The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2008-08024, 430 GULFVIEW BLVD S - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024 430 S GULFVIEW BLVD SALT BLOCK 57, LLC PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 08/01/2008 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: . CDB: CLWCoverSheet CDB Meeting Date: Case Numbers: Agenda Item: Owner/Applicant: Representative: Address: October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024/TDR2005-05022 E3 Salt Block 57, LLC E.D. Armstrong ill, Esquire 430 South Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units (as established by Cases FLD2005-01005, FLD2005-05047 and FLD2007-11034); where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 230-room overnight accommodation use (hotel) in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 81,450 square feet/1.87 acres zoned Tourist District (2.45 total acres; 0.58 acres of total acreage zoned Open Space/Recreation District), a lot width of236 feet, a front (east) setback of2.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building) from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and to permit a sidewalk 10 feet seaward of the CCCL, a side (south) setback of 16 feet (to building), 1.5 feet (to pavement) and zero feet (to privacy wall), a rear (west) setback of two feet (to building) from the CCCL and to permit concrete patios 13 feet seaward of the CCCL, a building height of 150 feet above Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to top of roof deck and 296 valet-only parking spaces at 1.286 parking spaces per hotel room, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and three driveways where the two northernmost driveways are spaced 110 feet apart and the two southernmost driveways are spaced 18 feet apart, where 125 feet is required by Section 3-102 and approval of a two-year development order; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005-05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4- 1402. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District and Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Resort Facilities High (RFH) USE CATEGORY: BEACH BY DESIGN South Beach/Clearwater Pass District CHARACTER DISTRICT: Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024/TDR2005-05022 - Page 1 of 16 PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant Proposed Use: 230 Overnight Accommodation units EXISTING SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES: North: Tourist (T) District South: Tourist (T) District East: Tourist (T) District Beach Attached dwellings Restaurant; Retail sales and services; Overnight accommodations Water West: Preservation (P) District ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.58 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) is located on the west side of South Gu1fview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Harnden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach. The former Adam's Mark Hotel on this property closed due to damage sustained during Hurricane Jeanne in September 2004. The Community Development Board (CDB) has taken the following actions since the closing of the former Adam's Mark Hotel: · On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 10 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217-room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms/units were permitted at that time) and for height to allow the existing 155-foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217 -room/unit overnight accommodation use with reductions to setbacks, an increase to building height to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; (3) Reduction to the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval (SGN2005-01016). · On August 16, 2005, the CDB approved with 18 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005-05022 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units were permitted at that time); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units with reductions to setbacks, increases to building height to 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade. · On January 15, 2008, the CDB approved with 15 conditions Case Nos. FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005-05022 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units with reductions to setbacks, an increase to building height to 100 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building, a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street and to allow a two-year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024/TDR2005-05022 - Page 2 of 16 under TDR2005-05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade. The hotel was not reopened and was demolished on October 8, 2005, under BCP2005-09027. The western submerged portion of the property is the Gulf of Mexico. The property is currently being used as a temporary parking lot as approved by the City. The 440 and 450 West attached dwelling condominiums towers are located to the south of this subject property and are 157 feet in height (each tower). The properties directly east of this property are developed with retail sales and services and restaurant uses. The City's Beach Walk project has been constructed transforming South Gulfview Boulevard to the north of this site into a winding beachside promenade with lush landscaping, artistic touches and clear views to Clearwater's award-winning beach and the water beyond. A City public parking lot is located to the north of this property. Development Proposal: The proposal is to construct a new hotel building on the property consisting of 230 overnight accommodation units. The nonconforming status of the prior hotel density has been determined to still be valid, even though the hotel was demolished, due to the status of the approval of Case Nos. FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005-05022. The proposal includes amenities accessory to the hotel, such as meeting rooms, spa, pool, restaurant and bar. The proposed hotel building has a distinctive contemporary design that will make it an attractive landmark at this location. From a bird's eye view, the 150-foot tall, tower portion of the building will look like a crescent or arc on top of the five-story parking, amenities and meeting room/ballroom base, providing a stepped massing of the building. The building design provides all hotel units with water views and provides easy access to for all guests to access the public beach and nearby businesses. The building's shape is a thin, tiered curve that acts as a focal point to the views from the adjacent beach and waterway. The curve acts as a "hinge" element that links the Beach Walk District from the South Beach/Clearwater Pass District. Development of the proposed hotel on this property will not impede the future redevelopment of properties to the east. It is not anticipated that properties to the north (beach) and south (440 West condominiums) will be redeveloped in the near future. Other than the basement parking level, the parking garage is located in the southeastern portion of the building. An arrival lobby is provided on parking level 1. Level 1 is the main lobby level, along with hotel administrative offices, restaurant, bar, fitness center, spa and parking level 2. Level 2 provides a junior ballroom of 1,370 square feet and meeting rooms. Level 3 provides a 9,600 square-foot ballroom. Levels 4 - 9 provide 23 hotel rooms on each floor. Level 10 is indicated to have 22 hotel rooms, although there is no floor plan that shows such. Levels 11 - 12 provide 15 hotel rooms and a large concierge/amenity area (two stories in height) for meetings or parties. Levels 14 - 15 provide 14 hotel rooms for each floor, while Level 16 provides 12 hotel rooms. Single hotel rooms will provide 437 square feet of floor area, while the suites are generally double the single size of room. The proposed hotel consists of four rooftop levels - one being the top of the ballroom area at approximately 59 feet; the second being the southerly portion of the hotel tower adjacent to the 440 West condominium building, having a maximum height of 100 feet; the third being just north of the second roof having a height of approximately 140 feet; and the fourth being the hotel tower having a height of a maximum of 150 feet to the flat roof deck. That portion of the building exceeding 100 feet in height is separated from the 440 West condominium building by 107.5 feet, exceeding the Beach by Design and the Transfer of Development Rights minimum requirement of a 100-foot separation. The materials and color of the building will support the streamline language of the architecture and its natural surroundings. The building will be painted linen ruffle white, accented by alabaster. The window mullions, railing caps and decorative grills will be arcadia silver. Balcony railings will be clear glass. The pool area is located at the northwesterly portion of the site, adjacent to Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024/TDR2005-05022 - Page 3 of 16 the beach, to minimize noise and visual distractions and impacts to the 440 West condominiums to the south. With the height and location of the adjacent 440 West condominiums, the proposed hotel design is compatible with the surrounding uses. Parking for the hotel guests and employees is provided in a five-story, on-site parking garage containing 296 parking spaces at 1.286 parking spaces per hotel room, which will be 100 percent valet parked. Parking levels above the basement level (Levels 2 - 5) are solely accessed by three hydraulic powered vehicular elevators. No guests or other public will access the parking garage; only valet employees will park and retrieve vehicles from the parking garage. The parking garage will include stacked or tandem spaces, where another car must be moved to get the stacked or tandem car out, and will employ the stacking of vehicles in drive aisles to create additional valet spaces when necessary, resulting in a total of 352 parking spaces in a worst case scenario (full occupancy and a large banquet). The site is designed with three driveways on S. Gulfview Boulevard. The northern driveway will be an entrance only, providing access to the porte cochere for the valet service, a middle, exit-only driveway for guests and a southern driveway for service and delivery vehicles. The garage will be accessed by valet drivers on the south side of the building. The applicant is requesting a two-year development order due to market conditions. Section 4-407 specifies that an application for a building permit must be submitted within one year of the date the CDB approves the project, unless otherwise specified under this approval. Density: Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, the maximum density for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 50 overnight accommodation units per acre. Based on the 1.87 acres zoned Tourist District, a maximum of 93 overnight accommodation units are permissible under current regulations. The former Adam's Mark Hotel had 217 units, which was nonconforming to current regulations. The applicant is requesting Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to maintain the same number of overnight accommodation units in a conforming manner (see discussion below). The applicant previously transferred eight dwelling units under TDR2005-05022 from three locations on the beach to this site and intends to convert these eight dwelling units to 13 overnight accommodation units (1.67 conversion ratio) to permit the 230-room proposed hotel (see Transfer of Development Rights discussion later in this Staff Report). Termination of Status of Nonconformity: The development proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today). The nonconforming status of the prior hotel density has been determined to still be valid, even though the hotel was demolished, due to the status of the approval of Case Nos. FLD2007-11034/TDR2005-05022. An important factor in this case is the ability to retain an overnight accommodation use on the beach where many hotels/motels have been lost to condominium (attached dwelling) construction. The criteria for Termination of Status of Nonconformity, as per Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code and outlined in the table below, including compliance with perimeter buffer requirements, the provision of required landscaping for off-street parking lots and bringing nonconforming signs, lighting and accessory uses/structures into compliance with the Code will be met with this development proposal. Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024/TDR2005-05022 - Page 4 of 16 Consistent Inconsistent 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202.D of the N/A Community Development Code shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established X in Section 3-1202.E of the Community Development Code. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory X use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and c.omprehensive sign programs may be used to X satisfy the requirements of this section. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District. The temporary parking lot will be removed upon construction of this proposal. All proposed parking will be within a parking garage, where landscaping is not required. Any prior nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures/uses have already been removed when the Adam's Mark Hotel was demolished. A Comprehensive Landscape Program is not required for this proposal, as the proposed landscaping meets Code requirements. Should the applicant desire attached or freestanding signage in excess of minimum Code requirements, the Comprehensive Sign Program may be used for proposed slgnage. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR): Pursuant to Section 4-1402 of the Community Development Code, parcels governed by a special area plan, such as Beach by Design, may only receive density transfers from parcels within the same special area plan. The Code does not limit the number of overnight accommodation units that may be transferred to this site, as opposed to residential transfers that may not exceed the otherwise applicable maximum density by more than 20 percent. However, for comparative purposes, the maximum number of overnight accommodation units permitted today on this site is 93 units, where a 20 percent transfer would be a maximum of 18 units. In this case, eight dwelling units were previously transferred to this site and are being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units, which is less than 20 percent of the maximum number of overnight accommodation units permitted today. The applicant has previously transferred a total of eight dwelling units under TDR2005-05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade. This proposal is recognizing this prior transfer. Accordingly, the TDR has been found to be consistent with the requirements of Section 4-1402 and Section 4-1403 of the Community Development Code as outlined in the following table: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market X value of abutting properties; 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; X 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses; X 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate X vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function that enhances the X community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to Section 2-801.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The overall proposed I.S.R. is 0.914, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Community Development Board - October 21,2008 FLD2008-08024/TDR2005-05022 - Page 5 of 16 Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum lot area for overnight accommodations is 20,000 square feet. The subject property is 81,450 square feet in area landward of the seawall (zoned Tourist District). Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for overnight accommodations can range between 100 - 150 feet. The lot width of this site along South Gulfview Boulevard is 236 feet. The proposal is consistent with these Code proVIsIOns. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum front setback for overnight accommodations can range between zero - 15 feet, the minimum side setback can range between zero - 10 feet and the minimum rear setback can range between zero - 20 feet. This site contains a Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) along the west and north sides of the property. Section 3-905.A requires setbacks to be measured from the CCCL. The proposal includes a front (east) setback of 2.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building) from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and to permit a sidewalk 10 feet seaward of the CCCL, a side (south) setback of 16 feet (to building), 1.5 feet (to pavement) and zero feet (to privacy wall) and a rear (west) setback of two feet (to building) from the CCCL and to permit concrete patios 13 feet seaward of theCCCL. The tower portion of the proposed building is set back 31.1 feet at its northeast comer from the front property line along S. Gulfview Boulevard. Balconies beginning on the meeting room Level 2 are set back 25 feet to the front property line. The southeast comer of the building is set back approximately 42 feet from the front property line. The support columns for the porte cochere at a distance of 2.5 feet to the front property line and are the only building structure located within the front setback. The stairs leading to the porte cochere from the sidewalk within the S. Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way is also located within the front setback. The pavement for the porte cochere is set back approximately 10 feet from the front property line. The proposed building is set back 16 feet from the south property line. The pavement for the drive on the south side of the building is setback 1.5 feet from the south property line. In response to 440 West condominium resident requests in order to mitigate negative views and noise from the loading area, the applicant is proposing a six-foot high wall along a portion of the south property line. The CCCL along the north property line is at an angle to and is not parallel with the north property line, being narrower at the front property line and wider towards the seawall at the rear of the building. The proposed setback to the side (north) setback to zero feet to the building is at the western portion of the building where the CCCL cuts greatest into the property and is for the pool deck, stairs and handicap ramping. The pool deck will be approximately 8.5 feet above the ground level. The tower will be set back 7.5 feet from the north CCCL, with the balconies at 2.5 feet from the north CCCL, whereas the tower will be approximately 10 feet from the north property line at its closest point. The proposal includes a sidewalk adjacent to the north property line from the east end of the handicap ramp to the sun terrace paver area on the western end of the property seaward of the CCCL. On the west side of the property, stairs from the pool deck to the sun terrace on the ground will be set back two feet from the CCCL, whereas the basement parking level and pool deck will be primarily set back eight feet from the CCCL (except a 24-foot wide area close to the pool at a five-foot setback to the CCCL). The proposed tower portion of the building is set back approximately 35 feet from the western CCCL. The proposal includes a sun terrace paver area on the western portion of the property adjacent to the seawall seaward of the CCCL. The Building Code requires an 18-foot setback from the seawall. Any approval of this application should be conditioned on the applicant receiving approval from the State to have the both sun terrace paver area on the west side and the sidewalk along the north side seaward of the CCCL. Additionally, any approval should be conditioned on the applicant receiving a variance from the seawall setbacks according to the Building Code. Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024/TDR2005-05022 - Page 6 of 16 Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable height for overnight accommodation uses is 100 feet. Beach by Design permits buildings up to a maximum of 150 feet through the use of Transfer of Development Rights, which this proposal employs. The proposed hotel consists of four rooftop levels - one being the top of the ballroom area at approximately 59 feet; the second being the southerly portion of the hotel tower adjacent to the 440 West condominium building, having a maximum height of 100 feet; the third being just north of the second roof having a height of approximately 140 feet; and the fourth being the hotel tower having a height of a maximum of 150 feet to the flat roof deck. That portion of the building exceeding 100 feet in height is separated from the 440 West condominium building by 107.5 feet, exceeding the Beach by Design and the Transfer of Development Rights minimum requirement of a 100-foot separation. The applicant has previously transferred eight dwelling units to this property from three other properties on the beach. Based on a conversion factor of 1.67 (50 overnight accommodation units to 30 dwelling units), these eight dwelling units convert to 13 overnight accommodation units. The proposed height of the lower and taller portions of the tower is consistent and compatible with the heights of adjacent properties. There is a reasonable relationship between the number of units being transferred to this site and the increase in height above 100 feet. This site is located within the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design, which is indicated as a distinctive area of mixed use, including high-rise condominiums and resort hotels. The applicant has submitted documentation indicating compliance with the Beach by Design criteria for no more than two buildings more than 100 feet in height within 500 feet of each other. The proposal also complies with the Code requirements under the definition of "Height, Building or Structure" for elevator and stair overruns and mechanical rooms, which are permitted to extend a maximum of 16 feet above the otherwise permitted height. Since both portions of the roof meet the maximum height limitations of the Code and Beach by Design, the definition of "Height, Building or Structure" does not allow rooftop occupancy by the public or guests. Approval of this request should be conditioned prohibiting such rooftop use. The design of this project creates a form and function that will be consistent with and enhance the character of this area. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum required parking is one parking space per unit, or 230 parking spaces. Parking for the hotel guests and employees is provided in a five-story, on-site parking garage containing 296 parking spaces at 1.286 parking spaces per hotel room, which will be 100 percent valet parked. Parking levels above the basement level (Levels 2 - 5) are solely accessed by three, 125 feet per minute, 7,000-pound hydraulic powered vehicular elevators. Two of these elevators also access the ballroom level. The parking garage will be adequately staffed to ensure all vehicles are efficiently parked without excess backup. The 296 parking spaces will be provided on the various parking levels as follows: Level 1 - 103 spaces; Level 2 - 41 spaces; Level 3 - 48 spaces; and Levels 4 - 5 - 52 spaces on each level. Of the 296 parking spaces provided, 121 spaces are designed as stacked or tandem spaces where another car must be moved to get the stacked or tandem car out. The submitted Parking Study demonstrates that stacking of vehicles in drive aisles to create additional valet spaces when necessary will result in a total of 352 parking spaces in a worst case scenario (full occupancy and a large banquet). The parking garage must comply with the Building Code and have a vertical clear height for all parking garage levels of not less than seven feet including the entrance and exit. This clear height includes any structural beams, fire sprinkler pipes and heads, electrical conduits and lighting, drainage pipes and any other building elements. The parking is designed to accommodate hotel guests and staff, as well as provide holding space for taxis and airport shuttles awaiting fares. The site is designed with three driveways on S. Gulfview Boulevard. The northern driveway will be an entrance only, providing access to the porte cochere. The porte cochere drive will be one-way only travel (north to south), three lanes wide, be serviced by valet only and provide stacking space for 21 vehicles. Guests departing will exit the property to S. Gulfview Boulevard using the middle, exit-only driveway. The southern driveway is for service and delivery vehicles, Cormnunity Development Board - October 21,2008 FLD2008-08024/TDR2005-05022 - Page 7 of 16 separated so as to not interfere with the valet operation in front of the hotel. Valet drivers will access the garage by an internal drive between the middle and southern driveways and will access the porte cochere from the garage by a garage exit at the northern driveway. The service drive on the south side of the hotel provides access to two loading spaces, which are not required by Code, and the compactor dumpster. This service area will prevent blocking traffic on South Gulfview Boulevard. The applicant will provide a 10-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the site frontage of South Gulfview Boulevard with a shell finish, in accordance with Beach Walk specifications. Driveways for this proposal allow direct access to S. Gulfview Boulevard. The site has no other means of street access except to S. Gulfview Boulevard, which is currently designated ail arterial street in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Access is much as the former Adam's Mark Hotel previously had. With Beach Walk construction, Coronado Drive will function as the main arterial street between the roundabout and Harnden Drive, south of the subject property. This change of street designation will be included in the upcoming Comprehensive Plan update. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-201.D.1 of the Community Development Code, all outside mechanical equipment shall be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. The proposed parking garage will have walls and screens concealing views of vehicles, where fans may be necessary to effect air flow in the garage. Such fans will be indicated on the building plans when submitted to comply with Building Code requirements. The applicant is proposing mechanical equipment to be located on the roofs of the building or within enclosures meeting Code requirements for maximum height above the flat roof. Based upon this, the development proposal is consistent with the Code with regard to screening of outdoor mechanical equipment. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, to minimize hazards at driveway intersections with South Gulfview Boulevard, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. The site and landscape plans do not correctly indicate the sight visibility triangles on the north and south sides of the northern driveway. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the site and landscape plans need to be revised to correctly indicate such sight visibility triangles and modify proposed improvements as necessary. Pursuant to Section 3-904.B of the Community Development Code, to enhance views of the water from waterfront property, no structures or landscaping may be installed (other than non-opaque fences not exceeding 36-inches in height) within waterfront visibility triangles. The proposal indicates a waterfront visibility triangle at the southwest comer of the seawall adjacent to the 440 West condominiums. but the triangle is not drawn according to Code requirements. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant will need to correctly show the waterfront visibility triangle on the site and landscape plans and comply with the restrictions for such, including fence heights. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. The civil site plan for this proposal indicates that all on- site electric and communication lines will be placed underground in conformance with this Code requirement. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.D ofthe Community Development Code, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this site. The landscape design incorporates plant material that is native and salt tolerant, while providing visual interest. Medjool Date Palms are proposed along the front of the site to provide height and scale to the building. The pedestrian scale along South Gulfview Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024rrDR2005-05022 - Page 8 of 16 Boulevard will be further enhanced through the use of accent shrubs and dense groundcover beds. The eastern portion of the north side and the south and west sides of the building will be enhanced with Cabbage Palms and other salt tolerant vegetation to create a landscape that will contribute to the overall sense of place and be coordinated with Beach Walk improvements to provide a seamless feel between properties. Due to the closeness of the building (pool deck, stairs and handicap ramping) to the north property line and the sidewalk along the north property line form the end of the handicap ramp to the western end of the property line, the applicant is only proposing hedges for landscaping within this western portion of the north side. The pool deck is approximately 8.5 feet above ground elevation. Much like the west side, Staff believes that palms and other accent trees can be planted within this area to help soften this northern edge of the building, without compromising views by guests to the beach. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan should be revised to include trees within the landscaping area on this western portion of the northern property line. The proposed on-site landscaping otherwise complies with and exceeds Code requirements. Vertical concrete curbing is required on-site to protect landscape materials and areas from vehicular encroachment. The south edge of the southern service drive is not curbed. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil plans should be amended to include such curbing. The site plan proposes a six-foot high chain link fencing along south property line east and west of the solid masonry wall. Pursuant to Section 3-805.B and the location of the building, there can be no chain link fencing east of this wall. Staff believes a higher quality fence than chain is appropriate to provide a barrier between the proposed hotel and the adjacent attached dwellings, such as a vinyl fence or vertical metal grillwork (east or west of the solid masonry wall). The fencing type and height within the waterfront visibility triangle must also meet the requirements of Sections 3-804.C and 3-904.B. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize hotel housekeeping staff to remove trash from units and transport the trash to the trash compactor located on the south side of the property. A storage room for recyclables is also provided adjacent to the loading area. Trash and recycling trucks will back into the service drive from S. Gulfview Boulevard. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Signage: No freestanding or attached signage is proposed at this time for this overnight accommodation use. Freestanding signage in the Tourist District is restricted to a maximum height of four feet, or six feet through a Comprehensive Sign Program. Any approval of this application should include a condition allowing for freestanding signage, where such future freestanding signage must be a monument-style sign meeting Code requirements and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Additional Beach bv Design Guidelines: Section B.3 requires the floorplate of any building exceeding 45 feet in height be limited to a maximum of 25,000 square feet between 45 - 100 feet and a maximum of 10,000 square feet between 100 - 150 feet, but allows deviations to these floorplate requirements provided the mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum building envelop allowance above 45 feet. The largest floorplate between 45 - 100 feet is approximately 13,879 square feet and between 100 - 150 feet it is approximately 12,837 square feet. The applicant requests such deviation to the floorplate restriction between 100 - 150 feet. The Design Guidelines provide that no more than 60 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelop located above 45 feet be occupied by a building. The applicant has calculated the overall building mass between 45 - 150 feet at 21.8 percent, almost one-third of the maximum permissible. This Staff Report has discussed the stepback of the crescent-shaped tower and the thin nature of the tower reduces the overall mass and scale of the building, which Staff believes is acceptable to justify the increased floorplates proposed. Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024/TDR2005-05022 - Page 9 of 16 Section C.l requires buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The proposed building footprint is approximately 38,000 square feet. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 212 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard and 300 feet along the north side, while the vertical plane is approximately 160 feet from grade to the top of the tallest roof. None of these dimensions are equal. Modulation of the building massing also provides considerable dimensional variation. Section C.2 requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. The tower portion of the building is crescent shaped, creating a continuously curving falj:ade and therefore, no plane is continuous for more than 30 feet. The waterside of the tower falj:ade is also modulated through the depth and framing methods of the balconies. There is a one-room break in balconies along the north side, creating a pause or gap in the balconies on the falj:ade. Other balconies along the northwest and west sides between Floors 4 - 11 are framed with end walls to create a different appearance. This break from balconies is widened on Floors 12 - 16, further tempering the falj:ade. Balconies are of different depths, which help interrupt the plane of the falj:ade. Balconies on the north side east of the one-room break and on Floors 12 - 16 on the northwest and west sides are five feet in depth, while the balconies that are framed with walls on Floors 4 - lIon the northwest and west sides are 8.5 feet in depth. Section C.3 requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has calculated that the north elevation is at 68 percent, the east elevation at 61 percent, the south elevation at 62 percent and the west elevation at 70 percent. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024ffDR2005-05022 - Page 10 of 16 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the overnight accommodation use proposal with the standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code: Standard Pro Dosed Consistent Inconsistent Density 50 overnight accommodation units per 230 overnight Xl acre (maximum of93 units) accommodation units (122.990VU/acre) I.S.R. 0.95 0.914 X Lot Area 20,000 sq. ft. 81,450 sq. ft. (upland area X zoned T District; site also has 25,954 sq. ft. of submerged land zoned OS/R District Lot Width 100 feet 236 feet X Setbacks Front: 0- 15 feet 2.5 feet (to building) and X2 zero feet (to pavement) Side: o - 10 feet North3: Zero feet (to X2 building) from the CCCL; and to permit a sidewalk 10 feet seaward of the CCCL South: 16 feet (to building), X2 1.5 feet (to pavement) and zero feet (to orivacv wall) Rear: o - 20 feee Two feet (to building) from X2 the CCCL and to permit concrete patios 13 feet seaward of the CCCL Height 35 - 100 feet 150 feet above Base Flood X2 Elevation (BFE) to top of roof deck4 Off-Street One space per unit (230 spaces) 296 valet -only parking X2 Parking spaces at 1.286 parking spaces oer hotel room 2 Per Termination of Status of Nonconformity, conversion calculations and Transfer of Development Rights under TDR200S-QS022 See analysis in Staff Report Setbacks are measured from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) Increased height available pursuant to Transfer of Development Rights and Beach by Design guidelines Connnunity Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024!TDR2005-05022 - Page 11 of 16 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. , 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number ofthe following design elements: 0 Changes in horizontal building planes; 0 Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; 0 Variety in materials, colors and textures; 0 Distinctive fenestration patterns; 0 Building stepbacks; and 0 Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape desil!I1 and appropriate distances between buildin.l!:s. Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024rrDR2005-05022 - Page 12 of 16 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of September 4, 2008, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The 2.45 total acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.58 acres zoned Open SpacelRecreation District) is located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Harnden Drive and directly south of Clearwater Beach; 2. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 10 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217-room/unit hotel (where 74 rooms/units were permitted at that time) and for height to allow the existing 155-foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217-room/unit overnight accommodation use with reductions to setbacks, an increase to building height to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; (3) Reduction to the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval (SGN2005- 01016); 3. On August 16,2005, the CDB approved with 18 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005-05047/TDR2005- 05022 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units wee permitted at that time); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units with reductions to setbacks, increases to building height to 100 feet for the overnight accommodation building tower and to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade; 4. On January 15,2008, the CDB approved with 15 conditions Case Nos. FLD2007-11034/TDR2005- 05022 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation Community Development Board - October 21,2008 FLD2008-08024rrDR2005-05022 - Page 13 of 16 units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units with reductions to setbacks, an increase to building height to 100 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building, a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street and to allow a two-year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005-05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esptanade; 5. The hotel was not reopened and was demolished on October 8, 2005, under BCP2005-09027; 6. The property is currently being used as a temporary parking lot as approved by the City; 7. The nonconforming status of the prior hotel density has been determined to still be valid, even though the hotel was demolished, due to the status of the approval of Case Nos. FLD2007- 11034/TDR2005-05022; 8. The proposal is to construct a new hotel building on the property consisting of 230 overnight accommodation units; 9. The development proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today); 10. Eight dwelling units were previously transferred to this site under TDR2005-05022 and are being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units for this project; 11. The proposal includes five floors of parking for a total of 296 parking spaces at a ratio of 1.286 spaces per hotel room (where one space per room is required). Further stacking of vehicles in drive aisles when necessary due to full occupancy and banquets can result in 352 parking spaces; 12. The proposal includes the following setbacks: a front (east) setback of 2.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building) from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and to permit a sidewalk 10 feet seaward of the CCCL, a side (south) setback of 16 feet (to building), 1.5 feet (to pavement) and zero feet (to privacy wall), a rear (west) setback of two feet (to building) from the CCCL and to permit concrete patios 13 feet seaward of the CCCL; 13. The proposal includes a building height of 150 feet (to highest roof deck); 14. That portion of the building taller than 100 feet is separated from the 440 West condominium tower to the south by approximately 107 feet, which is in compliance with the Beach by Design requirement to have a minimum spacing of 100 feet between towers exceeding 100 feet in height; 15. The proposal includes a request for deviation to Beach by Design guidelines which require the floorplate of any building exceeding 45 feet in height be limited to a maximum of 25,000 square feet between 45 - 100 feet and a maximum of 10,000 square feet between 100 - 150 feet, as the largest floorplate between 45 - 100 feet is approximately 13,879 square feet and between 100 - 150 feet is approximately 12,837 square feet, but the guideline allows deviations to these floorplate requirements provided the mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum building envelop allowance above 45 feet; 16. Beach by Design guidelines requires for buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet, where the proposal is approximately 38,000 square feet, to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 212 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard and 300 feet along the north side, while the vertical plane is approximately 160 feet from grade to the top of the tallest roof. None of these dimensions are equal; 17. Beach by Design guidelines requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. The tower portion of the building is crescent shaped, creating a continuously curving fac;:ade and therefore, no plane is continuous for more than 30 feet. The waterside of the tower fac;:ade is also modulated through the depth and framing methods of the balconies; Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024/TDR2005-05022 - Page 14 of 16 18. Beach by Design guidelines requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has calculated that the north elevation is at 68 percent, the east elevation at 61 percent, the south elevation at 62 percent and the west elevation at 70 percent; and 19. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units (as established by Cases FLD2005-01005, FLD2005-05047 and FLD2007-11034); where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development application to permit a 230-room overnight accommodation use (hotel) in the Tourist (T) District with a lot area of 81,450 square feet/1.87 acres zoned Tourist District (2.45 total acres; 0.58 acres of total acreage zoned Open Space/Recreation District), a lot width of 236 feet, a front (east) setback of 2.5 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a side (north) setback of zero feet (to building) from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) and to permit a sidewalk 10 feet seaward of the CCCL, a side (south) setback of 16 feet (to building), 1.5 feet (to pavement) and zero feet (to privacy wall), a rear (west) setback of two feet (to building) from the CCCL and to permit concrete patios 13 feet seaward of the CCCL, a building height of 150 feet above Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to top of roof deck and 296 valet-only parking spaces at 1.286 parking spaces per hotel room, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and three driveways where the two northernmost driveways are spaced 110 feet apart and the two southernmost driveways are spaced 18 feet apart, where 125 feet is required by Section 3-102 and approval of a two-year development order; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005-05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That application for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than October 21,2010, unless time extensions are granted pursuant to Section 4-407; 2. That the final design and color of the overnight accommodation building be consistent with the conceptual elevations approved by the CDB; 3. That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 4. That there be no public/guest use of any roof 100 feet or higher; 5. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, Level 10 be designed with only 22 rooms, so that the total number of rooms does not exceed 230 rooms; 6. That suites on all floors be designed to have only one door to the exterior hallway; Community Development Board - October 21, 2008 FLD2008-08024/TDR2005-05022 - Page 15 of 16 7. That prior to issuance of permits for any proposed structures north and west of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL), the applicant submit a copy of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection approval for that construction north and west of the CCCL; 8. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks or variances obtained prior to the issuance of any building permits; 9. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the vertical clear height of all the parking garage levels be not less than 7 feet including entrance and exit (Florida Building Code 2004, Section 406.2.2); 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, site and landscape plans be revised to show the following: a. pursuant to Section 3-904.B, comply with the dimensional requirements and restrictions for waterfront visibility triangles; b. pursuant to Section 3-805.B and the location of the building, revising the chain link fencing east of the solid masonry wall along the south property line to a vinyl or vertical metal grillwork, as acceptable to the Planning Department; c. revise the chain link fencing west of the solid masonry wall to a vinyl or vertical metal grillwork, as acceptable to the Planning Department, and the fencing type and height within the waterfront visibility triangle must meet the requirements of Sections 3-804.C and 3-904.B; d. pursuant to Section 3-904.A, correctly indicate such sight visibility triangles at the northern driveway and modify landscaping to comply with such requirements; e. pursuant to Section 3-1204.D, curb the south edge of the southern service drive with vertical concrete curbing; and f. palm and other accent trees planted in the landscape area along the western portion along the north property line, in an amount and location acceptable to the Planning Department; 11. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 12. That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Engineering Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 13. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 14. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Wayne M. Y\L 11. ells, AICP, Planner III AITACHMENTS: o Location Map o Aerial Map o Zoning Map o Existing Surrounding Uses Map o Photographs of Site and Vicinity S:\Planning Department\C D BIFLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Gulfview S 0430 New Hotel 2008 (1) - /0.21.08 CDB- WW\Gulfview S 430 Staff Report. doc Community Development Board - October 21,2008 FLD2008-08024/TDR2005-05022 - Page 16 of 16 WayneM. Wells,AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-562-4504 I Email: wavne.wells(Q).mvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE · Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; Reviewed building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). · Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinel/as Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director; Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or pre development meetings). · Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Dept. of Planning and Development, Bradenton, FL June 1984 to March 1989 Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or pre development meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; Supervised six employees; Prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; Investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner ll, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). · Planner I Alachua County Dept. of Planning and Development, Gainesville, FL June 1980 to June 1984 Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; Drafted ordinance revisions; General research. · Graduate Assistant University of Florida Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Gainesville, FL 1979 to 1981 Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; Coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. · Planning Technician Planning Division, City ofSt. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for'both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1Yz years; Worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section Owner: Site: DR BAYSIDE LOCATION MAP Salt Block 57, LLC Case: FLD2008-08024 430 S. Gulfview Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 2.45 PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: 276A p -- -- 25 -- 26 -- 26112 - Zl --- 28 - -- 29 - -OS/R-- 410 30 _ _ _ _ _ _ Jl 31 - - - - --- - - 32 33 ...- ...- ...- ...- 34 ...- ...- ...- ...- ...- ...- ,., 35 ,., ,/ p ZONING MAP Owner: Salt Block 57, LLC Case: FLD2008-08024 Site: 430 S. Gulfview Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 2.45 PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: 276A Owner: Site: -- - - _ !leach - -- 26 -- 27 - - - - 28 €' Overnight ~'>.,> ~ . accommodations EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Salt Block 57, LLC Case: FLD2008-08024 430 S. Gulfview Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 2.45 PIN: 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 Atlas Page: 276A RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS SALT BLOCK 57, L.L.C. FLD2008-08024 - 430 South Gulfview Boulevard GENERAL ENGINEERING: Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: Comment No.1: Install sanitary sewer double sweep cleanout in right-of-way and include City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #305 on detail sheet. Response NO.1: A sanitary sewer double sweep clean-out has been added to the sanitary sewer service line, within the Gulfview Boulevard right-of- way. See Sheet 9. City of Clearwater Detail #305 (1 of 3) has been added to the Plans. See Civil Plan Sheet 14. Comment No.2: Because the proposed use of the property includes a restaurant please show a grease trap location on the plan. Response NO.2: The proposed grease trap has been added to the Plans. See Civil Plan Sheet 9 Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy: Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Professional Engineer. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Note: In addition to the requirement for a City of Clearwater Building Permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. ENVIRONMENTAL: Comment No.1: Response NO.1: FIRE: Comment No.1: Response NO.1: Comment No.2: Response NO.2: HARBOR MASTER: LEGAL: LAND RESOURCES: LANDSCAPING: Prior to issuance of building permit: No light within 300 feet shall be visible or extend in areas identified as Sea Turtle Nesting Areas during the nesting season of May 1 to October 31. Those areas where security and public safety requires lighting, alternative light management approaches shall be applied. Demonstrate compliance on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits. A note has been added to the Plans stating, "No light within 300 feet shall be visible or extend in areas identified as Sea Turtle Nesting Areas during the nesting season of May 1 to October 31. Those areas where security and public safety require lighting, alternative light management approaches shall be applied". See Note 7 on Civil Plan Sheet 3. Plans do not show the locations of the Fire Pump Room or the Emergency Generator Room. Show locations on plans PRIOR TO COB. See Sheet A2 for location of the fire pump and generator. Utility page does not show location of fire line into building. Provide on plan PRIOR TO COB. The location of the proposed fire line into the building has been indicated on the Plans. See Civil Plan Sheet 10. No issues. No issues. No issues. 2 Comment No.1: Response NO.1: Comment No.2: Response NO.2: Comment No.3: Response NO.3: Sheet 7/13 - There is an inconsistency between the Grading Plan and the proposed landscaping shown on Sheet LP-1 regarding the Filter Drain 100 along the north property line. Based on the detail on Sheet 12/13, the top of the concrete filter drain is 7.02 and the proposed grades are between 4.2 and 5.5, which means the top of the filter drain is above ground and does not provide sufficient cover to plant the landscape material indicated. Revise. The Civil Plans and the Landscape Plans have been revised to be consistent with each other. The proposed top of Filter Drain 100 has been lowered, and the drain itself has been relocated to underneath the proposed sidewalk. The landscaping that was previously proposed in the same area has been revised accordingly. See Civil Plan Sheet 7 and Landscape Plan Sheet 1. Sheet 7/13 - There is an inconsistency between the Grading Plan and the proposed landscaping shown on Sheet LP-1 regarding the OCS 100, as there does not appear to be sufficient cover to provide the landscaping, especially the Medjool Palm, over this OCS 100. Revise. The Civil Plans and the Landscape Plans have been revised to be consistent with each other. The proposed top of OCS 100 has been lowered, and the drain itself has been relocated to underneath the proposed sidewalk. The landscaping that was previously proposed in the same area has been revised accordingly. See Civil Plans Sheet 7 and Landscape Plan Sheet 1. Sheet 7/13 - There is an inconsistency between the Grading Plan and the proposed landscaping shown on Sheet LP.1 regarding the Filter Drain 200 along the south property line. Based on the detail on Sheet 12/13, the top of the concrete filter drain is 4.00 and the proposed grades are between 4.4 and 6.45, which may not provide sufficient cover to plant the landscape material indicated. Revise. The Civil Plans and the Landscape Plans have been revised to be consistent with each other. Filter Drain 200 has been relocated to underneath the proposed sidewalk. The landscaping that was previously proposed in the same area has been revised accordingly. See Civil Plan Sheet 7 and Landscape Plan Sheet 1. 3 Comment No.4: Response No.4: Comment No.5: Response No.5: Comment No.6: Response No.6: Comment No.7: Sheet 7/13 - There is an inconsistency between the Grading Plan and the proposed landscaping shown on Sheet LP-1 regarding the OCS 200, as there does not appear to be sufficient cover to provide the landscaping, especially the palms, over this OCS 200. Revise. The Civil Plans and the Landscape Plans have been revised to be consistent with each other. OCS 200 has been relocated to underneath the proposed sidewalk. The landscaping that was previously proposed in the same area has been revised accordingly. See Civil Plan Sheet 7 and Landscape Plan Sheet 1. Sheets 10/13 and LP-1 - If the Fire Department access can go across grass but cannot be impeded by landscape materials, it appears these two sheets contradict each other. Sheet 10/13 indicates the Fire Department access is a five-foot wide path, which is not correct. Coordinate. The Civil Plans and the Landscape Plans have been revised to be consistent with each other. The Fire Department Access Path has been clarified. See Civil Plan Sheet 10 and Landscape Plan Sheet 1. Sheet LP-1 - Revise this sheet to provide a symbol with the Plant Key and Quantity rather than spelling everything out on this sheet and remove the height, spread, spacing, etc. A Plant List has been provided on Sheet LP-3 that has all the details. If there are specific heights of trees in particular areas of the site to be called out, then that information on Sheet LP-1 should be noted, but normal requirements of height, spread, spacing, etc. should be shown only on Sheet LP-3. The Plant Key on Sheet LP-3 is not even used on Sheet LP-1. Revisions have been made to landscape plans as requested. Sheet LP-1 - Revise for the following: a. Interior landscape area is supposedly shaded on this sheet, but all landscape areas are shaded. Remove the note from this sheet. Interior landscape area shading should be shown on Sheet 3/13; . b. Vehicular Use Area is indicated as 8,500 sf, which conflicts with that indicated on Sheet 1/13; and 4 Response NO.7: Comment No.8: Response NO.8: Comment No.9: Response NO.9: Comment No.1 0: Response No. 10: Comment No. 11: Response No. 11: Comment No. 12: Response NO.12: c. Interior landscape area provided is indicated as 1,000 sf, whereas Sheet 1/13 indicates 165 sf. The Civil Plans and the Landscape Plans have been revised to be consistent with each other. The interior landscape areas and vehicular use areas have been revised, indicated, and summarized on the Plans. See Civil Plan Sheet 3 and the Land Use Data table on the Cover Sheet. Sheet LP-1 - Please separate out the landscaping being provided on the ground from that being provided on upper decks (possibly a Sheet LP-1 and LP-1a [hardscape planting plan]). The City will enforce continuing landscape plan maintenance requirements for only that on the ground. Revisions have been made to landscape plans as requested. Sheet LP-3 - Please separate out the landscaping being provided on the ground from that being provided on upper decks (possibly into two Plant Lists [ground and hardscape]). The City will enforce continuing landscape plan maintenance requirements for only that on the ground. Revisions have been made to landscape plans as requested. Sheet LP-1 - Unclear why two high-rise oaks are proposed on the south side of the tower. The planting area appears too small for a large tree. Future canopy will be rubbing the building. Reconsider use of high-rise oaks at this location. Oak trees have been replaced with native Sabal Palms. Sheet LP-3 - Revise for the following: a. General Notes - Next to last - Unclear as to what is meant by shredded mulch "or ground cover" (?); and b. Plant List needs to indicate the caliper of trees (except palms) to be planted. Revisions have been made to landscape plans as requested. Sheets LP-1 and LP-3 - Ensure the plant counts on LP-1 add up to that indicated in the Plant List totals on LP-3. Quantities have been verified. 5 PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No.1: Response NO.1: Comment No.2: Response NO.1: STORMWATER: The Public Art and Design Impact Fee is due and payable on this project prior to issuance of a building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727-562-4837 to calculate the assessment. Noted. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to the issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Debbie Reid at 727- 562-4818 to calculate the assessment. Noted. The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of building permit. Comment No.1: Response No.1: Comment No.2: Response NO.2: Comment No.3: Response No.3: Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. Noted. A copy of the approved SWFWMD ERP will be provided upon receipt. Show on the Paving and Grading plan how roof and garage runoff will be routed to the proposed oil/grease separator and/or the vault as stated in the drainage report. The Civil Plans and the Architectural Plans have been revised to be consistent with each other. A Note has been added to the Civil Plans stating, "The building roof runoff will be directed to the stormwater vault pursuant to the Architectural Plumbing Plans". See Note 7 on Civil Plan Sheet 7 and Architectural Plan Sheet A-1. As indicated on the Paving and Grading Plan, please show proposed grades and other required drainage elevations on the construction plan. Proposed grades have been shown on the Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan and the Paving, Grading and Drainage Detail Sheets. Additional detail to the design will be added at the time of Construction Plan preparation. See Civil Plan Sheet 7. 6 Comment No.4: Response NO.4: Comment No.5: Response No.5: Comment No.6: Response NO.6: Comment No.7: Response NO.7: Comment No.8: Response NO.8: Provide a maintenance schedule of the stormwater management system. A Stormwater Management System - Operation and Maintenance Checklist will be created for this project and provided to the Client/Applicant at the time of Construction Plan preparation. Upon submittal to the Client/Applicant, a copy will also be provided to the City. Provide trench drain across the three driveways to intercept runoff and route to the proposed vault. . Pursuant to conversations with Scott Rice (City of Clearwater), trench drains have not been added at the three (3) driveway entrances to the proposed site. The originally requested location would essentially tie the Gulfview Boulevard drainage into the proposed stormwater system, effectively negating and effective functionality. Additionally, the proposed project does not intend to assume the responsibility for providing treatment for the Gulfview Boulevard runoff. Existing storm sewer and structures that will not be utilized shall be indicated to be removed on the demolition plan. All existing structures (including existing stormwater system components) that are not proposed to be re-used have been indicated as "to be removed" on the Civil Plans. See Civil Plan Sheet 2. Show the oil-water separator on the Paving Grading plan and show how garage runoff routed through this device. A series of floor drains have been added to the bottom garage level of the proposed building. The floor drains are routed to a proposed oil/water separator, located south of the loading area and east of the compactor. See Civil Plan Sheet 7. It is recommended to have the garage's finished floor elevation 0.5' higher than the crown of the road. The finished floor elevation of the bottom garage level has been raised 1.5 ft. to 5.5 ft. The proposed grades and stormwater system component elevations have been revised accordingly. Also, the Architectural Plans have been revised accordingly. See Civil Plan Sheet 3 and Architectural Plan Sheet A-1. 7 General Note 1: Response 1: General Note 2: Response 2: SOLID WASTE: Comment No.1: Response NO.1: Comment No.2: Response NO.2: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Acknowledged. At building permit application, applicant shall submit drainage report, soil report, and any other drainage related document for review and record. Acknowledged. Compactor area cannot be serviced as shown (not enough room). The Civil Plans and the Architectural Plans have been revised to be consistent with each other. The location I configuration of the compactor has been revised to allow adequate room for operation and maintenance. See Civil Plan Sheet 3 and Architectural Plan Sheet A 1. If applying for "green Lodging Certification" you will need to show where recycling will take place. The Civil Plans and the Architectural Plans have been revised to be consistent with each other. The location of the recycling area has been added to the Plans. See Sheet A 1. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No.1: Response NO.1: Comment No.2: Traffic Operation Division has concerns about the use of elevators as the only access to upper floors of the proposed parking garage for a resort hotel. Dependence upon the elevators could result in operational problems due to mechanical or electrical malfunctions. Previous designs for structures at this location have used ramps to provide access to upper parking floors, is it possible to design a building that would utilize ramps instead of the elevators? Please see the revised Exhibit "B" narrative to the application which includes a detailed description of the operation of the vehicular elevators. Does the applicant have other facilities where elevators provide the sole access to upper parking floors? If yes, 8 Response NO.2: Comment No.3: Response NO.3: Comment No.4: Response NO.4: Comment No.5: Response NO.5: Comment No.6: , Response NO.6: what operational and mechanical problems have been encountered? The Eden Roc is a comparable hotel project in Miami Beach that uses freights in lieu of ramps. This project is currently under constructions. The Tampa Waterside Marriott in Channelside uses a 7,500 lb. freight to transport cars from street level to the ballroom level, it also stops at the lobby level. The Diplomat Hotel in Hollywood has a freight that functions in a similar fashion as the Tampa Marriott. The applicant is proposing three 7,500 lb. elevators that will travel at 160 fpm. They can operate in two ways, with power or manual doors. Eden Roc has manual doors. The valet has to get out of the vehicles to open and close the doors each time. With a power type, there exists a pedestal with a push button. The valet can just pull up and register the command. What additional maintenance is anticipated to be necessary for the use of elevators for this purpose in a coastal environment? Periodic cleaning of the fixtures, frames and stainless steel. Use a rust inhibitor for any primed finishes. Is a generator included in the design of the hotel that can be used to power the three lifts in an emergency. A generator will be provided to power two lifts in the event of an emergency. Demonstrate, using a turning template, that a passenger vehicle can enter the freight elevator adjacent the transformer without hitting any objects. The Autoturn software program has been used to demonstrate how a standard size passenger vehicle will access and maneuver in and out of the proposed elevators. See enclosed Exhibits. Demonstrate using a turning template how a scaled WB-50 truck enters and exits the loading area. The Autoturn software program has been used to demonstrate how a delivery truck (30 feet in length, single-axle) will access and maneuver in and out of the proposed loading areas. The owner, who operates over 80 hotels throughout the country, has indicated that deliveries are made by vehicles no longer than 30' in length. See enclosed Exhibits. 9 Comment No.7: Response NO.7: Comment No.8: Response NO.8: Comment No.9: Response No.9: Comment No.1 0: Response No. 10: Comment No. 11: The structural columns at the end of the parking stalls create maneuverability problems. Consider re-positioning the columns away from the ends of the stalls. Where possible, the proposed structural columns have been relocated away from the ends of the parking stalls. See Civil Plan Sheets 3, 4, 5, 5A and Architectural Plan Sheet A 1. There shall be no columns in any of the drive aisles. The columns will be transferred to avoid drive aisles. See Sheet A1. The proposed parking spaces shown may be insufficient. Provide a parking study to support and justify the number of proposed parking spaces. See attached Parking Study, prepared by Florida Design Consultants, dated September 10, 2008. The information in the Parking Study has also been incorporated in the applicant's responses to criteria (Exhibit "B"). Show the path a wheelchair bound patron can use to get from a public sidewalk to the lobby. ADA access is provided through the northeast corner of the garage at grade level. Elevators P4/P5 will have rear opening doors that will service ADA access. Signage will be provided to slow down/stop traffic as it approaches the crossing of the drive aisle. See Sheet A 1. The Accessible Path has been indicated in the Civil Plans as well. From the lobby, a wheelchair bound patron will take the elevator to the ground floor garage level, where he will exit out of the garage to the north, follow the proposed sidewalk to the east, which connects to the existing sidewalk along Gulfview Boulevard. See Civil Plan Sheet 3. From South Gulfview Blvd., a wheelchair bound patron can also enter through the front door under the porte cochere. Although there are no proposed handicap parking spaces in the parking garage, the parking garage shall be designed to accommodate an accessible van which requires an 8' 2" clear vertical height. This includes entrance, route, parking stall and exit. Indicate this on the site plan. (Florida Accessibility Code Sections 11-4.1.2.(5)(b) and 11-4.6.5. ) 10 Response No. 11: Because the proposed administration areas, spa and ballroom are located in the northern portion of the proposed building, the northern portion of the ground floor parking garage has less height restriction. Therefore, all "accessible vehicles" will access the garage via the northern drive, where the required clearance of 8' 2" has been provided, which meets the Florida Accessibility Code. An ADA van space has been designated. See Sheet A1. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (COB) hearing. The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: Comment No.1: Response NO.1: Comment No.2: Response No.2: General Note 1: Response: General Note 2: Response: PLANNING: Comment No.1: If vehicle freight elevators are approved, then provide mirrors for the ground floor for vehicles exiting from the freight elevators. Mirrors have been added to the ground floor of the parking garage, for the use of the vehicles accessing the proposed elevators. See Architectural Plan Sheet A 1. Provide in the detail sheet FOOT's truncated dome standards (Index 304 page 6 of 6). Use link provided: http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/rd/RTDS/08/304.pdf FDOT Index 304, Page 6 of 6 (truncated dome standards) has been added to the Plans. See Civil Plan Sheet 11 Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). Acknowledged. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. . Acknowledged. It is unclear how such raised/elevated pool area shown with fill material complies with FEMA requirements for structures within a V-Zone allowing wave action to flow under the building. Any walls must breakaway to allow wave action. Fill goes against such requirement (based on 11 Response NO.1: Comment No.2: Response NO.2: Comment No.3: Response NO.3: discussions with our Building Official). Structure is also close to the existing seawall and will need variances to the Building Code requirement for seawall setbacks (18 feet required). Listed below are Jeff Walker's comments regarding the subject. Our drawings have been revised to show that the pool structure will be supported on piles. See Sheet A 12. [Walker, Jeff] It is my understanding that a pool is not considered a building by FEMA and the no fill requirement for a VE zone applies to buildings. I do remember a FEMA tech directive that said pools must be located and designed such that the breakup of the pool by wave action should not lead to building damage. I think it would be prudent to design the "retaining wall" around the pool deck by a S.E. such that it would withstand scouring wave action, i.e. cast in place reinforced concrete. Unclear why all the paver area (sun terrac~) is necessary along the seawall seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line. Provide an explanation and a justification for such. Prior request only had a sidewalk, but no paver area, on the west side of the building, and the sidewalk did not encroach or go seaward of the CCCL. So far, not convinced such paver area is necessary or justified. This area was provided for use as a sunning area, given the orientation of the pool and limited deck area surrounding the pool. The reasons are discussed in responses to criteria (Exhibit "B"). Sheet 3/13 - Unclear of the connection between the "sun terrace" paver area and the sidewalk along the north property line in the northwest corner, as to why the sidewalk must extend almost all the way to the seawall. Need to also show the interconnection of the sidewalk along the north property line to the pool deck stairs and pool ADA ramp. The project proposes a walkway that begins at the bottom of the ADA ramp and extends west to the sun terrace. The purpose of this walkway is to allow ADA access to the sun terrace as this is the only method a disabled person can travel to the sun terrace. 12 Comment No.4: Response NO.4: Comment No.5: Response NO.5: If I understand the. existing grades of the S. Gulfview Boulevard, the subject property and the properties north and south of the subject property properly: a. the existing grades in the center of S. Gulfview Blvd abutting the subject property ranges from approximately 4.00 on the north to 4.23 on the south; b. the existing grades of the subject property range from 4.03 to 11.03 feet. It is unknown what the grades for the top of the seawall is, as no grades have been provided; c. the grades on the property to the north range from 3.86 at S. Gulfview to over 6 feet along the north property line west of the paved City parking lot; and d. the existing grades on the property to the south range from 4 feet at their northern driveway to over 6 feet approximately in the center of the northern portion of their property . As such, it is interesting to note that the FFE for Parking Level 1 is 4.00, which is below the existing grades for the subject property and adjacent properties and would appear to flood in storm events, including flooding into the elevators and freight elevators. Correct? The finished floor elevation of the bottom garage level has been raised to 5.5 ft. The proposed grades and stormwater system component elevations have been revised accordingly. Also, the Architectural Plans have been revised accordingly. See Civil Plan Sheet 3 and Architectural Plan Sheet A-1. Sheets 3/13, 7/13, 9/13, 10/13 and A 1 - From a traffic flow standpoint (since garage is all valet), it would appear that the one-way drive aisle (27' wide) NW of the loading/compactor area would have a flow if it was relocated to be where Spaces 13-15, 22-24 and 27-29 currently are designed. The parking spaces can be relocated westward to the current location of the one-way drive aisle as it appears to be the same dimensionally. Revise. The layout of the ground floor garage level has been revised as requested. The proposed parking spaces have been relocated to the west, and the proposed "traffic flow" is located in the eastern garage area. See Civil Plan Sheets 3, 7, 9, 10 and Architectural Plan Sheet A 1. 13 Comment No.6: Response NO.6: Comment No.7: Response NO.7: Comment No.8: Response NO.8: Comment No.9: Sheet 3/13 - While loading spaces 35 feet in depth have been provided, the loading spaces end at an internal drive aisle, not a loading dock or unloading area. Off-loading the trucks would appear to be within the adjacent required 24- foot drive aisle/back up area for Spaces 13-18. Loading does not appear to function. It is also questionable whether a delivery truck and trash truck can access the loading spaces and compactor. Revise. The layout of the loading zone area has been revised. The delivery truck will now be positioned at a 45-degree angle for unloading, providing area both at the rear and the side of the vehicle. Additionally, the Autoturn software program has been used to demonstrate how a delivery truck (30 feet in length, single-axle) will access and maneuver in and out of the proposed loading areas. See enclosed Exhibits and Civil Plan Sheet 3. Sheet 3/13 - Unclear of the need for the gate on the drive on the south side of the building that restricts access into the garage, loading spaces and compactor. Gate appears to restrict the ability of trucks to get into and out of the southern loading area. The proposed gates that were previously shown within the driveway for the loading area have been relocated to just inside the entrance to the ground floor parking garage. In this revised location, it still provides security for the garage, and does not impede access to the loading area or compactor. See Civil Plan Sheet 3 and Architectural Plan Sheet A-1. Sheet 3/13 - Unclear of the need for a trash staging area outside of the building if a compactor is being provided. Advise/revise. The plans provide for a loading area that includes compactor, an area to roll out recycling which may be collected in the area near the loading dock, and general staging of the loading area. Sheets 3/13 and A1 - It my understanding under the Building Codes and FEMA regulations that there can be no occupiable space below BFE, except storage. Unclear of how the "valet" room qualifies to be below BFE. Advise/revise. 14 Response NO.9: Comment No. 10: Response No. 10: Comment No. 11: Response No. 11: Comment No. 12: Response No. 12: Comment No. 13: Response No. 13: The room designation has been revised to "key storage." See Civil Plan Sheet 3 and Architectural Plan Sheet A 1. Sheets 3/13 and A 1 - Unclear of what is meant by "support" for the area north of the SW stairwells. Only storage is allowed below BFE. Advise/revise. The area located at the ground floor parking level, labeled "support" has been renamed "storage". See Civil Plan Sheet 3 and Architectural Plan Sheet A 1. Sheet 3/13 - Need to dimension the distances from the western CCCL to the western edge of the paver sun terrace and the distances from the northern CCCL to the northern edge of the sidewalk, so these distances can be included in the advertising of this proposal. The distance from the western CCCL to the western edge of the proposed "sun terrace" paver area has been added to the Plans. The distance from the northern CCCL to the northern edge of the proposed walkway has been added to the Plans. See Civil Plan Sheet 3. Sheets 3/13 and A1 - There are columns from the hotel rooms tower above that are shown but not black as the other columns. Is this because they will not be seen or will not block drive aisles or the backing out ability from parking spaces. It appears that some spaces will be inaccessible. Advise. The proposed columns that are shown but not filled in black indicate a column on the upper floors. Therefore, they do no block any proposed parking spaces. See Civil Plan Sheets 3 and Architectural Plan Sheets A 1. Sheet 3/13 - Unclear of the need for the following notes: a. "H/C Ramp Type CR20" directly south of the stairs from the sidewalk in S. Gulfview Blvd R.O.W. and the porte cochere drive; and b. "H/C Access Path" within the S. Gulfview Blvd R.O.W. with an arrow just south of "a" above. Revise. The above referenced call-outs were incorrectly shown on the previous Plans. They have been removed. See Civil Plan Sheet 3. 15 Comment No. 14: Response No. 14: Comment No. 15: Response No. 15: Comment No. 16: Response No. 16: Comment No. 17: Response No. 17: Comment No. 18: Sheet 3/13 - Need to dimension the distance from the south property line to the proposed 6' high wall at its closest point and south of the trash staging area. The distance from the south property line to the closest point of the proposed 6' -high wall have been added to the Plans. See Sheet 3 and the Land Use Data table on the Cover Sheet. Sheet 3/13 - A fence is indicated along the south edge of the southernmost drive from the 6' high wall to the front property line. Need to indicate the height of the fence and the type of fence (wood, vinyl, etc). Within the visibility triangle, maximum height is 30". The height and type of proposed fence located along the south edge of the southern property line has been added to the Plans. Its location in reference to the sight triangle has also been delineated. See Civil Plan Sheet 3. Sheet 3/13 - A 6' high fence is indicated along the south property line from the trash staging area to the seawall (?) or the CCCl (?). Need to be more specific as to where the fence ends. Need to indicate the type of fence (wood, vinyl, .etc.). The proposed wall has been extended further to the west for the purpose of shielding the compactor area. The height and type. of proposed fence has been added to the Plans. Its location in reference to the CCCL has also been delineated. See Civil Plan Sheet 3. Sheet 3/13 - A note in indicated at the southwest corner regarding the waterfront sight triangle and refers to the "landscape plans for fence requirements". There is no information on the landscape plans regarding such fencing. Revise. The previously provided note referencing the Landscape Plans for proposed fence information has been removed from the Civil Plans. Sheet 1/13 - land Use Data indicates 8,783 sf of vehicular use area (VUA) and 165 sf of interior landscape area provided (2% of VUA), where Code requires 10% of VUA: a. Show by shading on Sheet 3/13 the area being counted toward interior landscape area; 16 Response No. 18': Comment No. 19: Response No. 19: Comment No. 20: b. Unclear why the required 10% requirement cannot be provided. Need to look at landscaped areas, other than foundation landscaping that could be counted toward interior landscape area. The Civil Plans and the Landscape Plans have been revised to be consistent with each other. The calculated vehicular use area (VUA) has been revised to 8,500 SF. The calculated interior landscape area has been revised to 1,000 SF. The resulting percentage is just under 12%, greater than the 10% required. See Civil Plan Sheet 1, the Land Use Date table on the Cover Sheet, and Landscape Plan Sheet 1. Sheet 1/13 - Revise the land Use Data for the following: a. Include the area zoned Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) in the Existing and Proposed columns; b. In accordance with Section 3-908.A, the porte cochere canopy, which is cantilevered from the building, is not subject to setbacks. No reduction is necessary. Revise Proposed Setbacks (Building) for Front; c. The proposed front setback (building), based on the submitted plans, is 31.1 feet to the NE corner of the building; d. The proposed front setback (tower) is 31.1 feet; and e. The proposed side (south) (tower) setback is indicated at 23 feet. Show such dimension on Sheet 3/13. The existing and proposed Open Space I Recreation (OS/R) area has been calculated and added to the Land Use Data table. The proposed front setback (building) has been revised to indicate both the distance to the porte cochere support column and the building. The proposed front setback (tower) and front setback (building) has been revised to 23 feet. The callout has been added to the Plans. The side setback (tower) callout has been added to the Plans. See Civil Plan Sheet 3 and the Land Use Data table on the Cover Sheet. Sheet 1/13 - Parking table at bottom of land Use Data needs to be coordinated with that indicated on Sheet AO, as the numbers are different as to the number of valet and tandem spaces provided. 17 Response No. 20: Comment No. 21: Response No. 21: Comment No. 22: Response No. 22: Comment No. 23: Response No. 23: Comment No. 24: Response No. 24: The Civil Plans and the Architectural Plans have been revised to be consistent with each other. The parking numbers for both the valet and tandem spaces now match. See the Land Use Data table on the Civil Plans Cover Sheet and Architectural Plan Sheet AO. Sheet 1/13 indicates in the Unit Count of hotel rooms a total of 230 rooms. Based on unit counts on the architectural plans, there a,re 231 rooms. The discrepancy occurs on Level 16 where there are 12 rooms, not 11 rooms. Revise the architectural plans to only provide for a total of 230 rooms. The Architectural Plans have been revised to indicate a total of 230 proposed rooms. See the Unit Count table on the Civil Plans Cover Sheet and Architectural Plan Sheet 1. Sheets A6, A7, A8, A9 and A10 - Dimension the width/depth of the balconies. If I understand the dimensions on Sheet AO correctly, the balconies on the north side of the building are within 2.5 feet of the CCCL. Correct? Sheets A6, A7, A8, A9 and A10 have been dimensioned. You are correct regarding the 2.5' dimension. Sheet AO - Provide the following on this sheet: a. A dimension from the adjacent building to the closest portion of the proposed building over 100 feet in height (either the mechanical oval or the balconies on the south side of the tower); and b. Show where the Building Sections (East - West) and (North - South) on Sheets A13 and A14 are cut through the building. a. Drawings have been revised to show dimensions. b. Section marks have been located. Sheets A14 - A18 - Per the definition of "height, building or structure", the maximum height of the parapet at the top of the building can be 42". Shown is 48". Revise. Drawings have been revised to reflect the 42" dimension. 18 Comment No. 25: Response No. 25: Comment No. 26: Response No. 26: Comment No. 27: Response No. 27: Comment No. 28: Response No. 28: Comment No. 29: Sheet 3/13 - Add a dimension from the front property line to the edge of the balconies (dashed line) in the NE corner of the building. A dimension from the front property line to the edge of the balconies (in the northeast corner of the building) has been added to the Plans. See Civil Plan Sheet 3. Sheet A18 - Dimension the height of the overhead doors. Drawings have been revised to show dimensions. Sheet A19 - SE View Perspective - View appears to be "see through" the building, which is not reality. Revise. Perspective has been revised. Sheet A19 - East and SE Perspective Views indicate the porte cochere with columns. Sheets A16 and A18 show the porte cochere as cantilevered from the building with no columns. Sheet A15 appears to indicate guy wires from the building holding up the porte cochere, however, the porte cochere is dashed in also indicating columns. The colored version of Sheet A 15 "greyed" in the porte cochere as if it is cantilevered, but indicates columns dashed in. Sheets A1, A2 and A3 indicate the porte cochere with columns close to the building, but with no columns out next to the front property line (meaning it is cantilevered). Sheet 3/13 does not indicate columns out next to the front property line (meaning it is cantilevered). Need to coordinate plans as to whether this porte cochere is cantilevered or is designed with columns. If it can be engineered, the cantilevered design is more exciting and fits better with the building design. All drawings have been revised to show columns supporting the porte cochere. Exhibit B - Request 2 - Flexible Development - Revise for the following: a. "d" - Need to revise depending on how the porte cochere is designed (if with columns close to the front property line, then there will be proposed setback; if cantilevered, then no proposed setback for the porte cochere). Otherwise, add in the proposed setback to the building at the northeast corner (to the building and to the corner of the balcony). Revise proposed setback to pavement (driveway) to 19 Response No. 29: Comment No. 30: Response No. 30: Comment No. 31: Response No. 31: whatever distance I have requested just south of the stairs to the sidewalk in S. Gulfview Blvd.; b. "e" - Need to include "to permit a sidewalk "x" feet seaward of the CCCL"; c. "f' - Need to include the proposed setback to the pavement; d. "g" - Need to include "to permit concrete patios "x" feet seaward of the CCCL"; and e. Need to include the proposed height of the building. Please see revised Exhibit "B," responses to criteria. Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - (2) - Need to include discussion of whether the garage will provide parking for all employees and whether employees' cars will be valet parked. Please see revised Exhibit "B," responses to criteria. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Revise for the following (keep in mind that the advertising for Compo Infill has been revised to set out what is proposed and does not set out any reductions or increases; the discussion needs to compare the reduction or increase to that normally required [or that otherwise that would have been advertised]): a. Height - Need to discuss the height increase from 35 feet to 1 00 feet, as well as to 150 feet; b. Setbacks - Need to discuss the proposed setbacks to that normally required. Additionally, depending on how the porte cochere is designed, modify the discussion of setbacks (columns or cantilevered design??); c. Relief from CCCL Setback - Need to discuss the proposed setbacks to that normally required; and d. While no relief is being requested, should include a discussion relating to lot area and lot width, due to the way we are advertising the request now. Obviously, both the lot area and lot width exceed the minimum requirements. Please see revised Exhibit "B," responses to criteria. 20 Comment No. 32: Response No. 32: Comment No. 33: Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #5 - Revise "f', as there are no minimum standard uses in the Tourist District. Please see revised Exhibit "B," responses to criteria. Response to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 - Revise for the following: a. Under "a" - The proposed hotel is not permitted as a Minimum Standard use, as there are no Minimum Standard uses in the Tourist District; b. Under "b" - Last sentence on Page 1 0 - Revise "compliments" to "complements"; . c. Under "b" - Page 11 for Tower Separation - Please provide written discussion of how this proposal meets the regulations, not just referring one to a map that one must interpret what they are looking at; d. Under "b" - Page 11 refers to Exhibits C-3 and C-4 - Revise the exhibits to 45 feet and recalculate allowable building envelope volume and proposed design. Revise the proposed percentage in the written material on Page 11; e. Under "b" - Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings on Page 12 - I would not characterize landscaping as "lush", as the landscape areas on the north, south and west have been minimized due to the higher than prior requests impervious surface ratio. The design of the site landscaping also conflicts with stormwater design features, both on the north and south sides of the property. Except the east side of the property, I don't agree that proposed landscaping will soften the architecture. Need to rethink how this is written and/or see how to reduce the ISR to provide adequate areas, free of obstructing stormwater features and Fire Department access, for landscaping to be provided to accomplish the effect of softening the architecture; f. Under "b" - Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings for Maximum Building Envelop on Page 13 - See discussion under "d" above. Revise proposed percentage after recalculating; g. Under "c" on Page 13 - Last sentence - Revise "compliments" to "complements"; 21 Response No. 33: Comment No. 34: h. Under "e" on Page 14 - Overall Landscaping - It is stated that a Comprehensive Landscape Program is not required, however, it is unclear if one is required based on other comments regarding the provided percentage of VUA for interior landscape area. Revise as necessary, depending on your responses to the other Landscaping comments; i. Under "e" on Page 14 - North Property Line - Unclear of what the last sentence is referring to. Need to expound on this sentence, however, there are landscape comments that point out conflicts between proposed landscaping and other requirements (Fire Department access, stormwater features, etc.). See also discussion above in "e". Landscaping along north property line could be characterized as minimal due to the reductions to setbacks and building mass/lSR; j. Termination of Nonconforming Status - #3 on Page 15 - There are no existing nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures or uses on the site. Remove statement regarding Comprehensive Sign Program. Revise; and k. Termination of Nonconforming Status - #4 on Page 15 - Since #3 is being modified, revise sentence #2 appropriately. Please see revised Exhibit "8," responses to criteria. There is a concern that the design of the site minimizes any ability to provide landscaping on the north and south sides of the property. On the south side of the property, the closeness of the vehicular use area for the loading area and garage access leaves very little room for meaningful landscaping. Other landscaping and planning comments speak to conflicts with Fire Department access and stormwater features. The closeness of the pool area to the north property line, coupled with the provision of the sidewalk to the rear along the north property line does not provide any meaningful area for "lush" landscaping to soften the architecture. The overall proposed ISR is greater than proposed for prior projects on this site, which is a contributing factor to this concern. The building design is excellent, but the overall feel is that the building is squeezed onto the site. 22 " Response No. 34: Although the proposed ISR is 91.4 percent; the mass of the proposed building (21.8% of the theoretical maximum building envelope) is less than one-half the mass of what is currently approved for the site (44.5% of the theoretical maximum building envelope). Please note that the former Adam's Mark at this location had an ISR of 90 percent and was not landscaped or of a superior architectural design as the proposed project. Providing increased parking than is required by the Code's 1:1 ratio also means the site must support a larger base building. The reduced mass of the project will enhance the site as viewed from the beach and 440 West condominiums. The site has been attractively landscaped to incorporate the adjoining Beach Walk and make the street level pedestrian friendly. OTHER: No Comments 9/15/2008 9:48 AM 49062.114967 #449790 v1 - Ocean Properties/Responses to Comments 23 . . " . -, ~Clearwatet -.~ o:~. Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: I:J SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION I:J SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets I:J SUBMIT FIRE PREll MARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 I:J SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1.205.00 * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) " APPLICANT NAME: Salt Block 57 L.L.C. MAILING ADDRESS: 1001 E. Atlantic Avenue PHONE NUMBER (561)279-9900 ~~Contact: Ken Gross e (561)276-1563 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Same as Applicant. List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER E. D. Arms t rong I I I, Es q '.:""Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP earwater, (727)461...;,U~lR ed@j"pfirm.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: 430 S. Gulfview PROJECT VALUATION: $50,000,000 STREET ADDRESS 430 S. Gulfview PARCEL NUMBER(S): 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 2.45 acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 106,504 sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit II A" attached. PROPOSED USE(S): 230 overnight accommodation units DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Exhibit "B" attached. Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) C:\Documents and Settings\derek. ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07 -11.doc Page 1 of 8 . . . DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES..x... NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) [J SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) [J Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in qetail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Criteria 1 through 6. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design ofthe proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours o{operation impacts, on adjacent properties. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07 -11.doc Page 2 of 8 ( . WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) Q Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See Exhibit "B." attached for responses to Criteria 1 through 6. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: Q Changes in horizontal building planes; Q Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; Q Variety in materials, colors and textures; Q Distinctive fenestration patterns; Q Building stepbacks; and . Q Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 3 of 8 - E. . STORMWA TER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) o A STORMWA TER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, induding buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A redudion in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. o If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. o At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall indude the following;. o Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; o Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all strudures; o All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; o Proposed stormwater detention/retention area induding top of bank, toe of slope and ouUet control strudure; o A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. o Proposed stormwater detention/retention area induding top of bank, toe of slope and ouUet control strudure; o Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. o COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must Initial one ofthe following): x Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. ,j CAUTION -IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contad the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) o SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; o TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, induding drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; o TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, refleding size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; o LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; o PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjundion with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; o GRADING PLAN, as applicable; o PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); o COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; C:\Documents and Settings\derekJerguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Projed (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) a SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required !lcreening {per Section 3-201 (D) (i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plan typicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a Level Two approval. a SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenltabularform: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (FAR.) for all nonresidential uses. a REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y:i X 11); a FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 5 of 8 . H. LANDSCAPI'NG PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) o LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. o REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Yo X 11); o COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) o BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information: All sides of all buildings Dimensioned Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) Materials o REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 Yo X 11 J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) o All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. o All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) o Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicabl~ (separate application and fee required). o Reduced signage proposal (8 Yo X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Documents and Settings\derek. ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07 -11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) o Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or hislher designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (lTE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a .Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Rerer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each tuming movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. X Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If yoli have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONSI WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. '~14 ~ Acknowledgement of fire flow calculationslwater study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): X Fire Flow CalculationslWater Study is included. Fire Flow CalculationslWater Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONSI WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and PhO~PPI""""". . STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before 'me this 3O.:th day of n 111 f ' A.D. 20-OS..-- to me and/or by E . . rms t rong I I I , who is personally known _ ~~x ~; t-~ ~ . My commission expires: ~'Il.~ ~ Jayne E. Sears ~ . . :*. ..- . ~ ;.. rJj Expires September 2, 2009 C:\Documents and Settings\derek. ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive I~ 16)e~~a~,l!IecjClO-_10f' Page 7 of 8 Signature of property owner or representative E. D. Armstrong III N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. PrcMde names of all properly owners on deed - PRINT fullllllll1llS: SALT BIDCK 57, L.L.C., a utah limited liability cx:rapmy 2. Thet (I arnl\Ne ant) the owner(s) and record lIle holder(s) of the foRowing desaibed property (address or general location): 430 South Gulfvi.er4l1 Parcel mi' 07/29/15/52380/00019330.. 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (desalbe l8quesl) . Flexible developlBlt approval for a catprehensive imin. redevel.qJIEnt project ....and-transfers of developtent rights .t'O-~p:tv~ i:unf receiver site. -.. 4. ,~~n==ai!~oi~~appan: ,J'r')httson, ~-Bckcr. Ruppel &-B1m:lsr-U.P as (hisltheir) agent(s) 10 exearte any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been exeaJllJd to induce Ihe City of Clearwater. Florida 10 consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by CIty representatives in oRfer 10 process lhis applcatlon and the owner authorizes City representaliws to visit and photograph Ihe property desaibed in this BPprlCllion; 7. That (1Iwe),lIIe undersigned authOllly, hereby cerlifythatlhe foregoing is true and correct. SALT - "'- - ..----. PToperiY: Owner' By: -..- --""--Property oWner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF P1NiLUdt l ~o.\,^- ~C'\ Before nM! \he undersign!d, a~ ollicer duly commissioned by the ~ of the State of Florida. on this ._.:25 ~_.__ day of J.u1-y-r-2008 _._ personally appeared .M...LC.J^.ll ~ I \tJ OI.ls k. __. __ who having been first dUy swam Deposes and says that heJshe fully understands the contents of the aftldavitlhat he/She signed. *as t'\.o..(\Afyer Salt Block 57, L.L.C. DEBORAH HOWARD Notary Public - State of Florida , ~ My Commission Expires Jul 31, 2009 Bonded By National NotalY Assn. of Notary P~bIC S!gnature My Commission Exp';'s: ."'J./.. ?2.lirlS! Q3... _____._... . C:\Documents and Sellings\derek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_0707\Comprehensive Inllll Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 8 018 , f EXHIBIT "An 430 SOUTH GULFVIEW A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACC.ORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE 'PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET . FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE. INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEIN~ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: .' FROM THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33, RUN SOUTH 770 41' 16" WEST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF"A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED' ABOve; RUN THENCE SOuTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE ,ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT (RADIUS -,~247.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET, (CHORD BEARING- SOUTH190 07' 51" EAST); RUN THENCE N9RTH 68" 55' 27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 36; RUN THENCE , . NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS 36, 35, 34 AND 33, WHICH LINE IS A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (RADIUS - 847.0 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET (CHORD - 235.0 FEET, CHORD BEARING - NORTH 20"17' 10" WEST) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AS: A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINEUAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAl RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542, OF-THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FtORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT AN IRON PIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT . 33 AND THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE PC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 847.00 FEET AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AND ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 20. 17' 10" EAST AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 235.00 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE RUN SOUTH 68" 55' 27" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO AN IRON PIN, SAID POINT BEING THE PC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1247.00 FEET AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT A CHORD BEARING OF NQRTH 19" 07' 51" WEST AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 296.09 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE RUN NORTH 77" 41'16" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF ' ' 400.00 FEET TO A POINT AND BACK TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ...~-. .. .~"" .. p /"\ "\ \.~ . ,{::~<') . / r" 1 . -i . ... .. .. . ..-(~~... .. TbJs)utrament WuPreP~;':.). . BYAl1d.~bo1dd~ R~~~:,~. StepJle..L KUsSDer (<{S) . . GrayROblDson, p.s. . '-.~,..... t 201 N. FranJdlD Street. Sulte.i200 . ':........'..........,/:> TaDq)a, ~orldf33QI~/ Pbone: (813P'~.. . i' .... '-. '\ ~ '" ' Prnperty. .w>p.....I~;. Parcel ?f j~ Identifle~..JP;ono) Number: 07/1,9/1~aOJO00I0330 /...);.......~ . /{</(~:. S~EClALW.uutANTY.DEED.. ... . (Y'/THts SPECIAL wARRANTY DEED,exeeuted as of the .21st dayof~ber, .2007, ,bI' :~IGO BEACH, ~~~, a Florida limited liability company formerly known as (~raEACH Residences - ClearWater, L.L.C." a Florida limited liability ,CODlplIl}r .(the. . l'.~~G'ruto["), whose mailing address is 877 Executive Center Drive West, Suite205,St'. r~ ~bui-g, Flotlda 33702-2472 to SALT BLOCK 57, L.LC., a Utah limited liability company. /~.,> "1\'l1ose .mailingaddreSs is 1000 Market Street, Buil~8 One, Suite 300, Po$mOutb, New '" '-'. '\~. ,-Hampshire: 03801 (the "G~ntee~. . ... .. . ...'.. I~"..~'.J .: . . . ',..j .. __. ..WIT.NESSETH: ... .. . ~t (Jranfor, for and i:rl consideration orthe: ~of $10.00 and 91het good and valuable consideration to Grantor in band paid by Grantee. the rec;eiptand sufficiency of which is . acknowledge~ his granted, bargained, and sOld to Oran~ and Grintee's successors and assigns forever, the fol1o~g descnbed real property situate, lying, and being in Pinellas County, Florida, (the: "ProDertvj and descnbed on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Together with all easements, tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances belonging or in anyways appertaining to the Property, and the reversion and revCrsions, ~der and remainders, rents, issues, and profits of the Property, and all the: estate, right, title, interest, claims, and demands whatsoever of the Grantor, either ~ law or equity, Qf,in, and to the Property, with . the hereditan1ents and appurtenances to tbeProperty. This conveyQ1lce is subject to: all c:asemcmts,. Conditions, res1riCtiona, cOveliants,_ limitations, reservations and maucrs()f recOi-d, provided, bowever~ that this reference shall not operate to reimpose any of same; all taxes and assessments for the year 2008 and subsequent Years; all laws, ordinances; govern.mental regulations and resolutions, includiDg, b1.1t not limited . to, all applil;able. building, zoning, l.~d uSe and. en~eJita1 ordinances and. regUlations; . and matters wbichwould be disclOsed by an accurate survey. TO HA VB AND TO IJ:QLDthe s.ame in fee simple forever. . . And Grantor co~ts with Grantee that,. except as above noted and u limited by the next sentence, at the: timC of the delivery of this special watI'lIntydeed, GrantOr h~by Specially wa:rrantsthe -title to the Property and will .defend it against"the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through, or under Grantor, but not otherwise. . \490039\70 ., 1194376 v3 . . .PlNELLAS CouNTY FL OFF. REC. 'BK 16097. PC;; . i398 ;_..._1.:.... '- /"\ .\ \ ;._~ 1. . . ,,:,:~......,:). ,"'...... '-.;' . '. !..<.>) 'IN WITNESS ~'i5:r;!GrantOrhaS executed thi~ special Warranty Deed as of the day and year first above ~ ) . . . . . . .~...,' ./ . /t' .j~ )~......." 1\ \ ., ! ......01 ." .~... / .........".... INDiGO B~ACII; LL.C., a Florida limited liability company WITNESSES: . tNlIQ1': . -' NIII' p,e"- (..~~./. (SEAL] /..)......... "- 1/ ~~/) ",,-./ ST~dF, FLORIDA cQ~oFMf1N,q/e~ ~, ~~ /;.::,\....~e foregQing instrument was acknowledgedbef~ me this aM.L.... 9aY of December, /' :~OO~;by Robert E. Glantz as Vice ~sidcnt of INDIGO BEACH, ( ~ a Florida limited ,_:'.:..,>.lfa~ility company, on behalf of the limited liability COD1pll1!Y. He is personal known to ~!"" "'~..mC or U has produced .. . . as id 'fication. . (,~~.~) . . /'" ~ t -'.. .........-.? . "'-..:..;/ . . By:~ Robert E. Glantz, Vice President .1.._..jENiitEii~CMRiER.-l _ CamrnlElDOlII3I18 I. . !)lpRIe(1CW2011 I . FIaIIdI NaIIIy~ !no .n............n..._..n-............. \490039\10 - fill \14316 vJ . , PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 16097 PG 1399 ,/'\ \ \ ,-"';:" I. ':.- ~'-" '') .J"'...... '-.../ ! " 1 .. .....t . , ., ~.~ \, /,..... .~.j EXHIBIT nAil \. \,J ) LEGAL DESCRIPTION ,.~"''''..''....... ../ / /.f,/\T<r \ \...) J A tract of land consisting. of Lots 33, 34 and 35 and part of Lot 36, of LLOYD-WHrrE- SKINNER SUBD~I9!'l, according to map or plat thereof recorded in Plat 13, pages 12 and 13, of the Public'~ of Pinellas County, Florida, and lands and submerged lands lying between and S.o1:tthet1l( Southwesterly or Westerly of the mean bigh water mark and the Bulkhead Lin~ described in and set forth in Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fwd of the State of Fl~"~laimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official Records BOC)k 765, Page 542, of the Public ReC~)of Pinellas County, Florida, said tract being descn'bed as follows: From the I ... I \.....' Northern, mQ~. qomer of said Lot 33. run South no 41'16" West, along the Northwesterly boundarY. "o"f:.s.jid I,.ot 33 and the So~westerly extension thereof, a distance of 400.00 feet to a . point ~~ ~u1kbead Line descn'bed above; run thence Southeasterly along said Bulkhead Line al~,a'6~ to the left (radius - 1247.00 feet), an lUC distan.ce of 296.79 feet, (chord ~g - Sout}i,):9" "t)7'51" East); iim thence North 6SO 55'27" East, a distance of 402.14 feet to a pomt on th(~#Casterly boundaty of said Lot 36; run thence Northwesterly along the Northeasterly bQ..~cs of said Lots 36, 35, 34 and 33, which line is a curve to the right (radius - 847.00 feet), (ah.~ distance of 235.76 feet (chord - 235.00 feet, chord bearing - North 200 17'10" West) to the (....:pr.~ I fB" . <...'~juto egmnmg. . r~ ~ . ~ ' /.......... ~-:--..""~. <.. ~,,,,.......,. /<'<,~\ '-BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AS: "" ....); .........../ A tract of land consisting of Lots 33, 34 and 35, and part of Lot 36, of LLOYD,.WlllTE- . SKINNER SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13, Pages 12 and 13, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and lailds and submerged lands lying.between and Southerly, Southwesterly or Westerly ofthc mean'bigh water mark and the Bulkhead Line described in and set forth in Trustets of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida Disclaimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official R.ecords Book 765, Page 542, of the P:Ublic Records of Pin~llas COWlty, Florida, said 1ract being described a follows: . .Begin ~t an '~On pin. ~t the ~orthcastc;omer of saidU)t 33 and the West righ~f,:,way margin afOulf Vi~w Boulevard, said point being the True Point ofBegirining; said point being the PC of a curve to the . left, having a radius of 847.00 feet, and an arc distance of 235.76 feet; thence run along said curve . to.the left,.an.d along the \Vest right-of-way DW'gM of GulfVievi Bouley.ro, a chord bearing of ~outh2oaI7'10n East, and ach~ dis_e of 235.00 f~ toliniroiipin;theD.cerim Sotitb680 55'27" West, for a distance of:402.14Ccet to an iron pm, said point being the PC of acuiv.e to the,. right, haVing il radius of 1,247.00 feet, and an arcdi_ce of 296.79 feet;tbence run along said curve to the right, a chofd bearing of North 19" 07'51" W cst, and a cl10rd distance of 296;09 feet to an iron pin; tbencerun NOrth 77D 41 '16"~t, for a distance of 400.00 feet to a pomt and back to the True Point of Beginning. " . \490039\70." 119437h3 . EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Salt Block 57, L.L.C. 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Section B. Description of Request Request The subject property is the former Adam's Mark hotel site, located at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard. The Applicant and property owner, Salt Block 57, L.L.C., proposes to redevelop the property with 230 overnight accommodation units. The applicant is an . affiliate of Ocean Properties, Ltd., the owner and operator of numerous hotels and resorts in North America and Canada (www.oplhotels.com). Specifically, the Applicant requests: 1. Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density, 217 overnight accommodation units (as established by FLD2005-01005, FLD2005-05047 and FLD2007-11034), where 93 overnight accommodation units (1.87 acres at 50 units/acre) are allowed by the current zoning (Tourist) and land use designation (RFH), under the provisions of Section 6-109, Clearwater Community Development Code ("Code"); 2. Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units in the Tourist (T) District, with a. a Lot Area (zoned T) of 81,450 square feet; b. a Lot Width of 236 feet; c. a maximum height of 150 feet above Base Flood Elevation (BFE) to top of roof deck; d. a front (east) setback of 2.5 feet to building (porte cochere support column) and zero feet to driveway and stairs; e. a side (north) setback from the CCCL of zero feet to building (raised pool) and to permit a sidewalk 10 feet seaward of the CCCL; f. a side (south) setback of 16 feet to building, 1.5 feet to pavement and zero feet to privacy wall; g. a rear (west) setback from the CCCL of 2 feet to building (stairs) and to permit concrete pavers 13 feet seaward of the CCCL; h. 296 valet parking spaces, consisting of 175 spaces conforming to Code specifications and 121 tandem spaces; I. three driveways where the two northernmost driveways are spaced 110 feet apart and the two southernmost driveways are spaced 18 feet between drives, where 125 feet is required by Section 3-102; and j. approval of a two year development order; as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C of the Code; and 3. including the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005-05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. History The property is the site of the former Adam's Mark Hotel which was built in 1975 and was a landmark at the southerly end of Clearwater Beach for almost 30 years. The hotel closed its doors after sustaining damage from Hurricane Jeanne in September, 2004, and on April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board approved a termination of nonconforming status as to density and granted flexible development approval for height (155'), setbacks, reduced parking and other existing nonconformities in order to allow the hotel to be renovated (FLD2005-01005). The hotel renovation never occurred due to economic reasons and site was subsequently sold and was approved for two new redevelopment scenarios. The first was for 112 residential condominium units and 78 condo hotel units (FLD2005-05047), followed by several minor revisions and extensions, and the most recent was the January 15, 2008 approval for 230 overnight accommodation units which were to be in the form of a vacation/interval ownership type of use (FLD2007-11034). Anticipating the approved redevelopment, the previous owner demolished the Adam's Mark on October 8, 2005. Changes in the real estate market and changes in ownership have caused the Applicant, which purchased the property in December, 2007, to modify the proposed overnight accommodations use of the property to traditional hotel accommodations (rather than a hotel-condo or timeshare). Proposed Use The Applicant proposes to redevelop the site with a 230-room hotel that will attract tourists to Clearwater Beach. The property will include amenities, such as meeting rooms, spa, pool, restaurant and bar, all accessory uses to the hotel use. 2 Parking for hotel guests and employees is a 5-story on-site parking garage, containing 296 parking spaces, 100 percent valet parked. Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. West: The property is bounded on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. North: The adjacent property to the north is the public beach and City-owned property, including a public parking lot, which was recently renovated with Beach Walk improvements. The proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the project, through extension of a 10'-wide shell finish concrete sidewalk, use of decorative pavers and planting of Medjool Date Palms. East: The adjacent property to the east is an area of smaller mixed uses, including hotel, condominium, retail and restaurants. It is anticipated that this area will also undergo renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. The height of the five-story base of the building is compatible with and reflects the scale of the buildings to the east across Gulfview Boulevard as those buildings are generally 4 stories. The "tower" portion of the proposed hotel is in a curved shape, oriented to the Gulf, such that it is stepped back from S. Gulfview. South: The adjacent property to south is occupied by 440 West condominiums, which consists of two towers of 157' in height. The proposed design (21.8 percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope) is less than one-half the mass of what is currently approved for the site (44.5% of the theoretical maximum building envelope) and will allow the 440 property a less dense neighbor and broader view than would the currently approved project. The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed project are in keeping with the Design Guidelines set forth in Beach by Design for projects including approvals of transfers of density and increased building height. The building mass is 36.3 percent of what is permitted by Beach by Design on the site. Please see the more detailed discussion of these criteria in response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria No. 6.b. in this exhibit. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3 The proposed project will enhance this area of the beach in a number of ways, including: (1) Superior architectural design will visually enhance the neighborhood at this southerly end of Beach Walk; (2) Construction which meets current building Codes; (3) Excess parking and adequate stacking space and loading area, in order to eliminate any traffic congestion at the site and eliminate potential off-site parking in public lots. The parking is designed to accommodate hotel guests and staff, as well as provide adequate holding space for taxis and airport shuttles awaiting fares; (4) Beach Walk improvements incorporated into the site provide for a better pedestrian flow along South Gulfview than what currently exists; (5) Property value will significantly increase, as the current taxable value of the vacant parcel is $16,414,800 and the estimated project valuation is $50,000,000; (6) A hotel operated by Ocean Properties, Ltd., a well-known and reputable company, will attract tourists; (7) The hotel guests are potential clientele of nearby restaurants and other Clearwater Beach businesses; and (8) Design locates guest activity portions of the hotel toward the public beach to increase activity around the site. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The Applicant will construct a 10'-wide shell finish concrete sidewalk in front of the hotel, creating a southerly extension of the Beach Walk, which will improve the pedestrian flow and safety along the westerly side of South Gulfview. The sidewalk will be interrupted by brick paver driveways as to call pedestrians' attention to the crosswalks for safety purposes. Adequate driveway stacking space at the hotel entrance and a separate driveway for delivery vehicle provide that vehicles do not back up into S. Gulfview, thereby minimizing traffic congestion and not blocking the sidewalk. With regard to health, safety and welfare, the proposed development and structure will comply as required with applicable codes including the Florida Building Code, the Life Safety Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code. Fire Department Access shall comply with NFPA 1 Chapter 18 with Gulf View Boulevard serving as the access road, and more specifically that the access road will extend to within 50' of a single exterior door per 18.2.2.2, an approved route around the exterior of the structure measures not more than 450' from the access road and the building is equipped with sprinklers per 18.2.2.2.3.1 and 18.2.2.3.2. 4 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The Applicant has submitted with this application a letter, dated July 23, 2008, prepared by Roy E. Chapman, P.E., Florida Design Consultants, Inc. which concludes that a traffic study should not be required. There are a number of ways in which the project has been designed to minimize traffic congestion on South Gulfview Boulevard: . (1) The driveway under the porte cochere will have a one-way north to south traffic flow. Vehicles will enter the two-lane driveway on the north side and drive in front of the hotel, where the driveway expands to 3-lanes, thereby providing an extra lane for through traffic. All vehicles are serviced by valet. From this location under the porte cochere, the valet will drive directly into the parking garage without exiting to S. Gulfview. When guests depart, the valet will bring the vehicle out of the garage directly into north side of the porte cochere without accessing S. Gulfview, after which the guests will proceed in a southerly direction (the drive returns to 2 lanes) and exit the property onto S. Gulfview. The porte cochere driveway provides stacking space for 21 vehicles, as shown on the diagram attached hereto as Exhibit "C" - Page 5. Service and delivery vehicles will use a separate service drive on the south side of the property so as not to interfere with the valet operation in front of the hotel. (2) The parking garage will contain 296 parking spaces, including 66 spaces in excess of the minimum Code requirement, as the Applicant desires to insure that all parking demands of the project can be accommodated on site. The 296 spaces will serve all guests and employees of the 230 room hotel. The parking garage will be 1 00 percent valet parked for guests and employees and will be adequately staffed such that all vehicles are efficiently parked without excess back-up. This application package includes a parking study prepared by Florida Design Consultants, Inc., dated, September 1 0, 2008 ("Parking Study") which is based on interviews with the Applicant who is the operator of 24 Florida properties and over 84 properties worldwide. The Parking Study determines that in a worst case scenario (full occupancy and a large banquet), the maximum demand would be 263 spaces. Based on information from the St. Petersburg Convention and Visitors Bureau, which releases annual statistics regarding tourism (www.oinellascvb.com/statistics). the countywide occupancy rate in 2007 for hotels with greater than 101 units was 71.6 percent. In Clearwater properties, the occupancy rate averages 80% in winter, 71 % in spring/summer and 59.4% in fall. It is unlikely the above "worst case" scenario will impact the project. The Parking Study demonstrates that stacking of vehicles in drive aisles to create additional valet spaces if necessary will result in a total of 352 5 parking spaces in the garage, and confirms the adequacy of the proposed parking garage to serve guests and employees of the proposed use. (3) Three (3) 125 feet per minute, 7,000 pound hydraulic powered vehicular elevators are planned for the vertical movement of passenger vehicles within the garage facility. The lower level of the garage is accessible via direct street access and includes parking for 103 vehicles accessible without use of the elevators. Floors two, three, four and five are accessible only by the vehicular elevators and include 193 available spaces. The Movement Analysis as based upon Thyssen Krupp Elevators provides for a movement of a single vehicle from the upper level of garage in an average of 153 seconds. For a single level of the garage to be exited with a single elevator the average time of 2.76 hours is required (each upper floor has different number of parking spaces). With the use of three elevators this is reduced to a time frame of 0.9 hours. With two elevators in service the total time would be 1.8 hours. As a comparison based on the information supplied by USA Parking Consultants, Inc., a typical manned gated ramp operation would provide exiting for an average of 90 vehicles per hour. Based on this information the 195 vehicles exiting through a single gate and ramp would take a total of 2.16 hours. In the event of a tropical storm that would require vehicular removal from the garage, a 48-72 hour notice to the hotel guests will be provided for them to leave the island. This would be in accordance with an emergency evacuation procedure to be published by the Hotel Operations Department. As the garage design is hurricane resistant and above the wave crest heights anticipated for the site, vehicles could remain safely within the. garage structure. Those vehicles on the ground level would be required to be removed. In the event of a loss of power prior to evacuation, generators will keep two elevators in operation at all times and the garage could be in less than 7.2 hours. The Eden Roc is a comparable hotel project in Miami Beach that uses freight elevators in lieu of ramps to two elevated parking decks with 90 elevated spaces (total of 175 spaces for 282 guestrooms in referenced addition). This project is currently under construction. The Tampa Waterside Marriott in Channelside uses a 7,500 lb. freight elevator to transport cars from street level to the ballroom level and stops at the lobby level. The Diplomat Hotel in Hollywood has a freight elevator that functions in a similar fashion as the Tampa Marriott. The applicant is proposing three 7,500 lb. elevators that will travel at 160 fpm. They can operate in two ways, with power or manual doors. Eden Roc has manual doors which forces the valet to get out of the vehicles to open and close the doors each time. With a power type such as is proposed, there exists a pedestal with a push button in order for the valet to pull up and register the command. 6 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The property is located within and at the northern end of the "Clearwater Pass District" of Clearwater Beach giving it a very visible location at the south end "Beach Walk." The proposed hotel has a distinctive design that will make it an attractive landmark at this location. The project is also consistent with the community character of the "Clearwater Pass District" which Beach by Design describes as an area of mixed uses including high rise condos and resort hotels. As to the immediate vicinity, to the west is the Gulf of Mexico and the parcel to the north is the public beach, public parking area and Beach Walk improvements. The Applicant will extend the Beach Walk sidewalk southerly in front of the property. The parcel to the south is occupied by 440 West Condominiums, having a height of 157'. This development was built in 1975 and co-existed for 30 years with the 155' high Adam's Mark hotel. The proposed project is the same use as the previous use of the Adam's Mark Hotel and therefore, is consistent with the historical development pattern in this area of the Beach. The proposed project is of a superior architectural design to the Adam's Mark building and incorporates Beach by Design guidelines therefore enhancing the 440 West property. To the east are mixed retail and overnight accommodation uses. This area is also expected to be affected and improved by Beach Walk and this redevelopment. Guests of the proposed project are prospective clientele of the retail and restaurant uses to the east. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed redevelopment project will improve the visual appeal at this south end of the public beach. The architectural style is a contemporary design which is appropriate and aesthetically pleasing for this beachfront property. As described in detail in General Applicability Criteria 4, the entrance driveways and parking garage design will keep vehicles off of the Beach Walk area. This will enhance and encourage the flow of pedestrians from the beach to the site or other properties to the south. The pool area will be located at the northwesterly area of the site, such that noise or visual distraction will not be a factor to the adjoining residential condominiums to the south. This location places the hotel's activity center adjacent to the public beach. 7 Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The development order approving the termination of non-conforming status as to the density of 217 overnight accommodation units (FLD2005-05047) is currently in effect. The proposed deviations from Code, which are discussed in detail below, are necessary and minimal deviations to Code without which the project cannot be constructed at this location. The Applicant has designed the proposed redevelopment project to comply with Beach by Design guidelines to the fullest extent possible. The proposed redevelopment of this site into a hotel use is highly visible from Beach Walk and is an integral part of the City's vision of Clearwater Beach as set forth in Beach by Design. Heiqht The proposed hotel consists of four rooftop levels-one being the top of the ballroom area at 58'-10"; the second being the southerly portion of the hotel tower which is adjacent to 440 West, having a maximum height of 1 00', the third being just north of the second roof having a height of 139'-10" and the fourth being the hotel tower with a maximum height of 150' to flat roof deck. All referenced elevations are relative to the FEMA base flood elevation of 16'-0".The request for up to 150' when 35' is allowed in the Tourist District (flexible standard) is consistent with the sec. 2-802, CDC which allows for increases from 35 ' to 100'-150' for an improved site plan, design and appearance, and the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design which provide for increased height of up to 150' in the event of a transfer of development rights to the property. This application includes a companion transfer of development rights application for 13 overnight accommodation units (equivalent to 8 residential dwelling units), which were previously transferred .to the site from three other eligible sites on Clearwater Beach (TDR2005-05022). There is a reasonable relationship between the height increase for the hotel and the 13 transferred units based upon other cases recommended for approval by staff and actually approved by CDB consistent with Beach by Design. There are 70 units located above 100', many of which are the luxury suites, which are the larger, more upscale units. There are five stories of parking which increase the height where the rooms are located, consistent with the Adam's Mark Hotel previously located on the site. Setbacks Front (East): As to South Gulfview, the 5-story base of the building is set back 31 feet and the 150' tower portion, taking into account a 6' balcony, is set back 25 feet from S. 8 Gulfview at its closest point. Therefore, these buildings exceed the 15' minimum front setback in the Tourist District required by Section 2-802, CDC. The deviation requested is for support columns of the porte cochere which covers the entrance, valet parking and drop-off area and the sidewalk and stairs to the porte cochere area, which are located 0' from the right-of-way of S. Gulfview. Side (South): The south side of the property adjoins 440 West condominiums. A 10' side setback is required by Section 2-802, CDC. The proposed building will meet this setback requirement as it will be 16' from the southerly property line at its closest point. The applicant requests a 1.5' setback for pavement (driveway for loading area) and 0' setback for the privacy wall which buffers the loading/trash staging area from the adjoining condominiums. The setbacks along the northerly and westerly boundaries are measured to the CCCL rather than the property lines and are discussed in the following paragraphs. Relief from CCCL Setbacks The property is unique in that the CCCL wraps around the site and affects both the westerly and northerly boundaries. The Applicant has designed the site such as to have the pool, pool deck and sun terrace oriented to the public beach at the northwesterly corner of the site, which area is traversed by the CCCL on two sides. The pool is proposed in this area for two reasons-(i) to provide an attractive step down to the beach and (ii) to keep the pool area buffered from the neighbors at 440 West. No part of any buildings are located seaward of the CCCL. The only proposed uses extending seaward of the CCCL are concrete pavers, which extend 13' seaward on the west property line, and a sidewalk which extends 10'seaward on the north property line, both within the Applicant's property. The Applicant acknowledges that a permit from Florida Department of Environmental Protection is required for these structures, and if this permit is not issued, the structures shall not be built. Side (North): Section 2-802, CDC, requires a 10' side setback from the CCCL. The hotel building is set back 6' from the CCCL; however the applicant requests a setback of zero feet for building to the CCCL in order to allow the proposed raised pool deck (which is raised over 12" in height and therefore treated as a structure), and to allow a sidewalk located on the property _10' seaward of the CCCL. If the pool were not raised, it would not be treated as a primary structure and the request for a setback deviation would be to pavement for the pool deck. The hotel property, as viewed by beach goers, will be enhanced by the raised pool deck, which is reminiscent of the raised tiki deck at the former Adam's Mark, and will detract from the existing riprap and jetty located on the property. 9 To incorporate this portion of the building to the public space, the applicant has provided screening and landscaping. (See attached Exhibit "0" highlighting the improvements). In addition, the applicant proposes to add public art on the northerly wall of the raised pool deck to visually enhance the wall and encourage public interaction with the space. Rear (West): Section 2-802, CDC, requires a 20' rear setback from the CCCL. The applicant requests a 2' setback from a stairwell located on the rear of the building to the CCCL and to allow concrete pavers extending _13' seaward of the CCCL. Lot Area Section 2-802, CDC, requires a minimum lot area in the Tourist District of 20,000 square feet. The property meets this requirement as the portion of the property zoned Tourist is 81,450 square feet. Lot Width Section 2-802, CDC, requires a minimum lot width in the Tourist District of 150'. The property meets this requirement with a lot width of 236'. Drivewav Spacinq Code Section 3-1402.B limits parking garages to "one entrance and one exit... per street". Code Section 3-102 calls for a minimum spacing of 125 ft between drives. The proposed plan, however, calls for a two-way service drive (located 18' from the exit drive) in addition to the porte cochere entrance and exit drives (separated by 110'). Code Section 3-1402.B provides for additional drives if "determined necessary by the traffic engineer to alleviate congestion and improve traffic flow". The proposed design alleviates congestion and improves traffic flow both on the site and on S. Gulfview. The porte cochere entrance gives valet direct access to the garage without accessing South Gulfview Blvd. The vehicles using the service drive would not need to wait in the queue for valet parking, thus alleviating unnecessary congestion at the drop-off drive. Additionally, the service drive offers a more direct route to the loading area/trash pick-up area leading to improved traffic flow allowing these vehicles to quickly exit S. Gulfview. The low volume anticipated for the service drive (10-20 trips per day), and the fact that the exit drive is one-way traffic, lessen the chance for conflicts with the service drive located within 18 feet of the garage exit per Code Section 3-102. Two-Year Development Order The Applicant requests a two-year development order due to market conditions and the extensive amount of time necessary to complete detailed construction drawings for the hotel. 10 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. Overnight accommodations are allowed in the "Tourist" zoning district as flexible standard and flexible uses. Primary uses in the "Resort Facilities High" land use category are "high density residential/overnight accommodation." The site is located in the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design which is characterized as "mixed use - high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood, as is more particularly discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 below, and will not impede other development. The Applicant will be the developer and operator of the proposed hotel. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. West: The property is bounded on the west by the Gulf of Mexico. North: The adjacent property to the north is the public beach and City-owned property renovated with Beach Walk improvements including public parking. The proposed landscaping and extension of shell sidewalk to the front of the proposed development incorporates and extends the Beach Walk improvements into the hotel project. East: The adjacent property to the east is an area of smaller mixed uses, including retail and restaurants. It is anticipated that this area will also undergo renovations, as are encouraged by Beach by Design's vision of Beach Walk. South: The adjacent property to south is occupied by 440 West condominiums, which are 157' in height and of similar scale to the former Adam's Mark. 440 West condominiums co-existed with the Adam's Mark hotel for its entire existence of 30 years. The extension of Beach Walk in front of the property will give 440 West residents easy pedestrian access to the north and the public beach access. Elimination of traffic congestion as previously described will improve traffic flow along South Gulfview for 440 West residents. The Applicant has included a screen wall and landscaping buffer along the southerly property line in response to the requests of the 440 West residents. 11 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. The proposed use meets several of these criteria. Overnight accommodations are permitted by the "Resort Facilities High" land use category and in the "Tourist" zoning district as a flexible standard and flexible use. Redevelopment of Clearwater Beach is a significant economic contributor to the City. Since 2004, the property has not contributed to the economy as it was closed to guests. This proposed use is an economic contributor by increasing the number of tourists to Clearwater Beach and encouraging patronization of local businesses. The proposed project will generate new jobs in the City of Clearwater. The proposed use as overnight accommodations is characteristic of the neighborhood, as the Adam's Mark Hotel located at this site was a focal point of the southerly end of Clearwater Beach for many years. As previously discussed in General Applicability Criteria 1 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 4 the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding uses. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. 12 The proposed use as overnight accommodations is contemplated as a flexible standard and flexible use in the Tourist zoning district. Surrounding properties are already developed. Public property to the north is not impacted. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. The proposed hotel is designed to meet the requirements of Beach by Design in scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. The 150' tall section of the project is oriented to the westerly side of the site and curved, such that it is not entirely visible from one building plane. The tower sits on a five-story base to provide a stepped massing in accordance with the massing requirements of Beach by Design. The project layout preserves some view corridors of the neighbors to the South and places the poollrecreational area at the northwesterly corner of project site to reduce noise transmission and visual distraction to the adjacent residential condominiums. The location of the units on the site provides all units in the project with water views and provides easy access for all guests to the public beach and nearby businesses. This project furthers the City's beach revitalization objective by providing tourist accommodations. The project's architecture and landscaping complements the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. We provide the following information concerning the height, tower separation, design, scale and mass criteria: Beach bv Desiqn VII. B Heiqht and Tower Separation The project consists of a five-story base structure (58'-10" in height) under one tower which is 150' high measured from FEMA to the top of the main roof deck. Per Beach by Design VII B: ".. .the height may be increased, however to one hundred fifty feet (150] if': . Additional density is allocated to the development by transferred development rights as discussed previously (See Item 1 page 6). . B.2 (a) Tower separation: No "portions of the building structures which exceed one hundred feet (100] (in height) are spaced at least 100' apart." The nearest structure to the southeast (440 S. Gulfview Boulevard) is separated from the 100' plus portion of the proposed building by approximately 107'-6". See Exhibit C. paqe 1. . "500' rule": The Applicant chooses this Option 1 of B2 as ".. .no more than two (2) structures which exceed one hundred feet (100] are within five hundred (500]..." for this project. As shown on Exhibit C. page 2 attached. the proposed proiect and the 440 West buildina will be the onlv two structures exceedinq 100' within a 500' radius. 13 The floor plate of any portion of a building that exceeds forty-five feet in height is limited as follows: a) between 45' and 100', the floor plate will be no greater than 25,000 square feet except for parking structures open to the public; and b) between 100' and 150', the floor plate will be no greater than 10,000 square feet; and c) deviations to the above floor plate requirements may be approved provided the mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum building envelope allowance above 45' as described in Section C.1.4. The largest floor plate between 45' and 100' is 13,879 square feet; and the largest floor plate between 100' and 150' is 12,837 square feet. The Applicant requests minimal relief from the 10,000 sq. ft. requirement above 100' as is allowed per Beach by Design. The stepback of the crescent-shaped tower and the thin nature of the tower reduces the overall mass and scale of the building and complies with the maximum building envelope of 60 percent as only 21.8 percent is actually occupied by the tower. See also responses to follow for further justification. Beach bv Desian VII C Design. Scale and Mass of Buildinas The concept of the building design is generated by the site and the opportunity to maximize waterfront views to all the guestrooms. The building's shape is a thin poetic tiered curve that acts as a focal point to the views from the adjacent beach and waterway. The curve acts as a "hinge" element that links the Beach Walk district from the South Beach/Clearwater Pass district. The materials and color of the building will support the streamline language of the architecture and its natural surroundings. Tropical landscaping is included at the entire project perimeter to soften the architecture, and to provide shade at pedestrian walkways and to enhance the beachfront character at all sides of the project. By placing all automobile parking internal to the project, automobiles are not seen and the Beach by Design goal of a pedestrian oriented beach community is realized. The quantifiable aspects of the architectural vocabulary are as follows per Beach by Design: . Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet...will be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. 14 The building footprint is approximately 38,000 square feet. The building dimensions vary considerably so that no more two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately: 212' wide along Gulf View Blvd, 300' deep along the north side, and 160' high from grade to the flat roof deck of the tower; none of these dimensions are "equal" (or va/}' by less than 40% of the shorter two lengths). In addition to these overall dimensions, the building's modulated massing provides considerable dimensional variation. . No plane (or elevation) of the project "...continue(s) uninterrupted for greater than one hundred (100). The tower portion of the building is crescent shaped creating a continuously curving facade and therefore, no plane is continuous for more than 30 feet. . At least sixty percent (60%) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. All of the elevations are provided with large windows or architectural decoration including: decorative grilles, stucco reveals, concrete eyebrows. The percentages of decoration on each of the exterior elevations are as follows, all exceeding the minimum requirement of 60%: . North elevation - 68% . East elevation - 61 % . South elevation - 62% . West elevation - 70% These percentages are noted on the architectural plans. . No more than sixty percent (60%) of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45' will be occupied by a building. The overall building mass from 45' to 150' (above FEMA) calculates to 21.8% of the theoretical maximum allowed building envelope. This is significantly less than the 60% maximum allowed building envelope. · The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The height and mass of the building are correlated to the parcel and adjacent public spaces as described above. . The guideline for mixed use is not applicable. 15 c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The proposed project is of a scale consistent with that of the Adam's Mark, which was an established landmark at this location for 30 years. The architectural style and compliance with design guidelines will support the emerging character of the area as envisioned by Beach by Design. The project's "contemporary coastal architecture" complements the tropical vernacular envisioned in Beach by Design. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: . Changes in horizontal building planes; . Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc; . Variety in materials, colors and textures; . Distinctive fenestration patterns; . Building stepbacks; and . Distinctive roofs forms. Many of these elements have been incorporated into the design as discussed in detail in response to Criteria 6.b. above. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Landscaping Overall Landscapinq: The landscape plan is in accordance with design guidelines set forth in Beach by Design and also Division 12 of the Landscape Development Standards. A Comprehensive Landscape Program is not required as the proposed landscape plan meets or exceeds Code requirements. All sight triangles have been indicated and will only contain low shrubs or groundcover Gulfview Boulevard: Compliance with the Beach by Design criteria has been noted on the planting plan to include specialty paving and street furniture as requested. Preferred Medjool Date Palms will be planted approximately 16' on center adjacent to the 10' sidewalk and along the building fagade. 16 North Property Line: The north property line is adjacent to the existing beach and also the public parking lot. The majority of planting is native species. Landscaping potentially incorporated with a public art project will create interest along the exposed wall of the upper sun terrace. A minimum five foot wide clear path is designed along the property line. Seawall: A lower level sun terrace is proposed landward of the seawall with vegetation planted against the building. South Property Line: A privacy wall will extend the distance of the service area and include tall hedges, trees and palms that will further extend to the east and west. Distances between Buildinqs The distances between buildings have been discussed in response to Beach by Design guidelines as set forth in Criteria 6.b. ******************** The following are additional criteria: Termination of Non-conformina Status The Applicant seeks termination of non-conforming status, in accordance with Section 6-109 of the Code, to allow the density of 217 hotel rooms on the site. Section 6-109 of the Code requires a level two approval to terminate status as a non- conforming use or structure with the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-1202(0). This requirement is not applicable as all off-street parking will be enclosed in the building. 17 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. This requirement is not applicable as there are no existing nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures or uses on the site. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. The proposed landscaping either meets or exceeds Code requirements as discussed in Comprehensive Infill Criteria 6.e above. Transfer of Development Riahts In connection with the Applicant's request for transfers of density to the property, the following are responses to the TOR criteria of Section 4-1403.A. 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. Please see the detailed discussion of how the project will improve abutting properties in response to General Applicability Criteria 2. The redevelopment project will increase the value of the site and neighboring parcels. 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Overnight accommodation use is permitted in the City. 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Please see the detailed discussion of the how the project is compatible with adjacent land uses in the response to General Applicability Criteria 5. The site is located in the Clearwater Pass District which Beach by Design indicates as characterized as "mixed use - high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed project will provide an interesting and visually appealing southerly "bookend" to the Beach Walk as viewed from the distance and beautifully landscaped at beach level for the enjoyment of pedestrians on Beach Walk as well as those walking in the sand. Please see the detailed discussion in response to General Applicability Criteria 2 and 5. 18 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. This site is at the south end of Beach Walk and as such, the beautification of this site through the proposed redevelopment project will have an immense favorable impact on Beach Walk, both visually and by providing an inviting pedestrian connection to the property. As discussed in detail in response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria #5, the proposed redevelopment will be an economic contributor to the City by increasing tourists to Clearwater Beach. 9/15/2008 10: 18 AM 49062.114967 #445354 v3 - Ocean Properties/Ex to Comp Infill 19 42' H. GLASS RAIL SEE LNDSCP. PLANS FOR HEDGEI AND GROUNDCOVER MATERIAL ~ POOL DECK I (+14'-0") I 15' (MIN.) CLEAR PATH >-d Pltx:l ()'Q~ roiI: H NO:J H OH Hl Nt3 w 31 I >- ---.J 8S I 81 CL ~I Exhibit "e" - Page 3 Beach by Design C. Design, Scale and Mass of Building 4. No more than 60% of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45' will be occupied by a building. For the purpose of this standard, theoretical maximum building envelope is the maximum permitted building volume that could be theoretically occupied by a building and occupied by a building includes any portion of the maximum building envelope that is not visible from a pu blic street. Note Theoretical max. calculation assumes the followig setbacks: East - O' North - 6' from CCCL South - 3' West - 8' from CCCL ~ ~ S <( 0 0:: 0 0 ~ ...J LL ~ - :r: ~ 0 CCCl. - <( -- UJ -- co ~ 0::: ~ UJ f- ~ ~ (J 0::: <( == UJ ...J /'./ '0,~:S. 0 ~ ~<<:..~ ~ 0 $ <<:.. $ \( 00 0 ~ ~ in o ~ b L() in ...r ALLOWABLE BUILDING ENVELOPE = 60% OF THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BLDG. ENVELOPE (7.636,965 CU. FT. X .6) = 4,582,179 CU.FT. PROPOSED DESIGN = 1,664,882 CU. FT., 21.8% OF THEORETICAL MAX. (<60%) Ii NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE &AS$OQA1!S, NC. ArlMIl*n & I'IIINV 111 ~..,.. .... iL5 :at.. .... ......... .. --.... SITE PlAN REVIEW AOOUST 1. 2008 CRe REVIEW COMMENTS SEP1E~BER 15, 2008 2855 C-3 Exhibit "e" - Page 4 Beach by Design C. Design, Scale and Mass of Building 4. No more than 60% of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45' will be occupied by a building. For the purpose of this standard, theoretical maximum building envelope is the maximum permitted building volume that could be theoretically occupied by a building and occupied by a building includes any portion of the maximum building envelope that is not visible from a public street. Note Theoretical max. calculation assumes the followig setbacks: East - 0' North - 6' from CCCL South - 3' West - 8' from CCCL PROPOSED DESIGN = 1,664,882 CU.FT., 21.8% OF THEORETICAL MAXIMUM o LO - in o ......,... ,/ I' ./ , ./ I ' , : ", ________THEORETiCAL MAXIMUM I '~ BUILDING ENVELOPE = I " 7,636,965 CU. FT I , , , , , , , , , .......->1 I I I / I I I ,- I ././ I K,/ I I......., I ........ < , I ./ , ./ . ~ K" ~ . ....... ., ~ I A~ , I ......." ~O~~~'- '<< I ././J.- " ~r~ ~ ~./ {4V~~~ '<, ~ I ./././ ~, ~ ~ , , .; -:-... '" ' ''':- ~ -.....:, I ./,/ ~ 't' ~ ~~ I ~~ I ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ,/ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ r(, I , I :--: , " in v CCCl -- -- ALLOWABLE BUILDING ENVELOPE = 60% OF THEORETICAL MAXIMUM BLDG. ENVELOPE (7,636,965 CU. FT. X .6) = 4,582,179 CU.FT. PROPOSED DESIGN = 1,664,882 CU. FT., 21.8% OF THEORETICAL MAX. (<60%) NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE I~INC. ........ . ...... 111____ ....U'..... ... - ... - ~ ~ ~ ~ <( ~ 0 i:2 0 0 -J ~ LL ~ - :c C> -- ~ <( ~ LU > llJ ~ a::: ~ LU ~ ~ ~ <( == LU -J C> ~ ~ 0 rJ'1 = ~ ~ SITE PLAN REVIEW AUGUST 1,2008 ORC REVIEW COMMENTS SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 2855 C-4 Exhibit "e" Page 5 ~ ~r1J ~ - - ==-=~ :::--- L~_ NICHOLS ANALYSIS BROSCH QUEUING ~ / WURST WOLFE .. ASIOCIA1!S.INC. An:IiIII*n I ....... 111 ......___ 0-1 ti' 33134- TIL ......... ... -.... \ , POTENTIAL QUEUING STACK ~- " . ~. I . ~ ~ C '\. 0::: ~ ~ S <( . w Cl , .oJ 0::: :) 0 0 0 ~ ...J u.. m ~~ ~ - ;: ::c I w ~ () 1-1 <( > UJ LI. lJ) .oJ :) ~ a::: ~ ~ UJ f- ::E: ~ ~ ~ ~ a::: . :) <( 0 == UJ ...J POTENllAL U) () VALET '\. -I ~ QUEUING G4.RAGE ~ / , 0 ~<~ 00. 'L-- I . Q ~ ~ == ==~ I I I SERVICE DRIVE ~ \ \ SERVICE ENTRANCE ORe REVIEW COMMENTS SEPiEMBER 15. 2008 SITE PlAN REVIEW AUGUST 1, 200B J : I : ~ 2855 (f)~ 30' 50' 120' , C-5 ~ a$ ~ ~ ~ ;s ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c:i ~ tiiil ------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 430 S. GULFVIEW Stormwater Management Report City of Clearwater Pinellas County, Florida Prepared for: Salt Block 57, LLC 1001 E. Atlantic Avenue Suite 202 Delray Beach, FL 33483 July 2008 Revised: September, 2008 Prepared by: Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, FL 34655 File: 0699-271A-30.02 EPN: 209 K:\430 S. Gulfview\Reports\Stormwater Management Report Revised 9-08.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table of Contents: Narrative: General Soil Survey Information Flood Zone Information Existing Conditions Developed Conditions Operation and Maintenance Developed Conditions: Runoff Curve Number Basin Onsite AdICPR Model Nodal Diagram Input Report 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event Basin Summary Node Min / Max Link Min / Max Water Quality Required Treatment Volume Side-Drain Filter Drawdown Analysis Attachments: Location Map Aerial Photograph USGS Quad Map Soils Map FEMA Map Developed Conditions Drainage Basin Map ,...... ., .,' J8ffr~y. W. benny /.ft,/, .~~~ t:2 Hot "". ~_ ,tr. - ~ ~ '. 0.. : ~ '\ r :ptP.E. 57425""' ~ ~ .. ~t}j1'.' .'). ~ ,'fl .~-'f . '. 'II' ''.: ' ., {-il'" _. , " . .. \" "7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NARRATIVE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I General Overview: The proposed 430 S. Gulfview project is located within the jurisdiction of the City of Clearwater, towards the south end of Clearwater Beach in Pinellas County, Florida (Section 7, Township 29 South, Range 15 East). The proposed project has a total area of 2.45 acres (with 1.87 acres located landward of the existing seawall), and consists of a proposed 230-room hotel with one (1) tower located above a five- story parking garage. The project site is bounded by a City of Clearwater Public Parking Lot to the north, the 440 S. Gulfview Boulevard Condominiums to the south, Gulfview Boulevard to the east, and the Gulf of Mexico to the west. See enclosed Location Map, Aerial Photograph, and USGS Quad Map. Soil Survey Information: Pursuant to the SCS Soils Survey of Pinellas County, Florida, the onsite soils are classified entirely as Coastal Beaches (Co). Coastal Beaches (Co) are defined as tide-washed sand bordering parts of the mainland. Most areas are covered during storms and daily at high tide. The beach sand has been deposited, mixed, and reworked by waves. It is firm or compact when moist, and loose when dry. Depth to the water table varies with the tide. See enclosed Soil Survey Map. Flood Zone Information: Pursuant to FEMA Flood Zone Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Numbers 12l03C 0102 G and 12103C 0104 G, revised September 3, 2003, the project lies within Flood Zones AE (EL 12), VE (EL. 13), VE (EL 14), and VE (EL 16). Flood Zone AE is defmed as special flood hazard areas inundated by 100 year flood, "base elevations determined". Flood Zone VE is defmed as special flood hazard areas inundated by 100 year flood, "coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); base flood elevations determined". See enclosed FEMA Map. Existing Conditions: The project site most recently was the location of the 13-story Adams Mark Hotel. The hotel was imploded in October 2005. Prior to demolition, the Adams Mark Hotel site did not contain a stormwater management system. Runoff discharged directly off site in all directions. The project site currently consists of an approximately 2,300 SF mobile sales facility, an ll-space parking area, a small detention pond, miscellaneous sidewalk, and three (3) paved driveway connections to Gulf View Boulevard. Due to the lack of any formal stormwater treatment system, the existing conditions were not analyzed. Developed Conditions: The proposed project consists of a proposed 230-room hotel with one (1) tower located above a five- story parking garage. The proposed building will encompass nearly all of the developable area east of the existing seawall. Therefore, stormwater treatment is provided via stormwater vault and effluent filtration (filterdrain). The vault is located underneath the "drop-off' area in front of the proposed lobby. For maintenance and access, the filterdrain treatment area is located on the north side of the site, underneath the proposed sidewalk, outside of the building footprint and proposed driveways. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I All roof runoff generated by the proposed building and parking garage will be routed though the stormwater vault. The vault design will not only include the areas that will be physically routed to it, but the entire site area (1.87 acres) located east of the existing seawall. Minimal flows are anticipated from the floor drains within the parking garage. However, the parking garage runoff will be routed through an oil-water separator prior to entering the stormwater vault. The proposed stormwater system ultimately discharges westward, to the Gulf of Mexico. As the Gulf is considered an Outstanding Florida Water (OFW), the required treatment volume is 150% of the typical W' of runoff, therefore, W' of runoff. Based on 1.87 acres located east of the existing seawall, the required treatment volume is approximately 5,100 CF. The proposed stormwater vault has interior dimensions of 1,992 square feet. Based on the square footage the required treatment depth is 2.63 feet. With a proposed vault bottom at elevation 2.37, the top of the treatment volume (and elevation of the proposed weir) is 5.00 feet. A filterdrain length of38 feet is required to drawdown the required treatment volume in 23.8 hours (less than the 24 hours required by City of Clearwater code). See enclosed Required Treatment Volume calculations and Side- Drain Filter Drawdown Analysis. The ultimate discharge for the proposed stormwater system is to the Gulf of Mexico, via outfall through the existing seawall. The discharge will occur landward of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL). The peak discharge rate for the 25 year / 24 hour storm event is 7.7 cfs. See enclosed AdICPR - Link Min / Max report. As previously stated, the proposed stormwater vault is designed to provide treatment (3/4" runoff for OFW) for the entire developable area (1.87 acres) east of the CCCL. However, the total area that will be physically routed to the stormwater vault (Basin 100) is 1.42 acres, which consists of the tower, parking garage, and a portion of the "drop-off' area. A portion of the ADA accessible sidewalk and open space, located in the northeastern corner of the site (Basin 150), will enter the stormwater system downstream of the proposed filterdrain, along the northern property boundary. This northern system ultimately discharges to the Gulf. A secondary stormwater system is located along the southern boundary of the proposed project. This secondary system includes a proposed filterdrain for treatment purposes; however, there is no formal "vault" or treatment volume designed. The area routed into this secondary system (Basin 200) consists of the service drive, loading area, as well as receiving any runoff generated within the ground floor parking garage area. A small portion of open space and proposed sidewalk will inter this system downstream of the filterdrain, prior to ultimately discharging to the Gulf. The remaining "perimeter" areas will discharge via sheetflow to the adjacent properties without any formal treatment. Specifically, the landscaped site frontage and the easternmost portions of the entrance driveways (Basin 300) will discharge to the Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way. The "sun terrace" located at the rear of the proposed building (Basin 400) will discharge to the Gulf. And the area along the north of the proposed site, between the pool deck and the property boundary, will discharge to the adjacent beach area. See enclosed Developed Conditions - Drainage Basin Map. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Operation and Maintenance: The Owner / Developer will be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the proposed stormwater system. At the time of Construction Plan preparation, a copy of the Operation and Maintenance Checklist requirements will be provided to the Owner / Developer. :es K:\430 s. Gulfview\Reports\Stormwater Management Report Revised 9-08.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEVELOPED CONDITIONS I I I I I I I. I. I I I I I I I I I I I Runoff Curve Number ." I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Runoff Curve Numbers Project: 430 Gulfview Basin: Onsite Existing CDeveloped :=:> By: OC/BF Revised: JWD Checked: Date: 10/24/2007 Date: 7/18/2008 Date: Circle one: File: K:\209\ProiDataIDmData\430-Dev-CN.xls .. .... .. .. ....................................... .-:..-:..-:.:.;.;.;.;-:.....:...; n n H n~H n nn?) / HW? UHH HH H H H HI \H H HHH H HHH H U H~ ~ HH ..... .... :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-: ;:;::=;:::;:;:::;:::::::;::: ........... ... .... ...... . .. ................. .lllj~~illl . ........... ...... ....... ........ .;.;.:.:.:.:.:.;.:<.;-:.:-;.;.;.;. ......................... . ........ ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... ...... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...........,............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -..... ,_...... .......... ...... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IJI]II~.~III..I . ........ ............ ::::~~?~~m~:~il ...... .... ....... .... lili[[lllllill~.,;.[!li~l[[ilil -.... ................ :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: . ........ ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ....... ...... ........ H(f@~#p.Y ::::::::::::j(!:::;:::::::::::~~:::::::::;:::::::::::::::?:'::::::::::::::::::: 111~illl j~b.Nixjat~~{ 111~~I~:)1 . . . . . . . . . WdiO/l "'(Hi. . . . tfd1f. . 9' . . . . . . !1!!III!I!i!I!!!I!I!'!!!!!!1 !1!1!1I1!1!1!111!1!lil!~!!ii!!!i!!~lii~~ii!illl~liil[[l!!I!!II!IIIIII - . . . . . . . . il~~~1r~l.j ::;:::::::::::::: ~nm~H)~n~~ . . . . . . . . . -:.:-:-:.:.:-:.:. . ........ . . . . . . . . . Pa ved parking lots, roofs; ~'.-,....~. Co Coastal Beaches D driveways, etc. (excl. row) 98 1 87 1 83. 26 CN (weighted) = total product/total area 1. 87 1 83. 26 References: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Technical Release 55, Soil Conservation Service, June 1986 98.0 " For the purposes of being conservative with the design, the entire 1.87 acres of developable acreage has been assumed to be impervious. I I 1 I I I I I I I I: I I I I I I I. I AdICPR Model - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Developed Conditions 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event Nodal Diagram Print: 7/24/2008 1:59:58 PM Nodes A Stage/Area V Stage/Volume T Time/Stage M Manhole Basins o Overland Flow U SCS Unit Hydro S Santa Barbara Links P Pipe W Weir C Channel D Drop Structure B Bridge R Rating Curve H Breach - A: Vault U: Onsite ,,---'---------'----'-----, D: OCS J --------- ~ T: Gulf I " 430 S. Gulfview EPN:209 File:699-271 File: K:\209\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\430-DEV_POST.ICP Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ~2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Developed Conditions 25 Year I 24 Hour Storm Event Input Report Print: 9/11/2008 2:52:40 PM ========================================================================================== ==== Basins ============================================================================== ========================================================================================== Name: Onsite Group: BASE Node: Vault Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Status: Onsite Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in) : 9.000 Area(ac): 1.870 Curve Number: 98.00 DCIA(%): 0.00 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration (hrs) : 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 15.00 Time Shift (hrs) : 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 Developable acreage of the proposed project site ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ==== Nodes =============================================================================== ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Gulf Group: BASE Type: TimelStage Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage (ft) : 1.620 Warn Stage (ft) : 3.000 Time (hrs) Stage (ft) 0.00 12.00 30.00 1. 620 1.620 1. 620 Name: Vault Group: BASE Type: StagelArea Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage (ft) : 5.000 Warn Stage(ft): 7.500 Proposed Stormwater Vault (1,992 SF) Stage (ft) Area(ac) 2.370 7.500 0.0457 0.0457 ========================================================================================== ==== Drop Structures ===================================================================== ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: OCS From Node: Vault Group: BASE To Node: Gulf UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Circular Circular Span (in) : 18.00 18.00 Rise (in) : 18.00 18.00 Invert (ft) : 2.370 2.370 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip (in) : 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip (in) : 0.000 0.000 Length (ft) : 336.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.500 Exit Loss Coef: 0.500 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use dc or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dn Solution Incs: 10 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: 430 S. Gulfview EPN:209 File:699-271 File: K:\209\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\430-DEV-POST.ICP Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) @2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. . Page 1 00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Developed Conditions 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event Input Report Print: 9/11/2008 2:52:40 PM Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Located beneath the proposed sidewalk at the northeast corner of the site. Separate from the stormwater vault for operation and maintenance. *** weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure OCS *** TABLE Count: 1 Type: vertical: Mavis Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Bottom Clip (in) : 0.000 Top C1ip(in): 0.000 Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Span (in): 72.00 Rise (in) : 13.30 Invert (ft) : 5.000 Control Elev(ft): 5.000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ==== Hydrology Simulations =============================================================== ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 430-Dev-25Yr Filename: K:\209\ProjData\DrnData\ICPR\430-Dev-Post.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration (hrs) : 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in) : 9.00 Time (hrs) Print Inc(min) 24.000 5.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ==== Routing Simulations ================================================================= ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 430-Dev-25Yr Hydrology Sim: 430-Dev-25Yr Filename: K:\209\ProjData\DrnData\ICPR\430-Dev-Post.I32 Execute: Yes Alternative: No Restart: No Patch: No Max Delta Z(ft): Time Step Optimizer: Start Time (hrs) : Min Calc Time (see) : Boundary Stages: 1. 00 10.000 0.000 0.5000 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 End Time (hrs) : 30.00 Max Calc Time (see) : 30.0000 Boundary Flows: Time (hrs) Print Inc(min) 8.000 10.000 12.000 16.000 24.000 30.000 80.000 60.000 30.000 10.000 15.000 30.000 60.000 60.000 430 S. Gulfview EPN:209 File:699-271 File: K:\209\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\430-DEV-POST.ICP Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) (92002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of3 I I Developed Conditions 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event Input Report Print: 9/11/2008 2:52:40 PM I Group Run I BASE Yes ========================================================================================== ==== Boundary Conditions ================================================================= I ========================================================================================== I I I I I I I I I I I I I 430 S. Gulfview EPN:209 Fi1e:699-271 File: K:\209\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\430-DEV-POST.ICP Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) @2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of3 I I I I I I, I! I Ii I' Ii Ii I: I: I I I' I I I 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event I I Developed Conditions 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event Basin Summary Print: 9/11/2008 2:53:32 PM I Basin Name: Group Name: Simulation: Node Name: Basin Type: I I Unit Hydrograph: Peaking Fator: Spec Time Inc (min): Comp Time Inc (min): Rainfall File: Rainfall Amount (in): Storm Duration (hrs): Status: Time of Cone (min): Time Shift (hrs): Area (ac): Vol of Unit Hyd (in): Curve Number: DCIA (%): I I I Time Max (hrs): Flow Max (cfs) Runoff Volume (in) Runoff Volume (ft3) I I I I I I I I I Onsite BASE 430-Dev-25Yr Vault SCS Unit Hydrograph Uh256 256.0 2.00 2.00 Flmod 9.000 24.00 Onsite 15.00 0.00 1. 870 1. 000 98.000 0.000 12.07 8.604 8.757 59441.339 I 430 S. Gulfview EPN:209 File: 699-271 File: K:\209\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\430-DEV-POST.ICP Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) @2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. I Page I of I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Developed Conditions 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event Node Min / Max Print: 9/11/2008 2:54:17 PM Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs Gulf BASE 430-Dev-25Yr 0.00 1. 620 3.000 0.0000 0 12.23 7.478 0.00 0.000 Vault BASE 430-Dev-25Yr 12.23 6.109 7.500 0.0050 1991 12.08 8.601 12.23 7.478 - - 430 S. Gu1fview EPN:209 Fi1e:699-271 File: K:\209\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\430-DEV-POST.ICP Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ~2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 - - - - - - - Developed Conditions 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event Link Min / Max Print: 9/11/2008 2:54:39 PM Name Max Time Simulation Flow hrs Group - - Max Flow cfs - Max Delta Q cfs - Max Time US Stage hrs - Max US Stage ft - Max Time DS Stage hrs - - - - - - Max DS Stage ft OCS BASE 430-Dev-25Yr 12.23 7.478 0.086 12.23 6.109 0.00 1. 620 430 S. Gulfview EPN:209 File:699-271 File: K:\209\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\430-DEV-POST.ICP Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) c&:>2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page I of 1 I I I I I I I . I I I: I I, I I I I I I I Water Quality ,. ".." I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project: 430 S. Gulfview EPN: 209 File No.: 699-271 Date: 09/11/08 By: SF Rev.: JWD File: K:\209\ProjData\DrnData\Spreadsheets\430-Dev- TrtVol.xls Water Quality - Reauired Treatment Volume Basin: Area: Onsite 1.87 acres Required Treatment: Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW): THEREFORE Required Treatment: Treatment: 5,091 0.12 cubic-feet acre-feet Water Quality - Proposed Stormwater Vault Area: 1,992 square feet (provided) THEREFORE Treatment Depth: 2.56 feet (required) DESIGN Proposed Bottom of Vault: PLUS Treatment Depth Proposed Weir Elevation: 2.37 feet 4.93 feet 0.50 150% 0.75 Use: I Use: I inches of treatment inches 2.63 I feet 5.00 I feet ------------------- Project: 430 S. Gulfview EPN: 209 File No.: 699-271 Date: 09/09/08 By: BF Rev.: JWD File: K:\209\ProjData\DrnData\Spreadsheets\430-Dev-FllterDrwdwn-Lowered.xls Side-Drain Filter Drawdown Analvsis E NGVD h TOTAL ^h INCR. V TOTAL ^V INCR. Lmin Lmax Lavg HYD. GRAD. AREA FILTER FLOW Q=KIA AVG. FLOW ^T INCR. ET TOTAL 5.00 3.13 XXXXXXXX 5,092 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.5650 128.4 1089.5 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 0.0 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.26 XXXXXXXX 509 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 1,004.9 0.5 XXXXXXXX 4.74 2.87 XXXXXXXX 4,583 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.4335 118.4 920.3 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 0.5 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.26 XXXXXXXX 509 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 842.8 0.6 XXXXXXXX 4.47 2.60 XXXXXXXX 4,073 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.3020 108.5 765.3 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 1.1 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.26 XXXXXXXX 509 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 695.0 0.7 XXXXXXXX 4.21 2.34 XXXXXXXX 3,564 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.1705 98.5 624.6 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 1.8 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.26 XXXXXXXX 509 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 561.4 0.9 XXXXXXXX 3.95 2.08 XXXXXXXX 3,055 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.0390 88.5 498.2 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 2.8 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.26 XXXXXXXX 509 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 442.1 1.2 XXXXXXXX 3.69 1.82 XXXXXXXX 2,546 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.9075 78.5 386.0 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 3.9 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.26 XXXXXXXX 509 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 337.0 1.5 XXXXXXXX 3.42 1.55 XXXXXXXX 2,037 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.7760 68.5 288.0 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 5.4 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.26 XXXXXXXX 509 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 246.1 2.1 XXXXXXXX 3.16 1.29 XXXXXXXX 1,528 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.6445 58.5 204.3 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 7.5 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.26 XXXXXXXX 509 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 169.6 3.0 XXXXXXXX 2.90 1.03 XXXXXXXX 1,018 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.5130 48.5 134.8 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 10.5 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.26 XXXXXXXX 509 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 107.2 4.7 XXXXXXXX 2.63 0.76 XXXXXXXX 509 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.3815 38.5 79.6 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 15.2 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.26 XXXXXXXX 509 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 59.1 8.6 XXXXXXXX 2.37 0.50 XXXXXXXX 0 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.2500 28.5 38.6 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 23.8 5.00 DLW (Top of Treatment Volume) 2.37 NWL (Bottom of Treatment Volume) 1.87 Centerline of Pipe Elevation 1,936 Area @ DLW (square feet) 1,936 Area @ NWL (square feet) 2 Lmin 2 L max 5.42 "K" (feet/hour) 38 Underdrain Length 23.8 Draw Down Time (24 Hours - Based on City of Clearwater Criteria) Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL 9/10/20089:13 AM 430-Dev-FilterDrwdwn-Lowered I I I I I I I I' I! I I I I I I I I I I ATTACHMENTS I I I " I I I I BASIN 400 I I I >- c c '" I: "- OJ 0 I: o N I~ 1 ...,16 "...r;;. .1 ";)1 BtSIN 500 .~ ;BASIN 1~~~ " i ~ \ . lb." ,..<i \ . ~,1i .. ~.i NOTE: 1. The Stormwater Vault is designed to provide treatment (3/4" runoff for OFW) for the entire project area (1.87 acres) east of the CCCL. 2.Basin 100: The area physically routed into the storm water vault, I ultimately discharging to the Gulf. I ~r. 3.Basin 150: A portion of handicap accessible sidewalk and open ~ space, entering the northern storm water system downstream of the filterdrain. ;:3 4.Basin 200: The service drive and open space area along the ~ southern portion of the site, routed through a separate filterdrain I~O~I prior to discharging to the Gulf. 5.Basin 300: A portion of the entrance drive and site frontage, m discharging via sheetflow to Gulfview Boulevard. ~ 6.Basin 400: The rear (seaward) deck, discharging via sheetflow to I ~ the Gulf ::- 7.Basin 500: The northeastern portion of the proposed project .8 between the pool deck and property line, discharging via sheetflow to 8 the adjacent beach area. c It DESCRIPTION, o '0 It -;.c , ." . ..~ 430 GU LFVI EW DEVELPOPED CONDITIONS - DRAINAGE BASIN MAP ~ FLq!!!~~, ~~~!~t$AL~l?ttu~}!v~:!: ~'tI~~R!NC. 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Pori Richey FL 34655 Tel, (727) 849-7588 - Fox, (727) 848-3648 @Copyright 2008 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. , I I I I I 'Ii ,,:t~ ~...1' . V ... . ,.." TG" '.l' .~ BA~}~~:~OO . fJ~s \ N , . .. ~ -\ ..~ . ~j LEGEND ---- BASIN LINE 0 30 60 120 I I BASIN AREA (ACRES) 100 1.42 150 0.03 200 0.15 300 0.14 400 0.10 500 0.03 TOTAL 1.87 PROJECT No. EPN, 699-271 A 209 DATE, FIGURE. SEPT 2008 DRAWN BY, 1 JMS Drawings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without written permission. ~ as ~ ~ ~ ~ ;Q e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c:::5 ~ ~ ------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I K:\430 S. Gutfview\Reports\Parking Study. doc 430 S. GULFVIEW BOULEVARD PARKING STUDY Submitted To: City of Clearwater Prepared For: Salt Block 57, LLC 1001 E. Atlantic Avenue, Suite 202 Delray Beach, FL 33483 Prepared By: Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34655 Prepared Under the Supervision of: Roy E. Chapman, P.E. FL Certification No. 34438 Date: September 11, 2008 tlL-r~~~_()5 '0 " . "t" \, . "-. .,(....',. ... .- \ \ ') ~ t ,. 4o''','O~; ,~ ~ ~ ,j. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.0 INTRODUCTION The 430 S. Gulfview Boulevard project is proposed to have a 230 room hotel constructed on it. The site is located between Gulf Boulevard and the Gulf of Mexico north of Hamden Drive. Access to the site will come from three driveways that have connection to S. Gulfview Boulevard, see Figure 1. This report has been prepared to review the proposed on-site parking operation and will review the demand for parking and expected operation of the parking plan. 2.0 PROPOSED PARKING CHARATERISTICS All parking within the hotel garage will be handled by a valet service. This includes hotel guests and employees. Vehicles arriving at the hotel to be parked will unload passengers and drivers at the arrival court located off of S. Gulfview Boulevard. Vehicles will be taken by valet to the parking garage without reentering S. Gulfview Boulevard. Parking will be provided on five floors. Access between floors will be provided by freight elevators. Deliveries to the hotel will take place through a service drive from S. Gulfview Boulevard located near the south side of the property. See Figure Al for the proposed driveway connections to S. Gulfview Drive and the location of the service dock and drive. 3.0 PARKING DEMAND The hotel will have 230 rooms for its guests. In addition there will be a restaurant, bar, spa and fitness center, eight meeting rooms, a 1,370 square foot ballroom, and a 9,600 square foot ballroom. To review the expected demand for parking at the hotel we have reviewed two occurrences that would have significant demands for parking. The first is with 100% occupancy of the hotel rooms and the peak overlap in employee shifts. The second looked at the parking needs for 100% hotel occupancy and a large banquet with 450 people attending. The hotel will be staffed 24 hours per day using three shifts. The shifts will run from 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Shift 1, the day shift will have 75 staff members on duty, Shift 2 will have 25 staff, and Shift 3 will have ten people. A large banquet will require an additional 25 persons to handle the expected guests. It is projected, based on discussions with hotel operators, that the parking requirements will be one parking space for every four employees (25% of the staff). The other staff are expected to come to the hotel using public transit, be dropped off by others, or share a ride with an employee parking at the hotel. Table 1 identifies the various staff shifts, number of staff, and parking requirements for each shift or to handle a large banquet. For the purpose of this analysis it is assumed that all hotel rooms would be filled. The expected parking requirements are that 60% of the occupied rooms would require a parking space. Other means of arrivals to the hotel for guests include: airport shuttle, taxi, and charter bus. Some of the people arriving in a private vehicle may require more than one hotel room (families with children or business people coming to a convention). Based on the 230 rooms, the parking demand would be 138 vehicles. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4.0 5.0 A conference with 450 attendees is expected to have half of the attendees stay in hotel rooms. The other half would come in personal vehicles, with an auto occupancy of two people per car. As indicated in Table 1, a banquet with 450 attendees would need another 113 parking spaces. We have reviewed the number of parking spaces needed for the two operating conditions ou1I'ined above based on time of day for the various parking demands identified. Table 2 summarizes the demand for parking on a hourly basis throughout the day assuming full occupancy in the hotel and no special event. As is indicated, the highest demand comes in the period from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. with a demand for 163 parking spaces. Full occupancy of the hotel and a large banquet at the same time represents the worst case scenario. Staff parking needs, that for hotel guests, and banquet attendees by hour throughout the day are indicated in Table 3. The greatest parking demand would occur as the banquet is in full attendance, with a need for 263 parking spaces from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. PARKING SUPPLY The hotel will provide parking in a five level garage on-site. The hotel will have 100% valet service, eliminating the need for handicapped spaces. There will be 296 marked spaces in the parking garage. Figures I through 5 indicate the parking to be provided on the various levels. Some of the marked spaces will be two vehicles deep, but since the site is served by 100% valet operation, should not present an access problem. If there is a greater demand for parking than is normally expected additional cars could be stacked in the aisles of the garage. This potential overflow parking has been marked in red on Figures 1 through 5. The locations indicated assume an 8' wide by 20' long parking spot. This was done to allow maneuvering room for parking or retrieving a car. The number of overflow spaces and marked spaces are summarized in Table 4, below. As is indicated there will be 296 marked spaces and 56 overflow spaces for a total of 352 parking spaces in the hotel garage. bl 4 P ki S P 'd d Ta e . ar ng ;paces rOVl e Level Marked Spaces Overflow Spaces Total 1 (Basement) 103 29 132 2 41 6 47 3 48 7 55 4 52 7 59 5 52 7 59 Total 296 56 352 PARKING COMPARISON The number of parking spaces required have been compared to the number of spaces to be provided in the parking garage. At full occupancy, there is a need for 163 parking spaces and a full occupancy with a large banquet there is a need for 263 parking spaces. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As indicated in Section 4 above, there will be 352 spaces available for parking within the garage. The 296 marked spaces exceed the demand of 263 spaces, while the overflow parking will allow the hotel to store up to 352 vehicles on site. It is, therefore, concluded that the site will provide adequate parking for its needs. 6.0 FREIGHT ELEVATORS Freight elevators will be used to transport vehicles between floors in the hotel. A series of three elevators are proposed, each with the capacity for one vehicle at a time. A generator will be provided on site that would be capable of powering two elevators simultaneously in the event of a power outage. 7.0 CONCLUSION As demonstrated in this report, the hotel will have adequate capacity in its parking garage to handle most expected events and full occupancy of all its hotel rooms. The maximum need identified was for 263 parking spaces. The parking lot will have the ability to contain 352 vehicles, which is significantly higher than the identified parking demand. Therefore adequate parking provisions have been made for the hotel. :es K:\430 S. GulfView\Reports\Parking Study. doc I I I I I : I I I I I I I I I I I I , ; I I I I I -'I v' Inca " ,6.0 6.ii'"5j':':'f""-2:9') ')9')' ~~~.5J'(F)' _\ r . ASTAl)<, 1~_-1l2 --...~ ~. . I . . .,.,. ft"-7; ?i:"~')' ~1 I I /' ~~ 21 10 ...~ - .~. . / / ~ ; I f' R:;'rrmBfAWlCH AfCC~7I" "'__~ ~.BO ~V' IV II/ -ft~ ~'\\ PL. \--- _ ---"k.... _...~ /._ . / \\ PA . \ . . '-,.. 4. ". _ 1. ,-I -'1 '-rz: "I PL' - 1= . _. '_. . '" :/' r'=r 7 I" -y ADA RAMP ...,.t'. .J. .-T II ; ~ ~~ P )1 --r- . ~ BfACH ~~E; / W I OK /T _0'; i I j I If \P~ 14 0" ~ . / I 1 \ , 011 i ""' ~r~", .-" ''- < v~~~~~ J~ .....::::::::c-.... ..1"-~ = ~ PL. 1""::;::".. ~~ 'J 157p1S.F. 0-- ADMIN ,J__1 v::-'>,--PL. "'" ~ Pl. ~7'-0" 1325 S.F. ,'n _ ~R ~ -- /ziy'. ,P', 'PL.IT hi! FEATURE '\" ~ ,''G'{~ra-' '-' W , j C). ~ _;' \ '- ~ Pl. L~~:-E /) I ',,, .. " \ //~ , I - ~ -- _'1...... I /" /~ ( ,/// ':s:I / ,/// \ccc I , d//f:rJ ,//~ '''''';;/ ", I ""v/ I I I . I I I I I I I I I I, EXISTING - ~. _0.6' RIP-RAP > _ I > jt \F~ I ~t"1 - > ~ - , r.J1 "n- . ~~ ~' ~ I SfAWAlL _2i _07' i ~\@ t; I '\ \~t +- ~ 1 j ; i~ ---[1\ ~ \ _2')' _06'\: ,~:~~P~I~ : : . L. I - ~ ~i ' I ...... PROPERlY UNE~..,_..._..._... 10' _O')~~.. ~~'-...~~.. ~\ ').7i ~ QI'c.~ \ --l ,------.......\~,~-. \ ~~ ~:I'< ~ '\ ~~ ~;I;~ o ~~'I '3 0;0 -' ~ o c cr'\ "" r C) ........./ ~ g I z \ I ~ ~ //W ~---~'---~f--) ==;;>> ~ / , 12 i I ~.~7' "3 i J ').~' Bl'-z,!" PROP~ UNE I - . ~~" ~f,'/ SPA 1'.:""1-.. -A~ ./ / 2810 S.F. -...... """'" ", / 1+17'-0"1 _l . '" ....- .!. (...... > I Ii I j PL- . , II _0 . I \ II '1 f;- 1\ .~ ~ I ....1 -;--1 "*,. II /. , 00 ~EC I '~~1 'i- W'pL j . 1/ . jB' 7" / Viii jq / II! ~ ').')7', 1/ 11~ ~ ,/ ~62'i .1 P41.' psi \ '? ~ ~l ~~ t%,. WATER., ELEVATOR:, ) - ----J ~_ -L_, ~\,i,I' ~ - FEATURE ',\ LOBBY - " l' :_, III J / _-RECtP~~, ==1 r': ~---~ ~--T--- '" :: II /~ '\ I J i / //-----"\ \ I ' I Ii ~~: i (Q 'i \ '=; j I Jill o' 1+17'-0"1 \ I V I : F . I ARRWAl ~ /,1.' \2.90' \ \\ / / COURT I .J \ '... /,' i BELOW . 4. I ILJ RETAJL ~,-~ o!= I=; If- _ f~;+-----------;- "~..j I, ~::.:. J I [J - [J - ~ WA,rE1 7 OL ------------ I fATUI RE cOMMAND 'I : I:, 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 1+.17'-0"[' '"""" II 1\ ,. I 26 27 ,: P~~~ i ~ .110.60' / ~.22 \ \ I E \ 1. II / E \ ! ,~-)\ I I ... 1\ I I ~~~ : v' ---- ~\.~;t 2 1 \ [1'/' '....1! ~'\\I - - -II _ _ .... /...) - Ii r--------1 ____J \ \ SER'IICE DRM: i \ \ \ - --- ---- --- -- -~~~~~-: \ __ ~O~. \ \ ... I... ...,,--... ..._~~ \\'\ 0.66' ').7' \\ 'i \1\ \,\ B ( LOWER SUN TERRACE ~ ,.B' -\.\' lIT ~IU l'-I.I~ nl~ y 1 . ".-- J...:..j).....'J/1 1/1 !/4 I et~; 41 ~ LOBBY RESTAURANT 2375 S.F. IIi I ! . 39 i I 117 1]1 I 3 I' I I ! : 1B 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 rn fj fj 4 5 6 I 41 PARKING SPACES 6 OVERFLOW SPACES m m 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 40 p'l. 15 16 DINING TERRACE 1+17'-0"1 "'" -1iI~ ~ rv1 m KITCHEN co HOTEL B.O.H. '6 GENERATOR I 1- - - ~~ I I I ! I I I I I h.a.L~..----:--- -j~lf · I 1 N68mS;;E(C;F) ;"402.14'(L)'316.34'C'F} , I I , I . ~ ~ I~, ;; ." I ,', :; 2i~Ir?iCi 0; r;;- Ir;;- CO co r r en ., ~ .:.~,. ;') 6 ~60' ~ I " 1,.6. ~.\g L100 PLAN/P2 PARKING LEVEL \ I ~\8 z z r:;:r:\fT1-:::;- ><1:>>: :S; 1"'1 1"'1 2i ~81~ ()) ~- = ,=.~ ~I~ 6.Bo'. 6.')B SCALE:1I16" = 1'.0" \\ 11\ 1'IC8IMATIlll(0IT1tr1llAUTT~ ~i.f;J~~ . FLq!!!2~, l~~~~~~AN~~?~~~~!i~"!Lr~hfNC" rei. (727) 849.7588 . F"a~, (127) 848~3648 E.B. No. 7421 PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION, 430 SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD CLEARWATER BE A C H, FLORIDA PARKING AND VALET LOCATIONS *" DATE ~/ II Ii ~.2')' ~.2" / .~ ~ ,"" i I ~ 1/) II W ~.,o' I Ir-k, r~ II I. iI J~ '~ a Vr= ~ ;Pf< ,'~~ L ~.\9' J~~ f"l,-U II l;\n ~ : ~ k1 t--=:::=. ~ l\ruf r- = l IiI \ ~ : ~\ L--- ~o ~-,~.. \\ II II ~.l';' I ~ .; ~ ~ ~ o '" ~ ,....N.tHT._ rnr- 2 1 ,::"j~W_g 699 211 II ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I @- @- 0- . ! .i ! . ~ 0- ~ ~ 7 ~ f3 ~ ~ ~ & (f) P3 PARKING LEVEL PLAN SHEET DESCRIPTION. 430 SOUT H GULFVIE CLEARWATER B ~W BOULEVARD E A C H, FLORIDA PARKING Al'l"D VALET LOCAT , IONS E,B. No. 7421 I I I !I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ 0f 9 ~ -------------------------- FREIGHT ElEVATOR- 2 o ., o @- FREIGHT ElEVATOR- 2 r 0- .~ is " PREPARED FOR, {J\ P4 PARKING \D SCALE 1/16' '1'-0' LEVEL PLAN 430 SOllTH GUL CLEARWATE~IE\V BOULEY ARD ,"EET DE'CRIPnON, E A C H, FLORIDA PARKING AND Y A LET LOCATIONS E.B. No. 7421 I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I TM!IICUTVUOf'TMt:1l.WJ1'T ~Ol'l"ICDI.n.I~ IltlllCIonITM.llTAU.Uev..U ~1'P.I'nlHAytUDlHT""[o ""I TII." COUtJtutTIO... ~"'UTllo..nOToeOllll(llCr. I ~ ~ 0f f3 ~ ~ ~ ~ CR (5 \+35'-0"1 0- PRE -FUNCTION -I:J- I:J 13- -I] 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 @- g I.J 52 PARKING SPACES 7 OVERFLOW SPACES g ~ I] IJ IJ [ @- 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 0 i 13 12 11 10 5 -ll_ , I'l fJ- -11- @)- f/) L200 PLAN (MEETING ROOMS)/P5 PARKING LEVEL o " ~ ~ FLq~!'2~, ,~~~~~~:~?~~v~~f~'tL!~h!NC" hi, (127) 649-1588 . 1'"<10. (727) 848.3648 E.B. No. 7421 PREF'ARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION, 699-271 430 SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD CLEARWATER BE A C H, FLORIDA PARKING AND VALET LOCATIONS 5 ~~ '::' 9 ------------------- Table 1. 430 S. Gulfview Boulevard - Parking Demand Full Occupancy + Lar ~e Banquet Spaces per Parking Function Variable Number Person/Room Spaces Req'd Hotel Staff - Shift 1 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.) Persons 75 25% 19 Hotel Staff - Shift 2 3:00 c.m. to 11:00 c.m.) Persons 25 25% 6 Hotel Staff - Shift 3 11:00 C.m. to 7:00 a.m.) Persons 10 25% 3 Hotel Staff - LarQe Banquet Persons 25 25% 6 Hotel Rooms Occupied Rooms 230 60% 138 Conference/Banquet Attendees - Hotel Guests Persons 225 NA 0 Conference/Banquet Attendees - Non-Guests Persons 225 2 113 Date: 9/11/08 T:\699-271A\Parking Study\[Parking Needs.xls]Demand I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 2. Full Occupancy - Time of Day Parking Needs Total Hotel Staff Hotel Parking Time Period Shift 1 Shift 2 Shift 3 Guests Needs 12 a.m. to 1 a.m. 3 138 141 1a.m. to 2 a.m. 3 138 141 2 a.m. to 3 a.m. 3 138 141 3 a.m. to 4 a.m. 3 138 141 4 a.m. to 5 a.m. 3 138 141 5 a.m. to 6 a.m. 3 138 141 6 a.m to 7 a.m. 19 3 138 160 7 a.m. to 8 a.m. 19 3 138 160 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. 19 138 157 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. 19 138 157 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. 19 138 157 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. 19 138 157 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. 19 138 157 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. 19 138 157 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. 19 6 138 163 3 p.m. to 4 p.m. 19 6 138 163 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. 6 138 144 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. 6 138 144 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. 6 138 144 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. 6 138 144 8 p.m. to 9 p.m. 6 138 144 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. 6 138 144 10 p.m. to 11 p.m. 6 3 138 147 11 p.m. to 12 a.m. 6 3 138 147 Date: 9/9/08 T:\699-271A\Parking Study\[Parking Needs.xls]Full I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 3. Full Occupancy + Large Banquet Time of Day Parking Needs Conferencel Total Hotel Staff Hotel Banquet Parking Time Period Shift 1 Shift 2 Shift 3 Banquet Guests Non-Guest Needs 12 a.m. to 1 a.m. 3 138 141 1a.m. to 2 a.m. 3 138 141 2 a.m. to 3 a.m. 3 138 141 3 a.m. to 4 a.m. 3 138 141 4 a.m. to 5 a.m. 3 138 141 5 a.m. to 6 a.m. 3 138 141 6 a.m to 7 a.m. 19 3 138 160 7 a.m. to 8 a.m. 19 3 138 160 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. 19 138 157 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. 19 138 157 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. 19 138 157 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. 19 138 157 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. 19 138 157 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. 19 138 157 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. 19 6 138 163 3 p.m. to 4 p.m. 19 6 138 163 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. 6 6 138 150 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. 6 6 138 75 225 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. 6 6 138 113 263 7 p.m. to 8 p.m. 6 6 138 113 263 8 p.m. to 9 p.m. 6 6 138 113 263 9 p.m. to 10 p.m. 6 6 138 113 263 10 p.m. to 11 p.m. 6 3 6 138 75 228 11 p.m. to 12 a.m. 6 3 138 147 Date: 9/9/08 T:\699-271A\Parking Study\[Parking Needs.xls]Full with Banquet I I I I I I I I I 0 0 X W ::;;: LL 0 LL -' ::J Cl r-- ---- -- ~. y ,( t'\)O ; ------ K; ) ~ ~30 0 ~":?~ ~ 0 \~ ~ V ~)" , ~~~ ~ ~ M }4 UPPER SUN ~ ,j TERRACE ___ I--- '3\ CRy 134\ f3'~ ~ LOWER SUN TERRACE 'sO' /3"C~ ~SP 3 Ii06' CRI ~ EX. RIP-RAP C.C.C.L. 'r 13\ __~ 13\ SFY _~ '81 f1\ ~ 136\ LJJ _ ~ EX SEAWALL w z ~I f- ffil a. o a: a. f1\ /56' 8 ~IR '39' i5'~ \ SP '-i6' ~ I I \ LOWER SUN TERRACE -- ------ -- ( " "ACe) ,-- 10' SIGHT TRIANGLE I - TYPICAL ~ -GATE n~ - ~fB.T!..!:INE ~/- ~~ ( ~ fd) SWIMMING POOL o ~ /~ 2B' 30' 24' !l~ / <, r--..J :::J 20 <~ 2B' 24l ::, 1/ / / / I /ii\ Iii /29\ \fa!:!! .... / \!:I.Y I ~ ~ (. 13\(_ f3\~ '7 \LU/53\/ f33\~ -- ~IT//3\ ~ ----- 26' ::J 'i7' 20 /3" ~ ~S' N1 '45'.~ ~ ~P 26' I~;r~' ~ D 2B' \ , COMPACTER I I \ \ - TYPICAL ~ ~,so~-, ;;,. ~ ~ 2' 20 INTERIOR PARKING DECK 1 I! illllll!1 : : ijl ID,III!I. "2 ,; !"I .:"1'1... ~-----------I11 ", , , 0 \1 /' b~,'-Cc: '_ ~ _ t-T------- , ! ~~ ~rm6 flJ D ~/ ~ .- ( " e,,:!-)j~j co, _//~~ / I \" - l/\~'~ ~LJI L---= LOBBY I '0" ~"":<~-----~),"-~ 15\ 113' ~ ~ 126\ 136' eQo/ ~fW\ ~ ~. I ~ ~ I ===~==== SERVICE AREA 26' c~"-// \ 120'@0 ~'ri' /33 \S:E ~P '/109 ~ WALKWYv' 11./: y . ,"~. ., ~'~:~ '-/~ ~ ,~~~~~ '--./ '--./ '--./ '--./ '--./ ~ROPERTY LINE / 134\ ~ 120\ ~ PORTE COCHERE " , , , , , ,~--------- ~ SERVICE ENTRANCE r\~i;.~'\ ,,\ ~ '" " ", , , ',I ~ 13\ /20 ~ \ TRI 26\ j1\ .gv \PD 19\ ~ o > -' [(J ~ w > LL -' ::J Cl I I- ::J o (j) " /iOo\ "'- 11\~ \!:QJ f4\ h44' ~ ~ 128\ -- /28 HII:!/ V ~ 10' WIDE SIDEWALK (WITH FINISH & - I- FURNITURE PER 'BEACH BY DESIGN' CRITERIAI 20' SIGHT TRIANGLE - TYPICAL 146\ 123\ ~ ~11\ ~ PROPERTY LINE --.. <:: / ! r I{ BIW>SHAW " ASlOCIATIS ............ ~ A.S.LA. ~~ """ 1'1-, 1001 w. er- Cnioklld. SalIo 114 llarlLlalllldolo Pb:lda moll TBL 954-'T72-0724 PAX 954-m-M17 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ j ~ ~ 0 ~ ~j ::Jri: 01 ~ ~ ~= ~I ...q-o ~ SeAL-E: 1/1 tI " = 1'-0" I " 16' e:2' BASE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM NIGHOL.5 BR05GH VVR5T Y'lOLFE ARc.HITEGTS II DR~~ BmSlll AUGUST 1. 2008 DATI H.c.H. DRAWN BY W.T.B. APPIIOYID BY :::.:.:L::: ~..:~ 1II....llCIltAtbe~iII... ..ta,ut.......u.....wtItID,... ...... 01 .... LP-l I ~~ / ( ~~/"'''G ) ~_~~ ~ ,~~- ---- I i i I / / / / / C EX. BEACH) r----- -- I / Ij - -7J~- / / BRADSHAW IABSOCIATIS ""...",.,.. AooaoIoIIaB A.S.L.A. Ladooope~ ad 1'1-, 1001 W. c,p- Cnok.... SaIIo 114 Pall LIDdonIoIo J1IoIlda '3309 TBL 1154-7'n-0724 FAX 1154-7'/2.1417 GATE c~ ~~ C.C.C.L. I I I I I I I I I 0 0 X w :2: LL 0 LL -l => (? -~- -----.::~~...- / ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ > ~ -l [IJ I s: I W I > LL --' ~ => (? I l- => S 0 (f) Ii 0 II II ~ II J. ~ ~ ~~ ::Jrt 01 rJ')= oi ~~ LOWER SUN TERRACE UPPER SUN TERRACE LOBBY PORTE COCHERE EX. RIP-RAP j ~ I ~ ~ ~ T-- I w z ~I f- ~I o CI: "- EX SEAWALL (-, -j INTERIOR PARKING DECK I \ \ \ \ L LOWER SUN TERRACE ~ J ====~---- l.. r, L...J DRC RlMBW COMMBNTS SEPTBMBBR. 15. 200S ........ AUGUST 1. 200S DATI B.C.H. ....WN BY W.T.B. ........... BY :: =: :: ~...:........... .....lobl,.,.,........... .It JIUt..... lIlt.....1IIUt.ID per- -,,- SERVICE AREA SERVICE ENTRANCE PROPERTY LINE r, 1- SEE SHEET LP-1 FOR GROUND PLANTING 1._- _ LP-la SCAl..E: VIti" = 1'-0" o 16' sk, BASE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM NI6HOL5 BR056H I^IJR5T I"IOLFE AR6HITE6T5 (5) 2")(4" BA1TEN5 120. APART (5) D0U6LE 2" )( 4" 6RACES TOENAIl.. INTO BATTENS TRUNK FLARE SHAl..!.. BE YISIBLE A60YE EXISTIN5 ~E 9" MUI..CH AS SPECIFIED 6' EARlHEN S~ FINISH 6AADE I"IATERED-IN PREPARED PLANTINlS SOIL AS SPECIFIED UNDIS'TlJRElED SOIL (5) 2"1'1 BLACK MESH POLY' STRAPS, TIE SECURELY' TO TREE 4 STAKES TRUNK FLARE SHALL BE YISIBLE A60YE EXISTIN5 ~E 9" MULCH AS SPECIFIED 6' ~ SAIJC,61. FINISH lSIlAOE I"IA 1'EIiED-IN _ARED PLANTINlS SOIL AS SPECIFIED UNDIS'TlJRElED SOIl.. (9) 2"X4" BATTENS 120. APART (9) 2" )( 4" BRACES TOENAIL INTO 6A1TEN5 TRUNK FLARE SHALL BE YISI6LE ABOVE EXISTIN5 c50RADE 9" MUI..CH AS SPECIFIED 6' EARnEN ~ FINISH I5RADE DATE PALM PLANTIN6 DETAIL SABAL / Y'lASHIN6TON PALM PLANTIN6 DETAIL N.T.5. N.T.5. SF'RfAD 5PREAD FINISH 6AADE (::I) 2"1'1 BLACK MESH t-' POLY' STRAPS, TIE :::J SECURE!.. Y' TO TREE nI 4 STAKES I\! TRUNK FLARE SHAl..!.. BE YISIBLE ABOVE EXISTIN5 ~E 9" MULCH AS SPECIFIED 6' EARTHEN S~ I"IATERED-IN PREPARED PLANTINlS SOIL AS SPECIFIED UNDISTURBED SOIl.. SMALL TREE PLANTIN,s DETAIL N.T.5. MULTI-TRUNK TREE PLANTING DETAIL N.TS. BRADSHAW . Al80CUT18 ~~ A.lI.L.A. SPREAD ~~ ....l'IIaaIDt 1001 W.c,p..CDotIl4 _U4 FarlLladada10 PIadda mot 'l1IL 954- 'J72.0724 PAX 954-m.4I417 UNDIS'TlJRElED SOIL ~ ~ ~ gs o t:Q ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~ 01 ~ ~i ~ M & ~ ~o ~ (5) 2"X4" BA1TEN5 120. APART (5) 2" )( 4" BRACES TOENAIL INTO BATTENS TRUNK FLARE SHAl..!.. BE YISIBI..E A60YE EXISTIN5 c50RADE 9" MULCH AS SPECIFIED 6' EARlHEN S~R FINISH 6AADE \ -"'I 1bl ~ LARiSE TREE PLANTIN,s DETAIL N.T.5. SET BASE STEM I" HliSHER THAN FINISH c50RADE oac~~ RIVISIlIl AUGUST 1. 2008 ....TI Kc.R _BY W.T.B. _BY :- .::.:r.: ~ m:.=- "'....Mtta..l'IpI'OiacMiD.. ..tDpWtWillllld.tM...._JIII'- -..- 9" MUI..CH AS SPECIFIED UNDISTURBED SOIl.. SHRUB / GROUNDC,OVER PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. LP-2 Plant List Sheet LP-l Ground Level Palms & Trees: Key Qty. BotanicallConunon Name Height Spread Trunk Remarks AM Adrnidia tmTIllii Ouislmas Palm CE Cmocarpus "",uus G-een Buttoo\\(xx1 1] ligustrum japooicum Wax Privet PD 14 Phwrix dact)iiftra 'Medjool' Mxjjool Date Palm SP 39 Saba! palmetto CafuJge Palm Shrubs & Groundcover: Key Qty. Botanical/Common Name cae 54 Cocooloro uvifera 'Shrub' Seagrape Shrub CON 170 Cooocarpus erectus 'Hedge' Green ButtOO\\OOd Hedge CRI 25 Crinum asiaticmn Tree Crinum HIH 45 Hibiscus r. s. 'Hedge' PInk Hibiscus Hedge IXN 81 Ixora .Nora C'Jf3Ilt' Nora Grant Ixora JUN 406 JlUllpet1.lo; chinen5is "Parsooii' Farsoni Juniper LIG 70 Ligmtrumjaponicum 'Hedge' Wa'\ Privet Hedge IlR 562 liriope 'Evergreen C,;ant' Giant Lil)tUIf PHX 13 Philodendron 'Xanadu' Dv.arfPhilodendron PIT 168 Pitt",,]JOTUl11 tobira Cffeel1 Pitt05pOfUl11 PLU 39 Plumbago a. 'Imperial Blue' Plumbago Leam.oo POD 54 Podocarpus macroph)ilus 'fledge' Japanese Yew RAP 1% Rhapbiolepis indica 'Alba' White Indian HaWhom TRI 21 Tripsaunn dactyloides Fakahatchee Grass vrn 17 Vibtunum odoratissimum 'Hedge' S~ ViooIllum Hedge Plant List Sheet LP-la Deck Level Palms & Trees: Key Qty. Botanical/Common Name Height Spread Trunk Remarks LJ Ligustnun Japollicwn Wax Privet Phoenix dactylifera 'Medjool' Medjool Date Palm 12' GENERAL NOTES . All plant materials shall c.onrorm to the standards ror Florloo No. I or better as given In "Grades and Stoodads ror Nurser~ Pla~ts", :2nd Edition: Februa~ 1'1'18, state Or Florida Department Or Agrlc.ulture, Tallahassee, or thereto. All landsc.ape areas to be provided ~Ith a 100% automatic. Irrigation s~stem. All landscaping and Irrigation shall be Installed In a sound ~orkmanllke manner and ac.c.ordlng to ac.c.epted and proper planting procedures ~Ith the quallt~ or plant materials desc.rlbed. Spec.lrlc.atlons Or plant materials as rollo~s: Spread-Indlc.ates average spread to midpoint; Height (o.a.)-Indlc.ates overall height rrom top Or root bcill to midpoint or c.urrent season's gro~th; C..T.-Indlc.ates c.lear trunk measurement to rlrst branc.hlng; Ft. or !"bod-Indicates measurEllTlent on palms rrom top Or 0011 to top Or stalks. All trees shall be properl~ gu~ed and staked at the time Or planting to ensure proper establishment. Hedges shall be planted and maintained so as to rorm a c.ontlnuous, unbroken, solid visual sc.reen. All sod areas to be st. Augustine 'Floratam' solid sod. The planting 5011 ror all planting areas shall be c.omposed Or a minimum Or 90% muc.k or hortlculturall~ ac.c.eptable organic. material. The minimum soli depth shall be rour Inc.hes In all hedge and mass planting beds and 1/:2 c.u. ~d. per tree. Palms to be planted In c.lean sand. A minimum Or three Inc.hes Or shredded mulc.h shall be Installed around each tree planting, Inc.ludlng palm trees, and throu'lhout hedge, shrubs and groundc.overs. The c.ontrac.tor Is responsible for his o~n quantl~ c.ount. An~ dISc.repanc.~ bet~een dra~lngs and plant list shall be c.onsldered as c.orrec.t on the dra~lngs. S-IO' 10-12' Full, triple trunk c.t. PD 14 10' 4' Multi-stem 12' T 5' Full canopy, 2" calipt.1' 12' of wood to nut 16.18' Matching 18<W' 7 stem min PR Phoenix reclinata 'Specimen" Senegal Date Palm Height Spread Trunk Remarks 20.24" FulI, 2"' a.c. 20-24" Full, 2' Q.C 12.14" 16-18" Full, 18" Q,C 20.24" full. 24" a.c. Sod -All sod to be St. Augustine F10ratam solid sod. Planting Soil- landscape contractor shall allow for planting soil depth as follows: . Sod area: I" depth of planting soil . Planters: 2' depth of planting soil @2' deep planters; 4' depth of planting soil @4' deep planters; 2' depth of planting soil @ planters open to grade . Trees: y, cu. yd. of planting soil per tree . Groundcover beels & hedges: 4" depth of planting soil Mulch -landscape contractor shall provide 3" depth of mulch over all planting beels and as per planting specifications IRRIGATION NOTES: ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL INGLUDE AN AUTOMATIC. IRRI5ATION SYSTEM PROYIDIN5 100% C.OVERAGE YiITH 50% MINIMUM OVERLAP. DESIGN AND INSTALLATION SHALL MINIMIZE SPRAY ONTO PAVED AREAS AND INCORPORATE A RAIN SENSOR. C.ONNEC.TION TO A PUBLIC. Y'lATER SUPPLY YiILL INC.LUDE A B.AGKFLOYi PREYENTOR AT THE SERYIC.E C.ONNEC.TION. . In case of discrepancies between planting plans and plant list, planting plans take precedent. . General contractor responsible for own soil & mulch take off. Quantities shown are estimates 12' 10' 4' Multi-stem 12' of wxxl to nut 1I@14'c't.; 1@18'; 71[ij20'; 7@24'; 6:i1J?6'; 4ril)28'; 3Iizl)0' Shrubs & GI"oundcover: Key Qty. Botanical/Common Name Matching Full heads IXN 126 Ixora 'Nora Grant' Nora Grant Ixora JAS 143 Jasminum volubile Wax Leaf Jasmine JUN 102 Juniperus chmensis 'Parsonii- Parsolli Juniper RAP 110 Rhaphiolepis indic-a 'i\lba' \Vhhe Indian Hawthom Height Spread Trunk Remarks 2' 20-24" Full, 2' o.c. 6' 2' Full, 24" o.c. 3' Full chunp, 3' O.c. 20-22" Full, 24"0.c., pink flo\\et'S 20-24" Full, 2' o.C. 16-18" Full,18"0.c. 4' Full to base, 3' O.C 10-12" Full, 12" o.c. 20-22" Full, 2' o.C. 20-22" Full, 2' o.C. 20-24" Full, 24" O.c. 24" Full to base, 24" o.C. 20-24" Full, 24" o.C. 24-30" Full, 3' o.C. 20-24" Full to base, 24" o.C 120 c.y MlSCELLA.NEOUS: 1000 s.f. 435 c.y. 12-14" 6' 6' 3' BRADSHAW IASSOCIATES ..........~ A.S.LA. ..........~ ad l'Iamdaa 1001 W. c,p,.. c-It.... SalIo 114 Parll.ollllaWo Pb:Ida S330lI 'ftlL!l54-~ PAX !l54-77U417 rn ~ ~ ~ rn ~ rn ::3 ~ ~ ~ ~ s o ~ ~ ~ j 6 ~ ~J ~ 01 ~ ~i ~ ~ & ~ ~o ~ DR~~ BnISIlD AUGUST 1. 2008 DATI B.c.H. DR.lWN BY W.T.B. ............, BY ::~::~~ 01 .... DOt to lit ,.,...... ia ..w. . Ia IUt ....... lilt .... mU. ,.. -..- LP-3 CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUlH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2nd FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 APPLICANT'S NAME APPLICANT AND AGENT INFORMATION: MAILING ADDRESS Salt Block 57, L.L.C. 1001 E. Atlantic Avenue, Suite 202 Delray Beach, FL 33483 PHONE NUMBER 561 279 9900 FAXNUMBER: 561-276-1563 Contact: Ken Gross E. D. Armstrong III, Esq. - Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel lie Buru5, LLP AGENT NAME PHONE NUMBER P. O. Box 1368. Clearwater. FL 33757-1368 727-461-1818 FAX NUMBER: 727-462-0365 PROPERTY OWNER SITE TO WHICH THE TOR WILL BE TRANSFERRED (receiver site): : Same as Applicant MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FAX NUMBER : See Exhibit "A" attached. (IF IN METES AND BOUNDS, ATrACH A SEPARATE SHEET) STREET ADDRESS : 430 S. Gulfview PARCEL NUMBER ZONING DISTRICT . : 07/29/15/52380/000/0330 :T : 2.45 acres SIZE OF SITE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY : 230 overnight accommodation units requested ( . OF HOTEL ROOMS, DWEUJNG UNITS, COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA, VACANT) Page 1 of2 HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE ALLOCATED TO THIS SITE? 217 overnight accommodation units 13 overnight accommodation units HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE BEING TRANSFERRED? HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PREVIOUSLY BEEN TRANSFERRED TO OR FROM THIS PROPERTY? X YES NO 13 overnight accommodation units IF YES, HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS HAVE BEEN TRANSFERRED? IS A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? ~ YES NO IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: 150' SITE FROM WHICH THE TDR WILL BE TRANSFERRED (sender site): The .transfer of development rights previously occurred pursuant to- TDR.2005-05022. (Copies .of deeds are attached.) PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER : LEGAL DESCRIPTION (IF IN METES AND BOUNDS, A'lTACH A SEPARATE SHEET) STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER ZONING DISTRICT SIZE OF SITE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY II OF HOTEL ROOMS, DWELlING UNITS, COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA, VACANT) HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE ALLOCATED TO THIS SITE? HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE BEING TRANSFERRED? HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PREVIOUSLY BEEN TRANSFERRED TO OR FROM THIS PROPERTY? YES NO THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION: _ COpy OF THE WARRANTY DEED OF OWNERSHIP OR CONTRACT TO PURCHASE THE RECEIVER SITE; STATEMENT THAT THE DEED OF TRANSFER WILL BE RECORDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. STATEMENT THAT THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS REFLECTED IN THE INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE HAVE NOT BEEN CONVEYED TO ANOTHER PERSON. Page 2 of 2 -....-...-.... ...... ...- ------. ...-.... ....-...- ......- ...-. ---.... ...--.----. ---- -... -..-...-.--- -. ......- ...-.... -...--.... SEALED SURVEY FOR BOTH THE SENDER AND THE RECEIVER SITES WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OR ACREAGE OF EACH SITE. COPY OF THE ZONING MAPS WITH SENDER AND RECEIVER SITE CLEARLY HIGHLIGHTED AND LABELED I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 30th. day of T,,1 y , A.D., ~ to me and/or by 1<' D A.rm5i t rong I II ' who is personally known ~~fl~R: x:Rlk Jd~m s;,~ E. D. Armstrong III ~ t,_~ my commission expires: 5: application forms/development review/transfer of development rights application.doc Page 3 of 2 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of an property owners an deed - PRINT full names: SALT BIDCK 57, L.L.C., a utah limite:l. liability a:.IlIfBI1Y 2. That (I emtwe are) the owner(s) and record lilIe halder(s) of the fonowing desaibed property (address or generallocalion): 430 South Gulfview PaJ:cel mt' 07 /29 /15/52380/000/0330 .' 3. That this property conslilules the property for which a reque5t for a: (desalbe request) Flexible developDent apprava.l for a catprehensive' infill. redevelopIent project -.--and-transfersof develoJ;m:!nt 'rlqht:s . eo-'1:heproperty as a' :receiver site. -.. 4. ~~~n==ai!f~oi~oesI~appoR: Johnson;, Pope.,-Ba]c;Q.r. Ruppel' & BuiD;r-LLP as (hisltheir) agenl(&) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such pelition; 5. 'That this aflidavil has been exea.lled to induce the CiIy of CleaJWater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site 'visits to the property are necessary by CIty representatives in oRler to process this application and the owner authorizes CI\y representatives to Visiland photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (Ilwe),the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is lNe and correct. SALT -.--. '-'PropertyOwner" .--_. By: Property OWner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PlNEJ..L.M _L jClo.\~ ~U\ .-25"--fl-- _., _ day of who having been first dUy swom Before ~ the undersign!,d, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Aorida, on this July. 2008 _~ personallyappeared ../'!lLC,M e\ lfJ(J,lsk Deposes and says \hat heJshe fUlly understands the contents of the atlidavitlhat helshe signed. *as f'/\.a.f\A.;').er Salt Block 57, L.L.C. DEBORAH HOWARD Notary Publlc - Slate of Florida . i My Commission Expires Ju131, 2009 of ~ ND Notary P~bDC S!911l1lure My Comm~n Exp~ ::J.l2LLrl2 ~ _____.__. _ Bonded By National Notary Assn. C:\Documents and Sellings\derekJergusonlDesktDp\planningforms_07D7\Comprehensive InfIIl Project (FLD) D4-24-D7.doc Page 8 of 8 ," Recap ofTDRs to Receiver Site of 430 S. Gulfview Number of Residential Seller Address of Sender Site Dwelling Units Recording Information Transferred BayEsplanade.com, LLC 625-627 Bay Esplanade 1 unit O,R.14634/Pg.305 Paul Kelley and Tracey Kelley 667 Bay Esplanade 3 units O.R. 14606/Pg. 945 Teresa A. Kramer and Maxwell M. 557 Cyprus and 579 Cyprus 4 units O.R. 14826/Pg. 1985 Radford f' #422857 vI - TWrrDR Table EXHIBIT "A" RECEIVER SITE - 430 SOUTH GULFVIEW A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF THE.PUBLlC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANbS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL tMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE 542, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33, RUN SOUTH 7r 41' 16" WEST, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 400.0 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED ABOVE; RUN THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT (RADIUS -1247.0 FEEl) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET, (CHORD BEARING- SOUTH19D 07' 51" EASl); RUN THENCE NORTH 68D 55' 27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 36; RUN THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LOTS 36, 35, 34 AND 33, WHICH LINE IS A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (RADIUS - 847.0 FEEl) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET (CHORD - 235.0 FEET, CHORD BEARING - NORTH 20D 17' 10' WESl) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AS: A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF LOTS 33, 34 AND 35 AND PART OF LOT 36 OF LLOYD-WHITE-SKINNER SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 12 AND 13 OF TH!: PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND LANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY OR WESTERLY OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER MARK AND THE BULKHEAD LINE DESCRIBED IN AND SET FORTH IN TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA DISCLAIMER NO. 22310, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 765, PAGE "542, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID TRACT BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT AN IRON PIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 33 AND THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD,SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE PC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 847.00 FEET AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 235.76 FEET; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AND ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF GULF VIEW BOULEVARD A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 20D 17' 10" EAST AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 235.00 FEET TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE RUN SOUTH 68D 55' 27" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 402.14 FEET TO AN IRON PIN, SAID POINT BEING THE PC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1247.00 FEET AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 296.79 FEET; THENCE RUN ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 19D 07' 51" WEST AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 296.09 FEI;T TO AN IRON PIN; THENCE RUN NORTH 77D 41' 16" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 400.00 FEET TO A POINT AND BACK TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Ii: 2005388583 BK: 14634 PG: 305, 09/27/2005 at 06:25 AM, RECORDING 7 PAGES $61.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $560.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLRDU13 1\ \, \ ~-..::. .. ':. "'-, ') /"'..... 'I i C. ) \.. ,. I ,.JI.....:.:..... '\.. . I',., .,....)....../ ~ \ \ . \ ......1 I This instrument prepared 41....,'__.1 and when recorded retum{~ J )'" \. .....; .' ... I Marc I, Spencer. Esq. "'-,..... an Executive Cent~r::erlv,..,!"., Suite 205 S1. Petersburg, FL..3aZ.~~' / l' ~''''''''''''','/ '- \;, ,) l'......~~\ -\; . " ',.1 . . /,;,~!' A:r WARRANTY DEED /..~..Y~,~NSFER OF DENSITY UNIT DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS /~":';'. ""', / .1/) ....../ /'\~ '.'1-1;1IS WARRANTY DEED, executed this 13 day of September, 2005, by BA~FSPLANADE.COM, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose address ;is"'~~ Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767, Grantor, to TWIBEACH (~I;~JDENCES-CLEARWATER, L.L.C.. a Florida limited liability company, ('~l1.o'se address is 877 Executive Center Drive West, Suite 205, S1. Petersburg, r-'" ff.. 33702, Grantee. . ". "\..-'~! t',,-. ..~ /......,' ") "\ \..' WITNESSETH, that Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of Ten '-.., '" / and No/100 Dollars ($10.00)" and other valuable consideration to said Grantor in ......... hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, one (1) density unit development right from that certain property . lying situate in Pinellas County, and further described as: Lot 7, Block 78, Mandalay Unit #5, accordh;g to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 27 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and further described as follows: From the Southeast comer of Block 78 of a Replat of Mandalay Unit #5, as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 48, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, run North 7 degrees 19'30- West, 352.99 feet along the East boundary of said block; thence along a curve to the left of said boundary, chord bearing North 26 degrees Q4'45-'West, a chord equals 70.73 feet and radius equals 110 feet for Point of Beginning; run thence South 43 degrees 21'34- West, 131.4 feet to the Northeasterly line of Bay Esplanade; thence along a curve to the left and along said line, chord bearing North 65 degrees 01 '22- West, chord equals 41.26 feet and radius equals 64 feet; thence North 4 degrees 13'05- East, 110.67 feet to the Northerly boundary of Block 78; thence East, 41.29 feet along chord equals 84.48 feet and radius equals 110 feet, to the Point of Beginning; together with all reparian rights and submerged land pertaining to the above property and particularly including any and all submerged land lying between the East and West boundary line of said lot as PlNELLAS COUNTY FL OFF" REC. BK 14634 PG 306 ,r, { \ < \ -..:;. 'f {"'"",,"\ /....... '-; i G) \.. '/ . ... ".......:...... .., extended to cf1ar~efih Clearwater Bay, public records of Pinellas County, Flori,9~..~ "Transferor Property"). . ll"' r~\ , \ 'I \ for transfer to Grant~e's:feal property described as: '...... See Extf~'it...~'Y attached hereto (the "Transferee Property"). :"~'-.......-',," TO ti~~!AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular tenements{ i1e:r~~maments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaiJ1~~~~d all the privilege, right, title, interest, estate, lien, equity and claim ~~ver of Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benef4..ana-behoof of Grantee forever; /.1,.....,... "';: / /./ . 'r.../ /'~~; At"D said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the said density unit d~veJOpr'nent rights, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all /~~~s whomsoever. , I ...... \ , ....J ' ('~'_/ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantor has hereunto set his hand and r-..... s~al the day and year first written above intending hereby to restrict, in t,~,-~-:perpetuity, the use of the property first described above. . ...... /........" \ ~ '\.... ..J .' ,.,...i Signed, sealed and delivered In the presence of: . GRANTOR: BAYESPLANADE.COM, LLC, a Florida ~mited liability co~ By: ~ ~d~. William Blackwood, X Manager Name: ~~~~ Na : ~A G.. "'tu.... STATEO~ ) COUNTY OF S' ) & The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,~Ttl day of fTE:Nt1L , 2005, by William Blackwood, II, Manager on behalf of Bayesplanade.com, LLC. a Florida limited liability company. He/she is personally known to me or has produced 'FL t:>L as identification. C--. ~D' _____ ---', - .t.....ll . G)...- . - PublIc. SfB/e of Florida at Large Mr~~CNl .... Pnnted Name: NMmbW~._ .. Commission No. .....,..-....:u,: My Commission Expires: PlNELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14634 PG 307 /r\ \ , , , 1-";;:' I i:':'::~) .. '/' ) ..... .. r I~"'~"""'" '... , ~',/' I '.... )" , \ \ \ .'....ll \<,:;'!~r.l Legal Description . \ , ! '- ' . A tract of land Consisting of Lots 33, 34 and 3S and part of Lot 36 ofLLOYD-WIDTE- SKINNER SUBI;>~ISION, &ccording to the map or plat thcreo~ as recorded in Plat Book 13, pages 12 and ~.~ ''bftb.!'''P ublic Records of PineUas County, Florida and lands and submerged lands lying b~)i1d southerly. southwesterly or westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bulkheact.LiD~~cn"bed in and set forth in Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of~'~sc1aimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official Records Book 765, Page 542 of, the PubUf ~ ofPinellas County, Florida, said tract being dcscn"bed as follows:. /"'-~ '-" / l-)iiOitftbe Northern most comer of said Lot 33. run South 770 41' 16" West, along the No~*,~ly boundary of said Lot 33 and the Southwesterly extension thl!:reo~ a distance of 490i~ to a point on the Bulkhead.Line dcscnced above; run thence Southeasterly along said It~ Line along a curve to the left (radius- 1247.0 feet) an arc distance of 296.79 feet /~o8l'- 269.09 feet, chord bearing - South 190 07' S I" Bast); run 1hcnce North 680 5S' 27" East ( \~~ce of 402.14 feet to a point on the Northeasterly boundmy of said Lot 36; run thence (.~~ptthwesterIY along the Northeasterly boundaries of said Lots 36. 35. 34 and 33. which line is a ,r'-:" ~urve to the right (radius - 847.0 feet) an arc distance of 235.76 feet (chord:- 235.0 feet, chord i~\.. ......~.bearing - North 200 17' 10" West) to the Point of Beginning. ..... "'v' ,"'".... . " 'V ~ ..... i '-..,.." . EXHIBIT A DU-5IlI9BMv2 A-I PlNELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14634 PG 308 .. ... .. /\ \ \ /-..;:. 1 ':. ~.""'\ ') r'.... ",' ,Ir. ) , V I ,.....:.:....... \ . .,... I '.... )..J , \ \ \ ',.f I ,....:j,.~-'CONSENT OF MORTGAGEE Regarding tra.~fer of Density Unit Development Rights by Owner ,,,.....' , Romick H. Kern ~.riCt'SGsan Kern, as to 12.5%, Ruth Geror, as to 50%, and Herb Kern and Nona Kern, a,"b:.~:r;5%, (collectively the -Mortgagee-), the holder of the Mortgage executed by ~ranade.com. LLC rOwner") in favor of Mortgagee, dated January 29, 2004 and ~ in Official Records Book 13355, Page 402, re-recorded in Official Records ~O~J(~, Page 2522,. and as modified by Mortgage Modification Agreement & Notice of {Fubilre Advance dated December 27, 2004 recorded in Official Records Book 14049; ~8geJS38 all of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Aorida, which Mortgage const~...8:jlien and encumbrance upon all or a portion of the real property desaibed withlr:i. ~ fOregoing Warranty Deed Transfer of Density Unit Development Rights (the -D~.~, the Transferor Property, hereby consents to Owner transferring one (1) Density ~~~ent Right ~ the Transferor Property to the Transferee Property desaibed I,..... , . ~ \ '1 } . t....~Q!w1thstanding the execution of this consent, nothing herein shall be construed to render ,r-::..... Mf!)rtgagee responsible or liable for the performance of any of the covenants or /~(-'- ~lpldertakings of Owner under this Deed. " '\.....; .,"\, ~ '....... ....." ,I Dated this....D...- day ~ ~ ~u~ . 200~ ... i . , ......-" Witness: ~a-? J-f. LP~.i Print name: Nan . Chlofalo Prird~Cristift4 J:.~ ~ ~f4" b Ronrick H.. Kern Witness: Print name: Na ~ Print name: Cristiruz J:.t1p1U! ~t Susan Kern PlNELLAS COUNTY FL OFF.. REC. BK 14634 PG 309 :. ~~ uth Geror Print n me: N~'sy,' ~ -,:,.; - ,;t?! Print na~( \) '-./ Cristina LopU < ......'S--, Wi /.............., , ,~d' t1~. elJ' I ~. ...... .. / ~ ' .. . l,\fn)t}~me: Nancy . ~,<"j ~ !'.. "t.-../ 1.." ',",\ .. ~.. ' /,,,, ,.... . " ,I' ' "'-l.... L .... '" / Print name: "'. .....IM tlpU .....~-" ~-~ -----r ~ Herb Kern ' 7~)/. ~ ~nIMme:Ner!~ ctB CrisAu .Gopu N Lf(1W~/~AA1/ ana em Print name: PlNELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14634 PG 310 ,. -- STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ) ~~~(!g!~ Commission No. My Commission Expires: ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~~ay of ~~~. 2005, by Ruth Geror. He/she is. ..2!!!9nally known to me or has p uced as identification. .......... NANCY M. CHIOFALO 1m'" ,. fl", Notary PublIc . State 01 Florida S. ~Ql.'.llIIIlan&pRIJcl'\3'2lXI9 ~ . CommIaIOn # DO 375972 ~r' IondecI~NaIICInaI NcJIaryIwft PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14634 PG 311 ,r\ \~ \ 1-";;' I '~_........ ') .,...... '-I ! (' \ Z li STATE OF FLORIDA /:.:t.) COUNlYOF , \, '} ) ) ,""'-l'\.'-/ Th~ foregoin~ ;j~~ment was acknowledged before me this ~ day of ~t'eC 2005, by.:H'erb Kern. He/she is personally known to me or has produced as identification. . . - . :.'\., "" t..,. ....'\jl./ . ~lOfALO ..,.......~ . ,151mB 01 flolldO F'. '~~"'" !. .- ':1-'_ # DO 375972 ~ "r ,. I~_ No\CIlV AlII\. ''"(,lRr... {~. " Jy~- ~. ....'"X ..,1/ /'y..... ." ,/ I/'"":~: " .': i"~' "- ,/ /,~. '''# STAl'E OF FLORIDA ... ' CG'4.f9Y OF I......... \ { ~~ foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this~~ day of' ~005, by Nona Kern. He/she is personally known to me or has produced .5.. ......-..... as identification. (~'..;\:i) fJ /J ..........j. {..0 . . . .. 2~!1d~:J Printed Name: Commission No. My Commission Expires: I*~ 2005370932 BK: 14606 PG: 945, 09/15/2005 at 05:09 PM, RECORDING 5 PAGES $44.00 D DOC S~ COLLECTION $1680.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDU08 ,\ \. \ ,_oJ:. t .:....... ') ,.,..... -'-o.l Ir ) '-...'11. ~..........:...... "- This instrument prepared 99,.... ~)...'./ and when recorded retum'fc7......) / ,.'#-.:.....~./ I .J :\ Marc I. Spencer, Esq. { t, , ! a17 Executive Center Drive W., Suite 205 . ~~~ . S1. Petersburg, FL 33702 {""'-l", . "'-. .... / WARRANTY DEED /"'~NSFER OF DENSITY UNIT DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS \ ;, r../ {"'~~\ \ . . T~~~#RANTY DEED, executed this '2Ml> day of ~~ , 2005, by PAUL KELLEY ~r\d \T~CEY KELLEY, whose address is 667 Bay Esplanade, Clearwater Beach, FL 33767,/~~' to TW/BEACH RESIDENCES - CLEARWATER, LL.C., a Florida limited lIabllltYj"edn,pany, whose address is 817 Executive Center Drive West, Suite 205, S1. .- "/ /...... . PetEtfsbL\fg}FL 33702, Grantee. . j'." \... / .ci~ITNESSETH, that Grantors for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other .v~bI.!! consideration to said Grantors in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and whereof is ;' ~repy' acknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and ...... \. assigns forever, three (3) density unit development rights from that certain property lying situate (....-:t.n..PInellas County, and further described as: ,,-._.... .,. \ . /....."-.......~-:.:.., Lot 7, Block 17, Unit No.5, according to the map Qr plat thereof as recorded in /--:-" \v' Plat Book 20, Page 27, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (the (.... V 1 "Transferor Property"). .... -i .....-, for transfer to Grantee's real property described as: See Exhibit MAM attached hereto (the "Transferee Property"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or ip anywise appertaining, and all the privilege, right, title, interest, estate, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of Grantors, either In law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of Grantee forever AND said Grantors do hereby fully warrant the said density unit development rights, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Grantors have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first written above intending hereby to restrict, in perpetuity, the use of the property first described above. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of. ~UOA.CL~ Nam~:~ ~,u... PINELLAS-COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14606 PG 946 /\ \\ I-~ 1. /:'--'--"'> : Co I , )' ..... <- 1"'-................ ') . /' ... ...../ STATE OF FLORIDA ) \ (~} ) COUNTY OF PINELLAStI '.... j I .J /'\ ~\" ! The foregoing srrymerit was acknowledged before me thisZMlt day of September, 2005, by Paul Kelley. H she is personally known to me or has produced ~ \.L. as identification. l '......... ".... t< ~0Cl. 10 C\o -\0 "-4l.,q -0 . ". "'./ /' . /'---.- " ;' \ \-, ''t' ..... \." r' ( .....,\ \ '- ''\1 ,.~-.." "\ .....,- /,.!.-~' t " , 1 ,-, \. ...... , I........... " ......;, .....\".~-,. I I . '- ,l 1//) '":.'"'10..,/ ....:..., ,/ t' , ".... l. / /.." " l t..l / ~...../ ..Sr~t~ OF FLORIDA ) (' fGQqm OF PINELLAS) , \. j 1 ..... \. -...,; I Z -',,".-I The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~!) da~ of September, C:.:. ~05. by Tracey Kelley. He/she is personally known to me or has produced R- \:) L as (~.)identitication. _ t(l.lCll- 712..1.'-'''''-0 /.....,.-\ l '.. "oJ' ' ~ ~ C" ~ \...-"-0 Notary. ub/ic, State of Florida at Large Printed Name: Commission No. My Commission .s: - l.cma CahI . MYCXlMIMSIQ, DOI<<I741 fXIIB . IO/qj~l- 2006 --- """.MII IlI.IIUcIIlC ~ .........,...i ~_nl~ Nota 'Public, State of Florida at Large Printed Name: Commission No; My Comm/~/on Expires: c Q) lanaCahl W: . MYCDlI..oN, lIDle4' DAIS Nawrnblr 1211116 . 1ClIClBl1llll1lOrMIN "UWlCUC PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14606 PC:; 947 ,r, { \ , \ ,-~ 1 ':._~. ') j"'.... ........./ '(j1 ~~ i. I,...,.......:..... ....... ( c\ S:../ EXHIBIT A \.....,.'1 /.....' ......,/ \ ()~ Legal Description .. / A tract of land consisting of Lots 33, 34 arid 35 and part of Lot 36 of LLOYD-WHITE- SKINNER SUBD1V~9N, according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13, pages 12 and l3-..Qr.-t!1.e'Public Records, of Pinellas County, Florida and lands and submerged lands lying bet\v~:ili1d southerly, southwesterly or westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bu1khea(L~ descn"bed in and set forth in Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of FJond",Dtsclaimer No. 22310, as recorded in Official. Records Book 765, Page 542 of. the Publit! R.ec.o)Cls ofPinellas County, Florida, said tract being descn"bed as follows: /"'~ '- ,: . ,.," .........", / ~m.'the Northern most comer of said Lot 33, run South 770 41' 16" West, along the No~~tdfy boundary of said Lot 33 and the Southwesterly extension thereof, a distance of 400,..()~~'to a point on the Bulkhead Line described above; run thence Southeasterly along said ~~~ea.a Line along a curve to the left (radius- 1247.0 feet) an arc distance of 296.79 fcct / (j{hUJd.t,. 269.09 feet, chord bearing - South 190 07' 51" East); run thence North 680 55' 27" East .~\ Ia~ce of 402.14 feet to a point on the Northeasterly boundary of said Lot 36; run thence (..~fthwcsterlY along the Northeasterly boundaries of said Lots 36, 35, 34 and 33, which line is a i . (~...Gbrve to the right (radius - 847.0 feet) an arc distance of 235.76 feet (chord:- 235.0 feet, chord I (~. > bearing - North 200 17' 10" West) to the Point of Beginning. I 1::'-.) l ~ I . ___...../ i I DIJ.S919B94v2 A-I PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14606 PG 948 - <\ _...-~ '\ "'-::'.~-"""I /y) .... I '. ..... 1>................ .. ( '''\ ~)e'ONSENT OF MORTGAGEE Reg.~~~.fer of Derwlty Unit Development Rights by Owner / ,f :\- { \ \ \ '\ ....." / Business Loan Cen~" J.tC, (the kMortgagH'1 the holder of the Mortgage executed by Kelley Investment & M~nag~ment Corp, 8 Florida' corporation, afKIa Kelley Investment and Management Corp, rOwner"Un~ of Mortgagee, dated August 20, 2003 and recorded In Official Records Book 13033, page,26!.o-.ef!the Public Records of Plnellas County, Aorlda, which Mortgage conslitutes a flen and en~ upon .11 or a portion of the real property described within the Wl!lrTllnly Deed Transfer qf.~~1tY Unit Development Rights (the MDteer) as the Transferor Pro~. hereby consents 19~r transferring the 3 Density Unit Development Rights from the Transferor Property to the Tf~ Property describea '" said Deed. , 1.--' ; N~lhg the execution of this cons8n~ nothing herein shan be constru~ to render the M~ee--JeSPOnsIble or liable for the performance of allY of the covenants or undertakings of the. ~,....ii'der this Deed, I"' ~. <~.triis3'~ay of ~O~T .2005. . . ......... ..... '"' . /' L~i / ,..... . I , \. i i (~() . ,::-::;- ~' '. 'IJJ ~ .. I~~,'~ r1.U ... "..... . , '\.... . '......... '\ \ . i..... ''J ."1 ~ ^ . '",-j Print name: ~ ,~ L. H IL~ '\ \ . e. BUSINESS LOAN CENTER. LLC Print Name: "1>.0,J Its: ".,,, Pl1G"S.~E~ Pr1nt name: ~b~~~~~~~4 ThRJoregolng Instrument we8 acknowledgecJ before me this 31 s ~ay of ~~ r- . 2005, by - PIon ..Tot.)F~ . as \)\co Pft?S t:)t:If\,.. of ............... . Buslnese Loan Center, LLCla C'or ~CltLlrl1Dt--..::> . Helal:MHs personally known to ~'lSr~c;l(llll.tl' has produced IYlvol1' 8S Identification. . ~''!J1,; . ~.......~ LlCQt'\St . I l 1JlI~..it. ~'. . . i JiO ~1111' 51;, , . :'. E' qij~,:i.i~ . t,.. ~ Notary Public, State of Florida at ~ . V,do .' PrintedN"m.:~__"C.V\ ~\.v l"\r..~. ~~~. Commission No. .' ",..._,,~ . MyCommtssJon ExpIres", : "....,y... 1AiluAln'1F. .., '. '.iJ..._- PlNELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14606 PG 949 /\ \\ ,_0.1;. 1, ::-...:" -.....) /V) \.. ! ~.,.~, "" . / ,-CC>>4SENT OF MORTGAGEE Regarding !r:ahSr,t of Density Unit Development Rights by Owner ,..,\.~"" . /.f '\ Mortgage Electronic R~~Yation Systems as nominee for America's Servicing Company, (the "Mortgagee"), the holder of the Mortgage executed by Paul Kelley and Tracey Kelley, husband and wife, rOWnerj in ,fii\'qr/~ Mortgagee, dated May 5, 2004 and recorded In Official Records Book 13562, Page 2321 dt tflE}'Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, which Mortgage constitutes a lien and encumb{a(!Pe'W>on all or a portion of the real property described within the Warranty Deed Transfer of qeQ9~ .(~nit Development Rights (the "Deed") as the Transferor Property, hereby consents to Q~rie~nsferring the 3 Density Unit Development Rights from .the Transferor Property to the Trans(ere~perty described in said Deed. " \ \ \....\ . Notwith$~./ihe execution of this consent,' nothing herein shall be construed to render the Mortgljlg~~pons(b1e or liable for the performance of any of the covenants or undertakings of the Own. I':Irlder-this Deed. ,.... , .' l,~. 'i!I D~cfJl'liS-~ day of August, 2005. ~-- '.. " i' ~ I [' {..... \'\..1 , "" 5 ' ,......\... -/ '----....,_..,. 1-----.,.. .. , , \ . . ....-....! {~\.........\ . . '\ ,u"itn . /'\... '.. t -VYI ess. . ,~;. r ~Ocf.!: ~i~~ Pnnt name: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS AS NOMINEE FOR AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY B;:rv~M tJ~lH. Print Name: Teresa A Naylor Its: VICe President STATE OF MARYLAND COUNTY OF _Frederick The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this !l9 day of August, 2005, by Teresa A. Naylor, as Vice President of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems as nominee for A~eri~'s S~rvicing Company. He/she l~rsonallY known to ~or has produced as Identification. . iSI .~..".. I . -.3[JJLnJJ,AnJ ~R Notary Public, State of Msiytand Printed Name: Vera Sam Smith Commission No. My Commission Expires: ~C ", ~0.5 Ii: 2005510738 BK: 14826 PG: 1985, 12/22/2005 at 12:53 PM, RECORDING 4 PAGES $35.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $2240.00 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PlNELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDUOB .\ \.\ ~ I-~ 1. ':'-~."""\, ") j,......., ../ . ,./ . Z'/ . .-..:..:., "'- This instrument prepared bY' ,.... ~~.../ and when ff!corded retum t~:\) J /'.-::.'......-./ Marc I. Spencer, Esq. / (" () an Executive Center rYn.V9'W., Suite 205 St. Petersburg, FL 33702........ . :.'\:. r.. ~"&.... '-...../ ,/ /'.-......:......./ WARRANTY DEED .' \ \~RANSFER OF DENSITY UNIT DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS <-'\"\ / t THJS'fvy~aRANTY DEED. executed this 19 day of .D~ c.~ L~^ ,2005, by TERESA ~CK~ER and MAXWELL M. RADFORD, whose address is 55 Laurel Street, CJearwate~~-33767, Grantors, to TWIBEACH RESIDENCES - CLEARWATER, L.LC.. a Florld,if~~Q'1ltijd liability company. whose address is an Executive Center Drive West, Suite 205, St/PeterSburg, FL 33702, Grantee. '- . . i/'2':':~TNESSETH, that Grantors for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other v.at.uatSle consideration to said Grantors in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and whereof is /her~/f:lcknowledged, has granted, bargained, and sold to the Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and \ ~ghs forever. four (4) density unit development rights from that certain property lying situate in (~iielias County. and further described as: r-_.... .. /: .'...... .....-:.../ That part of the unplatted block 79. Unit No.5, Mandalay replat, according to the , ..... '..~..) map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page 48, which was formeriy < '-..) 1 known as Lot 4, Block 79, Mandalay -rile Isle of a Thousand Palms" Clearwater ""j Beach Unit No.5. according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 20. Page 27. Public Records of Pinellas County. Florida (the "Transferor Property"). . .... .. for transfer to Grantee's real property described as: See Exhibit "AW attached hereto (the "Transferee Property"). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging or In anywise appertaining, and all the privilege. right, title. Interest, estate. lien, equity and claim whatsoever of Grantors, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of Grantee forever AND said Grantors do hereby fully warrant the said density unit development rights. and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the said Grantors have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first written above intending hereby to restrict, in perpetuity, the use of the property first described above. Signed. sealed and delivered in the presence of. ~~ ~~ Name: ~ ,..... "7_... :r........- Teresa A. Kramer Maxwell M. Rad rd PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14826 PG 1986 ~--- - - -.- --.:... --- ... /\ \ \ F-oJ1.. 1. .~. ~-.. ') /... ...., ,I '" '\ \." "fi ,.....".) . .,....' I !,"'"':.. ~.J STATE OF FLORIDA ) \ \, '} ) COUNTY OF PINELLA~)--:.,.........:/ l l' .''\ \ \ '\ ! '. 'If The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this If day of November, 2005. by Teresa A. Kramer. He/~ iSi3ersenall) kl'lO'..n to me or has produced f! Leo ....."A as identification. /........ I~" 0......... Llt.....s.. .......... .....""l ,l' (..'.--:--..../ \ \. 'i NOTARY Ptl'BUVsu~n Q.r~1IDA1 ~ Rita........ :e~c no COID_YC?Jl, 376706 Exp-!ies\...1E~. 20. 2008 Bonded '[hru~~iJll'nd!nr Co., Inc. l...,........ " / ,//) ."../ (. ./: ,.... ..... :' /.~',,;> I "" / ....../ $~1iQF FLORIDA ) /~o.~1'Y OF PINELLAS) , ". j , '" ('~~'./ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of November, 2005, [.-.... by,Maxwell M. Radford. He/she i~ persollCllly ~IIUWII lu 1111:> UI has produced " as /,,:::......"\qaentification. .uK.. P-.rt"~"": r \"'. ,'....... ,.",- .... t " V 1 .. ",-..J' ... lie, State of Florida at Large rinted Name: Commission No. My Commission Expires: NOTARY PUBliC.StATE OF FLO!tlDA ~ Rita Jane laano commlssiolllDD376706 Expiresl DEC. 20. 2008 BandRcl 'J'brtI Adllllll IlIncl1l\1 Co., I." ~~ Printed Name: Commission No. My Commission Expires: , PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF.. REC. BK 14826 PG 1987 r /\ \ ' , , /-..z.. 1\,. ;-:-:..~-. ) f . " /<./) \.. -/ I~'':':' ') /' ~ -. ' ,., '\..., '\ \.. '; } -~. I .~..., LealD" / . i ;~-'" g escnption \1 \ '\ \ -." ' A tract ofland 'consisting of Lots 33, 34 and 3S and part of Lot 36 of LLOYD-WHITE- SKINNER SUBPZV~lON. &ccording to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 13, pages 12 and ~ 3''C!r.tl1~'p ublic Records of Pinellas County, Florida a nd lands and submerged lands lying b~# southerly, southwesterly or westerly of the mean high water mark and the Bulkhea~ttiJl~..described in and set forth in Trustees of the 1ntema1 Improvement Fund of the State of F1.~~~sc1aimer No. 22310, as reCorded in Official Records Book 765, Page 542 of the Publii~s ofPinellas County, Florida. said tract being described as follows: t I.. \ } ,.(~1he Northern most comer of said Lot 33, run South 770 41' 16" West, along the No~W~y boundary of said Lot 33 and the Southwesterly extension thereof, a distance of 494~~t to a point on the Bulkhead Line described above; run thence Southeasterly along said :au1kh1:ad Line along a curve to the left (radius - 1247.0 feet) an arc distance of 296.79 feet ,.~(.c~C!t4- 269.09 feet, chord bearing- South 190 07' 51" Bast); run thence North 680 55' 27" Bast I (l",distance of 402.14 feet to a point on the Northeasterly boundary of said Lot 36; ron thence /....~. 'Northwesterly along the Northeasterly boundaries of said Lots 36. 35, 34 and 33, which line is a r':..:.. ~{~e to the right (radius - 847.0 feet) an arc distance of 235.76 feet (chord:- 235.0 feet, chord ,";'" "'\'7 --bearing-North 20017' 10" West) to the Point ofBemnning. . {, "'-. ~ -- ... '\. \./ .''\........ . " 'J l .............../ .~ . , EXHlBIT A DU-591!l894v1 A-I PlNELLAS COUNTY FL OFF: REC. BK 14826 PG 1988 r -- I I ,,'"\ \\ .-..::. 1 L_........ \ /........ V .. (I) ......: .( ....:.....,...... i / .,.... Y" " \)CONSENT OF IIORTGAGEE Reg;irdinll,:r~~.rof Den81tr Unl DeveJopnBlt Rights by Owner \ \.)) .. . Mortgage EIecI:ronicRegist1aB~n Systems, Inc. a Delaware corporation, as nominee for American Home Mor1gage ~l:JtEI~ 100. (the -Martg.g.', the holder of the Mortgage executed by Teresa A. Kramer and M~. M.,.Radford ("OlIrner") In favor of MDrtgagee, dat8d November 23, 2004 and recorded in ~. ~ Book 13962. Page 2009 of the Public Records of Pinellas ~, Aorlda, which ~ aee-amstiluf8s a lien and encumbrance upon an or a portion of the real property described withiA, ~ foregoing Wananty Peed' Transfer of Densily Unit Oevelopment Rights (the "Deed") as ~7~ Property, hereby consents to Owner tJansl'erring the fow' (4) DensIly Unit De~ 6igh)8 from the Transferor Pmper1y to the Transferee Pro~ desc:rfbed in said Deed. .,~...... , N~~nQ-the execution of this consent, nothing herein shall be construad to render the Martg~';tesponsIb1e or liable for the performance of 8TYf of the CXJVenanta or undertakings of the Own,.f,mdAr this Deed. . . 1';0,-:--:' ~ t..~''jl day of nrrr E1YJAI--7--2005.. ... '\ ' i ,....... -;:-f , \. j } ..... \ '.. f z,... ...." _...l /""......':14. .. , > l. ,,_../ ;.............. - (~~~M4 l;a;'</;'~ ~~ "A/ Print name: L~ \..J '" "'L- ~ -IYJ'r!! /;'ji1jt;S print name: i6f:.--rH (l'] Y t:J2-. t) . -. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.. .. narnin.. for Amertcan Home lIAortgage n Ine. B - Prtnt Name: '€AI.. !J,c.k.;t1flAJ J1~- 7it<</~ Its: STATE OF -rEv.~S COUNTY OF 1)", Lt'\-C; , The fpregolng lnstru!T'ent was aclcnowledged ~ me J:.Js f!i. d+. of Dr' hi.. keA<" 200.5. by s:\-t vol.", h-, ""hllt.vnttv! . as I.~ '1(' AI' of . Mort,gage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., II Delaware corporation. He/she Is personally Icnown to me or has produced - 8S tdentlfication. ~-~.tfJ Ie, of.r:L . ".II at Large =~me:No.S~~~ tJ.Wrt: My Commission ExpIres: ~ {q I '2--1 () ~ $I SHANKllM N. ClARK . i* :. MY CQMMISSICN EllPIREB ........ ....... I, IIlOI . ". JLiL-22-2008 12:24P FROrvl:CUHR FIF:E PPUt.m,j 727-562-4461 TO: 912394545401 P.2 ~~~-ater ..~ u~ Clearwaler Fire & Rescue 810 Franklin Street - Clearwater. Roode 33756 Public WQrb Administration- Engineering Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue. Suite 200 - Clearwater. Florida 33758 I . PI... "low alMl Hydrlllt workahMt ' . I 111" -ul1e.a .. MqlI..... to be ...~ to Ilnd ..-111 ~ l1li Aut/Iortlr Having Jurtadlcllon (NUl prior to DRe """n8 for a~ proJ-ct tlIIIlI - tII8lI ~ ...... or more than Win NegIIl:...... __..... DoIpt whlGle _ palnt or flIT .., atIw ,"'111111 wID NllUl'" an AIdDIIIlIlIo Wet ..nIIpl,. ~ lIIldIer FIN Pump ....... MIl' pMIIb for _ bulIcIlllll OlII\ItnIllIDII, building .......tan or .... ..,..,... will be IIIuId II>>' 1M ~ ., CINNMCIIr. IIifanMIIoa Ilnd ......n nut campIy wllIIl'erldI BuIIdI... Code. Chi., · - fire PraIKlIaIlI)wIMII. Florl... Fh p.....nuDn Codellllncllllle appllCllllll IiIFPA Code (Nl'PA 1. il. taD. tal, taR, tol, tl, -,lIt IUld tta ~ II) .... AWWA ...t1 -1nateIIalIan, FIeIII T..ung and ~ 01............. I Project InfDl'IIIlltloll Project Nmnr. 430 South Gulfview Boulevard 430 South Gulfview Bouelvard Clearwater, Florida PI'D)ec:t Add...: Pnljec:t AddIMe: llie_' WaNt 811'" Informdlcm 8tIa of W...r MeIn eup",1I8 FIN FIDw: Looped e,.tam Dr DeaIHnd WII? ttwdnnt. Grid 276A #25 & #3 Looped L.aatIDn of.... FI.. .....nt: NE Corner of Site 8" 8tatfo; 78 pal RMldulll: 6 3. pel PIIIIt: 51 ..., FIDw: 1200 gpm DIItI_ of tMt geug. ....",.111 "" ... of IhII rtHr. ~ II v.ttIGIII (eI"""') It HydrantT_CclndulItedIlr. City of Clearwater Water Department (IndulIWalllll:h DC>Pr' d ecIIaI ... .hMI) INFPAHWnlCfe..InDlltlDn 5ee d -c -cached ::;heet: .,.. CI..moatJDn o.crl or HuanI PI'DlIIc:t8d aIIactJ eddItIDneI .... If required. IDea""......... see attached sheet 1-- ,-- I-~ 1-- ,--- I--.~ -.:II addillonel ....... II requlrad. TOTAL lilEEDED FUI!. FLOW (1iI.F.F.I: 18 EXIS11JiIG SVS1BIllUI'PL V 8UFPlCIEHT TO MEET N.F.F. A8OYE? 0110 1,000 Yes GPM YE8 1<:odeI ..lltandenla IMbI. NFPA ........... ".., EdIIIon and OIlIer A 13 - 2002 NFPA 14 2003 NFPA 20 - 2003 NFPA 24 - 2002 bla ~ ar""- Stand i es Fire Pum Private Mains atildI addIlIDIIII...... ~ If "PruJlICt'" IIIClIu8e e ..... Pump, auppIy tIM fDl10wlllF FI.. Pump 1JIfanMtJon: Pump GaIlllCllY: R8IlId Pnluurw: 1,000 120 gpm Chum "- 135 92 pal pel pel Preuure 0 t6~ now: On..... 811ng. THIt CIlpCIlW(7); . J~L -22-2008 12: 24P FROt1: CLWTR FIf"E PRlJNTN 727-562-4461 TO: 912394545401 P.3 .........-- ~......,.,nl"cln.r Infonnlltlon Daniel H Wadsworth P.E. Wadsworth O'Neal Bacik Engineers 6418 Commerce Park Drive ~J-f W I!'Z-~ a'8 CaqIIIly "-= ....una Adll_: atr- Fort Myers Florida (239) 454-5511 I'lIX: et.III: ZIp: 33966 (239) 454-5401 f'hcInC P .E. Soal IL AddltIonai IIlfolllllltlan RequI...d FI... Prfttntlon __lIll '- 8dd__ pItar... DRC appnMIl: 1. PIOlIlM RM FlllIw c:.lcuIIllone I W..... 8Iudv br . FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to _ an ......... __ IUJIIlIY II .IIIIIIII* and to elMlnnln8 . anr upg._ _ raqulred IIV...-.par due to .-1mpM:I rI thla praJKl. TIle waW IUIlIll1IlMl '- ... to IUpparllha IlMCII fill anr Mqul. ftnIapllnldlr, IIandplpil MdlIIl' fire ....... ". IINI pump II reqUl~ .-....lIUlIIlIIr nMl III ... to IUPIIlY ,.~ fit... IItId c:apadIy. ~ wIIIl .- 2lI04 FlaItda FIni Pr8vanlIDn Cada to Indude NFPA tll. NFPA 14, NFPA 28. NFPA 28t. and NFPA t 142 (AMIx H) 11"""-, 2- WI*! an I'DO 110 ...... It.".. '-. minimum flt1rt """" bolIdIIlg and..... '- . fire "'*""' wIIIlIn 40'. Tt* ~nt"'" nat '- ~ llII _ main '1 FIla 8prlnIdar and mIIII III IIlIIUpIIly IIdI fit daubIe dNdar ctlICk YIlve. ThlI hydIaJlIllln Iddllan to .. hyd1an11IIat II '*JIInd IDr t1f111Wdlna plA'IlOIIIlhaIlI to .. WlIIIII1 3OlI' fill blIlIIllnlIlI .. '-III,. and DI1" ..... ... fit...... .... proJec:l ~ PrvvldI and IhaIr an till pIIIn IIIIftImIllll 311' lUmIna IIIdIuIIIllr -vane, WIIIdI__ and .-111" ___ and lIIdta. .. PnIVIda and ""'on till. plan 24 It wlcIh 1Il~ I dIIwI...... for ~ wIdcII......and ..,..lDrfnft and ,.,. partdng 1aII. Whn d\1wI way /I apIIlllV Illllllnd wIlh --r hfIIl: eacII _ fllllIIand ~d'lnd allOW CIII ... _ . IUlImUm 20 II W1d11l d"-r an ..,. ~ fit.. IIIInd .. PravIda 1ft dIpa/lmlnl-.laIIIwy (wIlh u-1'IlUIlCI. Y, T or ClI-Da-Sle) III ~ wIIIl NFPA -t. FlM 0apaItmant -. ftlIdway mutt have ZoHooI cIeIr width 1IllI14-f1X1l vwtIcod......., and .. c:apUIa flllaupportlng I!lI MIght fill fINo ~ whIdee (8O.llOOIbI) 7/23/2008 Fire Zone Summary Area Classification Description ! System Type Area (sf) i Density I Inside Hose i Outside Hose Equipment Rooms -- 16th Floor Ordinary Hazard 1 NFPA 13 3,300 0.20 250 0 -- .-.- 15th Floor Light Hazard "- Tenant Rooms , __~PA 13 _~_ 10,715 0.10 100 0 --- -.--- 14th Floor Light Hazard Tenant Rooms NFPA 13 __-- 12,820 _~_____--.!QQ..._________ 0 .~,- .- -- ....._- "'---"--'-- ------.. --- .._~- 12th Floor Light Hazard Tenant Rooms NFPA 13 12,820 0.10 100 0 --.---,...-- .---. ..__u.__ ---.-----.-- 11th Floor I Light Hazard Tenant Rooms NFPA 13 10,948 0.10 100 0 I I - Tenant Rooms NFPA 13 ~ 10th Floor Light Hazard 12,790 0.10 100 0 -- --- 9th Floor Light Hazard Tenant Rooms NFPA 13 13,932 0.10 100 0 m ----.------ .- -,--0----- 8th Floor Light Hazard Tenant Rooms ______ NFPA 13_~ 13,932____9.10 , 100 - ..----.--------... -- .,---- 7th Floor Light Hazard -........- Tenant Rooms NFPA 13 13,932 0.10 100 0 -_.--- - ---------.-.----- _6th Floor __n_:..Jdght Hazard______J~r:'an~ Rooms_____ NFPA 13 __..1},932 __~___ 100 0 -_._----------- 5th Floor Light Hazard Tenant Rooms NFPA 13 ___J},932 _~__ 100 _____Q.._ 4th Floor Light Hazard Tenant Rooms NFPA 13 13,932 0.10 100 0 -------.---- ---- ---"-_.."-- 3rd Floor Light Hazard Tenant Rooms NFPA 13 13,932 0.10 100 0 ._----~-- 2nd Floor Light Hazard Ballroom , NFPA 13 36,601 0.10 100 0 .n___ .----. 1 st Floor Light Hazard Lobb}' ____ _._._.___---0.. NFPA 13 12,820 0.10 I 100 0 --- --_.,--- -----.------'-- 1st Floor Ordinary Hazard 1 _-':~_arkl.~g -.---- NFPA 13 n-,-~609____0.29.__, 250 0 ---------------.--.--- Ground Floor Light Hazard _______J:.obb.Y_ --"--'--'-_'0'_- ~------ NFPA 13 --_._-!,~~~----- 0.10 ,____ 100___n~____Q._ --- -.-- Ground Floor Ordinary Hazard 1 ParkinQ NFPA 13 57,483 0.20 250 0 Wadsworth O'Neal Bacik Engineers . . I . '.' 12/14/2007 09:38 7278494219 12/13/2007 89:12 7275624961 us WATER SERVICES PUBLIC UTILITIES PAGE 83/04 PAGE 63 FLOW TEST. OIlY OF CLEARWAn:R WATER DEPARTMENT LOCATION L. .0 S. tw FLOW GPM - 0ri IDAT1$: OF TEST (STATIC: PSI 7 8' ~DUAL ps,.b3 IPIToT PSI 5/ )HYDRANT. 3 w_ -_. IGRID' ;J 7 (Q 8- _ 1_ ~d C~ceVff -;;>.5"" US W(l.t€r.Seruic~ CUSTOMER RElQuesnNG TEST Received Time Dec. 14 10:45AM 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Wadsworth O'Neal Bacik Engineers 7/23/2008 250 225 CI) ... ::::s tn tn CI) ... a.. i i J I i ! I I ..--+- I I I I I i I I I i I Iii. I "F1ow-a~Ptlmp-9,'sehargei I I I \ i i I I I I i I I I.. I ow - QUo gpm at 6 p,SI i I ! I I I I I I FIc~w = 1,~00 gpni at 55 p!>i ~.. I l~. I J I ! 1'-...., I ' r I 1 I i............. i I I I I;. i I I j !.............l I I ' I I............. I I iAvail~~eFow I I 1 at Putnp suction ! ! I i ' I I I I ! I I I i t t -I I L i I 1 j : . I Flow = 2,4~1 gpm atl20 psi 1 t I I r i ; j ,1 j --r-'--~ ! =r ~ I I' I' i ~ 1 <1tyMain I I i''-..j I ! I I !'-v! 11 I ! I 12001350 1500 1650 1800 1950 2100 2250 2400 2550 Flow (gpm) 2700 2850 Flow Curve.grf 'it.. FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. Civil Engineering . Surveying . Transportation Planning & Engineering . Land Planning . Environmental July 23,2008 Mr. piiul Bertels Traffic Operations Manager City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Room 220 Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 RE: 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Bertels: As you are aware, the site previously occupied by the Adams Mark Hotel on Clearwater Beach is being proposed for redevelopment. The previously existing 217 room resort hotel is to be replaced with a 230 room resort hotel. This letter is being sent to obtain the City's concurrence that: 1. A traffic study will not be required for this proposed redevelopment, and 2. Impact fees will only be due for the 13 additional resort hotel rooms. In support of the position that no traffic study is required for this change in land use, the following information is provided. First, we conducted a comparison in trip generation for the Adams Mark Hotel and for the proposed hotel. As indicated in Table 1, attached, the trip generation for the previous 217 rooms of resort hotel includes 83 a.m. peak hour trips and 244 p.m. peak hour trips. The proposed 230 resort hotel rooms will generate 88 a.m. peak hour trips and 258 p.m. peak hour trips. These estimates were made using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Informational Report Trip Generation, Seventh Edition, 2003. The increase in trips in the a.m. peak hour is 5, while the p.m. peak hour would see an additional 14 trips. The sited ITE reference does not include rates for daily trip generation, therefore, daily trips could not be estimated. As can be seen from the above, the increase in trips is minimal and requiring a traffic study would prove no useful purpose. Secondly, the property at 430 South Gulfview Boulevard was approved by the City of Clearwater to be allowed to develop 230 overnight accommodation units. This approval was conveyed by a letter from Mr. Michael Delk, AICP, Planning Director dated January 16, 2008, see copy attached. While the proposal before the City at that time was for time share units, they carry the same zoning classification, overnight accommodations, as the resort hotel currently proposed. Therefore due to the limited number of new trips generated by the proposed development and since the City has already approved the proposed total of 230 overnight accommodation units for this location, no traffic study should be needed. 3030 Starkey Boulevard. New Pon Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 . Fax: (727) 848-3648. (800) 532-1047 www.Hdesign.com Mr. Paul Bertels July 23, 2008 Page 2 Concerning the transportation impact fee due for the development, the applicant will pay for the 13 additional rooms (230 proposed less 217 previous) using the resort hotel category. Please review this request and provide me your written concurrence on the above. Sincerely, Enclosures c: Ken Gross, Ocean Properties, w/encl. Katie Cole, Johnson, Pope, et aI., w/encl. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., FDC, w/o encl. Octavio Cabrera, P.E., FDC, w/o encl. File: 0699-0271-10.01 :pcm K:\430 s. Gulfview\Letters\bertels.Ol.doc Table 1. 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use ITELUC Size Units Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Resort Hotel (Occupied Rooms) 330 217 Room 60 23 83 105 139 244 Resort Hotel (Occupied Rooms) 330 230 Room 63 25 88 111 147 258 Increase 3 2 5 6 8 14 Date: July 17, 2008 T:\Trip Generation\[2003 Trip Gen Rates.xls]Cabana Club "J.t~~~~ .,. OF Tilt. ~(~W;~~~~ ~~t,\I/~ ~ ~~ - ... - ~!II lOin. _ oc:c~ lor: \ :.==. ~~ .~~-=- ~~ ';.~~~~~......<~~ ~~)tTER.,...,Jl 1:"1'.6.1'" C I T Y OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER; FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNIOPAL SERVICES BUIlDING, 100 Saum MYRTLI! AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE 027) 562-4567 FAX 027) 562-4865 PlANNING DEPARTMEl'fl" January 16,2008 Mr. E. D. Armstrong ill, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, Florida 33757-1368 RE: Development Order - Cases FLD2007-11034/fDR2005-05022 430 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Armstrong: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On January 15, 2008, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today), under the provisions of Section 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 230 overnight accommodation units. in the Tourist (T) District with reductions to the front (east setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the~iqe (north) setback om the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to six feet (to bUl1dmg) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 teet to three feet (to sidewalk) and to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to eight feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building, a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street and to allow a two-year time frame to submit for a building permit, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; and (3) including the Transfer of Development Rights of eight total dwelling units (being converted to 13 overnight accommodation units) previously approved and transferred under TDR2005- 05022, including four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findinl!s of Fact: 1. The 2.45 total :acres (1.87 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.58 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) is located on the west side of South Gulfview Boulevard approximately 500 feet northwest of Harnden Dri~e and directly south of Clearwater Beach; 2. On April 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 10 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005-01005/SGN2005-01016 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of an existing 217-roomlunit hotel (where 74 rooms/units were (j "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" January 16, 2008 Annstrong - Page 2 permitted at that time) and for height to allow the existing 155-foot high building (where a maximum height of 150 feet is permitted today); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a 217-room/unit overnight accommodation use with reductions to setbacks, an increase to building height from 35 feet to 155 feet (to existing roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 217 to 201 spaces (existing) as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; (3) Reduction to the required interior landscape area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program.; and (4) Comprehensive Sign Program approval (SGN2005-01Ol6); 3. On August 16, 2005, the CDB approved with 18 conditions Case Nos. FLD2005-05047/TDR2005- 05022 for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 104 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units wee permitted at that time); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed USe of 112 attached dwelling units and 78 overnight acco:ri1tnodation rooms/units with reductions to setbacks, increases to building height from 35 feet 100 feet for the overnight a~commodatiori building tower and from 35 feet to 150 feet for the residential tower (to roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 feet to 90 feet and a deviation to allow direct access to. a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of four dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Avenue, one dwelling unit from 625-627 Bay Esplanade and three dwelling units from 667 Bay Esplanade; 4. The nonconforming status of the prior hotel density has been determined to still be valid, even though the hotel was 'demolished, due to the status of the approval of Case Nos. FLD2005- 05047ffDR2005-05022 and the time extensions granted; 5. The proposal is to construct a new building on the property with a vacation/interval ownership project consisting of 230 overnight accommodation units; 6. The development proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight aCCOnmiodation units; where 93 overnight accommodation units are permitted today); 7. Eight dwelling units were previously transferred to this site under TDR2005-05022 and are being convertedto 13 overnight accommodation units for this project; 8. The proposal includes three floors of parking for a total of 409 parking spaces at a ratio of 1.76 spaces per unit (where one space per unit is required); 9. The proposal includes a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, where the site has no other means of street access except to South GulfviewBoulevard; 10. With Beach Walk construction, Coronado Drive will function as the main arterial street between the roundabout and HaIIlden Drive, south of the subject property and this change of street designation will be included in the upcoming Comprehensive Plan update; 11. The proposal includes reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) from 10 feet to six feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk) and to zero feet (to trash staging area) and reductions to the rear (west) setback from the CCCL from 20 feet to eight feet (to building) and to zero feet (to sidewalk); . 12. The proposal includes an increase to building height from 35 feet to 100 feet (to roof deck) and to 150 feet (to roof deck) for two portions of the building; 13. The higher portion of the building is separated from the 440 West condominium. tower to the south by approximately 158 feet, which is in compliance with the Beach by Design requirement to have a minimum spacing of 100 feet between towers exceeding 100 feet in height; 14. The proposal includes a request for deviations to Beach by Design guidelines which require the floorplate of any building exceeding 45 feet in height be limited to a maximum of 25,000 square feet January 16,2008 Annstrong - Page 3 between 45 - 100 feet and a maximum of 10,000 square feet between 100 - 150 feet, as the largest floorplate between 45 - 100 feet is approximately 43,179 square feet and between 100 - 150 feet is approximately 20,832 square feet, but the guideline allows deviations to these floorplate requirements provided the. mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum building envelop allowance above 45 feet; . 15. Beach by Design guidelines requires for buildings with a footprint of greater than 5,000 square feet, where the proposal is approximately 60,804 square feet, to be constructed so that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The project's overall horizontal plane dimensions are approximately 207.5 feet along South Gulfview Boulevard and 276 feet along the north side, while the vertical plane is approximately 160 feet from grade to the top of the tallest roof. None of these dimensions are equal; . 16. Beach by Design guidelines requires no plane or elevation to continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet without an offset of more than five feet. The planes of all elevations provide in and out modulation of five - 10 feet, where the largest uninterrupted plane is approximately 29 feet; 17. Beach by Design guidelines requires at least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has calculated that the north elevation is at 62.6 percent, the east elevation at 70.7 percent, the south elevation at 66.1 percent and the west elevation at 68.8 percent; and 18. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Conditions of Approval: 1. That appli~ation for a building permit to construct the approved project be submitted no later than January 15,2010,. unless time extensions are granted pursuant to Section 4-407; 2. That the final design and .color of the overnight accommodation building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 3. That the use of this' property be for overnight accommodations, meeting the defmition of the Community Development Code, with owner and guest stays not to exceed 30 days (whether occupancy ofUI).its arise from a rental agreement, other agreement or the payment of consideration). This development shall not be deemed attached dwellings with individual dwelling units, nor shall units qualifY for homestead exemption or home or buSiness occupational licenses; 4. That a Declaration of Unity of Title (for condominiums) be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That a condominium or other form of plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the building permit or first Certificate of Occupancy, depending on the form of the sale of the units, as necessary or , required; 6. That there be no public/guest use of either roof; 7. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, waterfront visibility triangles be correctly indicated on the civil site and landscape plans; January 16,2008 Armstrong - Page 4 8. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. The maximum height shall be four feet, unless approved at six feet high through a Comprehensive Sign Program; 9. That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Engineering Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the civil plans be amended to indicate the following: a. curbing of the edges of pavement for the trash staginglloading area; b. detailed perimeter grading to ensure proposed site grading of swales and yard grate inlets works with the proposed landscaping; and c. a stoop outside the double doors from the south side of the building adjacent to the trash holding room; 11. That, prior to the issuazice of any permits, the civil and architectural plans be coordinated as to the location of mirrors and signage to aid motorists backing out of visually blocked parking spaces on all levels of the parking garage; 12. That, prior to the issuance of any permit, compliance with all requirements of General Engineering and Stormwater Engineering be met; 13. That all Fire Depa.t1ment requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. That any applicable Public .Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 15. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit or other approvals shall be made within the time frame of Condition #1 above. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay aIiy impact fees that may be requirC?d. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approv~l. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 28, 2008 (14 days from the date of the COB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner ill, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.mvclearwater.comlgov/deptslplanning. January 16,2008 Armstrong - Page 5 S:\Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)lInat:tive or Finished ApplicalionslGulfview S 0430 CB Vacation (1) 1.2008 - ApprovedlGulfview S 430 Development Order 1.16.08.OOc o o o N . . . o 20 ~ 40 II Q Q I , \ -' - fr --- --- - I I 80 I . . . I , . . . I ~ , I Q Q I ... -.. Q Q ---.. I I I - ~~--: I I L -l ..-\ 8 ~ ~~ l"Io 10 z ~~ ~ !i N88'52'35"E(c.F) 402.14'(L) 318.34'(F) ~ FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. IJ ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTALISTS. SURVEYORS a PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd. New Part Richey Fl. 34655 Tel. (727) 849-7588 - Fax. (727) 848-3648 E.B. No. 7421 DESCRIPTION. I fr I PROJ No. DATE. FIGURE. 699-271 a 9/12/08 EPN. 1 209 DRAWN BY. SCALE. 1 "=40' JEB GUEST VEHICLE: ENTER GARAGE AND ELEVATOR C Copyright 2008 Florida Design Consultants. Inc. drawings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without written permission. I o -1{- S713a-24"1t{c.1? 400.00'(1.) r f+CO~ At CONS -"'- I ~ . .~~~~. 16 I ,I II I I , o - o o ~...~ o N ji.- 0 20 40 80 ~ II I I . . . J . . > > 1\ I \ I' .1 I f " j If~ . 1[." ~ {}~ ,- I I a. i~ i,~ o - ~) ,5 IZ ~ ..-4 8 2~ 1"18 1% ~~ ~ \ ~ f-- . . . l . . . > '- ~ FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. f1 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd. New Port Richey Fl, 34655 Tel. (727) 849-7588 - Fax. (727) 848-3648 E.B. No. 7421 I I - I I -- == ---- !IlL r-- ..- - J\ l ..' ..' ......., . . . ,......, . , I:~' ;:',~:i"..:,::ii;;:,~ j ~ . . \';i~\}i,i:~~;\;' I, , ~ -'" ~ / B II =,a.t-~~~. I~I ~~ . - .--...- I - -.............. "I~ -- . __ . ---~ ~ Ij .......-: ~ - .-'~ Q II r ~ ~-- .112.aY(F) --...-- --..~ =r~'=~ _~ Q Q I - I '\ ~>.,::::~ ~~.:. :);;.: ".. "';"'~:""; r,J.' '. "i,;t.,~p, ~::":7""':" ':"':J;" " "';~>':':i"~':;' > &....:~ . '\/ t ':~'<il/~'~ .. ,.J.,. .,:...:..:<~ .\.:..':."~ '.' ,. " \\ ..... /J ,~;,~ D ..:;:.<::,:.Jj '.. ) "' I \ ~ - , ~- ~~ . z l' )ij ;Jj z '" I A }' . % . Ihlll ) 'F ~ ( ~- o \ ~ L-- ~ '--- I v :'" .~:. ,~"\ '~... . .' \ . ..:'t... I . I I II il I , :il _____b-:.. ~ I l-eJ I __-i-J h ,,~~ . - Q Q - ~ . 1#1 r-- ~- - - - - - ~\ ,n , . J '~ \ '----..I ~ fn ,,~~ ~ ~ - . .". . ~ I /DC! t. L - ~ - ~C) ~11[7 \ I Q I I 9 ...J \ .. ~l \ J - - r- ~~. ~ Q 9 . - rv1 -- --- --- ::~~",' I Il' ~~ L N81"52'35"E(cn 402.14'(L) 31U4'(F) ~\ PROJ No. DATE. FIGURE. DESCRIPTION, 699-271 a 9/12/08 EPN. 2 GUEST VEHICLE: LEAVE ELEVATOR AND GARAGE 209 DRAWN BY. SCALE. 1"=40' JEB C Copyright 2008 FlOrida Design Consultants, Inc. drawings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without written permission. o - o I I II S77";w24__ o g. _ c." 400.00'Cl) r ~....1fAI- - . " -~ J12.5.1"(F) -t=~:"'~~STR P' I ---ct'r -"'--- Ij~ I I I_I..:Q~ ------~ I ~-~~~It-l-I~~~ I ,~ --====\\ I I,/~ ~I- ~ '\ IA'. >- ~ ~ ,'-'''='' ?P '\ -11 ~ I ~ ". I ___ r:::::, 'f':::;".. A.~~1 ~ r . r'Y I ~ >- /' ~ ~ I 1- t ~ ~ \ Il-iH"~"; ~ ~ \ ! ~~ , VrID' ~:/~~: ,;f; "//@ ("" il ~ -1I - - - 1 o ~"'_ o o J . . - > I ~ ~~~~ -~ , I . . . I ( > If l~r . . . . . . If .IL\ '1\: )\=".Jl1 I I' I I fJ. I~ ~ ~ ~~ II Ii I I I ~~ Ii I I I L L/ 1 1 1 ...... ~ ~ :fSl' rv1 1 1 R$S ~ ~ 1 1 " "'" >< ".::~:.~ ':' r~:'...:. ~~..:.~~; ~ .~~ :.\ ;':..;./; ~.:.::~ I.~ ..:~:: ~~.~; . "'.:" ......:.....':.....~..(j..::: t~ .... :.:\;.:.~~;(\.~~.'::}:.~;::: '::::':~ ~ .::~.~'.::. .\ .,. ,.... . "1 . ... '. ". . :. .,;:,;:,}:~.;(: / ~/:'<' /7 I -r- / ~\l:~r :.,..' f:l'" L '~:/:'0':~ ~-:. .<' (...~::.::.:~:: .t!' I';~ .. ::......;.1"~r..I.' :'" B"":':'1'::':'"Il"'I"'~:" '.:',' :.' ( [J.'~ . .-.;. " .'. ~ . . .," : t~ '>. :'<;\,,, )) ~f"N...:.. . ...., - .~If.! . .:. . \ :, .' ,".:. ~ .', ,',. ~> ::..~..;:::~::. ....:; : " 'w' ;.:;;;:..... ..'. ,g .:~'.;. :~:~.~ .:. . '.' ';:, ;;~r':" ::l~,= ';::':::-"::":U:", ~ \.: ...... ':.~ .... . .:.... .'. '. . . ': ," "' ~ ~ ~ ==i3. t--- . --=-.. .~ I "_ . --- . ~...-- Trill "-. ~~ ~~-- . ~ - I ~---~ [[ill / " / /,~-, \ / / \ \ r'G \ 1II1IIII \ \. /)/ / II \ .....-..... /!L ~..... ~/'/ [[ill .- fi' ~ ~---- - ~ / - """""l I) -M " " :'. .;:' I I r;:;:: [.-'" ". "'N\'" . \. '.' j I I ------- h I I-.-.J I --~ 1il' - - -I -.... 1][~ ,----- I I ...J > '> ..-I 8 ~~ 1'10 I~ a~ \ i Ne8'52'35"E(c.F) 402.14'(L) 318.34'(F) '-.. ~ FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. . ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTALISTS. SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Slarkey Blvd. New PorI Richey Fl. 34655 Tel. (727) 849-7588 - Fax. (727) 848-3648 E.B. No. 7421 PROJ No. DATE. FIGURE. DESCRIPTION. 699-2710 9/12/08 EPN. 3 GUEST VEHICLE: UPPER FLOOR ELEVATOR AND PARKING 209 DRAWN BY. SCALE. 1"=40' JEB I I~ 'h , . ~ ',..,..;It' ,N.. q : t rU 'I'-----' n C"\ '..u~ \ vI I )\ ~l \ 'j - - \ ~ ). . j. ~\ 1\ C Copynght 200B Flonda DeSign Consultants, Inc. draWings ond concepts may not be used or reproduced wIthout wntten permission. / N 0 - , u 0 '7---_ o 0 0 J - - 80 I , ~ - - i > ( > - - - 11.0 o 20 40 ~ ~ I ( - - - I -1.{- S77-;w24"W(CJ? 400.00'(1,) r f+CO~ At. ~s ----- I'I~ -",.,...~. I ,6 II II I I I 1\ I \ I' .1 I r I' ~.C ~ 00 I- I I a. t~ 1~ ~ i, lti I ( ~ I-- ~ I -- ~ ---- IlL - .--- - IJ\ ..-1 ~ ~~ l'10 I~ ~~ \ i ~ FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. , ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS a PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd. New Port Richey FL. 34655 Tel. (727) 849-7588 - Fax, (727) 848-3648 E.B. No. 7421 \... DESCRIPTION, "'2.sY(F) --..-- ~...~ :::;="=:-- . -===~. ~ Q 9 I - I I '~r&:' '~.:. :..,: . '~J" '- "'':'' ;.:.~.. t::;;.......::. ....:.:::....~::', ., '..\, '. . . . ~ : (', .~. :',:' .' '. ",' ':. ,. ::......;.!;:.;.,/..' :'" ,.".:..::.;.~: r1..... ':,,:' "." . :, .... ", ~...:,;.;.:_;j..... . ,," ',' , : ," ~.:~~:;~;;>" :',: .":'~' ~~ . 11 ,~ ~:.. :.1. . '~'l :........;: :' ...:;' W' ~ 'J;. :::~."== .;" _'" J.. :.~..:.:::~:...y.~ . ," ". ~ . .. ~ /I '::; '::U. . ':... .'. .. ,'. ,-- I- - - - ~ I I ~ DELIVERY TRUCK: BACK INTO LOADING AREA - FORWARD OUT I , , ~ , - ~ '-- ~ I - ~ ~ ',,\~':',:::'<<'>'~~~: ;::';'/<::::'.~:-'> r~.:'.. ":'.:';:.,: .... ..:..:.,.....~..~.... /,~ .' .....\~~.::;:::\.......:<:,:;::: ..:< ~.~:.~.;~;. .' ........ . I" . ... .. ". . : "';:.;;.}:~}.j ~>~. /"7 I "\ , II . / a n 1 / I ( I I I hf--.J J ~ C Copynght 2008 Flonda DeSign Consultants, Inc. draWings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without wntten permission. ---:-- ~ I =]3' F ' -:~-~ ~ 11'\ . -~' ~~-~-:- / 1 ......, ~ ~ Q -.....,j II 9 II II '--- Q 9 . - I ~ -- -- ........... I - PC, 1iJ' I I Q 9 - I"v1 -- --- --- Jd, .~.~ l~~-II III I ~-'\:' 1..1 1..11 : V L u N88'W35"E(c.F) 402. 14-(L) 318.34'(F) ~ o l.r t I ~ H++ 1 ~ I I \ II pr I o I L I = I o .. ~7 ~~ ""', '. '., ;'. ':. fr. ':~'.\. Ii '-..:....L..J V-;== '~ :~~/ fn " . ~ fU ~ .r;~ j fU \ - J\ \~ - - ), ~ \\ \ PROJ No. DATE, FIGURE, 699-2710 9/12/08 EPN, 4 209 DRAWN BY, SCALE, 1"=40' JEB o - I III S77-.w24"11{i o - ~ - ~"400.OO'(I.) r ftCO~ AI. GCiNS';;-'" -~ II I.~ '~-~~~~-:t m ~, I ,6 ,I I' I I N o o ---cr-...._ o o j i.- 0 20 40 80 ~ I I I . . . ! . . ( 1\ ! J \ II ,/ I f " k ~ ~~ I~ I , g, r - lti ( J\ ~--~ ..-I 8 ~~ 1"10 I~ ~~ g ~ - > t-- . . . - I I -- ---- ML ..----. , . . . ( - > '- ~ FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. t ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL. 34655 Tel. (727) 849-7588 - Fox, (727) 848-3648 E.B. No. 7421 DESCRIPTION. ".::;: <~:.:/.:~<~~ ~:.:::::/<.;9. ~ ~~. . :':~'<~:\FS;~::;':I:::>~ ' J.:'.;::' . .:...:-:. / ,...., ~ "i:':~:: :',' ~ ......../ -..~ ,/,' ~ ~~'=~, -~ -...--./ n 1" F ' -=-~.-==- ,I rJ ~ ro.. ' - , -.::=~.::::::- I ~ -~ ~ II ~_::~V <::I!/~ __ ~ .r l.r (--- ) V (~~-~- ~ I _______jo I l-eJ I _--1-1 ~ .112.s.Y(r? ---..- Q 9 - '\ (l 1\ I II f , I ~ ri \ w ~ ,-- i- -- - -- I i \ I .1 .--- "t------' . I r-'1 ~ ~..I --= '\ 17 V , ~ '- ~m ~ ~ ~~ , 1\ PROJ No. EPN. GUEST VEHICLE: PULL INTO LOADING AREA - BACK OUT SCALE. C COPYright 2008 Florida DesIgn Consultants, Inc. drawings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without written permission. I'h ~ - ~ '-- ~ I - I '- Q 9 - ~ I I I -. . ........ I - - - ~ l' I I ~ ~ Q 9 I I I I - rv1 -- --- --- -=m~r I I ~I~ If' '\.. '" n r T 11111 II " __ l./ I II " /_ i L________________~ .. If N88'S2"35"E(c,F) 402.1.'(L) 318.34'(F) 699-271 a 209 1"=40' I~\')::..:.,-: ....~.l:' '- ~~~ " I" . ;...;..:?,:7.~..::~..:. , ,~l/- \:.'.;:. r ~.)j./": ' . '.' ,:0:., >> '.. :"'7" . ~ . \ '.', ":'{,'(jT .:. . ,...... ,,',' 1iJ.......'. " ~:'.::. :~:~ === ','.,..; ':.'" ~. {'::U:' ) \.: ...... ;'.?.. .'. " ," "'. '. '.. :'" '::. Pi: : 1-1";: . . . \ \, :: u. I ih :. ~ '~lr N .. . J /'IJ n .' ti~ 1 - - -. 'J11 \ - 1 ~~ i"\;l"" ~ DATE, 9/12/08 DRAWN BY. JEB FIGURE, 5 '0 430 SOUTH GULFVIEW BOULEVARD CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE &ASSOCIATES NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE ! ,kw..x:W!:~, :NC. Af~"t-;Cill~~ SEPTEMBER 15, 2008 DRC REVIEW COMMENTS o~ I 000 _o:t 0 UlIIII lIJN 1tJIW:[ U -(10'-0') ~ 1&1 :IE ~ 0 ,.' _",' i ~ ... :) III ElII51JC .< - ElII51JC srJMl. PRDPEIlIY UIE PUBLIC BEACH ElII51JC PIBJC _1Il1D1 / I _D.;}' )J I ~.{~ I ~~j _'2-:t _01 ~;,t., , rd~ I, I~ I' I, I~ ;: . 6 .~,' "I )1' I. 4.'JS \11 \\~. I>o.,ra' ( N::J'r.:~'-~,;"~(C ~Ii 40214'(L",,,,<< G ~\o"~\ ___h,/ . ,"_ \ ~~ NIN o 0 ........zz,..... Z I"Tl r'l z ~~I~ ~ ~r- r ~ ~,g __ -;~Il~ J,.05' ;.... .It ,.1 , l':\l': z z ........f'Tl (Tl........ z z ~: : ~ ~= \= ~ ~~ \ \ I NOTE: ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN REFERENCE TO ELEVATION + 16' -0. NAVO. ZONING ANALYSIS PARKING LEGEND SELF ADA VALET VAlET SUBTOTAL PARKING VAN (TANDEM) BASEMENT/PI 0 1 70 32 103 P2 0 D 25 16 41 P3 0 0 25 23 4B P4 0 0 27 25 52 P5 0 0 27 25 52 SUBTOTAl 0 1 174 121 296 296 TOTAL SPACES SITE: 2,45 ACRES 230 OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS PROPOSED 114 KING B4 QU EEN 32 SUllES 296 VAlET PARKING SPACES PROV1DED 230 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED "",.Mol'" 'LOO~AIC """.lC. -,a,.AC," ,~, TOUlasF FlOC_, O"""~TC-Al TOI'O''''''''""ROOM ,- l1",""""~OO'i"K1<_'~ W .- 0'" 1~,'" ~. ... ,.. ,= 11.... '0' ,,"', '" .- um ,,,.,, '" - ....., u..... ~..u_ '1<" '" .- ".'" - m ,..os, .,- '" 2'" 1~'" ~"- ,,- ~.l" la". 1. ~,. .. ",':U 2'337 '$.21" ,""to ~"- "- sr, Z", t"". -"- IS."" '" "- "". ~- is.'''' ,~''''' ;:;-;;;;: ':0.:0.0 Z,m ,,- "...C ""." '- ".070 '~O7l: ,,"0"'''''"' " :>:l._ ...., '".'" '.."" ....,""~ae ,","'" .. ..- ~ """..AOE ,""", '.....oo~, ""0"""0' ",.... ",",0 ,,' "". IlAseMEN'"1 p., 0."'"" ,", >>,'" ~ lO,AL =.10'1 1',',,,",- "",m ,",'" '"= .."., "'."'" (j) ~~~;. ~~o~N o 30' ......- 60' 120' , ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Arclileclure & PIarrrg 161 Alm.rla Avenu. Coral tiobl.e. florida JJ13<\. T.. tJ05) #J-5206 Fa,. 305) ~-2872. At 000880 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 = 13 ~ ir 9 u.. ~ :i u <C > UJ al ~ <>= UJ < ~ i ~ ...J U ~ = ~ ~ 0 00. = ~ ~ SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/01/0B aRC REV1EW COMMENTS 09/15/0B 2855 AD 0--'0--0- n-~----.._ ;, S77"38"24 ow;' o \p_~.B I-J~ -,--. C,F) 400.00'(l) , 00" IllS 1"; 6fJ-lcr- __________ 595' <95' 312. 53'(F) 05 r- C~'irAL c-- 0 ~ 59' , EDGE OF POOL-~ I I t Ie IUN [ _ ~'" 051 ~'2 ~ Q.~ ~ DECK ABOVE > ~ II ff?~~;:~~/i>~//~I/'I~ -i:d::ri3l r---I3fAQi Irrrrr ~ A BOA.Qv' ~) / T72 \ 11~/0~ ~;~tLffi~i~ ~ fT/7IIr l=I=?:;;=-~~_ _--=-~. == <.47' TIJ I /1~1/:r~4'~d~ %~j?f/ii / /)/) / / / _.~\~~ :-. ~~=~,,-_~~-"NE (_0.3' :10r1l~ ;;f{.;:/;i:%'j::;;f I ~ 'f Q / .. .....~ Ie, ;;Acc~--~-=<l"' V3' .BO' / } ( w' y-; )(.;/, '\. "Q / I ADA VJ;N~~ ;;;;;~ '/ / ,~d t. 1 .~ 8'-4"1~/~%?'//~ >;S;;,:{<"$.... '9' ''95 I~I ,97 98 I . 99 111,00 IVo, ,22l,,'0J ::: ,m)~)'i';> ._....-.. '/ t I"'; ".// /~// i '"',- ' . , 1- 1 - ~I'/I"- \" ~ r" /i/.) _ j 0 ~ _.._ '/. '(Ii _~.B' _0.'2' \ I 93 1921 91 90 r;;; 88 \861; 85 ",84 83 82 1\ ~ ~.!2. ) i p4][rsJCC ~I' = PL, ~!~r}N~ ~. ~' I I~ ""-. Hl~i ,~ ~J~I~ 11- r= ('r '---..1, >",,'(j )A'v > ~ ,~, II~II::;;;;:' ~ 11==,\ =I~\ 1=1 1= AL~~~~L ,l 1 /~1-T~>ir \ 6; I~ 67 5 69 NO 71 \.. 72 73 74 75 I 75 II 77 76 '''''in fli<iJ'/ II WATER VAULT I PL. 62 53 4 '.'. 55... 65 , I ...... .., - ( I I, ~ 20'-0" -Jl } I fl.',7i< ~ - S~~6~R RAMP. SEE ~ II l III , ..'c.. '" ~ 1- '-- d / r- .......ij \ ...... CIVIL DWGS. o b Q "-. GRAD~ O~EV~T~~~RKING ,:':15:,' ,/%.:..i ...~ . f ,\ ~'y '", ./ GIJ .I\K ] '~""'lljJ~~,: A '23', 20'-0"---tLi.....,.. I '\ ~ . I/It~-J \ 3,90 ! I ~~ 't It*<a f' 47 46 11~51':' : i 42; 41 I t; ~tH~6 ~ 35 II IN"!' ........ i., l\ I h:; t- 20UO' - I . 23 J' 24 r~~GE: I. \ "^"i,;~1 ~, 3.00' ! I II I I ~ \V l'\ f:4.'22 i FREIGHT 'i ..... X 11/7. <:~ - <:" I I. ELEVATOR \>\\' " ~ "- PARABOLIC ~ I . '7 '.,. ..'" . . > ~ i \ J,J . iN "'",J MIRROrS II. :L~:T~TR '.' .......~. .iii _____ .2i01 1~IG{ ~9'~\sB=I,)HI= - STORAGE M ~~ 113 ~t 111 ~Jl;~ ~ll s '122o,(--} i~;T~R PLv,;:,~ ~~ i~ '3, 60 ~l\ -= ~ L~+~' SERj: :\~~;DOj! ~~ j __~ J." II.' GE~iE l rDlrF j ~~/ _25' _0.0' ~~~I 0- PL 9<' <' m~~~-m: ~: ii "", ~ I . I SIDEWA~~A'2' 'CD . --" PI-. 'iN J I ''''; SERVICE DRIVEUI ~ \ ~ ,7 i r NiL .~. f- ._ > PL. 2;: PL. '" . 'n 99' 9" ~'2.0' _D.s' I 67'-6" 20' 0" ..... ?8' 5" . 35' 11" 0.0' 0.A3', '~68'S2'35"E(C,F) I 402.14'(L) 316.34'(F) 0.B3\-6' H. CMU WALL wi 0.00 . I 05B PAINTED STUCCO FIN. I o ro- LOWER SUN TERRACE EXISTING RIP-RAP EXISTING SEAWALL PRDPIRIY LINE ~ ()) ...1 i/'.' '. 77 / / -- -\- Q 42'-4~' SERVICE SITE PLAN REVIEW \ ENTRANCE OB/01/0B Y A.oB', ORe REVIEW COMMENTS 11,' . ~, 3.00' ~. 09/15/0B - A.05 . I' ~' 5. .Og' \ .~ \ 45'-6" 1 ~\ ([) ~~:~~.~~,~ENT PARKING LEVEL ~ A.52 o <J '" ~' > ( > B' ~. -~.~ > D 1 I 33 .. 31 ...~,~ ~ ;; ".- 0' _0. ( To ",.1'2' ~ (j) -I r)> Zr 1"'10 \0 Z O(j) 0-1 0;:0 rC o :::! o Z N\N o 0 .--..zz~ Z rr1 1"'1 z ~~\~~ OJ r;:; r;:; OJ ~r\r~ ~ ~ O"l --I'- -.../ -.../ 164'-1" N\N o 0 z Z r---. rTl rrl r-..... Z z J><\J> :J> < I'l I'l < o 0 OJ~\~ OJ OJ OJ '--'" --->. ---" '----" GJ N -.../ '-../ 23123 z z zf'l f"T1z J><I<:J> d I'l I'l d co r;:] ~ 00 ear1rea '--'" -....l. ........... "----" -/>. GJ '-../ '-../ 32' \ \ o 16' .......- A.'25' 0 0:::: <r: > LLJ -.--.J =:> 0 CD S LLJ > A.'2~' LL -.--.J =:> C) ::r::: f-- =:> 0 Ul 64' , A.~O' A.~g' NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, IN<: ArcNtedure & ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;J 0 = C3 ~ ~ LL ~ J: <) $: -< w CD 0:: ~ w !;( ~ ~ ;;J -' <) ~ = ~ ;;J 0 r;/j = ~ ~ 2855 A1 PROPERTY LINE ~ o r 0---0 LOWER SUN TERRACE EXISTING RIP-RAP EXISTING SEAWALL l;-;. ~'-.", i ,) / /,q ",,1" ! -_.'-~ L -r ~il:, C~ FJ O_,.B 0' 5.",' -----0- I 5' ,3 J .05' ~ ICOASTAl*- ~: Op~, ~5.95 5.9' , 1/1 L t~, lcr---5 tA'2 I /1 I U I. _______ ,?" :l~ 10'CC:... 1. _l!il}'E~~ '. ~~D4=--~ i -~f---~;;r ~T . (PL. '=- \ I ' - I;/' I ~ P L ADA RAMP _0.3' I! I Y t, \~i~:;~: KO" :~~ i f-I-~ I~' \; M IA I I I' I ~_ y ~ I e-.JL-,\ P~ ~PL: ~ '\. I. ~\ :.L '"-1) I '~~ I ( Hq~~=.../~ I "'~ )f /~~ TERRACE I I :PL. ~0 J )~ 1+17'-0"1 PL.! l~J ~ ~,PL. r -~ --:. ~'. WAJER -I- /~",\<l " } DL,/ ')l( FEATlN\E I 1'0. ~ .;, '- ( "'1 , ~--i -?fl- 1 \ I'" ^' " -+~. 0 "t- J \ IClP;L. L..J '. \ IJL II ), ~ I II II I ...1 ~- I ",<f~! . I 1\ I 11 I / ~ / / / ~~ ==" (f12) / i / ~A7' ~~~r7J~~~ /,- '5A' fr 7 "/.5. BEA~h ACCESS ~ PROPER LINE / -, - - - - ----'--' 5.' / I 1 u - ------i c:;~ 11 ~~ J ~ ~ ~l/~ f/ .\ ~~~ ~.A"'" FITNEJ~~~~ CENTER ~ 'j 157jYS.F.. ~ ~ ' / ,G I '. I 1 1 1 1 1 6 7 8 L~!I- ~ GENERATOR ,1/.... ................./j.................../.... 1 : r--------r----J I : : ' , t 25 /". . t... ... i ".l"n . ../ ... nn"5E"':R":",'oocj,. co' '3' f'~R"-'l"u:"c((' c\ 402.; .,'/, '. .3;6..34 v ~'~o' "bL. :)L. ,I..) '-',"',1' ; 1 T \,-.) ~ o 0 _______ o 4.5i 5." ,.B' 'L" 'I /, '1-^J,f PL. 00 1/ 1 DEC /; II \, \ \ \ L~OU8;6E ///) / '~ //@ ( /)<'\c:!fi/i, //s ....v / , I ", / '.J " / '" ',../ ~ I , I ~, ~ " -~. ~\L ~II~ :'~ " r- /, ;3! ).... '//1 I j d PL. "'~ 1////// r~ I ( I p~'I~'/ DINING F . /'~ . TERRACE f- L ri~? 1+17'--0"1 - S1 ) Fl~ , 41 Ii 40 : 39 RESTAURANT 2375 S.F. ~ !ll!..1 p 38, 37 _0.0' ELEVATOR LOBBY _'2.i I \ I II lco 1,,;,-1 ';1~ .'::'J. ~\' \ 'oi W,...J ,.j) <J;. PL. Ii, ':, 1 - q~ ,A., ;{l (I) \. - },;'r: I (r:::" = .-~ " : \.:::.. fi'il Il.c. I" FN', ~ II\~~ : I\r:-~ I~::; \ ~ \ FL. I I 28'-o,l"1 I 2 I I 39' 51" ? . 15 o 18 - =- ~ ":~if \ ;j~3\ ~ I PL. 1 I S2 '(' '1/ - KITCH EN 7 _0.7' HOTEL B.O.H. C> f- ..-=== Ik' .~~~ \.. ~[ I~k_/' 11",-/11 0' _0. I I oAi 7..0' _0.5' 10 5.7i ~ (j) -I ~~ 1"10 \~ OUl 0-1 0;;0 ,~ ::j o z ~I~ ,--...Z\Z,--... ZI"1 1"1 z )><\<)> C31"1 1"1 C3 (J)~\~ OJ ~'\'~ ~ ~ ~\~ \ \ \ 1 I 1 1 ~I~ ....-..... z Z,,-..... ZfTljfTlZ )> < < )> dfTllfTld CXl -;:;:; 1-;:;:; 00 CXl ' , CXl ~ ~ I c;: -..J "-"1"-" I I o (j SPA 2810 S.F. 1+17'-0"1 .-' 4.413; 3.95 -'N ARRIVAL LOBBY 1+17'-0"1 II 0 .;, / ADMIN ,.., / 1325 S.F. , 7' . / 5~i ~,n. 0"1 C;:~:E~~~~;J~I-~I{/ :, L<;'-REtfr>rt0N->>~L:\~l ~ ~, "/momm1m u/jlOj / , , / \ /: (\~) /. irl = ~ 'u+(~rf!Eu~ n/~! ' ").::. ~~ I 0/ ~ ~~J ~ ID':A~2f11JE _-,------------ _~--J EATURt IRE COMMAND -- : _ 33 32 31, 30 29 ..~' i "':'.'-N -1 I i i:=f.l: L/ : ~ . / I'll FIRE i 18 PUMP , / : .J RETAIL IJ ~ '~ ''', 1m 20 l 21 'Z2 o 34 I,... .-." 23 24 25 P2 PARKING DECK 41 STALLS 1+14'-2"1 FREIGHT ELEVATOR-l ~, I ~, I ~, I I I}Jr ! ,~~3..H'Jf ~ FREIGHT ELEVATOR-2 "", I 'of) " 10 r' i: 10 I 11 I , ~II~' FREIGHT ELEVATOR-2 o , m ..... 40B' S.9B' . ----$ 4.05' 6.133', 0.5B I " 5.0, ~~9 \ \ ~\~ Z z zfTl\fTl Z ~ ;;'i I~ ~ o 0 co ~ \~ OJ OJ' 'CXl '----" ---=:. \~ "--" IN N ~I"-" I I I 5.7' ..~f 4.'2i B' 4.4 7' 4.5 3.5 4.,~, 4.'20' 4.' .BO' / / / / " 4.'23' , 3.90 :,.63' 4.7." 3.90' 4.~O' 4.2.':>' 4.\9' 3.00' 1\..~6' SCALE:1/16" . 1'-0' LIDO PLAN/P2 PARKING LEVEL o 16' .....- 31' 64' , NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ArcNtecture & PIInq ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 = 1!l ~ ~ u.. ~ J: U ~ <( w m a: ~ w S I ...J U " == ~ ~ 0 ~ = ~ ~ SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/01/08 DRe REVIEW COMMENTS 09/15/08 2855 A2 @- @- @)- 0-- '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ jJ ~ ~ ---------------------- /////"\ _/ SPA BELOW ///// /////.... / ////// //,,/11 '" //' "'- /// ////'- "'- / " //// //// / / I / I / I I I I / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L ~ ~ ~ --, I I I _________~____________Sel I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --, I ~~J I I I __-~------------------J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FREIGHT ELEVATOR-2 FREIGHT ELEVATOR-2 NICHOLS BROSCH WURST yv'OLFE Al=IATES. INC. I1I&P~ c~~1~mer1a A~e T.' ~~l n3-idc JJ1J4 Fq~ 305 +46 5200 C 00088021J72 ~ ~ ~ ~ o == ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ 8 = ~ ~ o 00 = f'f') ~ C!i ~ u.. ::t: <> < w '" l>: w !;;: ~ d SITE PLAN RE;1EW OB/Ol/0B ORC REVIEW COMMENTS 09/15/0B 2855 f/) ~:LE~I~~,~~NG LEVEL PLAN o 16' ........- A3 32' 64' , @- @- @)- "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ --------------- 0-- .............../......------\ /' / / // // / // / ///'// ///// '" // ",,//' ,/'" /// "" / //// //// / // I I / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L-.;,.";" ~ ~ ~ -, I I I I ________J@: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --l . : ~~J I I I ___,------------------J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ARRIVAL LOBBY BELOW " Ir:;l~1 ..11; " 25 ~ 26 1:0] 27111 28 P4 PARKING DECK "" 52 STALLS 1+31' -6"1 "" 'L=l,lbdbdb 111[j1 d~l s lJIJ~! FREIGHT ELEVATOR-2 r FREIGHT : ELEVATOR- 2 ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE ~IATES, INC. rt & Pllm~ ~~1CO:~llriaA-...ue Tel '~'?l ~lda 3313<1- FUll ~ +4f3-~~~ 000880 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 == ~ ~ u. ~ :i u <( w '" ~ 0:: W ~ I ~ --' C-' u = ~ ~ 0 7J'l = ff') ~ SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/01/08 ORe REVIEW COf..lMENTS 09/15/08 2855 fl) P4 PARKING LE SCALE:1/16' = 1'-0' VEL PLAN o 16' ........- 31' 64' A3A @- @-- @)- '" '" '" '", '" '" ~ '" '", ~ '" 0-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & PRE -FUNCTION UP 15 41 40 39 36 37 f" FREIGHT ELEVATOR FREIGHT ELEVATOR FREIGHT ELEVATOR L 17 18 MEETING ROOM 815 SF " 13 12 11 10 ] ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ArcWtecIure & PIInq 161 A1merla AIo'fIl'lI.lIl Coral Gobi.. F1Mlda 331.J.4. T.. ~O~) +t.3-~2Oe fQK 305) 4<4fJ-2872 00""'" ~ ~ ~ ;J 0 == 13 ~ ~ ~ ::c u > <( W '" ~ '" W ~ I ;J ...J U C-' = ~ ;J 0 00 = ~ "l!t' SITE PLAN REVIEW OB/01(OB ORC REVIEW COMMENTS 09(15(OB 2855 (j) ~:L~~6,,~~~N (MEETING ROOMS)/P5 PARKING LEVEL o 16' .....- 32' 64' A4 @- @- @)- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SUPPORT ~ M 0-- ' BALLROOM ~ PRE-FUNCTION 0 I ~ 0 C',J ~ ~O'-O" ~ : ~ : <:> I -~ ~,: ~ I ' I~ I : ~ : ~ : ~ I I BALLROO M 9600 SF 0f ? f3 1+49'-10"1 26'-~" ON FREIGHT ELEVATOR FREIGHT ELEVATOR FREIGHT ELEVATOR ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE ,: ~SOCIATES. INC. cNtecIure . PiIrN'cl ~'~T:aF1A~1l T..~OS)-4-43f1rktG.J31.J.4. FaJ 305) +46 -~ 0006802872 ~ ~ ~ ~ o = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C-' = ~ ~ o 00 = ~ ~ 13 ~ "- :I: U <C u.J CO '" I u SITE PLAN RE~EW 08/01/08 ORe REVIEW COMMENTS 09/15/08 2855 (f) ~~L~I~6.~~~N (BALLROOM) o 16' 10...-- A5 31' 64' , @- @- @)- '" '" '" , '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ E( <7 ffJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0-- OPEN TO BALLROOM LEVEL BELOW '" '" '" '" I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 , I ",I , 1 ~ I ' I'" 1 ' : '" : '" 1 1 '" 1 1 L400-L500 SCALEl/lb' . 1'-0' PLAN o 16' ......- 32' ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST ~OLFE ~SOCIATES. INC. ArchiIecIure & PIaJftoG ~'~meriaA\W\Ue Tel. ~"b~~ rfl'dO JJ'1.}<1. FilII l~'oo~g ~ ~ ~ ~ o = ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 == E-l ~ o r:I'l = ~ ~ cs ~ u.. :I: U <( LJ.J OJ 0:: LJ.J < ~ ..J U SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/01/08 ORe REVIEW CO~MENTS 09/15/08 2855 64' A6 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ f3 NICHOLS BROSCH WURST 't'OLFE ~SOCIATES. INC- ArcNttcIure & PIIrrq cC::'~br~a AYDnUB Tel. P05) ~~a JJ1~ ra~ ~~'OO~~ 0-- NOTE: ~ LEVEL 1000 W SUITES + 20 iiANHt:~D ONLY 22 KEYS 2 ROOMS. . ~ ~ ~ @- 0 = ~ ~ ~ u.. ~ :i u <: w co ~ a:: w @- ~ !< ~ ~ ~ d = ~ 0- ~ 0 00 = f'f") ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/01/08 ORe REVIEW COMMENTS 09/15/08 2855 L600-L1000 SCALE 1/16' = 1'-0' PLAN o 16' ......- 32' 64' A7 ~ '" ~ ~ '" '" , '" '" ~ 5 '" , 0 @- '" , == '" ~ C3 '" ~ LL '" ~ I- u < '" w '" , ~ 0:: @- '" w ~ !;( '" 8 ! '" u ROOF '" == '" ~ ~ 0 00. = ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ r:p ~ ~ CONCIERGE ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST ~OLFE ~SOCIATES. INC ArcNlec:tIn & p~ ~lC:~~ A---." ~el, ~~?5i f~ 3313-4- CR rl~5)Oci:8c~ SITE PLAN REVlEW OB/01/0B DRC REVlEW COMMENTS 09/15/0B 2855 f!) L1100-L1200 SCALE 1116' = 1'-0' PLAN o 16' 0....-- 32' 64' , A8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ 6f 9 ~ ~ f!J NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE ,: ~SOCIATES. INC. cNtec\Ure & PIInq c~~'~~erla A'oWIln TIII.pO~mr1daJ31.J.04. FlIlI:d'b5)O~~ ~ 0-- ~ ~ ~ ~ @- 0 == 13 ~ 5 ~ ~ :i u <( W lD a: @- w ~ !;( ~ ~ ...J '-' U = ~ ~ 0 00- = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SITE PLAN REVIEW OB/01/0B DRe REVIEW COMMENTS 09/15/0B 2855 fl) ~~:~I~'~~~O~OO PLAN o 16' ..... - 31' 64' , 0-- '" '" '" '" , '" '" '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 f3 ~ ~ '" '" '" '" , '" '" '" , '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" fl) ;~~E~~' ~,~~N o 16' ......- 32' ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST ~OLFE ~5OCIATE5. INC ArcIVIec:ture & p~ ~'~~.::laFlA-.u~ Tel. '~5l4+JarIda.l31.J.04. FCM 'ffc5 OO~Oim ~ ~ ~ ~ o = ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ i ~ ~ ~ U = ~ ~ o 00 = ~ ~ SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/01/08 ORC REVIEW COMMENTS 09/15/08 2855 64' A10 Terrace t.J1_ \ o~ 15' 7~" c:o,. Queen/Queen 437 G.S.F. King 437 G.S.F. ---------------- f--- I, ~---. 5 _6' 13' 0" corridor (f) ENLARGED U SCALE 3/8' = 1'-0' NIT PLAN o ........- e' 16' , ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WWURST &2LFE AnHttcIJn IlJES. IN<:. I ........ eor:' Aim... A_. TIII.~~3J'lJ4. rOll~)~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 = C!i f$ ~ u: ~ :i u ..: w lD ~ ~ W ~ < 8 ~ ...J U = ~ ~ 0 00 = ~ ~ SITE PlAN RE'IlEW 08/01/08 ORC RE'IlEW COM~ENTS 09/15/08 2855 A11 ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Arclltlclulll & PIInq 161 Alm..1C1 A\W'lUtI CorQI GGbIIllll, FlIlr1ckl 331301- T., ~05) 44J-S2OB 'Qll JOS) 4<4fl-2872 CO"","" , ROOF LEVEL) , HOTEL UNIlS CD'" \? , ~ ", 1 00 , ", , ", ~ , ~ ", ---:;:!- 1100 , ~ , < ::: ~ ", 0 -=~- , = ", 23 0 ~ ~ , , ~ ", u.. ~ :I: N 0 , s: ", <( 700 LJ.J OJ , '" ", ~ LJ.J !;( , ~ ~ ", ~ .... 0 N ~ , ", L400 N = , "' 0 E-i ,- ~ ;;: L200 0 rJl <42'K.GlA55fVJL <= 0") ~ ~ SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/01/OB ORe REVIEW COMMENTS 09/15/08 2855 BUILDING SECTION SCAlE:III/)' = 1'-0' o 16' ........- 32' 64' , A12 NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, INt ArchiIecIuIll I Pllmll 161 A1mDrlo A__n... ConII Gobin. Florida 33'.:J..4. ToL (JOS) #J-52oe Fo_ 305) 44e-2872 AC 000680 ELEVATOR t.lACHINEfWQl.l , to o , " P~INGGNl.lOC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 (TT!l = 1i'l ~ ~ ~ ~ :I: U > <( W CO ~- ~ <r w ~ I ~ ...J ~ U ~ == ~ ~ 0 rI'l = ~ ~ rlo. eOOI DF,}:K 'Ip (+14 0 NAVD) 'lEV""'" LOBBY ElEVATOR COflfllODR LOBBY HOTEL CUESflllOot.IS CORRIDOR ELEVATOR CORRIDOR LOBBY o , " , " P,lR\o(I~~ 'lEV""'" LOBBY PAAI<INGGAI'WiE SITE PLAN REVIEW ) ~I 08/01/08 ~I gl 01 ~I ORC REVIEW COMMENTS 1 ~I 09/15/08 2855 BUILDING SECTION (EAST-WEST) SCALE:11I6" = 1'-0" o 16' ......- 32' 64' , A13 ~ TOS " r 300 LEV~L BALLROOM " " " " P-5 PARKING I FYrI P-4 PARKING I FVFI P-3 PARKING LEVEL P-2 PARKING LEVEL " BASEM~NT PARKING ( +5 -5 NAVD) o , i:l [ [ - L - L - L ! , '" , '" ----::-~~'.'-- ^~-::- ,-, j, ...:.: - , '" _-l -, SCIl:EEN./ ,,",OPY , '= -:rtll SEfl\I1CE ,"'" 1 B.O.H. BAllROO' - PARKINI:GA!WlE --- PARKING GARAGE ~ PARKINGGAAAGE - - . I I .... - , R toRR. Hom GUESTROONS BAllROOH PRE-FUNCTlON ~ - , N , ;... MEETING ROOM PRE-FUNCT10N , -;! o , '+ lliVAlOR LDBBY "'"" orneES - I - ,- ~ > .) r~1 rl h h J. hi h h rrl hi rrl hi 11m f- - f=i II I I I I I I -.: I I I I , ; - "i' , l>l -- - N , -"' LI500 LI500 , '" L1400 N , '" 11?OO , -~ L 1100 N , '" LIOOO , '" 1900 , '" 1800 L700 , '" L500 N , .~ " I 500 N , '" ~ 1400 ~ 1300 -. N , -"' ,- :c ~ L?OO o , ~ BUILDING SECTION (NORTH-SOUTH) SCALE:11I6' = 1'-0" o 15' ...... - 32' 64' , ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ArdIIecture a ~ 161 Almeria A\o'mI.Ie Coral Gabl_ f1or\dQ 3J134 To. ~05) 404.J.-5206 Fa~ 305) +4e-2!72 00<I<I80 ~ ~ ~ ~ o == ~ ~ 5: ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ o 00 = ~ ~ C3 ~ J: <> <( W CC <>: w ~ d SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/01/08 DRC RE\1EW COMMENTS 09/15/08 2855 A14 -t , i :J [] ~:TnrlnT ~'-ll'II' ---r 11 I 1 =r'r TT1 [2] I ~: ;I" :i~ ~~ d I ! J LEGEND fllllA$ON1lYo CIIu/COM:RETE SVllSTRATE WI LJ SUOOTH snxco I1NlSH (CUSlOlI COlOll P"'HI TO BE SIUCTED BY .lRCHfT(CT) f21 AlUlllNUV ""'llOW WAll ASSEIIlllY w/KYNAA ~ fW/SH COlII'lYll<G WI _ 2605. w/BlUE -CREEN COlOll ClASS; TO I.:[T WNO lOolO REOUIRO'INTS; Pfl<Mllf SAIIPlES TO NlOfIfCT fOR R(';O. I,l AL_ SPoYIlRE1 WIlOOW WALl ASSElIlU t.:.J w/omw>. F1IIISH COlII'lYNG wI _ 2ti05. W/BWE -GREEN COlOR ClASS; TO 11[(1 W1NIl LOoIO REOU1REIlENTS; PROVlOC __IS TO NltHITICT fOIl R(';O. f4I AlUlllMJll STOREfRONT ASSElI9l Y W/KYNN< fi"'5if L:.J CQlIPlYINC WI _ 2605. ON BlUE-GREIN ClASS; TD II{(I IIIND lOolO REO\It!ll:IlENTS; Pfl(M0I __IS TO NlCHfIICT f()!l REV'IW. r'5l AlI}lllNlJll SU~ ClASS I)()OI! ASSElI9l Y W/I('(I;Nl flNlSH L:,J CQIIPl YlNC wI _ 2605. ON BlUE -CREIN ClASS; TO 1lE(I WIND LOoIO R(O\It'l!:II[NTS; Pfl(M0I !W/Pt[S TO NlCHfI[CT f()!l R(VIW f6l AlU~ ClASS I)()OI! AS$ElI9lY W/KYNN< nl.1S>i L:J CQIIPlYlNC wI _ 2605. ON BLUE-GREIN ClASS; TO Il{(I IIIND LOAD R1CUlllEIIINTS; Pfl<Mllf __IS TO NltHITICT f()!l R(VIW ~ ~~S~ ~T-/O~~J ALUlIiIiIN TOP IlIJl wI KYNN< fiNlSH COIIPl YlNC W1TI1 ANI). 2605. 3 IlOTQIlIZ{D COIlJ'<<: I)()OI!. @] fQRll[lJ STUCCO Rf'IEAL I1Jl STON!: VO(ER PANELS APPlIID <MIl mil L::J REINFORCED lIASONRY SUBSTRATE GI AllillNVll SCREEN. PNlAlJNENI Gll>tLI. GR1l PATTERN. LJ WITH I<YNAR f1NlSH CQIIPlYNG wI _ 2605. PROVlOC CUSTQlI COlOR SAIF,IS TO ARClflfCT fOIl RlVI(W f8l ....THIRf'llOCr LOlN[R ASSEI/Bl Y 'tITH BIIlD L:J SCREENS IN IXTRUEIID AlUllililN n>..olII W/KYNAA flN.<;H COlII'l~lIC WI _ 2605. PRlM)[ CUSTOlI COlOR SAIIl'llS TO NltHITICT fOIl R(';O. fi4l PRI-lNClN(lRED TENS'" f-'C CANOPY. LJ S!RUCTllRI PROTtCTtD fOIl COASTAL APPllCATlON. f1;l CAHTl.!Wl COt<CIl(I[ EmlROII WI L::J f1.UIO APPltED WAlllll'llOOfl!lC CMR PAlNT I>M) SIUCtO fOllSH. G61 AUlllNUll/ClASS PRVIC SCREEN L"J AS$ElI9l Y W 1rn;Nl f1NlSH COIIPl YlNC WI _ 1&05 TO 1It(l WINO LOoIO REOUlRIlIINTS: PRCrlOC 9MPLIS TO .lIlOi!1lCT fOR R(VIW. Ig1 CLEAR PANll/.llUll f1lAlIl CANOPY L:.J wI KY'iAR fltlJSH COlII'l ~lIC wI _ 2605. EASI ELEV A TI ON SCALE:11I6. = "-0. NOTl PERCENTN:;[ Of OI'[MNCS ON lLl\lAliON ORJollllllCSi lOtS! - 7~ NORTH - 68% IAS1 - 61:\: SOUTl< - 62X o 16' ...... - J2' 64' NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE .. ASSOCWES. INC. An:MIctn I PIInt\ ~ -< :> ~ .J ;J o = ~ ~ .. :> '- .J ;J (.? == E-c ;J o 00 <= f") ~ ~ 3 -' ~ %: o <(; w ... a: w ... ~ ~ w -' o SITE PlA"- REView a.IOvos 2855 A15 [ . ..... ................. ...... ......... 8 ~ , .....i ............ <0 ...... --.-.- ~~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I 'I I I I II 1IIII1 = - - - - - - . - 5 g ~- - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I1111I111 . 5 - - - - - - - - - - - g~- - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I II 11I111 ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , I I I I I I I I I I II 11I111 ""'" 10 - - - - - - - - - - ~ !!I- - - - - - - - [i] I I I I I I I I I I I1111I111 - - - - - - - ~ - - -- g ~- - - - - - - - , I I I 111111111111111111 ~ 15 .- - - - - !l ~- - - - - - - - I I I il- I I I I I I I I I I II11II111 - - - - - - ~ ~- - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I II11II111 - - -- - - - g ~- - - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I II 11I1I1 - - g ~- - - - - - - - ..lJ [D-- ~ g ~- 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = - - - - - - - . [i] - - - 8- ---- g ~- - - - - - - - 13 II II II II II " II II . - - - 11 II Ii 11 II ~ 11 11. It II - = - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - BEEj IBBBBBI - - = - - =;= - - - - - - - - @] ~ =1= 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dO" =;= -\, ,.;;::. = -- -- -- . ~ ;\-. ~ -' ~ [i] =;= ~Q L L .. , ~ '> I I I I ;* - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0: :0 ~~OIO - Oln! ........ I' D 111,11 , i - - - - - - - - - LEGEND I,l MASONRY: CMU/CONCRETE SUBSTRATE W/ LJ SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH (CUSTOM COLOR PAINT TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT). Gl ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR L:.J FINISH COMPLYING W/ AMJA 2605, W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPlES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. IJl ALUMINUM SPANDREL WINDOW WALL ASSEMBLY L:'.J W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO~DE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR RE\1EW. f4l ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L.J COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO~DE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. I5l ALUMINUM SLIDING GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L:'.J COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO~DE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. '6l ALUMINUM GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L:'.J COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO~DE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. III ALUMINUM SCREEN, PARALlNEAR GRILLE, GRID PATTERN, LJ WITH KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605. PRO~OE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. '6l WEATHERPROOF LOUVER ASSEMBLY WITH BIRD L:'.J SCREENS IN EXTRUDED ALUMINUM FRAME W/KYNAR ~NISH COMPL~NG W/ MIlA 2605. PRO~DE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPlES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. r;Ql GLASS RAILING WITH BUTT-JOINTED GLASS W PANELS, CONCEALED POST / SUPPORTS AND ALUMINUM TOP RAIL W/ KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING WITH MMA 2605. [22] MOTORIZED COILING DOOR. [2TI FORMED STUCCO REVEAL @] ~~NNF~:C~~E~J~~~~S S~r:s~~~TEOVER STEEL EJ ~~ug~UG~~E~~~~E~~~6IL~0~A~~gtNOPY, APPUCATION. Ii5l CANTILEVER CONCRETE EYEBROW W / W FLUID APPLIED WATERPROOFING OVER PAINT AND STUCCO FINISH. Ii6l ALUMINUM/GLASS PRNACY SCREEN W ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ AMJA 2605 TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO~DE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR RE\1EW. Igl ClEAR PANEL/ALUM FRAME CANOPY L.:.J W/ KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, NOTE: PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS ON ELEVATION DRAWINGS: WEST - 70% NORTH - 6B% EAST -61% SOUTH - 62% SITE PLAN REV1EW OB/01 lOB ORe REVIEW COMMENTS 09/15/0B 2855 EAST ELEVATION SCALE:1/16' = 1'-0' o 16' ...... - A15 32' 64' ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ArchItcUIre & PIaNq 181,........ A_ C... lIIblM, fIorlM >>'1M Tel. IaoIJ .wa.ftOe ""....,-..... AAC OOONO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 == C!i ~ a:: 9 u.. r-1 :I: U ~ < > w en ~ '" ~ ~ ~ i1i -' ~ U == ~ ~ 0 00 = ~ ~ SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/01108 LEGEND ORC REVIEW COMMENT 09/15/08 111 MASONRY: CMU/CONCRETE SUBSTRATE W/ ~ SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH (CUSTOM COLOR PAINT TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT). I2l ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR ~ FINISH COMPLYING W/ AAMA 2605. W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GLASS, TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. I4l ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH U COMPLYING W/ AAMA 2605. ON BLUE -GREEN GlASS, TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. '5l ALUMINUM SLIDING GlASS DOOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L':'.J COMPLYING W/ AAMA 2605. ON BLUE-GREEN GlASS, TO MEET WINO LOAD REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDE SAMPlES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. 16' ALUMINUM GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR ~NISH L':'.J COMPLYING W/ AAMA 2605. ON BLUE-GREEN GlASS, TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. r]1 ALUMINUM SCREEN, PARAlINEAR GRILLE, GRID PATTERN. ~ WITH KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ AAMA 2605. PROVIDE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVEW. IBl WEATHERPROOF LOUVER ASSEMBLY WITH BIRD L':'.J SCREENS IN EXTRUDED ALUMINUM FRAME W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ AAMA 2605. PROVIDE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. Igl CLEAR PANEL/ALUM FRAME CANOPY L.:.J W/ KYNAR ~NISH COMPL~NG W/ MMA 2605, r;Ql GlASS RAILING WITH BUTT -JOINTED GLASS L:.':.J PANELS. CONCEALED POST / SUPPORTS AND ALUMINUM TOP RAIL W/ KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING WITH AAMA 2605. [22] MOTORIZED COILING DOOR. @] FORMED STUCCO REVEAL I,4l PRE-ENGINEERED TENSILE FABRIC CANOPY. o STRUCTURE PROTECTED FOR COASTAL APPLICATION. 1151 CANTILEVER CONCRETE ffiBROW W/ L:.':.J FLUID APPLIED WATERPROOFING OVER PAINT AND STUCCO ~NISH. Gl ALUMINUM SPANDREL WINDOW WALL ASSEMBLY L':'.J W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ AAMA 2605. W/BLUE -GREEN COLOR GLASS, TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR RE~EW. f13l STONE VENEER PANELS APPLIED OVER STEEL ~ REINFORCED MASONRY SUBSTRATE f16l ALUMINUM/GlASS PRr.tACY SCREEN L:.':.J ASSEMBLY W/K~AR FINISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605 TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. NOTE: PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS ON ELEVATION DRAWINGS: WEST - 70~ NORTH - 68% EAST - 61% SOUTH - 62% 2855 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE:1/16' = 1'-0" o 16' .....- 32' 64' A16 " T " nm lIT ~ """m rm r 1 If Tn rlI" 5 II II IIII III Tlll r III IIITT 1 T 10 I " TT II IIII II III 1111 IIHT 1 1 TT 1II1 1111 T Ir llll -linT 1~1r - - 11 rn IT ! III n II ~ nr 1 111111 m - - 1T rn TT ~ I r III II ~ nr 1 III II - - 1T rn TT i III 1111 II HI 1111 II - - WT rn TT T Ir 111 1 HT II ~ T - - liT Di TT II III 1111 II ~ nr lllll II - - rn II 1 II III 1111 II HI 1111 ~ - - liT rn llnl1~ T TT T I r III 5 II II II rn II III 1111 II HI 1111 II 10 em ~~~:~ 11 . - - - , 9 '" ----- ff w~ ~ . - - [!J ,888 ,888 ,888 ,HI] ,888 ,888 ,HE T o T T TT TI rn ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~! rn~ - ~~~ : _ iiii I"... T II r II II II ~. II T II T 1 li II ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ArcNleclure I I'Iannrl 151 A1mrlG A~. Coral Gabloa, Florida 3313<1- ''''1305) +43-5208 Fax 305) +4tI-2872 AC 00""" II 7 = - - - - - - - - ~ ~'700 -- Tn rr ,.., I - = ROOF LEVEL) N == , III ~ 10 ~ -- -- I ....... - - - - - - - - - - ~ 11600 -- 1 r I ~ ;JJWJ 5 , III 0, I - - - - - - - - - - ~ 11;)00 1 1 1 16 == TT , III 0, - - - - - - - - - - 140 1 1f I , ~ I II 0, ...- - - - - - - - - - - T If n I , 0, I - - - - - - - - - - 1 111 Ii , .~ ~ I I III Ll000 - - - - - - - - - - 1 111 Ii , ~ I III 0, ~ I - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 il II , ~ , 0 I III 0, I - - - - - - - - - - == 1 rr II II , C!l III 0, ~ ~ I - - - - - - - - - - 1 rr II II N u.. , III 0, ~ ;r; I - - - - - - - - - - L600 1 rr II u , ~ ..: 10 0, > w I - - - - - - - - lD 1 rr II Ir N ~ "" w , < 0, ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - ~ . , ~ 1= 1=- - - - - - - - - '" --' - - u rn ~::m 16 .... ~ , :> ;=J - i - - - - - - - - == 1= = ~ 0 1= m , ~ 111 '---- u ., .> I. 0 II -.--- - --=--- - ~ ~ POOL DECK 00 (+14 -0) [!J = ~ - - - - - ~ "\ ~ SllE PLAN RE\1EW 06/01 JOB LEGEND ORC RE\1EW COMMENTS 09/15/08 Ii' MASONRY: CMU/CoNCRETE SUBSTRAlE W/ LJ SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH (CUSTOM COLOR PAINT TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT). Gl ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR L:.J FIN~H COMPLYING w/ ~A 2605, W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. f4l ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L.J COMPLYING w/ ~A 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRo\10E SAMPLES TO ARCHllECT FOR REVIEW. '5l ALUMINUM SUolNG GLASS ODOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L::.J COMPLYING W/ ~A 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRo\1oE SAMPLES TO ARCHllECT FOR REVIEW. [2] ~~:'~~A;C~~~NH 6~~p~~'~GR ;;'~AG~~o:'AITERN, PRo\1DE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. fBl WEATHERPROOF LOUVER ASSEMBLY WITH BIRD L".J SCREENS IN EXTRUDED ALUMINUM FRAME W/KYNAR ~NISH CoMPL~NG wi MMA 2605. PRO\1DE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPLES TO ARCHllECT FOR REVIEW. fBl CLEAR PANEL/ALUM FRAME CANOPY L"J WI KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING WI ~A 2605, Gl ALUMINUM SPANDREL WINDOW WALL ASSEMBLY L::.J W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING wi MMA 2605, W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENlS; PR0\10E SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR RE\1EW. I6l ALUMINUM GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L".J COMPLYING WI ~A 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO\1oE SAMPLES TO ARCHllECT FOR REVIEW. I,Ql GLASS RAIUNG WITH BUTT-JOINTED GLASS ~ PANELS, CONCEALED POST / SUPPORTS AND ALUMINUM TOP RAIL wi KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING WITH MMA 2605. [2D MOTORIZED COILING DOOR. @] FORMED STUCCO REVEAL I,4l PRE -ENGINEERED lENSILE FABRIC CANOPY, LJ STRUGTURE PROTECTED FOR COPSTAL APPUCATlON. @] ~t~L~p~~oOWA~~Rii6~,~gw O~{R PI'JNT ANO STUCCO ~NISH. f16l ALUMINUM/GLASS PRNACY SCREEN ~ PSSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING wi ~A 2605 TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO\1DE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR RE\1EW. I,3l STONE VENEER PANELS APPLIED OVER SlEEL ~ REINFORCED MASONRY SUBSTRATE NOTE; PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS ON ELEVATION DRAWINGS: 2855 WEST - 70% NORTH - 68% EAST - 61% SOUTH - 62% NORTH ELEVATION SCALE:1116" = 1'-0' o 16' 1.....-- A16 32' 64' , ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Ard'b:1ure & PIIlvq W1A.....A_ ew.. e.bIM, FIDIMI U1M Tel. caom 441.uoe --- AAC 000110 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 == <3 ~ 0:: 9 u.. ~ :I: U ~ <<: > w en ~ '" W >- ~ ~ ~ ~ U '-' = ~ ~ 0 rL1 = ~ ~ SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/01/08 LEGEND ORe REVIEW COMMENT 09/15/08 III MASONRY: CMU/CONCRETE SUBSTRATE W/ ~ SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH (CUSTOM COLOR PAINT TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT). f2l ALUMINUM WINDOW WALl ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR L:-.J FINISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. CD ~%~~M F~~I~~D~~~:~~I~~W W~A~M~Si~o~~Y W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. I4l ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L.:J COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE -GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. 151 ALUMINUM SliDING GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L.:.J COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. [2] ~;~HMI~~:C~~~~ ~~:-~~I~t ;;I;;MA G~~OO;ATTERN, PROVIDE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REv1EW. Isl WEATHERPROOF LOUVER ASSEMBLY WITH BIRD L"J SCREENS IN EXTRUDED ALUMINUM FRAME W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605. PROVIDE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. f10l GLASS RAiliNG WITH BUTT-JOINTED GlASS L.:."J PANELS. CONCEALED POST / SUPPORTS AND ALUMINUM TOP RAIL W/ KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING WITH MMA 26D5. ~ MOTORIZED COiliNG DOOR. @] FORMED STUCCO REv1EAL I,3l STONE VENEER PANELS APPliED OVER STEEL L.:."J REINFORCED MASONRY SUBSTRATE EJ ~~~U~~UG~~E~~~~E~i~~IL~O~A~~~ST~tNOPY, APPliCATION. Ii5l CANTILEv1ER CONCRETE EYEBROW W/ L.:."J FLlUID APPliED WATERPROOFING OVER PAINT AND STUCCO FINISH. I,6l ALUMINUM/GLASS PRIVACY SCREEN L.:."J ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH CDMPLYING W/ MMA 2605 TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. Isl ALUMINUM GlASS DOOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L"J COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. Igl CLEAR PANEL/ALUM FRAME CANOPY L:J W/ KYNAR ~NISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, NOTE: PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS ON ELEVATION DRAWINGS: 2855 WEST - 70% NORTH - 68% EAST - 61% SOUTH - 62% WEST ELEVATION SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0" o 16' ......- 32' 64' , A17 E( 2 =~ nilE' l I ill rn mm f ~ ~ cr j Irr ~ I rr 15 ~ - --- - T I ....T III n-'"" [i] II II 15- III 1 I I II In III TT ,II II T I I I I I I I I I I I II II I~ If II I II II I I I I I II II II 16 ~- II II II II I I II 11 II II 11 II II II 11 II II II II II - - ~ F- ]00 - - ~ T III II H ~ II II If TlI 11 II II II III II I111 IIII 16 - - I III II I ~ Ii Ii II III Ii I I II 1fT III 1fT III I I III I I1II 11 II l rr I 11I1 - r- I II III 1I11 II 11 Tll IIII II IIII T 111I I ~- I II Tr III - -- r- lEIl r:tbt = f- II llC~~ iJt9 III ~ F=~ r ~ ~ .~-w III I M~-l ~ r~?i'~51L- III I I I "'J I ~ - - - I I l [i] I I 0, f- LEGEND '1l MASONRY: CMU/CONCRITE SUBSTRATE W/ U SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH (CUSTOM COLOR PAINT TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT), Iol ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR l2J FIN~H COMPLYING W/ AAMA 2605, W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GLASS; TO MEET WINO LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPlES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. '4l ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L.J COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WINO LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO~OE SAMPUES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. f5l ALUMINUM SLIDING GlASS ODOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR ~NISH L::.J COMPLYING W/ AAMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WINO LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPUES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW, '6l ALUMINUM GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FIN~H L::.J COMPLYING W/ AAMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPUES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. Iyl ALUMINUM SCREEN, PARALlNEAR GRILLE, GRID PAffiRN, L'.J WITH KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605. PROVIDE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. '6l WEATHERPROOF LOUVER ASSEMBLY wlm BIRD L::.J SCREENS IN EXTRUDED ALUMINUM FRAME W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLi1NG W/ MMA 2605. PROVlOE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPUES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. rgl CUEAR PANEL/ALUM FRAME CANOPY L"J W/ KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, IWl GlASS RAILING WITH BUTT-JOINTED GLASS L::J PANELS, CONCEAUED POST / SUPPORTS AND ALUMINUM TOP RAIL W/ KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING WITH MMA 2605. [22J MOTORIZED COILING DOOR. @] FORMED STUCCO REVEAL f1.ll STONE VENEER PANELS APPLIED OVER STEEL L::J REINFORCED MASONRY SUBSTRATE fi4l PRE -ENGINEERED TENSILE FABRIC CANOPY, u STRUCTURE PROTECTED FOR COASTAL APPLICATION. @] ~t[;frjL;;;p~(~~A~~R~~~~W O~{R P,>JNT AND STUCCO ~NISH. Ii6l ALUMINUM/GLASS PRNACY SCREEN L::J ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ AAMA 2605 TO MEET WINO LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRQVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. IJl ALUMINUM SPANDREL WINDOW WALL ASSEMBLY L::.J W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ AAMA 2605, W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GlASS; TO MEET WINO LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPUES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. NOTE: PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS ON ELEVATION DRAWINGS: WEST - 70% NORm - 68% EAST - 61% soum - 62~ , ~ , ~ ,-\0 ll700 V (ROOF UEVEL) ~ LI600 ~ LI500 , .~ N , .~ , .~ LI200 , .~ N , .~ Ll000 , '" , '" LB , '" , .~ N I .~ L500 , .~ ~ I .~ L300 , ;-, o I .~ WEST ELEVATION SCAlE:I/I!)' . 1'-0' o 16' .......- 32' ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ArcNlecture & Pllmra 161 A1m.-io AlIlInulI ConII GlmI8ll, Flarfda 3l1J.4- T.L tJ05) +43-.5208 FaM 305) ++tJ-2872 AC 000680 ~ ~ ~ ~ o = ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ o 00 = f'f') ~ 13 ~ u.. :r:: U < W In '" I ...J U SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/01/08 DRe REVIEW COMMENTS 09/15/08 2855 64' , A17 ~ NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ArcNtecIure a PiaJ'Iq .,.,A......A_ CcnI liMI... F10rIde U1M TtII. ~ 44a-UOIi F_cao&I......u72 ...- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 = ~ ~ a:: 0 -' LL ~ J: U ~ <C > w <n ~ "" ~ I ~ u C-' = ~ ~ 0 00- = ~ ~ SITE PLAN REVIEW 08/01108 LEGEND DRe REVIEW COMMENT 09/15/08 '1l MASONRY, CMU/CONCRETE SUBSTRATE W/ LJ SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH (CUSTOM COLOR PAINT TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT). Gl ALUMINUM WINDOW WAll ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR L..:.J FINISH COMPL'i1NG W/ MMA 2605, W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIOE SAMPLE5 TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. Gl ALUMINUM SPANDREL WINDOW WALL ASSEMBLY L:.J W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR RE~EW. f4l ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L:'.J COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. f5l ALUMINUM SLIDING GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L:.J COMPLYING w/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. [2] ~~~HMI~~A:C~~~NH ~~~~~~I~; ;;I~MA G~~O;ATTERN, PROVIDE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR RE'v1EW. o ~~~~~~P~~O:XT~~~~DR A~~~~~~Y F:~E B~/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605. PROVIDE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. r;Ql GLASS RAILING WITH BUTT-JOINTED GLASS ~ PANELS, CONCEALED POST / SUPPORTS AND ALUMINUM TOP RAIL W/ KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING WITH MMA 26D5. ~ MOTORIZED COILING DOOR. @] FORMED STUCCO REVEAL @] ~~?NNF~:~~~E~A:~~~~ S~:N~TEOVER STEEL EJ ~~~U~~G~~E~~~E~~~6IL~0~A~~~ST~~NOPY, APPLICATION. Ii5l CANTILEVER CONCRETE EYEBROW W/ L.:.:J FLUID APPLIED WATERPROOFING OVER PAINT ANO STUCCO FINISH. '6l ALUMINUM GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L.::.J COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW, IgI CLEAR PANEL/ALUM FRAME CANOPY L..:J w/ KYNAR 8NISH COMPL'i1NG W/ MMA 2605, f16l ALUMINUM/GLASS PRrlACY SCREEN L.:.:J ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605 TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO~DE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. NOTE, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS ON ELEVATION DRAWINGS, 2855 WEST - 70~ NORTH - 68~ EAST - 61~ SOUTH - 62~ SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE;1/16' = 1'-0" o 16' 0....-- 32' 64' , A18 --,----- ROOF LEVEL) , '" , '" [iJ , ~ .~ LHOO , .~ L1200 , '" ~ N ~ , i '" ;;;;J , 0 .~ L900 == , , 13 ~ '" ~ ~ ~ N u.. , '" ~ :t: U N ~ < J:lI-IIIl , > w .~ L600 CO ~ "" , W .~ ~ I L500 , ;;;;J '" -' U ~ C-' , "' L300 v = , ~---~------'"----------- ~ ~ !:C.. t --~ ::4:- :t- ;;;;J [iJ 0 0 , [iJ [iJ :<' 00 ~ rOOI DF~,,-- = +14 -0 f'f") ~ LEGEND Ii' MASONRY: CMU/CONCRETE SUBSffiATE W/ LJ SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH (CUSTOM COLOR PAINT TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT). 121 ALUMINUM WINDOW WALL ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR LJ FIN~H COMPLYING w/ MMA 2605, W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. f4l ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR fiNISH CJ COMPLYING w/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO~DE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. '5l ALUMINUM SLIDING GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH L.:'.J COMPLYING w/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO~DE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. '6l ALUMINUM GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FIN~H L.:'.J COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, ON BLUE-GREEN GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRD~DE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. [2] ~;~HMI~~A;C~~~H ~~~~L:~I~~ ;;I~A G~~D:'ATTERN, PRD~DE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. '8l WEATHERPROOF LOUVER ASSEMBLY WITH BIRD L'::..J SCREENS IN EXTRUDED ALUMINUM FRAME W/KYNAR FINISH CDMPL~NG w/ MMA 2605. PRD\1DE CUSTOM COLOR SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW, f10l GLASS RAILING WITH BUTT-JOINTED GLASS L.::J PANELS, CONCEALED POST / SUPPORTS AND ALUMINUM TOP RAIL w/ KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING WITH MMA 26DS. [D] MOTORIZED COILING DOOR. ~ FORMED STUCCO REVEAL @] ~~?NNF~:~~~E:~~~~~S s'0:JI~fTEOVER STEEL EJ ~~~~fuG~~[~~~~E~~~ILfo~A~~g~NOPY, APPLICATION. @] ~t:L~:U~DO~A~~R~~I~~W O~{R Pf!JNT AND STUCCO fiNISH. Ii6l ALUMINUM/GLASS PRWACY SCREEN L.::J ASSEMBLY W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING w/ MMA 2605 TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO~DE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR RE\1EW. Gl ALUMINUM SPANDREL WINDOW WALL ASSEMBLY L.:'.J W/KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING w/ MMA 2605, W/BLUE-GREEN COLOR GLASS; TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS; PRO~DE SAMPLES TO ARCHITECT FOR REVEW. Igl CLEAR PANEL/ALUM FRAME CANOPY L"J W/ KYNAR FINISH COMPLYING W/ MMA 2605, NOTE: PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS ON ELEVATION DRAWINGS: WEST - 70% NORTH - 6B% EAST - 61% SOUTH - 62% NICHOLS BROSCH WURST WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ArdIIectuFll & Pllmrc '81A1merlQA~I.I. ConIl GoblM, Florida 331M TOC rJ05) ++3-5208 Ftl~ Jtl5) "'""'-2872 AJ;000fi8() SITE PLAN REVIEW OB/Ol/0B ORC REVIEW COMMENTS D9/15/DB 2855 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:1116' = 1'-0' o 16' 0....-- A18 32' 64'