidential uses and a lO-foot buffer adjacent to attached dwellings or like uses. This proposal
includes reductions to perimeter buffers along Cross Boulevard (east) from 10 feet to one-foot (to existing
pavement), along the east side from seven to five feet (to existing pavement), along the west side from five
to two feet (to existing pavement), along the north side from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and
at the southeast comer ofthe adjacent nursing home parcel from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed pavement).
Due to the deteriorating condition of the attached dwelling buildings on this campus, the redevelopment
of this site has been crafted from a site and building design to maintain site roadway circulation in their
current locations to minimize loss of tree canopy. The site is heavily wooded with primarily oaks.
Instead of creating many buildings across this campus similar to what exists, the applicant has chosen to
create one new building with multiple stories to minimize the impacts on these existing trees. While
there will be efficiency from a building standpoint to having the residents in one building, there is also
site efficiency with this design by minimizing the building footprint on the site. Parking areas for the
new building will be landscaped to meet Code requirements.
Due to the value of the proposed improvements, in accordance with CDC Section 3-l202.A.3, the subject
property must be brought into full compliance with the landscape requirements of the Code. The
proposal is to construct a new building with the new parking areas meeting those landscape requirements.
There are existing areas of the site that are not proposed for redevelopment where landscaping does not
meet these current Codes. Inthe future the applicant intends to redevelop the existing ALF area, zoned C
District, in the northeast comer of the site and the northern and western portion of the site where existing
attached dwellings are being retained. These existing areas have structures close to property lines within
required buffers. The applicant is enhancing landscaping along the frontages adjacent to Gulf-to-Bay
Boulevard and Sky Harbor Drive, as these areas are those viewed by the traveling public along these
roadways. Staff does not generally have a problem with not bringing some of these existing areas into
full compliance at this time, but expects full compliance in the future when these areas are redeveloped.
Adjacent to Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, the existing parking lot for the ALF building is set back 28 feet from
the front property line, exceeding the l5-foot required landscaped buffer. This existing parking lot is
screened from view of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and Cross Boulevard by a six-foot high masonry wall.
Existing landscaping on the outside of this screen wall is being enhanced along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard,
as this is the primary entrance to this property. Since the pavement of this parking lot exists one-foot off
the front property line of Cross Boulevard, the request includes a reduction to the required 10-foot
landscape buffer along this roadway, as there is little area for enhanced landscaping. The existing hedge
on the outside of the screen wall is being retained. Likewise, this existing parking lot is located two feet
from the west property line, encroaching into the required five-foot perimeter buffer. There is an existing
Community Development Board - October 21,2008
FLD2008-050 12 - Page 8 of 8
hedge and other landscaping on the west side of this parking lot. The property to the west of this existing
parking lot is currently vacant (except for a billboard).
Along the eastern property line, the site abuts an existing restaurant and primarily vacant property zoned
for attached dwellings. A 10-foot wide perimeter buffer, or seven-foot wide with a decorative fence/wall,
is required along this eastern property line adjacent to nonresidential uses. Adjacent to attached
dwellings or like uses (which Staff is considering the primarily vacant property to the east), a 10-wide
perimeter buffer is required. The existing pavement of the internal drive for this property is located five
feet from the eastern property line. The proposal includes the installation of a six-foot high decorative
fence as well as the installation of a continuous hedge and trees (planted where there are gaps within the
existing tree canopy) within this existing five-foot wide area along the east property line. The applicant
is requesting a reduction to the required buffer along this property line from seven feet adjacent to the
restaurant and from 10 feet for the primarily vacant property to the existing five-foot width. Any
decision by the CDB regarding the buffer width along the east property line should be made in concert
with the decision on the required side setback along .this eastern property line (see also discussion under
"Minimum Setbacks" above). While there exist established trees in close proximity to this eastern
property line and pavement, it is Staffs determination that the seven-foot wide and 10-foot wide buffer
(and side setback to pavement) along this eastern property line can be provided. Staff does acknowledge
that the roadway has existed at this location at a five-foot distance since the mid-1960's and has not
caused any issues to-date. In order to provide the full seven-foot wide and 10-foot wide buffer, the
existing roadway and parking area on the west side of the roadway would need to be moved westward
two to five feet (depending on the decision regarding the required side setback to be applied). While
there will be impacts to existing trees on both the east and west side of this roadway, these impacts are
not severe enough to damage the adjacent existing trees. As such, Staff cannot support the requested
reduction to the perimeter buffer at this location along this eastern property line. Any approval of this
application should include a condition requiring the full seven-foot and 10-foot wide buffer along this
eastern property line.
The applicant is enhancing the perimeter buffer along the \vestem propert'j line adjacent to the City's
Fire Station, HarbourWood Nursing Home and the mobile home park. The required 10-foot wide buffer
is being maintained along this western property line, except in one location. The proposal includes a
reduction to the perimeter buffer from 10 to five feet at the southeast comer of the adj acent nursing home
parcel for the realignment of Loving Lane. A six-foot high decorative fence is proposed adjacent to the
HarbourWood Nursing Home. Extensive landscaping is proposed along the common property line with the
nursing home. An existing six-foot chain link fence along the west property line adjacent to the mobile
home park will be retained and extensive landscaping installed as part of the perimeter buffer to screen
views of adjacent buildings and parking spaces. Staff does not have any issues with the reduction to the
buffer width at this location.
As part of the City's landscape re-inspection process, landscape materials have died or been removed
without permits and have not been replaced to comply with approved landscape plans on file with the
City, as identified under Case No. CDC2008-02198. Replacement of these landscape materials will be
required as part of the proposed construction of the improvements under this proposal, unless it is
determined by the Planning Department that replacement should be initiated at an earlier date.
Solid Waste: With this redevelopment proposal, the applicant is proposing a compactor solid waste
dumpster within an enclosure on the west side of the new building as part of the loading area. Trash
throughout the campus will be collected by maintenance employees and disposed in the compactor. The
proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department.
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 9 of9
Signage: The subject property currently includes a monument-style, freestanding sign on Gulf-to-Bay
Boulevard west of Cross Boulevard and a monument-style, freestanding sign within a landscape median
within the entrance driveway at Sky Harbor Drive. These signs are intended to be retained, but with a
face change to reflect the name change to Bella Terra on the Bay.
Environmental Features: The site contains a tidal inlet/creek that is located at the southeast comer of the
property, actually extending onto the property to the east, and meandering northward through the site to
the west of the existing ALF building. This environmental feature of the site is located within FEMA
flood zone AE. No residential building, existing or proposed, is located within the FEMA Flood Zone
AE. Additionally, no assisted living facility or nursing home beds are located within a designated
Coastal Storm Area nor the area inundated by a category two hurricane. The applicant is providing the
required wetland buffers along this tidal inlet/creek.
Water/Sewer: The applicant needs to continue to work with the Engineering and Fire Departments to
resolve water, sewer and ftre line issues. There are issues with the water distribution system that may
develop stagnation problems and looping the water main through the site to Sky Harbor Drive may resolve
these issues. The proposal includes sanitary sewer lines designed under stormwater ponds, whicl). is not
desired. Additionally, a looped unrestricted water line for ftre hydrants is necessary for this site. Prior to
the issuance of any permits, the applicant must resolve these issues with the Engineering and Fire
Departments.
Code Enforcement Analysis:
There is an active Code Enforcement case for this property dealing with noncompliant landscaping
(CDC2008-02198). Any approval of this application will require the installation of landscaping to bring
the site back into compliance.
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 10 of 10
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA:
The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria
as per CDC Sections 2-701.1 and 2-401.1 and Tables 2-704 and 2-404:
Standard Pro nosed Consistent Inconsistent
Density 24 dwelling units per acre in CG land 299 dwelling units X
use; ] 5 dwelling units per acre in
R/OG and RM land use categories
(maximum of 487 dwelling units)
I.S.R. 0.95 in CG land use; 0.75 in R/OG and 0.43] overall X
RM land use categories
Minimum N/A1 C District: 2.45 acres; X
Lot Area MHDR (proposed) and 0 Districts:
28.33 acres
Minimum N/A1 Gu]f-to-Bay B]vd: 200 feet X
Lot Width Cross B]vd: 210 feet (tota])
Minimum Front:
Setbacks C Di stri ct: N/A1 Gu]f-to-Bay B]vd (north): X2
4 feet (to existing sign); and
28 feet (to existing pavement)
Cross B]vd (east):
I-foot (to existing pavement)
Cross B]vd (north):
25 feet (to proposed guardhouse)
MHDR District: 10 - 25 feetl Sky Harbor Drive (west): X2
21 feet (to existing building)
Side:
C District: N/A1 East: X2
5 feet (to existing pavement)
West:
2 feet (to existing pavement)
North:
Zero feet (to existing pavement)
MHDR District: 0- 10 feetl East: X2
5 feet (to existing pavement)
North:
23 feet (to existing building)
West:
10 feet (to existing building; and
5 feet (to pavement)
Rear:
C District: N/A1 N/A (part of applicant's property - no X
separate ]ots)
MHDR District: 0-]5 feetl 72 feet (to building) X
Maximum C District: N/A1 81 feet (to roof deck of existing ALF X2
Height building)
MHDR District: 30 feetl 82 feet (measured to the highest top X2
of towers for the new building)
Minimum Two spaces per dwelling unit 426 parking spaces X2
Off-Street (tota] of 583 required parking spaces) I
Parkin!!
Based on Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and Residential Infill Project standards
See analysis in Staff Report
Community Development Board - October 21,2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 11 of 11
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of
the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-704.C (Comprehensive fufill
Redevelopment Project):
Consistent
X
Inconsistent
I. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from
the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district.
2. The development or redevelopment wiII be consistent with the goals and policies of
the Comprehensive Plan, as weIl as with the general purpose, intent and basic
planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning
district.
3. The development or redevelopment wiII not impede the normal and orderly X
development and improvement of surrounding properties.
4. Adjoining properties wiII not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X
development
5. The proposed use shaIl otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X
category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, wiII not substantiaIly alter the
essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shaIl demonstrate compliance
with one or more of the foIlowing objectives:
a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard,
flexible standard or flexible development use;
b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's
economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs;
c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an
existing economic contributor;
d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing;
e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is
characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan
amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation;
or
f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of
a working waterfront use.
X
6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X
parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the foIlowing
design objectives:
a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development
and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning
district;
b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted
by the City;
c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the
established or emerging character of an area;
d. In order to form a cohesive, visuaIly interesting and attractive appearance, the
proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design
elements:
o Changes in horizontal building planes;
o Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses,
pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.;
o Variety in materials, colors and textures;
o Distinctive fenestration patterns;
o Building stepbacks; and
o Distinctive roofs forms.
e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape
design and appropriate distances between buildings.
See analysis in Staff Repon
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 12 of 12
COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts tne consistency of
the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-404.F (Residential Infill
Project):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is X
otherwise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following:
intensity; other development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district. X
4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent lands uses. X
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill X
project will upgrade the immediate vicinity ofthe parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function
which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are X
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and the Citv of Clearwater as a whole
See analysis in Staff Report
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The
following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level
Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-913:
I. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
Consistent
X
Inconsistent
6.
X
See analysis in Staff Report
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its
meetings of June 5, 2008, and August 7, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to
move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact
and conclusions of law:
Findings of Fact. The Planning Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and
requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to
support the following findings of fact:
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 13 of 13
1. The 31.12 total acres is located generally at 2855 Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard (south side of Gulf-to-Bay
Boulevard between Cross Boulevard [east] and Sky Harbor Drive [west]);
2. The overall site has three zoning districts, including 2.45 acres in the northeast corner of the site
adjacent to Cross Boulevard zoned Commercial (C) District, 0.34 acres in the northwest corner of the
site adjacent to Sky Harbor Drive zoned Office (0) District and the 28.33-acre balance zoned
Medium Density Residential (MDR) District;
3. There is a companion request to rezone the MDR District to Medium High Density Residential
(MHDR) District under REZ2008-07007 to permit the nursing home beds desired under this
proposal;
4. The area zoned Commercial District is currently developed with an eight-story, 94-bed Assisted
Living Facility (ALF), which is not proposed to be changed. The area zoned Office District is
currently vacant land with no buildings located on it. The balance of the site currently zoned MDR
District is developed with 62 one-story, attached dwelling buildings with varying number of units in
each building (total of229 units) that have existed since the mid-1960's;
5. The existing eight-story, 94-bed ALF building in the northeast corner of the site (zoned Commercial
District) will be retained with this proposal, as well as 18 of the existing attached dwelling buildings
containing 73 units along the northern and western portions of the site;
6. The proposal includes the construction of a new building that will have 138 attached dwelling units,
76 ALF beds and 40 nursing home beds;
7. The proposal includes a height increase from 30 to 82 feet for the new building. This site has
substantial changes in existing grades with the average contour level for this site at 12 feet. The
overall height of 82 feet is measured to the highest top of towers for the new building. From the
average grade level, the building is 70.5 feet to the top ofthe parapet roof;
8. The proposal also includes the construction of nine duplex attached dwelling buildings along the
southern portion of the site closer to the water and just south of the existing ALF building;
9. In the Commercial District, there are no required setbacks for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project use;
10. The proposal includes a front (north) setback along Gulf-to-Bay Blvd of four feet (to existing sign) and
28 feet (to existing pavement), a front (east) setback along Cross Blvd of one-foot (to existing
pavement), a front (north) setback along Cross Blvd of 25 feet (to proposed guardhouse), a side (east)
setback of five feet (to existing pavement), a side (west) setback of two feet (to existing pavement) and
a side (north) setback of zero feet (to existing pavement);
11. In the proposed MHDR District, required setbacks for a Residential Infill Project use are 10 - 25 feet
front, 0 - 10 feet side and 0 - 15 feet rear. The proposal includes a reduction to the front (west)
setback along Sky Harbor Drive from 25 to 21 feet (to existing building), a reduction to the side (east)
setback from 10 to five feet (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west) setback at the
southeast corner of the adjacent nursing home parcel from 10 to five feet (to proposed pavement);
12. The proposed change to the zoning of the property to MHDR District to permit the nursing home
beds within the proposed new building increases the side setback to 10 feet, whereas the existing
MDR District side setback is five feet;
13. The minimum required parking for Residential Infill Projects is two parking spaces per dwelling unit,
but the standard is a guideline that may be varied based on the Residential Infill Project criteria of
Section 2-404.F;
14. For all uses on the subject property, the number of overall required spaces totals 583 parking spaces.
The proposal includes a reduction to the required number of parking spaces from 583 to 426 parking
spaces. The applicant has submitted a Parking Sufficiency Study that has analyzed the existing
conditions and the proposed development relating to parking demand;
15. This site is required a 15-foot wide landscape buffer along Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, a 10-foot wide
landscape buffer along Cross Boulevard and Sky Harbor Drive, a 10-foot wide buffer (or seven-foot
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 14 of 14
wide with a decorative fence/wall) adjacent to nonresidential uses and a lO-foot buffer adjacent to
attached dwellings or like uses;
16. This proposal includes reductions to perimeter buffers along Cross Blvd (east) from 10 feet to one-foot
(to existing pavement), along the east side from seven to five feet (to existing pavement), along the west
side from five to two feet (to existing pavement), along the north side from 10 feet to zero feet (to
existing pavement) and at the southeast comer of the adjacent nursing home parcel from 10 feet to five
feet (to proposed pavement);
17. There is an active Code Enforcement case for this property dealing with noncompliant landscaping
(CDC2008-02198).
Conclusions of Law. The Planning Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the
following conclusions of law:
1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Sections 2-701.1 and 2-401.1
and Tables 2-704 and 2-404 of the Community Development Code;
2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-704.C of the
Community Development Code;
3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-404.F of the
Community Development Code;
4. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as
per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and
5. The proposal is compatible with the adjacent land uses.
Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development
approval for the redevelopment of the overall 31.12 acre-property zoned Commercial (C) District, Office
(0) District and proposed Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District (companion rezoning Case
No. REZ2008-07007) to permit a total of 229 attached dwellings (Independent Living Units) (73 units
existing to remain; 156 units proposed), a total of 40 nursing home beds (proposed) and a total of 170 beds
of assisted living facility (94 beds existing to remain; 76 beds proposed); (A) In the Commercial (C) District
with a lot area of 2.45 acres, a lot width of 200 feet along Gulf to Bay Boulevard (north) and a total of21O
feet along Cross Blvd, a front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Blvd of four feet (to existing sign) and 28
feet (to existing pavement), a front (east) setback along Cross Blvd of one-foot (to existing pavement), a
front (north) setback along Cross Blvd of25 feet (to proposed guardhouse), a side (east) setback of five feet
(to existing pavement), a side (west) setback of two feet (to existing pavement), a side (north) setback of
zero feet (to existing pavement) and a building height of 81 feet (to roof deck of existing assisted living
facility building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in the Commercial (C) District, under
the provisions of Section 2-704.C; (B) In the proposed Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District
with a lot area of 28.33 acres, a lot width along Sky Harbor Drive of 282 feet, a reduction to the front (west)
setback along Sky Harbor Drive from 25 to 21 feet (to existing building), a reduction to the side (west)
setback at the southeast comer of the adjacent nursing home parcel from 10 to five feet (to proposed
pavement), an increase to building height from 30 to 82 feet (to top of roof of proposed building) and a
reduction to the required number of parking spaces from 583 to 426 parking spaces, as a Residential Infill
Project under the provisions of Section 2-304.G; and (C) Reductions to perimeter buffers along Cross Blvd
(east) from 10 feet to one-foot (to existing pavement), along the west side from five to two feet (to existing
pavement), along the north side from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing pavement) and at the southeast comer
of the adj acent nursing home parcel from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed pavement), as a Comprehensive
Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, with the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. That approval of this application is subject to the approval of the companion rezoning Case No.
REZ2008-07007;
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-05012 - Page 15 of 15
2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations approved
by the CDB;
3. That a subdivision plat be required to be approved for any future division of this property into
additional lots;
4. That the existing eight-story ALF building zoned Commercial District be limited to a maximum of 94
beds and the new building be limited to a maximum of76 ALF beds and 40 nursing home beds;
5. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant assist the City with resolving the address
issue for the adjacent HarbourWood Nursing Home created by the gating of the subject property;
6. That approval of this application does not waive full compliance with the parking, landscaping or
underground utility requirements for the ALF area zoned Commercial District and the northern and
western areas where existing attached dwellings are being retained as part of this application,
however, full compliance is expected when these existing areas are redeveloped in the future;
7. That landscaping that has died or been removed without approvals identified under Case No.
CDC2008-02198 be replaced as part of the construction of these improvements, unless it is
determined by the Planning Department that replacement be initiated at an earlier date;
8. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, civil and landscape plans be revised to provide a lO-foot
wide setback and landscape buffer along the eastern property line;
9. That, prior to the issuance of building permits for the duplex buildings, mechanical equipment for
these new duplex buildings be screened from view in accordance with Code requirements;
10. That existing overhead utilities serving buildings along the north and west sides of the site that are
being retained under this proposal be placed underground when these areas are redeveloped;
11. That any freestanding signage be a monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials
and colors of the building, and be limited to a maximum height of six feet;
12. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant resolve water, sewer and fire line issues with the
Engineering and Fire Departments;
13. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering,
Traffic Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met; and
14. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits.
Prepared by Planning Department Staff:
Wayne M.
A IT ACHMENTS:
o Location Map
o Aerial Map
o Zoning Map
o Existing Surrounding Uses Map
o Photographs of Site and Vicinity
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFLEX (FLD)\Pending cases I Up for the next CDBIGulfto Bay 2855 Bella Terra on the Bay (C. 0 & MDR)-
10.21.08 CDB - WWlGulfto Bay 2855 Staff Report -10.21.08 CDB.doc
Community Development Board - October 21, 2008
FLD2008-050l2 - Page 16 of 16
Wayne M. Wells, AICP
100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756
Phone: 727-562-4504 I Email: wavne.wells\aJ.lllvclearwater.com
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
· Planner III
Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL
November 2001 to Present
As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible
Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats
before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and
Development Agreements before the City Council; Reviewed building permits for Code
conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information
(via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or pre development meetings).
· Zoning Coordinator
Zoning Division, City of Pinel/as Park, FL
March 1989 to November 2001
Acting Zoning Director; Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City
Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of
Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments,
rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; Reviewed final site
plans and building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code
amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or pre development
meetings).
· Program Manager, Zoning Branch
Manatee County Dept. of Planning and Development, Bradenton, FL
June 1984 to March 1989
Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board
of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance;
Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail,
zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the
Code Enforcement Section; Supervised six employees; Prosecuted cases before the Code
Enforcement Board; Investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building
codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones,
planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and
Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code
enforcement; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via
telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings).
· Planner I
Alachua County Dept. of Planning and Development, Gainesville, FL
June 1980 to June 1984
Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and
Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; Assisted in
preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter
or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information
and Data Book; Drafted ordinance revisions; General research.
· Graduate Assistant
University of Florida Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Gainesville, FL
1979 to 1981
Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; Coordinated graphics for Jefferson County
Comprehensive Plan.
· Planning Technician
PlanningDivision, City of St. Petersburg, FL
1977 to 1979
Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for I Yz
years; Worked on historic survey and report.
EDUCATION
Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not
completed), University of Florida, 1981
Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976
LICENSES & CERTIFICATES
American Institute of Certified Planners
American Planning Association, Suncoast Section
FLD2008-05012
2855 GULF TO BAY BLVD
BELLA TERRA ON THE BAY
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
ATLAS # 300B
ZONING: C
LAND USE: CG
RECEIVED: 05/01/2008
INCOMPLETE:
COMPLETE:
MAPS:
PHOTOS:
STAFF REPORT:
DRC:
CDB:
CLWCoverSheet
.-..41
c(
w
>
<<
~.;B
D~
o
~
o
z
o
l-
n.
:!:
~
i!;'.7-,)
w
m
<<
N
:J
w
~
a::
<<
n.
GULF-TO-BAY
(Jl
.
.."..............
o
a::
~/
~
DR
Location Map
Owner:
BVG Acquisition Inc. .
Case:
FLD2008-050 12
Site:
2855 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
Property
Size(Acres):
31.12
PIN: 1 7129/16/03006/000/0200
Atlas Page: 300A + B
es ~
"C "C'
0 0 '" ~ ,0 .. '"
~ ~ I:: ; H~ ~ !
'" '" ~, '" ....
...
... ~ '"
... ant ~ Retsil Sales Vapant
...
...
'"
...
~
'"
Retail Sales
~ Attached
~
... Dwellings
~
~
~q
~
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Owner:
BVG Acquisition Inc.
Case:
FLD2008-05012
Site:
2855 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
Property
Size(Acres):
31.12
PIN:
17/29/16/03006/000/0200
Atlas Page:
300A + B
..
~
~
.( ~,
<(
5l III ~ j '8 CI; 8
~ .... ~, ~ ~ ~
".f"
~
.... 0
'"
11~
~I
4131 .
" III
I~
~
,@
~ .
0)
~
I 1 I I
:~. .:.:~ :':~ ~'::~ ~':.;.
....
...
....
'"
MDR
-.:' - -t -
_ ID.. _lIl_
re H~
I
HDR
I
:18_ ':'" -
I'l
1
I
~
~
II
"i ~~
'V
Zoning Map
Owner:
BVG Acquisition Inc.
Case:
FLD2008-050 12
Site:
2855 Gulf to Bay Boulevard
Property
Size(Acres):
31.12
PIN:
17/29/16/03006/000/0200
Atlas Page:
300A + B
,
"'
.J. :'<l{~l~()
585 Sky Harbor Drive 223
Clearwater, FL 33759
727-812-9608
Michael Delk, Planning Director
City of ClealWater
POBox4748
ClealWater, FL 33758-4748
I.; n~ F.
, ,
! -= I' ,I-'~'
L.:::.:J U II C . ,
" Ii!
October 10, 2008
:-'~.,Ar,i;~'
~.;;~~ ","CLOP{viEt-,jT
0cFN/CES
~~!:,:,OF CLEARWATER
I
,
J
L
Dear Mr. Delk,
We are writing in response to the notice of community development we received
10/08/2008, which is continued from 9/16/08, from BVG Acquisition, Inc.
As we are a neighbor in very close proximity to this development site, we have grave
concerns over the following:
1. The projected length of the project.
2. The tolerance for construction noise.
This second concern deals with the hours per day that construction will take place,
the days per week that construction will take place and the noise that will be
generated as a result of the construction.
3. The debris and dirt created.
Noise is our greatest concern. We do not wish to be subjected to the constant, day in/ day
out pounding, jack-hammering, machinery-generated hum, drilling, etc. that is normally
associated with the type of construction this project suggests. We already must deal with
the constant noise and dirt associated with airplanes flying directly overhead, due to the
proximity of the ClealWater/St. Petersburg Airport.
This project will interfere with our lives and nearly everything that we do at Sky Harbor
Estates. This is a retirement community. Therefore, its residents are in and about their
homes twenty-four hours per day.
How will BVG Acquisition, Inc. address these concerns? What offer do they make to
control the noise and pollution, as well as to resolve other issues that may arise as a result
of this construction on an on-going basis? What rights, if any, do we have as neighbors to
ascertain that construction does not take place at odd hours? How are these rules to be
/
enforced?
I will thank you, in advance for your consideration of these concerns and answers to the
questions we have posed.
Sincerely, ,
~l~
(Yh~J
Joseph Nigro
Judith Nigro
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
City of Clearwater
Site Plan Application Package
Level II Approval
For
[]
'J&ma
[]
A SantaFe Senior Living Community
2855 GULF-TO-BAY BOULEVARD
Situated in the
17/29/16/03006/000/0200
- . """,. >,"-""-"
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
-bRCFirst Submittal: May2, 2008
. DRC Secon~~qI}IDitt'a!l:?Uly~t~29g~<
?~,cfrDJ,l S~b'~~ftt~I:~~gtIsf15, 200S' .' ~.':.
.;t;:DB.Re.;,~tlbmittal::Oct:Obel~ 15, 2008
SANTAFE HEALTHCARE
.A GREYSTONE
AvMed Heelth Plens . Heven Hospice. The Villoge . Beyview Gordens
BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS IN SENIOR LIVING.
~
three ~
......
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table of Contents
I. Residential Infill Application
II. Comprehensive Infill Application
ill. Comprehensive Landscape Program Application
IV. Attachment" A" - Legal Description
V. Attachment "B" - Setback and Buffer Reduction List
VI. Attachment "C" - Warranty Deed
VII. Attachment "D" - Parking Sufficiency Study
VIII. Attachment "E" - Trip Generation Rates
IX. Attachment "F" - Response to June 4, 2008 DRC Comments
x. Attachment "F.t." - Response to Stormwater Comments
XI. Attachment "G" - Fire Flow Calculations
XII. Attachment "H" - Bridge Certification Letter
XIII. Attachment "I" - Response to August 7, 2008 DRC Comments
J:\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\Table of Contents. doe
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
()
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
~ Clearwater
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
o SUBMIT FIRE PREll MARY SITE PLAN: $200.00
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ N/A CDB SUBMITTAL
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Residential Infill Project
(Revised 04/24/2007)
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT~
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: BVG Acquisition Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: 4300 N.W. 89m Blvd, Gainesville, FL 32606
PHONE NUMBER: 352.337.8686 FAX NUMBER: 352.337.8610
CELL NUMBER: n/a EMAIL: n/a
PROPERTY OWNER(S): BVG Acquisition Inc. 4300 N.W. 89m Blvd, Gainesville, FL 32606
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: Marc Mariano, AICP, PP and/or Bryan Zarlenga, PE
MAILING ADDRESS: TBE Group Inc. 380 Park Place Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE NUMBER: 727.431.1605 FAX NUMBER: 727.431.1777
CELL NUMBER: 727.492.6750 EMAIL: mmarianormtbePToun.com
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: Bella Terra on the Bay PROJECT VALUATION: $ 75,000,000
STREET ADDRESS 2855 Gulf to Bay Blvd
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 17/29/16/03006/000/0200
PARCEL SIZE (acres): 31.12 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 1,355,587
LEGAL BASKIN'S REPLAT RESUB PT OF LOT 2 DESC FROM NE COR OF LOT 1 TH E
DESCRIPTION: 60FT & S 190FT FOR POB TH E 135.2FT (short legal)
See Attachment "A" for Full Legal
Infill redevelopment of a 19.2-acre portion of an existing 31.12-acre senior living campus.
Total Proposed New Uses - 156 Independent Living Units, 40 Nursing Home Beds & 76
PROPOSED USE(S): Assisted Living Beds. 138 of the Independent Living Units, the 40 Nursing Home Beds &
76 Assisted Living Beds will be located in one (1) primary building; while18 Independent
Living Units will be located in nine (9) duplex cottages.
Uses To Remain - 94 Assisted Living Beds and 73 Independent Living Units
J:I02026\02026002.OOIDOCIPermilsICity of Clearwaler\Residenliallnfill Projec'- app _ CDB_resub _rev Jequestdoc
Page 1 of 12
I
I
I
I
I
DESCRIPTION OF
REQUEST:
Specifically identify
the request (include
number of units or
square footage of
non-residential use
and all requested
code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required
number of parking
spaces, specific use,
etc.)
I
I
I
I
Flexible Development approval for the redevelopment of the overall 31.12 acre-property zoned
Commercial (C) District, Office (0) District and proposed Medium High Density Residential (MHDR)
District (companion rezoning Case No. REZ2008-07007) to permit a total of 229 attached dwellings
(Independent Living Units) (73 units existing to remain; 156 units proposed), a total of 40 nursing
home beds (proposed) and a total of 170 beds of assisted living facility (94 beds existing to remain;
76 beds proposed); (A) In the Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 2.45 acres, a lot width of 200
feet along Gulf to Bay Blvd (north) and a total of 210 ft along Cross Blvd, a front (north) setback along
Gulf to Bay Blvd of 4 ft (to existing sign) and 28 ft (to existing pavement), a front (east) setback along
Cross Blvd of one-foot (to existing pavement), a front (north) setback along Cross Blvd of 25 ft (to
proposed guardhouse), a side (east) setback of 5 feet (to existing pavement), a side (west) setback
of 2 feet (to existing pavement), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to existing pavement) and a
building height of 81 ft (to roof deck of existing assisted living facility building), as a Comprehensive
Intill Redevelopment Project in the Commercial (C) District, under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C; (B)
In the proposed Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a lot area of 28.33 acres, a lot
width along Sky Harbor Dr. of 282 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback along Sky Harbor Dr.
from 25 to 21 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to 5 ft (to existing
pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback at the southeast corner of the adjacent nursing
home parcel from 10 to 5 ft (to proposed pavement), an increase to building height from 30 to 82 ft
(to top of roof of proposed building) and a reduction to the required number of parking spaces from
583 to 426 parking spaces, as a Residentiallntill Project under the provisions of Sec. 2-304.G; and
(C) Reductions to perimeter buffers along Cross Blvd (east) from 10 ft to one-foot (to existing
pavement), along the east side from 7 to 5 ft (to existing pavement), along the west side from 5 to 2 ft
(to existing pavement), along the north side from 10ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and at the
southeast corner of the adjacent nursing home parcel from 10ft to 5 ft (to proposed pavement), as a
Comprehensive Landscape ProQram under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G.
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NOlL (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents)
I
C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5)
o SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP
(see page 7) See Attachment 'c' - Special Warranty Deed
I
I
I
I
I
I
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A)
o Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which
it is located.
Generally speaking the development is substantially consistent with the surrounding property and of a lesser actual measured height
than the existing 8-story Assisted Living Facility (to remain) currently fronting Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. The proposed development includes
less than one-third (299 dwelling units vs. 487 dwelling units) of the residential units permitted on-site, with a proposed density of 9.6
du/a, and is much less intense than the adjacent HarbourWood Health and Rehab Center, with an existing density of 14.7 du/a.
Additionally, the proposed development design has gone through numerous iterations to ensure that the area's aesthetic and natural
quality, which is catamount to the character of this area, is maintained. This was achieved by producing a primary building that utilizes
a smaller building footprint but taller building height to obtain the desired density in a manner that is subsumed by the existing and
proposed landscape features. These consciences design techniques incorporated into the proposed development have ensured a
limited impact on the natural vitality and character of the area. The site layout allows consistent adjacent uses to be located in close
proximity to each other, as the single family residential use to the east will be nearest to the proposed duplex cottages along the
easterly extent of the site and the primary continuing care building containing the Independent Living units, Skilled Nursing beds and
Assisted Living beds will be centrally located and in close proximity to the existing HarbourWood Health and Rehab Center. As
stated, the primary building is of a lesser measured height than the existing assisted living facility fronting on Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard,
I
I
I
J:I02026102026002.00\00CIPermitsICity of Clearwater\Residentiallnfill Project_app _COB _resub _ rev _request.doc
Page 2 of 12
I
which has existed since 1966 and is of a lesser intensity/density than the existing HarbourWood Health and Rehad Center, which has
existed since 1996. As the bulk and scale of these existing developments have not had a deleterious impact on the surrounding
neighborhood, it should confirm that the proposed development will also be in harmony with the bulk, scale and intensity of existing
development in the area and will not impact the character or quality of the neighborhood.
I
I
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
impair the value thereof.
I
The existing campus consists of an 8-story assisted living facility (to remain) and approximately 62 duplex!, triplex and quadplex
dwellings (229 independent living units) and ancillary uses that were constructed in the mid-1960's and as such are approaching the
practical life span of buildings of this nature. The replacement of the majority of these structures (44 of 62 buildings) with a new, state-
of-the-art development that incorporates high quality adult living services and building and landscape architectural features and design
will not only enhance the visual quality for the adjoining property owners, but will without question positively impact property values in
the general vicinity. As identified in the landscape and building elevation plans, the architectural details and embellishments included
as part of the Mediterranean Revival building design, as well as the handsome landscape package used to enhance the all of
buildings and property boundaries within the proposed development will surely improve the value of adjoining properties and
encourage redevelopment, if desired, for the adjoining property owners. Additionally, while many of the properties in this area are
commercial in nature, the influx of new, higher-end senior residents will produce an economic boost for these commercial entities.
Finally, the adjoining residential uses to the east and west of the property will be buffered by attractive fencing, existing mature
vegetation, as well as proposed supplemental landscape features to ensure the privacy of all parties. Again, as identified above the
layout of this site allows consistent development types to be located in close proximity to each other. As such, no deleterious impact
on any of the adjoining property owners is anticipated.
I
I
I
I
I
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
I
I
The health, safety and welfare of residents and persons in the area will be greatly improved as a result of this application due to 1.)
the removal of dated dwelling units; 2.) the inclusion of a stormwater management system that meets current Local, Regional and
State criteria; 3.) the certification of the existing bridges on site to confirm that the structures can support the 80,000 Ib weight limit
required by the City of Clearwater Fire and Rescue Department; 4.) the upgrade of existing sewer and water lines that are in a
dilapidated state, which in some locations includes cracking, leaking and blockage; 5.) the removal of existing vegetation and trees
that due to poor conditions create a safety hazard to the residents and visitors of the site; 6.) the inclusion of a upgraded, ADA design
compliant sidewalk throughout the campus that will allow for safe and efficient pedestrian circulation through the site and out to Gulf-
to-Bay Blvd and Sky Harbor Blvd; 7.) The inclusion of a fire suppression system for use in the primary building to ensure the safety of
the residents and workers; 8.) the conformity of all site and building design requirements included in the Clearwater Fire Protection
Design and Construction Guidelines; 9.) the use of fencing, secluded landscaping and a gated roadway system to ensure the privacy
of residents and adjoining property owners, as well as the safety and security of residents on site; and 10.) the upgrade to site lighting
through the use of new, decorative street lighting and pedestrian bollards that ensures safe and effective nighttime vehicle and
pedestrian travel but utilize shielding technology to eliminate potential light trespass on adjoining properties. For all the reasons
stated, the proposed development will have no adverse impact on the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working
on-site or in the neighborhood.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J:\02D26102D26002.DOIDOCIPermitsICity of ClearwatenResidentiallnfill Project_app _ CDB _resub_rev Jequest.doc
Page 3 of 12
I
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
I
The intent for the proposal is to provide as many of the day-to-day necessities of senior living on-site to limit the number of off-campus
trips and will include full dining facilities, a day spa and salon, and a workout facility. The proposed development will incorporate four
(4) buses to transport residents to local shopping and retail venues on a daily basis to help limit the number of single vehicle trips from
the campus. As a result of the proposed redevelopment, only 318 new weekday and 44 PM Peak additional vehicle trips are
anticipated. Additionally, golf carts will be provided to the residents that live in the cottages outside of the primary building. While this
will not minimize trips, it will promote the use of alternative fuel vehicles by minimizing the use of gas powered vehicles for short trips
within the campus.
I
I
I
5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
I
The proposed development will actually be an enhancement to the character of this immediate vicinity in that all of the proposed
buildings will incorporate a high-quality Mediterranean Revival architectural design that is mildly eclectic, but certainly unique to the
immediate vicinity. This will be done in a manner that will not overwhelm the existing neighborhood fabric, as the scale of the
proposed development will be subsumed by the preservation of numerous existing mature trees and enhanced by the inclusion of an
abundant landscaping package. The increased height of the proposed primary building, while of lesser height than the existing ALF
building that has existed for over 40 years without any deleterious impact on surrounding property owners, will allow the area's
primary amenity, its natural beauty, to be preserved and enjoyed by the residents and adjoining property owners for years to come.
Additionally, an abundant level of new landscaping is proposed along the proposed lines of the redeveloped areas and around all
proposed buildings. The level of landscaping proposed by the project will ensure that the natural beauty of the area is enhanced and
continues to flourish.
I
I
I
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on
adjacent properties.
I
Numerous techniques have been incorporated into the overriding design of the project to limit any impacts on the adjoining property
owners, as well as the residents of the development. The primary design feature that will minimize all of the above listed impacts will
be the use of ornamental fencing in areas where the proposed development site abuts a residential use and a generous amount of
landscaping within required buffer areas. As such, the buffering capabilities of the ornamental fence will be enhanced through the use
of a substantial landscape buffer that dampens visual and acoustical impacts that may occur from the proposed senior living campus,
which is minimal, but also decreases visual and acoustical impacts on the proposed residents from the adjoining property owners.
Additionally, the implementation of an environmentally conscious building layout and the use of a parking study to determine the true
need of on-site parking has afforded the preservation of numerous mature trees on-site which provide a natural visual and acoustical
buffer for the adjoining property owners, minimizes the developments impact on the natural environment and promotes the overall
visual quality of the entire area. As the proposed development is primarily residential in nature, there is minimal impact anticipated
due to atypical hours of operation, with the exception of the 24-hour care provided by the Skilled Nursing and Assisted Living
components. While care will be provided for this use on a 24-hour basis, it shall be noted that the existing assisted living facility has
operated since 1966 without any deleterious impacts on the adjoining property owners and the existing HarbourWood Health and
Rehab Center has been in operation since 1996. The service area for the proposed site will be enclosed in a masonry wall, enhanced
by a landscape buffer and will utilize a delivery and trash pick-up schedule consistent with that recommended by staff and required by
code. Finally, the roof of the proposed primary building is designed to ensure that all roof top mechanical units are appropriately
screened from all adjoining property owners, visitors to the site and residents.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J:\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Perm~s\C~y of Clearwaler\Residentiallnfill Projecl_app_CDB_resub_rev_requesldoc
Page 4 of 12
I
WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residentiallnfill Project Criteria)
I 0 Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and
development standards.
I
I
While it would be possible to develop the site with the same number of units and not ask for a deviation to the permitted height or
required setbacks, it could not be done in a manner that would preserve as many trees as are being preserved through the proposed
site and building design with the requested deviations. It has been the Applicant's intention from the beginning of this design process
to preserve as many trees as possible, as it is understood that the existing tree inventory is one of the features that makes the site so
impressive and desirable. It shall be noted that we met with Mr. Rick Albee and walked the site to discuss the trees we intended to
preserve and remove. Mr. Albee stated that this is one of the only times he could remember that an Applicant conducted a tree
inventory prior to designing the site. The additional height from the 30 feet permitted to 82 feet allows for a primary building design
that incorporates a smaller building footprint and therefore decreases the amount of the site that gets disturbed by site improvements
and allows for the preservation of numerous trees. It shall be noted that no new non-conforming setback situations are being created
as a result of this application. A front setback reduction in the Commercial zone along Gulf to Bay Blvd is for a substantially
conforming existing sign that has been in place for numerous years and is in conformance with all other code requirements relative to
height and area. As stated, the sign has existed for numerous years without deleterious impact to surrounding property owner or
drivers and is not being alter as part of the plan, except to replace in-kind the sign face to the new campus name. A front setback
reduction along Cross Blvd from 25 feet to one-foot is requested to allow a portion an existing parking lot serving the ALF tower to
remain in its current location. This pavement has existed in its current configuration since 1966 without any deleterious impact on
adjoining property owners and no impact is anticipated as a result of this application. A reduction to the side east setback from ten
feet to five feet is also requested to allow the existing roadway configuration to remain as is. This roadway has existed since 1966
without any impact to adjoining property owners and re-aligning the roadway could impact the existing trees along the property line. A
reduction to the side (west) setback in the Commercial zone from 10 feet to two feet is requested to allow a portion an existing parking
lot serving the ALF tower to remain in its current location. This pavement has existing in its current configuration since 1966 without
any deleterious impact on adjoining property owners and no impact is anticipated as a result of this application. A reduction to the
side (north) setback is requested from 10 feet to zero to existing pavement. The location of this pavement is adjacent to a vacant
parcel of land and has existed without impacting the adjoining property owner. As such, the Applicant requests that this pavement
remain in its current configuration until the entire northern portion of the site is redeveloped. A request to permit an increased building
height of the existing ALF tower in the Commercial Zone from the permitted 25 feet to 81 feet is also being made. This building
received a termination of non-conforming use to allow a 94-bed assisted living facility to remain in operation. As such, this increased
configuration is the only way a 94 bed ALF could operate on site while meeting other bulk and area code requirements. This building
has been in existence for over 40 years and the height has not had any deleterious impact on any property owners. A reduction to the
front (west) setback in the proposed MHDR zone along Sky Harbor Dr from 25 feet to 21 feet (to existing building) is requested. This
non"conforming situation is not being exacerbated as a result of the application and has existed without any impact on adjoining
property owners for over 40 years. As such moving this building 4 feet and placing the facility elsewhere on site would disturb the
mature vegetative plantings that exist on site. A reduction to the side (west) setback in the proposed MHDR zone along at the
southeast comer of the adjacent HarbourWood facilities lot from 10 feet to 5 feet is being requested. This request is made to permit a
portion of the re-aligned Loving Lane roadway to travel in an appropriate path for truck and car travel and to also allow sufficient width
to accommodate fire truck access. The re-aligned Loving Lane will allow each of the 2 entities, HarbourWood and Bella Terra, to
function separately and independently in a safe and secure manner that allows each entity's delivery and solid waste trucks to travel
only within the area devoted to each facility. Under the current configuration, Loving Lane is utilized by service and delivery vehicles
and creates a conflict for fire and emergency access and daily vehicular traffic. This will re-alignment of Loving Lane provide
HarbourWood with a formal delivery and service area that is separate from daily traffic movement while allowing for safe and sufficient
access for emergency management vehicles. As such, this request will not negatively impact the adjacent property owner, but will
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J:\02026\02026002_00\00C\Perm~s\City of Clearwater\Residentiallnfill Projecl_app_CDB_resub_rev_requestdoc
Page 5 of 12
I
allow a more functional situation for both properties. A reduction to the side (east) setback in the MHDR zone is being requested from
10 feet to 5 feet in order to allow an existing roadway that has been in place for 40 years to remain in its current configuration. It shall
be noted that while a reduced setback is being requested to allow this existing non-conforming situation to remain, it is being
requested to ensure that existing mature trees located along the roads perimeter to the west are preserved and not impacted by
unnecessary roadway construction. Numerous steps have been taken to maintain the life and health of all trees on site and realigning
this existing roadway would unnecessarily impact these trees. Additionally, it shall be noted that a decorative fence and vegetative
buffer within the 5 foot setback is being installed to minimize any impact on the adjacent property owner. As such, the granting of this
existing non-conforming situation will not have any impact on the adjoining property owner and will ensure the health of several
existing mature trees. A deviation from the City's Code from 581 parking spaces to 426 parking spaces is requested, however there
are no parking ratios established for Attached Senior Housing, or Independent Living Units, and the code suggests using the Multi-
family Attached Dwelling ratio to determine the required number of spaces. It is understood by all parties involved that the vehicle use
habits of typical multi-family attached housing tenants and senior housing tenants are drastically different and do not warrant the same
parking ratios. As such, the Parking Sufficiency Study, included as Attachment "D", identifies real word parking ratios generated by a
nearly identical mix of senior living uses that the Applicant operates in Gainesville and are confirmed by ITE's Parking Generation
Study, 3rd Edition. The number of parking spaces required by the City for this project would unnecessarily increase the amount of
impervious surface on the site with no added benefit. This would be detrimental to the environment as it would reduce natural
groundwater recharge and produce additional locations where cars could park and leak vehicle fluids and solvents on to the pavement
and eventually into the stormwater management system, thereby unnecessarily degrading water quality; and would increase the heat
island effect on the site due to the increased black top; all of which is contrary to sustainable development. As a condition of approval
for this development application, the Applicant acknowledges and consents that when future redevelopment takes place in areas not
being disturbed at this time it must conform to the Land Development Code standards in place at that time and that the approval to
allow these existing non-conforming circumstances to remain in these undisturbed locations as a result of this development
application package does not eliminate the basic obligation of the Applicant to meet setback requirements in these locations in the
future.
A reduced landscape buffer along Cross Blvd from 10 feet to 1 foot is requested to allow an existing drive isle to remain in place.
Altering this roadway would unnecessarily impact existing trees to adjust a road that has existed for over 40 years, which could cause
permit damage to those trees. A reduction to the easterly landscape buffer from 7 feet to 5 feet to allow existing drive isle to remain is
also requested to allow a road that has existed for 40 years to remain in place without any detriment to adjoining property owners.
Re-aligning this road to the west by even 2 feet would impact the existing trees that are being preserved, which was included as a
comment from Rick Albee during DRC. Again, the Applicant has take painstaking efforts to ensure that as many trees as possible are
preserved on site and moving this road to gain 2 feet in buffer area at the potential expense of the very trees we are attempting to
preserve is reckless and unnecessary. To mitigate the reduced buffer width, additional plantings and an ornamental fence will be
place in the existing 5 foot buffer area. A reduction to the buffer along the west side from 5 feet to 2 feet to an existing drive isle for
the ALF tower parking lot that has been in place for over 40 years is also requested. Re-aligning this pavement could unnecessarily
impact existing vegetation and require the alteration of existing site conditions without benefit, as the condition has existed without an
impact on adjoining property owners and the Applicant has agreed to increase the landscaping in this area to help mitigate the effects.
A reduction to the northern buffer from 10 feet to zero to existing pavement. The location of this pavement is adjacent to a vacant
parcel of land and has existed without impacting the adjoining property owner. As such, the Applicant requests that this pavement
remain in its current configuration until the entire northem portion of the site is redeveloped. A new buffer reduction along the
southeast corner of the nursing home property from 10 feet to 5 feet is being requested with the intent of allowing the primary building
to be placed in a location to limit the impacts on existing trees and wetlands, while providing a 23-foot fire lane (Loving Lane) that is at
least 20 feet from any portion of the building, as required for conformance with the Clearwater Fire Protection Design and
Construction Guidelines, thereby ensuring appropriate life safety standards are maintained. As a condition of approval for this
development application, the Applicant acknowledges and consents that when future redevelopment takes place in areas not being
disturbed at this time it must conform to the Land Development Code standards in place at that time and that the approval to allow
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J:\02026\02026002.OOIDOCIPermils\City of Clearwaler\Residenliallnfill ProjecC app_ COB _resub_rev Jequesl.doc
Page 6 of 12
I
these existing non-conforming circumstances to remain in these undisturbed locations as a result of this development application
package does not eliminate the basic obligation of the Applicant to meet buffer and landscape requirements in these locations in the
future.
A list of all setback and buffer deficiencies and is included in Attachment "B".
I
I
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting
properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.)
I
The improvements proposed as part of this application will clearly increase the market value of adjoining property owners due to the
high quality building architecture that will be included as part of this state-of-the-art, full service senior living and care faculty.
Additionally, at approximately 2,220 square feet the selling price of the six (6) proposed duplex cottages (18, 2-bedroom units) on the
Tampa Bay will be well above the selling point of the typical residential units in the vicinity. While there is no question that the building
will be a display of exceptional architectural design, the site will continue to maintain its existing natural quality due to the care taken in
placing the buildings, sidewalks and parking areas in a manner that preserves an abundant number of the existing tree inventory at
the site. Additionally, the natural state of the site will be enhanced and complimented by a landscape plan that is sensitive to the
natural beauty of the site and offers subtle enhancement where necessary, but dynamic augmentation where needed.
According to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser data, the 2007 Just Market Value and Assessed Value both were $13,600,000 for
the entire 31.12-acre parcel. It shall be noted that we are redeveloping approximately 19.2 acres ofthe 31.12-acre parcel, or 61%. It
is anticipated that the total value of this redevelopment project is $75,000,000.
I
I
I
I
3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
I
I
The proposed Assisted Living, Nursing Home and Independent Living (Attached Dwelling) uses are permitted within the proposed
MHDR Zone (Case No. REZ2008-07007) and within the City of Clearwater. The portion of the site in the C Zone will continue to
provide Assisted Living units for an undetermined amount of time. While this use is permitted in the City of Clearwater, it is not
specifically permitted in the C Zone, but was granted a termination of non-conforming status on January 25, 2002, as part of FL 01-10-
33.
I
4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
I
The proposed mix of uses (Assisted Living units and Independent Living units) has existed on this parcel since 1966 without any
deleterious impact on the surrounding property owners. Since the construction of the site in 1966, the HarbourWood Health and
Rehab Center was built in 1996 and has apparently existed in harmony with adjacent land uses and provides an identical use that the
Applicant is introducing to the campus, Nursing Home beds. It was decided to place the proposed duplex cottages along the easterly
portion of the site, as they will be closest to the existing single family residential home on the adjoining property to the east.
Additionally, the proposed duplex cottages will be the closest buildings to the adjoining mobile home park to the southwest. While the
proposed and existing uses are compatible, measurements are being taken to provide appropriate buffering in the way of fencing and
landscaping to ensure that the privacy and quality of life of all parties involved is not impacted
I
I
I
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development.
I
As previously stated, the proposed development will enhance the character of this immediate vicinity due to the use of an eclectic
Mediterranean Revival architectural design that is unique to the immediate vicinity. It will be done in a manner that will not overwhelm
the existing neighborhood fabric, but will be subsumed by the numerous mature trees being preserved and enhanced by the inclusion
of new landscaping features. Also, the replacement of the majority of existing dilapidated structures with new, state of the buildings
that incorporate high quality building and landscape architectural features and design will not only enhance the visual quality for the
adjoining property owners, but will without question positively impact property values in the immediate vicinity. The adjoining
I
I
I
J:I02026102026002.00IDOCIPermitsICity of Clearwater\Residentiallnfill Projecl_app_CDB_resub_revJequesl.doc
Page 7 ofI2
I
residential uses to the east and west of the property will be buffered by attractive fencing and the existing mature vegetation, as well
as enhanced by the proposed supplemental landscaping to ensure the privacy of all parties. Again, the consciences design
techniques incorporated into the overall development ensure a limited impact on the natural vitality of the area and upgrade to the
character.
I
I
6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a fonn and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
I
The care taken to ensure that the character ofthe site and the area as a whole will not be degraded, but upgraded, is established by
the projects form, as evident by the decision to utilize a building that has a decreased footprint that preserves the natural aesthetic
beauty and character of the area and the proposed/continued use of the site as a senior living and care facility, which has functioned
since 1966. The community character in this area is built on the natural beauty provided by the trees, natural vegetation and views of
the Tampa and the form established by the proposed development embraces these amenities to the fullest extent, while providing a
needed use (senior living and care) that can function as a model for the City. Again, when we met with Mr. Rick Albee and walked the
site to discuss the trees we intended to preserve Mr. Albee stated that this is one of the only times he can remember that an Applicant
conducted a tree inventory prior to designing the site.
I
I
I
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
I
Clearly for all of the above reasons stated the flexibility requests for additional building height, setback reductions, reduction to the
required number of parking spaces and reduction to the required buffers are justified and can be granted without detriment to the
public good or surrounding property owners, as the project is consistent with and complementary to the existing character and uses in
the immediate vicinity, is actually less intensive then uses that have existing for over 10 years, has been designed in such a manner
that will preserve the natural beauty and aesthetic quality of the area and is supported by a parking sufficiency study that determined
the appropriate amount of parking for the specific uses proposed to help reduce the sites impact on stormwater quality and quantity,
as well as reduce the amount of heat islands effect by limited the amount of unnecessary impervious surface. Additionally, the
granting of the application will not impair the intent or purpose of the zoning district, zoning code or Comprehensive Master Plan, as
these uses have been contemplated by the City and the deviations requested produce an improved project over what would be
produced without the requested deviations at no detriment to surrounding property owners. Finally, the proposed infill redevelopment
project is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Future Land Use Element and Housing Element of the
Comprehensive Master Plan.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J:I02026102026002.00\DOCIPermilsICity of ClearwalerlResidentiallnfill ProjecLapp_CDB_resub_rev_requestdoc
Page 8 of 12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
I4Y A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition
or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of
Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement.
~ If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
ut
li'f
JJ'
,ij(
~
~
~
~
At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following;
Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with
the City manual.
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
,5iI
COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT
SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
o
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following):
~
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor
elevations shall be provided.
CAUTION -IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN
AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY
MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
Ji\I
.>Q
SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees;
A:!
TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and
condition of such trees;
~
~
LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY;
PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (Le. Reduce number of spaces).
Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and
shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved; SEE ATTACHMENT "0"
)l{ GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
o
PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
I
I
J:I02026102026002.00\DOCIPermitsICity of ClearwaterIResidential Infill Project_app_ COB _resub Jev Jequest.doc
Page 9 of 12
I
I
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A)
Jl( SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package;
North arrow;
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared;
All dimensions;
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures;
Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures;
All required setbacks;
All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including
description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements;
Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening
{per Section 3-201 (D) (i) and Index #701};
Location of all landscape material;
Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
I A SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabular form:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXISTING
REQUIRED
I
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the
number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways,
expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility
easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses.
I
I
I
I
~
A
FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:
One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Yz X 11);
I
I
I
PROPOSED
I
J:I02026102026002. OOIDOCIPermitslCity of ClearwaterIResidentiallnfill Projecl_app _COB _resub _rev _requesldoc
Page 10 ofl2
I
I
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A)
I
j( LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
Sight visibUity triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
-_ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required
~~~; .
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant
schedule;
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all
existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
percentage covered;
Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
Irrigation notes.
I
I
I
I
I
~
.l(
REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y:z X 11);
I
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
I
I.
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
I
~
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information;
I
All sides of all buildings;
Dimensioned;
Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations);
Materials;
I
}\
REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 Y:z X 11.
I J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806)
I
o
All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be
removed or to remain.
I
o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing;
freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals)
o
Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
o
Reduced signage proposal (8 Y:z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application.
I
I
I
J:I02026\02026002.00l00CIPermitsICity of ClearwalerIResidentiallnfill ProjecCapp _COB _resubJev Jequest.doc
Page II of 12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C)
o Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or
that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a .Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the
Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
If.... Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all
roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
~^ ^l^ Traffic Impact Study is not required. SEE ATTACHMENT "E" FOR PROPOSED AND EXISTING TRIP GENERATION
IV \ ~\ RATES
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC
IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED
AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-
4750.
L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONSI WATER STUDY:
Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if
any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire
sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with
the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required.
4
~~nftKedgement of fire flow calculationslwater study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
~ Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is included. SEE ATTACHMENT "G"
Fire Flow CalculationsNVater Study is not required.
CAUTION -IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW
CALCULATIONSI WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE
RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334.
M. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the pro erty desc. ed in this application.
Signature of property owner or representative
J:I02026102026002.00IDOCIPennilsICily of Clearwaler\Residenliallnfill Project_app_CDB_resu _ _
Page 12 of 12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
1. Provide names of ALL property owners on deed - please PRINT full names:
BVG Acquisition Inc.- 4300 N.W. B9'h Blvd., Gainesville, FL 32606-0749
2. That (I amlwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
2855 Gulf to Bay Blvd (17/29/16/03006/000/0200)
BASKIN'S REPLAT RESUB PT OF LOT 2 DESC FROM NE COR OF LOT 1 TH E 60FT & S 190FT FOR POB TH E 135.2FT (short legal)
3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request)
Residentiallnfill Site Plan Application has been submitted to redevelop a majority portion of the existing campus to allow for new Skilled Nursing,
Assisted Living, Memory Support and Indepemtent Living units
3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint:
Marc A. Mariano and/or Bryan L. Zarlenga of TBE Group, Inc. located at 380 Park Place Blvd. Clearwater FL 33759
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition;
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property;
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City
representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application;
6.
Th,t (-), ... """e'ig"~ '''"'''Yo ""'eby ~.fy that... f~regol'" i:" 'If ~lj6'h .
i'~. VICI'. cl'O>\\~
Property Owner
Property Owner
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
~o t~ day of
who having been first duly sworn
, ....... ............ .... ......'....H....~
: NANCY B. RUSSELL
! ",,~~"l"'l Comm' DD042IIS7
: ! . Expires ...4I2OOt
1 E~ '1 BonGed IIlN (8DO~
. OFf\; ,....'"
t 1I111"~\'i Fkmda ND\l.ry Alan., Inc:
...... .......... ......... II' .................
My Commission Expires:
Notary Seal/Stamp
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE #:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
~ Clearwater
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets
o SUBMIT FIRE PREll MARY SITE PLAN: N/A
o SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE ~
* NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Comprehensive Infill Project
(Revised 04/24/2007)
-PLEASE TYPE OR PRlNT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: BVG Acquisitions Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: 4300 N.W. 89th Blvd, Gainesville, FL 32606
PHONE NUMBER: 352.337.8686 FAX NUMBER: 352.337.8610
CELL NUMBER: nJa EMAIL: nJa
PROPERTY OWNER(S): BVG Acquisitions Inc. 4300 N.W. 89th Blvd, Gainesville, FL 32606
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: Marc Mariano, AICP, PP and/or Bryan Zarlenga, PE
MAILING ADDRESS: TBE Group Inc. 380 Park Place Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE NUMBER: 727.431.1605 FAX NUMBER: 727.431.1777
CELL NUMBER: 727.492.6750 EMAIL: mmariano(cV,tbe QTOUD. com
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
PROJECT NAME: Bella Terra on the Bay PROJECT VALUATION: $ 75,000,000
STREET ADDRESS 2855 Gulf to Bay Blvd
PARCEL NUMBER(S): 17/29/16/03006/000/0200
PARCEL SIZE (acres): 31.12 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 1,355,587
LEGAL BASKIN'S REPLAT RESUB PT OF LOT 2 DESC FROM NE COR OF LOT 1 TH E
DESCRIPTION: 60FT & S 190FT FOR POB TH E 135.2FT (short legal)
See Attachment "A" for Full Legal
Infill redevelopment of a 19.2-acre portion of an existing 31.12-acre senior living
campus. Total Proposed New Uses - 156 Independent Living Units, 40 Nursing Home
PROPOSED USE(S): Beds & 76 Assisted Living Beds. 138 of the Independent Living Units, the 40 Nursing
Home Beds & 76 Assisted Living Beds will be located in one (1) primary building;
while18 Independent Living Units will be located in nine (9) duplex cottages.
Uses To Remain - 94 Assisted Living Beds and 73 Independent Living Units
J:I02026\02026002.OOIDOCIPermilsICity of Clearwaler\Comp _ InfilLapp _ CDB_ submiltaUev Jequest. doc
Page 1 of2
I
I
I
I
I
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Specifically identify the request
(include number of units or
square footage of non-
residential use and all
requested code deviations; e.g.
reduction in required number of
parking spaces, specific use,
etc.)
I
I
I
I
Flexible Development approval for the redevelopment of the overall 31.12 acre-property
zoned Commercial (C) District, Office (0) District and proposed Medium High Density
Residential (MHDR) District (companion rezoning Case No. REZ2008-07007) to permit a
total of 229 attached dwellings (Independent Living Units) (73 units existing to remain; 156
units proposed), a total of 40 nursing home beds (proposed) and a total of 170 beds of
assisted living facility (94 beds existing to remain; 76 beds proposed); (A) In the
Commercial (C) District with a lot area of 2.45 acres, a lot width of 200 feet along Gulf to
Bay Blvd (north) and a total of 210 ft along Cross Blvd, a front (north) setback along Gulf to
Bay Blvd of 4 ft (to existing sign) and 28 ft (to existing pavement), a front (east) setback
along Cross Blvd of one-foot (to existing pavement), a front (north) setback along Cross
Blvd of 25 ft (to proposed guardhouse), a side (east) setback of 5 feet (to existing
pavement), a side (west) setback of 2 feet (to existing pavement), a side (north) setback of
zero feet (to existing pavement) and a building height of 81 ft (to roof deck of existing
assisted living facility building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in the
Commercial (C) District, under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C; (B) In the proposed Medium
High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a lot area of 28.33 acres, a lot width along
Sky Harbor Dr. of 282 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback along Sky Harbor Dr. from
25 to 21 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to 5 ft (to
existing pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback at the southeast corner of the
adjacent nursing home parcel from 10 to 5 ft (to proposed pavement), an increase to
building height from 30 to 82 ft (to top of roof of proposed building) and a reduction to the
required number of parking spaces from 583 to 426 parking spaces, as a Residentiallnfill
Project under the provisions of Sec. 2-304.G; and (C) Reductions to perimeter buffers
along Cross Blvd (east) from 10 ft to one-foot (to existing pavement), along the east side
from 7 to 5 ft (to existing pavement), along the west side from 5 to 2 ft (to existing
pavement), along the north side from 10ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and at the
southeast corner of the adjacent nursing home parcel from 10ft to 5 ft (to proposed
pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec. 3-
1202.G.
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made
in this application are true and accurate to the best of my
knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and
photograph the operty des 'bed in this application.
I
I
c. SIGNATURE:
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
S~ ~nd subscribed before me this I.... day of
UI be r- , A.D. 20 to me and/or by
, who' ersonall know has
produced oI~; vf'''' "<;, I. 'c.e.-.t "' e
~~~
My commission expires:
I
I
I
I
Signature of propertY owner or representative
I
I
I
I
"
:~w: io\ CommisslonDD800916
~ .. Expires August 14, 2012
. .oo" 8ondod 1Iw TIOJ FlIin Inolnnce 800.3811-701.
J:I02026102026002.00IDOCIPermitsICity of Clearwater\Comp_ InfilLapp_ COB _submittal_rev _requesldoc
Page 2 of2
I
u
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
CASE NUMBER:
I
~ Clearwater
RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials):
DATE RECEIVED:
I
o SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
I
o SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and
application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets
I
* NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION.
I
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM
(Revised 04/24/2007)
I
~PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT~
I
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: BVG Acquisition Inc.
MAILING ADDRESS: 4300 N.W. 89tn Blvd, Gainesville, FL 32606
PHONE NUMBER: 352.337.8686 FAX NUMBER: 352.337.8610
CELL NUMBER: nJa EMAIL: nJa
_._-~..__._~._-_._-------_._._~~---- ..~m_._____~_._____~___w__~_~___._~.~_____~_.__~___________._
PROPERTY OWNER(S): BVG Acquisition Inc. 4300 N.W. 89th Blvd, Gainesville, FL 32606
List ALL owners on the deed
AGENT NAME: Marc Mariano, AICP, PP and/or Bryan Zarlenga, PE
MAILING ADDRESS: TBE Group Inc. 380 Park Place Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33759
PHONE NUMBER: 727.431.1605 FAX NUMBER: 727.431.1777
CELL NUMBER: 727.492.6750 EMAIL: mmariano@tbegroup.com
I
I
I
I
I 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME:
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings
proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
I
I
The proposed landscaping has been designed to compliment the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed. Palms and
shade trees will offset the height of the building and help to blend it with the existing mature tree canopy. A large enclosed courtyard,
pool deck, and memory garden will provide interesting landscaped spaces in and around the building, taking advantage of the unique
topography and providing both active and passive recreation areas for residents.
I
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be
demonstrably more attractive than landscaping othelWise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape
standards.
I 2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of ClealWater.
I
I
J:I02026102026002.00100CIPermitsICity of CfearwaterlComp _Landscape _ app _ COB _ SubmittafJev Jequest. doc
Page 1 of 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Canopy coverage is an important community characteristic to the City of Clearwater. The proposed landscape takes special measures to
preserve over 60% of the existing canopy. In addition, new trees, 64% of which are canopy trees, have been strategically placed in the
landscape design to enhance the Bella Terra campus and replace the canopy that will be lost during development. The main entrance to the
campus will be given a face lift with an updated sign and new landscaping. These improvements will enhance the aesthetic value along the
S.R. 60 corridor.
3. PROPERTY VALUES:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
The required landscape buffers were a challenge to meet with the sites existing features and unusual property boundary. However, adequate
landscaping was provided for most of the boundary's with a few exceptions. These exceptions are called out on the Landscape Calculations
exhibit, sheet L3. I I.
Due to the existing location of Cross Boulevard, the required 7' buffer (with decorative fence) requirement was not met along the east
property line. Instead, the existing five foot wide area will contain a decorative fence, and a 3' hedgerow. Trees were only proposed along a
100' section of this buffer because existing canopy in the adjacent property covers the nearly the entire length. The remaining trees that were
required along this buffer were placed elsewhere in the site. The landscape improvements proposed around the cottages that will be directly
adjacent to this property will be aesthetically pleasing and well-maintained for the neighbors viewing.
The property line along the south edge stretches across the bay and adequate landscaping was provided for the buffer requirement along the
west property line.
Due to the existing sidewalk and cottage locations along the northern edge of the existing adjacent nursing home, the 10 foot buffer
requirement can not be met. To amend this situation, more than adequate landscaping has been provided along the other 1\\'0 property edges
that meet the facility. Furthermore, the Harbor Woods will benefit from new landscape improvements across the Bella Terra Campus.
Ornamental and canopy trees, shrubs and groundcover will be planted along the decorative fence in a cohesive pattern, creating a pleasing
view from the windows of the adjacent land owners. Additionally, the required 10 foot landscape buffer at the southeasterly comer of the
Harbour Wood facility is not able to be met due to a re-aligned Loving Lane. However, currently no buffer or screening exists between the 2
facilities and as a result of this application a minimum 5 foot buffer will be provided and will include landscaping and decorative fencing.
An updated landscape treatment has been proposed at the secondary entrance to the property at Sky Harbor Drive. Along the northern edge of
the property boundary, existing creeks and drainage swales and existing power lines created several areas where canopy trees and shrubs
could not be provided. However, the required trees along that edge have been place throughout the site in other areas and the Owner
understands that as a condition of approval all future development in areas not included as part of this proposed application shall conform to
code buffer requirements at the time of redevelopment. Therefore the shrub requirement will proposed along the existing chainlink fence
throughout this area providing a buffer between the commercial zone and the existing residents when that future development takes place.
Overall, the trees required in the mentioned buffers have been provided, ifnot directly in the buffers, then across the campus in other areas on
the plan. Special measures have been taken to preserve the existing beauty of the campus and its invaluable existing tree canopy. The
proposed landscape improvements will add to and accentuate that existing beauty.
A waiver is being requested for the requirement of wheel stops in existing parking spaces. The appropriate wheel
stops have been placed in all the necessary proposed parking spaces. The Owner has future redevelopment plans
in the locations of existing parking areas and understands that any development of those areas will need to fully
conform to code at the time of development.
(See Site Plan Application #FLD2008-0512 for all site conditions)
4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN:
The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which
the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
N/A
J:I02026102026002. OOIDOCIPermitslCity of Clearwater.Comp _ Landscape _ app _ COB _ SubmittalJev Jequest. doc
Page 2 of 3
I
THE LA.NDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL
TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE
LA.NDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LA.NDSCAPE PLA.NS, SECTIONS I ELEVATIONS,
RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET.
I
I
SIGNATURE:
I
I
I
"...~'(.f~""", lane
{t:&.~ ~~ Commission DO 800916
;.1- -1.$ Expires August 14, 2012
'i.~ -i-r.<!;'~ Ilonded ThIll Troy Fajn 1nGlK8llCe 600-385-7019
'fir."",
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J:I02026102026002.00IDOCIPermitsICity of Clearwater-Damp _ Landscape_ app _ COB _ SubmittalJev Jequest. doc
Page 3 of 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment" A"
BASKIN'S REPLAT RESUB PT OF LOT 2 DESC FROM NE COR OF LOT 1
TH E 60FT & S 190FT FOR POB TH E 135.2FT TH S42DE 34.61FT TH N48DE
100.IFT TH E 912.88FT TH N 150FT TH E 200FT TH S 150.02FT TH E
60.02FT TH S 1031.83FT TH S34DW 672.87 FT TH N39DW 819FT(S) TH
N51DE 52.16FT TH N34DW 40 FT TH N14DE 21.51FT TH N51DE 154.86FT
TH N61DE 4.55FT TH N39DE 27.26FT TH N42DW 67.34FT TH N31DW
141.97FT TH N27DW 181.44FT TH S42DW 113.46FT TH S82DW 112.08FT TH
N28DW 13.51FT TH S66DW 25.55FT THN23DW 34.80FT TH S62DW 88.09FT
TH N39DW 262FT(S) TH N 278FT(S) TO POB & ADJ SUBM LAND ON SE
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Pennits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentA _Iegal_ desc.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment "B"
Request for Setback &
Landscape Buffer Encroachments
Commercial Zone
1. A reduction to the front (north) setback along Gulf to Bay Blvd from five to four feet (to existing
sign),
2. A reduction to the front (east) setback along Cross Blvd from 25 feet to one-foot (to existing
pavement),
3. A reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 to five feet (to existing pavement),
4. A reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 to two feet (to existing pavement),
5. A reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 to zero feet (to existing pavement), and
6. An increase to building height from 25 to 81 feet (to roof deck of existing assisted living facility
building).
Medium High Density Residential (proposed)
1. A reduction to the front (west) setback along Sky Harbor Drive from 25 to 21 feet (to existing
building),
2. A reduction to the side (east) setback along Cross Blvd from 10 feet to 5 feet (to existing pavement),
3. A reduction to the side (west) setback along the southeasterly property line of the adjacent nursing
home facility from 10 feet to five feet (to proposed pavement),
4. An increase to building height from 30 to 82 feet (to top of roof for proposed building),
5. A reduction to the required number of parking spaces from 581 to 426 parking spaces, and
**See Site Plan Sheet SC3.09 for a location of proposed setback encroachments.
Landscape Buffer Encroachment
1. Along Cross Blvd (east) from 10 feet to one-foot (to existing pavement),
2. Along the east side from seven to five feet (to existing pavement),
3. Along the west side from five to two feet (to existing pavement),
4. Along the north side from 10 feet to zero feet (to existing building and pavement) and
5. At the southeasterly comer of the adjacent nursing home parcel from 10 feet to five feet.
**See Landscape Plan Sheet L3.11 for a location of proposed buffer encroachments.
J:\02026\02026002.00\DOaPermits\City of Cleanvater\AttachmentB _ setback_list.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
k \ \. \\ C 1\
1\ -t~ C\C- '" M.t (\~
~.
Morton Plant Mease Life Services, Inc.
a Florida not-for-profit corporation
BT- 6ZU ~
Denton W. Crockett, Jr.,
as its President
i
I
i
I
i
l
I
i
I
i
I
l
I
I
,
I
I
,
i
I
!
i
I
I
,
,.
I
I
i
t--
i
I
i
I
I
I
I
,
,
l
t
,
i
i
i
t
;
I
I
,
j
f
i
!
t
f
i
I
I
I
I
,
i
t
I
[
i
I
f
I
I
I
!
i
[
I
i
I
I
1
i
r
i
i
Ii: 2006049711 BK: 14922 PG:' 1724, 02/09/2006 at 11:33 AM, RECORDING 4 PAGES
$35.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $118300.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS
COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDU04
.35. ~o
t
@ ,61'
11~',oo
i.....\
)~ ..,
/-.>. \.
.. ~'--. '>
f.-......:,. ~I
! ,... ,
z. v /
~_.~, ~.
;/ r-r... ~..........I'
" ."
Thi . .-..--- db' " , i
B m"LCWl.1ent prepare y \ "J /
( Ii M ~ ,,-;,~ /
BB N tIrB. . / /.f ..~,.--
Samuel P. Queirolo{ . \.... '\ )
BOLLAND & KNIGuf.i.LP
P. O. Box 1288
Tampa, FL 3~12~
....... "-........ //
l "'-'...,:...../
,'!.-, !
172916-03006(~~200
Property API?r~s Parcel
Identifi~b~ fumber(s)
!-, '~../'
/'l/~'~, ?
... './.." "..
I~> (
:' I~~. ~I
/ .:.." l' ~'''../
,.->1'h~ Grantor, Morton Plant Mease Life Services, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit
cofpol'.';iii'on (d/b/a Bayview Gardens, successor by merger to Bayview Gardens
~~~s.!~, Inc" Congregational House, Inc., and Morton Plant Life Services, Inc.),
:whose mailing address is 300 Pinellas Street, Clearwater, FL 33756, in
/'~:whSideration of ten dollars and other valuable considerations received from the
(":':. ,.piiintee, hereby grants and conveys to the Grantee, BVG Acquisition Inc., a Florida
"'<jlot-for-profit corporation, whose mailing address is 4300 N. W. 89th Blvd.,
Gainesville, FL 32606-0749, the real property in Pinellas County, Florida, described
on attached Exhibit A.
SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
As against all persons claiming by, through, or under the Grantor, the
Grantor hereby covenants that the property is free of all encumbrances, subject to
lien for real estate taxes not yet due and payable and to all other matters set forth
on attached Exhibit B, that lawful seisin of and good right to convey the property
are vested in the Grantor, and that the Grantor hereby fully warrants the title tQ
the property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons
claiming by, through, or under the Grantor.
Datedthis ~\~aYOf~~2006.
Signed in the presence of
two wi s
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PlNELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14922 PG 1725
/.\
Ii.. \
i""'''''' 1
/=-:-0
( V,}
,...........::..:.... ........
STATE OF FLORIDA / r.... \~,j
\ \.~..) )
COUNTY OF ~ "'I s',6;i?Yf-
j \ . .
.... ...... / oS I-
The foregoing ~6-ument was acknowledged before me this ..3.l....:=.. day of
Jo..n~;'t ' ~l)Q(;by Denton ~. Crockett, Jr., as Presid~t of Morton Pl~t
Mease Life Se~~' Inc., a Flonda not-for-profit corporation, d/b/a BayvIew
Gardens, su~e.~~{J?y merger to Bayview Gardens Housing, Inc., Congregational
House, Inc., .~a.l4orton Plant Life Services, Inc., on behalf of the not-for-profit
con:x>rati?n{(./ (,\---He . or she. is . pe~nally known to melhas produced
L d.MlHk~'- ,p,r""ll 1- as Identification.
/.~"" ~..... ...~.~
/ h-';~,)
/{~~S '
I .-'. \ I
\ \. 1 ;:
I-~~:~<~j
l ."
/~;:~~5"'
t ..... 't .
"'.... '-j ~
" I
~.._..{
# 3524970.vl
~~:~
Notary Public-State of
Commission Number:
My Commission Expires:
(SEAL)
---
~~llllll~
'QJti. ~ AfYCOULt~!+:M ~
. .".... ~. _._~"""'Vtf I DDIt4Z82
"ol'!... ~D~ '" 2006 EJOlJIs
~FAf/~1IIC
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14922 PG 1726
,r,
, 1
~~ \
L ~.~'')
r"-". "I
/..~ '1
{ vJ
.....",.... ~.
/ ., ,,),.J F.XR1BIT A
\ \.~) l
.-~.;...... /
(,; '....-
\ ~ 'i I
Parcel No. 1: <'-J
A tract of land lying within Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and
being more particularl~e~ as follows:
Commence at the N~sFcomer of Block 2 of "A RESUB OF BASKIN'S REPLAT", as recorded in
Plat Book 24, page ~o(the Public Records of Pine lias County, Florida; thence North 89" 46' 0 I" East
along the North Iijie~ ~d Block 2, 1206.41 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue North
89046' 01" ~t~~ce of 200.00 feet; thence leaving said line South 00" 37' 03" West a distance of
150.02 feet; ~c~ff"orth 89" 46' 01" East a distance of 60.01 feet; thence South 00" 37' 03" West a
distance of~6Q:&rfiet; thence South 89'146' 01" West a distance of 191.21 feet; thence North 38" 27' 39"
West a distiime ))(330.94 feet; thence North 89'146' 01" East a distance of 139.84 feet; thence North 00"
37' 03" FJs(il1fis6mce of 150.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
/'.' <-
/ //",::::,.-. >
ParcelNQ/U
A tmd'q,(fimd lying within Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and
bethg}ito~ particularly described as follows:
~e at the Northwest comer of Block 2 of" A RESUB OF BASKIN'S REPLAT", as recorded in
,',.jlai'~k 24, page 42, of the Public Records of Pine lias County, Florida; thence North 89" 46' 0 I" East
;-~:.~tf:l~g:tbe North line of said Block 2, 1206.41 feet; thence continue North 89" 46' 01" East a distance of
..,(, 200-.00 feet; thence leaving said line South 00" 37' 03" West a distance of 150.02 feet; thence North 890
<c'" ,:)4~' 01" East a distance of 60.01 feet; thence South 000 37' 03" West a distance of26O.oo feet for a
........POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue South 00" 37' 03" West a distance of 967.93 feet; thence South
69" 21' 23" West a distance 0014.28 feet; thence South 52" 28'54" West a distance of215.00 feet;
thence North 39'1 01' 06" West a distance of 654.81 feet; thenceNortb 50" 58' 50" East a distance of 52.16
feet; thence North 34014'53" West a distance of40.00 feet; thence North 13041' 04" East a distance of
21.51 feet; thence North 50" 45' 48". East a distance of 154.86 feet; thence North 610 21' 53" East a
distance of 4.55 feet; thence North 39" 11' 48" East a distance of22.26 feet; thence North 42" 12' 55"
West a distance of67.34 feet; thence North 310 09'17" West a distance of 141.97 feet; thence North 270
02' 41" West a distance of 181.44 feet; thence South 42007' 22" West a distance of 113.46 feet; thence
South 82016' 09" West a distance of 112.08 feet; thence North 27" 46'45" West a distance of 13.51 feet;
thence South. 65046' 35" West a distance of25.55 fect; thence North 230 27' 38" West a distance of34.80
feet; thence South (f].o 09' 34" West a distance of88.09 feet; thence North 39" 01' 06" West a distance of
260.77 feet; thence North 000 13' 59" West a distance of 282.35 feet; thence North 89" 46' 01" East a
distance of 135.20 feet; thence South 410 34' 50" East a distance of34.65 fect; thence North 480 24' 08"
East a distance of 99.89 feet; thence North 89" 46' 01" East a distance of771.29 feet; thence South 380 27'
39" East a distance 0030.94 feet; thence North 89" 46' 01" East a distance ofl91.21 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.
Parcel No.3:
Non-Exclusive perpetual easement(s) for ingress, egress, and utilities as set forth in Declaration of Non-
Exclusive Easements and Maintenance Agreement, recorded in Official Records Book 11602, Page 1568,
oftbe Public Records of Pine lIas County, Florida.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PlNELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14922 PG 1727
1/"\
"j, \
.r-:~ i.
: '}
/--::..:V
t Cl 1
~~. .(
I..................' -.
/ r... ".j F.XR1R1T B
t \. ~ 1
\ \.... 1
.-", '----.I
I ..J "
1. Easement(s) gran~"~)the City of Clearwater recorded July 2, 1963, in Official Records
Book 1712, Page 345~-6f the Public Records of Pine lIas County, Florida.
2. Easement(s)'~ to the City of Clearwater recorded June 16, 1965, in Official
Records BQOk.2.1~4'; Page 498, of the Public Records ofPinellas County, Florida.
( ...."'.
3. Easem~t(.}l~ted to the City of Clearwater recorded September 9, 1965, in Official
Records Boo~:i224, Page 664, of the Public Records ofPinellas County, Florida.
,rj:-.... "l
4. EasetPE\?t(s-tgrantedto Florida Power and Light Company recorded October 22, 1965, in
Offi,c~~rds Book 2252, Page 636, of the Public Records ofPinellas County, Florida.
5. ~~S) granted to Florida Power Corporation recorded July 12, 1966, in Official
I~~hk 2419, Page 280, of the Public Records ofPinellas County, Florida.
6. <' E'~ent(s) granted to Florida Power Corporation recorded November 14, 1973, in
r --?:QfQcial Records Book 4103, Page 53, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
i '''.1
7. \ ()~ement(s) granted to the City of Clearwater recorded July 15, 1975 in Official Records
(-\.... _-Book 4309, Page 63, of the Public Records ofPinellas County, Florida.
r.......:.~ "..
}_~.....;":"../ Terms, covenants. conditions and other matters contained in the Cable Lease Agreement
__<.".~.) recorded January 6,1984, in Official Records Book 5677, Page 101, of the Public ReCords
<..:-.) ,: ofPinellas County, Florida.
.....9. Easement(s) granted to Florida Power Corporation recorded December 1, 1995 in Official
Records Book 9180, Page 511, of the Public Records ofPinellas County, Florida.
10. Easement(s) granted to the City of Clearwater recorded December 14, 1985, in Official
Records Book 9192, Page 2174, of the Public Records ofPinellas County, Florida.
11. Easement(s) granted to the City of Clearwater recorded August 21, 1996 in Official
Records Book 9440, Page 506, of the Public Records ofPineIlas County, Florida.
12. Terms, covenants, conditions, easement(s) and other matters contained. in the
Declaration of Non-Exclusive Easements and Maintenance Agreement recorded October
I, 2001, in Official Records Book 11602, Page 1568, of the Public Records of Pinellas
County, Florida.
13. Terms, covenants, conditions, easement(s) and other matters contained in the
Declaration of Non-Exclusive Cross Access Easements and Maintenance Agreement
recorded February 8, 2002, in Official Records Book 11881, Page 868, of the Public
Records ofPinellas County, Florida.
14. Terms, covenants, conditions and other matters contained in the Easement Agreement
recorded May 28, 2002, in Official Records Book 12023, Page 1386, oftba Public Records
ofPinellas County, Florida.
15. Easement(s) as disclosed by document recorded December 27,1967, in Official Records
Book 2741, Page 742, of the Public Records ofPinellas County, Florida.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AL T AI ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY
SE<:::;TIC>N 17, TC>VVNSHIP
C::ITY C>F <::::LEAAVV A TEA,
29 SC:::>UTH, AAN<:::3E 16
PINEL-LAS C::C::>UNTY,
E;::AST
F LC>AI a:::::> A.
EASEMENT UST:
SA YVIEW GARDENS
5. rights. 1f any. of the public to use os a pubJic beach or recre':ltionol.
area. any part of the lend lying between the ~od-y of .0tOl'" .abuttlng sOld
burl described in Schedule A and the natural Itn. of vegetation. bluff.
extreme hlgh water. line or other apparent boundary separating the
publicly used area from the upland private area. and any ri9ht of access
thereto. Appl1es 'on~ Affects subject property.. nothing to plot.
7. Any cJaim to any portion of the "and descrlbod In Schedule ~. whieh
lies below the mean high water line of Tampa Bay and other odpeent
waters. If any. Applies and Affects subject property. nothing to plot.
S As to any portion of the premises herein described which Is (0)
submerged land or is (b) artificially f"dled in land. ortlficially exposed land.
or any land accreted thereto.. in what was fDf'Tnerly na\oligable waters. this
Commitment or Policy is subject to the right of the United Stotes
government arising by reason of 1ts control over na....gable wa~enI 10 the
interest of navigation and commerce.. Applies and Aff.ets subJDct
property. nothing to plot..
9. Easement{s) granted to the City of Clearwater rec:orded .July 2. 1963.
in Official Records Book 1712. Poge 3...5. of the PubliC Records of
Plnellas County. Florida. Applies and Affects subject property os shown.
10 Easement{s) granted to the City of Clearwater recorded .July 1 S. 1963,
in Official Records Book 1721. Page 715. of the Public Records of Pinellas
County. florida. Does not Apply or Affect subject property_
11 Declaration of Easement recorded October 5. 196..... in Official Records
Book 2014. Page 702. of the PubUc Records of Pinellcs County. Florida.
Applies and Affects subject property os shown.
12 Easement{s) granted to the City of Clearwater recorded June 16.
1965. in Official Records Book 217-4-. ~oqe 49B.. ot the Public Records .of
Pinellos County. Florida. Applies and Affects subject property. blanket In
nature..
...... S1IlEEJ
GUlF TO BAY BClUlLI/ARD
5.R. &0
:i!
=
o
i
i5 .t';
j .~
.- ----.,
~
~
~
~
a
:E
,,;
:;
~rJ~
w \a
/,j' SIT[ ~
:F ~
. ~ OLD TAMPA BAY
I
I
13 Eusecrlfsnl(s) gront.!:!d to the City of Clearwater r~cucded S-erpternbe, 9.
1965. In Official Records Book 222-4-, Poge 66.. of the Public Records. of
Pin~llas County. Florida. ".pplies and Affects ~bject property. blanket In
nature.
BEUEAlO Rll.
I..... Eost:lment(s) granted to Florida Power and Light Compo.")o' recorded
Vctoueer .22. ; ~iii5, in vfficiai Recoros f:sool< :i:.c:~:i'. ....0915 b.,)ti. 01 tl",e ~ublic
Records of Pinellos County. Florido. Applies and Affects sub.jeet property.
blanket in nature_
.VIC-:::INITY r-.A_..o...P
15 Easement(s) granted to Florida Power Corporation recorded .July 12,
1966. tn Official Records Book 2419. Page 280, Clf the Public Records of
Pinellas County. Florida. A~pJies and Affects subject property. b~onket in
nature.
SURVEYOR'S NOlES:
16 Easement's) granted to Florida Power Corporation recorded November
14, 1973, in Officiol Records Book 4103, Page 53. of the Public Records
of Pinellas County. Florida. Applies and Affects subject property. bfonket
in nature_
I.) the ~ canlGirMd Mean ~ aI prap.ty dcscrI.>OII h OIicap
na. .....- c:..np..,. c.m.....-l Mea. 2DD5Ol53JI. Nt_ ""9Wl1B. 2005.
17 Easement(s) granted to the City of Ceorwatcr recorded .July 15. 1975
in Official Records Book 4309. Poge 63, of the Public Re=ords of Pinellcs
Count)', Florida. Applies and Affects subject property as shown.
18 Term.. c.ovenants. conditions and other matte contnine4 In the Cable
Lease Agreement recorded .January 6. 198..... in Official Records Book
5677. Page 101. of the Public Records of Pinelles County. florida. Applies
and Affects sub ]ect property. blanket In nature..
19 Terms covenants. conditions and other .matters contoined in the
Regulatory Agreement recorded November 3. 1986. In Official Records
Book 6352. PogO' 159. of the Public Recorda of Plnellos County. Florida.
Not a survey molter
20 Easement(s) granted to Florida Power CorporatJon recorded December
1 1995 in Official Records Book 9180. Page 511. of the Public Records
o'f Pinellcs County. Aorida.. Applies and Affects subject property, blanket
In nature.
2..) 8~ _ ........ _ .... Eod ... of Sub~ ........ -"'dI ~
5..lXI"3TOT1r.. pr o.d.
3.) Ho..... ~ fIIf -.-I..... .. ..... ....... _. b.nd .. alt. at
a.- ., --JL
4.) ~..... IbII ........, . -JId. 10 ...... ., tItN IWlid .. .... ~___
.. ...... ~ Ihk ~
~) ... --so ... ...., ......... JWtrtr:tfana .1111 --as ,..cMde4 t. th.
s.r.,w. ft II ....... ... .. oUw ,......... .......... 'IIIhic::h -,. -"eel:
-......,.
L) ..,....rty........._.............,.... z.-. ""X. AE -M \C, .-
f1RM .... 121ClX Dl2IIG. ..... 1/3I11:IJ3..
21 Easement(s) granted to the City of Clearwater recorded De.cember 14.
19B.S. in Official RecordS' Book 9192. Page 217.. of the Public Records of
,="inellas County, Florida. Applies and Affects subject property as shown.
22 Eosement{s) granted to the City of Clearwater recorded August 21.
1996 In Offieial Records Book 9+40. Page 506" 01 the Public Record.s of
PineUas County. Florida.. Applies and Affects subject property, blanket in
nature.
7.) .. ~ .. ... ... IkI .. s.w ..,. ~ ~ 04a0dat_
Iftc. - .r...-y ... 2DDI aM ~ .. .. WcI ..,. We. __ c.--. 01 the
ScuIh-.d ...... ..... ~ Dktrid .. ~ So 200L
I.) 1he 3 ,...ar ~ .. ~ wftbout .., ~ ,..._ . _au..
I.) .... of ,..... ...... 111/30/00
23 Terms. covenants, conditions. casement(s) and other motters
contained in the Declaration of Non-Exelusive Easements and
lrwCointenance Agreement recorded October 1. 2001. in Official Records
Book 11602. Page 1568. of the Public Records of Pinellas Cou~ty, F"Iorido.
Applies ond Affects subject property os shown
2. Terms. cavenonts.. conditions. eosemont(s) ond other metters
contained In the Declaration of Non-EJrcluslve Cross Access Easements
and Maintenonec Agreement recorded February S_ 2002. in Officii:;lf
Records 80ck 11831. Page 868. of the Public Reeards of PInellos County,
Florida. Applies and Affects subject properly, b1anket in natura..
25 Terms. covenants. conditions am) other not contained in the
Easeme.nt Agreement recorded "'oy 28. 2002,. in Officiol Records Soak
12023. Pogo. 1386. of the Public: Records ot Pinellos County. Florida.
Applies and Affects subject property as shown
27 E"osements os disclosed by document recorded December 27. 1967. in
Official Records Book 27....,. Page 742. of the PUblIc Records of Plnellcs
County. F"Iorida. Applies and Affecls subject property os shown
z:JI.....:;. .,;,,1t:::L 1 ::.:; C:l!t.4y%l,,- G~~~_
.;.~~:;
14'0':':: T:'l.: It.:5~I~~ -::R T",!~ ~~ ~~
~:P:Jh L.~.
S""~ ~~.e=~:Jt""" =-~:.cr~;;"
WI7:1Wr JoJ'_... O. 'j'~ CI'r ~ c,9.~'.'.r.-~
~...rn:A:~ "''= ,c.:c: r.;~,c.,..: 7C ~~s.:~
~~1O.5()1{5..~
3~.c ~=-.r..AA. 5-.&..::5
C f':;.J~,.e;.~ Y'.&..:5
3Ji:-o-lo.S-~
~.... ~Tot"=,I',-S I.c:Io
!l~r.3:1""Io
cAUSEW"'''
z:;M'''.:;.!''1Jt=~2~
:-..:::a..JhI.:o..5f!'V ;:O-=5c)~.T,^- :t5~=-
LEGAL DESCRlPllON:
Parcel No.1:
A tract of 'and l)lIng within Sectton 17. TOW!'ship 29 South.. Range 16 Ecst. PineUa.
County. Florida.. and being mot. particulorty .desen"bed os folloW$:
Commence at the Northwest corner'" of Bloek 2 of -A RESUB OF' BASKINS REPUr.
as recorded In Plat Book 24. poge "'2. of the Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida; thence North 89&46' 01- Eost olong the North line of sold &Jock 2. 1206.41
feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING. thence continue North 89&46" 01- East a distance of
200.00 teet: thence leaving said line South 00"'37. o;r West 0 distance of 150.02
fect; thence .Narth 89"46. 01. Eost 0 distance of 60.01 feet; thence South 00.37' 03-
West 0 di.tance of 260.00 feet; thence South 89.46.01. West a dlstonce of 191.21
feeli thene:. NQrth 38& 27' 39- West 0 dts:tane.e of 330.94 fe:t; thence f"Jorth eg.4t)1
01- Eost a distance of 139.S..... foet: thence North 00'"37. 0.3- East 0 distance of
150.02 feet to the POINT OF BEQlNNING.
Containing 106.916 Square feet << 2.45 Acres t.IIore or Loss.
Parcel Na.2:
A tract of land lying within Sectian 17. Township 29 South. Range 16 East. Pinellos
County. Florida. and being more particularly described as follows:
Commance at the Northwest corner of Block 2 af A RESUB OF BASKINS RE:PLA T, os
recorded in Plat Book 2.... page 42. of the Public Records of Pinellps County. Florida;
thence North 89-46101. East along the North line of-said Bloek 2. 1206.41 feet.;
thence continue North 89& ....601- East 0 distance of 200.00 feet: lhe.nc.e: leaving said
line. South 00.37' 03'" West a distance of 150.02 feet; thence North 69.....6. 01- Eost c
distance of 60.01 feet; thence South 00. 37" 03- West a distance of 260.00 ieet for
o POINT OF BEGINNING; thence conUnue So!Jth 00'" 37' 03- West 0 distance of 967.9.3
feet: thence South 69"'21.23. West a distance of 314.28 fe:et,; thence South 52"28'
5.... West 0 distance of 215.00 feet: thence North 39' Of' OS" 'West 0 distance of
65-4.81 feet; thent:e Nor-th SO- 58' SO' East a di:tance of 52.16 teet: thcnC4! North
.3.... 1-4' 53- West a distanca of 40.00 feet: thence North lS 41. ().4. Eost a distance
of 21.51 feet: thence North 50'''5" 48- East ClI distance ot 15.....86 feet: thence Harth
61'" 21' 5.3- East a dh:tonce of 4.55 feet thence North .39. 11' 4S. East 0 distance of
22.26 feet; thence North 42. 12' 55- West .0 distance of 67.3-4. feet; thence: ,",orth
.3'- 09' IT West 0 distance af '.'.97 feet; thence North 27. 02' .....,- West a distance
of 181.44 fe=t: thence South ....2"07' 22- West a distance of 113..46 feet; thence
S01Jth .82" 16. 09- Wcs:t a dis:ton~ of 112.05 feet: th6C1c.e North 2,-4-b 45- We$t a
distance of 13.51 feet.: thence South 65...6. .35- West a distance of 25.55 feet;
thence North 23-27'38- West a distance of 3.....80 feet; thence South 62. 09' 3-4--
West 0 distance of 88.09 feeti thence North 39.01'06- West a distance of 260.77
feet; thence North 00-13. 59- ~est 0 distance of 282..35 fed; thftnce N<rth 89'40.
0'- East a di:otonce of 135.20 feet; thence South 41' 34' 50" East 0 distance of
34.65 feet: thence North 48" 24' 08" East 0 distance of 99.89 fret; thence Narth
89" .....s" 01. East a distance of 771.29 feet; thence South 38' 27' 39- East a
distance of 330.94 feet; thence North 89. 40' 0'. East a distance of 191.21 feet to
the POINT OF" BEGINNING.
Containing 1.248.570 Square Feet or 28.66 Acres More or Less.
Parcel No. .3.
Non-Exclusive perpetual easements for ingre3:s. egress and utilities as set forth in
Decloration of Non-Exclusive Easements and Maintenance Agreement. . recorded In
Official Records 8001( 11602" Page 1568. 01 the Public Records of Pinellas County.
florida.
c~~'n=I~:l TO~ ~VG ^COJI5riI~. I,,",C.
MSl:.C.""'TI~ :'4.N(,. cs s~ .and kr .a~S.'9::S
C11CAGO TITC 1h:~""'C! COr.A:"M'V
'"1OI.l..v.O .. "''''I:;-1T LP
~..JJ. ll:5~J~I::Jl',~ ~... I::J7 _ S:J:::X: 5G:. ~
Mile .!..:)fWEJ,~ _ 50
1I.'J.l ~.:iT. _ 30
MIto' c-r S~~ -.c..:{(,II..:; _ ~ ~ U1<IIT
T;1:: 15 7::- C~TI1'V ir..-'T 1:1': M."- ~ ~_~i .-"'j j"1:' SiJR\If'" ~
Wt'II:::r ;j ~5 DASS) ~~ MAD!:; (I: ~ ~~C! lVii':1 -ulMMJ"'"
ST."'-I~ii'~ :?~AI:' J:.f:JJliL=M-90.:~S a- ~:Ai~ :A~~ ir:'"~
5.J~\~.. J':)fIl.."':"L'" 5-~~5:1~::: "'''i:: ~ :vA:......A.I:.J>l:: ~
J~ !eez. ~J IkC!..:J:J:S !T:'W.s !....c. A"':;;;"I! c..=:.s
Jf\:J"~OJflrl~ oJ 7r~-If5: O~ 7.~~ " T:-e:;e:J.&'. AI,;; (II) ;oo~.i.,,^-:-
TC T1! ~C,Jiit.:...cY 57"~:;'A~ i.~ .~..o~'" .....-:... .,,~':) .4C5f1/
.1\."'::: ;k =~.:CT Qt... ":"':"1! :>.'7= 0:: 7:"l~= C~71~1=.t,,71::>'\; ry= M ;P..5~
5~\'
5~~t"~ ~lT _ 25
3:1~-5
~~-5
~"l C -. ::r.' C":",:~"". ":'~{ z:r~....:; z.-
c~v =' MG:::~.. ;).1;,7::
#~:>c~51(>,,;'l SJR.\-~.. MA.~~
fLO~:;)~ ~:;~5-:'il.c..'j'10\ .tU;o;2
\.0":' \-.Io;J:; W.7no...",:, 7"'1: .s.:;'h,z.,,"':"u~ ,.".,-:>7:-;: ::RJ~I"'~ ~~5=:;
5::~ ::>= " ~ _0RI:;.c., ,,'C::I\:s:.:; 5-=~V~ ~..::: M~=7=~
PAGE 1 OF 3
;;; ~
0 .
.. :...
..
:z
D .
. .
e ;;
. 0 ;;
... ... '"
.
..
.
'!
1=
:r
... :IE ...
;;; 0 <
0 x "
'"
(J
~'~
:z . c:
. ~ "'"
: .
< f
SUOJSJM!f "' ~
'" (J '"
~I
~ ~~
crli~~
ill ~~
~~
m!l
'"
6
~
..
6
13
w
~
It
~
(
)1
ti ... 0
r::: ~
0 en
...... t.J lO
" CD
:! ,
c.!J 1Il 0/)
0/)
Z 0 z '"
0:: 0
...... ~~ '" ;::;-
:>-0 0
~ WtO ~ e
a:
> --'" ...
6'" 1Il
~ Z X
:::> lD 0 <(
'" 0 t.-
en w< I
"" --'
Q <(t.- O
--' I
Z ...'" J1. N
j ",< < "
w:::;; '" '"
'" ", <.> -
DO 0 I
Q. "
f-t ....-' ~
0 0/)
en - t:l
~ :;:: I ~
0 ~ ~.,
a: e
u <<
Z 0
z .;.:
~ ::>
c Cl
en '"
/r- D~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ._...
-
-
i UII'llliE"JI"~llI""'-""llllll'lllI ,
l~f'IIIJllIlllllIIl!!m"'lcl":fllllll~f' il~.; '.,
1ft IIhldi I 1,11111 II Idi!llil!ll ~ III
VoI'Hll Ie) 11111111111 I
d II ~ll!J~
'1 1 ~ IIi JI ;/i
I~JII~UI"IUll\'Sl"'.I_"~~"""".lI'" .
Illilfl'WUlII!!fl:IW!lII'I" filII If lUll
,I " 1IIlW ,Mllllu 'I
III
I I
,lID.'
.I .~r;1OJ1D S
"-
"\
,~. '
t?~\ J
.....\
~
'..,
~ rJl
:I! l"':l
I 'f (j
I- ~
: ~ 0
I z
t-
.....:!
I 'i:l>-3
c ~o
~ c ~~
r
I~ 11
I (j~
, -l
I 0 01\:)
, C::CO
III ZrJl
r > ~o
-<
, . c::
, ~i:2
I m
r
< 0
\ p ~
, >~
,
I f/l
;u Cj)
l"':l
m
0 t-
O)
l"':l
~
1-3
I.
I;
.
.J<Ji'~' -~ . ~"".,
::. . ., """'u-.....9W...;Io-;I~~
;. t' .!.:...~~::,~l. . ~~...
:. ....~~~~~~~~. ',;
, . ,...,. . I"
,. .~.~" ...
'"
..rn
ill
~
.',tJt/:lli,o,11r
:.,It':/.:';,o ""
l;
a
l'~
l;)
. ;
. ~
Ul
I n
~
"--.7
LB 4513
SUN COAST LAND SURVEYING
111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD '
OLDSMAR, "LA, 34677
BOUNDARY - Topoe
p RAPHIC - CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT
H: (813) 054-1342 FAX; (813) 855-6890
,
~t
a
~-
Inc,
BOUNDARY SURVEY
of
SA YVIEW QAflOENB
LR'
TBS .ClFIOUl'. INC.
1
r.l,I. 242 243 2"~ 2"'L
DAn: Of FJELD SURVEY
DATtI
[lti
DRAWINGI ~81\bo
Ch..kld QC KOM
Ora,," .lEP
U'.""'l,n
fj
ProJlo! No,
Soal.
Doll
5081
1'. so'
11/ /05
. .. .....~_._..w_... _.....
-
m
'"
o
11
t.J
j
~
L8 4513
....... ...........-.
'--~-..,,--
-
-
..
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
II~aII11Iel.'J..'.,II.........e.1l1ll111111 ','," ~
I f mIIIJII,!!ml'if"II:flfl/ll~11/1 : ~
" I~ J 1'1 II ",1'" 1 'ii ;iff,'I'!:! r
~f J II tli~ i'~ :
mmUlI'mlwU." l_ht ~."~""9.J'
Il1ii','WIIUmrl:JH'!f1l '111f"P If I "(1
11,1 I' I IIIU "1..,,,11 I
U ,II, I ,
I I
-
o
("
o
...
"
z
0
::: -l
"';0.1
::t~ Z
. ~1iI'" 0
I
~, ~{l r
iii... c
)>, ,.. 0
-/'
0/ m
0
:r::
.-II
l'
~
'\l
l'
III
l'
.J..
"
"
..
/......."""'.II1t.a.....
.....- ..........
~....._-
SOO'J?'oJ'~'
sOO'J?'o.1 ,.
96?ciJJY,}
967Jyn)
.
I
J;
a
1*
lj)
. ~
>> ~
IS
SUN COAST LAND SURVEYING
111 FOREST LAKEs BOULEVARD ·
OLDSMAR, FLA. J4677
BOUNDARY - TOPOGRAPHIC C -
- ONSTRUCTlON STAKEOUT
PH: (61J) 654-1J42 FAX: (61J) 655-6690
Inc.
~-
[it i -!j
I u...tl_n.n
DRAWING, 1l0gllb. Pro)..! No.
Ch.ok.d QC SOg1
KOt.! 5001.
1".50'
Drawn JEp Dol.
111 IDS
. BOUNDARY SURVEY
01
SA YVIew GARDENS
[ '00 ... -.~..,
]
r.8. 242243.245 2a...
DA'It or FlELD SURVEy
DAm .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT "D"
PARKING SUFFICIENCY STUDY
For
BELLA TERRA
ON THE BAY
A SANTAFE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY
2855 GULF - TO-BAY BOULEVARD
Situated in the
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
April 21, 2008
Revised July 2, 2008
Revised August 12,2008
/~
Marc A. Mariano, A.I.C.P., P.P.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bella Terra on the Bay
Parking Sufficiency Study
April 21, 2008 - Revised August 12, 2008
Page 2 of 13
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 3
I.A. Existing Conditions....................................................................................................... 3
I.B. Proposed Development.............................. ................................................................... 4
II. PARKING ASSESSMENT ..............................................................................................6
II.A. City of Clearwater Parking Ratio Requirements .................................................. 6
II.B. Existing Parking Conditions .......................................... .................,' ............................ 7
II.C. Proposed Parking Conditions.................................................................................. 8
II.D. Proposed Parking Generation Rates ....................................................................... 9
II.E. Conclusion................................................................................................................... 11
APPENDIX 1 DECLARATION OF NON-EXCLUSIVE
CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT ....................................... ......... ................................. ............ 12
APPENDIX 2 EXISTING PARKING SURVEY AT THE VILLAGE ............................. 13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bella Terra on the Bay
Parking Sufficiency Study
April 21, 2008 - Revised August 12,2008
Page 3 of 13
I. INTRODUCTION
The Applicant is proposing to redevelop property located on the south side of Gulf to Bay
Boulevard (S.R. 60) approximately 3,000 feet east of U.S. Highway 19 North at the southwest
comer of Gulf to Bay and Cross Boulevard. The property is located in Section 17, Township 29
South, Range 16 East and consists of approximately 31.12 acres. The subject site is located
within the City of Clearwater, an incorporated municipality within Pinellas County, with
frontage on Gulf to Bay Boulevard, Cross Boulevard and Sky Harbor Drive. The surrounding
properties consist of a single-family residential use to the east, a variety of non-residential uses
including, retail, office and restaurant to the north, a mobile home park, a nursing home
(HarbourWood Health and Rehab Center) and a fire station to the west, with Clearwater Mall
located farther to the west. The site also contains frontage along the Tampa Bay to the south.
I.A. Existing Conditions
Currently, the subject site is developed with an 8-story building containing a 94-bed Assisted
Living Facility (ALF) located at the northeast comer of the site (2.45 acres) and 55 one-story
garden residences containing 229 one- and two-bedroom Independent Living units for senior
housing (defined as attached dwellings by the City Code) with ancillary maintenance and
community buildings spread throughout the bulk of the property to the south (28.67 acres). As
mentioned above, the entire site consists of 31.12 acres and contains a total of 323 living units
(229 Independent Living Units and 94 Assisted Living Beds) devoted to a senior population.
The following provides an overview of existing conditions.
Existina Conditions Total
Assisted Living Beds 94
Independent Living Units 229
Existing Total 323
The site is accessed via two (2), two-way driveways with one (1) located at the northeast comer
of the site (Cross Boulevard) that provides access to Gulf to Bay Boulevard and a second
driveway at the northwest comer of the site that provides access to Sky Harbor Drive. The bulk
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bella Terra on the Bay
Parking Sufficiency Study
April 21, 2008 - Revised August 12,2008
Page 4 of 13
of the property IS accessed Via a private, circular driveway that runs generally along the
perimeter of the site and stems from Cross Boulevard. A second driveway, Loving Lane,
bifurcates the property providing access to units located within the interior of the site. The
subject site currently contains a total of 307 parking spaces throughout the campus that serve the
total 323 senior living units. The aerial map below provides a graphic representation of the
existing site conditions.
The subject site shares its driveway access from Sky Harbor Drive with the adjacent
HarbourWood Health and Rehab Center through a Non-Exclusive Cross Access Easement and
Maintenance Agreement (See Appendix 1 for a copy of this easement). As a result of the
proposed redevelopment the terms of this access easement will not be altered.
LB. Proposed Conditions
The proposed infill redevelopment project includes one (1) new primary building approximately
82 feet in height and 368,000 square feet in total floor area that will be centrally located on the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bella Terra on the Bay
Parking Sufficiency Study
April 21, 2008 - Revised August 12,2008
Page 5 of 13
site and contain 40 nursing home beds, 76 assisted living beds, 64 one-bedroom and 74 two-
bedroom independent living units (138 attached senior housing units), full dining and kitchen
facilities, a day spa, work out center and community rooms. Additionally nine (9) new duplex
cottages (totaling 45,735 square feet) will offer 18, two-bedroom independent living units, or
attached senior housing units, outside of the primary building and located along the southerly
and easterly portions of the site. The new building and site improvements are intended to be
located on approximately 60% of the site and will allow 16 of the existing garden residences,
containing 73 one- and two-bedroom independent living units, as well as the 8-story 94 bed
assisted living facility to remain. The following table provides an overview of proposed units
and units to remain.
Proposed Development Total
Assisted Living Beds (existing beds to remain) 94
Independent Living Units - 1 and 2 Bedrooms 73
(existing units to remain)
Assisted Living Beds (new beds) 76
Nursing Home Beds (new beds) 40
Independent Living - 1 and 2 Bedrooms (new 156
units)
Proposed Total 439
The proposed development includes a total of 426 parking spaces to support all of the end-users
of the site, existing to remain and new units. As part of the proposed redevelopment project,
access into and out the site and primary driveways through the site will not be altered. However,
a manned gate house is proposed in the vicinity of the Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard entrance and a
mechanical gate is proposed in the vicinity of the Sky Harbor Drive entrance and near the
southerly intersection of Loving Lane and Cross Boulevard.
I'
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
Bella Terra on the Bay
Parking Sufficiency Study
April 21, 2008 - Revised August 12,2008
Page 6 of 13
II. PARKING ASSESSMENT
II.A. City of Clearwater Parking Ratio Requirements
Parking ratios established by Article 2 of the City Land Development Code require one (1)
parking space per every two (2) assisted living or nursing home beds and two (2) parking spaces
per every one (1) attached dwelling (independent living/attached senior housing) unit.
Alternatively, in Section 2-404 of the MHDR Zone, the Code requires as part of a Residential
Infill Project two (2) parking spaces per every one (1) dwelling unit. The City of Clearwater's
parking standards do not provide a specific parking ratio for attached senior housing, such as
independent living or senior apartment units, and considers an attached senior housing unit in the
same manner as the typical multi-family attached housing unit. As such, City of Clearwater code
requires a total of 505 parking spaces to be provided for the existing conditions and 583 for the
proposed conditions, as identified in the table below.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Code
Required
Spaces for
Required Existing Existing
Development Type Ratio Conditions Conditions
Assisted Living Beds in 1 per 2
the Commercial Zone beds 94 47
Independent Living
Units/Attached Dwellings 2 per unit 229 458
Total 505
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
Code Required
Required Spaces for Proposed
Development Type Ratio Proposed Conditions Development
Assisted Living Beds in 1 per 2
the Commercial Zone beds 94 Beds 47
268 Units (229 Independent
Dwelling Units in the MDR Living Units, 40 Skilled Nursing
under the Residentiallnfill Beds & 76 ALF Beds equaling
. Project 2 per unit or 39 Dwelling Units) 536
Total 583
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bella Terra on the Bay
Parking Sufficiency Study
April 21, 2008 - Revised August 12, 2008
Page 7 of 13
II.B. Existing Parking Conditions
The site currently contains 307 parking spaces to accommodate the 94 assisted living beds and
229 independent living units, as indicated below. The distribution of parking spaces currently at
the site is such that 46 parking spaces are located in the immediate vicinity of the existing 8-story
assisted living facility and the remaining 261 parking spaces are strategically placed throughout
the site in close proximity to each existing garden residences, thereby minimizing the walking
distance for the independent living residents. See the aerial below for a partial view of the site
providing an exanlple of how parking is currently distributed for the garden residences. To date,
property management has not received any complaints from residents or visitors regarding the
number or location of parking spaces.
Existing Existing
Conditions Total Spaces Existing Ratio
Assisted Living 94 46 0.49 per unit
Beds
Independent 229 261 0.87 per unit
Livinq Units
Total 323 307
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bella Terra on the Bay
Parking Sufficiency Study
April 21, 2008 - Revised August 12,2008
Page 8 of 13
II.C. Proposed Parking Conditions
As part of the proposed redevelopment project, a total of 426 parking spaces will be located
throughout the site to serve the new residents and the residents that will remain in the existing
garden residences, as well as the 8-story assisted living facility. The majority of the new spaces
will be located within close proximity to each of the main entrances of the primary building,
while the proposed nine (9) duplex cottages will each contain a garage space for a car and a
garage space for a golf cart, as well as one (1) driveway space for each unit. Additional on-street
parking is also available in the cottage areas to supplement visitor parking. In total, 296 of the
tota1426 parking spaces will be construed to provide parking for the 272 new senior living units
(40 Nursing Home beds + 76 ALF beds + 156 Independent Living Units), while the remaining
130 parking spaces will be devoted to providing parking for the 167 senior living units (94 ALF
beds + 73 Independent Living Units) that are to remain. The following table provides an
analysis of the proposed parking and unit counts and the corresponding map below provides a
graphic representation of the proposed parking situation.
Proposed Proposed
Proposed Units Total Spaces Ratio
Assisted Living Units to Remain (shown in 94 46 0.49
blue)
Independent Living Units to Remain 73 84 1.15
(shown in yellow)
New Nursing Home and Assisted Living 116 58 0.50
Beds (shown in red)
New Independent Living Units (show in 156 238 1.52
red)
Total 439 426 0.97
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bella Terra on the Bay
Parking Sufficiency Study
April 21, 2008 - Revised August 12,2008
Page 9 of 13
C
COMlllrnCIAL
GENERAL
!oI>R
RESIDENTIAl...
IllEDIUM
MHP
RESIDENTIAL
Io4EDlUt.A
II.D. Proposed Parking Generation Rates
It is critical that a project of this stature and nature has a sufficient number of parking spaces to
operate effectively for its residents, visitors and employees. However, due to the numerous
mature trees and natural beauty of the site, it is also critical to ensure that the site does not
include an unwarranted number of parking spaces, which would mmecessarily add additional
impervious surface and could cause the mmecessary removal of trees. To ensure that an
appropriate number of parking spaces exist on the site, two (2) methods were used to calculate
the actual parking need of the proposed redevelopment project.
The Applicant, SantaFe HealthCare, owns and operates other senior living communities and
conducted an existing parking survey for a community in Gainesville, Florida. The study titled,
Existing Parking Survey at the Village, was conducted in March of 2006 and evaluated for one
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bella Terra on the Bay
Parking Sufficiency Study
April 21, 2008 - Revised August 12,2008
Page 10 of 13
(1) week the number of vehicles that actually parked at the site during various times of the day.
The community is developed in a nearly identical manner to that of the proposed subject site, in
that a mix of senior living units, including independent living units and assisted living and
nursing home beds, exist and similar on-site community services are also provide. Both the
subject site and The Village community include as part of their assisted living facility, memory
care and skilled nursing resources; however, The Village community also includes a marketing
division on-campus while the proposed Bella Terra project will have its marketing division at an
off-site location. The study concludes that the highest parking demand occurred on a Thursday
evening and identified a maximum required parking ratio of 0.86 parking spaces per unit or 0.62
parking spaces per bed (see sheet TV-3 and TV- 4 of the study). Utilizing this studied parking
ratio, the proposed redevelopment project would require 378 parking spaces to accommodate the
proposed number of new units and the proposed units to remain. The study is included as
Appendix 2 of this report.
A second analysis utilized the Institute of Traffic Engineer's, Parking Generation, 3rd Edition to
calculate the required number of parking spaces for the Attached Senior Housing and Assisted
Care Living categories. The ITE manual identified a parking need for Assisted Care Living
(Land Use Code 252) units consistent with the City of Clearwater code of 0.5 spaces per bed and
a ratio of 1.2 spaces per unit for the Senior Adult Housing Attached category (Land Use Code
254), contrary to the two (2) parking spaces per unit required by the City code. Utilizing this
method of study, the proposed redevelopment project would require a total of 381 parking spaces
to accommodate the proposed new units and the existing units to remain. The following table
provides a side-by-side comparison of the real world parking ratios determined by the parking
study conducted for The Village community and those included in the ITE manual with that
which is proposed as part of the redevelopment project and required by the City of Clearwater.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bella Terra on the Bay
Parking Sufficiency Study
April 21, 2008 - Revised August 12,2008
Page 11 of 13
The Spaces
Village Required Spaces Spaces
Proposed Study Per The Required City of Per City of
Use Proposed Peak Village ITE Per ITE Clearwater Clearwater
Proposed Units Total Ratio Spaces Ratio Studv Ratio Ratio Ratio Code
Assisted Living - ITE
LUC 254 94 0.49 46 0.86 80 0.5 47 0.5 47
Senior Adult Housing
Attached - ITE LUC
252 73 1.15 84 0.86 63 1.2 88 2.0 146
Assisted Care Living -
ITE LUC 254 116 0.50 58 0.86 100 0.5 58 2.0 78
Senior Adult Housing
Attached - ITE LUC
252 156 1.51 238 0.86 135 1.2 188 2.0 312
TOTAL 439 426 378 381 583
II.E. Conclusion
As certified by the above analysis, it can be concluded that the peak hour parking demand for the
proposed proj ect will generate a maximum need of 381 parking spaces. As such, the deviation to
allow 157 fewer parking spaces (583 required spaces - 426 proposed spaces = 157 spaces) than
is required by Code is clearly justified as:
1. It will not have any deleterious impact on any surrounding property owners or on the
operational efficiency of the site as it will allow the uses to function properly even under
abnormally high fluctuations in parking demand.
2. It ensures sufficient parking is available to accommodate the needs of the residents,
visitors or employees without parking in designated drive isles, fire lanes or underutilized
parking locations.
3. It promotes sustainable development through an environmentally sensitive site design
that minimizes the amount of unnecessary impervious surface and natural resource
disruption at the site, which promotes natural groundwater recharge, a reduced heat island
effect and the preservation a vital native plant species.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bella Terra on the Bay
Parking Sufficiency Study
Apri121, 2008 - Revised August 12,2008
Page 12 of 13
APPENDIX 1
DECLARATION OF NON-EXCLUSIVE
CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT
II
II
II
I
j
I
i
i
i
~
I
-
I
1
1
I
~
I,
I
J
I
I
!
I
i
-
;
~
I
-
l..
nJ bD
~1~'
.
(j)
.
Kf2.EEN F. DE BLAKER. llf.RK Of COURT
P11fllJlS COIlflY, fUJRIDA
Prepared by and Return to:
EMIL c. MARQUARDT, .:rR., ESQ.
Macfarlane Ferguson & MCMullen
625 Court street, Su.ite 200
Post Office Box 1669
C1earwater, FL 33757-1669
/>:::_~"_"h__"..;i
:.... {..:. f:
{...... .~.~....
......... ....---:::....,.. ...:......,:
- "..", ~
(. (~."\ 'J ....1 ~lNitl~~2coOC1K ltl!!s'b~l p5 \1:,~ -
_.. .. . .. >,....-.;<.....~::,./-. , . IlIDIUWllIUllIUDllIUlmUll1DI
". ,..; i~')'"
... - -DECLARATJ:ON OF N9N~.EXFLVSJ:VE ~EME~S
"~ AND ~INTE~CE l~GPF.F.MR'WJ1
-'".
-~ ',:,
, ,
~... \.
t.. .~
....:....J....~:. :-.
.." .....
"
J
5C16Wl 16-01-2001 17:18:02
51 AG!HllJRIOH PUlHT
25e64?
11:01342432 BK:ll602 SP6:1568 EPG:1583
RIDlRDING 016 Pm 1 rn.50
TtlTtL: . $'13.50
DID< 00. IDIDERED: $'73.50
CfWIJE: $.00
BY DEPUTY llfRK
JTF
~g~~.
REC~
DR219 .
DS
INT-
FEa$
MTF
PlC "-
REV
........ :t..,.... ~
THIS DECLARATION OF ,NON-EXCLUSIVE' EASEMENTS AND ~VTENANCE
~~:)T^l E ~liT _ (the "Agreement") ':. lrEa,de ':and entered into this \ day of
:,CK~,'l,l~ ~OIJU'Lo, 2001, by MO~~ON-'J?~ MEASE LJ:~ SERVICES, INC.J a F1or.ida.
.,'-{G A.,.f,T _..:..co:r:porati.on, hereinafter ,~:r'E!'.i-e~~e,d ~ a ~ ~ "Life Services", and whose
mailing address is: \ \ \'l~ .~.~\<~ \,\0- LA~, v= L "'"a.~"I\"
(- ......,.>~ S
,",..>,W 'I:~'l' N E SSE T H:
.t'- It" l;:........ ./
WHEREAS, Life! sa.rv.i~s is the owner of.. all of the properties
attached "LU composit'e ~i1bit "Au, si tuate in Pinellas County r Florida;
and ./ "'<~.....,.,../'
.:;".... ,....
WHEREAS, tii'e>Sei;vices desires to create and dedicate certain
. .."........
easements as t6 (~he s~id Properties, so that at a future. date Life
Services may i-3a.ll,(. transfer or convey a portion of its properties,
described onA::b.?~::a:tt~ched Exhibit "A-1ft to a third party or entity, and
such that uPob/ .con~eyance of the A-I parcel, easements for ingress,
egress, and'-,.,ut',i,lities would exist over and across the remaining
Propertie~ ....6f ;.r.~f:~ Services; and
j' .,......."".;. .....~. ....;
WH~~i) I}ife Services also seeks to create and dedicate easements
over tJ;n~.,~-l"p~rcel for the benefit and use of the remaining Properties
to be 'G.wrie:~ ,.by Life Services, described on attached Exhibit "A-2", for
ingr~.g'-;:~"esfr.~sB, and utilities would exist over ~d across the remaining
Pro~.rti,eJ:l.....9f Life Services; and .
./J.........,.....'- ..";,.....
<'.., 'NdW".:'THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($lO.OQ) and other
~d-'-'-.ai\~C valuable considerations, the receipt of which is hereby
a..c;knQ~ladged, agreed, and the parties hereto, each to the other, do
he~e.x-,;grant and covenant unto the others as follows:
1. RECITALS. .The recitals set forth above are true and correct
and are incorporated herein by reference.
~
I
.
~
i
i
.
e
e
2. GRANT OF NON-EXCLUSIVE MUTUAL EAS~&:~ FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND
UTILITIES. i""'\"\'
A. rnaress and Eo-ress Non-Exclusi ve:...Mutija}, Easements.
..l''''''' ..~.:.. ....:.~..J,:.
(1) Life Services does here.:bY....:,d$dicate, create, grant and
convey non-exclusive easements and~~ig4ts of use on, over and upon
the Properties owned by Life Se.rvi.~,~. ..qesqribed herein, for purposes
of ingress, egress and passage by/vehh.~'le:j and pedestrians, over and
across the easements described h'ere'ln, \and any future extensions or
modifications thereof, [herein \ i-{;!_te~red to as the "Access
Easements"], as follows: ""'.,,..;......... ,./
/' ,. .f' .:~'t:....,.""
(a) An Access EasemJpt:~ i1s )hereby established, dedicated,
created and granted as'~fore~aid, as the same is described in
Exhibit "A-3"t over and aaross the Properties described in A-
2, for the use and benefit of the Properties described in A-l.
;
I
I
;
I
!
i
I
~
I
r..,.... .l',.
(b) An Access lla.se:rw:~,ht> is hereby established, dedicated,
created and gra~ted'ai ~toresaid, as the same is described in
Exhibi t "A-4 ", /ove':J:..a.pcf across the Properties described in A-
1, for the use 'a,nd"pen,efit of the properties describe.d in A-2.
.'- -:.:. ~ /.....:
(2) Except ~~""Qiqe~wise expressly provided herein, each party
shall have th~.,._'!l.,ole' './ res onsibility for installin roadway
improvements op/ i~s ,,~ oarce..!, and s a 1 maintain the same in a
good state of .t?=p,p,it, \with landscaping well.maintained and roadways
and parking a:t:e'as"w..i'thln the said easet-nent areas, if any, kept clean
and free of.-:' 'd~?J:J.~"~' . The parties fiereto, their successors and
assigns, slia);'J.., keep their re.spect~ve easement areas free from
structures/ ,an4 ':...a:ll debris and other obstructions that might
unreasonaply/ /interfere with the normal operations, use or
mainten~ce. of such easement areas for the purposes herein
describ~d{;~and':'no party may construct or. erect curbs, fences or
landsc4pirig/ 50/ as to interfere with the free flow and passage of
vehicufa.r ~d pedestrian traffic over and between the various
par~ls" qe.t=ein described.
.t ...... ,
.i :" ......'.:, .~-;,....;
~ \.(3) No Construction Vehicles And Construction Traffic Serving
Tl'1'e,'~-z-''pioperty May Utilize The Easement Area Described in Exhibit
'''''-4' ."I:t.. ,...,/
.' ~ ....;.........
i......;~......::~ _
. <..B.'~...~..VHlities.
.!i'~......~ ''',. :.....
-'-'. ':_"~' -....J (1) Life Services does further create, dedicate and grant
/;...~, ......:pon-exclusive easements for the installation, maintenance, repair
.\... .'.....an.& replacement of utilities, below grade, within the Access
....... ~s:sement areas described above,. and in addition, the lands described
''''on Exhibits "A-I" and "A-2" shall be subject to blanket easements,
which are hereby created and established, each for the other
[COllectively referred to herein as the "Utility EasementsH], for
such Utility Easements, subject to the following limitations:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2
I
o
...,
"'TJ'lJ
;uz
I'lPl
-or
.r
ID:D
XU)
::-
0.- "
I-
-0
-0
me
02:
IU-f ,
-<
,.
Cl"""i
r
-:n
Uf.
0)
.(0
;(
I
I
e
e
I
The installatio~, use, opera~1~n or maintenance thereof __.
will not unreasonably inter!~re with the servient
estates operation or use, ~<~r~~ent its reasonable use
or development either currentJ.Y .~ in the future.
,."Jo'........ :"":.,...;i
The actual installatioif......oi~new utilities or utility
facilities shall eithei "'15e'" in conjunction with, or
located in the same ~~d!ab~ area as, other utilities
within the servient .esta't-e',.. /br alternatively the same
shall be within ten /(l'cp,) 'feet .of an exterior boundary
line of the servie~t"...~,~tJte, or within the roadway
easements descrlb~,cl""~s.-. Papcels A-3 and A-4.
.,/ to.f i"~~'';'''.
(2) No installation,tm~lriie~ance, repair or ~eplacement of
such utilities or utility or'~ppurf;~nances there-to shall materially
interfere with the use and operat.d.bn of the servient estate wherein
they are located, and said rights are conditioned upon the party
utilizing said easeni.ent,'il;nmecU~tely repairing and restoring any and
all damages which may b~'_;.cSu~ilcfi to the said servient estate incident
to the installation, ...!'laJ:ntena:nce, repair and replacement thereof,
TIME BEING OF THE ESSEt>i'rn::'...../
:~\ '~:~:"'" ". .,;:'
c. Non-Exclusiv}tv~f.t~sements. The easements granted herein
are non-exclusive in na~ur~"~~, except as otherwise expressly provided
herein, shall not pre~~qe 'ipricurrent use by others to this Agreement,
their successors a~~:f,~s~:~~, and their guests and invitees. All
easements and right~ ~st~tished in this Agreement shall extend to the
customers, employe~~~. ~'qehtk, guests and business invitees of the parties
hereto, and each,/ of:..,...t4~iD., provided, nevertheless, that the rights
hereunder are no~~~teh~ed nor shall be construed as creating any rights
in or for the b~h~"~i,.'~'....o~ the public generally.
..:" ~ ,/ :.' '...J
(a)
I
I
(b)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/" ......, ~...,
3. cofi~~Ii~~T~ON AND MAINTENANCE.
~,l .-:"./'.f ..../
A. pe~foimance Standards Relative to Easements and Easement
Areas. ;.Tlie<~.,cQnstruction, installation and maintenance of all
improvem~n~s'-.;,.an,"'6r under any easement areas herein described shall be
performeq .1,n ~a<$cordance with all applicable statutes, ordinances and
regula1f:!...otl:s>'aqd, if applicable, in accordance with plans approved by the
municiPa.l"'-"'~??r... "'fegula tory bodies, and all other requisi te governmental
agenci~~nd.authorities.
'{" -..:.:....""..:.../~
,.-,"'__8... ,.,..... Future Develooment. Anything herein to the contrary
no~it'hstanding, it is understood that the fee simple title owner of any
. .......
a.f-..., th.,~ ;properties described in the attached exhibi ts, or any part
t~er~9~~; shall have the right to develop, or redevelop its properties,
coh~istent with existing or future zoning or Land Use Plan Designation
for the properties, and to utilize the easements afforded that parcel
hereunder, incident to such development or redevelopment, and shall
further have the right to relocate or modify any easements crossing the
parcel being developed or redeveloped, so long as the modification or
I
I
I
I
I
I
3
I
o
"'l
. "'1"1)
~z
riM
.or
-r
m:n
~ID
f-.- :
!
_0
'_0
mc
DZ
IU-I
-<
"1J
. Q"'J'f
r
-:>>
. 01.
.....
o
r -"-
j-
I/i
,
I
I
I
I
;
I
;
!
i
I
!
.
I
-
-
.
I
-
~
~
I
i
,
.
.
i
I
.
e
relocation of any easements or easement area?'~~s at the sole cost and
expense of the title holder of that parcel whete2~he easement is located,
there is no unreasonable interruption or in~~t~~ence with utilization,
size or purpose of the easement or 5ervic.~~.,. t:o ":t,he benefitted parcel
. -..... )' .
during reconstruction or relocation and t~~ra~fte~j and further prov~ded
that any and all such modificatio;r:1:,/.. ltelocation, construction,
redevelopment or other events affect.i.?:'1g..}t;.-he. easement a,,rea are in
accordance with applicable codes and reg~latipns pertaining thereto.
J'~"" ....~.<......... 'j .
.: ..... '. .'
C. .Notice to Owners of permi~ Ab~l!citions. The constr~ction,
installation or replacement of any rQaas,) ~alkways, utilities or other
improvements on, above or under eit.pe:~:'\~e'i,!-fent estate, wher~ municipal,
governmental or regulatory approv~1,~s/~e~ired, shall requ~re that the
party seeking the permit, ~ovid~ ~rH:t~n notice of the application to
the owner(s) of the serv~ent ~tad~ land copies of all plans and
specifications generated for such app~xcation.
4.
MISCELLANEOOS.
PlNELLRS COUNTY rLA
Orr,REC,BK 11802 PG 1~71
."...... ....
,,: ....~.. ;l "'l
A. The provisions of'~hi5'A~reement are not intended to create,
nor shall they in any way.::b'E~f,"-iiJ:t.-"1::tpreted to create, a joint venture, a
partnership or any other s~i~p.r")elationship between the parties hereto.
,.... ;, ~ tt'.......
B. The owners o~' paJ,:'q.et~B A-I and A-2, their respective succeS::lors
and assigns, shall ea9b.~'~epaI:.ately maintain public liability insurance
for personal injury and'p.t~H~rty damage in such reasonable amounts and
in such form as may be;:' rEfa's.6'!lably acceptable fr'C>m time to time with the
other benefitted p'+Qp~~t~fuvmer named as an additional named insured.
Proof of the mainte~~pe,pf such insurance shall be provided annually.
The owners of tl)Q:~''l?a:t-c.eis described in Exhibits "A-I" and "A-2n, for
themselves and ~h~~~~~e~pective heirs, successors and assigns, do hereby
agree to defel)a.//irid~ify and hold harmless .one another, and their
respective o~'~rcer~, directors, shareholders, partners, agents and
employees" frtnp:'.anQ. ~gainst, and promptly reimburse them for, any and all
loesea, exPe~~;"'/ damages, deficiencies, liabilities, payments,
penalties, !~tig~tion, demands, defenses, judgments, proceedings, costs
(including"'eh~ne~ring costsr costs of remediation and related capital
expendit~r~~ Qbligations, settlement costs and attorneys, accountants
and other, p~o~e~sional advisor fees, including costs of investigation and
prepar?t.i"On)"" ,.of any kind whatsoever, without limit, directly or
indire~~t~~ba~ed upon or arising out oft resulting from, relating to or'
in cq-nneatio.p,. with any personal injury or property damage suffered by the
Indeinni~Q.1:"(./ their successors and assigns, officers, directors,
sh??~i~rs, partners, agents, employees or invitees arising out of the
~.~e-.,?y',,,<aItj such indemnified persons of the cross-easement area.
... ">,.:~ ~ ,
i...... -'..,):;.i In the event any party hereto brings or commences legal
piop'ee~ngs to enforce any of the terms of this Agreem.entr and a judgment.
or award shall detez:mine the successful party in such action, such
successful party shall be entitled to receive from the other party or
parties in such action a reasonable sum as attorneys' fees and court
costs.
4
I
I
~
~
-
I
~
~
I
I
.
I
i
.
I
I
i
.
j
.
;
i
-
1
;
I
.
i
.
e
e
D. The provisions of this Agreement ..--s,*all be deemed covenants
running with the land and shall inure to t~ ~enefit of the parties,
their respective heirs, successors and ass~.gns.. \.,
, "
..... ......-:.:.. j
E. This Agreement and the easem,~fie:s_, ~!.{jhts, obligations and
liabilities created hereby shall continu~ tQ the extent permitted by law
for a period of thirty (30) years from ~e~'dite herein unless otherwise
modified or cancelled by the parties h~re~Q, ~in writing, and shall after
such date be automatically and contiifu9.l,lsl-r',."r.'enewed for periods of ten
(10) years thereafter until the terminatlpn10f this Agreement evidenced
in writing by the owners of said parG.,els...? ;
'i#........ .!.\........ ....~l
F. Every covenant, promi~e,;~~rtaking, condition, easement or
right made, granted or assumed :l:>Y\ a'~y~ party ,~o this Agreement shall
constitute an equitable servitude:\,l?Ii'..t~e parcel owned by such party and
an appurtenance to and for the benefit of the other parcel [as used
herein, the "servient estate"]. Any transferee of any parcel shall
automatically be deemed to have a~sumed all obligations hereunder.
i.._. "'~.... / /
G. If any provisio1a.. ot. thil Agreement or portion thereof, o"r the
application thereof to a~y p~~a9n' or circumstance, shall to any extent
be held 1nvalid, inopera~i~ o~ unenforceable, the remainder of this
Agreement, or the appli~t:{t?n r{l'such provision or portion thereof to any
person or circumstance~,sh~llhot be affected thereby.
..M-....~~...\.:.. .. ...~.::.:../
H. This Agre..e~s=:lt;.':;~~ill be construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of Floiiqa.{ 1:.
0'" ::.:.. ....:....-:.! .1"
IN WITNESS ~~r~./ the parties. hereto have set their hands and
seals the day a~d~y.~ar'\~~rst above wr~tten.
: ,". .
/;" /:_/ ~~~\ ..;........./1
~... . I
'-"', t,
./ ./!:~:"'~. ::-
~ndi ,6f:"'!
.... J
MORTON PLANT f>4.EASE: LI FE
SERVICES, INC., a Florida
corporation
iiJ,BY: ~~L)
?~(ck.r
/....., "0,. '''i'':~:'''''l'''!
" <. "'<~;" .,)
$TA..Tg.,., at? FLORIDA
bqum.,i' ,OE' PINELLAS
...............-._.:"1
I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before me,
an officer~~uly auth. o~zed to administq oaths and take acknow-
ledgments, ~p tU ~<!.t(!...7"'-as .!!:.t!!.S l'he-Pi ofMaRTa~
PLANT MEASE LIFE SERVICES, INC., a Florida corporation, to me personally
5
o
....
....-u
-=.. ....
.uz
riM
,or
.r
m::o
~(I)
!,--
J"-
-0
-0
mc
,oz
N-i
-<
-u
CJ....
r
_:D
m.
'""
,00
I
I
~
-
I
I
I
i
I
-
1
I
1
-
I
.
-
i
-
I
.
.
I
~
;
.
e
e
known or who has produced j) I /'" as ident:i,.fication, and
known to me to be the individual de~ribed( in and who - executed the
foregoing instrument and he acknowledged be~Qt~\ae that he executed the
same for the purposes the.t:ein expressed. L... ""'-
.:~Jo" ..... .... -"'~""t, ,I?
WITNESS mYLhand and ofY-Cial seal ~~.:.c~earwater, said County and
State, this _ day of _~~ ;,: ,'....2[1'01-
- , .
/"""~<~'':..\.: ~
/ ;'....:'\. \.- ... /I
.,:.,.,~G
....~...,\~.~~~ly Public L . A_ - e t::..o-~'"
;' .../ ?*,xnt Na:."ne ~fr . L b-;ifl";
l 1. -:.M~ Commiss ion Expires: . (
\"'" .......) /'
.............ol..,}.
{<' :::~~~,..,~..'~:~:/
,..,........ -
"'.;
....."1..... ...~........\.. /
....,... "",;. ..
/f' , ,/ !, /r;,:.~_'-~/..
, .
~~'. \... \ ~
/'...~:~.--.~~~::;". .:
,/<~:~::~: ~<\.
. /' '~'''' ....
:" ...... J '..
. ""':... ..........;/ //
/"
BARBARA C. FORAY
Notary Public - Stale of Fb1dct
My Commission Expt'es Feb f. 311M
Commission Ii CC90S542
~
FINElLAS COUN1Y rLA
Orr,REC.SK 11802 PO 1573
...., .:...
(~~~s' ,,'
,'..., \. -..,.,:./
(... ~..:~:~ N.il'Il
I,....."'....::-~ #......
.:" . ":-
,: ..
...~ "";.::.--' -;...!
('<:".:(> , .:.
"'. ",.,/
<>'. ..) .;.
"'.............:.1
~
~~~~ ~
.-f==..::_....,j. _t>-----'''
.-\ ~- .\"
v ~...:;..-_... \
, \ ~--- \
\ \
\ )
\ 17/
\ I:'l
\ /
V.
I
I
Jli
_..,1
~.""I
'"',
e
e
I
..~...
I
I
...~~~
...~
I
---,,'
I/P"r-'C:O'
-""'(")
"g,
=
I
I
I
I
I
'(~)">
I
/-.. :;":;,... !..
. .(/..,>.."......./
II,:,
....., .........~:.
:...'......,:.....
IiI,.......... ................l/
t ""\ "
/ .\.'~..;~.:l~
I
I
..-.
.-
.... ,~..!\
~..
....t:~:...._.. .:'
~(. '~''>'':>'' ":,
'~":.W"
"
'.
..
40
I
"',
1',,(. .,..';....
.....
~
~
-.
....~ }
I......l~.
."\.......oz......J.
I
I
.. . - ...;....... -. ..:.-. ---:...=;,:.~ -
CA~~ctS i-tE: -....ej~. ~A
I
I
-;':;'---T--'- -
6tn:t') I
I
I
I
I
-I~...,......
~ ..J..".~_
_w 1--
,. -"1 "'11I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
1--
/1
/..<..~
=:::=.-......
~~
~....~
-' ~ a.M.
-'"
... nlW. ~.....
o
"IJ
"IJ"[J
'~z
fllPI
or
.r
m:n
"'m
t
F
l..
-0
''';''0
IDe
0%
IU-I
-<
'lJ
Q"J]"
r
...:1)
01.
~
...
1
I
I
-
~
I
~
I
~
I
.
.
i
I
I
i
.
.
I
.
i
.
~
.
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "A"
"r'A/tCEL eM _ .
. LEGAL OESCmPTlOH {O.R."" 2G. 100 a 701) ".
AU tka' c:erlQln troe1 or Jlarc~ fond IItUotOd. lying on6 hlng In Sacllon . ~'/inelllp 29
Soutb. Range 16 ECI$I, 10 1ho elf)' Df Cleonroler. CGUTlly of -PItt.lloe an,j Stale of Florlijd.
more parl1clltorly tJGun40d cml! dc,erlboc:l OJ faDaW't
From tho Hortneq.. C:O'l"ner Qf BLOCK 2 of RO'lIb of 6asldM Replot recorded In Plat Book
2'4. P'!g_ "'2. pu~nc fiecordl of Pln,UQ, Coltll11L Florldlll eVil Soul" 8S\6"Or"Welt, Cllong fhe
Ncrth line of IQld Bt..OCK 2 60.01 feof for 0 /"olnl Df elgllllllnlltlh.lllit run South
0l7'O;rw0$t. 150.02 fault tbonco run Horlb 8916'OI"ECl1I1, 60.0\ lCIltr'manc:e run South
057'03-Wo.l. 010n9 the Eost nno of lalel aLOCK ~, 1227.93 feblt thinee:, tlll1 Soutll
G~!*We,t. ~14.2B fo~fl Ibell~ Solllll ISt:eS'54"wut. 215 fell' to o~~Ttll on ItI.
SOlfthwett.rly Unit of 191d BI.OCK 2, Ihelle. rtln Norlh 35DI'OG''Wo.ti'''14G9J!1 f&.t,. thence
run Harth Q3'59''W''st {a1cn..o Q line I'orolllll fo olld GO ful o<lllef1Y of tbo-'We:II Uno of lIald
eLOCK 2) 109.20 faet rIO~02 fClef Field). t!\ane. rllR Norlh 1~10"f;llJ!. 322.93 fClllft
t".nea run North 9$1~'ol.E:o.t {alon; a IIno perQUol 10 end ISO/f..... .o\lI~ly of ih. North
lI~o of .1$14 Bl.OCK 2) 901.76 le.l. Ihllnc. ran NClrlll OS7'03"Ea,t. taO.02 fI_l. fhatlCe run
Norflt 8!3'iS'OI"ECl1t. along tho North !fno of acid BLOCK 2. 200i..fuf 10 Point of Boglnnlng.
Conlolnlng ~~44 AcrOI Mora or Lee,. \'.. .'.(
""1 .....~. .....~... .... ':': ..
./ ....."...........
All Ibal urlcln pelrcel of klnd .Ift,ated, 1)'1119 cmeS being Iri ~l:tIQ!l.;Jt.' Town-hip 29 Souill.
ROllg. IS Eot.. In Ihlt CIty of ClO<lrwohll;, counfy of Plllel1q$ ond $1014 of Florldo. morc
partlculatfy bounded 004 duc:rlbluf CIS fOlle".. \ ".,._) }
From the northellst CQmer of Block 2 of Rlllllb c~" Ci-.klna, Rapl~f. r'~DJ'd.4 In Plot paoK
24. flo.;o 412, ,"vllAc; R.cords of f'lnollUJ Counly. Flor dgj fJI~' at S5916'Orw. Cllon~ Ihe
Nonn lfli. of aold BlOCK 2 GO 01 toet for UI' pot - OF.- 8 GINNlNOI thence 'SOO!7'03"W.
'50.02 f~et, ~nt:o N6e1-6'OI,:g; 80.01 (Cletf 1h'n~ _ SO~'O 'W a{~ ill" E<llt /Ine of sold
BIOl:k ~ 249.31 f.." t"a~lI leQYln~ laId lIl\t SB9lti'OJ"'W'. 2'70 teet I\1WII W leu to tho
celltorlln. of ct cr..Ie. ,~"c:. Northw,,-tRr' Clleng .atd ~lMlorllnt. 370 f..t mOra vr. If.. to
g poInt 01\ III line balM _ 200.00 foal l:i of and PQraRtll to She Ea.UW8I1 con\orllnt 01 sold
S.ctloft IT, thenee N89'Ui'Of"E ato~ .eld " 260 faot mor1l or lOll, lhanl;:1l N~ro~"!:J
lSO.02 rns to " poInt of tho South rlllhl-of-wG'i IIn, of Gulf Ta Bay Bellfo'lllrd, thence
N8m6'OrE along aold line, 200.00 feel t6 '1b.1 'PQlNT OF BEGINNING.
COfttlllnklg 2.95 Ag-.. Mor. cr Lets. TOrClI of'-.3CM9-' AcrlJ Mor. or- Len,
.".;.... .....; /;l
.~,.....~... . "'\.,. !f
"PARCEL A" \. \?:-- '."'/
...... ..~.: L'..:
~ot t6rtalrt ~rtlOlt of Lot 2.aMKrtrtt-JlaiAT. accorclJn~ tlL tho mop or plct therlClf. r.eordecf
OR Plett 8flk Z4. fl.llU 42. Pubnel.ft..C~i:crlPIM1lIl1 Coun . Florida. lY'ns Il\ Slc;llon 17. Towllthlp
29 South, Range 16 ~OIt. Plnoll~...~J:,ftIrldllt dncrlbe a. folloW..
FrolD th.. ftOrtllwn1<<ly c~{~f :iakN.ot~2 Of G nltlbdlvlrJCS1! of BASKIN'S REPLAT CI rec:ordecf
In PIDt Baok 24. Pa9' 42. ~I~ ''R~a.. of PIl1fsUal COUIlty, florldG, and run thDllCCI
NSS46'OI"E. 60.00 fo.1 Cllont Il. nftrf~1y IIno 01 ,aid Lof 2, thine. S0Q3'(\9"E, 190.00
feab. fol' 0 Point of Be91nn1ng, t6..n.C1I ~V"J~UD SOaa'lSS"E, 165,36 fe,-k fhenee
N4~5'O"'E. 210.7:5 f.,tl tft~ N4!4~50"'W, 34.81 feot, tnane, S8Si\6"QI"W.
15~..20 f..1 to 1m. Point, /~ EJ'_~IIUlI.lll.' ContaIning O.a4 Acres Mo,. or L'".
i :.........(" ..
tClloth.r with / 1/-_>, \:
.' l.l 'i- ..... Z
IZ ..: Jt ," ......
~ Ir"' af 'olld lyJ~..wtfliln/Sllctton 17. TowMlllp 29 Soutb. Ran;_ 16 Eosf. PlneUOl C~\lnt~.
norlda an~ being ~ol?"'.(IarUC!JIQrli' Uelcrlb,a 01 folloWI, .
.' ,.I ."::;.0, ~
c,ommltnce cd fhi W~I ~~I~~cbm'r of seld Section 11 for ~ Point 9f ft.f.r.n~'l IlItnee NS9t6'OrE
Ol~~ Ihe fl:WJt-Welf'.f1terIlnO af .oId Socflon IT.!. lor ~3JeJ f.'k!!!enco Ilaylng .ald Une
S0Q3'59"E far" 405.2(., e.t, io the POINT Of B!:GINN . tllene. ~4'OS"E. for ~O.53 f....
tehJlI!IIC' Nt891ltOrE;-tQr 037 feels. fll.l\Ct &4E&'O"W, or 522.93 f..I. thalle. N003'59"W. for
T f., . to' till .P~OlNl" OF BE"INN\NGs Illld conhzlnlllg .e46 .quare f.et. mort or lea..
olaf of O)!E!- ~.re.:.: MOr. or Le,s.
PARCEl. .-b" \" ) J:
..i'~''.. ~'''' .....~.. ~/... .. I ..
A J)llI'e81. Or~'rg.d lotllt In Old TGIIJPO Boy In Section 17. TOWMhtp 2S Gcult!. 'Ran;- 16 Eaaf.
Pm'~p$"<:OJ!nt;~,,.~lorldo, mar. pOfl~llII'lY lIesCrll1.d CJt f.Wf,
Fr9~. thtt.~ W1!l6l~ .OuOI'16r CC1rner of elll4 Section J1 run North 89JS'O\'" East a\on.ll the !:ast.
t\l.nt, ~,nt~ 01 saId So~lon 17-\1. a dlllanclJ of 21li5.49 flit to tb. a,ter Of eold Section 17,
..en~...$OVIh"QC20'l3" EVil ato~l~' Horli-South centerllll. Df sold SecIlon fl, a d1ttoMtl
of- 4~.. f."t. t~nea South a(gt Q6" Ee.t oiling the Soulh"tllterly UntJ of Lot 2 of
/Rel \'MOii of BlllktR', Rljtlqt Gt recorded In Pled Boote 24, Pave 42 PubUc R~d. of Plllet10e
Z C:pClOl!}lY.f, FIortlfa. G cSll]Clllca of 661.78 f..t to lho "'"It tdob wofar mGrk of Old T~4 Bey GIld the
.~ 0".....1I Be;lllftlng. Tbel\~ c:<<\tlftllG South 39JF06- Em OIOl1g thlt 'XI191o" of tbl laid
!.~'~'If.,tMff fine of Lot 2 CI dlstol\cl of 2~6.63 fllaf. 1h.ftC8 South $CDO' East. 0 tltIlanel of
~.p.o-l feet to lb. bulkMGd 11M al tStClhlbhed b.Y fbe Pull" COUIIIY Wattt' end N~oJlOft
-.-urol AuthorIty In m..Ung JcmWl1' 8 1969 cncf formalJy apPrOVtd 11, th, TI'1/JI.tI Of lhe Int.moI
ImprOytnlttnffhFUDd III m.eflml Nay 19. 1~S9. Ih.GI:tI nortl\edstorlY along aQ1d beAlIeod lint being
o car'll ClI . right .of ~<JbO f.,t. radl", cbor4 "~!I_ Nortll 4&$'45" E~t. din IblGnce
:!f8~ f.." !lr~ ftnglb 4ae.~ f..h fhGal:e Norlh ~(J)O' Wo.f G dlltonc. of 674.29 f.., to Iho
.morstt:floft .llb Ifle 'j9trfY axten..lclI of 1M ..It.tly ... ef taW L.f a of R.slllidlYllton vf
Bos~_"'" ft-PlaI. lb.nC:1I l;Jt'th 005"'0;'- Eel' CIfllllt IClftf .otIf&erl)' '~'1II1GlJ ~9.o7 f..I..IM" .
or- I'll'" 10 tho me01\ H waler mark af Ofcl Templl BaYJ IltlllC8 .outhwalerl)' oIm ~14 .-.an
,hfth WUCller mm-k 662 l..t. more Qr less. to the Petaf OJ BalllMlag, contolnlng 9.66 acra.. mon IIIr
DSS. Illcm<J Tote! cf 1.04 AulS.
,
.
I..
o
"'1
"'1"1J
. ....
:;UZ
I"IJ'I
or
.r
, m:u
;0::00
_0
_0
me
oz
ro-t
-<
-u
Q"'1
r
_:D
(JI.
-.I
,61
;:
'-
I
I
e
e
I
11-115 IS N.Q.I A SURVEY
,
BLOCK 2
PINE~~~S COUNTY FLA
OF'F_.R~ .~)< 11602 PO Him;
".. ~
,......::...::. l.
; ....
'#..... ":"-~:!'" ..~~
:.;':-"" .....:.. ....:.....;i
/ l"',. ~
: -=.;- ;:
~. .....'~-
-..
-'.
".
I
I
GULf" TO SA Y BLVD.
P.O.C.
NORTHWEST
CORNER or
BLOCK .2 Of
BASKIN'S
REPLAT
DISTANCE
5B.09'
34.130'
25.55'
13.51'
112.08'
113.46'
18".44'
141.97'
67.34'
2226: <, __, .... ,.
4.55/~. \, ,..tlNj:iLA TTED
154 BS' '., 'I.. .:
21 ~t~ ~"'> .".-;,.-
40-:0& -:.... '>..,
52. ,-6;":, ""<. ..:
~3,69' ... ~
-.. . ..
..:/ ;-: .~::~...,.' ~:;
NOTES: ... / / / "',./
'.) The sketch shown'-':hueorl is for Informational purposes only
and Is not Inten~a..to 'ilIeptct a survey performed in the freld.
2.) The sketch shQ'\lin her~!1i~as prepared without the benefit of 0
. tlUe abstract-' o.n'~hJs s,ub'ject to <my and all easements,
restrictions ~ e:.ny''OUier motters of record.
3.) The beClrtn~ Sho'Vm'/he~eon ore based on the Held Deed Bearing of
NB9'46'Ot:E '~._ttit!l"tCl$t West centerl~ of Sectron '7, Township
29 SQU~, "'R.an~.'l6 East. ,
1...............,....::0.. -.....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BLOC!< 1
LINE
L!
L2
L3
L4
L5
L15
l7
L8
L9
LtO
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
US
BEARING
N 62'09'.'54"E
S 23"27'3S"e:
N SS'4S'35"E
S 27'046'4S"E
N 82'16'09"E
N 42'oi22"E
S 2T02'4,"E
S 31'09',7"E
S 42'12'55"E
5 3~11'48"W
S 61'21'53"W
S 50'4-5' 48"W
S 13.41'04"W
S 34.14'sj"E
S 50'SS'50"W
S 39'01'06"E
.:
. ...... .....":..........._.1
<: ~.,:::-.,. .....:'
~/'."-..,., . <\ '..~ "-'
I
.liC6Lt "
'".,00' '....5-2,i-2001
.m..tic.
1170-001-000
A RESUB Of'
BASKIN'S REPLA T
SCALE: '''=100'
,:
A RESUa OF
BASKIN'S REPLA T
A RESUB OF
BASKIN'S REPLA T
SEE SHEET 2 FOR LEGEND
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
BAYS/DE NURSING PAVlUON
DIWIH
mcl1
SIIl:lIt
17
~
I bucby cerllf, lhal Ihis leQ!lI aClcriplioa and sketch
meets Iha minimum tecbnlcal slon6ar6s os sel forlh
~he FIorillo Soard of Prolessional Surveyors gAd
ers In Chapler 61G17-6 Florida Administralive
c, pursuanl 10 St>dion 472.027, F1orfdo Stalutcs
Skel cb GIld i. ego! Ductlpfion nol VCIl1d wlthout Ih c
slgllOlure on1I (he Drlglncil ndsed Stlel of c Ftorida
liea:lSed SlIfYltyor cnd~
C~~ _ GAL ~T10N
ALLAN OSLUND
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
STATE Of FLORIDA I 4659
CERTlflCA TE OF AUTHORIZATION ND. LB 2610
Sheet 1 of
2
~
29 SOUlli
~
IWlliE
16 EAST
I
K-A..g,
-~- - ~._,-
~- CD/qlr" lUll: _ ,.. Ig._,_
--... I\IlIlIllt. J3CC E--. w.,ew t" ~ .......
I
I
C6tftt~,.,~ e-~. A-I
I
.
r
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
,
e
THIS IS lliU A SURVEY
/\ P INE:lLRS COUNTY F'LR
\"\ OF'F' . REC .8K 11802 PG 1!5?i'
/~....: .~:~. '\
~.~... ../'...1...... ....:')
...,1>......... "'......,j
.:.. ().~}
"
'. ....
A tract of land lying within Section 1-?-.'-'.:r.l?Wn~jp 29 South, Range 16
East, PineJlas County, Florida and b,eing.,_.m~.re" particularly described os
follows: ~ \. \ ?
~ ......_d !
" /
Commence at the Northwest corher/ ~i-,Blbck 2 of A Resub Of Baski~'s
Replot, as recorded in Plot Boqk ~~4~/Pflge 42 of the Public Records of
Pinellas County, Florida; thence\~long jhe West line of said Baskin's
Repfat, S0013'S9"E. for 399.07 fe.eJ.;...,thence S39 01'06"E. for 356.56 feet'
along the Southwesterly line of said replot to the POINT OF BEGJNNING;
thence reoving said line N~2~09'44"E, for 88.09 feet; thence S23.27'38"E,
. .... :,;"
for 34.80 feet; thence N6o.'4o,J5.E, for 25.55 feet; thence S27'46'45"E,
for 13.51 feet; then ce N,8.21'6'OOit, for 112.08 feet; th ence N42"07'22"E,
for 113.46 feet; thenc~ S2rG2:41"E, for 181.44 feet: thence S31'09'17"E,
for 141.97 feet; thence\S4-.2j.Z"SS"E. for 67.34 feet; thence S.39"11"4S'"W,
for 22.26 feet; thel)<:4,..S6.1'21'53"W. for 4.55 feet; thenee S50'4S'48"W,
for 154.86 feet; the~e~"SJ',;}{41'04"W, for 21.51 feet; thence S34i4'S3"E,
for 40.00 feet; tb'Em~e>S59;'58.50"W, for 52.16 feet to 0 point on the
Southwesterly Hnp Or $o~~'Baskin's Replot; thence olong said line
N39"01'06"W, for \.55~_"69/ feet; to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
/~ "-<:~~... "0/
Containing 2::7,1....,.9cr~~.more or less.
/ :".' "~
,Ii ~I~_/:..:~ ..:......./t
". .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
;!
,.., . t
LEGEND: ~:/.,~~>~;;..~.>..)..
L1 Denote~~'lJn~'-.~:rable Number
p,a: 'O"en,dhts Pi~t/Book
P~S. De~o(.7s\P~~es '.
P.O.B. D~.r\"(2tes.'!PGlnt of Beginning
p .O.C.i,::-,:.~.Q~~ ,Pain t of Commencemen t
~
/~~'''':...~...:.. ....:... .......
" -
".
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
BAYSlDE NURSING PAVlUON
~ ~
-', '.. '00.'
""1:. "~
,Ii"'.... .'.......~
~
"', I~< ,
-'.. L 5/217'2001
I&i!i
UAH
.sEClKl!i
17
mMlSI:!le. &I31i;
29 SOUTH 16 EAST
alQlL.!lg. ...... .,."
1170-00'1-000
K-A:g.g
=~~-=:IIlO =-= ::1:::=
"'"" PU:IfIO\J3IH ~ ~:t.1~1~""'"
Gl"\fbSt~e ex~ A..\
Sheet ..L of -L
I
I
.
!
I
.
.
i
I
'!
~
I
-
.
j
-
1
I
j
~
.
.
I
I
\
!
f
-
.
.
~"ARCEL C~ , COME'OSITE EXHIBIT A,:<f.. (Page e ,
. LEGAL CEScmPTION-(O :. .pc;; 700 a 701) 1
All tho' certain trod or p'aTc,f of lond .JfUGtad. 'IYIng and boJlIg In Sod/oil J7. Tiiwn.hfp 2S
Soalh. R~, t6 EOII. II> tho City of C'oal"W11tor. Count)' of P/n.1\41 and Stolo of Florida.
mor. pllrtlClIIOr/y bounded IIl1d dUCJ"llsod CJI f"Haw.,
From the Horfh6Q.t corner of BLOCK 2 of Ro.utJ or Basklns Replot" nl;Drded In P/qt Boole
24. P~g. 1~ PubIc R,corl1. 01 PlneJloa CounlYL Florido. ruq ~ovllt"'9S'46"Ol"Wellt. along tho
Nor!~ IIn. of lold BLOCK 2. 60.01 felft lor cr roo/nl oUkgllUlffiqt..th~.nco run S"olllh
CZ!, OO~'"W&~t. lSO,02 foch lhonc:a ran Horth 6S'46'0I"Eaal, 6000{ f'CDIt\. thellCG tun Soulb
CB.. 3"Wo.t. llTo~ tho EOllt Un" of lold flLOCKJ~, 1227.93 feilt~..}heiiea run South
S~'23"'W"$t. ~1<1.28 bot, Ibonee Souflt !5mS'e4-yynl. 215 "ot ro 'a P'oJrl1 cn III.
SoutbwcalM"Y line af '914 BLOCK 2. th.qc:ct run North 35D1'~:W'..t..,J46'.27 r..ll thane,
run North 03'a9"WClIt (olona a 1In, forQlkI fo olld 60 f..r ~llorJy Of m. W..,t Jlnll 01 said
. BLOCK 2) 109.20 felt {IOlf.02 lOG f1l1kf). thanee run NorJfJ 1G!O'lO"Ea.t. 322.93 fClot,
. tl\flll~llr run North ~FO""ECf.' tcloJ'lV 0 In. perllllol to OlId/1SO f~..t Rldherly of ift. North
line of sQf4 Bl.OCK 2) 901.75 I.et. tflonee nm Norfb QlT-O~lf. 150..02 'ull thollc:e run
Norfh 89'1S'Ol"Ecnl, olollG _ tho Nortb Vnet of aald eLOCI( a. 200 ..1..1 10 felllt of So;lnnlng.
ConJQlnlng ;'~,44 Acro. Mora or Le.,. ,'<' "": '" -"',..
I... /" '...;....._..-
.' t-.~.. ~..of ,
AU tbat c...lcln j)IlI:ce! of kind ,1I11ot.d. lylnJ and ..otim 1Jl St.cfl.n 17, Towlllldp 29 Soufl:.
Rallg, 10 Eott. In Iho CIty 01 Cloarwater, Collnfy of'i,plrltn<w odd St<lf.. of FJOrlda. morc
porllcUlotl1 boUlldod and .!e$erlblld 'liS 'ollow., .~""" \. . /
,- ':". .."'
From fila Northeast CDrner of Black e of RtBUb of.! oI~liit'JlaplClt, raeord.d III Pllll PClok
24. IlO';G 42, Pvllllc; Records af PJrloUGI COUIl"_ F.lll,. 0, lhlnce S89UI'Ol"W. cToPIl 'kG
Hortli IIn'e of tcld Block 2. GO.OI r..t for th..,P , r; SEGlHNINl3J thollc. .SOOS7'03"W.
1$0.02 fool. t~~1t N8M6'OI''f. eO,Of tel_" th~9 -lJOCll'r03"ffl. crll~ the Eo.t flao of lald
Block ~ 219.31 f.." tbOClco 1!I~YInG ,ellS 11110 SBSf6'or:w. 270 '0" lnora <lr .... to Iho
cenllfritn. of .d cr..'ri, 1!t61lC' Nortliw.!tor1Y "long lilllr' ce"torllM. ~70 f..t mora 111' I... to
a ~Int on g Ine bel!io. 200,00 'oDI South of GiI4 ponrlJ., to IlIt Eq,ttw..t CetntlltUne or _Did
Stenll" 17, ",Hce NS9Hl'O!"E otOIl9 el2fd .lIne. 26,0 foot mort or ..... thene. NOOTO~~
ISO.o2 fn' 10 " ~t,,1 of the $outh rhilitloOf.wcY..1I1I1I of GIIlf t'il.JJcY eoulaYlIrd, fhenc&
NctlMfrOrE atolla .old line. 200.00 flllftl 'o:'lhe' 'POlNT OF' BEGINNING.
cOlltollll~ 2.95 ;A~" Mor. or Lets. T~ 01 !~.49 Acres Mtlr. or La,..
..... .. ;
\. '\;-'~":' ,~:~/
"PARCEL A" .,. '\ ..~... /',/
.~ '. ... ~
TheIl c.rtalp portlgn of Lol 2. iJA~ Ra-LAT, If"ord&1o to the mqp or plot therllDf. I'".corded
In Pkll Boole 24. ~!l' 42. Pu~c,Rec-ol'if.fof Plnedll' Ctlunfy. FJorTdG. lyrll9 Il\ Stellan 17. TOWMhJp
28 Sout&. Ronge 16 ~Cl.t. Plpa~ ...~f1i' Florkflf, cllOCrlblfG o. follow..
I . ..~.......
From the ftOrIbw.alerly CG~t. :pf.raGfit-.'lGf 2 of IS r.eClbdlvldoll of 8ASIaN"S REPI.At al recorded
In P'll' Book 24 Pl1g. 4~ ~c:~RI""d. Gf PlnaDo, County. florlda. rniif rUll thonco
N09lEiOl"'e. 60:00 fHt .~I~ng 'ih.t;nOrfhNr, TlnD 01 lold Laf 2, flleneo SOtI3"09"E. /90.00
f8l1JrJor 0 Point of a~~SI tllenee ~o nUll SO03'S9"E. IS6~5 f*!.1t thane.
N4cr.J'IO"E. 2IO:n fut! tlieft'e. B<m4'S . a4,8r f.." thllUCO S69J6Vr'W.
t~15.20 fe.t 10 Ib P!'fIO',.af 13t$liultng. ContGlnlng 0,34 ACTOI More or bu.
/~ l......... :....
tog.ther with -.:/ .:/') ';......./
A trod cf lond,f~;r~;,wltina SIlCtl~ 17. TOI:IlIi'ltji 2$ Soulh. RG~. 16 Elisl. Pin.ilcis COllnty.
FJorldD IIlICI ~ 1~Qr~"'.p.1I~.Jlcol'U11 dlllcr/bl(f ot fOlia"., .
COftIlMftCI ut:.'.~'-WlJlf 1/4- cornor of 'aId Goel/oR 17 fol'" IS Point of 1tefert~.c th.ne' Na9t~l"E
ol!m~ tbe E..m..W..t"-,c:llnl,r8ne Df IClId Section 17. (OJ"_~3.e1 fo~.f.t Ihence leaVIng .ok! lIne
S~'59~.fDf':"~5.2l.f.." to tho POINT Of' SEOINN ,Ihtneo n4t24'O&"E. for 310.53 f',f.
1"1I11C. N~G'O~'lor-'9n fu"- ffJ,nce S4EE~'10"W. or 322.93 faal. thone, N003'Ci9"W. for
8.12 f..... fOrlbt POINT OF B~G1flNlNG, Clnd conhllftfn; 1Et46 'qllor. f.of. mort or Illss.
TDtaI ot O.;i58 "~r"'lt MIlr" or Len.
~ ..~.. } ;-
PARtEL....S'" -.,..i f
i.. ....~- ...~ ~.'..r
A IiGrj~ ;r:~g'd 10AIf In 016" T~O S~ In Soctloll IT. TOYlO!Np 29 Soulh. Range 16 EOllt.':
~.niii"-CClllltt- Fforldo. mare paftleulorly dosCrlllod a. {alIGn.
'. ..... .
Fr.G"'. Ifi.:"W"tst Quart.r Corll.r of laid Slctlon /71. fIlA Narth 69Ul'OI" toll c1l1njj' th.. e:ClSt-
/WflJ'-c;.nrlf'ltne -'11 lold SO..uQR 17. Q cIl.tonc~ 0 i:7eS.49 f.ol to 1M cantor Of lofd Section 17,
'ibe~' . -south OCBO'B- Eaaf Clle/HLDI. HI-SDutb qnhlrllne of saJd S.cOlIft IT, a dlttancG
", at" .44 fGof, ftlO!CO South 30::11'06" "Glong tho So1lthlffl.tarty llIla of Lot 2 af
."~a '.. ...1a4 of Ball " Re~Qt a. riCa eel In Plat Book 24. Palla 42 PubIlCO,!t6J:Ord. of Pinella.
'.. ~miY'.~'1:;tdG. 4J dI onee at 561.7& lftl to '~o 11lOO11 !dW woter II1Clrk of ... T!wpo Boy Imd thl
'" ,~,,;"':'~'e~'Of~:Fl :aarJ~:~o~h a~e~G;a~'h::l Nl,~I~\~~9"~tLIr:~':l~e of
8r5~Og fut fa tht bulkbocd IIl1e G' esldJRsb,d by 1M PlneUn Count, W;r.r GIld No ottQ~
fll1drol A"tharlly In nw.Hzi9 .J~.nulflY ~,,1969 anlf fWlJ\illly QPPrClV'~ lIy fb Tru;t... f tll& mt.rnot
.mprOVOlMnt f"lUId Ih tIletflM Moy 19. UjI59, IheftlCll nortlltesliii1Y olan; -aid bulkhead lIoe being
a CQ1'V, to ibe right "f 3:400 f..t. ncflri cbord "'9r1no Nan" 4115'415" EOII! char<<l eII.Janea
14 3t e.o~ f"t.. en "D9Ib ~aU! ."" IlHinc. North amo' W..t 12 dI.follCI OJ 6l'4.!$ f..t tv Ih.
n t1uKrloA .lIh tfJ, ralfllltrtY IIxten,loll of the eG.t'r~ tins .f aold L.,t 2 of R.~J61oft gf
812'''11I', RopJaf, 1ho1lCD Horfla ()(Bl"();''' !~It C11~ft~1l1 _culMr'" .xfllftlralJ ~9.07 fe.r. mere
01" ro", 10 tlMj moOI hlih water mark CJf OW T oJ) lhonca .olllbw..&rly al~ said m.cn
,hfth waf8r ftlll'" 662 f..t, mora or IIU. to Ole IlIJl OJ BeglMfn!ll eontoWl!g 9." lI;r~" more or
aSI. UpIGnd Toto( of t.04 Acrn.
'-'.
,.....
o
"'"I
"'"1"11
. -
::iO:Z:
I'1p
~r
~iR
_0
_0
me:.
o~
N-I
-<
"11.....
Qr
_;I)
(II.
....
m
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
e
" .
PINELLRS COUNTY rLA.
Orr,REC.SK 11S02 PG 1~7S
"....
./ \
.. i. ";.
COMPOSITE EXHIBIT ~:3. ~~age 2)
/" .~.
or...... ......~:.:... "").
,."........\ ":'..,;0'
.: .~
<. ,(; <~
((~)')
ltESS ~ ~CJlllT FR.OM co~osJ:n; RlQl,1.B:I;T ~"""2)~~.;i~./l.)
the !ollow:l.ng :l.egaJ. d~~C'.l:';f,pt:~oP.; / .;'./ ,:' \.
._ "," . \.,..~'~:-..?:...l:- .____, -"
A tract. of [and lying within Section 17, Township 29 Soulht Range 16
East. Pinellas County, Florida and ~ein9 rpore particularly described as
fotlows: !~ ""-., ;'.....
-......:..... .....;. ;'
CommencE; at the N?rth~est S~~~er-..Q~f."aiock 2 of A Resu~ Of Boski~'S
Replot, os recorded In Plot BOQ,k ':2tt-, poge 42 of the Pubhc Records of
Pine1las County, Aorido; th~e ''01~n9'''the West line of said Baskin's
Replot. 500..3'59"E, for 399.p7-....(~~ thence 539 Ot'06"e:, for 356.56 feet
along the Southwesterly fj!l~.})f.. sa~d replot to the POINT OF BEGINNING:
thence leaving said lin.e ,.Nf?2"Q_S.~~"E, for 88.09 feet: thence S23"2.7'36"E,
fot' 34.80 feet: thence t.J6't?.4$"35"E, for 25.S5 feet; thence S27.46'4S"E,
for 13.51 feet; tftenc~""~2"5'()~"E. for 112.08 feet; thence N42.07'22"E.
for 113.46 feet; th~na~ $'~2'41"E. for 181.44 feet; thence S31.09"17"E,
for 141'.97 feet; thin~~>S42:i12.55"E, for 67.34 feet; thence'S39i'"48"W,
for 22.26 feet; t!1~ge,.S6V2t'53"W. for 4.55 feet; thence.SSO.45'48"W.
for 154.86 feet;/.~~c~ S13.4,'04"W. for 21.51 feet; thence S34i4'53"E.
for 40.00 feet;/ \fi,~~ ,SSO'S8'50"W. for 5216 feet to a point on the
Southwesterty;)irili ,~f S61d 8askin"s Replot; thence oIong said line
N39.01.0S..W......!Qr.. S~.69 feet; to th&. POIN)" Of BEGlNl'nNG;
.:' ......:":.,;"
C~1'l.ta,~~' 'f--V,,: '~ctes ~Q1:e o};' l.~as.
'1 "\... .~ ;.
<~--- '~:~:. ',~~-~,/
/............~::~ ....-....:.
. ......~. .~../
(': <~:...'~"'~:,
./"'":"-; "'''":.. '\ "0:
::, .....'1...J }
" -
......................j
.!
..'
~
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THIS IS llill A SURVEY
SCALE: 1"=1.00'
." ...... :'.
~. "... . .
WEST R1GHi~F':::wAY ,.LINt
SKYHA.~~OR, DRlyE
< ":~'~~"" '>;/ I r:
CUR'vf DElIA RADIUS ARC OIORO'tANCEbit,' OIORD BEARING
Cl 86"55'29'" 25.00 37.93 ~.3!t., \" ms S 4D46'I4"E
. C2 39'04'18" 37.50 25.57 2M8 "".. "-13131 S 7O"41'5Q"E
C3 31'56'41 50.50 28.16 !...."'27..7'g., '-f.i,46 S 67'D8'OS"E
C4 37'52"49'" 162.14 107.20 / lQ$.2~"':'",,,,,,'55.54 s 15'D4'22"W
C5 4'19'30. 262.52 19..82f:'~ 19.~'1 \ 9.91 S 14"J8'37"E
C6 n4'Sg" 50.33 5.~~ \. ",.(1..5'1 r 3.26 S 20"30'52"E
C7 YJ7'35'" 217.17 1~'7~...>.. 13.74/ 6.87 S 26"02'09"(
C8 75"4113'" 24.50 ~-4:1 ,..'.....:l0;1~ 19.07 N 24'4S'14"Y1
C9 20"2138- 39.50 lfti1't... "1".03 7.13 N 72'52'40.'
Cl0 31'56'47. 75.50 / 4itih .'... 41.55 21.61 N 57'08'05"'"
Cl I 39'1)4'18. 39.50:' 2e;g4: ":26.42 14.02 N 70"41'SO"W
el2 93'35'31. 25.00 ..,:':: '. -ro,M 35.45 25.52 S 42'5S'1S"1!{
NOTES' .' ;' ;~::"\. '>
1.) Th~ sketch shown/hefi~'l! i~YOr informational purposes only
ond is not intena~ td...deplct <I survey performed in the field.
2.) The sketch ShQWI't'..h~eori'~(JS prepared without the benefit of a
title obstracf OI1P, is....~4.iect to any and all easements.
restrictions pr ;fany,.ottler matters of record.
3.) The bearin9s:~shQvm)h~eon ore bosed on the Held Deed Bearing of
NB9946'OliE. for {fie East West centerline of Section 17, Township
29 so~~~,~~~."ur' East.
./ ...........:!-. ....;-
^
LINE
LI
L2
LJ
t4
L5
L6
!.7
L8
L9
LtO
LlI
L12
Lt3
U4
US
U6
L17
118
Lt9
L20
L21
BE ARlNG
N 89'.(6'0t"E
S S1'OS'4t"E
S 83"06'28-E
S 04"3!'t3"E
S OS'49'42.E
S 13'10'08.1:
S 16'48'23"E
S 621)9'34""
N 25'29'59.W
N 2Q'1.fSO"w
N 16'47'3.iYl
N lS,a'lo"r
N 13"18'35'"
N 119'OS'3O"W
N 01'01'48.[
N on6'S5"E
N 6TJ8'51 "W
N 83'06'28"1'
N 51"09'41"1
S 89'46'01 "W
N O3'32'09"y(
CJ>
~
:3
DISTANCE
26.89'
53.52'
93.43'
16.59'
15.85'
21.96'
73.88'
25.25'
16.24'
8.44"
74.5t"
6.70'
19.79'
55. 74'
20.54"
31.67'
3.13'
18.73'
21.73'
29.42'
89.37'
\,' e
GULF TO 8A Y BL YD.
r,
f.1, 0... C.
NORn-tWEST
8i ..CORNER-..Of
.n '-BLOCK 2'{)F
~ /"'-'-BASr<1W:S
}'-l ./ (1 lEPLA T
~ '.. "'"
BLOCK 1 't!...<::..... . ';
A RESUB OF /8"- :". \,;..../
BASKIN'S REPLAJ '. \ i
\.Vl....A ,,; 1
/....:.:/.,>J,/ (\
NB~h~Olwt : .? L1
41.~O""; ..: I
............!..~
I
WEST LINE or
BASKIN'S REPLA T
PINELLRS COUNTY ~LR
Orr,REC.SK 1~S02 PG ISBa
BLOCK 2
A RESU3 Of
BASKIN'S REPLA T
UNPLATTED
E
rn
CIl
I
0"
Cll
C
c
:/ ,i ...:,,""'t....~.,.;.. ''':.''''
<i. '- .
i;t :.............."":" "\~~" BAYVlEW NURSING PAVIUON - fNGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT
g ~ ":<" ~ 7 DBMI:l t:.!.I.Cm ~ I bereby certify thot this leqal cle,crlplion allel sketch
o 1~-100' '" . 6"-~2001 GMI< GMK meets the minimum Isc!ullc,'ll ,IClIlc!Grds as set forlh
/' .lllB....!lll.. ",..~.,,. ......."'" TI"Af.lU........ D'''''''' by the Florilfcr Doard of Prof~~l\al Surveyors and
.- ............. .....................- Mappers in Chnpler 61GI7-6 Florida AclmlDislroliv.
8 1170-001-000 17 211 SOUTH 15 EAST Code. pUrSl!D'" 10 S~tI'QD 472.02"7, florida Slolule.
/' stceleh an" lege! Descripliot: not vaGe! wilhout the
g ~ signoh;l"e IIIld Il'.a original rolnd .eol 01 a Floriela
.,. _ g &c~~~~ler.
~ ... CER~~~~:~ON
cr ENClNEERINO ASSOCIATJ!S.. INc:.. ~ A~!.,&.N OSLUND
::> -__T ItOC III - - PROFESSIONAL SUa'l~()R ANO ~APPER
,. =,,~~tI1t.lllll :~ ~.-4aaz'''_ STATE OF n.ORIDA' 4659
~ CERTIFICATE Of' AUTHORIZATiON No. LB 2610
Jun 08, 200t - 1: 38pm Sheet --L- of ~..
CC~S~ Go'at.. A-~
SEE SHEET 2 FOR LEGEND
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
I
I
I
j
I
I
1
I
J
.
,
,
~
~
~
>
I
I
.
I
I
~
~
I
-
-
;
I
.
I
'\
e
lHlS IS JiQI A SURVEY
lEGAL DfSCRIPl1otj.
PINELLRS COUNTY ~LR,
Orr.REC.SK 11602 FG lee
Pinel/os County. Florida and be1rlg
A tract of land lying within Section 17, Township 29 South. Range 16 J':Qsl.
more particularly described os follows: { \
Commence at the Northwest corner of Block 2 of A Resub Of Basktrt~~ R~p~ot. 0$ recorded in Plot Book 24,
Page 42 of the Public Records of Pinellos County. Florida: thence;olol'tg.,.!he)West line of said Baskin's Replot,
500'13'59wE, for 285.99 feet; thence N89'46'01DE, for 47.90 feeVlo~'Q poiilt" on the West right-or-way line of
Skyhorbor Drive, soid point olso being POINT OF BEGINNING ond/t~, b~ginning of a curve to the left, of which the
radius point lies N8S"41'.30"E, a rodial distance of 25.00 feet 6nd"...J;"oying a chord bearing and distance of
S46"46'14-E, .34..39 feet: thence southeasterly along the ore, thrQugrr:..1] central angle of 86"55'29-, an orc
distance of 37.93 feet; thence NS9'-4S'01DE, 26.89 feet to ,.cf"poln{"-flf :eurvature; thence 25.51 feel easterly oloog
the ore of Q curve to the right, having Q radius of .31.5Q!f~..Qnd., 0' centrol ongle of 391)4'18", 0 chord bearing
and distance of S70'41'50"E. 25.08 feet: thence S51'09'4i."E},5$;.:521 feet to a point of curvature; thence 2&16
feet southeasterly along the orc of a curve to the left, h"qvirig.-~ r:adius of 50.50 feet cnd 0 central ongle of
.31"56'47", a chord bearing and distance of S67"08'OS~(-:"':if~19.. tee'!; thence S8SOS'28"E, 93.43 feel to the point
of intersection with 0 non-tangent Cl,Jrve to the left;! t~ehce~utherly along the arc of said curve with 0 radial
bearing S55'S9'13"E, and having 0 radius of 162.14 feet.. o\ce~tl'"ol angle of .37'52'49", on arc length of 107.20
feet cnd Q chord bearing and distance of S15"04'22"W" tOSt2Qi' feet; thence S04".31'1.3"E, 16.59 feet; thence
S08'49'42DE, 15.86 feet; thence 51310'08w(. 21.96 fee't.,Jo. p;'e point of intersection with 0 non-tangent ctJrve to
the left: thence southerly olong the arc of said curve with. a radial bearing Nn'31'10"E, and having a rodius of
262.52 feet, a centrc/ angle of 04"19'30D, an ~rc length of 19.82 feet and a chord bearing and distance of
S1-4.38'37~E, 19.81 feet thence 516'48'2,3"E, 1.:t88 feel. to 0 point of curvoture; thence 6.51 feet southerly alonq
the ore of 0 curve to the left, having 0 rad'nls,ot5.0.Jt feet and a central angle of OT24'59-, 0 chord bearing
on~ distance of 520"3<)'52D[, 6.51 feet to .a..poinl of ,Compound curvature: thence 13.74 feet southeasterly along
the orc of a curve to the left, hClYing a rbdiU;S"13(:2l'7.17 feet Clnd a central angle of 03"37"35D, 0 chord bearing
and distance of S26'02'09"E, 13.74 feet; lve&e s6i'09'34DW, 25.25 feet: thence N25"29'S9"W, 16.24 feeti thence
N2014'SO"W. 8,44 feet; thence N16'47'~~"W~ i4.~1'!feet: thence N1518'10"W, 6.70 feet: thence N131S'35"W, 19.79
feet; thence N09'05'30"W, 55.14 feet;( th'er.tc~:. NO;1'01'48"E, 20.54 feet: thence NOr26'55~E, 31.67 feet to the .
.point of intersection with a non-tang~. cu'~~.1"o the left; thence northwesterly along the arc of said curve with
o rodial bearing N76"51'J8DW, and I:lciViJ'lg 'n..roqfus of 24.50 feet. a central angle of 75'47'13D, an arc length of
32.41 feet and 0 chord bearing a!-fd ...di~t.d~e~'of N24'4S'14"W, 30.10 feet; thence N62"38'51DW, 3.13 feet to a
pain t cf curvature; thence 14.11 f~ee, we'lJ:t~y alan 9 the orc of 0 curve to the left, having a radius of 39.50 feet
and c central angle of 20'27'3~~.":.J;I chore ,bearing end distOllce of N72'52'40wW, 14.0.3 feet; thence N83"OS'28"W,
18.73 feet to 0 point of curvqture;::~'tben_ge 42.10 feet northwesterly olonq the arc of 0 curve to the right, having.
a radius of 75.50 feet and <f---c.C!(ilrOt-,pn'gle of .31"56'47", 0 chord bearing and distance of NSrOS'05"W, 41.55
feet; thence N51'09'41uW, ~f.7;j.,(~et tq a point of curvature; thence 26.94 feet westerly along the arc of 0
curve to the left, having q/ ro.aj~~ 0('-.39.50 feet and 0 central angle of 39'04'lS", 0 chord bearing ond distance
of N70'41'50.W, 26.42 fee,il. th.~~ 589'46'Q1DW, 29.42 feet to 0 point of curvature; thence 40.84 feet
southwesterly along the ;6rl:: 'or ri"'~rve to the len, having a radius of 25.00 feet cnd a central ongle of
93'35'31-, a chord beo.ring/..ciilp"4ilftonce of S42"5S'15.W, 35.45 feet: thence NOJ'32'09"W, 89.37 feet along the
West right-of-way lin~ of'~Yharbor Drive to the POINT Of BEGINNING.
...~ ;
'. "
Containing 0.318 Q~re!t;, 'i;nQre"9r less.
LEGEND: / ~ ..\.........!
. , """. '.
L1 Denotes tiin~t Toble"~.Number
P.8. Denot~M~t '806k/
PGS. Denof!l..~ P-'!.9.~SN' /
P.O.B. Denotes' Paiht of 8eglnnin9
P.O.C. Den~fe$..,.f.toint\'lf Commencement
0-
il:
"t)
,.j
E
I/)
G
I
01
Gl
I
""
;;-
-J
<
<.:l
~
8
~
8
./
o
r-..
.....
?
~
a::
::J
,.
~
Jun
./'<>,......... .,.':~' . ". ..?KETC.H AND DESCRW.llON _
"
/"""" '\. '"". ..:...' BAYVlEW NURSING PA\IIUON - INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT
~ .'.....l~~-i~l ~K ~K ~
&Il.lIll. ".,..., StCIllJL ~ B&mE:
1170-001-000 17 29 SOUTH 16 EAST
Kx:g.g
-__ _11.1__
_ _ a;Jmlt. un: XIO ,~ N _ _
.",...,. fUlIIGI DI.H t-va ..,.. J JlII'..A.~
08. 2001 - 1: 38pm
Sheet L of -Z.-
CA~f''-I1lt:.. ~'_ A..3
II'
I'
.
1
-
i
.
!
I
~
~
-
;
~
~
~
I
i
~
I
1
-
-
.
-
I hereby carmy lhal l!lis Je~1 descriplion and sketch
meets fhe mill/mum technical stondards os sel Corlh
by Ihe Florida Board of P!"of("n/onal Surve}ors ond
Mappers In Chapter GIGI7.6 Florldo Admmistrative
Clide, purSUCl1l1 10 Se;lion 47s.9c7. Florida Stotules
Sketch and L.1!lol ::l<<sa'~:cn Ill)I ..oiid .,,;Ihou! Ihe
signalure end .II:~ O"igillclJ !Ills (I =ec! cof c Florida
r,loen$:id Surn .:Ill Mllppor.
CERTIFIED T' 14!-
e
e
'\
TH\S IS IiQI A SUR Y
GULf" TO SA. Y 6l W.
RADIUS .
15.02
68a88
423.19
12420.00
10912.63
139.3.50
CURVE
Ct
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
CHORD
22.73
87.09
21.89
25.49
33.09
46.7.3
DELTA
98'17'34.
7"14'55"
2'51'53"
0'07'03"
0'10'25.
1'55'17"
ARC
25.17
B7.J.5
2l-~9Q
25.49\
,.33::09 1.
/46.73 "',
./P~:::.. ..;..~:..>...:.~../j
BE ARIN(j' . QJS TANeE
N 62"09'J4"E.i' f 25.25'
S 24'12'~1.E'.~ 49.42'
s 27'4P:-4~i"E:. --'..50.83'
S 31;49'501>1::,"... /50.75'
S 31'3:&~5'3."E '\ . J 99.85'
S 4Q'l&'03f,,E j 50.0r
S ~~8'b1';'E/ 49.90'
/..~~., ./..:~\....J
~. \~...).)
C'. ..
-",::
P.O.C.
NORlHWEST
CORNER OF
BLOCK 2 OF
BASKIN'S
REP.LA T
LINE
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
l7
BLOCK 2
BASKIN'S REPLA T A RESUB OF
U' BASKIN'S REPLA T
BLOCK 1 "l).,.. ~
A RESUB OF 't. ~.
BASKIN'S REF'LAT ~~~ ~.
'% U' I!'
~::.~ ,~-
U' <'J. ~
~ ~ '<(,..
<:.y~
r~
..,...... ~:....:
BLOCK 2
A RESU8 OF
BASKIN'S REPLA T
1 00 50 0
I I
SCALE:
.... "
. />:::~.~..~ ?
NOTES: :' .-.../.... ..;
1.) The sketch shown ti~,eon<Js for informational purposes only
and is not inteJ'ld'e<:t- t.o",d~ct 0 survey performed in the field.
2.) The sketch sho,wn .lJ..erelln',was prepared without the benefit of 0
title abstract fo~ i~<stipJect to ony and oU easements.
restrictions 01\ ari'y...<?,lh~r molters of record.
3.) The becrin2S'sQo~ he.f'eon are based on the Held Deed Beoring ot
N89'46 01 E~ fo....,the-. tost West centerline of Section 17, Township
29 Sout?,.. Rds.ge "1~ East.
',.. .....h...... SEE SHEET 2 FOR LEGEND
('-<::--..... "-,:~ SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
/'''-.,.~'.''':..~ "\ ".<' BAYVlEW NURSING PAVlUON - fNGRESSjE:GRESS
~ ". DAE: . '. DUiII::l C&CEIl ~
1"-100' . " 6 ..fi/Ol GMK GMK
.lQ!l...tIg. SW1llli mYiHStIIe
1170-001- 000 17 2S scum
EASEMENT
EWa
16 EAST
KA~g
:R=:=-:ram~ ~ 13::::
r_.... _ J.lUf E.aa. "'I"oll..~.....
rANGE NT
17.37
43,53
10.95
1275
16.54
23.37
LINE
L8
L9
LtO
L11
112
L13
L14
L15
US
L17
L1B
l1g
L20
L21
L22
L23
L24
l25
L26
L27
BE ARING
S 39'57'58"E
S 39'52'26"(
N 50"45'06"E
N 50"44'39"E
N 5S0B'13"E
N 49-48'35"'E
N 44'05'06"E
S 42'12'55"E
S 38'02'35"W
S 40"23'23"W
S 61'2"53"W
S 50'45' 4S"W
S 13"41'04"W
S 34-,4'5J"E
S SO'5S'SO"W
N 36'O'(.'4S"W
N 40'03'oa"w
N 40'0 t'S3"W
N 40'13'15"W
N 39'39'49"W
CHORD BE ARING
S 8S-4S'33"E
N J4'4S'47"W
N 30:02' 4S"W
N 2S"JO'20"W
N 2B"21'J5"W
N 2S'09'-41"W
DISTANCE
50.0S'
49.97'
33.:35',
26.33'
23.34' ~
51.90' ..... '1J .
46.09' ~ Z I.
23..06' PI rJ I
11.32' .n::
10,94' m:D t::
4.55' "" (I)
1&54.86' - g I
21,51' me
40.00' ox F
. 26.46' ro ~
89,46' ;g.....
71.31' r-
84.02'. Ui 3D
27,5'" m
58.62' ro
AlL'\.'l OSLUND
PROf(S~ONAL S~!EYCR A.~ MArP:R
ST/l. T:! or F LORWA' 4659
CERTIFICATE .or Alf'1HORl!t.T!ON Nc:.. LB 2610
Sheet -1- of --L.
cow.'~!.\"fS. er-.. A-I\.
~
,
I
.
,
.
-
j
.
I
I
.
I
e
"
e
THIS IS llill.A SURVEY
../\ P INE:LLRS COUNTY F"1.F1
\.. \OF'F'.RE'C.BK 11S02 PO 1~e3
I
..."....::..:-.
"
~.. .... .. ;''"':r
.. .- . . 1'-" ~~'"J.... I .
Township 29 South, R9~ge-"'\-6 tost. Pasco County. Florida and being
" / ~.:.)- ,f
<.
Commence at the Northwest corner of Block 2 of A Resub 9.ts9Skrn.;,S Replot, as recorded in Plot Book 24,
Page 42 of the Public Records of Plnellas County. FlorJda:/iii;;ce;"'QI~~9 the West line of said Baskin's Replot,
50013'59"E, for 399.07 feet; thence 539'01 "06 wE, for 368.0)"f~et'>p!o"g the Southwesterly line of said replot;
thence N50'5S'S4"E, 58.09 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNI~G;t.,. theJlc~ N621>9'34"E, 25.25 feet; thence 52412'41"E,
49.42 feet; thence 527"46'41"E, 50.83 feet; thence S:S1:~!r.50"'E;' ?b.75 Teef; thence 537"34'53"E, 99.85 feet;
thence 54016'03"E, 50.07 feet; thence 539'58'01 "E, 4'~.~a, '~e.t.,-i.hence. S39'57'58ME, 50.06 feet: thence
5-39'52'26ME, 49.97 feet to the point of intersection/witf,-' o.-'ri'Qn-tangent curve to the left; thence easterly olong
the orc of sold curve wlth 0 radial bearing N52'20'':4''E:~, o~ 6aving <:I radius of 15.02 feet, 0 central ongle of
98'17'34M, on arc length of 25.77 feet and a chord '~aring ..Cind distance of 586'48'33"E, 22,73 feet: thence
N50"4S'OS"E, 3~.35 feet; thence N50"44'39"E, 26.33 fe'jl!t;Ahence NSS06'lJ"E, 23.34 feet; thence N49'48'J5"E.
51.90 feet: thence N44'05'OS"E, 46.09 feet; thence 542'12'55"E, 23.06 feet; thence S38'02'J5"W, 11.32 feet;
thence 540'23'2,3"W, 10.94 feet; thence S61~1~&3"W, ~55 feet; thence 5SO'45'48"W, 154.86 feet; thence
S13"41'04"W, 21.51 feet: thence S.34'14'53"E, IAo.Oq (eet~ thence S50"58'SO"W, 26.45 feet: thence N361J.4'45"W,
89.46 feet; thence N40'O.:s'OS"W, 71.31 feet: tli'e,Jce" NfQ'01 '53"W, 84.02 feet; thence N40'13'lS"W, 27.51 feet;
thence N39"39"49"W, 58.62 feet to the p~ii'lt-<Qf. in~eriection with a nan-tongent curve to the right: thence
northwesterly olong the orc of said curve: wi-f,tl ci' ''rQaral bearing N51"J5'4S"E, and having a raolUs of 688.88 feet,
a central angle of 0714'55", on ore reng6" d(787-..r5 feet ond a chord bearing and distance of N.34"46'47MW,
87.09 feel to the point of intersectlory"'-'YitH-.; 0 qbn-tangent curve to the riC]ht; thence northwesterly along the
orc of said curve with 0 radial bearin~ N5B.:'2e'1~"E, ol1d having 0 rodius of 423.19 feet. 0 central ongle of
,02"57'53", on ore length of 21.90 f~~i.."~d a.;cflord bearing and distance of N.30'02'48-W. 21.89 feet to 0 point
of compound curvature; thence 2!j!<t9 .Je~kn~thwesterlY along the arc of 0 curve to the right, having 0 radius
of 12,420.00 feet and 0 centrol <#ng[e" qf Q0"07'0:S", (I chord bearing ond distance of N28'.30'20MW, 25.49 feet to
o point of compound curVQture; t.hei\Ce \33;09 feet northwesterly olong the arc of 0 curve to tne right, having (I
rCdius of 10,912.63 feet and Cl...-''C~ii~rCll,-tngle of 00"10'25", 0 chord bearing ond distonce of N2s-21'3S"W, 33.09
feet to the point of intersect!?n ~!tfl",Q;.-iu:m-tangent curve to the right; thence northwesterly olong the orc of
said curve with 0 rodiol be~'~63"~2'40"E, and having 0 radius of 1.393.50 feet, 0 central angle of Ol'SS'1r,
en arc length of 45.73 fee,f qri)l"'P,;ch9fd bearing and distance of N2S"09'41"W, 46.73 feet to the POINT OF
BEGlNNlNG. :' ~. / . ' ....../
." ~-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION; ., .=_. .
A parcel of land lying within Section 17,
more particularly described os follows:
I
.so&E
'.
Con taining 0.416 oCl'es, A~~re... ar!,.less.
:( {/)",,-~..-/
....... .........
,......... -0 .
LEGEND: ./ ,..~.,,_, }'
Ll Denotes lin~ '~T~ble\ N~mber
P.B. Denotes P)at'-eobk j'
c.p.a Denote~i'-cbndoiTiimi.rm Plat Book
PGS. Denol~ Pd-g)s" ,/
P.O.S. Den~tes,~f.l.ojrih'pf Beginning
P .O.c. Den.9te$,PS11l.t, ,'of Cornmencemen t
,0. .. ...~ .
... -~<>., .~~ SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
''''..", -'\ 't '. BAYVlEW NURSING PAVlUON - INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT
...... '....~:J
..t~/1'i/01 ~K ~K ~
~ ~ .R!tl.lit
17 29 SCUn-! 15 EAST
I
I
I
I
..IC!I.Jio.
1170-oot -000
I
Ki..:n.g
=-=~-- :::c m: I: .
r_..._1S34 C~ ~a"'a .,.....I~
I
~fiP~~\~ ~ ~-U
Sheet ~ ot..L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Bella Terra on the Bay
Parking Sufficiency Study
Apri121, 2008 - Revised August 12,2008
Page 13 of 13
APPENDIX 2
EXISTING PARKING SURVEY
AT THE VILLAGE
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentD ""parking_ STIJDY.doc
II fl..
Iln
Iln
I
-In
lin
II [1
I
II [J.
I f1 '
II [J
ILJ
IU
IU
lu
r' I
I~
I~
IU
IU
U
I
I [I
Existing Parking Survey
at
. The. Vi.llage
For
...-.... .. ........ .
.~..
..th...:.. :. r..e.....e....... '~"'.
. . . '. - "'. .~ .
.- ' .
, '. . . "' .
. .., .
. ". .
. - : '" ..... .. .'; .
'. .... . .
. .. '.
. .
. .
~.
. ..
. . .
'~".. " . '. . .
. ..
4040 N. Central Expressway
Suite 200
Dallas, Texas 75204
214 559-4080
The Village
8000 NW 27th Boulevard Gainesville, Florida 32606
Prepared by: .
william alan northsea, architect
florida registration ar 00082.22
. consultation services
.4117 northwest 66th terrace
gainesville, florida 32606
352 377-0328
billnsea@bellsouth..net
~n
~n
I
In
n
In
~n
-0
n
fl
[]
U
U
U
o
~
IU
r-]
I L.
.u
ll.
I .'
Table of Contents .
Section
Page
1.0 Purpose and Scope
1
2.0 Procedures
1thru2
Graphic - Overall Campus
Graphics -lake House Area
Graphics - Magnolia Grand Area
0-1.
lH-1 thru lH-2
MG-1 thru MG-2 .
Graphics - Tower Villas Area
TV-1 thru TV-2
3.0 Raw pata
lake House - Cars per Unit
1 thru 3
LH-3
Lake House - Cars per Bedroom
LH-4
. Magnolia Grand - Cars per Unit
Magnolia Grand - Cars per Bedroom
MG-3
MG-4
TV-3
Tower Villas - Cars per Unit
Tower Villas - Cars per Bedroom
TV-4
CW-1
Campus Wide Independent living Units - Cars per Unit
Campus Wide Independent living Units - Cars per Bedroom
CW-2
4.0' Summary and Conclusion
1thru2
II'
In
Iln-',I
1 I
\
~n
Ilnl
I )
In
n
fl
r'l
f1
[J
U
U
o
o
tJ
U
r 1
u
1.0 Purpose and Scope
The purpose of this survey and assessment is to provide the client with infonnation
related to the current existing parking use at the Independent Uving type units at The
Village in Gainesville, Rorida. The current Unified Land Development,Code for A1achua
County does not define or establish requirements for Independent Living Residential
Units in Section 407.14 and this evaluation is to provide criteria for establishing design
standards for that use at the subject property. The subject property and scope of this
evaluation and analySIs consists of a survey of existing vehicle parking use at'three
Independent Living residential facilities at The Village, in A1achua County, Flori~a -lake
House (180 Units), Magnolia Grand (60 Units), and Tower Villas (56 Units). In addition,
an analysis of the existing parking use for a Marketing Facility was conducted.
The existing site Iay-out and number and type of available parking spaces, along with
noted use and patterns was obtained from the client and property owner and reviewed '
and evaluated. In addition, interviews were conducted with Management, Marketing and
Gate Security personnel and initial field observations were conducted at various extreme
times of day prior to commencing the' count to determine the most representative
patterns of use for evaluation. Noted areas of use by staff and visitors for each, complex
were included, and Gate security personnel indicated a total trip generation per day as a
maximum of one 'trip per ~nit, or less on the average. AIl available spaces and types
were field verified and graphic representatJons of each of the three areas are included as
, Sheets LH-1 and 2 for lake House, Sheets MG -1 and 2 for Magnolia .Grand, and
, Sheets lV-1 and 2 for Tower Villas. A survey for a period of one week was conducted
on a regular basis at various times through-out the day pre-detennined to exhibit the
most variation for the residential use. In addition" historical data was reviewed and an
interview was conducted With Mar1<:eting personnel to detennine past use and projeCted
Mure use for the Marketing function at the facility. The data collected during this
investigation appeared to be accurate, as to a representation of actual use. However,
the provided services do not include complete verification of the ~ or autheriticity
of information provided by others.
2.0 Procedures
This evaluation and report is based upon observati~ns made during on-site field work .
conducted from Sunday. 26 March 2006 through Saturday.1 April 2006_ Graphic
representations of each of the areas were prepared after field verification and noted
patterns were observed arid noted by interviewed personnel. Observations were then ,
made and an actual vehicle count was recorded at 9:00 AM, 2:30 PM and 8:00 PM
at each of the three subject locations -lake House, a 180 Unit complex with 148
1 Bedroom and 32 2 Bedroom Units, or 212 Bedrooms, Magnolia Grand, a 60 Unit
complex with 20 1 Bedroom and 40 2 Bedroom Units, or 100 Bedrooms, and at Tower
Vinas, a 56 Unit complex with 34 1, Bedroom and 22 2 Bedroom Units, or 78 Bedrooms.
It should be noted that all complexes are 100 percent occupied. Data was recorded as
actual number of vehicles, vehicles per Unit, and vehicles per Bedroom. Data is
presented in raw form ,and graphically as Sheets lH-3 and 4 for lake House, Sheets
U
I
U
1
.
~n
n
n
In
In
n
n
fl
rJ
fJ
u
[]
u
u
o
u'
u
U
IOU
MG -3 and 4 for Magnolia Grand, and Sf1eets lV-3 and 4 for Tower Villas. A Summary
of recorded data for aU Campus Wide Independent living Units, as actual number of
vehicles, vehicles per Unit, and vehicles per Bedroom, is presented as Sheets CW-1 and
CW-2.
In addition, an interview was conducted with Michele Rist, the Director of Marketing for:
the Village for the past 18 years, prior to commencing the count and typical use patterns
. and peak periods were discussed. Separate interviews were also Conducted with
Management and Gate Security personnel. Historical data was reviewed, and field
observatiOns were made relative to parking use for Marke~ functions, to analyze
existing and projected use.
J
2
1
I
1
I
1
I
I,
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
1
J
;.', "..; ", _J i
Ii ' . . I
~._ .' ,..... .. '.. J,
i .;_:.:.:....::..:...:..~."::,.~~~~~.:._::....J;::..;:._~ ':.:::..,.'::..:...__:~"":"';.....- " ~..,'.'..<~---'-.:_-~~.:._._,._-~_..:_'.:....:_..._~_._':.__._._:_--- '-,- .:...} . I
,filenumber Ejdate Bnumber I.'.J.I,
:0_08 I
I
0603-1 I8VisionsO-1 J I
I
)
- - - .-. - .-
II.........'......................:... ........, ....~. .......,
~ii.W(+i;;..t;,t,):id'.;~
w i.11 i a m alan nor t h sea
architect
1Ioma regisIraliln IIIlIlk AR llOO8222
4117 _ 66th tenace gainesviIIe,1IcIid!I326ll6
~377.,o."l?ll I:JiIInsMlllb!I net
Existing Parking Survey - The Village
fat
..... em IIIGMtraJ E...-.,
thrft.~__1!il23M
... 21"'......
~ampus- The Vi~
"I
I.
.4
.... -lli
'l:.:_""J
>1
.'~'l
.: .~
,
:... i
':,'1
.:'t
'O;':i
,.:':i
'.,\1
. J
:1
:'i
~"j
",'l
j ":1
.','~',..'"
.,~~
~\~i
"
I
! i,
, !
~-].
I~
, I
d
i --j
I j
I'
I !
_.1
. :--]
j'l
U
U
J
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ifr
r;-I._;,": ;
r:: : .:'~:. . - .
I -.. . '';: ~:.". . .:~: -."
li~f
F'" ._,..~
~~-:"-'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
'~,
l
}
I
J
l
J
-,
1
"l
I
-\
I
J
]
l
J
J
J
J
.
!:t." . ~
,
-. J
~... ~
,~
.e
~i
~. ....~
'~~~>~>~~.~
E':;' .. bl .' ~*..
"".I .a:..;.If' ~'1
.w.;t .!
-'
~,);~~~:-
~ -.'.......:.... '. .
,",' .'..;. '
'~:~I' ."-f
'~B
.;;
JI
i..$ '-":. ",
~1! '",.,'.; .:
.., ll"O:>" -~...,::."~
,#-IJ""la. '.F" . .~ "
- "r ( .J,~. .\,.
; r-....,iR '1.~ :/', .
[ "'1{ \~ .~..
~ ~ ~~ ,;
- .fC- ;:itt_~... ~
J
Existing Parking Survey - The Village
lor
... o4D4ONCentral'~
thr~ . t;:s~ens 7S2a)4
- 2104559-<<180
Lake House - The Village
Gainesville, Flonda
william alan northsea
architect
Ilorida registralion number AR 0008222
4117 nw 66th terrace gainesville, ftonda 32606
352377-0328 bDlnsea@bellsouth.net
I
rue number
date
27 mIlCh Il6
0603-1
revisions
LH-1
j---,q,
r . r' --- r,,~q--
r - -I' (-----' [- - -') r--j
r--J ~ ':-:-1---' -1 -1 ---l
['--------'
r---'
Lake House A & B
90 Units ,
74 .. 1 BR 16.. 2 BR
, (106 BedrooJr1s)
\ Total.. 57 Spaces
\ (6 Accessible)
\ '
\
~
, ,
, Lake House C & 0
90 Units
74 .. 1 BR 16. 2 BR
(106 Bedrooms)
o 25' 50'
~-
Plan.. Existin
NORTH
Lake House Area E9
- - '--
.. - -- - - .' - - .. - - :- -
----l -~--l
m~
I :s
ItU I
rn~ '
.~ ~, ,
cb
C)
..!
5=
Cl)
F= &~ I
~ J ~~
~ I Q)
:;, II )RJI F
~ id~ ~
c:: .1'. ::JI'
.- 5 ~
~
ccs ~.
a. jl.!l
C)
c::
-:=
en
'x
W
I
I
~~Ii
'r:: Q) ~ 'It
c:~ I
~~t
I; ~ j I
.~ il
= ~~
~ ;~
- -
ctl
G)
rn
I
william alan northsea
architect
lIoridaregislralioo nwnber AR 0008222
4117 _86lIr~ gainesviIle, flcxida32S06
3Q 371-11328 soUII.net
'~.""".'"
. . .- -(I~.. .'
. .
.....
! !
i ;
I'
Ii
I ;
'.
I
Ii
! !
I
......:..
. . . . !
r;
I
. '. .. . .... '. i
'.' ....!ilf :J' ;
...... ;.&".
.-.....~-_..
': ..D' .' --"':1'
, !
'.---oJ -.
I.
..>:_~!
.:,,;::;T:'.:(:;\;fT:;~"::'l
<,:,"-;J!':.,:...;,-..:,...!
,:,:),~;,:'''i::~':''2J
I'
I I
'. J
I
I
'.
t;~i~tj~;~~i,i;:
'." ' .~: ,,' .~, ~:": :;:':j
;;~t~~I~i~~~~!,1
n
, !
l.J
i!
, ~
\
.J
I,
,',
I. .I
I
",'.' :L~;:.5;;:~}~}::J
. ,'. ..... - .~:):~/y.:.\j
./jr:-::'..~.~.(~:.':..~/.;}-.:.il
.:. '::.-. . fl' , ;.
fJ
I
iUJ
I
[J
I
fl
U
I
"," 1
::. :~ -..,
".
:..
UI
I
j
II:
u!
I
I
'.' ~
..:...~.....;
u
I
rJ;~f
,~._~_:.~._~;
. ,
.,
u
...
o.:-~ '..-1&- 2.:::=...-2
I
Existing Parking Survey - The Village
lor .
_ CMllN__
,......t::..""__".,.,.
----
M~norJa Grand - The ViDaae
Gallilsvllle. Fiiii1Ia
~EJU
rn~J
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I william alan northsea
architect
IDida regisr.iicn .... AR DlDl222
I 4117 lIIIII66th temlce gainesviIIe, lkxida 32606
352377-0328 lliIII-~
<:>
'"
<1! EBs
01 :;0
q -l
:I:
...
o
'Q
1J
tu
;::1..
--
0)
-
-0
-
0),
:::J
.
m
X
--
en
.......
--
:::J
:::J
o
-
--
0).
G)
...,
0)
:::J
Cl.
)>
-s
CD
0)
Existing Parking Survey - The Village
10r
.... ..oeNc.aI~
"":.4 ==1SlIM
Magnolia Grand - The Village
GairiesvIIIe. FIofiila
n
I !
I '
I I
,'--'
; 1
, '
" ;
,..-,
i
I !
n
w-
'l
LJ
D
n
[-1
J
tJ
l J
r 1
LJ
U
II
',~
U
lJ
lJ
Bflenumber IT-=rs Bnumber lJ
0603-1 revisions MG-2 \ l
" U
I
_ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I I[
I
n
I. ]
-:
I _,
il
I !
....J
II
:. )
w.
.~
I I
I )
!
I i
'-'
j
...
J
]
J
J
I
JI
'11
~,
j
J!
I
Ji
I
JI
0603-1
revisions
TV-1
'j
!
Ii
I
william alan northsea
architect
flooda registration number AR 0008222
4117 nw 66th terrace gainesville. f100da 32606
352 377-0328 billnse beUsouth.net
Existing Parking Survey - The Village
for
.... o4OCON CerVaf~
three. =-...Zfena~
..... 2'\.4-......a
Tower Villas - The Village
Gainesville. Flonda
file number
date
27 march 06
sheet number
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C)
"I
-0
Q)
~
-.
Q)
-0
-
Q)
:J
-.,
I
j
I
~J
l
J
M
C'lEBZ
(A 0
q ~
-
o
q
m
X
-.
(J)
r+
-.
:J
1
I
-1
I
J
-I
Q
~
CD
...,
I
J
.J
.J
J
<
-. .
-'
-
Q)
(j)
)>
...,
CD'.
Q)
1-1
Q'
~~~~
~I.C~
CD ~~.
a.to-<
..., 'T1 fJ) .
O~ :;
o -
3 N Q)
fJ) tv (j)
- I
tv
to
::u
1
I
J
I
II
.-1
JI
E1~EJJ
L:O~J
w jJ f i a m a I ann 0 rt h sea
architect
1Iorida regi;lraliJn I1lBIiJer AR lXXllI222
4117 IIW 66th lemIce ~ 1Iorida 32llO6
352 31T-0328- .
Existing Parking Survey - The Village
lor
_ _IlConlAl_
~.~=75Dl4
Tower Villas - The ViU-
Gainesville. ~
3.0 Raw Data
Lak, House -180 Units 212 Bedrooms 100 Percent Occupied
Sunday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
26 March 06 71 Cars 79 Cars 72 Cars
.39/Unit .34/BR '.441Unit .37/BR AO/Unit. .34/BR
Monday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
27 March 06 89 Cars 88 Cars 95 Cars
A9JUnit A2J8R ' A8JUnit .43IBR .53tUnit .45IBR
Tuesday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
28 March 06 87 Cars 95 Cars 90 Cars
.48/Unit .34/BR .53/Unit .45/BR .50/Unit .42/BR
Wednesday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM '
29 March 06 91 Cars 94 Cars 75 Cars
.51/Unit .43/BR .52/Unit .44/BR .42/Unit .35/BR
Thursday , 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
30 March 06 94 Cars 91 Cars 82 Cars '
.52/Unit .44/BR .51/Unit .43/BR .46/Unit .39/BR
Friday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
31 March 06 92 Cars 97 Cars 72 Cars
.51/Unit .43/BR .54/Unit .46/BR .40/Unit .34/BR
Saturday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
1 April 06 79 Cars 85 Cars 91 Cars
.44/Unit .37/BR ,.47/Unit .40/BR .51/Unit .43/BR
Magnolia Grand - 60 Units 100 Bedrooms 100 Percent Occupied
Sunday 9:00 AM ' 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
26 March 06 47 Cars, '47 Cars 46' Cars
.781Unit .47/BR .78/Unit A7/BR .77/Unit .46/BR
Monday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
27 March 06 42 Cars 43 Cars 47 Cars
,70/Unit .42/BR .72/Unit .43/BR .78/Unit .47/BR
Tuesday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
28 March 06 44 Cars 39 Cars 45, Cars
.73/Unit .44/BR .65/Unit .39/BR .75/Unit .45/BR
-1-
lin
Iln Wednesday 9:00 AM . 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
.in 29 March 06 40 Cars 41 Cars 47 Cars
. .67/Unit AO/BR .68/Unit .41/BR .78/Unit .471BR
,: . Thursday. 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
in 30 March 06 38 Cars 47 Cars 34 Cars'
.63/Unit .381BR .78/Unit .47/BR .57/Unit .34/BR
Ilii Friday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
31 March 06 46 Cars 39 Cars 50 Cars
. n/Unit A6/BR .65/Unit .39/BR .83/Unit .50/BR
Iln Saturday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 P~
1 Apnl 06 46 Cars 43 Cars 44 Cars
1m .n/Unit A6/BR .72/Unit .43/BR .73/Unit .44/BR
Iln Tower ViUas.... 56 Units 78 Bedrooms 100 Percent Occupied
.j
I Sunday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
IILI 26 March 06 37 Cars 42 Cars 40 Cars
.66/Unit .47/BR .75/Unit .54/BR .71/Unit .51/BR
IIC! Monday 9:00 MI. 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
27 March 06 41 Cars 43 Cars 44 Cars
.73/Unit .53/BR .n/Unit .55/BR .79/Unit .56/BR
I U Tuesday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
28 March 06 44 Cars 40 Cars 41 Gars
.79/Unit .56/BR .71/Unit .51/BR .73/Unit .53/BR
I U Wednesday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
29 March 06 43 Cars 40 Cars 40 Cars
I 0 .n/Unlt .55/BR .71/Unit .51/BR .71/Unit .511aR
Thursday. 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
0 30 March 06 42 Cars 41 Cars 48 Cars
I .75/Unit .54/BR . .73/Unit .53/BR .86/Unit .621BR
0 Friday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
I" --- 31 March 06 45 Cars 40 Cars 40 Cars
.80/Unit' .58/BR .71/Unit .51/BR. .71/Unit .51/BR
I 0 Saturday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
1Aprif06 : 40 Cars 41 Cars :46 Cars
.71/Unit .511aR .73/Unit .531BR .82/Unit .59/BR .
I u
I U
U -2-
I
I
Iln
.In
In
I! .
In
-In
In
lin
In
10
I 0
I 0
I [),
I 0
I 0
I~U
I U
U
I
.U
I U
Campus W"KI~ IndePendent Living Units - 296 Units 390 Bedrooms
100 Percent Occupied
SUnday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM, 8:00 PM
.26 March 06 155 Cars 168 Cars 158 Cars
, .52/Unit .40/BR .57/Unit .43/BR .53/Unit .41/BR
, Monday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
.27 March 06 172 Cars 174 Cars 186 Cars
.5B/Unit .44/BR . .59/Unit .45/BR .63/Unit .48/BR
Tuesday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
28 March 06 175 Cars 174 Cars 176 Cars
.59/Unit .45/BR .59/Unit .45/BR .59/Unit .45/BR
Wednesday _9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
29 March 06 174 Cars 175 Cars 162 Cars
.59/Unit .45/BR .59/Unit .45/BR .55/Unit .42/BR
Thursday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
30 March 06 174 Cars, ' 179 Cars 164 Cars
.59/Unit .45/BR .60/Unit .46/BR .55/Unit .42/BR
Friday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
31 March 06 183 Cars 176 Cars 162 Cars
.62/Unit .47/BR .59/Unit .45/BR .55/Unit .42/BR
Saturday 9:00 AM 2:30 PM 8:00 PM
1Apnl 06 165 Cars 169 Cars 181 Cars
.56/Unit .42/BR .57/Unit .43/BR .61/Unit .46/BR
Marketing
The Marketing staff currently, cOnsists of four employees and there are no plans for
expansion of the staff. All Marketing operations must be scheduled in advance with the
staff and any unscheduled visitors are turned away at the entrance gate to the campus,
and asked to contact staff for an appointment. Operations generally consist of a tour of
the campus and discussion that lasts two and one half hours and must be scheduled in
advance. Marketing tours historically have occurred at the rate of 50 tours per month '
and are scheduled as such, or 12.5 tours per week on a seven day week basis. Although
. the entire staff of four is rarely present at the same time, an evaluation indicates'the .
need for 4 employee spaces, and a maximum of two guest spaces as tours are not
scheduled simultaneously. Visitors or vendors not scheduled to tour are extremely rare
but may account for an additional space on occasion. Michele Rist, Director of Marketing
for 18 years has indicated a maximum need for 8 spaces presently, 4 for staff, 2 for
scheduled appointments, and 2 for vendorS or on-campus personnel. Although she has
indicated she believes that need will not change in the future. a maximum need for 10
spaces is a logical conclusion.
-3-
r-i
II ~ ~~ ~ .~
180 Units (1481 BR 322 BR)
212 Bedrooms
. ,..----.,
1
,---,
-1
Lake House A, B, C, & D
f---' r....-., r------, r-----' r.'-r r.---i r--'l r-'l
:2 ::iE :2
<( 0. 0.
000
9. ('t) 9.
Ol N to
Wednesday-
29 March 06
Time
- _. - .. - .. .. .. .. - - ..- - .. -
0.70
:'t:
C
:J 0.60
L-
CD
a.. 0.50
tJ)
s...
co
U 0.40
0.30
1.10
-
Peak High 0 97.00 Ca s - .54 Cars Per Unit
Average. e 86.14 Ca s - .48 Cars Per Unit
Peak Low 0 71.00 Ca s - .39 Cars Per Unit
- .
(95) (95) (97)
(89) (88) .53 .53 (90) (91) (94) (94) (91) (92) .54 (91)
(87) .50 --.:~ ...:52 .52 .51 ~~- .51
-A9~48'- - ~48- r --- -i82)- -fS5)- - -
(79) - .46 (79) .47
(71) .44 (72) (75) (72) .~
.42
_~_ -=.40 __ - -1- --- - .40
- -.-.- - - - - --- - ~-- . - - - --- - 1- -
- 1- - - - - "..-- - 1- - .-1- i- - - -- - - - - - I---- -- -' - ~ -.- - 1- -
_. -- I- - - - - 1- - - .- -- - - -1- - - - 1- -. I- -.- -- - :.... - - .....--- - ~ --
---- - -. - I- - - - - - _.- - - - -1- - - '- ..- - - 1- -- _. - -
'-- - '-- '- ...., '- '-
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.20
0,10
0.00
:2 :2 :2
<( 0. 0.
o 0 0
9. C') 9.
CJ)N to
Sunday
26 March 06
:2 :2 :2
<( 0. 0.
o 0 0
9. ~ 0
CJ) C'\I co
Monday
27 March 06
:2 :2 :2
<( 0. 0.
000
9. ~ 0
CJ) C'\I co
Tuesday
28 March 06
:2 :2 :2
<( 0. 0.
o 0 0
9. ('t) 9.
CJ) N to
Thursday-
30 March 06
:2 :2 :2 :2 :2 :2
<( 0. 0. <( 0. 0.
0 0 0 0 0 0
'9. C') 9. 9. ~ 0
CJ) N to CJ) C'\I co
Friday Saturda~
31 March 06 1 April 0
~
..a
~
c
11
OJ
.c
..
C?
:z:
...
8 ..
tl'E~
.., ~ ~ .
!
E
::l
C
.!!
1;:
~
I
('t)
o
co
o
CD
0)
co
:>
CD
..c
I:- II) '"
. C)'g
I lUe
~ J I ~LL
~ l!~'J~
en Uti; II)
0) _ III
.5 h. 5,gf
.llI:: ;:c~
.... II)QI
co ~c
0. lU'iij
-I(!)
0)'
s::
+:l
t/)
'x
w
as ~~
CD :;j.c:
r/) 4ll~
..s:: r~
::-~ .@)
~R
00 ~. ~;;;;
CCD~ 'ftI.o
01
c: I
as "
-J:i
as 0 .
~ S
E....:8
aslU08 .!l
.cOO
tD~
i~
1'-'"
~ ::~
""'"
.. - -
c: c=
c= .CJ OJ c= c=:::;
~ ~. J
.------,
L~
:::=J
==:J
~
c=
Lake. House A, B, C, & D
180 Units (148 1 BR 322 BR)
212 Bedrooms
1.10
1.00
,
0.90
0.80
E
0 ,
e 0.70
"'C
a>
OJ 0.60
L-
a>
c.. 0.50
~
ctS (79)
() 0.40 (71) .37 (72)
.34 .34
Peak High e 97.00 Ca s - .46 Cars Per Bedroom'
Average " 86.14 Ca s - .41 Cars Per Bedroom
Peak Low tit 71.00 Ca 5 - .33 Cars Per Bedroom
(95) (~~)
(89) (88).45 (87).45 (90)
.42 .43 41.42
r- '_
-- - -1--- - ----
(91) (94)
.43 .44
. ~97)
(~:)(91) (92) .46 (91)
. r- .43 (82)'~ (85) .43
_3,- ___ ___-tI9.).:40 __
(72) .37
.34 ;:...:
175)
.35
0.30 ---1- - - -- - --1- - - -- - - ---.-
--.1- - I- --....-
1--
0.201- -- 1- ---- - -----
-1--- -
-1---- - --1-- - ---.- --
.0.10 --~- - -----
-- -.- - -- -.1- -
_..- - ---.- - --- - - 1--
0.00 L- L- - '- L- L -
~ ~ ~. ~ :E ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ :2 ::1: .::1: :2 ::!!: ::1: :iE ::!!: ::!E
<( 0.. 0.. <( 0.. 0.. .,<( 0.. 0.. <( 0.. 0.. <( 0.. 0.. <( 0.. 0.. <( 0.. a..
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o. 0 0 o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 (Y) o. 0 (Y) 0 0 (Y) 0 o (Y) 0 .0 (Y) 0 0 (Y) 0 0 (Y) 0
c; N Cci c; N Cci c; N Cci c;N Cci c; N Cci c; N Cci c; N Cci
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesd~ Thursday. Friday' Sabirdaa
26 March 06 . 27 March 06 28 March 06 29 March 6 30 March 06 31 March 06 1 April 0
Time
=:J
=:J' =0
I~ ~ I
! ...
..
~
t!lLJ
I
"
c
.!!
'"
T""
I
M
o
<0
o
Q)
0)
ca
:>
Q)
.r::.
I- GlIII
I ~~
~ J 5iL
2: - I ~
~ ~lftJI'";"
0) I~~ ~ .
.5 ht o.!Ji
~ 5 J:'a
ca GlCD
a. iH
...J(!)
0)
c:::
+::i
en
'x
W
: I!
"
en ;8~
..c: . 8~
::-:; ~ fi
o ~~;:
r::: Q) ~ 'jj,'"
r:::"';'~
.- =>
~..c:i
aJ o.i
E'-Ij
aJ aJ 8 ~~
;=:!
c""
",,,,
~ ~1ii
-
---~-~~~~--~-------
==:J
___.__. ._..____J.......__,
L . c:= c= c= CI r---' c= L_~
Magnolia Grand,
c=J . l____~ r-; ~~ =::J L_____J. ----,
60 Units (20 1 BR 40 2 BR)
100 Bedrooms
=-=:J
1.10
Peak High. 50.00 Ca s - .83 Cars Per Unit
. 1-c::==J
R f'J
E .
i! "
J I:
..
8 ..
i l:~
~ e
.B
E
:J
C
&!
T""
I
en
o
<0
o
1.00
Average
e 43.57 Ca s - .73 Cars Per Unit
(J)
C)
J2
:>
(J) CD 01
~ i'8
L- _.9
~ :>11-
~ I~ ~
::J ! Inil -g
(/) ~fj~ ~
C) ~~l; (!)
.5 h.l1Iai
~ 5 ':g~
cu 6,lll
a.. l1I'~
C) ~(,!)
c::
~
'x
w
as lin!
Q) l:Hj
II) :U
..c: ~1
:: - ~ ;!li
o 0 ~ h
c:: Q) ~ .!:ii
- Ii:;
c:: ~
.- :>
as :;
_..c:1
as O.1!l
l!'
E.... ~ S
_as;S j!
\V '~~
i~
,,"PI
~ ~t?l
I
-I
0.90
Peal< Low e
34.00 Ca s - .57 Cars 'Per Unit
(5<l
.83
---!A6j_ _ ---!A.6.)
.7] .?J. (43)'(44)
.72 .73
'-(39) ----- -1--
.65
- _ _ _ _ - .. .. .. 8 ... _ _ _ _ _._ _ _
(47) (47) (46)
0.80 --;-7-8---;-7-8 .
0.70
(47)
.78
(42) (43)
.70 .72
---r-- - ----(39j
.65
(38)
.63
-
(47)
.ia--
(47)
'.i8
(44)
.73
-.
(45)
.75
'....0' (41)
--$-:08-
-
:!::
c
.::::>
s....
Q)
c..
CJ)
s....
CO
()
0.60 - --- -
--.-- ----- - 1----
-:-(-34)- - -". - -
.57
0.50 -_.- z_ --..-- - ---_ - ---- - -;--- - --'-- - ----~ - --
- ----- -
0.401--- -
'_ ---- f-
-1-,-,-- '-
---I-
- --
0.30 ---- ----- - ---- - ----- - --1-- -:- - - ----
0.20
- ----~-
- -- - - ---- - ----
,- - -r-----' - --
0.10
- - -- - ----- - ----- - ---- - --,-- - ----- - --
0.00 - - - - - -
~ ::E ~ ~ ~ ::E ::2 ::E ~ :: :E :: ::E :E ::E :E :E :a: :: ~ :i:
<( 0- 0- <( 0- Il;. <( 0- 0- <( 0- 0.. <( a. a. <( a. 0.. <( 0.. 0..
0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r::! ~ 0 c::! ('I) 0 c::! ~ 0 c::! ('I) c::! c::! M .c::! 0 ~ r::! 0 ~ c::!
lJ) N cXi (J) N cXi (J) N cX:i (J) N co (J) N co 0; N co 0; N'CO
. Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesd~ Thursday' Friday' Saturdae
26 Marcti 06 27 March 06 28 March 06 29 March 6 30 March 06 31 March 06' , 1 April 0
c= c= c= c:= CJ[
,-,
'---
c=:'
c=:
,---..
L-
'_'_'__'___'_' ._......_.~ ~ _.. .......~_........."..._...._._._..__......l....___._.._..._
f--..-' ! J :==J ~ ~ ~ ~ ':==J =.:J :~_._J
60 Units (20 1 BR 40 2 BR) I ,
100 Bedrooms i ~
Magnolia Grand
1.10
Peak High ~ 50.00 Can - .50 Cars I er Bedroom
3! l!l !
.. os. .!l
'D <( ..
... e
1.00
Average
. 43.57 Cap - .44 Cars F er Bedroom
I
c:
'"""
I
('I)
o
<0
o
~
0.90
Peak Low ~ 34.00 Cap - .34 Cars F er Bedroom
Q)
[J)
m
:>
Q) Q)11l
.c ~
I- mo
I 5U:
~ II ~
~ s ~RJI-g
[J) a~~ ~
.5 h. m.:
-c I; '5~
m COlli)
a. r:;
m'iij
[J) ::Eel
c:
+:i
U)
'x
w
0.80
E
o
e 0.70
"'C
Q)
OJ 0.60
S-
Q)
C-
0.50 -(4~7Z.)..(~47>-(-4f3-)
C/J . _' .46
s-
(\j
()
0.40
(50)
(47) (4-0) (4J..)--(4-7-)--'~6)--..,;50 -\40
42 (43).47 (44).45 .47 .47 .46 .~) (43)(44)
( ).43 .~ (39) (40) (41) r- .43 .44
..g 3.40 .41 (38) (39)
- ----- - ___~.JL -I-----"r'-'- - --:-38-f.! (34)---.--39- ------ -- --
.34
0.30-"-- '- ---.-- - ---- - ----.- -
0.10 _n__ - --.-..- - ---- - ---- - ---..-,- - ------ '- --_.- - ---
to iH
CI) l:'l :g
fIJ -81.l
.c :U
-- ~ .!i~
r... N"'-5/
o 0 ~ i~
c CI) ~ .~.a
-.2i
C E
.- '"
to.c g
- g
to O.1Il
Er...:~
to to.s ~'"
Ul&j
i~
1'-'"
....'"
....'"
'<1''''
~
-
-
0.20-....-. - ---..- - --.-- - __'..n_ - ----- - .--......-
0.00 '- '- '- - - - -
:: :: :: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :2 :!: :!: :!: :!: :2 :2 :2 :2 :!:
c{ a. a. c{ a. a. c{ a. a. c{ a. a. c{ a. a. c{ a. a. c{ a. a.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 ~ 0 0 (") 0 0 (") c::! 0 ('i) 0 0 (") 0 0 (") 0 0 (") 0
0; N ciO 0) N ciO 0) N 00 0) N ciO Q) N ciO 0; N 00 0) N 00
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday' Friday Saturda~
26 Marcli 06 27 March 06 28 March 06 29 March 06 30 March 06 31 March 06 1 April 0
-
-
----....--....----
-
~
r--'. r~:=J ==:=J ~
56 Units (34 1 BR 22 2 BR)
78 Bedrooms
_..._..._..__._..___...__.__.....~.__.._........._.__ .... ..L...._..__.____
----, . =:J .=:J _.__ J c __J
!
E
:J
C
11
.c
..
c=. c= c= L"' CJC
[=:J
,---., ,--..
~ "-----
Tower Villas
:!:
c:
:::>
L-
0)
0-
w
L-
etS
()
1.10
Peak High G 48.00 Ca s - .86 Cars Per Unit
Average_ . 41.8iCJ1! s - . 75~..am .E.er Unit
Peak Low . 37.00 Ca s - .66 Cars Per Unit
(4"8r-
.86 (46)
(43)~~~ (44) (45) .82
(~2) ---.-7-9 (43) (42)(41) - --.:f!9 - -
(41) .77 (40) (41) .77 (40) (41)
.75 - (40) (40) .7J .73 (40) (40)
I (40) .I9
.71 .71 .73 .71 .71 .71 .71 .71 .73
-(37')- '- -- -~.._- - - - --- - - - - -. - - - _.- - - -- --- - - -=- .- - -
66 ~
'-
- --1- - - - -- - - - .-. - - - - .- - - - - --- - - - -- -- - - --- - - -
- --~- - - - .._- - - - -- - - - 1- -- - - - -- - - - --'- - - - ._- - -- -
- --- - - - - --- - - - -- - - - - --- - - - .- -. - - - -- '-jl! - - - ~_.- - - -
- - - - - - .-- - .- - -...- _. - - - - - - -- - - -- ._- .......- - - -- - - t -
- - t - -- ._- - - - .-.'- - -- - -- - - - - - - - .- -- - - - - .- --
-- .- - '- - - -- - -- - - .._~_. 1- - - --- - - - -- - - .- ...-- .- - - --'--,. - - .-
- - I - - '- -
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
::?: ::?: ::?: ::?: ::?: ::?: ~ ::?: ::?: ::?: ::?: ::?: ::?: ::?: :E ::?: :E ::?: ::?: ::?: ::?:
~ 0.. 0.. ~ 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. ~ 0.. 0.. ~ 0.. 0.. ~ 0.. 0.. ~ 0.. 0..
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
<;:! ~ 0 0 ('I) <;:! 0 ('I) 0 0 ~ 0 <;:! ~ <;:! <;:! ('I) <;:! <;:! ('I) <;:!
0> N co en N IX) en N co 0> N co 0> N IX) 0> N IX) 0> N IX)
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesd~ Thursday' Friday' Saturda~
26 March 06 27 March 06 28 March 06 29 March 6 30 March 06 31 March 06 1 April 0
------....---..--..-
M
e
8 ~
I ~ ~
'D -< >
r I!!
~
~
e
~
~
I
(\')
o
CD
o
CI)
C)
co
:>
CI)
..c (J) III
J- m'g
I ~.2
>. I 5ll.
CI) ill (J)
2:glil.c
:J SSRJS,,:"
C/) ""i~
U~~ ~
g> .-r. E Ji
32 Ii-;::~
~ (J)Ql
co ~.5
0. H~
C)
C
;l
t/J
'x
W
- <Dlj
'" it~
(J) "'~
t/J ~a
.c '6 Ji
-; - ~ ~,
o 0 ! 1!
c CI) ~ ,!ii
-11
s:: E
.- ::0
<<l ::;
_.cj
<<l 0 .f/!
E~:~
<<l co;g .!!
~~
<Do
~~
...'"
;: ~~
- --
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I william alan northsea
architect
I
Cars Per Bedroom
o
Co
o
!=' ......
co 0
o 0
!='
CJ'I
o
o
en
o
o
~
o
o
o
o
!='
!='
w
o
o
~
o
o
~
o
......
o
I I I I I
I :J(;3
j ! ! ..:...l......
I I I I I- . -
Ol.j::>.
I I I I i I .j::>.~
. -
CJ'I.j::>.
......0
I I I I I -
I I I I I ,01-:;;:
i r j ,
I I I I I W.::;
O1~
OlW
I I I I I I -
~4
I I I I I
I I I I I .-J
I i I I I ~~~1
I ,
I I I I I
I i I " I I .......9
. -
Ol.j::>.
w......
I I I I I -I
I I I I I 101-:;;:
, I I I , "tJ ~ "tJ
, Olw
! I I I I - CD CD
O1~ su CD su
.......9 " OJ "
I I I I I I O1~ r co :c
.......9 0 CD cO'
I I I I I :E
I ::r
I I I I I ~ e e
I I01~
i ; I ! I .j::>.1\) (.t.) ~ ~
I I I I I - "'-I ~ co
01-:;;: 0 ex> 0
I I I I I I W.::; 0 ~ 0
en~ () () ()
I I I I I I I\)~ su su su
..., ..., ...,
I I I I I ..1-
I I I I
! I ! i i )cn .j::>.
I I I I ! CO~ ~ 01 0)
:O1~ "'-I ~ N
......0 () () ()
I i I I I I. ::::::
CJ'I.j::>. su su su
......0 ..., ..., ..,
I I I I I - Q) Q) Q)
- - -
I I I I I ro ro m
I I. _ ..., ..., ..,
! , I ! II~~ m m OJ
I I I I I .-_ CD CD CD
CJ'I.j::>. 0. 0. 0.
I I I I I I W.::; a a a
Q1-:;;:
coO) 0 0 0
I I I I I ,- 3 3 3
I I I I I I I I I I I
I I
I\)
0') en 9:00 AM
S:S:::
~ ~2:30 PM
::r:1ll
'<
g 8:00 PM
I\)
......s:9:00 AM
S:O
~ ~ 2:30 PM
::rill
g'< 8:00 PM
I\)
co-l9:00 AM
s:c
Ql
~ ~2:30 PM
::rill
g'< 8:00 PM
~~9:00AM
S:a.
~ ill 2:30 PM
::r~
g~ 8:00 PM
~-I9:00 AM
s:~
~ ~ 2:30 PM
::rg.
g'< 8:00 PM
w
......" 9:00 AM
S:::!.
~ g. 2:30 PM
::r'<
g 8:00 PM
....en 9:00 AM
)>Ill
'0-
:J.E; 2:30 PM
-a.
OD!
l>>< 8:00 PM
Existing Parking Survey - The Village
lor
... o404ONCenIr1II~
threl!. =:'~._15Zi!D4
... 214558-o4Cl1O
Tower Villas - The Village
Gainesville. Flonda
fde number
dale
1 April 06
revisions
0603-1
fIorida regislralion number AR 0008222
4117 fT>N 66th terrace gainesville. f100da 32606
352 377-0328 billnsea@bensouth.net
....
o
~n
o n
~ IJ
CD
< [I
--
w= f]
en
w-
[]
o
!]
[J
[] -
IJ
\.
"'-101
COO)
mc
CD ::J
0. ;:::;:
a Q)
0-
3 ~
U) ~ u
:;:0
~ U
m
~ lJ
U
!J
U
U
o
sheet number
TV-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
o
o
f\.)
moo9:00AM
S:C
~ 5.2:30 PM
:J""~ I
~ 8:00 PM
f\.)
""s: 9:00 AM
S:O
~ 5. 2:30 PM
:J""II) I
~'< 8:00 PM
f\.)
0)-19:00 AM
S:ffi
~ ~2:30 PM
:J""II) I
~'< 8:00 PM
~~9:00 AM
S:o.
~ ~ 2:30 PM
:J""~ I
~~ 8:00 PM
~-I9:00 AM
s:E"
II) iiJ 2"30 PM
00. "
:J""II) I
~'< 8:00 PM
W
->." 9:00 AM
S:=:!.
~ g- 2:30 PM
:J""'< I
~ 8:00 PM
->'009:00 AM
)>11)
-0-
=:!.5i 2:30 PM
-a.
ODl I
C1'I< 8:00 PM
p
->.
o
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I I
I I
o
i->
o
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
1
T
I
I
;
;
I
I
william alan northsea
architect
IIorida regisllation number AR 0008222
4117 nw 66th terrace gainesville, f10rida 32606
352377-0328 billnsea@beUsouth.nel
p
W
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
t
Cars Per Unit
o
:s:..
o
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
p
en
o
o
m
o
o
:......
o
o
00
o
Existing Parking Survey - The Village
for
.... := ~cenIraI eqns.w.,
th~.~1SZ/04
Campus Wide Independent Living Units - The VillaQe
Gainesville, Aorfda
I
I
I . -::;: I"
i I~g:
I -. ~
enOl
I ""co
i:n~ T
I W$I
I .1-::;:
i l&l;:j
I Jn~
""
1.Jlo.-
m->.
WCXl
I ~
1-::;:
~Ol
.I~
C!TI""
"f~
m->.
0""
I~
l~
lco~
.1-
Ot->'
I . _CD I ~
en ->.
enm
I ~l
I .I~
! j,C!TI.Jlo
cp-
I 1,_
m->.
0""
I . _ ~
en ->.
enm
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
.
;
;
!
I -::;:
, ImO)
IIf\.)W
.1- -
en ->.
CO""
. -I~
en ->.,
en~1
.-d
-a1
I~!!!
I
-
. ......
~d.l
co
~.-
m->.
.....0)
I .:;
I
o ->.
Co 0
o 0
-0
CD
m
"
.....
o
=E
~
~
CD
-.os
m
CO
CD
~
~
c.n
c.n
o
o
(')
gj
I
~
......
~
01
N
(')
~
c.n
N
(')
m
...,
"Tn
""0
CD
-.os
c.n
00
(')
m
...,
v'
""0
CD
...,
C
::s
;:+
e
::s
;:+
I I
file number
0603-1
""0
CD
m
"
:c
cO'
::rl
e
~
00
0)
o
o
(')
~ I
en
0)
VJ
(')
m
-.os
v'
""0
CD
...,
e
::s
;:+
date
1 April 06
revisions
I
;
j
()
Q)
3
~ "'0
c:
CIJ
~l
-- j
c..
CD
.....
",
j
I
I
J
-~
j
_f _
-
::J
-:
c.. i
CD _J
"'C
CD
::J
c..l
CD
::J
,-+ --1
_J
l
.J
_...1
r
--
< -")
-- I
::J __J
c.c
-")
CJ
::J
--
en JI
--1
VJ N J I
coco
00)
me I'
CD ::s
a.;:+.J
..., en
0_
o N)
3 0 r
en N -.1
~
OJ
~ J
~
~ J
-
,
sheet number J
CW-1 ~1
,..---.......
L-= .~~
r--
1.__'
'-- )
,....__...__.._..._..___.__ou__..__..........l._._..___.._
....,.--,
. _ ___.1
Campus Wide Independent Living Units
~___l ~ :=J =:-l -----,
296 Units (202 1 BR 94 2 BR)
390 Bedrooms
~
,--,
r-~ r-"'~
'~-,,--'-'
1.10
Peak High . 186.00 C us - .48 Car Per Bedroor 1
Average . 171.52 C us - .44 Car ) Per Bedroor,
Peak Low . 155.00 C us - .40 Car ) Per Bedroor 1
(186) -(.:1.B3)
.413 (175)(174) ("176')" (174)(175) (fl4f(1-79r-- (176) \ .'81') -
(168) (172)(174) .45 ,46 (164) .47 (165)(169).46
(155).43(158) ,44 , .~ .45 .46 ,4P .45 (162) ;..;. .45 (162)
.42 ~ .42 .42 42 .43
.40 .41 'F
-,.;..;- - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - I-- -- c- - -
- - T - - -I- - - - - - -I- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -
- - -- -
- - - - - - - - - 1- - - - i- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - I- -
- I- - - '- - I-- --- '- - - - - - - -I- - - - -- - ---t - -
- - '- - -
1.00
0.90
0.80
E
o
e 0.70
"'0
(J)
CO 0.60
l-
(J)
(L
0.50
(j)
l-
etS
o 0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
~ :E :!: ~ :!: :2: ~ :::l: :!: :::l: ~ :::l: :!: ~ :!: :!: :!: ~ :E :!: :!:
a. a. a. 0- ct: 0- 0- ct: 0- 0- ct: 0- ct: 0- 0- ct: 0... 0...
0 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 l"') 0 0 l"') 0 l"') 0 0 M 0 0 l"') 0 0 l"') 0 0 M 0
m N co en N co m N co m c'l co m N co m c'l co m N 'co
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesd~ Thursday. Friday' Saturd~
26 Marcn 06 27 March 06 28 March 06 29 March 6 30 March 06 31 March 06 1 April
.~
II ~ I
! u
.. l!l :!
1il 'l: ,51
.., ~ .~
!
E
~
..
IlO
T""
I
(t)
o
<0
o
8, ~~
.!!! 5 ~
:> CIl
CD ~
.c I
I- ,gj
t III
~ ~ IllJJ c
C) ul~ ~
c: ... CIl
._ I Q.
~ ~ ~
cu ..5
a. CIl
C) ~
.5 Ult'
..... J
.~ Q.
>< E.!ij
W ~~
m i~
: II~
~B
~ - ~ It
o 0 ~ fi
c Q) ~ 'l.a
c-I
.- =>
m :;
_.L:j
mo~
r
; ~ II
!~
~~
,..<'1
~ ;51
---~--~-------~----
II
-10
lin
I .
I
lin
,
~n
lin
lJ
Il]
1[",]
l J
4.0 Summary and Conclusion
A StImmary of collected data is as follows:
Lake House -180 Units 212 Bedrooms 100 Percent Occupied
Peak High - 97.00 Cars .54 Cars/Unit 046 Cars/ Bedroom
Average - 86.14 Cars .48 Cars/Unit .41 Cars/ Bedroom
Peak Low - 71.00 Cars .39 Cars/Unit .33 Cars/ Bedroom
Magnolia Grand - 60 Units 100 Bedrooms
100 Percent Occupied
Peak High - 50.00 Cars .83 Cars/Unit .50 Cars/ Bedroom
Average - 43.57 Cars .73 Cars/Unit 044 Cars/ Bedroom
Peak Low - 34.00 Cars .57 Cars/Unit .34 Cars/ Bedroom
Tower Villas - 56 Units 78 Bedrooms
100 Percent Occupied
Peak High - 48.00 Cars .86 Cars/Unit .62 Cars/ Bedroom
Average - 41.81 Cars .75 Cars/Unit .54 Cars/ Bedroom
Peak Low - 37.00 Cars .66 Cars/Unit 047 Cars/ Bedroom
t J
,J
]
J
-H
U
Ll
! ]
l.
Campus Wide Independent Living Units - 296 Units 390 Bedrooms
100 Percent Occupied
Peak High - 186.00 Cars .63 Cars/Unit 048 Cars/ Bedroom
Average - 171.52 Cars .58 Cars/Unit .44 Cars/ Bedroom
Peak Low - 155.00 Cars .52 Cars/Unit AD Cars/ Bedroom
It was observed that although during the seven day pattern there were some slight
peaks at different times of the day, each of the observed complexes seem to have a
relative constant number of visitor, staff and service vehicles in addition to resident
vehicles using the parking facilities at each of the different times of day.
The conclusion that can be reached, based upon observation and recorded data, is
that the Peak High for Independent Living Units at the entire complex, occurring at the
Tower Villas Complex, is .86 Cars/Unit or .62 Cars/Bedroom, and the Peak High for all
of the Independent Living Units on a campus wide basis is a value of .63 Cars/Unit or
.48 CarslBedroom.
~~
William Alan Northsea, Architect
Florida Registration AR 0008222
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment "E"
ITE Trip Generation Rates
T rip Generation Rates - Per ITE
ITE
Land
Use
Existing Use Code Existing Weekday AM Peak PM Peak
Senior Adult Housing
Attached 252 229 797 17 26
Assisted Livinq 254 94 258 24 36
TOTAL 323 1055 41 62
ITE
Land
Use Proposed and
Proposed Use Code To Remain Weekday AM Peak PM Peak
Senior Adult Housing
Attached 252 229 797 17 26
Assisted Living 254 210 576 53 80
TOTAL 439 1373 70 106
Total New Traffic 318 29 44
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentE _Trip Generation Rates.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment "F"
Bella Terra on the Bay
2855 Gulf to Bay Blvd
FLD2008-05012
Response to 6-4-08 DRC Comments
1. Environmental Condition Prior to building pem1it: Provide detailed erosion control measures for the
construction wash down area. Not Met Sarah Josuns 562-4897
A construction entrance detail has been added to sheet SC2.03 and note to Erosion Control
Plans.
2. Fire Condition The porte-cacheres must have a clear height of 14'. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB
Not Met Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3078
The porte-cocheres [IL entrance and AL/MS entrances] are designed to have a 14'-0" height
clearance. Please refer to Wall Sections [Sheet A4.07 and Sheet A4.10]. Confirm with Jim
Keller (City of Clearwater Fire Plans Review) that the existing note is sufficient.
3. Fire Condition Must Comply with Ordinance No. 7617-06 Radio System Regulations for buildings,
Install 911 Radio Repeater / Antenna Booster System for emergency Fire and Police communications.
Acknowledge intent to comply in letter fonl1 for file PRIOR TO CDB Not Met Leonard Rickard 562-
4327 x3078
The architect will request the application for this system from Jim Keller. A letter, or email if
sufficient, will be sent to Jim Keller confirming the willingness to comply.
4. Fire Condition Add 80,000 lb. requirement to bridge comment on page CS3.02 and SC3.04 PRIOR
TO CDB Not Met Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3078
A note has been added referring to an inspection report prepared by Delta Engineering,
assuring that the 80,000 lb. bridge requirement is met. Additionally, a certification letter issued
by Delta Engineers has been provided to Jim Keller and Wayne Wells. A copy of the letter is
included in the resubmitted package. See Attachment "H".
5. Fire Condition Provide location of Fire Department Connection. TIns must be a minimum of 15'
from the building in an accessible location and be within 25' to 50' of a dedicated fire hydrant. Show
on Utility pages PRIOR TO CDB. Not Met Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3078
The location of the FDCs has been added to the utility sheets. Additionally, a Siamese
connection can be located in the exterior wall of the Pump Room if necessary [BOH120].
6. Fire Condition All vehicle gates will be required to be equipped with a Knox Key switch and have
battery backup in the event of power outage. Show on plan pages SC3.01,SC3.02, SC3.03, SC3.08
PRIOR TO CDB Not Met Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3078
A note indicating the need for a Knox Key and battery back up has been added to the requested
sheets above. Additionally, the application for this system has been requested from Jim Keller.
7. Fire Condition All vehicle gates must maintain a minimum 20' clear opening. Show on pages
SC3.01, SC3.02, SC3.03 & SC3.08 PRIOR TO CDB Not Met Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3078
The vehicle gates have been redesigned to ensure the minimum clear opening conforms in all
locations to this requirement and the measurement has been added to the sheets above.
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOCIPennits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentF _6-4-08_ DRC Comments Jeponse 7 -2-08.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8. Harbour Master Condition No issues. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
9. Land Resource Condition Reassess potential impacts at every tree to be preserved. Address utility
demo impacts under the trees canopies. Insure all proposed utilities are addressed, roof drains and
sanitary demo at trees #361 and #366, sanitary demo at tree #352, roof drain at trees #431,411 and
440, water lines at #440 and storm drain at tree 398. The proposed sanitary is too close to tree #357.
These are just a few examples. Revisit every tree to insure every impact is addressed prior to building
permit. Not Met Rick Albee 727-562-4741
The Applicant has decided to utilize a certified arborist at the site 6 months prior to and during
construction to ensure preserved trees are properly pruned and protected.
Utility demolition plan conflicts have been addressed by the engineer in conjunction with the
landscape architect. As mentioned during the DRC, roof drains will run above existing ground
to avoid damaging trees.
The Landscape Architect has reviewed the specific tree conflicts noted above as well as the
overall tree preservation plan, and revised barricades and utility locations accordingly. Trees
rated 2.5 and larger have been included in the overall calculations as trees to be replaced when
removed. Notes were added to the preservation table to acknowledge that existing utility lines
that would appear to be in conflict with existing trees are to be abandoned in order to reduce
impact to existing root systems.
10. Land Resource Condition Show the proposed underground eclectic on the tree preservation plan and
address the possible tree impacts prior to building permit. Not Met Rick Albee 727-562-4741
The underground electric has been added to the tree preservation plan, and revisions have been
made to address potential impacts to existing trees.
11. Landscape Wheel stops are required for all parking spaces that abut landscape areas (in addition to
required curbing). This applies to both existing parking spaces to remain and new parking spaces. Not
Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
Wheel stops will be added to the proposed parking spaces that require this feature. As
discussed during DRC, a waiver from providing wheel stops to existing spaces is requested.
12. Legal Condition No issues. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
13. Parks & Recs Condition The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this project
prior to issuance of building pemlit. This fee could be substantial and it is recOlmnended that you
contact Chris Hubbard at 727-562-4837 to calculate the assessment. Not Met Debbie Reid 562-4818
Will comply.
14. Solid Waste Condition Please explain how all solid waste will be handled. Not Met Wayne Wells,
AICP 727-562-4504
A solid waste roll-off system and recycling dumpster will be located within the service yard. See
sheet SC3.03. Trash throughout the campus will be collected by maintenance employees and
disposed in the compactor.
15. Storm Water Condition
a. The following shall be addressed at Building Penn it application. 1. City of Clearwater criteria
allows only 1/2 credit to be given to the existing impervious area in curve number determination.
Per TBE's correspondence with City Engineer Phuong Vo, the Existing Curve Number
calculation has been adjusted to reflect City of Clearwater's criteria. See Attachment 'F l'
for revised calculations.
J :\02026\02026002. OO\DOC\Permits\City of ClearwaterlAttachmentF _6-4-08 _DRC Comments _reponse7 - 2-08.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
b. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD pemlit.
Approved SWFWMD ERP Permit No. 44030075.002 for this project is forthcoming. A copy
of the SWFWMD approval letter will be submitted when received.
c. Show on the construction plan a drainage easement drawn from the center line of the creek to a
point 25-feet beyond the top of bank on either side of the creek to be dedicated to the City of
Clearwater. Sufficient documentation shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of the first
Certificate of Occupancy. Please contact Earl Barrett at 727-562-4754 for further infomlation.
Corrections have been made to show that the entire ditch shall have a drainage easement.
See sheet SC3.04
d. The City of Clearwater suggests a 25' private drainage easement over the pond outfall pipe of the
Harbour Wood Nursing Center to be dedicated to the owner of this center. Please show this
easement on the construction plan and a copy of the easement document to be submitted to the
City for record.
An existing cross-access agreement between HarborWood and BVG sufficiently addresses
stormwater pipes and all shared utilities.
General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Pemlit Review; additional comments may
be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Not Met Steve Doherty 562-4773
16. Traffic Eng Condition
a. Traffic Operations Division shall require that the parking study take into account similar assisted
living facilities in the Pinellas County area. The parking ratios for these facilities in the nearby
area are a better reflection of what the proposed parking will be.
Explanation of the methodology used to conduct the parking study has been provided to the
Traffic Operations Division and they agree that an additional study is not necessary.
b. Handicapped parking stalls shall be dispersed throughout all buildings.
Handicap parking spaces have been dispersed near all building entrances.
c. Provide 9 handicap-parking stalls per Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction
Chapter 11, Section 11-4.1.2. Also show this on the "Site Data" page.
Plans have been revised to include 9 spaces and total HC spaces are noted on the site data
table Gl.Ol.
d. Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards.
http://www.myclearwater.com/gov / depts/pwa/ enginlProduction/ stddet/index.asp
Sheet SC6.01 includes the City of Clearwater details.
e. Provide ADA standard truncated domes where sidewalk crosses the roadway and/or driveway.
Use FDOT 2006 Design Standards Index 304 and provide this detail on the site plan.
Sheet SC6.01 includes truncated dome details in the handicap and pedestrian ramps.
f. Provide typical dimensions for parking stalls and drive aisles. The dimensional width and length
of a parking stall shall be to current City standards.
Typical parking space dimensions are shown on Site Plan Sheets A through F.
g. For multiple building(s), handicapped parking spaces shall be dispersed and located closest to the
accessible entrances (Florida Building Code Ch. 11 Section 11-4.6.2).
Handicap spaces are located closest to the accessible entrances for the main building. See
sheet SC3.00.
h. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General
Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the cun.ent Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee
schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (e.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for
Building Pemlit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building
Pemlit Application. Not Met Steve Doherty 562-4773
] :\02026\02026002. OO\OOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentF _6-4-08_ ORC Comments _reponse 7 -2-08.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
17. Zoning Condition Show or indicate the location of all outside mechanical equipment and required
screening. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The electrical transformers have been screened with landscaping. The service yard, containing
most of the large mechanical equipment has been screened with a decorative wall and
landscaping combined. The HV AC equipment located on the roof will be screened through the
design of the building facade.
18. Zoning Condition Based on the floor plans submitted, there are "skilled nursing" units indicated on
the second and third floors. The property is zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, where
"nursing homes" are not a listed permissible use. One cannot request such use through Residential
Infill Project use, as the criteria requires requested uses to be listed within the zoning district. Nursing
homes are pemlissible in the MHDR District. Revise. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
A rezoning application has been submitted to change the zoning to MHDR.
19. Zoning Condition
a. Sheet G 1.01 - Site Data - Indicate the existing Land Use designations on the property.
Land uses have been added to the site data table
b. Indicate the land area (square footage and acreage) under the three land use designations/zoning
districts (CG/C, RlOG/O and RMIMDR). Indicate how the overall density was calculated,
including that AL units are based on three beds = one dwelling unit, and upon what acreage the
density was calculated (if utilizing all three land use designations/zoning districts and based on
density averaging). We have to report density averaging projects to the Pinellas Planning Council
(PPC). Also, since these land use designations have different maximum ISR's, provide the
proposed ISR per land use designation.
All Land Use designations are included on the Site Plan sheets and land area devoted to each
designation is included as well. The overall density is based on 3 beds equals 1 dwelling unit
and averaged as shown below.
a. CG FLUP (24 du/a) portion is 2.45 acres and permits 58 dwelling units or 174 ALF
beds
b. RlOG FLUP (15 dula) portion is 0.34 acres and permits 5 dwelling units or 15 ALF
beds
c. RM FLUP (15 du/a) portion is 28.33 and permits 424 dwelling units or 1,296 ALF
beds
d. Calculated density utilizes all three FLUP/Zoning designations, is based on density
averaging across the entire site and utilizes three (3) ALF beds equals one (1)
dwelling unit.
e. Total permitted density was determined using the above acreage and equals 484
dwelling units or 1,485 ALF beds.
f. Existing density on the 31.12 acre site is 32 units (94 ALF beds) and 229 attached
dwelling units (independent senior living).
g. Total proposed density on 31.12 acre site is 299 dwelling units. This is calculated
using 210 (94 existing beds and 116 new beds) ALF type beds, which equates to 70
attached dwelling units and 229 (73 existing and 156 new) Independent
Living/Attached Senior Housing units.
c. Additionally, need to know if the number of beds/density of the nursing home outparcel is based
solely on their land area (acreage) or if any portion of their density utilized the subject property to
attain their number of beds/density (we previously spoke of such issue). May be in written fonn.
J :\02026\02026002. 00\OOC\Pem1its\City of Clearwater\AttachmentF _6-4-08_ ORC Comments Jeponse7 -2-08 .doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The density calculation for the 120-bed HarbourW ood Rehab Center is based only on their
land area of 2.711 acres and their permitted RM density of 15.0 du/a. This calculation also
considers that the nursing home unit is calculated per code at 3 beds per 1 dwelling unit.
2.711 x 15 = 40 dwelling units x 3 = 120 beds.
d. Sheet SC3.00 - Indicate on the subject property the locations of the land use designations
Commercial General (CG) and Residential Medium (RM) and the locations ofthe Zoning Districts
Commercial (C) and Medium Density Residential (MDR). Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-
4504
Will comply.
20. Zoning Condition Sheet Gl.Ol - Revise Site Data Note #1 to 2855 Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Not Met
Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
Site Data Note # 1 has been revised.
2l. Zoning Condition Please provide the math to docUlllent the Harbour Wood Nursing Home density is
contained on its own property. Our occupational license indicates 120 beds. You indicate in your
response to General Applicability criteria #1 that their density is 14.7 dulacre. I do not know their
acreage and am unclear if you used 3 beds = one duo If their density is not contained on their own
property, need to reflect such in your density calculations for this project.
See above response 19.c.
22. Additionally, please provide documentation that they have their required parking on their own
property. Parking requirement is one space/l,OOO square feet of GFA. If they do not have their
required parking on their own property, since this nursing home used to be part of Morton Plant
Mease property, then need to provide required parking on the subject property of this application to
meet the minimum Code requirement. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The HarbourWood Rehab center currently has 63 delineated parking spaces. The gross floor
area of the HarbourWood Center is 49,165 square feet, which requires 50 parking spaces to
satisfy City code requirement. As such a surplus of 13 parking spaces is available at the
HarbourWood Rehab Center above that which is required by code.
23. Zoning Condition Building elevations (all buildings) need to indicate the proposed exterior materials
and colors. Provide samples/swatches of proposed colors (such as color 1 and 2, etc.). Not Met Wayne
Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The architect has provided these details as part of the resubmittal package.
24. Zoning Condition On all appropriate site plan sheets and landscape sheets, show all required sight
triangles. Ensure all objects and landscaping within the visibility triangles meet requirements. Not Met
Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
Site triangles meeting Clearwater Code have been added to the plans.
25. Engineering Condition
a. Applicant shall obtain pemlanent address assignments from the Engineering Department prior to
submission of a building permit application.
Permanent address assignment will be obtained prior to submission of a building permit.
b. The City of Clearwater will provide water taps, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095),
set the water meters (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.F.P.D.s (back
flow prevention devices). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to
the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees.
.I :\02026\02026002. OO\OOC\Pennits\City of ClearwaterlAttachmentF _6-4-08_ ORC Comments Jeponse 7 - 2-08.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The project will utilize the existing meter as well as the BFPD located on Gulf to Bay, which
is currently under the owners account.
c. Provide a copy of an approved Florida Department of Environmental Protection (F.D .E.P.) permit
for the installation of the domestic water main prior to issuance of a building pemlit. Prior to
Request for Clearance, the applicant shall be responsible for bacteriological testing of completed
water mains and all fees associated with the testing. The health permit application formes) can be
found at: www.dep.state.f1.us/water/drinkingwater/forms.htm
http://www.dep.state.f1.us/water/drinkingwater/foffils.htm
A copy of an approved FDEP permit will be provided as soon as it becomes available. We
are submitting an application (in duplicate) to be signed and completed by the City with our
current submission.
d. Please note the City Engineering has on file a recorded copy of a cross-access/cross parking
agreement between the subject property and the Harbour Wood Nursing home (formerly Bayview
Nursing Pavilion).
The Applicant and adjoining property owner are aware of such of agreement, which has
been included as part of the submittal package. It should be clarified that this is a cross-
access agreement only.
e. Identify all sanitary sewer manholes and provide proposed pipe lengths and slopes for all sanitary
pipes to be replaced.
Sanitary sewer manhole and pipes are identified, See sheets SC5.00 to SC5.06.
f. Where water services are to be capped, the services shall be cut and capped as close to the water
main as practical to prevent stagnation.
Services will be capped as closed to the water main as possible.
g. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-
specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the
modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water
mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in-service prior to
construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a
prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal
of a Building Pemlit Application. Not Met Steve Doherty 562-4773
Acknowledged.
26. Zoning Condition The proposed project intends to keep the basic internal streets in their existing
location. The request includes a proposal to gate this community, with a primary manned gate at Cross
Blvd, a gate on Cross Circle northeast of the access drive to Sky Harbor Drive and a gate at the south
end of the Harbour Wood Nursing Home parcel on Cross Blvd. The address for this site is 2855 Gulf
to Bay Blvd., which is intended to be retained. However, the Harbor Wood Nursing Home, which is
on a separate parcel and is owned by another entity, is also addressed at 2855 Gulf to Bay Blvd (per
the phone book and their occupational license ). The Property Appraiser has the Harbor Wood Nursing
Home at 2861 Gulf to Bay Blvd. By design, the proposed gating of the project will require Harbor
Wood personnel and guests to access that facility via Sky Harbor Drive. The address for Harbor Wood
Nursing Home, therefore, should change to a Sky Harbor Drive address. Has the proposed gating and
net effect regarding an address change been discussed with Harbor Wood management? Not Met
Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The owners and managers of the HarbourWood facility are aware of the proposed gating plan
as well as the City's request that they change to a Sky Harbor Drive address. The Bella Terra
ownership wants to be a good neighbor and is willing to help to rectify this issue in conjunction
with the City and HarbourWood management. The City shall consider allowing the
HarbourW ood Center to maintain its existing mailing address, but change its physical location
J :\02026\02026002.00\OOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentF _6-4-08 _ORC Comments _reponse7 -2-08 .doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
address to a Sky Harbor Blvd address. This is very common when a business owner lives or
operates a business in a different location than the physical address of the business.
27. Zoning Condition We have been made aware by an adjoining propeliy owner (Allan Stowell) that an
air conditioning chiller located on the northwest side of the maintenance building west of the high-rise
ALF building is extremely noisey. His concern is also with the closeness of the concrete pad to the
property line. Can the concrete pad be cut back, while still maintaining adequate area for maintenance
and operational aspects of the alc unit and can a masonry wall a maximum of six feet in height be
constructed to help mitigate the noise impacts ofthis alc unit? Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-
4504
Adjustments will be made to accommodate adjoining property owner as much as possible.
28. Zoning Condition We have been made aware by an adjoining property owner (Allan Stowell) that a
gazebo and deck northwest of the high-rise ALF building has been constructed close to the property
line (with the deck apparently extending onto Mr. Stowell's property) without the benefit of a building
pennit. Provide documentation such structures were constructed with a building permit, remove such
structures immediately or need to request to retain such structures (later will need to obtain required
after-the-fact building permits), although removing any encroaching structures on Mr. Stowell's
property. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
Adjustments will be made to accommodate adjoining property owner as much as possible.
29. Zoning Condition Sheet G 1.0 1 - Site Data Note #11 - Since the plans indicate DER jurisdictional
areas, unclear of the meaning ofthis note. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The note refers to animal species and has been clarified.
30. Zoning Condition The City is in the process of adopting amendments to our Comprehensive Plan
prohibiting ALF's and similar facilities from Coastal High Hazard Areas. Need to ensure such
facilities are not located within such Areas. See Gina Clayton for infonnation regarding Plan
amending language. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
No portion of any building related to this project is located in the Coastal High Hazard Area.
31. Zoning Condition Flood zone information is missing from the survey. Revise. Not Met Wayne
Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
Flood zone information has been added to the Site Data Table as well as the Master Site Plan
Sheet.
32. Zoning Condition Survey and plans indicates a "Parcel 1" in the northeast corner for the high-rise
ALF building. This "Parcel 1" is presumed to be for internal applicant purposes only, as there is no
separate parcel per the Pinellas County Property Appraiser information. Any such desire to separate
this "Parcel 1" from the rest of the property (Parcel 2) requires the filing of a subdivision application
with the City and compliance with all applicable Code provisions. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-
562-4504
This condition was discussed during DRC and was determined to be informational only. At this
time the Applicant is only requesting approval of the submitted site plan and rezoning
applications
33. Zoning Condition Based on the number of parking spaces indicated on Sheet SC3.00 and assuming
(based on the elevations of the nine duplex buildings) four parking spaces for each duplex building, I
count a total of 427 parking spaces provided. Sheet G 1.0 1 indicates a total of 424 spaces. Reconcile
parking numbers. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
J :\02026\02026002.00\OOCIPennits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentF _6-4-08_ ORC Comments Jeponse 7 - 2-08.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The parking count has been verified and revised to 427
34. Zoning Condition Sheet SC3.01 - A pedestrian gate is proposed at the existing sidewalk on the north
side of the drive to Sky Harbour Drive close to the proposed gate. While there are existing sidewalks
on the south side of the drive to Sky Harbour Drive, these sidewalks appear narrow (not complying
with ADA width requirements). Need to provide an accessible path meeting ADA requirements for
this project to Sky Harbour Drive (see Traffic Engineering). Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-
4504
Sidewalks have been adjusted to comply with requirements.
35. Zoning Condition Sheet SC3.01 - A six-foot high decorative fence is proposed extending along Sky
Harbour Drive north of the project drive and then into the property along the north side of this drive.
There is an existing wall in this location. Unclear ofthe need for a double "fence/wall" at this location.
Advise. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The decorative fence has been revised to meet, but not overlap, the existing wall at Sky Harbor
Drive.
36. Landscape Sheet SC3.01, SC3.02, L3.00 and L3.01 - A six-foot high decorative fence is proposed
extending along Sky Harbour Drive north of the project drive and then into the property along the
north side of this drive and on the east side along Cross Blvd. Section 3-804.A.3 requires a three-foot
wide landscape area with a hedge on the outside of the fence on the street side of the fence.
Additionally, with the amount of improvement to this property, even though the areas around this
drive entrance on Sky Harbour Drive is not proposed to be renovated and is for "future" development,
landscaping improvements should be made at this project entrance. Revise. Not Met Wayne Wells,
AICP 727-562-4504
Landscape improvements have been made at the Sky Harbor entrance. The decorative fence has
been revised to be set back behind the existing sidewalk, and space has been provided for a 3'
landscape area between the fence and the sidewalk on the street-side.
37. Zoning Condition Sheet SC3.02 - Unclear why the proposed guard house could not be moved back to
meet required (or greater than presently proposed) setbacks and provide the required opening width in
the gate the Fire Department needs. Advise/revise. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The proposed guard house location has been shifted and now complies with all setback
requirements
38. Zoning Condition Sheet SC3.02 - A proposed six-foot high decorative fence is proposed along the
south side of the existing parking lot north of the high-rise ALF building, placing the parking lot
outside of the fencing. Unclear how persons parking in tIns parking lot access the high-rise ALF
building, especially handicap individuals. Need to provide an accessible path meeting ADA
requirements for this project to Cross Blvd (see Traffic Engineering). Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP
727-562-4504
Persons visiting the ALF will access the building via an ADA accessible sidewalk that utilizes a
pedestrian gate located near the guard house.
39. Zoning Condition Sheet SC3.02 - Show handicap parking in the parking lot north of the high-rise
ALF building, meeting Code requirements. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
Two (2) handicap parking spaces are already located in this lot and will be shown on the plans.
J :\02026\02026002. OO\DOC\Permits\City of ClearwaterlAttachmentF _ 6-4-08_ D RC Comments _reponse 7 -2-08 .doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
40. Zoning Condition Sheet SC3.03 - There is an existing dumpster at the southeast comer of the
adjacent nursing home. Ensure the proposed decorative fence does not create issues for the trash truck
turning movements. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
Fence will be placed inside the Bella Terra property and should not have any effect on the
trucks movement for the adjacent nursing home.
41. Zoning Condition Sheets SC3.01(?), SC3.02, SC3.03 and SC3.05 - The chain link fencing along the
north property line (cannot tell if it is proposed along the entire north property line - see Sheets
SC3.01 and SC3.02) and along the west property line south of the Harbour Woods Nursing Home
parcel must be green or black vinyl clad and must be planted with a continuous hedge or vine per
Sections 3-805.C and .D (Sheet S3.04 indicates adequate landscaping along southwest property line).
Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
In an effort to minimize disruption to existing residents, landscape improvements and fencing
along the northern property line will be implemented with future phases that include
underground utility improvements that will disrupt these areas. The existing fence will remain
until the time such improvements are made. A detail showing the fence along the west property
line south of the Harbour Woods Nursing Home parcel will be constructed of green vinyl clad
has been added to the landscape detail sheet.
42. Zoning Condition Sheet SC3.03 - Proposed pavement near the southeast comer of the Nursing Home
parcel does not meet the required 5-foot side setback and the 10-foot landscape buffer. Sheet SC3.09
states the pavement is proposed at a 4.9-foot setback, while that which is drawn on Sheet SC3.03 is
less than 4.9 feet. However, unclear why such setback and buffer cannot be met and Staff cannot
support a O.l-foot reduction to the required setback. Revise. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-
4504
As discussed during the DRC meeting and included as part of the application package, the
setback and buffer requirements can not be met due to minimum spacing requirements of the
City of Clearwater Fire Protection Design and Construction Documents and natural site
features (trees and wetlands) that limit the ability to shift the proposed building to the east. As
such this deviation from Code will allow sufficient public safety while preserving the natural
quality of the site.
43. Zoning Condition Code requires the undergrounding of anyon-site overhead utilities. Not Met
Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
Existing overhead utilities will be routed underground in the proposed redevelopment area.
However, in the northerly portion of the site not slated to be improved the existing overhead
utilities will not be altered from their current state until redevelopment of those areas occur.
44. Landscape Sheets L3.00 - L3.05 - Indicate the property lines on these sheets. Not Met Wayne Wells,
AICP 727-562-4504
Property lines have been indicated on the landscape plans.
45. Landscape Sheets L3.01 and L3.03 - A lO-foot wide landscape buffer is proposed along the east
property line and the request is to reduce it to five feet. A six-foot high decorative fence is proposed
within this buffer, but no continuous hedge or shade trees every 35 feet. Provide a continuous hedge
within this five-foot area on the inside of the proposed fence (DSP may be spec'ed in this area but
plans are not clear; DSP is too small otherwise; Code requires shrubs as part of hedges to be 18-24"
high at time of planting). Provide accent trees (two accent trees = one shade tree) within this buffer
where possible. Do not plant proposed accent trees under the canopy of existing trees. Not Met Wayne
Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
J :102026102026002.00\DOCIPermitsICity of Cleanvater\AttachmentF _ 6-4-08 ~ ORC Comments _reponse7 -2-08.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A continuous hedge has been provided within the 5' area along the proposed fence. Canopy
trees or accent trees will not be planted in this area due to existing canopy coverage.
46. Landscape Sheet L3.06 - Planting Schedule lists the specifications for SPX and WRX "as noted on
plan". Plan does not indicate height of these palms. Code requires a minimum height of 10-foot clear
trunk. Revise to indicate minimum height. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
Height of palms has been indicated on the landscape plans.
47. Landscape Sheet L3.06 - Code requirement for accent trees is a minimum of eight-foot tall and two-
inch caliper at time of planting. Planting Schedule specifications for LI, LJ and MC do not indicate
these minimum standards. Revise. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The planting schedule has been revised to assure a minimum of eight-foot taU and two-inch
caliper specifications for LI, LJ and Me.
48. Landscape Sheet L3.01 - Parking lot north of the existing high-rise ALF can be improved with
landscaping within the east and west perimeter buffers (none shovm). Revise. Not Met Wayne Wells,
AICP 727-562-4504
As discussed during DRC, the landscape drawings have been revised to show proposed
plantings along the easterly side of the parking lot and existing plantings to remain along the
westerly end.
49. Landscape Sheet L3.11 - If the required "interior islands required" is 28,318 sf and the "interior
islands provided" is 30,671 sf, with shrubs required at 50% of the "interior islands required" of 14,159
sf, unclear how the "shrubs provided" is greater in square footage (31,866 sf) than the "interior islands
provided" of30,671 sf. Advise/revise. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The landscape calculations have been revised to show the correct square footage of shrubs
provided within interior islands.
50. Zoning Condition Sheet L3.11 - Remove the "Parking Requirements" from this sheet to avoid
inconsistent infonnation, as the numbers provided are inconsistent with that on Sheet G 1.01 and by
actual parking counts. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The "parking requirements" have been removed from this sheet.
51. Landscape Sheets L3.00, L3.01, L3.02 and L3.11 - Landscape buffers are required along the north
property line adjacent to the commercial areas fronting on Gulf to Bay Blvd and along the nOlih
property line of the Harbour Wood Nursing Home parcel. Unclear why these areas are being ignored,
being shown as "future development", as these areas can be planted to meet the requirements and
preserved when these areas are developed in the future. Revise. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-
562-4504
Buffers have been provided along the north property line of Harbour Wood Rehab Center. In
an effort to minimize disruption to existing residents, buffers along the northern property line
adjacent to the commercial areas fronting Gulf to Bay Blvd. will be implemented during future
redevelopment of that property, which will include underground utility improvements that will
disrupt planting in these areas.
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Pennits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentF _ 6-4-08_ ORC Comments _reponse 7 - 2-08.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
52. Landscape Sheet L3.02 - Seven PE are proposed along the east property line of the Harbor Wood
Nursing Home parcel. Since PE produces sap, which people don't like dropping on their cars,
recommending relocating any PE shown so that they are not closer than 20 feet to any parking area
(we get many requests to remove pines for this reason; we are trying to prevent their future removal).
Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The seven PE's that were proposed have been changed to MC's.
53. Zoning Condition Sheet L3.03 - Relocate "wayfinding signage" out of Cross Blvd. roadway. Not Met
Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The signage element has been removed from the roadway.
54. Zoning Condition Sheet L3.1 0 - While signage is not being reviewed under this FLD case, the survey
and Sheet SC3.01 indicate a "signage easement" at the Sky Harbor Drive entrance, which most likely
is for the Harbour Wood Nursing Home. Unclear how the sign indicated on this sheet for this area
provides any signage for the Nursing Home. Advise. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
In-kind replacement of the existing "Bayview Gardens" sign face only is proposed. No changes
are proposed to the existing "Harbour Wood" sign face or the sign structure as a whole.
55. Zoning Condition Sheet SC3.03 - A screen wall is indicated around the loading and dumpster area
with a note to "see landscape plan" assumably for the details for such. No such screen wall is
indicated on the Landscape Plans. Revise. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The detail for the screen wall has been added to the landscape details.
56. Zoning Condition Sheet SC3.02 - Assumably there will be a pedestrian gate at Cross Blvd near the
guard house. If the "pedestrian gate" detail on Sheet L3.1 0 is to be used, this is a problem with fence
height. Advise/revise. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The fence detail has been revised to be only 6'-0" in height. The trellis has been removed.
57. Zoning Condition Sheet SC3.03 - In order to comply with ADA accessible path requirements for the
Harbour Wood Nursing Home parcel, won't a pedestrian gate be required at the sidewalk at Cross
Circle (see Traffic Engineering)? Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The fence location has been revised so that a pedestrian gate will not be needed at the Harbor
Woods location, but will be installed further north near the vehicular gate.
58. Landscape Sheet L3.12 - Irrigation system must provide 100% coverage to all landscaped areas. Not
Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The irrigation notes have been revised to state that an irrigation system will be provided for
100% coverage to all landscape areas. A detail on the preservation details shows how a radial
pattern will be used around existing trees to preserve root systems.
59. Zoning Condition Provide typical floor plans for the duplex units. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-
562-4504
Typical floor plans for the duplex units have been provided as part of the resubmitted package.
60. Zoning Condition
a. Elevations and Height - Definition of "height, building or structure" requires height to be
measured using the average grade elevation of the site to the top of the building. Need to
determine the height ofthe building so we can advertise properly (see also "b" below).
Average grade has been determined to be 13.5 feet. As such, the proposed maximum
building height will be no greater than 83 feet.
J :\02026\02026002. OO\DOC\Pennits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentF _6-4-08_ DRC Comments Jeponse 7 - 2-08.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
b. Based on the Code definition of "height, building or structure", parapets may only extend a
maximum of 42-inches above the flat roof of the building. In this case, and assuming under "a"
above that the building height is exceeding 50 feet, the parapet/mansard roof is dimensioned at 9'-
11 ". Since this parapet/mansard roof exceeds the maximum of 42", the request for an increase to
height would need to be determined from the average grade of the site to the top of the
parapet/mansard roof.
Requested building height has been revised to measure from average grade to highest point
on the roof system, as identified above.
c. Based on the Code definition of "height, building or structure", mechanical rooms may only
extend a maximum of 16 feet above the flat roof of the building. I am unaware if any of these
structural projections above the flat roof deck shown on the elevations are solely mechanical
rooms or purely decorative architectural features. If solely mechanical rooms, Staff cannot support
heights of these mechanical rooms exceeding 16 feet above the flat roof deck (dimensioned at 19'-
10"). For purely decorative architectural features, we would need to advertise the height of the
building rather than the height of the parapet/mansard roof (see "b" above) but to the top of these
decorative architectural features. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
Requested building height has been revised to measure from average grade to highest point
on the roof system.
61. Zoning Condition Elevations - Elevations are directionally impaired (revise): a. East is really West;
b. South is really North; c. \Vest is really East; and d. North is really South. Not Met Wayne Wells,
AICP 727-562-4504
The plans have been revised
62. Zoning Condition Based on the floor plans submitted for the main building, it is unclear what the
maximum population (ie: maximum number of beds) is anticipated in this facility for areas other than
the independent living units (attached dwellings), including the memory support, skilled nursing (?)
and assised living units. How many beds per room? We need to include such population in the
request. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
All uses other than the IL units will only be 1 bed per room. The proposed building will contain
116 ALF type beds and 138 IL units (64 Ibedroom and 74 2 bedroom). The 9 IL duplex cottages
will contain 18, 2 bedroom units.
63. Zoning Condition Application/request - Ensure the request includes the maximum number of beds
that will be in the ALF (existing and proposed) and includes all setback reductions, parking reduction,
height increase and landscape buffer reductions. Not Met Wayne \Vells, AICP 727-562-4504
The maximum number of beds proposed as part of this project is 210 (94 existing to remain in
the ALF tower and 116 new beds in the main CCRC building).
64. Landscape Comprehensive Landscape Program - Need to identify all reductions or changes from
Code landscaping requirements that are requested and the reponses to the crteria need to address these
reductions and changes in light of the criteria. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum
Code will not be met. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The Comprehensive Landscape Program has been revised to identify all reductions or changes
from Code. The Landscape Calculations diagram has been revised to identify all reductions as
well.
J: \02026\02026002. OO\DOC\Pennits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentF _6-4-08_ ORC Comments Jeponse 7 -2-08 .doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
65. Zoning Condition Attachment B - a. Ensure all reductions to setbacks are consistent with that listed
by Staff in the "request"; b. Reductions to setbacks and landscape buffers are not required for cross-
access driveways; and c. Ensure all landscape buffer reductions are consistent with that listed by Staff
in the "request". Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
The setback and buffer reduction requests have been reviewed to ensure consistency with the
Staff request.
66. Zoning Condition Parking Sufficiency Study - a. Introduction - Harbour Wood to the west is a
nursing home, not an assisted living facility; b. Existing Conditions - It is unclear if you are equating
independent living units with independent living BEDS. If independent living units are attached
dwellings by our Code, these dwellings could have a minimum of one person to "x" number of
persons living in it. You further refer to 323 living units (= to people?); c. Proposed Conditions -
Again, you refer to 116 assisted living units (= to beds?); d. Proposed Conditions - The duplex
dwellings are proposed along the south and east sides of the property, not the west. Correct? e. Was
there an analysis done on the existing Bayview Gardens as to the number of unitslbeds, the number of
persons living in the facility owning a car or cars, when the existing parking spaces are fully utilized
(or empty), the use of buses for the existing facility, etc.? This would be good infoffilation relative to
the existing facility providing a comparison to the proposed conditions. Not Met Wayne Wells, AICP
727-562-4504
The parking sufficiency study has been revised in accordance with the above comments.
67. Zoning Condition Ensure the responses to the General Applicability, Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project and Residential Infill Project criteria address all of the requested reductions
and/or increases in the individual responses, as appropriate to the criteria. Not Met Wayne Wells,
AICP 727-562-4504
The criteria has been reviewed and revised in accordance with the above comment.
68. Land Resource Condition Show to remove all #1 and #2 rated trees prior to building pennit. Not
Met Rick Albee 727-562-4741.
Tree removal plans have been revised to show all trees rated #1 and #2 have been removed
except for four trees (shown in red in the preservation table), which have instructions from the
arborist that they could be preserved if special measures are taken.
69. Land Resource Condition Tree replacement are required for all #2.5 rated trees and above and palm
trees equal 1 ", removed or replacements. Revise calculations prior to building permit. Not Met Rick
Albee 727-562-4741.
The landscape calculations have been revised to include all trees rated #2.5 and above to be
removed in the replacement calculations.
J :\02026\02026002. OO\DOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentF _6-4-08_ DRC Comments ~reponse 7 -2-08.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT 'F l'
REVISED CURVE NUMBER CALCULAITONS AT BASIN 'A'
AND
REVISED STORM ROUTING CALCULATIONS AT BASIN 'A' (pOND 'A')
Jorge A. Hernandez, PE
FL REG. No. 59898
Date:
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Pennits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentFl_ stonnwatefJesponse7 -2-08.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The following revisions were made to proposed Basin' A', and Pond' A' control structure' A-]' per the
City ofC]earwater's requirements:
Only one-half of the existing impervious area was used. This area was added to the existing pervious area
and the Curve Number (CN) was re-calcu]ated.
As shown in attached revised CN calculation, the existing CN calculation for Basin 'A' (Pond 'A') was
revised per the City ofC]earwater's criteria to 87.12. Note that the basin area remains at 7.26 acres.
The pre-development peak discharge rate was re-calcu]ated as 35.34 CFS (see attached revised ICPR pre
and post development routing calculations).
Pond 'A' control structure 'A-]' was revised so that the post development peak discharge from proposed
dry detention Pond 'A' will be limited to the adjusted pre-development peak discharge rate of35.34 CFS.
The 25 year 24 hour design storm was routed through an FDOT Type 'D' modified control structure with
the weir elevation set at the water quality elevation of] 7.]0 (see attached Plan Sheet SC6.05 showing the
revised Structure 'A-I ').
Revised control structure 'A-I' was designed to maintain a maximum stage of 18.42' at Pond 'A',
allowing for 9.4 inches of freeboard. Note that Pond 'A' will still discharge directly in the existing ditch
system via a 24" RCP storm pipe. Pond 'A' post development 25 year 24 hour peak discharge rate is
35.30 CFS, which is less than the pre-development allowable discharge rate.
The following is a summary of the revised results of Pond 'A':
Pond Maximum Inflow Rate Discharge Rate Top of Freeboard
ill Stage Pre-Development Post- Deve]opment Bank (Inches)
(25 yr-24 hr) Allowab]e discharge Maximum Positive (Feet)
iF eet) (CFS) (CFS)
Pond A 18.42 35.34 35.30 19.2 9.4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
",.
A \-\-C\vhMt.^k . \\ ~ \ \
....J~
~,'~~arwater
~~
u~
Clearwater Fire & Rescue
610 Franklin Street - Clearwater, Florida 33756
Public Works Administration - Engineering Department
100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 - Clearwater, Florida 33756
....~:~:(\ Flg~.F4QYV,:.~',tiYR._MJffYilqH.K~.H~{;r:.",.;,,, ';" : ',' :,' J::":~;':',:,>~ '.' ';:". ", :;'::', .1
(Revised 03/29/2006)
This works,eet is required 10 be submitted 10 and approved by the Authority Halling Juns:llction (AHJ) prior to mc
meeting for any project that ismore than 3 stories or more than 30 feet in height above the loV>.est Fire Dept vehicle
access point or fur any other project that will require an Automatic Wet Standpipe System and/or Rre Pump before
any permits for new building construction, building expanscin or fire h)drants will be iSSJed by the CitY of Qearwater.
Infoll11ation and design must comply wth Ronda Building Code, Chapter 9 - Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire
Prevention Code to indude applicable NFPA Code (NFPA 1, 13. 13D, 13E, 13R, 14, 15, 20, 291 and 1142 Annex H)
and AWlNA, M-11 - Installation, Field Testing and Maintenance of Rre Hydrants.
F. ,'".' ..."..'.....-.
I:.~~gd~~]: I.NJfg>.BMAIJJ;~,NW~;t~;?';,;;~2~,?';;?'~{~:;C;!)!.m~~;r:~;~'/tI~:?:'!;::'~r:!;~;:,;:;;;.:~t~':~~;~!',;L;;!.:';,.~: 'j,;t:,E::)1;:NI~i,':?;}:'?~":..~.':;-':? '1
Of\ the ~o'J.
~C\~ \1\\td. tli\d 2.'b 5!) (;\j\ f "\0 eQ'I ~\VcL
~\e~~ \..VQrtR. fL "&~ ~'5<\
r G.!;NJ;J~~:t~, W!f]rgR:~Y:3]~J:N~.~RM'A:TlQtfC:;::sU;\~~r2~,~':::c,::,;;,:.~.;' :'r:;;i.;1.,~~:;:': ::-:;;?{:;~t::\:X:):'~::;;I;::/D<~r.:';-:; ':~'.\ I
location of !\earest Fire Hydrant ~-e.\\\\\d \\\ ~l\ \\\ ',-t _
"
~ II Looped System or Dead End WaterMain? D~a d ef\d
Project Name: Be:\.\o \-e~~d
:roject Address: 2~l\o ~\)\f- \0
Hydrant #:
i.
Size of Water Main Supplying Rre Row:
Static: \~
psi Resdual: bo
ps Flow: 1 ~5 ()
Ft. Vertical Elevation N I Pt
,
Ft.
0'J
N1Fi
.
ps Pi1ot:
gpm
Distance of Test Gauges Relative to the Base of the Riser: Horizontal
HydrantTest Conducted by: ~. t\.)~\\\Q
(Irclude/Attach Copy of Actual Test Sheet)
IN.FI?A: ~ARD;.9.1iA~~nm~~JtQ:tf::"::.: ':;':/\'::';:~';?:::.:;n;,<.<;-:',".:.:: '.,
.:"'.~" .;;..,.....:.: ~ ~ - 1. t.. .~. ..~.... .-
. ".' '. ~ -:
: ...'~' . ,.; . . . - .:.:.. .......: '. '. . .... ~...' . ,-
:~', ~.,: I.
...:.....::.,.....1..::.:
. ,. .... ...... ",~.. '..
Area #
Cfas:ification Description of Hazard Protected
(CorrmxJity DescriptIon. Storage Height andArrangemenl, ifapplicable):
~~i de:t\-\Q \ f\()qR-\- ~f)t \:l'r\\ \-~
l'! n-\ \i'd2.C\{ld () f.fi c t. pqte.
6~'~I\~tly \\a2Q~I~ f'C\-et\\~(\\r()'\ \l,.OQff\. 't\\kY\~fY. ~tOa.q\}.lt.. \J.elow ~ feet
f . V
,
'2..
:3
AIIac h A dditio nal She ets If Necess ery
Page 1 of 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. .
,
. ..
.~
[n~~IG...r PADl\'MET~c"-"""':'''''' ". .......~ .... .', ..".' .., ,." . -.
~.Ht.:.t.,~;.,-.-f"'-:\- ~~. ....~:.._~::.~. ,,9" ":": ".:"'. :....1: .:
, . ';'. ........":.::...,'..':. : ;"J ....~.!..:iJ
".,~ '"1. ',' I ~. .1.;. .. '.
Area # System Type Area (sq. tt:) Density (gpm'ft) Inside Hose [Jpm) Ouffide Hose (gpm)
t hrt.t lS();O fu\}R. "t:~d!S 1<:)0 !()O
2- \ut\- i5.<H.i l\..! 0 lea \C:lC
3 hi't:t , !5Q() () .If\ 100 '2EiO
AthlchAddffJonal Shilafs if Necr=;ary
Total Needed Are Row(N,F.F.) ~SUJ a\"tf\ \'f'R \.9::J"'.. af
l~M ~~\\\jt\ (:jtt-e ~~'P
16 Existing System Supply Suftident to Meet N.F.F. Above? _ No ~ Yes
System Gorrponent (\ Applicab/fJ'NFPA Standard I Year EJiition and Other Applicable Codes or Statutes
'~\\\l'\Omo.;~~ ~~tf\\<ltP. Nf~1\ B. .13~ t\J1\('..,~{~'tU\-t\~N
~~~o. ~ tR& ~fP~ \4 ~\l~~{ E-dHi<iN
\(t f'IJ P Nf'PJ\ .1.0 r\)<Q..~t\+ ~d{\teN
AltechAddltiooal Sl1&ets If Necessary
If Project Indudes Ffre Pump, Suppfy1he Follov.ing:
Fire Pump Infornanon: Pump Capadty: loo/:)
Rated Pressure: t'10
On-Sit~ Storage Tank Capacity (7): --.liJ ~
\~
\liO
ps
gpm Chum Pressure:
ps
ps Pressure @ 150% Row:
Preparsr Name:
~o.\jl "\Q&1.~q~t.\
\f\t.\ ~ hQ~1 \. t(J~'JL\t~ cN%1t\ect4
\i\\fe. . -- ~\l\ Yt. H.40
Company Name:
Mailing Address: \01 N ~ o\\d
City: fh l~\j{}t~ do te
ft.
Zip:
3~~o 1
"5\4' ~~'S. bLt ?Ji
.f. Seal
Stale:
Phone: ~5~- '1~5 ~ ~~ :S~
Fax:
Page2 of 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'.
s..}'
MAR-Il-~OOB(TUE) 06109
If5-V5C. HIe.
(FRX)7?7 572 7c&&
P. OOU004
HYDRANT lNSPECTrON
Job
Addre~
PhOTle:
Hvdrlll'll Number J -it - tI. .~ ~l~ IHO>~ ':L , IZ.... 1?Ml.b. ....,1>
f:fudranJ Make, .A ..... I.... ,
Dlreatlon ODens CC~W 'It. Gl.W: lh CCLW: It. CI.W: Il.h CCLW: CLW: GCl.W: CLW:
SeMce l1~reac!s OK 'f7 NO: OK ,;r O~ OK'
Gaskets 01< """ NO: OK (/ 01<: OK:
Stem Oaemllon OK l" N'O' . OK v' OK: . ' OK:
l.eekaoe & JOInl6 NO y YES; NO. V' hlO. NO:
Slallo Pressure '7~ 'F'SI 7<t PSI PSI PSI
AeeldUaJ Pres$l)r(t b." PSI r..." PSI PSI PSi
Pilot P19B$UTi) co.::. PSI .,.1 I>SI PSI PSI
a..p.M. ' I"~'" J.o')..1J
Aow Capaolty: 1000 - 1499 gpm
Flow Capacity: 50D- 99lJ gpm .
Flow CtiplIclty; Loss than 500 gpm
elMS AA _ Light Blue - FloW capacity; - 1000 gpn'l or
greater
HII6re.r'l1 Number
HYdrant M~kf;l -
Olrvc.lion OoeRS CCLW rlLW: I CCLW' CLW: CC\.W: Cl.W; CCLW CI.W:
Service ThfYd!l OK NO:! 01(: NO OK: NO OK .. NO
Gasket! 01< NO~ Ole NO OK: NO 01< NO"
Stem Qaera,lon OK N01 OK: NO OJ<: NO OK NO.
leBkaoe & Joints NO. YE!iJ NO YES: NO: YES NO. VES
S\alio-Press~re PSI PSI PSI PSI
R6sidlJat'ProssUT9 PSI PSI PSI PSI
Pilot Pressure- - PSI PSI PSI ~Sl
G.p:M.
Color COde - Class A - Green
. biase 6 - Orange
ClaA ~- Red
C{)mmen1s~ ",
Flow Cllpadly: 1000~ 149& gpm
Flow Capacity: 500- 999 gpm
floW Capacity: Less than 1500 qpm '
Class M - Light $lula - Flow Capacity: - 1500 Gpm or
glUlflr
Hvdml'lt Number
HVtfi'an1 :Make
Dlrec(iI)D'Oilens eel w~ CLW; CCLW; CLW: CCLW: CLW: CCLW: CLW: I
SElIVlcs Threads OK: NO: oK:. NO: OK: NO: OK: NO:
Ga9kc,t$ OK: NO: OK: NO: OK: NO: OK: '.,NO:
Stem'Ooerallon OK: /'olO: oK: NO: 0'1<: NO: OK: .NO:
, .LEJakaoe & Jarilla NO: yES: - NO: YES: NO~ YES: NO: YEs.
StEti'c.PresSure PSl PSI PSi PSI
Residual PressUre . PSI PSI PSI PSI
Pilot 'Pres~tlrtl PSI PSI PSI . PSI
G.P.M',
Color Code -.elMS A "'- Sreen .
Clan $ - Orange
Class C - Red
Comments:
Flow-Ce~lty: 1000-14f}~.gpm
FlolV G8pac:i1y: 500 - 999 gptl'l
Flow Capacity: LeGs than 500 apm
Class AA - Light Blue - ,Flow CapacitY: - 1500 gpm or
gr&star
r Cu~tomGr sJgna'lUr~:
I Dat9:
I
,I
I
t
I
!
r
I
I
I
I
-,
I
i
--------------------
80.0
70.0
G
A 60.0
U
G
E
50.0
P
R
E
S 40.0
S
U
R'
E 30.0
(
P 20.0
s
i
10.0
, /-IydrfA'1f fI :t
l '
~,
WATER SUPPLY N~ALYSIS
Static: 73.00 psi Resid: 60.00 psi Flow: 1250.0 gpm
LEGEND
~ .._~
0.0 B
-14.7
400 600
800
--f> -
l"'- 1500 a
,J/:>'?1 e.$'l) ~
PSt
-.-----
1000
1200
1400 tSoo
FLOW (GPM)
-----
1600
1800
'-..
tp "
L",? .,
>-3
H
>-3 .
t""
tr.l , "
OJ
L"J
t"'
t'"
>'
l-J
tr.l
:tl
~
\/)
>-3
>'
Z
t:I
''1;1
H
I'd
txJ
2000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t i .' il..
~:411'brwate' r
~~
u~
ClealWater Fire & Rescue
610 Franklin Street - Clearwater, Florida 33756
Public Works Administration - Engineering Department
100 $. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 - Clearwater, Florida 33756
1:>:':.>>';\: :..,.....,'.. :."... "::'.' ":"::::. fl B(;!:F';Ji)W.~HYPRAfff'W9~K~I;i!l:~'l':::::';'.'.;.'. ',...' ...T.;.:.':.....:.......'. '.::'/:":<';,1
(Revised 03/29/20(6)
This worksheet is required to be &lbmitted to and approved by the Authority Ha\>ing Juris:liction (AHJ) prior to mc
meeting for any project that is more than 3 sories or more than 36 feet In height above the 10Vle& Fire Dept vehicle
access point or for any other project that will require an h.llomatic Wet Standpipe Sysem and/or Fire Pump before
any permits for new building construction, building e>q)ansion or fire h)drants will be lS&led by the City of Clearwater.
Information and design must comply wth Rorida Building Code. Chapter 9 - Fire Proleclion Sysems. Florida Fire
Prevention Code to indude applicable NFPA Code (NFPA 1, 13, 130, 13E, 13R, 14, 15, 20, 291 and 1142 Annex H)
and AWNA M-17 -Installation, Field Testing and Maintenance of Rre Hydrants.
1':.p.R~~~..INf9BMAT!.QNff..::w,;y;:/r,';:~J\~;;tt~0:::;i':~{'t~;::;;~',:f.';~;,f{;s;\T.:,;~.?rct'\t~:'..](':::.,3~:~r:.';>.3}S~k'i;:;tC'.:,;<. ."":'{X;'::;/L"
Cf\ the e,'Q\}.
\1<\y e\\J d. al\d 2<t 55' b\J\ f '10
~\e~ ~ \}jQ t-eR fL ~
.~~~I;~g,W-*] t;.R.\S'l$m!~lYl!JNE.~BM~:rJ~~n;Gi\:;f>i;:;';::',. " . q'
Project Name: Beno \-e~(\6
:roject Address: 2~ 1 \0 ~\) \ f-\O
LocationofN3arestFireHydrant ~\.l ~\)\\d\(\~if 10. Hydrant#: 2-
Size of Water Main Supplying Rre Row: '0/1 Looped System or Dead End Water Main? OlQ c:J €f\d
Static: ~~
pe Resdual: faS
pe Pi tat:
31
N)f1
pe Flow: in.2. 0
Ft. Vertical Elevation N I A
gpm
Distance of Test Gauges Relative to the Base of the Rser: Horizontal
Ft.
HydrantTest Conducted by:. ~. f\J~\\\(}
(Include/Atl ach cop y of ACPJal Test Sheet)
I NJzg~:!;'JA?~J~Pj. e.-t:~~~JIrIQ~J'PN\"~':' i,: ,;'''~:;,:<::: ??f:'.::,:; ,t,:: L';..:'::: ~.:\t': :::....:":. ':?L::':. <:,~... ' <, '0;-:,;'::; <~':'.<. '.: I
,
2..
~
Classifica60n Description of Hazard PlOtected
(CommdityDesarfptJon, Storage Height andArra~mert, ifapplicable):
?-t~l dei\-\-Q \. f\tJqA.-t ~r~t~+ \H\' \-~
\.l~h-\ \idzt\~ Qff'iet. pqCe.. .
O~ ~f\c;1ly \\a2Ct~ \'l\tt\\~(\\('~\ \t-OQt\ "\k\'\et'(. ~t~i2.G~ \){Iow ~ fce4
Area #
AtfachAdditionaf Sheets if Necessary
Page 1 of 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! .;
'.
....
rnOJE~'GN RAAAM f;:fERS.....: ........:...... .,. .~., .... ..., .'. ......
. .,. '.' '.",......
.. I..... -' ~ ": " .. ...... -, . .;.',. " ~'.- .' .'. .
" ";'. ...'.....;.. ".:'
..:'. ',~:' ":.':'.'..~:': ""','~.i":"'~1
'-.' '-:', ',-;
Area # System Type Area (sq. fI) Density (gprrlft) Inside Hose (gprrj Outfide Hose (gp~
, \IJtr lS()O ~~ . "'ti\.d~ me !()O
2- We\- \'5<j(i C\~!O 100 ,~
3 \nt.:t i50Q ().i~ \.00 '250
Attach A ddiHonal Sh?efs if Necessary
Total Needed Rre Aow(N.F.F.) iStr.l ~9N\ \it' \t. \!){J"t.. of
lOO() ~<\\\<:i\\ fi (1.:~ ~~f
Is Existing System Suppy SuHident 10 Meet N.F.F. Above? _ No ~ Yes
~~.~n~gAtiJj)~ ;I~Jm~Jmmt~~~~~'t1iJ&~:~~t~~~:!~~:K~rJi~{Zt~1~~t~;;r1~;~:~~~Wj-~~.:~~~~~~~~~~{~~!~1~~11~~~~1I;~
System Gonponent f1 AppUceblfrNFPA Standard / Year Edition and Other Applicable Codes or Statutes
_"\l\'o\V\O,\{Q ~r~i(\KttQ. Nf?!'\ ~_ .i3~ t\J[\t\-~tt\t~\~\b~
~\<1l\dB~&-e. ~fP~ \4 t\lll$.'~(\* GdH\QN
f'\{)..t .Il.) P Nf'Pj\ 1..0 f\)O-Q;tC..t ~.dtJt\~w .
Atrac h A ddido 118/ Shffets jf NftCBS8 ary
If Project Indudes Fire Pump, SUpply the FolioWng:
Fire Pump Infornation: Pump Capadty: , lOOf:)
Rated PreSSJra: t'lD
On-SIte Storage Tank Capacity (7): -ill t\
gpm Chum PreS$.Jre: \ K()
pel
psi Pressure @ 150% Ro'N. ~QC)
psi
ERJlI;~., . .,..~HJ;~J~.s~!lfI:m.~l.lll~~aM'NJ.:W. ':r~~i::r:"~;::;}Yp.~:{S:~t: ..~:-:r.:;J'\~K~E{!,:,.:.!g:',~i,\t~'.~:~~:r;::.;~~i/~ :.'i.:; ~}i{;;,;~f:(..:;:FJt.
\to-ul (\'Q~t~qC~
Com~ny Name: S'i\.t\ N \'\~ttt1 \. tt:.t\~u\Nif\~ eN~1(\e~~
Mailing Address: \01 \'.1 ~ 2>\\d l\'J.e:."'" ~\ h:.. H.40
fh lo,~d-e~Ja\..e
ft.
Preparer Name:
City:
'2~
9h~/OB
State:
Zip:
3~~o i
Phone: ~~N- t~~j.. ~'+ ~3
Fax: "5t..\, '\~~. bLt ~R
IP.E. Seal
Paget of 3
I
I
(FAX)7?7 572 7~66
P.002l004
MAR-11-20D6(TUE) 06109
IFS-V5C. [tic.
I
HYDRANT lNSPECTION
Job
Atldr~
I
PhOTlEl:
I
~vd:1U'l1 Number I-n,I..- Hl..1\ IhU- 1"1 12.. a..Lbo .....11>
Hvdranl Make , ,,-
DlteatIM Onens CCI.W Ill. C1.W. lib CClW: it: CI.W: 1"'-. CCLW; CLW: CCl.W: CLW:
SeMele ll'ireac!s OK '1/ NO' OK: 'r/' OKe OK:
GaskelS OK ...... NO' OK: V OK- OK:
Stem Ocerati'on OK V NO .OK v Ml(. 01<:
Ulakaoe & JOlnl!; NO ,.". YES; NO 7 1II0. NO:
S1aUo PreCllUr9 '1"~ "P"SI 7<t PSI PSI PSI
AeslcI\JaJ Pl'ess\JrG t.o PSI t.<; PSI PSI Pst
Pilot Pr9SSIlTO ' .c:-~ PSS ~., PSI PSI PSI
G..P. M. " I'>.:'''' to 1--0
I
I
Flow Capacity: 1000 - '4&9 upm
FloW Capacity: 50D - 999 gpm "
Flow C;ipacity; !.oss Ihsn 500 gpm
Class AA _ Light Blue - Flow Capaolty. - 1S00 gpn'l or
tlrealer
I
I
Hvdrant Number
Hvdrant Milke.
Olriidlo"; rlMll'lfl: r:;CLW CLW: CCLW: CLW; CC\..W: C1.W; CCLW OLW:
Service ~adll 01( NO' OK: NO: OK: NO 01( .' NO
GeskeI$ OK. NO, OK~ NO. OK: NO 01< NO-'
Stem Ol\l'!ratlon OK: 1-10: 01<; NO: OK: NO 01( NO.
LeBk&.O& 8. Joln18 NO! YES' NO Yt:S: NO: YES NO: 'l"i::S
SIalkrPres&'ure PSI PSI PSI PSI
Ae6iduat:PrOO$ure PSI PSI PSI PSI
Pilot PrG$~re' . PSI PSI PSI PSI
G.P:M. "
I
I
Color ~ -Olas$A - Gre&n
. 'CIaSG S ~ Orange
Class C.-fled
Commenl$~ '.
FloW Capaclly: 1000 -149~ gpm
FloW Capaolly. 600 - !)e9 gpm
FloW Capacity: [,ew than 500 gpm .
C1al;s M - LIght 61ul/l - FtQW Cspaclly: - 1500 gpm or
greater
I
I
HYdrant Number
Hvdrant:Malce
DlreclJoil'Dnens CCLW: CLW: CCLW; CLW; CCLW: CLW: CCLW: ClW:
S6Jvfoe Threads oK: NO: OK: NO: OK: NO: OK-! 11I0:
Gaekqts OK: NO: OK: NO: OK: NO: OK: '.'..NO:
.$tem'O""rallon OK: NO: OK: NO: oK NO: OK.: .NO!
'. .J.eakBar: &. Jolnls NO: yes: NO: YES: NO: YES: NO: YES':
SiallC.P resSu ra PSI P$I PSI PSI
ResIdual Proeeura - PSI P$l PSI PSI
puot.PreSStlrlJ PSI PSI PSI . PSI
G.P.M:
I
I
F1ow'Capatlty: 10DO - .1499.gpm
Flo\ll capacity: 500 - 900 gpm
Flow Capacity: Less tlan 500 gpm
Class AA _ Ught Slue - .F1ow CapacitY: - 1500 gpm or
Qr~ater
I
Color Code -Class A.:. Green
Class a - Orange
Class C - Red
Commenls:
I
[ CUMoroor SlgnGIUTQ:.
I 001''':
I
I
I
t
[
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f.
I
i
I
I
!
':
I
i
I
I
I
I
l
I
>
I
I
1
i
I
i
I
I SPRINKLER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS Page 4
DATE: 3/12/2008LCS\PLUMBING-FIRE CALCS\PLUMBING-FIRE CALC. HYDRANT #2.SDF
JOB TITLE: BELLA TERRA STANDPIPE
0
0
I 0
N
E'i
I 0. I
Q\
0
0 I
N
I 00 I
.-fZ 0
r.il 0
.. t!J I ro
~ ril .-f
o H
.-I
I [,.., I
'H
Ul li.
0. (l \1 I
0 ~ ct
I 0 () I
o.n 100 0
l.P VllJ) 0
I l.P
o. -~ .-f
'D J/-
I '.-1 1-
m
Q) 0
C
..-1 I I ~
I Ul
Ul 0. I
H 0
UlO 0 :2::
)-<0 1 I G- o...
H .-f t!J
~C'i
zr-
I ~ .. I s:
0
>< U H
H or; I (u
0..+J
0.. rd
I ;::>+J 0
UlUl I 0
i N
~ .-f
ril I
E-<
~
I s:
I
0
I 0
0
.-f
I I
<1 I 0
0
I I co
'*
I 0
0
I I l.P
0
I 0
o::r
I
r-
I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 .-i
0 0 0 0 0 0 I
co r- l.P o.n '<l' C'i N M
t!J.:C::>t!Jtil 0.. 0:: tilUlUl::>t:l:liJ 0.. II) -rl ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
M~~~4 \\ \\"
A R!;~I~
(::1:17. !Cmr;-a CitV Genter, 201 Norrt't Franklrn Street Sui1e 1e.40, Tamp.c3. FL :}.3602
1(11: 613-223--67'00 F~x: B12;~Z20-67G7 INl/t"L'4/." delta.p.:n.g};n'e~r~:.G'0:Tl
June 4, 2008
John Waldo, Project Manager
Santa Fe Health Care
Construction & Design Services
P. O. Box 749
Gainesville, FL 32602'()749
RE: Bella Terra Retirement Community
Letter of Certificati.on for Load Rating of 2 Bridges
Delta Project No. 2008.091.001
Dear Mr. Waldo:
Based on the load testing and load rating analyses we performed for the two bridges in the
Bella Terra Retirement Community, we hereby certify that the both bridges have the capacity to
safely carry aU legal loads including the locaHy used fire truck with a gross vehicle weight of
80,000 pounds (40 tons).
The full details of our work on these bridges are included in our report dated May 13, 2008.
If you have any questions, please call me at 607-222-2978.
Respectfully,
DELTA ENGINEERS (COA #9770)
7Z~:ii)-
Ralph Verrastro, PE # 39784
Director of Engineering
~~~
G> - 4---<.008
We are a seamless extension of our clients' organizations.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment "I"
Bella Terra on the Bay
2855 Gulf to Bay Blvd
FLD2008-050 12
Response to 8-7-08 DRC Comments
General Engineering:
1. Revise utility plans to show that no sanitary sewer lines will be located under ponds.
Per the August 12th meeting with City Engineers (Scott Rice, Rob Fahey and Steve Doherty) and
Bryan Zarlenga (Project Engineer), the sewer line located under the westerly pond, C-2, will be
relocated under Cross Blvd and the sewer line under the easterly pond, D, will remain in its
existing location to limit conflicts with existing trees. It was decided at this meeting that these
changes could be made as part of the Building Plan submittal package and were not necessary
prior to CDB.
2. The privately owned water distribution system on this site as proposed may develop stagnation
problems due to long dead end lines and limited circulation. If the developer is interested in
looping the water main via making a connection to the City water main in Sky Harbor Drive or
other nearby point and removing the water meter/backflow prevention device near Gulf to Bay
Boulevard to create an unrestricted water main the City of Clearwater may be agreeable to
owning and maintaining what would become part of the pubic water system. If so, the City may
be agreeable to assuming ownership subject to but not limited to the following:
a. The developer would make any needed repairs/upgrades at the developer's cost,
b. An appropriate easement would be deeded to the City, and
c. No water mains would be pemlitted to be installed under drainage ponds.
Per the August 1ih meeting with City Engineers (Scott Rice, Rob Fahey and Steve Doherty) and
Bryan Zarlenga (Project Engineer), it was decided that the water system could remain under
private ownership, but that Hydrant #10 would need to be looped back to the proposed water line
along Loving Lane to avoid a dead end situation. It was agreed at this meeting that this change
could be made as part of the Building Plan submittal package and was not necessary prior to
CDB.
Additionally, engineering staff indicated that when the northern portion of the property is
redeveloped the owner will need to re-evaluate the water system to ensure sufficient functioning,
that the City will request that the water system is turned over to the City and that a connection is
made to the water line in Sky Harbor Blvd.
Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit:
1. Identify all sanitary sewer manholes and provide proposed pipe lengths and slopes for all
sanitary pipes to be replaced. PLEASE PROVIDE PIPE LENGTH AND SLOPES FOR
REPLACEMENT SEWER LINES ON SHEET 5.01
All sewer pipe lengths and invert/main hole data has been provided.
2. Sidewalks are required to be installed on both sides of the roads in this development and have
a minimum width of 4-feet. Community Development Code Sec. 3-1907. (PREVIOUS
CONDITION NOT MET)
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Pennits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentI _ 8-7 -08 _ DRC Jcsponse.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
It was agreed at DRC that the Applicant would provide sidewalks between Cottages 4-9, but that
sidewalks on both sides of the entire campus would not be necessary as long as a continuous
sidewalk providing access to Gulf-to-Bay Blvd and Sky Harbor was available, which it is.
Sidewalks between the identified cottages have been provided.
3. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and
constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index
#109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304). (PREVIOUS
CONDITION NOT MET)
See Sheet 6.01. ADA compliant sidewalk ramps and yellow truncated domes have been located
at all road crossings as requested by Staff.
General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfY site-
specific water capacity and pressure requirements andlor wastewater capacity requirements, the
modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water
mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in-service prior to
construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements.
Acknowledged.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Pemlit Review; additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Pemlit Application.
Environmental:
1 . No issues.
Fire:
1 .Show looped 8" line for fire line and fire hydrants. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB
NOTE: Fire Hydrants SHALL not be on a restricted line. Contact Mr. Ten)' LaBelle Public
Utilities Coordinator @ (727) 562-4960 7227.
Per the August 1ih meeting with City Engineers (Scott Rice, Rob Fahey and Steve Doherty) and
Bryan Zarlenga (Project Engineer), it was decided that Hydrant #10 would need to be looped
back to the proposed water line along Loving Lane to avoid a dead end situation. It was agreed
at this meeting that this changes could be made as part of the Building Plan submittal package
and was not necessary prior to CDB.
2 .Fire Hydrants SHALL not be on a restricted line.(JFK)
Public Utilities Coordinator contact I Mr. TelTY LaBelle (727) 562-4960 Ext.7227
Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB
Acknowledged and discussed during the August 12th meeting with City Staff.
Harbor Master:
1 . No issues.
Legal:
1 . No issues.
Land Resources:
1 .5/27/08-Show the proposed underground eclectic on the tree preservation plan and address the
possible tree impacts prior to building permit.
Underground electric is located on the landscape plans and each tree has been reassessed and
specific notes included.
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentI_ 8-7 -08_ DRC Jesponse.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2 .7/23/08-Show the building tie-in locations and address on the plans if trenched or directional
bore. If trenched, direct lines away from trees and/or show root prune limits. Provide prior to
building permit.
Building tie-in locations are now shown on the preservation plans. Root prune limits have been
indicated where utilities are trenched near existing trees.
3 . 5/27/08-Reasses potential impacts at every tree to be preserved. Address utility demo impacts
under the trees canopies. Insure all proposed utilities are addressed, roof drains and sanitary
demo at trees #361 and #366, sanitary demo at tree #352, roof drain at trees #431,411 and 440,
water lines at #440 and stom1 drain at tree 398. The proposed sanitary is too close to tree #357.
These are just a few examples. Revisit every tree to insure every impact is addressed prior to
building pennit.
7/23/08-Still saw some areas where utility installation under trees did not show root pruning and
the sanitary at tree #357 is still too close to the tree. Revisit every tree to insure every impact is
addressed prior to building permit.
The sewer line located in close proximity to tree #357 will be relocated as part ofthe realignment
of the sewer line from underneath Pond C-2. As agreed upon, this realignment will take place
during building plan submittal. Proposed utility lines have been made clearer on the preservation
plan to ensure the contractor can decipher between existing and proposed utilities. General notes
on the plans and specific notes on the preservation schedule explain to the contractor that certain
existing utilities are to remain abandoned to protect existing tree root structures that may have
grown around them. Each tree to be preserved has been assessed and the proper root pruning has
been shown on the plans.
The Applicant has decided to utilize a certified arborist at the site 6 months prior to and during
construction to ensure preserved trees are properly pruned and protected.
Utility demolition plan conflicts have been addressed by the engineer in conjunction with the
landscape architect. As mentioned during the DRC, roof drains will run above existing ground
to avoid damaging trees.
Address the proposed gas impacts at the trees to be preserved. Provide prior to building pern1it.
The gas line is being designed by Clearwater gas and as such will they will need to adhere to all
code requirements.
Landscaping:
1 . 8/5/08 - WW - Response states you are requesting a waiver to providing wheel stops. This
must be made through the Comprehensive Landscape Program. Justification must be provided;
however, Staff is not supportive of such a waiver.
5/8/08 - WW - Wheel stops are required for all parking spaces that abut landscape areas (in
addition to required curbing). This applies to both existing parking spaces to remain and new
parking spaces.
Wheel stops have been placed in all necessary locations within the redevelopment area. Wheel
stops will not be included in areas not being redeveloped and as such a waiver from placing
wheel stops in areas no included as part ofthis redevelopment is being requested through the
Comprehensive Landscape Program. The owner understands and agrees to adhere to a Condition
of Approval that any future development of the remainder of the site will need to confom1 to
code.
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentI _ 8-7 -08 _ DRC _response. doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2. 8/5/08 - WW - Response says it is shown on the plans, but that layer must not have been
turned on. There is verbiage stating where the property line is, but no lines that show it.
6/3/08 - WW - Landscape Sheets L3.00 - L3.05 - Indicate the property lines on these sheets.
Property line has been indicated as a dark dashed line on the plans.
3.8/5/08 - WW - Plans do not document any existing canopy that would prevent the planting of
trees within this buffer. Based upon site inspection of this buffer area, there is significant area
south of Cross Circle south of the high-rise ALF building that is void of any landscaping (other
than grass) where accent trees can be planted unaffected by existing tree canopy. Upon further
review with management, it is unclear why, except monetarily, the fulllO-foot (or seven-foot
wide with decorative fence) wide buffer along the east side cannot be met by relocating the drive
to the west for the 600- foot length that the drive is presently located within the buffer. In
checking with Rick Albee, there will be an impact on the existing trees to the west of this drive,
but not a severe impact. RecOlmnend moving the drive and other improvements over to meet the
required buffer.
6/3/08 - WW - Sheets L3.01 and L3.03 - A 10-foot wide landscape buffer is proposed along the
east property line and the request is to reduce it to five feet. A six-foot high decorative fence is
proposed within this buffer, but no continuous hedge or shade trees every 35 feet. Provide a
continuous hedge within this five-foot area on the inside of the proposed fence (DSP may be
spec'ed in this area but plans are not clear; DSP is too small otherwise; Code requires shrubs as
part of hedges to be 18-24" high at time of planting). Provide accent trees (two accent trees = one
shade tree) within this buffer where possible. Do not plant proposed accent trees under the
canopy of existing trees.
Additional accent trees have been placed in an approximate 100 linear foot location along the
easterly property line to supplement the landscape buffer. The remaining tree requirement has
been planted elsewhere on the site.
To ensure the health and future existence of vast trees throughout the site the Applicant has taken
painstaking measures that limit any impact on the trees to remain. There is no practical benefit
gained by moving a road over 2 feet to meet a buffer width when we are meeting the intent of the
buffer requirement (screening the adjoining property owner) through the proposed landscape
program and ornan1ental fence. Any potential impact on the adjoining property owner will be
mitigated after the proposed landscaping and fence are put in place. Any possible impact on the
existing tree west of Cross Blvd in this location is a risk that should not be taken, just to move a
road 2 feet over, especially as the road has existed without these buffer features for over 40 years
without any deleterious impact on the adjoining property owner. Rick Albee states in his
comment that there will be an impact on the existing trees, but not severe, does a tree know the
difference between a regular impact and a severe impact and is it worth finding out when we
have taken such consideration to make sure other trees on the site are not impacted.
4. 8/5/08 - WW - Include as a condition of approval that the "future development" areas will
need to meet Code buffer requirements at time of redevelopment (such that this development
approval does not grant a future waiver to meet requirements).
6/4/08 - WW - Sheets L3.00, L3.01, L3.02 and L3.11 - Landscape buffers are required along the
north property line adjacent to the commercial areas fronting on Gulf to Bay Blvd and along the
north property line of the Harbour Wood Nursing Home parcel. Unclear why these areas are
being ignored, being shown as "future development", as these areas can be planted to meet the
requirements and preserved when these areas are developed in the future. Revise.
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentI _ 8-7 -08_ DRC _response. doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
As a condition of approval for this development application, the Applicant acknowledges and
consents that when future redevelopment takes place in areas not being disturbed at this time it
must conform to the Land Development Code standards in place at that time and that the
approval to allow any existing non-confornling circumstances to remain in these undisturbed
locations as a result of this development application package does not eliminate the basic
obligation of the Applicant to meet existing code requirements in these locations in the future. A
note has been made in the Comprehensive Landscape Progranl that all "future development"
areas will meet code buffer requirements at time of redevelopment. The northern property line
tree requirement has been placed throughout the site instead of along the buffer because future
development plans are unknown at this time. However, shrub requirements in that area will be
met in that location when future development is planned.
5. 8/5/08 - WW Sheet L3.12 was not resubmitted. Unclear if the Irrigation Notes on Sheet
L2.13 are being substituted for Sheet L3.12. Advise.
6/4/08 - WW Sheet L3.12 - Irrigation system must provide 100% coverage to all landscaped
areas.
The irrigation notes and irrigation detail on sheet L2.13 are being substituted for the diagram that
was on Sheet L3.12. The previous diagram is no longer needed as all landscape areas will be
irrigated now, and the diagram was deciphering between irrigation and hand watering.
Parks and Recreation:
1 .No issues regarding P&R impact fees - number of individual residential units will be the same,
square footage of building footprint increasing by less than 1 %.
2 .The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this project prior to issuance of
building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris
Hubbard at 727-562-4837 to calculate the assessment.
Acknowledged
Stormwater:
The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of Building Pernlit:
1. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit.]
SWFWMD Permit will be provided when received.
2. A proposed drainage easement drawn from the center line ofthe creek to a point 25-feet
beyond the top of bank on either side of the creek to be dedicated to the City of Clearwater has
been shown on the revised plan. Please submit easement legal description and other required
documentation to Earl Barrett, Real Estate Services Manager at 727-562-4754 for review.
Approval of the easement documentation is required prior to the issuance of the first Celiificate
of Occupancy.
Acknowledged. This will be established prior the CO.
3. Please submit the existing cross-access agreement between Harbour Wood and BVG for
review to detennine if the document can be in-lieu of the suggested 25' private drainage
easement over the pond outfall pipe of the Harbour Wood Nursing Center
The Cross-Access easement addressing utilities and vehicular and pedestrian accesses between
the 2 sites was provided during the August ih DRC and is included in the written application
package.
General note:
1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Pernlit Review; additional comments may be
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\Attachmentl_ 8-7 -08 _ DRC _response. doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Pennit Application.
2. At building pennit application, applicant shall submit drainage report, soil report, and any
other drainage related document for review and record.
Acknowledged.
Solid Waste:
1 . Please explain how all solid waste will be handled.
A solid waste roll-off system and recycling dumpster will be located within the service yard. See
sheet SC3.03. Trash throughout the campus will be collected by maintenance employees and
disposed in the compactor.
Traffic Engineering:
1. The distribution of handicap parking stalls needs to be re-worked. For multiple building(s),
handicap parking spaces shall be dispersed and located closest to the accessible entrances
(Florida Building Code Ch. 11 Section 11-4.6.2).
This was addressed at DRC and it was determined that handicap parking spaces do not need to
be delineated for the proposed cottages and that the handicap parking spacing layout for the main
building is appropriate.
The Applicant acknowledged at DRC that if a handicap resident moves into any of the existing
cottages then a handicap parking space meeting ADA code will need to be delineated at that
time.
2. On page SC6.0 1 handicap sign detail, change the Florida Statute number to read" 318.18".
This has been revised on Sheet 6.01.
3. Provide ADA standard truncated domes where sidewalk crosses the roadway and/or driveway.
Use FDOT 2008 Design Standards Index 304 page 6 of 6 and provide this detail on the site plan.
See link provided: http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesiwrd/RTDS/08/304.pdf
This has been included on the detail sheet. All truncated domes will be yellow.
4. The 4 parallel parking loading spaces shall be 12' wide by 35' long.
These spaces have been identified as loading spaces and redesigned to be 12 'x3 5' .
5. On the site plan show marked white painted directional arrows for one- way circulation at the
driveway at the Main CCRC building.
Provided on revised plans.
6. Provide an accessible route cOlmection for buildings 4 through 9. Buildings 4 - 9 shall connect
to each other and also to the Main CCRC building.
Provided on revised plans.
7. Provide a scaled turning template for a WB-50 truck maneuvering in and out of the truck
loading dock at the main ccrc building.
Provided as part of the civil engineering drawing on Sheet SC3.10
8. Provide vertical height clearance of 14' under all porte-cocheres.
Note has been provided on the civil engineering drawings.
The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing.
General Note(s):
1. Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee
schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (e.O.).
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentI _ 8-7 -08_ DRC Jesponse.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Acknowledged and already determined by Bennett Elbo.
2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Pennit Review; additional COlmnents may be
forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Pennit Application.
Acknowledged
Planning:
I .8/5/08 - WW - It is my understanding from Tom Mahony in Engineering, who is a surveyor,
that the survey is to have such flood zone infonnation on the survey. Based on FIRM Panel
125096-0017D, there is Flood Zone AE 10 on the property. Needs to be shown on the survey and
Master Site Plan. Need to ensure proposed buildings meet FEMA regulations.
6/3/08 - WW - Flood zone information is missing from the survey. Revise. Also reflect the
flood zones onto the site plans. There appears there may be a VE flood zone, which could affect
location and/or design of units on the south side of the property.
Flood Zone line has been clearly delineated on plan sheets.
2" 8/5/08 - WW - The City is experiencing problems in issuing permits to Harbour Woods
because the address is the same as Bayview Gardens, even if the parcel numbers are slightly
different. The address for Harbour Woods should really change to a Sky Harbor address for this,
and emergency response, purposes.
5/27/08 - WW - The proposed project intends to keep the basic intemal streets in their existing
location. The request includes a proposal to gate this conununity, with a primary manned gate at
Cross Blvd, a gate on Cross Circle northeast ofthe access drive to Sky Harbor Drive and a gate
at the south end of the Harbour Wood Nursing Home parcel on Cross Blvd. The address for this
site is 2855 Gulf to Bay Blvd., which is intended to be retained. However, the Harbour Wood
Nursing Home, which is on a separate parcel and is owned by another entity, is also addressed at
2855 Gulf to Bay Blvd (per the phone book and their occupational license). The Property
Appraiser has the Harbour Wood Nursing Home at 2861 Gulfto Bay Blvd. By design, the
proposed gating of the project will require Harbour Wood persOlmel and guests to access that
facility via Sky Harbor Drive. The address for Harbour Wood Nursing Home, therefore, should
change to a Sky Harbor Drive address. Has the proposed gating and net effect regarding an
address change been discussed with Harbour Wood management?
The Applicant indicated at DRC that they would be willing to hand over their existing 2855
Gulf-to-Bay Blvd address to the HarbourWood facility to help facilitate this issue.
2 . 8/6/08 & 5/8/08 - WW - Building elevations (all buildings) need to indicate the proposed
exterior materials and colors (including the color name). Provide samples/swatches of proposed
colors (such as color 1,2, etc.).
Material and colors have been identified on elevation sheets.
3.8/6/08 - WW - I am not asking for the building to be relocated. I am asking for the pavement
to meet the required five-foot setback. Proposed is 4.9 feet. Staff Calmot support the reduction at
tIllS location. I am confident that, from an engineering standpoint, this required setback can be
met through a minor relocation ofthe roadway. All trees in tIllS area al"e being removed, so that
cannot be a claim.
6/3/08 - WW Sheet SC3.03 - Proposed pavement near the southeast comer ofthe Nursing Home
pal"cel does not meet the required 5- foot side setback and the 10- foot landscape buffer. Sheet
SC3.09 states the pavement is proposed at a 4.9-foot setback, while that which is drawn on Sheet
SC3.03 is less than 4.9 feet. However, unclear why such setback and buffer Calmot be met and
Staff cannot support a 0.1- foot reduction to the required setback. Revise.
] :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentI_ 8-7 -08_ DRC Jesponse.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
At DRC Mr. Jim Kelher agreed to allow the proposed road to be reduced to less than the required
width for a fire lane of24 feet in order to allow the Applicant meet the required 5 foot setback.
The road is now approximately 23 feet.
4. 8/6108 - WW - Compliance with the Code requirements for this northern area is not being
waived forever with any approval of this request and any such approval will be conditioned upon
compliance with Code requirements when that area redevelops.
6/3/08 - WW Sheets SC3.0l(?), SC3.02, SC3.03 and SC3.05 - The chain link fencing along the
north property line (cannot tell if it is proposed along the entire north property line - see Sheets
SC3.0l and SC3.02) and along the west property line south ofthe Harbour Woods Nursing
Home parcel must be green or black vinyl clad and must be planted with a continuous hedge or
vine per Sections 3-805.C and .D (Sheet S3.04 indicates adequate landscaping along southwest
property line).
As a condition of approval for tIns development application, the Applicant acknowledges and
consents that when future redevelopment takes place in areas not being disturbed at this time it
must conform to the Land Development Code standards in place at that time and that the
approval to allow any existing non-confonning circumstances to remain in these undisturbed
locations as a result of this development application package does not eliminate the basic
obligation of the Applicant to meet existing code requirements in these locations in the future.
5.8/6108 - WW - Show sight triangles on Sheets SC3.0l (on both sides of drive at Cross Blvd
north of security building), L3.00 (at Sky Harbor Dr) and L3.0l (on both sides of drive at Cross
Blvd north of security building). On Sheet SC3.02 show sight triangles at street intersection of
Gulf to Bay Blvd and Cross Blvd at the property lines, not the pavement edge. On Sheet L3.0l,
show Code sight triangles at street intersection of Gulf to Bay Blvd and Cross Blvd (not shown
properly).
5/8/08 - WW On all appropriate site plan sheets and landscape sheets, show all required sight
triangles. Ensure all objects and landscaping within the visibility triangles meet requirements.
Site triangle locations have been modified on the requested sheets.
6 . 8/6108 - WW - Need to be a little more specific with what is possible. Any approval will
include a condition of approval for such.
The HV AC unit was located and installed as part of approved pernlit BCP2005-04435. As the
HV AC unit is located immediately adjacent to vacant land, the Applicant requests that the
HV AC unit remain in place until the redevelopment of that area or the removal of the ALF tower
occurs or until that vacant parcel of land is developed.
6/3/08 - WW We have been made aware by an adjoining property owner (Allan Stowell) that an
air conditioning cruller located on the northwest side of the maintenance building west of the
high-rise ALF building is extremely noisey. His concern is also with the closeness of the
concrete pad to the property line. Can the concrete pad be cut back, wlnle still maintaining
adequate area for maintenance and operational aspects ofthe alc unit and can a masonry wall a
maximum of six feet in height be constructed to help mitigate the noise impacts oftrus alc unit?
7.8/6108 - WW Since these land use designations have different maximum ISR's, provide the
proposed ISR per land use designation (don't see on plans).
Provided as part of the site data table
5/8/08 - WW Sheet G 1.01 - Site Data - Indicate the existing Land Use designations on the
property. Indicate the land area (square footage and acreage) under the three land use
designations/Zoning districts (CG/C, RlOGIO and RM/MDR). Indicate how the overall density
was calculated, including that AL units are based on three beds = one dwelling unit, and upon
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Pem1its\City of Clearwater\ArtachmentI _ 8-7 -08 _ DRC Jesponse.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
what acreage the density was calculated (if utilizing all thTee land use designations/zoning
districts and based on density averaging). We have to report density averaging projects to the
Pinellas Planning Council (PPC). Also, since these land use designations have different
maximum ISR's, provide the proposed ISR per land use designation.
Additionally, need to know if the number of beds/density of the nursing home outparcel is based
solely on their land area (acreage) or if any portion of their density utilized the subj ect property
to attain their number of beds/density (we previously spoke of such issue). May be in written
form. See also other Planning comments regarding this issue.
Sheet SC3.00 - Indicate on the subject property the locations of the land use designations
Commercial General (CG) and Residential Medium (RM) and the locations of the Zoning
Districts Commercial (C) and Medium Density Residential (MDR).
8. 7/31/08 - WW - Response says the second floor plans have been submitted; however, I do not
find such plans.
Second floor plans are definitely included in this package.
6/4/08 - WW Provide the second floor plans for the duplex units (a and b floor plans).
9.8/6/08 - WW - If the average grade has been determined to be 13.5 feet, unclear where the 83
feet height comes in. The highest point indicated on the elevations is 80.5 feet above average
elevation. Revise Site Data on Sheet G 1. Oland in written material.
Average site grade was incorrectly calculated previously and has been recalculated to be 12 feet,
which creates a defined building height of 82 feet to the peak of roof.
6/4/08 - WW Elevations and Height -
a. Definition of "height, building or structure" requires height to be measured using the average
grade elevation ofthe site to the top ofthe building. Need to determine the height of the building
so we can advertise properly (see also "b" below).
b. Based on the Code definition of "height, building or structure", parapets may only extend a
maximum of 42-inches above the flat roof of the building. In tllis case, and assuming under "a"
above that the building height is exceeding 50 feet, the parapet/mansard roof is dimensioned at
9'-11 ". Since this parapet/mansard roof exceeds the maximum of 42", the request for an increase
to height would need to be determined from the average grade of the site to the top of the
parapet/mansard roof.
c. Based on the Code definition of "height, building or structure", mechanical rooms may only
extend a maximum of 16 feet above the flat roof of the building. I am unaware if any of these
structural projections above the flat roof deck shown on the elevations are solely mechanical
rooms or purely decorative architectural features. If solely mechanical rooms, Staff cannot
support heights of these mechanical rooms exceeding 16 feet above the flat roof deck
(dimensioned at 19'-10"). For purely decorative architectural features, we would need to
advertise the height of the building rather than the height of the parapet/mansard roof (see "b"
above) but to the top of these decorative architectural features.
1 O. 8/6/08 - WW - You have answered regarding the main building. Please indicate for the
duplex buildings and the guard house.
Location of mechanical equipment for guardhouse and duplex buildings is now provided.
5/8/08 - WW Show or indicate the location of all outside mechanical equipment and required
screemng.
11. 8/6/08 - WW Based on the survey and site plans submitted, the proposed fence eliminates
the handicap accessible path from the existing handicap parking spaces north of the high-rise
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Pennits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentI_ 8-7-08_ DRC Jesponse.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ALF building and does not replace it with a new handicap accessible path meeting Code
requirements. Revise.
The proposed fence has been realigned to allow the continued passage of the handicap accessible
path in this location.
6/3/08 - WW Sheet SC3.02 - A proposed six-foot high decorative fence is proposed along the
south side of the existing parking lot north of the high-rise ALF building, placing the parking lot
outside of the fencing. Unclear how persons parking in this parking lot access the high-rise ALF
building, especially handicap individuals. Need to provide an accessible path meeting ADA
requirements for this project to Cross Blvd (see Traffic Engineering).
12. 8/6/08 - WW Agreed that the undergrounding will occur at this time only in the area of
redevelopment. A condition of approval will be included requiring such undergrounding in
future redevelopment phases when they come through the process.
The Applicant consents to a condition relative to future undergrounding of electric lines.
6/3/08 - WW Code requires the undergrounding of anyon-site overhead utilities.
13 .8/6/08 - WW Thank you for revising based on the comments below. However, staff will be
advertising differently now in the future and we need for you to revise how the request is stated
(see "Request" on the DRC comments. Response to criteria needs to address and justifY general
Code requirements for that use as a point of comparison as to what is proposed. See me for
discussion of tIns change.
The Applicant's representative has coordinated with Planning Staff to ensure the project is
properly advertised.
6/4/08 - WW Attachment B-
a. Ensure all reductions to setbacks are consistent with that listed by Staff in the "request";
b. Reductions to setbacks and landscape buffers are not required for cross-access driveways; and
c. Ensure all landscape buffer reductions are consistent with that listed by Staff in the "request".
14.8/6/08 - WW - Need to be more specific with your response. Ifthe gazebo and deck were
constructed without the benefit of a building pennit, and they are desired to be retained in their
present location, then need to include in the request and provide justification. If approved by the
CDB, then after-the-fact permits will be required. If, however, there are to be changes to the
existing conditions, you need to tell me what you are proposing and then address such changed
conditions in the request and justification.
The gazebo and deck have been relocated outside of the setback and buffer area.
6/3/08 - WW We have been made aware by an adjoining propelty owner (Allan Stowell) that a
gazebo and deck nOlthwest of the l1igh-rise ALF building has been constructed close to the
propelty line (with the deck apparently extending onto Mr. Stowell's property) without the
benefit of a building permit. Provide documentation such structures were constructed with a
building permit, remove such structures immediately or need to request to retain such structures
(later will need to obtain required after-the-fact building pernlits), although removing any
encroaching structures on Mr. Stowell's propelty.
15 . 8/6/08 & 6/3/08 - WW - The City has adopted amendments to our Comprehensive Plan
prohibiting the establishment of new hospitals, nursing homes and assisted living facilities within
the Coastal Stornl Area and the area inundated by a category 2 hUlTicane. Need to ensure such
facilities are not located within such areas. See Catherine Porter for information regarding Plan
amending language and maps.
Reference has been made in the site data table indicating that the site is in a Hurricane
Evacuation Level C. Additionally, no buildings are located in any portion of the Coastal Stornl
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentC 8-7-08_ DRC Jesponse.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Area or areas inundated by a Category 2 hurricane, as identified by the City's Floodplain
Management Plan.
16.8/6/08 - WW Response is that there will be only one person/bed per room in everything
except the independent living units. Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report.
The Applicant will consent to a condition of this type, "in compliance with State licensing
requirements, the Owner is limited to a capacity of only 1 resident per room".
6/4/08 - WW Based on the floor plans submitted for the main building, it is unclear what the
maximum population (ie: maximum number of beds) is anticipated in this facility for areas other
than the independent living units (attached dwellings), including the memory support, skilled
nursing (?) and assised living units. How many beds per room? We need to include such
population in the request.
17 . Parking Sufficiency Study - After additional discussion of regulations by Planning staff, a
Residential Infill Project parking requirement under the proposed MHDR District is two parking
spaces per unit!. While you do not need to change what you already have in the Study, I do need
for you to calculate what the Residential Infill Project parking requirement is and indicate such
in the Study. Additionally, I need such information included in the Site Data on Sheet G 1.0 1.
Required number of parking spaces have been recalculated in accordance with the above
infoffi1ation and included as part of Parking Sufficiency Study and site data table.
18 . When providing responses to DRC comments, please group comments by departments, as
you received such conm1ents, rather than as submitted on July 14th.
J :\02026\02026002.00\DOC\Permits\City of Clearwater\AttachmentI _ 8- 7 -08_ DRC Jesponse.doc
'"
0
'" 0
0 N
0 ",'
N
<li
~ ::J
-5 01
::J
'"
main building west elevation
,,;..~
.'1
''''';'';
<Il
lJ
~ 'i:
o
'+=
...'
Q)
...,
<Il
~
...
<Il
Q)
U
'\:
~
..w
main building north elevation
*note:
main entry level finished floor = contour level 26'-0"
average contour level on site = 12' -0"
o 16' )}' 60'
"\.1"\.-
'"
o
o
N
",'
~
::J
0"1
::J
'"
main building east elevation
'i:
Q.;
<Il
-' "0
01:
0
;;:
,,", ....'
, , (j)
......
...,.-.;. <Il
v ~
~ ....
~ <Il
~",' (j)
U
',-"
main building south elevation
*note:
main entry level finished floor = contour level 26'-0"
average contour level on site = 12' -0"
I) 16' \) 60'
"J'..___
800l '8l jsn6np
800l '><>JlH '
eppoll 'JaleMJeap
/\PCl a Ljl
I P II
~
~
!
t
L~
11"
S:Q
I ~',:L~l
,----. ~n=
~ c
c
'"
0.
(;
~~
~-g
~o
~u
Oll!
U'"
.
c
'"
0.
~o
m2
"'~
~~
~'"
o~
u-.;::
'"
c
'"
0.
(;
o
;;::
'~
;:ofl
ll!
01
~
'0
u
~,
~)
~
~
~,
~.'
A'~i!U~?'-:':~,__
~
front elevation
back elevation
cottage 1 elevations
I' 8 16 )~
..........--.------
~~!~~()r
~l"
~
~
~)r
~"
~
V(~lr'v:;i'il"
side elevation
side elevation
<Xl <Xl
0 0
0 0
N N
<lJ <Xl'
<lJ
oS ~
:J
01
:J
'"
>-
",..
v
III
-0
";:
0
;;::
....'
Q)
....
III
~
....
III
Q)
U
'\j
Q)
t"'\
........
SOOl 'SL ,sn5ne
SOOl aaJLIl '
I?PPOll 'Jall?MJl?ap
,~ p ,) l ~ I I j Ii P I J a1 P II aq
I
~l~L; ~!~f
.. ,.~ ~~~~
c
'"
"is..
~
o
N.2
ClI:;
O\c
.::30
~u
OCll
u~
9
c
'"
Q.
N~
",,0
cn.2
"'-
~~
~~
o ~
u-.;::
~
c
'"
"is..
(;
o
;;:
:~
}
N
""
0\
.::3
'0
u
~)r
~;"
q,;,';;:<t;,',F()""
~,'
v-;~-'O. )('"
l/)''''"T''
,,11'..' n'_.Il'-
front elevation
cottage 2 elevations
~4
, \PC''1tj floor
{'I~v !f)'.lO"
~
~
~~;f~~,';r<:.0ir).,
"" ""
o 0
o 0
N N
~ 00'
-5 ~
::J
01
::J
'"
v
....../
~
-0
'C
o
;;:
'''"'
....'
Q)
......
~
~
....
~
~
U
v
1......
'\j
w
800l '8l lsn6ne
800l <><>JI11 ,
PPPOll'J<3lPMJP<3P
I'll
II !If) PIJdj PII,j(t
~ c
ii:~
~::
]
'Lt' "
'-, =',1,;,., '--', "
,I ~':'I
~.
.
e
, p
.>
e
~
D-
o
",.2
ClJ:;;
Ole
~O
~U
Ou;
Uv>
~
e
'"
Q.
'" ~
~~
"'-
~~
o~
u-.;::
V>
e
'"
Q.
o
o
0;::
'"
u;
Ol
~
'0
U
]
:1
cO'
~'r
~)"
~
~
~.'."'HII""
~",.
~
V"";I~:;=;;-'
front elevation
back elevation
cottage 3 elevations
R 16 )4
.......-~
,.,t,cOnd !Ic-,(J
<:'1(>.' iO'-ln"
lir~t !Ioor
C"
if' ::I-E~,>');';:,Ii';~~.
':::(:,~':~H.':)"
side elevation
r
W
III
"'0
'C
r 0
;;:
j~ ....'
v Q)
....
'-'..;; III
~
....
III
Q)
u
'\:
...;...I
-
.._------------ concrete tile, typ
side elevation
Pq ~Hn II
r
800l8ll<n6ne
800l aaJlH '
ep!JOIJ 'JaleMJeap
VI
C
o
'.;:0
'"
i '~
cl